thiohydantoins and Neoplasm-Metastasis

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Docetaxel; Humans; Male; Neoplasm Metastasis; Prostatic Neoplasms; Thiohydantoins

Prostate cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer-related death among men with the majority of deaths linked to metastatic disease. Accumulating clinical data have confirmed the substantial survival benefit of the addition of docetaxel or androgen signaling inhibitors to androgen deprivation therapy for the treatment of metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). Apalutamide, a next-generation androgen receptor inhibitor, has recently been shown to provide an added survival benefit in the treatment of mCSPC and consequently approved for this indication. This review summarizes the body of evidence with regards to the preclinical activity and clinical efficacy of apalutamide with a specific focus on its efficacy in the treatment of mCSPC.

Topics: Androgen Receptor Antagonists; Androgens; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Male; Neoplasm Metastasis; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Quality of Life; Thiohydantoins

High-risk nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer is a lethal disease that previously lacked clear treatment options. Progression to bone metastases is associated with significant morbidity and high cost. Apalutamide, an androgen receptor inhibitor, has substantial clinical response in nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Apalutamide + androgen deprivation therapy is well tolerated and improves metastasis-free survival, progression-free survival and time to symptomatic progression, and is associated with a favorable trend of improved overall survival. Future research is needed to elucidate mechanisms of resistance to treatment with androgen signaling inhibitors.

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Humans; Male; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neoplasm Staging; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Prostatic Neoplasms; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Signal Transduction; Thiohydantoins; Treatment Outcome

The basic therapy of metastatic prostate carcinoma is androgen deprivation therapy. Unfortunately, almost all patients develop resistance to treatment that leads to castration-resistant prostate cancer. From 2010, 6 new active substances were registered for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, which dramatically improved the overall survival of patients. Two of these are treatments for the androgenic axis, the other drugs or therapeutic methods are immunotherapy, chemotherapy, isotope treatment and RANK-ligand inhibition. The year 2018 was a major success in the treatment of nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate carcinoma, with the FDA authorizing both apalutamide and enzalutamide at this stage. The aim of this review is to present the standard of care of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer by disease stage, and to introduce the emerging treatment modalities presently assessed in clinical trials and discuss the open questions.. A metasztatikus prosztatakarcinóma bázisterápiája az androgéndeprivációs terápia. Sajnos szinte minden betegnél rezisztencia alakul ki a kezelésre, mely kasztrációrezisztens prosztatarákhoz vezet. A metasztatikus kasztrációrezisztens prosztatarák kezelésében 2010-tõl 6 új hatóanyag került törzskönyvezésre, melyek drámaian javították a betegek teljes túlélését. Ezek közül kettõ az androgéntengelyt célzó kezelések közé tartozik, a többi hatóanyag, illetve terápiás eljárás: immunterápia, kemoterápia, izotópkezelés és RANK-ligandum-gátlás. A nem metasztatikus kasztrációrezisztens prosztatakarcinóma kezelésében a 2018-as év átütõ sikert hozott, az FDA engedélyezte mind az apalutamid, mind az enzalutamid használatát ebben a stádiumban. Közleményünk célja kasztrációrezisztens elõrehaladott prosztatadaganatban stádiumok szerint a már egyértelmû evidenciák ismertetése, az új fejlesztések bemutatása, nyitott kérdések megvitatása.

Topics: Benzamides; Humans; Male; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neoplasm Staging; Nitriles; Phenylthiohydantoin; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Thiohydantoins

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer in elderly males. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is still the cornerstone of initial treatment; however, the vast majority of patients develop castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Several studies with numerous androgen receptor (AR)-directed agents have emerged since the approval of abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide. One of these agents is apalutamide, which seems to be a promising AR antagonist for the treatment of CRPC. Areas covered: The authors review Phase I, II, and III studies for apalutamide, in a large spectrum of PCa (from low-risk to metastatic CRPC [mCRPC]) patients as sole treatment or in the setting of combined therapy. Expert opinion: Apalutamide is an oral, investigational, AR antagonist that targets the AR ligand-binding domain and prevents AR nuclear translocation, DNA binding, and transcription of AR gene targets. It has shown favorable safety profile and therapeutic index in Phase I studies, good tolerance and efficacy in patients with high-risk CRPC in Phase II studies. Also, results were promising in a recent phase III study in patients with non-mCRPC who were at high risk for the development of metastasis. These data may offer potential advantages over the second-generation antiandrogens.

