thymine has been researched along with Colorectal Neoplasms in 187 studies
Colorectal Neoplasms: Tumors or cancer of the COLON or the RECTUM or both. Risk factors for colorectal cancer include chronic ULCERATIVE COLITIS; FAMILIAL POLYPOSIS COLI; exposure to ASBESTOS; and irradiation of the CERVIX UTERI.
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
" fluoropyrimidine and irinotecan plus bevacizumab (control) as second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)." | 9.69 | Trifluridine/tipiracil+bevacizumab (BEV) vs. fluoropyrimidine-irinotecan+BEV as second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomised noninferiority trial. ( Hara, H; Ishihara, S; Kagawa, Y; Kajiwara, T; Kawakami, H; Kotaka, M; Kuboki, Y; Makiyama, A; Masuishi, T; Morita, S; Nakajima, TE; Nakamura, M; Ojima, H; Oki, E; Ozawa, D; Shirao, K; Sugimoto, N; Sunakawa, Y; Takashima, A; Takenaka, N; Taniguchi, H; Terazawa, T; Watanabe, J; Yoshino, T, 2023) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) improved both overall and progression-free survival (OS, PFS) of patients with pre-treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in the pivotal phase III RECOURSE trial." | 9.51 | Efficacy, safety and quality-of-life data from patients with pre-treated metastatic colorectal cancer receiving trifluridine/tipiracil: results of the TALLISUR trial. ( Ettrich, TJ; Heinemann, V; Hess, J; Karthaus, M; Klein, A; Kretzschmar, A; Pelz, H; Reisländer, T; Riera-Knorrenschild, J; Vehling-Kaiser, U; Weiss, L; Welslau, M, 2022) |
"We conducted a phase I study to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, and efficacy of trametinib in combination with TAS-102 in patients with chemotherapy-refractory KRAS-mutant, wild-type PIK3CA/PTEN metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)." | 9.51 | A Phase I Clinical Trial of Trametinib in Combination with TAS-102 in Patients with Chemotherapy-Resistant RAS-Mutated (PIK3CA/PTEN-Wild Type) Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. ( Chuang, J; Fakih, M; Gong, J; Li, SM; Wang, C, 2022) |
"A previous Phase I/II study demonstrated that TAS-102 (trifluridine/tipiracil [FTD/TPI]) plus bevacizumab (Bev) has encouraging efficacy and controllable safety for patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer." | 9.41 | Trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab as a first-line treatment for elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (KSCC1602): A multicenter phase II trial. ( Akagi, Y; Ando, K; Baba, H; Kabashima, A; Kashiwada, T; Kawanaka, H; Kotaka, M; Maehara, Y; Makiyama, A; Miwa, K; Miyamoto, Y; Mori, M; Noguchi, T; Oki, E; Saeki, H; Shimokawa, M; Yuge, K, 2021) |
"Lay abstract PRECONNECT is an international study demonstrating the efficacy and tolerability of the drug combination trifluridine/tipiracil in adult patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated in everyday clinical practice." | 9.41 | Italian results of the PRECONNECT study: safety and efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil in metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Banzi, MC; Barone, CA; Bartolomeo, MD; Bergamo, F; Besse, MG; Blasi, L; Bordonaro, R; Costanzo, FD; Falcone, A; Frassineti, GL; Garufi, C; Giuliani, F; Latiano, TP; Martinelli, E; Personeni, N; Racca, P; Spione, M; Tamburini, E; Tonini, G; Zaniboni, A, 2021) |
"Although the efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) plus bevacizumab (BEV) against metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has been demonstrated, little is known about its effectiveness upon disease stratification by RAS mutations." | 9.41 | Phase II study of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab by RAS mutation status in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard therapies: JFMC51-1702-C7. ( Asayama, M; Kagawa, Y; Maehara, Y; Makiyama, A; Manaka, D; Matsuhashi, N; Mitsugi, K; Nakamura, M; Oba, K; Ojima, H; Oki, E; Okuda, H; Shimada, Y; Shiozawa, M; Takahashi, T; Watanabe, J; Yamazaki, K; Yoshida, K; Yoshino, T; Yuasa, Y, 2021) |
"We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of combination treatment with panitumumab plus trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who were refractory/intolerant to standard therapies other than anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy." | 9.41 | Safety and efficacy of panitumumab in combination with trifluridine/tipiracil for pre-treated patients with unresectable, metastatic colorectal cancer with wild-type RAS: The phase 1/2 APOLLON study. ( Denda, T; Gamoh, M; Goto, M; Iwata, M; Kagawa, Y; Kato, T; Komatsu, Y; Kotaka, M; Kuboki, Y; Makiyama, A; Oba, K; Oki, E; Satake, H; Shibuya, K; Soeda, J; Tanioka, H; Yamaguchi, K; Yamazaki, K; Yasui, H; Yoshino, T, 2021) |
"The current study aimed to determine the efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil for elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer." | 9.41 | Phase II study of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) therapy in elderly patients with colorectal cancer (T-CORE1401): geriatric assessment tools and plasma drug concentrations as possible predictive biomarkers. ( Imai, H; Ishioka, C; Kato, S; Komine, K; Kuroki, M; Ohori, H; Otsuka, K; Ouchi, K; Sakamoto, Y; Shibata, H; Shimodaira, H; Shirota, H; Takahashi, M; Takahashi, S; Takahashi, Y; Tanaka, M; Tsuji, Y; Yamaguchi, H; Yamaguchi, T; Yoshioka, T, 2021) |
"The phase II J003 (N = 169) and phase III RECOURSE (N = 800) trials demonstrated a significant improvement in survival with trifluridine (FTD)/tipiracil (TPI) versus placebo in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer." | 9.34 | Neutropenia and survival outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with trifluridine/tipiracil in the RECOURSE and J003 trials. ( Argilés, G; Baba, H; Benedetti, F; Cleary, JM; Esaki, T; Falcone, A; Garcia-Carbonero, R; Hamada, C; Hochster, HS; Komatsu, Y; Lenz, HJ; Makris, L; Mayer, RJ; Moriwaki, T; Muro, K; Nishina, T; Ohtsu, A; Peeters, M; Shimada, Y; Shinozaki, E; Sobrero, A; Sugimoto, N; Tanase, T; Tran, B; Tsuji, A; Tsuji, Y; Van Cutsem, E; Yamaguchi, K; Yamashita, F; Yamazaki, K; Yoshino, T; Zaniboni, A, 2020) |
"In RECOURSE (, trifluridine/tipiracil significantly improved overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo in patients with pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)." | 9.34 | Safety, efficacy and patient-reported outcomes with trifluridine/tipiracil in pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer: results of the PRECONNECT study. ( Atlan, D; Bachet, JB; Becquart, M; Cicin, I; Cremolini, C; Falcone, A; Mounedji, N; Ozet, A; Phelip, JM; Portales, F; Price, T; Taieb, J; Van Cutsem, E; Vidot, L; Wyrwicz, L, 2020) |
"We designed an open-label, noncomparative phase II study to assess the safety and efficacy of first-line treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab (TT-B) and capecitabine plus bevacizumab (C-B) in untreated patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who were not candidates for combination with cytotoxic chemotherapies." | 9.34 | Trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab in patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer ineligible for intensive therapy: the randomized TASCO1 study. ( Amellal, N; Argilés, G; Aubel, P; Borg, C; Danielewicz, I; Egorov, A; Falcone, A; Fedyanin, M; Garcia-Alfonso, P; Glynne-Jones, R; Kanehisa, A; Kroening, H; Moiseenko, V; Pfeiffer, P; Punt, CJA; Saunders, MP; Stroyakovskiy, D; Van Cutsem, E; Van de Wouw, AJ; Wasan, H, 2020) |
"This study evaluated the cost utility of regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil (T/T) compared with that of best supportive care (BSC) in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer previously treated with, or not considered candidates for, available therapies, including fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-based chemotherapies; anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents; and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor agents, in Japan." | 9.34 | Comparative Cost-utility Analysis of Regorafenib and Trifluridine/Tipiracil in The Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Japan. ( Kashiwa, M; Matsushita, R, 2020) |
"A previous phase I/II C-TASK FORCE study of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for patients with heavily pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) showed promising activity with an acceptable toxicity profile." | 9.30 | Retrospective cohort study of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) plus bevacizumab versus trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Bando, H; Horasawa, S; Kaneko, A; Kawazoe, A; Kojima, T; Kotani, D; Kuboki, Y; Nakamura, Y; Shitara, K; Taniguchi, H; Tsuji, A; Yoshino, T, 2019) |
"Purpose Trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) was effective in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in a phase II Japanese trial." | 9.27 | Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Trial of Trifluridine/Tipiracil (TAS-102) Monotherapy in Asian Patients With Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The TERRA Study. ( Ahn, JB; Bai, Y; Bi, F; Guo, W; Han, SW; Kim, TW; Li, J; Li, Q; Lin, D; Liu, T; Ma, D; Pan, H; Park, YS; Qin, S; Shen, L; Shi, C; Sriuranpong, V; Wu, C; Xu, J; Xu, R, 2018) |
"In the phase III RECOURSE trial, trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) extended overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) with an acceptable toxicity profile in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory or intolerant to standard therapies." | 9.27 | The subgroups of the phase III RECOURSE trial of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) versus placebo with best supportive care in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Benavides, M; Ciardiello, F; Denda, T; Grávalos, C; Laurent, S; Lenz, HJ; Loehrer, P; Longo-Munoz, F; Makris, L; Mayer, RJ; Muro, K; Ohtsu, A; Portales, F; Siena, S; Tsuji, Y; Van Cutsem, E; Winkler, R; Yamaguchi, K, 2018) |
"Regorafenib and TAS-102 are standard treatment options in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer based on improvement in overall survival by 6 and 8 weeks, respectively, when compared with best supportive care alone (BSC)." | 9.27 | Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Regorafenib and TAS-102 in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the United States. ( Barzi, A; Cho, SK; Hay, JW, 2018) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI; TAS-102, Lonsurf®), a novel form of chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), has shown clinical benefit in the global, phase III RECOURSE trial, regardless of patient age." | 9.27 | Safety of trifluridine/tipiracil in an open-label expanded-access program in elderly and younger patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Cohen, SJ; Grothey, A; Hochster, HS; Makris, L; Mayer, RJ; Winkler, R, 2018) |
" We investigated the recommended dose (RD) of TAS-102 plus irinotecan for metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and oxaliplatin." | 9.20 | Phase I study of TAS-102 and irinotecan combination therapy in Japanese patients with advanced colorectal cancer. ( Boku, N; Doi, T; Fuse, N; Koizumi, W; Ohtsu, A; Shimada, K; Takinishi, Y; Yamazaki, K; Yoshino, T, 2015) |
"Direct randomized comparisons of regorafenib, TAS-102, and fruquintinib for treating metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are lacking." | 9.05 | Regorafenib, TAS-102, or fruquintinib for metastatic colorectal cancer: any difference in randomized trials? ( Li, J; Peng, Z; Shen, L; Wang, Q; Wang, X; Zhang, Q, 2020) |
"Electronic databases were searched to identify studies comparing the efficacy and safety of regorafenib and TAS-102 in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer using pooled analyses." | 9.05 | A meta-analysis comparing regorafenib with TAS-102 for treating refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Liu, H; Su, GL; Wang, JC; Wang, YY, 2020) |
"Regorafenib at different dosing strategies and TAS-102 are treatment options for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)." | 9.01 | A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Regorafenib and TAS-102 in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. ( Ahn, DH; Bekaii-Saab, T; Benkhadra, R; Firwana, B; Hubbard, JM; Mody, K; Murad, MH; Sonbol, MB; Walden, DJ; Wang, Z, 2019) |
"Regorafenib and TAS-102 have shown to be superior to placebo in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer." | 8.98 | A Comparison of Regorafenib and TAS-102 for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. ( Abrahao, ABK; Berry, S; Chan, KKW; Ko, YJ, 2018) |
"Regorafenib is a standard salvage line therapy used for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC)." | 8.31 | Regorafenib is suitable for advanced colorectal cancer patients who have previously received trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab. ( Ikoma, T; Matsumoto, T; Miura, K; Nagai, H; Takatani, M; Tsuduki, T; Watanabe, T; Yamamura, S; Yasui, H, 2023) |
"The aim of this analysis is to assess the pharmacological costs of trifluridine/tipiracil as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients who were not candidates for combination with cytotoxic chemotherapies." | 8.12 | Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Combination with Bevacizumab in First-Line for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Way Forward. A Point of View Based on Cost-Effectiveness. ( Giuliani, J, 2022) |
"The RECOURSE trial supported trifluridine/tipiracil as a treatment option in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)." | 8.12 | The effect of prognostic factors at baseline on the efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A Portuguese exploratory analysis. ( Basto, R; Bonito, N; Gomes, I; Jacinto, P; Magalhães, J; Paulo, J; Pereira, TC; Sousa, G; Sousa, MJ, 2022) |
"Regorafenib (R) and trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) are of proven efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patient's refractory to standard therapies." | 8.12 | Sequential Treatment With Trifluridine/Tipiracil and Regorafenib in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: An AGEO Prospective "Real-World Study". ( Artru, P; Bouché, O; Coriat, R; Coutzac, C; De La Fouchardière, C; Doat, S; Gallois, C; Henriques, J; Masson, T; Moulin, V; Saint, A; Taieb, J; Tougeron, D; Trouilloud, I; Vernerey, D, 2022) |
"The RECOURSE trial demonstrated a modest benefit in overall survival (OS) for trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) versus placebo in pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients." | 8.12 | Quality of Life and Survival of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated With Trifluridine-Tipiracil (QUALITAS). ( Dijksterhuis, WPM; Elferink, MAG; Hamers, PAH; Koopman, M; May, AM; Punt, CJA; Stellato, RK; Vink, GR, 2022) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (TFTD), with or without bevacizumab (Bev), and regorafenib are salvage chemotherapy options for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)." | 8.12 | Influence of precedent drug on the subsequent therapy in the sequence of trifluridine/tipiracil with/out bevacizumab and regorafenib for unresectable or recurrent colorectal cancer. ( Boku, N; Hirano, H; Iwasa, S; Okita, N; Oshima, K; Shoji, H; Takashima, A, 2022) |
"To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) compared with best supportive care (BSC) for the treatment of patients with metastatic gastric cancer(mGC), including gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma(GEJ), who have received at least two prior therapies for metastatic disease and are eligible for third-line treatment, in Greece." | 8.12 | Cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil as a third-line treatment of metastatic gastric cancer, including adenocarcinoma of the gastrohesophageal junction, among patients previously treated in Greece. ( Androulakis, N; Beletsi, A; Boukovinas, I; Chotzagiannoglou, V; Gourzoulidis, G; Karamouzis, M; Koulentaki, M; Koumarianou, A; Kourlaba, G; Papakotoulas, P; Samadas, E; Souglakos, J; Xynogalos, S, 2022) |
"Recently, trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) treatment was established as a later-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)." | 8.02 | The Efficacy and Safety of Trifluridine/Tipiracil Treatment for Elderly Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in a Real-world Setting. ( En, W; Fukuoka, T; Hirakawa, K; Iseki, Y; Kashiwagi, S; Ohira, M; Okazaki, Y; Shibutani, M, 2021) |
"The novel oral nucleoside antineoplastic agent trifluridine/tipiracil was approved for metastatic colorectal cancer in Japan in March 2014." | 8.02 | Post-marketing surveillance study of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Funato, Y; Koyama, T; Muro, K; Ozawa, D; Tajiri, M; Uetake, H; Yamaguchi, Y; Yoshino, T, 2021) |
"This study aimed to describe the chemotherapy effects after trifluridine/tipiracil (TFTD) and/or regorafenib treatment in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients." | 8.02 | Salvage Therapy After Regorafenib or Trifluridine/Tipiracil Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Conditional Landmark Analysis. ( Kawakami, K; Nakashima, M; Takeuchi, M; Tanaka, S, 2021) |
"Although the effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil(TFTD)with bevacizumab for unresectable colorectal cancer that was refractory to previous standard chemotherapy was reported, its effectiveness as a first-line treatment, especially for elderly frail patients, is unclear." | 8.02 | [A Case of an Elderly Frail Patient with Unresectable Colorectal Cancer Controlled by Trifluridine/Tipiracil with Bevacizumab Therapy as a First-Line Treatment]. ( Arigami, T; Kita, Y; Kurahara, H; Maemura, K; Matsumoto, R; Mori, S; Natsugoe, S; Sasaki, K; Toda, H, 2021) |
"In later-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), trifluridine/tipiracil is often selected because regorafenib is difficult to use in patients with comorbidities such as thrombosis, hemorrhage, or cardiac events." | 8.02 | Clinical Outcomes Following Trifluridine/Tipiracil Treatment for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Ineligible for Regorafenib Treatment. ( Denda, T; Esaki, T; Fukuoka, S; Hatachi, Y; Kajiwara, T; Kumekawa, Y; Makiyama, A; Masuishi, T; Moriwaki, T; Niisato, Y; Shimada, Y; Sugimoto, N; Suto, T; Takashima, A; Yamazaki, K, 2021) |
"Regorafenib (REG) and trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) have have been shown to improve overall survival in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer." | 8.02 | Regorafenib-to-trifluridine/tipiracil Versus the Reverse Sequence for Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Real-life Experience. ( Ceribelli, A; Chilelli, MG; DE Marco, S; Gemma, D; Grande, R; Morandi, MG; Ruggeri, EM; Saltarelli, R; Signorelli, C; Sperduti, I; Spinelli, GP; Zoratto, F, 2021) |
"In the UK, Trifluridine-tipiracil (Lonsurf) is used to treat metastatic colorectal cancer in the third-line setting, after prior exposure to fluoropyrimidine-based regimes." | 8.02 | Long Term Real-World Outcomes of Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer-A Single UK Centre Experience. ( Essapen, S; Mendis, J; Tong, D; Wang, L, 2021) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil increases overall survival (OS) in patients with refractory, metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)." | 8.02 | Prediction of survival in patients with advanced, refractory colorectal cancer in treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil: real-world vs clinical trial data. ( Carmona-Bayonas, A; Carriles Fernández, C; Cousillas Castiñeiras, A; Covela Rúa, M; De la Cámara Gómez, J; Fernández Montes, A; Garcia García, T; Gonzalez Villarroel, P; Jimenez-Fonseca, P; Martinez Lago, N; Méndez, JCM; Sanchez Cánovas, M; Vázquez Rivera, F, 2021) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) and regorafenib prolong survival for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC); limited comparative effectiveness data exist." | 8.02 | Trifluridine/Tipiracil and Regorafenib in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study at a Tertiary Oncology Center. ( Abhyankar, R; Barghout, VE; Brais, LK; Duh, MS; Fuchs, CS; Huynh, L; Ng, K; Patel, AK; Yenikomshian, MA, 2021) |
"Trifluridine and tipiracil (FTD + TPI) and regorafenib (REG) are approved treatments for the treatment of refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)." | 7.96 | Real-World Adherence in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with Trifluridine plus Tipiracil or Regorafenib. ( Barghout, V; Duh, MS; Germain, G; Jacques, P; Laliberté, F; Patel, AK; Yenikomshian, MA, 2020) |
"Although regorafenib or trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) has been recognized as a later-line standard treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), not all patients have beneficial outcomes." | 7.96 | Prognostic scores for evaluating the survival benefit of regorafenib or trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: an exploratory analysis of the REGOTAS study. ( Denda, T; Enomoto, M; Esaki, T; Fukuoka, S; Hatachi, Y; Ishikawa, T; Kajiwara, T; Kashiwada, T; Komatsu, Y; Kumekawa, Y; Makiyama, A; Masuishi, T; Moriwaki, T; Oki, E; Sakai, D; Shimada, Y; Sugimoto, N; Suto, T; Takashima, A; Tamura, T; Tsuchihashi, K; Tsuji, A; Ueno, H; Yamashita, K; Yamazaki, K, 2020) |
"The standard first- and second- line chemotherapy backbone regimens for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/capecitabine-based with addition of irinotecan or oxaliplatin." | 7.96 | Review of metastatic colorectal cancer treatment pathways and early clinical experience of trifluridine/tipiracil in the UK named patient programme. ( Carter, AM; Iveson, T; Mullamitha, S; Shiu, KK; Spooner, C; Stevens, D, 2020) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil is available on the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) previously treated with, or not considered candidates for, fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based chemotherapies, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor agents." | 7.96 | Trifluridine/tipiracil: A practical guide to its use in the management of refractory metastatic colorectal cancer in Australia. ( Burge, M; Chantrill, L; Gibbs, P; Pavlakis, N; Price, T; Shapiro, J; Sjoquist, K, 2020) |
"Regorafenib (REG) and trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) showed survival benefits in metastatic colorectal cancer patients previously treated with standard chemotherapies; therefore, we compared the efficacy and safety of these two treatments." | 7.96 | Regorafenib vs trifluridine/tipiracil for metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapies: A multicenter retrospective comparison study in Japan. ( Hatachi, Y; Kato, T; Kotaka, M; Ogata, M; Ogata, T; Satake, H; Tsuji, A; Yasui, H, 2020) |
