Page last updated: 2024-10-20

thymine and Cancer of Stomach

thymine has been researched along with Cancer of Stomach in 36 studies

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) compared with best supportive care (BSC) for the treatment of patients with metastatic gastric cancer(mGC), including gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma(GEJ), who have received at least two prior therapies for metastatic disease and are eligible for third-line treatment, in Greece."8.12Cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil as a third-line treatment of metastatic gastric cancer, including adenocarcinoma of the gastrohesophageal junction, among patients previously treated in Greece. ( Androulakis, N; Beletsi, A; Boukovinas, I; Chotzagiannoglou, V; Gourzoulidis, G; Karamouzis, M; Koulentaki, M; Koumarianou, A; Kourlaba, G; Papakotoulas, P; Samadas, E; Souglakos, J; Xynogalos, S, 2022)
"To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) compared with best supportive care (BSC) for the treatment of patients with metastatic gastric cancer(mGC), including gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma(GEJ), who have received at least two prior therapies for metastatic disease and are eligible for third-line treatment, in Greece."4.12Cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil as a third-line treatment of metastatic gastric cancer, including adenocarcinoma of the gastrohesophageal junction, among patients previously treated in Greece. ( Androulakis, N; Beletsi, A; Boukovinas, I; Chotzagiannoglou, V; Gourzoulidis, G; Karamouzis, M; Koulentaki, M; Koumarianou, A; Kourlaba, G; Papakotoulas, P; Samadas, E; Souglakos, J; Xynogalos, S, 2022)
" Among FTD/TPI-treated patients, frequencies of any-cause grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) were similar across age subgroups (80% each), although grade ≥ 3 neutropenia was more frequent in older patients [40% (≥ 65 and ≥ 75 years); 29% (< 65 years)]; AE-related discontinuation rates did not increase with age [14% (< 65 years), 12% (≥ 65 years), and 12% (≥ 75 years)]."3.11Efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil in older and younger patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 3 study (TAGS). ( Alsina, M; Benhadji, KA; Cicin, I; Doi, T; Hosaka, H; Ilson, DH; Longo, F; Makris, L; Özgüroğlu, M; Ozyilkan, O; Park, D; Pericay, C; Santoro, A; Shitara, K; Thuss-Patience, P; Zaanan, A, 2022)
" Common treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or worse were neutrophil count decreased (27 [82%] in cohort A and 23 [74%] in cohort B), white blood cell count decreased (eight [24%] and seven [23%]), and platelet count decreased (eight [24%] and four [13%])."3.01Safety and activity of trifluridine/tipiracil and ramucirumab in previously treated advanced gastric cancer: an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial. ( Amagai, K; Ando, T; Fujita, J; Fujitani, K; Hosaka, H; Kawazoe, A; Koeda, K; Nishikawa, K; Ogata, K; Shitara, K; Watanabe, K; Yamamoto, Y, 2021)
