thioperamide and Edema

Histamine receptors are known to participate in spinal cord nociceptive transmission, and previous studies have suggested that histaminergic receptors are involved in the analgesic effects of morphine. Herein, we investigated the effect of intrathecal injection of histaminergic agonists and antagonists in a model of acute articular inflammation and their interaction with morphine.. After carrageenan injection in the right knee joint, articular incapacitation was measured hourly, for up to 6 hours, by the paw elevation time during 1-minute periods of stimulated walking. Inflammatory edema was also assessed hourly by determining an increase in articular diameter. Spinal treatments were administered 20 minutes before knee-joint carrageenan injection and were compared with the saline-treated control group.. Intrathecally injected histamine increased incapacitation and articular edema, whereas the H1R antagonist, cetirizine, decreased both parameters. The H3R agonist, immepip, decreased both incapacitation and edema, but the H3R antagonist, thioperamide, increased both incapacitation and edema. Morphine inhibited both incapacitation and edema. Furthermore, combining a subeffective dose of morphine with cetirizine or immepip potentiated the analgesic and antiedematogenic effect.. Histamine seems to act at the spinal level via H1 and H3 receptors to modulate acute arthritis in rats. An H1R antagonist and H3R agonist were found to potentiate the analgesic and antiedematogenic effects of morphine, suggesting that histaminergic and opioid spinal systems may be explored for means of improving analgesia, as well as peripheral anti-inflammatory effects.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Carrageenan; Cetirizine; Disease Models, Animal; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Edema; Histamine; Histamine Agonists; Histamine Antagonists; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Histamine H3 Antagonists; Imidazoles; Injections, Spinal; Joints; Male; Morphine; Osteoarthritis; Piperidines; Rats, Wistar; Receptors, Histamine H1; Receptors, Histamine H3; Spinal Cord

Hit optimization of the class of quinazoline containing histamine H(4) receptor (H(4)R) ligands resulted in a sulfonamide substituted analogue with high affinity for the H(4)R. This moiety leads to improved physicochemical properties and is believed to probe a distinct H(4)R binding pocket that was previously identified using pharmacophore modeling. By introducing a variety of sulfonamide substituents, the H(4)R affinity was optimized. The interaction of the new ligands, in combination with a set of previously published quinazoline compounds, was described by a QSAR equation. Pharmacological studies revealed that the sulfonamide analogues have excellent H(4)R affinity and behave as inverse agonists at the human H(4)R. In vivo evaluation of the potent 2-(6-chloro-2-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)quinazoline-4-amino)-N-phenylethanesulfonamide (54) (pK(i) = 8.31 +/- 0.10) revealed it to have anti-inflammatory activity in an animal model of acute inflammation.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Binding, Competitive; Carrageenan; Edema; Humans; Kinetics; Models, Chemical; Molecular Structure; Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship; Quinazolines; Rats; Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled; Receptors, Histamine; Receptors, Histamine H4; Sulfonamides

Pharmacological activation of histamine H3 receptors is known to reduce the release of inflammatory peptides, thereby reducing pain and inflammation, but the site(s) and mechanism(s) of these effects are currently unknown. The present study addressed these questions by examining the effects of the H3 agonist immepip and the H3 antagonist thioperamide on nociceptive behaviors and swelling produced during the rat formalin test. Systemic administration of immepip (5 and 30 mg/kg, s.c.) significantly attenuated formalin-induced flinching but not licking responses during both phases. This attenuation was reversed by either systemic (15 mg/kg, i.p.) or intrathecal (20 or 50 microg) administration of thioperamide. Furthermore, immepip (30 mg/kg, s.c.) significantly inhibited formalin-induced swelling, an action which was completely reversed by systemic (15 mg/kg, i.p.), but not intrathecal (50 microg) thioperamide. Also consistent with this pattern, intrathecal immepip (50 microg) reduced flinching responses, but had no effect on formalin-induced paw swelling. The present findings suggest that activation of H3 receptors located on peripheral and spinal terminals of deep dermal fibers attenuates formalin-induced swelling and flinching, respectively. Pharmacological stimulation of H3 receptors could be an important therapeutic approach for many disorders related to deep dermal or inflammatory pain.

Topics: Animals; Behavior, Animal; Brain; Edema; Formaldehyde; Histamine Agonists; Histamine Antagonists; Imidazoles; Inflammation; Injections, Spinal; Male; Nerve Endings; Nerve Fibers; Neurons, Afferent; Pain Measurement; Peripheral Nervous System; Piperidines; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptors, Histamine H3; Skin; Spinal Cord

Despite histamine being a potent endogenous vasoactive agent released in increasing amounts postburn, its role in postburn oedema formation has been controversial and its effect on burn circulation poorly investigated. The present study investigated the involvement of H(1), H(2) and H(3) receptors in postburn edema in rats exposed to skin and muscle burns and their influence on skin circulation postburn. We used the selective antagonists clemastine (H(1)), ranitidine (H(2)), thioperamide (H(3)) and the selective H(3) receptor agonist, imetit. Results showed that none of the antagonists or the H(3) agonist had significant effect on postburn edema measured by quantitative spectrophotometric analysis of extravasated Evans blue-albumin in the full-thickness burned skin or muscle. Clemastine and thioperamide failed to induce significant effect on blood flow in the partial- or full-thickness skin burn injury as measured by laser Doppler flowmetry, while ranitidine significantly (P<0.01) reduced blood flow in the full-thickness burn. In contrast, the H(3) receptor agonist, imetit, significantly increased blood flow, both in the partial-thickness burn injury (P<0.05) and in the full-thickness burn (P<0.01). Moreover, imetit significantly (P<0.01) increased mean arterial pressure while thioperamide significantly (P<0.01) reduced systemic pressure. In conclusion, H(1), H(2) and H(3) receptors are not important actors in the regulation of vascular patency permeability, whereas H(3) receptors play an important role by increasing skin circulation postburn, presumably by relaxation of vascular smooth muscle and/or by interacting with other inflammatory neurotransmitters. Data also suggest that H(2) receptor blockers may not be best choice for stress ulcer prophylaxis in burn patients.

Topics: Animals; Burns; Clemastine; Edema; Histamine Agonists; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Histamine H2 Antagonists; Imidazoles; Male; Piperidines; Ranitidine; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptors, Histamine; Receptors, Histamine H3; Regional Blood Flow; Skin; Statistics, Nonparametric; Thiourea