Page last updated: 2024-11-05

thalidomide and Palmoplantaris Pustulosis

thalidomide has been researched along with Palmoplantaris Pustulosis in 302 studies

Thalidomide: A piperidinyl isoindole originally introduced as a non-barbiturate hypnotic, but withdrawn from the market due to teratogenic effects. It has been reintroduced and used for a number of immunological and inflammatory disorders. Thalidomide displays immunosuppressive and anti-angiogenic activity. It inhibits release of TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR-ALPHA from monocytes, and modulates other cytokine action.
thalidomide : A racemate comprising equimolar amounts of R- and S-thalidomide.
2-(2,6-dioxopiperidin-3-yl)-1H-isoindole-1,3(2H)-dione : A dicarboximide that is isoindole-1,3(2H)-dione in which the hydrogen attached to the nitrogen is substituted by a 2,6-dioxopiperidin-3-yl group.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"To evaluate apremilast 30 mg twice daily for mild-to-moderate psoriasis."9.51Efficacy and safety of apremilast in patients with mild-to-moderate plaque psoriasis: Results of a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. ( Albrecht, L; Bhatia, N; Callis Duffin, K; Chen, M; Gooderham, M; Green, L; Papp, K; Paris, M; Pariser, D; Sofen, H; Stein Gold, L; Wang, Y, 2022)
"We evaluated the pharmacodynamic effects of apremilast in 69 patients who were included in biomarker subanalyses of a phase 2b study that demonstrated the long-term safety and efficacy of apremilast in Japanese adults with moderate to severe psoriasis."9.41Pharmacodynamic analysis of apremilast in Japanese patients with moderate to severe psoriasis: Results from a phase 2b randomized trial. ( Imafuku, S; Komine, M; Nemoto, O; Ohtsuki, M; Okubo, Y; Petric, R; Schafer, P, 2021)
"The objective of this article was to  compare the efficacy and safety of apremilast and methotrexate in patients with palmoplantar psoriasis."9.41Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast and Methotrexate in Patients with Palmoplantar Psoriasis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. ( Dogra, S; Handa, S; Kt, S; Narang, T; Thakur, V, 2021)
"To evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in pediatric patients with psoriasis."9.34Pharmacokinetics and safety of apremilast in pediatric patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Results from a phase 2 open-label study. ( Barcellona, C; Becker, EM; de Lucas, R; Fiorillo, L; Hong, Y; Maes, P; Paller, AS; Paris, M; Zhang, W; Zhang, Z, 2020)
"To evaluate the efficacy and safety of apremilast for moderate to severe scalp psoriasis."9.34Efficacy and safety of apremilast in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis of the scalp: Results of a phase 3b, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. ( Cauthen, A; Lebwohl, M; Lynde, C; Paris, M; Sofen, H; Stein Gold, L; Strober, B; Tyring, S; Van Voorhees, AS; Wang, Y; Zhang, Z, 2020)
"064% (Cal/BD) foam to oral apremilast in treating moderate plaque psoriasis."9.34Efficacy and Safety of Calcipotriene 0.005%/Betamethasone Dipropionate 0.064% Foam With Apremilast for Moderate Plaque Psoriasis. ( Kircik, LH; Schlesinger, TE; Tanghetti, E, 2020)
"Adults (≥18 years of age) with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (baseline PGA ≥3, BSA affected ≥10%, PASI ≥12) took oral apremilast (30 mg twice daily) for 8 weeks."9.34Apremilast with Add-On Calcipotriene/Betamethasone Dipropionate for Treating Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis. ( Bagel, J; Hetzel, A; Nelson, E; Riley, C, 2020)
"Pharmacodynamic (PD) subanalyses of clinical trials in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis demonstrated the efficacy of apremilast correlated with reductions in cytokines involved in the pathogenesis of psoriasis."9.30Apremilast mechanism of efficacy in systemic-naive patients with moderate plaque psoriasis: Pharmacodynamic results from the UNVEIL study. ( Alikhan, A; Cirulli, J; Lockshin, B; Schafer, P; Shi, R; Strober, B, 2019)
"The main objectives of this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study were to assess the efficacy and impact on quality of life and work productivity of apremilast for the treatment of moderate-to-severe palmoplantar psoriasis."9.27Apremilast for the treatment of moderate-to-severe palmoplantar psoriasis: results from a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study. ( Barber, K; Bissonnette, R; Bukhalo, M; Delorme, I; Fowler, JF; Gagné-Henley, A; Gooderham, M; Haydey, R; Jenkin, P; Landells, I; Lynde, CW; Pariser, DM; Poulin, Y; Rosoph, LA, 2018)
"Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis."9.27Safety and efficacy of apremilast through 104 weeks in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis who continued on apremilast or switched from etanercept treatment: findings from the LIBERATE study. ( Bewley, A; Chen, R; Cirulli, J; Gooderham, M; Green, L; Marcsisin, J; Petric, R; Piguet, V; Reich, K; Soung, J, 2018)
"Randomized, controlled trials demonstrated efficacy and safety of apremilast for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis."9.24Long-term safety and tolerability of apremilast in patients with psoriasis: Pooled safety analysis for ≥156 weeks from 2 phase 3, randomized, controlled trials (ESTEEM 1 and 2). ( Cather, JC; Chen, R; Crowley, J; Day, RM; Ferrándiz, C; Goncalves, J; Joly, P; Papp, KA; Peris, K; Shah, K; Thaçi, D, 2017)
"The combination of apremilast with NB-UVB was effective for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, without any unexpected safety signals."9.24Apremilast and Narrowband Ultraviolet-B Combination Therapy for Treating Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis. ( Bagel, J; Keegan, BR; Nelson, E, 2017)
"Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, has an acceptable safety profile and is effective for treatment of plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis."9.24Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, improves patient-reported outcomes in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis: results of two phase III randomized, controlled trials. ( Chen, R; Feldman, SR; Foley, P; Kimball, A; Levi, E; Poulin, Y; Thaçi, D, 2017)
"Apremilast, an oral, small-molecule phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis."9.24The efficacy and safety of apremilast, etanercept and placebo in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: 52-week results from a phase IIIb, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (LIBERATE). ( Bewley, A; Day, RM; Goncalves, J; Gooderham, M; Green, L; Khanskaya, I; Piguet, V; Reich, K; Shah, K; Soung, J; Zhang, Z, 2017)
" Inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of psoriasis, age ≥ 18 years, concomitant treatment with apremilast and a specified biologic agent, and available safety and/or efficacy results."9.22Combination Therapy with Apremilast and Biologics for Psoriasis: A Systematic Review. ( Alinaghi, F; Egeberg, A; Gyldenløve, M; Skov, L; Zachariae, C, 2022)
"This review article serves to compare global dermatologic organizations and the available clinical practice guidelines for the use of apremilast in the treatment of psoriasis."9.22Comparison of psoriasis guidelines for use of apremilast in the United States and Europe: a critical appraisal and comprehensive review. ( Ghamrawi, RI; Ghiam, N; Wu, JJ, 2022)
"In the phase III double-blind Efficacy and Safety Trial Evaluating the Effects of Apremilast in Psoriasis (ESTEEM) 1 and 2, apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, demonstrated efficacy in moderate to severe psoriasis."9.22Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in patients with difficult-to-treat nail and scalp psoriasis: Results of 2 phase III randomized, controlled trials (ESTEEM 1 and ESTEEM 2). ( Bachelez, H; Chen, R; Crowley, J; Day, RM; Goncalves, J; Gooderham, M; Rich, P, 2016)
" The effects of apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase inhibitor, on pruritus, skin discomfort/pain, and patient global assessment of psoriasis disease activity (PgAPDA) were assessed in moderate/severe chronic plaque psoriasis patients in the phase 3 ESTEEM trials."9.22Effects of Apremilast on Pruritus and Skin Discomfort/Pain Correlate With Improvements in Quality of Life in Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis. ( Chen, R; Day, RM; Foley, P; Girolomoni, G; Goncalves, J; Mrowietz, U; Sobell, JM; Toth, D; Yosipovitch, G, 2016)
"We evaluated the efficacy and safety of apremilast in palmoplantar psoriasis."9.22Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, in the treatment of palmoplantar psoriasis: Results of a pooled analysis from phase II PSOR-005 and phase III Efficacy and Safety Trial Evaluating the Effects of Apremilast in Psoriasis (ESTEEM) clinical ( Bissonnette, R; Chen, R; Day, RM; Goncalves, J; Pariser, DM; Sebastian, M; Wasel, NR, 2016)
"ESTEEM 1 evaluated efficacy/safety of apremilast at 30 mg twice a day for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis."9.20Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor, in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Results of a phase III, randomized, controlled trial (Efficacy and Safety Trial Evaluating the Effects of Apremilast in Psoriasis [ESTEEM] 1). ( Chimenti, S; Day, RM; Gordon, KB; Griffiths, CE; Hu, C; Kircik, L; Korman, NJ; Langley, RG; Leonardi, CL; Papp, K; Reich, K; Stevens, RM, 2015)
"Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, regulates immune responses associated with psoriasis."9.20Efficacy and safety of apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis over 52 weeks: a phase III, randomized controlled trial (ESTEEM 2). ( Cather, J; Crowley, J; Day, RM; Ferrandiz, C; Girolomoni, G; Gooderham, M; Gottlieb, AB; Hu, C; Mrowietz, U; Paul, C; Poulin, Y; Shah, K; Stevens, RM, 2015)
"Apremilast's effect on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis was evaluated in a phase IIb randomized, controlled trial (NCT00773734)."9.17Improvements in patient-reported outcomes with apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis: results from a phase IIb randomized, controlled study. ( Day, RM; Fiorentino, D; Hu, C; Papp, KA; Stevens, RM; Strand, V, 2013)
" Patients with recalcitrant plaque psoriasis received apremilast 20 mg BID for 12 weeks."9.17Efficacy, tolerability, and pharmacodynamics of apremilast in recalcitrant plaque psoriasis: a phase II open-label study. ( Day, RM; Gottlieb, AB; Hu, C; Krueger, JG; Leonardi, CL; Matheson, RT; Menter, A; Schafer, PH, 2013)
"Assess apremilast efficacy and safety in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis."9.17Efficacy and safety of apremilast in subjects with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: results from a phase II, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-comparison study. ( Hu, C; Kaufmann, R; Papp, KA; Rohane, P; Sutherland, D; Thaçi, D, 2013)
"Apremilast, a small-molecule inhibitor of phosphodiesterase 4, works intracellularly to modulate proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory mediator production, and doses of 20 mg twice daily have shown efficacy in the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in a 12-week phase 2 study."9.16Efficacy of apremilast in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis: a randomised controlled trial. ( Cather, JC; Day, RM; Hu, C; Langley, RG; Matheson, RT; Papp, K; Rosoph, L; Sofen, H, 2012)
"To evaluate the clinical and biological activity of apremilast in patients with severe plaque-type psoriasis."9.13An open-label, single-arm pilot study in patients with severe plaque-type psoriasis treated with an oral anti-inflammatory agent, apremilast. ( Gottlieb, AB; Hu, CC; Kipnis, C; Krueger, JG; Rohane, P; Strober, B; Zeldis, JB, 2008)
"Following a review of the literature, a panel of dermatologists with expertise in the management of psoriasis considered 5 scenarios in which the evidence supporting the use of apremilast to treat moderate psoriasis is insufficient or controversial."9.05The Use of Apremilast in Psoriasis: A Delphi Study. ( Ara, M; Belinchón, I; Bustinduy, M; Carrascosa, JM; Herranz, P; Rivera, R, 2020)
"Apremilast is a small-molecule inhibitor of phosphodiesterase 4 with an intracellular mechanism of action that increases levels of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) indicated for the oral treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis and for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis."9.05Apremilast for psoriasis treatment. ( Carrascosa, JM; Del-Alcazar, E, 2020)
"To review the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of apremilast and determine its role relative to other agents in the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis."8.93Apremilast: A Novel Drug for Treatment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis. ( Bank, M; Haber, SL; Hamilton, S; Leong, SY; Pierce, E, 2016)
"As part of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence's (NICE) single technology appraisal (STA) process, apremilast was assessed to determine the clinical and cost effectiveness of its use in the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in two patient populations, differentiated by the severity of the patient's Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) score."8.93Apremilast for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A Critique of the Evidence. ( Hinde, S; Palmer, S; Spackman, E; Wade, R; Woolacott, N, 2016)
"Apremilast is an effective and well-tolerated option in treating moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis."8.93Pharmacodynamic assessment of apremilast for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. ( Bianchi, L; Chimenti, S; Chiricozzi, A; Del Duca, E; Romanelli, M; Saraceno, R, 2016)
"To our knowledge, no clinical trials directly compare apremilast with methotrexate (the standard of care for initial systemic treatment of psoriasis)."8.93Comparative efficacy and incremental cost per responder of methotrexate versus apremilast for methotrexate-naïve patients with psoriasis. ( Armstrong, AW; Betts, KA; Signorovitch, JE; Sundaram, M; Thomason, D, 2016)
"Apremilast (Otezla(®)) is an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor indicated for the twice-daily treatment of adults with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA)."8.91Apremilast: A Review in Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis. ( Deeks, ED, 2015)
"This review reported the latest data available from Phase I, II and III trials on apremilast for the treatment of plaque psoriasis."8.91Apremilast for the treatment of psoriasis. ( Bianchi, L; Buonomo, O; Chimenti, MS; Chimenti, S; Chiricozzi, A; Garofalo, V; Gramiccia, T; Perricone, R; Saraceno, R, 2015)
"We reviewed phase III randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial results for apremilast and tofacitinib for efficacy and safety in psoriasis."8.91Emerging Oral Immunomodulators for the Treatment of Psoriasis: A Review of Phase III Clinical Trials for Apremilast and Tofacitinib. ( Koo, J; Levin, E; McAndrew, R, 2015)
"We report the real-life use of apremilast (APR) in patients with psoriasis and recent cancer."8.31Real-life use of apremilast for the treatment of psoriasis in patients with oncological comorbidities: a retrospective descriptive multicentre study in France. ( Azib, S; Becquart, C; Cottencin, AC; Darras, S; Dezoteux, F; Duparc, A; Faiz, S; Florin, V; Lehembre, SD; Podevin, P; Staumont-Salle, D, 2023)
"Apremilast is approved for the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis."8.12Real-Life Effectiveness of Apremilast for the Treatment of Psoriasis in Belgium: Results From the Observational OTELO Study. ( de la Brassinne, M; Ghislain, PD; Hillary, T; Lam Hoai, XL; Lambert, J; Roquet-Gravy, PP; Segaert, S, 2022)
"Real-world data in patients with moderate psoriasis treated with apremilast is limited."8.12A real-world, non-interventional, prospective study of the effectiveness and safety of apremilast in bio-naïve adults with moderate plaque psoriasis treated in the routine care in Greece - the 'APRAISAL' study. ( Anagnostopoulos, Z; Anastasiadis, G; Antonakopoulos, N; Aronis, P; Bassukas, I; Chasapi, V; Drosos, A; Ioannides, D; Kalinou, C; Kekki, A; Krasagakis, K; Lazaridou, E; Lefaki, I; Neofotistou, O; Oikonomou, C; Papadavid, E; Papageorgiou, M; Papakonstantis, M; Pokas, E; Protopapa, A; Rigopoulos, D; Rovithi, E; Tampouratzi, E; Zafiriou, E, 2022)
"There is limited evidence about the real-world survival of apremilast in patients with psoriasis, especially over the long term."8.12Retrospective study of apremilast drug survival in psoriasis patients in a daily practice setting: A long-term experience. ( Bordallo-Landa, J; Galache-Osuna, C; Lozano, A; Reyes-García, S; Salgueiro, E; Santos-Juanes, J; Vázquez-López, F, 2022)
"This real-world safety analysis was requested by the European Medicines Agency following approval of apremilast, an oral treatment for psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis."8.12Safety of Apremilast in Patients with Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis: Findings from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. ( Cordey, M; Jick, S; Paris, M; Persson, R, 2022)
"Apremilast showed fast and sustained improvement of nail psoriasis over time and a complete resolution of life quality impairment due to the disease."8.12Apremilast as a target therapy for nail psoriasis: a real-life observational study proving its efficacy in restoring the nail unit. ( Bianchi, L; Campione, E; Cesaroni, GM; Gaziano, R; Lanna, C; Marino, D; Mazzilli, S; Vollono, L, 2022)
"Apremilast is an oral phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor used for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis."8.12Long-Term Effectiveness and Drug Survival of Apremilast in Treating Psoriasis: A Real-World Experience. ( Cazzaniga, S; Distel, J; Emelianov, V; Heidemeyer, K; Schlapbach, C; Seyed Jafari, SM; Yawalkar, N, 2022)
"Apremilast is a small molecule approved for the treatment of plaques psoriasis and adult psoriatic arthritis."8.02Long-term efficacy and safety of apremilast in the treatment of plaques psoriasis: A real-world, single-center experience. ( Bobyr, I; Campanati, A; Diotallevi, F; Giannoni, M; Martina, E; Offidani, A; Radi, G; Rizzetto, G, 2021)
"Real-world treatment patterns among psoriasis patients with and without psoriatic arthritis (PsA) newly initiating treatment with a biologic or apremilast were assessed."8.02Real-world biologic and apremilast treatment patterns in patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. ( Feldman, SR; Hoit Marchlewicz, E; Lopez-Gonzalez, L; Martinez, DJ; Mendelsohn, AM; Shrady, G; Zhang, J; Zhao, Y, 2021)
"To compare treatment patterns and costs among psoriasis patients with and without metabolic conditions newly initiating a biologic or apremilast."8.02Real-world treatment patterns and healthcare costs of biologics and apremilast among patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis by metabolic condition status. ( Feldman, SR; Lopez-Gonzalez, L; Marchlewicz, EH; Martinez, DJ; Mendelsohn, AM; Shrady, G; Zhang, J; Zhao, Y, 2021)
"Apremilast has been approved as an effective and safe treatment for psoriasis, but clinical trial results may differ from real-life data."8.02Is apremilast for psoriasis as effective and safe as reported in clinical trials? Five-year experience from a Greek tertiary hospital: long-term real-life efficacy and safety of apremilast in Greece. ( Bakirtzi, K; Ioannides, D; Lallas, A; Papadimitriou, I; Sideris, N; Sotiriou, E; Tsentemeidou, A; Vakirlis, E, 2021)
"Apremilast is an oral phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor indicated for patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis and active psoriatic arthritis."8.02Effectiveness and safety of apremilast in biologic-naïve patients with moderate psoriasis treated in routine clinical practice in Greece: the APRAISAL study. ( Anagnostopoulos, Z; Anastasiadis, G; Antonakopoulos, N; Antoniou, C; Aronis, P; Bassukas, I; Chasapi, V; Drosos, A; Georgiou, S; Ioannides, D; Ioannidou, D; Katsantonis, I; Krasagakis, K; Lazaridou, E; Lefaki, I; Neofotistou, O; Papageorgiou, M; Papakonstantis, M; Patsatsi, A; Protopapa, A; Rigopoulos, D; Roussaki-Schulze, AV; Satra, F, 2021)
"Apremilast is an oral selective phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor developed recently for psoriasis treatment."8.02Effectiveness of Apremilast in Real Life in Patients with Psoriasis: A Longitudinal Study. ( D'Arrigo, G; Malara, G; Politi, C; Testa, A; Trifirò, C; Tripepi, G; Verduci, C, 2021)
"Specific studies on apremilast for nail psoriasis are lacking."8.02Apremilast improves quality of life and ultrasonography parameters in patients with nail psoriasis: A prospective cohort study. ( Guilabert, A; Muñoz-Santos, C; Sola-Ortigosa, J; Vidal, D, 2021)
"Apremilast is an orally available phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor used for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis."8.02Population pharmacokinetic and exposure-response analysis of apremilast in Japanese subjects with moderate to severe psoriasis. ( Imafuku, S; Kassir, N; Komine, M; Nemoto, O; Ohtsuki, M; Okubo, Y; Petric, R, 2021)
"To quantify the risk of incident treated anxiety, depression and mixed anxiety + depression in users of apremilast compared with users of other treatments for psoriasis and PsA."7.96The risk of treated anxiety and treated depression among patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis treated with apremilast compared to biologics, DMARDs and corticosteroids: a cohort study in the United States MarketScan database. ( Hagberg, KW; Jick, S; Persson, R; Vasilakis-Scaramozza, C, 2020)
"Little has been published on the real-world effectiveness and safety of apremilast in psoriasis."7.96Real-world effectiveness and safety of apremilast in psoriasis at 52 weeks: a retrospective, observational, multicentre study by the Spanish Psoriasis Group. ( Armesto, S; Belinchón, I; Carrascosa, JM; Carretero, G; Del Alcázar, E; Ferran, M; Herranz, P; Herrera-Acosta, E; Hospital, M; Llamas, M; López-Ferrer, A; Martín, I; Mitxelena, MJ; Mollet, J; Montesinos, E; Muñoz, C; Pérez-Barrio, S; Rivera, R; Ruiz-Genao, DP; Ruiz-Villaverde, R; Sahuquillo-Torralba, A; Suárez-Pérez, JA; Valentí, F; Vidal, D; Vilarrasa, E, 2020)
"We synthesized a thalidomide analog containing the benzyl chloride group (2-[1-(3-chlorobenzyl)-2,6-dioxopiperidin-3-yl]isoindoline-1,3-dione, CDI) to examine anti-inflammatory activity against psoriasis."7.96Facile skin targeting of a thalidomide analog containing benzyl chloride moiety alleviates experimental psoriasis via the suppression of MAPK/NF-κB/AP-1 phosphorylation in keratinocytes. ( Alalaiwe, A; Fang, JY; Lin, ZC; Tang, KW; Tseng, CH; Wang, PW, 2020)
"Apremilast is a drug recently developed for psoriasis."7.96Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Apremilast in Older Patients with Psoriasis. ( Bastien, M; Beauchet, A; Begon, E; Beneton, N; Boulard, C; Chaby, G; Cinotti, E; Delaunay, J; Fougerousse, AC; Maccari, F; Mahé, E; Mery-Bossard, L; Parier, J; Phan, C; Prignano, F; Reguiai, Z; Romanelli, M; Samimi, M; Thomas-Beaulieu, D, 2020)
"Apremilast is the first small molecule approved for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis in adult patients."7.96Comorbidities burden and previous exposure to biological agents may predict drug survival of apremilast for psoriasis in a real-world setting. ( Dalamaga, M; Kapniari, E; Papadavid, E, 2020)
"To assess and compare the long-term persistence of apremilast and methotrexate in a large cohort of patients with psoriasis."7.96Persistence of apremilast in moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a real-world analysis of 14 147 apremilast- and methotrexate-naive patients in the French National Health Insurance database. ( Billionnet, C; Maura, G; Mezzarobba, M; Sbidian, E; Weill, A, 2020)
"Biologics and apremilast have advanced psoriasis management by adding treatment options."7.91Real-world US healthcare costs of psoriasis for biologic-naive patients initiating apremilast or biologics. ( Bonafede, MM; Brouillette, MA; Feldman, SR; Mehta, RK; Pelletier, CL; Smith, D; Wilson, KL, 2019)
"The aim of the study was to determine the safety of apremilast in combination of biologic therapies in the treatment of plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis."7.91Combination Therapy of Apremilast and Biologic Agent as a Safe Option of Psoriatic Arthritis and Psoriasis. ( Chen, C; Gettas, T; Messiah, R; Metyas, S; Quismorio, A; Tomassian, C, 2019)
"This study compared real-world treatment patterns and healthcare costs among biologic-naive psoriasis patients initiating apremilast or biologics."7.91Real-world treatment patterns and healthcare costs among biologic-naive patients initiating apremilast or biologics for the treatment of psoriasis. ( Pelletier, C; Tian, M; Ung, B; Wu, JJ, 2019)
"Ex vivo stimulated cell analysis identified that post-apremilast (IL-10+CD19+) B10 cells were increased in all PsA and psoriasis patients and correlated with psoriatic skin and joint clinical improvement."7.91Apremilast increases IL-10-producing regulatory B cells and decreases proinflammatory T cells and innate cells in psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis. ( Bogdanos, DP; Brotis, AG; Katsiari, CG; Liaskos, C; Mavropoulos, A; Roussaki-Schulze, A; Sakkas, LI; Simopoulou, T; Zafiriou, E, 2019)
"Apremilast is a novel oral phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor approved for psoriasis treatment."7.88Apremilast in psoriasis - a prospective real-world study. ( Herman, R; Monshi, B; Posch, C; Rappersberger, K; Richter, L; Sanlorenzo, M; Vujic, I, 2018)
"The total psoriasis area and severity index scores in the moderate- and high-dose thalidomide and acitretin groups decreased significantly (p<0."7.88Thalidomide Improves Psoriasis-like Lesions and Inhibits Cutaneous VEGF Expression without Alteration of Microvessel Density in Imiquimod- induced Psoriatic Mouse Model. ( Gao, Q; Liu, JH; Luo, DQ; Wang, F; Wu, HH; Zhao, YK, 2018)
"We analysed and report the efficacy and safety of apremilast in the first 51 patients with psoriasis that have undergone treatment with this novel small molecule in our outpatient clinic."7.88Real-world data on the efficacy and safety of apremilast in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. ( Kokkalis, G; Papadavid, E; Rigopoulos, D; Rompoti, N; Theodoropoulos, K, 2018)
"Apremilast is a novel oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor effective for psoriasis."7.88Real-world use of apremilast for patients with psoriasis in Japan. ( Hioki, T; Kamiya, K; Kishimoto, M; Komine, M; Ohtsuki, M; Sugai, J, 2018)
"OBJECTIVE: To examine real-world use and patient outcomes with apremilast, an oral PDE4 inhibitor, in the dermatology practice set-ting for treatment of patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis."7.85Real-World Clinical Experience With Apremilast in a Large US Retrospective Cohort Study of Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis. ( Armstrong, A; Levi, E, 2017)
"Apremilast is an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor that has been approved as monotherapy for the treatment of moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis."7.83Use of Apremilast in Combination With Other Therapies for Treatment of Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: A Retrospective Study. ( AbuHilal, M; Shear, N; Walsh, S, 2016)
"We reviewed the results of the phase IIb and phase III clinical trials for apremilast in treating nail and scalp psoriasis."7.83Improvement of Nail and Scalp Psoriasis Using Apremilast in Patients With Chronic Psoriasis: Phase 2b and 3, 52-Week Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial Results. ( Beroukhim, K; Danesh, M; Koo, J; Leon, A; Nguyen, CM; Wu, JJ, 2016)
"We report a 67-year-old Caucasian man with a long-term history of recalcitrant plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis who was initiated on a treatment regimen of apremilast and secukinumab after failing multiple topical, photo, and systemic therapies."7.83Apremilast and Secukinumab Combined Therapy in a Patient With Recalcitrant Plaque Psoriasis. ( Goldminz, AM; Gottlieb, AB; Greb, JE; McQuade, B; Rothstein, BE, 2016)
"A 54-year-old woman developed psoriasis on the plantar surface of her feet after 2 weeks of thalidomide 100 mg daily for the treatment of multiple IgG myeloma."7.80Psoriasis induced by thalidomide in a patient with multiple myeloma. ( Alaibac, M; Ferrazzi, A; Russo, I; Zambello, R, 2014)
"Apremilast is an orally administered phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, currently in phase 2 clinical studies of psoriasis and other chronic inflammatory diseases."7.76Apremilast, a cAMP phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, demonstrates anti-inflammatory activity in vitro and in a model of psoriasis. ( Adams, M; Baillie, GS; Bartlett, JB; Capone, L; Cheung, YF; Gandhi, AK; Gilhar, A; Houslay, MD; Loveland, MA; Man, HW; Muller, GW; Parton, A; Schafer, PH; Stirling, DI; Wu, L, 2010)
" The most common adverse events (≥5% of patients) through week 52 were diarrhea (28."6.87Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast in Systemic- and Biologic-Naive Patients With Moderate Plaque Psoriasis: 52-Week Results of UNVEIL. ( Bagel, J; Chen, R; Duffin, KC; Goncalves, J; Jackson, JM; Lebwohl, M; Levi, E; Stein Gold, L, 2018)
" Most common adverse events (AEs) with placebo, apremilast 20 and apremilast 30 (0-16 weeks) were nasopharyngitis (8."6.84Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in the treatment of Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Efficacy, safety and tolerability results from a phase 2b randomized controlled trial. ( Chen, P; Day, RM; Imafuku, S; Komine, M; Maroli, A; Nemoto, O; Ohtsuki, M; Okubo, Y; Petric, R, 2017)
" Most adverse events were mild or moderate; most common were diarrhea, headache, nausea, upper respiratory tract infection, decreased appetite, and vomiting."6.84Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast in Patients With Moderate Plaque Psoriasis With Lower BSA: Week 16 Results from the UNVEIL Study. ( Bagel, J; Callis Duffin, K; Chen, R; Goncalves, J; Jackson, JM; Lebwohl, M; Levi, E; Stein Gold, L; Strober, B, 2017)
"Apremilast is an oral phosphodiesterase type 4 inhibitor recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the management of plaque psoriasis."6.82Efficacy and safety of apremilast monotherapy in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. ( Alahmadi, RA; Alamri, AM; Aljefri, YE; Alkhamisi, TA; Alkhunani, TA; Alraddadi, AA; Ghaddaf, AA, 2022)
"Apremilast has been shown to improve the quality of life and reduce symptom severity in moderate to severe psoriasis."6.72Review of Apremilast Combination Therapies in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Psoriasis. ( Ivanic, MG; Liao, W; Thatiparthi, A; Walia, S; Wu, JJ, 2021)
"Apremilast is an oral, small-molecule phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor that works intracellularly by blocking the degradation of cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate, resulting in increased intracellular cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate levels in phosphodiesterase 4-expressing cells."6.58Apremilast: A Novel Oral Treatment for Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis. ( Puig, L; Torres, T, 2018)
"Apremilast is a selective PDE4 inhibitor approved for the treatment of adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis."6.58Mechanisms Underlying the Clinical Effects of Apremilast for Psoriasis. ( Augustin, M; French, LE; Krueger, JG; Pincelli, C; Schafer, PH, 2018)
"Classically, the first line of treatment for nail psoriasis has been topical medication, but the new biological drugs seem to be the most effective treatment."6.58Effective treatment of nail psoriasis with apremilast: report of two cases and review of the literature. ( Hernández-Bel, P; Magdaleno-Tapial, J; Ortiz-Salvador, JM; Subiabre-Ferrer, D; Valenzuela-Oñate, C, 2018)
"Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by erythematous plaques on extensor surfaces, scalp, and back."6.55Apremilast for the management of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. ( Alikhan, A; Vangipuram, R, 2017)
"Apremilast is a substrate of cytochrome P450 isoenzyme 3A4 and accumulates in patients with renal failure."6.53Apremilast (Otezla). No progress in plaque psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis. ( , 2016)
"Treatment with apremilast was well tolerated, with generally mild gastrointestinal complaints, which occurred early in the course of the treatment and resolved over time, and there was no requirement for laboratory test monitoring."6.52Selective Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors for Psoriasis: Focus on Apremilast. ( Gooderham, M; Papp, K, 2015)
"Apremilast has been tested in a number of psoriasis and PsA pilot and Phase II trials to evaluate its efficacy and safety."6.49New developments in the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: a focus on apremilast. ( McCann, FE; McNamee, KE; Palfreeman, AC, 2013)
"Apremilast is an oral medication that inhibits the activity of multiple inflammatory markers involved in the pathogenesis of psoriasis."6.48Apremilast as a treatment for psoriasis. ( Feldman, S; Pellerin, M; Shutty, B; West, C, 2012)
"Plaque psoriasis is a chronic disease requiring long-term therapy."5.62Real-world biologic and apremilast treatment patterns and healthcare costs in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. ( Feldman, SR; Lopez-Gonzalez, L; Marchlewicz, EH; Martinez, DJ; Mendelsohn, AM; Shrady, G; Zhang, J; Zhao, Y, 2021)
"During the 24 weeks of treatment, diarrhea was observed in four patients, and diarrhea and nausea were observed in one patient."5.56Combination therapy of apremilast and biologics in patients with psoriasis showing biologic fatigue. ( Sugai, S; Taguchi, R; Takamura, S; Teraki, Y, 2020)
"Psoriasis is a common inflammatory skin condition, affecting 2-4% of the worldwide population."5.56Real life experience of apremilast in psoriasis and arthritis psoriatic patients: Preliminary results on metabolic biomarkers. ( Bianchi, L; Campione, E; Cesaroni, GM; Chiaramonte, C; Chimenti, MS; Cosio, T; Dattola, A; Galluzzo, M; Gaziano, R; Gisondi, P; Lanna, C; Mazzilli, S; Palumbo, V; Zangrilli, A, 2020)
"Apremilast is a phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor taken orally."5.56Treatment Persistence and Safety of Apremilast in Psoriasis: Experience With 30 Patients in Routine Clinical Practice. ( Botella Estrada, R; de Unamuno Bustos, B; Monte Boquet, E; Rodríguez Serna, M; Sahuquillo-Torralba, A, 2020)
"Apremilast is a recently approved drug, belonging to the small molecule phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors, whose optimal safety and efficacy profile is somewhat affected by slow activity rate in clinical trials."5.56Clinical efficacy, speed of improvement and safety of apremilast for the treatment of adult Psoriasis during COVID-19 pandemic. ( Atzori, L; Melis, D; Mugheddu, C; Rongioletti, F; Sanna, S, 2020)
"While many treatments for psoriasis exist, few are convenient and safe long term; even if sufficiently effective, treatments themselves often decrease quality of life and make long-term treatment adherence difficult."5.51Real-world experiences of apremilast in clinics for Japanese patients with psoriasis. ( Saruwatari, H, 2019)
"To evaluate apremilast 30 mg twice daily for mild-to-moderate psoriasis."5.51Efficacy and safety of apremilast in patients with mild-to-moderate plaque psoriasis: Results of a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. ( Albrecht, L; Bhatia, N; Callis Duffin, K; Chen, M; Gooderham, M; Green, L; Papp, K; Paris, M; Pariser, D; Sofen, H; Stein Gold, L; Wang, Y, 2022)
"Plaque psoriasis has significant impact on patients' quality of life."5.51Calcipotriol plus betamethasone dipropionate aerosol foam vs. apremilast, methotrexate, acitretin or fumaric acid esters for the treatment of plaque psoriasis: a matching-adjusted indirect comparison. ( Bewley, AP; Calzavara-Pinton, PG; Hansen, JB; Nyeland, ME; Shear, NH; Signorovitch, J, 2019)
"The risk of developing a malignancy during treatment is an important consideration, and many studies have been conducted to determine the magnitude of this risk."5.51Treatment of Psoriasis With Biologics and Apremilast in Patients With a History of Malignancy: A Retrospective Chart Review ( Casseres, RG; Dumont, N; Gottlieb, AB; Her, MJ; Kahn, JS; Rosmarin, D, 2019)
"Apremilast offers treatment efficacy similar to that of methotrexate, and it may be taken while deployed because it does not require monitoring or refrigeration."5.46The Use of Apremilast to Treat Psoriasis During Deployment. ( Meyerle, J; Rosenberg, A, 2017)
"Apremilast is a phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor that regulates the transduction of intracellular signals, including pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory pathways."5.43A new therapeutic for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: apremilast. ( Cannizzaro, MV; Caposiena, D; Chimenti, S; Chiricozzi, A; Garofalo, V; Saraceno, R, 2016)
"Psoriasis is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory condition that affects 2-3% of the population."5.42Apremilast and adalimumab: a novel combination therapy for recalcitrant psoriasis. ( Beroukhim, K; Danesh, MJ; Koo, J; Levin, E; Nguyen, C, 2015)
" This chart review evaluated the use of methotrexate alone and in combination with 7 other systemic therapies in 48 patients with palmoplantar psoriasis."5.42The Use of Methotrexate, Alone or in Combination With Other Therapies, for the Treatment of Palmoplantar Psoriasis. ( Klufas, DM; Strober, BE; Wald, JM, 2015)
"Two phase 3, 52-week trials evaluated deucravacitinib 6 mg against placebo and apremilast - POETYK PSO-1 and PSO-2, enrolling 1688 patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis."5.41Deucravacitinib in the treatment of psoriasis. ( Estevinho, T; Lé, AM; Torres, T, 2023)
"After 4 months of treatment, more people taking deucravacitinib had improvements in psoriasis plaques and skin appearance than those taking placebo or apremilast."5.41Treatment of plaque psoriasis with deucravacitinib (POETYK PSO-1 study): a plain language summary. ( Armstrong, AW; Banerjee, S; Blauvelt, A; Colston, E; Gooderham, M; Imafuku, S; Kundu, S; Linaberry, M; Morita, A; Papp, KA; Schoenfeld, S; Strober, B; Szepietowski, JC; Thaçi, D; Throup, J; Warren, RB, 2023)
"After 4 months of treatment, more participants taking deucravacitinib had significantly greater improvements in psoriasis than those taking placebo or apremilast."5.41Treatment of plaque psoriasis with deucravacitinib (POETYK PSO-2 study): a plain language summary. ( Bagel, J; Banerjee, S; Colston, E; Foley, P; Gordon, KB; Kircik, L; Kundu, S; Linaberry, M; Papp, KA; Paul, C; Rich, P; Sekaran, C; Sofen, H; Strober, B; Thaçi, D; Throup, J, 2023)
"We evaluated the pharmacodynamic effects of apremilast in 69 patients who were included in biomarker subanalyses of a phase 2b study that demonstrated the long-term safety and efficacy of apremilast in Japanese adults with moderate to severe psoriasis."5.41Pharmacodynamic analysis of apremilast in Japanese patients with moderate to severe psoriasis: Results from a phase 2b randomized trial. ( Imafuku, S; Komine, M; Nemoto, O; Ohtsuki, M; Okubo, Y; Petric, R; Schafer, P, 2021)
"Apremilast treatment influences the expression of VEGF, iNOS and IDO not only by keratinocytes but also by MSCs, restoring their intrinsic profile and their natural anti-inflammatory action, and decreasing the auto-inflammatory process that underpins the development of psoriasis."5.41The efficacy of in vivo administration of Apremilast on mesenchymal stem cells derived from psoriatic patients. ( Caffarini, M; Campanati, A; Di Vincenzo, M; Diotallevi, F; Lucarini, G; Offidani, A; Orciani, M; Radi, G, 2021)
"The objective of this article was to  compare the efficacy and safety of apremilast and methotrexate in patients with palmoplantar psoriasis."5.41Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast and Methotrexate in Patients with Palmoplantar Psoriasis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. ( Dogra, S; Handa, S; Kt, S; Narang, T; Thakur, V, 2021)
"We performed a two-part study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of oral apremilast, a phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor indicated for the treatment of psoriasis, in healthy Korean adult men."5.41Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of apremilast in healthy Korean adult men. ( Choi, Y; Huh, KY; Lee, H; Liu, L; Nissel, J; Palmisano, M; Ramirez-Valle, F; Wang, X, 2021)
" Apremilast is a phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor that has proven effective in the therapy of psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis and in oral ulcers associated with Behcet's disease."5.41A multicentre open-label study of apremilast in palmoplantar pustulosis (APLANTUS). ( Gerdes, S; Kromer, C; Linker, C; Magnolo, N; Mössner, R; Reich, K; Sabat, R; Wilsmann-Theis, D, 2021)
"In patients with moderate-to-severe and severe psoriasis and high efficacy of therapy (PASI≥75) with signaling pathway inhibitors (apremilast, tofacitinib), cytokine spectra in the skin and blood plasma were studied using xMAP technology at baseline and on weeks 14 and 26 of treatment."5.41The Effect of Janus Kinase Inhibitors and Phosphodiesterase-4 Inhibitors on Skin and Plasma Cytokine Levels in Patients with Psoriasis. ( Artamonova, OG; Karamova, AE; Kubanov, AA; Nikonorov, AA; Vasileva, EL; Verbenko, DA, 2021)
"This study aims to identify the indices which predict the efficacy of apremilast in psoriasis, and to investigate the impact of metabolic activity in immune cells on the psoriatic pathogenesis."5.41Serum lactate dehydrogenase level as a possible predictor of treatment preference in psoriasis. ( Fujimoto, M; Fujisawa, Y; Furuta, J; Inoue, S; Ishitsuka, Y; Koguchi-Yoshioka, H; Matsumura, Y; Matsuzaka, T; Nakamura, Y; Okiyama, N; Shimano, H; Watanabe, R, 2021)
"Apremilast is an orally available targeted PDE4 inhibitor that modulates a wide array of inflammatory mediators involved in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, including decreases in the expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase, TNF-α, and interleukin (IL)-23 and increases IL-10."5.38Apremilast mechanism of action and application to psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. ( Schafer, P, 2012)
"To evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in pediatric patients with psoriasis."5.34Pharmacokinetics and safety of apremilast in pediatric patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Results from a phase 2 open-label study. ( Barcellona, C; Becker, EM; de Lucas, R; Fiorillo, L; Hong, Y; Maes, P; Paller, AS; Paris, M; Zhang, W; Zhang, Z, 2020)
" Here, we present the largest plasma proteomic biomarker dataset available to-date and the corresponding analyses from placebo-controlled Phase III clinical trials of the phosphodiesterase type 4 inhibitor apremilast in psoriasis (PSOR), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) from 526 subjects overall."5.34Large-scale Analyses of Disease Biomarkers and Apremilast Pharmacodynamic Effects. ( Ai, J; Eisinger, D; LaBrie, ST; Medvedeva, IV; Schafer, P; Stokes, ME; Trotter, MWB; Yang, R, 2020)
"To evaluate the efficacy and safety of apremilast for moderate to severe scalp psoriasis."5.34Efficacy and safety of apremilast in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis of the scalp: Results of a phase 3b, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. ( Cauthen, A; Lebwohl, M; Lynde, C; Paris, M; Sofen, H; Stein Gold, L; Strober, B; Tyring, S; Van Voorhees, AS; Wang, Y; Zhang, Z, 2020)
"064% (Cal/BD) foam to oral apremilast in treating moderate plaque psoriasis."5.34Efficacy and Safety of Calcipotriene 0.005%/Betamethasone Dipropionate 0.064% Foam With Apremilast for Moderate Plaque Psoriasis. ( Kircik, LH; Schlesinger, TE; Tanghetti, E, 2020)
"Adults (≥18 years of age) with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (baseline PGA ≥3, BSA affected ≥10%, PASI ≥12) took oral apremilast (30 mg twice daily) for 8 weeks."5.34Apremilast with Add-On Calcipotriene/Betamethasone Dipropionate for Treating Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis. ( Bagel, J; Hetzel, A; Nelson, E; Riley, C, 2020)
"Pharmacodynamic (PD) subanalyses of clinical trials in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis demonstrated the efficacy of apremilast correlated with reductions in cytokines involved in the pathogenesis of psoriasis."5.30Apremilast mechanism of efficacy in systemic-naive patients with moderate plaque psoriasis: Pharmacodynamic results from the UNVEIL study. ( Alikhan, A; Cirulli, J; Lockshin, B; Schafer, P; Shi, R; Strober, B, 2019)
"The main objectives of this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study were to assess the efficacy and impact on quality of life and work productivity of apremilast for the treatment of moderate-to-severe palmoplantar psoriasis."5.27Apremilast for the treatment of moderate-to-severe palmoplantar psoriasis: results from a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study. ( Barber, K; Bissonnette, R; Bukhalo, M; Delorme, I; Fowler, JF; Gagné-Henley, A; Gooderham, M; Haydey, R; Jenkin, P; Landells, I; Lynde, CW; Pariser, DM; Poulin, Y; Rosoph, LA, 2018)
"Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis."5.27Safety and efficacy of apremilast through 104 weeks in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis who continued on apremilast or switched from etanercept treatment: findings from the LIBERATE study. ( Bewley, A; Chen, R; Cirulli, J; Gooderham, M; Green, L; Marcsisin, J; Petric, R; Piguet, V; Reich, K; Soung, J, 2018)
"Randomized, controlled trials demonstrated efficacy and safety of apremilast for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis."5.24Long-term safety and tolerability of apremilast in patients with psoriasis: Pooled safety analysis for ≥156 weeks from 2 phase 3, randomized, controlled trials (ESTEEM 1 and 2). ( Cather, JC; Chen, R; Crowley, J; Day, RM; Ferrándiz, C; Goncalves, J; Joly, P; Papp, KA; Peris, K; Shah, K; Thaçi, D, 2017)
"The combination of apremilast with NB-UVB was effective for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, without any unexpected safety signals."5.24Apremilast and Narrowband Ultraviolet-B Combination Therapy for Treating Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis. ( Bagel, J; Keegan, BR; Nelson, E, 2017)
"Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, has an acceptable safety profile and is effective for treatment of plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis."5.24Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, improves patient-reported outcomes in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis: results of two phase III randomized, controlled trials. ( Chen, R; Feldman, SR; Foley, P; Kimball, A; Levi, E; Poulin, Y; Thaçi, D, 2017)
