thymine has been researched along with Neoplasm Metastasis in 54 studies
Neoplasm Metastasis: The transfer of a neoplasm from one organ or part of the body to another remote from the primary site.
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"Lay abstract PRECONNECT is an international study demonstrating the efficacy and tolerability of the drug combination trifluridine/tipiracil in adult patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated in everyday clinical practice." | 9.41 | Italian results of the PRECONNECT study: safety and efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil in metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Banzi, MC; Barone, CA; Bartolomeo, MD; Bergamo, F; Besse, MG; Blasi, L; Bordonaro, R; Costanzo, FD; Falcone, A; Frassineti, GL; Garufi, C; Giuliani, F; Latiano, TP; Martinelli, E; Personeni, N; Racca, P; Spione, M; Tamburini, E; Tonini, G; Zaniboni, A, 2021) |
"A previous phase I/II C-TASK FORCE study of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for patients with heavily pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) showed promising activity with an acceptable toxicity profile." | 9.30 | Retrospective cohort study of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) plus bevacizumab versus trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Bando, H; Horasawa, S; Kaneko, A; Kawazoe, A; Kojima, T; Kotani, D; Kuboki, Y; Nakamura, Y; Shitara, K; Taniguchi, H; Tsuji, A; Yoshino, T, 2019) |
" We investigated the recommended dose (RD) of TAS-102 plus irinotecan for metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and oxaliplatin." | 9.20 | Phase I study of TAS-102 and irinotecan combination therapy in Japanese patients with advanced colorectal cancer. ( Boku, N; Doi, T; Fuse, N; Koizumi, W; Ohtsu, A; Shimada, K; Takinishi, Y; Yamazaki, K; Yoshino, T, 2015) |
"Direct randomized comparisons of regorafenib, TAS-102, and fruquintinib for treating metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are lacking." | 9.05 | Regorafenib, TAS-102, or fruquintinib for metastatic colorectal cancer: any difference in randomized trials? ( Li, J; Peng, Z; Shen, L; Wang, Q; Wang, X; Zhang, Q, 2020) |
"Regorafenib at a dose of 160 mg and TAS-102 appear to have similar efficacy in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer." | 9.01 | A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Regorafenib and TAS-102 in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. ( Ahn, DH; Bekaii-Saab, T; Benkhadra, R; Firwana, B; Hubbard, JM; Mody, K; Murad, MH; Sonbol, MB; Walden, DJ; Wang, Z, 2019) |
"The novel oral nucleoside antineoplastic agent trifluridine/tipiracil was approved for metastatic colorectal cancer in Japan in March 2014." | 8.02 | Post-marketing surveillance study of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Funato, Y; Koyama, T; Muro, K; Ozawa, D; Tajiri, M; Uetake, H; Yamaguchi, Y; Yoshino, T, 2021) |
"This study aimed to describe the chemotherapy effects after trifluridine/tipiracil (TFTD) and/or regorafenib treatment in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients." | 8.02 | Salvage Therapy After Regorafenib or Trifluridine/Tipiracil Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Conditional Landmark Analysis. ( Kawakami, K; Nakashima, M; Takeuchi, M; Tanaka, S, 2021) |
"Regorafenib (REG) and trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) have have been shown to improve overall survival in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer." | 8.02 | Regorafenib-to-trifluridine/tipiracil Versus the Reverse Sequence for Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Real-life Experience. ( Ceribelli, A; Chilelli, MG; DE Marco, S; Gemma, D; Grande, R; Morandi, MG; Ruggeri, EM; Saltarelli, R; Signorelli, C; Sperduti, I; Spinelli, GP; Zoratto, F, 2021) |
"In later-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), trifluridine/tipiracil is often selected because regorafenib is difficult to use in patients with comorbidities such as thrombosis, hemorrhage, or cardiac events." | 8.02 | Clinical Outcomes Following Trifluridine/Tipiracil Treatment for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Ineligible for Regorafenib Treatment. ( Denda, T; Esaki, T; Fukuoka, S; Hatachi, Y; Kajiwara, T; Kumekawa, Y; Makiyama, A; Masuishi, T; Moriwaki, T; Niisato, Y; Shimada, Y; Sugimoto, N; Suto, T; Takashima, A; Yamazaki, K, 2021) |
"Trifluridine and tipiracil (FTD + TPI) and regorafenib (REG) are approved treatments for the treatment of refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)." | 7.96 | Real-World Adherence in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with Trifluridine plus Tipiracil or Regorafenib. ( Barghout, V; Duh, MS; Germain, G; Jacques, P; Laliberté, F; Patel, AK; Yenikomshian, MA, 2020) |
"The standard first- and second- line chemotherapy backbone regimens for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/capecitabine-based with addition of irinotecan or oxaliplatin." | 7.96 | Review of metastatic colorectal cancer treatment pathways and early clinical experience of trifluridine/tipiracil in the UK named patient programme. ( Carter, AM; Iveson, T; Mullamitha, S; Shiu, KK; Spooner, C; Stevens, D, 2020) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil combination has shown a benefit over placebo in the treatment of patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)." | 7.96 | Efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil in third-line and beyond for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in routine clinical practice: patterns of use and prognostic nomogram. ( Candamio Folgar, S; Carmona Campos, M; Cousillas Castiñeiras, A; Covela Rúa, M; de la Cámara Gómez, J; Fernandez Montes, A; Gallardo Martín, E; García Gómez, J; Gonzalez Villarroel, P; Jorge Fernández, M; Martinez Lago, N; Méndez Méndez, JC; París Bouzas, L; Pellón Augusto, ML; Reboredo López, M; Salgado Fernández, M; Vazquez Rivera, F, 2020) |
"This study aimed to clarify the tolerability of a trifluridine/tipiracil combination tablet (TAS-102) in patients with advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer over 75 years of age." | 7.91 | Evaluation of Tolerability of Trifluridine/Tipiracil Combination Tablet in Patients With Advanced/Recurrent Colorectal Cancer. ( Kimura, M; Teramachi, H; Usami, E; Yoshimura, T, 2019) |
"Regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) both prolong survival for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer." | 7.85 | Regorafenib Versus Trifluridine/Tipiracil for Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Comparison. ( Ando, M; Fukutomi, A; Hamauchi, S; Ishihara, M; Kadowaki, S; Kito, Y; Komori, A; Machida, N; Masuishi, T; Mori, K; Muro, K; Narita, Y; Onozawa, Y; Tajika, M; Tanaka, T; Taniguchi, H; Todaka, A; Tsushima, T; Ura, T; Yamazaki, K; Yasui, H; Yokota, T, 2017) |
"Regorafenib and TAS-102 are novel antitumor agents for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) whose disease has progressed after standard therapies." | 7.83 | Efficacy and Safety of Regorafenib or TAS-102 in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Therapies. ( Doki, Y; Haraguchi, N; Hata, T; Hayashi, T; Kudo, T; Mizushima, T; Mori, M; Nishimura, J; Sakai, D; Satoh, T; Sueda, T; Sugiura, T; Takahashi, H, 2016) |
"Microsatellite-stable (MSS) colorectal cancer (CRC) tends to be poorly immunogenic, with limited treatment options." | 7.01 | A phase 2 trial of trifluridine/tipiracil plus nivolumab in patients with heavily pretreated microsatellite-stable metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Bendell, JC; Falchook, GS; Hamada, K; Makris, L; Patel, MR, 2021) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) is an orally active formulation of trifluridine, a thymidine-based nucleoside analog, and tipiracil hydrochloride, a thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor that increases the bioavailability of trifluridine." | 7.01 | Trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for third-line management of metastatic colorectal cancer: SUNLIGHT study design. ( Amellal, N; Ciardiello, F; Fakih, M; Fougeray, R; Leger, C; Prager, GW; Tabernero, J; Taieb, J; van Cutsem, E, 2021) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (TT) is an orally administered combination of the thymidine-based nucleoside analogue trifluridine and the thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor tipiracil hydrochloride, which increases the bioavailability of cytotoxic trifluridine." | 6.94 | First-line trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer: SOLSTICE study design. ( Amellal, NC; André, T; Falcone, A; Fougeray, R; Gandossi, E; Kanehisa, A; Saunders, M, 2020) |
"Lay abstract PRECONNECT is an international study demonstrating the efficacy and tolerability of the drug combination trifluridine/tipiracil in adult patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated in everyday clinical practice." | 5.41 | Italian results of the PRECONNECT study: safety and efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil in metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Banzi, MC; Barone, CA; Bartolomeo, MD; Bergamo, F; Besse, MG; Blasi, L; Bordonaro, R; Costanzo, FD; Falcone, A; Frassineti, GL; Garufi, C; Giuliani, F; Latiano, TP; Martinelli, E; Personeni, N; Racca, P; Spione, M; Tamburini, E; Tonini, G; Zaniboni, A, 2021) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) is an orally administrated anticancer drug with efficacy validated for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) or gastric cancer." | 5.41 | Monitoring FTD in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer administered FTD plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment. ( Ando, K; Fujimoto, Y; Kimura, Y; Kitao, H; Kotaka, M; Maehara, Y; Makiyama, A; Miyamoto, Y; Mori, M; Nakanishi, R; Oki, E; Qiu, S; Shimokawa, M, 2021) |
"This study assessed the efficacy and safety of biweekly trifluridine and tipiracil hydrochloride (TAS-102) with bevacizumab combination therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)." | 5.41 | Prospective Multicenter Phase II Study of Biweekly TAS-102 and Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. ( Enomoto, M; Ishizaki, T; Kasahara, K; Katsumata, K; Kawakita, H; Matsudo, T; Mazaki, J; Nagakawa, Y; Shigoka, M; Tsuchida, A, 2021) |
"TAS-102 (trifluridine-tipiracil) has shown a significant overall survival benefit compared with placebo in patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer." | 5.34 | TAS-102 with or without bevacizumab in patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer: an investigator-initiated, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial. ( Krogh, M; Möller, S; Petersen, LN; Pfeiffer, P; Poulsen, LØ; Qvortrup, C; Thomsen, KG; Winther, SB; Yilmaz, M; Zitnjak, D, 2020) |
"A previous phase I/II C-TASK FORCE study of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for patients with heavily pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) showed promising activity with an acceptable toxicity profile." | 5.30 | Retrospective cohort study of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) plus bevacizumab versus trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Bando, H; Horasawa, S; Kaneko, A; Kawazoe, A; Kojima, T; Kotani, D; Kuboki, Y; Nakamura, Y; Shitara, K; Taniguchi, H; Tsuji, A; Yoshino, T, 2019) |
"Regorafenib and TAS-102 have recently demonstrated statistically significant survival gains in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)." | 5.24 | Estimating 12-week death probability in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: the Colon Life nomogram. ( Antonuzzo, L; Aprile, G; Baretti, M; Battaglin, F; Berenato, R; Beretta, G; Bozzarelli, S; Cinieri, S; Cremolini, C; de Braud, F; Falcone, A; Formica, V; Ghidini, M; Lonardi, S; Loupakis, F; Marmorino, F; Mennitto, A; Miceli, R; Morano, F; Mosconi, S; Petrelli, F; Pietrantonio, F; Rimassa, L; Rossini, D; Spada, D; Tamburini, E, 2017) |
"Early clinical trials conducted primarily in Japan have shown that TAS-102, an oral agent that combines trifluridine and tipiracil hydrochloride, was effective in the treatment of refractory colorectal cancer." | 5.20 | Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Benedetti, F; Boucher, E; Cleary, JM; Falcone, A; Garcia-Carbonero, R; Hochster, H; Ito, M; Komatsu, Y; Lenz, HJ; Makris, L; Mayer, RJ; Mizuguchi, H; Mizunuma, N; Ohtsu, A; Peeters, M; Prenen, H; Shimada, Y; Sobrero, A; Tabernero, J; Tran, B; Van Cutsem, E; Yamazaki, K; Yoshino, T; Zaniboni, A, 2015) |
" We investigated the recommended dose (RD) of TAS-102 plus irinotecan for metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and oxaliplatin." | 5.20 | Phase I study of TAS-102 and irinotecan combination therapy in Japanese patients with advanced colorectal cancer. ( Boku, N; Doi, T; Fuse, N; Koizumi, W; Ohtsu, A; Shimada, K; Takinishi, Y; Yamazaki, K; Yoshino, T, 2015) |