"The efficacy of trifluridine/thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor (FTD/TPI) plus bevacizumab as later-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has been demonstrated." | 7.96 | Combining Bevacizumab With Trifluridine/Thymidine Phosphorylase Inhibitor Improves the Survival Outcomes Regardless of the Usage History of Bevacizumab in Front-line Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. ( Fukuoka, T; Hirakawa, K; Iseki, Y; Kashiwagi, S; Maeda, K; Nagahara, H; Ohira, M; Okazaki, Y; Shibutani, M; Wang, EN, 2020) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI; marketed as Lonsurf®) has shown clinically relevant activity after fluoropyrimidine failure in colorectal cancer and may thus be of increased efficacy compared with current standard capecitabine chemoradiation." | 7.96 | Radiosensitisation and enhanced tumour growth delay of colorectal cancer cells by sustained treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil and X-rays. ( Brinker, A; Burdak-Rothkamm, S; Christiansen, S; Frenzel, T; Horn, M; Petersen, C; Rieckmann, T; Rothkamm, K; Schumacher, U; Stein, A, 2020) |
"Compared with the best supportive care, a survival benefit of using regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil (TFTD) in patients with colorectal cancer has been shown in previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs)." | 7.96 | Effectiveness and Safety of Regorafenib vs. Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Unresectable Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study. ( Kawakami, K; Nakashima, M; Takeuchi, M, 2020) |
" The present study was initiated to address the lack of published prospective data about the qol benefits of trifluridine/tipiracil (ftd/tpi) compared with best supportive care (bsc) in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mcrc)." | 7.96 | Quality of life in a real-world study of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with trifluridine/tipiracil. ( Cheung, WY; Dolley, A; Kavan, P, 2020) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil combination has shown a benefit over placebo in the treatment of patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)." | 7.96 | Efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil in third-line and beyond for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in routine clinical practice: patterns of use and prognostic nomogram. ( Candamio Folgar, S; Carmona Campos, M; Cousillas Castiñeiras, A; Covela Rúa, M; de la Cámara Gómez, J; Fernandez Montes, A; Gallardo Martín, E; García Gómez, J; Gonzalez Villarroel, P; Jorge Fernández, M; Martinez Lago, N; Méndez Méndez, JC; París Bouzas, L; Pellón Augusto, ML; Reboredo López, M; Salgado Fernández, M; Vazquez Rivera, F, 2020) |
"Although regorafenib (REG) and trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) have been recognised as standard treatments in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the best option remains unclear." | 7.91 | Impact of tumour growth rate during preceding treatment on tumour response to regorafenib or trifluridine/tipiracil in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Kadowaki, S; Kawakami, T; Kawamoto, Y; Komatsu, Y; Masuishi, T; Muranaka, T; Muro, K; Nakatsumi, H; Omae, K; Onozawa, Y; Tajika, M; Taniguchi, H; Yamazaki, K; Yasui, H; Yuki, S, 2019) |
"To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of trifluridine and tipiracil hydrochloride (FTD/TPI) compared with best supportive care (BSC) or regorafenib for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who have been previously treated with or are not considered candidates for available therapies including fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based chemotherapies, anti-VEGF agents and anti-EGFR agents in Greece." | 7.91 | Economic evaluation of trifluridine and tipiracil hydrochloride in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in Greece. ( Gourzoulidis, G; Kourlaba, G; Maniadakis, N; Pentheroudakis, G; Petrakis, D; Souglakos, J, 2019) |
"This study aimed to clarify the tolerability of a trifluridine/tipiracil combination tablet (TAS-102) in patients with advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer over 75 years of age." | 7.91 | Evaluation of Tolerability of Trifluridine/Tipiracil Combination Tablet in Patients With Advanced/Recurrent Colorectal Cancer. ( Kimura, M; Teramachi, H; Usami, E; Yoshimura, T, 2019) |
"The aim of this report was to evaluate the onset of grade≥3 neutropenia during the first-cycle in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with trifluridine/tipiracil and its relationship with clinical parameters of interest, such as overall survival (OS)." | 7.91 | The Onset of Grade ≥3 Neutropenia Is Associated With Longer Overall Survival in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated With Trifluridine/Tipiracil. ( Bonetti, A; Giuliani, J, 2019) |
"This study compared the efficacy of regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil (TFTD) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who are refractory to standard chemotherapy, because despite their clinical approval, it still remains unclear which of these two drugs should be used as initial treatment." | 7.88 | Propensity Score Analysis of Regorafenib Versus Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Chemotherapy (REGOTAS): A Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum Multicenter Observational Study. ( Baba, E; Denda, T; Enomoto, M; Esaki, T; Fukuoka, S; Gosho, M; Ishikawa, T; Kajiwara, T; Kashiwada, T; Komatsu, Y; Kumekawa, Y; Makiyama, C; Moriwaki, T; Okuyama, H; Sakai, D; Satake, H; Shimada, Y; Sugimoto, N; Sugiyama, M; Suto, T; Takashima, A; Tamura, T; Taniguchi, H; Watanabe, T; Yamashita, K; Yamazaki, K, 2018) |
" Clinical data were derived from the pivotal phase III (Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study of TAS-102 plus Best Supportive Care [BSC] versus Placebo plus BSC in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Chemotherapies [RECOURSE]) and supporting phase II (J003-10040030) randomized controlled trial of trifluridine/tipiracil + BSC versus placebo + BSC, as well as the phase III Colorectal Cancer Treated With Regorafenib or Placebo After Failure of Standard Therapy (CORRECT) randomized controlled trial of regorafenib, and were extrapolated to estimate lifetime outcomes." | 7.88 | Cost-effectiveness of Trifluridine/tipiracil for Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in England and Wales. ( Bullement, A; Fougeray, R; Hatswell, AJ; Underhill, S, 2018) |
"The RECOURSE trial showed clinical efficacy for trifluridine/tipiracil for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer patients." | 7.88 | Feasibility and effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil in metastatic colorectal cancer: real-life data from The Netherlands. ( Baars, A; Beerepoot, LV; Boot, H; Creemers, GJ; de Groot, JW; Hamberg, P; Jansen, RL; Kapiteijn, E; Koopman, M; Kwakman, JJM; Los, M; Opdam, FL; Punt, CJA; Schut, H; Sommeijer, DW; van Meerten, E; van Rooijen, JM; Vestjens, JH; Vink, G; Vulink, AJE, 2018) |
"Elucidating the factors influencing severe neutropenia could aid in earlier management of neutropenia during oral trifluridine-tipiracil (TAS-102) chemotherapy in advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer (CRC)." | 7.88 | Risk factors contributing to the development of neutropenia in patients receiving oral trifluridine-tipiracil (TAS-102) chemotherapy for advanced/recurrent colorectal cancer. ( Ikeda, Y; Iwai, M; Kawachi, S; Kimura, M; Mitsuoka, M; Usami, E; Yasue, F; Yoshimura, T, 2018) |
"Salvage chemotherapy for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer using trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) and regorafenib has shown survival benefits." | 7.88 | Effective Sequential Combined Chemotherapy with Trifluridine/Tipiracil and Regorafenib in Human Colorectal Cancer Cells. ( Matsuo, K; Matsuoka, K; Nakagawa, F; Okabe, H; Takechi, T; Tanaka, N, 2018) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102, Lonsurf®), a novel oral anti-tumor agent combining an anti-neoplastic thymidine-based nucleoside analogue (trifluridine, FTD) with a thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor (tipiracil hydrochloride, TPI) presents a new treatment option for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients refractory or intolerant to standard therapies." | 7.88 | Safety profile of trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy in clinical practice: results of the German compassionate-use program for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Fuchs, M; Karthaus, M; Kasper, S; Kisro, J; Müller, C; Rafiyan, MR; Schulz-Abelius, A; Stein, A, 2018) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (TFTD, TAS-102) is an orally administrated anti-cancer drug with efficacy validated for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)." | 7.85 | Monitoring trifluridine incorporation in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of colorectal cancer patients under trifluridine/tipiracil medication. ( Iimori, M; Kiniwa, M; Kitao, H; Kurashige, J; Maehara, Y; Morodomi, Y; Nakanishi, R; Nakashima, Y; Oki, E; Saeki, H; Sugiyama, M, 2017) |
"We assessed the role of aspirin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who failed all previous treatments and were receiving capecitabine as a salvage option before the introduction of regorafenib and TAS-102." | 7.85 | The Role of Aspirin as Antitumoral Agent for Heavily Pretreated Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Receiving Capecitabine Monotherapy. ( Andrikou, K; Berardi, R; Bianconi, M; Bittoni, A; Cabras, F; Cascinu, S; Del Prete, M; Faloppi, L; Giampieri, R; Maccaroni, E; Pusceddu, V; Restivo, A; Scartozzi, M; Scintu, F; Zorcolo, L, 2017) |
"Regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) both prolong survival for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer." | 7.85 | Regorafenib Versus Trifluridine/Tipiracil for Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Comparison. ( Ando, M; Fukutomi, A; Hamauchi, S; Ishihara, M; Kadowaki, S; Kito, Y; Komori, A; Machida, N; Masuishi, T; Mori, K; Muro, K; Narita, Y; Onozawa, Y; Tajika, M; Tanaka, T; Taniguchi, H; Todaka, A; Tsushima, T; Ura, T; Yamazaki, K; Yasui, H; Yokota, T, 2017) |
"Regorafenib and TAS-102 are novel antitumor agents for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) whose disease has progressed after standard therapies." | 7.83 | Efficacy and Safety of Regorafenib or TAS-102 in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Therapies. ( Doki, Y; Haraguchi, N; Hata, T; Hayashi, T; Kudo, T; Mizushima, T; Mori, M; Nishimura, J; Sakai, D; Satoh, T; Sueda, T; Sugiura, T; Takahashi, H, 2016) |
"A novel oral agent that consists of trifluridine and tipiracil hydrochloride (TFTD) has been established as salvage-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)." | 7.83 | Self-Reported Adherence to Trifluridine and Tipiracil Hydrochloride for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study. ( Aoyama, T; Hama, T; Inoue, A; Kawakami, K; Machida, Y; Suenaga, M; Sugisaki, T; Sugita, K; Suzuki, K; Takiguchi, T; Yamaguchi, K; Yamaguchi, T; Yokokawa, T, 2016) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (TFTD) is a combination drug that is used for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer and was formerly known as TAS-102." | 7.83 | Effect of a novel oral chemotherapeutic agent containing a combination of trifluridine, tipiracil and the novel triple angiokinase inhibitor nintedanib, on human colorectal cancer xenografts. ( Matsuoka, K; Nakagawa, F; Suzuki, N; Takechi, T, 2016) |
"To investigate the behaviour of total plasma homocysteine (tHcy) and its most common genetic determinant defect, the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T (C677TMTHFR) polymorphism in patients with early stage colorectal carcinoma." | 7.73 | Total plasma homocysteine and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T polymorphism in patients with colorectal carcinoma. ( Battistelli, S; Bing, C; Roviello, F; Stefanoni, M; Vittoria, A, 2006) |
"Microsatellite-stable (MSS) colorectal cancer (CRC) tends to be poorly immunogenic, with limited treatment options." | 7.01 | A phase 2 trial of trifluridine/tipiracil plus nivolumab in patients with heavily pretreated microsatellite-stable metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Bendell, JC; Falchook, GS; Hamada, K; Makris, L; Patel, MR, 2021) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) is an orally active formulation of trifluridine, a thymidine-based nucleoside analog, and tipiracil hydrochloride, a thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor that increases the bioavailability of trifluridine." | 7.01 | Trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for third-line management of metastatic colorectal cancer: SUNLIGHT study design. ( Amellal, N; Ciardiello, F; Fakih, M; Fougeray, R; Leger, C; Prager, GW; Tabernero, J; Taieb, J; van Cutsem, E, 2021) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (TT) is an orally administered combination of the thymidine-based nucleoside analogue trifluridine and the thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor tipiracil hydrochloride, which increases the bioavailability of cytotoxic trifluridine." | 6.94 | First-line trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer: SOLSTICE study design. ( Amellal, NC; André, T; Falcone, A; Fougeray, R; Gandossi, E; Kanehisa, A; Saunders, M, 2020) |
"Trifluridine-tipiracil is an oral antineoplastic agent consisting of trifluridine (a trifluorothymidine, a thymidine-based nucleoside analog) and tipiracil (a thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor), at a molar ratio of 1:0." | 6.61 | The safety and efficacy of trifluridine-tipiracil for metastatic colorectal cancer: A pharmacy perspective. ( Chan, BM; Hochster, HS; Lenz, HJ, 2019) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil was associated with an acceptable tolerability profile, with adverse events generally being managed with dose reductions, temporary interruptions in treatment or administration of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor." | 6.53 | Trifluridine/Tipiracil: A Review in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. ( Burness, CB; Duggan, ST, 2016) |
" fluoropyrimidine and irinotecan plus bevacizumab (control) as second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)." | 5.69 | Trifluridine/tipiracil+bevacizumab (BEV) vs. fluoropyrimidine-irinotecan+BEV as second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomised noninferiority trial. ( Hara, H; Ishihara, S; Kagawa, Y; Kajiwara, T; Kawakami, H; Kotaka, M; Kuboki, Y; Makiyama, A; Masuishi, T; Morita, S; Nakajima, TE; Nakamura, M; Ojima, H; Oki, E; Ozawa, D; Shirao, K; Sugimoto, N; Sunakawa, Y; Takashima, A; Takenaka, N; Taniguchi, H; Terazawa, T; Watanabe, J; Yoshino, T, 2023) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) improved both overall and progression-free survival (OS, PFS) of patients with pre-treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in the pivotal phase III RECOURSE trial." | 5.51 | Efficacy, safety and quality-of-life data from patients with pre-treated metastatic colorectal cancer receiving trifluridine/tipiracil: results of the TALLISUR trial. ( Ettrich, TJ; Heinemann, V; Hess, J; Karthaus, M; Klein, A; Kretzschmar, A; Pelz, H; Reisländer, T; Riera-Knorrenschild, J; Vehling-Kaiser, U; Weiss, L; Welslau, M, 2022) |
"We conducted a phase I study to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, and efficacy of trametinib in combination with TAS-102 in patients with chemotherapy-refractory KRAS-mutant, wild-type PIK3CA/PTEN metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)." | 5.51 | A Phase I Clinical Trial of Trametinib in Combination with TAS-102 in Patients with Chemotherapy-Resistant RAS-Mutated (PIK3CA/PTEN-Wild Type) Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. ( Chuang, J; Fakih, M; Gong, J; Li, SM; Wang, C, 2022) |
"Initial systemic therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is usually based on two- or three-drug chemotherapy regimens with fluoropyrimidine (5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or capecitabine), oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan, combined with either anti-VEGF (bevacizumab) or, for RAS wild-type (WT) tumors, anti-EGFR antibodies (panitumumab or cetuximab)." | 5.51 | Study protocol of the FIRE-8 (AIO-KRK/YMO-0519) trial: a prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter phase II trial investigating the efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil plus panitumumab versus trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab as first-line tre ( Dechow, T; Ettrich, TJ; Fruehauf, S; Fuchs, M; Heinemann, V; Hoyer, I; Kaiser, F; Karthaus, M; Kiani, A; König, A; Kurreck, A; Modest, DP; Müller, L; Quante, M; Reinacher-Schick, A; Roderburg, C; Schwaner, I; Sommerhäuser, G; Stahler, A; Stintzing, S; von Weikersthal, LF, 2022) |
"Outcomes for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mcrc) are improving with the introduction of new treatments." | 5.51 | Real-world use of trifluridine/tipiracil for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Canada. ( Afzal, AR; Brezden-Masley, C; Cheung, WY; Dolley, A; Samawi, HH, 2019) |
" The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (41." | 5.43 | Safety and Efficacy of Trifluridine/Tipiracil Monotherapy in Clinical Practice for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Experience at a Single Institution. ( Bando, H; Doi, T; Fukuoka, S; Kawazoe, A; Kojima, T; Kotani, D; Kuboki, Y; Ohtsu, A; Okamoto, W; Shitara, K; Yoshino, T, 2016) |
"A previous Phase I/II study demonstrated that TAS-102 (trifluridine/tipiracil [FTD/TPI]) plus bevacizumab (Bev) has encouraging efficacy and controllable safety for patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer." | 5.41 | Trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab as a first-line treatment for elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (KSCC1602): A multicenter phase II trial. ( Akagi, Y; Ando, K; Baba, H; Kabashima, A; Kashiwada, T; Kawanaka, H; Kotaka, M; Maehara, Y; Makiyama, A; Miwa, K; Miyamoto, Y; Mori, M; Noguchi, T; Oki, E; Saeki, H; Shimokawa, M; Yuge, K, 2021) |
"Lay abstract PRECONNECT is an international study demonstrating the efficacy and tolerability of the drug combination trifluridine/tipiracil in adult patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated in everyday clinical practice." | 5.41 | Italian results of the PRECONNECT study: safety and efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil in metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Banzi, MC; Barone, CA; Bartolomeo, MD; Bergamo, F; Besse, MG; Blasi, L; Bordonaro, R; Costanzo, FD; Falcone, A; Frassineti, GL; Garufi, C; Giuliani, F; Latiano, TP; Martinelli, E; Personeni, N; Racca, P; Spione, M; Tamburini, E; Tonini, G; Zaniboni, A, 2021) |
"Although the efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) plus bevacizumab (BEV) against metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has been demonstrated, little is known about its effectiveness upon disease stratification by RAS mutations." | 5.41 | Phase II study of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab by RAS mutation status in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard therapies: JFMC51-1702-C7. ( Asayama, M; Kagawa, Y; Maehara, Y; Makiyama, A; Manaka, D; Matsuhashi, N; Mitsugi, K; Nakamura, M; Oba, K; Ojima, H; Oki, E; Okuda, H; Shimada, Y; Shiozawa, M; Takahashi, T; Watanabe, J; Yamazaki, K; Yoshida, K; Yoshino, T; Yuasa, Y, 2021) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) is an orally administrated anticancer drug with efficacy validated for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) or gastric cancer." | 5.41 | Monitoring FTD in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer administered FTD plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment. ( Ando, K; Fujimoto, Y; Kimura, Y; Kitao, H; Kotaka, M; Maehara, Y; Makiyama, A; Miyamoto, Y; Mori, M; Nakanishi, R; Oki, E; Qiu, S; Shimokawa, M, 2021) |
"This study assessed the efficacy and safety of biweekly trifluridine and tipiracil hydrochloride (TAS-102) with bevacizumab combination therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)." | 5.41 | Prospective Multicenter Phase II Study of Biweekly TAS-102 and Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. ( Enomoto, M; Ishizaki, T; Kasahara, K; Katsumata, K; Kawakita, H; Matsudo, T; Mazaki, J; Nagakawa, Y; Shigoka, M; Tsuchida, A, 2021) |
"We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of combination treatment with panitumumab plus trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who were refractory/intolerant to standard therapies other than anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy." | 5.41 | Safety and efficacy of panitumumab in combination with trifluridine/tipiracil for pre-treated patients with unresectable, metastatic colorectal cancer with wild-type RAS: The phase 1/2 APOLLON study. ( Denda, T; Gamoh, M; Goto, M; Iwata, M; Kagawa, Y; Kato, T; Komatsu, Y; Kotaka, M; Kuboki, Y; Makiyama, A; Oba, K; Oki, E; Satake, H; Shibuya, K; Soeda, J; Tanioka, H; Yamaguchi, K; Yamazaki, K; Yasui, H; Yoshino, T, 2021) |
"The current study aimed to determine the efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil for elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer." | 5.41 | Phase II study of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) therapy in elderly patients with colorectal cancer (T-CORE1401): geriatric assessment tools and plasma drug concentrations as possible predictive biomarkers. ( Imai, H; Ishioka, C; Kato, S; Komine, K; Kuroki, M; Ohori, H; Otsuka, K; Ouchi, K; Sakamoto, Y; Shibata, H; Shimodaira, H; Shirota, H; Takahashi, M; Takahashi, S; Takahashi, Y; Tanaka, M; Tsuji, Y; Yamaguchi, H; Yamaguchi, T; Yoshioka, T, 2021) |
"The phase II J003 (N = 169) and phase III RECOURSE (N = 800) trials demonstrated a significant improvement in survival with trifluridine (FTD)/tipiracil (TPI) versus placebo in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer." | 5.34 | Neutropenia and survival outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with trifluridine/tipiracil in the RECOURSE and J003 trials. ( Argilés, G; Baba, H; Benedetti, F; Cleary, JM; Esaki, T; Falcone, A; Garcia-Carbonero, R; Hamada, C; Hochster, HS; Komatsu, Y; Lenz, HJ; Makris, L; Mayer, RJ; Moriwaki, T; Muro, K; Nishina, T; Ohtsu, A; Peeters, M; Shimada, Y; Shinozaki, E; Sobrero, A; Sugimoto, N; Tanase, T; Tran, B; Tsuji, A; Tsuji, Y; Van Cutsem, E; Yamaguchi, K; Yamashita, F; Yamazaki, K; Yoshino, T; Zaniboni, A, 2020) |
"TAS-102 (trifluridine-tipiracil) has shown a significant overall survival benefit compared with placebo in patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer." | 5.34 | TAS-102 with or without bevacizumab in patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer: an investigator-initiated, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial. ( Krogh, M; Möller, S; Petersen, LN; Pfeiffer, P; Poulsen, LØ; Qvortrup, C; Thomsen, KG; Winther, SB; Yilmaz, M; Zitnjak, D, 2020) |