"Apremilast, an oral, small-molecule phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis."5.24The efficacy and safety of apremilast, etanercept and placebo in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: 52-week results from a phase IIIb, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (LIBERATE). ( Bewley, A; Day, RM; Goncalves, J; Gooderham, M; Green, L; Khanskaya, I; Piguet, V; Reich, K; Shah, K; Soung, J; Zhang, Z, 2017)
" Inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of psoriasis, age ≥ 18 years, concomitant treatment with apremilast and a specified biologic agent, and available safety and/or efficacy results."5.22Combination Therapy with Apremilast and Biologics for Psoriasis: A Systematic Review. ( Alinaghi, F; Egeberg, A; Gyldenløve, M; Skov, L; Zachariae, C, 2022)
"Apremilast, a small molecule that acts by inhibition of the phosphodiesterase-4 enzyme, has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the management of psoriatic arthritis, plaque psoriasis and Behçet disease."5.22Evolving utility of apremilast in dermatological disorders for off-label indications. ( Dogra, S; Mehta, H; Sharma, A, 2022)
"This review article serves to compare global dermatologic organizations and the available clinical practice guidelines for the use of apremilast in the treatment of psoriasis."5.22Comparison of psoriasis guidelines for use of apremilast in the United States and Europe: a critical appraisal and comprehensive review. ( Ghamrawi, RI; Ghiam, N; Wu, JJ, 2022)
"In the phase III double-blind Efficacy and Safety Trial Evaluating the Effects of Apremilast in Psoriasis (ESTEEM) 1 and 2, apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, demonstrated efficacy in moderate to severe psoriasis."5.22Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in patients with difficult-to-treat nail and scalp psoriasis: Results of 2 phase III randomized, controlled trials (ESTEEM 1 and ESTEEM 2). ( Bachelez, H; Chen, R; Crowley, J; Day, RM; Goncalves, J; Gooderham, M; Rich, P, 2016)
" The effects of apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase inhibitor, on pruritus, skin discomfort/pain, and patient global assessment of psoriasis disease activity (PgAPDA) were assessed in moderate/severe chronic plaque psoriasis patients in the phase 3 ESTEEM trials."5.22Effects of Apremilast on Pruritus and Skin Discomfort/Pain Correlate With Improvements in Quality of Life in Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis. ( Chen, R; Day, RM; Foley, P; Girolomoni, G; Goncalves, J; Mrowietz, U; Sobell, JM; Toth, D; Yosipovitch, G, 2016)
"We evaluated the efficacy and safety of apremilast in palmoplantar psoriasis."5.22Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, in the treatment of palmoplantar psoriasis: Results of a pooled analysis from phase II PSOR-005 and phase III Efficacy and Safety Trial Evaluating the Effects of Apremilast in Psoriasis (ESTEEM) clinical ( Bissonnette, R; Chen, R; Day, RM; Goncalves, J; Pariser, DM; Sebastian, M; Wasel, NR, 2016)
"ESTEEM 1 evaluated efficacy/safety of apremilast at 30 mg twice a day for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis."5.20Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor, in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Results of a phase III, randomized, controlled trial (Efficacy and Safety Trial Evaluating the Effects of Apremilast in Psoriasis [ESTEEM] 1). ( Chimenti, S; Day, RM; Gordon, KB; Griffiths, CE; Hu, C; Kircik, L; Korman, NJ; Langley, RG; Leonardi, CL; Papp, K; Reich, K; Stevens, RM, 2015)
"Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, regulates immune responses associated with psoriasis."5.20Efficacy and safety of apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis over 52 weeks: a phase III, randomized controlled trial (ESTEEM 2). ( Cather, J; Crowley, J; Day, RM; Ferrandiz, C; Girolomoni, G; Gooderham, M; Gottlieb, AB; Hu, C; Mrowietz, U; Paul, C; Poulin, Y; Shah, K; Stevens, RM, 2015)
"Apremilast's effect on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis was evaluated in a phase IIb randomized, controlled trial (NCT00773734)."5.17Improvements in patient-reported outcomes with apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis: results from a phase IIb randomized, controlled study. ( Day, RM; Fiorentino, D; Hu, C; Papp, KA; Stevens, RM; Strand, V, 2013)
" Patients with recalcitrant plaque psoriasis received apremilast 20 mg BID for 12 weeks."5.17Efficacy, tolerability, and pharmacodynamics of apremilast in recalcitrant plaque psoriasis: a phase II open-label study. ( Day, RM; Gottlieb, AB; Hu, C; Krueger, JG; Leonardi, CL; Matheson, RT; Menter, A; Schafer, PH, 2013)
"Assess apremilast efficacy and safety in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis."5.17Efficacy and safety of apremilast in subjects with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: results from a phase II, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-comparison study. ( Hu, C; Kaufmann, R; Papp, KA; Rohane, P; Sutherland, D; Thaçi, D, 2013)
"Apremilast, a small-molecule inhibitor of phosphodiesterase 4, works intracellularly to modulate proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory mediator production, and doses of 20 mg twice daily have shown efficacy in the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in a 12-week phase 2 study."5.16Efficacy of apremilast in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis: a randomised controlled trial. ( Cather, JC; Day, RM; Hu, C; Langley, RG; Matheson, RT; Papp, K; Rosoph, L; Sofen, H, 2012)
"To evaluate the clinical and biological activity of apremilast in patients with severe plaque-type psoriasis."5.13An open-label, single-arm pilot study in patients with severe plaque-type psoriasis treated with an oral anti-inflammatory agent, apremilast. ( Gottlieb, AB; Hu, CC; Kipnis, C; Krueger, JG; Rohane, P; Strober, B; Zeldis, JB, 2008)
"To evaluate the relationship between psoriasis severity, disease characteristics and achievement of PASI ≤2 with apremilast in a pooled analysis of the phase 3 ESTEEM 1 and 2 (NCT01194219 and NCT01232283), phase 3b LIBERATE (NCT01690299) and phase 4 UNVEIL (NCT02425826) clinical trials."5.12Effect of baseline disease severity on achievement of treatment target with apremilast: results from a pooled analysis. ( Bagel, J; Griffiths, CEM; Guerette, B; Lebwohl, M; Menter, A; Mrowietz, U; Nunez Gomez, N; Reich, K; Shi, R; Strober, B, 2021)
"Treatment agents, such as Dupilumab and Apremilast are traditionally indicated for integumentary conditions, such as atopic dermatitis and psoriasis, respectively."5.12Comparison of structural components and functional mechanisms within the skin vs. the conjunctival surface. ( Bielory, L; Norris, MR; Valentine, L, 2021)
"Following a review of the literature, a panel of dermatologists with expertise in the management of psoriasis considered 5 scenarios in which the evidence supporting the use of apremilast to treat moderate psoriasis is insufficient or controversial."5.05The Use of Apremilast in Psoriasis: A Delphi Study. ( Ara, M; Belinchón, I; Bustinduy, M; Carrascosa, JM; Herranz, P; Rivera, R, 2020)
"Apremilast is a small-molecule inhibitor of phosphodiesterase 4 with an intracellular mechanism of action that increases levels of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) indicated for the oral treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis and for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis."5.05Apremilast for psoriasis treatment. ( Carrascosa, JM; Del-Alcazar, E, 2020)
"Apremilast is an oral inhibitor of phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) that is licensed for the second-line treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis."5.01[Gastrointestinal side effects of apremilast : Characterization and management]. ( Beigel, F; Beissert, S; Gerdes, S; Homey, B; Körber, A; Mössner, R; Pinter, A; Radtke, MA; Staubach-Renz, P, 2019)
"This review evaluates the safety of newer treatments approved for psoriasis, including interleukin-(IL)-17 inhibitors, IL-23/p19 inhibitors, ustekinumab, certolizumab pegol and apremilast, using phases III and IV clinical trial data."5.01A safety review of recent advancements in the treatment of psoriasis: analysis of clinical trial safety data. ( Cline, A; Feldman, SR; Kepley, AL; Kolli, SS, 2019)
"To review the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of apremilast and determine its role relative to other agents in the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis."4.93Apremilast: A Novel Drug for Treatment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis. ( Bank, M; Haber, SL; Hamilton, S; Leong, SY; Pierce, E, 2016)
"As part of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence's (NICE) single technology appraisal (STA) process, apremilast was assessed to determine the clinical and cost effectiveness of its use in the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in two patient populations, differentiated by the severity of the patient's Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) score."4.93Apremilast for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A Critique of the Evidence. ( Hinde, S; Palmer, S; Spackman, E; Wade, R; Woolacott, N, 2016)
"Apremilast is an effective and well-tolerated option in treating moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis."4.93Pharmacodynamic assessment of apremilast for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. ( Bianchi, L; Chimenti, S; Chiricozzi, A; Del Duca, E; Romanelli, M; Saraceno, R, 2016)
"To our knowledge, no clinical trials directly compare apremilast with methotrexate (the standard of care for initial systemic treatment of psoriasis)."4.93Comparative efficacy and incremental cost per responder of methotrexate versus apremilast for methotrexate-naïve patients with psoriasis. ( Armstrong, AW; Betts, KA; Signorovitch, JE; Sundaram, M; Thomason, D, 2016)
"Despite the recent FDA approval of apremilast, the development of new oral treatments for moderate-to-severe psoriasis has not kept pace with biologic therapies."4.91Emerging oral drugs for psoriasis. ( Mahmood, T; Menter, A; Zaghi, D, 2015)
"Apremilast (Otezla(®)) is an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor indicated for the twice-daily treatment of adults with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA)."4.91Apremilast: A Review in Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis. ( Deeks, ED, 2015)
"This review reported the latest data available from Phase I, II and III trials on apremilast for the treatment of plaque psoriasis."4.91Apremilast for the treatment of psoriasis. ( Bianchi, L; Buonomo, O; Chimenti, MS; Chimenti, S; Chiricozzi, A; Garofalo, V; Gramiccia, T; Perricone, R; Saraceno, R, 2015)
"We reviewed phase III randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial results for apremilast and tofacitinib for efficacy and safety in psoriasis."4.91Emerging Oral Immunomodulators for the Treatment of Psoriasis: A Review of Phase III Clinical Trials for Apremilast and Tofacitinib. ( Koo, J; Levin, E; McAndrew, R, 2015)
"We did a non-systematic analysis of literature on phosphodiesterase inhibition followed by a review of published information on apremilast and topical AN2728 and their use for psoriasis and atopic dermatitis."4.90A review of phosphodiesterase-inhibition and the potential role for phosphodiesterase 4-inhibitors in clinical dermatology. ( Feldman, SR; Moustafa, F, 2014)
"We report the real-life use of apremilast (APR) in patients with psoriasis and recent cancer."4.31Real-life use of apremilast for the treatment of psoriasis in patients with oncological comorbidities: a retrospective descriptive multicentre study in France. ( Azib, S; Becquart, C; Cottencin, AC; Darras, S; Dezoteux, F; Duparc, A; Faiz, S; Florin, V; Lehembre, SD; Podevin, P; Staumont-Salle, D, 2023)
"Apremilast is approved for the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis."4.12Real-Life Effectiveness of Apremilast for the Treatment of Psoriasis in Belgium: Results From the Observational OTELO Study. ( de la Brassinne, M; Ghislain, PD; Hillary, T; Lam Hoai, XL; Lambert, J; Roquet-Gravy, PP; Segaert, S, 2022)
"To explore how clinicians' personal models inform shared decision making and consultation style in managing people living with psoriasis in the context of a new treatment, Apremilast."4.12How do dermatologists' personal models inform a patient-centred approach to management: a qualitative study using the example of prescribing a new treatment (Apremilast). ( Augustin, M; Blome, C; Bundy, C; Chachos, E; Griffiths, CEM; Hewitt, RM; Kleyn, CE; Newi, AL; Sommer, R, 2022)
"Real-world data in patients with moderate psoriasis treated with apremilast is limited."4.12A real-world, non-interventional, prospective study of the effectiveness and safety of apremilast in bio-naïve adults with moderate plaque psoriasis treated in the routine care in Greece - the 'APRAISAL' study. ( Anagnostopoulos, Z; Anastasiadis, G; Antonakopoulos, N; Aronis, P; Bassukas, I; Chasapi, V; Drosos, A; Ioannides, D; Kalinou, C; Kekki, A; Krasagakis, K; Lazaridou, E; Lefaki, I; Neofotistou, O; Oikonomou, C; Papadavid, E; Papageorgiou, M; Papakonstantis, M; Pokas, E; Protopapa, A; Rigopoulos, D; Rovithi, E; Tampouratzi, E; Zafiriou, E, 2022)
"There is limited evidence about the real-world survival of apremilast in patients with psoriasis, especially over the long term."4.12Retrospective study of apremilast drug survival in psoriasis patients in a daily practice setting: A long-term experience. ( Bordallo-Landa, J; Galache-Osuna, C; Lozano, A; Reyes-García, S; Salgueiro, E; Santos-Juanes, J; Vázquez-López, F, 2022)
"Apremilast is an oral small molecule approved for the treatment of psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis and oral ulcers associated with Behçet's disease."4.12Apremilast and biologics: Characteristics of patients treated with apremilast before, during, or after a biological treatment. ( García-Verdú, E; González-Cañete, M; Lario, AR; Medina-Montalvo, S; Pinto-Pulido, EL; Piteiro-Bermejo, AB; Polo-Rodríguez, I; Trasobares-Marugán, L; Vega-Díez, D, 2022)
"This real-world safety analysis was requested by the European Medicines Agency following approval of apremilast, an oral treatment for psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis."4.12Safety of Apremilast in Patients with Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis: Findings from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. ( Cordey, M; Jick, S; Paris, M; Persson, R, 2022)
"Apremilast showed fast and sustained improvement of nail psoriasis over time and a complete resolution of life quality impairment due to the disease."4.12Apremilast as a target therapy for nail psoriasis: a real-life observational study proving its efficacy in restoring the nail unit. ( Bianchi, L; Campione, E; Cesaroni, GM; Gaziano, R; Lanna, C; Marino, D; Mazzilli, S; Vollono, L, 2022)
"Apremilast is an oral phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor used for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis."4.12Long-Term Effectiveness and Drug Survival of Apremilast in Treating Psoriasis: A Real-World Experience. ( Cazzaniga, S; Distel, J; Emelianov, V; Heidemeyer, K; Schlapbach, C; Seyed Jafari, SM; Yawalkar, N, 2022)
"We conducted a prospective, open-label study (Immune Metabolic Associations in Psoriatic Arthritis) of adults receiving apremilast 30 mg as part of routine care for PsA and/or psoriasis."4.12Effect of the phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor apremilast on cardiometabolic outcomes in psoriatic disease-results of the Immune Metabolic Associations in Psoriatic Arthritis study. ( Brooksbank, K; Brown, R; Cathcart, S; Ferguson, LD; Gao, X; Harvie, J; McInnes, IB; Paterson, C; Radjenovic, A; Rimmer, D; Sattar, N; Semple, G; Siebert, S; Welsh, P, 2022)
"Apremilast, a selective inhibitor of the enzyme phosphodiesterase 4, is efficacious for psoriasis."4.02Apremilast downregulates interleukin-17 production and induces splenic regulatory B cells and regulatory T cells in imiquimod-induced psoriasiform dermatitis. ( Egawa, S; Ito, M; Kamata, M; Mizukawa, I; Shimizu, T; Tada, Y; Takeshima, R; Uchida, H; Watanabe, A, 2021)
"Apremilast is a small molecule approved for the treatment of plaques psoriasis and adult psoriatic arthritis."4.02Long-term efficacy and safety of apremilast in the treatment of plaques psoriasis: A real-world, single-center experience. ( Bobyr, I; Campanati, A; Diotallevi, F; Giannoni, M; Martina, E; Offidani, A; Radi, G; Rizzetto, G, 2021)
"Real-world treatment patterns among psoriasis patients with and without psoriatic arthritis (PsA) newly initiating treatment with a biologic or apremilast were assessed."4.02Real-world biologic and apremilast treatment patterns in patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. ( Feldman, SR; Hoit Marchlewicz, E; Lopez-Gonzalez, L; Martinez, DJ; Mendelsohn, AM; Shrady, G; Zhang, J; Zhao, Y, 2021)
"To compare treatment patterns and costs among psoriasis patients with and without metabolic conditions newly initiating a biologic or apremilast."4.02Real-world treatment patterns and healthcare costs of biologics and apremilast among patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis by metabolic condition status. ( Feldman, SR; Lopez-Gonzalez, L; Marchlewicz, EH; Martinez, DJ; Mendelsohn, AM; Shrady, G; Zhang, J; Zhao, Y, 2021)
"APPRECIATE is a multinational, observational, retrospective, cross-sectional study in patients treated for psoriasis with apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor."4.02Characteristics and outcomes of patients treated with apremilast in the real world: results from the APPRECIATE study. ( Augustin, M; Bundy, C; Conrad, C; Cordey, M; Eyerich, K; Greggio, C; Griffiths, CEM; Kleyn, CE; Koscielny, V; Mellars, L; Radtke, MA; Sator, PG; Ståhle, M, 2021)
" These patients were treated with the phosphodiesterase‑4 inhibitor apremilast at our psoriasis outpatient clinic at the dermatological department of the University Hospital Innsbruck and we compared and documented the clinical response using an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score over several months."4.02[Apremilast in the treatment of palmoplantar pustulosis : A case series]. ( Frischhut, N; Ratzinger, G, 2021)
"We present a series of general and specific recommendations based on pathophysiologic considerations for managing the most common adverse effects of apremilast that lead to treatment discontinuation: diarrhea, nausea, and headache."4.02Multidisciplinary Management of the Adverse Effects of Apremilast. ( Alonso Suárez, J; Beltrán Catalán, E; Blasco Maldonado, C; Daudén Tello, E; García-Merino, A; Herrero Manso, MC; Jiménez Morales, A; Marín-Jiménez, I; Martín-Arranz, MD; Porta Etessam, J; Rodríguez-Sagrado, MA; Rosas Gómez de Salazar, J; Salgado-Boquete, L; Trujillo Martín, E, 2021)
"Acitretin, apremilast, and methotrexate are safe and effective modalities for ICI-mediated psoriasis."4.02Immune checkpoint-mediated psoriasis: A multicenter European study of 115 patients from the European Network for Cutaneous Adverse Event to Oncologic Drugs (ENCADO) group. ( Annunziata, MC; Apalla, Z; Carrera, C; Fabbrocini, G; Fattore, D; Giacchero, D; Lallas, A; Lallas, K; Lazaridou, E; Nikolaou, V; Ortiz-Brugués, A; Patri, A; Peris, K; Riganti, J; Rigopoulos, D; Romano, MC; Rossi, E; Sibaud, V; Sollena, P; Stratigos, AJ; Voudouri, D, 2021)
"Apremilast has been approved as an effective and safe treatment for psoriasis, but clinical trial results may differ from real-life data."4.02Is apremilast for psoriasis as effective and safe as reported in clinical trials? Five-year experience from a Greek tertiary hospital: long-term real-life efficacy and safety of apremilast in Greece. ( Bakirtzi, K; Ioannides, D; Lallas, A; Papadimitriou, I; Sideris, N; Sotiriou, E; Tsentemeidou, A; Vakirlis, E, 2021)
"Apremilast is an oral phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor indicated for patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis and active psoriatic arthritis."4.02Effectiveness and safety of apremilast in biologic-naïve patients with moderate psoriasis treated in routine clinical practice in Greece: the APRAISAL study. ( Anagnostopoulos, Z; Anastasiadis, G; Antonakopoulos, N; Antoniou, C; Aronis, P; Bassukas, I; Chasapi, V; Drosos, A; Georgiou, S; Ioannides, D; Ioannidou, D; Katsantonis, I; Krasagakis, K; Lazaridou, E; Lefaki, I; Neofotistou, O; Papageorgiou, M; Papakonstantis, M; Patsatsi, A; Protopapa, A; Rigopoulos, D; Roussaki-Schulze, AV; Satra, F, 2021)
"Apremilast is an oral selective phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor developed recently for psoriasis treatment."4.02Effectiveness of Apremilast in Real Life in Patients with Psoriasis: A Longitudinal Study. ( D'Arrigo, G; Malara, G; Politi, C; Testa, A; Trifirò, C; Tripepi, G; Verduci, C, 2021)
"Specific studies on apremilast for nail psoriasis are lacking."4.02Apremilast improves quality of life and ultrasonography parameters in patients with nail psoriasis: A prospective cohort study. ( Guilabert, A; Muñoz-Santos, C; Sola-Ortigosa, J; Vidal, D, 2021)
"Apremilast is an orally available phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor used for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis."4.02Population pharmacokinetic and exposure-response analysis of apremilast in Japanese subjects with moderate to severe psoriasis. ( Imafuku, S; Kassir, N; Komine, M; Nemoto, O; Ohtsuki, M; Okubo, Y; Petric, R, 2021)
" Apremilast is an oral phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor which is approved for the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis."3.96Refractory palmoplantar pustulosis succesfully treated with apremilast. ( Carrascosa de Lome, R; Conde Montero, E; de la Cueva Dobao, P, 2020)
"To quantify the risk of incident treated anxiety, depression and mixed anxiety + depression in users of apremilast compared with users of other treatments for psoriasis and PsA."3.96The risk of treated anxiety and treated depression among patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis treated with apremilast compared to biologics, DMARDs and corticosteroids: a cohort study in the United States MarketScan database. ( Hagberg, KW; Jick, S; Persson, R; Vasilakis-Scaramozza, C, 2020)
"Little has been published on the real-world effectiveness and safety of apremilast in psoriasis."3.96Real-world effectiveness and safety of apremilast in psoriasis at 52 weeks: a retrospective, observational, multicentre study by the Spanish Psoriasis Group. ( Armesto, S; Belinchón, I; Carrascosa, JM; Carretero, G; Del Alcázar, E; Ferran, M; Herranz, P; Herrera-Acosta, E; Hospital, M; Llamas, M; López-Ferrer, A; Martín, I; Mitxelena, MJ; Mollet, J; Montesinos, E; Muñoz, C; Pérez-Barrio, S; Rivera, R; Ruiz-Genao, DP; Ruiz-Villaverde, R; Sahuquillo-Torralba, A; Suárez-Pérez, JA; Valentí, F; Vidal, D; Vilarrasa, E, 2020)
"We synthesized a thalidomide analog containing the benzyl chloride group (2-[1-(3-chlorobenzyl)-2,6-dioxopiperidin-3-yl]isoindoline-1,3-dione, CDI) to examine anti-inflammatory activity against psoriasis."3.96Facile skin targeting of a thalidomide analog containing benzyl chloride moiety alleviates experimental psoriasis via the suppression of MAPK/NF-κB/AP-1 phosphorylation in keratinocytes. ( Alalaiwe, A; Fang, JY; Lin, ZC; Tang, KW; Tseng, CH; Wang, PW, 2020)
"Apremilast is a drug recently developed for psoriasis."3.96Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Apremilast in Older Patients with Psoriasis. ( Bastien, M; Beauchet, A; Begon, E; Beneton, N; Boulard, C; Chaby, G; Cinotti, E; Delaunay, J; Fougerousse, AC; Maccari, F; Mahé, E; Mery-Bossard, L; Parier, J; Phan, C; Prignano, F; Reguiai, Z; Romanelli, M; Samimi, M; Thomas-Beaulieu, D, 2020)
"Apremilast is the first small molecule approved for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis in adult patients."3.96Comorbidities burden and previous exposure to biological agents may predict drug survival of apremilast for psoriasis in a real-world setting. ( Dalamaga, M; Kapniari, E; Papadavid, E, 2020)
"To assess and compare the long-term persistence of apremilast and methotrexate in a large cohort of patients with psoriasis."3.96Persistence of apremilast in moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a real-world analysis of 14 147 apremilast- and methotrexate-naive patients in the French National Health Insurance database. ( Billionnet, C; Maura, G; Mezzarobba, M; Sbidian, E; Weill, A, 2020)
"Apremilast is a "small molecule," an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor indicated for the twice-daily treatment of adults with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA)."3.91Skin involvement in patients with psoriatic arthritis: preliminary results of treatment with apremilast in real world setting. ( Campanati, A; Diotallevi, F; Molinelli, E; Offidani, A; Radi, G, 2019)
"Biologics and apremilast have advanced psoriasis management by adding treatment options."3.91Real-world US healthcare costs of psoriasis for biologic-naive patients initiating apremilast or biologics. ( Bonafede, MM; Brouillette, MA; Feldman, SR; Mehta, RK; Pelletier, CL; Smith, D; Wilson, KL, 2019)
"The aim of the study was to determine the safety of apremilast in combination of biologic therapies in the treatment of plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis."3.91Combination Therapy of Apremilast and Biologic Agent as a Safe Option of Psoriatic Arthritis and Psoriasis. ( Chen, C; Gettas, T; Messiah, R; Metyas, S; Quismorio, A; Tomassian, C, 2019)
"This study compared real-world treatment patterns and healthcare costs among biologic-naive psoriasis patients initiating apremilast or biologics."3.91Real-world treatment patterns and healthcare costs among biologic-naive patients initiating apremilast or biologics for the treatment of psoriasis. ( Pelletier, C; Tian, M; Ung, B; Wu, JJ, 2019)
"Objective: To explore the impact of adding apremilast to a regimen of topical corticosteroids in patients with moderate plaque-type psoriasis."3.91Use of Apremilast in Patients Who Are Dissatisfied With Stable Maintenance Topical Therapy ( Aljaser, M; Amar, L; Kircik, LH, 2019)
"Apremilast is a novel oral phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor approved for treatment of plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis in Japan in December 2016."3.91Drug survival of apremilast in a real-world setting. ( Kamiya, K; Kishimoto, M; Komine, M; Ohtsuki, M; Sugai, J, 2019)
"Ex vivo stimulated cell analysis identified that post-apremilast (IL-10+CD19+) B10 cells were increased in all PsA and psoriasis patients and correlated with psoriatic skin and joint clinical improvement."3.91Apremilast increases IL-10-producing regulatory B cells and decreases proinflammatory T cells and innate cells in psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis. ( Bogdanos, DP; Brotis, AG; Katsiari, CG; Liaskos, C; Mavropoulos, A; Roussaki-Schulze, A; Sakkas, LI; Simopoulou, T; Zafiriou, E, 2019)
"Apremilast is a novel oral phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor approved for psoriasis treatment."3.88Apremilast in psoriasis - a prospective real-world study. ( Herman, R; Monshi, B; Posch, C; Rappersberger, K; Richter, L; Sanlorenzo, M; Vujic, I, 2018)
"The total psoriasis area and severity index scores in the moderate- and high-dose thalidomide and acitretin groups decreased significantly (p<0."3.88Thalidomide Improves Psoriasis-like Lesions and Inhibits Cutaneous VEGF Expression without Alteration of Microvessel Density in Imiquimod- induced Psoriatic Mouse Model. ( Gao, Q; Liu, JH; Luo, DQ; Wang, F; Wu, HH; Zhao, YK, 2018)
"We analysed and report the efficacy and safety of apremilast in the first 51 patients with psoriasis that have undergone treatment with this novel small molecule in our outpatient clinic."3.88Real-world data on the efficacy and safety of apremilast in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. ( Kokkalis, G; Papadavid, E; Rigopoulos, D; Rompoti, N; Theodoropoulos, K, 2018)
"Apremilast is a novel oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor effective for psoriasis."3.88Real-world use of apremilast for patients with psoriasis in Japan. ( Hioki, T; Kamiya, K; Kishimoto, M; Komine, M; Ohtsuki, M; Sugai, J, 2018)
"Chemotherapy regimen based on bortezomib and thalidomide had achieved hematologic partial remission, but the kidney had no response and psoriasis was still active."3.88Complete remission of both immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis and psoriasis after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A case report. ( Chen, W; Huang, X; Ren, G; Zuo, K, 2018)
"The phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor apremilast increases cellular cAMP levels and has proven effective in the treatment of psoriasis and psoriasis arthritis."3.85The phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor apremilast inhibits Th1 but promotes Th17 responses induced by 6-sulfo LacNAc (slan) dendritic cells. ( Döbel, T; Ebling, A; Enk, A; Kunze, A; Oehrl, S; Prakash, H; Schäkel, K; Schmitz, M; Trenkler, N; Wölbing, P, 2017)
"This observational study compares quality of life, treatment satisfaction and the efficacy of non-biological systemic therapy between 60 patients suffering from plaque psoriasis receiving the non-biological systemic therapies with apremilast, methotrexate and fumaric acid esters."3.85Quality of life, treatment satisfaction and efficacy of non-biological systemic therapies in patients with plaque psoriasis: study protocol for a prospective observational study. ( Fink, C; Schäkel, K; Schank, TE; Trenkler, N; Uhlmann, L, 2017)
"OBJECTIVE: To examine real-world use and patient outcomes with apremilast, an oral PDE4 inhibitor, in the dermatology practice set-ting for treatment of patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis."3.85Real-World Clinical Experience With Apremilast in a Large US Retrospective Cohort Study of Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis. ( Armstrong, A; Levi, E, 2017)
" In particular, apremilast has been recently approved for the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis."3.83Phosphodiesterase 4 in inflammatory diseases: Effects of apremilast in psoriatic blood and in dermal myofibroblasts through the PDE4/CD271 complex. ( Horan, G; Kosek, J; Lotti, R; Marconi, A; Parton, A; Pincelli, C; Quadri, M; Saltari, A; Schafer, PH; Truzzi, F; Wu, L; Zhang, LH, 2016)
"Apremilast is an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor that has been approved as monotherapy for the treatment of moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis."3.83Use of Apremilast in Combination With Other Therapies for Treatment of Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: A Retrospective Study. ( AbuHilal, M; Shear, N; Walsh, S, 2016)
"We reviewed the results of the phase IIb and phase III clinical trials for apremilast in treating nail and scalp psoriasis."3.83Improvement of Nail and Scalp Psoriasis Using Apremilast in Patients With Chronic Psoriasis: Phase 2b and 3, 52-Week Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial Results. ( Beroukhim, K; Danesh, M; Koo, J; Leon, A; Nguyen, CM; Wu, JJ, 2016)
"We report a 67-year-old Caucasian man with a long-term history of recalcitrant plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis who was initiated on a treatment regimen of apremilast and secukinumab after failing multiple topical, photo, and systemic therapies."3.83Apremilast and Secukinumab Combined Therapy in a Patient With Recalcitrant Plaque Psoriasis. ( Goldminz, AM; Gottlieb, AB; Greb, JE; McQuade, B; Rothstein, BE, 2016)
"A 54-year-old woman developed psoriasis on the plantar surface of her feet after 2 weeks of thalidomide 100 mg daily for the treatment of multiple IgG myeloma."3.80Psoriasis induced by thalidomide in a patient with multiple myeloma. ( Alaibac, M; Ferrazzi, A; Russo, I; Zambello, R, 2014)
"Apremilast is an orally administered phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, currently in phase 2 clinical studies of psoriasis and other chronic inflammatory diseases."3.76Apremilast, a cAMP phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, demonstrates anti-inflammatory activity in vitro and in a model of psoriasis. ( Adams, M; Baillie, GS; Bartlett, JB; Capone, L; Cheung, YF; Gandhi, AK; Gilhar, A; Houslay, MD; Loveland, MA; Man, HW; Muller, GW; Parton, A; Schafer, PH; Stirling, DI; Wu, L, 2010)
"Treatment options for alcohol use disorders (AUDs) have minimally advanced since 2004, while the annual deaths and economic toll have increased alarmingly."3.30Preclinical and clinical evidence for suppression of alcohol intake by apremilast. ( Aziz, HC; Becker, HC; Beneze, A; Bess, J; Crabbe, JC; Eisenstein, TK; Firsick, EJ; Grigsby, KB; Light, JM; Lopez, MF; Mangieri, RA; Mason, BJ; Meissler, JJ; Metten, P; Miller, J; Morrisett, RA; Ozburn, AR; Quello, S; Roberto, M; Roberts, AJ; Shadan, F; Skinner, M; Townsley, KG, 2023)
" The most common adverse events (≥5% of patients) through week 52 were diarrhea (28."2.87Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast in Systemic- and Biologic-Naive Patients With Moderate Plaque Psoriasis: 52-Week Results of UNVEIL. ( Bagel, J; Chen, R; Duffin, KC; Goncalves, J; Jackson, JM; Lebwohl, M; Levi, E; Stein Gold, L, 2018)
" Most common adverse events (AEs) with placebo, apremilast 20 and apremilast 30 (0-16 weeks) were nasopharyngitis (8."2.84Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in the treatment of Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Efficacy, safety and tolerability results from a phase 2b randomized controlled trial. ( Chen, P; Day, RM; Imafuku, S; Komine, M; Maroli, A; Nemoto, O; Ohtsuki, M; Okubo, Y; Petric, R, 2017)
" Most adverse events were mild or moderate; most common were diarrhea, headache, nausea, upper respiratory tract infection, decreased appetite, and vomiting."2.84Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast in Patients With Moderate Plaque Psoriasis With Lower BSA: Week 16 Results from the UNVEIL Study. ( Bagel, J; Callis Duffin, K; Chen, R; Goncalves, J; Jackson, JM; Lebwohl, M; Levi, E; Stein Gold, L; Strober, B, 2017)
"Apremilast is an oral phosphodiesterase type 4 inhibitor recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the management of plaque psoriasis."2.82Efficacy and safety of apremilast monotherapy in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. ( Alahmadi, RA; Alamri, AM; Aljefri, YE; Alkhamisi, TA; Alkhunani, TA; Alraddadi, AA; Ghaddaf, AA, 2022)
"Despite advances in the treatment of psoriasis, namely among biologic agents, an oral, effective and safe new drug can bring several advantages to prescribers and patients."2.82Deucravacitinib for the Treatment of Psoriatic Disease. ( Lé, AM; Puig, L; Torres, T, 2022)
"Apremilast was effective in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis, improving signs and symptoms and physical function."2.79Treatment of psoriatic arthritis in a phase 3 randomised, placebo-controlled trial with apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor. ( Adebajo, AO; Gladman, DD; Gomez-Reino, JJ; Hall, S; Hochfeld, M; Hough, D; Hu, C; Kavanaugh, A; Lespessailles, E; Mease, PJ; Schett, G; Stevens, RM; Wollenhaupt, J, 2014)
"Apremilast has been shown to improve the quality of life and reduce symptom severity in moderate to severe psoriasis."2.72Review of Apremilast Combination Therapies in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Psoriasis. ( Ivanic, MG; Liao, W; Thatiparthi, A; Walia, S; Wu, JJ, 2021)
"Psoriasis is a lifelong disease and its prevalence in older adults continues to increase as the population ages."2.66Optimizing the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis in Older Adults. ( Kalb, RE; Shary, N, 2020)
"Apremilast is an oral small-molecule phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor with a multilevel immunomodulating mechanism of action."2.66On- and Off-Label Uses of Apremilast in Dermatology. ( Georgiou, S; Plachouri, KM, 2020)
"Apremilast is an oral, small-molecule phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor that works intracellularly by blocking the degradation of cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate, resulting in increased intracellular cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate levels in phosphodiesterase 4-expressing cells."2.58Apremilast: A Novel Oral Treatment for Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis. ( Puig, L; Torres, T, 2018)
"The variety of available systemic treatments for psoriasis is increasing rapidly."2.58Efficacy of Systemic Treatments of Psoriasis on Pruritus: A Systemic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis. ( Barnetche, T; Brenaut, E; Misery, L; Théréné, C, 2018)
"Many treatments for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis are also used for IBD."2.58Management of psoriasis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: From the Medical Board of the National Psoriasis Foundation. ( Armstrong, AW; Enos, CW; Gottlieb, A; Langley, RG; Lebwohl, M; Merola, JF; Ryan, C; Siegel, MP; Van Voorhees, AS; Weinberg, JM; Whitlock, SM; Wu, JJ, 2018)
"Psoriasis is a systemic inflammatory disorder, associated with both physical and psychological burden, and can be the presenting feature of HIV infection."2.58HIV-Associated Psoriasis. ( Queirós, N; Torres, T, 2018)
"Apremilast is a selective PDE4 inhibitor approved for the treatment of adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis."2.58Mechanisms Underlying the Clinical Effects of Apremilast for Psoriasis. ( Augustin, M; French, LE; Krueger, JG; Pincelli, C; Schafer, PH, 2018)
"Psoriasis is chronic inflammatory skin condition that imposes a significant physical and psychosocial burden on patients."2.58Oral small molecules for psoriasis. ( Armstrong, AW; Singh, S, 2018)
"Classically, the first line of treatment for nail psoriasis has been topical medication, but the new biological drugs seem to be the most effective treatment."2.58Effective treatment of nail psoriasis with apremilast: report of two cases and review of the literature. ( Hernández-Bel, P; Magdaleno-Tapial, J; Ortiz-Salvador, JM; Subiabre-Ferrer, D; Valenzuela-Oñate, C, 2018)
"Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by erythematous plaques on extensor surfaces, scalp, and back."2.55Apremilast for the management of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. ( Alikhan, A; Vangipuram, R, 2017)
"Psoriasis is a common inflammatory disease with significant comorbidities, whose management can be challenging given the variety of treatment options."2.53Managing Patients With Psoriasis in the Busy Clinic: Practical Tips for Health Care Practitioners. ( Aldredge, L; Armstrong, AW; Yamauchi, PS, 2016)
"Apremilast is a substrate of cytochrome P450 isoenzyme 3A4 and accumulates in patients with renal failure."2.53Apremilast (Otezla). No progress in plaque psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis. ( , 2016)
"Psoriasis is a common chronic inflammatory skin disease observed in about 1-3% of the general population."2.53Itch in Psoriasis Management. ( Reich, A; Szepietowski, JC, 2016)
"Apremilast is an orally available small molecule that targets PDE4."2.52Drug safety evaluation of apremilast for treating psoriatic arthritis. ( Busa, S; Kavanaugh, A, 2015)
"Treatment with apremilast was well tolerated, with generally mild gastrointestinal complaints, which occurred early in the course of the treatment and resolved over time, and there was no requirement for laboratory test monitoring."2.52Selective Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors for Psoriasis: Focus on Apremilast. ( Gooderham, M; Papp, K, 2015)
"Apremilast has been tested in a number of psoriasis and PsA pilot and Phase II trials to evaluate its efficacy and safety."2.49New developments in the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: a focus on apremilast. ( McCann, FE; McNamee, KE; Palfreeman, AC, 2013)
"Apremilast is an oral medication that inhibits the activity of multiple inflammatory markers involved in the pathogenesis of psoriasis."2.48Apremilast as a treatment for psoriasis. ( Feldman, S; Pellerin, M; Shutty, B; West, C, 2012)
"Thalidomide has been used off-label with some success to treat a number of dermatologic diseases, including several inflammatory skin conditions."2.41Targeting tumor necrosis factor alpha. New drugs used to modulate inflammatory diseases. ( Gaspari, AA; LaDuca, JR, 2001)
"Apremilast is a novel oral agent that has recently been made available to dermatologists for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis."1.72Psoriatic patients with a history of cancer: A real-life experience with Apremilast treatment for 104 weeks. ( Bernardini, N; Maddalena, P; Mambrin, A; Marchesiello, A; Marraffa, F; Potenza, C; Proietti, I; Rossi, G; Skroza, N; Tolino, E; Volpe, S, 2022)
" This pilot study assesses the effect of twice-weekly maintenance doses of Cal/BD foam after 4 weeks of standard once-daily treatment in combination with apremilast."1.72The Maintenance Effect of Calcipotriene 0.05% and Betamethasone Dipropionate 0.064% (Cal/BD) Aerosol Foam in Combination With Apremilast. ( Kircik, L; Ozyurekoglu, E, 2022)
"Plaque psoriasis is a chronic disease requiring long-term therapy."1.62Real-world biologic and apremilast treatment patterns and healthcare costs in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. ( Feldman, SR; Lopez-Gonzalez, L; Marchlewicz, EH; Martinez, DJ; Mendelsohn, AM; Shrady, G; Zhang, J; Zhao, Y, 2021)
"During the 24 weeks of treatment, diarrhea was observed in four patients, and diarrhea and nausea were observed in one patient."1.56Combination therapy of apremilast and biologics in patients with psoriasis showing biologic fatigue. ( Sugai, S; Taguchi, R; Takamura, S; Teraki, Y, 2020)
"Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease involving multiple organ systems and affecting approximately 2% of the world's population."1.56Joint American Academy of Dermatology-National Psoriasis Foundation guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis with systemic nonbiologic therapies. ( Armstrong, AW; Connor, C; Cordoro, KM; Davis, DMR; Elewski, BE; Elmets, CA; Gelfand, JM; Gordon, KB; Gottlieb, AB; Hariharan, V; Kaplan, DH; Kavanaugh, A; Kiselica, M; Kivelevitch, D; Korman, NJ; Kroshinsky, D; Lebwohl, M; Leonardi, CL; Lichten, J; Lim, HW; Mehta, NN; Menter, A; Paller, AS; Parra, SL; Pathy, AL; Prater, EF; Rahimi, RS; Rupani, RN; Siegel, M; Stoff, B; Strober, BE; Tapper, EB; Wong, EB; Wu, JJ, 2020)
"Psoriasis is a common inflammatory skin condition, affecting 2-4% of the worldwide population."1.56Real life experience of apremilast in psoriasis and arthritis psoriatic patients: Preliminary results on metabolic biomarkers. ( Bianchi, L; Campione, E; Cesaroni, GM; Chiaramonte, C; Chimenti, MS; Cosio, T; Dattola, A; Galluzzo, M; Gaziano, R; Gisondi, P; Lanna, C; Mazzilli, S; Palumbo, V; Zangrilli, A, 2020)
" At least one adverse event was experienced by 56/96 patients, and 11/56 events required drug withdrawal."1.56Long-term efficacy and safety of apremilast in psoriatic arthritis: Focus on skin manifestations and special populations. ( Balato, A; Bianchi, L; Campione, E; Cirillo, T; Fabbrocini, G; Malara, G; Trifirò, C, 2020)
"Apremilast is a phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor taken orally."1.56Treatment Persistence and Safety of Apremilast in Psoriasis: Experience With 30 Patients in Routine Clinical Practice. ( Botella Estrada, R; de Unamuno Bustos, B; Monte Boquet, E; Rodríguez Serna, M; Sahuquillo-Torralba, A, 2020)
"Apremilast is a recently approved drug, belonging to the small molecule phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors, whose optimal safety and efficacy profile is somewhat affected by slow activity rate in clinical trials."1.56Clinical efficacy, speed of improvement and safety of apremilast for the treatment of adult Psoriasis during COVID-19 pandemic. ( Atzori, L; Melis, D; Mugheddu, C; Rongioletti, F; Sanna, S, 2020)
"While many treatments for psoriasis exist, few are convenient and safe long term; even if sufficiently effective, treatments themselves often decrease quality of life and make long-term treatment adherence difficult."1.51Real-world experiences of apremilast in clinics for Japanese patients with psoriasis. ( Saruwatari, H, 2019)
"Plaque psoriasis has significant impact on patients' quality of life."1.51Calcipotriol plus betamethasone dipropionate aerosol foam vs. apremilast, methotrexate, acitretin or fumaric acid esters for the treatment of plaque psoriasis: a matching-adjusted indirect comparison. ( Bewley, AP; Calzavara-Pinton, PG; Hansen, JB; Nyeland, ME; Shear, NH; Signorovitch, J, 2019)
"The risk of developing a malignancy during treatment is an important consideration, and many studies have been conducted to determine the magnitude of this risk."1.51Treatment of Psoriasis With Biologics and Apremilast in Patients With a History of Malignancy: A Retrospective Chart Review ( Casseres, RG; Dumont, N; Gottlieb, AB; Her, MJ; Kahn, JS; Rosmarin, D, 2019)
"Psoriasis is an immunodysregulatory inflammatory disease associated with comorbidities affecting quality of life."1.48Characterization of disease burden, comorbidities, and treatment use in a large, US-based cohort: Results from the Corrona Psoriasis Registry. ( Greenberg, JD; Guo, N; Holmgren, SH; Karki, C; Lebwohl, M; Mason, M; Strober, B, 2018)
"Apremilast offers treatment efficacy similar to that of methotrexate, and it may be taken while deployed because it does not require monitoring or refrigeration."1.46The Use of Apremilast to Treat Psoriasis During Deployment. ( Meyerle, J; Rosenberg, A, 2017)
"Apremilast is a phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor that regulates the transduction of intracellular signals, including pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory pathways."1.43A new therapeutic for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: apremilast. ( Cannizzaro, MV; Caposiena, D; Chimenti, S; Chiricozzi, A; Garofalo, V; Saraceno, R, 2016)
"Psoriasis is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory condition that affects 2-3% of the population."1.42Apremilast and adalimumab: a novel combination therapy for recalcitrant psoriasis. ( Beroukhim, K; Danesh, MJ; Koo, J; Levin, E; Nguyen, C, 2015)
" This chart review evaluated the use of methotrexate alone and in combination with 7 other systemic therapies in 48 patients with palmoplantar psoriasis."1.42The Use of Methotrexate, Alone or in Combination With Other Therapies, for the Treatment of Palmoplantar Psoriasis. ( Klufas, DM; Strober, BE; Wald, JM, 2015)
"Apremilast is an orally available targeted PDE4 inhibitor that modulates a wide array of inflammatory mediators involved in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, including decreases in the expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase, TNF-α, and interleukin (IL)-23 and increases IL-10."1.38Apremilast mechanism of action and application to psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. ( Schafer, P, 2012)