" Among FTD/TPI-treated patients, grade 3 or higher adverse events of any cause occurred in 122 of 145 patients (84."2.94Efficacy and Safety of Trifluridine/Tipiracil Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Gastric Cancer Who Had Undergone Gastrectomy: Subgroup Analyses of a Randomized Clinical Trial. ( Alsina, M; Arkenau, HT; Beretta, GD; Catenacci, D; Doi, T; Fujitani, K; George, B; Ghidini, M; Ilson, DH; Makris, L; Mansoor, W; McGuigan, S; Prokharau, A; Shitara, K; Tabernero, J; Thuss-Patience, P; Van Cutsem, E; Zhavrid, E, 2020)
"Trifluridine/tipiracil is a compound drug, approved in 2015 by the US FDA, and in 2016 by the EMA, for the treatment of chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancers, after the phase III RECOURSE trial demonstrated significant benefit."2.82Trifluridine/tipiracil in the treatment of gastric cancer. ( Arkenau, HT; Fostea, RM, 2022)
"TAS-102 is a preconstituted drug combination comprising an oral fluoropyrimidine (trifluridine, TFT) and a potent inhibitor of thymidine phosphorylase (tipiracil hydrochloride, TPI)."2.66TAS-102 in gastric cancer: Development and perspectives of a new biochemically modulated fluroropyrimidine drug combination. ( Aprile, G; Cianchi, F; Fancelli, S; Gatta Michelet, MR; Lavacchi, D; Mini, E; Nobili, S; Roviello, F; Roviello, G, 2020)
"Gastric cancer is a global health problem with high incidence rate and mortality rate."1.62The effect of trifluridine/tipiracil for patients with heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. ( He, X; Wu, L; Wu, Y; Zhang, T; Zhou, X, 2021)
"Trifluridine/tipiracil was more cost-effective than nivolumab for patients with heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer."1.62Cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil against nivolumab for heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer in Japan. ( Doi, T; Igarashi, A; Shitara, K; Takushima, Y; Yoshihara, H, 2021)
"Metastatic gastric cancer and cancer of the esophagogastric junction (GC/EGJ) is an aggressive disease with poor prognosis."1.62Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo for third or later lines of treatment in metastatic gastric cancer: an exploratory subgroup analysis from the TAGS study. ( Alsina, M; Arkenau, HT; Azcue, P; Catenacci, DVT; Doi, T; Fornaro, L; Fougeray, R; Ilson, DH; Lorenzen, S; Moreno, SR; Shitara, K; Tabernero, J; Van Cutsem, E; Zaanan, A, 2021)
"The study population included 177 gastric cancer patients and 224 healthy control subjects."1.33A single nucleotide polymorphism in the MMP-9 promoter affects tumor progression and invasive phenotype of gastric cancer. ( Chayama, K; Imai, K; Kitadai, Y; Matsumura, S; Matsusaki, K; Nakachi, K; Nakayama, H; Oue, N; Yamaguchi, Y; Yasui, W; Yoshida, K, 2005)
" Our hypothesis was that a relatively short and high dosage of TAS-102 results in an additional mechanism of FTD incorporation into DNA other than thymidylate synthase (TS) inhibition."1.32A novel combination antimetabolite, TAS-102, exhibits antitumor activity in FU-resistant human cancer cells through a mechanism involving FTD incorporation in DNA. ( Emura, T; Fukushima, M; Ohshimo, H; Suzuki, N; Yamaguchi, M, 2004)

