Page last updated: 2024-10-20

thymine and Colorectal Neoplasms

thymine has been researched along with Colorectal Neoplasms in 187 studies

Colorectal Neoplasms: Tumors or cancer of the COLON or the RECTUM or both. Risk factors for colorectal cancer include chronic ULCERATIVE COLITIS; FAMILIAL POLYPOSIS COLI; exposure to ASBESTOS; and irradiation of the CERVIX UTERI.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" fluoropyrimidine and irinotecan plus bevacizumab (control) as second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."9.69Trifluridine/tipiracil+bevacizumab (BEV) vs. fluoropyrimidine-irinotecan+BEV as second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomised noninferiority trial. ( Hara, H; Ishihara, S; Kagawa, Y; Kajiwara, T; Kawakami, H; Kotaka, M; Kuboki, Y; Makiyama, A; Masuishi, T; Morita, S; Nakajima, TE; Nakamura, M; Ojima, H; Oki, E; Ozawa, D; Shirao, K; Sugimoto, N; Sunakawa, Y; Takashima, A; Takenaka, N; Taniguchi, H; Terazawa, T; Watanabe, J; Yoshino, T, 2023)
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) improved both overall and progression-free survival (OS, PFS) of patients with pre-treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in the pivotal phase III RECOURSE trial."9.51Efficacy, safety and quality-of-life data from patients with pre-treated metastatic colorectal cancer receiving trifluridine/tipiracil: results of the TALLISUR trial. ( Ettrich, TJ; Heinemann, V; Hess, J; Karthaus, M; Klein, A; Kretzschmar, A; Pelz, H; Reisländer, T; Riera-Knorrenschild, J; Vehling-Kaiser, U; Weiss, L; Welslau, M, 2022)
"We conducted a phase I study to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, and efficacy of trametinib in combination with TAS-102 in patients with chemotherapy-refractory KRAS-mutant, wild-type PIK3CA/PTEN metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."9.51A Phase I Clinical Trial of Trametinib in Combination with TAS-102 in Patients with Chemotherapy-Resistant RAS-Mutated (PIK3CA/PTEN-Wild Type) Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. ( Chuang, J; Fakih, M; Gong, J; Li, SM; Wang, C, 2022)
"A previous Phase I/II study demonstrated that TAS-102 (trifluridine/tipiracil [FTD/TPI]) plus bevacizumab (Bev) has encouraging efficacy and controllable safety for patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer."9.41Trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab as a first-line treatment for elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (KSCC1602): A multicenter phase II trial. ( Akagi, Y; Ando, K; Baba, H; Kabashima, A; Kashiwada, T; Kawanaka, H; Kotaka, M; Maehara, Y; Makiyama, A; Miwa, K; Miyamoto, Y; Mori, M; Noguchi, T; Oki, E; Saeki, H; Shimokawa, M; Yuge, K, 2021)
"Lay abstract PRECONNECT is an international study demonstrating the efficacy and tolerability of the drug combination trifluridine/tipiracil in adult patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated in everyday clinical practice."9.41Italian results of the PRECONNECT study: safety and efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil in metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Banzi, MC; Barone, CA; Bartolomeo, MD; Bergamo, F; Besse, MG; Blasi, L; Bordonaro, R; Costanzo, FD; Falcone, A; Frassineti, GL; Garufi, C; Giuliani, F; Latiano, TP; Martinelli, E; Personeni, N; Racca, P; Spione, M; Tamburini, E; Tonini, G; Zaniboni, A, 2021)
"Although the efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) plus bevacizumab (BEV) against metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has been demonstrated, little is known about its effectiveness upon disease stratification by RAS mutations."9.41Phase II study of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab by RAS mutation status in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard therapies: JFMC51-1702-C7. ( Asayama, M; Kagawa, Y; Maehara, Y; Makiyama, A; Manaka, D; Matsuhashi, N; Mitsugi, K; Nakamura, M; Oba, K; Ojima, H; Oki, E; Okuda, H; Shimada, Y; Shiozawa, M; Takahashi, T; Watanabe, J; Yamazaki, K; Yoshida, K; Yoshino, T; Yuasa, Y, 2021)
"We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of combination treatment with panitumumab plus trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who were refractory/intolerant to standard therapies other than anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy."9.41Safety and efficacy of panitumumab in combination with trifluridine/tipiracil for pre-treated patients with unresectable, metastatic colorectal cancer with wild-type RAS: The phase 1/2 APOLLON study. ( Denda, T; Gamoh, M; Goto, M; Iwata, M; Kagawa, Y; Kato, T; Komatsu, Y; Kotaka, M; Kuboki, Y; Makiyama, A; Oba, K; Oki, E; Satake, H; Shibuya, K; Soeda, J; Tanioka, H; Yamaguchi, K; Yamazaki, K; Yasui, H; Yoshino, T, 2021)
"The current study aimed to determine the efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil for elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer."9.41Phase II study of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) therapy in elderly patients with colorectal cancer (T-CORE1401): geriatric assessment tools and plasma drug concentrations as possible predictive biomarkers. ( Imai, H; Ishioka, C; Kato, S; Komine, K; Kuroki, M; Ohori, H; Otsuka, K; Ouchi, K; Sakamoto, Y; Shibata, H; Shimodaira, H; Shirota, H; Takahashi, M; Takahashi, S; Takahashi, Y; Tanaka, M; Tsuji, Y; Yamaguchi, H; Yamaguchi, T; Yoshioka, T, 2021)
"The phase II J003 (N = 169) and phase III RECOURSE (N = 800) trials demonstrated a significant improvement in survival with trifluridine (FTD)/tipiracil (TPI) versus placebo in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer."9.34Neutropenia and survival outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with trifluridine/tipiracil in the RECOURSE and J003 trials. ( Argilés, G; Baba, H; Benedetti, F; Cleary, JM; Esaki, T; Falcone, A; Garcia-Carbonero, R; Hamada, C; Hochster, HS; Komatsu, Y; Lenz, HJ; Makris, L; Mayer, RJ; Moriwaki, T; Muro, K; Nishina, T; Ohtsu, A; Peeters, M; Shimada, Y; Shinozaki, E; Sobrero, A; Sugimoto, N; Tanase, T; Tran, B; Tsuji, A; Tsuji, Y; Van Cutsem, E; Yamaguchi, K; Yamashita, F; Yamazaki, K; Yoshino, T; Zaniboni, A, 2020)
"In RECOURSE (, trifluridine/tipiracil significantly improved overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo in patients with pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."9.34Safety, efficacy and patient-reported outcomes with trifluridine/tipiracil in pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer: results of the PRECONNECT study. ( Atlan, D; Bachet, JB; Becquart, M; Cicin, I; Cremolini, C; Falcone, A; Mounedji, N; Ozet, A; Phelip, JM; Portales, F; Price, T; Taieb, J; Van Cutsem, E; Vidot, L; Wyrwicz, L, 2020)
"We designed an open-label, noncomparative phase II study to assess the safety and efficacy of first-line treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab (TT-B) and capecitabine plus bevacizumab (C-B) in untreated patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who were not candidates for combination with cytotoxic chemotherapies."9.34Trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab in patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer ineligible for intensive therapy: the randomized TASCO1 study. ( Amellal, N; Argilés, G; Aubel, P; Borg, C; Danielewicz, I; Egorov, A; Falcone, A; Fedyanin, M; Garcia-Alfonso, P; Glynne-Jones, R; Kanehisa, A; Kroening, H; Moiseenko, V; Pfeiffer, P; Punt, CJA; Saunders, MP; Stroyakovskiy, D; Van Cutsem, E; Van de Wouw, AJ; Wasan, H, 2020)
"This study evaluated the cost utility of regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil (T/T) compared with that of best supportive care (BSC) in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer previously treated with, or not considered candidates for, available therapies, including fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-based chemotherapies; anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents; and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor agents, in Japan."9.34Comparative Cost-utility Analysis of Regorafenib and Trifluridine/Tipiracil in The Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Japan. ( Kashiwa, M; Matsushita, R, 2020)
"A previous phase I/II C-TASK FORCE study of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for patients with heavily pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) showed promising activity with an acceptable toxicity profile."9.30Retrospective cohort study of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) plus bevacizumab versus trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Bando, H; Horasawa, S; Kaneko, A; Kawazoe, A; Kojima, T; Kotani, D; Kuboki, Y; Nakamura, Y; Shitara, K; Taniguchi, H; Tsuji, A; Yoshino, T, 2019)
"Purpose Trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) was effective in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in a phase II Japanese trial."9.27Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Trial of Trifluridine/Tipiracil (TAS-102) Monotherapy in Asian Patients With Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The TERRA Study. ( Ahn, JB; Bai, Y; Bi, F; Guo, W; Han, SW; Kim, TW; Li, J; Li, Q; Lin, D; Liu, T; Ma, D; Pan, H; Park, YS; Qin, S; Shen, L; Shi, C; Sriuranpong, V; Wu, C; Xu, J; Xu, R, 2018)
"In the phase III RECOURSE trial, trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) extended overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) with an acceptable toxicity profile in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory or intolerant to standard therapies."9.27The subgroups of the phase III RECOURSE trial of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) versus placebo with best supportive care in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Benavides, M; Ciardiello, F; Denda, T; Grávalos, C; Laurent, S; Lenz, HJ; Loehrer, P; Longo-Munoz, F; Makris, L; Mayer, RJ; Muro, K; Ohtsu, A; Portales, F; Siena, S; Tsuji, Y; Van Cutsem, E; Winkler, R; Yamaguchi, K, 2018)
"Regorafenib and TAS-102 are standard treatment options in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer based on improvement in overall survival by 6 and 8 weeks, respectively, when compared with best supportive care alone (BSC)."9.27Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Regorafenib and TAS-102 in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the United States. ( Barzi, A; Cho, SK; Hay, JW, 2018)
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI; TAS-102, Lonsurf®), a novel form of chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), has shown clinical benefit in the global, phase III RECOURSE trial, regardless of patient age."9.27Safety of trifluridine/tipiracil in an open-label expanded-access program in elderly and younger patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Cohen, SJ; Grothey, A; Hochster, HS; Makris, L; Mayer, RJ; Winkler, R, 2018)
" We investigated the recommended dose (RD) of TAS-102 plus irinotecan for metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and oxaliplatin."9.20Phase I study of TAS-102 and irinotecan combination therapy in Japanese patients with advanced colorectal cancer. ( Boku, N; Doi, T; Fuse, N; Koizumi, W; Ohtsu, A; Shimada, K; Takinishi, Y; Yamazaki, K; Yoshino, T, 2015)
"Direct randomized comparisons of regorafenib, TAS-102, and fruquintinib for treating metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are lacking."9.05Regorafenib, TAS-102, or fruquintinib for metastatic colorectal cancer: any difference in randomized trials? ( Li, J; Peng, Z; Shen, L; Wang, Q; Wang, X; Zhang, Q, 2020)
"Electronic databases were searched to identify studies comparing the efficacy and safety of regorafenib and TAS-102 in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer using pooled analyses."9.05A meta-analysis comparing regorafenib with TAS-102 for treating refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Liu, H; Su, GL; Wang, JC; Wang, YY, 2020)
"Regorafenib at different dosing strategies and TAS-102 are treatment options for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."9.01A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Regorafenib and TAS-102 in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. ( Ahn, DH; Bekaii-Saab, T; Benkhadra, R; Firwana, B; Hubbard, JM; Mody, K; Murad, MH; Sonbol, MB; Walden, DJ; Wang, Z, 2019)
"Regorafenib and TAS-102 have shown to be superior to placebo in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer."8.98A Comparison of Regorafenib and TAS-102 for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. ( Abrahao, ABK; Berry, S; Chan, KKW; Ko, YJ, 2018)
"Regorafenib is a standard salvage line therapy used for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC)."8.31Regorafenib is suitable for advanced colorectal cancer patients who have previously received trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab. ( Ikoma, T; Matsumoto, T; Miura, K; Nagai, H; Takatani, M; Tsuduki, T; Watanabe, T; Yamamura, S; Yasui, H, 2023)
"The aim of this analysis is to assess the pharmacological costs of trifluridine/tipiracil as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients who were not candidates for combination with cytotoxic chemotherapies."8.12Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Combination with Bevacizumab in First-Line for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Way Forward. A Point of View Based on Cost-Effectiveness. ( Giuliani, J, 2022)
"The RECOURSE trial supported trifluridine/tipiracil as a treatment option in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."8.12The effect of prognostic factors at baseline on the efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A Portuguese exploratory analysis. ( Basto, R; Bonito, N; Gomes, I; Jacinto, P; Magalhães, J; Paulo, J; Pereira, TC; Sousa, G; Sousa, MJ, 2022)
"Regorafenib (R) and trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) are of proven efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patient's refractory to standard therapies."8.12Sequential Treatment With Trifluridine/Tipiracil and Regorafenib in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: An AGEO Prospective "Real-World Study". ( Artru, P; Bouché, O; Coriat, R; Coutzac, C; De La Fouchardière, C; Doat, S; Gallois, C; Henriques, J; Masson, T; Moulin, V; Saint, A; Taieb, J; Tougeron, D; Trouilloud, I; Vernerey, D, 2022)
"The RECOURSE trial demonstrated a modest benefit in overall survival (OS) for trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) versus placebo in pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients."8.12Quality of Life and Survival of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated With Trifluridine-Tipiracil (QUALITAS). ( Dijksterhuis, WPM; Elferink, MAG; Hamers, PAH; Koopman, M; May, AM; Punt, CJA; Stellato, RK; Vink, GR, 2022)
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (TFTD), with or without bevacizumab (Bev), and regorafenib are salvage chemotherapy options for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."8.12Influence of precedent drug on the subsequent therapy in the sequence of trifluridine/tipiracil with/out bevacizumab and regorafenib for unresectable or recurrent colorectal cancer. ( Boku, N; Hirano, H; Iwasa, S; Okita, N; Oshima, K; Shoji, H; Takashima, A, 2022)
"To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) compared with best supportive care (BSC) for the treatment of patients with metastatic gastric cancer(mGC), including gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma(GEJ), who have received at least two prior therapies for metastatic disease and are eligible for third-line treatment, in Greece."8.12Cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil as a third-line treatment of metastatic gastric cancer, including adenocarcinoma of the gastrohesophageal junction, among patients previously treated in Greece. ( Androulakis, N; Beletsi, A; Boukovinas, I; Chotzagiannoglou, V; Gourzoulidis, G; Karamouzis, M; Koulentaki, M; Koumarianou, A; Kourlaba, G; Papakotoulas, P; Samadas, E; Souglakos, J; Xynogalos, S, 2022)
"Recently, trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) treatment was established as a later-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."8.02The Efficacy and Safety of Trifluridine/Tipiracil Treatment for Elderly Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in a Real-world Setting. ( En, W; Fukuoka, T; Hirakawa, K; Iseki, Y; Kashiwagi, S; Ohira, M; Okazaki, Y; Shibutani, M, 2021)
"The novel oral nucleoside antineoplastic agent trifluridine/tipiracil was approved for metastatic colorectal cancer in Japan in March 2014."8.02Post-marketing surveillance study of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Funato, Y; Koyama, T; Muro, K; Ozawa, D; Tajiri, M; Uetake, H; Yamaguchi, Y; Yoshino, T, 2021)
"This study aimed to describe the chemotherapy effects after trifluridine/tipiracil (TFTD) and/or regorafenib treatment in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients."8.02Salvage Therapy After Regorafenib or Trifluridine/Tipiracil Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Conditional Landmark Analysis. ( Kawakami, K; Nakashima, M; Takeuchi, M; Tanaka, S, 2021)
"Although the effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil(TFTD)with bevacizumab for unresectable colorectal cancer that was refractory to previous standard chemotherapy was reported, its effectiveness as a first-line treatment, especially for elderly frail patients, is unclear."8.02[A Case of an Elderly Frail Patient with Unresectable Colorectal Cancer Controlled by Trifluridine/Tipiracil with Bevacizumab Therapy as a First-Line Treatment]. ( Arigami, T; Kita, Y; Kurahara, H; Maemura, K; Matsumoto, R; Mori, S; Natsugoe, S; Sasaki, K; Toda, H, 2021)
"In later-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), trifluridine/tipiracil is often selected because regorafenib is difficult to use in patients with comorbidities such as thrombosis, hemorrhage, or cardiac events."8.02Clinical Outcomes Following Trifluridine/Tipiracil Treatment for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Ineligible for Regorafenib Treatment. ( Denda, T; Esaki, T; Fukuoka, S; Hatachi, Y; Kajiwara, T; Kumekawa, Y; Makiyama, A; Masuishi, T; Moriwaki, T; Niisato, Y; Shimada, Y; Sugimoto, N; Suto, T; Takashima, A; Yamazaki, K, 2021)
"Regorafenib (REG) and trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) have have been shown to improve overall survival in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer."8.02Regorafenib-to-trifluridine/tipiracil Versus the Reverse Sequence for Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Real-life Experience. ( Ceribelli, A; Chilelli, MG; DE Marco, S; Gemma, D; Grande, R; Morandi, MG; Ruggeri, EM; Saltarelli, R; Signorelli, C; Sperduti, I; Spinelli, GP; Zoratto, F, 2021)
"In the UK, Trifluridine-tipiracil (Lonsurf) is used to treat metastatic colorectal cancer in the third-line setting, after prior exposure to fluoropyrimidine-based regimes."8.02Long Term Real-World Outcomes of Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer-A Single UK Centre Experience. ( Essapen, S; Mendis, J; Tong, D; Wang, L, 2021)
"Trifluridine/tipiracil increases overall survival (OS) in patients with refractory, metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."8.02Prediction of survival in patients with advanced, refractory colorectal cancer in treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil: real-world vs clinical trial data. ( Carmona-Bayonas, A; Carriles Fernández, C; Cousillas Castiñeiras, A; Covela Rúa, M; De la Cámara Gómez, J; Fernández Montes, A; Garcia García, T; Gonzalez Villarroel, P; Jimenez-Fonseca, P; Martinez Lago, N; Méndez, JCM; Sanchez Cánovas, M; Vázquez Rivera, F, 2021)
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) and regorafenib prolong survival for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC); limited comparative effectiveness data exist."8.02Trifluridine/Tipiracil and Regorafenib in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study at a Tertiary Oncology Center. ( Abhyankar, R; Barghout, VE; Brais, LK; Duh, MS; Fuchs, CS; Huynh, L; Ng, K; Patel, AK; Yenikomshian, MA, 2021)
"Trifluridine and tipiracil (FTD + TPI) and regorafenib (REG) are approved treatments for the treatment of refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."7.96Real-World Adherence in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with Trifluridine plus Tipiracil or Regorafenib. ( Barghout, V; Duh, MS; Germain, G; Jacques, P; Laliberté, F; Patel, AK; Yenikomshian, MA, 2020)
"Although regorafenib or trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) has been recognized as a later-line standard treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), not all patients have beneficial outcomes."7.96Prognostic scores for evaluating the survival benefit of regorafenib or trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: an exploratory analysis of the REGOTAS study. ( Denda, T; Enomoto, M; Esaki, T; Fukuoka, S; Hatachi, Y; Ishikawa, T; Kajiwara, T; Kashiwada, T; Komatsu, Y; Kumekawa, Y; Makiyama, A; Masuishi, T; Moriwaki, T; Oki, E; Sakai, D; Shimada, Y; Sugimoto, N; Suto, T; Takashima, A; Tamura, T; Tsuchihashi, K; Tsuji, A; Ueno, H; Yamashita, K; Yamazaki, K, 2020)
"The standard first- and second- line chemotherapy backbone regimens for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/capecitabine-based with addition of irinotecan or oxaliplatin."7.96Review of metastatic colorectal cancer treatment pathways and early clinical experience of trifluridine/tipiracil in the UK named patient programme. ( Carter, AM; Iveson, T; Mullamitha, S; Shiu, KK; Spooner, C; Stevens, D, 2020)
"Trifluridine/tipiracil is available on the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) previously treated with, or not considered candidates for, fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based chemotherapies, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor agents."7.96Trifluridine/tipiracil: A practical guide to its use in the management of refractory metastatic colorectal cancer in Australia. ( Burge, M; Chantrill, L; Gibbs, P; Pavlakis, N; Price, T; Shapiro, J; Sjoquist, K, 2020)
"Regorafenib (REG) and trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) showed survival benefits in metastatic colorectal cancer patients previously treated with standard chemotherapies; therefore, we compared the efficacy and safety of these two treatments."7.96Regorafenib vs trifluridine/tipiracil for metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapies: A multicenter retrospective comparison study in Japan. ( Hatachi, Y; Kato, T; Kotaka, M; Ogata, M; Ogata, T; Satake, H; Tsuji, A; Yasui, H, 2020)
"The efficacy of trifluridine/thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor (FTD/TPI) plus bevacizumab as later-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has been demonstrated."7.96Combining Bevacizumab With Trifluridine/Thymidine Phosphorylase Inhibitor Improves the Survival Outcomes Regardless of the Usage History of Bevacizumab in Front-line Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. ( Fukuoka, T; Hirakawa, K; Iseki, Y; Kashiwagi, S; Maeda, K; Nagahara, H; Ohira, M; Okazaki, Y; Shibutani, M; Wang, EN, 2020)