Research

Studies (302)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19901 (0.33)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's5 (1.66)29.6817
2010's152 (50.33)24.3611
2020's144 (47.68)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Filippi, F1
Patrizi, A3
Iezzi, L1
Carpanese, MA1
Conti, A2
Lasagni, C1
Tabanelli, M1
D'Adamio, S1
DI Nuzzo, S1
Cortelazzi, C1
DI Lernia, V2
Peccerillo, F1
Corazza, M1
Odorici, G1
Bardazzi, F3
Uchida, H1
Kamata, M2
Shimizu, T2
Egawa, S1
Ito, M1
Takeshima, R1
Mizukawa, I1
Watanabe, A1
Tada, Y2
Bakirtzi, K2
Sotiriou, E2
Vakirlis, E2
Papadimitriou, I2
Lallas, A3
Kougkas, N1
Lazaridou, E4
Ioannides, D4
Konishi, R1
Tanaka, R1
Inoue, S2
Ichimura, Y1
Nomura, T1
Okiyama, N2
Ahmed, SMA1
Volontè, M1
Isoletta, E1
Vassallo, C1
Tomasini, CF1
Lilleri, D1
Zelini, P1
Musella, V1
Klersy, C1
Brazzelli, V1
Lytvyn, Y1
Georgakopoulos, JR5
Mufti, A1
Devani, AR1
Gooderham, MJ3
Jain, V1
Lansang, P1
Vender, R1
Prajapati, VH1
Yeung, J5
Radi, G3
Campanati, A3
Diotallevi, F3
Rizzetto, G1
Martina, E1
Bobyr, I1
Giannoni, M1
Offidani, A3
Feldman, SR8
Zhang, J6
Martinez, DJ3
Lopez-Gonzalez, L3
Hoit Marchlewicz, E1
Shrady, G3
Zhao, Y3
Mendelsohn, AM3
Megna, M3
Ocampo-Garza, SS1
Fabbrocini, G6
Cinelli, E2
Ruggiero, A1
Camela, E2
Dorgham, N1
Crasto, D1
Skopit, S1
Bettuzzi, T1
Bachelez, H2
Beylot-Barry, M1
Arlégui, H1
Paul, C4
Viguier, M1
Mahé, E3
Beneton, N2
Jullien, D1
Richard, MA1
Joly, P2
Tubach, F1
Dupuy, A1
Sbidian, E5
Chosidow, O1
Yatsuzuka, K1
Murakami, M1
Yoshida, S1
Utsunomiya, R1
Watanabe, T1
Sayama, K1
Pavia, G1
Gargiulo, L1
Cortese, A1
Valenti, M1
Sanna, F1
Borroni, RG1
Costanzo, A1
Narcisi, A1
Meier-Schiesser, B1
Mellett, M1
Ramirez-Fort, MK1
Maul, JT1
Klug, A1
Winkelbeiner, N1
Fenini, G1
Schafer, P5
Contassot, E1
French, LE3
Ikumi, K1
Torii, K1
Sagawa, Y1
Kanayama, Y1
Nakada, A1
Nishihara, H1
Morita, A2
Ghislain, PD1
Lambert, J1
Lam Hoai, XL1
Hillary, T1
Roquet-Gravy, PP1
de la Brassinne, M1
Segaert, S1
Hewitt, RM1
Bundy, C2
Newi, AL1
Chachos, E1
Sommer, R1
Kleyn, CE2
Augustin, M3
Griffiths, CEM3
Blome, C1
Bernardini, N2
Skroza, N2
Marchesiello, A2
Mambrin, A2
Proietti, I2
Tolino, E2
Maddalena, P1
Marraffa, F1
Rossi, G1
Volpe, S1
Potenza, C2
Teeple, A1
Villacorta, R1
PharmD, SL1
Fakharzadeh, S1
Lucas, J1
PhD, NL1
Potestio, L1
Di Caprio, N1
Tajani, A1
Annunziata, A1
Pina Vegas, L2
Claudepierre, P2
Suruki, RY1
Desai, RJ1
Davis, KJ1
Berlin, JA1
Gagne, JJ1
Ozyurekoglu, E1
Kircik, L4
Antonakopoulos, N2
Chasapi, V2
Oikonomou, C1
Tampouratzi, E1
Rigopoulos, D5
Neofotistou, O2
Drosos, A2
Anastasiadis, G2
Rovithi, E1
Kalinou, C1
Papadavid, E3
Aronis, P2
Papageorgiou, M2
Protopapa, A2
Bassukas, I2
Lefaki, I2
Zafiriou, E2
Krasagakis, K2
Pokas, E1
Anagnostopoulos, Z2
Kekki, A1
Papakonstantis, M2
Aljefri, YE1
Ghaddaf, AA1
Alkhunani, TA1
Alkhamisi, TA1
Alahmadi, RA1
Alamri, AM1
Alraddadi, AA1
Kaplan, D1
Husni, E1
Chang, E1
Broder, MS1
Paydar, C1
Bognar, K1
Yan, J1
Richter, S1
Desai, P1
Khilfeh, I1
Galache-Osuna, C1
Reyes-García, S1
Salgueiro, E1
Bordallo-Landa, J1
Lozano, A2
Vázquez-López, F1
Santos-Juanes, J2
Parmar, PK1
Sharma, N1
Wasil Kabeer, S1
Rohit, A1
Bansal, AK1
Torrente-Segarra, V1
Bonet, M1
Ouyang, F1
Garbayo Salmons, P1
Expósito Serrano, V1
Romaní de Gabriel, J1
Ribera Pibernat, M1
Gyldenløve, M1
Alinaghi, F1
Zachariae, C1
Skov, L2
Egeberg, A4
Lé, AM4
Puig, L2
Torres, T6
Mehta, H1
Sharma, A1
Dogra, S4
Pinto-Pulido, EL1
Lario, AR1
Vega-Díez, D1
González-Cañete, M1
García-Verdú, E1
Polo-Rodríguez, I1
Piteiro-Bermejo, AB1
Medina-Montalvo, S1
Trasobares-Marugán, L1
Persson, R3
Cordey, M2
Paris, M5
Jick, S3
Foti, R2
Visalli, E1
Amato, G1
Dal Bosco, Y1
Baccano, G1
Tiberio, R1
Rosi, E1
Fastame, MT1
Di Cesare, A2
Prignano, F3
Wu, JJ14
Liu, J1
Thatiparthi, A2
Martin, A1
Tsiogka, A1
Gerochristou, M1
Agrogianni, A1
Gregoriou, S1
Kontochristopoulos, G1
Estevinho, T3
Hong, HC2
Litvinov, IV3
Grigsby, KB1
Mangieri, RA1
Roberts, AJ1
Lopez, MF1
Firsick, EJ1
Townsley, KG1
Beneze, A1
Bess, J1
Eisenstein, TK1
Meissler, JJ1
Light, JM1
Miller, J1
Quello, S1
Shadan, F1
Skinner, M1
Aziz, HC1
Metten, P1
Morrisett, RA1
Crabbe, JC1
Roberto, M1
Becker, HC1
Mason, BJ1
Ozburn, AR1
Wolk, K1
Wilsmann-Theis, D2
Witte, K1
Brembach, TC1
Kromer, C2
Gerdes, S3
Ghoreschi, K1
Reich, K7
Mössner, R3
Sabat, R2
Fusta-Novell, X1
Esquius, M1
Creus-Vila, L1
Mioso, G1
Gnesotto, L1
Russo, I2
Piaserico, S1
Alaibac, M2
Liu, T1
Chu, Y1
Li, S1
Fang, H1
Qiao, J1
Armstrong, AW6
Gooderham, M8
Warren, RB2
Papp, KA7
Strober, B9
Thaçi, D5
Szepietowski, JC2
Imafuku, S4
Colston, E2
Throup, J2
Kundu, S2
Schoenfeld, S1
Linaberry, M2
Banerjee, S2
Blauvelt, A1
Sofen, H5
Gordon, KB3
Foley, P4
Rich, P2
Bagel, J11
Sekaran, C1
Podevin, P1
Cottencin, AC1
Becquart, C1
Azib, S1
Duparc, A1
Darras, S1
Florin, V1
Faiz, S1
Lehembre, SD1
Staumont-Salle, D1
Dezoteux, F1
Paller, AS2
Hong, Y1
Becker, EM1
de Lucas, R1
Zhang, W1
Zhang, Z4
Barcellona, C1
Maes, P1
Fiorillo, L1
Plachouri, KM2
Kyriakou, G1
Chourdakis, V1
Georgiou, S3
Grafanaki, K1
Damiani, G3
Natsis, NE1
Merola, JF3
Weinberg, JM2
Orbai, AM1
Gottlieb, AB9
Lanna, C3
Mazzilli, S3
Zangrilli, A2
Bianchi, L8
Campione, E4
Loft, ND1
Rasmussen, MK1
Bryld, LE1
Gniadecki, R1
Dam, TN1
Iversen, L1
Saruwatari, H1
Dozier, L1
Bartos, G1
Kerdel, F1
Marchlewicz, EH2
Alikhan, A3
Lockshin, B1
Shi, R2
Cirulli, J2
Barbieri, M1
Loconsole, F1
Migliore, A1
Capri, S1
Carrascosa, JM3
Belinchón, I2
Rivera, R2
Ara, M1
Bustinduy, M1
Herranz, P2
Takamura, S1
Sugai, S1
Taguchi, R1
Teraki, Y1
Pérez Ferriols, A1
Takama, H4
Ando, Y4
Yanagishita, T4
Ohshima, Y4
Akiyama, M4
Watanabe, D4
Medvedeva, IV1
Stokes, ME1
Eisinger, D1
LaBrie, ST1
Ai, J1
Trotter, MWB1
Yang, R1
Carrascosa de Lome, R1
Conde Montero, E1
de la Cueva Dobao, P1
Vasilakis-Scaramozza, C2
Hagberg, KW2
Kikuchi, N1
Yamamoto, T1
Van Voorhees, AS3
Stein Gold, L6
Lebwohl, M8
Lynde, C1
Tyring, S1
Cauthen, A1
Wang, Y3
Wei, C1
Friedman, AJ1
Prussick, RB1
Nittala, R1
Singh, A1
Menter, A4
Gelfand, JM1
Connor, C1
Cordoro, KM1
Davis, DMR1
Elewski, BE2
Kaplan, DH1
Kavanaugh, A3
Kiselica, M1
Kivelevitch, D1
Korman, NJ2
Kroshinsky, D1
Leonardi, CL5
Lichten, J1
Lim, HW1
Mehta, NN1
Parra, SL1
Pathy, AL1
Prater, EF1
Rahimi, RS1
Rupani, RN1
Siegel, M1
Stoff, B1
Strober, BE3
Tapper, EB1
Wong, EB1
Hariharan, V1
Elmets, CA1
Shavit, E1
Shear, NH6
Qian, Y1
Chiaramonte, C1
Cesaroni, GM2
Palumbo, V1
Cosio, T1
Dattola, A2
Gaziano, R2
Galluzzo, M2
Chimenti, MS2
Gisondi, P3
Del Alcázar, E1
Suárez-Pérez, JA1
Armesto, S4
Herrera-Acosta, E1
Martín, I1
Montesinos, E2
Hospital, M1
Vilarrasa, E1
Ferran, M1
Ruiz-Villaverde, R2
Sahuquillo-Torralba, A2
Ruiz-Genao, DP1
Pérez-Barrio, S1
Muñoz, C1
Llamas, M1
Valentí, F1
Mitxelena, MJ1
López-Ferrer, A1
Carretero, G1
Vidal, D2
Mollet, J1
Stolshek, BS2
Yang, Y3
Kricorian, G2
Kircik, LH5
Conrad, C2
Sator, PG1
Ståhle, M1
Eyerich, K1
Radtke, MA2
Mellars, L1
Greggio, C1
Koscielny, V1
Balato, A1
Cirillo, T1
Malara, G2
Trifirò, C2
Michelini, S1
Di Fraia, M1
Balduzzi, V1
Porta, N1
Romeo, G1
Di Cristofano, C1
Petrozza, V1
Mugheddu, C2
Pizzatti, L1
Sanna, S2
Atzori, L2
Rongioletti, F2
Ghamrawi, RI1
Ghiam, N1
de Unamuno Bustos, B1
Rodríguez Serna, M1
Monte Boquet, E1
Botella Estrada, R1
González Vela, C3
González López, MA2
Wang, WM1
Shu, D1
Jiang, YY1
Jin, HZ1
Oak, ASW1
Ho-Pham, H1
Haller, C1
Cozzio, A1
von Kempis, J1
Rubbert-Roth, A1
Melis, D1
Shibata, T1
Del-Alcazar, E1
Queiro Silva, R1
Naharro Fernández, C2
González-Gay, MA2
Tang, KW1
Lin, ZC1
Wang, PW1
Alalaiwe, A1
Tseng, CH1
Fang, JY1
Talamonti, M1
Tofani, L1
Kt, S3
Thakur, V3
Handa, S3
Narang, T3
Phan, C1
Delaunay, J1
Reguiai, Z1
Boulard, C2
Fougerousse, AC2
Cinotti, E1
Romanelli, M2
Mery-Bossard, L2
Thomas-Beaulieu, D2
Parier, J2
Maccari, F2
Chaby, G1
Bastien, M2
Begon, E2
Samimi, M1
Beauchet, A2
Vollono, L1
Marino, D1
Shary, N1
Kalb, RE1
Kapniari, E1
Dalamaga, M1
Teng, J1
Moore, A1
Cantrell, W1
Alonso-Llamazares, J1
Koo, J4
Casanova, DM1
Ricci, C1
Frischhut, N1
Ratzinger, G1
Nemoto, O3
Okubo, Y3
Komine, M6
Petric, R4
Ohtsuki, M7
Daudén Tello, E1
Alonso Suárez, J1
Beltrán Catalán, E1
Blasco Maldonado, C1
Herrero Manso, MC1
Jiménez Morales, A1
Marín-Jiménez, I1
Martín-Arranz, MD1
García-Merino, A1
Porta Etessam, J1
Rodríguez-Sagrado, MA1
Rosas Gómez de Salazar, J1
Trujillo Martín, E1
Salgado-Boquete, L1
Czarnowicki, T1
Rosendorff, BP1
Lebwohl, MG1
Schlesinger, TE1
Tanghetti, E1
Kataoka, S1
Takaishi, M1
Nakajima, K3
Sano, S3
Sánchez, J1
Illaro, A1
Mayorga, J1
López Sundh, AE1
Palmou, N1
Gómez-Fernández, C1
Price, AD1
Wagler, VD1
Donaldson, C1
Mastin, PJ1
Caffarini, M1
Lucarini, G1
Di Vincenzo, M1
Orciani, M1
Nikolaou, V2
Sibaud, V1
Fattore, D2
Sollena, P1
Ortiz-Brugués, A1
Giacchero, D1
Romano, MC1
Riganti, J1
Lallas, K1
Peris, K2
Voudouri, D1
Carrera, C1
Annunziata, MC2
Rossi, E1
Patri, A1
Stratigos, AJ1
Apalla, Z1
Foti, C1
Tucci, M1
Stingeni, L1
Hansel, K1
Lospalluti, L1
Frisario, R1
Giuffrida, R1
Romita, P1
Nelson, E2
Riley, C1
Hetzel, A1
Patel, DR1
Urva, S1
Ho, S1
Buckman, CJ1
Ma, Y2
Lim, J1
Sissons, SE1
Zuniga, MS1
Philips, D1
Cox, K1
Dairaghi, DJ1
Kato, N1
Ohashi, W1
Zeb, L1
Mhaskar, R1
Lewis, S1
Patel, NS1
Sadhwani, D1
Patel, N1
Ekhlassi, E1
Lu, Y1
Seminario-Vidal, L1
Geat, D1
Girolomoni, G3
Kurata, M1
Ohyama, M1
Papp, K5
Tsentemeidou, A1
Sideris, N1
Nakajima, R1
Morisaka, H1
Nakajima, H2
Huh, KY1
Choi, Y1
Nissel, J1
Palmisano, M1
Wang, X1
Liu, L1
Ramirez-Valle, F1
Lee, H2
Kearns, DG1
Uppal, S1
Chat, VS1
Pacifico, A1
d'Arino, A1
Pigatto, PDM1
Malagoli, P1
Katsantonis, I1
Antoniou, C1
Ioannidou, D1
Patsatsi, A1
Roussaki-Schulze, AV1
Satra, F1
Politi, C1
Verduci, C1
D'Arrigo, G1
Testa, A1
Tripepi, G1
Linker, C1
Magnolo, N1
Distel, J1
Cazzaniga, S1
Seyed Jafari, SM1
Emelianov, V1
Schlapbach, C1
Yawalkar, N2
Heidemeyer, K1
Ferguson, LD1
Cathcart, S1
Rimmer, D1
Semple, G1
Brooksbank, K1
Paterson, C1
Brown, R1
Harvie, J1
Gao, X2
Radjenovic, A1
Welsh, P1
McInnes, IB1
Sattar, N1
Siebert, S1
Artamonova, OG1
Karamova, AE1
Nikonorov, AA1
Verbenko, DA1
Vasileva, EL1
Kubanov, AA1
Mrowietz, U4
Nunez Gomez, N1
Guerette, B1
Penso, L1
Bergqvist, C1
Meyer, A1
Herlemont, P1
Weill, A2
Zureik, M1
Dray-Spira, R1
Koguchi-Yoshioka, H1
Watanabe, R1
Matsumura, Y1
Ishitsuka, Y1
Furuta, J1
Nakamura, Y1
Matsuzaka, T1
Shimano, H1
Fujisawa, Y1
Fujimoto, M1
Pariser, D1
Green, L3
Bhatia, N1
Albrecht, L1
Chen, M1
Callis Duffin, K2
Valentine, L1
Norris, MR2
Bielory, L2
Muñoz-Santos, C2
Sola-Ortigosa, J2
Guilabert, A2
Kassir, N1
Ivanic, MG1
Walia, S1
Liao, W1
Croney, S1
Loyal, J1
Flores, S1
Vakharia, PP1
Orrell, KA1
Lee, D1
Rangel, SM1
Lund, E1
Laumann, AE1
West, DP1
Nardone, B1
Day, RM11
Chen, P1
Maroli, A1
Crowley, J3
Goncalves, J7
Chen, R10
Shah, K3
Ferrándiz, C2
Cather, JC2
Reddy, SP2
Shah, VV1
Oehrl, S1
Prakash, H1
Ebling, A1
Trenkler, N2
Wölbing, P1
Kunze, A1
Döbel, T1
Schmitz, M1
Enk, A1
Schäkel, K2
Wong, TH1
Sinclair, S1
Smith, B1
Fraser, C1
Morton, CA1
Fink, C1
Schank, TE1
Uhlmann, L1
Kalik, JA1
Friedman, H1
Bechtel, MA1
Gru, AA1
Kaffenberger, BH1
Jackson, JM2
Levi, E7
Rosenberg, A1
Meyerle, J1
Théréné, C1
Brenaut, E1
Barnetche, T1
Misery, L1
Nast, A2
Spuls, PI1
van der Kraaij, G2
Ormerod, AD1
Saiag, P1
Smith, CH1
Dauden, E1
de Jong, EM1
Feist, E1
Jobling, R1
Maccarone, M1
Rosumeck, S2
Talme, T1
Thio, HB1
van de Kerkhof, P1
Werner, RN2
Dressler, C2
Vujic, I1
Herman, R1
Sanlorenzo, M1
Posch, C1
Monshi, B1
Rappersberger, K1
Richter, L1
van Lumig, P1
Wakkee, M1
Spuls, P1
Liu, JH1
Wu, HH1
Zhao, YK1
Wang, F1
Gao, Q1
Luo, DQ1
Ighani, A4
Walsh, S5
Keegan, BR1
Karki, C1
Mason, M1
Guo, N1
Holmgren, SH1
Greenberg, JD1
Bissonnette, R2
Haydey, R1
Rosoph, LA1
Lynde, CW1
Bukhalo, M1
Fowler, JF1
Delorme, I1
Gagné-Henley, A1
Poulin, Y3
Barber, K1
Jenkin, P1
Landells, I1
Pariser, DM3
Reinke, T1
Duffin, KC3
Cline, A2
Cardwell, LA1
Bewley, A2
Soung, J3
Marcsisin, J1
Piguet, V2
Armstrong, A1
Whitlock, SM1
Enos, CW1
Gottlieb, A1
Langley, RG3
Ryan, C1
Siegel, MP1
Pescitelli, L1
Ricceri, F1
Lazzeri, L1
Queirós, N1
Rompoti, N1
Theodoropoulos, K1
Kokkalis, G1
Shibuya, T1
Honma, M1
Iinuma, S1
Iwasaki, T1
Ishida-Yamamoto, A1
Lee, EB3
Amin, M3
Schmutz, JL2
Waki, Y1
Kamiya, K3
Maekawa, T1
Murata, S1
Ishii, N1
Hashimoto, T1
Yang, EJ1
Beck, KM1
Sekhon, S1
Bhutani, T1
Velasco, L1
Munguía-Calzada, P1
Gómez-Díez, S1
Eto, A1
Nakao, M1
Furue, M1
Vazquez, B1
Gonzalez, V1
Molina, I1
Ramon, MD1
Monteagudo, C1
Garcet, S1
Nograles, K1
Correa da Rosa, J1
Schafer, PH5
Krueger, JG4
Giácaman von der Weth, MM1
Tapial, JM1
Guillén, BF1
Ferrer, DS1
Sánchez-Carazo, JL1
Ninet, VZ1
Favalli, EG1
Conti, F1
Atzeni, F2
Selmi, C1
D'Angelo, S1
Caporali, R1
Iannone, F1
Pincelli, C2
Kishimoto, M2
Hioki, T1
Sugai, J2
Singh, S1
Winiczenko, R1
Górnicki, K1
Kaleta, A1
Janaszek-Mańkowska, M1
Khan, ZA1
Singh, C1
Khan, T1
Ganguly, M1
Bradsher, C1
Goodwin, P1
Petty, JT1
Sandau, C1
Bove, DG1
Marsaa, K1
Bekkelund, CS1
Lindholm, MG1
Salazar, J1
Bermúdez, V1
Olivar, LC1
Torres, W1
Palmar, J1
Añez, R1
Ordoñez, MG1
Rivas, JR1
Martínez, MS1
Hernández, JD1
Graterol, M1
Rojas, J1
Mubarak, Z1
Humaira, A1
Gani, BA1
Muchlisin, ZA1
Gremillet, C1
Jakobsson, JG1
Gomila, A1
Shaw, E1
Carratalà, J1
Leibovici, L1
Tebé, C1
Wiegand, I1
Vallejo-Torres, L1
Vigo, JM1
Morris, S1
Stoddart, M1
Grier, S1
Vank, C1
Cuperus, N1
Van den Heuvel, L1
Eliakim-Raz, N1
Vuong, C1
MacGowan, A1
Addy, I1
Pujol, M1
Cobb, A1
Rieger, E1
Bell, J1
Mallik, S1
Zhao, Z1
Szécsényi, Á1
Li, G1
Gascon, J1
Pidko, EA1
Zhang, GR1
Wolker, T1
Sandbeck, DJS1
Munoz, M1
Mayrhofer, KJJ1
Cherevko, S1
Etzold, BJM1
Lukashuk, L1
Yigit, N1
Rameshan, R1
Kolar, E1
Teschner, D1
Hävecker, M1
Knop-Gericke, A1
Schlögl, R1
Föttinger, K1
Rupprechter, G1
Franconieri, F1
Deshayes, S1
de Boysson, H1
Trad, S1
Martin Silva, N1
Terrier, B1
Bienvenu, B1
Galateau-Sallé, F1
Emile, JF1
Johnson, AC1
Aouba, A1
Vogt, TJ1
Gevensleben, H1
Dietrich, J1
Kristiansen, G1
Bootz, F1
Landsberg, J1
Goltz, D1
Dietrich, D1
Idorn, M1
Skadborg, SK1
Kellermann, L1
Halldórsdóttir, HR1
Holmen Olofsson, G1
Met, Ö1
Thor Straten, P1
Johnson, LE1
Brockstedt, D1
Leong, M1
Lauer, P1
Theisen, E1
Sauer, JD1
McNeel, DG1
Morandi, F1
Marimpietri, D1
Horenstein, AL1
Bolzoni, M1
Toscani, D1
Costa, F1
Castella, B1
Faini, AC1
Massaia, M1
Pistoia, V1
Giuliani, N1
Malavasi, F1
Qiu, J1
Peng, S1
Yang, A1
Han, L1
Cheng, MA1
Farmer, E1
Hung, CF1
Wu, TC1
Modak, S1
Le Luduec, JB1
Cheung, IY1
Goldman, DA1
Ostrovnaya, I1
Doubrovina, E1
Basu, E1
Kushner, BH1
Kramer, K1
Roberts, SS1
O'Reilly, RJ1
Cheung, NV1
Hsu, KC1
Salgarello, T1
Giudiceandrea, A1
Calandriello, L1
Marangoni, D1
Colotto, A1
Caporossi, A1
Falsini, B1
Lefrançois, P1
Xie, P1
Wang, L2
Tetzlaff, MT1
Moreau, L1
Watters, AK1
Netchiporouk, E1
Provost, N1
Gilbert, M1
Ni, X1
Sasseville, D1
Wheeler, DA1
Duvic, M1
O'Connor, BJ1
Fryda, NJ1
Ranglack, DH1
Yang, J1
Zhang, X2
Grün, AL1
Emmerling, C1
Aumeeruddy-Elalfi, Z1
Ismaël, IS1
Hosenally, M1
Zengin, G1
Mahomoodally, MF1
Dotsenko, A1
Gusakov, A1
Rozhkova, A1
Sinitsyna, O1
Shashkov, I1
Sinitsyn, A1
Hong, CE1
Kim, JU1
Lee, JW1
Lee, SW1
Jo, IH1
Pandiyarajan, S1
Premasudha, P1
Kadirvelu, K1
Wang, B1
Luo, L1
Wang, D2
Ding, R1
Hong, J1
Caviezel, D1
Maissen, S1
Niess, JH1
Kiss, C1
Hruz, P1
Pockes, S1
Wifling, D1
Keller, M1
Buschauer, A1
Elz, S1
Santos, AF1
Ferreira, IP1
Pinheiro, CB1
Santos, VG1
Lopes, MTP1
Teixeira, LR1
Rocha, WR1
Rodrigues, GLS1
Beraldo, H1
Lohar, S1
Dhara, K1
Roy, P1
Sinha Babu, SP1
Chattopadhyay, P1
Sukwong, P1
Sunwoo, IY1
Lee, MJ1
Ra, CH1
Jeong, GT1
Kim, SK2
Huvinen, E1
Eriksson, JG1
Stach-Lempinen, B1
Tiitinen, A1
Koivusalo, SB1
Malhotra, M1
Suresh, S1
Garg, A1
Wei, L1
Jiang, Y2
Zhou, W1
Liu, S1
Liu, Y1
Rausch-Fan, X1
Liu, Z1
Marques, WL1
van der Woude, LN1
Luttik, MAH1
van den Broek, M1
Nijenhuis, JM1
Pronk, JT1
van Maris, AJA1
Mans, R1
Gombert, AK1
Xu, A1
Sun, J1
Li, J1
Chen, W3
Zheng, R1
Han, Z1
Ji, L1
Shen, WQ1
Bao, LP1
Hu, SF1
Gao, XJ1
Xie, YP1
Gao, XF1
Huang, WH1
Lu, X1
Gostin, PF1
Addison, O1
Morrell, AP1
Zhang, Y2
Cook, AJMC1
Liens, A1
Stoica, M1
Ignatyev, K1
Street, SR1
Wu, J1
Chiu, YL1
Davenport, AJ1
Qiu, Z1
Shu, J1
Tang, D1
Huang, K1
Wai, H1
Du, K1
Anesini, J1
Kim, WS1
Eastman, A1
Micalizio, GC1
Liang, JH1
Huo, XK1
Cheng, ZB1
Sun, CP1
Zhao, JC1
Kang, XH1
Zhang, TY1
Chen, ZJ1
Yang, TM1
Wu, YY1
Deng, XP1
Zhang, YX1
Salem, HF1
Kharshoum, RM1
Abou-Taleb, HA1
AbouTaleb, HA1
AbouElhassan, KM1
Ohata, C1
Ohyama, B1
Kuwahara, F1
Katayama, E1
Nakama, T1
Kobayashi, S1
Kashiwagi, T1
Kimura, J1
Lin, JD1
Liou, MJ1
Hsu, HL1
Leong, KK1
Chen, YT1
Wang, YR1
Hung, WS1
Lee, HY1
Tsai, HJ1
Tseng, CP1
Alten, B1
Yesiltepe, M1
Bayraktar, E1
Tas, ST1
Gocmen, AY1
Kursungoz, C1
Martinez, A1
Sara, Y1
Huang, S2
Adams, E1
Van Schepdael, A1
Wang, Q1
Chung, CY1
Yang, W1
Yang, G1
Chough, S1
Chen, Y1
Yin, B1
Bhattacharya, R1
Hu, Y1
Saeui, CT1
Yarema, KJ1
Betenbaugh, MJ1
Zhang, H1
Patik, JC1
Tucker, WJ1
Curtis, BM1
Nelson, MD1
Nasirian, A1
Park, S1
Brothers, RM1
Dohlmann, TL1
Hindsø, M1
Dela, F1
Helge, JW1
Larsen, S1
Gayani, B1
Dilhari, A1
Wijesinghe, GK1
Kumarage, S1
Abayaweera, G1
Samarakoon, SR1
Perera, IC1
Kottegoda, N1
Weerasekera, MM1
Nardi, MV1
Timpel, M1
Ligorio, G1
Zorn Morales, N1
Chiappini, A1
Toccoli, T1
Verucchi, R1
Ceccato, R1
Pasquali, L1
List-Kratochvil, EJW1
Quaranta, A1
Dirè, S1
Heo, K1
Jo, SH1
Shim, J1
Kang, DH1
Kim, JH1
Park, JH1
Akhtar, N1
Saha, A1
Kumar, V1
Pradhan, N1
Panda, S1
Morla, S1
Kumar, S2
Manna, D1
Wang, H1
Xu, E1
Yu, S1
Li, D1
Quan, J1
Xu, L1
Saslow, SA1
Um, W1
Pearce, CI1
Bowden, ME1
Engelhard, MH1
Lukens, WL1
Kim, DS1
Schweiger, MJ1
Kruger, AA1
Adair, LS1
Kuzawa, C1
McDade, T1
Carba, DB1
Borja, JB1
Liang, X2
Song, W1
Wang, K1
Zhang, B1
Peele, ME1
Luo, HR1
Chen, ZY1
Fei, JJ1
Du, ZJ1
Yi, KJ1
Im, WT1
Kim, DW1
Ji, X1
Zhang, C1
Xu, Z1
Ding, Y1
Song, Q1
Li, B2
Zhao, H1
Lee, DW1
Kwon, BO1
Khim, JS1
Yim, UH1
Park, H1
Park, B1
Choi, IG1
Kim, BS1
Kim, JJ1
Wang, JJ1
Chen, Q1
Li, YZ1
Sakai, M1
Yamaguchi, M1
Nagao, Y1
Kawachi, N1
Kikuchi, M1
Torikai, K1
Kamiya, T1
Takeda, S1
Watanabe, S1
Takahashi, T1
Arakawa, K1
Nakano, T1
Rufo, S1
Continentino, MA1
Plass, F1
Planchat, A1
Charisiadis, A1
Charalambidis, G1
Angaridis, PA1
Kahnt, A1
Odobel, F1
Coutsolelos, AG1
Fuentes, I1
García-Mendiola, T1
Sato, S2
Pita, M1
Nakamura, H1
Lorenzo, E1
Teixidor, F1
Marques, F1
Viñas, C1
Liu, F1
Qi, P1
Zhang, L1
Molinelli, E1
Abignano, G1
Laws, P1
Del Galdo, F1
Marzo-Ortega, H1
McGonagle, D1
Knuckles, MLF1
Sacchelli, L2
Ferrara, F1
Samad, AS1
Aras, GA1
Chung, JB1
Pelletier, CL1
Wilson, KL1
Mehta, RK1
Brouillette, MA1
Smith, D1
Bonafede, MM1
Bewley, AP1
Calzavara-Pinton, PG1
Hansen, JB1
Nyeland, ME1
Signorovitch, J1
Metyas, S1
Tomassian, C1
Messiah, R1
Gettas, T1
Chen, C1
Quismorio, A1
Ichiyama, S2
Hoashi, T2
Kanda, N2
Hashimoto, H1
Matsushita, M1
Nozawa, K1
Ueno, T1
Saeki, H2
Ren, G1
Zuo, K1
Huang, X1
McCarthy, S1
Heffron, CCBB1
Murphy, M1
Komatsu, T1
Nagai, K1
Yamada, Y1
Ansai, SI1
Pelletier, C1
Ung, B1
Tian, M1
Tokuyama, M1
Yamada, T1
Kondoh, A1
Mabuchi, T1
Magdaleno-Tapial, J1
Valenzuela-Oñate, C1
Ortiz-Salvador, JM1
Subiabre-Ferrer, D1
Hernández-Bel, P1
Krishnamoorthy, G1
Kotecha, A1
Pimentel, J1
Peitsch, WK1
Panariello, L1
Marasca, C1
D'Arena, G1
Galdo, G1
Musto, P1
Bragazzi, NL1
Grossi, E1
Petrou, S1
Radovanovic, D1
Rizzi, M1
Sarzi-Puttini, P1
Santus, P1
Pigatto, PD1
Franchi, C1
Pinter, A1
Beigel, F1
Körber, A1
Homey, B1
Beissert, S1
Staubach-Renz, P1
Okazaki, S1
Osawa, R1
Aljaser, M1
Amar, L1
Kahn, JS1
Casseres, RG1
Her, MJ1
Dumont, N1
Rosmarin, D1
Billionnet, C1
Maura, G1
Mezzarobba, M1
Kolli, SS1
Kepley, AL1
Loi, C1
Higa, S1
Devine, B1
Patel, V1
Baradaran, S1
Bansal, A1
Stein Gold, LF1
Mavropoulos, A1
Simopoulou, T1
Brotis, AG1
Liaskos, C1
Roussaki-Schulze, A1
Katsiari, CG1
Bogdanos, DP1
Sakkas, LI1
Lee, E1
Becherel, PA1
Quiles-Tsimaratos, N1
Le Guyadec, T1
Halioua, B1
Perrot, JL1
Pallure, V1
Bilan, P1
Steff, M1
Pfister, P1
Vermersch-Langlin, A1
Boyé, T1
Maillard, H1
Kemula, M1
Girard, C1
Poiraud, C1
Monfort, JB1
Kupfer-Bessaguet, I1
Perrussel, M1
Lons-Danic, D1
Sultan, N1
Lorier, E1
Zeitoun, M1
Wagner, L1
Gabison, G1
Vico-Alonso, C1
Sánchez-Velázquez, A1
Pinilla-Martin, B1
Andrés-Lencina, JJ1
Aragón-Miguel, R1
Calleja-Algarra, A1
Rivera-Díaz, R1
Nagata, M1
Palfreeman, AC1
McNamee, KE1
McCann, FE1
Harrison, C1
Strand, V1
Fiorentino, D1
Hu, C7
Stevens, RM4
Matheson, RT2
Mease, PJ1
Gomez-Reino, JJ1
Adebajo, AO1
Wollenhaupt, J1
Gladman, DD1
Lespessailles, E1
Hall, S1
Hochfeld, M1
Hough, D1
Schett, G1
Moustafa, F1
Ratner, M1
Ferrazzi, A1
Zambello, R1
Sobell, JM2
Kelly, JB1
Mahmood, T1
Zaghi, D1
Busa, S1
Mansouri, Y1
Goldenberg, G1
Chimenti, S4
Griffiths, CE1
Danesh, MJ1
Beroukhim, K2
Nguyen, C1
Levin, E2
Deeks, ED1
Gramiccia, T2
Saraceno, R4
Garofalo, V2
Buonomo, O1
Perricone, R1
Chiricozzi, A3
McAndrew, R1
Wald, JM1
Klufas, DM1
Cather, J1
Caposiena, D1
Cannizzaro, MV1
Aldredge, L1
Yamauchi, PS1
Haber, SL1
Hamilton, S1
Bank, M1
Leong, SY1
Pierce, E1
Truzzi, F1
Parton, A2
Wu, L2
Kosek, J1
Zhang, LH1
Horan, G1
Saltari, A1
Quadri, M1
Lotti, R1
Marconi, A1
Hinde, S1
Wade, R1
Palmer, S1
Woolacott, N1
Spackman, E1
Toth, D1
Yosipovitch, G1
AbuHilal, M1
Shear, N1
Yiu, ZZ1
Nguyen, CM1
Leon, A1
Danesh, M1
Wasel, NR1
Sebastian, M1
Rothstein, BE1
McQuade, B1
Greb, JE1
Goldminz, AM1
Kolios, AG1
Anliker, M1
Boehncke, WH1
Borradori, L1
Gilliet, M1
Häusermann, P1
Itin, P1
Laffitte, E1
Mainetti, C1
Navarini, AA1
Del Duca, E2
Betts, KA1
Sundaram, M1
Thomason, D1
Signorovitch, JE1
Kimball, A1
Reich, A1
Khanskaya, I1
Sfecci, A1
Khemis, A1
Lacour, JP1
Montaudié, H1
Passeron, T2
Braun, J1
Keating, GM1
Bueno-Rodriguez, A1
Tercedor-Sánchez, J1
Vangipuram, R1
Shimanovich, I1
Merl, V1
Zillikens, D1
Grabbe, J1
Rose, C1
Gandhi, AK1
Capone, L1
Adams, M1
Bartlett, JB1
Loveland, MA1
Gilhar, A1
Cheung, YF1
Baillie, GS1
Houslay, MD1
Man, HW1
Muller, GW1
Stirling, DI1
Li, L1
Su, F1
Jin, H1
Shutty, B1
West, C1
Pellerin, M1
Feldman, S1
Rosoph, L1
van de Kerkhof, PC1
Kaufmann, R1
Sutherland, D1
Rohane, P2
Crow, JM1
Dobson, CM1
Parslew, RA1
Varma, K1
Finlay, AY1
Zeldis, JB1
Hu, CC1
Kipnis, C1
Li, C1
LaDuca, JR1
Gaspari, AA1
Naafs, B1
Faber, WR1

Clinical Trials (24)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
An Observational Study of the Real-life Management of Psoriasis Patients Treated With Otezla® (Apremilast) in Belgium[NCT03097003]124 participants (Actual)Observational2017-04-06Completed
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Open-Label Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Apremilast (CC-10004) in Pediatric Subjects With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis[NCT02576678]Phase 242 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-13Completed
Open Label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Etanercept Treatment in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis Who Have Failed Therapy With Apremilast[NCT02749370]Phase 480 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-18Completed
A Non-interventional, Prospective, Observational Study of Treatment With APRemilast in Moderate psoriAsIS in Real Life clinicAL Practice (The 'APRAISAL' Study)[NCT03059953]302 participants (Actual)Observational2017-04-07Completed
A Multicenter, Open Label, Single-arm Pilot Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Apremilast in Patients With Moderate to Severe Palmoplantar Pustulosis (PPP) (APLANTUS)[NCT04572997]Phase 221 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-29Completed
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Efficacy and Safety Study of Apremilast (CC-10004) in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis[NCT01232283]Phase 3413 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-22Completed
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Efficacy and Safety Study of Apremilast (CC-10004) in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis[NCT01194219]Phase 3844 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-09Completed
A Phase 4, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast (CC-10004) in Subjects With Moderate Plaque Psoriasis[NCT02425826]Phase 4221 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-20Completed
A Phase 3B, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of Apremilast (CC-10004), Etanercept, And Placebo, In Subjects With Moderate To Severe Plaque Psoriasis[NCT01690299]Phase 3250 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-01Completed
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast (CC-10004) in Subjects With Mild to Moderate Plaque Psoriasis[NCT03721172]Phase 3595 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-03-11Completed
A Phase 2B, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Efficacy and Safety Study of Two Doses of Apremilast (CC-10004) In Japanese Subjects With Moderate-To-Severe Plaque-Type Psoriasis[NCT01988103]Phase 2254 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-09Completed
A Pilot Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast in Patients of Chronic and Recurrent Erythema Nodosum Leprosum[NCT04822909]Phase 410 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-15Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast in Patients With Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis[NCT06032858]Phase 430 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-03-06Completed
An Open-label, Single-Arm Pilot Study Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Chronic Hand Dermatitis[NCT03741933]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-02-28Withdrawn (stopped due to The principal investigator left George Washington University and closed the study at their departure.)
A Phase 2B, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Ranging, Efficacy and Safety Study of Apremilast (CC-10004) in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Plaque-Type Psoriasis (Core Study)[NCT00773734]Phase 2352 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-01Completed
A Phase 2, Open-label Multi-center Study to Evaluate the Safety, Pharmacodynamics, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of Apremilast in Subjects With Recalcitrant Plaque-type Psoriasis[NCT00521339]Phase 231 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-01Completed
Molecular Effects of Apremilast in the Synovium of Psoriatic Arthritis Patients (MEAS Study)[NCT04645420]19 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-11-12Completed
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Efficacy and Safety Study of Two Doses of Apremilast (CC-10004) in Subjects With Active Psoriatic Arthritis[NCT01172938]Phase 3504 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-02Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Tofacitinib vs Methotrexate in the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis[NCT03736161]Phase 361 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-15Completed
An Investigator Initiated Study of Monocyte Biomarkers in Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis Subjects Treated With Apremilast[NCT03442088]Phase 228 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-06-01Completed
Apremilast in Combination With Clobetasol Spray for the Treatment of Plaque Psoriasis[NCT03453190]Phase 420 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-02-25Recruiting
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Dose Comparison Study of CC-10004 in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Plaque-Type Psoriasis[NCT00606450]Phase 2260 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-01Completed
Open-Label, Single-Arm Pilot Study to Evaluate the Pharmacodynamics, Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Preliminary Efficacy of CC10004 in Subjects With Severe Plaque Type Psoriasis[NCT00604682]Phase 219 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-01Completed
A Phase 2, Open-label, Investigator-Initiated Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Apremilast in Subjects With Recalcitrant Contact or Atopic Dermatitis[NCT00931242]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Apparent Total Plasma Clearance When Dosed Orally (CL/F) for Apremilast

Apparent total plasma clearance (CL/F) of apremilast was calculated using non-compartmental methods, plasma concentrations and actual blood sampling times from the intensive sampling schedule. (NCT02576678)
Timeframe: For adolescents, a pre-dose sample prior to morning dose and on Day 14 as well as at hours 1, 2, 3, 5, 8 and 12 post dose; for the children, samples were collected 2 hours at predose (prior to morning dose) and at 2, 5 and 12 hours post morning dose.

InterventionLiters/hour (Geometric Mean)
Group 1 Adolescents: Apremilast 20 mg11.113
Group 1 Adolescents: Apremilast 30 mg10.338
Group 2 Children: Apremilast 20 mg7.859

Apparent Total Volume of Distribution When Dosed Orally, Based on Study-State (Vss/F) or in the Terminal Phase (Vz/F)

Apparent total volume of distribution when dosed orally, based on study-state (Vss/F) or in the terminal phase (Vz/F). Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using non-compartmental methods, plasma concentrations and actual blood sampling times from the intensive sampling schedule. (NCT02576678)
Timeframe: For adolescents, a pre-dose sample prior to morning dose and on Day 14 as well as at hours 1, 2, 3, 5, 8 and 12 post dose; for the children, samples were collected 2 hours at predose (prior to morning dose) and at 2, 5 and 12 hours post morning dose.

InterventionLiters (Geometric Mean)
Group 1 Adolescents: Apremilast 20 mg86.870
Group 1 Adolescents: Apremilast 30 mg101.049
Group 2 Children: Apremilast 20 mg55.126

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours Post Dose of Apremilast (AUC0-12)

Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the 12 hours post dose was calculated using non-compartmental methods, plasma concentrations and actual blood sampling times from the intensive sampling schedule. (NCT02576678)
Timeframe: For adolescents, a pre-dose sample prior to morning dose and on Day 14 as well as at hours 1, 2, 3, 5, 8 and 12 post dose; for the children, samples were collected 2 hours at predose (prior to morning dose) and at 2, 5 and 12 hours post morning dose.

Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Group 1 Adolescents: Apremilast 20 mg1799.717
Group 1 Adolescents: Apremilast 30 mg2901.795
Group 2 Children: Apremilast 20 mg2544.874

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Measurable Concentration of Apremilast (AUC0-t)

Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable time point and was calculated using non-compartmental methods, plasma concentrations and actual blood sampling times from the intensive sampling schedule. (NCT02576678)
Timeframe: For adolescents, a pre-dose sample prior to morning dose and on Day 14 as well as at hours 1, 2, 3, 5, 8 and 12 post dose; for the children, samples were collected 2 hours at predose (prior to morning dose) and at 2, 5 and 12 hours post morning dose.

Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Group 1 Adolescents: Apremilast 20 mg1794.815
Group 1 Adolescents: Apremilast 30 mg2900.472
Group 2 Children: Apremilast 20 mg2367.641

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Apremilast

Maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) of apremilast. PK parameters were calculated using non-compartmental methods, plasma concentrations and actual blood sampling times from the intensive sampling schedule. (NCT02576678)
Timeframe: For adolescents, a pre-dose sample prior to morning dose and on Day 14 as well as at hours 1, 2, 3, 5, 8 and 12 post dose; for the children, samples were collected 2 hours at predose (prior to morning dose) and at 2, 5 and 12 hours post morning dose.

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Group 1 Adolescents: Apremilast 20 mg274.272
Group 1 Adolescents: Apremilast 30 mg410.929
Group 2 Children: Apremilast 20 mg348.146

Terminal Phase Elimination Half-Life

Terminal-phase elimination half-life (t ½). PK parameters were calculated using non-compartmental methods, plasma concentrations and actual blood sampling times from the intensive sampling schedule. (NCT02576678)
Timeframe: For adolescents, a pre-dose sample prior to morning dose and on Day 14 as well as at hours 1, 2, 3, 5, 8 and 12 post dose; for the children, samples were collected 2 hours at predose (prior to morning dose) and at 2, 5 and 12 hours post morning dose.

Interventionhours (Geometric Mean)
Group 1 Adolescents: Apremilast 20 mg5.418
Group 1 Adolescents: Apremilast 30 mg6.775
Group 2 Children: Apremilast 20 mg4.862

Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Apremilast

Time to maximum observed plasma concentration obtained directly from the observed concentration versus time data. PK parameters were calculated using non-compartmental methods, plasma concentrations and actual blood sampling times from the intensive sampling schedule. (NCT02576678)
Timeframe: For adolescents, a pre-dose sample prior to morning dose and on Day 14 as well as at hours 1, 2, 3, 5, 8 and 12 post dose; for the children, samples were collected 2 hours at predose (prior to morning dose) and at 2, 5 and 12 hours post morning dose.

Interventionhours (Median)
Group 1 Adolescents: Apremilast 20 mg2.467
Group 1 Adolescents: Apremilast 30 mg3.000
Group 2 Children: Apremilast 20 mg2.000

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

A TEAE is an adverse event with a start date on or after the date of the first dose of apremilast and no later than 28 days after the last dose of apremilast. An adverse event is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen in a subject during the course of a study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the subject's health, including laboratory test values, regardless of etiology. A serious AE is any untoward AE that results in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization or in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect or constitutes an important medical event. The investigator assessment of severity/intensity of an event was defined as mild, moderate or severe. (NCT02576678)
Timeframe: From first dose of apremilast until 28 days after the last dose; up to 29 July 2019; median treatment duration for adolescents apremilast 20 mg and 30 mg was 50.00 and 50.57 weeks respectively and for children was 50.00 weeks.