"In RECOURSE (, trifluridine/tipiracil significantly improved overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo in patients with pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)." | 5.34 | Safety, efficacy and patient-reported outcomes with trifluridine/tipiracil in pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer: results of the PRECONNECT study. ( Atlan, D; Bachet, JB; Becquart, M; Cicin, I; Cremolini, C; Falcone, A; Mounedji, N; Ozet, A; Phelip, JM; Portales, F; Price, T; Taieb, J; Van Cutsem, E; Vidot, L; Wyrwicz, L, 2020) |
"We designed an open-label, noncomparative phase II study to assess the safety and efficacy of first-line treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab (TT-B) and capecitabine plus bevacizumab (C-B) in untreated patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who were not candidates for combination with cytotoxic chemotherapies." | 5.34 | Trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab in patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer ineligible for intensive therapy: the randomized TASCO1 study. ( Amellal, N; Argilés, G; Aubel, P; Borg, C; Danielewicz, I; Egorov, A; Falcone, A; Fedyanin, M; Garcia-Alfonso, P; Glynne-Jones, R; Kanehisa, A; Kroening, H; Moiseenko, V; Pfeiffer, P; Punt, CJA; Saunders, MP; Stroyakovskiy, D; Van Cutsem, E; Van de Wouw, AJ; Wasan, H, 2020) |
"This study evaluated the cost utility of regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil (T/T) compared with that of best supportive care (BSC) in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer previously treated with, or not considered candidates for, available therapies, including fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-based chemotherapies; anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents; and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor agents, in Japan." | 5.34 | Comparative Cost-utility Analysis of Regorafenib and Trifluridine/Tipiracil in The Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Japan. ( Kashiwa, M; Matsushita, R, 2020) |
"A previous phase I/II C-TASK FORCE study of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for patients with heavily pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) showed promising activity with an acceptable toxicity profile." | 5.30 | Retrospective cohort study of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) plus bevacizumab versus trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Bando, H; Horasawa, S; Kaneko, A; Kawazoe, A; Kojima, T; Kotani, D; Kuboki, Y; Nakamura, Y; Shitara, K; Taniguchi, H; Tsuji, A; Yoshino, T, 2019) |
"Purpose Trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) was effective in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in a phase II Japanese trial." | 5.27 | Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Trial of Trifluridine/Tipiracil (TAS-102) Monotherapy in Asian Patients With Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The TERRA Study. ( Ahn, JB; Bai, Y; Bi, F; Guo, W; Han, SW; Kim, TW; Li, J; Li, Q; Lin, D; Liu, T; Ma, D; Pan, H; Park, YS; Qin, S; Shen, L; Shi, C; Sriuranpong, V; Wu, C; Xu, J; Xu, R, 2018) |
"In the phase III RECOURSE trial, trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) extended overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) with an acceptable toxicity profile in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory or intolerant to standard therapies." | 5.27 | The subgroups of the phase III RECOURSE trial of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) versus placebo with best supportive care in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Benavides, M; Ciardiello, F; Denda, T; Grávalos, C; Laurent, S; Lenz, HJ; Loehrer, P; Longo-Munoz, F; Makris, L; Mayer, RJ; Muro, K; Ohtsu, A; Portales, F; Siena, S; Tsuji, Y; Van Cutsem, E; Winkler, R; Yamaguchi, K, 2018) |
"Regorafenib and TAS-102 are standard treatment options in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer based on improvement in overall survival by 6 and 8 weeks, respectively, when compared with best supportive care alone (BSC)." | 5.27 | Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Regorafenib and TAS-102 in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the United States. ( Barzi, A; Cho, SK; Hay, JW, 2018) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI; TAS-102, Lonsurf®), a novel form of chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), has shown clinical benefit in the global, phase III RECOURSE trial, regardless of patient age." | 5.27 | Safety of trifluridine/tipiracil in an open-label expanded-access program in elderly and younger patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Cohen, SJ; Grothey, A; Hochster, HS; Makris, L; Mayer, RJ; Winkler, R, 2018) |
"In patients with heavily treated metastatic colorectal cancer, TAS-102-a combination of trifluridine and tipiracil-has shown a significant overall survival benefit compared with placebo." | 5.24 | TAS-102 plus bevacizumab for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard therapies (C-TASK FORCE): an investigator-initiated, open-label, single-arm, multicentre, phase 1/2 study. ( Doi, T; Kajiwara, T; Kuboki, Y; Matsumoto, T; Mochizuki, N; Nishina, T; Nomura, S; Ohtsu, A; Okamoto, W; Sato, A; Shinozaki, E; Shitara, K; Tsushima, T; Yamazaki, K; Yoshino, T, 2017) |
"Regorafenib and TAS-102 have recently demonstrated statistically significant survival gains in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)." | 5.24 | Estimating 12-week death probability in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: the Colon Life nomogram. ( Antonuzzo, L; Aprile, G; Baretti, M; Battaglin, F; Berenato, R; Beretta, G; Bozzarelli, S; Cinieri, S; Cremolini, C; de Braud, F; Falcone, A; Formica, V; Ghidini, M; Lonardi, S; Loupakis, F; Marmorino, F; Mennitto, A; Miceli, R; Morano, F; Mosconi, S; Petrelli, F; Pietrantonio, F; Rimassa, L; Rossini, D; Spada, D; Tamburini, E, 2017) |
"Early clinical trials conducted primarily in Japan have shown that TAS-102, an oral agent that combines trifluridine and tipiracil hydrochloride, was effective in the treatment of refractory colorectal cancer." | 5.20 | Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Benedetti, F; Boucher, E; Cleary, JM; Falcone, A; Garcia-Carbonero, R; Hochster, H; Ito, M; Komatsu, Y; Lenz, HJ; Makris, L; Mayer, RJ; Mizuguchi, H; Mizunuma, N; Ohtsu, A; Peeters, M; Prenen, H; Shimada, Y; Sobrero, A; Tabernero, J; Tran, B; Van Cutsem, E; Yamazaki, K; Yoshino, T; Zaniboni, A, 2015) |
" We investigated the recommended dose (RD) of TAS-102 plus irinotecan for metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and oxaliplatin." | 5.20 | Phase I study of TAS-102 and irinotecan combination therapy in Japanese patients with advanced colorectal cancer. ( Boku, N; Doi, T; Fuse, N; Koizumi, W; Ohtsu, A; Shimada, K; Takinishi, Y; Yamazaki, K; Yoshino, T, 2015) |
"The analysis was conducted to assess the pharmacological costs of regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil in the treatment of refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)." | 5.12 | Dose-escalation strategy in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: A change in terms of cost-effectiveness. ( Azzurro, M; Bonetti, A; Fiorica, F; Giuliani, J; Ponturo, G; Ruzzenente, A, 2021) |
"Direct randomized comparisons of regorafenib, TAS-102, and fruquintinib for treating metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are lacking." | 5.05 | Regorafenib, TAS-102, or fruquintinib for metastatic colorectal cancer: any difference in randomized trials? ( Li, J; Peng, Z; Shen, L; Wang, Q; Wang, X; Zhang, Q, 2020) |
"Electronic databases were searched to identify studies comparing the efficacy and safety of regorafenib and TAS-102 in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer using pooled analyses." | 5.05 | A meta-analysis comparing regorafenib with TAS-102 for treating refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Liu, H; Su, GL; Wang, JC; Wang, YY, 2020) |
"Regorafenib at different dosing strategies and TAS-102 are treatment options for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)." | 5.01 | A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Regorafenib and TAS-102 in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. ( Ahn, DH; Bekaii-Saab, T; Benkhadra, R; Firwana, B; Hubbard, JM; Mody, K; Murad, MH; Sonbol, MB; Walden, DJ; Wang, Z, 2019) |
"Regorafenib and TAS-102 have shown to be superior to placebo in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer." | 4.98 | A Comparison of Regorafenib and TAS-102 for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. ( Abrahao, ABK; Berry, S; Chan, KKW; Ko, YJ, 2018) |
"Regorafenib is a standard salvage line therapy used for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC)." | 4.31 | Regorafenib is suitable for advanced colorectal cancer patients who have previously received trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab. ( Ikoma, T; Matsumoto, T; Miura, K; Nagai, H; Takatani, M; Tsuduki, T; Watanabe, T; Yamamura, S; Yasui, H, 2023) |
"For patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment with Trifluridine/Tipiracil, also known as TAS-102, improves overall survival." | 4.12 | Initial experience of TAS-102 chemotherapy in Australian patients with Chemo-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Ananda, S; Banks, S; Dunn, C; Gard, G; Gately, L; Gibbs, P; Jalali, A; Jennens, R; Khattak, A; Kosmider, S; Lee, B; Lee, M; Lim, L; Loft, M; McKendrick, J; Shapiro, JD; Tie, J; Wong, HL; Wong, R; Yeung, JM, 2022) |
"The aim of this analysis is to assess the pharmacological costs of trifluridine/tipiracil as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients who were not candidates for combination with cytotoxic chemotherapies." | 4.12 | Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Combination with Bevacizumab in First-Line for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Way Forward. A Point of View Based on Cost-Effectiveness. ( Giuliani, J, 2022) |
"The RECOURSE trial supported trifluridine/tipiracil as a treatment option in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)." | 4.12 | The effect of prognostic factors at baseline on the efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A Portuguese exploratory analysis. ( Basto, R; Bonito, N; Gomes, I; Jacinto, P; Magalhães, J; Paulo, J; Pereira, TC; Sousa, G; Sousa, MJ, 2022) |
"Regorafenib (R) and trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) are of proven efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patient's refractory to standard therapies." | 4.12 | Sequential Treatment With Trifluridine/Tipiracil and Regorafenib in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: An AGEO Prospective "Real-World Study". ( Artru, P; Bouché, O; Coriat, R; Coutzac, C; De La Fouchardière, C; Doat, S; Gallois, C; Henriques, J; Masson, T; Moulin, V; Saint, A; Taieb, J; Tougeron, D; Trouilloud, I; Vernerey, D, 2022) |
"The RECOURSE trial demonstrated a modest benefit in overall survival (OS) for trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) versus placebo in pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients." | 4.12 | Quality of Life and Survival of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated With Trifluridine-Tipiracil (QUALITAS). ( Dijksterhuis, WPM; Elferink, MAG; Hamers, PAH; Koopman, M; May, AM; Punt, CJA; Stellato, RK; Vink, GR, 2022) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (TFTD), with or without bevacizumab (Bev), and regorafenib are salvage chemotherapy options for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)." | 4.12 | Influence of precedent drug on the subsequent therapy in the sequence of trifluridine/tipiracil with/out bevacizumab and regorafenib for unresectable or recurrent colorectal cancer. ( Boku, N; Hirano, H; Iwasa, S; Okita, N; Oshima, K; Shoji, H; Takashima, A, 2022) |
" We treated a co-culture comprised of human colorectal cancer (CRC) cells and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) with the nucleoside analogue trifluridine (FTD) and used scRNA-seq to analyze posttreatment gene expression profiles in thousands of individual cancer and immune cells concurrently." | 4.12 | Single-cell transcriptional pharmacodynamics of trifluridine in a tumor-immune model. ( Andersson, CR; Fasterius, E; Fryknäs, M; Jarvius, M; Larsson, R; Selvin, T, 2022) |
"To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) compared with best supportive care (BSC) for the treatment of patients with metastatic gastric cancer(mGC), including gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma(GEJ), who have received at least two prior therapies for metastatic disease and are eligible for third-line treatment, in Greece." | 4.12 | Cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil as a third-line treatment of metastatic gastric cancer, including adenocarcinoma of the gastrohesophageal junction, among patients previously treated in Greece. ( Androulakis, N; Beletsi, A; Boukovinas, I; Chotzagiannoglou, V; Gourzoulidis, G; Karamouzis, M; Koulentaki, M; Koumarianou, A; Kourlaba, G; Papakotoulas, P; Samadas, E; Souglakos, J; Xynogalos, S, 2022) |
"Recently, trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) treatment was established as a later-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)." | 4.02 | The Efficacy and Safety of Trifluridine/Tipiracil Treatment for Elderly Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in a Real-world Setting. ( En, W; Fukuoka, T; Hirakawa, K; Iseki, Y; Kashiwagi, S; Ohira, M; Okazaki, Y; Shibutani, M, 2021) |
"The novel oral nucleoside antineoplastic agent trifluridine/tipiracil was approved for metastatic colorectal cancer in Japan in March 2014." | 4.02 | Post-marketing surveillance study of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Funato, Y; Koyama, T; Muro, K; Ozawa, D; Tajiri, M; Uetake, H; Yamaguchi, Y; Yoshino, T, 2021) |
"This study aimed to describe the chemotherapy effects after trifluridine/tipiracil (TFTD) and/or regorafenib treatment in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients." | 4.02 | Salvage Therapy After Regorafenib or Trifluridine/Tipiracil Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Conditional Landmark Analysis. ( Kawakami, K; Nakashima, M; Takeuchi, M; Tanaka, S, 2021) |
"Although the effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil(TFTD)with bevacizumab for unresectable colorectal cancer that was refractory to previous standard chemotherapy was reported, its effectiveness as a first-line treatment, especially for elderly frail patients, is unclear." | 4.02 | [A Case of an Elderly Frail Patient with Unresectable Colorectal Cancer Controlled by Trifluridine/Tipiracil with Bevacizumab Therapy as a First-Line Treatment]. ( Arigami, T; Kita, Y; Kurahara, H; Maemura, K; Matsumoto, R; Mori, S; Natsugoe, S; Sasaki, K; Toda, H, 2021) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) is an important chemotherapeutic agent recommended by the Japanese guidelines as third- or fourth-line treatment for colorectal cancer." | 4.02 | [Two Cases of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with TAS-102 plus Bevacizumab]. ( Amagasa, H; Ami, K; Ando, M; Fukuda, A; Gan, S; Ganno, H; Iida, S; Imai, K; Kajiyama, D; Kawaguchi, M; Maeda, F; Motoyama, K; Okano, Y; Tokitou, F; Yamada, A, 2021) |
"In later-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), trifluridine/tipiracil is often selected because regorafenib is difficult to use in patients with comorbidities such as thrombosis, hemorrhage, or cardiac events." | 4.02 | Clinical Outcomes Following Trifluridine/Tipiracil Treatment for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Ineligible for Regorafenib Treatment. ( Denda, T; Esaki, T; Fukuoka, S; Hatachi, Y; Kajiwara, T; Kumekawa, Y; Makiyama, A; Masuishi, T; Moriwaki, T; Niisato, Y; Shimada, Y; Sugimoto, N; Suto, T; Takashima, A; Yamazaki, K, 2021) |
"Regorafenib (REG) and trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) have have been shown to improve overall survival in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer." | 4.02 | Regorafenib-to-trifluridine/tipiracil Versus the Reverse Sequence for Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Real-life Experience. ( Ceribelli, A; Chilelli, MG; DE Marco, S; Gemma, D; Grande, R; Morandi, MG; Ruggeri, EM; Saltarelli, R; Signorelli, C; Sperduti, I; Spinelli, GP; Zoratto, F, 2021) |
"In the UK, Trifluridine-tipiracil (Lonsurf) is used to treat metastatic colorectal cancer in the third-line setting, after prior exposure to fluoropyrimidine-based regimes." | 4.02 | Long Term Real-World Outcomes of Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer-A Single UK Centre Experience. ( Essapen, S; Mendis, J; Tong, D; Wang, L, 2021) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil increases overall survival (OS) in patients with refractory, metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)." | 4.02 | Prediction of survival in patients with advanced, refractory colorectal cancer in treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil: real-world vs clinical trial data. ( Carmona-Bayonas, A; Carriles Fernández, C; Cousillas Castiñeiras, A; Covela Rúa, M; De la Cámara Gómez, J; Fernández Montes, A; Garcia García, T; Gonzalez Villarroel, P; Jimenez-Fonseca, P; Martinez Lago, N; Méndez, JCM; Sanchez Cánovas, M; Vázquez Rivera, F, 2021) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) and regorafenib prolong survival for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC); limited comparative effectiveness data exist." | 4.02 | Trifluridine/Tipiracil and Regorafenib in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study at a Tertiary Oncology Center. ( Abhyankar, R; Barghout, VE; Brais, LK; Duh, MS; Fuchs, CS; Huynh, L; Ng, K; Patel, AK; Yenikomshian, MA, 2021) |
"Trifluridine and tipiracil (FTD + TPI) and regorafenib (REG) are approved treatments for the treatment of refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)." | 3.96 | Real-World Adherence in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with Trifluridine plus Tipiracil or Regorafenib. ( Barghout, V; Duh, MS; Germain, G; Jacques, P; Laliberté, F; Patel, AK; Yenikomshian, MA, 2020) |
"Although regorafenib or trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) has been recognized as a later-line standard treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), not all patients have beneficial outcomes." | 3.96 | Prognostic scores for evaluating the survival benefit of regorafenib or trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: an exploratory analysis of the REGOTAS study. ( Denda, T; Enomoto, M; Esaki, T; Fukuoka, S; Hatachi, Y; Ishikawa, T; Kajiwara, T; Kashiwada, T; Komatsu, Y; Kumekawa, Y; Makiyama, A; Masuishi, T; Moriwaki, T; Oki, E; Sakai, D; Shimada, Y; Sugimoto, N; Suto, T; Takashima, A; Tamura, T; Tsuchihashi, K; Tsuji, A; Ueno, H; Yamashita, K; Yamazaki, K, 2020) |
"The standard first- and second- line chemotherapy backbone regimens for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/capecitabine-based with addition of irinotecan or oxaliplatin." | 3.96 | Review of metastatic colorectal cancer treatment pathways and early clinical experience of trifluridine/tipiracil in the UK named patient programme. ( Carter, AM; Iveson, T; Mullamitha, S; Shiu, KK; Spooner, C; Stevens, D, 2020) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil is available on the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) previously treated with, or not considered candidates for, fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based chemotherapies, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor agents." | 3.96 | Trifluridine/tipiracil: A practical guide to its use in the management of refractory metastatic colorectal cancer in Australia. ( Burge, M; Chantrill, L; Gibbs, P; Pavlakis, N; Price, T; Shapiro, J; Sjoquist, K, 2020) |
"Regorafenib (REG) and trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) showed survival benefits in metastatic colorectal cancer patients previously treated with standard chemotherapies; therefore, we compared the efficacy and safety of these two treatments." | 3.96 | Regorafenib vs trifluridine/tipiracil for metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapies: A multicenter retrospective comparison study in Japan. ( Hatachi, Y; Kato, T; Kotaka, M; Ogata, M; Ogata, T; Satake, H; Tsuji, A; Yasui, H, 2020) |
"The efficacy of trifluridine/thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor (FTD/TPI) plus bevacizumab as later-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has been demonstrated." | 3.96 | Combining Bevacizumab With Trifluridine/Thymidine Phosphorylase Inhibitor Improves the Survival Outcomes Regardless of the Usage History of Bevacizumab in Front-line Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. ( Fukuoka, T; Hirakawa, K; Iseki, Y; Kashiwagi, S; Maeda, K; Nagahara, H; Ohira, M; Okazaki, Y; Shibutani, M; Wang, EN, 2020) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) improves the overall survival (OS) of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients." | 3.96 | Neutropenia is an indicator of outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab: a retrospective study. ( Hata, T; Kagawa, Y; Kato, T; Katsura, Y; Kawai, K; Masuzawa, T; Mori, R; Murakami, K; Murata, K; Naito, A; Nose, Y; Ohmura, Y; Sakamoto, T; Takeda, Y; Takeno, A, 2020) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI; marketed as Lonsurf®) has shown clinically relevant activity after fluoropyrimidine failure in colorectal cancer and may thus be of increased efficacy compared with current standard capecitabine chemoradiation." | 3.96 | Radiosensitisation and enhanced tumour growth delay of colorectal cancer cells by sustained treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil and X-rays. ( Brinker, A; Burdak-Rothkamm, S; Christiansen, S; Frenzel, T; Horn, M; Petersen, C; Rieckmann, T; Rothkamm, K; Schumacher, U; Stein, A, 2020) |
"Compared with the best supportive care, a survival benefit of using regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil (TFTD) in patients with colorectal cancer has been shown in previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs)." | 3.96 | Effectiveness and Safety of Regorafenib vs. Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Unresectable Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study. ( Kawakami, K; Nakashima, M; Takeuchi, M, 2020) |