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI; marketed as Lonsurf®) has shown clinically relevant activity after fluoropyrimidine failure in colorectal cancer and may thus be of increased efficacy compared with current standard capecitabine chemoradiation."7.96Radiosensitisation and enhanced tumour growth delay of colorectal cancer cells by sustained treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil and X-rays. ( Brinker, A; Burdak-Rothkamm, S; Christiansen, S; Frenzel, T; Horn, M; Petersen, C; Rieckmann, T; Rothkamm, K; Schumacher, U; Stein, A, 2020)
"Compared with the best supportive care, a survival benefit of using regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil (TFTD) in patients with colorectal cancer has been shown in previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs)."7.96Effectiveness and Safety of Regorafenib vs. Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Unresectable Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study. ( Kawakami, K; Nakashima, M; Takeuchi, M, 2020)
" The present study was initiated to address the lack of published prospective data about the qol benefits of trifluridine/tipiracil (ftd/tpi) compared with best supportive care (bsc) in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mcrc)."7.96Quality of life in a real-world study of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with trifluridine/tipiracil. ( Cheung, WY; Dolley, A; Kavan, P, 2020)
"Trifluridine/tipiracil combination has shown a benefit over placebo in the treatment of patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."7.96Efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil in third-line and beyond for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in routine clinical practice: patterns of use and prognostic nomogram. ( Candamio Folgar, S; Carmona Campos, M; Cousillas Castiñeiras, A; Covela Rúa, M; de la Cámara Gómez, J; Fernandez Montes, A; Gallardo Martín, E; García Gómez, J; Gonzalez Villarroel, P; Jorge Fernández, M; Martinez Lago, N; Méndez Méndez, JC; París Bouzas, L; Pellón Augusto, ML; Reboredo López, M; Salgado Fernández, M; Vazquez Rivera, F, 2020)
"Although regorafenib (REG) and trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) have been recognised as standard treatments in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the best option remains unclear."7.91Impact of tumour growth rate during preceding treatment on tumour response to regorafenib or trifluridine/tipiracil in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Kadowaki, S; Kawakami, T; Kawamoto, Y; Komatsu, Y; Masuishi, T; Muranaka, T; Muro, K; Nakatsumi, H; Omae, K; Onozawa, Y; Tajika, M; Taniguchi, H; Yamazaki, K; Yasui, H; Yuki, S, 2019)
"To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of trifluridine and tipiracil hydrochloride (FTD/TPI) compared with best supportive care (BSC) or regorafenib for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who have been previously treated with or are not considered candidates for available therapies including fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based chemotherapies, anti-VEGF agents and anti-EGFR agents in Greece."7.91Economic evaluation of trifluridine and tipiracil hydrochloride in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in Greece. ( Gourzoulidis, G; Kourlaba, G; Maniadakis, N; Pentheroudakis, G; Petrakis, D; Souglakos, J, 2019)
"This study aimed to clarify the tolerability of a trifluridine/tipiracil combination tablet (TAS-102) in patients with advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer over 75 years of age."7.91Evaluation of Tolerability of Trifluridine/Tipiracil Combination Tablet in Patients With Advanced/Recurrent Colorectal Cancer. ( Kimura, M; Teramachi, H; Usami, E; Yoshimura, T, 2019)
"The aim of this report was to evaluate the onset of grade≥3 neutropenia during the first-cycle in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with trifluridine/tipiracil and its relationship with clinical parameters of interest, such as overall survival (OS)."7.91The Onset of Grade ≥3 Neutropenia Is Associated With Longer Overall Survival in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated With Trifluridine/Tipiracil. ( Bonetti, A; Giuliani, J, 2019)
"This study compared the efficacy of regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil (TFTD) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who are refractory to standard chemotherapy, because despite their clinical approval, it still remains unclear which of these two drugs should be used as initial treatment."7.88Propensity Score Analysis of Regorafenib Versus Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Chemotherapy (REGOTAS): A Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum Multicenter Observational Study. ( Baba, E; Denda, T; Enomoto, M; Esaki, T; Fukuoka, S; Gosho, M; Ishikawa, T; Kajiwara, T; Kashiwada, T; Komatsu, Y; Kumekawa, Y; Makiyama, C; Moriwaki, T; Okuyama, H; Sakai, D; Satake, H; Shimada, Y; Sugimoto, N; Sugiyama, M; Suto, T; Takashima, A; Tamura, T; Taniguchi, H; Watanabe, T; Yamashita, K; Yamazaki, K, 2018)
" Clinical data were derived from the pivotal phase III (Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study of TAS-102 plus Best Supportive Care [BSC] versus Placebo plus BSC in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Chemotherapies [RECOURSE]) and supporting phase II (J003-10040030) randomized controlled trial of trifluridine/tipiracil + BSC versus placebo + BSC, as well as the phase III Colorectal Cancer Treated With Regorafenib or Placebo After Failure of Standard Therapy (CORRECT) randomized controlled trial of regorafenib, and were extrapolated to estimate lifetime outcomes."7.88Cost-effectiveness of Trifluridine/tipiracil for Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in England and Wales. ( Bullement, A; Fougeray, R; Hatswell, AJ; Underhill, S, 2018)
"The RECOURSE trial showed clinical efficacy for trifluridine/tipiracil for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer patients."7.88Feasibility and effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil in metastatic colorectal cancer: real-life data from The Netherlands. ( Baars, A; Beerepoot, LV; Boot, H; Creemers, GJ; de Groot, JW; Hamberg, P; Jansen, RL; Kapiteijn, E; Koopman, M; Kwakman, JJM; Los, M; Opdam, FL; Punt, CJA; Schut, H; Sommeijer, DW; van Meerten, E; van Rooijen, JM; Vestjens, JH; Vink, G; Vulink, AJE, 2018)
"Elucidating the factors influencing severe neutropenia could aid in earlier management of neutropenia during oral trifluridine-tipiracil (TAS-102) chemotherapy in advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer (CRC)."7.88Risk factors contributing to the development of neutropenia in patients receiving oral trifluridine-tipiracil (TAS-102) chemotherapy for advanced/recurrent colorectal cancer. ( Ikeda, Y; Iwai, M; Kawachi, S; Kimura, M; Mitsuoka, M; Usami, E; Yasue, F; Yoshimura, T, 2018)
"Salvage chemotherapy for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer using trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) and regorafenib has shown survival benefits."7.88Effective Sequential Combined Chemotherapy with Trifluridine/Tipiracil and Regorafenib in Human Colorectal Cancer Cells. ( Matsuo, K; Matsuoka, K; Nakagawa, F; Okabe, H; Takechi, T; Tanaka, N, 2018)
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102, Lonsurf®), a novel oral anti-tumor agent combining an anti-neoplastic thymidine-based nucleoside analogue (trifluridine, FTD) with a thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor (tipiracil hydrochloride, TPI) presents a new treatment option for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients refractory or intolerant to standard therapies."7.88Safety profile of trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy in clinical practice: results of the German compassionate-use program for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Fuchs, M; Karthaus, M; Kasper, S; Kisro, J; Müller, C; Rafiyan, MR; Schulz-Abelius, A; Stein, A, 2018)
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (TFTD, TAS-102) is an orally administrated anti-cancer drug with efficacy validated for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."7.85Monitoring trifluridine incorporation in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of colorectal cancer patients under trifluridine/tipiracil medication. ( Iimori, M; Kiniwa, M; Kitao, H; Kurashige, J; Maehara, Y; Morodomi, Y; Nakanishi, R; Nakashima, Y; Oki, E; Saeki, H; Sugiyama, M, 2017)
"We assessed the role of aspirin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who failed all previous treatments and were receiving capecitabine as a salvage option before the introduction of regorafenib and TAS-102."7.85The Role of Aspirin as Antitumoral Agent for Heavily Pretreated Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Receiving Capecitabine Monotherapy. ( Andrikou, K; Berardi, R; Bianconi, M; Bittoni, A; Cabras, F; Cascinu, S; Del Prete, M; Faloppi, L; Giampieri, R; Maccaroni, E; Pusceddu, V; Restivo, A; Scartozzi, M; Scintu, F; Zorcolo, L, 2017)
"Regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) both prolong survival for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer."7.85Regorafenib Versus Trifluridine/Tipiracil for Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Comparison. ( Ando, M; Fukutomi, A; Hamauchi, S; Ishihara, M; Kadowaki, S; Kito, Y; Komori, A; Machida, N; Masuishi, T; Mori, K; Muro, K; Narita, Y; Onozawa, Y; Tajika, M; Tanaka, T; Taniguchi, H; Todaka, A; Tsushima, T; Ura, T; Yamazaki, K; Yasui, H; Yokota, T, 2017)
"Regorafenib and TAS-102 are novel antitumor agents for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) whose disease has progressed after standard therapies."7.83Efficacy and Safety of Regorafenib or TAS-102 in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Therapies. ( Doki, Y; Haraguchi, N; Hata, T; Hayashi, T; Kudo, T; Mizushima, T; Mori, M; Nishimura, J; Sakai, D; Satoh, T; Sueda, T; Sugiura, T; Takahashi, H, 2016)
"A novel oral agent that consists of trifluridine and tipiracil hydrochloride (TFTD) has been established as salvage-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."7.83Self-Reported Adherence to Trifluridine and Tipiracil Hydrochloride for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study. ( Aoyama, T; Hama, T; Inoue, A; Kawakami, K; Machida, Y; Suenaga, M; Sugisaki, T; Sugita, K; Suzuki, K; Takiguchi, T; Yamaguchi, K; Yamaguchi, T; Yokokawa, T, 2016)
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (TFTD) is a combination drug that is used for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer and was formerly known as TAS-102."7.83Effect of a novel oral chemotherapeutic agent containing a combination of trifluridine, tipiracil and the novel triple angiokinase inhibitor nintedanib, on human colorectal cancer xenografts. ( Matsuoka, K; Nakagawa, F; Suzuki, N; Takechi, T, 2016)
"To investigate the behaviour of total plasma homocysteine (tHcy) and its most common genetic determinant defect, the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T (C677TMTHFR) polymorphism in patients with early stage colorectal carcinoma."7.73Total plasma homocysteine and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T polymorphism in patients with colorectal carcinoma. ( Battistelli, S; Bing, C; Roviello, F; Stefanoni, M; Vittoria, A, 2006)
"Microsatellite-stable (MSS) colorectal cancer (CRC) tends to be poorly immunogenic, with limited treatment options."7.01A phase 2 trial of trifluridine/tipiracil plus nivolumab in patients with heavily pretreated microsatellite-stable metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Bendell, JC; Falchook, GS; Hamada, K; Makris, L; Patel, MR, 2021)
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) is an orally active formulation of trifluridine, a thymidine-based nucleoside analog, and tipiracil hydrochloride, a thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor that increases the bioavailability of trifluridine."7.01Trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for third-line management of metastatic colorectal cancer: SUNLIGHT study design. ( Amellal, N; Ciardiello, F; Fakih, M; Fougeray, R; Leger, C; Prager, GW; Tabernero, J; Taieb, J; van Cutsem, E, 2021)
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (TT) is an orally administered combination of the thymidine-based nucleoside analogue trifluridine and the thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor tipiracil hydrochloride, which increases the bioavailability of cytotoxic trifluridine."6.94First-line trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer: SOLSTICE study design. ( Amellal, NC; André, T; Falcone, A; Fougeray, R; Gandossi, E; Kanehisa, A; Saunders, M, 2020)
"Trifluridine-tipiracil is an oral antineoplastic agent consisting of trifluridine (a trifluorothymidine, a thymidine-based nucleoside analog) and tipiracil (a thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor), at a molar ratio of 1:0."6.61The safety and efficacy of trifluridine-tipiracil for metastatic colorectal cancer: A pharmacy perspective. ( Chan, BM; Hochster, HS; Lenz, HJ, 2019)
"Trifluridine/tipiracil was associated with an acceptable tolerability profile, with adverse events generally being managed with dose reductions, temporary interruptions in treatment or administration of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor."6.53Trifluridine/Tipiracil: A Review in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. ( Burness, CB; Duggan, ST, 2016)
" fluoropyrimidine and irinotecan plus bevacizumab (control) as second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."5.69Trifluridine/tipiracil+bevacizumab (BEV) vs. fluoropyrimidine-irinotecan+BEV as second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomised noninferiority trial. ( Hara, H; Ishihara, S; Kagawa, Y; Kajiwara, T; Kawakami, H; Kotaka, M; Kuboki, Y; Makiyama, A; Masuishi, T; Morita, S; Nakajima, TE; Nakamura, M; Ojima, H; Oki, E; Ozawa, D; Shirao, K; Sugimoto, N; Sunakawa, Y; Takashima, A; Takenaka, N; Taniguchi, H; Terazawa, T; Watanabe, J; Yoshino, T, 2023)
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) improved both overall and progression-free survival (OS, PFS) of patients with pre-treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in the pivotal phase III RECOURSE trial."5.51Efficacy, safety and quality-of-life data from patients with pre-treated metastatic colorectal cancer receiving trifluridine/tipiracil: results of the TALLISUR trial. ( Ettrich, TJ; Heinemann, V; Hess, J; Karthaus, M; Klein, A; Kretzschmar, A; Pelz, H; Reisländer, T; Riera-Knorrenschild, J; Vehling-Kaiser, U; Weiss, L; Welslau, M, 2022)
"We conducted a phase I study to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, and efficacy of trametinib in combination with TAS-102 in patients with chemotherapy-refractory KRAS-mutant, wild-type PIK3CA/PTEN metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."5.51A Phase I Clinical Trial of Trametinib in Combination with TAS-102 in Patients with Chemotherapy-Resistant RAS-Mutated (PIK3CA/PTEN-Wild Type) Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. ( Chuang, J; Fakih, M; Gong, J; Li, SM; Wang, C, 2022)
"Initial systemic therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is usually based on two- or three-drug chemotherapy regimens with fluoropyrimidine (5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or capecitabine), oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan, combined with either anti-VEGF (bevacizumab) or, for RAS wild-type (WT) tumors, anti-EGFR antibodies (panitumumab or cetuximab)."5.51Study protocol of the FIRE-8 (AIO-KRK/YMO-0519) trial: a prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter phase II trial investigating the efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil plus panitumumab versus trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab as first-line tre ( Dechow, T; Ettrich, TJ; Fruehauf, S; Fuchs, M; Heinemann, V; Hoyer, I; Kaiser, F; Karthaus, M; Kiani, A; König, A; Kurreck, A; Modest, DP; Müller, L; Quante, M; Reinacher-Schick, A; Roderburg, C; Schwaner, I; Sommerhäuser, G; Stahler, A; Stintzing, S; von Weikersthal, LF, 2022)
"Outcomes for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mcrc) are improving with the introduction of new treatments."5.51Real-world use of trifluridine/tipiracil for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Canada. ( Afzal, AR; Brezden-Masley, C; Cheung, WY; Dolley, A; Samawi, HH, 2019)
" The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (41."5.43Safety and Efficacy of Trifluridine/Tipiracil Monotherapy in Clinical Practice for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Experience at a Single Institution. ( Bando, H; Doi, T; Fukuoka, S; Kawazoe, A; Kojima, T; Kotani, D; Kuboki, Y; Ohtsu, A; Okamoto, W; Shitara, K; Yoshino, T, 2016)
"A previous Phase I/II study demonstrated that TAS-102 (trifluridine/tipiracil [FTD/TPI]) plus bevacizumab (Bev) has encouraging efficacy and controllable safety for patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer."5.41Trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab as a first-line treatment for elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (KSCC1602): A multicenter phase II trial. ( Akagi, Y; Ando, K; Baba, H; Kabashima, A; Kashiwada, T; Kawanaka, H; Kotaka, M; Maehara, Y; Makiyama, A; Miwa, K; Miyamoto, Y; Mori, M; Noguchi, T; Oki, E; Saeki, H; Shimokawa, M; Yuge, K, 2021)
"Lay abstract PRECONNECT is an international study demonstrating the efficacy and tolerability of the drug combination trifluridine/tipiracil in adult patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated in everyday clinical practice."5.41Italian results of the PRECONNECT study: safety and efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil in metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Banzi, MC; Barone, CA; Bartolomeo, MD; Bergamo, F; Besse, MG; Blasi, L; Bordonaro, R; Costanzo, FD; Falcone, A; Frassineti, GL; Garufi, C; Giuliani, F; Latiano, TP; Martinelli, E; Personeni, N; Racca, P; Spione, M; Tamburini, E; Tonini, G; Zaniboni, A, 2021)
"Although the efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) plus bevacizumab (BEV) against metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has been demonstrated, little is known about its effectiveness upon disease stratification by RAS mutations."5.41Phase II study of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab by RAS mutation status in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard therapies: JFMC51-1702-C7. ( Asayama, M; Kagawa, Y; Maehara, Y; Makiyama, A; Manaka, D; Matsuhashi, N; Mitsugi, K; Nakamura, M; Oba, K; Ojima, H; Oki, E; Okuda, H; Shimada, Y; Shiozawa, M; Takahashi, T; Watanabe, J; Yamazaki, K; Yoshida, K; Yoshino, T; Yuasa, Y, 2021)
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) is an orally administrated anticancer drug with efficacy validated for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) or gastric cancer."5.41Monitoring FTD in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer administered FTD plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment. ( Ando, K; Fujimoto, Y; Kimura, Y; Kitao, H; Kotaka, M; Maehara, Y; Makiyama, A; Miyamoto, Y; Mori, M; Nakanishi, R; Oki, E; Qiu, S; Shimokawa, M, 2021)
"This study assessed the efficacy and safety of biweekly trifluridine and tipiracil hydrochloride (TAS-102) with bevacizumab combination therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."5.41Prospective Multicenter Phase II Study of Biweekly TAS-102 and Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. ( Enomoto, M; Ishizaki, T; Kasahara, K; Katsumata, K; Kawakita, H; Matsudo, T; Mazaki, J; Nagakawa, Y; Shigoka, M; Tsuchida, A, 2021)
"We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of combination treatment with panitumumab plus trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who were refractory/intolerant to standard therapies other than anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy."5.41Safety and efficacy of panitumumab in combination with trifluridine/tipiracil for pre-treated patients with unresectable, metastatic colorectal cancer with wild-type RAS: The phase 1/2 APOLLON study. ( Denda, T; Gamoh, M; Goto, M; Iwata, M; Kagawa, Y; Kato, T; Komatsu, Y; Kotaka, M; Kuboki, Y; Makiyama, A; Oba, K; Oki, E; Satake, H; Shibuya, K; Soeda, J; Tanioka, H; Yamaguchi, K; Yamazaki, K; Yasui, H; Yoshino, T, 2021)
"The current study aimed to determine the efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil for elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer."5.41Phase II study of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) therapy in elderly patients with colorectal cancer (T-CORE1401): geriatric assessment tools and plasma drug concentrations as possible predictive biomarkers. ( Imai, H; Ishioka, C; Kato, S; Komine, K; Kuroki, M; Ohori, H; Otsuka, K; Ouchi, K; Sakamoto, Y; Shibata, H; Shimodaira, H; Shirota, H; Takahashi, M; Takahashi, S; Takahashi, Y; Tanaka, M; Tsuji, Y; Yamaguchi, H; Yamaguchi, T; Yoshioka, T, 2021)
"The phase II J003 (N = 169) and phase III RECOURSE (N = 800) trials demonstrated a significant improvement in survival with trifluridine (FTD)/tipiracil (TPI) versus placebo in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer."5.34Neutropenia and survival outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with trifluridine/tipiracil in the RECOURSE and J003 trials. ( Argilés, G; Baba, H; Benedetti, F; Cleary, JM; Esaki, T; Falcone, A; Garcia-Carbonero, R; Hamada, C; Hochster, HS; Komatsu, Y; Lenz, HJ; Makris, L; Mayer, RJ; Moriwaki, T; Muro, K; Nishina, T; Ohtsu, A; Peeters, M; Shimada, Y; Shinozaki, E; Sobrero, A; Sugimoto, N; Tanase, T; Tran, B; Tsuji, A; Tsuji, Y; Van Cutsem, E; Yamaguchi, K; Yamashita, F; Yamazaki, K; Yoshino, T; Zaniboni, A, 2020)
"TAS-102 (trifluridine-tipiracil) has shown a significant overall survival benefit compared with placebo in patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer."5.34TAS-102 with or without bevacizumab in patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer: an investigator-initiated, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial. ( Krogh, M; Möller, S; Petersen, LN; Pfeiffer, P; Poulsen, LØ; Qvortrup, C; Thomsen, KG; Winther, SB; Yilmaz, M; Zitnjak, D, 2020)
"In RECOURSE (, trifluridine/tipiracil significantly improved overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo in patients with pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."5.34Safety, efficacy and patient-reported outcomes with trifluridine/tipiracil in pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer: results of the PRECONNECT study. ( Atlan, D; Bachet, JB; Becquart, M; Cicin, I; Cremolini, C; Falcone, A; Mounedji, N; Ozet, A; Phelip, JM; Portales, F; Price, T; Taieb, J; Van Cutsem, E; Vidot, L; Wyrwicz, L, 2020)