"Direct randomized comparisons of regorafenib, TAS-102, and fruquintinib for treating metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are lacking." | 5.05 | Regorafenib, TAS-102, or fruquintinib for metastatic colorectal cancer: any difference in randomized trials? ( Li, J; Peng, Z; Shen, L; Wang, Q; Wang, X; Zhang, Q, 2020) |
"Regorafenib at a dose of 160 mg and TAS-102 appear to have similar efficacy in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer." | 5.01 | A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Regorafenib and TAS-102 in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. ( Ahn, DH; Bekaii-Saab, T; Benkhadra, R; Firwana, B; Hubbard, JM; Mody, K; Murad, MH; Sonbol, MB; Walden, DJ; Wang, Z, 2019) |
"Regorafenib (REG) and trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) have have been shown to improve overall survival in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer." | 4.02 | Regorafenib-to-trifluridine/tipiracil Versus the Reverse Sequence for Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Real-life Experience. ( Ceribelli, A; Chilelli, MG; DE Marco, S; Gemma, D; Grande, R; Morandi, MG; Ruggeri, EM; Saltarelli, R; Signorelli, C; Sperduti, I; Spinelli, GP; Zoratto, F, 2021) |
"This study aimed to describe the chemotherapy effects after trifluridine/tipiracil (TFTD) and/or regorafenib treatment in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients." | 4.02 | Salvage Therapy After Regorafenib or Trifluridine/Tipiracil Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Conditional Landmark Analysis. ( Kawakami, K; Nakashima, M; Takeuchi, M; Tanaka, S, 2021) |
"The novel oral nucleoside antineoplastic agent trifluridine/tipiracil was approved for metastatic colorectal cancer in Japan in March 2014." | 4.02 | Post-marketing surveillance study of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Funato, Y; Koyama, T; Muro, K; Ozawa, D; Tajiri, M; Uetake, H; Yamaguchi, Y; Yoshino, T, 2021) |
"In later-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), trifluridine/tipiracil is often selected because regorafenib is difficult to use in patients with comorbidities such as thrombosis, hemorrhage, or cardiac events." | 4.02 | Clinical Outcomes Following Trifluridine/Tipiracil Treatment for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Ineligible for Regorafenib Treatment. ( Denda, T; Esaki, T; Fukuoka, S; Hatachi, Y; Kajiwara, T; Kumekawa, Y; Makiyama, A; Masuishi, T; Moriwaki, T; Niisato, Y; Shimada, Y; Sugimoto, N; Suto, T; Takashima, A; Yamazaki, K, 2021) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil combination has shown a benefit over placebo in the treatment of patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)." | 3.96 | Efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil in third-line and beyond for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in routine clinical practice: patterns of use and prognostic nomogram. ( Candamio Folgar, S; Carmona Campos, M; Cousillas Castiñeiras, A; Covela Rúa, M; de la Cámara Gómez, J; Fernandez Montes, A; Gallardo Martín, E; García Gómez, J; Gonzalez Villarroel, P; Jorge Fernández, M; Martinez Lago, N; Méndez Méndez, JC; París Bouzas, L; Pellón Augusto, ML; Reboredo López, M; Salgado Fernández, M; Vazquez Rivera, F, 2020) |
"Trifluridine and tipiracil (FTD + TPI) and regorafenib (REG) are approved treatments for the treatment of refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)." | 3.96 | Real-World Adherence in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with Trifluridine plus Tipiracil or Regorafenib. ( Barghout, V; Duh, MS; Germain, G; Jacques, P; Laliberté, F; Patel, AK; Yenikomshian, MA, 2020) |
"The standard first- and second- line chemotherapy backbone regimens for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/capecitabine-based with addition of irinotecan or oxaliplatin." | 3.96 | Review of metastatic colorectal cancer treatment pathways and early clinical experience of trifluridine/tipiracil in the UK named patient programme. ( Carter, AM; Iveson, T; Mullamitha, S; Shiu, KK; Spooner, C; Stevens, D, 2020) |
"This study aimed to clarify the tolerability of a trifluridine/tipiracil combination tablet (TAS-102) in patients with advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer over 75 years of age." | 3.91 | Evaluation of Tolerability of Trifluridine/Tipiracil Combination Tablet in Patients With Advanced/Recurrent Colorectal Cancer. ( Kimura, M; Teramachi, H; Usami, E; Yoshimura, T, 2019) |
"Trifluridine (FTD) is an active cytotoxic component of the metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) drug TAS-102, and thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor (TPI) inhibits the rapid degradation of FTD." | 3.85 | Potential role of polymorphisms in the transporter genes ENT1 and MATE1/OCT2 in predicting TAS-102 efficacy and toxicity in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Barzi, A; Berger, MD; Borelli, B; Cao, S; Dadduzio, V; Gopez, R; Lenz, HJ; Loupakis, F; Miyamoto, Y; Ning, Y; Okazaki, S; Pietrantonio, F; Salvatore, L; Schirripa, M; Suenaga, M; Yamaguchi, T; Yang, D; Zhang, W, 2017) |
"Regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) both prolong survival for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer." | 3.85 | Regorafenib Versus Trifluridine/Tipiracil for Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Comparison. ( Ando, M; Fukutomi, A; Hamauchi, S; Ishihara, M; Kadowaki, S; Kito, Y; Komori, A; Machida, N; Masuishi, T; Mori, K; Muro, K; Narita, Y; Onozawa, Y; Tajika, M; Tanaka, T; Taniguchi, H; Todaka, A; Tsushima, T; Ura, T; Yamazaki, K; Yasui, H; Yokota, T, 2017) |
"Regorafenib and TAS-102 are novel antitumor agents for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) whose disease has progressed after standard therapies." | 3.83 | Efficacy and Safety of Regorafenib or TAS-102 in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Therapies. ( Doki, Y; Haraguchi, N; Hata, T; Hayashi, T; Kudo, T; Mizushima, T; Mori, M; Nishimura, J; Sakai, D; Satoh, T; Sueda, T; Sugiura, T; Takahashi, H, 2016) |