Research

Studies (36)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19903 (8.33)18.7374
1990's2 (5.56)18.2507
2000's6 (16.67)29.6817
2010's7 (19.44)24.3611
2020's18 (50.00)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Shitara, K12
Doi, T11
Hosaka, H2
Thuss-Patience, P3
Santoro, A1
Longo, F1
Ozyilkan, O1
Cicin, I1
Park, D2
Zaanan, A2
Pericay, C1
Özgüroğlu, M1
Alsina, M6
Makris, L7
Benhadji, KA5
Ilson, DH9
Fostea, RM1
Arkenau, HT9
Van Cutsem, E7
Hochster, H3
Mayer, R3
Ohtsu, A4
Falcone, A3
Yoshino, T3
George, B4
Tabernero, J8
Prokharau, A3
Ghidini, M3
Fujitani, K3
Beretta, GD3
Mansoor, W4
Zhavrid, E3
Catenacci, D1
McGuigan, S1
Dvorkin, M3
Faustino, C2
Gorbunova, V2
Nishikawa, K3
Ando, T3
Yalçın, Ş2
Sabater, J1
Skanji, D1
Leger, C1
Amellal, N1
Arigami, T1
Matsushita, D1
Okubo, K1
Yanagita, S1
Ehi, K1
Sasaki, K1
Noda, M1
Kita, Y1
Mori, S1
Kurahara, H1
Uenosono, Y1
Ishigami, S1
Natsugoe, S1
Roviello, G1
Fancelli, S1
Gatta Michelet, MR1
Aprile, G1
Nobili, S1
Roviello, F1
Cianchi, F1
Mini, E1
Lavacchi, D1
Giuliani, J1
Bonetti, A1
Narita, Y1
Shoji, H1
Kawai, S1
Mizukami, T1
Nakamura, M1
Moriwaki, T1
Yamanaka, T1
Sunakawa, Y1
Kawakami, H1
Nishina, T2
Misumi, T1
Muro, K2
He, X1
Zhang, T1
Wu, L1
Wu, Y1
Zhou, X1
Hamada, S1
Komatsu, S1
Shibata, R1
Konishi, T1
Matsubara, D1
Soga, K1
Shimomura, K1
Ikeda, J1
Taniguchi, F1
Shioaki, Y1
Kawazoe, A1
Fujita, J1
Koeda, K1
Amagai, K1
Ogata, K1
Watanabe, K1
Yamamoto, Y1
Zhu, M1
Sonbol, MB1
Yoon, HH1
Cuffe, S1
Van Den Eynde, M1
Zaniboni, A1
Gourzoulidis, G1
Koulentaki, M1
Koumarianou, A1
Samadas, E1
Androulakis, N1
Xynogalos, S1
Papakotoulas, P1
Boukovinas, I1
Karamouzis, M1
Souglakos, J1
Chotzagiannoglou, V1
Beletsi, A1
Kourlaba, G1
Takushima, Y1
Igarashi, A1
Yoshihara, H1
Lorenzen, S1
Fornaro, L1
Catenacci, DVT1
Fougeray, R1
Moreno, SR1
Azcue, P1
Nienhüser, H1
Schmidt, T1
Hosokawa, A1
Cutsem, EV1
Winkler, RE1
McCaw, ZR1
Kim, DH1
Tian, L1
Fu, H1
Wei, LJ1
Zhou, K1
Zhou, J1
Zhang, M1
Liao, W1
Li, Q1
Borzenko, BG1
Bakurova, EM1
Popovich, YA1
Sidyuk, EA1
Popovich, AY1
Nukatsuka, M2
Nakagawa, F3
Saito, H1
Sakata, M1
Uchida, J1
Takechi, T2
Bando, H1
Yasui, H1
Yamaguchi, K1
Takahashi, S1
Nomura, S1
Kuno, H1
Sato, A1
Goto, M1
Shinmura, K1
Igarashi, H1
Kobayashi, M1
Konno, H1
Yamada, H1
Iwaizumi, M1
Kageyama, S1
Tsuneyoshi, T1
Tsugane, S1
Sugimura, H1
Yan, L1
Yanan, D1
Donglan, S1
Na, W1
Rongmiao, Z1
Zhifeng, C1
Emura, T2
Fujioka, A1
Ohshimo, H2
Kitazato, K1
Suzuki, N1
Yamaguchi, M1
Fukushima, M1
Matsumura, S1
Oue, N1
Nakayama, H1
Kitadai, Y1
Yoshida, K1
Yamaguchi, Y1
Imai, K1
Nakachi, K1
Matsusaki, K1
Chayama, K1
Yasui, W1
Yang, M1
Guo, Y1
Zhang, X1
Miao, X1
Tan, W1
Sun, T1
Zhao, D1
Yu, D1
Liu, J1
Lin, D1
Akimov, AA1
Lazarev, NV1
Matsuda, A1
Dan, A1
Minakawa, N1
Tregear, SJ1
Okazaki, S1
Sugimoto, Y1
Sasaki, T1
Kobayashi, K1
Sumi, S1
Kidouchi, K1
Mizuno, I1
Mohri, N1
Fukui, T1
Akamo, Y1
Takeyama, H1
Manabe, T1
Deng, GR1
Lu, YY1
Chen, SM1
Miao, J1
Lu, GR1
Li, H1
Cai, H1
Xu, XL1
E, Z1
Liu, PN1
Rusakov, VI1
Vishagurov, KK1