Topics: Aged; Androgen Receptor Antagonists; Animals; Disease Progression; Humans; Male; Neoplasm Metastasis; Prostatic Neoplasms; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Thiohydantoins

Five new agents have been shown to prolong survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, including two targeting androgen receptor signaling (abiraterone acetate plus prednisone; enzalutamide). Recognition that these tumors remain driven by androgen receptor signaling has prompted clinical evaluation of these agents at earlier states in the prostate cancer disease continuum, along with the continued development of new agents targeting this pathway. Areas covered: This article focuses on apalutamide, a next-generation nonsteroidal antiandrogen, with current literature queried in PubMed/Medline. A narrative review strategy describes studies from engineering of the compound through to a 5-year outlook. Expert commentary: In the phase III SPARTAN study, apalutamide significantly improved metastasis-free survival in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer - the first treatment approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for this indication. Phase III studies are under way to determine the clinical benefit of apalutamide in other disease states. Given the multiplicity of prostate cancer treatment options now available, there is a need to maximize individual patient benefit through the development and validation of predictive biomarkers of sensitivity to drugs that can be used in real time to determine the optimal sequence and combinations of treatments for patients in need.

Topics: Androgen Receptor Antagonists; Animals; Biomarkers, Tumor; Drug Development; Humans; Male; Neoplasm Metastasis; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Receptors, Androgen; Survival Rate; Thiohydantoins

The majority of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) will have disease progression of a uniformly fatal disease. mCRPC is driven by both activated androgen receptors and elevated intratumoural androgens; however, the current standard of care is therapy that targets a single androgen signalling mechanism. We aimed to investigate the combination treatment using apalutamide plus abiraterone acetate, each of which suppresses the androgen signalling axis in a different way, versus standard care in mCRPC.. ACIS was a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 study done at 167 hospitals in 17 countries in the USA, Canada, Mexico, Europe, the Asia-Pacific region, Africa, and South America. We included chemotherapy-naive men (aged ≥18 years) with mCRPC who had not been previously treated with androgen biosynthesis signalling inhibitors and were receiving ongoing androgen deprivation therapy, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, and a Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form question 3 (ie, worst pain in the past 24 h) score of 3 or lower. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via a centralised interactive web response system with a permuted block randomisation scheme (block size 4) to oral apalutamide 240 mg once daily plus oral abiraterone acetate 1000 mg once daily and oral prednisone 5 mg twice daily (apalutamide plus abiraterone-prednisone group) or placebo plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone (abiraterone-prednisone group), in 28-day treatment cycles. Randomisation was stratified by presence or absence of visceral metastases, ECOG performance status, and geographical region. Patients, the investigators, study team, and the sponsor were masked to group assignments. An independent data-monitoring committee continually monitored data to ensure ongoing patient safety, and reviewed efficacy data. The primary endpoint was radiographic progression-free survival assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was reported for all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is completed and no longer recruiting and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02257736.. 982 men were enrolled and randomly assigned from Dec 10, 2014 to Aug 30, 2016 (492 to apalutamide plus abiraterone-prednisone; 490 to abiraterone-prednisone). At the primary analysis (median follow-up 25·7 months [IQR 23·0-28·9]), median radiographic progression-free survival was 22·6 months (95% CI 19·4-27·4) in the apalutamide plus abiraterone-prednisone group versus 16·6 months (13·9-19·3) in the abiraterone-prednisone group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·69, 95% CI 0·58-0·83; p<0·0001). At the updated analysis (final analysis for overall survival; median follow-up 54·8 months [IQR 51·5-58·4]), median radiographic progression-free survival was 24·0 months (95% CI 19·7-27·5) versus 16·6 months (13·9-19·3; HR 0·70, 95% CI 0·60-0·83; p<0·0001). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse event was hypertension (82 [17%] of 490 patients receiving apalutamide plus abiraterone-prednisone and 49 [10%] of 489 receiving abiraterone-prednisone). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 195 (40%) patients receiving apalutamide plus abiraterone-prednisone and 181 (37%) patients receiving abiraterone-prednisone. Drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events with fatal outcomes occurred in three (1%) patients in the apalutamide plus abiraterone-prednisone group (2 pulmonary embolism, 1 cardiac failure) and five (1%) patients in the abiraterone-prednisone group (1 cardiac failure and 1 cardiac arrest, 1 mesenteric arterial occlusion, 1 seizure, and 1 sudden death).. Despite the use of an active and established therapy as the comparator, apalutamide plus abiraterone-prednisone improved radiographic progression-free survival. Additional studies to identify subgroups of patients who might benefit the most from combination therapy are needed to further refine the treatment of mCRPC.. Janssen Research & Development.

Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Androgen Receptor Antagonists; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Double-Blind Method; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Humans; Male; Neoplasm Metastasis; Prednisone; Progression-Free Survival; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Steroid Synthesis Inhibitors; Survival Rate; Thiohydantoins

The first interim analysis of the phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled TITAN study showed that apalutamide significantly improved overall survival (OS) and radiographic progression-free survival in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) receiving ongoing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Herein, we report final efficacy and safety results after unblinding and placebo-to-apalutamide crossover.. Patients with mCSPC (N = 1,052) were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive apalutamide (240 mg QD) or placebo plus ADT. After unblinding in January 2019, placebo-treated patients were allowed to receive apalutamide. Efficacy end points were updated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional-hazards model without formal statistical retesting and adjustment for multiplicity. Change from baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate total score was assessed.. With a median follow-up of 44.0 months, 405 OS events had occurred and 208 placebo-treated patients (39.5%) had crossed over to apalutamide. The median treatment duration was 39.3 (apalutamide), 20.2 (placebo), and 15.4 months (crossover). Compared with placebo, apalutamide plus ADT significantly reduced the risk of death by 35% (median OS not reached. The final analysis of TITAN confirmed that, despite crossover, apalutamide plus ADT improved OS, delayed castration resistance, maintained health-related quality of life, and had a consistent safety profile in a broad population of patients with mCSPC.

Topics: Androgen Receptor Antagonists; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Male; Neoplasm Metastasis; Progression-Free Survival; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Quality of Life; Thiohydantoins; Time Factors

In the phase 3 TITAN study, the addition of apalutamide to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) significantly improved the primary endpoints of overall survival and radiographic progression-free survival in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. We aimed to assess health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in TITAN, including pain and fatigue.. In this randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 study, patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (defined as not receiving ADT at the time of metastatic disease progression) aged 18 years and older, receiving continuous ADT (selected at the investigator's discretion), and with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1 were randomly assigned (1:1), using an interactive web response system, to receive oral apalutamide (four 60 mg tablets, once daily) or matching placebo. Previous localised disease treatment or previous docetaxel for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer were allowed. Randomisation was stratified by Gleason score at diagnosis, region, and previous docetaxel treatment. Randomisation was done using randomly permuted blocks (block size of four). Investigators, research staff, sponsor study team, and patients were masked to the identities of test and control treatments. Patient-reported outcomes were prespecified exploratory endpoints and were the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF), Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P), and EuroQoL 5D questionnaire 5 level (EQ-5D-5L). BPI and BFI were completed for 7 consecutive days (days -6 to 1 inclusive of each cycle visit), then at months 4, 8, and 12 in follow-up. FACT-P and EQ-5D-5L were completed during cycles 1-7, then every other cycle until the end of treatment, and at months 4, 8, and 12 in follow-up. Analyses were based on the intention-to-treat population. Missing patient-reported outcome assessments were calculated as the expected number of assessments for a visit minus the actual number of assessments received for that visit. For time-to-event endpoints, when median values could not be calculated because less than 50% of patients had degradation, 25th percentiles were compared. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02489318, and is ongoing.. Between Dec 9, 2015, and July 25, 2017, 1052 eligible patients were enrolled randomly assigned to apalutamide (n=525) or placebo (n=527). Data cutoff for this analysis of patient-reported outcomes was Nov 23, 2018. Median follow-up for time to pain-related endpoints ranged from 19·4 to 22·1 months. Patients were mostly asymptomatic at baseline: on the BPI-SF pain severity scale of 0-10, median pain scores (indicating worst pain in the past 24 h) were 1·14 (IQR 0-3·17) in the apalutamide group and 1·00 (0-2·86) in the placebo group, and median worst fatigue scores on the BFI were 1·29 (IQR 0-3·29) in the apalutamide group and 1·43 (0·14-3·14) in the placebo group. Patient experience of pain and fatigue (intensity and interference) did not differ between the groups for the duration of treatment. Median time to worst pain intensity progression was 19·09 months (95% CI 11·04-not reached) in the apalutamide group versus 11·99 months (8·28-18·46) in the placebo group (HR 0·89 [95% CI 0·75-1·06]; p=0·20). Median time to pain interference progression was not reached in either group (95% CI 28·58-not reached in the apalutamide group; not reached-not reached in the placebo group). 25th percentiles for time to pain interference progression were 9·17 months (5·55-11·96) in the apalutamide group and 6·24 months (4·63-7·43) in the placebo group (HR 0·90 [95% CI 0·73-1·10]; p=0·29). FACT-P total scores and EQ-5D-5L data showed preservation of HRQOL in both groups. The median time to deterioration as determined by FACT-P total score was 8·87 months (95% CI 4·70-11·10) in the apalutamide group and 9·23 months (7·39-12·91) in the placebo group (HR 1·02 [95% CI 0·85-1·22]; p=0·85).. Apalutamide with ADT is a well-tolerated and effective option for men with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. The combination significantly improves survival outcomes compared with ADT alone while maintaining HRQOL despite additive androgen blockade.. Janssen Research & Development.

