thiohydantoins has been researched along with Adenocarcinoma* in 5 studies
1 review(s) available for thiohydantoins and Adenocarcinoma
Article | Year |
---|---|
Treatment and trials in non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Metastatic prostate cancer is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Standard treatment for non-metastatic prostate cancer, to prevent metastatic progression, is androgen deprivation therapy (ADT); however, many patients will eventually develop castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), which can prove challenging to treat. Between the stages of non-metastatic androgen-sensitive disease and metastatic CRPC is an intermediate disease state that has been termed non-metastatic CRPC (nmCRPC), which is a heterogeneous, man-made disease stage that occurs after a patient who has no radiological evidence of metastasis shows evidence of cancer progression even after ADT. Awareness of nmCRPC has risen owing to an increased use of ADT and its eventual failure. Men with nmCRPC are at a high risk of progression to mCRPC, with historically few options to halt this process. However, in the past two decades, multiple therapies have been investigated for the treatment of nmCRPC, including endothelin receptor antagonists and bone-targeted therapies, but none has changed the standard of care. In the past decade, the efficacy of androgen receptor pathway-targeting modalities has been investigated. Three novel nonsteroidal antiandrogen agents for treating high-risk nmCRPC have been investigated; the PROSPER, SPARTAN and ARAMIS trials were phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials that investigated the efficacy and safety of enzalutamide, apalutamide and darolutamide, respectively. All three therapeutics showed statistically significant improvements in metastasis-free survival, progression to antineoplastic therapy was lengthened and at final analysis, overall survival was significantly improved. The comparative efficacy and safety of all three agents has not yet been investigated in a comprehensive clinical trial, but approval of these medications by the FDA and other regulatory agencies means that providers now have three effective therapeutic options to augment ADT for patients with nmCRPC. Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Benzamides; Humans; Male; Neoplasm Staging; Nitriles; Nonsteroidal Anti-Androgens; Phenylthiohydantoin; Progression-Free Survival; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Pyrazoles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Survival Rate; Thiohydantoins | 2021 |
3 trial(s) available for thiohydantoins and Adenocarcinoma
Article | Year |
---|---|
The LACOG-0415 phase II trial: abiraterone acetate and ADT versus apalutamide versus abiraterone acetate and apalutamide in patients with advanced prostate cancer with non-castration testosterone levels.
Testosterone suppression is the standard treatment for advanced prostate cancer, and it is associated with side-effects that impair patients' quality of life, like sexual dysfunction, osteoporosis, weight gain, and increased cardiovascular risk. We hypothesized that abiraterone acetate with prednisone (AAP) and apalutamide, alone or in combination, can be an effective hormonal therapy also possibly decreasing castration-associated side effects.. Phase II, open-label, randomized, efficacy trial of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) and Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) versus apalutamide versus the combination of AAP (without ADT) and apalutamide. Key eligibility criteria are confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma; biochemical relapse after definitive treatment (PSA ≥ 4 ng/ml and doubling time less than 10 months, or PSA ≥ 20 ng/ml); newly diagnosed locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer; asymptomatic to moderately symptomatic regarding bone symptoms. Patients with other histology besides adenocarcinoma or previous use of hormonal therapy or chemotherapy were excluded.. There is an urgent need to study and validate regimens such as new hormonal agents that may add benefit to castration with an acceptable safety profile. We aim to evaluate if apalutamide in monotherapy or in combination with AAP is an effective and safety hormonal treatment that can spare patients of androgen deprivation therapy.. This trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov on October 16, 2017, under Identifier: NCT02867020. Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Adenocarcinoma; Androgen Receptor Antagonists; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Disease-Free Survival; Goserelin; Humans; Male; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Prednisone; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Quality of Life; Testosterone; Thiohydantoins; Treatment Outcome | 2019 |
Apalutamide for Metastatic, Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.