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any TEAEAny Drug Related TEAEAny Severe TEAEAny Serious TEAEAny Serious Drug-Related TEAEAny TEAE Leading to Drug InterruptionAny TEAE Leading to Drug WithdrawalAny TEAE Leading to Death
Group 1 Adolescents: Apremilast 20 mg1311100100
Group 1 Adolescents: Apremilast 30 mg76000000
Group 2 Children: Apremilast 20 mg2017110420

Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response at Week 12

A PASI 75 response is a 75% or greater improvement (reduction) from baseline in PASI score. The PASI measures the average redness (erythema), thickness (induration), and scaliness (each graded on a 0 to 4 scale) of psoriasis lesions, weighted by the area of involvement in the four main body areas (i.e., head and neck, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities). PASI scores can range from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating greater severity and/or more extensive psoriasis. (NCT02749370)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Etanercept41.6

"PSI Burning of Skin Lesions Component Score at Each Visit"

Participants rated the severity of their psoriasis signs and symptoms on an 8-item questionnaire (itch, redness, scaling, burning, stinging, cracking, flaking, pain) based on the past 7 days. Each item was scored on a 5-point scale from 0 (not at all severe) to 4 (very severe). (NCT02749370)
Timeframe: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 8Week 12Week 16Week 20Week 24
Etanercept1.31.21.01.00.80.80.90.90.9

"PSI Cracking of Skin Lesions Component Score at Each Visit"

Participants rated the severity of their psoriasis signs and symptoms on an 8-item questionnaire (itch, redness, scaling, burning, stinging, cracking, flaking, pain) based on the past 7 days. Each item was scored on a 5-point scale from 0 (not at all severe) to 4 (very severe). (NCT02749370)
Timeframe: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 8Week 12Week 16Week 20Week 24
Etanercept1.91.71.61.41.21.11.21.21.2

"PSI Flaking of Skin Lesions Component Score at Each Visit"

Participants rated the severity of their psoriasis signs and symptoms on an 8-item questionnaire (itch, redness, scaling, burning, stinging, cracking, flaking, pain) based on the past 7 days. Each item was scored on a 5-point scale from 0 (not at all severe) to 4 (very severe). (NCT02749370)
Timeframe: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 8Week 12Week 16Week 20Week 24
Etanercept2.22.11.81.81.51.31.51.61.4

"PSI Itch From Psoriasis Component Score at Each Visit"

Participants rated the severity of their psoriasis signs and symptoms on an 8-item questionnaire (itch, redness, scaling, burning, stinging, cracking, flaking, pain) based on the past 7 days. Each item was scored on a 5-point scale from 0 (not at all severe) to 4 (very severe). (NCT02749370)
Timeframe: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 8Week 12Week 16Week 20Week 24
Etanercept2.22.01.91.81.51.31.51.51.5

"PSI Pain From Skin Lesions Component Score at Each Visit"

Participants rated the severity of their psoriasis signs and symptoms on an 8-item questionnaire (itch, redness, scaling, burning, stinging, cracking, flaking, pain) based on the past 7 days. Each item was scored on a 5-point scale from 0 (not at all severe) to 4 (very severe). (NCT02749370)
Timeframe: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 8Week 12Week 16Week 20Week 24
Etanercept1.21.21.01.00.80.70.90.90.8

"PSI Redness of Skin Lesions Component Score at Each Visit"

Participants rated the severity of their psoriasis signs and symptoms on an 8-item questionnaire (itch, redness, scaling, burning, stinging, cracking, flaking, pain) based on the past 7 days. Each item was scored on a 5-point scale from 0 (not at all severe) to 4 (very severe). (NCT02749370)
Timeframe: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 8Week 12Week 16Week 20Week 24
Etanercept2.42.22.01.81.71.51.71.51.5

"PSI Scaling of Skin Lesions Component Score at Each Visit"

Participants rated the severity of their psoriasis signs and symptoms on an 8-item questionnaire (itch, redness, scaling, burning, stinging, cracking, flaking, pain) based on the past 7 days. Each item was scored on a 5-point scale from 0 (not at all severe) to 4 (very severe). (NCT02749370)
Timeframe: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 8Week 12Week 16Week 20Week 24
Etanercept2.32.11.91.91.61.51.61.61.4

"PSI Stinging of Skin Lesions Component Score at Each Visit"

Participants rated the severity of their psoriasis signs and symptoms on an 8-item questionnaire (itch, redness, scaling, burning, stinging, cracking, flaking, pain) based on the past 7 days. Each item was scored on a 5-point scale from 0 (not at all severe) to 4 (very severe). (NCT02749370)
Timeframe: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 8Week 12Week 16Week 20Week 24
Etanercept1.21.11.01.00.80.70.90.90.8

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

(NCT02749370)
Timeframe: From first dose of etanercept to 30 days after last dose, up to 28 weeks.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
All adverse events (AEs)Serious adverse eventsAEs leading to discontinuation of etanerceptFatal adverse eventsTreatment-related adverse events (TRAEs)Treatment-related serious adverse eventsTRAEs leading to discontinuation of etanerceptFatal treatment-related adverse events
Etanercept1922010110

Patient Assessment of Treatment Satisfaction at Week 12

"Participants indicated their level of satisfaction with the medication's control of psoriasis on a scale from very dissatisfied to very satisfied." (NCT02749370)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Very dissatisfiedDissatisfiedNeither satisfied nor dissatisfiedSatisfiedVery satisfied
Etanercept4.113.521.632.428.4

Patient Assessment of Treatment Satisfaction at Week 24

"Participants indicated their level of satisfaction with the medication's control of psoriasis on a scale from very dissatisfied to very satisfied." (NCT02749370)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Very dissatisfiedDissatisfiedNeither satisfied nor dissatisfiedSatisfiedVery satisfied
Etanercept8.025.313.324.029.3

Percent Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Weeks 12 and 24

The dermatology life quality index (DLQI) is a skin disease-specific instrument to evaluate health-related quality of life. The DLQI questionnaire asks participants to evaluate the degree that psoriasis has affected their quality of life in the last week, and includes the following parameters: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure activities, work or school activities, personal relationships and treatment related feelings. Participants answered 10 questions on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); the range of the total score is from 0 (best possible score) to 30 (worst possible score). Percent change from baseline was calculated as (Baseline Value - Post-baseline Value) / Baseline Value * 100, hence a positive value indicates improvement. (NCT02749370)
Timeframe: Baseline and weeks 12 and 24

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Week 12Week 24
Etanercept53.6036.95

Percent Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)

"The PASI measures the average redness (erythema), thickness (induration), and scaliness (each graded on a 0 to 4 scale) of psoriasis lesions, weighted by the area of involvement in the four main body areas (i.e., head and neck, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities). PASI scores can range from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating greater severity and/or more extensive psoriasis.~Percent change from baseline was calculated as (Baseline Value - Post-baseline Value) / Baseline Value * 100, hence a positive value indicates improvement." (NCT02749370)
Timeframe: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Week 4Week 8Week 12Week 16Week 20Week 24
Etanercept22.0343.5155.4757.4160.4257.67

Percent Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Body Surface Area (BSA) Involved With Psoriasis at Each Visit

A measurement of psoriasis involvement, given as the physician's assessment of the percentage of the participant's total body surface area (BSA) involved with psoriasis. The percent of BSA affected was estimated by assuming that the participant's palm, excluding the fingers and thumb, represented roughly 1% of the body's surface. Percent change from baseline was calculated as (Baseline Value - Post-baseline Value) / Baseline Value * 100, hence a positive value indicates improvement. (NCT02749370)
Timeframe: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Week 4Week 8Week 12Week 16Week 20Week 24
Etanercept13.4731.0344.4948.2649.9746.89

Percentage of Participants With a PASI 50 Response at Each Visit

A PASI 50 response is a 50% or greater improvement (reduction) from baseline in PASI score. The PASI measures the average redness (erythema), thickness (induration), and scaliness (each graded on a 0 to 4 scale) of psoriasis lesions, weighted by the area of involvement in the four main body areas (i.e., head and neck, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities). PASI scores can range from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating greater severity and/or more extensive psoriasis. (NCT02749370)
Timeframe: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 4Week 8Week 12Week 16Week 20Week 24
Etanercept23.750.670.168.874.062.3

Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response at Each Visit

A PASI 75 response is a 75% or greater improvement (reduction) from baseline in PASI score. The PASI measures the average redness (erythema), thickness (induration), and scaliness (each graded on a 0 to 4 scale) of psoriasis lesions, weighted by the area of involvement in the four main body areas (i.e., head and neck, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities). PASI scores can range from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating greater severity and/or more extensive psoriasis. (NCT02749370)
Timeframe: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 4Week 8Week 12Week 16Week 20Week 24
Etanercept6.623.441.642.942.945.5

Percentage of Participants With a PASI 90 Response at Each Visit

A PASI 90 response is a 90% or greater improvement (reduction) from baseline in PASI score. The PASI measures the average redness (erythema), thickness (induration), and scaliness (each graded on a 0 to 4 scale) of psoriasis lesions, weighted by the area of involvement in the four main body areas (i.e., head and neck, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities). PASI scores can range from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating greater severity and/or more extensive psoriasis. (NCT02749370)
Timeframe: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 4Week 8Week 12Week 16Week 20Week 24
Etanercept1.36.513.016.923.422.1

Percentage of Participants With an sPGA Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Each Visit

The sPGA is a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 5 (very severe) used to measure the severity of disease (induration, scaling, and erythema). A sPGA response is defined as a sPGA value of clear (score 0) or almost clear (score 1). (NCT02749370)
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 4Week 8Week 12Week 16Week 20Week 24
Etanercept3.915.623.428.629.933.8

Percentage of Participants With an sPGA Score of 0, 1 or 2 at Each Visit

The sPGA is a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 5 (very severe) used to measure the severity of disease (induration, scaling, and erythema). The percentage of participants with a score of 0 (clear), 1 (almost clear) or 2 (mild) is reported. (NCT02749370)
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 4Week 8Week 12Week 16Week 20Week 24
Etanercept21.155.862.359.755.857.1

Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1 Grade Improvement in sPGA From Baseline

The sPGA is a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 5 (very severe) used to measure the severity of disease (induration, scaling, and erythema). The percentage of participants with an improvement from baseline of ≥ 1 grade is reported. (NCT02749370)
Timeframe: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 4Week 8Week 12Week 16Week 20Week 24
Etanercept40.870.175.372.774.074.0

Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement in sPGA From Baseline

The sPGA is a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 5 (very severe) used to measure the severity of disease (induration, scaling, and erythema). The percentage of participants with an improvement from baseline of ≥ 2 grades is reported. (NCT02749370)
Timeframe: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 4Week 8Week 12Week 16Week 20Week 24
Etanercept7.931.232.537.736.439.0

Psoriasis Symptom Inventory (PSI) Total Score at Each Visit

Participants rated the severity of their psoriasis signs and symptoms on an 8-item questionnaire (itch, redness, scaling, burning, stinging, cracking, flaking, pain) based on the past 7 days. Each item was scored on a 5-point scale from 0 (not at all severe) to 4 (very severe). The total score is the sum of the 8 responses, and ranges from 0 to 32. Higher scores indicate more severe psoriasis. (NCT02749370)
Timeframe: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 8Week 12Week 16Week 20Week 24
Etanercept14.713.712.111.710.08.810.19.99.6

Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Each Visit

The sPGA is a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 5 (very severe) used to measure the severity of disease (induration, scaling, and erythema). (NCT02749370)
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 4Week 8Week 12Week 16Week 20Week 24
Etanercept2.92.42.22.22.22.2

Pustules Count Percent Change From Baseline

Percentage change from baseline in Pustules count after 20 weeks of treatment with Apremilast (NCT04572997)
Timeframe: At Visit 2 (Baseline) and Visit 5 (End of Study - Week 20)

InterventionPercent change (Median)
Full Analysis Set - LOCF-76.3
Per Protocol Set (PPS)-79.82

Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)

"The DLQI is a dermatology-specific quality of life instrument designed to assess the impact of a disease on the patient's daily life which is also validated for PPP. It is a 10-item questionnaire and can be used to assess 6 different aspects: symptoms and feelings, leisure, daily activities, work or school performance, personal relationship and treatment. The DLQI was calculated by summing the score of each question resulting in a maximum of 30 and a minimum of 0. The higher the score, the more quality of life was impaired.~Meaning of DLQI scores:~0 to 1 = No effect at all on patient's life~2 to 5 = Small effect on patient's life~6 to 10 = Moderate effect on patient's life~11 to 20 = Very large effect on patient's life~21 to 30 = Extremely large effect on patient's life" (NCT04572997)
Timeframe: At Visit 2 (Baseline), Visit 4 (Week 12) and Visit 5 (Week 20).

,
InterventionDLQI Score (Median)
Visit 2 - BaselineVisit 4 - Week 12Visit 5 - End of Study - Week 20
Full Analysis Set (FAS)8.502.502.00
Per Protocol Set (PPS)8.002.502.00

Number of Participants With PPPASI 50 Response

PPPASI 50 response defined as a 50% decrease in PPPASI from baseline. (NCT04572997)
Timeframe: At Visit 3 (Week 4), Visit 4 (Week 12) and Visit 5 (Week 20).

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Visit 3 - Week 4Visit 4 - Week 12Visit 5 - End of Study - Week 20
Full Analysis Set (FAS)71213
Per Protocol Set (PPS)71213

Number of Participants With PPPASI 75 Response

PPPASI 75 response defined as a 75% decrease in PPPASI from baseline. (NCT04572997)
Timeframe: At Visit 3 (Week 4), Visit 4 (Week 12) and Visit 5 (Week 20).

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Visit 3 - Week 4Visit 4 - Week 12Visit 5 - End of Study - Week 20
Full Analysis Set (FAS)263
Per Protocol Set (PPS)263

Number of Participants With Pustules Count 50 and 75 Response

Patients experiencing a 50% and 75% decrease in Pustules count from baseline (NCT04572997)
Timeframe: At Visit 3 (Week 4), Visit 4 (Week 12) and Visit 5 (End of Study-Week 20).

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Pustules count 50: Visit 3 - Week 4Pustules count 50: Visit 4 - Week 12Pustules count 50: Visit 5-End of Study- Week 20Pustules count 75: Visit 3 - Week 4Pustules count 75: Visit 4 - Week 12Pustules count 75: Visit 5-End of Study- Week 20
Full Analysis Set (FAS)13181681412
Per Protocol Set (PPS)14171691412

Palmoplantar Pustulosis Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PPPASI) at Week 20 Compared With Baseline

The PPPASI assess palms of hands and soles of feet for psoriasis involvement. The PPPASI score range from 0-72, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. (NCT04572997)
Timeframe: PPPASI Score at baseline and Week 20.

,,
InterventionPPPASI Score (Median)
Visit 2 - BaselineVisit 5 - End of Study - Week 20
Full Analysis Set - LOCF16.508.10
Full Analysis Set (FAS)16.507.65
Per Protocol Set (PPS)15.857.65

Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)

The PASI is a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The total qualitative score (sum of erythema, thickness, and scaling scores) is multiplied by the degree of involvement for each anatomic region and then multiplied by a constant. These values for each anatomic region are summed to yield the PASI score. (NCT04572997)
Timeframe: At Visit 2 (Baseline), Visit 3 (Week 4), Visit 4 (Week 12) and Visit 5 (End of Study - Week 20).

InterventionPASI Score (Median)
Visit 2 - BaselineVisit 3 - Week 4Visit 4 - Week 12Visit 5-End of Study-Week 20
Per Protocol Set (PPS)3.852.270.50.95

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Discomfort/Pain

VAS was used to assess discomfort/pain. The patient was asked to place a vertical stroke on a 100 mm VAS on which the left-hand boundary represented no discomfort/pain (at 0 mm), and the right-hand boundary (at 100 mm) represented discomfort/pain as severe as can be imagined. The distance from the mark to the left-hand boundary was recorded, with higher values indicating more discomfort/pain (worse conditions). (NCT04572997)
Timeframe: At Visit 2 (Baseline), Visit 3 (Week 4), Visit 4 (Week 12) and Visit 5 (End of Study - Week 20).

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Median)
Visit 2 - BaselineVisit 3 - Week 4Visit 4 - Week 12Visit 5 - End of Study - Week 20
Full Analysis Set (FAS)44.04.02.09.0
Per Protocol Set (PPS)37.53.01.57.5

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pruritus/Itch

VAS was used to assess pruritus/itch. The patient was asked to place a vertical stroke on a 100 mm VAS on which the left-hand boundary (at 0 mm) represented no pruritus/itch, and the right-hand boundary (at 100 mm) represented pruritus/itch as severe as can be imagined. The distance from the mark to the left-hand boundary was recorded, with higher values indicating more pruritus/itch (worse outcomes). (NCT04572997)
Timeframe: At Visit 2 (Baseline), Visit 3 (Week 4), Visit 4 (Week 12) and Visit 5 (End of Study - Week 20).

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Median)
Visit 2 - BaselineVisit 3 - Week 4Visit 4 - Week 12Visit 5 - End of Study - Week 20
Full Analysis Set (FAS)31.02.025.012.0
Per Protocol Set (PPS)29.511.024.011.5

Dynamic H&F PGA

The dynamic H&F PGA describes the global improvement compared with baseline. It relies on the physician's memory of the baseline severity to evaluate the level of alteration. The categories vary between 0 (cleared) and 6 (worse). (NCT04572997)
Timeframe: At Visit 3 (Week 4), Visit 4 (Week 12) and Visit 5 (End of Study - Week 20).

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Visit 3 - Week 472520894Visit 4 - Week 1272520894Visit 5 - End of Study - Week 2072520894
5 fair6 worse1 excellent2 good3 slight4 unchanged0 cleared
Per Protocol Set (PPS)3
Per Protocol Set (PPS)4
Per Protocol Set (PPS)7
Per Protocol Set (PPS)0
Per Protocol Set (PPS)5
Per Protocol Set (PPS)2
Per Protocol Set (PPS)6

Hand and Feet Physician Global Assessment (H&F PGA)

The H&F PGA describes the severity of psoriasis on the hands and/or feet using five categories ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe). (NCT04572997)
Timeframe: At Visit 2 (Baseline), Visit 3 (Week 4) , Visit 4 (Week 12) and Visit 5 (Week 20).

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Visit 2 - Baseline72520890Visit 2 - Baseline72520891Visit 3 - Week 472520890Visit 3 - Week 472520891Visit 4 - Week 1272520890Visit 4 - Week 1272520891Visit 5 - End of Study - Week 2072520890Visit 5 - End of Study - Week 2072520891
0 clear1 almost clear2 mild3 moderate4 severe
Full Analysis Set (FAS)0
Per Protocol Set (PPS)0
Full Analysis Set (FAS)2
Per Protocol Set (PPS)2
Full Analysis Set (FAS)19
Per Protocol Set (PPS)18
Full Analysis Set (FAS)1
Full Analysis Set (FAS)10
Full Analysis Set (FAS)9
Full Analysis Set (FAS)3
Per Protocol Set (PPS)3
Per Protocol Set (PPS)9
Full Analysis Set (FAS)8
Per Protocol Set (PPS)1
Per Protocol Set (PPS)10
Per Protocol Set (PPS)8

Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Week 16

"DLQI is a simple, compact, and practical questionnaire for use in a dermatology clinical setting to assess limitations related to the impact of skin disease. The instrument contains ten items dealing with the participant's skin. With the exception of Item Number 7, the participant responds on a four-point scale, ranging from Very Much (score 3) to Not at All or Not relevant (score 0). Item Number 7 is a multi-part item, the first part of which ascertains whether the participant's skin prevented them from working or studying (Yes or No, scores 3 or 0 respectively), and if No, then the subject is asked how much of a problem the skin has been at work or study over the past week, with response alternatives being A lot, A little, or Not at all (scores 2, 1, or 0 respectively). The DLQI total score was derived by summing all item scores, which has a possible range of 0 to 30, with 30 corresponding to the worst quality of life, and 0 corresponding to the best." (NCT01232283)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Apremilast-6.7
Placebo-2.7

Change From Baseline in Pruritus Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 16

The Pruritus Visual Analog Scores (VAS) were used to measure the amount of itching and discomfort a participant experiences. Participant's Assessment of Pruritus (Itch) asked: On average, how much itch have you had because of your condition in the past week? All VAS values range from 0 to 100. Higher scores correspond to more severe symptom or disease. Change from baseline was calculated for the VAS scale, where change = visit value - baseline value. (NCT01232283)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Apremilast-33.5
Placebo-12.2

Change From Baseline in the Mental Component Summary (MSC) Score of the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-item (SF-36) Health Survey Version 2.0 at Week 16

"The SF-36 was a 36-item general health instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS).~Scores from the 8 scales, PCS and MCS were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population, with 50 as the average and 10 as the standard deviation, higher scores indicating better health. For norm based scores, change from baseline were calculated for the 8 scales and the two summary scales, where change = visit value - baseline value." (NCT01232283)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Apremilast2.60
Placebo-0.03

Percent Change From Baseline in the Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16

"BSA was a measurement of involved skin. The overall BSA affected by psoriasis was estimated based on the palm area of the participant's hand (entire palmar surface or handprint including the fingers), which equates to approximately 1% of total body surface area.~BSA percent change from baseline (Visit 2 Week 0) was determined at each visit of the study, which is calculated as 100*(visit BSA - baseline BSA) / baseline BSA (%)." (NCT01232283)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Apremilast-48.40
Placebo-6.25

Percent Change From Baseline in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) Score at Week 16

Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The total qualitative score (sum of erythema, thickness, and scaling scores) is multiplied by the degree of involvement for each anatomic region and then multiplied by a constant. These values for each anatomic region are summed to yield the PASI score. The PASI score was set to missing if any severity score or degree of involvement is missing. (NCT01232283)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Apremilast-50.8
Placebo-16.0

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score (PASI-50) at Week 16 From Baseline

PASI-50 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 50% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 16. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI is a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The PASI score was set to missing if any severity score or degree of involvement is missing. (NCT01232283)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Apremilast55.5
Placebo19.7

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) With at Least 2 Points Reduction From Baseline

The sPGA was a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear), 1 (almost clear), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), to 4 (severe), incorporating an assessment of the severity of the three primary signs of the disease: erythema, scaling and plaque elevation. When making the assessment of overall severity, the Investigator must have factored in areas that have already been cleared (ie, have scores of 0) and not just evaluate remaining lesions for severity, ie, the severity of each sign was averaged across all areas of involvement, including cleared lesions. In the event of different severities across disease signs, the sign that is the predominant feature of the disease should be used to help determine the sPGA score. (NCT01232283)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Apremilast20.4
Placebo4.4

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 75% Improvement (Response) in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI-75) at Week 16 From Baseline

PASI-75 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at week 16. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI is a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The PASI score was set to missing if any severity score or degree of involvement is missing. (NCT01232283)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Apremilast28.8
Placebo5.8

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Both a 75% Improvement (Response) in the PASI and sPGA Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) With at Least 2 Points Reduction at Week 16 From Baseline

"PASI-75 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 16. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. See Outcome measure #1 for further description.~sPGA is a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear), 1 (almost clear), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), to 4 (severe), incorporating an assessment of the severity of the three primary signs of the disease: erythema, scaling and plaque elevation. See Outcome Measure #2 for further description." (NCT01232283)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Apremilast18.6
Placebo4.4

Time to Loss of Effect (Loss of 50% Improvement in PASI Score Obtained at Week 32 Compared to Baseline) During the Randomized Treatment Withdrawal Phase

Time to loss was the time between the re-randomization date and the date of the first assessment with loss of 50% PASI improvement (event), or the time between the re-randomization date and the date of the last PASI assessment in the randomized withdrawal phase prior to addition of topical/phototherapy or other effective psoriasis therapies, or resumption of apremilast 30 mg BID, or discontinuation, or Week 52 if no loss (censored), whichever was earlier (NCT01232283)
Timeframe: Weeks 32 to Week 52

InterventionWeeks (Median)
APR-APR Re-randomized to PBO12.4
APR-APR-Re-randomized to APR21.9

Number of Participants With Psoriasis Flare or Rebound in the Apremilast-Exposure Period

Psoriasis flare was defined as a sudden intensification of psoriasis requiring medical intervention, or a diagnosis of new generalized erythrodermic, inflammatory, or pustular psoriasis. Rebound is defined as a severe and sudden worsening of disease that occurs after treatment has been discontinued. Note categories below. [1] Psoriasis adverse events (ie, preferred term as Guttate psoriasis, Psoriasis, Pustular psoriasis) started on or after the first dose date and on or before the last dose date within the phase. [2] Psoriasis adverse events (ie, preferred term as Guttate psoriasis, Psoriasis, Pustular psoriasis, Rebound psoriasis) started after the last dose date for participants who discontinued within the phase. [3] PASI >= 125% of baseline score at any visit after the last dose date for participants who discontinued within the phase and were not included in [1] and/or [2]. (NCT01232283)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 260

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Participants with any psoriasis flareParticipants with any psoriasis reboundPASI ≥ 125% of Baseline score after last dose
Apremilast251112

Number of Participants With Psoriasis Flare or Rebound in the Placebo Controlled Phase

Psoriasis flare was defined as a sudden intensification of psoriasis requiring medical intervention, or a diagnosis of new generalized erythrodermic, inflammatory, or pustular psoriasis. Rebound is defined as a severe and sudden worsening of disease that occurs after treatment has been discontinued. Note categories below. [1] Psoriasis adverse events (ie, preferred term as Guttate psoriasis, Psoriasis, Pustular psoriasis) started on or after the first dose date and on or before the last dose date within the phase. [2] Psoriasis adverse events (ie, preferred term as Guttate psoriasis, Psoriasis, Pustular psoriasis, Rebound psoriasis) started after the last dose date for participants who discontinued within the phase. [3] PASI >= 125% of baseline score at any visit after the last dose date for participants who discontinued within the phase and were not included in [1] and/or [2]. (NCT01232283)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 16

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Participants with any psoriasis flareParticipants with any psoriasis reboundPASI ≥ 125% of Baseline score after last dose
Apremilast311
Placebo702

Number of Participants With TEAEs During the Apremilast-Exposure Period Through Week 260

The Apremilast-exposure Period started on the date of the first dose of apremilast (Week 0 for participants originally randomized to apremilast or Week 16 for participants originally randomized to placebo) to the last dose of apremilast. Adverse events that started after 28 days of initiating placebo and before resuming apremilast treatment in the Randomized Treatment Withdrawal Phase (Weeks 32 to 52) were excluded in the Apremilast-exposure phase. A serious AE (SAE) is any untoward adverse event that is fatal, life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, requires or prolongs existing in-patient hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or a condition that may jeopardize the patient or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. An AE is a treatment emergent AE if the AE start date is on or after the date of the first dose of study drug and no later than 28 days after the last dose. (NCT01232283)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 260; The mean duration of exposure was 100.66 weeks.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any TEAEAny Drug-Related TEAEAny Severe TEAEAny Serious TEAEAny Serious Drug-Related TEAEAny TEAE Leading to Drug InterruptionAny TEAE Leading to Drug WithdrawalAny TEAE Leading to Death
Apremilast3161655844856451

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) in the Placebo Controlled Phase

An AE was any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence, that may appear or worsen in a participant during the course of study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the participant's health, including laboratory test values regardless of etiology. Any worsening (ie, any clinically significant adverse change in the frequency or intensity of a preexisting condition) was considered an AE. A serious AE (SAE) is any untoward adverse event that is fatal, life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, requires or prolongs existing in-patient hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is a condition that may jeopardize the patient or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. An AE is a treatment emergent AE if the AE start date is on or after the date of the first dose of study drug and no later than 28 days after the last dose. (NCT01232283)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any TEAEAny drug related TEAEAny Severe TEAEAny Serious TEAEAny TEAE leading to drug interruptionAny TEAE leading to drug withdrawal
Apremilast1851061251615
Placebo82296347

Change From Baseline in Pruritus Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 16

The Pruritus Visual Analog Scores (VAS) were used to measure the amount of itching and discomfort a participant experiences. Participant's Assessment of Pruritus (Itch) asked: On average, how much itch have you had because of your condition in the past week? All VAS values range from 0 to 100. Higher scores correspond to more severe symptom or disease. Change from baseline was calculated for the VAS scale, where change = visit value - baseline value. (NCT01194219)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Apremilast-31.5
Placebo-7.3

Change From Baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Week 16

"DLQI is a simple, compact, and practical questionnaire for use in a dermatology clinical setting to assess limitations related to the impact of skin disease. The instrument contains ten items dealing with the participant's skin. With the exception of Item Number 7, the participant responds on a four-point scale, ranging from Very Much (score 3) to Not at All or Not relevant (score 0). Item Number 7 is a multi-part item, the first part of which ascertains whether the participant's skin prevented them from working or studying (Yes or No, scores 3 or 0 respectively), and if No, then the participant is asked how much of a problem the skin has been at work or study over the past week, with response alternatives being A lot, A little, or Not at all (scores 2, 1, or 0 respectively). The DLQI total score is derived by summing all item scores, which has a possible range of 0 to 30, with 30 corresponding to the worst quality of life, and 0 corresponding to the best." (NCT01194219)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Apremilast-6.6
Placebo-2.1

Change From Baseline in the Mental Component Summary (MSC) Score of the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-item (SF-36) Health Survey Version 2.0 at Week 16

The SF-36 was a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS). Scores from the 8 scales, PCS and MCS were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population, with 50 as the average and 10 as the standard deviation, higher scores indicating better health. For norm based scores, change from baseline were calculated for the 8 scales and the two summary scales, where change = visit value - baseline value. (NCT01194219)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Apremilast2.28
Placebo-0.81

Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to Loss of PASI-75 Response (Loss of Effect) at Week 32 During the Re-Randomized Treatment Withdrawal Phase

Time to loss was the time between the re-randomization date and the date of the first assessment where loss of PASI-75 was observed (event); or the time between the re-randomization date and the date of the last PASI assessment in the Weeks 32-52 interval prior to addition of protocol-prohibited medication/therapy, or resumption of APR 30 BID, or discontinuation, or Week 52 if no loss (censored). (NCT01194219)
Timeframe: Week 32 to Week 52

InterventionWeeks (Median)
APR-APR-Re-randomized to APR17.7
APR-APR -Re-randomized to PBO5.1

Percent Change From Baseline in Percent of Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16

"BSA was a measurement of involved skin. The overall BSA affected by psoriasis was estimated based on the palm area of the participant's hand (entire palmar surface or handprint including the fingers), which equates to approximately 1% of total body surface area. BSA percent change from baseline (Visit 2 Week 0) was determined at each visit of the study, which is calculated as 100*(visit BSA - baseline BSA) / baseline BSA (%)." (NCT01194219)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Apremilast-47.77
Placebo-6.99

Percent Change From Baseline in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) Score at Week 16

Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The total qualitative score (sum of erythema, thickness, and scaling scores) is multiplied by the degree of involvement for each anatomic region and then multiplied by a constant. These values for each anatomic region are summed to yield the PASI score. The PASI score was set to missing if any severity score or degree of involvement is missing. PASI score percent change from baseline was calculated as 100* (visit score - baseline score)/baseline score (%). (NCT01194219)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Apremilast-52.1
Placebo-16.8

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score (PASI-50) at Week 16 From Baseline

A participant was classified as having at least a 50% improvement in PASI score from baseline, which was equivalent to a percent change from baseline ranging from -100% to -50%. PASI score is based on an assessment of erythema (reddening), induration (plaque thickness), desquamation (scaling), and the percent area affected as observed on the day of examination. (NCT01194219)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Placebo/Apremilast58.7
Placebo17.0

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI-75) at Week 16 From Baseline

PASI-75 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 16. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The PASI score was set to missing if any severity score or degree of involvement is missing. (NCT01194219)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo/Apremilast33.1
Placebo (PBO)5.3

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) With At Least 2 Points Reduction From Baseline

The sPGA was a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear), 1 (almost clear), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), to 4 (severe), incorporating an assessment of the severity of the three primary signs of the disease: erythema, scaling and plaque elevation. When making the assessment of overall severity, the Investigator factored in areas that have already been cleared (ie, have scores of 0) and did not just evaluate remaining lesions for severity, ie, the severity of each sign was averaged across all areas of involvement, including cleared lesions. In the event of different severities across disease signs, the sign that is the predominant feature of the disease should be used to help determine the sPGA score. (NCT01194219)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Apremilast21.7
Placebo3.9

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Both a 75% Improvement (Response) in the PASI and sPGA Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) With at Least 2 Points Reduction at Week 16 From Baseline

PASI-75 response was the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 16. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. See Outcome Measure #1 for further description. sPGA is a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear), 1 (almost clear), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), to 4 (severe), incorporating an assessment of the severity of the three primary signs of the disease: erythema, scaling and plaque elevation. See OCM #2 for further description. (NCT01194219)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Apremilast20.3
Placebo3.5

Number of Participants With a Psoriasis Flare or Rebound During the During the Apremilast-exposure Period Through Week 260

Psoriasis flare was defined as a sudden intensification of psoriasis requiring medical intervention, or a diagnosis of new generalized erythrodermic, inflammatory, or pustular psoriasis. Rebound is defined as a severe and sudden worsening of disease that occurs after treatment has been discontinued. Note categories below. [1] Psoriasis adverse events (ie, preferred term as Guttate psoriasis, Psoriasis, Pustular psoriasis) started on or after the first dose date and on or before the last dose date within the phase. [2] Psoriasis adverse events (ie, preferred term as Guttate psoriasis, Psoriasis, Pustular psoriasis, Rebound psoriasis) started after the last dose date for participants who discontinued within the phase. [3] PASI >= 125% of baseline score at any visit after the last dose date for participants who discontinued within the phase and were not included in [1] and/or [2]. (NCT01194219)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 260

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Participants with any psoriasis flare [1]Participants with any psoriasis rebound [2]PASI ≥ 125% of Baseline score after last dose [3]
Apremilast351226

Number of Participants With a Psoriasis Flare or Rebound During the Placebo-Controlled Phase

Psoriasis flare was defined as a sudden intensification of psoriasis requiring medical intervention, or a diagnosis of new generalized erythrodermic, inflammatory, or pustular psoriasis. Rebound is defined as a severe and sudden worsening of disease that occurs after treatment has been discontinued. Note categories below. [1] Psoriasis adverse events (ie, preferred term as Guttate psoriasis, Psoriasis, Pustular psoriasis) started on or after the first dose date and on or before the last dose date within the phase. [2] Psoriasis adverse events (ie, preferred term as Guttate psoriasis, Psoriasis, Pustular psoriasis, Rebound psoriasis) started after the last dose date for participants who discontinued within the phase. [3] PASI >= 125% of baseline score at any visit after the last dose date for participants who discontinued within the phase and were not included in [1] and/or [2]. (NCT01194219)
Timeframe: Weeks 0 to Week 16

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Participants with any psoriasis flare [1]Participants with any psoriasis rebound [2]PASI ≥ 125% of Baseline score after last dose [3]
Apremilast613
Placebo713

Number of Participants With TEAEs During the Apremilast-Exposure Period Through Week 260

The Apremilast-exposure Period started on the date of the first dose of apremilast (Week 0 for participants originally randomized to apremilast or Week 16 for participants originally randomized to placebo) to the last dose of apremilast. Adverse events that started after 28 days of initiating placebo and before resuming apremilast treatment in the Randomized Treatment Withdrawal Phase (Weeks 32 to 52) were excluded in the Apremilast-exposure Period. A serious AE (SAE) is any untoward adverse event that is fatal, life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, requires or prolongs existing in-patient hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or a condition that may jeopardize the patient or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. An AE is a treatment emergent AE if the AE start date is on or after the date of the first dose of study drug and no later than 28 days after the last dose. (NCT01194219)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 260; mean exposure to apremilast 30 mg BID during the Apremilast-exposure Period up to Week 260 was 97.83 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any At TEAEAny Drug-Related TEAEAny Severe TEAEAny Serious TEAEAny Serious Drug-Related TEAEAny TEAE Leading to Drug InterruptionAny TEAE Leading to Drug withdrawalAny TEAE Leading to Death
Apremilast675372787412107983

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Placebo-Controlled Phase

An AE was any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence, that may appear or worsen in a participant during the course of study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the participant's health, including laboratory test values regardless of etiology. Any worsening (ie, any clinically significant adverse change in the frequency or intensity of a preexisting condition) was considered an AE. A serious AE (SAE) is any untoward adverse event that is fatal, life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, requires or prolongs existing in-patient hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or a condition that may jeopardize the patient or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. An AE is a treatment emergent AE if the AE start date is on or after the date of the first dose of study drug and no later than 28 days after the last dose. (NCT01194219)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 16; mean duration of exposure was 14.8 weeks and 15.0 weeks for subjects randomized to placebo and apremilast respectively.

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any TEAEAny Drug-Related TEAEAny Severe TEAEAny Serious TEAEAny Serious Drug-Related TEAEAny TEAE leading to Drug InterruptionAny TEAE leading to drug withdrawalAny TEAE Leading to Death
Apremilast3882242012437291
Placebo157589801391

Mean Change From Baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Week 16

"DLQI is a simple, compact, and practical questionnaire for use in a dermatology clinical setting to assess limitations related to the impact of skin disease. The instrument contains ten items dealing with the participant's skin. With the exception of Item Number 7, the participant responds on a four-point scale, ranging from Very Much (score 3) to Not at All or Not relevant (score 0). Item Number 7 is a multi-part item, the first part of which ascertains whether the participant's skin prevented them from working or studying (Yes or No, scores 3 or 0 respectively), and if No, then the participant is asked how much of a problem the skin has been at work or study over the past week, with response alternatives being A lot, A little, or Not at all (scores 2, 1, or 0 respectively). The DLQI total score is derived by summing all item scores, which has a possible range of 0 to 30, with 30 corresponding to the worst quality of life, and 0 corresponding to the best." (NCT02425826)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16 (end of phase)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-2.4
Apremilast-4.8

Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area Severity Index Score (PASI) at Week 16

The PASI score is a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. (NCT02425826)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16 (end of phase)

Interventionpercentage change (Mean)
Placebo-3.87
Apremilast-40.72

Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in the Product of BSA (%) and the sPGA Which is Considered as the Total Psoriasis Severity Index at Week 16

"BSA is a measurement of involved skin. The overall BSA affected by psoriasis is estimated based on the palm area of the participant's hand (entire palmar surface or handprint including the fingers), which equates to approximately 1% of total body surface area. The sPGA is a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (clear), 1 (almost clear), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), to 4 (severe), 5 (very severe) incorporating a separate assessment of the severity of the three primary signs of the plaques of all involved areas: erythema, scaling and plaque elevation with an overall sPGA calculated as (E + I + D)/3. Scores for each assessment are rounded to the nearest whole number to result in the final score. The range of BSA*sPGA mean percentage change from baseline to week 16 (end of phase) were -100 to 344.4 and -100 to 100 for the placebo and apremilast groups respectively. Higher scores represented worse outcomes." (NCT02425826)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16 (end of phase)

Interventionpercentage change (Mean)
Placebo-10.17
Apremilast-48.07

Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in the Product of BSA (%) x sPGA at Week 52

"BSA is a measurement of involved skin. The overall BSA affected by psoriasis is estimated based on the palm area of the participant's hand (entire palmar surface or handprint including the fingers), which equates to approximately 1% of total body surface area. The sPGA is a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (clear), 1 (almost clear), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), to 4 (severe), 5 (very severe) incorporating a separate assessment of the severity of the three primary signs of the plaques of all involved areas: erythema, scaling and plaque elevation with an overall sPGA calculated as (E + I + D)/3. Scores for each assessment are rounded to the nearest whole number to result in the final score." (NCT02425826)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52

Interventionpercentage change (Mean)
Placebo-Apremilast-42.23
Apremilast-55.45

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Clear (0) or Very Mild (1) on Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale at Week 16 From Baseline

The PtGA response rate is defined as the percentage of participants achieving 0 (clear) or 1 (very mild) on the PtGA scale at Week 16. The PtGA is the assessment by the participant of the overall disease severity at the time of evaluation. The PtGA is a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe). (NCT02425826)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16 (end of phase)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo20.5
Apremilast33.8

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a sPGA Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) at Week 16 From Baseline

The sPGA is an assessment by the investigator of the overall disease severity at the time of evaluation. Erythema (E), induration (I), and desquamation (D) are scored on a 6-point scale, ranging from 0 (clear) to 5 (very severe), with an overall sPGA calculated as (E + I + D)/3. Scores for each assessment are averaged and rounded to the nearest whole number to result in the final sPGA score. (NCT02425826)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16 (end of phase)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo9.6
Apremilast30.4

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 50% Improvement (Response) in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)-50 From Baseline at Week 16.

The PASI score is a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. (NCT02425826)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16 (end of phase)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo24.7
Apremilast53.4

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 75% Improvement (Response) in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)-75 From Baseline at Week 16

The PASI score is a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. (NCT02425826)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16 (end of phase)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo8.2
Apremilast21.6

Percentage of Participants With Scalp Psoriasis Who Achieved a Clear (0) or Minimal (1) on Scalp Physician's Global Assessment (ScPGA) Scale at Week 16.

The ScPGA assessed scalp involvement, if present at baseline. The 6-point ScPGA scale includes three dimensions (Plaque Thickening, Scaling, and Erythema) and a global assessment. Scores range from 0 (clear), 1 (minimal), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (severe), to 5 (very severe). Analysis of ScPGA was restricted to the participants with scalp involvement at baseline. (NCT02425826)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16 (end of phase)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo38.2
Apremilast50.0

Mean Change From Baseline in Pruritus Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

The Pruritus VAS assessment was conducted at the baseline visit and each post-baseline visit. The participant was asked to place a vertical stroke on a 100 mm VAS on which the left-hand boundary (0) represents no itch, and the right-hand boundary (100) represents itch as severe as can be imagined. The distance from the mark to the left-hand boundary will be recorded. The Pruritus VAS score ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores correspond to more severe symptom. (NCT02425826)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 1 and 16 (end of phase)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 1Week 16
Apremilast-13.9-19.2
Placebo-9.6-10.2

Number of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Apremilast-Exposure Phase

Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are defined as any AEs that begin or worsen on or after the start of study drug through 28 days after the last dose of study drug or study treatment discontinuation date, whichever was later. A serious AE (SAE) is any untoward adverse event that is fatal, life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, requires or prolongs existing in-patient hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is a condition that may jeopardize the patient or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. (NCT02425826)
Timeframe: Date of first dose of apremilast during the placebo controlled phase or date of first dose of apremilast after week 16; overall maximum duration of exposure was 61.5 weeks during apremilast-exposure phase

Interventionparticipants (Number)
≥ At Least 1 TEAE≥ 1 Drug-related TEAE≥ At Least 1 Severe TEAE≥ At Least 1 Serious TEAE≥ 1 Serious Drug-related TEAE≥ 1 TEAE leading to drug withdrawal≥ 1 TEAE Leading to drug interruptionAny TEAE leading to death
Apremilast14298510114270

Number of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Placebo Controlled Phase

Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are defined as any AEs that begin or worsen on or after the start of study drug through 28 days after the last dose of study drug or study treatment discontinuation date, whichever was later. A serious AE (SAE) is any untoward adverse event that is fatal, life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, requires or prolongs existing in-patient hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is a condition that may jeopardize the patient or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. (NCT02425826)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug to Week 16; maximum duration of exposure was 20.1 weeks during placebo controlled phase

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
≥ At Least 1 TEAE≥ 1 Drug-related TEAE≥ At Least 1 Severe TEAE≥ At Least 1 Serious TEAE≥ 1 Serious Drug-related TEAE≥ 1 TEAE leading to drug withdrawal≥ 1 TEAE Leading to drug interruptionAny TEAE leading to death
Apremilast9271330590
Placebo3521100330

Percentage of Participants With Scalp Psoriasis Who Were Initially Randomized to Apremilast and Maintained the Scalp Physician's Global Assessment (ScPGA) Response From Week 16 to Week 52.