"We designed an open-label, noncomparative phase II study to assess the safety and efficacy of first-line treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab (TT-B) and capecitabine plus bevacizumab (C-B) in untreated patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who were not candidates for combination with cytotoxic chemotherapies."5.34Trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab in patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer ineligible for intensive therapy: the randomized TASCO1 study. ( Amellal, N; Argilés, G; Aubel, P; Borg, C; Danielewicz, I; Egorov, A; Falcone, A; Fedyanin, M; Garcia-Alfonso, P; Glynne-Jones, R; Kanehisa, A; Kroening, H; Moiseenko, V; Pfeiffer, P; Punt, CJA; Saunders, MP; Stroyakovskiy, D; Van Cutsem, E; Van de Wouw, AJ; Wasan, H, 2020)
"This study evaluated the cost utility of regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil (T/T) compared with that of best supportive care (BSC) in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer previously treated with, or not considered candidates for, available therapies, including fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-based chemotherapies; anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents; and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor agents, in Japan."5.34Comparative Cost-utility Analysis of Regorafenib and Trifluridine/Tipiracil in The Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Japan. ( Kashiwa, M; Matsushita, R, 2020)
"A previous phase I/II C-TASK FORCE study of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for patients with heavily pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) showed promising activity with an acceptable toxicity profile."5.30Retrospective cohort study of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) plus bevacizumab versus trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Bando, H; Horasawa, S; Kaneko, A; Kawazoe, A; Kojima, T; Kotani, D; Kuboki, Y; Nakamura, Y; Shitara, K; Taniguchi, H; Tsuji, A; Yoshino, T, 2019)
"Purpose Trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) was effective in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in a phase II Japanese trial."5.27Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Trial of Trifluridine/Tipiracil (TAS-102) Monotherapy in Asian Patients With Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The TERRA Study. ( Ahn, JB; Bai, Y; Bi, F; Guo, W; Han, SW; Kim, TW; Li, J; Li, Q; Lin, D; Liu, T; Ma, D; Pan, H; Park, YS; Qin, S; Shen, L; Shi, C; Sriuranpong, V; Wu, C; Xu, J; Xu, R, 2018)
"In the phase III RECOURSE trial, trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) extended overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) with an acceptable toxicity profile in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory or intolerant to standard therapies."5.27The subgroups of the phase III RECOURSE trial of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) versus placebo with best supportive care in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Benavides, M; Ciardiello, F; Denda, T; Grávalos, C; Laurent, S; Lenz, HJ; Loehrer, P; Longo-Munoz, F; Makris, L; Mayer, RJ; Muro, K; Ohtsu, A; Portales, F; Siena, S; Tsuji, Y; Van Cutsem, E; Winkler, R; Yamaguchi, K, 2018)
"Regorafenib and TAS-102 are standard treatment options in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer based on improvement in overall survival by 6 and 8 weeks, respectively, when compared with best supportive care alone (BSC)."5.27Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Regorafenib and TAS-102 in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the United States. ( Barzi, A; Cho, SK; Hay, JW, 2018)
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI; TAS-102, Lonsurf®), a novel form of chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), has shown clinical benefit in the global, phase III RECOURSE trial, regardless of patient age."5.27Safety of trifluridine/tipiracil in an open-label expanded-access program in elderly and younger patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Cohen, SJ; Grothey, A; Hochster, HS; Makris, L; Mayer, RJ; Winkler, R, 2018)
"In patients with heavily treated metastatic colorectal cancer, TAS-102-a combination of trifluridine and tipiracil-has shown a significant overall survival benefit compared with placebo."5.24TAS-102 plus bevacizumab for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard therapies (C-TASK FORCE): an investigator-initiated, open-label, single-arm, multicentre, phase 1/2 study. ( Doi, T; Kajiwara, T; Kuboki, Y; Matsumoto, T; Mochizuki, N; Nishina, T; Nomura, S; Ohtsu, A; Okamoto, W; Sato, A; Shinozaki, E; Shitara, K; Tsushima, T; Yamazaki, K; Yoshino, T, 2017)
"Regorafenib and TAS-102 have recently demonstrated statistically significant survival gains in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."5.24Estimating 12-week death probability in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: the Colon Life nomogram. ( Antonuzzo, L; Aprile, G; Baretti, M; Battaglin, F; Berenato, R; Beretta, G; Bozzarelli, S; Cinieri, S; Cremolini, C; de Braud, F; Falcone, A; Formica, V; Ghidini, M; Lonardi, S; Loupakis, F; Marmorino, F; Mennitto, A; Miceli, R; Morano, F; Mosconi, S; Petrelli, F; Pietrantonio, F; Rimassa, L; Rossini, D; Spada, D; Tamburini, E, 2017)
"Early clinical trials conducted primarily in Japan have shown that TAS-102, an oral agent that combines trifluridine and tipiracil hydrochloride, was effective in the treatment of refractory colorectal cancer."5.20Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Benedetti, F; Boucher, E; Cleary, JM; Falcone, A; Garcia-Carbonero, R; Hochster, H; Ito, M; Komatsu, Y; Lenz, HJ; Makris, L; Mayer, RJ; Mizuguchi, H; Mizunuma, N; Ohtsu, A; Peeters, M; Prenen, H; Shimada, Y; Sobrero, A; Tabernero, J; Tran, B; Van Cutsem, E; Yamazaki, K; Yoshino, T; Zaniboni, A, 2015)
" We investigated the recommended dose (RD) of TAS-102 plus irinotecan for metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and oxaliplatin."5.20Phase I study of TAS-102 and irinotecan combination therapy in Japanese patients with advanced colorectal cancer. ( Boku, N; Doi, T; Fuse, N; Koizumi, W; Ohtsu, A; Shimada, K; Takinishi, Y; Yamazaki, K; Yoshino, T, 2015)
"The analysis was conducted to assess the pharmacological costs of regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil in the treatment of refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."5.12Dose-escalation strategy in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: A change in terms of cost-effectiveness. ( Azzurro, M; Bonetti, A; Fiorica, F; Giuliani, J; Ponturo, G; Ruzzenente, A, 2021)
"Direct randomized comparisons of regorafenib, TAS-102, and fruquintinib for treating metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are lacking."5.05Regorafenib, TAS-102, or fruquintinib for metastatic colorectal cancer: any difference in randomized trials? ( Li, J; Peng, Z; Shen, L; Wang, Q; Wang, X; Zhang, Q, 2020)
"Electronic databases were searched to identify studies comparing the efficacy and safety of regorafenib and TAS-102 in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer using pooled analyses."5.05A meta-analysis comparing regorafenib with TAS-102 for treating refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Liu, H; Su, GL; Wang, JC; Wang, YY, 2020)
"Regorafenib at different dosing strategies and TAS-102 are treatment options for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."5.01A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Regorafenib and TAS-102 in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. ( Ahn, DH; Bekaii-Saab, T; Benkhadra, R; Firwana, B; Hubbard, JM; Mody, K; Murad, MH; Sonbol, MB; Walden, DJ; Wang, Z, 2019)
"Regorafenib and TAS-102 have shown to be superior to placebo in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer."4.98A Comparison of Regorafenib and TAS-102 for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. ( Abrahao, ABK; Berry, S; Chan, KKW; Ko, YJ, 2018)
"Regorafenib is a standard salvage line therapy used for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC)."4.31Regorafenib is suitable for advanced colorectal cancer patients who have previously received trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab. ( Ikoma, T; Matsumoto, T; Miura, K; Nagai, H; Takatani, M; Tsuduki, T; Watanabe, T; Yamamura, S; Yasui, H, 2023)
"For patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment with Trifluridine/Tipiracil, also known as TAS-102, improves overall survival."4.12Initial experience of TAS-102 chemotherapy in Australian patients with Chemo-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Ananda, S; Banks, S; Dunn, C; Gard, G; Gately, L; Gibbs, P; Jalali, A; Jennens, R; Khattak, A; Kosmider, S; Lee, B; Lee, M; Lim, L; Loft, M; McKendrick, J; Shapiro, JD; Tie, J; Wong, HL; Wong, R; Yeung, JM, 2022)
"The aim of this analysis is to assess the pharmacological costs of trifluridine/tipiracil as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients who were not candidates for combination with cytotoxic chemotherapies."4.12Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Combination with Bevacizumab in First-Line for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Way Forward. A Point of View Based on Cost-Effectiveness. ( Giuliani, J, 2022)
"The RECOURSE trial supported trifluridine/tipiracil as a treatment option in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."4.12The effect of prognostic factors at baseline on the efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A Portuguese exploratory analysis. ( Basto, R; Bonito, N; Gomes, I; Jacinto, P; Magalhães, J; Paulo, J; Pereira, TC; Sousa, G; Sousa, MJ, 2022)
"Regorafenib (R) and trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) are of proven efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patient's refractory to standard therapies."4.12Sequential Treatment With Trifluridine/Tipiracil and Regorafenib in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: An AGEO Prospective "Real-World Study". ( Artru, P; Bouché, O; Coriat, R; Coutzac, C; De La Fouchardière, C; Doat, S; Gallois, C; Henriques, J; Masson, T; Moulin, V; Saint, A; Taieb, J; Tougeron, D; Trouilloud, I; Vernerey, D, 2022)
"The RECOURSE trial demonstrated a modest benefit in overall survival (OS) for trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) versus placebo in pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients."4.12Quality of Life and Survival of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated With Trifluridine-Tipiracil (QUALITAS). ( Dijksterhuis, WPM; Elferink, MAG; Hamers, PAH; Koopman, M; May, AM; Punt, CJA; Stellato, RK; Vink, GR, 2022)
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (TFTD), with or without bevacizumab (Bev), and regorafenib are salvage chemotherapy options for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."4.12Influence of precedent drug on the subsequent therapy in the sequence of trifluridine/tipiracil with/out bevacizumab and regorafenib for unresectable or recurrent colorectal cancer. ( Boku, N; Hirano, H; Iwasa, S; Okita, N; Oshima, K; Shoji, H; Takashima, A, 2022)
" We treated a co-culture comprised of human colorectal cancer (CRC) cells and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) with the nucleoside analogue trifluridine (FTD) and used scRNA-seq to analyze posttreatment gene expression profiles in thousands of individual cancer and immune cells concurrently."4.12Single-cell transcriptional pharmacodynamics of trifluridine in a tumor-immune model. ( Andersson, CR; Fasterius, E; Fryknäs, M; Jarvius, M; Larsson, R; Selvin, T, 2022)
"To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) compared with best supportive care (BSC) for the treatment of patients with metastatic gastric cancer(mGC), including gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma(GEJ), who have received at least two prior therapies for metastatic disease and are eligible for third-line treatment, in Greece."4.12Cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil as a third-line treatment of metastatic gastric cancer, including adenocarcinoma of the gastrohesophageal junction, among patients previously treated in Greece. ( Androulakis, N; Beletsi, A; Boukovinas, I; Chotzagiannoglou, V; Gourzoulidis, G; Karamouzis, M; Koulentaki, M; Koumarianou, A; Kourlaba, G; Papakotoulas, P; Samadas, E; Souglakos, J; Xynogalos, S, 2022)
"Recently, trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) treatment was established as a later-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."4.02The Efficacy and Safety of Trifluridine/Tipiracil Treatment for Elderly Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in a Real-world Setting. ( En, W; Fukuoka, T; Hirakawa, K; Iseki, Y; Kashiwagi, S; Ohira, M; Okazaki, Y; Shibutani, M, 2021)
"The novel oral nucleoside antineoplastic agent trifluridine/tipiracil was approved for metastatic colorectal cancer in Japan in March 2014."4.02Post-marketing surveillance study of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Funato, Y; Koyama, T; Muro, K; Ozawa, D; Tajiri, M; Uetake, H; Yamaguchi, Y; Yoshino, T, 2021)
"This study aimed to describe the chemotherapy effects after trifluridine/tipiracil (TFTD) and/or regorafenib treatment in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients."4.02Salvage Therapy After Regorafenib or Trifluridine/Tipiracil Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Conditional Landmark Analysis. ( Kawakami, K; Nakashima, M; Takeuchi, M; Tanaka, S, 2021)
"Although the effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil(TFTD)with bevacizumab for unresectable colorectal cancer that was refractory to previous standard chemotherapy was reported, its effectiveness as a first-line treatment, especially for elderly frail patients, is unclear."4.02[A Case of an Elderly Frail Patient with Unresectable Colorectal Cancer Controlled by Trifluridine/Tipiracil with Bevacizumab Therapy as a First-Line Treatment]. ( Arigami, T; Kita, Y; Kurahara, H; Maemura, K; Matsumoto, R; Mori, S; Natsugoe, S; Sasaki, K; Toda, H, 2021)
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) is an important chemotherapeutic agent recommended by the Japanese guidelines as third- or fourth-line treatment for colorectal cancer."4.02[Two Cases of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with TAS-102 plus Bevacizumab]. ( Amagasa, H; Ami, K; Ando, M; Fukuda, A; Gan, S; Ganno, H; Iida, S; Imai, K; Kajiyama, D; Kawaguchi, M; Maeda, F; Motoyama, K; Okano, Y; Tokitou, F; Yamada, A, 2021)
"In later-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), trifluridine/tipiracil is often selected because regorafenib is difficult to use in patients with comorbidities such as thrombosis, hemorrhage, or cardiac events."4.02Clinical Outcomes Following Trifluridine/Tipiracil Treatment for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Ineligible for Regorafenib Treatment. ( Denda, T; Esaki, T; Fukuoka, S; Hatachi, Y; Kajiwara, T; Kumekawa, Y; Makiyama, A; Masuishi, T; Moriwaki, T; Niisato, Y; Shimada, Y; Sugimoto, N; Suto, T; Takashima, A; Yamazaki, K, 2021)
"Regorafenib (REG) and trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) have have been shown to improve overall survival in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer."4.02Regorafenib-to-trifluridine/tipiracil Versus the Reverse Sequence for Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Real-life Experience. ( Ceribelli, A; Chilelli, MG; DE Marco, S; Gemma, D; Grande, R; Morandi, MG; Ruggeri, EM; Saltarelli, R; Signorelli, C; Sperduti, I; Spinelli, GP; Zoratto, F, 2021)
"In the UK, Trifluridine-tipiracil (Lonsurf) is used to treat metastatic colorectal cancer in the third-line setting, after prior exposure to fluoropyrimidine-based regimes."4.02Long Term Real-World Outcomes of Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer-A Single UK Centre Experience. ( Essapen, S; Mendis, J; Tong, D; Wang, L, 2021)
"Trifluridine/tipiracil increases overall survival (OS) in patients with refractory, metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."4.02Prediction of survival in patients with advanced, refractory colorectal cancer in treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil: real-world vs clinical trial data. ( Carmona-Bayonas, A; Carriles Fernández, C; Cousillas Castiñeiras, A; Covela Rúa, M; De la Cámara Gómez, J; Fernández Montes, A; Garcia García, T; Gonzalez Villarroel, P; Jimenez-Fonseca, P; Martinez Lago, N; Méndez, JCM; Sanchez Cánovas, M; Vázquez Rivera, F, 2021)
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) and regorafenib prolong survival for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC); limited comparative effectiveness data exist."4.02Trifluridine/Tipiracil and Regorafenib in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study at a Tertiary Oncology Center. ( Abhyankar, R; Barghout, VE; Brais, LK; Duh, MS; Fuchs, CS; Huynh, L; Ng, K; Patel, AK; Yenikomshian, MA, 2021)
"Trifluridine and tipiracil (FTD + TPI) and regorafenib (REG) are approved treatments for the treatment of refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."3.96Real-World Adherence in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with Trifluridine plus Tipiracil or Regorafenib. ( Barghout, V; Duh, MS; Germain, G; Jacques, P; Laliberté, F; Patel, AK; Yenikomshian, MA, 2020)
"Although regorafenib or trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) has been recognized as a later-line standard treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), not all patients have beneficial outcomes."3.96Prognostic scores for evaluating the survival benefit of regorafenib or trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: an exploratory analysis of the REGOTAS study. ( Denda, T; Enomoto, M; Esaki, T; Fukuoka, S; Hatachi, Y; Ishikawa, T; Kajiwara, T; Kashiwada, T; Komatsu, Y; Kumekawa, Y; Makiyama, A; Masuishi, T; Moriwaki, T; Oki, E; Sakai, D; Shimada, Y; Sugimoto, N; Suto, T; Takashima, A; Tamura, T; Tsuchihashi, K; Tsuji, A; Ueno, H; Yamashita, K; Yamazaki, K, 2020)
"The standard first- and second- line chemotherapy backbone regimens for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/capecitabine-based with addition of irinotecan or oxaliplatin."3.96Review of metastatic colorectal cancer treatment pathways and early clinical experience of trifluridine/tipiracil in the UK named patient programme. ( Carter, AM; Iveson, T; Mullamitha, S; Shiu, KK; Spooner, C; Stevens, D, 2020)
"Trifluridine/tipiracil is available on the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) previously treated with, or not considered candidates for, fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based chemotherapies, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor agents."3.96Trifluridine/tipiracil: A practical guide to its use in the management of refractory metastatic colorectal cancer in Australia. ( Burge, M; Chantrill, L; Gibbs, P; Pavlakis, N; Price, T; Shapiro, J; Sjoquist, K, 2020)
"Regorafenib (REG) and trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) showed survival benefits in metastatic colorectal cancer patients previously treated with standard chemotherapies; therefore, we compared the efficacy and safety of these two treatments."3.96Regorafenib vs trifluridine/tipiracil for metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapies: A multicenter retrospective comparison study in Japan. ( Hatachi, Y; Kato, T; Kotaka, M; Ogata, M; Ogata, T; Satake, H; Tsuji, A; Yasui, H, 2020)
"The efficacy of trifluridine/thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor (FTD/TPI) plus bevacizumab as later-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has been demonstrated."3.96Combining Bevacizumab With Trifluridine/Thymidine Phosphorylase Inhibitor Improves the Survival Outcomes Regardless of the Usage History of Bevacizumab in Front-line Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. ( Fukuoka, T; Hirakawa, K; Iseki, Y; Kashiwagi, S; Maeda, K; Nagahara, H; Ohira, M; Okazaki, Y; Shibutani, M; Wang, EN, 2020)
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) improves the overall survival (OS) of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients."3.96Neutropenia is an indicator of outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab: a retrospective study. ( Hata, T; Kagawa, Y; Kato, T; Katsura, Y; Kawai, K; Masuzawa, T; Mori, R; Murakami, K; Murata, K; Naito, A; Nose, Y; Ohmura, Y; Sakamoto, T; Takeda, Y; Takeno, A, 2020)
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI; marketed as Lonsurf®) has shown clinically relevant activity after fluoropyrimidine failure in colorectal cancer and may thus be of increased efficacy compared with current standard capecitabine chemoradiation."3.96Radiosensitisation and enhanced tumour growth delay of colorectal cancer cells by sustained treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil and X-rays. ( Brinker, A; Burdak-Rothkamm, S; Christiansen, S; Frenzel, T; Horn, M; Petersen, C; Rieckmann, T; Rothkamm, K; Schumacher, U; Stein, A, 2020)
"Compared with the best supportive care, a survival benefit of using regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil (TFTD) in patients with colorectal cancer has been shown in previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs)."3.96Effectiveness and Safety of Regorafenib vs. Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Unresectable Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study. ( Kawakami, K; Nakashima, M; Takeuchi, M, 2020)
" The present study was initiated to address the lack of published prospective data about the qol benefits of trifluridine/tipiracil (ftd/tpi) compared with best supportive care (bsc) in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mcrc)."3.96Quality of life in a real-world study of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with trifluridine/tipiracil. ( Cheung, WY; Dolley, A; Kavan, P, 2020)
"Trifluridine/tipiracil combination has shown a benefit over placebo in the treatment of patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."3.96Efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil in third-line and beyond for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in routine clinical practice: patterns of use and prognostic nomogram. ( Candamio Folgar, S; Carmona Campos, M; Cousillas Castiñeiras, A; Covela Rúa, M; de la Cámara Gómez, J; Fernandez Montes, A; Gallardo Martín, E; García Gómez, J; Gonzalez Villarroel, P; Jorge Fernández, M; Martinez Lago, N; Méndez Méndez, JC; París Bouzas, L; Pellón Augusto, ML; Reboredo López, M; Salgado Fernández, M; Vazquez Rivera, F, 2020)
"Although regorafenib (REG) and trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) have been recognised as standard treatments in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the best option remains unclear."3.91Impact of tumour growth rate during preceding treatment on tumour response to regorafenib or trifluridine/tipiracil in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Kadowaki, S; Kawakami, T; Kawamoto, Y; Komatsu, Y; Masuishi, T; Muranaka, T; Muro, K; Nakatsumi, H; Omae, K; Onozawa, Y; Tajika, M; Taniguchi, H; Yamazaki, K; Yasui, H; Yuki, S, 2019)
"To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of trifluridine and tipiracil hydrochloride (FTD/TPI) compared with best supportive care (BSC) or regorafenib for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who have been previously treated with or are not considered candidates for available therapies including fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based chemotherapies, anti-VEGF agents and anti-EGFR agents in Greece."3.91Economic evaluation of trifluridine and tipiracil hydrochloride in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in Greece. ( Gourzoulidis, G; Kourlaba, G; Maniadakis, N; Pentheroudakis, G; Petrakis, D; Souglakos, J, 2019)