Clinical Trials (4)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 Study Evaluating TAS-102 Plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) Versus Placebo Plus BSC in Patients With Metastatic Gastric Cancer Refractory to Standard Treatments[NCT02500043]Phase 3507 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-24Completed
Phase II Trial of TAS-102 in Patients With Advanced, Refractory Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma[NCT04923529]Phase 228 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-03-01Recruiting
A Phase I/II Trial of TS-1 and Oxaliplatin in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer[NCT00531245]Phase 1/Phase 277 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Combination With Irinotecan as a Second Line Therapy in Patients With Cholangiocarcinoma[NCT04059562]Phase 228 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-10-28Active, not recruiting
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Disease Control Rate (DCR)

DCR was defined as the proportion of participants with a best overall response of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD). The assessment of DCR was based on Investigator review of radiologic images and following RECIST criteria (version 1.1, 2009). (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to the cut-off date (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months), assessed every 8 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
TAS-102+BSC44.1
Placebo+BSC14.5

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

"Overall response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with objective evidence of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR).~CR was defined as the disappearance of all target or non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes for target lesions or all lymph nodes for non-target lesions were non-pathological morphologically that was reduced in size in short axis to < 10 mm.~PR was defined as target lesions with at least 30% decrease in the sum of diameters, taking baseline sum diameters as reference." (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to the cut-off date (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months), assessed every 8 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
TAS-102+BSC4.5
Placebo+BSC2.1

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Participants without documented death were censored at last follow-up or cut-off date, whichever comes first. OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to the data cut-off date (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
TAS-102+BSC5.7
Placebo+BSC3.6

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from randomization until the date of first occurrence of investigator-assessed radiological disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever came first. Disease progression as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) for target lesions were defined as target lesions with at least 20 % relative increase in the sum of diameters with reference to the smallest sum on study, including the baseline sum and this sum demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeter (mm) or the appearance of one or more new lesions or Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. All alive participants with no disease progression as of the analysis cut-off date were censored at the last tumor assessment. PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to the cut-off date (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
TAS-102+BSC2.0
Placebo+BSC1.8

Time to Deterioration of European Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Score From Baseline

The ECOG performance status was used to evaluate participant's disease progression and the effect of the disease on the participant's activities of daily living. It ranges on the scale from 0-5 (0 = normal activity; 1= symptoms but ambulatory; 2= in bed for < 50% of the time; 3= in bed for > 50% of the time; 4= 100% bedridden; 5= dead). Time to definitive deterioration in ECOG performance status score from baseline was defined as a change from 0, 1 to >=2, or from 2 to >=3. (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: At the time of randomization (Day 1 Cycle 1) and within 24 hours prior to start of study treatment in every cycle (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
TAS-102+BSC4.3
Placebo+BSC2.3

Change From Baseline in Quality of Life European Organization for Research and Treatment for Cancer (EORTC) QoL Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30 Score): Global Health Status

EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a cancer-specific instrument with 30 questions for evaluation of new chemotherapy and provides an assessment of participant reported outcome dimensions. First 28 questions used 4-point scale (1=not at all,2=a little,3=quite a bit,4=very much) for evaluating 5 functional scales (physical,role,emotional,cognitive,social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue,nausea/vomiting,pain) and other single items. For each item,high score represented high level of symptomatology/problem. Last 2 questions represented participant's assessment of overall health and QoL, coded on 7-point scale (1=very poor to 7=excellent). EORTC QLQ-C30 observed values and change from baseline for global health status (scoring of questions 29 and 30) and 5 functional scales, 3 symptom scales and other single items (scoring of questions 1 to 28). Answers were converted into grading scale, with values between 0 and 100. A high score represented a favorable outcome with a best QoL for participant. (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 Cycle 2 up to end of treatment (EOT) (within 30 days of last study treatment) and 30-Day safety follow-up visit (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 1Cycle 2Cycle 3Cycle 4Cycle 5Cycle 6Cycle 7Cycle 8Cycle 9Cycle 10Cycle 11Cycle 12Cycle 13Last Collection CycleSafety Follow-Up
TAS-102+BSC-2.7-5.9-4.1-3.6-5.9-8.8-9.5-4.32.4-14.4-16.7-8.30.0-8.8-16.5