"Microsatellite-stable (MSS) colorectal cancer (CRC) tends to be poorly immunogenic, with limited treatment options." | 3.01 | A phase 2 trial of trifluridine/tipiracil plus nivolumab in patients with heavily pretreated microsatellite-stable metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Bendell, JC; Falchook, GS; Hamada, K; Makris, L; Patel, MR, 2021) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) is an orally active formulation of trifluridine, a thymidine-based nucleoside analog, and tipiracil hydrochloride, a thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor that increases the bioavailability of trifluridine." | 3.01 | Trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for third-line management of metastatic colorectal cancer: SUNLIGHT study design. ( Amellal, N; Ciardiello, F; Fakih, M; Fougeray, R; Leger, C; Prager, GW; Tabernero, J; Taieb, J; van Cutsem, E, 2021) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (TT) is an orally administered combination of the thymidine-based nucleoside analogue trifluridine and the thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor tipiracil hydrochloride, which increases the bioavailability of cytotoxic trifluridine." | 2.94 | First-line trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer: SOLSTICE study design. ( Amellal, NC; André, T; Falcone, A; Fougeray, R; Gandossi, E; Kanehisa, A; Saunders, M, 2020) |
"Molecular mechanisms of colorectal cancer are at the forefront of research." | 2.53 | Current and advancing treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Argiles, G; Elez, ME; Grasselli, J; Sanz-Garcia, E; Tabernero, J, 2016) |
"In the setting of metastatic colorectal cancer, many gains in patient outcomes have been achieved throughout the last 2 decades." | 1.62 | Transitioning from second-line to third-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Bekaii-Saab, TS; Loupakis, F; Marshall, JL, 2021) |
"Management of metastatic colorectal cancer reflects a continuum of care." | 1.56 | How to incorporate a chemo-free interval into the management of metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Ciardiello, F; Grothey, A; Marshall, JL, 2020) |
"In clinical trials of metastatic colorectal cancer, progressive disease after second-line therapy is often defined according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria." | 1.56 | Optimizing the treatment sequence from second-line to third-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Bekaii-Saab, TS; Grothey, A; Prager, GW; Yoshino, T, 2020) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil has been approved for the treatment of refractory metastatic colorectal cancer." | 1.48 | Leukocytoclastic vasculitis with late-onset Henoch-Schönlein purpura after trifluridine/tipiracil treatment. ( Aria, AB; Chen, L; Chon, SY; Glass, WF; Lahoti, A, 2018) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 3 (5.56) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 0 (0.00) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 1 (1.85) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 26 (48.15) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 24 (44.44) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Patel, AK | 1 |
Barghout, V | 1 |
Yenikomshian, MA | 1 |
Germain, G | 1 |
Jacques, P | 1 |
Laliberté, F | 1 |
Duh, MS | 1 |
Grothey, A | 3 |
Marshall, JL | 4 |
Bekaii-Saab, T | 2 |
Zhang, Q | 1 |
Wang, Q | 1 |
Wang, X | 1 |
Li, J | 1 |
Shen, L | 1 |
Peng, Z | 1 |
Kotani, D | 1 |
Kuboki, Y | 1 |
Horasawa, S | 1 |
Kaneko, A | 1 |
Nakamura, Y | 1 |
Kawazoe, A | 1 |
Bando, H | 1 |
Taniguchi, H | 2 |
Shitara, K | 2 |
Kojima, T | 1 |
Tsuji, A | 2 |
Yoshino, T | 6 |
André, T | 1 |
Saunders, M | 1 |
Kanehisa, A | 1 |
Gandossi, E | 1 |
Fougeray, R | 2 |
Amellal, NC | 1 |
Falcone, A | 6 |
Pfeiffer, P | 1 |
Yilmaz, M | 1 |
Möller, S | 1 |
Zitnjak, D | 1 |
Krogh, M | 1 |
Petersen, LN | 1 |
Poulsen, LØ | 1 |
Winther, SB | 1 |
Thomsen, KG | 1 |
Qvortrup, C | 1 |
Iveson, T | 1 |
Carter, AM | 1 |
Shiu, KK | 1 |
Spooner, C | 1 |
Stevens, D | 1 |
Mullamitha, S | 1 |
Siebenhüner, A | 1 |
De Dosso, S | 1 |
Meisel, A | 1 |
Wagner, AD | 1 |
Borner, M | 1 |
Walter, T | 1 |
Hawkins, NS | 1 |
Pollock, RF | 1 |
Colaone, F | 1 |
Shergill, S | 1 |
Ross, PJ | 1 |
Giuliani, J | 1 |
Bonetti, A | 1 |
Uetake, H | 1 |
Funato, Y | 1 |
Yamaguchi, Y | 1 |
Koyama, T | 1 |
Ozawa, D | 1 |
Tajiri, M | 1 |
Muro, K | 3 |
Nakashima, M | 1 |
Takeuchi, M | 1 |
Tanaka, S | 1 |
Kawakami, K | 1 |
Patel, MR | 1 |
Falchook, GS | 1 |
Hamada, K | 1 |
Makris, L | 3 |
Bendell, JC | 1 |
Tabernero, J | 4 |
Taieb, J | 2 |
Prager, GW | 3 |
Ciardiello, F | 2 |
Fakih, M | 1 |
Leger, C | 1 |
Amellal, N | 1 |
van Cutsem, E | 3 |
Zaniboni, A | 3 |
Barone, CA | 1 |
Banzi, MC | 1 |
Bergamo, F | 1 |
Blasi, L | 1 |
Bordonaro, R | 1 |
Bartolomeo, MD | 1 |
Costanzo, FD | 1 |
Frassineti, GL | 1 |
Garufi, C | 1 |
Giuliani, F | 1 |
Latiano, TP | 1 |
Martinelli, E | 1 |
Personeni, N | 1 |
Racca, P | 1 |
Tamburini, E | 2 |
Tonini, G | 1 |
Besse, MG | 1 |
Spione, M | 1 |
Mansoor, W | 1 |
Arkenau, HT | 1 |
Alsina, M | 1 |
Thuss-Patience, P | 1 |
Cuffe, S | 1 |
Dvorkin, M | 1 |
Park, D | 1 |
Ando, T | 1 |
Van Den Eynde, M | 1 |
Beretta, GD | 1 |
Doi, T | 2 |
Ilson, DH | 1 |
Benhadji, KA | 1 |
Fujimoto, Y | 1 |
Oki, E | 1 |
Qiu, S | 1 |
Nakanishi, R | 1 |
Makiyama, A | 2 |
Miyamoto, Y | 3 |
Kotaka, M | 1 |
Shimokawa, M | 1 |
Ando, K | 1 |
Kimura, Y | 1 |
Kitao, H | 1 |
Maehara, Y | 1 |
Mori, M | 2 |
Ishizaki, T | 1 |
Mazaki, J | 1 |
Enomoto, M | 1 |
Shigoka, M | 1 |
Kasahara, K | 1 |
Matsudo, T | 1 |
Kawakita, H | 1 |
Nagakawa, Y | 1 |
Katsumata, K | 1 |
Tsuchida, A | 1 |
Niisato, Y | 1 |
Moriwaki, T | 2 |
Fukuoka, S | 1 |
Masuishi, T | 2 |
Takashima, A | 1 |
Kumekawa, Y | 1 |
Kajiwara, T | 1 |
Yamazaki, K | 5 |
Esaki, T | 2 |
Denda, T | 1 |
Hatachi, Y | 1 |
Suto, T | 1 |
Sugimoto, N | 2 |
Shimada, Y | 2 |
Loupakis, F | 4 |
Bekaii-Saab, TS | 2 |
Signorelli, C | 1 |
Gemma, D | 1 |
Grande, R | 1 |
DE Marco, S | 1 |
Saltarelli, R | 1 |
Morandi, MG | 1 |
Spinelli, GP | 1 |
Zoratto, F | 1 |
Sperduti, I | 1 |
Chilelli, MG | 1 |
Ceribelli, A | 1 |
Ruggeri, EM | 1 |
Kuramochi, H | 1 |
Yamada, T | 2 |
Yoshida, Y | 1 |
Matsuda, A | 2 |
Kamiyama, H | 1 |
Kosugi, C | 1 |
Ishibashi, K | 1 |
Fukazawa, A | 1 |
Ihara, K | 1 |
Sonoda, H | 1 |
Yoshimatsu, K | 2 |
Yoshida, H | 2 |
Hasegawa, S | 1 |
Sakamoto, K | 1 |
Ishida, H | 1 |
Koda, K | 1 |
Chen, Y | 1 |
Wang, DD | 1 |
Wu, YP | 1 |
Su, D | 1 |
Zhou, TY | 1 |
Gai, RH | 1 |
Fu, YY | 1 |
Zheng, L | 1 |
He, QJ | 1 |
Zhu, H | 1 |
Yang, B | 1 |
Suenaga, M | 1 |
Schirripa, M | 2 |
Cao, S | 1 |
Zhang, W | 1 |
Yang, D | 1 |
Dadduzio, V | 1 |
Salvatore, L | 3 |
Borelli, B | 1 |
Pietrantonio, F | 2 |
Ning, Y | 1 |
Okazaki, S | 1 |
Berger, MD | 1 |
Gopez, R | 1 |
Barzi, A | 1 |
Yamaguchi, T | 1 |
Lenz, HJ | 3 |