The ScPGA will assess scalp involvement, if present at baseline. The 6-point ScPGA scale includes three dimensions (Plaque Thickening, Scaling, and Erythema) and a global assessment with scores range from 0 (clear), 1 (minimal), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (severe), to 5 (very severe). Analysis of ScPGA is restricted to the participants with scalp involvement at baseline. (NCT02425826)
Timeframe: Week 16 to Week 52

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Responder status at Week 16Responder status maintained at Week 52
Apremilast50.080.4

Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Version II at Week 16

The TSQM version II is an 11-question self-administered instrument to understand a participation's satisfaction with the current therapy. The TSQM scale comprises four domains, on which participants evaluate their medication (i.e., effectiveness, side effects, convenience and global satisfaction. TSQM scores range from 0 to 100 for each domain; a higher score mean indicates higher satisfaction with treatment. (NCT02425826)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16 (end of phase)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
TSQM-EffectivenessTSQM-Side EffectsTSQM-ConvenienceTSQM-Global Satisfaction
Apremilast57.2578.5066.9363.24
Placebo38.8175.0065.6848.74

Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Version II at Week 52

The TSQM version II is an 11-question self-administered instrument to understand a participants satisfaction on the current therapy. The TSQM scale comprises four domains, on which participants evaluate their medication (i.e., effectiveness, side effects, convenience and global satisfaction. TSQM scores range from 0 to 100 for each domain; a higher score indicates higher satisfaction with treatment. (NCT02425826)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 52

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
TSQM-EffectivenessTSQM-Side EffectsTSQM-ConvenienceTSQM-Global Satisfaction
Apremilast54.1375.4571.7659.92
Placebo-Apremilast57.6877.2972.7459.24

Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score In Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo and Etanercept and Placebo at Week 16

"DLQI is a simple, compact, and practical questionnaire for use in a dermatology clinical setting to assess limitations related to the impact of skin disease. The instrument contains ten items dealing with the participant's skin. With the exception of Item Number 7, the participant responds on a four-point scale, ranging from Very Much (score 3) to Not at All or Not relevant (score 0). Item Number 7 is a multi-part item, the first part of which ascertains whether the participant's skin prevented them from working or studying (Yes or No, scores 3 or 0 respectively), and if No, then the participant is asked how much of a problem the skin has been at work or study over the past week, with response alternatives being A lot, A little, or Not at all (scores 2, 1, or 0 respectively). The DLQI total score is derived by summing all item scores, which has a possible range of 0 to 30, with 30 corresponding to the worst quality of life, and 0 corresponding to the best." (NCT01690299)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-3.9
Apremilast 30mg Plus Placebo Injection-8.4
Etanercept 50mg Plus Placebo Tablet-7.8

Change From Baseline in the Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score of the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-item (SF-36) Health Survey Version 2.0 in Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo and Etanercept and Placebo at Week 16

The SF-36 is a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Scores from the 8 scales were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population to have a mean of 50 and variance = 10, with higher scores indicating better health. From these 8 scale, two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS), both having the same mean of 50 and variance = 10 as noted for the individual scales for the U.S. general population, and with higher scores indicating better health. For MCS, change from baseline was calculated, where change = visit value - baseline value. (NCT01690299)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo2.6
Apremilast Plus Placebo Injection3.5
Etanercept Plus Placebo Tablets4.8

Percent Change From Baseline in the Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) for Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo and Etanercept and Placebo at Week 16

"BSA is a measurement of involved skin. The overall BSA affected by psoriasis was estimated based on the palm area of the participant's hand (entire palmar surface or handprint including the fingers), which equates to approximately 1% of total body surface area. BSA percent change from baseline was determined at each visit of the study, and is calculated as 100*(post-baseline BSA - baseline BSA) / baseline BSA." (NCT01690299)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-16.3
Apremilast Plus Placebo Injection-47.7
Etanercept Plus Placebo Tablets-56.1

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement (Response) in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI-50) for Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo and Etanercept and Placebo at Week 16

PASI-50 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 50% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 16. The PASI score was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The PASI score was set to missing if any severity score or degree of involvement was missing. (NCT01690299)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo33.3
Apremilast Plus Placebo Injection62.7
Etanercept Plus Placebo Tablet83.1

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) for the Comparison Between Etanercept 50mg SC QW and Placebo at Week 16

PASI-75 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 16. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The PASI score was set to missing if any severity score or degree of involvement was missing. (NCT01690299)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo11.9
Etanercept 50mg Plus Placebo Tablet48.2

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI-75) for the Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo at Week 16 From Baseline

PASI-75 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 16. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The PASI score was set to missing if any severity score or degree of involvement was missing. (NCT01690299)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo11.9
Apremilast Plus Placebo Injection39.8

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Lattice System Physician's Global Assessment (LS-PGA) Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear at Week 16 in Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo and Etanercept and Placebo at Week 16

The Lattice System Physician's Global Assessment is a global assessment performed by the investigator of psoriasis severity. Integrating ranges of BSA involvement with assessments of overall plaque severity (using a 4 point scale from none to marked for the signs of plaque elevation, erythema and scale), the LS-PGA produces an overall assessment of psoriasis severity on an 8-point scale, ranging from clear to very severe. To determine the final score, the lattice portion is governed by the BSA and among the plaque qualities, weights plaque elevation as most important, erythema next, and scale least. (NCT01690299)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo6.0
Apremilast Plus Placebo Injection24.1
Etanercept Plus Placebo Tablets22.9

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) With at Least 2 Points Reduction for Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo and Etanercept and Placebo at Week 16

The sPGA is an assessment by the Investigator of the overall disease severity at the time of evaluation. The sPGA is a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe), incorporating an assessment of the severity of the three primary signs of the disease: erythema, scaling and plaque elevation. When making the assessment of overall severity, the Investigator should factor in areas that have already been cleared (ie, have scores of 0) and not just evaluate remaining lesions for severity, ie, the severity of each sign is averaged across all areas of involvement, including cleared lesions. In the event of different severities across disease signs, the sign that is the predominant feature of the disease should be used to help determine the sPGA score. (NCT01690299)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo3.6
Apremilast Plus Placebo Injection21.7
Etanercept Plus Placebo Tablet28.9

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Apremilast-exposure Period

A TEAE in the apremilast-exposure phase is an AE with a start date on or after the date of the first dose of study drug and no later than 28 days after the last dose of study drug. An AE is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen during the study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the subject's health, including laboratory test values, regardless of etiology. Any worsening (ie, any clinically significant adverse change in the frequency or intensity of a preexisting condition) should be considered an AE. A serious AE (SAE) is any untoward AE that is fatal, life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, requires or prolongs existing in-patient hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is a condition that may jeopardize or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. (NCT01690299)
Timeframe: From the first dose of apremilast (either Week 0 for participants originally randomized to apremilast or Week 16 for those originally randomized to placebo or etanercept who were switched to apremilast at week 16) until 28 days after last apremilast dose

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any TEAEAny Drug-related TEAEAny Severe TEAEAny Serious TEAEAny Serious Drug-related TEAEAny TEAE Leading to Drug InterruptionAny TEAE Leading to Drug WithdrawalAny TEAE Leading to Death
Apremilast/Apremilast71367621370
Etanercept/Apremilast5415741720
Placebo/Apremilast4523452830

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled Phase

A TEAE is an AE with a start date on or after the date of the first dose of study drug and no later than 28 days after the last dose of study drug for participants who discontinued early. An AE is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen during the study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the patient's health, including laboratory test values, regardless of etiology. Any worsening (ie, clinically significant adverse change in frequency or intensity of a preexisting condition) should be considered an AE. A serious AE (SAE) is any untoward AE that is fatal, life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, requires or prolongs existing in-patient hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is a condition that may jeopardize or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes above. (NCT01690299)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 16; mean duration of exposure was 14.90 weeks for placebo group, 15.13 weeks for apremilast group and 15.87 weeks for Etanercept group

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any TEAEAny Drug-related TEAEAny Severe TEAEAny Serious TEAEAny Serious Drug-related TEAEAny TEAE Leading to Drug InterruptionAny TEAE Leading to Drug WithdrawalAny TEAE Leading to Death
Apremilast Plus Placebo Injection5927332930
Etanercept Plus Placebo Tablets4421321320
Placebo4517200120

Psoriasis Flare/Rebound

Psoriasis flare is an AE and represents an atypical or unusual worsening of disease during treatment. It is defined as a sudden intensification of psoriasis requiring medical intervention or a diagnosis of new generalized erythrodermic, inflammatory, or pustular psoriasis. Rebound is an AE and is defined as a severe and sudden worsening of disease that occurs after treatment has been discontinued. This exacerbation is characterized by a PASI ≥125% of baseline or a new generalized pustular, erythrodermic, or more inflammatory psoriasis after stopping therapy. (NCT01690299)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 16; Placebo controlled phase

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any psoriasis flare captured as a TEAEAny psoriasis rebound captured as a TEAEThose with PASI ≥125% baseline score and D/C APR
Apremilast Plus Placebo Injection100
Etanercept Plus Placebo Tablets000
Placebo301

Psoriasis Flare/Rebound

Psoriasis flare is an AE and represents an atypical or unusual worsening of disease during treatment. It is defined as a sudden intensification of psoriasis requiring medical intervention or a diagnosis of new generalized erythrodermic, inflammatory, or pustular psoriasis. Rebound is an AE and is defined as a severe and sudden worsening of disease that occurs after treatment has been discontinued. This exacerbation is characterized by a PASI ≥125% of baseline or a new generalized pustular, erythrodermic, or more inflammatory psoriasis after stopping therapy. PASI ≥125% of baseline score at any visit after the last dose date for those who discontinued within the phase. (NCT01690299)
Timeframe: From the first dose of apremilast (either Week 0 or Week 16 for participants originally randomized to placebo or etanercept who were switched at Week 16) until 28 days after the last dose of apremilast.

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any psoriasis flare captured as a TEAEAny psoriasis rebound captured as a TEAEThose with PASI ≥125% baseline score and D/C APR
Apremilast/Apremilast420
Etanercept/Apremilast071
Placebo/Apremilast110

Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Week 16

"The DLQI is a 10 item questionnaire dealing with the participant's skin. With the exception of Item Number 7, the participant responds on a four-point scale, ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). Item Number 7 is a multi-part item, the first part of which ascertains whether the participant's skin prevented them from working or studying (Yes or No), and if No, then the subject is asked how much of a problem the skin has been at work or study over the past week, with response alternatives being 0 (not at all), 1 (a little) and 2 (a lot).~Total scores have a possible range of 0 to 30, with 30 corresponding to the worst health-related quality of life, and 0 corresponding to the best score.~A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement in health-related quality of life scores." (NCT03721172)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16 of the placebo-controlled phase

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-controlled Phase: Placebo-2.4
Placebo-controlled Phase: Apremilast 30 mg-5.2

Change From Baseline in Percentage of Affected BSA at Week 16

"The BSA is a measurement of involved skin over the whole body. The overall BSA affected by psoriasis is estimated based on the palm area of the participant's hand. The surface area of the whole body is made up of approximately 100 palms or handprints (each entire palmar surface or handprint equates to approximately 1% of total body surface area).~A negative change from baseline indicates a reduction of affected BSA." (NCT03721172)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16 of the placebo-controlled phase

InterventionPercentage change of affected BSA (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-controlled Phase: Placebo-0.07
Placebo-controlled Phase: Apremilast 30 mg-3.45

Change From Baseline in Total Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) Score at Week 16

"The PASI is a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The total qualitative score (sum of erythema, thickness, and scaling scores) is multiplied by the degree of involvement for each anatomic region and then multiplied by a constant. These values for each anatomic region are summed to yield the PASI score.~PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity.~A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement of disease symptoms." (NCT03721172)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16 of the placebo-controlled phase

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-controlled Phase: Placebo-0.54
Placebo-controlled Phase: Apremilast 30 mg-3.47

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved BSA ≤ 3% for Participants With Baseline Affected BSA > 3% at Week 16

"The BSA is a measurement of involved skin over the whole body. The overall BSA affected by psoriasis is estimated based on the palm area of the participant's hand. The surface area of the whole body is made up of approximately 100 palms or handprints (each entire palmar surface or handprint equates to approximately 1% of total body surface area)." (NCT03721172)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16 of the placebo-controlled phase

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo-controlled Phase: Placebo22.9
Placebo-controlled Phase: Apremilast 30 mg61.0

Percentage of Participants With ≥ 4-point Reduction From Baseline in Whole Body Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16 Who Had Baseline Whole Body Itch NRS ≥ 4

The whole body itch NRS is a self-reported measure where participants were asked to assess whole body itch and select a number on a scale of 0-10, where 0 represents no itch, and 10 represents the worst imaginable itch. A reduction in score from baseline represents an improvement in symptoms. (NCT03721172)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16 of the placebo-controlled phase

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo-controlled Phase: Placebo18.6
Placebo-controlled Phase: Apremilast 30 mg43.2

Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 75 Percent (%) Improvement From Baseline in Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16

"The BSA is a measurement of involved skin over the whole body. The overall BSA affected by psoriasis is estimated based on the palm area of the participant's hand. The surface area of the whole body is made up of approximately 100 palms or handprints (each entire palmar surface or handprint equates to approximately 1% of total body surface area)." (NCT03721172)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16 of the placebo-controlled phase

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo-controlled Phase: Placebo7.4
Placebo-controlled Phase: Apremilast 30 mg33.0

Percentage of Participants With a Scalp Physician Global Assessment (ScPGA) Response at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline scPGA Score ≥ 2 at Week 16

"The ScPGA is a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe), incorporating an Investigator's assessment of the severity of the three primary signs of the disease: erythema, scaling and plaque elevation of the overall scalp.~An ScPGA response is defined as and ScPGA score clear (0) or almost clear (1) with at least a 2-point reduction from baseline among participants with a baseline ScPGA score ≥ 2." (NCT03721172)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16 of the placebo-controlled phase

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo-controlled Phase: Placebo16.6
Placebo-controlled Phase: Apremilast 30 mg44.0

Percentage of Participants With a Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Response at Week 16 During the Placebo-Controlled Phase

"The sPGA is a 5-point scale where 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 =severe. Scores incorporate an assessment by the Investigator of the severity of the 3 primary signs of the disease: erythema, scaling and plaque elevation.~An sPGA response is defined as sPGA score of clear (0) or almost clear (1) and with at least a 2-point reduction from baseline at Week 16." (NCT03721172)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16 of the placebo-controlled phase

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo-controlled Phase: Placebo4.1
Placebo-controlled Phase: Apremilast 30 mg21.6

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

"An adverse event (AE) is An AE is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen in a participant during the course of a study. A TEAE is any AE that occurs following administration of study treatment.~Frequency of TEAEs was assessed as well as severity and treatment relatedness.~A TEAE was considered severe based on the Investigator's assessment. A TEAE could be severe if it was serious or non-serious, had symptoms causing discomfort or pain, requiring medical or surgical attention or intervention, interfered with activities of daily life and if drug therapy was required." (NCT03721172)
Timeframe: Placebo: Day 1 to Week 16; Apremilast Day 1 to a maximum of Week 32 (plus 4 week safety follow-up)

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any TEAESevere TEAETreatment-related TEAE
Apremalist: Placebo-controlled Phase and Extension Phase35124186
Placebo-controlled Phase: Apremilast 30 mg1958110
Placebo-controlled Phase: Placebo139236

Change From Baseline in Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score of the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-item (SF-36) Health Survey Version 2.0 at Week 16

SF-36 is a 36-item general health status instrument often used in clinical trials and health services research. It consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life (better functioning) (NCT01988103)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.59
Apremilast 20mg-0.71
Apremilast 30mg0.27

Change From Baseline in Pruritus Visual Analogue Scale 100-mm (VAS) at Week 16

The pruritus visual analog scale (VAS) was used to measure the amount of itching and discomfort a participant experiences. Participant's assessment of pruritus (Itch) asked: On average, how much itch have you had because of your condition in the past week? Higher scores correspond to more severe symptom or disease. The participant places a vertical line on a 100-mm VAS on which the left-hand boundary represents no itch at all and the right-hand boundary represents the worst itch imaginable. The distance from the vertical line to the left-hand boundary is recorded. VAS scores range from 0 to 100 mm, where higher scores correspond to worse pruritis (itch). (NCT01988103)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo7.1
Apremilast 20mg-7.5
Apremilast 30mg-17.7

Change From Baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Week 16

"Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) was developed as a practical questionnaire for use in a dermatology clinical setting to assess limitations related to the impact of skin disease. The instrument contains 10 items dealing with the participants skin. With the exception of Item Number 7, the participant responds on a four-point scale, ranging from Very Much (score 3) to Not at All or Not relevant (score 0). Item Number 7 is a multi-part item, the first part of which ascertains whether the participant's skin prevented them from working or studying (Yes or No, scores 3 or 0 respectively), and if No, then the participant is asked how much of a problem the skin has been at work or study over the past week, with response alternatives being A lot, A little, or Not at all (scores 2, 1, or 0 respectively). The DLQI total score has a possible range from 0 to 30, with 30 corresponding to the worst quality of life, and 0 corresponding to the best." (NCT01988103)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo1.3
Apremilast 20mg-0.5
Apremilast 30mg-2.2

Percent Change From Baseline in the Psoriasis Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16

"BSA is a measurement of involved skin. The overall BSA affected by psoriasis is estimated based on the palm area of the subject's hand (entire palmar surface or handprint including the fingers), which equates to approximately 1% of total body surface area." (NCT01988103)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo7.5
Apremilast 20mg-21.6
Apremilast 30mg-30.5

Percent Change From Baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score

The PASI is a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. The PASI is a validated instrument that has become standard in clinical trials for psoriasis. The PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting a greater disease severity. (NCT01988103)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-3.7
Apremilast 20mg-33.1
Apremilast 30mg-43.1

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement From Baseline (Response) Reduction in the PASI-50 at Week 16

PASI-50 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 50% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 16. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The PASI score was set to missing if any severity score or degree of involvement is missing. (NCT01988103)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo21.4
Apremilast 20mg41.2
Apremilast 30mg50.6

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) From Baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI-75) at Week 16

PASI-75 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 16. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The PASI score was set to missing if any severity score or degree of involvement was missing. (NCT01988103)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo7.1
Apremilast 20mg23.5
Apremilast 30mg28.2

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) With at Least 2 Point Reduction From Baseline to Week 16

The sPGA is a measure of psoriasis disease severity at the time of evaluation by the Investigator. It does not compare assessments across visits or rely on investigator recall or prior disease. The sPGA is a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (clear, except for residual discoloration) to 5 (severe; majority of plaques have severe thickness, erythema, and scaling). The investigator examines all of the lesions on the participant and assigns a score ranging from 0 to 5 for thickness, erythema and degree of scaling. Scores for thickness, erythema and scaling are then summed and the mean of these 3 scores equals the overall sPGA score. (NCT01988103)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo8.8
Apremilast 20mg23.9
Apremilast 30mg29.6

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) in the During the Apremilast-exposure Period

An AE was any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen in a participant during the course of study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the participant's health, including laboratory test values regardless of etiology. Any worsening (ie, any clinically significant adverse change in the frequency or intensity of a preexisting condition) was considered an AE. A serious AE (SAE) is any untoward adverse event that is fatal, life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, requires or prolongs existing in-patient hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or a condition that may jeopardize the patient or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. An AE is a treatment emergent AE if the AE start date is on or after the date of the first dose of study drug and no later than 28 days after the last dose. (NCT01988103)
Timeframe: From the first dose of apremilast (either Week 0 or Week 16 for participants originally randomized to placebo who were re-randomized at Week 16) until 28 days after the last dose of apremilast.

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
≥ At Least 1 TEAE≥ 1 Drug-related TEAR≥ At Least 1 Severe TEAE≥ 1 Serious TEAEAny Serious Drug-related TEAE≥ 1 TEAE leading to Drug Interruption≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Drug Withdrawal≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Death
Apremilast 20mg9434121156191
Apremilast 30mg89372202100

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) in the Placebo Controlled Phase

An AE was any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence, that may appear or worsen in a participant during the course of study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the participant's health, including laboratory test values regardless of etiology. Any worsening (ie, any clinically significant adverse change in the frequency or intensity of a preexisting condition) was considered an AE. A serious AE (SAE) is any untoward adverse event that is fatal, life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, requires or prolongs existing in-patient hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or a condition that may jeopardize the patient or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. An AE is a treatment emergent AE if the AE start date is on or after the date of the first dose of study drug and no later than 28 days after the last dose. (NCT01988103)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
≥ At least 1 TEAE≥ 1 Drug-related TEAE≥ At least 1 Severe TEAE≥ 1 Serious TEAEAny Serious Drug-related TEAE≥ 1 TEAE leading to Drug Interruption≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Drug Withdrawal≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Death
Apremilast 20mg49184422100
Apremilast 30mg4425000060
Placebo358100240

Core Study: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC0-8)

Area under the concentration versus time curve from time 0 (pre-dose) to 8 hours, calculate using the linear trapezoid rule. (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Apremilast 10mg1200
Apremilast 20mg1257
Apremilast 30 mg3477

Core Study: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC0-8)

Area under the concentration versus time curve from time 0 (pre-dose) to 8 hours, calculated using the linear trapezoid rule. (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 14; Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 8 hours after the morning dose of apremilast

Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Apremilast 10mg BID1008
Apremilast 20mg BID1591
Apremilast 30 mg BID3467

Core Study: Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 16

The DLQI was a validated, self-administered, 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on subjects' quality of life, based on recall over the past week. Domains include symptoms, feelings, daily activities, social, leisure, work or studying, personal relationships and treatment. Each question on the extent of the impact of skin disease was answered on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); the total DLQI score ranged from 0 to 30. A DLQI score greater than 10 is indicative of severe psoriasis. (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 16

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo BID-1.9
Apremilast 10mg BID-3.2
Apremilast 20mg BID-5.9
Apremilast 30 mg BID-4.4

Core Study: Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 24

The DLQI was a validated, self-administered, 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on subjects' quality of life, based on recall over the past week. Domains include symptoms, feelings, daily activities, social, leisure, work or studying, personal relationships and treatment. Each question on the extent of the impact of skin disease was answered on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); the total DLQI score ranged from 0 to 30. A DLQI score greater than 10 is indicative of severe psoriasis. (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Apremilast 10mg BID-3.4
Apremilast 20mg BID-6.2
Apremilast 30 mg BID-4.9
Placebo-Apremilast (APR) 20 mg BID-6.4
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID-5.4

Core Study: Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36), Version 2 Physical Component Summary Score at Week 24

The SF-36 was a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS). Scores from the 8 scales, PCS and MCS were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population, with 50 as the average and 10 as the standard deviation, higher scores indicating better health. For norm based scores, change from baseline were calculated for the 8 scales and the two summary scales, where change = visit value - baseline value. (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Apremilast 10mg BID1.1
Apremilast 20mg BID2.3
Apremilast 30 mg BID1.0
PBO-Apremilast 20mg BID2.5
PBO-Apremilast 30 mg BID2.7

Core Study: Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36), Version 2; Mental Component Summary Score at Week 16

The SF-36 was a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS). Scores from the 8 scales, PCS and MCS were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population, with 50 as the average and 10 as the standard deviation, higher scores indicating better health. For norm based scores, change from baseline were calculated for the 8 scales and the two summary scales, where change = visit value - baseline value. (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 16

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo BID-0.6
Apremilast 10mg BID2.8
Apremilast 20mg BID2.9
Apremilast 30 mg BID3.0

Core Study: Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36), Version 2; Mental Component Summary Score at Week 24

The SF-36 was a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS). Scores from the 8 scales, PCS and MCS were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population, with 50 as the average and 10 as the standard deviation, higher scores indicating better health. For norm based scores, change from baseline were calculated for the 8 scales and the two summary scales, where change = visit value - baseline value. (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Apremilast 10mg BID2.8
Apremilast 20mg BID3.9
Apremilast 30 mg BID2.9
PBO-Apremilast 20mg BID2.8
PBO-Apremilast 30 mg BID0.5

Core Study: Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36), Version 2; Physical Component Summary Score at Week 16

The SF-36 was a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS). Scores from the 8 scales, PCS and MCS were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population, with 50 as the average and 10 as the standard deviation, higher scores indicating better health. For norm based scores, change from baseline were calculated for the 8 scales and the two summary scales, where change = visit value - baseline value. (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to week 16

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo BID0.7
Apremilast 10mg BID1.3
Apremilast 20mg BID2.1
Apremilast 30 mg BID0.8

Core Study: Peak; (Maximum) Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Apremilast

The maximum observed plasma concentration of apremilast observed at Week 14 (steady-state Cmax) (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 14; Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 8 hours after the morning dose of apremilast

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Apremilast 10mg BID209
Apremilast 20mg BID298
Apremilast 30 mg BID637

Core Study: Peak; (Maximum) Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Apremilast

The maximum observed plasma concentration of apremilast observed at Week 24 (steady-state Cmax) (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Apremilast 10mg BID238
Apremilast 20mg BID236
Apremilast 30 mg BID670

Core Study: Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Score at Week 16

The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling were scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions was scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The total qualitative score (sum of erythema, thickness, and scaling scores) was multiplied by the degree of involvement for each anatomic region and then multiplied by a constant. The values for each anatomic region were summed to yield the PASI score. (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 16

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo BID-20.3
Apremilast 10mg BID-34.0
Apremilast 20mg BID-45.4
Apremilast 30 mg BID-53.2

Core Study: Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Score at Week 24

The PASI is a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling were scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions was scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The total qualitative score (sum of erythema, thickness, and scaling scores) was multiplied by the degree of involvement for each anatomic region and then multiplied by a constant. The values for each anatomic region were summed to yield the PASI score (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 24

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Apremilast 10mg BID-36.3
Apremilast 20mg BID-46.5
Apremilast 30 mg BID-56.8
PBO-Apremilast 20mg BID-61.7
PBO-Apremilast 30 mg BID-61.7

Core Study: Percent Change From Baseline in the Percent of Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) During the Active Treatment Phase at Week 24

"The overall BSA affected by psoriasis was estimated by comparison of the size of the affected area to the palm area of the participant's hand (entire palmar surface or handprint), which equates to approximately 1% of total BSA." (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 24

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Apremilast 10mg BID-28.1
Apremilast 20mg BID-40.6
Apremilast 30 mg BID-54.0
Placebo-Apremilast 20 mg BID-52.5
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID-54.2

Core Study: Percent Change From Baseline in the Percent of Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) During the Placebo Controlled Phase

"The overall BSA affected by psoriasis was estimated by comparison of the size of the affected area to the palm area of the participant's hand (entire palmar surface or handprint), which equates to approximately 1% of total BSA." (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 16

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo BID-8.0
Apremilast 10mg BID-28.3
Apremilast 20mg BID-38.0
Apremilast 30 mg BID-50.4

Core Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement (Response) in PASI Score at Week 16

PASI-50 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 50% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 16. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy The PASI score was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 16

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo BID25.0
Apremilast 10mg BID38.2
Apremilast 20mg BID47.1
Apremilast 30 mg BID60.2

Core Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 24

PASI-50 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 50% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 24. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI score was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Apremilast 10mg BID38.2
Apremilast 20mg49.4
Apremilast 30 mg BID65.9
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID61.8
PBO-Apremilast 30 mg BID75.0

Core Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in PASI Score at Week 24

PASI-75 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 24. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy.The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head,trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Apremilast 10mg BID18.0
Apremilast 20mg BID26.4
Apremilast 30 mg BID39.8
PBO-Apremilast 20mg BID41.2
PBO-Apremilast 30 mg BID44.4

Core Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at Week 16

PASI-75 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 16. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 and Week 16

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo BID5.7
Apremilast 10mg BID11.2
Apremilast 20mg BID28.7
Apremilast 30 mg BID40.9

Core Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 90% Improvement (Response) From Baseline in the PASI Score at Week 16

PASI-90 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 90% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 16. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI score was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 16

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo BID1.1
Apremilast 10mg BID4.5
Apremilast 20mg BID9.2
Apremilast 30 mg BID11.4

Core Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 90% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 24

PASI-90 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 90% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 24. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy..The PASI is a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling were scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions was scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Apremilast 10mg4.5
Apremilast 20mg8.0
Apremilast 30 mg14.8
PBO-Apremilast 20mg BID14.7
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID16.7

Core Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 24

The sPGA was a measure of psoriasis disease severity at the time of evaluation by the investigator. It does not compare assessments across visits or rely on investigator recall of prior disease severity. The sPGA was a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (clear, except for residual discoloration) to 5 (severe; majority of plaques have severe thickness, erythema, and scaling). The investigator examined all of the lesions on the participant and assigned a score ranging from 0 to 5 for thickness, erythema and degree of scaling . Scores for thickness, erythema and scaling are then summed and the mean of these 3 scores equaled the overall sPGA score. Fractional values for the sPGA were rounded to the next highest integer (eg, a score of 3.5 was rounded to 4, 3.4 was rounded to 3). A lower sPGA score was associated with less severe disease (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 and Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Apremilast 10mg BID13.5
Apremilast 20mg BID24.1
Apremilast 30 mg BID34.1
Placebo-Apremilast 20 mg BID41.2
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID50.0

Core Study: Percentage of Participants With a Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Greater Than 2 at Baseline Who Achieved a Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16

The sPGA was a measure of psoriasis disease severity at the time of evaluation by the investigator. It does not compare assessments across visits or rely on investigator recall of prior disease severity. The sPGA was a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (clear, except for residual discoloration) to 5 (severe; majority of plaques have severe thickness, erythema, and scaling). The investigator examined all of the lesions on the participant and assigned a score ranging from 0 to 5 for thickness, erythema and degree of scaling . Scores for thickness, erythema and scaling are then summed and the mean of these 3 scores equaled the overall sPGA score. Fractional values for the sPGA were rounded to the next highest integer (eg, a score of 3.5 was rounded to 4, 3.4 was rounded to 3). A lower sPGA score was associated with less severe disease (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 16

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo12.6
Apremilast 10mg10.5
Apremilast 20mg25.0
Apremilast 30 mg33.7

Core Study: Time to Achieve a PASI-50 Response During the Placebo Controlled Phase

For PASI-50 responders in the placebo-controlled period weeks 0-16, time to achieve PASI-50 was defined as the time interval, inclusive between the date of randomization (day 1) and the date of the first assessment where PASI-50 was achieved. (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to 16

Interventionweeks (Median)
Placebo BID6.5
Apremilast 10mg BID5.9
Apremilast 20mg BID6.0
Apremilast 30 mg BID4.3

Core Study: Time to Achieve a PASI-75 Response During the Placebo Controlled Phase

For PASI-75 responders in the placebo-controlled period Weeks 0-16, time to achieve PASI-75 was defined as the time interval, inclusive between the date of randomization (day 1) and the date of the first assessment where PASI-75 is achieved. (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Weeks 0 to 16

Interventionweeks (Median)
Placebo BID8.1
Apremilast 10mg BID10.0
Apremilast 20mg BID11.9
Apremilast 30 mg BID6.3

Core Study: Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration of Drug (Tmax)

Time to achieve maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) observed at Week 14 (Time to achieve steady-state Tmax) (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 14; Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 8 hours after the morning dose of apremilast

Interventionhours (Median)
Apremilast 10mg BID2.00
Apremilast 20mg BID2.00
Apremilast 30 mg BID1.00

Core Study: Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration of Drug (Tmax)

Time to achieve maximum plasma concentration (tmax) observed at Week 24 (Time to achieve steady-state Tmax) (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionhours (Median)
Apremilast 10mg BID1.00
Apremilast 20mg BID1.50
Apremilast 30 mg BID1.00

Extension Study: Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 32

The DLQI was a validated, self-administered, 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on subjects' quality of life, based on recall over the past week. Domains include symptoms, feelings, daily activities, social, leisure, work or studying, personal relationships and treatment. Each question on the extent of the impact of skin disease was answered on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); the total DLQI score ranged from 0 to 30. A DLQI score greater than 10 is indicative of severe psoriasis. (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 32

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Apremilast 10mg BID-6.5
Apremilast 20mg BID-7.5
Apremilast 30 mg BID-6.0
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID-8.1
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID5.5

Extension Study: Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 40

The DLQI was a validated, self-administered, 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on subjects' quality of life, based on recall over the past week. Domains include symptoms, feelings, daily activities, social, leisure, work or studying, personal relationships and treatment. Each question on the extent of the impact of skin disease was answered on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); the total DLQI score ranged from 0 to 30. A DLQI score greater than 10 is indicative of severe psoriasis. (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 40

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Apremilast 10mg BID-5.5
Apremilast 20mg BID-6.6
Apremilast 30 mg BID-6.4
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID-7.1
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID-5.9

Extension Study: Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 52

The DLQI was a validated, self-administered, 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on subjects' quality of life, based on recall over the past week. Domains include symptoms, feelings, daily activities, social, leisure, work or studying, personal relationships and treatment. Each question on the extent of the impact of skin disease was answered on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); the total DLQI score ranged from 0 to 30. A DLQI score greater than 10 is indicative of severe psoriasis. (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 52

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Apremilast 10mg BID-5.8
Apremilast 20mg BID-6.1
Apremilast 30 mg BID-5.6
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID-6.8
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID-4.9

Extension Study: Change From Baseline in Medical Outcome Study Short Form,SF-36, Version 2; Physical Component Summary Score at Week 40

The SF-36 was a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS). Scores from the 8 scales, PCS and MCS were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population, with 50 as the average and 10 as the standard deviation, higher scores indicating better health. For norm based scores, change from baseline were calculated for the 8 scales and the two summary scales, where change = visit value - baseline value. (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 40

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Apremilast 10mg BID-0.2
Apremilast 20mg BID1.6
Apremilast 30 mg BID1.7
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID3.2
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID1.8

Extension Study: Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Study Short Form,SF-36, Version 2; Mental Component Summary Score at Week 32

The SF-36 was a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS). Scores from the 8 scales, PCS and MCS were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population, with 50 as the average and 10 as the standard deviation, higher scores indicating better health. For norm based scores, change from baseline were calculated for the 8 scales and the two summary scales, where change = visit value - baseline value. (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 32

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Apremilast 10mg BID5.2
Apremilast 20mg BID3.8
Apremilast 30 mg BID2.9
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID4.6
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID2.8

Extension Study: Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Study Short Form,SF-36, Version 2; Mental Component Summary Score at Week 40

The SF-36 was a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS). Scores from the 8 scales, PCS and MCS were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population, with 50 as the average and 10 as the standard deviation, higher scores indicating better health. For norm based scores, change from baseline were calculated for the 8 scales and the two summary scales, where change = visit value - baseline value. (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 40

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Apremilast 10mg BID5.4
Apremilast 20mg BID4.8
Apremilast 30 mg BID1.7
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID2.9
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID3.8

Extension Study: Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Study Short Form,SF-36, Version 2; Mental Component Summary Score at Week 52

The SF-36 was a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS). Scores from the 8 scales, PCS and MCS were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population, with 50 as the average and 10 as the standard deviation, higher scores indicating better health. For norm based scores, change from baseline were calculated for the 8 scales and the two summary scales, where change = visit value - baseline value. (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 52

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Apremilast 10mg BID5.1
Apremilast 20mg BID4.1
Apremilast 30 mg BID2.4
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID4.7
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID3.4

Extension Study: Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Study Short Form,SF-36, Version 2; Physical Component Summary Score (PCS) at Week 32

The SF-36 was a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS). Scores from the 8 scales, PCS and MCS were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population, with 50 as the average and 10 as the standard deviation, higher scores indicating better health. For norm based scores, change from baseline were calculated for the 8 scales and the two summary scales, where change = visit value - baseline value. (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 32

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Apremilast 10mg BID1.4
Apremilast 20mg BID2.6
Apremilast 30 mg BID1.8
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID3.1
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID1.5

Extension Study: Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Study Short Form,SF-36, Version 2; Physical Component Summary Score at Week 52

The SF-36 was a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS). Scores from the 8 scales, PCS and MCS were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population, with 50 as the average and 10 as the standard deviation, higher scores indicating better health. For norm based scores, change from baseline were calculated for the 8 scales and the two summary scales, where change = visit value - baseline value.. (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 52

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Apremilast 10mg BID1.2
Apremilast 20mg BID1.2
Apremilast 30 mg BID2.0
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID3.4
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID0.3

Extension Study: Percent Change From Baseline in the Affected BSA at Week 32

"The overall BSA affected by psoriasis was estimated by comparison of the size of the affected area to the palm area of the participant's hand (entire palmar surface or handprint), which equates to approximately 1% of total BSA." (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 32

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Apremilast 10mg BID-47.1
Apremilast 20mg BID-65.1
Apremilast 30 mg BID-75.3
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID-62.6
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID-66.7

Extension Study: Percent Change From Baseline in the Affected BSA at Week 40

"The overall BSA affected by psoriasis was estimated by comparison of the size of the affected area to the palm area of the participant's hand (entire palmar surface or handprint), which equates to approximately 1% of total BSA." (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 40

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Apremilast 10mg BID-55.4
Apremilast 20mg BID-65.4
Apremilast 30 mg BID-74.3
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID-66.2
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID-68.0

Extension Study: Percent Change From Baseline in the Affected BSA at Week 52

"The overall BSA affected by psoriasis was estimated by comparison of the size of the affected area to the palm area of the participant's hand (entire palmar surface or handprint), which equates to approximately 1% of total BSA." (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 52

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Apremilast 10mg BID-53.1
Apremilast 20mg BID-58.3
Apremilast 30 mg BID-67.3
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID-67.4
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID-64.9

Extension Study: Percent Change in PASI Score at Week 32

The PASI is a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling were scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions was scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The total qualitative score (sum of erythema, thickness, and scaling scores) was multiplied by the degree of involvement for each anatomic region and then multiplied by a constant. The values for each anatomic region were summed to yield the PASI score (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 32

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Apremilast 10mg BID-51.0
Apremilast 20mg BID-63.1
Apremilast 30 mg BID-72.7
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID-64.0
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID-69.2

Extension Study: Percent Change in PASI Score at Week 40

The PASI is a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling were scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions was scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The total qualitative score (sum of erythema, thickness, and scaling scores) was multiplied by the degree of involvement for each anatomic region and then multiplied by a constant. The values for each anatomic region were summed to yield the PASI score (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 40

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Apremilast 10mg BID-55.9
Apremilast 20mg BID-63.3
Apremilast 30 mg BID-71.1
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID-64.5
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID-71.7

Extension Study: Percent Change in PASI Score at Week 52

The PASI is a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling were scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions was scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The total qualitative score (sum of erythema, thickness, and scaling scores) was multiplied by the degree of involvement for each anatomic region and then multiplied by a constant. The values for each anatomic region were summed to yield the PASI score (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 52

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Apremilast 10mg BID-55.1
Apremilast 20mg BID-58.9
Apremilast 30 mg BID-65.3
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID-62.7
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID-62.0

Extension Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 32

PASI-50 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 50% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 32 of the extension study. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 32

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Apremilast 10mg BID57.4
Apremilast 20mg BID72.0
Apremilast 30 mg BID86.2
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID74.1
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID74.1

Extension Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 40

PASI-50 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 50% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 16 of the extension study. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 40

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Apremilast 10mg BID48.9
Apremilast 20mg BID62.0
Apremilast 30 mg BID82.8
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID63.0
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID66.7

Extension Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 52

PASI-50 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 50% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 52 of the extension study. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 52

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Apremilast 10mg BID42.6
Apremilast 20mg BID48.0
Apremilast 30 mg BID72.4
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID55.6
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID48.1

Extension Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 32

PASI-75 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 32 of the extension study. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 32

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Apremilast 10mg BID27.7
Apremilast 20mg BID38.0
Apremilast 30 mg BID46.6
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID33.3
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID55.6

Extension Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 40

PASI-75 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 40 of the extension study. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 40

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Apremilast 10mg BID21.3
Apremilast 20mg BID28.0
Apremilast 30 mg BID34.5
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID37.0
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID44.4

Extension Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 52

PASI-75 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 52. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 52

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Apremilast 10mg BID14.9
Apremilast 20mg BID22.0
Apremilast 30 mg BID36.2
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID37.0
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID33.3

Extension Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 90% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 32

PASI-90 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 90% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 32 of the extension study. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 32

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Apremilast 10mg BID10.6
Apremilast 20mg BID14.0
Apremilast 30 mg BID19.0
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID18.5
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID25.9

Extension Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 90% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 40

PASI-90 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 90% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 40 of the extension study. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 40

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Apremilast 10mg BID8.5
Apremilast 20mg BID14.0
Apremilast 30 mg BID17.2
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID18.5
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID22.2

Extension Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 90% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at Week 52

PASI-90 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 90% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 52 of the extension study. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 52

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Apremilast 10mg BID4.3
Apremilast 20mg BID10.0
Apremilast 30 mg BID13.8
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID14.8
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID11.1

Extension Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 32

The sPGA was a measure of psoriasis disease severity at the time of evaluation by the investigator. It does not compare assessments across visits or rely on investigator recall of prior disease severity. The sPGA was a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (clear, except for residual discoloration) to 5 (severe; majority of plaques have severe thickness, erythema, and scaling). The investigator examined all of the lesions on the participant and assigned a score ranging from 0 to 5 for thickness, erythema and degree of scaling . Scores for thickness, erythema and scaling are then summed and the mean of these 3 scores equaled the overall sPGA score. Fractional values for the sPGA were rounded to the next highest integer (eg, a score of 3.5 was rounded to 4, 3.4 was rounded to 3). A lower sPGA score was associated with less severe disease. (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 32

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Apremilast 10mg BID23.4
Apremilast 20mg BID26
Apremilast 30 mg BID44.8
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID33.3
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID59.3

Extension Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 40

The sPGA was a measure of psoriasis disease severity at the time of evaluation by the investigator. It does not compare assessments across visits or rely on investigator recall of prior disease severity. The sPGA was a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (clear, except for residual discoloration) to 5 (severe; majority of plaques have severe thickness, erythema, and scaling). The investigator examined all of the lesions on the participant and assigned a score ranging from 0 to 5 for thickness, erythema and degree of scaling . Scores for thickness, erythema and scaling are then summed and the mean of these 3 scores equaled the overall sPGA score. Fractional values for the sPGA were rounded to the next highest integer (eg, a score of 3.5 was rounded to 4, 3.4 was rounded to 3). A lower sPGA score was associated with less disease. (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 40

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Apremilast 10mg BID23.4
Apremilast 20mg BID18.0
Apremilast 30 mg BID29.3
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID29.6
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID37.0

Extension Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 52

The sPGA was a measure of psoriasis disease severity at the time of evaluation by the investigator. It does not compare assessments across visits or rely on investigator recall of prior disease severity. The sPGA was a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (clear, except for residual discoloration) to 5 (severe; majority of plaques have severe thickness, erythema, and scaling). The investigator examined all of the lesions on the participant and assigned a score ranging from 0 to 5 for thickness, erythema and degree of scaling . Scores for thickness, erythema and scaling are then summed and the mean of these 3 scores equaled the overall sPGA score. Fractional values for the sPGA were rounded to the next highest integer (eg, a score of 3.5 was rounded to 4, 3.4 was rounded to 3). A lower sPGA score was associated with less severe disease. (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 52

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Apremilast 10mg BID12.8
Apremilast 20mg BID10.0
Apremilast 30 mg BID22.4
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID33.3
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID22.2

LTE Study: Change From Baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at 18 Months

The DLQI was a validated, self-administered, 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on subjects' quality of life, based on recall over the past week. Domains include symptoms, feelings, daily activities, social, leisure, work or studying, personal relationships and treatment. Each question on the extent of the impact of skin disease was answered on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); the total DLQI score ranged from 0 to 30. A DLQI score greater than 10 is indicative of severe psoriasis. (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Month 18

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Apremilast 20mg BID-6.5

LTE Study: Change From Baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at 2 Years

The DLQI was a validated, self-administered, 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on subjects' quality of life, based on recall over the past week. Domains include symptoms, feelings, daily activities, social, leisure, work or studying, personal relationships and treatment. Each question on the extent of the impact of skin disease was answered on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); the total DLQI score ranged from 0 to 30. A DLQI score greater than 10 is indicative of severe psoriasis. (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Month 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Apremilast 10mg BID-5.2
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID-13.5
Apremilast 20mg BID-5.9
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID-1.8
Apremilast 30 mg BID-6.8

LTE Study: Change From Baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at 3 Years

The DLQI was a validated, self-administered, 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on subjects' quality of life, based on recall over the past week. Domains include symptoms, feelings, daily activities, social, leisure, work or studying, personal relationships and treatment. Each question on the extent of the impact of skin disease was answered on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); the total DLQI score ranged from 0 to 30. A DLQI score greater than 10 is indicative of severe psoriasis. (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Month 36

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Apremilast 10mg BID-11.7
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID-3.0
Apremilast 20mg BID-4.2
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID-2.0
Apremilast 30 mg BID-6.0

LTE Study: Change From Baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at 4 Years

The DLQI was a validated, self-administered, 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on subjects' quality of life, based on recall over the past week. Domains include symptoms, feelings, daily activities, social, leisure, work or studying, personal relationships and treatment. Each question on the extent of the impact of skin disease was answered on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); the total DLQI score ranged from 0 to 30. A DLQI score greater than 10 is indicative of severe psoriasis. (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Month 48

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Apremilast 10mg BID-6.0
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID-9.0
Apremilast 20mg BID-3.5
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID-7.0
Apremilast 30 mg BID-10.3

LTE Study: Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Study Short Form, SF-36, Version 2; Mental Component Summary Score at 18 Months

The SF-36 was a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS). Scores from the 8 scales, PCS and MCS were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population, with 50 as the average and 10 as the standard deviation, higher scores indicating better health. For norm based scores, change from baseline were calculated for the 8 scales and the two summary scales, where change = visit value - baseline value. (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Month 18

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Apremilast 20mg BID-2.8

LTE Study: Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Study Short Form, SF-36, Version 2; Mental Component Summary Score at 2 Years

The SF-36 was a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS). Scores from the 8 scales, PCS and MCS were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population, with 50 as the average and 10 as the standard deviation, higher scores indicating better health. For norm based scores, change from baseline were calculated for the 8 scales and the two summary scales, where change = visit value - baseline value. (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Month 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Apremilast 10mg BID5.0
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID2.0
Apremilast 20mg BID5.2
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID4.5
Apremilast 30 mg BID0.2

LTE Study: Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Study Short Form, SF-36, Version 2; Mental Component Summary Score at 3 Years

The SF-36 was a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS). Scores from the 8 scales, PCS and MCS were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population, with 50 as the average and 10 as the standard deviation, higher scores indicating better health. For norm based scores, change from baseline were calculated for the 8 scales and the two summary scales, where change = visit value - baseline value. (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Month 36

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Apremilast 10mg BID6.0
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID-2.7
Apremilast 20mg BID3.6
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID2.1
Apremilast 30 mg BID2.4

LTE Study: Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Study Short Form, SF-36, Version 2; Mental Component Summary Score at 4 Years

The SF-36 was a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS). Scores from the 8 scales, PCS and MCS were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population, with 50 as the average and 10 as the standard deviation, higher scores indicating better health. For norm based scores, change from baseline were calculated for the 8 scales and the two summary scales, where change = visit value - baseline value. (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Month 48

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Apremilast 10mg BID-1.1
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID4.1
Apremilast 20mg BID-1.0
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID17.6
Apremilast 30 mg BID1.2

LTE Study: Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Study Short Form, SF-36, Version 2; Physical Component Summary Score at 2 Years

The SF-36 was a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS). Scores from the 8 scales, PCS and MCS were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population, with 50 as the average and 10 as the standard deviation, higher scores indicating better health. For norm based scores, change from baseline were calculated for the 8 scales and the two summary scales, where change = visit value - baseline value. (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Month 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Apremilast 10mg BID4.1
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID3.7
Apremilast 20mg BID1.0
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID2.4
Apremilast 30 mg BID5.0

LTE Study: Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Study Short Form, SF-36, Version 2; Physical Component Summary Score at 3 Years

The SF-36 was a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS). Scores from the 8 scales, PCS and MCS were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population, with 50 as the average and 10 as the standard deviation, higher scores indicating better health. For norm based scores, change from baseline were calculated for the 8 scales and the two summary scales, where change = visit value - baseline value. (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Month 36

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Apremilast 10mg BID6.6
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID1.0
Apremilast 20mg BID-0.1
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID4.4
Apremilast 30 mg BID4.2

LTE Study: Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Study Short Form, SF-36, Version 2; Physical Component Summary Score at 4 Years

The SF-36 was a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS). Scores from the 8 scales, PCS and MCS were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population, with 50 as the average and 10 as the standard deviation, higher scores indicating better health. For norm based scores, change from baseline were calculated for the 8 scales and the two summary scales, where change = visit value - baseline value. (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Month 48

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Apremilast 10mg BID1.4
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID2.0
Apremilast 20mg BID-4.1
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID10.2
Apremilast 30 mg BID9.4

LTE Study: Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Study Short Form,SF-36, Version 2; Physical Component Summary Score at 18 Months

The SF-36 was a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS). Scores from the 8 scales, PCS and MCS were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population, with 50 as the average and 10 as the standard deviation, higher scores indicating better health. For norm based scores, change from baseline were calculated for the 8 scales and the two summary scales, where change = visit value - baseline value. (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Month 18

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Apremilast 20mg BID10.2

LTE Study: Median Percent Change From Baseline in the Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) at 18 Months

"The overall BSA affected by psoriasis was estimated by comparison of the size of the affected area to the palm area of the participant's hand (entire palmar surface or handprint), which equates to approximately 1% of total BSA." (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Month 18

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Apremilast 10mg BID-78.6
Placebo-Apremilast 20 mg BID-73.9
Apremilast 20mg BID-73.3
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID-49.2
Apremilast 30 mg BID-86.4

LTE Study: Median Percent Change From Baseline in the Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) at 2 Years

"The overall BSA affected by psoriasis was estimated by comparison of the size of the affected area to the palm area of the participant's hand (entire palmar surface or handprint), which equates to approximately 1% of total BSA." (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Month 24

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Apremilast 10mg BID-60.5
Placebo-Apremilast 20 mg BID-66.2
Apremilast 20mg BID-75.0
Apremilast 30 mg BID-41.5
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID-77.4

LTE Study: Median Percent Change From Baseline in the Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) at 3 Years

"The overall BSA affected by psoriasis was estimated by comparison of the size of the affected area to the palm area of the participant's hand (entire palmar surface or handprint), which equates to approximately 1% of total BSA." (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Month 36

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Apremilast 10mg BID-85.7
Placebo-Apremilast 20 mg BID-63.4
Apremilast 20mg BID-60.9
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID-52.2
Apremilast 30 mg BID-81.0

LTE Study: Median Percent Change From Baseline in the Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) at 4 Years

"The overall BSA affected by psoriasis was estimated by comparison of the size of the affected area to the palm area of the participant's hand (entire palmar surface or handprint), which equates to approximately 1% of total BSA." (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Month 48

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Apremilast 10mg BID-75.0
Placebo-Apremilast 20 mg BID-50.6
Apremilast 20mg BID-73.5
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID-75.0
Apremilast 30 mg BID-91.9

LTE Study: Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Score at 18 Months

The PASI is a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling were scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions was scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The total qualitative score (sum of erythema, thickness, and scaling scores) was multiplied by the degree of involvement for each anatomic region and then multiplied by a constant. The values for each anatomic region were summed to yield the PASI score (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Month 18