Change From Baseline in Quality of Life European Organization for Research and Treatment for Cancer (EORTC) QoL Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30 Score): Global Health Status

EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a cancer-specific instrument with 30 questions for evaluation of new chemotherapy and provides an assessment of participant reported outcome dimensions. First 28 questions used 4-point scale (1=not at all,2=a little,3=quite a bit,4=very much) for evaluating 5 functional scales (physical,role,emotional,cognitive,social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue,nausea/vomiting,pain) and other single items. For each item,high score represented high level of symptomatology/problem. Last 2 questions represented participant's assessment of overall health and QoL, coded on 7-point scale (1=very poor to 7=excellent). EORTC QLQ-C30 observed values and change from baseline for global health status (scoring of questions 29 and 30) and 5 functional scales, 3 symptom scales and other single items (scoring of questions 1 to 28). Answers were converted into grading scale, with values between 0 and 100. A high score represented a favorable outcome with a best QoL for participant. (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 Cycle 2 up to end of treatment (EOT) (within 30 days of last study treatment) and 30-Day safety follow-up visit (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 1Cycle 2Cycle 3Cycle 4Cycle 5Cycle 6Cycle 7Cycle 8Cycle 9Cycle 10Cycle 11Cycle 12Cycle 13Cycle 14Cycle 15Last Collection CycleSafety Follow-Up
Placebo+BSC-5.9-7.3-1.4-1.711.115.620.016.716.725.025.033.333.333.333.3-9.8-8.9

EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire - Gastric-specific Module (EORTC QLQ-STO22): Percentage of Participants With Overall Compliance

The Quality of Life Questionnaire Stomach Cancer Module 22 (QLQ-STO22) assessed symptoms and treatment-related side effects commonly reported in participants. There are 22 questions which comprise 5 scales (dysphagia, dietary restrictions, pain QS22, reflux, and anxiety) and 4 single items (dry mouth, hair loss, taste problems, body image). Most questions use 4-point scale (1='Not at all', 2=a little, 3=quite a bit and 4='Very much'). A linear transformation was used to standardize all scores and single-items to a scale of 0 to 100, where higher score=better level of functioning or greater degree of symptoms. (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 1 up to end of treatment (EOT) (within 30 days of last study treatment) (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
DysphagiaDietary RestrictionsPain QS22RefluxAnxietyDry MouthBody ImageHair LossTaste Problems
Placebo+BSC78.278.278.278.278.278.278.278.278.2
TAS-102+BSC86.686.686.686.686.686.485.886.686.6

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAE)

Any untoward medical condition that occurs in a participants while participating in a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the use of the study medication was considered an adverse event (AE). A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. TEAEs/TESAEs were defined as events that started on or after treatment or started before treatment and worsened after the start of treatment through 30 days after the last dose of study treatment. (NCT02500043)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum duration: up to approximately 46 months)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TEAETESAE
Placebo+BSC15170
TAS-102+BSC319143

Reviews

2 reviews available for thymine and Cancer of Stomach

ArticleYear
Trifluridine/tipiracil in the treatment of gastric cancer.
    Future oncology (London, England), 2022, Volume: 18, Issue:12

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Combinatio

2022
TAS-102 in gastric cancer: Development and perspectives of a new biochemically modulated fluroropyrimidine drug combination.
    Critical reviews in oncology/hematology, 2020, Volume: 152

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biochemical Phenomena; Drug Combinations; Humans; Py