"Regorafenib and TAS-102 are standard salvage-line treatment options for patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."3.91Low Skeletal Muscle Mass before Salvage-Line Chemotherapy Is a Poor Prognostic Factor in Patients with Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. ( Akiyama, T; Baba, H; Baba, Y; Eto, K; Hiyoshi, Y; Iwagami, S; Kiyozumi, Y; Miyamoto, Y; Yohei, N; Yoshida, N, 2019)
"This study aimed to clarify the tolerability of a trifluridine/tipiracil combination tablet (TAS-102) in patients with advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer over 75 years of age."3.91Evaluation of Tolerability of Trifluridine/Tipiracil Combination Tablet in Patients With Advanced/Recurrent Colorectal Cancer. ( Kimura, M; Teramachi, H; Usami, E; Yoshimura, T, 2019)
"The aim of this report was to evaluate the onset of grade≥3 neutropenia during the first-cycle in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with trifluridine/tipiracil and its relationship with clinical parameters of interest, such as overall survival (OS)."3.91The Onset of Grade ≥3 Neutropenia Is Associated With Longer Overall Survival in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated With Trifluridine/Tipiracil. ( Bonetti, A; Giuliani, J, 2019)
"This study compared the efficacy of regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil (TFTD) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who are refractory to standard chemotherapy, because despite their clinical approval, it still remains unclear which of these two drugs should be used as initial treatment."3.88Propensity Score Analysis of Regorafenib Versus Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Chemotherapy (REGOTAS): A Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum Multicenter Observational Study. ( Baba, E; Denda, T; Enomoto, M; Esaki, T; Fukuoka, S; Gosho, M; Ishikawa, T; Kajiwara, T; Kashiwada, T; Komatsu, Y; Kumekawa, Y; Makiyama, C; Moriwaki, T; Okuyama, H; Sakai, D; Satake, H; Shimada, Y; Sugimoto, N; Sugiyama, M; Suto, T; Takashima, A; Tamura, T; Taniguchi, H; Watanabe, T; Yamashita, K; Yamazaki, K, 2018)
" Clinical data were derived from the pivotal phase III (Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study of TAS-102 plus Best Supportive Care [BSC] versus Placebo plus BSC in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Chemotherapies [RECOURSE]) and supporting phase II (J003-10040030) randomized controlled trial of trifluridine/tipiracil + BSC versus placebo + BSC, as well as the phase III Colorectal Cancer Treated With Regorafenib or Placebo After Failure of Standard Therapy (CORRECT) randomized controlled trial of regorafenib, and were extrapolated to estimate lifetime outcomes."3.88Cost-effectiveness of Trifluridine/tipiracil for Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in England and Wales. ( Bullement, A; Fougeray, R; Hatswell, AJ; Underhill, S, 2018)
"Trifluridine/tipiracil, an oral treatment combining trifluridine (an antineoplastic thymidine-based nucleoside analog) and tipiracil hydrochloride (a thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor), led to significant improvement in overall survival in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients refractory to standard therapy in the phase III RECOURSE trial."3.88Integrated safety summary for trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102). ( Bebeau, P; Bendell, JC; Buscaglia, M; Falcone, A; Kopetz, S; Mayer, RJ; Ohtsu, A; Van Cutsem, E; Yoshino, T, 2018)
"The RECOURSE trial showed clinical efficacy for trifluridine/tipiracil for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer patients."3.88Feasibility and effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil in metastatic colorectal cancer: real-life data from The Netherlands. ( Baars, A; Beerepoot, LV; Boot, H; Creemers, GJ; de Groot, JW; Hamberg, P; Jansen, RL; Kapiteijn, E; Koopman, M; Kwakman, JJM; Los, M; Opdam, FL; Punt, CJA; Schut, H; Sommeijer, DW; van Meerten, E; van Rooijen, JM; Vestjens, JH; Vink, G; Vulink, AJE, 2018)
"Elucidating the factors influencing severe neutropenia could aid in earlier management of neutropenia during oral trifluridine-tipiracil (TAS-102) chemotherapy in advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer (CRC)."3.88Risk factors contributing to the development of neutropenia in patients receiving oral trifluridine-tipiracil (TAS-102) chemotherapy for advanced/recurrent colorectal cancer. ( Ikeda, Y; Iwai, M; Kawachi, S; Kimura, M; Mitsuoka, M; Usami, E; Yasue, F; Yoshimura, T, 2018)
"A total of 550 patients with mCRC who were registered in the REGOTAS study (Regorafenib versus TAS-102 as Salvage-line in patients with colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapies: a multicenter observational study, UMIN 000020416) and treated with trifluridine/tipiracil (TFTD) or regorafenib as a later-line therapy were retrospectively stratified according to the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS), which divided patients into mGPS 0 to 2 by serum albumin and C-reactive protein, and compared."3.88Role of Predictive Value of the Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score for Later-line Chemotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. ( Baba, E; Denda, T; Esaki, T; Fukuoka, S; Ishikawa, T; Ito, M; Kajiwara, T; Kashiwada, T; Katsumata, K; Kishimoto, J; Komatsu, Y; Kumekawa, Y; Makiyama, A; Moriwaki, T; Oki, E; Okuyama, H; Sakai, D; Satake, H; Shimada, Y; Sugimoto, N; Suto, T; Takashima, A; Tamura, T; Taniguchi, H; Tsuchihashi, K; Ueno, H; Yamashita, K; Yamazaki, K, 2018)
"Salvage chemotherapy for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer using trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) and regorafenib has shown survival benefits."3.88Effective Sequential Combined Chemotherapy with Trifluridine/Tipiracil and Regorafenib in Human Colorectal Cancer Cells. ( Matsuo, K; Matsuoka, K; Nakagawa, F; Okabe, H; Takechi, T; Tanaka, N, 2018)
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102, Lonsurf®), a novel oral anti-tumor agent combining an anti-neoplastic thymidine-based nucleoside analogue (trifluridine, FTD) with a thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor (tipiracil hydrochloride, TPI) presents a new treatment option for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients refractory or intolerant to standard therapies."3.88Safety profile of trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy in clinical practice: results of the German compassionate-use program for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Fuchs, M; Karthaus, M; Kasper, S; Kisro, J; Müller, C; Rafiyan, MR; Schulz-Abelius, A; Stein, A, 2018)
"Trifluridine (FTD) is an active cytotoxic component of the metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) drug TAS-102, and thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor (TPI) inhibits the rapid degradation of FTD."3.85Potential role of polymorphisms in the transporter genes ENT1 and MATE1/OCT2 in predicting TAS-102 efficacy and toxicity in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Barzi, A; Berger, MD; Borelli, B; Cao, S; Dadduzio, V; Gopez, R; Lenz, HJ; Loupakis, F; Miyamoto, Y; Ning, Y; Okazaki, S; Pietrantonio, F; Salvatore, L; Schirripa, M; Suenaga, M; Yamaguchi, T; Yang, D; Zhang, W, 2017)
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (TFTD, TAS-102) is an orally administrated anti-cancer drug with efficacy validated for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."3.85Monitoring trifluridine incorporation in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of colorectal cancer patients under trifluridine/tipiracil medication. ( Iimori, M; Kiniwa, M; Kitao, H; Kurashige, J; Maehara, Y; Morodomi, Y; Nakanishi, R; Nakashima, Y; Oki, E; Saeki, H; Sugiyama, M, 2017)
"The effect of oral trifluridine-tipiracil (TAS-102)-induced neutropenia on survival of patients with advanced/recurrent colorectal cancer was investigated."3.85Severe neutropenia: a prognosticator in patients with advanced/recurrent colorectal cancer ( Iwai, M; Kimura, M; Teramachi, H; Usami, E; Yoshimura, T, 2017)
"We assessed the role of aspirin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who failed all previous treatments and were receiving capecitabine as a salvage option before the introduction of regorafenib and TAS-102."3.85The Role of Aspirin as Antitumoral Agent for Heavily Pretreated Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Receiving Capecitabine Monotherapy. ( Andrikou, K; Berardi, R; Bianconi, M; Bittoni, A; Cabras, F; Cascinu, S; Del Prete, M; Faloppi, L; Giampieri, R; Maccaroni, E; Pusceddu, V; Restivo, A; Scartozzi, M; Scintu, F; Zorcolo, L, 2017)
"Regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) both prolong survival for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer."3.85Regorafenib Versus Trifluridine/Tipiracil for Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Comparison. ( Ando, M; Fukutomi, A; Hamauchi, S; Ishihara, M; Kadowaki, S; Kito, Y; Komori, A; Machida, N; Masuishi, T; Mori, K; Muro, K; Narita, Y; Onozawa, Y; Tajika, M; Tanaka, T; Taniguchi, H; Todaka, A; Tsushima, T; Ura, T; Yamazaki, K; Yasui, H; Yokota, T, 2017)
"Cardiotoxicity in the form of cardiac arrhythmia, myocardial infarction, and angina-like symptoms are not rare complications of fluoropyrimidines as 5-Fluorouracil (5FU) and capecitabine."3.83TAS-102, the first "cardio-gentle" fluoropyrimidine in the colorectal cancer landscape? ( Barni, S; Bertocchi, P; Petrelli, F; Zaniboni, A, 2016)
"TAS-102 (trifluridine and tipiracil hydrochloride; a novel combination oral nucleoside anti-tumor agent) has recently received regulatory approval for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."3.83Chemotherapy induced neutropenia at 1-month mark is a predictor of overall survival in patients receiving TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a cohort study. ( Cecchini, M; Grothey, A; Hochster, HS; Kasi, PM; Kotani, D; Ohtsu, A; Ramanathan, RK; Shitara, K; Yoshino, T, 2016)
"Regorafenib and TAS-102 are novel antitumor agents for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) whose disease has progressed after standard therapies."3.83Efficacy and Safety of Regorafenib or TAS-102 in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Therapies. ( Doki, Y; Haraguchi, N; Hata, T; Hayashi, T; Kudo, T; Mizushima, T; Mori, M; Nishimura, J; Sakai, D; Satoh, T; Sueda, T; Sugiura, T; Takahashi, H, 2016)
"A novel oral agent that consists of trifluridine and tipiracil hydrochloride (TFTD) has been established as salvage-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."3.83Self-Reported Adherence to Trifluridine and Tipiracil Hydrochloride for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study. ( Aoyama, T; Hama, T; Inoue, A; Kawakami, K; Machida, Y; Suenaga, M; Sugisaki, T; Sugita, K; Suzuki, K; Takiguchi, T; Yamaguchi, K; Yamaguchi, T; Yokokawa, T, 2016)
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (TFTD) is a combination drug that is used for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer and was formerly known as TAS-102."3.83Effect of a novel oral chemotherapeutic agent containing a combination of trifluridine, tipiracil and the novel triple angiokinase inhibitor nintedanib, on human colorectal cancer xenografts. ( Matsuoka, K; Nakagawa, F; Suzuki, N; Takechi, T, 2016)
"TAS-102, which is effective for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer, is a combination drug of anticancer trifluridine (FTD; which is derived from pyrimidine nucleoside) and FTD-metabolizing enzyme inhibitor tipiracil hydrochloride (TPI) at a molecular ratio of 1:0."3.81Involvement of Concentrative Nucleoside Transporter 1 in Intestinal Absorption of Trifluridine Using Human Small Intestinal Epithelial Cells. ( Chiba, M; Nakanishi, T; Takahashi, K; Tamai, I; Yoshisue, K, 2015)
"To investigate the behaviour of total plasma homocysteine (tHcy) and its most common genetic determinant defect, the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T (C677TMTHFR) polymorphism in patients with early stage colorectal carcinoma."3.73Total plasma homocysteine and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T polymorphism in patients with colorectal carcinoma. ( Battistelli, S; Bing, C; Roviello, F; Stefanoni, M; Vittoria, A, 2006)
"The authors investigated the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T polymorphism in 101 metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with 5-fluoropyrimidine-based therapy and in 196 healthy individuals by PCR-RFLP method."3.72[The clinical importance of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T polymorphism in the 5-fluoropyrimidine-based therapy of metastatic colorectal tumours]. ( Adleff, V; Budai, B; Czeglédi, F; Gyergyay, F; Hitre, E; Kralovánszky, J; Láng, I, 2004)
" Among FTD/TPI-treated patients, frequencies of any-cause grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) were similar across age subgroups (80% each), although grade ≥ 3 neutropenia was more frequent in older patients [40% (≥ 65 and ≥ 75 years); 29% (< 65 years)]; AE-related discontinuation rates did not increase with age [14% (< 65 years), 12% (≥ 65 years), and 12% (≥ 75 years)]."3.11Efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil in older and younger patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 3 study (TAGS). ( Alsina, M; Benhadji, KA; Cicin, I; Doi, T; Hosaka, H; Ilson, DH; Longo, F; Makris, L; Özgüroğlu, M; Ozyilkan, O; Park, D; Pericay, C; Santoro, A; Shitara, K; Thuss-Patience, P; Zaanan, A, 2022)
"Microsatellite-stable (MSS) colorectal cancer (CRC) tends to be poorly immunogenic, with limited treatment options."3.01A phase 2 trial of trifluridine/tipiracil plus nivolumab in patients with heavily pretreated microsatellite-stable metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Bendell, JC; Falchook, GS; Hamada, K; Makris, L; Patel, MR, 2021)
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) is an orally active formulation of trifluridine, a thymidine-based nucleoside analog, and tipiracil hydrochloride, a thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor that increases the bioavailability of trifluridine."3.01Trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for third-line management of metastatic colorectal cancer: SUNLIGHT study design. ( Amellal, N; Ciardiello, F; Fakih, M; Fougeray, R; Leger, C; Prager, GW; Tabernero, J; Taieb, J; van Cutsem, E, 2021)
" Among FTD/TPI-treated patients, grade 3 or higher adverse events of any cause occurred in 122 of 145 patients (84."2.94Efficacy and Safety of Trifluridine/Tipiracil Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Gastric Cancer Who Had Undergone Gastrectomy: Subgroup Analyses of a Randomized Clinical Trial. ( Alsina, M; Arkenau, HT; Beretta, GD; Catenacci, D; Doi, T; Fujitani, K; George, B; Ghidini, M; Ilson, DH; Makris, L; Mansoor, W; McGuigan, S; Prokharau, A; Shitara, K; Tabernero, J; Thuss-Patience, P; Van Cutsem, E; Zhavrid, E, 2020)
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (TT) is an orally administered combination of the thymidine-based nucleoside analogue trifluridine and the thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor tipiracil hydrochloride, which increases the bioavailability of cytotoxic trifluridine."2.94First-line trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer: SOLSTICE study design. ( Amellal, NC; André, T; Falcone, A; Fougeray, R; Gandossi, E; Kanehisa, A; Saunders, M, 2020)
" Fruquintinib exhibited better PFS, good tolerability and reduced gastrointestinal adverse effects in wild-type KRAS subgroup, making it a promising agent to treat patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC beyond the second line."2.66Comparison of efficacy and safety for patients with beyond second line treated metastatic colorectal cancer: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. ( Cao, M; Zhang, J; Zhou, M, 2020)
"Trifluridine-tipiracil is an oral antineoplastic agent consisting of trifluridine (a trifluorothymidine, a thymidine-based nucleoside analog) and tipiracil (a thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor), at a molar ratio of 1:0."2.61The safety and efficacy of trifluridine-tipiracil for metastatic colorectal cancer: A pharmacy perspective. ( Chan, BM; Hochster, HS; Lenz, HJ, 2019)
"Molecular mechanisms of colorectal cancer are at the forefront of research."2.53Current and advancing treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Argiles, G; Elez, ME; Grasselli, J; Sanz-Garcia, E; Tabernero, J, 2016)
" The rapid degradation of TFT brought initial clinical development to a halt, but TFT reentered clinical trials when addition of a TPI was found to improve the bioavailability of TFT."2.53TAS-102 for Treatment of Advanced Colorectal Cancers That Are No Longer Responding to Other Therapies. ( Opdam, FL; van der Velden, DL; Voest, EE, 2016)
"Trifluridine/tipiracil was associated with an acceptable tolerability profile, with adverse events generally being managed with dose reductions, temporary interruptions in treatment or administration of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor."2.53Trifluridine/Tipiracil: A Review in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. ( Burness, CB; Duggan, ST, 2016)
"Combination cancer chemotherapy is one of the most useful treatment methods to achieve a synergistic effect and reduce the toxicity of dosing with a single drug."1.91Synergistic binding of actinomycin D and echinomycin to DNA mismatch sites and their combined anti-tumour effects. ( Chang, CC; Hou, MH; Li, LY; Lin, SH; Neidle, S; Satange, R, 2023)
"In the setting of metastatic colorectal cancer, many gains in patient outcomes have been achieved throughout the last 2 decades."1.62Transitioning from second-line to third-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Bekaii-Saab, TS; Loupakis, F; Marshall, JL, 2021)
"Trifluridine/tipiracil was more cost-effective than nivolumab for patients with heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer."1.62Cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil against nivolumab for heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer in Japan. ( Doi, T; Igarashi, A; Shitara, K; Takushima, Y; Yoshihara, H, 2021)
"Metastatic gastric cancer and cancer of the esophagogastric junction (GC/EGJ) is an aggressive disease with poor prognosis."1.62Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo for third or later lines of treatment in metastatic gastric cancer: an exploratory subgroup analysis from the TAGS study. ( Alsina, M; Arkenau, HT; Azcue, P; Catenacci, DVT; Doi, T; Fornaro, L; Fougeray, R; Ilson, DH; Lorenzen, S; Moreno, SR; Shitara, K; Tabernero, J; Van Cutsem, E; Zaanan, A, 2021)
"Treatment with Bmab in combination with TAS-102 is significantly associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with mCRC refractory to standard therapies."1.56Bevacizumab in Combination with TAS-102 Improves Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study. ( Fujii, H; Hirose, C; Iihara, H; Ishihara, T; Kitahora, M; Matsuhashi, N; Suzuki, A; Takahashi, T; Watanabe, D; Yamada, Y; Yoshida, K, 2020)
"At the time of disease progression, FOLFIRI cetuximab regimen was reintroduced resulting in stabilization of disease and he continued with capecitabine cetuximab therapy until disease progression in October 2016."1.56Evaluation of RAS mutational status through BEAMing assay to monitor disease progression of metastatic colorectal cancer: a case report. ( Antonuzzo, L; Castiglione, F; Di Costanzo, F; Lastraioli, E; Lavacchi, D; Messerini, L; Palmieri, VE, 2020)
"Management of metastatic colorectal cancer reflects a continuum of care."1.56How to incorporate a chemo-free interval into the management of metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Ciardiello, F; Grothey, A; Marshall, JL, 2020)
"In the clinic, however, disease progression can be identified through a composite of factors, including new lesions, carcinoembryonic antigen level, and symptoms such as pain and fatigue."1.56Optimizing the treatment sequence from second-line to third-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Bekaii-Saab, TS; Grothey, A; Prager, GW; Yoshino, T, 2020)
"Outcomes for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mcrc) are improving with the introduction of new treatments."1.51Real-world use of trifluridine/tipiracil for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Canada. ( Afzal, AR; Brezden-Masley, C; Cheung, WY; Dolley, A; Samawi, HH, 2019)
"Neutropenia is the most common adverse event and an important factor impacting chemotherapy continuation."1.48Biweekly Administration of TAS-102 for Neutropenia Prevention in Patients with Colorectal Cancer. ( Aisu, N; Daibo, K; Hasegawa, S; Kajitani, R; Kiyomi, F; Komono, A; Matsumoto, Y; Munechika, T; Sakamoto, R; Yoshida, Y, 2018)
" The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (41."1.43Safety and Efficacy of Trifluridine/Tipiracil Monotherapy in Clinical Practice for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Experience at a Single Institution. ( Bando, H; Doi, T; Fukuoka, S; Kawazoe, A; Kojima, T; Kotani, D; Kuboki, Y; Ohtsu, A; Okamoto, W; Shitara, K; Yoshino, T, 2016)
" The most frequent Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (44%), leukopenia (26%) and anemia (23%)."1.43Efficacy and Safety of TAS-102 in Clinical Practice of Salvage Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. ( Akashi, K; Arita, S; Ariyama, H; Baba, E; Esaki, T; Hirano, G; Kusaba, H; Makiyama, A; Matsushita, Y; Mitsugi, K; Shibata, Y; Shimokawa, HK; Shirakawa, T; Tamura, S, 2016)
" This postmarketing surveillance study investigated expected and unexpected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of TAS-102 in clinical practice in the first 6 months after market launch."1.43TAS-102 Safety in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results From the First Postmarketing Surveillance Study. ( Fujita, N; Furuta, T; Hara, N; Katori, J; Muro, K; Uetake, H; Yoshino, T, 2016)
"Here, we present the first case of interstitial lung disease occurring in association with TAS-102 treatment."1.43Interstitial pneumonia in a patient treated with TAS-102 for metastatic colorectal cancer: a case report. ( Akagi, Y; Ishibashi, N; Kamei, H; Tanigawa, M; Uchida, M; Yamaguchi, K, 2016)
"In the present study, we used colorectal cancer xenografts to assess whether the efficacy of TAS-102 could be improved by combining it with bevacizumab, cetuximab or panitumumab."1.42Efficacy of combination chemotherapy using a novel oral chemotherapeutic agent, TAS-102, together with bevacizumab, cetuximab, or panitumumab on human colorectal cancer xenografts. ( Ishida, K; Matsuo, K; Nakagawa, F; Okabe, H; Sakamoto, K; Takechi, T; Tanaka, N; Tsukihara, H; Uchida, J, 2015)
"DNA samples were isolated from 60 colorectal cancer (CRC) patients."1.36Comparison of two different screening methods for the KRAS mutation in colorectal cancer. ( Chang, JG; Chang, TJ; Chang, YS; Er, TK; Yeh, KT, 2010)