Arnold, D | 1 |
Quintela, A | 1 |
Stein, A | 1 |
Moreno Vera, S | 1 |
Mounedji, N | 1 |
Kawahara, H | 1 |
Mouri, T | 1 |
Ishida, K | 1 |
Matsumoto, N | 1 |
Akiba, T | 1 |
Yanaga, K | 1 |
Martinez-Perez, J | 1 |
Riesco-Martinez, MC | 1 |
Garcia-Carbonero, R | 2 |
Aria, AB | 1 |
Chen, L | 1 |
Glass, WF | 1 |
Lahoti, A | 1 |
Chon, SY | 1 |
Kimura, M | 1 |
Usami, E | 1 |
Teramachi, H | 1 |
Yoshimura, T | 1 |
Fernandez Montes, A | 1 |
Vazquez Rivera, F | 1 |
Martinez Lago, N | 1 |
Covela Rúa, M | 1 |
Cousillas Castiñeiras, A | 1 |
Gonzalez Villarroel, P | 1 |
de la Cámara Gómez, J | 1 |
Méndez Méndez, JC | 1 |
Salgado Fernández, M | 1 |
Candamio Folgar, S | 1 |
Reboredo López, M | 1 |
Carmona Campos, M | 1 |
Gallardo Martín, E | 1 |
Jorge Fernández, M | 1 |
Pellón Augusto, ML | 1 |
París Bouzas, L | 1 |
García Gómez, J | 1 |
Sonbol, MB | 1 |
Benkhadra, R | 1 |
Wang, Z | 1 |
Firwana, B | 1 |
Walden, DJ | 1 |
Mody, K | 1 |
Hubbard, JM | 1 |
Murad, MH | 1 |
Ahn, DH | 1 |
Matsumoto, S | 1 |
Sakurazawa, N | 1 |
Kawano, Y | 1 |
Shinozuka, E | 1 |
Sekiguchi, K | 1 |
Suzuki, H | 1 |
Mayer, RJ | 1 |
Mizunuma, N | 2 |
Komatsu, Y | 2 |
Sobrero, A | 1 |
Boucher, E | 1 |
Peeters, M | 1 |
Tran, B | 1 |
Hochster, H | 1 |
Cleary, JM | 1 |
Prenen, H | 1 |
Benedetti, F | 1 |
Mizuguchi, H | 1 |
Ito, M | 1 |
Ohtsu, A | 3 |
Cleghorn, S | 1 |
Fuse, N | 1 |
Boku, N | 1 |
Koizumi, W | 1 |
Shimada, K | 1 |
Takinishi, Y | 1 |
Yokomizo, H | 1 |
Nakayama, M | 1 |
Okayama, S | 1 |
Satake, M | 1 |
Sakuma, A | 1 |
Yano, Y | 1 |
Matsumoto, A | 1 |
Fujimoto, T | 1 |
Usui, T | 1 |
Yamaguchi, K | 2 |
Shiozawa, S | 1 |
Shimakawa, T | 1 |
Katsube, T | 1 |
Naritaka, Y | 1 |
Rossini, D | 2 |
Moretto, R | 1 |
Cremolini, C | 2 |
Antoniotti, C | 1 |
Marmorino, F | 2 |
Masi, G | 1 |
Sanz-Garcia, E | 1 |
Grasselli, J | 1 |
Argiles, G | 1 |
Elez, ME | 1 |
Baba, H | 2 |
Goldberg, R | 1 |
Sueda, T | 1 |
Sakai, D | 1 |
Kudo, T | 1 |
Sugiura, T | 1 |
Takahashi, H | 1 |
Haraguchi, N | 1 |
Nishimura, J | 1 |
Hata, T | 1 |
Hayashi, T | 1 |
Mizushima, T | 1 |
Doki, Y | 1 |
Satoh, T | 1 |
Hamauchi, S | 1 |
Komori, A | 1 |
Kito, Y | 1 |
Narita, Y | 1 |
Tsushima, T | 1 |
Ishihara, M | 1 |
Todaka, A | 1 |
Tanaka, T | 1 |
Yokota, T | 1 |
Kadowaki, S | 1 |
Machida, N | 1 |
Ura, T | 1 |
Fukutomi, A | 1 |
Ando, M | 1 |
Onozawa, Y | 1 |
Tajika, M | 1 |
Yasui, H | 1 |
Mori, K | 1 |
Miceli, R | 1 |
Rimassa, L | 1 |
Lonardi, S | 1 |
Aprile, G | 1 |
Mennitto, A | 1 |
Bozzarelli, S | 1 |
Antonuzzo, L | 1 |
Morano, F | 1 |
Battaglin, F | 1 |
Baretti, M | 1 |
Berenato, R | 1 |
Formica, V | 1 |
Mosconi, S | 1 |
Petrelli, F | 1 |
Ghidini, M | 1 |
Spada, D | 1 |
Cinieri, S | 1 |
Beretta, G | 1 |
de Braud, F | 1 |
Lee, JJ | 1 |
Chu, E | 1 |
Nishina, T | 1 |
Tsuji, Y | 1 |
Hamada, C | 1 |
Tanase, T | 1 |
GREKH, IF | 1 |
KARLINSKAIA, RS | 1 |
TURBINA, IL | 1 |
Emura, T | 1 |
Murakami, Y | 1 |
Nakagawa, F | 1 |
Fukushima, M | 1 |
Kitazato, K | 1 |
Wolberg, WH | 1 |
Van Way, CW | 1 |
Reynolds, VH | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TACTIC: a Phase II Study of TAS-102 Monotherapy and Thalidomide Plus TAS-102 as Third-line Therapy and Beyond in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma[NCT05266820] | Phase 2 | 120 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2021-10-01 | Recruiting | ||
A Randomized, Controlled Phase II Clinical Trial of Fruquintinib Combined With Raltitrexed Versus Fruquintinib Monotherapy in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer Who Had Failed Second-line or Above Standard Chemotherapy[NCT04582981] | Phase 2 | 136 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2020-09-28 | Recruiting | ||
A Phase 2 Study With Safety Lead-in, Evaluating TAS-102 Plus Nivolumab in Patients With Microsatellite Stable Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT02860546] | Phase 2 | 18 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2016-08-29 | Completed | ||
An Open-label Early Access Phase IIIb Study of Trifluridine / Tipiracil (S 95005/TAS-102) in Patients With a Pretreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (PRECONNECT)[NCT03306394] | Phase 3 | 907 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2016-10-18 | Completed | ||
NIVOLUMAB Plus IPILIMUMAB and TEMOZOLOMIDE in Combination in Microsatellite Stable (MSS), MGMT Silenced Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC): the MAYA Study[NCT03832621] | Phase 2 | 135 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2019-03-25 | Completed | ||
Phase II Trial of TAS-102 in Patients With Advanced, Refractory Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma[NCT04923529] | Phase 2 | 28 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2021-03-01 | Recruiting | ||
Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 Study of TAS-102 Plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) Versus Placebo Plus BSC in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Chemotherapies[NCT01607957] | Phase 3 | 800 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2012-06-17 | Completed | ||
Efficacy and Safety of Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Combination With Irinotecan as a Second Line Therapy in Patients With Cholangiocarcinoma[NCT04059562] | Phase 2 | 28 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2021-10-28 | Active, not recruiting | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
DCR was defined as the percentage of participants with objective evidence of radiologic complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) and was based on the overall best response from each participant as determined from investigator response assessments and following irRC criteria. Per irRC criteria, CR was defined as the disappearance of all tumor lesions (measurable or not, and no new lesions). PR was defined as a decrease in the sum of the products of the two largest perpendicular diameters by 50% or greater by a consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks after first documentation. SD was defined as the failure to meet criteria for irCR or irPR in absence of in absence of irPD. (NCT02860546)
Timeframe: From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to 53 weeks)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
TAS-102 + Nivolumab | 44.4 |