2020

Trials

9 trials available for thymine and Cancer of Stomach

ArticleYear
Efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil in older and younger patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 3 study (TAGS).
    Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2022, Volume: 25, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Esoph

2022
Pooled safety analysis from phase III studies of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer and metastatic colorectal cancer.
    ESMO open, 2022, Volume: 7, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms; Esophagogastric Junction; Frontotemporal Dementia; H

2022
Pooled safety analysis from phase III studies of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer and metastatic colorectal cancer.
    ESMO open, 2022, Volume: 7, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms; Esophagogastric Junction; Frontotemporal Dementia; H

2022
Pooled safety analysis from phase III studies of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer and metastatic colorectal cancer.
    ESMO open, 2022, Volume: 7, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms; Esophagogastric Junction; Frontotemporal Dementia; H

2022
Pooled safety analysis from phase III studies of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer and metastatic colorectal cancer.
    ESMO open, 2022, Volume: 7, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms; Esophagogastric Junction; Frontotemporal Dementia; H

2022
Efficacy and Safety of Trifluridine/Tipiracil Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Gastric Cancer Who Had Undergone Gastrectomy: Subgroup Analyses of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
    JAMA oncology, 2020, Jan-01, Volume: 6, Issue:1

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Gastrectomy

2020
Health-related quality of life associated with trifluridine/tipiracil in heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer: results from TAGS.
    Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2020, Volume: 23, Issue:4

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Pro

2020
REVIVE study: a prospective observational study in chemotherapy after nivolumab therapy for advanced gastric cancer.
    Future oncology (London, England), 2021, Volume: 17, Issue:8

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Humans

2021
Safety and activity of trifluridine/tipiracil and ramucirumab in previously treated advanced gastric cancer: an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial.
    The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2021, Volume: 6, Issue:3

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Administration, Intravenous; Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic

2021
Trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic gastroesophageal junction cancer: a subgroup analysis from the phase 3 TAGS study.
    Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2021, Volume: 24, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Drug Combinations; E

2021
Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer (TAGS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2018, Volume: 19, Issue:11

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinat

2018
Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer (TAGS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2018, Volume: 19, Issue:11

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinat

2018
Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer (TAGS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2018, Volume: 19, Issue:11

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinat

2018
Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer (TAGS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2018, Volume: 19, Issue:11

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinat

2018
A multicenter phase II study of TAS-102 monotherapy in patients with pre-treated advanced gastric cancer (EPOC1201).
    European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2016, Volume: 62

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Surv

2016

Other Studies

25 other studies available for thymine and Cancer of Stomach

ArticleYear
Response Rate and Prognostic Impact of Salvage Chemotherapy after Nivolumab in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer.
    Oncology, 2020, Volume: 98, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Antineoplastic Combined Chemot

2020
Trifluridine/Tipiracil in heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer. A perspective based on pharmacological costs.
    European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2020, Volume: 138

    Topics: Drug Combinations; Drug Costs; Humans; Neoplasm Metastasis; Pyrrolidines; Stomach Neoplasms; Thymine

2020
The effect of trifluridine/tipiracil for patients with heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Medicine, 2021, Jan-15, Volume: 100, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Clinical Protocols; Drug Combinations; Humans; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Midd

2021
[Long-Term Survivor with Recurrent Gastric Cancer Using Trifluridine/Tipiracil as a Late-Line Chemotherapy].
    Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy, 2020, Volume: 47, Issue:13

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Humans; Neo

2020
Trifluridine/tipiracil plus ramucirumab in gastric cancer.
    The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2021, Volume: 6, Issue:3

    Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Humans; Pyrrolidines; Ramucirumab; Stomach Neoplasms; Thymine; Tr

2021
Cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil as a third-line treatment of metastatic gastric cancer, including adenocarcinoma of the gastrohesophageal junction, among patients previously treated in Greece.
    Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research, 2022, Volume: 22, Issue:2

