thiopental and Gagging

An admixture of thiopentone and propofol was evaluated against propofol for laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion. Eighty-one ASA 1 and 2 18- to 65-year-old patients, premedicated with 7.5 mg midazolam orally were assigned randomly to receive either propofol 1% or an admixture of thiopentone and propofol (1.25% and 0.5% respectively), both at a dose of 0.25 ml x kg(-1). Satisfactory conditions for insertion were achieved with the admixture, which was comparable to propofol (73% vs 85%, P>0.05). There was no statistical difference in the incidence or severity of gagging, coughing, inadequate jaw relaxation and laryngospasm. The incidence of hypotension was lower in the admixture group (51% vs 78%, P=0.02). The duration of apnoea was not different between the admixture and propofol group (mean 103s vs 109s respectively, P>0.05). We conclude that thiopentone/propofol admixture can be a suitable alternative to propofol for LMA insertion, producing less hypotension while allowing cost savings of up to 45%. An admixture of thiopentone and propofol (1.25% and 0.5% respectively) can produce suitable conditions compared to propofol 1%, for laryngeal mask insertion. In addition to cost containment, the admixture also produces less hypotension.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anesthesia, Intravenous; Anesthetics, Combined; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Apnea; Double-Blind Method; Drug Costs; Female; Gagging; Humans; Laryngeal Masks; Male; Middle Aged; Propofol; Thiopental

We assessed conditions for insertion of a laryngeal mask airway in 90 unpremedicated adult patients who received either thiopentone 5 mg.kg-1 preceded by 40 mg of topical lignocaine spray to the posterior pharyngeal wall or propofol 2.5 mg.kg-1 alone in a randomised, single-blinded trial. All patients received fentanyl 1 microgram.kg-1. Gagging, coughing and laryngospasm following laryngeal mask insertion were graded and haemodynamic data and apnoea times were recorded. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to the incidence of gagging, coughing and laryngospasm, but the apnoea time was significantly less in the thiopentone group (p < 0.005). The decrease in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, following induction and the insertion of a laryngeal mask with propofol was significantly greater than following thiopentone (p < 0.05--systolic, p < 0.01--diastolic). We conclude that thiopentone preceded by topical lignocaine spray provides conditions for insertion of a laryngeal mask equal to those of propofol, with more haemodynamic stability and a shorter period of apnoea.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Anesthetics, Local; Female; Gagging; Hemodynamics; Humans; Laryngeal Masks; Lidocaine; Male; Middle Aged; Propofol; Single-Blind Method; Thiopental

To assess the ease of insertion of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) comparing propofol with lidocaine or midazolam followed by thiopentone and compare the costs with each technique.. One hundred and fifty ASA 1 or 2 patients equally divided into three groups scheduled for elective surgery were recruited into this prospective, single blind, randomized, parallel groups study. Anaesthetic induction was achieved with 1 microgram.kg-1 fentanyl i.v. followed by either 2.5 mg.kg-1 propofol (group P), or a sequence of 1.5 mg.kg-1 lidocaine and 5 mg.kg-1 thiopentone (group LT), or midazolam 0.1 mg.kg-1 and, three minutes later, 5 mg.kg-1 thiopentone (group MT). The LMA was inserted by the blinded anaesthetist who assessed and graded the conditions for LMA insertion and noted any adverse responses (i.e., inadequate jaw relaxation, gagging, coughing, limb or head movement, hiccough and laryngospasm). Conditions were considered "excellent" if there were no adverse responses, and "satisfactory" if such a response was mild and transient.. Excellent or satisfactory conditions were observed in 48 (96%) patients in the midazolam-thiopentone group, 46 (92%) in the propofol group, and 34 (68%) in the lidocaine-thiopentone group (P = 0.0001). The incidence of gagging (P = 0.042), limb movement (P = 0.031), and laryngospasm (P = 0.0001) was higher in the lidocaine-thiopentone group.. With the above doses, a fentanyl-midazolam-thiopentone combination which is about 35% less expensive than fentanyl-propofol, provides equally good conditions for the insertion of LMA.

Topics: Adult; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Anesthetics, Local; Cough; Drug Costs; Elective Surgical Procedures; Female; Fentanyl; Gagging; Hiccup; Humans; Laryngeal Masks; Laryngismus; Lidocaine; Logistic Models; Male; Midazolam; Middle Aged; Movement; Propofol; Prospective Studies; Sex Factors; Single-Blind Method; Thiopental; Treatment Outcome

The response to insertion of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) following either propofol 2.5 mg.kg-1 or thiopentone 5 mg.kg-1 was assessed in two groups of patients. The purpose of the study was to ascertain which of these two induction agents provided the better conditions for insertion of the LMA. Anaesthesia was induced by propofol in 35 patients and by thiopentone in 37. Following induction, ventilation was assisted for two minutes using 50% oxygen and nitrous oxide and 2% isoflurane, before insertion of the LMA. The presence of gagging, coughing, laryngospasm and movement was noted and graded. Thiopentone was associated with an adverse response in 76% of patients, compared with propofol in 26% (P < 0.01). Gagging, laryngospasm and head movement were more common using thiopentone (P < 0.01, P < 0.05 and P < 0.05 respectively) and in 11% (P < 0.05) of the thiopentone group insertion of the LMA was impossible due to inadequate relaxation. We conclude that, using these doses, propofol is superior to thiopentone as an induction agent for insertion of the laryngeal mask airway.

Topics: Adult; Anesthesia, Inhalation; Anesthesia, Intravenous; Cough; Extremities; Female; Gagging; Head; Humans; Isoflurane; Laryngeal Masks; Laryngismus; Larynx; Male; Movement; Muscle Relaxation; Nitrous Oxide; Propofol; Reflex; Thiopental

Clinical observations during anaesthesia and intubation of emergency patients are presented showing a differentiated impact of etomidate (Hypnomidate) on upper airway reflexes: a blockade of pharyngeal reflexes with sustained but possibly delayed laryngeal reflexes and a certain protection against laryngospasm and vomiting. In addition etomidate enables, preferably in combination, difficult intubation with sustained spontaneous breathing due to its low respiratory depressant effect. These features were confirmed in a small foreshortened clinical study using thiopentone (Trapanal) or etomidate without muscle relaxants, whereby the difference in high risk patients became obvious. The impact of anaesthetics on airway reflexes is generally concealed by muscular relaxants, and observations on this matter are difficult to make subject to quantifiable parameters and controlled studies; accordingly such observations are scarcely found in newer anaesthetic literature. In the development of new techniques for intubation and anaesthesia without muscle relaxation, these methodical problems deserve attention.

Topics: Etomidate; Gagging; Humans; Laryngismus; Larynx; Reflex; Thiopental; Vomiting

Topics: Adult; Aerosols; Anesthesia, Intravenous; Anesthesia, Local; Gagging; Humans; Laryngeal Masks; Lidocaine; Oropharynx; Thiopental

Conditions for insertion of the laryngeal mask were assessed following induction of anaesthesia with either propofol 2.5 mg/kg or thiopentone 4.0 mg/kg in 80 patients premedicated with diazepam 10 mg. Insertion following induction with thiopentone resulted in a greater incidence of gagging (p less than 0.01). The use of additional induction agent, where necessary, resulted in no ultimate significant difference between the groups for the provision of satisfactory conditions.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anesthesia, General; Cough; Female; Gagging; Humans; Intubation; Larynx; Male; Masks; Middle Aged; Propofol; Thiopental