" The present study was initiated to address the lack of published prospective data about the qol benefits of trifluridine/tipiracil (ftd/tpi) compared with best supportive care (bsc) in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mcrc)." | 3.96 | Quality of life in a real-world study of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with trifluridine/tipiracil. ( Cheung, WY; Dolley, A; Kavan, P, 2020) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil combination has shown a benefit over placebo in the treatment of patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)." | 3.96 | Efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil in third-line and beyond for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in routine clinical practice: patterns of use and prognostic nomogram. ( Candamio Folgar, S; Carmona Campos, M; Cousillas Castiñeiras, A; Covela Rúa, M; de la Cámara Gómez, J; Fernandez Montes, A; Gallardo Martín, E; García Gómez, J; Gonzalez Villarroel, P; Jorge Fernández, M; Martinez Lago, N; Méndez Méndez, JC; París Bouzas, L; Pellón Augusto, ML; Reboredo López, M; Salgado Fernández, M; Vazquez Rivera, F, 2020) |
"Although regorafenib (REG) and trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) have been recognised as standard treatments in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the best option remains unclear." | 3.91 | Impact of tumour growth rate during preceding treatment on tumour response to regorafenib or trifluridine/tipiracil in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Kadowaki, S; Kawakami, T; Kawamoto, Y; Komatsu, Y; Masuishi, T; Muranaka, T; Muro, K; Nakatsumi, H; Omae, K; Onozawa, Y; Tajika, M; Taniguchi, H; Yamazaki, K; Yasui, H; Yuki, S, 2019) |
"To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of trifluridine and tipiracil hydrochloride (FTD/TPI) compared with best supportive care (BSC) or regorafenib for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who have been previously treated with or are not considered candidates for available therapies including fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based chemotherapies, anti-VEGF agents and anti-EGFR agents in Greece." | 3.91 | Economic evaluation of trifluridine and tipiracil hydrochloride in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in Greece. ( Gourzoulidis, G; Kourlaba, G; Maniadakis, N; Pentheroudakis, G; Petrakis, D; Souglakos, J, 2019) |
"Regorafenib and TAS-102 are standard salvage-line treatment options for patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)." | 3.91 | Low Skeletal Muscle Mass before Salvage-Line Chemotherapy Is a Poor Prognostic Factor in Patients with Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. ( Akiyama, T; Baba, H; Baba, Y; Eto, K; Hiyoshi, Y; Iwagami, S; Kiyozumi, Y; Miyamoto, Y; Yohei, N; Yoshida, N, 2019) |
"This study aimed to clarify the tolerability of a trifluridine/tipiracil combination tablet (TAS-102) in patients with advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer over 75 years of age." | 3.91 | Evaluation of Tolerability of Trifluridine/Tipiracil Combination Tablet in Patients With Advanced/Recurrent Colorectal Cancer. ( Kimura, M; Teramachi, H; Usami, E; Yoshimura, T, 2019) |
"The aim of this report was to evaluate the onset of grade≥3 neutropenia during the first-cycle in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with trifluridine/tipiracil and its relationship with clinical parameters of interest, such as overall survival (OS)." | 3.91 | The Onset of Grade ≥3 Neutropenia Is Associated With Longer Overall Survival in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated With Trifluridine/Tipiracil. ( Bonetti, A; Giuliani, J, 2019) |
"This study compared the efficacy of regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil (TFTD) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who are refractory to standard chemotherapy, because despite their clinical approval, it still remains unclear which of these two drugs should be used as initial treatment." | 3.88 | Propensity Score Analysis of Regorafenib Versus Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Chemotherapy (REGOTAS): A Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum Multicenter Observational Study. ( Baba, E; Denda, T; Enomoto, M; Esaki, T; Fukuoka, S; Gosho, M; Ishikawa, T; Kajiwara, T; Kashiwada, T; Komatsu, Y; Kumekawa, Y; Makiyama, C; Moriwaki, T; Okuyama, H; Sakai, D; Satake, H; Shimada, Y; Sugimoto, N; Sugiyama, M; Suto, T; Takashima, A; Tamura, T; Taniguchi, H; Watanabe, T; Yamashita, K; Yamazaki, K, 2018) |
" Clinical data were derived from the pivotal phase III (Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study of TAS-102 plus Best Supportive Care [BSC] versus Placebo plus BSC in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Chemotherapies [RECOURSE]) and supporting phase II (J003-10040030) randomized controlled trial of trifluridine/tipiracil + BSC versus placebo + BSC, as well as the phase III Colorectal Cancer Treated With Regorafenib or Placebo After Failure of Standard Therapy (CORRECT) randomized controlled trial of regorafenib, and were extrapolated to estimate lifetime outcomes." | 3.88 | Cost-effectiveness of Trifluridine/tipiracil for Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in England and Wales. ( Bullement, A; Fougeray, R; Hatswell, AJ; Underhill, S, 2018) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil, an oral treatment combining trifluridine (an antineoplastic thymidine-based nucleoside analog) and tipiracil hydrochloride (a thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor), led to significant improvement in overall survival in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients refractory to standard therapy in the phase III RECOURSE trial." | 3.88 | Integrated safety summary for trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102). ( Bebeau, P; Bendell, JC; Buscaglia, M; Falcone, A; Kopetz, S; Mayer, RJ; Ohtsu, A; Van Cutsem, E; Yoshino, T, 2018) |
"The RECOURSE trial showed clinical efficacy for trifluridine/tipiracil for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer patients." | 3.88 | Feasibility and effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil in metastatic colorectal cancer: real-life data from The Netherlands. ( Baars, A; Beerepoot, LV; Boot, H; Creemers, GJ; de Groot, JW; Hamberg, P; Jansen, RL; Kapiteijn, E; Koopman, M; Kwakman, JJM; Los, M; Opdam, FL; Punt, CJA; Schut, H; Sommeijer, DW; van Meerten, E; van Rooijen, JM; Vestjens, JH; Vink, G; Vulink, AJE, 2018) |
"Elucidating the factors influencing severe neutropenia could aid in earlier management of neutropenia during oral trifluridine-tipiracil (TAS-102) chemotherapy in advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer (CRC)." | 3.88 | Risk factors contributing to the development of neutropenia in patients receiving oral trifluridine-tipiracil (TAS-102) chemotherapy for advanced/recurrent colorectal cancer. ( Ikeda, Y; Iwai, M; Kawachi, S; Kimura, M; Mitsuoka, M; Usami, E; Yasue, F; Yoshimura, T, 2018) |
"A total of 550 patients with mCRC who were registered in the REGOTAS study (Regorafenib versus TAS-102 as Salvage-line in patients with colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapies: a multicenter observational study, UMIN 000020416) and treated with trifluridine/tipiracil (TFTD) or regorafenib as a later-line therapy were retrospectively stratified according to the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS), which divided patients into mGPS 0 to 2 by serum albumin and C-reactive protein, and compared." | 3.88 | Role of Predictive Value of the Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score for Later-line Chemotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. ( Baba, E; Denda, T; Esaki, T; Fukuoka, S; Ishikawa, T; Ito, M; Kajiwara, T; Kashiwada, T; Katsumata, K; Kishimoto, J; Komatsu, Y; Kumekawa, Y; Makiyama, A; Moriwaki, T; Oki, E; Okuyama, H; Sakai, D; Satake, H; Shimada, Y; Sugimoto, N; Suto, T; Takashima, A; Tamura, T; Taniguchi, H; Tsuchihashi, K; Ueno, H; Yamashita, K; Yamazaki, K, 2018) |
"Salvage chemotherapy for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer using trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) and regorafenib has shown survival benefits." | 3.88 | Effective Sequential Combined Chemotherapy with Trifluridine/Tipiracil and Regorafenib in Human Colorectal Cancer Cells. ( Matsuo, K; Matsuoka, K; Nakagawa, F; Okabe, H; Takechi, T; Tanaka, N, 2018) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102, Lonsurf®), a novel oral anti-tumor agent combining an anti-neoplastic thymidine-based nucleoside analogue (trifluridine, FTD) with a thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor (tipiracil hydrochloride, TPI) presents a new treatment option for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients refractory or intolerant to standard therapies." | 3.88 | Safety profile of trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy in clinical practice: results of the German compassionate-use program for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Fuchs, M; Karthaus, M; Kasper, S; Kisro, J; Müller, C; Rafiyan, MR; Schulz-Abelius, A; Stein, A, 2018) |
"Trifluridine (FTD) is an active cytotoxic component of the metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) drug TAS-102, and thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor (TPI) inhibits the rapid degradation of FTD." | 3.85 | Potential role of polymorphisms in the transporter genes ENT1 and MATE1/OCT2 in predicting TAS-102 efficacy and toxicity in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Barzi, A; Berger, MD; Borelli, B; Cao, S; Dadduzio, V; Gopez, R; Lenz, HJ; Loupakis, F; Miyamoto, Y; Ning, Y; Okazaki, S; Pietrantonio, F; Salvatore, L; Schirripa, M; Suenaga, M; Yamaguchi, T; Yang, D; Zhang, W, 2017) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (TFTD, TAS-102) is an orally administrated anti-cancer drug with efficacy validated for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)." | 3.85 | Monitoring trifluridine incorporation in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of colorectal cancer patients under trifluridine/tipiracil medication. ( Iimori, M; Kiniwa, M; Kitao, H; Kurashige, J; Maehara, Y; Morodomi, Y; Nakanishi, R; Nakashima, Y; Oki, E; Saeki, H; Sugiyama, M, 2017) |
"The effect of oral trifluridine-tipiracil (TAS-102)-induced neutropenia on survival of patients with advanced/recurrent colorectal cancer was investigated." | 3.85 | Severe neutropenia: a prognosticator in patients with advanced/recurrent colorectal cancer ( Iwai, M; Kimura, M; Teramachi, H; Usami, E; Yoshimura, T, 2017) |
"We assessed the role of aspirin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who failed all previous treatments and were receiving capecitabine as a salvage option before the introduction of regorafenib and TAS-102." | 3.85 | The Role of Aspirin as Antitumoral Agent for Heavily Pretreated Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Receiving Capecitabine Monotherapy. ( Andrikou, K; Berardi, R; Bianconi, M; Bittoni, A; Cabras, F; Cascinu, S; Del Prete, M; Faloppi, L; Giampieri, R; Maccaroni, E; Pusceddu, V; Restivo, A; Scartozzi, M; Scintu, F; Zorcolo, L, 2017) |
"Regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) both prolong survival for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer." | 3.85 | Regorafenib Versus Trifluridine/Tipiracil for Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Comparison. ( Ando, M; Fukutomi, A; Hamauchi, S; Ishihara, M; Kadowaki, S; Kito, Y; Komori, A; Machida, N; Masuishi, T; Mori, K; Muro, K; Narita, Y; Onozawa, Y; Tajika, M; Tanaka, T; Taniguchi, H; Todaka, A; Tsushima, T; Ura, T; Yamazaki, K; Yasui, H; Yokota, T, 2017) |
"Cardiotoxicity in the form of cardiac arrhythmia, myocardial infarction, and angina-like symptoms are not rare complications of fluoropyrimidines as 5-Fluorouracil (5FU) and capecitabine." | 3.83 | TAS-102, the first "cardio-gentle" fluoropyrimidine in the colorectal cancer landscape? ( Barni, S; Bertocchi, P; Petrelli, F; Zaniboni, A, 2016) |
"TAS-102 (trifluridine and tipiracil hydrochloride; a novel combination oral nucleoside anti-tumor agent) has recently received regulatory approval for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)." | 3.83 | Chemotherapy induced neutropenia at 1-month mark is a predictor of overall survival in patients receiving TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a cohort study. ( Cecchini, M; Grothey, A; Hochster, HS; Kasi, PM; Kotani, D; Ohtsu, A; Ramanathan, RK; Shitara, K; Yoshino, T, 2016) |
"Regorafenib and TAS-102 are novel antitumor agents for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) whose disease has progressed after standard therapies." | 3.83 | Efficacy and Safety of Regorafenib or TAS-102 in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Therapies. ( Doki, Y; Haraguchi, N; Hata, T; Hayashi, T; Kudo, T; Mizushima, T; Mori, M; Nishimura, J; Sakai, D; Satoh, T; Sueda, T; Sugiura, T; Takahashi, H, 2016) |
"A novel oral agent that consists of trifluridine and tipiracil hydrochloride (TFTD) has been established as salvage-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)." | 3.83 | Self-Reported Adherence to Trifluridine and Tipiracil Hydrochloride for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study. ( Aoyama, T; Hama, T; Inoue, A; Kawakami, K; Machida, Y; Suenaga, M; Sugisaki, T; Sugita, K; Suzuki, K; Takiguchi, T; Yamaguchi, K; Yamaguchi, T; Yokokawa, T, 2016) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (TFTD) is a combination drug that is used for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer and was formerly known as TAS-102." | 3.83 | Effect of a novel oral chemotherapeutic agent containing a combination of trifluridine, tipiracil and the novel triple angiokinase inhibitor nintedanib, on human colorectal cancer xenografts. ( Matsuoka, K; Nakagawa, F; Suzuki, N; Takechi, T, 2016) |
"TAS-102, which is effective for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer, is a combination drug of anticancer trifluridine (FTD; which is derived from pyrimidine nucleoside) and FTD-metabolizing enzyme inhibitor tipiracil hydrochloride (TPI) at a molecular ratio of 1:0." | 3.81 | Involvement of Concentrative Nucleoside Transporter 1 in Intestinal Absorption of Trifluridine Using Human Small Intestinal Epithelial Cells. ( Chiba, M; Nakanishi, T; Takahashi, K; Tamai, I; Yoshisue, K, 2015) |
"To investigate the behaviour of total plasma homocysteine (tHcy) and its most common genetic determinant defect, the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T (C677TMTHFR) polymorphism in patients with early stage colorectal carcinoma." | 3.73 | Total plasma homocysteine and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T polymorphism in patients with colorectal carcinoma. ( Battistelli, S; Bing, C; Roviello, F; Stefanoni, M; Vittoria, A, 2006) |
"The authors investigated the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T polymorphism in 101 metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with 5-fluoropyrimidine-based therapy and in 196 healthy individuals by PCR-RFLP method." | 3.72 | [The clinical importance of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T polymorphism in the 5-fluoropyrimidine-based therapy of metastatic colorectal tumours]. ( Adleff, V; Budai, B; Czeglédi, F; Gyergyay, F; Hitre, E; Kralovánszky, J; Láng, I, 2004) |
" Among FTD/TPI-treated patients, frequencies of any-cause grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) were similar across age subgroups (80% each), although grade ≥ 3 neutropenia was more frequent in older patients [40% (≥ 65 and ≥ 75 years); 29% (< 65 years)]; AE-related discontinuation rates did not increase with age [14% (< 65 years), 12% (≥ 65 years), and 12% (≥ 75 years)]." | 3.11 | Efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil in older and younger patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 3 study (TAGS). ( Alsina, M; Benhadji, KA; Cicin, I; Doi, T; Hosaka, H; Ilson, DH; Longo, F; Makris, L; Özgüroğlu, M; Ozyilkan, O; Park, D; Pericay, C; Santoro, A; Shitara, K; Thuss-Patience, P; Zaanan, A, 2022) |
"Microsatellite-stable (MSS) colorectal cancer (CRC) tends to be poorly immunogenic, with limited treatment options." | 3.01 | A phase 2 trial of trifluridine/tipiracil plus nivolumab in patients with heavily pretreated microsatellite-stable metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Bendell, JC; Falchook, GS; Hamada, K; Makris, L; Patel, MR, 2021) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) is an orally active formulation of trifluridine, a thymidine-based nucleoside analog, and tipiracil hydrochloride, a thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor that increases the bioavailability of trifluridine." | 3.01 | Trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for third-line management of metastatic colorectal cancer: SUNLIGHT study design. ( Amellal, N; Ciardiello, F; Fakih, M; Fougeray, R; Leger, C; Prager, GW; Tabernero, J; Taieb, J; van Cutsem, E, 2021) |
" Among FTD/TPI-treated patients, grade 3 or higher adverse events of any cause occurred in 122 of 145 patients (84." | 2.94 | Efficacy and Safety of Trifluridine/Tipiracil Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Gastric Cancer Who Had Undergone Gastrectomy: Subgroup Analyses of a Randomized Clinical Trial. ( Alsina, M; Arkenau, HT; Beretta, GD; Catenacci, D; Doi, T; Fujitani, K; George, B; Ghidini, M; Ilson, DH; Makris, L; Mansoor, W; McGuigan, S; Prokharau, A; Shitara, K; Tabernero, J; Thuss-Patience, P; Van Cutsem, E; Zhavrid, E, 2020) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil (TT) is an orally administered combination of the thymidine-based nucleoside analogue trifluridine and the thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor tipiracil hydrochloride, which increases the bioavailability of cytotoxic trifluridine." | 2.94 | First-line trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer: SOLSTICE study design. ( Amellal, NC; André, T; Falcone, A; Fougeray, R; Gandossi, E; Kanehisa, A; Saunders, M, 2020) |
" Fruquintinib exhibited better PFS, good tolerability and reduced gastrointestinal adverse effects in wild-type KRAS subgroup, making it a promising agent to treat patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC beyond the second line." | 2.66 | Comparison of efficacy and safety for patients with beyond second line treated metastatic colorectal cancer: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. ( Cao, M; Zhang, J; Zhou, M, 2020) |
"Trifluridine-tipiracil is an oral antineoplastic agent consisting of trifluridine (a trifluorothymidine, a thymidine-based nucleoside analog) and tipiracil (a thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor), at a molar ratio of 1:0." | 2.61 | The safety and efficacy of trifluridine-tipiracil for metastatic colorectal cancer: A pharmacy perspective. ( Chan, BM; Hochster, HS; Lenz, HJ, 2019) |
"Molecular mechanisms of colorectal cancer are at the forefront of research." | 2.53 | Current and advancing treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Argiles, G; Elez, ME; Grasselli, J; Sanz-Garcia, E; Tabernero, J, 2016) |
" The rapid degradation of TFT brought initial clinical development to a halt, but TFT reentered clinical trials when addition of a TPI was found to improve the bioavailability of TFT." | 2.53 | TAS-102 for Treatment of Advanced Colorectal Cancers That Are No Longer Responding to Other Therapies. ( Opdam, FL; van der Velden, DL; Voest, EE, 2016) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil was associated with an acceptable tolerability profile, with adverse events generally being managed with dose reductions, temporary interruptions in treatment or administration of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor." | 2.53 | Trifluridine/Tipiracil: A Review in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. ( Burness, CB; Duggan, ST, 2016) |
"Combination cancer chemotherapy is one of the most useful treatment methods to achieve a synergistic effect and reduce the toxicity of dosing with a single drug." | 1.91 | Synergistic binding of actinomycin D and echinomycin to DNA mismatch sites and their combined anti-tumour effects. ( Chang, CC; Hou, MH; Li, LY; Lin, SH; Neidle, S; Satange, R, 2023) |
"In the setting of metastatic colorectal cancer, many gains in patient outcomes have been achieved throughout the last 2 decades." | 1.62 | Transitioning from second-line to third-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Bekaii-Saab, TS; Loupakis, F; Marshall, JL, 2021) |
"Trifluridine/tipiracil was more cost-effective than nivolumab for patients with heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer." | 1.62 | Cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil against nivolumab for heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer in Japan. ( Doi, T; Igarashi, A; Shitara, K; Takushima, Y; Yoshihara, H, 2021) |
"Metastatic gastric cancer and cancer of the esophagogastric junction (GC/EGJ) is an aggressive disease with poor prognosis." | 1.62 | Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo for third or later lines of treatment in metastatic gastric cancer: an exploratory subgroup analysis from the TAGS study. ( Alsina, M; Arkenau, HT; Azcue, P; Catenacci, DVT; Doi, T; Fornaro, L; Fougeray, R; Ilson, DH; Lorenzen, S; Moreno, SR; Shitara, K; Tabernero, J; Van Cutsem, E; Zaanan, A, 2021) |
"Treatment with Bmab in combination with TAS-102 is significantly associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with mCRC refractory to standard therapies." | 1.56 | Bevacizumab in Combination with TAS-102 Improves Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study. ( Fujii, H; Hirose, C; Iihara, H; Ishihara, T; Kitahora, M; Matsuhashi, N; Suzuki, A; Takahashi, T; Watanabe, D; Yamada, Y; Yoshida, K, 2020) |
"At the time of disease progression, FOLFIRI cetuximab regimen was reintroduced resulting in stabilization of disease and he continued with capecitabine cetuximab therapy until disease progression in October 2016." | 1.56 | Evaluation of RAS mutational status through BEAMing assay to monitor disease progression of metastatic colorectal cancer: a case report. ( Antonuzzo, L; Castiglione, F; Di Costanzo, F; Lastraioli, E; Lavacchi, D; Messerini, L; Palmieri, VE, 2020) |
"Management of metastatic colorectal cancer reflects a continuum of care." | 1.56 | How to incorporate a chemo-free interval into the management of metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Ciardiello, F; Grothey, A; Marshall, JL, 2020) |
"In the clinic, however, disease progression can be identified through a composite of factors, including new lesions, carcinoembryonic antigen level, and symptoms such as pain and fatigue." | 1.56 | Optimizing the treatment sequence from second-line to third-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. ( Bekaii-Saab, TS; Grothey, A; Prager, GW; Yoshino, T, 2020) |
"Outcomes for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mcrc) are improving with the introduction of new treatments." | 1.51 | Real-world use of trifluridine/tipiracil for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Canada. ( Afzal, AR; Brezden-Masley, C; Cheung, WY; Dolley, A; Samawi, HH, 2019) |
"Neutropenia is the most common adverse event and an important factor impacting chemotherapy continuation." | 1.48 | Biweekly Administration of TAS-102 for Neutropenia Prevention in Patients with Colorectal Cancer. ( Aisu, N; Daibo, K; Hasegawa, S; Kajitani, R; Kiyomi, F; Komono, A; Matsumoto, Y; Munechika, T; Sakamoto, R; Yoshida, Y, 2018) |