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Apremilast 10mg BID-71.8
PBO-Apremilast 20mg BID-60.5
Apremilast 20mg BID-65.3
PBO-Apremilast 30 mg BID-50.0
Apremilast 30 mg BID-77.3

LTE Study: Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Score at 2 Years

The PASI is a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling were scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions was scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The total qualitative score (sum of erythema, thickness, and scaling scores) was multiplied by the degree of involvement for each anatomic region and then multiplied by a constant. The values for each anatomic region were summed to yield the PASI score (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Month 24

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Apremilast 10mg BID-57.8
PBO-Apremilast 20mg BID-64.5
Apremilast 20mg BID-65.9
PBO-Apremilast 30 mg BID-46.0
Apremilast 30 mg BID-78.4

LTE Study: Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Score at 3 Years

The PASI is a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling were scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions was scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The total qualitative score (sum of erythema, thickness, and scaling scores) was multiplied by the degree of involvement for each anatomic region and then multiplied by a constant. The values for each anatomic region were summed to yield the PASI score (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Month 36

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Apremilast 10mg BID-87.7
PBO-Apremilast 20mg BID-69.0
Apremilast 20mg BID-48.8
PBO-Apremilast 30 mg BID-48.0
Apremilast 30 mg BID-80.0

LTE Study: Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Score at 4 Years

The PASI is a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling were scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions was scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The total qualitative score (sum of erythema, thickness, and scaling scores) was multiplied by the degree of involvement for each anatomic region and then multiplied by a constant. The values for each anatomic region were summed to yield the PASI score (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Month 48

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Apremilast 10mg BID-82.5
PBO-Apremilast 20mg BID-52.0
Apremilast 20mg BID-54.3
PBO-Apremilast 30 mg BID-80.0
Apremilast 30 mg BID-85.0

LTE Study: Percent Change From Baseline in the Percent of the Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) at 18 Months

"The overall BSA affected by psoriasis was estimated by comparison of the size of the affected area to the palm area of the participant's hand (entire palmar surface or handprint), which equates to approximately 1% of total BSA." (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Month 18

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Apremilast 10mg BID-71.1
Placebo-Apremilast 20 mg BID-73.9
Apremilast 20mg BID-74.2
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID-44.2
Apremilast 30 mg BID-76.7

LTE Study: Percent Change From Baseline in the Percent of the Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) at 2 Years

"The overall BSA affected by psoriasis was estimated by comparison of the size of the affected area to the palm area of the participant's hand (entire palmar surface or handprint), which equates to approximately 1% of total BSA." (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Month 24

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Apremilast 10mg BID-64.7
Placebo-Apremilast 20 mg BID-66.2
Apremilast 20mg BID-74.5
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID-24.7
Apremilast 30 mg BID-74.5

LTE Study: Percent Change From Baseline in the Percent of the Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) at 3 Years

"The overall BSA affected by psoriasis was estimated by comparison of the size of the affected area to the palm area of the participant's hand (entire palmar surface or handprint), which equates to approximately 1% of total BSA." (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Month 36

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Apremilast 10mg BID-86.1
Placebo-Apremilast 20 mg BID-63.4
Apremilast 20mg BID-58.4
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID-39.1
Apremilast 30 mg BID-78.5

LTE Study: Percent Change From Baseline in the Percent of the Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) at 4 Years

"The overall BSA affected by psoriasis was estimated by comparison of the size of the affected area to the palm area of the participant's hand (entire palmar surface or handprint), which equates to approximately 1% of total BSA." (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Month 48

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Apremilast 10mg BID-75.0
Placebo-Apremilast 20 mg BID-50.6
Apremilast 20mg BID-72.4
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID-75.0
Apremilast 30 mg BID-86.1

LTE Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at 18 Months

PASI-50 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 50% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Month 18

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Apremilast 10mg BID100.0
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID50.0
Apremilast 20mg BID70.0
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID50.0
Apremilast 30 mg BID100

LTE Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at 2 Years

PASI-50 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 50% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Month 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Apremilast 10mg BID60.0
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID50.0
Apremilast 20mg BID50.0
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID25.0
Apremilast 30 mg BID90.0

LTE Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at 3 Years

PASI-50 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 50% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Month 36

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Apremilast 10mg BID60.0
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID50.0
Apremilast 20mg BID30.0
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID50.0
Apremilast 30 mg BID60.0

LTE Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at 4 Years

PASI-50 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 50% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Month 48

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Apremilast 10mg BID40.0
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID25.0
Apremilast 20mg BID20.0
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID25.0
Apremilast 30 mg BID40.0

LTE Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at 18 Months

PASI-75 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Month 18

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Apremilast 10mg BID60.0
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID0.0
Apremilast 20mg BID40.0
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID0.0
Apremilast 30 mg BID50.0

LTE Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at 2 Years

PASI-75 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Month 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Apremilast 10mg BID20.0
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID0.0
Apremilast 20mg BID30.0
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID25.0
Apremilast 30 mg BID50.0

LTE Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at 3 Years

PASI-75 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Month 36

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Apremilast 10mg BID60.0
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID25.0
Apremilast 20mg BID10.0
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID0.0
Apremilast 30 mg BID30.0

LTE Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at 4 Years

PASI-75 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Month 48

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Apremilast 10mg BID40.0
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID0.0
Apremilast 20mg BID0
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID25.0
Apremilast 30 mg BID30.0

LTE Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 90% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at 18 Months

PASI-90 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 90% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 76 of the long-term extension study. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Month 18

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Apremilast 10mg BID0.0
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID0.0
Apremilast 20mg BID10.0
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID0.0
Apremilast 30 mg BID30.0

LTE Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 90% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at 2 Years

PASI-90 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 90% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 100 of the extension study. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Month 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Apremilast 10mg BID0.0
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID0
Apremilast 20mg BID10.0
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID0.0
Apremilast 30 mg BID30.0

LTE Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 90% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at 3 Years

PASI-90 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 90% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 148 of the extension study. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Month 36

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Apremilast 10mg BID20.0
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID0.0
Apremilast 20mg BID10.0
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID0.0
Apremilast 30 mg BID20.0

LTE Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 90% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score at 4 Years

PASI-90 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 90% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 196 of the extension study. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Month 48

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Apremilast 10mg BID0.0
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BID0.0
Apremilast 20mg BID0.0
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID0.0
Apremilast 30 mg BID20.0

LTE Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score of 0 or 1 at 18 Months

The sPGA was a measure of psoriasis disease severity at the time of evaluation by the investigator. It does not compare assessments across visits or rely on investigator recall of prior disease severity. The sPGA was a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (clear, except for residual discoloration) to 5 (severe; majority of plaques have severe thickness, erythema, and scaling). The investigator examined all of the lesions on the participant and assigned a score ranging from 0 to 5 for thickness, erythema and degree of scaling . Scores for thickness, erythema and scaling are then summed and the mean of these 3 scores equaled the overall sPGA score. Fractional values for the sPGA were rounded to the next highest integer (eg, a score of 3.5 was rounded to 4, 3.4 was rounded to 3). A lower sPGA score was associated with less severe disease (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Month 18

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Apremilast 10mg BID60.0
Placebo-Apremilast 20 mg BID0.0
Apremilast 20mg BID20.0
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID25.0
Apremilast 30 mg BID60.0

LTE Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score of 0 or 1 at 2 Years

The sPGA was a measure of psoriasis disease severity at the time of evaluation by the investigator. It does not compare assessments across visits or rely on investigator recall of prior disease severity. The sPGA was a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (clear, except for residual discoloration) to 5 (severe; majority of plaques have severe thickness, erythema, and scaling). The investigator examined all of the lesions on the participant and assigned a score ranging from 0 to 5 for thickness, erythema and degree of scaling . Scores for thickness, erythema and scaling are then summed and the mean of these 3 scores equaled the overall sPGA score. Fractional values for the sPGA were rounded to the next highest integer (eg, a score of 3.5 was rounded to 4, 3.4 was rounded to 3). A lower sPGA score was associated with less severe disease (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Month 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Apremilast 10mg BID20.0
Placebo-Apremilast 20 mg BID0.00
Apremilast 20mg BID10.0
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID25.0
Apremilast 30 mg BID40.0

LTE Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score of 0 or 1 at 3 Years

The sPGA was a measure of psoriasis disease severity at the time of evaluation by the investigator. It does not compare assessments across visits or rely on investigator recall of prior disease severity. The sPGA was a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (clear, except for residual discoloration) to 5 (severe; majority of plaques have severe thickness, erythema, and scaling). The investigator examined all of the lesions on the participant and assigned a score ranging from 0 to 5 for thickness, erythema and degree of scaling . Scores for thickness, erythema and scaling are then summed and the mean of these 3 scores equaled the overall sPGA score. Fractional values for the sPGA were rounded to the next highest integer (eg, a score of 3.5 was rounded to 4, 3.4 was rounded to 3). A lower sPGA score was associated with less severe disease (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 and month 36

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Apremilast 10mg BID60.0
Placebo-Apremilast 20 mg BID0.0
Apremilast 20mg BID0
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID25.0
Apremilast 30 mg BID30.0

LTE Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score of 0 or 1 at 4 Years

The sPGA was a measure of psoriasis disease severity at the time of evaluation by the investigator. It does not compare assessments across visits or rely on investigator recall of prior disease severity. The sPGA was a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (clear, except for residual discoloration) to 5 (severe; majority of plaques have severe thickness, erythema, and scaling). The investigator examined all of the lesions on the participant and assigned a score ranging from 0 to 5 for thickness, erythema and degree of scaling . Scores for thickness, erythema and scaling are then summed and the mean of these 3 scores equaled the overall sPGA score. Fractional values for the sPGA were rounded to the next highest integer (eg, a score of 3.5 was rounded to 4, 3.4 was rounded to 3). A lower sPGA score was associated with less severe disease (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Month 48

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Apremilast 10mg BID20.0
Placebo-Apremilast 20 mg BID0.0
Apremilast 20mg BID0.0
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID25.0
Apremilast 30 mg BID30.0

Time to Loss of 50% of the PASI Response During the Observational Follow-up Phase Relative to the End of Treatment (Participants Who Had at Least a PASI-50 Response at the End of Treatment Phase)

Time to loss of response was modified to be 50% loss in the PASI response observed at the end of treatment for participants who achieved at least a PASI-50 at the end of treatment. This definition was changed since participants may have already lost their maximal PASI response prior to enrollment into the Observation Follow-up Phase. Included all participants that enrolled into the observational follow-up phase after the treatment phase. (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Up to 4 weeks after the last dose

Interventionweeks (Median)
Apremilast 10mg BIDNA
Apremilast 20mg BIDNA
Apremilast 30 mg BIDNA
Placebo-Apremilast 20mg BIDNA
Placebo-Apremilast 30 mg BID5.3

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) in the Apremilast Exposure Period

An AE was any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence, that may appear or worsen in a participant during the course of study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the participant's health, including laboratory test values regardless of etiology. Any worsening (ie, any clinically significant adverse change in the frequency or intensity of a preexisting condition) was considered an AE. A serious AE (SAE) is any untoward adverse event that is fatal, life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, requires or prolongs existing in-patient hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is a condition that may jeopardize the patient or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. An AE is a treatment emergent AE if the AE start date is on or after the date of the first dose of study drug and no later than 28 days after the last dose. (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to 6 years of study treatment; maximum duration of exposure was 314.6 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any treatment emergent AEAny drug-related TEAEAny severe TEAEAny serious TEAEAny serious drug-related≥ 1 TEAE leading to drug interruption≥ 1 TEAE leading to drug withdrawal≥ 1 TEAE leading to death
Apremilast 10mg BID6723420350
Apremilast 20mg BID9732109111110
Apremilast 30 mg BID11146146010160

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) in the Apremilast Exposure Period

An AE was any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence, that may appear or worsen in a participant during the course of study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the participant's health, including laboratory test values regardless of etiology. Any worsening (ie, any clinically significant adverse change in the frequency or intensity of a preexisting condition) was considered an AE. A serious AE (SAE) is any untoward adverse event that is fatal, life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, requires or prolongs existing in-patient hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is a condition that may jeopardize the patient or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. An AE is a treatment emergent AE if the AE start date is on or after the date of the first dose of study drug and no later than 28 days after the last dose. (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0-88; up to data cut off of 21 July 2011

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any treatment emergent AEAny drug-related TEAEAny severe TEAEAny serious TEAEAny serious drug-related≥ 1 TEAE leading to drug interruption≥ 1 TEAE leading to drug withdrawal≥ 1 TEAE leading to death
Apremilast 10mg BID6723310350
Apremilast 20mg BID973198111110
Apremilast 30 mg BID1104513609150

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) in the Placebo Controlled Phase

An AE was any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence, that may appear or worsen in a participant during the course of study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the participant's health, including laboratory test values regardless of etiology. Any worsening (ie, any clinically significant adverse change in the frequency or intensity of a preexisting condition) was considered an AE. A serious AE (SAE) is any untoward adverse event that is fatal, life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, requires or prolongs existing in-patient hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is a condition that may jeopardize the patient or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. An AE is a treatment emergent AE if the AE start date is on or after the date of the first dose of study drug and no later than 28 days after the last dose. (NCT00773734)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 16; up to data cut off of 21 July 2011

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any treatment emergent AEAny drug-related TEAEAny severe TEAEAny serious TEAEAny serious drug-related≥ 1 TEAE leading to drug interruption≥ 1 TEAE leading to drug withdrawal≥ 1 TEAE leading to death
Apremilast 10mg BID5920100320
Apremilast 20mg BID6723530380
Apremilast 30 mg BID72325406120
Placebo5711320451

Accumulation Index (R)

Accumulation represents the relationship between the dosing interval and the rate of elimination for the drug. (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Day 85 Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 hours after the AM dose

Interventionratio (Geometric Mean)
Apremilast 20mg1.68

Apparent Total Clearance of Apremilast From Plasma After Extravascular Administration (CL/F) During the Extension Phase

For 169/170, apparent clearance of drug from plasma after extravascular administration (CL/F) was calculated as follows: CL/F= Dose/AUC12 (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Day 169 pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 12, 24 and 36 hours after AM dose

InterventionmL/hour (Geometric Mean)
Apremilast 20mg/30mg PO BID (Treatment + Extension Phase)14853.59

Apparent Total Clearance of Apremilast From Plasma After Extravascular Administration (CLz/F) During the Treatment Phase

"The apparent total clearance of apremilast from plasma after extravascular administration (CLz/F); for Day 1, apparent clearance of drug from plasma (CL/F) was not calculated.~For Day 85, Apparent clearance of drug from plasma after extravascular administration (CL/F) was calculated as follows: CL/F= Dose/AUC^12 where τ=12." (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Day 85 Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 hours after the AM dose

InterventionmL/hour (Geometric Mean)
Apremilast 20mg8249.19

Apparent Total Volume of Distribution During the Terminal Phase After Extravascular Administration (Vz/F) During the Extension Phase

For Days 169/170, apparent volume of distribution of drug (V/z) based on the terminal phase was calculated as follows: Vz/F=Dose/(λ*AUC12) where λ = the terminal elimination rate constant (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Day 169 pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 12, 24 and 36 hours after AM dose

InterventionmL (Geometric Mean)
Apremilast 20mg BID/30mg PO BID (Treatment + Extension Phase)134734.60

Apparent Total Volume of Distribution During the Terminal Phase After Extravascular Administration (Vz/F) During the Treatment Phase

"Apparent volume of distribution during the terminal phase after extravascular administration (Vz/F) (for Days 1, 85, and 169/170)~For Day 1, Vz/F was not calculated.~For Days 85 and 169/170, apparent volume of distribution of drug (V/z) based on the terminal phase was calculated as follows: Vz/F=Dose/(λ*AUC^12)" (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Day 85

InterventionmL (Geometric Mean)
Apremilast 20mg107616.08

Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time-curve From 0 to 12 Hours Post Dose (AUC 0-12)

"Plasma concentrations of apremilast were determined using validated chiral liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry methods (LC-MS/MS). For Day 1, AUC0-12 was calculated, using linear trapezoidal area method in WinNonlin (linear-linear trapezoidal). For Days 85 and 169/170, the AUC during a dosing interval (12 hours) (AUC0-12), was calculated at steady-state using the partial area function within WinNonlin.~." (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Day 85 Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 hours after the AM dose

Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Apremilast 20mg2424.48

Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time-curve From 0 to 12 Hours Post Dose (AUC 0-12) During the Extension Phase

Plasma concentrations of apremilast were determined using validated chiral liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry methods (LC-MS/MS). (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Day 169 pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 12, 24 and 36 hours after AM dose

Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Apremilast 20/30mg BID2019.71

Change From Baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 12

DLQI was the dermatology-specific quality of life (QOL) measure used for the psoriatic population. The DLQI was a validated, self-administered, 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on a participants QoL, based on recall over the past week. Domains include symptoms, feelings, daily activities, leisure, work, personal relationships, and treatment. Possible responses for each of the 10 items are: not at all, a little, a lot, and very much. Each question is rated on a scale of 0 to 3 with a total range of 0 to 30. Higher scores indicate greater impact of disease on QOL (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Apremilast 20 mg PO BID (Treatment Phase)-4.7

Mean Residence Time (MRT) During the Extension Phase

Mean Residence Time (MRT) is defined as the mean duration of time the drug spends in the body. The average concentration at steady state (Cavg) (for Days169/170) was calculated as follows: Cavg = (Day 169/170)/(12) (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Day 169 pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 12, 24 and 36 hours after AM dose

Interventionhours (Geometric Mean)
Apremilast 20mg/30mg PO BID (Treatment + Extension Phase)168.3092

Mean Residence Time (MRT) During the Treatment Phase

Mean Residence Time (MRT) is defined as the mean duration of time the drug spends in the body. The average concentration at steady state (Cavg) (for Day 85 was calculated as follows: Cavg = (Day 85 AUC0-12)/(12). (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Day 85 Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 hours after the AM dose

Interventionhours (Geometric Mean)
Apremilast 20mg PO BID202.04

Peak (Maximum) Plasma Concentration of Apremilast (Cmax) During the Extension Phase

The maximum observed plasma concentration of CC-10004 (Cmax); the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was obtained directly from the observed concentration-time data on Days 169/170. (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Day 169 pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 12, 24 and 36 hours after AM dose

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Apremilast 20mg/30mg PO BID (Treatment + Extension Phase)320.35

Peak (Maximum) Plasma Concentration of Medication (Cmax)

The maximum observed plasma concentration of apremilast (Cmax); the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was obtained directly from the observed concentration-time data on Days 1, 85, and 169/170, respectively. (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Day 85 Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 hours after the AM dose

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Apremilast 20mg364.85

Percent Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) Score at Week 12

The PASI score was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The total qualitative score (sum of erythema, thickness, and scaling scores) was multiplied by the degree of involvement for each anatomic region and then multiplied by a constant. These values for each anatomic region are summed to yield the PASI score. (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Apremilast 20 mg-59.0

Percent Change From Baseline in the Chemokine Ligand (CXCL9) Inflammatory Marker in Psoriatic Skin Biopsies

Inflammatory markers associated with psoriasis (using skin biopsies) were used to detect acute inflammation and as markers of treatment response. The inflammatory markers were measured using Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the messenger Ribonucleic acid (mRNA) is being measured. (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Apremilast 20 mg PO BID (Treatment Phase)-36.4

Percent Change From Baseline in the Defensin Beta 4 (DEFB4) Inflammatory Marker in Psoriatic Skin Biopsies

Inflammatory markers associated with psoriasis (using skin biopsies) were used to detect acute inflammation and as markers of treatment response. The inflammatory markers were measured using Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the messenger Ribonucleic acid (mRNA) i being measured. (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Apremilast 20 mg PO BID (Treatment Phase)-82.3

Percent Change From Baseline in the Dendritic Cell (CD83) Inflammatory Marker in Psoriatic Skin Biopsies

Inflammatory markers associated with psoriasis (using skin biopsies) were used to detect acute inflammation and as markers of treatment response. The inflammatory markers were measured using Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the messenger Ribonucleic acid (mRNA) is being measured. (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Apremilast 20 mg PO BID (Treatment Phase)14.2

Percent Change From Baseline in the IL10 Inflammatory Marker in Psoriatic Skin Biopsies

Inflammatory markers associated with psoriasis (using skin biopsies) were used to detect acute inflammation and as markers of treatment response. The inflammatory markers were measured using Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the messenger Ribonucleic acid (mRNA) is being measured. (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Apremilast 20 mg PO BID (Treatment Phase)-26.5

Percent Change From Baseline in the IL17A Inflammatory Marker in Psoriatic Skin Biopsies

Inflammatory markers associated with psoriasis (using skin biopsies) were used to detect acute inflammation and as markers of treatment response. The inflammatory markers were measured using Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the messenger Ribonucleic acid (mRNA) is being measured. (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Apremilast 20 mg PO BID (Treatment Phase)-49.4

Percent Change From Baseline in the IL2 Inflammatory Marker in Psoriatic Skin Biopsies

Inflammatory markers associated with psoriasis (using skin biopsies) were used to detect acute inflammation and as markers of treatment response. The inflammatory markers were measured using Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the messenger Ribonucleic acid (mRNA) is being measured. (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Apremilast 20 mg PO BID (Treatment Phase)-25.0

Percent Change From Baseline in the IL8 Inflammatory Marker in Psoriatic Skin Biopsies

Inflammatory markers associated with psoriasis (using skin biopsies) were used to detect acute inflammation and as markers of treatment response. The inflammatory markers were measured using Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the messenger Ribonucleic acid (mRNA) is being measured. (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Apremilast 20 mg PO BID (Treatment Phase)-66.5

Percent Change From Baseline in the Inducible Nitric Oxide (iNOS) Inflammatory Marker in Psoriatic Skin Biopsies

Inflammatory markers associated with psoriasis (using skin biopsies) were used to detect acute inflammation and as markers of treatment response. The inflammatory markers were measured using Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the messenger Ribonucleic acid (mRNA) is being measured. (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Apremilast 20 mg PO BID (Treatment Phase)-100.0

Percent Change From Baseline in the Interferon (INF) Gamma Inflammatory Marker in Psoriatic Skin Biopsies

Inflammatory markers associated with psoriasis (using skin biopsies) were used to detect acute inflammation and as markers of treatment response. The inflammatory markers were measured using Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the messenger Ribonucleic acid (mRNA) is being measured. (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Apremilast 20 mg PO BID (Treatment Phase)-37.6

Percent Change From Baseline in the Interleukin (IL) IL-22 Inflammatory Marker in Psoriatic Skin Biopsies

Inflammatory markers associated with psoriasis (using skin biopsies) were used to detect acute inflammation and as markers of treatment response. The inflammatory markers were measured using Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the messenger Ribonucleic acid (mRNA) is being measured. (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Apremilast 20 mg PO BID (Treatment Phase)-100.0

Percent Change From Baseline in the keratin16 (K16) Inflammatory Marker in Psoriatic Skin Biopsies

Inflammatory markers associated with psoriasis (using skin biopsies) were used to detect acute inflammation and as markers of treatment response. The inflammatory markers were measured using Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the messenger Ribonucleic acid (mRNA) is being measured. (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Apremilast 20 mg PO BID (Treatment Phase)-78.6

Percent Change From Baseline in the MX1 (Gene That Encodes the Interferon-induced p78 Protein) Inflammatory Marker in Psoriatic Skin Biopsies

Inflammatory markers associated with psoriasis (using skin biopsies) were used to detect acute inflammation and as markers of treatment response. The inflammatory markers were measured using Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the messenger Ribonucleic acid (mRNA) is being measured. (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Apremilast 20 mg PO BID (Treatment Phase)-52.6

Percent Change From Baseline in the p40 Inflammatory Marker in Psoriatic Skin Biopsies

Inflammatory markers associated with psoriasis (using skin biopsies) were used to detect acute inflammation and as markers of treatment response. The inflammatory markers were measured using Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the messenger Ribonucleic acid (mRNA) is being measured. (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Apremilast 20 mg PO BID (Treatment Phase)-86.7

Percent Change From Baseline in the pluripotent19 (P19) Inflammatory Marker in Psoriatic Skin Biopsies

Inflammatory markers associated with psoriasis (using skin biopsies) were used to detect acute inflammation and as markers of treatment response. The inflammatory markers were measured using Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the messenger Ribonucleic acid (mRNA) is being measured. (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Apremilast 20 mg PO BID (Treatment Phase)-68.3

Percent Change From Baseline in the Psoriasis Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement at Week 12

The BSA estimate was based on the palm area of the hand of the participant which equates to 1% of the total body surface area. (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

InterventionPercent change in BSA (Mean)
Apremilast 20 mg-53.0

Percent Change From Baseline in the Tumor Necrosing Factor (TNF) Alpha Inflammatory Marker in Psoriatic Skin Biopsies

Inflammatory markers associated with psoriasis (using skin biopsies) were used to detect acute inflammation and as markers of treatment response. The inflammatory markers were measured using Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the messenger Ribonucleic acid (mRNA) is being measured. (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Apremilast 20 mg PO BID (Treatment Phase)-42.7

Percent Change From Baseline of CD 11c in the Dermis of the Psoriatic Skin Biopsy at Week 12

The aim of the study was to measure the pharmacodynamic effects of apremilast in participants with plaque psoriasis in skin affected by psoriasis, immune cells enter the skin through blood vessels and cause the epidermis to grow very rapidly and to stop shedding properly. This causes thickening of the skin as well as the scaly build up composed of dead skin cells seen on areas affected by psoriasis. (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Apremilast 20 mg PO BID (Treatment Phase)-54.6

Percent Change From Baseline of CD11c in the Epidermis of the Psoriatic Skin Biopsy at Week 12

The aim of the study was to measure the pharmacodynamic effects of apremilast in participants with plaque psoriasis in skin affected by psoriasis, immune cells enter the skin through blood vessels and cause the epidermis to grow very rapidly and to stop shedding properly. This causes thickening of the skin as well as the scaly build up composed of dead skin cells seen on areas affected by psoriasis. (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Apremilast 20 mg PO BID (Treatment Phase)-88.6

Percent Change From Baseline of CD3 in the Dermis of the Psoriatic Skin Biopsy at Week 12

The aim of the study was to measure the pharmacodynamic effects of apremilast in participants with plaque psoriasis in skin affected by psoriasis, immune cells enter the skin through blood vessels and cause the epidermis to grow very rapidly and to stop shedding properly. This causes thickening of the skin as well as the scaly build up composed of dead skin cells seen on areas affected by psoriasis. (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Apremilast 20 mg PO BID (Treatment Phase)-62.0

Percent Change From Baseline of CD3 in the Epidermis of the Psoriatic Skin Biopsy at Week 12

The aim of the study was to measure the pharmacodynamic effects of apremilast in participants with plaque psoriasis in skin affected by psoriasis, immune cells enter the skin through blood vessels and cause the epidermis to grow very rapidly and to stop shedding properly. This causes thickening of the skin as well as the scaly build up composed of dead skin cells seen on areas affected by psoriasis. (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Apremilast 20 mg PO BID (Treatment Phase)-47.4

Percent Change From Baseline of CD56 in the Dermis of the Psoriatic Skin Biopsy at Week 12

The aim of the study was to measure the pharmacodynamic effects of apremilast in participants with plaque psoriasis in skin affected by psoriasis, immune cells enter the skin through blood vessels and cause the epidermis to grow very rapidly and to stop shedding properly. This causes thickening of the skin as well as the scaly build up composed of dead skin cells seen on areas affected by psoriasis. (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Apremilast 20 mg PO BID (Treatment Phase)-12.5

Percent Change From Baseline of CD56 in the Epidermis of the Psoriatic Skin Biopsy at Week 12

The aim of the study was to measure the pharmacodynamic effects of apremilast in participants with plaque psoriasis in skin affected by psoriasis, immune cells enter the skin through blood vessels and cause the epidermis to grow very rapidly and to stop shedding properly. This causes thickening of the skin as well as the scaly build up composed of dead skin cells seen on areas affected by psoriasis. (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Apremilast 20 mg PO BID (Treatment Phase)-73.3

Percent Change From Baseline of Epidermal Thickness in the Psoriatic Skin Biopsy at Week 12

The aim of the study was to measure the pharmacodynamic effects of apremilast in participants with plaque psoriasis in skin affected by psoriasis, immune cells enter the skin through blood vessels and cause the epidermis to grow very rapidly and to stop shedding properly. This causes thickening of the skin as well as the scaly build up composed of dead skin cells seen on areas affected by psoriasis. (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Apremilast 20 mg PO BID (Treatment Phase)-34.3

Percent Change From Baseline of Langerin in the Dermis of Psoriatic Skin Biopsy at Week 12

The aim of the study was to measure the pharmacodynamic effects of apremilast in participants with plaque psoriasis in skin affected by psoriasis, immune cells enter the skin through blood vessels and cause the epidermis to grow very rapidly and to stop shedding properly. This causes thickening of the skin as well as the scaly build up composed of dead skin cells seen on areas affected by psoriasis. (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Apremilast 20 mg PO BID (Treatment Phase)-57.9

Percent Change From Baseline of Langerin in the Epidermis of the Psoriatic Skin Biopsy at Week 12

The aim of the study was to measure the pharmacodynamic effects of apremilast in participants with plaque psoriasis in skin affected by psoriasis, immune cells enter the skin through blood vessels and cause the epidermis to grow very rapidly and to stop shedding properly. This causes thickening of the skin as well as the scaly build up composed of dead skin cells seen on areas affected by psoriasis. (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Apremilast 20 mg PO BID (Treatment Phase)17.1

Percent of Participants With Psoriatic Arthritis Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 20% Improvement (ACR-20) Response at Week 12

"A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from baseline were met:~≥ 20% improvement in 78 tender joint count;~≥ 20% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and~≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); C-Reactive Protein." (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Apremilast 20 mg PO BID (Treatment Phase)25.0

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI-50 Score at Week 12

PASI -50 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 50% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 12. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head,trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the4 anatomic regions was scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The total qualitative score (sum of erythema, thickness, and scaling scores) was multiplied by the degree of involvement for each anatomic region and then multiplied by a constant. (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Apremilast 20 mg46.7

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI-75 Score at Week 12

PASI-75 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 12. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the4 anatomic regions was scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The total qualitative score (sum of erythema, thickness, and scaling scores) was multiplied by the degree of involvement for each anatomic region and then multiplied by a constant. (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Apremilast 20 mg30.00

Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1 Point Reduction on 0 to 5 Point Scale From Baseline in Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 12

The static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) rated the investigator's overall clinical assessment of a participants plaque thickness, erythema, and scaling on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (clear, except for residual discoloration) to 5 (majority of plaques have severe thickness, erythema, and scale). To assign a sPGA score, the investigator examined all psoriatic lesions and assigned a severity score ranging from 0 to 5 for thickness, erythema, and scaling. Scores for thickness, erythema, and scaling are summed and the mean of these 3 scores equals the overall sPGA score. Decreases in sPGA correspond to clinical improvement. (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Apremilast 20 mg PO BID (Treatment Phase)66.7

Terminal Phase Elimination Half Life of Apremilast (t½)

Terminal phase elimination half-life (t1/2) was calculated as follows: t1/2 = 0.693/λz. The terminal elimination rate constant (λZ) was estimated by linear regression of the log-transformed concentration-time data. (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Day 85 Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 hours after the AM dose

InterventionLiters (Geometric Mean)
Apremilast 20mg7.832

Terminal Phase Elimination Half Life of Apremilast (t½) During the Extension Phase

Terminal phase elimination half-life (t1/2) was calculated as follows: t1/2 = 0.693/λz. The terminal elimination rate constant (λZ) was estimated by linear regression of the log-transformed concentration-time data. (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Day 169 pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 12, 24 and 36 hours after AM dose

Interventionhours (Geometric Mean)
Apremilast 20mg/30mg PO BID (Treatment + Extension Phase)6.287

Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) During the Extension Phase

The time to reach Cmax (Tmax) was obtained directly from the observed concentration-time data on Day 169/170. Actual times utilized were used for reporting Tmax values. (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Day 169 pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 12, 24 and 36 hours after AM dose

Interventionhours (Geometric Mean)
Apremilast 20mg BID/30mg PO BID (Treatment + Extension Phase)1.59

Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) During the Treatment Phase

The time to reach Cmax (Tmax) was obtained directly from the observed concentration-time data on Day 85. Actual times utilized were used for reporting Tmax values. (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Day 85 Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 hours after the AM dose

Interventionhours (Median)
Apremilast 20mg2.00

Trough Plasma Concentration (Cmin)

The trough observed plasma concentration of apremilast (Cmin) was determined directly from the observed pre-AM dose concentration on Day 85. (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Day 85 Pre-dose

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Apremilast 20mg101.36

Change From Baseline in Peripheral Blood T Cell, B Cell, and NK Cell Subsets at Week 12

T cells or T lymphocytes, a type of white blood cell, play a role in cell-mediated immunity. T cells are distinguished from other lymphocytes by the presence of a T-cell receptor (TCR) on the cell surface and mature in the thymus. B cells, a type of lymphocyte in the humoral immunity of the adaptive immune system can be distinguished by the presence of a protein on the B cells outer surface called a B cell receptor (BCR). This receptor protein allows a B cell to bind to a specific antigen and make antibodies against antigens [(antigen-presenting cells APCs)], and to develop into memory B cells after activation by antigen interaction. Natural Killer Cells (NK) are a type of cytotoxic lymphocyte critical to the innate immune system. Their role is analogous to that of cytotoxic T cells in the vertebrate adaptive immune response. They constitute the third kind of cells differentiated from the common lymphoid progenitor generating B and T lymphocytes and mature in the bone marrow. (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionpercentage of lymphocytes (Mean)
CD 16 + CD 56 (NK cells)CD 19 (B-cells)CD 3 (T-cells)
Apremilast 20 mg PO BID (Treatment Phase)-0.7-0.50.6

Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-item Health Survey (SF-36) Scores, Mental and Physical Components to Week 12

The SF-36 was a self-administered instrument consisting of 8 multi-item scales that assess 8 health domains: 1) limitations in physical activities because of health problems; 2) limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems; 3) limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems; 4) bodily pain; 5) general mental health (psychological distress and well-being); 6) limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems; 7) vitality (energy and fatigue); and 8) general health perceptions. A higher score post-baseline is indicative of improvement in the disease state. The summary physical health score included physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain and general health. The summary mental health score included: vitality, social functioning, role-emotional and mental health. The resulting score for each subscale is then standardized, to obtain values ranging from 0 to 100, with higher values indicating a better QOL. (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Mental ComponentPhysical Component
Apremilast 20 mg0.82.4

Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Extension Phase

"TEAE = any AE occurring or worsening on or after the first treatment with any study drug. Related = suspected by investigator to be related to study treatment. National Cancer Institute [NCI] Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE], Version 3.0, grades: 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, 4 = life threatening, 5 = death.~Adverse event (AE) = any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence occurring at any dose that may appear or worsen in a participant during the course of a study, including new intercurrent illness, worsening concomitant illness, injury, or any concomitant impairment of participant's health, including laboratory test values, regardless of etiology. Serious adverse event (SAE) = any AE which: results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; constitutes an important medical event." (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Week 12 to Week 24

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
≥ 1 AE≥ 1 AE with a suspected relationship to study drug≥ 1 severe AE≥ 1 SAE
Apremilast 20mg/20mg (Extension Phase)4010
Apremilast 20mg/30mg (Extension Phase)5211

Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Treatment Phase

"TEAE = any AE occurring or worsening on or after the first treatment with any study drug. Related = suspected by investigator to be related to study treatment. National Cancer Institute [NCI] Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE], Version 3.0, grades: 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, 4 = life threatening, 5 = death.~Adverse event (AE) = any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence occurring at any dose that may appear or worsen in a participant during the course of a study, including new intercurrent illness, worsening concomitant illness, injury, or any concomitant impairment of participant's health, including laboratory test values, regardless of etiology. Serious adverse event (SAE) = any AE which results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; constitutes an important medical event." (NCT00521339)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
≥ 1 AE≥ 1 AE with a suspected relationship to study drug≥ 1 severe AE≥ 1Severe AE suspected to be related to study drug≥ 1 SAE≥ AE leading to study drug discontinuation>=1 treatment-related AE drug discontinued
Apremilast 20 mg251331042

Change From Baseline in 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Functioning Domain at Week 16

The Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36) is a self-administered instrument that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life and consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). Norm-based scores were used in analyses, calibrated so that 50 is the average score and the standard deviation equals 10. Higher scores indicate a higher level of functioning. The physical functioning domain assesses limitations in physical activities because of health problems. A positive change from Baseline score indicates an improvement. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo1.81
Apremilast 20 mg3.50
Apremilast 30 mg4.23

Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Week 16

The Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is a composite index that is calculated as the sum of the: • 28 tender joint count (TJC), • 28 swollen joint count (SJC), • Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity measured on a 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS), where 0 cm = lowest disease activity and 10 cm = highest; • Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity -measured on a 10 cm VAS, where 0 cm = lowest disease activity and 10 cm = highest. The CDAI score ranges from 0 to 76 where lower scores indicate less disease activity. The following thresholds of disease activity have been defined for the CDAI: Remission: ≤ 2.8 Low Disease Activity: > 2.8 and ≤ 10 Moderate Disease Activity: > 10 and ≤ 22 High Disease Activity: > 22. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-3.84
Apremilast 20 mg-8.24
Apremilast 30 mg-8.72

Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Week 24

The Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is a composite index that is calculated as the sum of the: • 28 tender joint count (TJC), • 28 swollen joint count (SJC), • Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity measured on a 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS), where 0 cm = lowest disease activity and 10 cm = highest; • Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity -measured on a 10 cm VAS, where 0 cm = lowest disease activity and 10 cm = highest. The CDAI score ranges from 0-76 where lower scores indicate less disease activity. The following thresholds of disease activity have been defined for the CDAI: Remission: ≤ 2.8; Low Disease Activity: > 2.8 and ≤ 10; Moderate Disease Activity: > 10 and ≤ 22; High Disease Activity: > 22. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-3.14
Apremilast 20 mg-7.55
Apremilast 30 mg-9.52

Change From Baseline in Dactylitis Severity Score at Week 16

Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet will be rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis severity score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.4
Apremilast 20 mg-1.9
Apremilast 30 mg-1.7

Change From Baseline in Dactylitis Severity Score at Week 24

Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet will be rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis severity score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.3
Apremilast 20 mg-2.0
Apremilast 30 mg-1.8

Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 52

The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire consisting of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and usual activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task are summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative mean changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement in functional ability. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo / Apremilast 20 mg-0.27
Placebo / Apremilast 30 mg-0.29
Apremilast 20 mg-0.37
Apremilast 30 mg-0.32

Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 16

The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire consisting of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and usual activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task are summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative mean changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement in functional ability. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.086
Apremilast 20 mg-0.198
Apremilast 30 mg-0.244

Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 24

The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire consisting of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and usual activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task are summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative mean changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement in functional ability. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.076
Apremilast 20 mg-0.211
Apremilast 30 mg-0.258

Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score (MASES) at Week 16

The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone): 1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Archilles tendon left/right. The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.9
Apremilast 20 mg-1.4
Apremilast 30 mg-1.3

Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score (MASES) at Week 24

The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone): 1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Archilles tendon left/right. The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.8
Apremilast 20 mg-1.6
Apremilast 30 mg-1.6

Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score (MASES) at Week 52

The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone): 1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Archilles tendon left/right. The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 52

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo / Apremilast 20 mg-2.2
Placebo / Apremilast 30 mg-1.9
Apremilast 20 mg-2.7
Apremilast 30 mg-1.9

Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Week 16

"The participant was asked to place a vertical line on a 100-mm visual analog scale on which the left-hand boundary (score = 0 mm) represents no pain, and the right-hand boundary (score = 100 mm) represents pain as severe as can be imagined. The distance from the mark to the left-hand boundary was recorded in millimeters." (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

Interventionmm (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-5.7
Apremilast 20 mg-11.5
Apremilast 30 mg-13.5

Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Week 24

"The participant was asked to place a vertical line on a 100-mm visual analog scale on which the left-hand boundary (score = 0 mm) represents no pain, and the right-hand boundary (score = 100 mm) represents pain as severe as can be imagined. The distance from the mark to the left-hand boundary was recorded in millimeters." (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionmm (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-4.2
Apremilast 20 mg-11.2
Apremilast 30 mg-14.7

Change From Baseline in SF-36 Physical Function at Week 24

The Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36) is a self-administered instrument that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life and consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). Norm-based scores were used in analyses, calibrated so that 50 is the average score and the standard deviation equals 10. Higher scores indicate a higher level of functioning. The physical functioning domain assesses limitations in physical activities because of health problems. A positive change from Baseline score indicates an improvement. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo1.45
Apremilast 20 mg3.49
Apremilast 30 mg5.01

Change From Baseline in the CDAI Score at Week 52

The Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is a composite index that is calculated as the sum of the: • 28 tender joint count (TJC), • 28 swollen joint count (SJC), • Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity measured on a 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS), where 0 cm = lowest disease activity and 10 cm = highest; • Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity -measured on a 10 cm VAS, where 0 cm = lowest disease activity and 10 cm = highest. The CDAI score ranges from 0-76 where lower scores indicate less disease activity. The following thresholds of disease activity have been defined for the CDAI: Remission: ≤ 2.8 Low Disease Activity: > 2.8 and ≤ 10 Moderate Disease Activity: > 10 and ≤ 22 High Disease Activity: > 22. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo / Apremilast 20 mg-15.00
Placebo / Apremilast 30 mg-14.03
Apremilast 20 mg-15.41
Apremilast 30 mg-14.54

Change From Baseline in the Dactylitis Severity Score at Week 52

Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet will be rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis severity score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo / Apremilast 20 mg-0.8
Placebo / Apremilast 30 mg-2.4
Apremilast 20 mg-2.7
Apremilast 30 mg-1.8

Change From Baseline in the DAS28 at Week 52

The DAS28 measures the severity of disease at a specific time and is derived from the following variables: • 28 tender joint count • 28 swollen joint count, which do not include the DIP joints, the hip joint, or the joints below the knee; • C-reactive protein (CRP) • Patient's global assessment of disease activity. DAS28(CRP) scores range from 0 to approximately 10, with the upper bound dependent on the highest possible level of CRP. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo / Apremilast 20 mg-1.47
Placebo / Apremilast 30 mg-1.15
Apremilast 20 mg-1.40
Apremilast 30 mg-1.31

Change From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score (DAS28) at Week 16

The DAS28 measures the severity of disease at a specific time and is derived from the following variables: • 28 tender joint count • 28 swollen joint count, which do not include the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joints, the hip joint, or the joints below the knee; • C-reactive protein (CRP) • Patient's global assessment of disease activity. DAS28(CRP) scores range from 0 to approximately 10, with the upper bound dependent on the highest possible level of CRP. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.26
Apremilast 20 mg-0.73
Apremilast 30 mg-0.79

Change From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score (DAS28) at Week 24

The DAS28 measures the severity of disease at a specific time and is derived from the following variables: • 28 tender joint count • 28 swollen joint count, which do not include the DIP joints, the hip joint, or the joints below the knee; • C-reactive protein (CRP) • Patient's global assessment of disease activity. DAS28(CRP) scores range from 0 to approximately 10, with the upper bound dependent on the highest possible level of CRP. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.20
Apremilast 20 mg-0.66
Apremilast 30 mg-0.90

Change From Baseline in the FACIT-Fatigue Scale Score at Week 52

"The FACIT-Fatigue scale is a 13-item self-administered questionnaire that assesses both the physical and functional consequences of fatigue. Each question is answered on a 5-point scale, where 0 means not at all, and 4 means very much. The FACIT-Fatigue scale score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores denoting lower levels of fatigue. A positive change from Baseline score indicates an improvement." (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo / Apremilast 20 mg4.33
Placebo / Apremilast 30 mg4.15
Apremilast 20 mg4.27
Apremilast 30 mg3.67

Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Week 16

"The FACIT-Fatigue scale is a 13-item self-administered questionnaire that assesses both the physical and functional consequences of fatigue. Each question is answered on a 5-point scale, where 0 means not at all, and 4 means very much. The FACIT-Fatigue scale score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores denoting lower levels of fatigue. A positive change from Baseline score indicates an improvement." (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo1.55
Apremilast 20 mg1.68
Apremilast 30 mg3.88

Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Week 24

"The FACIT-Fatigue scale is a 13-item self-administered questionnaire that assesses both the physical and functional consequences of fatigue. Each question is answered on a 5-point scale, where 0 means not at all, and 4 means very much. The FACIT-Fatigue scale score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores denoting lower levels of fatigue. A positive change from Baseline score indicates an improvement." (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo1.12
Apremilast 20 mg1.52
Apremilast 30 mg3.33

Change From Baseline in the Patient Assessment of Pain at Week 52

"The participant was asked to place a vertical line on a 100-mm visual analog scale on which the left-hand boundary (score = 0 mm) represents no pain, and the right-hand boundary (score = 100 mm) represents pain as severe as can be imagined. The distance from the mark to the left-hand boundary was recorded in millimeters." (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

Interventionmm (Mean)
Placebo / Apremilast 20 mg-20.2
Placebo / Apremilast 30 mg-21.0
Apremilast 20 mg-17.8
Apremilast 30 mg-20.3

Change From Baseline in the SF-36 Physical Functioning Domain at Week 52

The Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36) is a self-administered instrument that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life and consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). Norm-based scores were used in analyses, calibrated so that 50 is the average score and the standard deviation equals 10. Higher scores indicate a higher level of functioning. The physical functioning domain assesses limitations in physical activities because of health problems. A positive change from Baseline score indicates an improvement. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo / Apremilast 20 mg4.46
Placebo / Apremilast 30 mg4.62
Apremilast 20 mg6.98
Apremilast 30 mg5.69

Percentage of Participants Achieving a Dactylitis Score of Zero at Week 16

Percentage of participants with pre-existing dactylitis whose dactylitis severity score improves to zero after 16 weeks of treatment. Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet was rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis severity score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Week 16

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo39.7
Apremilast 20 mg42.4
Apremilast 30 mg38.2

Percentage of Participants Achieving a Dactylitis Score of Zero at Week 24

Percentage of participants with pre-existing dactylitis whose dactylitis severity score improves to zero after 24 weeks of treatment. Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet was rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis severity score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo39.7
Apremilast 20 mg49.2
Apremilast 30 mg45.6

Percentage of Participants Achieving a Dactylitis Score of Zero at Week 52

Percentage of participants with pre-existing dactylitis whose dactylitis severity score improves to zero after 52 weeks. Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet was rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis severity score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present. Two-sided 95% confidence interval is based on the Clopper-Pearson method. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Week 52

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo / Apremilast 20 mg52.2
Placebo / Apremilast 30 mg53.8
Apremilast 20 mg68.8
Apremilast 30 mg63.3