Research

Studies (187)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's7 (3.74)29.6817
2010's89 (47.59)24.3611
2020's91 (48.66)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Jalali, A1
Gard, G1
Banks, S1
Dunn, C1
Wong, HL1
Wong, R1
Lee, M1
Gately, L1
Loft, M1
Shapiro, JD1
Kosmider, S1
Tie, J1
Ananda, S1
Yeung, JM1
Jennens, R1
Lee, B1
McKendrick, J1
Lim, L1
Khattak, A1
Gibbs, P2
Stavraka, C1
Pouptsis, A1
Synowiec, A1
Angelis, V1
Satterthwaite, L1
Khan, S1
Chauhan, M1
Holden, C1
Young, S1
Karampera, C1
Martinou, M1
Mills-Baldock, T1
Baxter, M1
Barry, A1
Eccles, B1
Iveson, T2
Shiu, KK2
Hill, M1
Abdel-Raouf, S1
Graham, JS1
Thomas, A1
Ross, PJ2
Shibutani, M2
En, W1
Okazaki, Y2
Kashiwagi, S2
Fukuoka, T2
Iseki, Y2
Hirakawa, K2
Ohira, M2
Talaat, W1
Kaddah, MMY1
Keshk, RM1
Giuliani, J7
Shitara, K12
Doi, T11
Hosaka, H1
Thuss-Patience, P2
Santoro, A1
Longo, F1
Ozyilkan, O1
Cicin, I2
Park, D1
Zaanan, A2
Pericay, C2
Özgüroğlu, M1
Alsina, M3
Makris, L10
Benhadji, KA4
Ilson, DH6
Weiss, L1
Karthaus, M3
Riera-Knorrenschild, J1
Kretzschmar, A1
Welslau, M1
Vehling-Kaiser, U1
Pelz, H1
Ettrich, TJ2
Hess, J1
Reisländer, T1
Klein, A1
Heinemann, V2
Sousa, MJ1
Gomes, I1
Pereira, TC1
Magalhães, J1
Basto, R1
Paulo, J1
Jacinto, P1
Bonito, N1
Sousa, G1
Coutzac, C1
Trouilloud, I1
Artru, P1
Henriques, J1
Masson, T1
Doat, S1
Bouché, O1
Coriat, R1
Saint, A1
Moulin, V1
Vernerey, D1
Gallois, C1
De La Fouchardière, C1
Tougeron, D1
Taieb, J4
Hamers, PAH1
Vink, GR1
Elferink, MAG1
Stellato, RK1
Dijksterhuis, WPM1
Punt, CJA3
Koopman, M2
May, AM1
Oshima, K1
Hirano, H1
Shoji, H1
Iwasa, S1
Okita, N1
Takashima, A7
Boku, N2
Yoshino, T24
Van Cutsem, E14
Li, J3
Shen, L3
Kim, TW2
Sriuranpong, V2
Xuereb, L1
Aubel, P2
Fougeray, R5
Cattan, V1
Amellal, N3
Ohtsu, A16
Mayer, RJ8
Chuang, J1
Gong, J1
Li, SM1
Wang, C1
Fakih, M2
Mantoan, B1
Bonetti, A6
Selvin, T1
Fasterius, E1
Jarvius, M1
Fryknäs, M1
Larsson, R1
Andersson, CR1
Sommerhäuser, G1
Kurreck, A1
Stintzing, S1
von Weikersthal, LF1
Dechow, T1
Kaiser, F1
Schwaner, I1
Fuchs, M2
König, A1
Roderburg, C1
Hoyer, I1
Quante, M1
Kiani, A1
Fruehauf, S1
Müller, L1
Reinacher-Schick, A1
Stahler, A1
Modest, DP1
Martínez-Lago, N1
Chucla, TC1
De Castro, BA1
Ponte, RV1
Rendo, CR1
Rodriguez, MIG1
Diaz, SS1
Suarez, BG1
de la Cámara Gomez, J3
Fernández, FB1
Salvador, MM1
Lopez, MR1
Hochster, H4
Mayer, R3
Falcone, A14
Arkenau, HT5
George, B4
Tabernero, J11
Matsumoto, T3
Ikoma, T1
Yamamura, S1
Miura, K1
Tsuduki, T1
Watanabe, T3
Nagai, H1
Takatani, M1
Yasui, H8
Kuboki, Y5
Terazawa, T2
Masuishi, T7
Nakamura, M3
Watanabe, J2
Ojima, H2
Makiyama, A11
Kotaka, M6
Hara, H1
Kagawa, Y5
Sugimoto, N8
Kawakami, H1
Kajiwara, T7
Oki, E12
Sunakawa, Y1
Ishihara, S1
Taniguchi, H8
Nakajima, TE1
Morita, S1
Shirao, K1
Takenaka, N1
Ozawa, D2
Satange, R1
Chang, CC1
Li, LY1
Lin, SH1
Neidle, S1
Hou, MH1
Shiroyama, M1
Fukuoka, S7
Kumekawa, Y5
Yamazaki, K17
Shimada, Y9
Esaki, T9
Moriwaki, T8
Patel, AK3
Barghout, V2
Yenikomshian, MA3
Germain, G1
Jacques, P1
Laliberté, F1
Duh, MS3
Prokharau, A1
Ghidini, M2
Fujitani, K1
Beretta, GD1
Mansoor, W1
Zhavrid, E1
Catenacci, D1
McGuigan, S1
Samawi, HH1
Brezden-Masley, C1
Afzal, AR1
Cheung, WY2
Dolley, A2
Grothey, A6
Marshall, JL4
Bekaii-Saab, T2
Chen, J1
Wang, J1
Lin, H1
Peng, Y1
Denda, T7
Hatachi, Y3
Suto, T4
Enomoto, M3
Ishikawa, T3
Kashiwada, T4
Komatsu, Y10
Tsuji, A7
Tsuchihashi, K2
Sakai, D4
Ueno, H3
Tamura, T4
Yamashita, K3
Zhang, Q1
Wang, Q1
Wang, X1
Peng, Z1
Kotani, D5
Horasawa, S1
Kaneko, A1
Nakamura, Y2
Kawazoe, A2
Bando, H3
Kojima, T2
Kasi, PM2
Cleary, JM2
Shinozaki, E3
Nishina, T5
Garcia-Carbonero, R4
Baba, H7
Argilés, G6
Sobrero, A3
Yamaguchi, K9
Peeters, M2
Muro, K10
Zaniboni, A5
Tsuji, Y5
Hochster, HS5
Tran, B2
Hamada, C2
Tanase, T3
Benedetti, F3
Yamashita, F1
Lenz, HJ8
André, T1
Saunders, M1
Kanehisa, A2
Gandossi, E1
Amellal, NC1
Pfeiffer, P2
Yilmaz, M1
Möller, S1
Zitnjak, D1
Krogh, M1
Petersen, LN1
Poulsen, LØ1
Winther, SB1
Thomsen, KG1
Qvortrup, C1
Carter, AM1
Spooner, C1
Stevens, D1
Mullamitha, S1
Cao, M1
Zhou, M1
Zhang, J1
Siebenhüner, A2
De Dosso, S1
Meisel, A1
Wagner, AD1
Borner, M1
Fujii, H2
Matsuhashi, N2
Kitahora, M1
Takahashi, T3
Hirose, C1
Iihara, H1
Yamada, Y2
Watanabe, D1
Ishihara, T1
Suzuki, A1
Yoshida, K2
Casadei-Gardini, A1
Vagheggini, A1
Gelsomino, F1
Spallanzani, A1
Ulivi, P1
Orsi, G1
Rovesti, G1
Andrikou, K2
Tamburini, E4
Scartozzi, M2
Cascinu, S2
Colloca, G1
Venturino, A1
Guarneri, D1
Fujimoto, Y2
Nakanishi, R3
Nukatsuka, M3
Matsuoka, K4
Ando, K3
Wakasa, T1
Kitao, H4
Maehara, Y6
Mori, M5
Price, T2
Burge, M1
Chantrill, L1
Pavlakis, N1
Shapiro, J1
Sjoquist, K1
Kawakami, T1
Kawamoto, Y1
Kadowaki, S3
Onozawa, Y3
Muranaka, T1
Tajika, M3
Nakatsumi, H1
Yuki, S1
Omae, K1
Bachet, JB1
Wyrwicz, L1
Cremolini, C4
Phelip, JM1
Portales, F2
Ozet, A1
Atlan, D1
Becquart, M1
Vidot, L2
Mounedji, N2
Danielewicz, I1
Saunders, MP1
Borg, C2
Glynne-Jones, R1
Van de Wouw, AJ1
Fedyanin, M1
Stroyakovskiy, D1
Kroening, H1
Garcia-Alfonso, P1
Wasan, H1
Egorov, A1
Moiseenko, V1
Ogata, M1
Ogata, T1
Kato, T5
Satake, H5
Roda, D1
Roselló, S2
Huerta, M1
Cervantes, A3
Nagahara, H1
Wang, EN1
Maeda, K1
Kashiwa, M1
Matsushita, R1
Su, GL1
Wang, YY1
Wang, JC1
Liu, H1
Oba, K3
Kii, T1
Takano, N1
Yokota, M1
Okita, Y1
Matoba, K1
Hasegawa, H1
Mishima, H1
Nagata, N1
Sakamoto, J1
Walter, T1
Hawkins, NS1
Pollock, RF1
Colaone, F1
Shergill, S1
Nose, Y1
Hata, T2
Mori, R1
Kawai, K1
Naito, A2
Sakamoto, T1
Murakami, K1
Katsura, Y1
Ohmura, Y1
Masuzawa, T1
Takeno, A1
Takeda, Y1
Murata, K1
Sobrero, AF1
Moreno Vera, SR1
Lastraioli, E1
Lavacchi, D1
Palmieri, VE1
Castiglione, F1
Messerini, L1
Di Costanzo, F1
Antonuzzo, L2
Rothkamm, K1
Christiansen, S1
Rieckmann, T1
Horn, M1
Frenzel, T1
Brinker, A1
Schumacher, U1
Stein, A3
Petersen, C1
Burdak-Rothkamm, S1
Nakashima, M2
Takeuchi, M2
Kawakami, K3
Yoshida, Y3
Yamada, T3
Kamiyama, H2
Kosugi, C2
Ishibashi, K2
Yoshida, H3
Ishida, H2
Yamaguchi, S1
Kuramochi, H2
Fukazawa, A2
Sonoda, H2
Yoshimatsu, K3
Matsuda, A3
Hasegawa, S3
Sakamoto, K4
Otsuka, T1
Koda, K2
Kavan, P1
Miyamoto, Y7
Kawanaka, H1
Miwa, K1
Kabashima, A1
Noguchi, T1
Yuge, K1
Shimokawa, M2
Saeki, H3
Akagi, Y2
Insolda, J1
Pigozzi, E1
Uetake, H2
Funato, Y1
Yamaguchi, Y1
Koyama, T2
Tajiri, M1
Hamada, S1
Komatsu, S1
Shibata, R1
Konishi, T1
Matsubara, D1
Soga, K1
Shimomura, K1
Ikeda, J1
Taniguchi, F1
Shioaki, Y1
Iwamoto, K1
Ohtsuka, M1
Imasato, M1
Inui, M1
Zenitani, S1
Wada, R1
Nakahara, Y1
Mikamori, M1
Furukawa, K1
Moon, J1
Asaoka, T1
Kishi, K1
Akamatsu, H1
Tanaka, S1
Fiorica, F1
Ponturo, G1
Azzurro, M1
Ruzzenente, A1
Patel, MR2
Falchook, GS1
Hamada, K1
Bendell, JC3
Modrzejewska, M1
Gawronski, M1
Gackowski, D1
Prager, GW4
Ciardiello, F5
Leger, C1
Matsumoto, R1
Mori, S1
Toda, H1
Kita, Y1
Arigami, T1
Sasaki, K1
Kurahara, H1
Maemura, K1
Natsugoe, S1
Barone, CA1
Banzi, MC1
Bergamo, F1
Blasi, L1
Bordonaro, R1
Bartolomeo, MD1
Costanzo, FD1
Frassineti, GL2
Garufi, C1
Giuliani, F1
Latiano, TP1
Martinelli, E3
Personeni, N1
Racca, P1
Tonini, G1
Besse, MG1
Spione, M1
Shiozawa, M1
Mitsugi, K2
Okuda, H1
Asayama, M1
Yuasa, Y1
Manaka, D1
Qiu, S1
Kimura, Y1
Maeda, F1
Gan, S1
Yamada, A1
Kajiyama, D1
Tokitou, F1
Kawaguchi, M1
Amagasa, H1
Motoyama, K1
Ganno, H1
Imai, K1
Ami, K1
Iida, S1
Fukuda, A1
Ando, M3
Okano, Y1
Ishizaki, T1
Mazaki, J1
Shigoka, M1
Kasahara, K1
Matsudo, T1
Kawakita, H1
Nagakawa, Y1
Katsumata, K2
Tsuchida, A1
Niisato, Y1
Loupakis, F5
Bekaii-Saab, TS2
Sugiura, K1
Seo, Y1
Tokura, H1
Ito, Y1
Tanaka, M2
Kishida, N1
Nishi, Y1
Onishi, Y1
Aoki, H1
Gourzoulidis, G2
Koulentaki, M1
Koumarianou, A1
Samadas, E1
Androulakis, N1
Xynogalos, S1
Papakotoulas, P1
Boukovinas, I1
Karamouzis, M1
Souglakos, J2
Chotzagiannoglou, V1
Beletsi, A1
Kourlaba, G2
Gamoh, M1
Tanioka, H1
Goto, M2
Soeda, J1
Shibuya, K1
Iwata, M1
Yukami, H1
Mishima, S1
Sawada, K1
Shirasu, H1
Ebi, H1
Yamanaka, T1
Aleshin, A1
Billings, PR1
Rabinowitz, M1
Takemasa, I1
Signorelli, C1
Gemma, D1
Grande, R1
DE Marco, S1
Saltarelli, R1
Morandi, MG1
Spinelli, GP1
Zoratto, F1
Sperduti, I1
Chilelli, MG1
Ceribelli, A1
Ruggeri, EM1
Takahashi, M2
Sakamoto, Y1
Ohori, H1
Kuroki, M1
Kato, S1
Otsuka, K1
Komine, K1
Takahashi, S2
Shirota, H1
Ouchi, K1
Takahashi, Y1
Imai, H1
Shibata, H1
Yoshioka, T1
Yamaguchi, H1
Yamaguchi, T4
Shimodaira, H1
Ishioka, C1
Ihara, K1
Takushima, Y1
Igarashi, A1
Yoshihara, H1
Lorenzen, S1
Fornaro, L1
Catenacci, DVT1
Moreno, SR1
Azcue, P1
Tong, D1
Wang, L1
Mendis, J1
Essapen, S1
Vitale, P1
Zanaletti, N1
Famiglietti, V1
De Falco, V1
Fenocchio, E1
Milanesio, M1
Lombardi, P1
Ciardiello, D1
Martini, G2
Troiani, T2
Napolitano, S1
Fernández Montes, A2
Carmona-Bayonas, A1
Jimenez-Fonseca, P1
Vázquez Rivera, F2
Martinez Lago, N2
Covela Rúa, M2
Cousillas Castiñeiras, A2
Gonzalez Villarroel, P2
Méndez, JCM1
Carriles Fernández, C1
Sanchez Cánovas, M1
Garcia García, T1
Abhyankar, R1
Brais, LK1
Barghout, VE1
Huynh, L1
Ng, K1
Fuchs, CS3
Suenaga, M3
Schirripa, M3
Cao, S2
Zhang, W2
Yang, D2
Murgioni, S2
Rossini, D4
Marmorino, F3
Mennitto, A2
Ning, Y2
Okazaki, S2
Berger, MD2
Gopez, R2
Barzi, A3
Okamoto, W2
Tsushima, T3
Mochizuki, N1
Nomura, S2
Sato, A2
Makiyama, C1
Sugiyama, M2
Okuyama, H2
Baba, E3
Gosho, M1
Dadduzio, V1
Salvatore, L3
Borelli, B2
Pietrantonio, F3
Bullement, A1
Underhill, S1
Hatswell, AJ1
Abrahao, ABK1
Ko, YJ1
Berry, S1
Chan, KKW1
Buscaglia, M1
Kopetz, S2
Bebeau, P1
Ramaekers, BLT1
Wolff, R1
van Giessen, A1
Pouwels, X1
Fayter, D1
Lang, S1
Armstrong, N1
Worthy, G1
Duffy, S1
Kleijnen, J1
Joore, MA1
Kwakman, JJM1
Vink, G1
Vestjens, JH1
Beerepoot, LV1
de Groot, JW1
Jansen, RL1
Opdam, FL2
Boot, H1
Creemers, GJ1
van Rooijen, JM1
Los, M1
Vulink, AJE1
Schut, H1
van Meerten, E1
Baars, A1
Hamberg, P1
Kapiteijn, E1
Sommeijer, DW1
Kiniwa, M1
Morodomi, Y1
Iimori, M2
Kurashige, J1
Nakashima, Y1
Xu, J1
Pan, H1
Xu, R1
Guo, W1
Han, SW1
Liu, T1
Park, YS1
Shi, C1
Bai, Y1
Bi, F1
Ahn, JB1
Qin, S1
Li, Q1
Wu, C1
Ma, D1
Lin, D2
Burki, TK1
Laurent, S1
Winkler, R2
Grávalos, C2
Benavides, M1
Longo-Munoz, F2
Siena, S1
Loehrer, P1
Kimura, M3
Usami, E3
Iwai, M2
Teramachi, H2
Yoshimura, T3
Arnold, D1
Quintela, A1
Moreno Vera, S1
Mulet, N1
Matos, I1
Noguerido, A1
Élez, ME2
Yasue, F1
Kawachi, S1
Mitsuoka, M1
Ikeda, Y1
Sun, R1
Horiguchi, M1
Wei, LJ1
Kawahara, H1
Mouri, T1
Ishida, K3
Matsumoto, N1
Akiba, T1
Yanaga, K1
Lonardi, S2
Noventa, S1
Mosconi, S2
Nichetti, F1
Zucchelli, G1
Dal Maso, A1
Sforza, V1
Masi, G2
Antoniotti, C2
Di Bartolomeo, M1
Miceli, R2
Martinez-Perez, J1
Riesco-Martinez, MC1
Xiao, Y1
Wynant, W1
Tabesh, M1
Chu, E2
Sakamoto, R1
Kajitani, R1
Munechika, T1
Matsumoto, Y1
Komono, A1
Aisu, N1
Daibo, K1
Kiyomi, F1
Unseld, M1
Drimmel, M1
Gleiss, A1
Bianconi, D1
Kieler, M1
Scheithauer, W1
Winder, T1
Ito, M2
Kishimoto, J1
Takayama, T1
Hamamoto, Y1
Nakayama, N1
Cho, SK1
Hay, JW1
Nakagawa, F6
Tanaka, N3
Okabe, H3
Matsuo, K3
Takechi, T5
Cohen, SJ1
Kasper, S1
Kisro, J1
Müller, C1
Schulz-Abelius, A1
Rafiyan, MR1
Maniadakis, N1
Petrakis, D1
Pentheroudakis, G1
Hiyoshi, Y1
Akiyama, T1
Kiyozumi, Y1
Eto, K1
Yohei, N1
Iwagami, S1
Baba, Y1
Yoshida, N1
Méndez Méndez, JC1
Salgado Fernández, M1
Candamio Folgar, S1
Reboredo López, M1
Carmona Campos, M1
Gallardo Martín, E1
Jorge Fernández, M1
Pellón Augusto, ML1
París Bouzas, L1
García Gómez, J1
Sonbol, MB1
Benkhadra, R1
Wang, Z1
Firwana, B1
Walden, DJ1
Mody, K1
Hubbard, JM1
Murad, MH1
Ahn, DH1
Chan, BM1
Matsumoto, S1
Sakurazawa, N1
Kawano, Y1
Shinozuka, E1
Sekiguchi, K1
Suzuki, H1
Chung, FH1
Chiang, YR1
Tseng, AL1
Sung, YC1
Lu, J1
Huang, MC1
Ma, N1
Lee, HC1
Saito, H1
Sakata, M1
Uchida, J2
Tsukihara, H1
Takahashi, K1
Yoshisue, K1
Chiba, M1
Nakanishi, T1
Tamai, I1
Yokogawa, T1
Oguchi, K1
Kazuno, H1
Osada, A1
Mizunuma, N2
Boucher, E1
Prenen, H1
Mizuguchi, H3
Cleghorn, S1
Fuse, N1
Koizumi, W1
Shimada, K1
Takinishi, Y1
Rosen, LS1
Goldman, JW1
Infante, JR1
Zergebel, C1
Cho, E1
Zhang, X1
Townsend, MK1
Selhub, J1
Paul, L1
Rosner, B1
Willett, WC1
Giovannucci, EL1
Yokomizo, H1
Nakayama, M1
Okayama, S1
Satake, M1
Sakuma, A1
Yano, Y1
Matsumoto, A1
Fujimoto, T1
Usui, T1
Shiozawa, S1
Shimakawa, T1
Katsube, T1
Naritaka, Y1
Moretto, R1
Sanz-Garcia, E1
Grasselli, J1
Uboha, N1
Tokunaga, E1
Goldberg, R1
Arita, S1
Shirakawa, T1
Matsushita, Y1
Shimokawa, HK1
Hirano, G1
Shibata, Y1
Tamura, S1
Ariyama, H1
Kusaba, H1
Akashi, K1
van der Velden, DL1
Voest, EE1
Kuno, H1
Mota, JM1
Fonseca, LG1
Braghiroli, MI1
Hoff, PM1
Fujita, N1
Furuta, T1
Katori, J1
Hara, N1
Petrelli, F3
Barni, S2
Bertocchi, P2
Cecchini, M1
Ramanathan, RK1
Gil-Calle, S1
Carrato-Mena, A1
Limón, ML1
Sueda, T1
Kudo, T1
Sugiura, T1
Takahashi, H1
Haraguchi, N1
Nishimura, J1
Hayashi, T1
Mizushima, T1
Doki, Y1
Satoh, T1
Sugita, K1
Yokokawa, T1
Sugisaki, T1
Takiguchi, T1
Aoyama, T1
Suzuki, K1
Inoue, A1
Machida, Y1
Hama, T1
Hamauchi, S2
Kito, Y2
Komori, A2
Narita, Y2
Todaka, A2
Ishihara, M2
Yokota, T2
Tanaka, T2
Machida, N2
Fukutomi, A2
Ura, T2
Mori, K2
Burness, CB1
Duggan, ST1
Giampieri, R1
Restivo, A1
Pusceddu, V1
Del Prete, M1
Maccaroni, E1
Bittoni, A1
Faloppi, L1
Bianconi, M1
Cabras, F1
Berardi, R1
Zorcolo, L1
Scintu, F1
Suzuki, N1
Kamei, H1
Ishibashi, N1
Tanigawa, M1
Uchida, M1
Rimassa, L1
Aprile, G1
Bozzarelli, S1
Morano, F1
Battaglin, F1
Baretti, M1
Berenato, R1
Formica, V1
Spada, D1
Cinieri, S1
Beretta, G1
de Braud, F1
Lee, JJ1
Overman, MJ1
Varadhachary, G1
Fukushima, M2
Kuwata, K1
Mita, A1
Wolff, RA1
Hoff, P1
Xiong, H1
Abbruzzese, JL1
Er, TK1
Chang, YS1
Yeh, KT1
Chang, TJ1
Chang, JG1
Emura, T1
Murakami, Y1
Kitazato, K1
Budai, B1
Hitre, E1
Adleff, V1
Czeglédi, F1
Gyergyay, F1
Láng, I1
Kralovánszky, J1
Nakamura, T1
Komoto, C1
Sakaeda, T1
Taniguchi, M1
Okamura, N1
Aoyama, N1
Kamigaki, T1
Kuroda, Y1
Kasuga, M1
Kadoyama, K1
Okumura, K1
Battistelli, S1
Vittoria, A1
Stefanoni, M1
Bing, C1
Roviello, F1
Morel, A1
Boisdron-Celle, M1
Fey, L1
Lainé-Cessac, P1
Gamelin, E1
Levine, AJ1
Siegmund, KD1
Ervin, CM1
Diep, A1
Lee, ER1
Frankl, HD1
Haile, RW1