" The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (41." | 1.43 | Safety and Efficacy of Trifluridine/Tipiracil Monotherapy in Clinical Practice for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Experience at a Single Institution. ( Bando, H; Doi, T; Fukuoka, S; Kawazoe, A; Kojima, T; Kotani, D; Kuboki, Y; Ohtsu, A; Okamoto, W; Shitara, K; Yoshino, T, 2016) |
" The most frequent Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (44%), leukopenia (26%) and anemia (23%)." | 1.43 | Efficacy and Safety of TAS-102 in Clinical Practice of Salvage Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. ( Akashi, K; Arita, S; Ariyama, H; Baba, E; Esaki, T; Hirano, G; Kusaba, H; Makiyama, A; Matsushita, Y; Mitsugi, K; Shibata, Y; Shimokawa, HK; Shirakawa, T; Tamura, S, 2016) |
" This postmarketing surveillance study investigated expected and unexpected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of TAS-102 in clinical practice in the first 6 months after market launch." | 1.43 | TAS-102 Safety in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results From the First Postmarketing Surveillance Study. ( Fujita, N; Furuta, T; Hara, N; Katori, J; Muro, K; Uetake, H; Yoshino, T, 2016) |
"Here, we present the first case of interstitial lung disease occurring in association with TAS-102 treatment." | 1.43 | Interstitial pneumonia in a patient treated with TAS-102 for metastatic colorectal cancer: a case report. ( Akagi, Y; Ishibashi, N; Kamei, H; Tanigawa, M; Uchida, M; Yamaguchi, K, 2016) |
"In the present study, we used colorectal cancer xenografts to assess whether the efficacy of TAS-102 could be improved by combining it with bevacizumab, cetuximab or panitumumab." | 1.42 | Efficacy of combination chemotherapy using a novel oral chemotherapeutic agent, TAS-102, together with bevacizumab, cetuximab, or panitumumab on human colorectal cancer xenografts. ( Ishida, K; Matsuo, K; Nakagawa, F; Okabe, H; Sakamoto, K; Takechi, T; Tanaka, N; Tsukihara, H; Uchida, J, 2015) |
"DNA samples were isolated from 60 colorectal cancer (CRC) patients." | 1.36 | Comparison of two different screening methods for the KRAS mutation in colorectal cancer. ( Chang, JG; Chang, TJ; Chang, YS; Er, TK; Yeh, KT, 2010) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 0 (0.00) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 7 (3.74) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 89 (47.59) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 91 (48.66) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Jalali, A | 1 |
Gard, G | 1 |
Banks, S | 1 |
Dunn, C | 1 |
Wong, HL | 1 |
Wong, R | 1 |
Lee, M | 1 |
Gately, L | 1 |
Loft, M | 1 |
Shapiro, JD | 1 |
Kosmider, S | 1 |
Tie, J | 1 |
Ananda, S | 1 |
Yeung, JM | 1 |
Jennens, R | 1 |
Lee, B | 1 |
McKendrick, J | 1 |
Lim, L | 1 |
Khattak, A | 1 |
Gibbs, P | 2 |
Stavraka, C | 1 |
Pouptsis, A | 1 |
Synowiec, A | 1 |
Angelis, V | 1 |
Satterthwaite, L | 1 |
Khan, S | 1 |
Chauhan, M | 1 |
Holden, C | 1 |
Young, S | 1 |
Karampera, C | 1 |
Martinou, M | 1 |
Mills-Baldock, T | 1 |
Baxter, M | 1 |
Barry, A | 1 |
Eccles, B | 1 |
Iveson, T | 2 |
Shiu, KK | 2 |
Hill, M | 1 |
Abdel-Raouf, S | 1 |
Graham, JS | 1 |
Thomas, A | 1 |
Ross, PJ | 2 |
Shibutani, M | 2 |
En, W | 1 |
Okazaki, Y | 2 |
Kashiwagi, S | 2 |
Fukuoka, T | 2 |
Iseki, Y | 2 |
Hirakawa, K | 2 |
Ohira, M | 2 |
Talaat, W | 1 |
Kaddah, MMY | 1 |
Keshk, RM | 1 |
Giuliani, J | 7 |
Shitara, K | 12 |
Doi, T | 11 |
Hosaka, H | 1 |
Thuss-Patience, P | 2 |
Santoro, A | 1 |
Longo, F | 1 |
Ozyilkan, O | 1 |
Cicin, I | 2 |
Park, D | 1 |
Zaanan, A | 2 |
Pericay, C | 2 |
Özgüroğlu, M | 1 |
Alsina, M | 3 |
Makris, L | 10 |
Benhadji, KA | 4 |
Ilson, DH | 6 |
Weiss, L | 1 |
Karthaus, M | 3 |
Riera-Knorrenschild, J | 1 |
Kretzschmar, A | 1 |
Welslau, M | 1 |
Vehling-Kaiser, U | 1 |
Pelz, H | 1 |
Ettrich, TJ | 2 |
Hess, J | 1 |
Reisländer, T | 1 |
Klein, A | 1 |
Heinemann, V | 2 |
Sousa, MJ | 1 |
Gomes, I | 1 |
Pereira, TC | 1 |
Magalhães, J | 1 |
Basto, R | 1 |
Paulo, J | 1 |
Jacinto, P | 1 |
Bonito, N | 1 |
Sousa, G | 1 |
Coutzac, C | 1 |
Trouilloud, I | 1 |
Artru, P | 1 |
Henriques, J | 1 |
Masson, T | 1 |
Doat, S | 1 |
Bouché, O | 1 |
Coriat, R | 1 |
Saint, A | 1 |
Moulin, V | 1 |
Vernerey, D | 1 |
Gallois, C | 1 |
De La Fouchardière, C | 1 |
Tougeron, D | 1 |
Taieb, J | 4 |
Hamers, PAH | 1 |
Vink, GR | 1 |
Elferink, MAG | 1 |
Stellato, RK | 1 |
Dijksterhuis, WPM | 1 |
Punt, CJA | 3 |
Koopman, M | 2 |
May, AM | 1 |
Oshima, K | 1 |
Hirano, H | 1 |
Shoji, H | 1 |
Iwasa, S | 1 |
Okita, N | 1 |
Takashima, A | 7 |
Boku, N | 2 |
Yoshino, T | 24 |
Van Cutsem, E | 14 |
Li, J | 3 |
Shen, L | 3 |
Kim, TW | 2 |
Sriuranpong, V | 2 |
Xuereb, L | 1 |
Aubel, P | 2 |
Fougeray, R | 5 |
Cattan, V | 1 |
Amellal, N | 3 |
Ohtsu, A | 16 |
Mayer, RJ | 8 |
Chuang, J | 1 |
Gong, J | 1 |
Li, SM | 1 |
Wang, C | 1 |
Fakih, M | 2 |
Mantoan, B | 1 |
Bonetti, A | 6 |
Selvin, T | 1 |
Fasterius, E | 1 |
Jarvius, M | 1 |
Fryknäs, M | 1 |
Larsson, R | 1 |
Andersson, CR | 1 |
Sommerhäuser, G | 1 |
Kurreck, A | 1 |
Stintzing, S | 1 |
von Weikersthal, LF | 1 |
Dechow, T | 1 |
Kaiser, F | 1 |
Schwaner, I | 1 |
Fuchs, M | 2 |
König, A | 1 |
Roderburg, C | 1 |
Hoyer, I | 1 |
Quante, M | 1 |
Kiani, A | 1 |
Fruehauf, S | 1 |
Müller, L | 1 |
Reinacher-Schick, A | 1 |
Stahler, A | 1 |
Modest, DP | 1 |
Martínez-Lago, N | 1 |
Chucla, TC | 1 |
De Castro, BA | 1 |
Ponte, RV | 1 |
Rendo, CR | 1 |
Rodriguez, MIG | 1 |
Diaz, SS | 1 |
Suarez, BG | 1 |
de la Cámara Gomez, J | 3 |
Fernández, FB | 1 |
Salvador, MM | 1 |
Lopez, MR | 1 |
Hochster, H | 4 |
Mayer, R | 3 |
Falcone, A | 14 |
Arkenau, HT | 5 |
George, B | 4 |
Tabernero, J | 11 |
Matsumoto, T | 3 |
Ikoma, T | 1 |
Yamamura, S | 1 |
Miura, K | 1 |
Tsuduki, T | 1 |
Watanabe, T | 3 |
Nagai, H | 1 |
Takatani, M | 1 |
Yasui, H | 8 |
Kuboki, Y | 5 |
Terazawa, T | 2 |
Masuishi, T | 7 |
Nakamura, M | 3 |
Watanabe, J | 2 |
Ojima, H | 2 |
Makiyama, A | 11 |
Kotaka, M | 6 |
Hara, H | 1 |
Kagawa, Y | 5 |
Sugimoto, N | 8 |
Kawakami, H | 1 |
Kajiwara, T | 7 |
Oki, E | 12 |
Sunakawa, Y | 1 |
Ishihara, S | 1 |
Taniguchi, H | 8 |
Nakajima, TE | 1 |
Morita, S | 1 |
Shirao, K | 1 |
Takenaka, N | 1 |
Ozawa, D | 2 |
Satange, R | 1 |
Chang, CC | 1 |
Li, LY | 1 |
Lin, SH | 1 |
Neidle, S | 1 |
Hou, MH | 1 |
Shiroyama, M | 1 |
Fukuoka, S | 7 |
Kumekawa, Y | 5 |
Yamazaki, K | 17 |
Shimada, Y | 9 |
Esaki, T | 9 |
Moriwaki, T | 8 |
Patel, AK | 3 |
Barghout, V | 2 |
Yenikomshian, MA | 3 |
Germain, G | 1 |
Jacques, P | 1 |
Laliberté, F | 1 |
Duh, MS | 3 |
Prokharau, A | 1 |
Ghidini, M | 2 |
Fujitani, K | 1 |
Beretta, GD | 1 |
Mansoor, W | 1 |
Zhavrid, E | 1 |
Catenacci, D | 1 |
McGuigan, S | 1 |
Samawi, HH | 1 |
Brezden-Masley, C | 1 |
Afzal, AR | 1 |
Cheung, WY | 2 |
Dolley, A | 2 |
Grothey, A | 6 |
Marshall, JL | 4 |
Bekaii-Saab, T | 2 |
Chen, J | 1 |
Wang, J | 1 |
Lin, H | 1 |
Peng, Y | 1 |
Denda, T | 7 |
Hatachi, Y | 3 |
Suto, T | 4 |
Enomoto, M | 3 |
Ishikawa, T | 3 |
Kashiwada, T | 4 |
Komatsu, Y | 10 |
Tsuji, A | 7 |
Tsuchihashi, K | 2 |
Sakai, D | 4 |
Ueno, H | 3 |
Tamura, T | 4 |
Yamashita, K | 3 |
Zhang, Q | 1 |
Wang, Q | 1 |
Wang, X | 1 |
Peng, Z | 1 |
Kotani, D | 5 |
Horasawa, S | 1 |
Kaneko, A | 1 |
Nakamura, Y | 2 |
Kawazoe, A | 2 |
Bando, H | 3 |
Kojima, T | 2 |
Kasi, PM | 2 |
Cleary, JM | 2 |
Shinozaki, E | 3 |
Nishina, T | 5 |
Garcia-Carbonero, R | 4 |
Baba, H | 7 |
Argilés, G | 6 |
Sobrero, A | 3 |
Yamaguchi, K | 9 |
Peeters, M | 2 |
Muro, K | 10 |
Zaniboni, A | 5 |
Tsuji, Y | 5 |
Hochster, HS | 5 |
Tran, B | 2 |
Hamada, C | 2 |
Tanase, T | 3 |
Benedetti, F | 3 |
Yamashita, F | 1 |
Lenz, HJ | 8 |
André, T | 1 |
Saunders, M | 1 |
Kanehisa, A | 2 |
Gandossi, E | 1 |
Amellal, NC | 1 |
Pfeiffer, P | 2 |
Yilmaz, M | 1 |
Möller, S | 1 |
Zitnjak, D | 1 |
Krogh, M | 1 |
Petersen, LN | 1 |
Poulsen, LØ | 1 |
Winther, SB | 1 |
Thomsen, KG | 1 |
Qvortrup, C | 1 |
Carter, AM | 1 |
Spooner, C | 1 |
Stevens, D | 1 |
Mullamitha, S | 1 |
Cao, M | 1 |
Zhou, M | 1 |
Zhang, J | 1 |
Siebenhüner, A | 2 |
De Dosso, S | 1 |
Meisel, A | 1 |
Wagner, AD | 1 |
Borner, M | 1 |
Fujii, H | 2 |
Matsuhashi, N | 2 |
Kitahora, M | 1 |
Takahashi, T | 3 |
Hirose, C | 1 |
Iihara, H | 1 |
Yamada, Y | 2 |
Watanabe, D | 1 |
Ishihara, T | 1 |
Suzuki, A | 1 |
Yoshida, K | 2 |
Casadei-Gardini, A | 1 |
Vagheggini, A | 1 |
Gelsomino, F | 1 |
Spallanzani, A | 1 |
Ulivi, P | 1 |
Orsi, G | 1 |
Rovesti, G | 1 |
Andrikou, K | 2 |
Tamburini, E | 4 |
Scartozzi, M | 2 |
Cascinu, S | 2 |
Colloca, G | 1 |
Venturino, A | 1 |
Guarneri, D | 1 |
Fujimoto, Y | 2 |
Nakanishi, R | 3 |
Nukatsuka, M | 3 |
Matsuoka, K | 4 |
Ando, K | 3 |
Wakasa, T | 1 |
Kitao, H | 4 |
Maehara, Y | 6 |
Mori, M | 5 |
Price, T | 2 |
Burge, M | 1 |
Chantrill, L | 1 |
Pavlakis, N | 1 |
Shapiro, J | 1 |
Sjoquist, K | 1 |
Kawakami, T | 1 |
Kawamoto, Y | 1 |
Kadowaki, S | 3 |
Onozawa, Y | 3 |
Muranaka, T | 1 |
Tajika, M | 3 |
Nakatsumi, H | 1 |
Yuki, S | 1 |
Omae, K | 1 |
Bachet, JB | 1 |
Wyrwicz, L | 1 |
Cremolini, C | 4 |
Phelip, JM | 1 |
Portales, F | 2 |
Ozet, A | 1 |
Atlan, D | 1 |
Becquart, M | 1 |
Vidot, L | 2 |
Mounedji, N | 2 |
Danielewicz, I | 1 |
Saunders, MP | 1 |
Borg, C | 2 |
Glynne-Jones, R | 1 |
Van de Wouw, AJ | 1 |
Fedyanin, M | 1 |
Stroyakovskiy, D | 1 |
Kroening, H | 1 |
Garcia-Alfonso, P | 1 |
Wasan, H | 1 |
Egorov, A | 1 |
Moiseenko, V | 1 |
Ogata, M | 1 |
Ogata, T | 1 |
Kato, T | 5 |
Satake, H | 5 |
Roda, D | 1 |
Roselló, S | 2 |
Huerta, M | 1 |
Cervantes, A | 3 |
Nagahara, H | 1 |
Wang, EN | 1 |
Maeda, K | 1 |
Kashiwa, M | 1 |
Matsushita, R | 1 |
Su, GL | 1 |
Wang, YY | 1 |
Wang, JC | 1 |
Liu, H | 1 |
Oba, K | 3 |
Kii, T | 1 |
Takano, N | 1 |
Yokota, M | 1 |
Okita, Y | 1 |
Matoba, K | 1 |
Hasegawa, H | 1 |
Mishima, H | 1 |
Nagata, N | 1 |
Sakamoto, J | 1 |
Walter, T | 1 |
Hawkins, NS | 1 |
Pollock, RF | 1 |
Colaone, F | 1 |
Shergill, S | 1 |
Nose, Y | 1 |
Hata, T | 2 |
Mori, R | 1 |
Kawai, K | 1 |
Naito, A | 2 |
Sakamoto, T | 1 |
Murakami, K | 1 |
Katsura, Y | 1 |
Ohmura, Y | 1 |
Masuzawa, T | 1 |
Takeno, A | 1 |
Takeda, Y | 1 |
Murata, K | 1 |
Sobrero, AF | 1 |
Moreno Vera, SR | 1 |
Lastraioli, E | 1 |
Lavacchi, D | 1 |
Palmieri, VE | 1 |
Castiglione, F | 1 |
Messerini, L | 1 |
Di Costanzo, F | 1 |
Antonuzzo, L | 2 |
Rothkamm, K | 1 |
Christiansen, S | 1 |
Rieckmann, T | 1 |
Horn, M | 1 |
Frenzel, T | 1 |
Brinker, A | 1 |
Schumacher, U | 1 |
Stein, A | 3 |
Petersen, C | 1 |
Burdak-Rothkamm, S | 1 |
Nakashima, M | 2 |
Takeuchi, M | 2 |
Kawakami, K | 3 |
Yoshida, Y | 3 |
Yamada, T | 3 |
Kamiyama, H | 2 |
Kosugi, C | 2 |
Ishibashi, K | 2 |
Yoshida, H | 3 |
Ishida, H | 2 |
Yamaguchi, S | 1 |
Kuramochi, H | 2 |
Fukazawa, A | 2 |
Sonoda, H | 2 |
Yoshimatsu, K | 3 |
Matsuda, A | 3 |
Hasegawa, S | 3 |
Sakamoto, K | 4 |
Otsuka, T | 1 |
Koda, K | 2 |
Kavan, P | 1 |
Miyamoto, Y | 7 |
Kawanaka, H | 1 |
Miwa, K | 1 |
Kabashima, A | 1 |
Noguchi, T | 1 |
Yuge, K | 1 |
Shimokawa, M | 2 |
Saeki, H | 3 |
Akagi, Y | 2 |
Insolda, J | 1 |
Pigozzi, E | 1 |
Uetake, H | 2 |
Funato, Y | 1 |
Yamaguchi, Y | 1 |
Koyama, T | 2 |
Tajiri, M | 1 |
Hamada, S | 1 |
Komatsu, S | 1 |
Shibata, R | 1 |
Konishi, T | 1 |
Matsubara, D | 1 |
Soga, K | 1 |
Shimomura, K | 1 |
Ikeda, J | 1 |
Taniguchi, F | 1 |
Shioaki, Y | 1 |
Iwamoto, K | 1 |
Ohtsuka, M | 1 |
Imasato, M | 1 |
Inui, M | 1 |
Zenitani, S | 1 |
Wada, R | 1 |
Nakahara, Y | 1 |
Mikamori, M | 1 |
Furukawa, K | 1 |
Moon, J | 1 |
Asaoka, T | 1 |
Kishi, K | 1 |
Akamatsu, H | 1 |
Tanaka, S | 1 |
Fiorica, F | 1 |
Ponturo, G | 1 |
Azzurro, M | 1 |
Ruzzenente, A | 1 |
Patel, MR | 2 |
Falchook, GS | 1 |
Hamada, K | 1 |
Bendell, JC | 3 |
Modrzejewska, M | 1 |
Gawronski, M | 1 |
Gackowski, D | 1 |
Prager, GW | 4 |
Ciardiello, F | 5 |
Leger, C | 1 |
Matsumoto, R | 1 |
Mori, S | 1 |
Toda, H | 1 |
Kita, Y | 1 |
Arigami, T | 1 |
Sasaki, K | 1 |
Kurahara, H | 1 |
Maemura, K | 1 |
Natsugoe, S | 1 |
Barone, CA | 1 |
Banzi, MC | 1 |
Bergamo, F | 1 |
Blasi, L | 1 |
Bordonaro, R | 1 |
Bartolomeo, MD | 1 |
Costanzo, FD | 1 |
Frassineti, GL | 2 |
Garufi, C | 1 |
Giuliani, F | 1 |
Latiano, TP | 1 |
Martinelli, E | 3 |
Personeni, N | 1 |
Racca, P | 1 |
Tonini, G | 1 |
Besse, MG | 1 |
Spione, M | 1 |
Shiozawa, M | 1 |
Mitsugi, K | 2 |
Okuda, H | 1 |
Asayama, M | 1 |
Yuasa, Y | 1 |
Manaka, D | 1 |
Qiu, S | 1 |
Kimura, Y | 1 |
Maeda, F | 1 |
Gan, S | 1 |
Yamada, A | 1 |
Kajiyama, D | 1 |
Tokitou, F | 1 |
Kawaguchi, M | 1 |
Amagasa, H | 1 |
Motoyama, K | 1 |
Ganno, H | 1 |
Imai, K | 1 |
Ami, K | 1 |
Iida, S | 1 |
Fukuda, A | 1 |
Ando, M | 3 |
Okano, Y | 1 |
Ishizaki, T | 1 |
Mazaki, J | 1 |
Shigoka, M | 1 |
Kasahara, K | 1 |
Matsudo, T | 1 |
Kawakita, H | 1 |
Nagakawa, Y | 1 |
Katsumata, K | 2 |
Tsuchida, A | 1 |
Niisato, Y | 1 |
Loupakis, F | 5 |
Bekaii-Saab, TS | 2 |
Sugiura, K | 1 |
Seo, Y | 1 |
Tokura, H | 1 |
Ito, Y | 1 |
Tanaka, M | 2 |
Kishida, N | 1 |
Nishi, Y | 1 |
Onishi, Y | 1 |
Aoki, H | 1 |
Gourzoulidis, G | 2 |
Koulentaki, M | 1 |
Koumarianou, A | 1 |
Samadas, E | 1 |
Androulakis, N | 1 |
Xynogalos, S | 1 |
Papakotoulas, P | 1 |
Boukovinas, I | 1 |
Karamouzis, M | 1 |
Souglakos, J | 2 |
Chotzagiannoglou, V | 1 |
Beletsi, A | 1 |
Kourlaba, G | 2 |
Gamoh, M | 1 |
Tanioka, H | 1 |
Goto, M | 2 |
Soeda, J | 1 |
Shibuya, K | 1 |
Iwata, M | 1 |
Yukami, H | 1 |
Mishima, S | 1 |
Sawada, K | 1 |
Shirasu, H | 1 |
Ebi, H | 1 |
Yamanaka, T | 1 |
Aleshin, A | 1 |
Billings, PR | 1 |
Rabinowitz, M | 1 |
Takemasa, I | 1 |
Signorelli, C | 1 |
Gemma, D | 1 |
Grande, R | 1 |
DE Marco, S | 1 |
Saltarelli, R | 1 |
Morandi, MG | 1 |
Spinelli, GP | 1 |
Zoratto, F | 1 |
Sperduti, I | 1 |
Chilelli, MG | 1 |
Ceribelli, A | 1 |
Ruggeri, EM | 1 |
Takahashi, M | 2 |
Sakamoto, Y | 1 |
Ohori, H | 1 |
Kuroki, M | 1 |
Kato, S | 1 |
Otsuka, K | 1 |
Komine, K | 1 |
Takahashi, S | 2 |
Shirota, H | 1 |
Ouchi, K | 1 |
Takahashi, Y | 1 |
Imai, H | 1 |
Shibata, H | 1 |
Yoshioka, T | 1 |
Yamaguchi, H | 1 |
Yamaguchi, T | 4 |
Shimodaira, H | 1 |
Ishioka, C | 1 |
Ihara, K | 1 |
Takushima, Y | 1 |
Igarashi, A | 1 |
Yoshihara, H | 1 |
Lorenzen, S | 1 |
Fornaro, L | 1 |
Catenacci, DVT | 1 |
Moreno, SR | 1 |
Azcue, P | 1 |
Tong, D | 1 |
Wang, L | 1 |
Mendis, J | 1 |
Essapen, S | 1 |
Vitale, P | 1 |
Zanaletti, N | 1 |
Famiglietti, V | 1 |
De Falco, V | 1 |
Fenocchio, E | 1 |
Milanesio, M | 1 |
Lombardi, P | 1 |
Ciardiello, D | 1 |
Martini, G | 2 |
Troiani, T | 2 |
Napolitano, S | 1 |
Fernández Montes, A | 2 |
Carmona-Bayonas, A | 1 |
Jimenez-Fonseca, P | 1 |
Vázquez Rivera, F | 2 |
Martinez Lago, N | 2 |
Covela Rúa, M | 2 |
Cousillas Castiñeiras, A | 2 |
Gonzalez Villarroel, P | 2 |
Méndez, JCM | 1 |
Carriles Fernández, C | 1 |
Sanchez Cánovas, M | 1 |
Garcia García, T | 1 |
Abhyankar, R | 1 |
Brais, LK | 1 |
Barghout, VE | 1 |
Huynh, L | 1 |
Ng, K | 1 |
Fuchs, CS | 3 |
Suenaga, M | 3 |
Schirripa, M | 3 |
Cao, S | 2 |
Zhang, W | 2 |
Yang, D | 2 |
Murgioni, S | 2 |
Rossini, D | 4 |
Marmorino, F | 3 |
Mennitto, A | 2 |
Ning, Y | 2 |
Okazaki, S | 2 |
Berger, MD | 2 |
Gopez, R | 2 |
Barzi, A | 3 |
Okamoto, W | 2 |
Tsushima, T | 3 |
Mochizuki, N | 1 |
Nomura, S | 2 |
Sato, A | 2 |
Makiyama, C | 1 |
Sugiyama, M | 2 |
Okuyama, H | 2 |
Baba, E | 3 |
Gosho, M | 1 |
Dadduzio, V | 1 |
Salvatore, L | 3 |
Borelli, B | 2 |
Pietrantonio, F | 3 |
Bullement, A | 1 |
Underhill, S | 1 |
Hatswell, AJ | 1 |
Abrahao, ABK | 1 |
Ko, YJ | 1 |
Berry, S | 1 |
Chan, KKW | 1 |
Buscaglia, M | 1 |
Kopetz, S | 2 |
Bebeau, P | 1 |
Ramaekers, BLT | 1 |
Wolff, R | 1 |
van Giessen, A | 1 |
Pouwels, X | 1 |
Fayter, D | 1 |
Lang, S | 1 |
Armstrong, N | 1 |
Worthy, G | 1 |
Duffy, S | 1 |
Kleijnen, J | 1 |
Joore, MA | 1 |
Kwakman, JJM | 1 |
Vink, G | 1 |
Vestjens, JH | 1 |
Beerepoot, LV | 1 |
de Groot, JW | 1 |
Jansen, RL | 1 |
Opdam, FL | 2 |
Boot, H | 1 |
Creemers, GJ | 1 |
van Rooijen, JM | 1 |
Los, M | 1 |
Vulink, AJE | 1 |
Schut, H | 1 |
van Meerten, E | 1 |
Baars, A | 1 |
Hamberg, P | 1 |
Kapiteijn, E | 1 |
Sommeijer, DW | 1 |
Kiniwa, M | 1 |
Morodomi, Y | 1 |
Iimori, M | 2 |
Kurashige, J | 1 |
Nakashima, Y | 1 |
Xu, J | 1 |
Pan, H | 1 |
Xu, R | 1 |
Guo, W | 1 |
Han, SW | 1 |
Liu, T | 1 |
Park, YS | 1 |
Shi, C | 1 |
Bai, Y | 1 |
Bi, F | 1 |
Ahn, JB | 1 |
Qin, S | 1 |
Li, Q | 1 |
Wu, C | 1 |
Ma, D | 1 |
Lin, D | 2 |
Burki, TK | 1 |
Laurent, S | 1 |
Winkler, R | 2 |
Grávalos, C | 2 |
Benavides, M | 1 |
Longo-Munoz, F | 2 |
Siena, S | 1 |
Loehrer, P | 1 |
Kimura, M | 3 |
Usami, E | 3 |
Iwai, M | 2 |
Teramachi, H | 2 |
Yoshimura, T | 3 |
Arnold, D | 1 |
Quintela, A | 1 |
Moreno Vera, S | 1 |
Mulet, N | 1 |
Matos, I | 1 |
Noguerido, A | 1 |
Élez, ME | 2 |
Yasue, F | 1 |
Kawachi, S | 1 |
Mitsuoka, M | 1 |
Ikeda, Y | 1 |
Sun, R | 1 |
Horiguchi, M | 1 |
Wei, LJ | 1 |
Kawahara, H | 1 |
Mouri, T | 1 |
Ishida, K | 3 |
Matsumoto, N | 1 |
Akiba, T | 1 |
Yanaga, K | 1 |
Lonardi, S | 2 |
Noventa, S | 1 |
Mosconi, S | 2 |
Nichetti, F | 1 |
Zucchelli, G | 1 |
Dal Maso, A | 1 |
Sforza, V | 1 |
Masi, G | 2 |
Antoniotti, C | 2 |
Di Bartolomeo, M | 1 |
Miceli, R | 2 |
Martinez-Perez, J | 1 |
Riesco-Martinez, MC | 1 |
Xiao, Y | 1 |
Wynant, W | 1 |
Tabesh, M | 1 |
Chu, E | 2 |
Sakamoto, R | 1 |
Kajitani, R | 1 |
Munechika, T | 1 |
Matsumoto, Y | 1 |
Komono, A | 1 |
Aisu, N | 1 |
Daibo, K | 1 |
Kiyomi, F | 1 |
Unseld, M | 1 |
Drimmel, M | 1 |
Gleiss, A | 1 |
Bianconi, D | 1 |
Kieler, M | 1 |
Scheithauer, W | 1 |
Winder, T | 1 |
Ito, M | 2 |
Kishimoto, J | 1 |
Takayama, T | 1 |
Hamamoto, Y | 1 |
Nakayama, N | 1 |
Cho, SK | 1 |
Hay, JW | 1 |
Nakagawa, F | 6 |
Tanaka, N | 3 |
Okabe, H | 3 |
Matsuo, K | 3 |
Takechi, T | 5 |
Cohen, SJ | 1 |
Kasper, S | 1 |
Kisro, J | 1 |
Müller, C | 1 |
Schulz-Abelius, A | 1 |
Rafiyan, MR | 1 |
Maniadakis, N | 1 |
Petrakis, D | 1 |
Pentheroudakis, G | 1 |
Hiyoshi, Y | 1 |
Akiyama, T | 1 |
Kiyozumi, Y | 1 |
Eto, K | 1 |
Yohei, N | 1 |
Iwagami, S | 1 |
Baba, Y | 1 |
Yoshida, N | 1 |
Méndez Méndez, JC | 1 |
Salgado Fernández, M | 1 |
Candamio Folgar, S | 1 |
Reboredo López, M | 1 |
Carmona Campos, M | 1 |
Gallardo Martín, E | 1 |
Jorge Fernández, M | 1 |
Pellón Augusto, ML | 1 |
París Bouzas, L | 1 |
García Gómez, J | 1 |
Sonbol, MB | 1 |
Benkhadra, R | 1 |
Wang, Z | 1 |
Firwana, B | 1 |
Walden, DJ | 1 |
Mody, K | 1 |
Hubbard, JM | 1 |
Murad, MH | 1 |
Ahn, DH | 1 |
Chan, BM | 1 |
Matsumoto, S | 1 |
Sakurazawa, N | 1 |
Kawano, Y | 1 |
Shinozuka, E | 1 |
Sekiguchi, K | 1 |
Suzuki, H | 1 |
Chung, FH | 1 |
Chiang, YR | 1 |
Tseng, AL | 1 |
Sung, YC | 1 |
Lu, J | 1 |
Huang, MC | 1 |
Ma, N | 1 |
Lee, HC | 1 |
Saito, H | 1 |
Sakata, M | 1 |
Uchida, J | 2 |
Tsukihara, H | 1 |
Takahashi, K | 1 |
Yoshisue, K | 1 |
Chiba, M | 1 |
Nakanishi, T | 1 |
Tamai, I | 1 |
Yokogawa, T | 1 |
Oguchi, K | 1 |
Kazuno, H | 1 |
Osada, A | 1 |
Mizunuma, N | 2 |
Boucher, E | 1 |
Prenen, H | 1 |
Mizuguchi, H | 3 |
Cleghorn, S | 1 |
Fuse, N | 1 |
Koizumi, W | 1 |
Shimada, K | 1 |
Takinishi, Y | 1 |
Rosen, LS | 1 |
Goldman, JW | 1 |
Infante, JR | 1 |
Zergebel, C | 1 |
Cho, E | 1 |
Zhang, X | 1 |
Townsend, MK | 1 |
Selhub, J | 1 |
Paul, L | 1 |
Rosner, B | 1 |
Willett, WC | 1 |
Giovannucci, EL | 1 |
Yokomizo, H | 1 |
Nakayama, M | 1 |
Okayama, S | 1 |
Satake, M | 1 |
Sakuma, A | 1 |
Yano, Y | 1 |
Matsumoto, A | 1 |
Fujimoto, T | 1 |
Usui, T | 1 |
Shiozawa, S | 1 |
Shimakawa, T | 1 |
Katsube, T | 1 |
Naritaka, Y | 1 |
Moretto, R | 1 |
Sanz-Garcia, E | 1 |
Grasselli, J | 1 |
Uboha, N | 1 |
Tokunaga, E | 1 |
Goldberg, R | 1 |
Arita, S | 1 |
Shirakawa, T | 1 |
Matsushita, Y | 1 |
Shimokawa, HK | 1 |
Hirano, G | 1 |
Shibata, Y | 1 |
Tamura, S | 1 |
Ariyama, H | 1 |
Kusaba, H | 1 |
Akashi, K | 1 |
van der Velden, DL | 1 |
Voest, EE | 1 |
Kuno, H | 1 |
Mota, JM | 1 |
Fonseca, LG | 1 |
Braghiroli, MI | 1 |
Hoff, PM | 1 |
Fujita, N | 1 |
Furuta, T | 1 |
Katori, J | 1 |
Hara, N | 1 |
Petrelli, F | 3 |
Barni, S | 2 |
Bertocchi, P | 2 |
Cecchini, M | 1 |
Ramanathan, RK | 1 |
Gil-Calle, S | 1 |
Carrato-Mena, A | 1 |
Limón, ML | 1 |
Sueda, T | 1 |
Kudo, T | 1 |
Sugiura, T | 1 |
Takahashi, H | 1 |
Haraguchi, N | 1 |
Nishimura, J | 1 |
Hayashi, T | 1 |
Mizushima, T | 1 |
Doki, Y | 1 |
Satoh, T | 1 |
Sugita, K | 1 |
Yokokawa, T | 1 |
Sugisaki, T | 1 |
Takiguchi, T | 1 |
Aoyama, T | 1 |
Suzuki, K | 1 |
Inoue, A | 1 |
Machida, Y | 1 |
Hama, T | 1 |
Hamauchi, S | 2 |
Kito, Y | 2 |
Komori, A | 2 |
Narita, Y | 2 |
Todaka, A | 2 |
Ishihara, M | 2 |
Yokota, T | 2 |
Tanaka, T | 2 |
Machida, N | 2 |
Fukutomi, A | 2 |
Ura, T | 2 |
Mori, K | 2 |
Burness, CB | 1 |
Duggan, ST | 1 |
Giampieri, R | 1 |
Restivo, A | 1 |
Pusceddu, V | 1 |
Del Prete, M | 1 |
Maccaroni, E | 1 |
Bittoni, A | 1 |
Faloppi, L | 1 |
Bianconi, M | 1 |
Cabras, F | 1 |
Berardi, R | 1 |
Zorcolo, L | 1 |
Scintu, F | 1 |
Suzuki, N | 1 |
Kamei, H | 1 |
Ishibashi, N | 1 |
Tanigawa, M | 1 |
Uchida, M | 1 |
Rimassa, L | 1 |
Aprile, G | 1 |
Bozzarelli, S | 1 |
Morano, F | 1 |
Battaglin, F | 1 |
Baretti, M | 1 |
Berenato, R | 1 |
Formica, V | 1 |
Spada, D | 1 |
Cinieri, S | 1 |
Beretta, G | 1 |
de Braud, F | 1 |
Lee, JJ | 1 |
Overman, MJ | 1 |
Varadhachary, G | 1 |
Fukushima, M | 2 |
Kuwata, K | 1 |
Mita, A | 1 |
Wolff, RA | 1 |
Hoff, P | 1 |
Xiong, H | 1 |
Abbruzzese, JL | 1 |
Er, TK | 1 |
Chang, YS | 1 |
Yeh, KT | 1 |
Chang, TJ | 1 |
Chang, JG | 1 |
Emura, T | 1 |
Murakami, Y | 1 |
Kitazato, K | 1 |
Budai, B | 1 |
Hitre, E | 1 |
Adleff, V | 1 |
Czeglédi, F | 1 |
Gyergyay, F | 1 |
Láng, I | 1 |
Kralovánszky, J | 1 |
Nakamura, T | 1 |
Komoto, C | 1 |
Sakaeda, T | 1 |
Taniguchi, M | 1 |
Okamura, N | 1 |
Aoyama, N | 1 |
Kamigaki, T | 1 |
Kuroda, Y | 1 |
Kasuga, M | 1 |
Kadoyama, K | 1 |
Okumura, K | 1 |
Battistelli, S | 1 |
Vittoria, A | 1 |
Stefanoni, M | 1 |
Bing, C | 1 |
Roviello, F | 1 |
Morel, A | 1 |
Boisdron-Celle, M | 1 |
Fey, L | 1 |
Lainé-Cessac, P | 1 |
Gamelin, E | 1 |
Levine, AJ | 1 |
Siegmund, KD | 1 |
Ervin, CM | 1 |
Diep, A | 1 |
Lee, ER | 1 |
Frankl, HD | 1 |
Haile, RW | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A Phase I Clinical Trial of Trametinib in Combination With TAS-102 in Patients With Chemotherapy-Resistant RAS-Mutated (PIK3CA/PTEN-Wild-Type) Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT03317119] | Phase 1 | 26 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2018-04-11 | Active, not recruiting | ||
Prospective, Randomized, Open, Multicenter Phase II Trial to Investigate the Efficacy of Trifluridine/Tipiracil Plus Panitumumab Versus Trifluridine/Tipiracil Plus Bevacizumab as First-line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: FIRE-8; AIO-KRK/YMO-05[NCT05007132] | Phase 2 | 153 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2021-12-17 | Recruiting | ||
Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 Study Evaluating TAS-102 Plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) Versus Placebo Plus BSC in Patients With Metastatic Gastric Cancer Refractory to Standard Treatments[NCT02500043] | Phase 3 | 507 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2016-02-24 | Completed | ||
TACTIC: a Phase II Study of TAS-102 Monotherapy and Thalidomide Plus TAS-102 as Third-line Therapy and Beyond in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma[NCT05266820] | Phase 2 | 120 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2021-10-01 | Recruiting | ||
Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 Study of TAS-102 Plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) Versus Placebo Plus BSC in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Chemotherapies[NCT01607957] | Phase 3 | 800 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2012-06-17 | Completed | ||
A Randomized, Controlled Phase II Clinical Trial of Fruquintinib Combined With Raltitrexed Versus Fruquintinib Monotherapy in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer Who Had Failed Second-line or Above Standard Chemotherapy[NCT04582981] | Phase 2 | 136 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2020-09-28 | Recruiting | ||
An Open-label Early Access Phase IIIb Study of Trifluridine / Tipiracil (S 95005/TAS-102) in Patients With a Pretreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (PRECONNECT)[NCT03306394] | Phase 3 | 907 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2016-10-18 | Completed | ||
An Open-label, Randomised, Non-comparative Phase 2 Study Evaluating S 95005 (TAS-102) Plus Bevacizumab and Capecitabine Plus Bevacizumab in Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic COlorectal Cancer Who Are Non-eligible for Intensive Therapy (TASCO1 [NCT02743221] | Phase 2 | 154 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2016-04-29 | Completed | ||
Evaluating Trifluridine/Tipiracil Based Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer - The Phase I/II TARC Trial[NCT04177602] | Phase 1/Phase 2 | 10 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2019-11-04 | Terminated (stopped due to Due to the amended therapy strategies for rectal cancer recently, it was decided not to transfer the study to the phase II part, as superiority over standard chemoradiation and transfer to a new therapy standard are increasingly unlikely.) | ||
A Phase 2 Study With Safety Lead-in, Evaluating TAS-102 Plus Nivolumab in Patients With Microsatellite Stable Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT02860546] | Phase 2 | 18 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2016-08-29 | Completed | ||
Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Study of TAS-102 Versus Placebo in Asian Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory or Intolerable to Standard Chemotherapies[NCT01955837] | Phase 3 | 406 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2013-09-30 | Completed | ||
An Open-Label Expanded Access Study of TAS-102 in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to or Failing Standard Chemotherapy[NCT02286492] | 0 participants | Expanded Access | Approved for marketing | ||||
NIVOLUMAB Plus IPILIMUMAB and TEMOZOLOMIDE in Combination in Microsatellite Stable (MSS), MGMT Silenced Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC): the MAYA Study[NCT03832621] | Phase 2 | 135 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2019-03-25 | Completed | ||
Phase II Trial of TAS-102 in Patients With Advanced, Refractory Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma[NCT04923529] | Phase 2 | 28 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2021-03-01 | Recruiting | ||
Efficacy and Safety of Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Combination With Irinotecan as a Second Line Therapy in Patients With Cholangiocarcinoma[NCT04059562] | Phase 2 | 28 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2021-10-28 | Active, not recruiting | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
DCR was defined as the proportion of participants with a best overall response of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD). The assessment of DCR was based on Investigator review of radiologic images and following RECIST criteria (version 1.1, 2009). (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to the cut-off date (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months), assessed every 8 weeks
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
TAS-102+BSC | 44.1 |
Placebo+BSC | 14.5 |
"Overall response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with objective evidence of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR).~CR was defined as the disappearance of all target or non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes for target lesions or all lymph nodes for non-target lesions were non-pathological morphologically that was reduced in size in short axis to < 10 mm.~PR was defined as target lesions with at least 30% decrease in the sum of diameters, taking baseline sum diameters as reference." (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to the cut-off date (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months), assessed every 8 weeks
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
TAS-102+BSC | 4.5 |
Placebo+BSC | 2.1 |
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Participants without documented death were censored at last follow-up or cut-off date, whichever comes first. OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to the data cut-off date (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
TAS-102+BSC | 5.7 |
Placebo+BSC | 3.6 |
PFS was defined as the time from randomization until the date of first occurrence of investigator-assessed radiological disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever came first. Disease progression as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) for target lesions were defined as target lesions with at least 20 % relative increase in the sum of diameters with reference to the smallest sum on study, including the baseline sum and this sum demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeter (mm) or the appearance of one or more new lesions or Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. All alive participants with no disease progression as of the analysis cut-off date were censored at the last tumor assessment. PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to the cut-off date (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
TAS-102+BSC | 2.0 |
Placebo+BSC | 1.8 |
The ECOG performance status was used to evaluate participant's disease progression and the effect of the disease on the participant's activities of daily living. It ranges on the scale from 0-5 (0 = normal activity; 1= symptoms but ambulatory; 2= in bed for < 50% of the time; 3= in bed for > 50% of the time; 4= 100% bedridden; 5= dead). Time to definitive deterioration in ECOG performance status score from baseline was defined as a change from 0, 1 to >=2, or from 2 to >=3. (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: At the time of randomization (Day 1 Cycle 1) and within 24 hours prior to start of study treatment in every cycle (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
TAS-102+BSC | 4.3 |
Placebo+BSC | 2.3 |
EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a cancer-specific instrument with 30 questions for evaluation of new chemotherapy and provides an assessment of participant reported outcome dimensions. First 28 questions used 4-point scale (1=not at all,2=a little,3=quite a bit,4=very much) for evaluating 5 functional scales (physical,role,emotional,cognitive,social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue,nausea/vomiting,pain) and other single items. For each item,high score represented high level of symptomatology/problem. Last 2 questions represented participant's assessment of overall health and QoL, coded on 7-point scale (1=very poor to 7=excellent). EORTC QLQ-C30 observed values and change from baseline for global health status (scoring of questions 29 and 30) and 5 functional scales, 3 symptom scales and other single items (scoring of questions 1 to 28). Answers were converted into grading scale, with values between 0 and 100. A high score represented a favorable outcome with a best QoL for participant. (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 Cycle 2 up to end of treatment (EOT) (within 30 days of last study treatment) and 30-Day safety follow-up visit (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 1 | Cycle 2 | Cycle 3 | Cycle 4 | Cycle 5 | Cycle 6 | Cycle 7 | Cycle 8 | Cycle 9 | Cycle 10 | Cycle 11 | Cycle 12 | Cycle 13 | Last Collection Cycle | Safety Follow-Up | |
TAS-102+BSC | -2.7 | -5.9 | -4.1 | -3.6 | -5.9 | -8.8 | -9.5 | -4.3 | 2.4 | -14.4 | -16.7 | -8.3 | 0.0 | -8.8 | -16.5 |
EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a cancer-specific instrument with 30 questions for evaluation of new chemotherapy and provides an assessment of participant reported outcome dimensions. First 28 questions used 4-point scale (1=not at all,2=a little,3=quite a bit,4=very much) for evaluating 5 functional scales (physical,role,emotional,cognitive,social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue,nausea/vomiting,pain) and other single items. For each item,high score represented high level of symptomatology/problem. Last 2 questions represented participant's assessment of overall health and QoL, coded on 7-point scale (1=very poor to 7=excellent). EORTC QLQ-C30 observed values and change from baseline for global health status (scoring of questions 29 and 30) and 5 functional scales, 3 symptom scales and other single items (scoring of questions 1 to 28). Answers were converted into grading scale, with values between 0 and 100. A high score represented a favorable outcome with a best QoL for participant. (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 Cycle 2 up to end of treatment (EOT) (within 30 days of last study treatment) and 30-Day safety follow-up visit (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 1 | Cycle 2 | Cycle 3 | Cycle 4 | Cycle 5 | Cycle 6 | Cycle 7 | Cycle 8 | Cycle 9 | Cycle 10 | Cycle 11 | Cycle 12 | Cycle 13 | Cycle 14 | Cycle 15 | Last Collection Cycle | Safety Follow-Up | |
Placebo+BSC | -5.9 | -7.3 | -1.4 | -1.7 | 11.1 | 15.6 | 20.0 | 16.7 | 16.7 | 25.0 | 25.0 | 33.3 | 33.3 | 33.3 | 33.3 | -9.8 | -8.9 |
The Quality of Life Questionnaire Stomach Cancer Module 22 (QLQ-STO22) assessed symptoms and treatment-related side effects commonly reported in participants. There are 22 questions which comprise 5 scales (dysphagia, dietary restrictions, pain QS22, reflux, and anxiety) and 4 single items (dry mouth, hair loss, taste problems, body image). Most questions use 4-point scale (1='Not at all', 2=a little, 3=quite a bit and 4='Very much'). A linear transformation was used to standardize all scores and single-items to a scale of 0 to 100, where higher score=better level of functioning or greater degree of symptoms. (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 1 up to end of treatment (EOT) (within 30 days of last study treatment) (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dysphagia | Dietary Restrictions | Pain QS22 | Reflux | Anxiety | Dry Mouth | Body Image | Hair Loss | Taste Problems | |
Placebo+BSC | 78.2 | 78.2 | 78.2 | 78.2 | 78.2 | 78.2 | 78.2 | 78.2 | 78.2 |
TAS-102+BSC | 86.6 | 86.6 | 86.6 | 86.6 | 86.6 | 86.4 | 85.8 | 86.6 | 86.6 |
Any untoward medical condition that occurs in a participants while participating in a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the use of the study medication was considered an adverse event (AE). A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. TEAEs/TESAEs were defined as events that started on or after treatment or started before treatment and worsened after the start of treatment through 30 days after the last dose of study treatment. (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
TEAE | TESAE | |
Placebo+BSC | 151 | 70 |
TAS-102+BSC | 319 | 143 |
Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death for participants. If a participant discontinued study medication for reasons other than radiologic disease progression, the participant was followed for tumor response until radiologic disease progression or initiation of new anticancer therapy. (NCT01607957)
Timeframe: Every 8 weeks, up to 12 months after the last participant was randomized or until the target number of events (deaths) was met, whichever was later. (Overall survival data was collected till 24 Jan 2014 which was date of observation of the 571st death)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
TAS-102 | 7.1 |
Placebo | 5.3 |
Tumor assessments were performed throughout the study based on RECIST, Version 1.1, 2009. Progression free survival was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization until the date of the investigator-assessed radiological disease progression or death due to any cause. For participants who were alive with no radiological disease progression as of the analysis cut-off date, their survival was censored at the date of the last tumor assessment. Participants who received non-study cancer treatment before disease progression, or participants with clinical but not radiologic evidence of progression, were censored at the date of the last radiologic evaluable tumor assessment before the non-study cancer treatment was initiated. (NCT01607957)
Timeframe: Every 8 weeks, up to 12 months after the last participant was randomized or until the date of the investigator-assessed radiological disease progression or death due to any cause,whichever was later. (Progression free survival cutoff: 31 Jan 2014)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
TAS-102 | 2.0 |
Placebo | 1.7 |
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Treatment-related AEs were events between administration of study drug and up to 30 Days that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability /incapacity; congenital anomaly. The AEs were graded for severity using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AEs. (NCT01607957)
Timeframe: From the time of signing the informed consent form until the period of participant follow up (30 days following after the administration of last dose of study medication or until initiation of new antitumor therapy, whichever was earlier
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Any adverse event (AE) | Any treatment-related AE | Any ≥Grade 3 AE | Any treatment-related ≥Grade 3 AE | Any serious AE (SAE) | Any AE resulting in discontinuation | Any AE with outcome of death | |
Placebo | 93.2 | 54.7 | 51.7 | 9.8 | 33.6 | 13.6 | 11.3 |
TAS-102 | 98.3 | 85.7 | 69.4 | 49.0 | 29.6 | 10.3 | 3.2 |
DCR was the proportion of patients with confirmed CR, PR or stable disease (SD) as best overall response. SD defined as neither sufficient decrease to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. (NCT02743221)
Timeframe: Baseline and every 8 weeks (maximum follow-up duration: 17.9 months)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Trifluridine/Tipiracil + Bevacizumab | 66 |
Capecitabine + Bevacizumab | 59 |
The DR was calculated among patients with CR or PR as the time (months) from the first documentation of response to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. (NCT02743221)
Timeframe: Baseline and every 8 weeks (maximum follow-up duration: 16.6 months)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Trifluridine/Tipiracil + Bevacizumab | 7.9 |
Capecitabine + Bevacizumab | 9.9 |
As per RECIST v1.1, Complete Response (CR) was disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR) was at least 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. The ORR was the proportion of patients who presented CR or PR with confirmation at subsequent time point or at least 4 weeks later. (NCT02743221)
Timeframe: Baseline and every 8 weeks (maximum follow-up duration: 17.9 months)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Trifluridine/Tipiracil + Bevacizumab | 26 |
Capecitabine + Bevacizumab | 23 |
The OS was defined as the time from the date of randomisation to the date of death. If death was not confirmed, or patient was alive at study cut-off date, survival time was censored at the date of last follow-up or at the study cut-off date, whichever was earlier. (NCT02743221)
Timeframe: Baseline up to death or study cut-off (maximum follow-up duration: 19.9 months)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Trifluridine/Tipiracil + Bevacizumab | 18.0 |
Capecitabine + Bevacizumab | 16.2 |
The progression free survival (PFS), defined as the time from the date of randomisation until the date of the investigator-assessed radiological disease progression or death due to any cause according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Progressive disease (PD) was defined at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study) and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm in the sum of lesions or the appearance of new lesions. (NCT02743221)
Timeframe: Baseline and every 8 weeks (maximum follow-up duration: 17.9 months)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Trifluridine/Tipiracil + Bevacizumab | 9.2 |
Capecitabine + Bevacizumab | 7.8 |
DCR was defined as the percentage of participants with objective evidence of radiologic complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) and was based on the overall best response from each participant as determined from investigator response assessments and following irRC criteria. Per irRC criteria, CR was defined as the disappearance of all tumor lesions (measurable or not, and no new lesions). PR was defined as a decrease in the sum of the products of the two largest perpendicular diameters by 50% or greater by a consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks after first documentation. SD was defined as the failure to meet criteria for irCR or irPR in absence of in absence of irPD. (NCT02860546)
Timeframe: From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to 53 weeks)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
TAS-102 + Nivolumab | 44.4 |
DCR was defined as the percentage of participants with objective evidence of radiologic CR, PR, or SD and was based on the overall best response from each participant as determined from investigator response assessments and following RECIST Criteria version 1.1. Per RECIST Criteria CR defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Reduction in any pathological lymph nodes in short axis to <10 mm. PR defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum diameters. SD defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as a reference the smallest sum diameters during study. (NCT02860546)
Timeframe: From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to 53 weeks)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
TAS-102 + Nivolumab | 55.6 |
irORR was defined as the percentage of participants achieving a complete response (irCR) or partial response (irPR) based on irRC criteria. Per irRC criteria, Complete Response (irCR) was defined as the disappearance of all tumor lesions (measurable or not, and no new lesions)., Partial Response (irPR) was defined as a decrease in the sum of the products of the two largest perpendicular diameters (SPD) by 50 percent (%) or greater by a consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks after first documentation, Stable Disease (irSD) was defined as the failure to meet criteria for irCR or irPR in absence of progressive disease (irPD), irPD was defined as at least 25% increase in SPD relative to nadir. (NCT02860546)
Timeframe: From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to 53 weeks)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
TAS-102 + Nivolumab | 0 |
"DLT: defined as occurrence of any of the following-~Hematological toxicities:~Grade 4 neutropenia lasting greater than(>)7 days~Grade 4 febrile neutropenia and fever greater than or equal to (>=)38 degree celsius for over 1 hour~Grade 4 thrombocytopenia or grade 3 thrombocytopenia associated with bleeding or requiring transfusions~Non-hematological toxicities:~Grade 3 or grade 4 non-hematologic toxicity (excluding alopecia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea)~Grade 3 or grade 4 nausea/vomiting lasting >48 hours and uncontrolled by aggressive anti-emetic therapy, including serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonists (e.g, ondansetron)~Grade 3 or grade 4 diarrhea lasting > 48 hours and unresponsive to antidiarrheal medication~Drug-related toxicities:~Any drug-related toxicity resulting in > 2 weeks delay in initiation of Cycle 2 (i.e, cannot start Cycle 2 until Day 43 or later)~Any drug-related toxicity that prevents completion of 80% compliance for either drug in Cycle 1" (NCT02860546)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (each cycle is of 4 weeks)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
TAS-102 + Nivolumab | 0 |
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with objective evidence of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version 1.1.CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to less than (<)10 millimeters (mm). PR was defined as at least a 30 % decrease in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum diameters. (NCT02860546)
Timeframe: From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to 53 weeks)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
TAS-102 + Nivolumab | 0 |
RP2D of TAS-102 was evaluated based on the safety and tolerability of the combination therapy of TAS-102 and Nivolumab. (NCT02860546)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (each cycle is of 4 weeks)
Intervention | mg/m^2 (Number) |
---|---|
TAS-102 + Nivolumab | 35 |
Hematological and chemistry laboratory tests abnormalities were graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.03. as: Grade 1 (Mild, asymptomatic or mild symptoms); Grade 2 (Moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated); Grade 3 (Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated); Grade 4 (Life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated); Grade 5 (Death related to AE). (NCT02860546)
Timeframe: From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to 53 weeks)
Intervention | participants (Number) | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Grade 4: Neutropenia (neutrophils low) | Grade 4: Anemia (hemoglobin low) | Grade 4: Leukopenia (leukocytes low) | Grade 4: Lymphopenia (lymphocytes low) | Grade 4: Thrombocytopenia (platelets low) | Grade 4: Bilirubin High | Grade 4: Glucose High | Grade 4: Sodium Low | Grade 3: Neutropenia (neutrophils low) | Grade 3: Anemia (hemoglobin low) | Grade 3: Leukopenia (leukocytes low) | Grade 3: Lymphopenia (lymphocytes low) | Grade 3: Thrombocytopenia (platelets low) | Grade 3: Bilirubin High | Grade 3: Glucose High | Grade 3: Sodium Low | |
TAS-102 + Nivolumab | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical condition that occurs in a participants while participating in a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the use of the study treatment. A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. TEAEs: AEs that developed or worsened during the on-treatment period which was defined as the period from the time of first dose of study treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment. (NCT02860546)
Timeframe: From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to 53 weeks)
Intervention | participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Participants with TEAEs | Participants with TESAEs | |
TAS-102 + Nivolumab | 18 | 6 |