Percentage of Participants Achieving a MASES Score of Zero at Week 16

Percentage of participants with pre-existing enthesopathy whose MASES improves to 0 after 16 weeks of treatment. The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone): 1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Archilles tendon left/right. The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Week 16

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo15.3
Apremilast 20 mg27.2
Apremilast 30 mg22.8

Percentage of Participants Achieving a MASES Score of Zero at Week 24

Percentage of participants with pre-existing enthesopathy whose MASES improves to 0 after 24 weeks of treatment. The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone): 1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Archilles tendon left/right. The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo14.3
Apremilast 20 mg31.1
Apremilast 30 mg31.6

Percentage of Participants Achieving a MASES Score of Zero at Week 52

Percentage of participants with pre-existing enthesopathy whose MASES improves to 0 after 24 weeks. The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone): 1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Archilles tendon left/right. The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses. Two-sided 95% confidence interval is based on the Clopper-Pearson method. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Week 52

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo / Apremilast 20 mg33.3
Placebo / Apremilast 30 mg27.8
Apremilast 20 mg50.7
Apremilast 30 mg38.2

Percentage of Participants Achieving Good or Moderate EULAR Response at Week 52

A EULAR response reflects an improvement in disease activity and an attainment of a lower degree of disease activity based on the DAS-28 score. A Good Response is defined as an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of more than 1.2 compared with Baseline and attainment of a DAS28 score less than or equal to 3.2. A Moderate Response is defined as either: • an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of greater than 0.6 and less than or equal to 1.2 and attainment of a DAS28 score of less than or equal to 5.1 or, • an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of more than 1.2 and attainment of a DAS28 score of greater than 3.2. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo / Apremilast 20 mg82.8
Placebo / Apremilast 30 mg70.0
Apremilast 20 mg75.0
Apremilast 30 mg74.4

Percentage of Participants With a ACR 20 Response at Week 52

Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: • ≥ 20% improvement in 78 tender joint count; • ≥ 20% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: ◦ Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); ◦ Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); ◦ C-Reactive Protein. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo / Apremilast 20 mg53.1
Placebo / Apremilast 30 mg50.0
Apremilast 20 mg63.0
Apremilast 30 mg54.6

Percentage of Participants With a ACR 50 Response at Week 16

Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: • ≥ 50% improvement in 78 tender joint count; • ≥ 50% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: ◦ Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); ◦ Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); ◦ C-Reactive Protein. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo6.0
Apremilast 20 mg15.5
Apremilast 30 mg16.1

Percentage of Participants With a ACR 70 Response at Week 24

Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: • ≥ 70% improvement in 78 tender joint count; • ≥ 70% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: ◦ Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); ◦ Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); ◦ C-Reactive Protein. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo0.6
Apremilast 20 mg5.4
Apremilast 30 mg10.1

Percentage of Participants With a Modified PsARC Response at Week 52

Modified PsARC response is defined as improvement in at least 2 of the 4 measures, at least one of which must be tender joint count or swollen joint count, and no worsening in any of the 4 measures: • 78 tender joint count, • 76 swollen joint count, • Patient global assessment of disease activity, measured on a 100 mm visual Analog scale (VAS), where 0 mm = lowest disease activity and 100 mm = highest; • Physician global assessment of disease activity, measured on a 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = lowest disease activity and 100 mm = highest. Improvement or worsening in joint counts is defined as decrease or increase, respectively, from Baseline by ≥ 30%, and improvement or worsening in global assessments is defined as decrease or increase, respectively, from Baseline by ≥ 20 mm VAS. Two-sided 95% confidence interval is based on the Clopper-Pearson method. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo / Apremilast 20 mg73.8
Placebo / Apremilast 30 mg71.2
Apremilast 20 mg77.5
Apremilast 30 mg73.6

Percentage of Participants With a Modified Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Week 16

Modified PsARC response is defined as improvement in at least 2 of the 4 measures, at least one of which must be tender joint count or swollen joint count, and no worsening in any of the 4 measures: • 78 tender joint count, • 76 swollen joint count, • Patient global assessment of disease activity, measured on a 100 mm visual Analog scale (VAS), where 0 mm = lowest disease activity and 100 mm = highest; • Physician global assessment of disease activity, measured on a 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = lowest disease activity and 100 mm = highest. Improvement or worsening in joint counts is defined as decrease or increase, respectively, from Baseline by ≥ 30%, and improvement or worsening in global assessments is defined as decrease or increase, respectively, from Baseline by ≥ 20 mm VAS. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo29.8
Apremilast 20 mg38.7
Apremilast 30 mg46.4

Percentage of Participants With a Modified Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Week 24

Modified PsARC response is defined as improvement in at least 2 of the 4 measures, at least one of which must be tender joint count or swollen joint count, and no worsening in any of the 4 measures: •78 tender joint count, •76 swollen joint count, •Patient global assessment of disease activity, measured on a 100 mm visual Analog scale (VAS), where 0 mm = lowest disease activity and 100 mm = highest; •Physician global assessment of disease activity, measured on a 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = lowest disease activity and 100 mm = highest. Improvement or worsening in joint counts is defined as decrease or increase, respectively, from baseline by ≥ 30%, and improvement or worsening in global assessments is defined as decrease or increase, respectively, from baseline by ≥ 20 mm VAS. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo18.5
Apremilast 20 mg31.0
Apremilast 30 mg42.9

Percentage of Participants With an ACR 20 Response at Week 24

Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response at Week 24. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: • ≥ 20% improvement in 78 tender joint count; • ≥ 20% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: ◦ Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); ◦ Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); ◦ C-Reactive Protein. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo13.1
Apremilast 20 mg25.6
Apremilast 30 mg35.1

Percentage of Participants With an ACR 50 Response at Week 24

Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: • ≥ 50% improvement in 78 tender joint count; • ≥ 50% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: ◦ Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); ◦ Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); ◦ C-Reactive Protein. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo4.2
Apremilast 20 mg14.3
Apremilast 30 mg19.0

Percentage of Participants With an ACR 50 Response at Week 52

Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: • ≥ 50% improvement in 78 tender joint count; • ≥ 50% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: ◦ Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); ◦ Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); ◦ C-Reactive Protein. Two-sided 95% confidence interval is based on the Clopper-Pearson method. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo / Apremilast 20 mg25.4
Placebo / Apremilast 30 mg27.9
Apremilast 20 mg24.8
Apremilast 30 mg24.6

Percentage of Participants With an ACR 70 Response at Week 16

Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: • ≥ 70% improvement in 78 tender joint count; • ≥ 70% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: ◦ Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); ◦ Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); ◦ C-Reactive Protein. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo1.2
Apremilast 20 mg6.0
Apremilast 30 mg4.2

Percentage of Participants With an ACR 70 Response at Week 52

Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: • ≥ 70% improvement in 78 tender joint count; • ≥ 70% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: ◦ Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); ◦ Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); ◦ C-Reactive Protein. Two-sided 95% confidence interval is based on the Clopper-Pearson method. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo / Apremilast 20 mg4.8
Placebo / Apremilast 30 mg14.8
Apremilast 20 mg15.4
Apremilast 30 mg13.8

Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 16

Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: • ≥ 20% improvement in 78 tender joint count; • ≥ 20% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: ◦ Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); ◦ Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); ◦ C-Reactive Protein. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo19.0
Apremilast 20 mg30.4
Apremilast 30 mg38.1

Percentage of Participants With Dactylitis Improvement ≥ 1 Point at Week 16

Percentage of participants with pre-existing dactylitis whose dactylitis severity score improved by ≥ 1 after 16 weeks of treatment. Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet was rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis severity score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo57.4
Apremilast 20 mg66.1
Apremilast 30 mg60.3

Percentage of Participants With Dactylitis Improvement ≥ 1 Point at Week 24

Percentage of participants with pre-existing dactylitis whose dactylitis severity score improved by ≥ 1 after 24 weeks of treatment. Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet was rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis severity score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo60.3
Apremilast 20 mg69.5
Apremilast 30 mg69.1

Percentage of Participants With Dactylitis Improvement ≥ 1 Point at Week 52

Percentage of participants with pre-existing dactylitis whose dactylitis severity score improved by ≥ 1 after 52 weeks. Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet was rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis severity score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present. Two-sided 95% confidence interval is based on the Clopper-Pearson method. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo / Apremilast 20 mg65.2
Placebo / Apremilast 30 mg73.1
Apremilast 20 mg85.4
Apremilast 30 mg77.6

Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate EULAR Response at Week 24

EULAR response reflects an improvement in disease activity and an attainment of a lower degree of disease activity based on the DAS-28 score. A Good Response is defined as an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of more than 1.2 compared with Baseline and attainment of a DAS28 score less than or equal to 3.2. A Moderate Response is defined as either: • an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of greater than 0.6 and less than or equal to 1.2 and attainment of a DAS28 score of less than or equal to 5.1 or, • an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of more than 1.2 and attainment of a DAS28 score of greater than 3.2. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo16.1
Apremilast 20 mg30.4
Apremilast 30 mg42.3

Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Week 16

A EULAR response reflects an improvement in disease activity and an attainment of a lower degree of disease activity based on the DAS-28 score. A Good Response is defined as an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of more than 1.2 compared with Baseline and attainment of a DAS28 score less than or equal to 3.2. A Moderate Response is defined as either: • an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of greater than 0.6 and less than or equal to 1.2 and attainment of a DAS28 score of less than or equal to 5.1 or, • an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of more than 1.2 and attainment of a DAS28 score of greater than 3.2. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo29.8
Apremilast 20 mg46.4
Apremilast 30 mg48.8

Percentage of Participants With MASES Improvement ≥ 20% at Week 16

Percentage of participants with pre-existing enthesopathy whose MASES improved by ≥ 20% from Baseline after 16 weeks of treatment. The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone): 1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Archilles tendon left/right. The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo49.0
Apremilast 20 mg56.3
Apremilast 30 mg52.6

Percentage of Participants With MASES Improvement ≥ 20% at Week 24

Percentage of participants with pre-existing enthesopathy whose MASES improved by ≥ 20% from Baseline after 24 weeks of treatment. The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone): 1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Archilles tendon left/right. The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo46.9
Apremilast 20 mg58.3
Apremilast 30 mg60.5

Percentage of Participants With MASES Improvement ≥ 20% at Week 52

Percentage of participants with pre-existing enthesopathy whose MASES improved by ≥ 20% from Baseline after 52 weeks. The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone): 1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Archilles tendon left/right. The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses. Two-sided 95% confidence interval is based on the Clopper-Pearson method. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo / Apremilast 20 mg69.4
Placebo / Apremilast 30 mg55.6
Apremilast 20 mg84.1
Apremilast 30 mg75.3

Number of Participants With Adverse Events During the Apremilast-Exposure Period

A TEAE is an AE with a start date on or after the date of the first dose of Investigational Product (IP) and no later than 28 days after the last dose of IP. An AE is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence, that may appear or worsen in a participant during the course of study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the participant's health, including laboratory test values regardless of etiology. Any worsening (ie, any clinically significant adverse change in the frequency or intensity of a preexisting condition) was considered an AE. A serious AE (SAE) is any untoward adverse event that is fatal, life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, requires or prolongs existing in-patient hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or a condition that may jeopardize the patient or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 260; median total exposure to Apremilast was 170 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Drug-related TEAESevere TEAESerious TEAE (SAE)Drug-related SAETEAE leading to drug interruptionTEAE leading to drug withdrawalTEAE leading to death
Apremilast 20 mg (Pre-switch)203963541447271
Apremilast 20 mg/30 mg BID (Post-switch)395161300
Apremilast 30 mg BID1311313049949302

Number of Participants With Adverse Events During the Placebo-Controlled Period

A Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) is an AE with a start date on or after the date of the first dose of Investigational Product (IP). An AE is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence, that may appear or worsen in a participant during the course of study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the participant's health, including laboratory test values regardless of etiology. Any worsening (ie, any clinically significant adverse change in the frequency or intensity of a preexisting condition) was considered an AE. A serious AE (SAE) is any untoward adverse event that is fatal, life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, requires or prolongs existing in-patient hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or a condition that may jeopardize the patient or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. (NCT01172938)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 16 for placebo participants who entered early escape at Week 16 and up to Week 24 for all other participants (placebo participants who remained on placebo through week 24 and participants randomized to the APR 20 mg BID or APR 30 mg BID)

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treatment Emergent Adverse EventsDrug-related TEAESevere TEAESerious TEAE (SAE)Drug-related Serious AE)TEAE leading to drug interruptionTEAE leading to drug withdrawalTEAE leading to drug death
Apremilast 20 mg1015488010101
Apremilast 30 mg10370119317120
Placebo8132672980

Change in IL-17

To assess change in IL-17 in the identified patient AM-endotype computing relative percent reduction for each subject being treated and serum marker. The median and other summary statistics of these percent change values will be computed (NCT03442088)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16

InterventionPg/mL (Mean)
BaselineWeek 16
Apremilast for Treatment of Psoriasis With the AM-endotype1.513-0.8315

Change in Serum Myeloperoxidase

To assess change in serum myeloperoxidase in the identified patient AM-endotype computing relative percent reduction for each subject being treated and serum marker. The median and other summary statistics of these percent change values will be computed (NCT03442088)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16

InterventionPg/mL (Mean)
BaselineWeek 16
Apremilast for Treatment of Psoriasis With the AM-endotype2419824294

Change in Tissue Factor

To assess change in Tissue Factor in the identified patient AM-endotype computing relative percent reduction for each subject being treated and serum marker. The median and other summary statistics of these percent change values will be computed (NCT03442088)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16

InterventionPg/mL (Mean)
BaselineWeek 16
Apremilast for Treatment of Psoriasis With the AM-endotype72.2875.52

Change in TNF Alpha

To assess change in in the identified patient AM-endotype computing relative percent reduction for each subject being treated and serum marker. The median and other summary statistics of these percent change values will be computed (NCT03442088)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16

InterventionPg/mL (Mean)
BaselineWeek 16
Apremilast for Treatment of Psoriasis With the AM-endotype14.9514.26

The Primary Outcome Measure Will be to Evaluate Change in Aberrant Inflammatory Profiles of Activated Blood Monocytes (Aberrant-monocyte Endotype Patients (AM-endotype).

For each subject, we will identify a target biomarker of abnormally elevated monocytes, among 1.) intermediate, or 2.) doublets, or 3.) platelet doubles. Each subject will thus have one identified monocyte biomarker for which relative percent change will be its basis for analysis in the primary outcome measure. We will specifically assess change from baseline to 16 weeks by computing relative percent reduction for each subject being treated. Note for example that a change of 1.5% to 1.2% is (1 - (1.2/1.5))*100% = 20% reduction. The median and other summary statistics of these percent change values will be computed. Wilcoxon's signed rank test will be used to evaluate the null hypothesis of the median percent change being 0. (NCT03442088)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
BaselineWeek 16
Apremilast for Treatment of Psoriasis With the AM-endotype0.56650.1715

Number of Patients Achieving 50% Reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 12 in Reference to Week 0

EASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, edema, lichenification, and excoriations/erosions are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 to 6. The total qualitative score is multiplied by the degree of involvement for each anatomic region and then multiplied by a constant and summed to yield the EASI score. (NCT00931242)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Apremilast2

Number of Patients Achieving 75% Reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 12 in Reference to Week 0

EASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, edema, lichenification, and excoriations/erosions are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 to 6. The total qualitative score is multiplied by the degree of involvement for each anatomic region and then multiplied by a constant and summed to yield the EASI score. (NCT00931242)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Apremilast1

Number of Patients Achieving an Improvement (Decrease) in IGA (Investigator Global Assessment) by Two or More Points

Improvement in IGA (Investigator Global Assessment) by two or more points on a five point scale, with 0 being no disease activity and 5 being maximum disease activity, at week 12 (NCT00931242)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Apremilast2

Reviews

56 reviews available for thalidomide and Palmoplantaris Pustulosis

ArticleYear
Efficacy and safety of apremilast monotherapy in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Dermatologic therapy, 2022, Volume: 35, Issue:7

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Chronic Disease; Humans; Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitors; Ps

2022
Combination Therapy with Apremilast and Biologics for Psoriasis: A Systematic Review.
    American journal of clinical dermatology, 2022, Volume: 23, Issue:5

    Topics: Adolescent; Biological Products; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exanthema; Humans; Psoriasis; Retrospect

2022
Deucravacitinib for the Treatment of Psoriatic Disease.
    American journal of clinical dermatology, 2022, Volume: 23, Issue:6

    Topics: Biological Factors; Double-Blind Method; Heterocyclic Compounds; Humans; Interferon Type I; Interleu

2022
Evolving utility of apremilast in dermatological disorders for off-label indications.
    Clinical and experimental dermatology, 2022, Volume: 47, Issue:12

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Behcet Syndrome; Humans; Off-Label Us

2022
Deucravacitinib in the treatment of psoriasis.
    The Journal of dermatological treatment, 2023, Volume: 34, Issue:1

    Topics: Chronic Disease; Humans; Psoriasis; Quality of Life; Severity of Illness Index; Thalidomide

2023
Deucravacitinib in the treatment of psoriasis.
    The Journal of dermatological treatment, 2023, Volume: 34, Issue:1

    Topics: Chronic Disease; Humans; Psoriasis; Quality of Life; Severity of Illness Index; Thalidomide

2023
Deucravacitinib in the treatment of psoriasis.
    The Journal of dermatological treatment, 2023, Volume: 34, Issue:1

    Topics: Chronic Disease; Humans; Psoriasis; Quality of Life; Severity of Illness Index; Thalidomide

2023
Deucravacitinib in the treatment of psoriasis.
    The Journal of dermatological treatment, 2023, Volume: 34, Issue:1

    Topics: Chronic Disease; Humans; Psoriasis; Quality of Life; Severity of Illness Index; Thalidomide

2023
Treatment of plaque psoriasis with deucravacitinib (POETYK PSO-1 study): a plain language summary.
    Immunotherapy, 2023, Volume: 15, Issue:12

    Topics: Adult; Humans; Psoriasis; Skin; Thalidomide; Treatment Outcome

2023
Treatment of plaque psoriasis with deucravacitinib (POETYK PSO-2 study): a plain language summary.
    Immunotherapy, 2023, Volume: 15, Issue:11

    Topics: Adult; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Humans; Psoriasis; Skin; Thalidomide; Treatment Outcome

2023
One stone, two birds: Improvement of early-onset vitiligo under apremilast in a patient with plaque psoriasis.
    Dermatologic therapy, 2019, Volume: 32, Issue:5

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Early Diagnosis; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Psor

2019
Treatment of Medicare Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis who Cannot Afford Biologics or Apremilast.
    American journal of clinical dermatology, 2020, Volume: 21, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Biological Products; Dermatologic Agents; Humans; Medicare; Phototherapy

2020
The Use of Apremilast in Psoriasis: A Delphi Study.
    Actas dermo-sifiliograficas, 2020, Volume: 111, Issue:2

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Consensus; Delphi Technique; Foot Der

2020
An update on the safety of apremilast for the treatment of plaque psoriasis.
    Expert opinion on drug safety, 2020, Volume: 19, Issue:4

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Humans; Medication Adherence;

2020
Comparison of psoriasis guidelines for use of apremilast in the United States and Europe: a critical appraisal and comprehensive review.
    The Journal of dermatological treatment, 2022, Volume: 33, Issue:1

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Biological Products; Europe; Humans; Psoriasis; Thalidomide

2022
Apremilast for psoriasis treatment.
    Giornale italiano di dermatologia e venereologia : organo ufficiale, Societa italiana di dermatologia e sifilografia, 2020, Volume: 155, Issue:4

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Humans; Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitors; Psoriasis; Quality of Life; Severity o

2020
Optimizing the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis in Older Adults.
    Drugs & aging, 2020, Volume: 37, Issue:10

    Topics: Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Comorbidity; Drug Interactions; Female; Huma

2020
Fixed Combination Calcipotriene and Betamethasone Dipropionate (Cal/BD) Foam for Beyond-Mild Psoriasis: A Possible Alternative to Systemic Medication.
    Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD, 2020, Aug-01, Volume: 19, Issue:8

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Aerosols; Betamethasone; Biological Products; Calcitriol; Cost-Benefit An

2020
On- and Off-Label Uses of Apremilast in Dermatology.
    Acta dermatovenerologica Croatica : ADC, 2020, Volume: 28, Issue:3

    Topics: Humans; Off-Label Use; Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitors; Psoriasis; Skin Diseases; Thalidomide

2020
Effect of baseline disease severity on achievement of treatment target with apremilast: results from a pooled analysis.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2021, Volume: 35, Issue:12

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Humans; Nail Diseases; Psoriasis; Quality of Life; Severity of

2021
Effect of baseline disease severity on achievement of treatment target with apremilast: results from a pooled analysis.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2021, Volume: 35, Issue:12

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Humans; Nail Diseases; Psoriasis; Quality of Life; Severity of

2021
Effect of baseline disease severity on achievement of treatment target with apremilast: results from a pooled analysis.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2021, Volume: 35, Issue:12

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Humans; Nail Diseases; Psoriasis; Quality of Life; Severity of

2021
Effect of baseline disease severity on achievement of treatment target with apremilast: results from a pooled analysis.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2021, Volume: 35, Issue:12

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Humans; Nail Diseases; Psoriasis; Quality of Life; Severity of

2021
Effect of baseline disease severity on achievement of treatment target with apremilast: results from a pooled analysis.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2021, Volume: 35, Issue:12

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Humans; Nail Diseases; Psoriasis; Quality of Life; Severity of

2021
Effect of baseline disease severity on achievement of treatment target with apremilast: results from a pooled analysis.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2021, Volume: 35, Issue:12

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Humans; Nail Diseases; Psoriasis; Quality of Life; Severity of

2021
Effect of baseline disease severity on achievement of treatment target with apremilast: results from a pooled analysis.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2021, Volume: 35, Issue:12

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Humans; Nail Diseases; Psoriasis; Quality of Life; Severity of

2021
Effect of baseline disease severity on achievement of treatment target with apremilast: results from a pooled analysis.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2021, Volume: 35, Issue:12

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Humans; Nail Diseases; Psoriasis; Quality of Life; Severity of

2021
Effect of baseline disease severity on achievement of treatment target with apremilast: results from a pooled analysis.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2021, Volume: 35, Issue:12

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Humans; Nail Diseases; Psoriasis; Quality of Life; Severity of

2021
Effect of baseline disease severity on achievement of treatment target with apremilast: results from a pooled analysis.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2021, Volume: 35, Issue:12

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Humans; Nail Diseases; Psoriasis; Quality of Life; Severity of

2021
Effect of baseline disease severity on achievement of treatment target with apremilast: results from a pooled analysis.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2021, Volume: 35, Issue:12

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Humans; Nail Diseases; Psoriasis; Quality of Life; Severity of

2021
Effect of baseline disease severity on achievement of treatment target with apremilast: results from a pooled analysis.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2021, Volume: 35, Issue:12

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Humans; Nail Diseases; Psoriasis; Quality of Life; Severity of

2021
Effect of baseline disease severity on achievement of treatment target with apremilast: results from a pooled analysis.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2021, Volume: 35, Issue:12

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Humans; Nail Diseases; Psoriasis; Quality of Life; Severity of

2021
Effect of baseline disease severity on achievement of treatment target with apremilast: results from a pooled analysis.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2021, Volume: 35, Issue:12

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Humans; Nail Diseases; Psoriasis; Quality of Life; Severity of

2021
Effect of baseline disease severity on achievement of treatment target with apremilast: results from a pooled analysis.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2021, Volume: 35, Issue:12

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Humans; Nail Diseases; Psoriasis; Quality of Life; Severity of

2021
Effect of baseline disease severity on achievement of treatment target with apremilast: results from a pooled analysis.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2021, Volume: 35, Issue:12

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Humans; Nail Diseases; Psoriasis; Quality of Life; Severity of

2021
Comparison of structural components and functional mechanisms within the skin vs. the conjunctival surface.
    Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology, 2021, 10-01, Volume: 21, Issue:5

    Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Conjunctiva; Dermatitis, Atopic; Eczema; Humans; Psoriasis; Skin;

2021
Review of Apremilast Combination Therapies in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Psoriasis.
    Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD, 2021, Aug-01, Volume: 20, Issue:8

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Humans; Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitors; Psoriasis; Quality

2021
Apremilast: A Novel Oral Treatment for Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis.
    American journal of clinical dermatology, 2018, Volume: 19, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; Phosph

2018
Efficacy of Systemic Treatments of Psoriasis on Pruritus: A Systemic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.
    The Journal of investigative dermatology, 2018, Volume: 138, Issue:1

    Topics: Adalimumab; Administration, Oral; Dermatologic Agents; Humans; Interleukin-17; Janus Kinase Inhibito

2018
Advances in treating psoriasis in the elderly with small molecule inhibitors.
    Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy, 2017, Volume: 18, Issue:18

    Topics: Adamantane; Azetidines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Niacinamide; Nitriles; Phosphodiesterase 4

2017
Management of psoriasis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: From the Medical Board of the National Psoriasis Foundation.
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2018, Volume: 78, Issue:2

    Topics: Acitretin; Adalimumab; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Certolizumab Pegol

2018
HIV-Associated Psoriasis.
    Actas dermo-sifiliograficas, 2018, Volume: 109, Issue:4

    Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Biological Therapy; Contraindications, Drug; Diagnosis, Differential; Disea

2018
Mechanisms Underlying the Clinical Effects of Apremilast for Psoriasis.
    Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD, 2018, Aug-01, Volume: 17, Issue:8

    Topics: Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Humans; Inflammation Mediators; Interleukin-17; In

2018
Oral small molecules for psoriasis.
    Seminars in cutaneous medicine and surgery, 2018, Volume: 37, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Humans; Patient Selection; Piperidine

2018
Effective treatment of nail psoriasis with apremilast: report of two cases and review of the literature.
    Dermatology online journal, 2018, Sep-15, Volume: 24, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nail Diseases; Psoriasis;

2018
[Gastrointestinal side effects of apremilast : Characterization and management].
    Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete, 2019, Volume: 70, Issue:5

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Humans; Ph

2019
A safety review of recent advancements in the treatment of psoriasis: analysis of clinical trial safety data.
    Expert opinion on drug safety, 2019, Volume: 18, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Biological Products; Certolizumab Pegol; Dermatologic Agents; Humans; Injectio

2019
Treating psoriasis: patient assessment, treatment goals, and treatment options.
    Cutis, 2019, Volume: 103, Issue:4S

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanize

2019
New developments in the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: a focus on apremilast.
    Drug design, development and therapy, 2013, Volume: 7

    Topics: Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Clinical Trials, Phase II as

2013
A review of phosphodiesterase-inhibition and the potential role for phosphodiesterase 4-inhibitors in clinical dermatology.
    Dermatology online journal, 2014, May-16, Volume: 20, Issue:5

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Boron Compounds; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic; C

2014
Therapeutic development in psoriasis.
    Seminars in cutaneous medicine and surgery, 2014, Volume: 33, Issue:4 Suppl

    Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Immunol

2014
Current and future oral systemic therapies for psoriasis.
    Dermatologic clinics, 2015, Volume: 33, Issue:1

    Topics: Acitretin; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antimetabolites; Cyclosporine; Fumarates; Humans

2015
Emerging oral drugs for psoriasis.
    Expert opinion on emerging drugs, 2015, Volume: 20, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Dermatologic Agents; Drug Approval; Drug Design; Humans; Psoriasis; S

2015
Drug safety evaluation of apremilast for treating psoriatic arthritis.
    Expert opinion on drug safety, 2015, Volume: 14, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Psor

2015
New systemic therapies for psoriasis.
    Cutis, 2015, Volume: 95, Issue:3

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized;

2015
Apremilast: A Review in Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis.
    Drugs, 2015, Volume: 75, Issue:12

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Phosphodi

2015
Apremilast for the treatment of psoriasis.
    Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy, 2015, Volume: 16, Issue:13

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Phosphodiesterase

2015
Emerging Oral Immunomodulators for the Treatment of Psoriasis: A Review of Phase III Clinical Trials for Apremilast and Tofacitinib.
    Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD, 2015, Volume: 14, Issue:8

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Humans; Immunologic Factors; Phosphodiest

2015
▼ Apremilast for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.
    Drug and therapeutics bulletin, 2015, Volume: 53, Issue:9

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Humans; Psorias

2015
Selective Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors for Psoriasis: Focus on Apremilast.
    BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy, 2015, Volume: 29, Issue:5

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Depression; Drug Interactions; Humans; Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhib

2015
Managing Patients With Psoriasis in the Busy Clinic: Practical Tips for Health Care Practitioners.
    Journal of cutaneous medicine and surgery, 2016, Volume: 20, Issue:3

    Topics: Acitretin; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Biological Products; Cyclosporine; Disease Progr

2016
Apremilast: A Novel Drug for Treatment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis.
    The Annals of pharmacotherapy, 2016, Volume: 50, Issue:4

    Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Diarrhea; Headache; Humans; Nausea; Psoriasis; Thalidomi

2016
Apremilast for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A Critique of the Evidence.
    PharmacoEconomics, 2016, Volume: 34, Issue:6

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; Psoriasis; Severity of Illne

2016
Novel Oral Therapies for Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis.
    American journal of clinical dermatology, 2016, Volume: 17, Issue:3

    Topics: Adamantane; Adenosine; Adenosine A3 Receptor Antagonists; Administration, Oral; Arthritis, Psoriatic

2016
Pharmacodynamic assessment of apremilast for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.
    Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology, 2016, Volume: 12, Issue:9

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Humans; Inflammation; Inflam

2016
Comparative efficacy and incremental cost per responder of methotrexate versus apremilast for methotrexate-naïve patients with psoriasis.
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2016, Volume: 75, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Cost-Benefit An

2016
Apremilast (Otezla). No progress in plaque psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis.
    Prescrire international, 2016, Volume: 25, Issue:172

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Pso

2016
Itch in Psoriasis Management.
    Current problems in dermatology, 2016, Volume: 50

    Topics: Adaptation, Psychological; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antidepressive Agents; Doxepin;

2016
New targets in psoriatic arthritis.
    Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2016, Volume: 55, Issue:suppl 2

    Topics: Adalimumab; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthrit

2016
Apremilast: A Review in Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis.
    Drugs, 2017, Volume: 77, Issue:4

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Hum

2017
Apremilast for the management of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.
    Expert review of clinical pharmacology, 2017, Volume: 10, Issue:4

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Humans; Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitor

2017
[What's new in dermatological research?].
    Annales de dermatologie et de venereologie, 2010, Volume: 137 Suppl 4

    Topics: Biomedical Research; Dermatitis, Atopic; Dermatology; Herpesviridae Infections; HIV Infections; Huma

2010
Apremilast as a treatment for psoriasis.
    Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy, 2012, Volume: 13, Issue:12

    Topics: Animals; Humans; Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitors; Psoriasis; Thalidomide

2012
Targeting tumor necrosis factor alpha. New drugs used to modulate inflammatory diseases.
    Dermatologic clinics, 2001, Volume: 19, Issue:4

    Topics: Animals; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Dermatologic Agents; Etanercept; Humans; Immunoglobulin G; Inflamma

2001

Trials

45 trials available for thalidomide and Palmoplantaris Pustulosis

ArticleYear
Evaluation of apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, for refractory cutaneous dermatomyositis: A phase 1b clinical trial.
    The Journal of dermatology, 2022, Volume: 49, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Dermatomyositis; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans;

2022
Preclinical and clinical evidence for suppression of alcohol intake by apremilast.
    The Journal of clinical investigation, 2023, 03-15, Volume: 133, Issue:6

    Topics: Alcohol Drinking; Alcoholism; Animals; Ethanol; Humans; Mice; Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitors; Psoria

2023
Pharmacokinetics and safety of apremilast in pediatric patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Results from a phase 2 open-label study.
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2020, Volume: 82, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Child; Humans; Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitors;

2020
Apremilast mechanism of efficacy in systemic-naive patients with moderate plaque psoriasis: Pharmacodynamic results from the UNVEIL study.
    Journal of dermatological science, 2019, Volume: 96, Issue:3

    Topics: Adipokines; Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Apolipoproteins; Cytokines; Double

2019
Large-scale Analyses of Disease Biomarkers and Apremilast Pharmacodynamic Effects.
    Scientific reports, 2020, 01-17, Volume: 10, Issue:1

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Biomarkers; Gene Expression Regulation; Glycoproteins; Huma

2020
Efficacy and safety of apremilast in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis of the scalp: Results of a phase 3b, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study.
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2020, Volume: 83, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administrat

2020
Psoriasis improvement and satisfaction in patients using a clobetasol spray and oral apremilast combination regimen: A pilot study.
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2020, Volume: 83, Issue:4

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aerosols; Clobetasol; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Patient

2020
Evaluation of Patient-Reported Outcomes With Etanercept in Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis Patients After Therapy With Apremilast.
    Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD, 2020, Apr-01, Volume: 19, Issue:4

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Drug Administration Schedule; Etanercept; Female; Humans; I

2020
Improvement of 11 patients with nail psoriasis with apremilast: Results of an investigator-initiated open-label study.
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2020, Volume: 83, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nail Diseases

2020
Pharmacodynamic analysis of apremilast in Japanese patients with moderate to severe psoriasis: Results from a phase 2b randomized trial.
    The Journal of dermatology, 2021, Volume: 48, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Japan; Psoriasis; Severity of Illness Index; Thalidomide; Treatm

2021
Efficacy and Safety of Calcipotriene 0.005%/Betamethasone Dipropionate 0.064% Foam With Apremilast for Moderate Plaque Psoriasis.
    Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD, 2020, Sep-01, Volume: 19, Issue:9

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Administration, Oral; Adult; Aerosols; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Betametha

2020
The efficacy of in vivo administration of Apremilast on mesenchymal stem cells derived from psoriatic patients.
    Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.], 2021, Volume: 70, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Female; Humans; Indoleamine-Pyrrole 2,3,-Dioxy

2021
Apremilast with Add-On Calcipotriene/Betamethasone Dipropionate for Treating Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis.
    Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD, 2020, Dec-01, Volume: 19, Issue:12

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adult; Aerosols; Aged; Betamethasone; Calcitriol; Diarrhea; Drug Combinat

2020
Characterization of LY2775240, a selective phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, in nonclinical models and in healthy subjects.
    Clinical and translational science, 2021, Volume: 14, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Animals; Cross-Over Studies; Cyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type

2021
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast and Methotrexate in Patients with Palmoplantar Psoriasis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    American journal of clinical dermatology, 2021, Volume: 22, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Dermatologic Agents; Female; Humans; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Ps

2021
Efficacy and safety of apremilast in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis of the scalp: results up to 32 weeks from a randomized, phase III study.
    The British journal of dermatology, 2021, Volume: 185, Issue:4

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Psoriasis; Scalp; Severity of

2021
Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of apremilast in healthy Korean adult men.
    Clinical and translational science, 2021, Volume: 14, Issue:4

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Area Under Curve; Asian People; Cross-Over Studies; Dose-Re

2021
A multicentre open-label study of apremilast in palmoplantar pustulosis (APLANTUS).
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2021, Volume: 35, Issue:10

    Topics: Humans; Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitors; Psoriasis; Severity of Illness Index; Skin Diseases, Vesicul

2021
The Effect of Janus Kinase Inhibitors and Phosphodiesterase-4 Inhibitors on Skin and Plasma Cytokine Levels in Patients with Psoriasis.
    Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine, 2021, Volume: 171, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Cohort Studies; Cytokines; Female; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Male; Middle Aged; Phosph

2021
Serum lactate dehydrogenase level as a possible predictor of treatment preference in psoriasis.
    Journal of dermatological science, 2021, Volume: 103, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Case-Control Studies; Female; Humans; L-Lactate Dehydrogenase; Male;

2021
Efficacy and safety of apremilast in patients with mild-to-moderate plaque psoriasis: Results of a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2022, Volume: 86, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Psoriasis; Severity of

2022
Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in the treatment of Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Efficacy, safety and tolerability results from a phase 2b randomized controlled trial.
    The Journal of dermatology, 2017, Volume: 44, Issue:8

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Diarrhea; Dose-Response Relati

2017
Long-term safety and tolerability of apremilast in patients with psoriasis: Pooled safety analysis for ≥156 weeks from 2 phase 3, randomized, controlled trials (ESTEEM 1 and 2).
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2017, Volume: 77, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Cardiovascular Diseases; Depression; Diarrhea; Femal

2017
Long-term safety and tolerability of apremilast in patients with psoriasis: Pooled safety analysis for ≥156 weeks from 2 phase 3, randomized, controlled trials (ESTEEM 1 and 2).
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2017, Volume: 77, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Cardiovascular Diseases; Depression; Diarrhea; Femal

2017
Long-term safety and tolerability of apremilast in patients with psoriasis: Pooled safety analysis for ≥156 weeks from 2 phase 3, randomized, controlled trials (ESTEEM 1 and 2).
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2017, Volume: 77, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Cardiovascular Diseases; Depression; Diarrhea; Femal

2017
Long-term safety and tolerability of apremilast in patients with psoriasis: Pooled safety analysis for ≥156 weeks from 2 phase 3, randomized, controlled trials (ESTEEM 1 and 2).
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2017, Volume: 77, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Cardiovascular Diseases; Depression; Diarrhea; Femal

2017
Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast in Patients With Moderate Plaque Psoriasis With Lower BSA: Week 16 Results from the UNVEIL Study.
    Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD, 2017, Aug-01, Volume: 16, Issue:8

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pso

2017
Apremilast and Narrowband Ultraviolet-B Combination Therapy for Treating Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis.
    Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD, 2017, Oct-01, Volume: 16, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Combined Modality Therapy; Humans; Middle Aged

2017
Apremilast for the treatment of moderate-to-severe palmoplantar psoriasis: results from a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2018, Volume: 32, Issue:3

    Topics: Double-Blind Method; Efficiency; Female; Foot Dermatoses; Hand Dermatoses; Humans; Male; Middle Aged

2018
Assessing clinical response and defining minimal disease activity in plaque psoriasis with the Physician Global Assessment and body surface area (PGA × BSA) composite tool: An analysis of apremilast phase 3 ESTEEM data.
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2017, Volume: 77, Issue:6

    Topics: Body Surface Area; Humans; Psoriasis; Severity of Illness Index; Thalidomide; Treatment Outcome

2017
Safety and efficacy of apremilast through 104 weeks in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis who continued on apremilast or switched from etanercept treatment: findings from the LIBERATE study.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2018, Volume: 32, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Drug Administration Schedule; Etanercept; Female; Hu

2018
Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast in Systemic- and Biologic-Naive Patients With Moderate Plaque Psoriasis: 52-Week Results of UNVEIL.
    Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD, 2018, Feb-01, Volume: 17, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Biological Factors; Diarrhea; Double-Blind Method; F

2018
    Neural computing & applications, 2018, Volume: 30, Issue:6

    Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Acute Disease; Adalimumab; Adaptation, Physiological; Adenosine Triphosp

2018
Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Etanercept Treatment in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis Who Have Failed Therapy With Apremilast.
    Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD, 2018, Oct-01, Volume: 17, Issue:10

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Etanercept; Female; Humans; Male

2018
Improvements in patient-reported outcomes with apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis: results from a phase IIb randomized, controlled study.
    Health and quality of life outcomes, 2013, May-10, Volume: 11

    Topics: Adult; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitors; Psoriasis; Quality Indicat

2013
Efficacy, tolerability, and pharmacodynamics of apremilast in recalcitrant plaque psoriasis: a phase II open-label study.
    Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD, 2013, Volume: 12, Issue:8

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Inflammation; Leu

2013
Treatment of psoriatic arthritis in a phase 3 randomised, placebo-controlled trial with apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor.
    Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2014, Volume: 73, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Double-Blind Method;

2014
Treatment of psoriatic arthritis in a phase 3 randomised, placebo-controlled trial with apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor.
    Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2014, Volume: 73, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Double-Blind Method;

2014
Treatment of psoriatic arthritis in a phase 3 randomised, placebo-controlled trial with apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor.
    Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2014, Volume: 73, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Double-Blind Method;

2014
Treatment of psoriatic arthritis in a phase 3 randomised, placebo-controlled trial with apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor.
    Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2014, Volume: 73, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Double-Blind Method;

2014
Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor, in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Results of a phase III, randomized, controlled trial (Efficacy and Safety Trial Evaluating the Effects of Apremilast in Psoriasis [ESTEEM] 1).
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2015, Volume: 73, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Phosphodiesterase 4 In

2015
Efficacy and safety of apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis over 52 weeks: a phase III, randomized controlled trial (ESTEEM 2).
    The British journal of dermatology, 2015, Volume: 173, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Analysis of Variance; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Chronic Disease

2015
Efficacy and safety of apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis over 52 weeks: a phase III, randomized controlled trial (ESTEEM 2).
    The British journal of dermatology, 2015, Volume: 173, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Analysis of Variance; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Chronic Disease

2015
Efficacy and safety of apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis over 52 weeks: a phase III, randomized controlled trial (ESTEEM 2).
    The British journal of dermatology, 2015, Volume: 173, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Analysis of Variance; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Chronic Disease

2015
Efficacy and safety of apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis over 52 weeks: a phase III, randomized controlled trial (ESTEEM 2).
    The British journal of dermatology, 2015, Volume: 173, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Analysis of Variance; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Chronic Disease

2015
Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in patients with difficult-to-treat nail and scalp psoriasis: Results of 2 phase III randomized, controlled trials (ESTEEM 1 and ESTEEM 2).
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2016, Volume: 74, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Dose-Response Relationsh

2016
Effects of Apremilast on Pruritus and Skin Discomfort/Pain Correlate With Improvements in Quality of Life in Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis.
    Acta dermato-venereologica, 2016, Volume: 96, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pain; Pain Measur

2016
Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, in the treatment of palmoplantar psoriasis: Results of a pooled analysis from phase II PSOR-005 and phase III Efficacy and Safety Trial Evaluating the Effects of Apremilast in Psoriasis (ESTEEM) clinical
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2016, Volume: 75, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Double-Blind Method; Female; Foot Dermatoses; Hand Dermatoses; Humans;

2016
Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, improves patient-reported outcomes in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis: results of two phase III randomized, controlled trials.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2017, Volume: 31, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Double-Blind Method; Female; Health Status; Humans;

2017
The efficacy and safety of apremilast, etanercept and placebo in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: 52-week results from a phase IIIb, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (LIBERATE).
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2017, Volume: 31, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Diarrhea; Double-Blind Method; Etanercept; Female; H

2017
Evaluation of the Physician Global Assessment and Body Surface Area Composite Tool for Assessing Psoriasis Response to Apremilast Therapy: Results from ESTEEM 1 and ESTEEM 2.
    Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD, 2017, Feb-01, Volume: 16, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Benchmarking; Body Surface Area; Dermatology; Female; Global Health; Hu

2017
Efficacy of apremilast in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis: a randomised controlled trial.
    Lancet (London, England), 2012, Aug-25, Volume: 380, Issue:9843

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans;

2012
Efficacy of apremilast in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis: a randomised controlled trial.
    Lancet (London, England), 2012, Aug-25, Volume: 380, Issue:9843

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans;

2012
Efficacy of apremilast in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis: a randomised controlled trial.
    Lancet (London, England), 2012, Aug-25, Volume: 380, Issue:9843

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans;

2012
Efficacy of apremilast in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis: a randomised controlled trial.
    Lancet (London, England), 2012, Aug-25, Volume: 380, Issue:9843

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans;

2012
Efficacy of apremilast in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis: a randomised controlled trial.
    Lancet (London, England), 2012, Aug-25, Volume: 380, Issue:9843

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans;

2012
Efficacy of apremilast in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis: a randomised controlled trial.
    Lancet (London, England), 2012, Aug-25, Volume: 380, Issue:9843

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans;

2012
Efficacy of apremilast in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis: a randomised controlled trial.
    Lancet (London, England), 2012, Aug-25, Volume: 380, Issue:9843

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans;

2012
Efficacy of apremilast in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis: a randomised controlled trial.
    Lancet (London, England), 2012, Aug-25, Volume: 380, Issue:9843

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans;

2012
Efficacy of apremilast in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis: a randomised controlled trial.
    Lancet (London, England), 2012, Aug-25, Volume: 380, Issue:9843

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans;

2012
Efficacy and safety of apremilast in subjects with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: results from a phase II, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-comparison study.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2013, Volume: 27, Issue:3

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Placebos; Psoriasis; Severity

2013
An open-label, single-arm pilot study in patients with severe plaque-type psoriasis treated with an oral anti-inflammatory agent, apremilast.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2008, Volume: 24, Issue:5

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Biopsy, Needle; Confidence Intervals; Dose-Re

2008
An open-label, single-arm pilot study in patients with severe plaque-type psoriasis treated with an oral anti-inflammatory agent, apremilast.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2008, Volume: 24, Issue:5

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Biopsy, Needle; Confidence Intervals; Dose-Re

2008
An open-label, single-arm pilot study in patients with severe plaque-type psoriasis treated with an oral anti-inflammatory agent, apremilast.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2008, Volume: 24, Issue:5

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Biopsy, Needle; Confidence Intervals; Dose-Re

2008
An open-label, single-arm pilot study in patients with severe plaque-type psoriasis treated with an oral anti-inflammatory agent, apremilast.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2008, Volume: 24, Issue:5

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Biopsy, Needle; Confidence Intervals; Dose-Re

2008

Other Studies

201 other studies available for thalidomide and Palmoplantaris Pustulosis

ArticleYear
Use of Apremilast® in the psoriasis treatment: a real-life multicenter Italian experience.
    Italian journal of dermatology and venereology, 2022, Volume: 157, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Humans; Psoriasis; Retrospective Studies; Severity o

2022
Apremilast downregulates interleukin-17 production and induces splenic regulatory B cells and regulatory T cells in imiquimod-induced psoriasiform dermatitis.
    Journal of dermatological science, 2021, Volume: 104, Issue:1

    Topics: Animals; B-Lymphocytes, Regulatory; Disease Models, Animal; Down-Regulation; Female; Humans; Imiquim

2021
When the low may still be high: the heavy burden of residual psoriasis in difficult-to-treat areas despite a low DLQI score among patients under biologics or apremilast: a 5-year, prospective, case-control study.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2022, Volume: 36, Issue:2

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Biological Products; Case-Control Studies; Humans; Prospect

2022
SARS-CoV-2 serology in patients on biological therapy or apremilast for psoriasis: a study of 93 patients in the Italian red zone.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2022, Volume: 36, Issue:2

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Biological Therapy; COVID-19; Humans; Psoriasis; SARS-CoV-2

2022
Incidence and prognosis of COVID-19 in patients with psoriasis on apremilast: a multicentre retrospective cohort study.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2022, Volume: 36, Issue:2

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; COVID-19; Humans; Incidence; Prognosis; Psoriasis; Retrospe