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Greece; Humans; Pyrrolidines; Quality-A

2022
Cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil against nivolumab for heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer in Japan.
    Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2021, Aug-30, Volume: 51, Issue:9

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Co

2021
Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo for third or later lines of treatment in metastatic gastric cancer: an exploratory subgroup analysis from the TAGS study.
    ESMO open, 2021, Volume: 6, Issue:4

    Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Humans; Pyrrolidines; Stomach Neoplasms; Thymine; Trifluridine; Uracil

2021
9 weeks that matter for patients with gastric cancer.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2018, Volume: 19, Issue:11

    Topics: Double-Blind Method; Gastrectomy; Humans; Pyrrolidines; Stomach Neoplasms; Thymine; Trifluridine

2018
Trifluridine/tipiracil in metastatic gastric cancer.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2019, Volume: 20, Issue:1

    Topics: Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Humans; Pyrrolidines; Stomach Neoplasms; Thymine; Trifluridi

2019
Cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS102) for heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer.
    Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2020, Volume: 22, Issue:3

    Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Combinations; Drug Costs; Humans; Markov Chain

2020
Activity of thymidilate "salvage pathway" enzymes in human gastric cancer and blood serum: correlation with treatment modalities.
    Experimental oncology, 2013, Volume: 35, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Biomarkers, Tumor; Humans; Middle Aged; Serum; Stomach Neoplasms; Thymidine; Thymidine

2013
Efficacy of combination chemotherapy using a novel oral chemotherapeutic agent, TAS-102, with irinotecan hydrochloride on human colorectal and gastric cancer xenografts.
    Anticancer research, 2015, Volume: 35, Issue:3

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Camptothecin; Cell Line, Tumor; Colorectal

2015
Efficacy of Combination Chemotherapy Using a Novel Oral Chemotherapeutic Agent, TAS-102, with Oxaliplatin on Human Colorectal and Gastric Cancer Xenografts.
    Anticancer research, 2015, Volume: 35, Issue:9

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols

2015
Altered expression of the human base excision repair gene NTH1 in gastric cancer.
    Carcinogenesis, 2009, Volume: 30, Issue:8

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blotting, Western; Case-Control Studies; Deoxyribonuclease (Pyrimidi

2009
Polymorphisms of XRCC1 gene and risk of gastric cardiac adenocarcinoma.
    Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus, 2009, Volume: 22, Issue:5

    Topics: Adenine; Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Arginine; Cardia; Case-Control Studies; Codon; Cytosine; DNA R

2009
Thymidine kinase and thymidine phosphorylase level as the main predictive parameter for sensitivity to TAS-102 in a mouse model.
    Oncology reports, 2004, Volume: 11, Issue:2

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Cell Division; Drug Combinations; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; M

2004
A novel combination antimetabolite, TAS-102, exhibits antitumor activity in FU-resistant human cancer cells through a mechanism involving FTD incorporation in DNA.
    International journal of oncology, 2004, Volume: 25, Issue:3

    Topics: Animals; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Cell Line, Tumor; Colonic Neoplasms; DNA Damage; DNA, Neop

2004
A novel combination antimetabolite, TAS-102, exhibits antitumor activity in FU-resistant human cancer cells through a mechanism involving FTD incorporation in DNA.
    International journal of oncology, 2004, Volume: 25, Issue:3

    Topics: Animals; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Cell Line, Tumor; Colonic Neoplasms; DNA Damage; DNA, Neop

2004
A novel combination antimetabolite, TAS-102, exhibits antitumor activity in FU-resistant human cancer cells through a mechanism involving FTD incorporation in DNA.
    International journal of oncology, 2004, Volume: 25, Issue:3

    Topics: Animals; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Cell Line, Tumor; Colonic Neoplasms; DNA Damage; DNA, Neop

2004
A novel combination antimetabolite, TAS-102, exhibits antitumor activity in FU-resistant human cancer cells through a mechanism involving FTD incorporation in DNA.
    International journal of oncology, 2004, Volume: 25, Issue:3