Clinical Trials (15)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Phase I Clinical Trial of Trametinib in Combination With TAS-102 in Patients With Chemotherapy-Resistant RAS-Mutated (PIK3CA/PTEN-Wild-Type) Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT03317119]Phase 126 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-04-11Active, not recruiting
Prospective, Randomized, Open, Multicenter Phase II Trial to Investigate the Efficacy of Trifluridine/Tipiracil Plus Panitumumab Versus Trifluridine/Tipiracil Plus Bevacizumab as First-line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: FIRE-8; AIO-KRK/YMO-05[NCT05007132]Phase 2153 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-17Recruiting
Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 Study Evaluating TAS-102 Plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) Versus Placebo Plus BSC in Patients With Metastatic Gastric Cancer Refractory to Standard Treatments[NCT02500043]Phase 3507 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-24Completed
TACTIC: a Phase II Study of TAS-102 Monotherapy and Thalidomide Plus TAS-102 as Third-line Therapy and Beyond in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma[NCT05266820]Phase 2120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-10-01Recruiting
Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 Study of TAS-102 Plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) Versus Placebo Plus BSC in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Chemotherapies[NCT01607957]Phase 3800 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-17Completed
A Randomized, Controlled Phase II Clinical Trial of Fruquintinib Combined With Raltitrexed Versus Fruquintinib Monotherapy in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer Who Had Failed Second-line or Above Standard Chemotherapy[NCT04582981]Phase 2136 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-28Recruiting
An Open-label Early Access Phase IIIb Study of Trifluridine / Tipiracil (S 95005/TAS-102) in Patients With a Pretreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (PRECONNECT)[NCT03306394]Phase 3907 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-18Completed
An Open-label, Randomised, Non-comparative Phase 2 Study Evaluating S 95005 (TAS-102) Plus Bevacizumab and Capecitabine Plus Bevacizumab in Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic COlorectal Cancer Who Are Non-eligible for Intensive Therapy (TASCO1 [NCT02743221]Phase 2154 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-29Completed
Evaluating Trifluridine/Tipiracil Based Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer - The Phase I/II TARC Trial[NCT04177602]Phase 1/Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-11-04Terminated (stopped due to Due to the amended therapy strategies for rectal cancer recently, it was decided not to transfer the study to the phase II part, as superiority over standard chemoradiation and transfer to a new therapy standard are increasingly unlikely.)
A Phase 2 Study With Safety Lead-in, Evaluating TAS-102 Plus Nivolumab in Patients With Microsatellite Stable Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT02860546]Phase 218 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-08-29Completed
Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Study of TAS-102 Versus Placebo in Asian Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory or Intolerable to Standard Chemotherapies[NCT01955837]Phase 3406 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-30Completed
An Open-Label Expanded Access Study of TAS-102 in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to or Failing Standard Chemotherapy[NCT02286492]0 participants Expanded AccessApproved for marketing
NIVOLUMAB Plus IPILIMUMAB and TEMOZOLOMIDE in Combination in Microsatellite Stable (MSS), MGMT Silenced Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC): the MAYA Study[NCT03832621]Phase 2135 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-03-25Completed
Phase II Trial of TAS-102 in Patients With Advanced, Refractory Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma[NCT04923529]Phase 228 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-03-01Recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Combination With Irinotecan as a Second Line Therapy in Patients With Cholangiocarcinoma[NCT04059562]Phase 228 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-10-28Active, not recruiting
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Disease Control Rate (DCR)

DCR was defined as the proportion of participants with a best overall response of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD). The assessment of DCR was based on Investigator review of radiologic images and following RECIST criteria (version 1.1, 2009). (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to the cut-off date (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months), assessed every 8 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
TAS-102+BSC44.1
Placebo+BSC14.5

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

"Overall response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with objective evidence of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR).~CR was defined as the disappearance of all target or non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes for target lesions or all lymph nodes for non-target lesions were non-pathological morphologically that was reduced in size in short axis to < 10 mm.~PR was defined as target lesions with at least 30% decrease in the sum of diameters, taking baseline sum diameters as reference." (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to the cut-off date (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months), assessed every 8 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
TAS-102+BSC4.5
Placebo+BSC2.1

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Participants without documented death were censored at last follow-up or cut-off date, whichever comes first. OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to the data cut-off date (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
TAS-102+BSC5.7
Placebo+BSC3.6

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from randomization until the date of first occurrence of investigator-assessed radiological disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever came first. Disease progression as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) for target lesions were defined as target lesions with at least 20 % relative increase in the sum of diameters with reference to the smallest sum on study, including the baseline sum and this sum demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeter (mm) or the appearance of one or more new lesions or Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. All alive participants with no disease progression as of the analysis cut-off date were censored at the last tumor assessment. PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to the cut-off date (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
TAS-102+BSC2.0
Placebo+BSC1.8

Time to Deterioration of European Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Score From Baseline

The ECOG performance status was used to evaluate participant's disease progression and the effect of the disease on the participant's activities of daily living. It ranges on the scale from 0-5 (0 = normal activity; 1= symptoms but ambulatory; 2= in bed for < 50% of the time; 3= in bed for > 50% of the time; 4= 100% bedridden; 5= dead). Time to definitive deterioration in ECOG performance status score from baseline was defined as a change from 0, 1 to >=2, or from 2 to >=3. (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: At the time of randomization (Day 1 Cycle 1) and within 24 hours prior to start of study treatment in every cycle (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
TAS-102+BSC4.3
Placebo+BSC2.3

Change From Baseline in Quality of Life European Organization for Research and Treatment for Cancer (EORTC) QoL Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30 Score): Global Health Status

EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a cancer-specific instrument with 30 questions for evaluation of new chemotherapy and provides an assessment of participant reported outcome dimensions. First 28 questions used 4-point scale (1=not at all,2=a little,3=quite a bit,4=very much) for evaluating 5 functional scales (physical,role,emotional,cognitive,social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue,nausea/vomiting,pain) and other single items. For each item,high score represented high level of symptomatology/problem. Last 2 questions represented participant's assessment of overall health and QoL, coded on 7-point scale (1=very poor to 7=excellent). EORTC QLQ-C30 observed values and change from baseline for global health status (scoring of questions 29 and 30) and 5 functional scales, 3 symptom scales and other single items (scoring of questions 1 to 28). Answers were converted into grading scale, with values between 0 and 100. A high score represented a favorable outcome with a best QoL for participant. (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 Cycle 2 up to end of treatment (EOT) (within 30 days of last study treatment) and 30-Day safety follow-up visit (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 1Cycle 2Cycle 3Cycle 4Cycle 5Cycle 6Cycle 7Cycle 8Cycle 9Cycle 10Cycle 11Cycle 12Cycle 13Last Collection CycleSafety Follow-Up
TAS-102+BSC-2.7-5.9-4.1-3.6-5.9-8.8-9.5-4.32.4-14.4-16.7-8.30.0-8.8-16.5

Change From Baseline in Quality of Life European Organization for Research and Treatment for Cancer (EORTC) QoL Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30 Score): Global Health Status

EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a cancer-specific instrument with 30 questions for evaluation of new chemotherapy and provides an assessment of participant reported outcome dimensions. First 28 questions used 4-point scale (1=not at all,2=a little,3=quite a bit,4=very much) for evaluating 5 functional scales (physical,role,emotional,cognitive,social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue,nausea/vomiting,pain) and other single items. For each item,high score represented high level of symptomatology/problem. Last 2 questions represented participant's assessment of overall health and QoL, coded on 7-point scale (1=very poor to 7=excellent). EORTC QLQ-C30 observed values and change from baseline for global health status (scoring of questions 29 and 30) and 5 functional scales, 3 symptom scales and other single items (scoring of questions 1 to 28). Answers were converted into grading scale, with values between 0 and 100. A high score represented a favorable outcome with a best QoL for participant. (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 Cycle 2 up to end of treatment (EOT) (within 30 days of last study treatment) and 30-Day safety follow-up visit (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 1Cycle 2Cycle 3Cycle 4Cycle 5Cycle 6Cycle 7Cycle 8Cycle 9Cycle 10Cycle 11Cycle 12Cycle 13Cycle 14Cycle 15Last Collection CycleSafety Follow-Up
Placebo+BSC-5.9-7.3-1.4-1.711.115.620.016.716.725.025.033.333.333.333.3-9.8-8.9

EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire - Gastric-specific Module (EORTC QLQ-STO22): Percentage of Participants With Overall Compliance

The Quality of Life Questionnaire Stomach Cancer Module 22 (QLQ-STO22) assessed symptoms and treatment-related side effects commonly reported in participants. There are 22 questions which comprise 5 scales (dysphagia, dietary restrictions, pain QS22, reflux, and anxiety) and 4 single items (dry mouth, hair loss, taste problems, body image). Most questions use 4-point scale (1='Not at all', 2=a little, 3=quite a bit and 4='Very much'). A linear transformation was used to standardize all scores and single-items to a scale of 0 to 100, where higher score=better level of functioning or greater degree of symptoms. (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 1 up to end of treatment (EOT) (within 30 days of last study treatment) (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
DysphagiaDietary RestrictionsPain QS22RefluxAnxietyDry MouthBody ImageHair LossTaste Problems
Placebo+BSC78.278.278.278.278.278.278.278.278.2
TAS-102+BSC86.686.686.686.686.686.485.886.686.6

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAE)

Any untoward medical condition that occurs in a participants while participating in a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the use of the study medication was considered an adverse event (AE). A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. TEAEs/TESAEs were defined as events that started on or after treatment or started before treatment and worsened after the start of treatment through 30 days after the last dose of study treatment. (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TEAETESAE
Placebo+BSC15170
TAS-102+BSC319143

Overall Survival

Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death for participants. If a participant discontinued study medication for reasons other than radiologic disease progression, the participant was followed for tumor response until radiologic disease progression or initiation of new anticancer therapy. (NCT01607957)
Timeframe: Every 8 weeks, up to 12 months after the last participant was randomized or until the target number of events (deaths) was met, whichever was later. (Overall survival data was collected till 24 Jan 2014 which was date of observation of the 571st death)

Interventionmonths (Median)
TAS-1027.1
Placebo5.3

Progression-free Survival

Tumor assessments were performed throughout the study based on RECIST, Version 1.1, 2009. Progression free survival was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization until the date of the investigator-assessed radiological disease progression or death due to any cause. For participants who were alive with no radiological disease progression as of the analysis cut-off date, their survival was censored at the date of the last tumor assessment. Participants who received non-study cancer treatment before disease progression, or participants with clinical but not radiologic evidence of progression, were censored at the date of the last radiologic evaluable tumor assessment before the non-study cancer treatment was initiated. (NCT01607957)
Timeframe: Every 8 weeks, up to 12 months after the last participant was randomized or until the date of the investigator-assessed radiological disease progression or death due to any cause,whichever was later. (Progression free survival cutoff: 31 Jan 2014)

Interventionmonths (Median)
TAS-1022.0
Placebo1.7

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AE), Treatment-Related AEs, Discontinuations, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Deaths

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Treatment-related AEs were events between administration of study drug and up to 30 Days that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability /incapacity; congenital anomaly. The AEs were graded for severity using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AEs. (NCT01607957)
Timeframe: From the time of signing the informed consent form until the period of participant follow up (30 days following after the administration of last dose of study medication or until initiation of new antitumor therapy, whichever was earlier

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Any adverse event (AE)Any treatment-related AEAny ≥Grade 3 AEAny treatment-related ≥Grade 3 AEAny serious AE (SAE)Any AE resulting in discontinuationAny AE with outcome of death
Placebo93.254.751.79.833.613.611.3
TAS-10298.385.769.449.029.610.33.2

Disease Control Rate (DCR)

DCR was the proportion of patients with confirmed CR, PR or stable disease (SD) as best overall response. SD defined as neither sufficient decrease to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. (NCT02743221)
Timeframe: Baseline and every 8 weeks (maximum follow-up duration: 17.9 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Trifluridine/Tipiracil + Bevacizumab66
Capecitabine + Bevacizumab59

Duration of Response (DR)

The DR was calculated among patients with CR or PR as the time (months) from the first documentation of response to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. (NCT02743221)
Timeframe: Baseline and every 8 weeks (maximum follow-up duration: 16.6 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Trifluridine/Tipiracil + Bevacizumab7.9
Capecitabine + Bevacizumab9.9

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

As per RECIST v1.1, Complete Response (CR) was disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR) was at least 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. The ORR was the proportion of patients who presented CR or PR with confirmation at subsequent time point or at least 4 weeks later. (NCT02743221)
Timeframe: Baseline and every 8 weeks (maximum follow-up duration: 17.9 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Trifluridine/Tipiracil + Bevacizumab26
Capecitabine + Bevacizumab23

Overall Survival (OS)

The OS was defined as the time from the date of randomisation to the date of death. If death was not confirmed, or patient was alive at study cut-off date, survival time was censored at the date of last follow-up or at the study cut-off date, whichever was earlier. (NCT02743221)
Timeframe: Baseline up to death or study cut-off (maximum follow-up duration: 19.9 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Trifluridine/Tipiracil + Bevacizumab18.0
Capecitabine + Bevacizumab16.2

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

The progression free survival (PFS), defined as the time from the date of randomisation until the date of the investigator-assessed radiological disease progression or death due to any cause according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Progressive disease (PD) was defined at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study) and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm in the sum of lesions or the appearance of new lesions. (NCT02743221)
Timeframe: Baseline and every 8 weeks (maximum follow-up duration: 17.9 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Trifluridine/Tipiracil + Bevacizumab9.2
Capecitabine + Bevacizumab7.8

Disease Control Rate (DCR) Based on irRC Criteria

DCR was defined as the percentage of participants with objective evidence of radiologic complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) and was based on the overall best response from each participant as determined from investigator response assessments and following irRC criteria. Per irRC criteria, CR was defined as the disappearance of all tumor lesions (measurable or not, and no new lesions). PR was defined as a decrease in the sum of the products of the two largest perpendicular diameters by 50% or greater by a consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks after first documentation. SD was defined as the failure to meet criteria for irCR or irPR in absence of in absence of irPD. (NCT02860546)
Timeframe: From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to 53 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
TAS-102 + Nivolumab44.4

Disease Control Rate (DCR) Based on RECIST Criteria

DCR was defined as the percentage of participants with objective evidence of radiologic CR, PR, or SD and was based on the overall best response from each participant as determined from investigator response assessments and following RECIST Criteria version 1.1. Per RECIST Criteria CR defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Reduction in any pathological lymph nodes in short axis to <10 mm. PR defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum diameters. SD defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as a reference the smallest sum diameters during study. (NCT02860546)
Timeframe: From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to 53 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
TAS-102 + Nivolumab55.6

Immune-Related Overall Response Rate (irORR)

irORR was defined as the percentage of participants achieving a complete response (irCR) or partial response (irPR) based on irRC criteria. Per irRC criteria, Complete Response (irCR) was defined as the disappearance of all tumor lesions (measurable or not, and no new lesions)., Partial Response (irPR) was defined as a decrease in the sum of the products of the two largest perpendicular diameters (SPD) by 50 percent (%) or greater by a consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks after first documentation, Stable Disease (irSD) was defined as the failure to meet criteria for irCR or irPR in absence of progressive disease (irPD), irPD was defined as at least 25% increase in SPD relative to nadir. (NCT02860546)
Timeframe: From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to 53 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
TAS-102 + Nivolumab0

Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

"DLT: defined as occurrence of any of the following-~Hematological toxicities:~Grade 4 neutropenia lasting greater than(>)7 days~Grade 4 febrile neutropenia and fever greater than or equal to (>=)38 degree celsius for over 1 hour~Grade 4 thrombocytopenia or grade 3 thrombocytopenia associated with bleeding or requiring transfusions~Non-hematological toxicities:~Grade 3 or grade 4 non-hematologic toxicity (excluding alopecia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea)~Grade 3 or grade 4 nausea/vomiting lasting >48 hours and uncontrolled by aggressive anti-emetic therapy, including serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonists (e.g, ondansetron)~Grade 3 or grade 4 diarrhea lasting > 48 hours and unresponsive to antidiarrheal medication~Drug-related toxicities:~Any drug-related toxicity resulting in > 2 weeks delay in initiation of Cycle 2 (i.e, cannot start Cycle 2 until Day 43 or later)~Any drug-related toxicity that prevents completion of 80% compliance for either drug in Cycle 1" (NCT02860546)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (each cycle is of 4 weeks)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TAS-102 + Nivolumab0

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with objective evidence of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version 1.1.CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to less than (<)10 millimeters (mm). PR was defined as at least a 30 % decrease in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum diameters. (NCT02860546)
Timeframe: From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to 53 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
TAS-102 + Nivolumab0

Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D)

RP2D of TAS-102 was evaluated based on the safety and tolerability of the combination therapy of TAS-102 and Nivolumab. (NCT02860546)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (each cycle is of 4 weeks)

Interventionmg/m^2 (Number)
TAS-102 + Nivolumab35

Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Laboratory Tests Abnormalities

Hematological and chemistry laboratory tests abnormalities were graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.03. as: Grade 1 (Mild, asymptomatic or mild symptoms); Grade 2 (Moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated); Grade 3 (Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated); Grade 4 (Life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated); Grade 5 (Death related to AE). (NCT02860546)
Timeframe: From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to 53 weeks)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Grade 4: Neutropenia (neutrophils low)Grade 4: Anemia (hemoglobin low)Grade 4: Leukopenia (leukocytes low)Grade 4: Lymphopenia (lymphocytes low)Grade 4: Thrombocytopenia (platelets low)Grade 4: Bilirubin HighGrade 4: Glucose HighGrade 4: Sodium LowGrade 3: Neutropenia (neutrophils low)Grade 3: Anemia (hemoglobin low)Grade 3: Leukopenia (leukocytes low)Grade 3: Lymphopenia (lymphocytes low)Grade 3: Thrombocytopenia (platelets low)Grade 3: Bilirubin HighGrade 3: Glucose HighGrade 3: Sodium Low
TAS-102 + Nivolumab3100000031621111

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical condition that occurs in a participants while participating in a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the use of the study treatment. A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. TEAEs: AEs that developed or worsened during the on-treatment period which was defined as the period from the time of first dose of study treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment. (NCT02860546)
Timeframe: From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to 53 weeks)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Participants with TEAEsParticipants with TESAEs
TAS-102 + Nivolumab186

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Based on Immune Related Response-Criteria (irRC)

Immune-related progression free survival was defined as the time (in months) from the date of first dose of study treatment until the date of the investigator-assessed radiological disease progression (based on irRC) or death due to any cause. Participants who were alive with no disease progression at the moment of the analysis cut-off date was censored at the date of the last tumor assessment. Per irRC criteria disease progression defined as at least 25% increase in SPD relative to nadir. Analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. (NCT02860546)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study treatment to disease progression or death (up to 53 weeks)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Radiologic progression of disease onlyRadiologic + clinical progression of disease
TAS-102 + Nivolumab2.22.2

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Based on RECIST Criteria

Progression free survival was defined as the time (in months) from the date of first dose of study treatment until the date of the investigator-assessed radiological disease progression (based on RECIST 1.1) or death due to any cause. Per RECIST criteria disease progression defined as least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference the smallest sum on study, including the baseline sum. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Definitive new lesion presence also indicated progression. (NCT02860546)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study treatment to disease progression or death (up to 53 weeks)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Radiologic progression of disease onlyRadiologic + clinical progression of disease
TAS-102 + Nivolumab2.82.5

Disease Control Rate (DCR; CR, PR, or Stable Disease)

The assessment of DCR paralleled that of ORR, with DCR defined as the proportion of patients with objective evidence of CR, PR, or SD. (NCT01955837)
Timeframe: From randomization until the date of radiologic disease progression, permanent discontinuation of study treatment, or death due to any cause, assessed up to 30 months.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)44.1
Placebo14.6

Duration of Response

Duration of response was derived for those patients with objective evidence of PR or CR. Duration of response was defined as the time from the first documentation of response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause. Patients alive and progression free as of the analysis cut-off date were censored at their last evaluable tumor response assessment prior to initiation of any non-study cancer treatment. (NCT01955837)
Timeframe: From randomization until the date of radiologic disease progression, permanent discontinuation of study treatment, or death due to any cause, assessed up to 30 months.

InterventionMonths (Median)
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)6.6
Placebo0

Overall Response Rate (ORR; Complete Response [CR] or Partial Response [PR] Using RECIST Criteria)

"The assessment of ORR was based on Investigator review of the images according to RECIST Version 1.1. Overall response rate was defined as the proportion of patients with objective evidence of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). At the analysis stage, the best overall response was assigned for each patient as the best response recorded from all responses recorded after study randomization. If applicable, responses recorded after disease progression or initiation of non-study cancer treatment was excluded. A patient's best response assignment of stable disease (SD) needed to be maintained for at least 6 weeks after study randomization. If a patient didn't meet this condition, best response was assigned Not evaluable." (NCT01955837)
Timeframe: From randomization until the date of radiologic disease progression, permanent discontinuation of study treatment, or death due to any cause, assessed up to 30 months.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)1.1
Placebo0.0

Overall Survival(OS)

The primary endpoint was Overall Survival (OS), which was defined as the time from random assignment to the date of death. In the absence of confirmation of death or for patients alive at the OS cutoff date, survival time was censored at the date of last trial follow-up or the cutoff date, whichever was earlier. (NCT01955837)
Timeframe: Every 8 weeks. Survival status should be collected for up to 12 months after the last patient is randomized or until the target number of events (deaths) is met, whichever is later.

InterventionMonths (Median)
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)7.8
Placebo7.1

Overall Survival(OS)(Mutant Type KRAS)

"The primary end point was OS, which was defined as the time from random assignment to the date of death. In the absence of confirmation of death or for patients alive at the OS cutoff date, survival time was censored at the date of last trial follow-up or the cutoff date, whichever was earlier.~The OS indicated above as secondary outcome was analyzed by mutant type KRAS." (NCT01955837)
Timeframe: Every 8 weeks. Survival status should be collected for up to 12 months after the last patient is randomized or until the target number of events (deaths) is met, whichever is later.

Interventionmonths (Median)
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)7.0
Placebo6.5

Overall Survival(OS)(Wild Type KRAS)

"The primary end point was OS, which was defined as the time from random assignment to the date of death. In the absence of confirmation of death or for patients alive at the OS cutoff date, survival time was censored at the date of last trial follow-up or the cutoff date, whichever was earlier.~The OS indicated above as secondary outcome was analyzed by wild type KRAS." (NCT01955837)
Timeframe: Every 8 weeks. Survival status should be collected for up to 12 months after the last patient is randomized or until the target number of events (deaths) is met, whichever is later.

Interventionmonths (Median)
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)8.6
Placebo7.4

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Tumor assessments were performed throughout the study period and analyzed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria (Version 1.1, 2009). Progression-free survival was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization until the date of the Investigator-assessed radiological disease progression or death due to any cause. Patients who received non-study cancer treatment before radiologic evidence of disease progression were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment before initiation of non-study cancer treatment. (NCT01955837)
Timeframe: Every 8 weeks. Tumor assessments will be performed until radiologic progression develops or the start of new anticancer treatment, for up to 12 months after the last patient is randomized or until the target number of events (deaths) is met.

InterventionMonths (Median)
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)2.0
Placebo1.8

Progression-free Survival (PFS) (Mutant Type KRAS)

Progression-free survival was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization until the date of the Investigator-assessed radiological disease progression or death due to any cause. Patients who received non-study cancer treatment before radiologic evidence of disease progression were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment before initiation of non-study cancer treatment. The PFS indicated above as secondary outcome was analyzed by mutant type KRAS. (NCT01955837)
Timeframe: Every 8 weeks. Tumor assessments will be performed until radiologic progression develops or the start of new anticancer treatment, for up to 12 months after the last patient is randomized or until the target number of events (deaths) is met.