2022
Long-term efficacy and safety of apremilast in the treatment of plaques psoriasis: A real-world, single-center experience.
    Dermatologic therapy, 2021, Volume: 34, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Humans; Psoriasis; Severity of Illness Index; Thalidomide; Treatment Ou

2021
Real-world biologic and apremilast treatment patterns in patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.
    Dermatology online journal, 2021, Sep-15, Volume: 27, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; H

2021
A case of erythrodermic psoriasis successfully treated with apremilast.
    Dermatologic therapy, 2022, Volume: 35, Issue:1

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Humans; Psoriasis; Severity of Illness Index; Thalidomide

2022
Successful Treatment of Palmoplantar Pustulosis With Apremilast.
    Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD, 2021, Nov-01, Volume: 20, Issue:11

    Topics: Acute Disease; Humans; Psoriasis; Skin Diseases, Vesiculobullous; Thalidomide

2021
Evolution of Drug Survival with Biological Agents and Apremilast Between 2012 and 2018 in Patients with Psoriasis from the PsoBioTeq Cohort.
    Acta dermato-venereologica, 2022, Mar-08, Volume: 102

    Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Biological Factors; Biological Products; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Psoriasi

2022
Successful treatment of psoriasis vulgaris with apremilast in a patient with decompensated cirrhosis.
    The Journal of dermatology, 2022, Volume: 49, Issue:4

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Psoriasis; Severity of Illness Ind

2022
Apremilast for the treatment of palmo-plantar non-pustular psoriasis: A real-life single-center retrospective study.
    Dermatologic therapy, 2022, Volume: 35, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Humans; Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitors; Psoriasis; R

2022
Phosphodiesterase-4 Inhibition Reduces Cutaneous Inflammation and IL-1β Expression in a Psoriasiform Mouse Model but Does Not Inhibit Inflammasome Activation.
    International journal of molecular sciences, 2021, Nov-28, Volume: 22, Issue:23

    Topics: Animals; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Humans; Immunity, Innate; Inflammasomes; Interleukin-1beta; M

2021
Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor apremilast improves insulin resistance in psoriasis patients.
    The Journal of dermatology, 2022, Volume: 49, Issue:4

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Humans; Insulin Resistance; Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitors;

2022
Real-Life Effectiveness of Apremilast for the Treatment of Psoriasis in Belgium: Results From the Observational OTELO Study.
    Advances in therapy, 2022, Volume: 39, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Belgium; Humans; Psoriasis; Quality of L

2022
How do dermatologists' personal models inform a patient-centred approach to management: a qualitative study using the example of prescribing a new treatment (Apremilast).
    The British journal of dermatology, 2022, Volume: 187, Issue:1

    Topics: Decision Making; Dermatologists; Humans; Psoriasis; Qualitative Research; Referral and Consultation;

2022
Psoriatic patients with a history of cancer: A real-life experience with Apremilast treatment for 104 weeks.
    Dermatologic therapy, 2022, Volume: 35, Issue:10

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Chronic Disease; Humans; Neoplasms; P

2022
Determinants of patient and physician treatment satisfaction in moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a multinational survey of psoriasis patients.
    Dermatology online journal, 2021, Oct-15, Volume: 27, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Biological Products; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dermatologists; Female; France; Germany; Humans

2021
Acrodermatitis continua of Hallopeau: Is apremilast an efficacious treatment option?
    Dermatologic therapy, 2022, Volume: 35, Issue:5

    Topics: Acrodermatitis; Exanthema; Humans; Psoriasis; Skin Diseases, Vesiculobullous; Thalidomide

2022
Comment on: Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients initiating biologics/apremilast for psoriatic arthritis: a nationwide cohort study: Reply.
    Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2022, 08-03, Volume: 61, Issue:8

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Biological Products; Cardiovascular D

2022
Comment on: Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients initiating biologics/apremilast for psoriatic arthritis: a nationwide cohort study.
    Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2022, 08-03, Volume: 61, Issue:8

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Biological Products; Cardiovascular D

2022
The Maintenance Effect of Calcipotriene 0.05% and Betamethasone Dipropionate 0.064% (Cal/BD) Aerosol Foam in Combination With Apremilast.
    Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD, 2022, Apr-01, Volume: 21, Issue:4

    Topics: Aerosols; Betamethasone; Calcitriol; Dermatologic Agents; Drug Combinations; Humans; Pilot Projects;

2022
A real-world, non-interventional, prospective study of the effectiveness and safety of apremilast in bio-naïve adults with moderate plaque psoriasis treated in the routine care in Greece - the 'APRAISAL' study.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2022, Volume: 36, Issue:11

    Topics: Adult; Greece; Humans; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Psoriasis; Quality of Life; Severity of Ill

2022
Biologic initiation rates in systemic-naive psoriasis patients after first-line apremilast versus methotrexate use.
    Journal of comparative effectiveness research, 2022, Volume: 11, Issue:8

    Topics: Biological Products; Humans; Methotrexate; Psoriasis; Retrospective Studies; Thalidomide

2022
Retrospective study of apremilast drug survival in psoriasis patients in a daily practice setting: A long-term experience.
    Dermatologic therapy, 2022, Volume: 35, Issue:7

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Humans; Psoriasis; Retrospective Studies; Severity of Illne

2022
Nanocrystal-based gel of apremilast ameliorates imiquimod-induced psoriasis by suppressing inflammatory responses.
    International journal of pharmaceutics, 2022, Jun-25, Volume: 622

    Topics: Animals; Disease Models, Animal; Gels; Imiquimod; Nanoparticles; Psoriasis; Skin; Thalidomide

2022
Apremilast Use in Oligoarticular Psoriatic Arthritis.
    The Journal of rheumatology, 2022, Volume: 49, Issue:11

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Humans; Psoriasis; Thalidomide

2022
Comment on: Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients initiating biologics/apremilast for psoriatic arthritis: a nationwide cohort study.
    Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2022, 10-06, Volume: 61, Issue:10

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Biological Products; Cardiovascular D

2022
Comment on: Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients initiating biologics/apremilast for psoriatic arthritis: a nationwide cohort study: Reply.
    Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2022, 10-06, Volume: 61, Issue:10

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Biological Products; Cardiovascular D

2022
Effectiveness and Drug Survival of Apremilast in 65 Patients With Psoriasis and/or Psoriatic Arthritis.
    Actas dermo-sifiliograficas, 2022, Volume: 113, Issue:5

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Humans; Psoriasis; Thalidomide

2022
Apremilast and biologics: Characteristics of patients treated with apremilast before, during, or after a biological treatment.
    Dermatologic therapy, 2022, Volume: 35, Issue:11

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Biological Products; Humans; Psoriasi

2022
Safety of Apremilast in Patients with Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis: Findings from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink.
    Drug safety, 2022, Volume: 45, Issue:11

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Biological Products; Cohort Studies;

2022
Drug Survival of Apremilast for Psoriatic Arthritis in a Real-World Setting: A Single-Center Experience.
    The Journal of rheumatology, 2023, Volume: 50, Issue:3

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Humans; Psoriasis; Thalidomide

2023
Real-world experience on the efficacy and safety of apremilast in bio-naïve patients with moderate plaque psoriasis.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2022, Volume: 36, Issue:11

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Humans; Psoriasis; Severity of Illness Index; Thalidomide;

2022
Psoriasis Flare in a Liver Transplant Patient: A Case Report of a Successful Treatment With Apremilast.
    Transplantation, 2023, 01-01, Volume: 107, Issue:1

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Humans; Liver Transplantation; Psoriasis; Severity of Illne

2023
The risk of COVID-19 in patients with psoriasis: A retrospective cohort study.
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2022, Volume: 87, Issue:6

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; COVID-19; Humans; Psoriasis; Retrospective Studies; Thalido

2022
Apremilast for the Treatment of Concomitant Subacute Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus and Psoriasis.
    Skinmed, 2022, Volume: 20, Issue:5

    Topics: Humans; Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous; Psoriasis; Thalidomide

2022
Selective TYK2 Inhibition in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
    Skin therapy letter, 2022, Volume: 27, Issue:6

    Topics: Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Psoriasis; Severity of Illness Index; Thalidomide; Treatment Outcom

2022
Selective TYK2 Inhibition in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
    Skin therapy letter, 2022, Volume: 27, Issue:6

    Topics: Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Psoriasis; Severity of Illness Index; Thalidomide; Treatment Outcom

2022
Selective TYK2 Inhibition in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
    Skin therapy letter, 2022, Volume: 27, Issue:6

    Topics: Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Psoriasis; Severity of Illness Index; Thalidomide; Treatment Outcom

2022
Selective TYK2 Inhibition in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
    Skin therapy letter, 2022, Volume: 27, Issue:6

    Topics: Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Psoriasis; Severity of Illness Index; Thalidomide; Treatment Outcom

2022
Interleukin-19 Levels Are Increased in Palmoplantar Pustulosis and Reduced following Apremilast Treatment.
    International journal of molecular sciences, 2023, Jan-09, Volume: 24, Issue:2

    Topics: Humans; Interleukins; Psoriasis; Skin; Thalidomide

2023
Rapid and sustained response to apremilast in a patient with long-standing acrodermatitis continua of Hallopeau.
    Dermatology online journal, 2022, 12-15, Volume: 28, Issue:6

    Topics: Acrodermatitis; Exanthema; Humans; Psoriasis; Thalidomide

2022
Exacerbation of psoriasis induced by lenalidomide in a patient with multiple myeloma.
    The Journal of dermatological treatment, 2023, Volume: 34, Issue:1

    Topics: Humans; Lenalidomide; Multiple Myeloma; Patients; Psoriasis; Thalidomide

2023
Clinical and immunological phenotype switch to prurigo nodularis in a patient receiving ixekizumab for treating psoriasis: a case report.
    International journal of dermatology, 2023, Volume: 62, Issue:8

    Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Humans; Prurigo; Psoriasis; Thalidomide

2023
Real-life use of apremilast for the treatment of psoriasis in patients with oncological comorbidities: a retrospective descriptive multicentre study in France.
    European journal of dermatology : EJD, 2023, Feb-01, Volume: 33, Issue:1

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Humans; Psoriasis; Quality of Life; Retrospective Studies;

2023
Comparison of risankizumab with apremilast for the treatment of moderate psoriasis.
    The British journal of dermatology, 2023, 10-25, Volume: 189, Issue:5

    Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Psoriasis; Severity of Illness Index; Thalidomi

2023
Apremilast does not appear to outlast methotrexate.
    The British journal of dermatology, 2020, Volume: 182, Issue:3

    Topics: Humans; Methotrexate; National Health Programs; Psoriasis; Thalidomide

2020
One drug and two diseases: A case of multidrug-resistant hidradenitis suppurativa and psoriasis treated with apremilast.
    Dermatologic therapy, 2019, Volume: 32, Issue:6

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Drug Resistance, Multiple; Hidradenitis Suppurativa; Humans

2019
Patient-reported Outcomes During Treatment in Patients with Moderate-to-severe Psoriasis: A Danish Nationwide Study.
    Acta dermato-venereologica, 2019, Dec-01, Volume: 99, Issue:13

    Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Biological Products; Denmark; Dose-Response Relationship,

2019
Real-world experiences of apremilast in clinics for Japanese patients with psoriasis.
    The Journal of dermatology, 2019, Volume: 46, Issue:12

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Asian People; Female; Human

2019
Apremilast and psoriasis in the real world: A retrospective case series.
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2020, Volume: 83, Issue:1

    Topics: Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Psoriasis; Retrospective Studies; Thalidomide; Treatment Outcome

2020
Real-world treatment patterns and healthcare costs of biologics and apremilast among patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis by metabolic condition status.
    The Journal of dermatological treatment, 2021, Volume: 32, Issue:2

    Topics: Adalimumab; Adult; Databases, Factual; Dermatologic Agents; Etanercept; Female; Health Care Costs; H

2021
A cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of apremilast in patients with psoriasis in the Italian setting.
    Journal of medical economics, 2020, Volume: 23, Issue:4

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Costs; Humans; Italy; Middle Ag

2020
Combination therapy of apremilast and biologics in patients with psoriasis showing biologic fatigue.
    The Journal of dermatology, 2020, Volume: 47, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Biological Products; Dermatologic Agents; Diar

2020
Apremilast in Psoriasis.
    Actas dermo-sifiliograficas, 2020, Volume: 111, Issue:2

    Topics: Humans; Psoriasis; Thalidomide

2020
Successful treatment of pustulotic arthro-osteitis with apremilast: a case report with follow-up MRI.
    European journal of dermatology : EJD, 2019, 12-01, Volume: 29, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthritis; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Magneti

2019
Refractory palmoplantar pustulosis succesfully treated with apremilast.
    Dermatologic therapy, 2020, Volume: 33, Issue:2

    Topics: Arthritis, Psoriatic; Humans; Psoriasis; Skin Diseases, Vesiculobullous; Thalidomide

2020
The risk of treated anxiety and treated depression among patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis treated with apremilast compared to biologics, DMARDs and corticosteroids: a cohort study in the United States MarketScan database.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2020, Volume: 34, Issue:8

    Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Antirheumatic Agents; Anxiety; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Biological Products; C

2020
Effects of apremilast on pustulotic arthro-osteitis in a real-world setting: Report of five cases.
    Dermatologic therapy, 2020, Volume: 33, Issue:2

    Topics: Arthritis; Humans; Osteitis; Psoriasis; Thalidomide

2020
Effects of Apremilast, an Oral Inhibitor of Phosphodiesterase 4, in a Randomized Trial of Patients With Active Ulcerative Colitis.
    Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association, 2020, Volume: 18, Issue:13

    Topics: Colitis, Ulcerative; Cyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type 4; Humans; Psoriasis; Thalidomide

2020
Joint American Academy of Dermatology-National Psoriasis Foundation guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis with systemic nonbiologic therapies.
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2020, Volume: 82, Issue:6

    Topics: Acitretin; Cyclosporine; Drug Monitoring; Humans; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Psoriasis; Pyrimidines;

2020
Two cases of refractory nail psoriasis successfully treated with calcipotriol plus betamethasone dipropionate gel.
    The Journal of dermatology, 2020, Volume: 47, Issue:5

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Betamethasone; Calcitriol; Cyclosporine; Dermatologic Agents; Drug Combi

2020
The risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, and revascularization among patients with psoriasis treated with apremilast compared with biologics and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: A cohort study in the US MarketScan database.
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2020, Volume: 83, Issue:1

    Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Biological Products; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fol

2020
Real life experience of apremilast in psoriasis and arthritis psoriatic patients: Preliminary results on metabolic biomarkers.
    The Journal of dermatology, 2020, Volume: 47, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Biomarkers; Comorbidity; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; F

2020
Real-world effectiveness and safety of apremilast in psoriasis at 52 weeks: a retrospective, observational, multicentre study by the Spanish Psoriasis Group.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2020, Volume: 34, Issue:12

    Topics: Adult; Humans; Psoriasis; Retrospective Studies; Severity of Illness Index; Thalidomide; Treatment O

2020
Apremilast efficacy and safety in elderly psoriasis patients over a 48-week period.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2020, Volume: 34, Issue:11

    Topics: Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Humans; Psoriasis; Severity of Illness Index; Thalido

2020
Characteristics and outcomes of patients treated with apremilast in the real world: results from the APPRECIATE study.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2021, Volume: 35, Issue:1

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Cross-Sectional Studies; Europe; Humans; Psoriasis; Quality

2021
Long-term efficacy and safety of apremilast in psoriatic arthritis: Focus on skin manifestations and special populations.
    Dermatologic therapy, 2020, Volume: 33, Issue:3

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Humans; Italy; Psoriasis; Thalidomide

2020
A case of hidradenitis suppurativa successfully treated with apremilast in a patient with psoriasis and SAMPUS.
    Dermatologic therapy, 2020, Volume: 33, Issue:3

    Topics: Hidradenitis Suppurativa; Humans; Psoriasis; Thalidomide

2020
COVID-19 pulmonary infection in erythrodermic psoriatic patient with oligodendroglioma: safety and compatibility of apremilast with critical intensive care management.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2020, Volume: 34, Issue:8

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Betacoronavirus; Coronavirus Infections; COVID-19; Critical

2020
Treatment Persistence and Safety of Apremilast in Psoriasis: Experience With 30 Patients in Routine Clinical Practice.
    Actas dermo-sifiliograficas, 2020, Volume: 111, Issue:5

    Topics: Humans; Psoriasis; Retrospective Studies; Severity of Illness Index; Thalidomide

2020
Opportunistic virus infections in psoriasis patients: The safer alternative of apremilast in the COVID-19 era.
    Dermatologic therapy, 2020, Volume: 33, Issue:4

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Betacoronavirus; Comorbidity; Coronavirus Infections; COVID

2020
Recurrent generalized pustular psoriasis possibly triggered by apremilast.
    Chinese medical journal, 2020, May-20, Volume: 133, Issue:10

    Topics: Acute Disease; Humans; Psoriasis; Skin Diseases, Vesiculobullous; Thalidomide

2020
Successful Treatment of Rituximab-Associated Palmoplantar Pustulosis With Apremilast in a Patient With Seropositive Rheumatoid Arthritis.
    Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases, 2021, Oct-01, Volume: 27, Issue:7

    Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Psoriasis; Rituximab; Thalidomide

2021
Clinical efficacy, speed of improvement and safety of apremilast for the treatment of adult Psoriasis during COVID-19 pandemic.
    Dermatologic therapy, 2020, Volume: 33, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Betacoronavirus; Coronaviru

2020
Pembrolizumab-induced psoriasis vulgaris successfully treated with apremilast.
    European journal of dermatology : EJD, 2020, Apr-01, Volume: 30, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Age

2020
COVID-19 patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis on biologic immunosuppressant therapy vs apremilast in North Spain.
    Dermatologic therapy, 2020, Volume: 33, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antirheumatic Age

2020
Facile skin targeting of a thalidomide analog containing benzyl chloride moiety alleviates experimental psoriasis via the suppression of MAPK/NF-κB/AP-1 phosphorylation in keratinocytes.
    Journal of dermatological science, 2020, Volume: 99, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Animals; Disease Models, Animal; HaCaT Cells; Humans; Imiquimod; Keratino

2020
Optimizing care for psoriatic patients requiring systemic therapies: how will COVID-19 disease transform risk perceptions?
    Archives of dermatological research, 2021, Volume: 313, Issue:2

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Biological Factors; Clinical Decision-Making; Comorbidity;

2021
Photosensitivity during apremilast treatment in patients with palmoplantar psoriasis.
    International journal of dermatology, 2020, Volume: 59, Issue:12

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Humans; Psoriasis; Severity of Illness Index; Thalidomide;

2020
Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Apremilast in Older Patients with Psoriasis.
    Drugs & aging, 2020, Volume: 37, Issue:9

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Female; Humans; Ma

2020
Apremilast as a target therapy for nail psoriasis: a real-life observational study proving its efficacy in restoring the nail unit.
    The Journal of dermatological treatment, 2022, Volume: 33, Issue:2

    Topics: Humans; Nail Diseases; Nails; Psoriasis; Quality of Life; Severity of Illness Index; Thalidomide; Tr

2022
Comorbidities burden and previous exposure to biological agents may predict drug survival of apremilast for psoriasis in a real-world setting.
    Dermatologic therapy, 2020, Volume: 33, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Biological Factors; Female; Humans; Male; Midd

2020
Apremilast in patients with history of malignancy: a real-life, single-center experience.
    International journal of dermatology, 2021, Volume: 60, Issue:1

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Humans; Neoplasms; Psoriasis; Thalidomide

2021
[Apremilast in the treatment of palmoplantar pustulosis : A case series].
    Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete, 2021, Volume: 72, Issue:3

    Topics: Exanthema; Humans; Psoriasis; Quality of Life; Thalidomide

2021
Multidisciplinary Management of the Adverse Effects of Apremilast.
    Actas dermo-sifiliograficas, 2021, Volume: 112, Issue:2

    Topics: Combined Modality Therapy; Diarrhea; Disease Management; Headache; Humans; Nausea; Patient Care Team

2021
Apremilast and systemic retinoid combination treatment for moderate to severe palmoplantar psoriasis.
    Cutis, 2020, Volume: 106, Issue:1

    Topics: Dermatologic Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Psoriasis; Retinoids; Sev

2020
Phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors reduce the expression of proinflammatory mediators by human epidermal keratinocytes independent of intracellular cAMP elevation.
    Journal of dermatological science, 2020, Volume: 100, Issue:3

    Topics: Aminopyridines; Benzamides; Boron Compounds; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic; Cell Line; Cyc

2020
Treating multidrug-resistant psoriasis with brodalumab, apremilast, methotrexate and prednisone combination therapy in the COVID-19 pandemic.
    Dermatologic therapy, 2020, Volume: 33, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; COVID-19; Drug Resistance, Multiple; Drug Therapy, Combina

2020
The Effects of Apremilast Therapy on Deployability in Active Duty US Army Soldiers With Plaque Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis.
    Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases, 2021, Apr-01, Volume: 27, Issue:3

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Humans; Military Personnel; Psoriasis

2021
Immune checkpoint-mediated psoriasis: A multicenter European study of 115 patients from the European Network for Cutaneous Adverse Event to Oncologic Drugs (ENCADO) group.
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2021, Volume: 84, Issue:5

    Topics: Acitretin; Aged; Biological Products; Dermatologic Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Europe; Female

2021
Successful treatment with apremilast of severe psoriasis exacerbation during nivolumab therapy for metastatic melanoma.
    Dermatologic therapy, 2021, Volume: 34, Issue:1

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Humans; Melanoma; Nivolumab; Psoriasis; Severity of Illness

2021
Immediate response to apremilast in patients with palmoplantar pustulosis: a retrospective pilot study.
    International journal of dermatology, 2021, Volume: 60, Issue:5

    Topics: Humans; Pilot Projects; Psoriasis; Retrospective Studies; Thalidomide

2021
Apremilast in treatment of palmoplantar pustulosis - a case series.
    International journal of dermatology, 2021, Volume: 60, Issue:6

    Topics: Exanthema; Humans; Psoriasis; Skin Diseases, Vesiculobullous; Thalidomide

2021
Real-world drug survival and reasons for treatment discontinuation of biologics and apremilast in patients with psoriasis in an academic center.
    Dermatologic therapy, 2021, Volume: 34, Issue:2

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Biological Products; Humans; Pharmaceutical Preparations; P

2021
Real-world biologic and apremilast treatment patterns and healthcare costs in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.
    Dermatology online journal, 2021, Jan-15, Volume: 27, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Ambulatory Care; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Fees, Pharmaceutical; Female; Healt

2021
Place of apremilast in the real-life treatment of patients with plaque psoriasis.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2021, Volume: 35, Issue:1

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Humans; Psoriasis; Severity of Illness Index; Thalidomide;

2021
Long-term remission of severe nail psoriasis after discontinuation of apremilast in a colorectal cancer survivor.
    The Journal of dermatology, 2021, Volume: 48, Issue:6

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Colorectal Neoplasms; Humans; Psoriasis; Severity of Illnes

2021
Is apremilast for psoriasis as effective and safe as reported in clinical trials? Five-year experience from a Greek tertiary hospital: long-term real-life efficacy and safety of apremilast in Greece.
    Clinical and experimental dermatology, 2021, Volume: 46, Issue:8

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Cross-Sectional Studies; Drug Administration Schedule; Fema

2021
Beneficial Impact of Apremilast on Palmoplantar Keratodermas.
    Acta dermato-venereologica, 2021, Apr-26, Volume: 101, Issue:4

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Humans; Keratoderma, Palmoplantar; Psoriasis; Thalidomide

2021
Assessing the Risk of Apremilast Use for Psoriasis During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
    Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD, 2021, May-01, Volume: 20, Issue:5

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; COVID-19; Humans; Phos

2021
COVID-19 vaccines do not trigger psoriasis flares in patients with psoriasis treated with apremilast.
    Clinical and experimental dermatology, 2021, Volume: 46, Issue:7

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; COVID-19; COVID-19 Vaccines; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; O

2021
Effectiveness and safety of apremilast in biologic-naïve patients with moderate psoriasis treated in routine clinical practice in Greece: the APRAISAL study.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2021, Volume: 35, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Biological Products; Female; Greece; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Psoriasis; Quality of Life; S

2021
Effectiveness of Apremilast in Real Life in Patients with Psoriasis: A Longitudinal Study.
    Acta dermato-venereologica, 2021, Sep-15, Volume: 101, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Psoriasis; Severity of Illness Index; Thalidomide

2021
Long-Term Effectiveness and Drug Survival of Apremilast in Treating Psoriasis: A Real-World Experience.
    Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland), 2022, Volume: 238, Issue:2

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Humans; Psoriasis; Retrospective Studies; Severity of Illne

2022
Effect of the phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor apremilast on cardiometabolic outcomes in psoriatic disease-results of the Immune Metabolic Associations in Psoriatic Arthritis study.
    Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2022, 03-02, Volume: 61, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Body Fat Distribution; Cardiometabolic Risk Factors; Female; Humans; Ma

2022
Risk of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Patients With Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis/Ankylosing Spondylitis Initiating Interleukin-17 Inhibitors: A Nationwide Population-Based Study Using the French National Health Data System.
    Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.), 2022, Volume: 74, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Cohort Studies; Etanercept; Female; France; Humans; Inflammatory

2022
Apremilast improves quality of life and ultrasonography parameters in patients with nail psoriasis: A prospective cohort study.
    The Journal of dermatology, 2021, Volume: 48, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Humans; Nail Diseases; Prospective Studies; Psoriasis; Quality of Life; Severity of Illness I

2021
Population pharmacokinetic and exposure-response analysis of apremilast in Japanese subjects with moderate to severe psoriasis.
    The Journal of dermatology, 2021, Volume: 48, Issue:11

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Japan; Psoriasis; Severity of

2021
Management of patients with psoriasis.
    British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing), 2017, Mar-09, Volume: 26, Issue:5

    Topics: Acitretin; Administration, Cutaneous; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Betamethasone; Calcitriol; Cyclospor

2017
Resolution of psoriasis after tonsillectomy.
    Dermatology online journal, 2017, 02-16, Volume: 23, Issue:2

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Facial Dermatoses; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Pharyng

2017
Apremilast and suicidality - a retrospective analysis of three large databases: the FAERS, EudraVigilance and a large single-centre US patient population.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2017, Volume: 31, Issue:10

    Topics: Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Humans; Pharmacovi

2017
Apremilast for a psoriasis patient with HIV and hepatitis C.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2017, Volume: 31, Issue:11

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pso

2017
The phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor apremilast inhibits Th1 but promotes Th17 responses induced by 6-sulfo LacNAc (slan) dendritic cells.
    Journal of dermatological science, 2017, Volume: 87, Issue:2

    Topics: Amino Sugars; Coculture Techniques; Cyclic AMP; Cytokines; Dendritic Cells; Humans; Immunologic Fact

2017
Real-world, single-centre experience of apremilast for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis.
    Clinical and experimental dermatology, 2017, Volume: 42, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Phosphodies

2017
Quality of life, treatment satisfaction and efficacy of non-biological systemic therapies in patients with plaque psoriasis: study protocol for a prospective observational study.
    BMJ open, 2017, 06-30, Volume: 7, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Dermatologic Agents; Fumarates; Humans; Methotrexate

2017
Purpura Annularis Telangiectodes of Majocchi Associated With the Initiation and Rechallenge of Apremilast for Psoriasis Vulgaris.
    JAMA dermatology, 2017, 11-01, Volume: 153, Issue:11

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Biopsy; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Psoriasis; Purpura; Skin

2017
The Use of Apremilast to Treat Psoriasis During Deployment.
    Military medicine, 2017, Volume: 182, Issue:7

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Humans; Military Personnel; Psoriasis; Thalidomide; Treatme

2017
European S3-Guideline on the systemic treatment of psoriasis vulgaris - Update Apremilast and Secukinumab - EDF in cooperation with EADV and IPC.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2017, Volume: 31, Issue:12

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized;

2017
Apremilast in psoriasis - a prospective real-world study.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2018, Volume: 32, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthralgia; Body Weight; Diarrhea; Drug Substi

2018
Methods report: European S3-Guideline on the systemic treatment of psoriasis vulgaris - Update Apremilast and Secukinumab - EDF in cooperation with EADV and IPC.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2017, Volume: 31, Issue:12

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized;

2017
Thalidomide Improves Psoriasis-like Lesions and Inhibits Cutaneous VEGF Expression without Alteration of Microvessel Density in Imiquimod- induced Psoriatic Mouse Model.
    Current vascular pharmacology, 2018, Volume: 16, Issue:5

    Topics: Acitretin; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Animals; Disease Models, Animal; Dose-Response Relationship, Dru

2018
A comparison of apremilast monotherapy and combination therapy for plaque psoriasis in clinical practice: A Canadian multicenter retrospective study.
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2018, Volume: 78, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Canada; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hum

2018
Short-term reasons for withdrawal and adverse events associated with apremilast therapy for psoriasis in real-world practice compared with in clinical trials: A multicenter retrospective study.
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2018, Volume: 78, Issue:4

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Hu

2018
Characterization of disease burden, comorbidities, and treatment use in a large, US-based cohort: Results from the Corrona Psoriasis Registry.
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2018, Volume: 78, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Biological Products; Body Surface Area; Comorb

2018
Otezla, Warts and All, Racks Up Sales and Eyes Blockbuster Status.
    Managed care (Langhorne, Pa.), 2017, Volume: 26, Issue:10

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Humans; Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitors; Psoriasis; Thalidomide; United States

2017
Real-World Clinical Experience With Apremilast in a Large US Retrospective Cohort Study of Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis.
    Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD, 2017, 12-01, Volume: 16, Issue:12

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Cohort Studies; Databases, Factual; E

2017
Cutaneous hyperpigmentation induced by apremilast.
    International journal of dermatology, 2018, Volume: 57, Issue:4

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Facial Dermatoses; Female; Foll

2018
Real-world data on the efficacy and safety of apremilast in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2018, Volume: 32, Issue:7

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meie

2018
Rapid improvement of nail matrix psoriasis with apremilast: clinical and ultrasonographic assessment.
    Clinical and experimental dermatology, 2018, Volume: 43, Issue:5

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nail Disea

2018
Persistent pruritus in psoriatic patients during administration of biologics.
    The Journal of dermatology, 2018, Volume: 45, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Chemokine CCL17; Dermatologic

2018
Drug survival of apremilast in patients treated for psoriasis in a real-world setting.
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2018, Volume: 79, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Cohort Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Dr

2018
[Apremilast withdrawals more frequent in standard practice than in clinical trials].
    Annales de dermatologie et de venereologie, 2018, Volume: 145, Issue:4

    Topics: Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Clinical Trials as Topic; Depression; Female; Humans; Male;

2018
A case of anti-laminin γ1 (p200) pemphigoid with psoriasis vulgaris successfully treated with apremilast.
    European journal of dermatology : EJD, 2018, Jun-01, Volume: 28, Issue:3

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Humans; Immunoglobulin G; Laminin; Male; Middle Aged; Pemph

2018
Pharmacy costs of specialty medications for plaque psoriasis in the United States.
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2019, Volume: 80, Issue:1

    Topics: Adalimumab; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Cost of Illness; Dermatologic Agents; Etanercept; Humans; Psor

2019
Maintenance of therapeutic response after 1 year of apremilast combination therapy compared with monotherapy for the treatment of plaque psoriasis: A multicenter, retrospective study.
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2018, Volume: 79, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Cohort Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Dr

2018
Adverse events associated with apremilast use and withdrawal for psoriasis in a real-world setting.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2018, Volume: 32, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Diarrhea; Female; Headache; Humans; Male; Middle Age

2018
Comment on "Drug survival of apremilast for psoriasis in a real-world setting".
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2018, Volume: 79, Issue:4

    Topics: Humans; Psoriasis; Thalidomide

2018
Three cases of palmoplantar pustulosis successfully treated with apremilast.
    The Journal of dermatology, 2019, Volume: 46, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitors; Psoriasis; Severi

2019
Repy to: "Comment on 'Drug survival of apremilast for psoriasis in a real-world setting'".
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2018, Volume: 79, Issue:4

    Topics: Humans; Psoriasis; Thalidomide

2018
Multiple lentigines arising on resolving psoriatic plaques after treatment with apremilast.
    Clinical and experimental dermatology, 2019, Volume: 44, Issue:1

    Topics: Humans; Lentigo; Male; Middle Aged; Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors; Psoriasis; Skin; Thalidomide

2019
Synergistic cytokine effects as apremilast response predictors in patients with psoriasis.
    The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2018, Volume: 142, Issue:3

    Topics: Algorithms; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Cytokines; Humans; Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibito

2018
Complex Aphthae Treated With Apremilast.
    Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases, 2020, Volume: 26, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Female; Humans; Male; Oral Ulcer; Psoriasis; Stomati

2020
Chronic tearing induced by apremilast.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2018, Volume: 121, Issue:3

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Conjunctivitis; Cyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type

2018
Comments on "Short-term reasons for withdrawal and adverse events associated with apremilast therapy for psoriasis in real-world practice compared with in clinical trials: A multicenter retrospective study".
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2018, Volume: 79, Issue:6

    Topics: Humans; Psoriasis; Retrospective Studies; Thalidomide

2018
Long-term 52-week trends in apremilast safety outcomes for treatment of psoriasis in clinical practice: a multicentre, retrospective case series.
    The British journal of dermatology, 2019, Volume: 180, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Diarrhea; Female; Headache; Humans; Long-Term Care;

2019
Real-world use of apremilast for patients with psoriasis in Japan.
    The Journal of dermatology, 2018, Volume: 45, Issue:11

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Diarrhea; Female; Headache;

2018
Skin involvement in patients with psoriatic arthritis: preliminary results of treatment with apremilast in real world setting.
    Giornale italiano di dermatologia e venereologia : organo ufficiale, Societa italiana di dermatologia e sifilografia, 2019, Volume: 154, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Diarrhea; Fe

2019
Three-dimensional nail imaging by optical coherence tomography: a novel biomarker of response to therapy for nail disease in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.
    Clinical and experimental dermatology, 2019, Volume: 44, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Female; Humans; Imaging, Three

2019
Treating moderate plaque psoriasis: prospective 6-month chart review of patients treated with apremilast.
    The Journal of dermatological treatment, 2019, Volume: 30, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Dermatologists; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; P

2019
Apremilast as therapeutic option in a HIV positive patient with severe psoriasis.
    Dermatologic therapy, 2018, Volume: 31, Issue:6

    Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged;

2018
Real-world US healthcare costs of psoriasis for biologic-naive patients initiating apremilast or biologics.
    Journal of comparative effectiveness research, 2019, Volume: 8, Issue:1

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Biological Products; Female; Health Care Costs; Humans; Mal

2019
Calcipotriol plus betamethasone dipropionate aerosol foam vs. apremilast, methotrexate, acitretin or fumaric acid esters for the treatment of plaque psoriasis: a matching-adjusted indirect comparison.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2019, Volume: 33, Issue:6

    Topics: Acitretin; Administration, Cutaneous; Aerosols; Betamethasone; Calcitriol; Dermatologic Agents; Drug

2019
Combination Therapy of Apremilast and Biologic Agent as a Safe Option of Psoriatic Arthritis and Psoriasis.
    Current rheumatology reviews, 2019, Volume: 15, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Bi

2019
Psoriasis vulgaris associated with systemic lupus erythematosus successfully treated with apremilast.
    The Journal of dermatology, 2019, Volume: 46, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Antibodies, Antinuclear; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Lup

2019
Complete remission of both immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis and psoriasis after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A case report.
    Medicine, 2018, Volume: 97, Issue:50

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Bortezomib; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Immunoglobulin L

2018
Lentigines within fixed drug eruption: reply to 'Multiple lentigines arising on resolving psoriatic plaques after treatment with apremilast'.
    Clinical and experimental dermatology, 2019, Volume: 44, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Dermoscopy; Drug Eruptions; Exanthema; Female; Humans; Hyperpigmentation; Inflammation; Lenti

2019
Treatment with apremilast was beneficial for chronic graft-versus-host disease skin lesion in a patient with psoriasis.
    The Journal of dermatology, 2019, Volume: 46, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Biopsy; Bone Marrow Transplantation; Chronic Disease; Cytarabine; Graft vs Hos

2019
Real-world treatment patterns and healthcare costs among biologic-naive patients initiating apremilast or biologics for the treatment of psoriasis.
    Journal of medical economics, 2019, Volume: 22, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Biological Products; Female; Health Expenditur

2019
Case of psoriasis vulgaris with atrial fibrillation, heart failure and chronic kidney disease which were found accidentally through blood examination during apremilast treatment.
    The Journal of dermatology, 2019, Volume: 46, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Creatinine; Electrocardiography;

2019
Complete resolution of erythrodermic psoriasis with first-line apremilast monotherapy.
    BMJ case reports, 2019, Jan-31, Volume: 12, Issue:1

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Dermatitis, Exfoliative; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pruritu

2019
Apremilast in a patient with psoriasis and mantle cell lymphoma under maintenance treatment with rituximab.
    Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG, 2019, Volume: 17, Issue:3

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Humans; Lymphoma, Man

2019
Successful treatment of psoriasis induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors with apremilast.
    European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2019, Volume: 110

    Topics: Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Carcinoma, Non-

2019
Thalidomide-induced psoriasis in a patient with multiple myeloma.
    Postgraduate medical journal, 2019, Volume: 95, Issue:1121

    Topics: Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Multiple Myeloma; Psoriasis; Severity of Illnes

2019
Severe bitter taste associated with apremilast.
    Dermatologic therapy, 2019, Volume: 32, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Humans; Male; Psor

2019
Favorable response to apremilast in a patient with refractory psoriasis verrucosa.
    The Journal of dermatology, 2019, Volume: 46, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Administration, Oral; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Derm

2019
Use of Apremilast in Patients Who Are Dissatisfied With Stable Maintenance Topical Therapy
    Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD, 2019, Apr-01, Volume: 18, Issue:4

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adolescent; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non

2019
Treatment of Psoriasis With Biologics and Apremilast in Patients With a History of Malignancy: A Retrospective Chart Review
    Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD, 2019, Apr-01, Volume: 18, Issue:4

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Biological Products; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neo

2019
Persistence of apremilast in moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a real-world analysis of 14 147 apremilast- and methotrexate-naive patients in the French National Health Insurance database.
    The British journal of dermatology, 2020, Volume: 182, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Female; Humans; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Nat

2020
Combination therapy of apremilast and secukinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe, recalcitrant plaque psoriasis.
    Clinical and experimental dermatology, 2019, Volume: 44, Issue:7

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Combined Modality

2019
Psoriasis treatment patterns: a retrospective claims study.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2019, Volume: 35, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Biological Products; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Ps

2019
Drug survival of apremilast in a real-world setting.
    The Journal of dermatology, 2019, Volume: 46, Issue:7

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Humans; Japan; Male; Middl

2019
Apremilast increases IL-10-producing regulatory B cells and decreases proinflammatory T cells and innate cells in psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis.
    Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2019, 12-01, Volume: 58, Issue:12

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthritis, Psoriatic; B-Lymphocytes, Regulator

2019
Apremilast and phototherapy for treatment of psoriasis in a patient with human immunodeficiency virus.
    Cutis, 2019, Volume: 103, Issue:5

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Phototherapy; Ps

2019
Factors that may influence the choice for initiating apremilast or methotrexate treatment for psoriasis in real-world clinical setting.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2019, Volume: 33, Issue:12

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Clinical Decision-Making; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dermatologic Agents; Female; Humans;

2019
Psoriasis and chronic myeloid leukemia: treatment with Apremilast.
    International journal of dermatology, 2020, Volume: 59, Issue:4

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Humans; Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive; M

2020
Scalp psoriasis in a haemodialysis patient successfully treated with a half-dose of apremilast.
    European journal of dermatology : EJD, 2019, Jun-01, Volume: 29, Issue:3

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Psoriasis; Remission Induction;

2019
Trial watch: PDE4 inhibitor leads wave of target-specific oral psoriasis drugs.
    Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2013, Volume: 12, Issue:5

    Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Cyclic AMP; Cyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type 4; Cytok

2013
First PDE4 inhibitor for psoriasis hits the market but impact is uncertain.
    Nature biotechnology, 2014, Volume: 32, Issue:6

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Drug Approval; Drug Industry; Humans; Marketing of Health S

2014
Psoriasis induced by thalidomide in a patient with multiple myeloma.
    BMJ case reports, 2014, Jun-27, Volume: 2014

    Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Multiple Myeloma; Psoriasis; Thalidomide; Tumo

2014
Apremilast and adalimumab: a novel combination therapy for recalcitrant psoriasis.
    Dermatology online journal, 2015, Jun-16, Volume: 21, Issue:6

    Topics: Adalimumab; Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Male;

2015
The Use of Methotrexate, Alone or in Combination With Other Therapies, for the Treatment of Palmoplantar Psoriasis.
    Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD, 2015, Volume: 14, Issue:8

    Topics: Adalimumab; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Cyc

2015
A new therapeutic for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: apremilast.
    Expert review of clinical immunology, 2016, Volume: 12, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cy

2016
Phosphodiesterase 4 in inflammatory diseases: Effects of apremilast in psoriatic blood and in dermal myofibroblasts through the PDE4/CD271 complex.
    Cellular signalling, 2016, Volume: 28, Issue:7

    Topics: Adapalene; Adult; Cell Differentiation; Cell Movement; Cyclic AMP; Cyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiestera

2016
Use of Apremilast in Combination With Other Therapies for Treatment of Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: A Retrospective Study.
    Journal of cutaneous medicine and surgery, 2016, Volume: 20, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Chronic Disease; Combined Modality Therapy; De

2016
Improvement of Nail and Scalp Psoriasis Using Apremilast in Patients With Chronic Psoriasis: Phase 2b and 3, 52-Week Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial Results.
    Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD, 2016, Volume: 15, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Chronic Disease; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase II

2016
Apremilast and Secukinumab Combined Therapy in a Patient With Recalcitrant Plaque Psoriasis.
    Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD, 2016, May-01, Volume: 15, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Human

2016
Swiss S1 Guidelines on the Systemic Treatment of Psoriasis Vulgaris.
    Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland), 2016, Volume: 232, Issue:4

    Topics: Acitretin; Biological Factors; Cyclosporine; Dermatology; Fumarates; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Immuno

2016
New Therapies for Psoriasis.
    Seminars in cutaneous medicine and surgery, 2016, Volume: 35, Issue:4 Suppl 4

    Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Dermatologic Agents; Dermatology; Humans;

2016
Appearance of lentigines in psoriasis patients treated with apremilast.
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2016, Volume: 75, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Female; Humans; Lentigo; Male; Middle Aged; Phosph

2016
Safety evaluation of apremilast for the treatment of psoriasis.
    Expert opinion on drug safety, 2017, Volume: 16, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Humans;

2017
[Apremilast: Beware of suicidal ideation and behaviour].
    Annales de dermatologie et de venereologie, 2017, Volume: 144, Issue:3

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Depression; France; Humans; Prevalence; Psoriasis; Risk Fac

2017
Apremilast, beyond psoriasis as a therapeutic target.
    Medicina clinica, 2017, 07-07, Volume: 149, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Female; Humans; Psoriasis; Thalidomide

2017
[Two faces of Janus. Coexistence of systemic lupus erythematosus and psoriasis in the same patient].
    Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete, 2010, Volume: 61, Issue:1

    Topics: Acitretin; Adult; False Negative Reactions; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Keratolytic Ag

2010
Apremilast, a cAMP phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, demonstrates anti-inflammatory activity in vitro and in a model of psoriasis.
    British journal of pharmacology, 2010, Volume: 159, Issue:4

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Cell Proliferation; Cyclic Nucleotid

2010
Apremilast, a cAMP phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, demonstrates anti-inflammatory activity in vitro and in a model of psoriasis.
    British journal of pharmacology, 2010, Volume: 159, Issue:4

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Cell Proliferation; Cyclic Nucleotid

2010
Apremilast, a cAMP phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, demonstrates anti-inflammatory activity in vitro and in a model of psoriasis.
    British journal of pharmacology, 2010, Volume: 159, Issue:4

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Cell Proliferation; Cyclic Nucleotid

2010
Apremilast, a cAMP phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, demonstrates anti-inflammatory activity in vitro and in a model of psoriasis.
    British journal of pharmacology, 2010, Volume: 159, Issue:4

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Cell Proliferation; Cyclic Nucleotid

2010
Thalidomide in the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris: a pilot study.
    The Journal of dermatology, 2011, Volume: 38, Issue:12

    Topics: Adult; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Psoriasis; Thali

2011
Apremilast mechanism of action and application to psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.
    Biochemical pharmacology, 2012, Jun-15, Volume: 83, Issue:12

    Topics: Arthritis, Psoriatic; Cyclic AMP; Humans; Interleukins; Nitric Oxide Synthase Type II; Phosphodieste

2012
Apremilast mechanism of action and application to psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.
    Biochemical pharmacology, 2012, Jun-15, Volume: 83, Issue:12

    Topics: Arthritis, Psoriatic; Cyclic AMP; Humans; Interleukins; Nitric Oxide Synthase Type II; Phosphodieste

2012
Apremilast mechanism of action and application to psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.
    Biochemical pharmacology, 2012, Jun-15, Volume: 83, Issue:12

    Topics: Arthritis, Psoriatic; Cyclic AMP; Humans; Interleukins; Nitric Oxide Synthase Type II; Phosphodieste

2012
Apremilast mechanism of action and application to psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.
    Biochemical pharmacology, 2012, Jun-15, Volume: 83, Issue:12

    Topics: Arthritis, Psoriatic; Cyclic AMP; Humans; Interleukins; Nitric Oxide Synthase Type II; Phosphodieste

2012
Apremilast: a step forward in the treatment of psoriasis?
    Lancet (London, England), 2012, Aug-25, Volume: 380, Issue:9843

    Topics: Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Psoriasis; Thalidomide

2012
Therapeutics: Silencing psoriasis.
    Nature, 2012, Dec-20, Volume: 492, Issue:7429

    Topics: Alefacept; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Clinical Trials as Topic; Derm

2012
Exacerbation of psoriasis by thalidomide in Behçet's syndrome.
    The British journal of dermatology, 2003, Volume: 149, Issue:2

    Topics: Behcet Syndrome; Drug Eruptions; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Middle Aged; Psoriasis; T

2003
Exacerbation of psoriasis by thalidomide in a patient with erythema multiforme.
    The British journal of dermatology, 2006, Volume: 154, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Drug Eruptions; Erythema Multiforme; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Psoriasis; Tha

2006
Targeting of vasculature in cancer and other angiogenic diseases.
    Trends in immunology, 2001, Volume: 22, Issue:3

    Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antigens, CD; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Diabetic Retin

2001
Thalidomide therapy. An open trial.
    International journal of dermatology, 1985, Volume: 24, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Central Nervous System Diseases; Erythema Multiforme; Female; Humans; Lichen Planus; Lu

1985