DCR was defined as the percentage of participants with objective evidence of radiologic CR, PR, or SD and was based on the overall best response from each participant as determined from investigator response assessments and following RECIST Criteria version 1.1. Per RECIST Criteria CR defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Reduction in any pathological lymph nodes in short axis to <10 mm. PR defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum diameters. SD defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as a reference the smallest sum diameters during study. (NCT02860546)
Timeframe: From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to 53 weeks)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
TAS-102 + Nivolumab | 55.6 |
irORR was defined as the percentage of participants achieving a complete response (irCR) or partial response (irPR) based on irRC criteria. Per irRC criteria, Complete Response (irCR) was defined as the disappearance of all tumor lesions (measurable or not, and no new lesions)., Partial Response (irPR) was defined as a decrease in the sum of the products of the two largest perpendicular diameters (SPD) by 50 percent (%) or greater by a consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks after first documentation, Stable Disease (irSD) was defined as the failure to meet criteria for irCR or irPR in absence of progressive disease (irPD), irPD was defined as at least 25% increase in SPD relative to nadir. (NCT02860546)
Timeframe: From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to 53 weeks)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
TAS-102 + Nivolumab | 0 |
"DLT: defined as occurrence of any of the following-~Hematological toxicities:~Grade 4 neutropenia lasting greater than(>)7 days~Grade 4 febrile neutropenia and fever greater than or equal to (>=)38 degree celsius for over 1 hour~Grade 4 thrombocytopenia or grade 3 thrombocytopenia associated with bleeding or requiring transfusions~Non-hematological toxicities:~Grade 3 or grade 4 non-hematologic toxicity (excluding alopecia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea)~Grade 3 or grade 4 nausea/vomiting lasting >48 hours and uncontrolled by aggressive anti-emetic therapy, including serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonists (e.g, ondansetron)~Grade 3 or grade 4 diarrhea lasting > 48 hours and unresponsive to antidiarrheal medication~Drug-related toxicities:~Any drug-related toxicity resulting in > 2 weeks delay in initiation of Cycle 2 (i.e, cannot start Cycle 2 until Day 43 or later)~Any drug-related toxicity that prevents completion of 80% compliance for either drug in Cycle 1" (NCT02860546)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (each cycle is of 4 weeks)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
TAS-102 + Nivolumab | 0 |
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with objective evidence of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version 1.1.CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to less than (<)10 millimeters (mm). PR was defined as at least a 30 % decrease in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum diameters. (NCT02860546)
Timeframe: From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to 53 weeks)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
TAS-102 + Nivolumab | 0 |
RP2D of TAS-102 was evaluated based on the safety and tolerability of the combination therapy of TAS-102 and Nivolumab. (NCT02860546)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (each cycle is of 4 weeks)
Intervention | mg/m^2 (Number) |
---|---|
TAS-102 + Nivolumab | 35 |
Hematological and chemistry laboratory tests abnormalities were graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.03. as: Grade 1 (Mild, asymptomatic or mild symptoms); Grade 2 (Moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated); Grade 3 (Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated); Grade 4 (Life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated); Grade 5 (Death related to AE). (NCT02860546)
Timeframe: From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to 53 weeks)
Intervention | participants (Number) | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Grade 4: Neutropenia (neutrophils low) | Grade 4: Anemia (hemoglobin low) | Grade 4: Leukopenia (leukocytes low) | Grade 4: Lymphopenia (lymphocytes low) | Grade 4: Thrombocytopenia (platelets low) | Grade 4: Bilirubin High | Grade 4: Glucose High | Grade 4: Sodium Low | Grade 3: Neutropenia (neutrophils low) | Grade 3: Anemia (hemoglobin low) | Grade 3: Leukopenia (leukocytes low) | Grade 3: Lymphopenia (lymphocytes low) | Grade 3: Thrombocytopenia (platelets low) | Grade 3: Bilirubin High | Grade 3: Glucose High | Grade 3: Sodium Low | |
TAS-102 + Nivolumab | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical condition that occurs in a participants while participating in a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the use of the study treatment. A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. TEAEs: AEs that developed or worsened during the on-treatment period which was defined as the period from the time of first dose of study treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment. (NCT02860546)
Timeframe: From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to 53 weeks)
Intervention | participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Participants with TEAEs | Participants with TESAEs | |
TAS-102 + Nivolumab | 18 | 6 |
Immune-related progression free survival was defined as the time (in months) from the date of first dose of study treatment until the date of the investigator-assessed radiological disease progression (based on irRC) or death due to any cause. Participants who were alive with no disease progression at the moment of the analysis cut-off date was censored at the date of the last tumor assessment. Per irRC criteria disease progression defined as at least 25% increase in SPD relative to nadir. Analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. (NCT02860546)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study treatment to disease progression or death (up to 53 weeks)
Intervention | months (Median) | |
---|---|---|
Radiologic progression of disease only | Radiologic + clinical progression of disease | |
TAS-102 + Nivolumab | 2.2 | 2.2 |
Progression free survival was defined as the time (in months) from the date of first dose of study treatment until the date of the investigator-assessed radiological disease progression (based on RECIST 1.1) or death due to any cause. Per RECIST criteria disease progression defined as least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference the smallest sum on study, including the baseline sum. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Definitive new lesion presence also indicated progression. (NCT02860546)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study treatment to disease progression or death (up to 53 weeks)