    Topics: Animals; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Cell Line, Tumor; Colonic Neoplasms; DNA Damage; DNA, Neop

2004
A novel combination antimetabolite, TAS-102, exhibits antitumor activity in FU-resistant human cancer cells through a mechanism involving FTD incorporation in DNA.
    International journal of oncology, 2004, Volume: 25, Issue:3

    Topics: Animals; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Cell Line, Tumor; Colonic Neoplasms; DNA Damage; DNA, Neop

2004
A novel combination antimetabolite, TAS-102, exhibits antitumor activity in FU-resistant human cancer cells through a mechanism involving FTD incorporation in DNA.
    International journal of oncology, 2004, Volume: 25, Issue:3

    Topics: Animals; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Cell Line, Tumor; Colonic Neoplasms; DNA Damage; DNA, Neop

2004
A novel combination antimetabolite, TAS-102, exhibits antitumor activity in FU-resistant human cancer cells through a mechanism involving FTD incorporation in DNA.
    International journal of oncology, 2004, Volume: 25, Issue:3

    Topics: Animals; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Cell Line, Tumor; Colonic Neoplasms; DNA Damage; DNA, Neop

2004
A novel combination antimetabolite, TAS-102, exhibits antitumor activity in FU-resistant human cancer cells through a mechanism involving FTD incorporation in DNA.
    International journal of oncology, 2004, Volume: 25, Issue:3

    Topics: Animals; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Cell Line, Tumor; Colonic Neoplasms; DNA Damage; DNA, Neop

2004
A novel combination antimetabolite, TAS-102, exhibits antitumor activity in FU-resistant human cancer cells through a mechanism involving FTD incorporation in DNA.
    International journal of oncology, 2004, Volume: 25, Issue:3

    Topics: Animals; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Cell Line, Tumor; Colonic Neoplasms; DNA Damage; DNA, Neop

2004
A single nucleotide polymorphism in the MMP-9 promoter affects tumor progression and invasive phenotype of gastric cancer.
    Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2005, Volume: 131, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Case-Control Studies; Cytosine; Female; Helicobacter Infections; Helicobacter pylori; Humans;

2005
Interaction of P53 Arg72Pro and MDM2 T309G polymorphisms and their associations with risk of gastric cardia cancer.
    Carcinogenesis, 2007, Volume: 28, Issue:9

    Topics: Aged; Amino Acid Substitution; Arginine; DNA Primers; Female; Genes, Reporter; Genotype; Guanine; Hu

2007
[On the experimental study of stomach ulcer in rats].
    Voprosy onkologii, 1966, Volume: 12, Issue:8

    Topics: Animals; Cytosine; Male; Pyrimidines; Rats; Stomach Neoplasms; Stomach Ulcer; Thiouracil; Thymine; U

1966
Nucleosides and nucleotides. 123. Synthesis of 1-(2-deoxy-2-isocyano-beta-D-arabinofuranosyl)cytosine and related nucleosides as potential antitumor agents.
    Journal of medicinal chemistry, 1993, Dec-24, Volume: 36, Issue:26

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Cytarabine; Deoxycytidine; Drug Stability; Humans; Isocyanates; Leuk

1993
[A case of gastric cancer with decreased dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity].
    Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy, 1998, Volume: 25, Issue:8

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Dihydrouracil Dehydrogenase (NADP); Female; F

1998
Activated c-Ha-ras oncogene with a guanine to thymine transversion at the twelfth codon in a human stomach cancer cell line.
    Cancer research, 1987, Jun-15, Volume: 47, Issue:12

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Amino Acid Sequence; Animals; Base Sequence; Cell Line; Cloning, Molecular; Codon; D

1987
[Use of methyluracil in stomach surgery].
    Klinicheskaia khirurgiia, 1972, Volume: 1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Female; Gastrectomy; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Peptic Ulcer;

1972