Topics: Aged; Androgen Antagonists; Androgen Receptor Antagonists; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Asia; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Disease Progression; Europe; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Grading; Neoplasm Metastasis; North America; Orchiectomy; Progression-Free Survival; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Quality of Life; South America; Thiohydantoins; Time Factors

Apalutamide, a competitive inhibitor of the androgen receptor, is under development for the treatment of prostate cancer. We evaluated the efficacy of apalutamide in men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who were at high risk for the development of metastasis.. We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial involving men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and a prostate-specific antigen doubling time of 10 months or less. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 2:1 ratio, to receive apalutamide (240 mg per day) or placebo. All the patients continued to receive androgen-deprivation therapy. The primary end point was metastasis-free survival, which was defined as the time from randomization to the first detection of distant metastasis on imaging or death.. A total of 1207 men underwent randomization (806 to the apalutamide group and 401 to the placebo group). In the planned primary analysis, which was performed after 378 events had occurred, median metastasis-free survival was 40.5 months in the apalutamide group as compared with 16.2 months in the placebo group (hazard ratio for metastasis or death, 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23 to 0.35; P<0.001). Time to symptomatic progression was significantly longer with apalutamide than with placebo (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.63; P<0.001). The rate of adverse events leading to discontinuation of the trial regimen was 10.6% in the apalutamide group and 7.0% in the placebo group. The following adverse events occurred at a higher rate with apalutamide than with placebo: rash (23.8% vs. 5.5%), hypothyroidism (8.1% vs. 2.0%), and fracture (11.7% vs. 6.5%).. Among men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, metastasis-free survival and time to symptomatic progression were significantly longer with apalutamide than with placebo. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; SPARTAN ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01946204 .).

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androgen Antagonists; Disease Progression; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Exanthema; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Proportional Hazards Models; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Thiohydantoins