Intervention | months (Median) | |
---|---|---|
Radiologic progression of disease only | Radiologic + clinical progression of disease | |
TAS-102 + Nivolumab | 2.8 | 2.5 |
Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death for participants. If a participant discontinued study medication for reasons other than radiologic disease progression, the participant was followed for tumor response until radiologic disease progression or initiation of new anticancer therapy. (NCT01607957)
Timeframe: Every 8 weeks, up to 12 months after the last participant was randomized or until the target number of events (deaths) was met, whichever was later. (Overall survival data was collected till 24 Jan 2014 which was date of observation of the 571st death)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
TAS-102 | 7.1 |
Placebo | 5.3 |
Tumor assessments were performed throughout the study based on RECIST, Version 1.1, 2009. Progression free survival was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization until the date of the investigator-assessed radiological disease progression or death due to any cause. For participants who were alive with no radiological disease progression as of the analysis cut-off date, their survival was censored at the date of the last tumor assessment. Participants who received non-study cancer treatment before disease progression, or participants with clinical but not radiologic evidence of progression, were censored at the date of the last radiologic evaluable tumor assessment before the non-study cancer treatment was initiated. (NCT01607957)
Timeframe: Every 8 weeks, up to 12 months after the last participant was randomized or until the date of the investigator-assessed radiological disease progression or death due to any cause,whichever was later. (Progression free survival cutoff: 31 Jan 2014)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
TAS-102 | 2.0 |
Placebo | 1.7 |
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Treatment-related AEs were events between administration of study drug and up to 30 Days that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability /incapacity; congenital anomaly. The AEs were graded for severity using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AEs. (NCT01607957)
Timeframe: From the time of signing the informed consent form until the period of participant follow up (30 days following after the administration of last dose of study medication or until initiation of new antitumor therapy, whichever was earlier
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Any adverse event (AE) | Any treatment-related AE | Any ≥Grade 3 AE | Any treatment-related ≥Grade 3 AE | Any serious AE (SAE) | Any AE resulting in discontinuation | Any AE with outcome of death | |
Placebo | 93.2 | 54.7 | 51.7 | 9.8 | 33.6 | 13.6 | 11.3 |
TAS-102 | 98.3 | 85.7 | 69.4 | 49.0 | 29.6 | 10.3 | 3.2 |
10 reviews available for thymine and Neoplasm Metastasis
Article | Year |
---|---|
Regorafenib, TAS-102, or fruquintinib for metastatic colorectal cancer: any difference in randomized trials?
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzofurans; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disea | 2020 |
Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma after Second Progression and the Role of Trifluridine-Tipiracil (TAS-102) in Switzerland.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Colorectal Neop | 2020 |
Systematic review and network meta-analyses of third-line treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Brachytherapy; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Me | 2020 |
Beyond second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease Progression; Drug Combinations; Drugs, Investigational; Humans; Neopla | 2018 |
The safety of trifluridine and tipiracil for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Co | 2018 |
A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Regorafenib and TAS-102 in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Drug Resist | 2019 |
TAS-102 for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Com | 2015 |
Current and advancing treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Animals; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Bevacizum | 2016 |
A novel antimetabolite: TAS-102 for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Combinations; Huma | 2016 |
Adherence, Dosing, and Managing Toxicities With Trifluridine/Tipiracil (TAS-102).
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Dose-Response Relationship, Dr | 2017 |
14 trials available for thymine and Neoplasm Metastasis
Article | Year |
---|---|
Retrospective cohort study of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) plus bevacizumab versus trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Beva | 2019 |
First-line trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer: SOLSTICE study design.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Clinical Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasm | 2020 |
TAS-102 with or without bevacizumab in patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer: an investigator-initiated, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combin | 2020 |
A phase 2 trial of trifluridine/tipiracil plus nivolumab in patients with heavily pretreated microsatellite-stable metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations | 2021 |
Trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for third-line management of metastatic colorectal cancer: SUNLIGHT study design.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Clinica | 2021 |
Italian results of the PRECONNECT study: safety and efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Aged; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; International Agen | 2021 |
Trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic gastroesophageal junction cancer: a subgroup analysis from the phase 3 TAGS study.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Drug Combinations; E | 2021 |
Monitoring FTD in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer administered FTD plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment.
Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bevacizumab; Colorectal | 2021 |
Prospective Multicenter Phase II Study of Biweekly TAS-102 and Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Chemothera | 2021 |
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb | 2015 |
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb | 2015 |
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb | 2015 |
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb | 2015 |
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb | 2015 |
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb | 2015 |
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb | 2015 |
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb | 2015 |
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb | 2015 |
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb | 2015 |
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb | 2015 |
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb | 2015 |
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb | 2015 |
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb | 2015 |
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb | 2015 |
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb | 2015 |
TAS-102 for metastatic refractory colorectal cancer.
Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Male; Neoplasm Metas | 2015 |
Phase I study of TAS-102 and irinotecan combination therapy in Japanese patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Area Under Curve; Camptothecin; Colorec | 2015 |
Estimating 12-week death probability in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: the Colon Life nomogram.
Topics: Aged; Colon; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Combinations; | 2017 |
TAS-102 monotherapy for pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female | 2012 |
30 other studies available for thymine and Neoplasm Metastasis
Article | Year |
---|---|
Real-World Adherence in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with Trifluridine plus Tipiracil or Regorafenib.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cohort Studies; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinati | 2020 |
Sequencing beyond the second-line setting in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Neo | 2019 |
Review of metastatic colorectal cancer treatment pathways and early clinical experience of trifluridine/tipiracil in the UK named patient programme.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Camptothecin; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease Pr | 2020 |
Trifluridine/Tipiracil in heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer. A perspective based on pharmacological costs.
Topics: Drug Combinations; Drug Costs; Humans; Neoplasm Metastasis; Pyrrolidines; Stomach Neoplasms; Thymine | 2020 |
Post-marketing surveillance study of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug | 2021 |
Salvage Therapy After Regorafenib or Trifluridine/Tipiracil Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Conditional Landmark Analysis.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Femal | 2021 |
Clinical Outcomes Following Trifluridine/Tipiracil Treatment for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Ineligible for Regorafenib Treatment.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Colorectal Neoplasms; Comorbidity; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; J | 2021 |
How to incorporate a chemo-free interval into the management of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; COVID-1 | 2020 |
Third-line treatments for the management of metastatic colorectal cancer: why to change the mechanism of action after frontline chemotherapy, and insights into management during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Colorectal Neoplasms; COVID-19; Disease Management; | 2020 |
Transitioning from second-line to third-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Decision-Making; Colorectal Neoplasms; Dise | 2021 |
Optimizing the treatment sequence from second-line to third-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease | 2020 |
Regorafenib-to-trifluridine/tipiracil Versus the Reverse Sequence for Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Real-life Experience.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug | 2021 |
The Pre-treatment Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio Predicts Efficacy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated With TAS-102 and Bevacizumab.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Bevacizumab; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Fe | 2021 |
MDM2 promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition and metastasis of ovarian cancer SKOV3 cells.
Topics: Aminoquinolines; Antigens, CD; Blotting, Western; Cadherins; Carcinoma; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Movem | 2017 |
Potential role of polymorphisms in the transporter genes ENT1 and MATE1/OCT2 in predicting TAS-102 efficacy and toxicity in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; California; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Combinations; E | 2017 |
Usefulness of TAS-102 as Third-line Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Colorectal Neop | 2018 |
Leukocytoclastic vasculitis with late-onset Henoch-Schönlein purpura after trifluridine/tipiracil treatment.
Topics: Adult; Appendiceal Neoplasms; Fatal Outcome; Glomerulonephritis; Humans; IgA Vasculitis; Kidney Fail | 2018 |
Evaluation of Tolerability of Trifluridine/Tipiracil Combination Tablet in Patients With Advanced/Recurrent Colorectal Cancer.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anemia; Anorexia; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Co | 2019 |
Efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil in third-line and beyond for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in routine clinical practice: patterns of use and prognostic nomogram.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Drug-Related Side Effects a | 2020 |
Pretreatment Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Survival After TAS-102 Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Biomarkers, Tumor; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; | 2019 |
[Short-Term Outcome of TAS-102 for Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer].
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Male; Middl | 2015 |
Emerging phase 3 data in relapsed/refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Colorectal Neop | 2016 |
In brief: trifluridine/tipiracil (Lonsurf) for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasm | 2016 |
An interview with Alfredo Falcone and Lisa Salvatore: RECOURSE and trifluridine/tipiracil in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Achievement; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Career Choice; Clinical Trials as Topic | 2016 |
Efficacy and Safety of Regorafenib or TAS-102 in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Therapies.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Combinations; Drug | 2016 |
Regorafenib Versus Trifluridine/Tipiracil for Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Comparison.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Cohort Studies; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Combi | 2017 |
[ON THE EFFECT OF CERTAIN PYRIMIDINE DERIVATIVES ON THE METASTASIZATION OF TRANSPLANTABLE SSK RAT SARCOMA].
Topics: Cytosine; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neoplasms; Pharmacology; Pyrimidines; Rats; Research; Sarcoma; Sarcom | 1964 |
A novel antimetabolite, TAS-102 retains its effect on FU-related resistant cancer cells.
Topics: Animals; Antimetabolites; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Cell Line, Tumor; Colorectal Neoplasms; C | 2004 |
A novel antimetabolite, TAS-102 retains its effect on FU-related resistant cancer cells.
Topics: Animals; Antimetabolites; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Cell Line, Tumor; Colorectal Neoplasms; C | 2004 |
A novel antimetabolite, TAS-102 retains its effect on FU-related resistant cancer cells.
Topics: Animals; Antimetabolites; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Cell Line, Tumor; Colorectal Neoplasms; C | 2004 |
A novel antimetabolite, TAS-102 retains its effect on FU-related resistant cancer cells.
Topics: Animals; Antimetabolites; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Cell Line, Tumor; Colorectal Neoplasms; C | 2004 |
Biochemical approaches to prediction of response in solid tumors.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Antineoplastic Agents; Carbon Isotopes; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Carcinoma, Squamo | 1971 |
A new method for treatment of carcinoma of the breast and colon with 5-fluorouracil.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Breast Neoplasms; Chemical Phenomena; Chemistry; Colonic Neoplasms; Female; Fluorouraci | 1970 |