Immune-related progression free survival was defined as the time (in months) from the date of first dose of study treatment until the date of the investigator-assessed radiological disease progression (based on irRC) or death due to any cause. Participants who were alive with no disease progression at the moment of the analysis cut-off date was censored at the date of the last tumor assessment. Per irRC criteria disease progression defined as at least 25% increase in SPD relative to nadir. Analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. (NCT02860546)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study treatment to disease progression or death (up to 53 weeks)
Intervention | months (Median) | |
---|---|---|
Radiologic progression of disease only | Radiologic + clinical progression of disease | |
TAS-102 + Nivolumab | 2.2 | 2.2 |
Progression free survival was defined as the time (in months) from the date of first dose of study treatment until the date of the investigator-assessed radiological disease progression (based on RECIST 1.1) or death due to any cause. Per RECIST criteria disease progression defined as least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference the smallest sum on study, including the baseline sum. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Definitive new lesion presence also indicated progression. (NCT02860546)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study treatment to disease progression or death (up to 53 weeks)
Intervention | months (Median) | |
---|---|---|
Radiologic progression of disease only | Radiologic + clinical progression of disease | |
TAS-102 + Nivolumab | 2.8 | 2.5 |
The assessment of DCR paralleled that of ORR, with DCR defined as the proportion of patients with objective evidence of CR, PR, or SD. (NCT01955837)
Timeframe: From randomization until the date of radiologic disease progression, permanent discontinuation of study treatment, or death due to any cause, assessed up to 30 months.
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | 44.1 |
Placebo | 14.6 |
Duration of response was derived for those patients with objective evidence of PR or CR. Duration of response was defined as the time from the first documentation of response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause. Patients alive and progression free as of the analysis cut-off date were censored at their last evaluable tumor response assessment prior to initiation of any non-study cancer treatment. (NCT01955837)
Timeframe: From randomization until the date of radiologic disease progression, permanent discontinuation of study treatment, or death due to any cause, assessed up to 30 months.
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|---|
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | 6.6 |
Placebo | 0 |
"The assessment of ORR was based on Investigator review of the images according to RECIST Version 1.1. Overall response rate was defined as the proportion of patients with objective evidence of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). At the analysis stage, the best overall response was assigned for each patient as the best response recorded from all responses recorded after study randomization. If applicable, responses recorded after disease progression or initiation of non-study cancer treatment was excluded. A patient's best response assignment of stable disease (SD) needed to be maintained for at least 6 weeks after study randomization. If a patient didn't meet this condition, best response was assigned Not evaluable." (NCT01955837)
Timeframe: From randomization until the date of radiologic disease progression, permanent discontinuation of study treatment, or death due to any cause, assessed up to 30 months.
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | 1.1 |
Placebo | 0.0 |
The primary endpoint was Overall Survival (OS), which was defined as the time from random assignment to the date of death. In the absence of confirmation of death or for patients alive at the OS cutoff date, survival time was censored at the date of last trial follow-up or the cutoff date, whichever was earlier. (NCT01955837)
Timeframe: Every 8 weeks. Survival status should be collected for up to 12 months after the last patient is randomized or until the target number of events (deaths) is met, whichever is later.
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|---|
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | 7.8 |
Placebo | 7.1 |
"The primary end point was OS, which was defined as the time from random assignment to the date of death. In the absence of confirmation of death or for patients alive at the OS cutoff date, survival time was censored at the date of last trial follow-up or the cutoff date, whichever was earlier.~The OS indicated above as secondary outcome was analyzed by mutant type KRAS." (NCT01955837)
Timeframe: Every 8 weeks. Survival status should be collected for up to 12 months after the last patient is randomized or until the target number of events (deaths) is met, whichever is later.
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | 7.0 |
Placebo | 6.5 |
"The primary end point was OS, which was defined as the time from random assignment to the date of death. In the absence of confirmation of death or for patients alive at the OS cutoff date, survival time was censored at the date of last trial follow-up or the cutoff date, whichever was earlier.~The OS indicated above as secondary outcome was analyzed by wild type KRAS." (NCT01955837)
Timeframe: Every 8 weeks. Survival status should be collected for up to 12 months after the last patient is randomized or until the target number of events (deaths) is met, whichever is later.
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | 8.6 |
Placebo | 7.4 |
Tumor assessments were performed throughout the study period and analyzed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria (Version 1.1, 2009). Progression-free survival was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization until the date of the Investigator-assessed radiological disease progression or death due to any cause. Patients who received non-study cancer treatment before radiologic evidence of disease progression were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment before initiation of non-study cancer treatment. (NCT01955837)
Timeframe: Every 8 weeks. Tumor assessments will be performed until radiologic progression develops or the start of new anticancer treatment, for up to 12 months after the last patient is randomized or until the target number of events (deaths) is met.
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|---|
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | 2.0 |
Placebo | 1.8 |
Progression-free survival was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization until the date of the Investigator-assessed radiological disease progression or death due to any cause. Patients who received non-study cancer treatment before radiologic evidence of disease progression were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment before initiation of non-study cancer treatment. The PFS indicated above as secondary outcome was analyzed by mutant type KRAS. (NCT01955837)
Timeframe: Every 8 weeks. Tumor assessments will be performed until radiologic progression develops or the start of new anticancer treatment, for up to 12 months after the last patient is randomized or until the target number of events (deaths) is met.
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|---|
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | 2.2 |
Placebo | 1.8 |
Progression-free survival was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization until the date of the Investigator-assessed radiological disease progression or death due to any cause. Patients who received non-study cancer treatment before radiologic evidence of disease progression were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment before initiation of non-study cancer treatment. The PFS indicated above as secondary outcome was analyzed by wild type KRAS. (NCT01955837)
Timeframe: Every 8 weeks. Tumor assessments will be performed until radiologic progression develops or the start of new anticancer treatment, for up to 12 months after the last patient is randomized or until the target number of events (deaths) is met.
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | 2.0 |
Placebo | 1.8 |
Time to treatment failure was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization until the date of radiologic disease progression, permanent discontinuation of study treatment, or death due to any cause. Censoring for TTF was also applied for those patients who were given non-study cancer treatment, with censoring at the time when the patient began the non-study cancer treatment. (NCT01955837)
Timeframe: From randomization until the date of radiologic disease progression, permanent discontinuation of study treatment, or death due to any cause, assessed up to 30 months.
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | 1.9 |
Placebo | 1.8 |
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Treatment-related AEs were events between administration of study drug and up to 30 Days that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability /incapacity; congenital anomaly. The AEs were graded for severity using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AEs. (NCT01955837)
Timeframe: From the time a patient signed informed until 30 day safety follow-up visit or until initiation of new anticancer treatment, or assessed up to 30 months.
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No AEs | One or more AEs | One or more TEAEs | TEAE severity by CTCAE grade:Grade1 | TEAE severity by CTCAE grade:Grade2 | TEAE severity by CTCAE grade:Grade3 | TEAE severity by CTCAE grade:Grade4 | TEAE severity by CTCAE grade:Grade5 | TEAE causality(Related) | TEAE causality(Not Related) | One or more TEAEs leading to discontinuation | One or more SAEs | One or more TESAEs | One or more TEAEs leading to death | |
Placebo | 15 | 120 | 118 | 32 | 41 | 33 | 11 | 1 | 70 | 48 | 13 | 32 | 31 | 1 |
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | 2 | 269 | 269 | 23 | 84 | 127 | 30 | 5 | 244 | 25 | 27 | 63 | 63 | 5 |
All laboratory values that were out of the normal range were to be evaluated for their clinical significance before exposing the patient to the next dose of study medication. Any laboratory abnormality that was clinically significant, e.g., results in delay of study medication dosing, study discontinuation, required treatment due to abnormal values, or was considered by the Investigator to be medical important, were to be reported as an AE, unless it was considered part of clinical manifestations to a clinical diagnosis that has already been reported as an AE. (NCT01955837)
Timeframe: From the time a patient signed informed until 30 day safety follow-up visit or until initiation of new anticancer treatment, or assessed up to 30 months.
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Anemia:Any Grade | Anemia:Grade >=3 | Leukopenia:Any Grade | Leukopenia:Grade >=3 | Neutropenia:Any Grade | Neutropenia:Grade >=3 | Lymphopenia:Any Grade | Lymphopenia:Grade >=3 | Thrombocytopenia:Any Grade | Thrombocytopenia:Grade >=3 | Lymphocytosis:Any Grade | Lymphocytosis:Grade >=3 | Increase in alkaline phosphatase level:Any Grade | Increase in alkaline phosphatase level:Grade >=3 | Hyperglycemia:Any Grade | Hyperglycemia:Grade >=3 | Increase in total bilirubin level:Any Grade | Increase in total bilirubin level:Grade >=3 | Hypoalbuminemia:Any Grade | Hypoalbuminemia:Grade >=3 | Hyponatremia:Any Grade | Hyponatremia:Grade >=3 | Hypocalcemia:Any Grade | Hypocalcemia:Grade >=3 | Increase in AST level:Any Grade | Increase in AST level:Grade >=3 | Increase in ALT level:Any Grade | Increase in ALT level:Grade >=3 | Hypokalemia:Any Grade | Hypokalemia:Grade >=3 | Increase in creatinine level:Any Grade | Increase in creatinine level:Grade >=3 | Hyperkalemia:Any Grade | Hyperkalemia:Grade >=3 | Hypercalcemia:Any Grade | Hypercalcemia:Grade >=3 | |
Placebo | 52 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 34 | 3 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 58 | 5 | 50 | 3 | 28 | 10 | 44 | 0 | 38 | 6 | 33 | 1 | 40 | 7 | 29 | 4 | 11 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
TAS-102(Trifluridine/Tipiracil) | 209 | 48 | 190 | 56 | 182 | 90 | 146 | 39 | 96 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 91 | 11 | 98 | 7 | 99 | 19 | 78 | 8 | 81 | 12 | 77 | 3 | 63 | 10 | 48 | 3 | 31 | 2 | 13 | 3 | 11 | 1 | 8 | 0 |
25 reviews available for thymine and Colorectal Neoplasms
Article | Year |
---|---|
Effect of KRAS codon 12 or 13 mutations on survival with trifluridine/tipiracil in pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Topics: Codon; Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms; Frontotemporal Dementia; Humans; Mutation; Proto-Onc | 2022 |
Comparison of Regorafenib, Fruquintinib, and TAS-102 in Previously Treated Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Five Clinical Trials.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzofurans; Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms | 2019 |
Regorafenib, TAS-102, or fruquintinib for metastatic colorectal cancer: any difference in randomized trials?
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzofurans; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disea | 2020 |
Comparison of efficacy and safety for patients with beyond second line treated metastatic colorectal cancer: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Cetuximab; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Ne | 2020 |
Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma after Second Progression and the Role of Trifluridine-Tipiracil (TAS-102) in Switzerland.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Colorectal Neop | 2020 |
A meta-analysis comparing regorafenib with TAS-102 for treating refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Phenylurea Compounds; Pyridines; Pyrrolidines; Thym | 2020 |
Systematic review and network meta-analyses of third-line treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Brachytherapy; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Me | 2020 |
Dose-escalation strategy in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: A change in terms of cost-effectiveness.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dose-Re | 2021 |
A Comparison of Regorafenib and TAS-102 for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Pheny | 2018 |
Trifluridine-Tipiracil for Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Combinations; Humans; Pyrro | 2018 |
Beyond second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease Progression; Drug Combinations; Drugs, Investigational; Humans; Neopla | 2018 |
The safety of trifluridine and tipiracil for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Co | 2018 |
A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Regorafenib and TAS-102 in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Drug Resist | 2019 |
The safety and efficacy of trifluridine-tipiracil for metastatic colorectal cancer: A pharmacy perspective.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Trials as Topic; Colorectal Neoplasms; Dose | 2019 |
[Efficacy of TAS-102].
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Py | 2015 |
TAS-102 for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Com | 2015 |
Current and advancing treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Animals; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Bevacizum | 2016 |
TAS-102: a novel antimetabolite for the 21st century.
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Proto | 2016 |
A novel antimetabolite: TAS-102 for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Combinations; Huma | 2016 |
[Antitumor Molecular Mechanism of Trifluridine and Tipiracil Hydrochloride (TAS-102: TFTD)].
Topics: Animals; Cell Cycle; Colorectal Neoplasms; DNA; Drug Combinations; Drug Design; Drug Resistance, Neo | 2016 |
TAS-102 for Treatment of Advanced Colorectal Cancers That Are No Longer Responding to Other Therapies.
Topics: Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasm | 2016 |
Review on TAS-102 development and its use for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Animals; Clinical Trials as Topic; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Pyrrolidines; Th | 2016 |
TAS-102 (Lonsurf) for the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. A Concise Review.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Pyrrolidines; Randomized Con | 2016 |
Trifluridine/Tipiracil: A Review in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, | 2016 |
Adherence, Dosing, and Managing Toxicities With Trifluridine/Tipiracil (TAS-102).
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Dose-Response Relationship, Dr | 2017 |
41 trials available for thymine and Colorectal Neoplasms
Article | Year |
---|---|
Efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil in older and younger patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 3 study (TAGS).
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Esoph | 2022 |
Efficacy, safety and quality-of-life data from patients with pre-treated metastatic colorectal cancer receiving trifluridine/tipiracil: results of the TALLISUR trial.
Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Humans; Prospective Studies; Pyrrolidines; Quality of Life; Thymine; Triflurid | 2022 |
A Phase I Clinical Trial of Trametinib in Combination with TAS-102 in Patients with Chemotherapy-Resistant RAS-Mutated (PIK3CA/PTEN-Wild Type) Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Class I Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases; Colorectal N | 2022 |
Study protocol of the FIRE-8 (AIO-KRK/YMO-0519) trial: a prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter phase II trial investigating the efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil plus panitumumab versus trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab as first-line tre
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bev | 2022 |
Pooled safety analysis from phase III studies of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer and metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adult; Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms; Esophagogastric Junction; Frontotemporal Dementia; H | 2022 |
Pooled safety analysis from phase III studies of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer and metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adult; Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms; Esophagogastric Junction; Frontotemporal Dementia; H | 2022 |
Pooled safety analysis from phase III studies of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer and metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adult; Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms; Esophagogastric Junction; Frontotemporal Dementia; H | 2022 |
Pooled safety analysis from phase III studies of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer and metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adult; Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms; Esophagogastric Junction; Frontotemporal Dementia; H | 2022 |
Trifluridine/tipiracil+bevacizumab (BEV) vs. fluoropyrimidine-irinotecan+BEV as second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomised noninferiority trial.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms | 2023 |
Efficacy and Safety of Trifluridine/Tipiracil Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Gastric Cancer Who Had Undergone Gastrectomy: Subgroup Analyses of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Gastrectomy | 2020 |
Retrospective cohort study of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) plus bevacizumab versus trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Beva | 2019 |
Neutropenia and survival outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with trifluridine/tipiracil in the RECOURSE and J003 trials.
Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Japan; Neutropenia; Pyrrolidines; Thymine; Trifluri | 2020 |
First-line trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer: SOLSTICE study design.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Clinical Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasm | 2020 |
TAS-102 with or without bevacizumab in patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer: an investigator-initiated, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combin | 2020 |
Safety, efficacy and patient-reported outcomes with trifluridine/tipiracil in pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer: results of the PRECONNECT study.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Male; Mi | 2020 |
Trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab in patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer ineligible for intensive therapy: the randomized TASCO1 study.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Capecitabine; Colorectal Neoplasms; Flu | 2020 |
Comparative Cost-utility Analysis of Regorafenib and Trifluridine/Tipiracil in The Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Japan.
Topics: Adult; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Combinations; Humans; Japan; Phenylurea Com | 2020 |
Phase Ib/II Study of Biweekly TAS-102 in Combination with Bevacizumab for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Therapies (BiTS Study).
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations | 2020 |
Effect of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients treated in RECOURSE by prognostic factors at baseline: an exploratory analysis.
Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Pyrrolidines; | 2020 |
Combination of TAS-102 and bevacizumab as third-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: TAS-CC3 study.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Surv | 2021 |
Trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab as a first-line treatment for elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (KSCC1602): A multicenter phase II trial.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Colorectal Neo | 2021 |
A phase 2 trial of trifluridine/tipiracil plus nivolumab in patients with heavily pretreated microsatellite-stable metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations | 2021 |
Trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for third-line management of metastatic colorectal cancer: SUNLIGHT study design.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Clinica | 2021 |
Italian results of the PRECONNECT study: safety and efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Aged; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; International Agen | 2021 |
Phase II study of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab by RAS mutation status in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard therapies: JFMC51-1702-C7.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Colorectal Neoplasms; Humans; Mutation; | 2021 |
Monitoring FTD in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer administered FTD plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment.
Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bevacizumab; Colorectal | 2021 |
Prospective Multicenter Phase II Study of Biweekly TAS-102 and Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Chemothera | 2021 |
Safety and efficacy of panitumumab in combination with trifluridine/tipiracil for pre-treated patients with unresectable, metastatic colorectal cancer with wild-type RAS: The phase 1/2 APOLLON study.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Humans; Panitumumab; Pyrrolidi | 2021 |
CIRCULATE-Japan: Circulating tumor DNA-guided adaptive platform trials to refine adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Capecitabine; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Circulating Tu | 2021 |
Phase II study of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) therapy in elderly patients with colorectal cancer (T-CORE1401): geriatric assessment tools and plasma drug concentrations as possible predictive biomarkers.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers, Tumor; Colorect | 2021 |
TAS-102 plus bevacizumab for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard therapies (C-TASK FORCE): an investigator-initiated, open-label, single-arm, multicentre, phase 1/2 study.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Bevacizumab; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Fre | 2017 |
Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Trial of Trifluridine/Tipiracil (TAS-102) Monotherapy in Asian Patients With Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The TERRA Study.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Asia; C | 2018 |
The subgroups of the phase III RECOURSE trial of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) versus placebo with best supportive care in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Surv | 2018 |
Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Regorafenib and TAS-102 in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the United States.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Double- | 2018 |
Safety of trifluridine/tipiracil in an open-label expanded-access program in elderly and younger patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Dose-Respon | 2018 |
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb | 2015 |
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb | 2015 |
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb | 2015 |
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb | 2015 |
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb | 2015 |
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb | 2015 |
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb | 2015 |
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb | 2015 |
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb | 2015 |
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb | 2015 |
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb | 2015 |
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb | 2015 |
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb | 2015 |
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb | 2015 |
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb | 2015 |
Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb | 2015 |
TAS-102 for metastatic refractory colorectal cancer.
Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Male; Neoplasm Metas | 2015 |
Phase I study of TAS-102 and irinotecan combination therapy in Japanese patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Area Under Curve; Camptothecin; Colorec | 2015 |
Phase 1 study of oral TAS-102 in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antimetabolites, Antineoplasti | 2015 |
A multicenter phase II study of TAS-102 monotherapy in patients with pre-treated advanced gastric cancer (EPOC1201).
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Surv | 2016 |
Efficacy of trifluridine and tipiracil (TAS-102) versus placebo, with supportive care, in a randomized, controlled trial of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer from Spain: results of a subgroup analysis of the phase 3 RECOURSE trial.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiviral Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Co | 2017 |
Efficacy of trifluridine and tipiracil (TAS-102) versus placebo, with supportive care, in a randomized, controlled trial of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer from Spain: results of a subgroup analysis of the phase 3 RECOURSE trial.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiviral Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Co | 2017 |
Efficacy of trifluridine and tipiracil (TAS-102) versus placebo, with supportive care, in a randomized, controlled trial of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer from Spain: results of a subgroup analysis of the phase 3 RECOURSE trial.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiviral Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Co | 2017 |
Efficacy of trifluridine and tipiracil (TAS-102) versus placebo, with supportive care, in a randomized, controlled trial of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer from Spain: results of a subgroup analysis of the phase 3 RECOURSE trial.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiviral Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Co | 2017 |
Estimating 12-week death probability in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: the Colon Life nomogram.
Topics: Aged; Colon; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Combinations; | 2017 |
Phase I clinical study of three times a day oral administration of TAS-102 in patients with solid tumors.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Colorectal Neopl | 2008 |
TAS-102 monotherapy for pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female | 2012 |
121 other studies available for thymine and Colorectal Neoplasms
Article | Year |
---|---|
Initial experience of TAS-102 chemotherapy in Australian patients with Chemo-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Australia; Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms; | 2022 |
Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A UK Multicenter Real-world Analysis on Efficacy, Safety, Predictive and Prognostic Factors.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Humans; Prognosis; Pyrro | 2021 |
The Efficacy and Safety of Trifluridine/Tipiracil Treatment for Elderly Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in a Real-world Setting.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Male; Pr | 2021 |
Selective sensing of the nucleoside analogue, trifluridine and tipiracil in dosage form and biological matrices.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Nuc | 2022 |
Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Combination with Bevacizumab in First-Line for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Way Forward. A Point of View Based on Cost-Effectiveness.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms | 2022 |
The effect of prognostic factors at baseline on the efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A Portuguese exploratory analysis.
Topics: Aged; Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Male; Portugal; Prog | 2022 |
Sequential Treatment With Trifluridine/Tipiracil and Regorafenib in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: An AGEO Prospective "Real-World Study".
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combin | 2022 |
Quality of Life and Survival of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated With Trifluridine-Tipiracil (QUALITAS).
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combin | 2022 |
Influence of precedent drug on the subsequent therapy in the sequence of trifluridine/tipiracil with/out bevacizumab and regorafenib for unresectable or recurrent colorectal cancer.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Colorectal Neoplasms; Humans; Neoplasm | 2022 |
Long-term survivors of metastatic colorectal cancer treated with trifluridine/tipiracil.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Pyr | 2022 |
Single-cell transcriptional pharmacodynamics of trifluridine in a tumor-immune model.
Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Frontotemporal Dementia; Humans; Leukocytes, Mononuclear; Pyrrolidines; Single | 2022 |
Efficacy, safety and prognostic factors in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer treated with trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab in a real-world setting.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms | 2022 |
Regorafenib is suitable for advanced colorectal cancer patients who have previously received trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Colorec | 2023 |
Synergistic binding of actinomycin D and echinomycin to DNA mismatch sites and their combined anti-tumour effects.
Topics: Animals; Base Sequence; Binding Sites; Colorectal Neoplasms; Dactinomycin; DNA; Echinomycin; Humans; | 2023 |
Renal impairment as a risk factor for trifluridine/tipiracil-induced adverse events in metastatic colorectal cancer patients from the REGOTAS study.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combin | 2023 |
Real-World Adherence in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with Trifluridine plus Tipiracil or Regorafenib.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cohort Studies; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinati | 2020 |
Real-world use of trifluridine/tipiracil for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Canada.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Canada; Colorectal Neop | 2019 |
Sequencing beyond the second-line setting in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Neo | 2019 |
Prognostic scores for evaluating the survival benefit of regorafenib or trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: an exploratory analysis of the REGOTAS study.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier E | 2020 |
Should we optimize cytotoxic therapy by dosing to neutropenia? Lessons from TAS-102.
Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Neutropenia; Pyrrolidines; Thymine; Trifluridine; U | 2020 |
Review of metastatic colorectal cancer treatment pathways and early clinical experience of trifluridine/tipiracil in the UK named patient programme.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Camptothecin; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease Pr | 2020 |
Bevacizumab in Combination with TAS-102 Improves Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations | 2020 |
Is There an Optimal Choice in Refractory Colorectal Cancer? A Network Meta-Analysis.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; | 2020 |
Neutropenia in metastatic colorectal cancer receiving trifluridine/tipiracil.
Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Humans; Neutropenia; Pyrrolidines; Thymine; Trifluridine | 2020 |
Detection of trifluridine in tumors of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with trifluridine/tipiracil.
Topics: Animals; Apoptosis; Cell Proliferation; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Liver Neopl | 2020 |
Trifluridine/tipiracil: A practical guide to its use in the management of refractory metastatic colorectal cancer in Australia.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Australia; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; | 2020 |
Reply to the letter to the editor 'Neutropenia in metastatic colorectal cancer receiving trifluridine/tipiracil' by Colloca et al.
Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Humans; Neutropenia; Pyrrolidines; Thymine; Trifluridine | 2020 |
Impact of tumour growth rate during preceding treatment on tumour response to regorafenib or trifluridine/tipiracil in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Decision-Making; Colorectal Neoplasms | 2019 |
Economic Sustainability of Trifluridine/Tipiracil for the Treatment of Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Real Life.
Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Combinations; England; Humans; Pyrrolidines; Thymi | 2020 |
Regorafenib vs trifluridine/tipiracil for metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapies: A multicenter retrospective comparison study in Japan.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms | 2020 |
Trifluridine/tipiracil in earlier lines of chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer.
Topics: Bevacizumab; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Pyrrolidines; Thymine; Trifluridine | 2020 |
Combining Bevacizumab With Trifluridine/Thymidine Phosphorylase Inhibitor Improves the Survival Outcomes Regardless of the Usage History of Bevacizumab in Front-line Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protoc | 2020 |
Neutropenia is an indicator of outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab: a retrospective study.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Colorec | 2020 |
Evaluation of RAS mutational status through BEAMing assay to monitor disease progression of metastatic colorectal cancer: a case report.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Camptothecin; Capecitabine; Cetuximab; | 2020 |
Radiosensitisation and enhanced tumour growth delay of colorectal cancer cells by sustained treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil and X-rays.
Topics: Animals; Caco-2 Cells; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Cell Survival; Chemoradiotherapy; Color | 2020 |
Effectiveness and Safety of Regorafenib vs. Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Unresectable Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Femal | 2020 |
Quality of life in a real-world study of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with trifluridine/tipiracil.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Prospect | 2020 |
Trifluridine/tipiracil or regorafenib in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: from clinical trials to daily clinical practice.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Phe | 2020 |
Post-marketing surveillance study of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug | 2021 |
[Long-Term Survivor with Recurrent Gastric Cancer Using Trifluridine/Tipiracil as a Late-Line Chemotherapy].
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Neo | 2020 |
[Case Series of the TAS-102 plus Bevacizumab(Bev)Combination Therapy in Unresectable Advanced Colorectal Cancer].
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations | 2020 |
Salvage Therapy After Regorafenib or Trifluridine/Tipiracil Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Conditional Landmark Analysis.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Femal | 2021 |
Normalization of metabolic data to total thymine content and its application to determination of 2-hydroxyglutarate.
Topics: Aged; Colorectal Neoplasms; Female; Glutarates; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; | 2021 |
[A Case of an Elderly Frail Patient with Unresectable Colorectal Cancer Controlled by Trifluridine/Tipiracil with Bevacizumab Therapy as a First-Line Treatment].
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Colorectal Neo | 2021 |
[Two Cases of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with TAS-102 plus Bevacizumab].
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations | 2021 |
Clinical Outcomes Following Trifluridine/Tipiracil Treatment for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Ineligible for Regorafenib Treatment.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Colorectal Neoplasms; Comorbidity; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; J | 2021 |
How to incorporate a chemo-free interval into the management of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; COVID-1 | 2020 |
Third-line treatments for the management of metastatic colorectal cancer: why to change the mechanism of action after frontline chemotherapy, and insights into management during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Colorectal Neoplasms; COVID-19; Disease Management; | 2020 |
Transitioning from second-line to third-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Decision-Making; Colorectal Neoplasms; Dise | 2021 |
Optimizing the treatment sequence from second-line to third-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease | 2020 |
Cost-effectiveness of TAS-102 plus bevacizumab versus TAS-102 monotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cost-Benefit Anal | 2021 |
Cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil as a third-line treatment of metastatic gastric cancer, including adenocarcinoma of the gastrohesophageal junction, among patients previously treated in Greece.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Greece; Humans; Pyrrolidines; Quality-A | 2022 |
Regorafenib-to-trifluridine/tipiracil Versus the Reverse Sequence for Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Real-life Experience.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug | 2021 |
The Pre-treatment Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio Predicts Efficacy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated With TAS-102 and Bevacizumab.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Bevacizumab; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Fe | 2021 |
Cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil against nivolumab for heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer in Japan.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Co | 2021 |
Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo for third or later lines of treatment in metastatic gastric cancer: an exploratory subgroup analysis from the TAGS study.
Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Humans; Pyrrolidines; Stomach Neoplasms; Thymine; Trifluridine; Uracil | 2021 |
Long Term Real-World Outcomes of Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer-A Single UK Centre Experience.
Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Pyrrolidines; Retrospective Studies; Thymine; Trifl | 2021 |
Retrospective Study of Regorafenib Versus TAS-102 Efficacy and Safety in Chemorefractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) Patients: A Multi-institution Real Life Clinical Data.
Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Phenylurea Compounds; Pyridines; Pyrrolidines; Retr | 2021 |
Prediction of survival in patients with advanced, refractory colorectal cancer in treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil: real-world vs clinical trial data.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Asthenia; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Femal | 2021 |
Trifluridine/Tipiracil and Regorafenib in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study at a Tertiary Oncology Center.
Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Phenylurea Compounds; Pyridines; Pyrrolidines; R | 2021 |
Genetic variants of DNA repair-related genes predict efficacy of TAS-102 in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; | 2017 |
Propensity Score Analysis of Regorafenib Versus Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Chemotherapy (REGOTAS): A Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum Multicenter Observational Study.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone | 2018 |
Potential role of polymorphisms in the transporter genes ENT1 and MATE1/OCT2 in predicting TAS-102 efficacy and toxicity in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; California; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Combinations; E | 2017 |
Cost-effectiveness of Trifluridine/tipiracil for Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in England and Wales.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cost-Benefit Anal | 2018 |
Integrated safety summary for trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102).
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Colorectal | 2018 |
Feasibility and effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil in metastatic colorectal cancer: real-life data from The Netherlands.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms | 2018 |
Monitoring trifluridine incorporation in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of colorectal cancer patients under trifluridine/tipiracil medication.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Marrow Cells; Colorectal Neoplasms; DNA; | 2017 |
TAS-102 in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Colorectal Neop | 2018 |
Severe neutropenia: a prognosticator in patients with advanced/recurrent colorectal cancer
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherap | 2017 |
Evaluating trifluridine + tipiracil hydrochloride in a fixed combination (TAS-102) for the treatment of colorectal cancer.
Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Prognosis; Pyrrolidines; Thymine; Trifluridine; Ura | 2018 |
Risk factors contributing to the development of neutropenia in patients receiving oral trifluridine-tipiracil (TAS-102) chemotherapy for advanced/recurrent colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Creatinine; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; | 2018 |
Regorafenib or Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer? A Perspective on the Basis of Pharmacological Costs.
Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Humans; Phenylurea Compounds; Pyridines; Pyrrolidines; Retrospective Studies; | 2018 |
Interpreting the Benefit of Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer With Respect to Progression-Free Survival and Overall Survival.
Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Humans; Progression-Free Survival; Pyr | 2018 |
Usefulness of TAS-102 as Third-line Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Colorectal Neop | 2018 |
Trifluridine/Tipiracil (TAS-102) in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Register in the Frame of the Italian Compassionate Use Program.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Italy; Male | 2018 |
Real-world Treatment Patterns Among Patients With Colorectal Cancer Treated With Trifluridine/Tipiracil and Regorafenib.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease Progression; Drug Combinations; Dr | 2018 |
How I treat chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Prot | 2018 |
Biweekly Administration of TAS-102 for Neutropenia Prevention in Patients with Colorectal Cancer.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; | 2018 |
Optimizing Treatment Sequence for Late-line Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Using Trifluridine/Tipiracil and Regorafenib.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Administration Schedule; | 2018 |
Role of Predictive Value of the Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score for Later-line Chemotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers, Tumor; C-Reactive Protein; Colorec | 2018 |
Relationship Between Thymidine Kinase 1 Expression and Trifluridine/Tipiracil Therapy in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of 2 Randomized Clinical Trials.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Fem | 2018 |
Effective Sequential Combined Chemotherapy with Trifluridine/Tipiracil and Regorafenib in Human Colorectal Cancer Cells.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Apoptosis; Cell Line | 2018 |
Safety profile of trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy in clinical practice: results of the German compassionate-use program for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Compassionate Use Trials; Drug-Related Side Effec | 2018 |
Economic evaluation of trifluridine and tipiracil hydrochloride in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in Greece.
Topics: Adult; Antimetabolites; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Greece; Humans; Pyrrolidines; S | 2019 |
Low Skeletal Muscle Mass before Salvage-Line Chemotherapy Is a Poor Prognostic Factor in Patients with Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; | 2019 |
Evaluation of Tolerability of Trifluridine/Tipiracil Combination Tablet in Patients With Advanced/Recurrent Colorectal Cancer.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anemia; Anorexia; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Co | 2019 |
Efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil in third-line and beyond for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in routine clinical practice: patterns of use and prognostic nomogram.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Drug-Related Side Effects a | 2020 |
The Onset of Grade ≥3 Neutropenia Is Associated With Longer Overall Survival in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated With Trifluridine/Tipiracil.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Female; Hum | 2019 |
Pretreatment Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Survival After TAS-102 Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Biomarkers, Tumor; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; | 2019 |
Functional Module Connectivity Map (FMCM): a framework for searching repurposed drug compounds for systems treatment of cancer and an application to colorectal adenocarcinoma.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Algorithms; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Repositioning; Epistasis, Genetic; Ethacrynic | 2014 |
Efficacy of combination chemotherapy using a novel oral chemotherapeutic agent, TAS-102, with irinotecan hydrochloride on human colorectal and gastric cancer xenografts.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Camptothecin; Cell Line, Tumor; Colorectal | 2015 |
Efficacy of combination chemotherapy using a novel oral chemotherapeutic agent, TAS-102, together with bevacizumab, cetuximab, or panitumumab on human colorectal cancer xenografts.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocol | 2015 |
Involvement of Concentrative Nucleoside Transporter 1 in Intestinal Absorption of Trifluridine Using Human Small Intestinal Epithelial Cells.
Topics: Animals; Caco-2 Cells; Carrier Proteins; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Membrane Permeability; Colorectal Ne | 2015 |
Crucial roles of thymidine kinase 1 and deoxyUTPase in incorporating the antineoplastic nucleosides trifluridine and 2'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine into DNA.
Topics: Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Colorectal Neoplasms; DNA, Neoplasm; Drug Combinations; Equilibrati | 2015 |
Drug Improves Survival in Refractory Colorectal Cancer.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; | 2015 |
Efficacy of Combination Chemotherapy Using a Novel Oral Chemotherapeutic Agent, TAS-102, with Oxaliplatin on Human Colorectal and Gastric Cancer Xenografts.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols | 2015 |
Unmetabolized Folic Acid in Prediagnostic Plasma and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer.
Topics: Adult; Case-Control Studies; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cytosine; Dietary Supplements; Female; Folic Acid | 2015 |
[Short-Term Outcome of TAS-102 for Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer].
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Male; Middl | 2015 |
Safety and Efficacy of Trifluridine/Tipiracil Monotherapy in Clinical Practice for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Experience at a Single Institution.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Combinations; | 2016 |
Emerging phase 3 data in relapsed/refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Colorectal Neop | 2016 |
Efficacy and Safety of TAS-102 in Clinical Practice of Salvage Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocol | 2016 |
In brief: trifluridine/tipiracil (Lonsurf) for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasm | 2016 |
An interview with Alfredo Falcone and Lisa Salvatore: RECOURSE and trifluridine/tipiracil in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Topics: Achievement; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Career Choice; Clinical Trials as Topic | 2016 |
TAS-102 Safety in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results From the First Postmarketing Surveillance Study.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Fema | 2016 |
TAS-102, the first "cardio-gentle" fluoropyrimidine in the colorectal cancer landscape?
Topics: Cardiotoxicity; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Pyrrolidines; Thymine; Treatment Ou | 2016 |
Chemotherapy induced neutropenia at 1-month mark is a predictor of overall survival in patients receiving TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a cohort study.
Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia; Clinical Trials, | 2016 |
Efficacy and Safety of Regorafenib or TAS-102 in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Therapies.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Combinations; Drug | 2016 |
Self-Reported Adherence to Trifluridine and Tipiracil Hydrochloride for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Topics: Abdominal Pain; Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemot | 2016 |
Neutropenia as a Predictive Factor in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated With TAS-102.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Fema | 2017 |
The Role of Aspirin as Antitumoral Agent for Heavily Pretreated Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Receiving Capecitabine Monotherapy.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aspirin; Capecit | 2017 |
Regorafenib Versus Trifluridine/Tipiracil for Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Comparison.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Cohort Studies; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Combi | 2017 |
Effect of a novel oral chemotherapeutic agent containing a combination of trifluridine, tipiracil and the novel triple angiokinase inhibitor nintedanib, on human colorectal cancer xenografts.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; | 2016 |
Interstitial pneumonia in a patient treated with TAS-102 for metastatic colorectal cancer: a case report.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Japan; Lung Diseases, Inters | 2016 |
Comparison of two different screening methods for the KRAS mutation in colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Base Sequence; Cell Line, Tumor; Codon; Colorectal Neoplasms; DNA Mutational Analysi | 2010 |
TAS-102 in refractory colorectal cancer: caution is needed.
Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Male; Pyrrolidines; Thymine; Trifluridine; | 2012 |
A novel antimetabolite, TAS-102 retains its effect on FU-related resistant cancer cells.
Topics: Animals; Antimetabolites; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Cell Line, Tumor; Colorectal Neoplasms; C | 2004 |
A novel antimetabolite, TAS-102 retains its effect on FU-related resistant cancer cells.
Topics: Animals; Antimetabolites; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Cell Line, Tumor; Colorectal Neoplasms; C | 2004 |
A novel antimetabolite, TAS-102 retains its effect on FU-related resistant cancer cells.
Topics: Animals; Antimetabolites; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Cell Line, Tumor; Colorectal Neoplasms; C | 2004 |
A novel antimetabolite, TAS-102 retains its effect on FU-related resistant cancer cells.
Topics: Animals; Antimetabolites; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Cell Line, Tumor; Colorectal Neoplasms; C | 2004 |
[The clinical importance of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T polymorphism in the 5-fluoropyrimidine-based therapy of metastatic colorectal tumours].
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Case-Control Studies | 2004 |
MDR1 T-129C polymorphism can be predictive of differentiation, and thereby prognosis of colorectal adenocarcinomas in Japanese.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Cell Differentiation; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cytosine; DNA Primers; Gene Expression R | 2006 |
Total plasma homocysteine and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T polymorphism in patients with colorectal carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Carcinoma; Cell Proliferation; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cytosine; Female; Genotype; Homocysteine; | 2006 |
Identification of a novel mutation in the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene in a patient with a lethal outcome following 5-fluorouracil administration and the determination of its frequency in a population of 500 patients with colorectal carcinoma.
Topics: Adenine; Aged; Alleles; Colorectal Neoplasms; Dihydrouracil Dehydrogenase (NADP); DNA Mutational Ana | 2007 |
The methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase 677C-->T polymorphism and distal colorectal adenoma risk.
Topics: Adenoma; Aged; Case-Control Studies; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cytosine; Female; Genotype; Humans; Loss | 2000 |