In the SPARTAN trial, addition of apalutamide to androgen deprivation therapy, as compared with placebo plus androgen deprivation therapy, significantly improved metastasis-free survival in men with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who were at high risk for development of metastases. We aimed to investigate the effects of apalutamide versus placebo added to androgen deprivation therapy on health-related quality of life (HRQOL).. SPARTAN is a multicentre, international, randomised, phase 3 trial. Participants were aged 18 years or older, with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, a prostate-specific antigen doubling time of 10 months or less, and a prostate-specific antigen concentration of 2 ng/mL or more in serum. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to 240 mg oral apalutamide per day plus androgen deprivation therapy, or matched oral placebo plus androgen deprivation therapy, using an interactive voice randomisation system. Permuted block randomisation was used according to the three baseline stratification factors: prostate-specific antigen doubling time (>6 months vs ≤6 months), use of bone-sparing drugs (yes vs no), and presence of local-regional nodal disease (N0 vs N1). Each treatment cycle was 28 days. The primary endpoint was metastasis-free survival. The trial was unblinded in July, 2017. In this prespecified exploratory analysis we assessed HRQOL using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) and EQ-5D-3L questionnaires, which we collected at baseline, day 1 of cycle 1 (before dose), day 1 of treatment cycles 1-6, day 1 of every two cycles from cycles 7 to 13, and day 1 of every four cycles thereafter. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01946204.. Between Oct 14, 2013, and Dec 15, 2016, we randomly assigned 1207 patients to receive apalutamide (n=806) or placebo (n=401). The clinical cutoff date, as for the primary analysis, was May 19, 2017. Median follow-up for overall survival was 20·3 months (IQR 14·8-26·6). FACT-P total and subscale scores were associated with a preservation of HRQOL from baseline to cycle 29 in the apalutamide group; there were similar results for EQ-5D-3L. At baseline, the mean for FACT-P total score in both the apalutamide and placebo groups were consistent with the FACT-P general population norm for US adult men. Group mean patient-reported outcome scores over time show that HRQOL was maintained from baseline after initiation of apalutamide treatment and was similar over time among patients receiving apalutamide versus placebo. Least-squares mean change from baseline shows that HRQOL deterioration was more apparent in the placebo group.. In asymptomatic men with high-risk non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, HRQOL was maintained after initiation of apalutamide treatment. Considered with findings from SPARTAN, patients who received apalutamide had longer metastasis-free survival and longer time to symptomatic progression than did those who received placebo, while preserving HRQOL.. Janssen Research & Development.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androgen Receptor Antagonists; Antineoplastic Agents; Humans; Kallikreins; Male; Neoplasm Metastasis; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Progression-Free Survival; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Quality of Life; Thiohydantoins; Time Factors

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Double-Blind Method; Germany; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Placebo Effect; Prevalence; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Risk Factors; Survival Rate; Thiohydantoins; Treatment Outcome

Tubulin-β3 encoded by the Tubulin-β3 (TUBB3) gene is a microtubule protein. Previous studies have shown that TUBB3 expression is upregulated in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CaP) and is involved in taxane resistance. However, the biological mechanism of TUBB3 involvement in the progression to castration-resistant CaP is not fully elucidated. This study aimed to analyze the expression and function of TUBB3 in localized and metastatic CaP.. TUBB3 expression was determined using immunohistochemistry in localized and metastatic CaP. We also investigated the association between TUBB3, phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), and neuroendocrine differentiation and examined the involvement of TUBB3 in new antiandrogen drugs (enzalutamide and apalutamide) resistance in metastatic CaP.. In 155 cases of localized CaP, immunohistochemistry showed that 5 (3.2%) of the CaP cases were positive for tubulin-β3. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that high expression of tubulin-β3 was associated with poor prostate-specific antigen recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy. In 57 cases of metastatic CaP, immunohistochemistry showed that 14 (25%) cases were positive for tubulin-β3. Tubulin-β3 expression was higher in metastatic CaP than in localized CaP. High tubulin-β3 expression was correlated with negative PTEN expression. TUBB3 expression was increased in neuroendocrine CaP based on several public databases. PTEN knockout decreased the sensitivity to enzalutamide and apalutamide in 22Rv-1 cells. TUBB3 knockdown reversed the sensitivity to enzalutamide and apalutamide in PTEN-CRISPR 22Rv-1 cells. High expression of tubulin-β3 and negative expression of PTEN were significantly associated with poor overall survival in metastatic CaP treated with androgen deprivation therapy.. These results suggest that TUBB3 may be a useful predictive biomarker for survival and play an essential role in antiandrogen resistance in CaP.