Apalutamide is an inhibitor of the ligand-binding domain of the androgen receptor. Whether the addition of apalutamide to androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) would prolong radiographic progression-free survival and overall survival as compared with placebo plus ADT among patients with metastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer has not been determined.. In this double-blind, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients with metastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer to receive apalutamide (240 mg per day) or placebo, added to ADT. Previous treatment for localized disease and previous docetaxel therapy were allowed. The primary end points were radiographic progression-free survival and overall survival.. A total of 525 patients were assigned to receive apalutamide plus ADT and 527 to receive placebo plus ADT. The median age was 68 years. A total of 16.4% of the patients had undergone prostatectomy or received radiotherapy for localized disease, and 10.7% had received previous docetaxel therapy; 62.7% had high-volume disease, and 37.3% had low-volume disease. At the first interim analysis, with a median of 22.7 months of follow-up, the percentage of patients with radiographic progression-free survival at 24 months was 68.2% in the apalutamide group and 47.5% in the placebo group (hazard ratio for radiographic progression or death, 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39 to 0.60; P<0.001). Overall survival at 24 months was also greater with apalutamide than with placebo (82.4% in the apalutamide group vs. 73.5% in the placebo group; hazard ratio for death, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.89; P = 0.005). The frequency of grade 3 or 4 adverse events was 42.2% in the apalutamide group and 40.8% in the placebo group; rash was more common in the apalutamide group.. In this trial involving patients with metastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer, overall survival and radiographic progression-free survival were significantly longer with the addition of apalutamide to ADT than with placebo plus ADT, and the side-effect profile did not differ substantially between the two groups. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; TITAN ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02489318.). Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androgen Antagonists; Androgen Receptor Antagonists; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Double-Blind Method; Exanthema; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Grading; Progression-Free Survival; Prostatic Neoplasms; Quality of Life; Radiography; Thiohydantoins | 2019 |
Apalutamide Treatment and Metastasis-free Survival in Prostate Cancer.
Apalutamide, a competitive inhibitor of the androgen receptor, is under development for the treatment of prostate cancer. We evaluated the efficacy of apalutamide in men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who were at high risk for the development of metastasis.. We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial involving men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and a prostate-specific antigen doubling time of 10 months or less. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 2:1 ratio, to receive apalutamide (240 mg per day) or placebo. All the patients continued to receive androgen-deprivation therapy. The primary end point was metastasis-free survival, which was defined as the time from randomization to the first detection of distant metastasis on imaging or death.. A total of 1207 men underwent randomization (806 to the apalutamide group and 401 to the placebo group). In the planned primary analysis, which was performed after 378 events had occurred, median metastasis-free survival was 40.5 months in the apalutamide group as compared with 16.2 months in the placebo group (hazard ratio for metastasis or death, 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23 to 0.35; P<0.001). Time to symptomatic progression was significantly longer with apalutamide than with placebo (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.63; P<0.001). The rate of adverse events leading to discontinuation of the trial regimen was 10.6% in the apalutamide group and 7.0% in the placebo group. The following adverse events occurred at a higher rate with apalutamide than with placebo: rash (23.8% vs. 5.5%), hypothyroidism (8.1% vs. 2.0%), and fracture (11.7% vs. 6.5%).. Among men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, metastasis-free survival and time to symptomatic progression were significantly longer with apalutamide than with placebo. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; SPARTAN ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01946204 .). Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androgen Antagonists; Disease Progression; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Exanthema; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Proportional Hazards Models; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Thiohydantoins | 2018 |
1 other study(ies) available for thiohydantoins and Adenocarcinoma
Article | Year |
---|---|
KY1022, a small molecule destabilizing Ras via targeting the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, inhibits development of metastatic colorectal cancer.
APC (80-90%) and K-Ras (40-50%) mutations frequently occur in human colorectal cancer (CRC) and these mutations cooperatively accelerate tumorigenesis including metastasis. In addition, both β-catenin and Ras levels are highly increased in CRC, especially in metastatic CRC (mCRC). Therefore, targeting both the Wnt/β-catenin and Ras pathways could be an ideal therapeutic approach for treating mCRC patients. In this study, we characterized the roles of KY1022, a small molecule that destabilizes both β-catenin and Ras via targeting the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, in inhibiting the cellular events, including EMT, an initial process of metastasis, and apoptosis. As shown by in vitro and in vivo studies using APCMin/+/K-RasG12DLA2 mice, KY1022 effectively suppressed the development of mCRC at an early stage of tumorigenesis. A small molecular approach degrading both β-catenin and Ras via inhibition of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling would be an ideal strategy for treatment of mCRC. Topics: Actin Cytoskeleton; Adenocarcinoma; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; beta Catenin; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Movement; Cell Proliferation; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease Models, Animal; Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition; Genes, APC; HEK293 Cells; Humans; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Mice, Transgenic; Mutation; Neoplasm Invasiveness; Protein Stability; Proteolysis; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras); Thiohydantoins; Time Factors; Wnt Signaling Pathway | 2016 |