InterventionMonths (Median)
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)2.2
Placebo1.8

Progression-free Survival (PFS) (Wild Type KRAS)

Progression-free survival was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization until the date of the Investigator-assessed radiological disease progression or death due to any cause. Patients who received non-study cancer treatment before radiologic evidence of disease progression were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment before initiation of non-study cancer treatment. The PFS indicated above as secondary outcome was analyzed by wild type KRAS. (NCT01955837)
Timeframe: Every 8 weeks. Tumor assessments will be performed until radiologic progression develops or the start of new anticancer treatment, for up to 12 months after the last patient is randomized or until the target number of events (deaths) is met.

Interventionmonths (Median)
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)2.0
Placebo1.8

Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)

Time to treatment failure was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization until the date of radiologic disease progression, permanent discontinuation of study treatment, or death due to any cause. Censoring for TTF was also applied for those patients who were given non-study cancer treatment, with censoring at the time when the patient began the non-study cancer treatment. (NCT01955837)
Timeframe: From randomization until the date of radiologic disease progression, permanent discontinuation of study treatment, or death due to any cause, assessed up to 30 months.

Interventionmonths (Median)
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)1.9
Placebo1.8

Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Adverse Events)

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Treatment-related AEs were events between administration of study drug and up to 30 Days that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability /incapacity; congenital anomaly. The AEs were graded for severity using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AEs. (NCT01955837)
Timeframe: From the time a patient signed informed until 30 day safety follow-up visit or until initiation of new anticancer treatment, or assessed up to 30 months.

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
No AEsOne or more AEsOne or more TEAEsTEAE severity by CTCAE grade:Grade1TEAE severity by CTCAE grade:Grade2TEAE severity by CTCAE grade:Grade3TEAE severity by CTCAE grade:Grade4TEAE severity by CTCAE grade:Grade5TEAE causality(Related)TEAE causality(Not Related)One or more TEAEs leading to discontinuationOne or more SAEsOne or more TESAEsOne or more TEAEs leading to death
Placebo1512011832413311170481332311
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)22692692384127305244252763635

Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Will Focus on Adverse Events and Laboratory Assessments(Laboratory Assessments)

All laboratory values that were out of the normal range were to be evaluated for their clinical significance before exposing the patient to the next dose of study medication. Any laboratory abnormality that was clinically significant, e.g., results in delay of study medication dosing, study discontinuation, required treatment due to abnormal values, or was considered by the Investigator to be medical important, were to be reported as an AE, unless it was considered part of clinical manifestations to a clinical diagnosis that has already been reported as an AE. (NCT01955837)
Timeframe: From the time a patient signed informed until 30 day safety follow-up visit or until initiation of new anticancer treatment, or assessed up to 30 months.

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Anemia:Any GradeAnemia:Grade >=3Leukopenia:Any GradeLeukopenia:Grade >=3Neutropenia:Any GradeNeutropenia:Grade >=3Lymphopenia:Any GradeLymphopenia:Grade >=3Thrombocytopenia:Any GradeThrombocytopenia:Grade >=3Lymphocytosis:Any GradeLymphocytosis:Grade >=3Increase in alkaline phosphatase level:Any GradeIncrease in alkaline phosphatase level:Grade >=3Hyperglycemia:Any GradeHyperglycemia:Grade >=3Increase in total bilirubin level:Any GradeIncrease in total bilirubin level:Grade >=3Hypoalbuminemia:Any GradeHypoalbuminemia:Grade >=3Hyponatremia:Any GradeHyponatremia:Grade >=3Hypocalcemia:Any GradeHypocalcemia:Grade >=3Increase in AST level:Any GradeIncrease in AST level:Grade >=3Increase in ALT level:Any GradeIncrease in ALT level:Grade >=3Hypokalemia:Any GradeHypokalemia:Grade >=3Increase in creatinine level:Any GradeIncrease in creatinine level:Grade >=3Hyperkalemia:Any GradeHyperkalemia:Grade >=3Hypercalcemia:Any GradeHypercalcemia:Grade >=3
Placebo528401034310210585503281044038633140729411110010011
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil)2094819056182901463996841911198799197888112773631048331213311180

Reviews

25 reviews available for thymine and Colorectal Neoplasms

ArticleYear
Effect of KRAS codon 12 or 13 mutations on survival with trifluridine/tipiracil in pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
    ESMO open, 2022, Volume: 7, Issue:3

    Topics: Codon; Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms; Frontotemporal Dementia; Humans; Mutation; Proto-Onc

2022
Comparison of Regorafenib, Fruquintinib, and TAS-102 in Previously Treated Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Five Clinical Trials.
    Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2019, Dec-02, Volume: 25

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzofurans; Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms

2019
Regorafenib, TAS-102, or fruquintinib for metastatic colorectal cancer: any difference in randomized trials?
    International journal of colorectal disease, 2020, Volume: 35, Issue:2

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzofurans; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disea

2020
Comparison of efficacy and safety for patients with beyond second line treated metastatic colorectal cancer: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Journal of chemotherapy (Florence, Italy), 2020, Volume: 32, Issue:4

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Cetuximab; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Ne

2020
Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma after Second Progression and the Role of Trifluridine-Tipiracil (TAS-102) in Switzerland.
    Oncology research and treatment, 2020, Volume: 43, Issue:5

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Colorectal Neop

2020
A meta-analysis comparing regorafenib with TAS-102 for treating refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
    The Journal of international medical research, 2020, Volume: 48, Issue:7

    Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Phenylurea Compounds; Pyridines; Pyrrolidines; Thym

2020
Systematic review and network meta-analyses of third-line treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2020, Volume: 146, Issue:10

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Brachytherapy; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Me

2020
Dose-escalation strategy in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: A change in terms of cost-effectiveness.
    Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners, 2021, Volume: 27, Issue:4

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dose-Re

2021
A Comparison of Regorafenib and TAS-102 for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
    Clinical colorectal cancer, 2018, Volume: 17, Issue:2

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Pheny

2018
Trifluridine-Tipiracil for Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.
    PharmacoEconomics, 2018, Volume: 36, Issue:3

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Combinations; Humans; Pyrro

2018
Beyond second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2018, 04-01, Volume: 29, Issue:4

    Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease Progression; Drug Combinations; Drugs, Investigational; Humans; Neopla

2018
The safety of trifluridine and tipiracil for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Expert opinion on drug safety, 2018, Volume: 17, Issue:6

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Co

2018
A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Regorafenib and TAS-102 in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
    The oncologist, 2019, Volume: 24, Issue:9

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Drug Resist

2019
The safety and efficacy of trifluridine-tipiracil for metastatic colorectal cancer: A pharmacy perspective.
    American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, 2019, Feb-21, Volume: 76, Issue:6

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Trials as Topic; Colorectal Neoplasms; Dose

2019
[Efficacy of TAS-102].
    Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy, 2015, Volume: 42, Issue:1

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Py

2015
TAS-102 for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Expert review of anticancer therapy, 2015, Volume: 15, Issue:11

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Com

2015
Current and advancing treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Expert opinion on biological therapy, 2016, Volume: 16, Issue:1

    Topics: Animals; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Bevacizum

2016
TAS-102: a novel antimetabolite for the 21st century.
    Future oncology (London, England), 2016, Volume: 12, Issue:2

    Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Proto

2016
A novel antimetabolite: TAS-102 for metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Expert review of clinical pharmacology, 2016, Volume: 9, Issue:3

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Combinations; Huma

2016
[Antitumor Molecular Mechanism of Trifluridine and Tipiracil Hydrochloride (TAS-102: TFTD)].
    Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy, 2016, Volume: 43, Issue:1

    Topics: Animals; Cell Cycle; Colorectal Neoplasms; DNA; Drug Combinations; Drug Design; Drug Resistance, Neo

2016
TAS-102 for Treatment of Advanced Colorectal Cancers That Are No Longer Responding to Other Therapies.
    Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2016, 06-15, Volume: 22, Issue:12

    Topics: Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasm

2016
Review on TAS-102 development and its use for metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Critical reviews in oncology/hematology, 2016, Volume: 104

    Topics: Animals; Clinical Trials as Topic; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Pyrrolidines; Th

2016
TAS-102 (Lonsurf) for the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. A Concise Review.
    Clinical colorectal cancer, 2016, Volume: 15, Issue:4

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Pyrrolidines; Randomized Con

2016
Trifluridine/Tipiracil: A Review in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
    Drugs, 2016, Volume: 76, Issue:14

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials,

2016
Adherence, Dosing, and Managing Toxicities With Trifluridine/Tipiracil (TAS-102).
    Clinical colorectal cancer, 2017, Volume: 16, Issue:2

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Dose-Response Relationship, Dr

2017

Trials

41 trials available for thymine and Colorectal Neoplasms

ArticleYear
Efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil in older and younger patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 3 study (TAGS).
    Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2022, Volume: 25, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Esoph

2022
Efficacy, safety and quality-of-life data from patients with pre-treated metastatic colorectal cancer receiving trifluridine/tipiracil: results of the TALLISUR trial.
    ESMO open, 2022, Volume: 7, Issue:1

    Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Humans; Prospective Studies; Pyrrolidines; Quality of Life; Thymine; Triflurid

2022
A Phase I Clinical Trial of Trametinib in Combination with TAS-102 in Patients with Chemotherapy-Resistant RAS-Mutated (PIK3CA/PTEN-Wild Type) Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
    Clinical colorectal cancer, 2022, Volume: 21, Issue:3

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Class I Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases; Colorectal N

2022
Study protocol of the FIRE-8 (AIO-KRK/YMO-0519) trial: a prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter phase II trial investigating the efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil plus panitumumab versus trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab as first-line tre
    BMC cancer, 2022, Jul-27, Volume: 22, Issue:1

    Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bev

2022
Pooled safety analysis from phase III studies of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer and metastatic colorectal cancer.
    ESMO open, 2022, Volume: 7, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms; Esophagogastric Junction; Frontotemporal Dementia; H

2022
Pooled safety analysis from phase III studies of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer and metastatic colorectal cancer.
    ESMO open, 2022, Volume: 7, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms; Esophagogastric Junction; Frontotemporal Dementia; H

2022
Pooled safety analysis from phase III studies of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer and metastatic colorectal cancer.
    ESMO open, 2022, Volume: 7, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms; Esophagogastric Junction; Frontotemporal Dementia; H

2022
Pooled safety analysis from phase III studies of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer and metastatic colorectal cancer.
    ESMO open, 2022, Volume: 7, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms; Esophagogastric Junction; Frontotemporal Dementia; H

2022
Trifluridine/tipiracil+bevacizumab (BEV) vs. fluoropyrimidine-irinotecan+BEV as second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomised noninferiority trial.
    British journal of cancer, 2023, Volume: 128, Issue:10

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms

2023
Efficacy and Safety of Trifluridine/Tipiracil Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Gastric Cancer Who Had Undergone Gastrectomy: Subgroup Analyses of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
    JAMA oncology, 2020, Jan-01, Volume: 6, Issue:1

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Gastrectomy

2020
Retrospective cohort study of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) plus bevacizumab versus trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.
    BMC cancer, 2019, Dec-27, Volume: 19, Issue:1

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Beva

2019
Neutropenia and survival outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with trifluridine/tipiracil in the RECOURSE and J003 trials.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2020, Volume: 31, Issue:1

    Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Japan; Neutropenia; Pyrrolidines; Thymine; Trifluri

2020
First-line trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer: SOLSTICE study design.
    Future oncology (London, England), 2020, Volume: 16, Issue:4

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Clinical Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasm

2020
TAS-102 with or without bevacizumab in patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer: an investigator-initiated, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2020, Volume: 21, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combin

2020
Safety, efficacy and patient-reported outcomes with trifluridine/tipiracil in pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer: results of the PRECONNECT study.
    ESMO open, 2020, Volume: 5, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Male; Mi

2020
Trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab in patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer ineligible for intensive therapy: the randomized TASCO1 study.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2020, Volume: 31, Issue:9

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Capecitabine; Colorectal Neoplasms; Flu

2020
Comparative Cost-utility Analysis of Regorafenib and Trifluridine/Tipiracil in The Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Japan.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2020, Volume: 42, Issue:7

    Topics: Adult; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Combinations; Humans; Japan; Phenylurea Com

2020
Phase Ib/II Study of Biweekly TAS-102 in Combination with Bevacizumab for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Therapies (BiTS Study).
    The oncologist, 2020, Volume: 25, Issue:12

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations

2020
Effect of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients treated in RECOURSE by prognostic factors at baseline: an exploratory analysis.
    ESMO open, 2020, Volume: 5, Issue:4

    Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Pyrrolidines;

2020
Combination of TAS-102 and bevacizumab as third-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: TAS-CC3 study.
    International journal of clinical oncology, 2021, Volume: 26, Issue:1

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Surv

2021
Trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab as a first-line treatment for elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (KSCC1602): A multicenter phase II trial.
    Cancer medicine, 2021, Volume: 10, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Colorectal Neo

2021
A phase 2 trial of trifluridine/tipiracil plus nivolumab in patients with heavily pretreated microsatellite-stable metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Cancer medicine, 2021, Volume: 10, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations

2021
Trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for third-line management of metastatic colorectal cancer: SUNLIGHT study design.
    Future oncology (London, England), 2021, Volume: 17, Issue:16

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Clinica

2021
Italian results of the PRECONNECT study: safety and efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil in metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Future oncology (London, England), 2021, Volume: 17, Issue:18

    Topics: Aged; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; International Agen

2021
Phase II study of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab by RAS mutation status in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard therapies: JFMC51-1702-C7.
    ESMO open, 2021, Volume: 6, Issue:2

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Colorectal Neoplasms; Humans; Mutation;

2021
Monitoring FTD in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer administered FTD plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment.
    Cancer science, 2021, Volume: 112, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bevacizumab; Colorectal

2021
Prospective Multicenter Phase II Study of Biweekly TAS-102 and Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
    Anticancer research, 2021, Volume: 41, Issue:4

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Chemothera

2021
Safety and efficacy of panitumumab in combination with trifluridine/tipiracil for pre-treated patients with unresectable, metastatic colorectal cancer with wild-type RAS: The phase 1/2 APOLLON study.
    International journal of clinical oncology, 2021, Volume: 26, Issue:7

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Humans; Panitumumab; Pyrrolidi

2021
CIRCULATE-Japan: Circulating tumor DNA-guided adaptive platform trials to refine adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer.
    Cancer science, 2021, Volume: 112, Issue:7

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Capecitabine; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Circulating Tu

2021
Phase II study of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) therapy in elderly patients with colorectal cancer (T-CORE1401): geriatric assessment tools and plasma drug concentrations as possible predictive biomarkers.
    Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2021, Volume: 88, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers, Tumor; Colorect

2021
TAS-102 plus bevacizumab for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard therapies (C-TASK FORCE): an investigator-initiated, open-label, single-arm, multicentre, phase 1/2 study.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2017, Volume: 18, Issue:9

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Bevacizumab; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Fre

2017
Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Trial of Trifluridine/Tipiracil (TAS-102) Monotherapy in Asian Patients With Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The TERRA Study.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2018, 02-01, Volume: 36, Issue:4

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Asia; C

2018
The subgroups of the phase III RECOURSE trial of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) versus placebo with best supportive care in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
    European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2018, Volume: 90

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Surv

2018
Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Regorafenib and TAS-102 in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the United States.
    Clinical colorectal cancer, 2018, Volume: 17, Issue:4

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Double-

2018
Safety of trifluridine/tipiracil in an open-label expanded-access program in elderly and younger patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2018, Volume: 82, Issue:6

    Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Dose-Respon

2018
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2015, May-14, Volume: 372, Issue:20

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb

2015
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2015, May-14, Volume: 372, Issue:20

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb

2015
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2015, May-14, Volume: 372, Issue:20

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb

2015
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2015, May-14, Volume: 372, Issue:20

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb

2015
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2015, May-14, Volume: 372, Issue:20

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb

2015
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2015, May-14, Volume: 372, Issue:20

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb

2015
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2015, May-14, Volume: 372, Issue:20

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb

2015
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2015, May-14, Volume: 372, Issue:20

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb

2015
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2015, May-14, Volume: 372, Issue:20

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb

2015
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2015, May-14, Volume: 372, Issue:20

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb

2015
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2015, May-14, Volume: 372, Issue:20

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb

2015
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2015, May-14, Volume: 372, Issue:20

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb

2015
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2015, May-14, Volume: 372, Issue:20

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb

2015
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2015, May-14, Volume: 372, Issue:20

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb

2015
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2015, May-14, Volume: 372, Issue:20

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb

2015
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2015, May-14, Volume: 372, Issue:20

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb

2015
TAS-102 for metastatic refractory colorectal cancer.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2015, Volume: 16, Issue:7

    Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Male; Neoplasm Metas

2015
Phase I study of TAS-102 and irinotecan combination therapy in Japanese patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
    Investigational new drugs, 2015, Volume: 33, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Area Under Curve; Camptothecin; Colorec

2015
Phase 1 study of oral TAS-102 in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2015, Volume: 76, Issue:5

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antimetabolites, Antineoplasti

2015
A multicenter phase II study of TAS-102 monotherapy in patients with pre-treated advanced gastric cancer (EPOC1201).
    European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2016, Volume: 62

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Surv

2016
Efficacy of trifluridine and tipiracil (TAS-102) versus placebo, with supportive care, in a randomized, controlled trial of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer from Spain: results of a subgroup analysis of the phase 3 RECOURSE trial.
    Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2017, Volume: 19, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiviral Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Co

2017
Efficacy of trifluridine and tipiracil (TAS-102) versus placebo, with supportive care, in a randomized, controlled trial of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer from Spain: results of a subgroup analysis of the phase 3 RECOURSE trial.
    Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2017, Volume: 19, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiviral Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Co

2017
Efficacy of trifluridine and tipiracil (TAS-102) versus placebo, with supportive care, in a randomized, controlled trial of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer from Spain: results of a subgroup analysis of the phase 3 RECOURSE trial.
    Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2017, Volume: 19, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiviral Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Co

2017
Efficacy of trifluridine and tipiracil (TAS-102) versus placebo, with supportive care, in a randomized, controlled trial of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer from Spain: results of a subgroup analysis of the phase 3 RECOURSE trial.
    Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2017, Volume: 19, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiviral Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Co

2017
Estimating 12-week death probability in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: the Colon Life nomogram.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2017, 03-01, Volume: 28, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Colon; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Combinations;

2017
Phase I clinical study of three times a day oral administration of TAS-102 in patients with solid tumors.
    Cancer investigation, 2008, Volume: 26, Issue:8

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Colorectal Neopl

2008
TAS-102 monotherapy for pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2012, Volume: 13, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female

2012

Other Studies

121 other studies available for thymine and Colorectal Neoplasms

ArticleYear
Initial experience of TAS-102 chemotherapy in Australian patients with Chemo-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Current problems in cancer, 2022, Volume: 46, Issue:2

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Australia; Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms;

2022
Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A UK Multicenter Real-world Analysis on Efficacy, Safety, Predictive and Prognostic Factors.
    Clinical colorectal cancer, 2021, Volume: 20, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Humans; Prognosis; Pyrro

2021
The Efficacy and Safety of Trifluridine/Tipiracil Treatment for Elderly Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in a Real-world Setting.
    Anticancer research, 2021, Volume: 41, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Male; Pr

2021
Selective sensing of the nucleoside analogue, trifluridine and tipiracil in dosage form and biological matrices.
    Talanta, 2022, Feb-01, Volume: 238, Issue:Pt 1

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Nuc

2022
Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Combination with Bevacizumab in First-Line for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Way Forward. A Point of View Based on Cost-Effectiveness.
    Clinical colorectal cancer, 2022, Volume: 21, Issue:2

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms

2022
The effect of prognostic factors at baseline on the efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A Portuguese exploratory analysis.
    Cancer treatment and research communications, 2022, Volume: 31

    Topics: Aged; Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Male; Portugal; Prog

2022
Sequential Treatment With Trifluridine/Tipiracil and Regorafenib in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: An AGEO Prospective "Real-World Study".
    Clinical colorectal cancer, 2022, Volume: 21, Issue:2

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combin

2022
Quality of Life and Survival of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated With Trifluridine-Tipiracil (QUALITAS).
    Clinical colorectal cancer, 2022, Volume: 21, Issue:2

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combin

2022
Influence of precedent drug on the subsequent therapy in the sequence of trifluridine/tipiracil with/out bevacizumab and regorafenib for unresectable or recurrent colorectal cancer.
    PloS one, 2022, Volume: 17, Issue:6

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Colorectal Neoplasms; Humans; Neoplasm

2022
Long-term survivors of metastatic colorectal cancer treated with trifluridine/tipiracil.
    Recenti progressi in medicina, 2022, Volume: 113, Issue:6

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Pyr

2022
Single-cell transcriptional pharmacodynamics of trifluridine in a tumor-immune model.
    Scientific reports, 2022, 07-13, Volume: 12, Issue:1

    Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Frontotemporal Dementia; Humans; Leukocytes, Mononuclear; Pyrrolidines; Single

2022
Efficacy, safety and prognostic factors in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer treated with trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab in a real-world setting.
    Scientific reports, 2022, 08-26, Volume: 12, Issue:1

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms

2022
Regorafenib is suitable for advanced colorectal cancer patients who have previously received trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab.
    Scientific reports, 2023, 02-10, Volume: 13, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Colorec

2023
Synergistic binding of actinomycin D and echinomycin to DNA mismatch sites and their combined anti-tumour effects.
    Nucleic acids research, 2023, 05-08, Volume: 51, Issue:8

    Topics: Animals; Base Sequence; Binding Sites; Colorectal Neoplasms; Dactinomycin; DNA; Echinomycin; Humans;

2023
Renal impairment as a risk factor for trifluridine/tipiracil-induced adverse events in metastatic colorectal cancer patients from the REGOTAS study.
    Scientific reports, 2023, 10-20, Volume: 13, Issue:1

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combin

2023
Real-World Adherence in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with Trifluridine plus Tipiracil or Regorafenib.
    The oncologist, 2020, Volume: 25, Issue:1

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cohort Studies; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinati

2020
Real-world use of trifluridine/tipiracil for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Canada.
    Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2019, Volume: 26, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Canada; Colorectal Neop

2019
Sequencing beyond the second-line setting in metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Clinical advances in hematology & oncology : H&O, 2019, Volume: 17 Suppl 7, Issue:3

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Neo

2019
Prognostic scores for evaluating the survival benefit of regorafenib or trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: an exploratory analysis of the REGOTAS study.
    International journal of clinical oncology, 2020, Volume: 25, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier E

2020
Should we optimize cytotoxic therapy by dosing to neutropenia? Lessons from TAS-102.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2020, Volume: 31, Issue:1

    Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Neutropenia; Pyrrolidines; Thymine; Trifluridine; U

2020
Review of metastatic colorectal cancer treatment pathways and early clinical experience of trifluridine/tipiracil in the UK named patient programme.
    BMC cancer, 2020, Feb-03, Volume: 20, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Camptothecin; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease Pr

2020
Bevacizumab in Combination with TAS-102 Improves Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study.
    The oncologist, 2020, Volume: 25, Issue:3

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations

2020
Is There an Optimal Choice in Refractory Colorectal Cancer? A Network Meta-Analysis.
    Clinical colorectal cancer, 2020, Volume: 19, Issue:2

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations;

2020
Neutropenia in metastatic colorectal cancer receiving trifluridine/tipiracil.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2020, Volume: 31, Issue:7

    Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Humans; Neutropenia; Pyrrolidines; Thymine; Trifluridine

2020
Detection of trifluridine in tumors of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with trifluridine/tipiracil.
    Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2020, Volume: 85, Issue:6

    Topics: Animals; Apoptosis; Cell Proliferation; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Liver Neopl

2020
Trifluridine/tipiracil: A practical guide to its use in the management of refractory metastatic colorectal cancer in Australia.
    Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology, 2020, Volume: 16 Suppl 1

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Australia; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations;

2020
Reply to the letter to the editor 'Neutropenia in metastatic colorectal cancer receiving trifluridine/tipiracil' by Colloca et al.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2020, Volume: 31, Issue:8

    Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Humans; Neutropenia; Pyrrolidines; Thymine; Trifluridine

2020
Impact of tumour growth rate during preceding treatment on tumour response to regorafenib or trifluridine/tipiracil in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
    ESMO open, 2019, Volume: 4, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Decision-Making; Colorectal Neoplasms

2019
Economic Sustainability of Trifluridine/Tipiracil for the Treatment of Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Real Life.
    Clinical colorectal cancer, 2020, Volume: 19, Issue:4

    Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Combinations; England; Humans; Pyrrolidines; Thymi

2020
Regorafenib vs trifluridine/tipiracil for metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapies: A multicenter retrospective comparison study in Japan.
    PloS one, 2020, Volume: 15, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms

2020
Trifluridine/tipiracil in earlier lines of chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2020, Volume: 31, Issue:9

    Topics: Bevacizumab; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Pyrrolidines; Thymine; Trifluridine

2020
Combining Bevacizumab With Trifluridine/Thymidine Phosphorylase Inhibitor Improves the Survival Outcomes Regardless of the Usage History of Bevacizumab in Front-line Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
    Anticancer research, 2020, Volume: 40, Issue:7

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protoc

2020
Neutropenia is an indicator of outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab: a retrospective study.
    Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2020, Volume: 86, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Colorec

2020
Evaluation of RAS mutational status through BEAMing assay to monitor disease progression of metastatic colorectal cancer: a case report.
    Anti-cancer drugs, 2020, Volume: 31, Issue:9

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Camptothecin; Capecitabine; Cetuximab;

2020
Radiosensitisation and enhanced tumour growth delay of colorectal cancer cells by sustained treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil and X-rays.
    Cancer letters, 2020, 11-28, Volume: 493

    Topics: Animals; Caco-2 Cells; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Cell Survival; Chemoradiotherapy; Color

2020
Effectiveness and Safety of Regorafenib vs. Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Unresectable Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Clinical colorectal cancer, 2020, Volume: 19, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Femal

2020
Quality of life in a real-world study of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with trifluridine/tipiracil.
    Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2020, Volume: 27, Issue:5

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Prospect

2020
Trifluridine/tipiracil or regorafenib in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: from clinical trials to daily clinical practice.
    Recenti progressi in medicina, 2020, Volume: 111, Issue:12

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Phe

2020
Post-marketing surveillance study of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2021, Apr-30, Volume: 51, Issue:5

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug

2021
[Long-Term Survivor with Recurrent Gastric Cancer Using Trifluridine/Tipiracil as a Late-Line Chemotherapy].
    Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy, 2020, Volume: 47, Issue:13

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Neo

2020
[Case Series of the TAS-102 plus Bevacizumab(Bev)Combination Therapy in Unresectable Advanced Colorectal Cancer].
    Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy, 2020, Volume: 47, Issue:13

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations

2020
Salvage Therapy After Regorafenib or Trifluridine/Tipiracil Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Conditional Landmark Analysis.
    Anticancer research, 2021, Volume: 41, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Femal

2021
Normalization of metabolic data to total thymine content and its application to determination of 2-hydroxyglutarate.
    Analytical biochemistry, 2021, 04-01, Volume: 618

    Topics: Aged; Colorectal Neoplasms; Female; Glutarates; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Tandem Mass Spectrometry;

2021
[A Case of an Elderly Frail Patient with Unresectable Colorectal Cancer Controlled by Trifluridine/Tipiracil with Bevacizumab Therapy as a First-Line Treatment].
    Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy, 2021, Volume: 48, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Colorectal Neo

2021
[Two Cases of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with TAS-102 plus Bevacizumab].
    Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy, 2021, Volume: 48, Issue:3

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations

2021
Clinical Outcomes Following Trifluridine/Tipiracil Treatment for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Ineligible for Regorafenib Treatment.
    Anticancer research, 2021, Volume: 41, Issue:4

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Colorectal Neoplasms; Comorbidity; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; J

2021
How to incorporate a chemo-free interval into the management of metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Clinical advances in hematology & oncology : H&O, 2020, Volume: 18 Suppl 16, Issue:10

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; COVID-1

2020
Third-line treatments for the management of metastatic colorectal cancer: why to change the mechanism of action after frontline chemotherapy, and insights into management during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    Clinical advances in hematology & oncology : H&O, 2020, Volume: 18 Suppl 16, Issue:10

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Colorectal Neoplasms; COVID-19; Disease Management;

2020
Transitioning from second-line to third-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Clinical advances in hematology & oncology : H&O, 2021, Volume: 19 Suppl 3, Issue:1

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Decision-Making; Colorectal Neoplasms; Dise

2021
Optimizing the treatment sequence from second-line to third-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Clinical advances in hematology & oncology : H&O, 2020, Volume: 18 Suppl 2, Issue:1

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease

2020
Cost-effectiveness of TAS-102 plus bevacizumab versus TAS-102 monotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
    BMC gastroenterology, 2021, Apr-20, Volume: 21, Issue:1

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cost-Benefit Anal

2021
Cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil as a third-line treatment of metastatic gastric cancer, including adenocarcinoma of the gastrohesophageal junction, among patients previously treated in Greece.
    Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research, 2022, Volume: 22, Issue:2

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Greece; Humans; Pyrrolidines; Quality-A

2022
Regorafenib-to-trifluridine/tipiracil Versus the Reverse Sequence for Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Real-life Experience.
    Anticancer research, 2021, Volume: 41, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug

2021
The Pre-treatment Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio Predicts Efficacy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated With TAS-102 and Bevacizumab.
    Anticancer research, 2021, Volume: 41, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Bevacizumab; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Fe

2021
Cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil against nivolumab for heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer in Japan.
    Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2021, Aug-30, Volume: 51, Issue:9

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Co

2021
Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo for third or later lines of treatment in metastatic gastric cancer: an exploratory subgroup analysis from the TAGS study.
    ESMO open, 2021, Volume: 6, Issue:4

    Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Humans; Pyrrolidines; Stomach Neoplasms; Thymine; Trifluridine; Uracil

2021
Long Term Real-World Outcomes of Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer-A Single UK Centre Experience.
    Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2021, 06-18, Volume: 28, Issue:3

    Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Pyrrolidines; Retrospective Studies; Thymine; Trifl

2021
Retrospective Study of Regorafenib Versus TAS-102 Efficacy and Safety in Chemorefractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) Patients: A Multi-institution Real Life Clinical Data.
    Clinical colorectal cancer, 2021, Volume: 20, Issue:3

    Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Phenylurea Compounds; Pyridines; Pyrrolidines; Retr

2021
Prediction of survival in patients with advanced, refractory colorectal cancer in treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil: real-world vs clinical trial data.
    Scientific reports, 2021, 07-12, Volume: 11, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Asthenia; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Femal

2021
Trifluridine/Tipiracil and Regorafenib in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study at a Tertiary Oncology Center.
    The oncologist, 2021, Volume: 26, Issue:12

    Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Phenylurea Compounds; Pyridines; Pyrrolidines; R

2021
Genetic variants of DNA repair-related genes predict efficacy of TAS-102 in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2017, 05-01, Volume: 28, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival;

2017
Propensity Score Analysis of Regorafenib Versus Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Chemotherapy (REGOTAS): A Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum Multicenter Observational Study.
    The oncologist, 2018, Volume: 23, Issue:1

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone

2018
Potential role of polymorphisms in the transporter genes ENT1 and MATE1/OCT2 in predicting TAS-102 efficacy and toxicity in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
    European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2017, Volume: 86

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; California; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Combinations; E

2017
Cost-effectiveness of Trifluridine/tipiracil for Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in England and Wales.
    Clinical colorectal cancer, 2018, Volume: 17, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cost-Benefit Anal

2018
Integrated safety summary for trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102).
    Anti-cancer drugs, 2018, Volume: 29, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Colorectal

2018
Feasibility and effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil in metastatic colorectal cancer: real-life data from The Netherlands.
    International journal of clinical oncology, 2018, Volume: 23, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms

2018
Monitoring trifluridine incorporation in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of colorectal cancer patients under trifluridine/tipiracil medication.
    Scientific reports, 2017, 12-05, Volume: 7, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Marrow Cells; Colorectal Neoplasms; DNA;

2017
TAS-102 in metastatic colorectal cancer.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2018, Volume: 19, Issue:1

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Colorectal Neop

2018
Severe neutropenia: a prognosticator in patients with advanced/recurrent colorectal cancer
    Die Pharmazie, 2017, Jan-10, Volume: 72, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherap

2017
Evaluating trifluridine + tipiracil hydrochloride in a fixed combination (TAS-102) for the treatment of colorectal cancer.
    Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy, 2018, Volume: 19, Issue:6

    Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Prognosis; Pyrrolidines; Thymine; Trifluridine; Ura

2018
Risk factors contributing to the development of neutropenia in patients receiving oral trifluridine-tipiracil (TAS-102) chemotherapy for advanced/recurrent colorectal cancer.
    Die Pharmazie, 2018, 03-05, Volume: 73, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Creatinine; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans;

2018
Regorafenib or Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer? A Perspective on the Basis of Pharmacological Costs.
    Clinical colorectal cancer, 2018, Volume: 17, Issue:2

    Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Humans; Phenylurea Compounds; Pyridines; Pyrrolidines; Retrospective Studies;

2018
Interpreting the Benefit of Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer With Respect to Progression-Free Survival and Overall Survival.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2018, 05-01, Volume: 36, Issue:13

    Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Humans; Progression-Free Survival; Pyr

2018
Usefulness of TAS-102 as Third-line Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
    Anticancer research, 2018, Volume: 38, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Colorectal Neop

2018
Trifluridine/Tipiracil (TAS-102) in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Register in the Frame of the Italian Compassionate Use Program.
    The oncologist, 2018, Volume: 23, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Italy; Male

2018
Real-world Treatment Patterns Among Patients With Colorectal Cancer Treated With Trifluridine/Tipiracil and Regorafenib.
    Clinical colorectal cancer, 2018, Volume: 17, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease Progression; Drug Combinations; Dr

2018
How I treat chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Clinical advances in hematology & oncology : H&O, 2018, Volume: 16, Issue:5

    Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Prot

2018
Biweekly Administration of TAS-102 for Neutropenia Prevention in Patients with Colorectal Cancer.
    Anticancer research, 2018, Volume: 38, Issue:7

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival;

2018
Optimizing Treatment Sequence for Late-line Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Using Trifluridine/Tipiracil and Regorafenib.
    Clinical colorectal cancer, 2018, Volume: 17, Issue:4

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Administration Schedule;

2018
Role of Predictive Value of the Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score for Later-line Chemotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
    Clinical colorectal cancer, 2018, Volume: 17, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers, Tumor; C-Reactive Protein; Colorec

2018
Relationship Between Thymidine Kinase 1 Expression and Trifluridine/Tipiracil Therapy in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of 2 Randomized Clinical Trials.
    Clinical colorectal cancer, 2018, Volume: 17, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Fem

2018
Effective Sequential Combined Chemotherapy with Trifluridine/Tipiracil and Regorafenib in Human Colorectal Cancer Cells.
    International journal of molecular sciences, 2018, Sep-25, Volume: 19, Issue:10

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Apoptosis; Cell Line

2018
Safety profile of trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy in clinical practice: results of the German compassionate-use program for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
    BMC cancer, 2018, Nov-16, Volume: 18, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Compassionate Use Trials; Drug-Related Side Effec

2018
Economic evaluation of trifluridine and tipiracil hydrochloride in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in Greece.
    Journal of comparative effectiveness research, 2019, Volume: 8, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Antimetabolites; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Greece; Humans; Pyrrolidines; S

2019
Low Skeletal Muscle Mass before Salvage-Line Chemotherapy Is a Poor Prognostic Factor in Patients with Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
    Digestion, 2019, Volume: 99, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival;

2019
Evaluation of Tolerability of Trifluridine/Tipiracil Combination Tablet in Patients With Advanced/Recurrent Colorectal Cancer.
    Anticancer research, 2019, Volume: 39, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anemia; Anorexia; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Co

2019
Efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil in third-line and beyond for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in routine clinical practice: patterns of use and prognostic nomogram.
    Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2020, Volume: 22, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Drug-Related Side Effects a

2020
The Onset of Grade ≥3 Neutropenia Is Associated With Longer Overall Survival in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated With Trifluridine/Tipiracil.
    Anticancer research, 2019, Volume: 39, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Female; Hum

2019
Pretreatment Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Survival After TAS-102 Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
    Anticancer research, 2019, Volume: 39, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Biomarkers, Tumor; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans;

2019
Functional Module Connectivity Map (FMCM): a framework for searching repurposed drug compounds for systems treatment of cancer and an application to colorectal adenocarcinoma.
    PloS one, 2014, Volume: 9, Issue:1

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Algorithms; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Repositioning; Epistasis, Genetic; Ethacrynic

2014
Efficacy of combination chemotherapy using a novel oral chemotherapeutic agent, TAS-102, with irinotecan hydrochloride on human colorectal and gastric cancer xenografts.
    Anticancer research, 2015, Volume: 35, Issue:3

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Camptothecin; Cell Line, Tumor; Colorectal

2015
Efficacy of combination chemotherapy using a novel oral chemotherapeutic agent, TAS-102, together with bevacizumab, cetuximab, or panitumumab on human colorectal cancer xenografts.
    Oncology reports, 2015, Volume: 33, Issue:5

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocol

2015
Involvement of Concentrative Nucleoside Transporter 1 in Intestinal Absorption of Trifluridine Using Human Small Intestinal Epithelial Cells.
    Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 2015, Volume: 104, Issue:9

    Topics: Animals; Caco-2 Cells; Carrier Proteins; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Membrane Permeability; Colorectal Ne

2015
Crucial roles of thymidine kinase 1 and deoxyUTPase in incorporating the antineoplastic nucleosides trifluridine and 2'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine into DNA.
    International journal of oncology, 2015, Volume: 46, Issue:6

    Topics: Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Colorectal Neoplasms; DNA, Neoplasm; Drug Combinations; Equilibrati

2015
Drug Improves Survival in Refractory Colorectal Cancer.
    Cancer discovery, 2015, Volume: 5, Issue:7

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations;

2015
Efficacy of Combination Chemotherapy Using a Novel Oral Chemotherapeutic Agent, TAS-102, with Oxaliplatin on Human Colorectal and Gastric Cancer Xenografts.
    Anticancer research, 2015, Volume: 35, Issue:9

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols

2015
Unmetabolized Folic Acid in Prediagnostic Plasma and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer.
    Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2015, Volume: 107, Issue:12

    Topics: Adult; Case-Control Studies; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cytosine; Dietary Supplements; Female; Folic Acid

2015
[Short-Term Outcome of TAS-102 for Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer].
    Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy, 2015, Volume: 42, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Male; Middl

2015
Safety and Efficacy of Trifluridine/Tipiracil Monotherapy in Clinical Practice for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Experience at a Single Institution.
    Clinical colorectal cancer, 2016, Volume: 15, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Combinations;

2016
Emerging phase 3 data in relapsed/refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Clinical advances in hematology & oncology : H&O, 2016, Volume: 14, Issue:1

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Colorectal Neop

2016
Efficacy and Safety of TAS-102 in Clinical Practice of Salvage Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
    Anticancer research, 2016, Volume: 36, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocol

2016
In brief: trifluridine/tipiracil (Lonsurf) for metastatic colorectal cancer.
    The Medical letter on drugs and therapeutics, 2016, Jun-06, Volume: 58, Issue:1496

    Topics: Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasm

2016
An interview with Alfredo Falcone and Lisa Salvatore: RECOURSE and trifluridine/tipiracil in metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Future oncology (London, England), 2016, Volume: 12, Issue:18

    Topics: Achievement; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Career Choice; Clinical Trials as Topic

2016
TAS-102 Safety in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results From the First Postmarketing Surveillance Study.
    Clinical colorectal cancer, 2016, Volume: 15, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Fema

2016
TAS-102, the first "cardio-gentle" fluoropyrimidine in the colorectal cancer landscape?
    BMC cancer, 2016, 07-04, Volume: 16

    Topics: Cardiotoxicity; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Pyrrolidines; Thymine; Treatment Ou

2016
Chemotherapy induced neutropenia at 1-month mark is a predictor of overall survival in patients receiving TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a cohort study.
    BMC cancer, 2016, 07-13, Volume: 16

    Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia; Clinical Trials,

2016
Efficacy and Safety of Regorafenib or TAS-102 in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Therapies.
    Anticancer research, 2016, Volume: 36, Issue:8

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Combinations; Drug

2016
Self-Reported Adherence to Trifluridine and Tipiracil Hydrochloride for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Oncology, 2016, Volume: 91, Issue:4

    Topics: Abdominal Pain; Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemot

2016
Neutropenia as a Predictive Factor in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated With TAS-102.
    Clinical colorectal cancer, 2017, Volume: 16, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Fema

2017
The Role of Aspirin as Antitumoral Agent for Heavily Pretreated Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Receiving Capecitabine Monotherapy.
    Clinical colorectal cancer, 2017, Volume: 16, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aspirin; Capecit

2017
Regorafenib Versus Trifluridine/Tipiracil for Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Comparison.
    Clinical colorectal cancer, 2017, Volume: 16, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Cohort Studies; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Combi

2017
Effect of a novel oral chemotherapeutic agent containing a combination of trifluridine, tipiracil and the novel triple angiokinase inhibitor nintedanib, on human colorectal cancer xenografts.
    Oncology reports, 2016, Volume: 36, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms;

2016
Interstitial pneumonia in a patient treated with TAS-102 for metastatic colorectal cancer: a case report.
    Journal of medical case reports, 2016, Nov-03, Volume: 10, Issue:1

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Japan; Lung Diseases, Inters

2016
Comparison of two different screening methods for the KRAS mutation in colorectal cancer.
    Clinical laboratory, 2010, Volume: 56, Issue:5-6

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Base Sequence; Cell Line, Tumor; Codon; Colorectal Neoplasms; DNA Mutational Analysi

2010
TAS-102 in refractory colorectal cancer: caution is needed.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2012, Volume: 13, Issue:10

    Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Male; Pyrrolidines; Thymine; Trifluridine;

2012
A novel antimetabolite, TAS-102 retains its effect on FU-related resistant cancer cells.
    International journal of molecular medicine, 2004, Volume: 13, Issue:4

    Topics: Animals; Antimetabolites; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Cell Line, Tumor; Colorectal Neoplasms; C

2004
A novel antimetabolite, TAS-102 retains its effect on FU-related resistant cancer cells.
    International journal of molecular medicine, 2004, Volume: 13, Issue:4

    Topics: Animals; Antimetabolites; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Cell Line, Tumor; Colorectal Neoplasms; C

2004
A novel antimetabolite, TAS-102 retains its effect on FU-related resistant cancer cells.
    International journal of molecular medicine, 2004, Volume: 13, Issue:4

    Topics: Animals; Antimetabolites; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Cell Line, Tumor; Colorectal Neoplasms; C

2004
A novel antimetabolite, TAS-102 retains its effect on FU-related resistant cancer cells.
    International journal of molecular medicine, 2004, Volume: 13, Issue:4

    Topics: Animals; Antimetabolites; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Cell Line, Tumor; Colorectal Neoplasms; C

2004
[The clinical importance of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T polymorphism in the 5-fluoropyrimidine-based therapy of metastatic colorectal tumours].
    Magyar onkologia, 2004, Volume: 48, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Case-Control Studies

2004
MDR1 T-129C polymorphism can be predictive of differentiation, and thereby prognosis of colorectal adenocarcinomas in Japanese.
    Biological & pharmaceutical bulletin, 2006, Volume: 29, Issue:7

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Cell Differentiation; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cytosine; DNA Primers; Gene Expression R

2006
Total plasma homocysteine and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T polymorphism in patients with colorectal carcinoma.
    World journal of gastroenterology, 2006, Oct-14, Volume: 12, Issue:38

    Topics: Aged; Carcinoma; Cell Proliferation; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cytosine; Female; Genotype; Homocysteine;

2006
Identification of a novel mutation in the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene in a patient with a lethal outcome following 5-fluorouracil administration and the determination of its frequency in a population of 500 patients with colorectal carcinoma.
    Clinical biochemistry, 2007, Volume: 40, Issue:1-2

    Topics: Adenine; Aged; Alleles; Colorectal Neoplasms; Dihydrouracil Dehydrogenase (NADP); DNA Mutational Ana

2007
The methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase 677C-->T polymorphism and distal colorectal adenoma risk.
    Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2000, Volume: 9, Issue:7

    Topics: Adenoma; Aged; Case-Control Studies; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cytosine; Female; Genotype; Humans; Loss

2000