Topics: Aged; Benzamides; Cell Differentiation; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neuroendocrine Tumors; Nitriles; Phenylthiohydantoin; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; PTEN Phosphohydrolase; Retrospective Studies; Thiohydantoins; Tubulin

In the placebo-controlled SPARTAN study, apalutamide added to androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) improved metastasis-free survival, second progression-free survival (PFS2), and overall survival (OS) in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). Mechanisms of resistance to apalutamide in nmCRPC require evaluation.. In a subset of patients from SPARTAN, aberrations were assessed at baseline and end of study treatment (EOST) using targeted next-generation sequencing or qRT-PCR. Circulating-tumor DNA (ctDNA) levels were assessed qualitatively. Select aberrations in androgen receptor (AR) and other common PC-driving genes were detected and summarized by the treatment group; genomic aberrations were summarized in ctDNA-positive samples. Association between detection of aberrations in all patients and outcomes was assessed using Cox proportional-hazards models and multivariate analysis.. In 247 patients, the overall prevalence of ctDNA, AR aberrations, and. Apalutamide plus ADT did not increase detectable AR/non-AR aberrations over ADT alone. Detectable ctDNA, AR aberrations, and

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androgen Antagonists; Biomarkers, Tumor; Disease Progression; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Risk Assessment; Survival Rate; Thiohydantoins

Topics: Administration, Oral; Androstenes; Benzamides; Humans; Male; Neoplasm Metastasis; Nitriles; Phenylthiohydantoin; Prostatic Neoplasms; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Thiohydantoins

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Androgen Receptor Antagonists; Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Humans; Male; Neoplasm Metastasis; Prostatic Neoplasms; Thiohydantoins

Novel androgen deprivation agents delay metastasis in non-metastatic, castration-resistant, prostate cancer (nmCRPC). The recent regulatory guidance: considerations for metastasis-free survival endpoint in clinical trials, opens new opportunities in cell biology, medicinal chemistry and advanced imaging. Past failures are the likely result of equating tumour shrinkage to efficacy, rather than inhibition of tumour spread. In the future, the selection of anti-metastasis drug candidates will probably be based on anti-migratory rather than anti-proliferative potential. Oligometastatic cancer coupled with advanced imaging can serve as a clinical proof-of-concept model.

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Benzamides; Cell Movement; Cell Proliferation; Disease Progression; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Humans; Male; Neoplasm Metastasis; Nitriles; Phenylthiohydantoin; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Progression-Free Survival; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Pyrazoles; Testosterone; Thiohydantoins; Tumor Burden; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

To perform an adjusted indirect comparison of the efficacy of enzalutamide and apalutamide in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) with a high risk of progression to metastatic disease.. After carrying out a literature search, we performed an adjusted indirect comparison (Bucher et al.) of the relative efficacy of enzalutamide and apalutamide in patients with nmCRPC with a high risk of progression to metastatic disease. The outcomes included were metastasis-free survival (MFS) and PSA response rate (PSARR).. There were no statistically significant differences between enzalutamide and apalutamide regarding the analysed outcomes. For the comparison enzalutamide+ADT vs. apalutamide+ADT: MFS a HR (95% CI)=1,036 (0.781-1.373) was obtained. For PSARR, a RR (95% CI)=0.81 (0.339-1.938) was obtained.. The adjusted indirect comparison performed in this study shows that there are no statistically significant differences in terms of efficacy regarding MFS and PSARR between enzalutamide+ADT and apalutamide+ADT in patients with nmCRPC with a high risk of progression to metastatic disease. However, in order to confirm these results, an independent trial with direct comparison between both drugs would be required.

Topics: Aged; Benzamides; Disease Progression; Humans; Male; Neoplasm Metastasis; Nitriles; Phenylthiohydantoin; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Risk Assessment; Thiohydantoins; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Androgen Receptor Antagonists; Antineoplastic Agents; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Humans; Male; Neoplasm Metastasis; Progression-Free Survival; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thiohydantoins; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Approval; Humans; Male; Neoplasm Metastasis; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Thiohydantoins; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzamides; Clinical Trials as Topic; Endpoint Determination; Humans; Male; Neoplasm Metastasis; Nitriles; Phenylthiohydantoin; Progression-Free Survival; Prostatic Neoplasms; Research Design; Risk Factors; Thiohydantoins; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome