thalidomide has been researched along with Diffuse Lymphocytic Lymphoma, Poorly-Differentiated in 76 studies
Thalidomide: A piperidinyl isoindole originally introduced as a non-barbiturate hypnotic, but withdrawn from the market due to teratogenic effects. It has been reintroduced and used for a number of immunological and inflammatory disorders. Thalidomide displays immunosuppressive and anti-angiogenic activity. It inhibits release of TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR-ALPHA from monocytes, and modulates other cytokine action.
thalidomide : A racemate comprising equimolar amounts of R- and S-thalidomide.
2-(2,6-dioxopiperidin-3-yl)-1H-isoindole-1,3(2H)-dione : A dicarboximide that is isoindole-1,3(2H)-dione in which the hydrogen attached to the nitrogen is substituted by a 2,6-dioxopiperidin-3-yl group.
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"In this review, the authors describe the pharmacological properties of lenalidomide, and the rational for its use in B-cell lymphomas; focusing on diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL)." | 8.93 | Lenalidomide for the treatment of B-cell lymphoma. ( Bouabdallah, R; Coso, D; Garciaz, S; Schiano de Colella, JM, 2016) |
"In this review, the authors describe the pharmacological properties of lenalidomide, and the rational for its use in B-cell lymphomas; focusing on diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL)." | 4.93 | Lenalidomide for the treatment of B-cell lymphoma. ( Bouabdallah, R; Coso, D; Garciaz, S; Schiano de Colella, JM, 2016) |
"Lenalidomide is an oral non-chemotherapy immunomodulator with direct and indirect effects on non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) cells and with single-agent activity in relapsed/refractory aggressive and indolent B-cell NHL, including mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and follicular lymphoma." | 4.91 | A comprehensive review of lenalidomide therapy for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. ( Chiappella, A; Czuczman, MS; Fowler, N; Goy, A; Habermann, TM; Hernandez-Ilizaliturri, FJ; Nowakowski, GS; Vitolo, U; Witzig, TE, 2015) |
"Lenalidomide (LEN) is an immunomodulatory drug with US Food and Drug Administration approval for use in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), multiple myeloma (MM), and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL)." | 4.91 | Practical Management of Lenalidomide-Related Rash. ( Kurtin, SE; Ridgeway, JA; Tinsley, SM, 2015) |
"Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), which accounts for about 6% of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), is characterized by the chromosomal translocation t(11;14)(q13;q32), resulting in de-regulated expression of cyclin D1." | 4.89 | Therapies for mantle cell lymphoma: current challenges and a brighter future. ( Skarbnik, AP; Smith, MR, 2013) |
"Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory agent approved in the US for patients with relapsed/refractory MCL following bortezomib based on results from 3 multicenter phase II studies (2 including relapsed/refractory aggressive NHL and 1 focusing on MCL post-bortezomib)." | 2.84 | Long-term analysis of phase II studies of single-agent lenalidomide in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma. ( Casadebaig Bravo, ML; Drach, J; Fu, T; Goy, A; Habermann, TM; Kalayoglu Besisik, S; Luigi Zinzani, P; Ramchandren, R; Takeshita, K; Tuscano, JM; Witzig, TE; Zhang, L, 2017) |
"Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory agent that has demonstrated clinical benefit for patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL); however, despite this observed clinical activity, the mechanism of action (MOA) of lenalidomide has not been characterized in this setting." | 2.84 | Activity of lenalidomide in mantle cell lymphoma can be explained by NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity. ( Apollonio, B; Chiu, H; Chopra, R; Couto, S; Flynt, E; Gandhi, AK; Hagner, PR; Ortiz, M; Ramsay, AG; Thakurta, A; Trotter, M; Waldman, MF; Wang, M, 2017) |
"Thalidomide maintenance was associated with significant toxicity and was subsequently modified to rituximab maintenance." | 2.80 | Updated survival analysis of two sequential prospective trials of R-MACLO-IVAM followed by maintenance for newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma. ( Arteaga, AG; Goodman, D; Hoffman, J; Hosein, PJ; Lossos, IS; Reis, I; Rosenblatt, JD; Sandoval-Sus, JD; Stefanovic, A, 2015) |
"Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory drug with effects on the immune system that may enhance antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity and reverse tumor-induced immune suppression." | 2.79 | Combined lenalidomide, low-dose dexamethasone, and rituximab achieves durable responses in rituximab-resistant indolent and mantle cell lymphomas. ( Ahmadi, T; Aqui, NA; Chong, EA; Gordon, A; Mato, AR; Nasta, SD; Schuster, SJ; Svoboda, J, 2014) |
"Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory agent with proven tumoricidal and antiproliferative activity in MCL." | 2.78 | Single-agent lenalidomide in patients with mantle-cell lymphoma who relapsed or progressed after or were refractory to bortezomib: phase II MCL-001 (EMERGE) study. ( Cicero, S; Drach, J; Fu, T; Goy, A; Kalayoglu Besisik, S; Ramchandren, R; Sinha, R; Williams, ME; Witzig, TE; Zhang, L, 2013) |
"Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory agent demonstrating antitumor and antiproliferative effects in MCL." | 2.78 | Long-term follow-up of lenalidomide in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma: subset analysis of the NHL-003 study. ( Czuczman, MS; Haioun, C; Li, J; Polikoff, J; Prandi, K; Reeder, CB; Tilly, H; Vose, JM; Witzig, TE; Zhang, L; Zinzani, PL, 2013) |
" We aimed to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of lenalidomide when combined with rituximab in a phase 1 trial and to assess the efficacy and safety of this combination in a phase 2 trial in patients with relapsed or refractory MCL." | 2.77 | Lenalidomide in combination with rituximab for patients with relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma: a phase 1/2 clinical trial. ( Badillo, M; Bejarano, M; Bell, N; Byrne, C; Cabanillas, F; Champlin, R; Chen, W; Chen, Y; Fanale, M; Fayad, L; Feng, L; Fowler, N; Hagemeister, F; Hartig, K; Kwak, L; McLaughlin, P; Neelapu, SS; Newberry, KJ; Romaguera, J; Samaniego, F; Sun, L; Wagner-Bartak, N; Wang, M; Younes, A; Young, KH; Zeldis, J; Zhang, L, 2012) |
"Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory agent with antitumor activity in B-cell malignancies." | 2.76 | An international phase II trial of single-agent lenalidomide for relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. ( Bouabdallah, R; Buckstein, R; Czuczman, MS; Ervin-Haynes, AL; Guo, P; Haioun, C; Pietronigro, D; Polikoff, JA; Reeder, CB; Tilly, H; Vose, JM; Witzig, TE; Zinzani, PL, 2011) |
"Oral lenalidomide 25 mg was self-administered once daily on days 1-21 every 28 d for up to 52 weeks, according to tolerability or until disease progression." | 2.74 | Lenalidomide oral monotherapy produces a high response rate in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma. ( Ervin-Haynes, A; Habermann, TM; Justice, G; Lossos, IS; McBride, K; Pietronigro, D; Takeshita, K; Tuscano, JM; Vose, JM; Wiernik, PH; Wride, K; Zeldis, JB, 2009) |
"Lenalidomide has activity in a variety of hematologic malignancies, including non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL)." | 2.73 | Lenalidomide monotherapy in relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. ( Cole, CE; Ervin-Haynes, A; Habermann, TM; Justice, G; Lam, W; Lossos, IS; McBride, K; Pietronigro, D; Takeshita, K; Tuscano, JM; Vose, JM; Wiernik, PH; Wride, K; Zeldis, JB, 2008) |
"Lenalidomide is an oral immunomodulatory drug with significant activity in indolent B-cell and mantle cell lymphomas." | 2.53 | Clinical experience with lenalidomide alone or in combination with rituximab in indolent B-cell and mantle cell lymphomas. ( Martin, P; Ruan, J; Schuster, SJ; Shah, B, 2016) |
"Lenalidomide is an approved medication for relapsed mantle cell lymphoma in patients who received at least two lines of therapy, including bortezomib." | 2.52 | Lenalidomide for mantle cell lymphoma. ( Goy, AH; Skarbnik, AP, 2015) |
"Lenalidomide-based treatment showed clinical activity, with no unexpected toxicities, in patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma who previously failed ibrutinib therapy." | 1.46 | Observational study of lenalidomide in patients with mantle cell lymphoma who relapsed/progressed after or were refractory/intolerant to ibrutinib (MCL-004). ( Barnett, E; Bravo, MC; Ghosh, N; Goy, A; Hamadani, M; Lossos, IS; Martin, P; Phillips, T; Reeder, CB; Rule, S; Schuster, SJ; Wang, M, 2017) |
"Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) with activity in lymphoid malignancies occurring primarily through immune modulation (eg, T-cell immune synapse enhancement and NK-cell/T-cell effector augmentation) and antiproliferative effects." | 1.42 | Lenalidomide in non-Hodgkin lymphoma: biological perspectives and therapeutic opportunities. ( Coyle, M; Evens, AM; Kritharis, A; Sharma, J, 2015) |
"Lenalidomide was particularly active in this subgroup of tumors, targeting IRF4 expression and plasmacytic differentiation program, thus overcoming bortezomib resistance." | 1.40 | Synergistic antitumor activity of lenalidomide with the BET bromodomain inhibitor CPI203 in bortezomib-resistant mantle cell lymphoma. ( Balsas, P; Campo, E; Colomer, D; Martínez, A; Montraveta, A; Moros, A; Normant, E; Pérez-Galán, P; Rodríguez, V; Roué, G; Saborit-Villarroya, I; Sandy, P; Wiestner, A, 2014) |
"Lenalidomide (Len) has been demonstrated to be one of the most efficient new treatment options." | 1.40 | Combination of lenalidomide with vitamin D3 induces apoptosis in mantle cell lymphoma via demethylation of BIK. ( Amiot, M; Brosseau, C; Dousset, C; Le Gouill, S; Maïga, S; Moreau, P; Pellat-Deceunynck, C; Touzeau, C, 2014) |
"Lenalidomide treatment resulted in a significant reduction in the number of MCL-associated macrophages." | 1.39 | Lenalidomide inhibits lymphangiogenesis in preclinical models of mantle cell lymphoma. ( Chen, H; Fu, J; Herzog, BH; McDaniel, JM; Ruan, J; Sheng, M; Song, K; Xia, L, 2013) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 0 (0.00) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 12 (15.79) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 62 (81.58) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 2 (2.63) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Husby, S | 1 |
Bæch-Laursen, C | 1 |
Eskelund, CW | 2 |
Favero, F | 1 |
Jespersen, JS | 1 |
Hutchings, M | 2 |
Pedersen, LB | 2 |
Niemann, CU | 2 |
Weischenfeldt, J | 1 |
Räty, R | 2 |
Larsen, TS | 1 |
Kolstad, A | 2 |
Jerkeman, M | 2 |
Grønbæk, K | 2 |
Alderuccio, JP | 1 |
Saul, EE | 1 |
Iyer, SG | 1 |
Reis, IM | 1 |
Alencar, AJ | 1 |
Rosenblatt, JD | 3 |
Lossos, IS | 6 |
Ma, J | 1 |
Wu, K | 1 |
Bai, W | 1 |
Cui, X | 1 |
Chen, Y | 2 |
Xie, Y | 2 |
Sun, B | 1 |
Fiskus, W | 1 |
Qian, Y | 1 |
Rajapakshe, K | 1 |
Raina, K | 1 |
Coleman, KG | 1 |
Crew, AP | 1 |
Shen, A | 1 |
Saenz, DT | 1 |
Mill, CP | 1 |
Nowak, AJ | 1 |
Jain, N | 1 |
Zhang, L | 9 |
Wang, M | 6 |
Khoury, JD | 1 |
Coarfa, C | 1 |
Crews, CM | 1 |
Bhalla, KN | 1 |
Witzig, TE | 5 |
Luigi Zinzani, P | 1 |
Habermann, TM | 4 |
Tuscano, JM | 3 |
Drach, J | 6 |
Ramchandren, R | 3 |
Kalayoglu Besisik, S | 3 |
Takeshita, K | 3 |
Casadebaig Bravo, ML | 2 |
Fu, T | 3 |
Goy, A | 5 |
Hagner, PR | 1 |
Chiu, H | 1 |
Ortiz, M | 1 |
Apollonio, B | 1 |
Couto, S | 1 |
Waldman, MF | 1 |
Flynt, E | 1 |
Ramsay, AG | 1 |
Trotter, M | 1 |
Gandhi, AK | 1 |
Chopra, R | 1 |
Thakurta, A | 1 |
Vidal-Crespo, A | 1 |
Rodriguez, V | 2 |
Matas-Cespedes, A | 1 |
Lee, E | 1 |
Rivas-Delgado, A | 1 |
Giné, E | 1 |
Navarro, A | 1 |
Beà, S | 2 |
Campo, E | 3 |
López-Guillermo, A | 1 |
Lopez-Guerra, M | 1 |
Roué, G | 3 |
Colomer, D | 3 |
Pérez-Galán, P | 2 |
Schuster, SJ | 5 |
Phillips, T | 1 |
Rule, S | 4 |
Hamadani, M | 1 |
Ghosh, N | 1 |
Reeder, CB | 3 |
Barnett, E | 1 |
Bravo, MC | 2 |
Martin, P | 4 |
Arcaini, L | 2 |
Lamy, T | 2 |
Walewski, J | 2 |
Belada, D | 2 |
Mayer, J | 2 |
Radford, J | 2 |
Jurczak, W | 3 |
Morschhauser, F | 2 |
Alexeeva, J | 2 |
Cabeçadas, J | 1 |
Pileri, SA | 3 |
Biyukov, T | 2 |
Patturajan, M | 2 |
Trnĕný, M | 2 |
Wader, KF | 1 |
Laurell, A | 1 |
Toldbod, H | 1 |
Dahl, C | 1 |
Kuitunen, H | 1 |
Geisler, CH | 2 |
Peitsch, WK | 1 |
Skarbnik, AP | 2 |
Smith, MR | 1 |
Xu, M | 1 |
Hou, Y | 1 |
Sheng, L | 1 |
Peng, J | 1 |
Sinha, R | 1 |
Williams, ME | 2 |
Cicero, S | 2 |
Zinzani, PL | 2 |
Vose, JM | 4 |
Czuczman, MS | 4 |
Haioun, C | 2 |
Polikoff, J | 1 |
Tilly, H | 2 |
Prandi, K | 1 |
Li, J | 1 |
Rivera-Rodriguez, N | 1 |
Cabanillas, F | 2 |
Ahmadi, T | 2 |
Chong, EA | 2 |
Gordon, A | 1 |
Aqui, NA | 2 |
Nasta, SD | 2 |
Svoboda, J | 3 |
Mato, AR | 2 |
Song, K | 1 |
Herzog, BH | 1 |
Sheng, M | 1 |
Fu, J | 1 |
McDaniel, JM | 1 |
Chen, H | 1 |
Ruan, J | 5 |
Xia, L | 1 |
Moros, A | 2 |
Bustany, S | 1 |
Cahu, J | 1 |
Saborit-Villarroya, I | 2 |
Martínez, A | 2 |
Sola, B | 1 |
Maddocks, K | 1 |
Blum, KA | 2 |
Montraveta, A | 1 |
Balsas, P | 1 |
Sandy, P | 1 |
Wiestner, A | 1 |
Normant, E | 1 |
Mishchenko, E | 1 |
Attias, D | 1 |
Tadmor, T | 1 |
Morrison, VA | 1 |
Jung, SH | 1 |
Johnson, J | 1 |
LaCasce, A | 1 |
Bartlett, NL | 1 |
Pitcher, BN | 1 |
Cheson, BD | 1 |
Brosseau, C | 1 |
Dousset, C | 1 |
Touzeau, C | 1 |
Maïga, S | 1 |
Moreau, P | 1 |
Amiot, M | 1 |
Le Gouill, S | 1 |
Pellat-Deceunynck, C | 1 |
Cosenza, M | 1 |
Civallero, M | 1 |
Pozzi, S | 1 |
Marcheselli, L | 1 |
Bari, A | 1 |
Sacchi, S | 1 |
Hao, Q | 1 |
Wei, X | 1 |
Yin, Q | 1 |
Mi, R | 1 |
Yuan, F | 1 |
Ai, H | 1 |
Wang, P | 1 |
Li, Y | 1 |
Song, Y | 1 |
Walsh, KM | 1 |
Nowakowski, GS | 1 |
Hernandez-Ilizaliturri, FJ | 1 |
Chiappella, A | 2 |
Vitolo, U | 3 |
Fowler, N | 2 |
Kritharis, A | 1 |
Coyle, M | 1 |
Sharma, J | 1 |
Evens, AM | 1 |
Hosein, PJ | 2 |
Sandoval-Sus, JD | 1 |
Goodman, D | 1 |
Arteaga, AG | 1 |
Reis, I | 1 |
Hoffman, J | 1 |
Stefanovic, A | 1 |
Robertson, MJ | 1 |
Avivi, I | 1 |
Rowe, JM | 1 |
Herbrecht, R | 1 |
Van Hoof, A | 1 |
Witzig, T | 1 |
Goy, AH | 1 |
Tinsley, SM | 1 |
Kurtin, SE | 1 |
Ridgeway, JA | 1 |
Smolewski, P | 1 |
Witkowska, M | 1 |
Robak, T | 1 |
Shah, B | 2 |
Smith, SM | 1 |
Furman, RR | 2 |
Christos, P | 1 |
Rodriguez, A | 1 |
Lewis, J | 1 |
Katz, O | 1 |
Coleman, M | 2 |
Leonard, JP | 4 |
Cheah, CY | 1 |
Seymour, JF | 1 |
Wang, ML | 1 |
Afanasyev, B | 1 |
Kaplanov, K | 1 |
Thyss, A | 1 |
Kuzmin, A | 1 |
Voloshin, S | 1 |
Kuliczkowski, K | 1 |
Giza, A | 1 |
Milpied, N | 1 |
Stelitano, C | 2 |
Marks, R | 1 |
Trümper, L | 1 |
Hutchinson, L | 1 |
Tsuda, K | 1 |
Tanimoto, T | 1 |
Komatsu, T | 1 |
Wu, C | 1 |
de Miranda, NF | 1 |
Chen, L | 1 |
Wasik, AM | 1 |
Mansouri, L | 1 |
Galazka, K | 1 |
Dlugosz-Danecka, M | 1 |
Machaczka, M | 1 |
Zhang, H | 1 |
Peng, R | 1 |
Morin, RD | 1 |
Rosenquist, R | 1 |
Sander, B | 1 |
Pan-Hammarström, Q | 1 |
Tempescul, A | 2 |
Ianotto, JC | 2 |
Bagacean, C | 1 |
Salaun, PY | 1 |
Bocsan, C | 1 |
Zdrenghea, M | 1 |
Garciaz, S | 1 |
Coso, D | 1 |
Schiano de Colella, JM | 1 |
Bouabdallah, R | 2 |
Zaja, F | 2 |
Ferrero, S | 1 |
Ferrari, A | 1 |
Salvi, F | 2 |
Arcari, A | 1 |
Musuraca, G | 1 |
Botto, B | 1 |
Spina, M | 1 |
Cellini, C | 1 |
Patti, C | 1 |
Liberati, AM | 1 |
Minotto, C | 1 |
Ceccarelli, M | 1 |
Volpetti, S | 2 |
Ferranti, A | 1 |
Drandi, D | 1 |
Montechiarello, E | 1 |
Ladetto, M | 1 |
Carmichael, J | 1 |
Fanin, R | 2 |
Wiernik, PH | 2 |
Justice, G | 2 |
Cole, CE | 1 |
Lam, W | 1 |
McBride, K | 2 |
Wride, K | 2 |
Pietronigro, D | 3 |
Ervin-Haynes, A | 2 |
Zeldis, JB | 2 |
Morel, F | 1 |
Marion, V | 1 |
De Braekeleer, M | 1 |
Berthou, C | 1 |
Qian, Z | 2 |
Cai, Z | 2 |
Sun, L | 3 |
Wang, H | 2 |
Bartlett, JB | 1 |
Yi, Q | 2 |
Richardson, SJ | 2 |
Eve, HE | 3 |
Copplestone, JA | 1 |
Dyer, MJ | 1 |
Rule, SA | 3 |
Morgensztern, D | 1 |
Coleman, F | 1 |
Escalón, MP | 1 |
Byrne, GE | 1 |
Walker, GR | 1 |
Dasanu, CA | 1 |
Reale, MA | 1 |
Bauer, F | 1 |
Cheung, K | 1 |
Faye, A | 1 |
Elstrom, R | 1 |
Lachs, M | 1 |
Hajjar, KA | 1 |
Buckstein, R | 1 |
Polikoff, JA | 1 |
Guo, P | 1 |
Ervin-Haynes, AL | 1 |
Cox, MC | 1 |
Mannino, G | 1 |
Lionetto, L | 1 |
Naso, V | 1 |
Simmaco, M | 1 |
Spiriti, MA | 1 |
De Luca, S | 1 |
Orsucci, L | 1 |
Levis, A | 1 |
Rusconi, C | 1 |
Ravelli, E | 1 |
Tucci, A | 1 |
Bottelli, C | 1 |
Balzarotti, M | 1 |
Brusamolino, E | 1 |
Bonfichi, M | 1 |
Sabattini, E | 1 |
Monagheddu, C | 1 |
Vacca, A | 1 |
Ria, R | 1 |
Fayad, L | 1 |
Wagner-Bartak, N | 1 |
Hagemeister, F | 1 |
Neelapu, SS | 1 |
Samaniego, F | 1 |
McLaughlin, P | 1 |
Fanale, M | 1 |
Younes, A | 1 |
Newberry, KJ | 1 |
Young, KH | 1 |
Champlin, R | 1 |
Kwak, L | 1 |
Feng, L | 1 |
Badillo, M | 1 |
Bejarano, M | 1 |
Hartig, K | 1 |
Chen, W | 1 |
Byrne, C | 1 |
Bell, N | 1 |
Zeldis, J | 1 |
Romaguera, J | 1 |
Dawar, R | 1 |
Hernandez-Ilizaliturri, F | 1 |
Carey, S | 1 |
Heise, CC | 1 |
Mamidipudi, V | 1 |
Shi, T | 1 |
Radford, JA | 1 |
Auer, RL | 1 |
Bullard, SH | 1 |
Dreyling, M | 2 |
Kluin-Nelemans, HC | 1 |
Klapper, W | 1 |
Vogt, N | 1 |
Delfau-Larue, MH | 1 |
Hutter, G | 1 |
Cheah, C | 1 |
Cortelazzo, S | 1 |
Pott, C | 1 |
Hess, G | 1 |
Visco, C | 1 |
Klener, P | 1 |
Aurer, I | 1 |
Unterhalt, M | 1 |
Ribrag, V | 1 |
Hoster, E | 1 |
Hermine, O | 2 |
Furtado, M | 1 |
Shah, N | 1 |
Levoguer, A | 1 |
Harding, S | 1 |
Zhao, HF | 1 |
Wei, XD | 1 |
Yin, QS | 1 |
Wilson, EA | 1 |
Jobanputra, S | 1 |
Jackson, R | 1 |
Parker, AN | 1 |
McQuaker, IG | 1 |
Horrobin, DF | 1 |
Damaj, G | 1 |
Lefrère, F | 1 |
Delarue, R | 1 |
Varet, B | 1 |
Furman, R | 1 |
Kaufmann, H | 3 |
Raderer, M | 2 |
Wöhrer, S | 1 |
Püspök, A | 1 |
Bankier, A | 1 |
Zielinski, C | 1 |
Chott, A | 1 |
Seidl, S | 1 |
Lenz, G | 1 |
Amen, K | 1 |
Urbauer, E | 1 |
Nösslinger, T | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Phase II Study of Rituximab in Combination With Methotrexate, Doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide, Leucovorin, Vincristine, Ifosfamide, Etoposide, Cytarabine and Mesna (R-MACLO/VAM) in Patients With Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma[NCT00878254] | Phase 2 | 25 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2009-03-25 | Active, not recruiting | ||
Phase II Study of Rituximab in Combination With Methotrexate, Doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide, Leucovorin, Vincristine, Ifosfamide, Etoposide, Cytarabine and Mesna (MACLO/IVAM) in Patients With Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma[NCT00450801] | Phase 2 | 22 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2004-04-30 | Completed | ||
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm, Open-Label Study To Determine The Efficacy And Safety Of Single-Agent Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) In Patients With Mantel Cell NHL Who Have Relapsed Or Progressed After Treatment With Bortezomib Or Are Refractory To Bortez[NCT00737529] | Phase 2 | 134 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2008-12-22 | Completed | ||
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized Open-Label Study To Determine the Efficacy of Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) Versus Investigator's Choice in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma[NCT00875667] | Phase 2 | 254 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2009-04-30 | Completed | ||
A Multicenter, Observational Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) in Subjects With Mantle Cell Lymphoma Who Have Relapsed or Progressed After Treatment With Ibrutinib or Are Refractory or Intolerant to Ibrutinib.[NCT02341781] | 30 participants (Actual) | Observational | 2015-04-30 | Completed | |||
A Phase II Trial of Ibrutinib, Lenalidomide and Rituximab for Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma[NCT02460276] | Phase 2 | 50 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-04-30 | Completed | ||
Phase Ib Dose Finding Study of Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Inhibitor, Ibrutinib (PCI-32765) Plus Lenalidomide / Rituximab in Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL)[NCT02446236] | Phase 1 | 27 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-06-18 | Active, not recruiting | ||
A Phase II, Multicenter, Single-Arm, Open-Label Study To Evaluate The Safety And Efficacy Of Single-Agent Lenalidomide (Revlimid®, CC-5013) in Subjects With Relapsed Or Refractory Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma[NCT00413036] | Phase 2 | 217 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2006-06-30 | Completed | ||
A Phase 3 Open-Label Randomized Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Plus Lenalidomide (CC-5013) Versus Rituximab Plus Chemotherapy in Subjects With Previously Untreated Follicular Lymphoma[NCT01476787] | Phase 3 | 255 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2011-12-29 | Active, not recruiting | ||
Lenalidomide to Reverse Drug Resistance After Lenvatinib Combined With PD-1 Inhibitors in the First-line Treatment of Advanced HCC :a Prospective, Exploratory, Single-arm, Open-label, Multi-center Clinical Study[NCT05831969] | Phase 2 | 23 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2023-06-05 | Not yet recruiting | ||
Phase II Study of Lenalidomide Plus Rituximab in Patients With Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma[NCT01472562] | Phase 2 | 38 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2011-07-29 | Completed | ||
Bortezomib Combined With Fludarabine and Cytarabine for Mantle Cell Lymphoma Patients:a Single Arm, Open-labelled, Phase 2 Study[NCT03016988] | Phase 2 | 50 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2017-01-31 | Not yet recruiting | ||
A Phase II, Multicenter, Single-Arm, Open-Label Study To Evaluate The Safety And Efficacy Of Single-Agent Lenalidomide (Revlimid®, CC-5013) In Subjects With Relapsed Or Refractory Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma[NCT00179660] | Phase 2 | 50 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2005-08-31 | Completed | ||
A Phase II Study of MK 2206 in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma[NCT01466868] | Phase 2 | 22 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2011-11-30 | Terminated (stopped due to Regarding the comments of the iDSMB, the sponsor decided to stop the inclusions) | ||
Long-term Follow-up and/or Continued Thalidomide (THALOMID®) Maintenance Therapy for Patients Enrolled on Clinical Trial 20030165[NCT02507336] | Phase 2 | 2 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-11-24 | Completed | ||
Phase II Trial of Anti-Angiogenic Therapy With RT-PEPC in Patients With Relapsed Mantle Cell Lymphoma[NCT00151281] | Phase 2 | 25 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2004-11-30 | Completed | ||
Salvage Treatment With Lenalidomide and Dexamethaosne(LEN-DEX) in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL)[NCT00786851] | Phase 2 | 33 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2008-07-31 | Completed | ||
Lenalidomide and Rituximab Treatment of Relapsed Mantle Cell Lymphoma and Diffuse Large B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, Transformed Large Cell Lymphoma, and/or Grade 3 Follicular Lymphoma (Follicular Cleaved Large Cell Lymphoma or Follicular Non-Cleaved La[NCT00294632] | Phase 1/Phase 2 | 54 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2006-02-28 | Completed | ||
[NCT00261612] | Phase 2 | 16 participants | Interventional | 2005-01-31 | Active, not recruiting | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
Number of patients experiencing adverse events during the course of protocol therapy. (NCT00450801)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
R-MACLO Cycles | 22 |
R-IVAM Cycles | 22 |
Thalidomide Therapy | 19 |
Percentage of participants achieving complete response (CR) to protocol therapy according to International Working Group Response Criteria for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) using the CT imaging method. Patients were classified by best tumor response; CR was defined as normalization of the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), complete disappearance of disease-related symptoms and lymph nodes, and clearance of lymphoma from involved organs; complete response unconfirmed (CRu) as a residual lymph node greater than 1.5 cm in greatest transverse diameter that had regressed by more than 75% or an indeterminate bone marrow examination; partial response (PR) as greater than 50% reduction in the involved lymph nodes, or disappearance of the involved lymph nodes but persistent bone marrow involvement; relapse/progression as new or increased lymph nodes, organomegaly, or reappearance of bone marrow involvement. (NCT00450801)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
R-MACLO-IVAM-T | 100 |
Percentage of participants who are alive up to five years after receipt of protocol therapy. (NCT00450801)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1-year rate overall survival Rate | 2-year overall survival Rate | 3-year overall survival rate | 4-year overall survival rate | 5-year overall survival rate | |
R-MACLO-IVAM-T | 96 | 96 | 96 | 87 | 87 |
Percentage of participants achieving progression-free survival at 1, 3 and 5 years after the start of protocol therapy, based upon the International Working Group Response Criteria for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL). Progression is defined as a ≥ 50% increase from nadir in the product of the two largest perpendicular diameters (PPD-size) of any previously identified abnormal node, or appearance of any new lesion. (NCT00450801)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
1 year progression-free survival | 3 year progression-free survival | 5-year progression-free survival | |
R-MACLO-IVAM-T | 91 | 78 | 69 |
Kaplan Meier estimates for the duration of CR/CRu was calculated from the date of the first occurrence of CR/CRu to the date of documented disease progression or death (without documented progression) for participants who obtained a CR/CRu; participants who had not progressed (or died) were censored at the last valid assessment. (NCT00737529)
Timeframe: From Day 1 of study drug to progression or early discontinuation; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; median time in follow-up was 16.34 months
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | 24.43 |
Kaplan Meier estimate for the duration of response (DoR) was calculated from the date of the first occurrence of initial response for responders (demonstrating evidence of at least a PR) to the date of first documented disease progression (any new lesion or increase by ≥ 50% of previously involved sites from nadir) or death (without documented progression) for participants who responded; participants who had not progressed (or died) were censored at the last valid assessment. (NCT00737529)
Timeframe: From Day 1 of study drug to progression or early treatment discontinuation; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; Median duration of treatment was 94.5 days.
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | 16.64 |
Kaplan Meier estimate of time to progression was calculated as time from the start of the study drug therapy to the first observation of disease progression. Participants who died without progression were censored at the date of death; otherwise, the censoring rules presented above for PFS applied to the analysis of TTP. Progressive Disease(PD): Appearance of new lesion or increase by ≥50% from previously involved sites from nadir (NCT00737529)
Timeframe: From Day 1 of study drug to first documented time of progression; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; median time in follow-up was 16.34 months
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | 5.46 |
Kaplan Meier estimates of PFS was defined as the start of study drug therapy to the first observation of disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever comes first. If a participant had not progressed or died, PFS was censored at the time of last adequate assessment when the participant was known not to have progressed. For participants who received other anti-lymphoma therapy with no evidence of progression, PFS was censored at time of last adequate tumor assessment with no evidence of progression prior to the start of new anti-lymphoma treatment. (NCT00737529)
Timeframe: From Day 1 of study drug to first documented date of disease progression; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; median time in follow-up was 16.34 months
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | 4.01 |
Time to treatment failure (TTF) was calculated from the start of study drug therapy to early discontinuation from treatment due to any cause, including disease progression, toxicity, or death and was based on site-reported data. (NCT00737529)
Timeframe: From Day 1 of study drug to first documented time of treatment failure; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; median duration of treatment was 94.5 days
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | 3.75 |
Kaplan Meier estimate of overall survival was calculated from the time the first dose of study drug to death from any cause. Participants who had not died were censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive. (NCT00737529)
Timeframe: From Day 1 of study drug to first documented date of progressive disease or death; up to the final data cut-off date of 30 March 2017; median duration of follow-up for surviving participants was 62.94 months
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | 19.50 |
Overall Response Rate (ORR) was defined as the percentage of participants whose best response was Complete Response, Complete Response unconfirmed or Partial Response. Participants who had discontinued before any response has been observed, or changed to other anti-lymphoma treatments before response had been observed, were considered as non-responders. Tumor Response was assessed by a modification of the International Lymphoma Workshop Response Criteria, IWRC, Cheson, 1999); CR is defined as the disappearance of all clinical and radiographic evidence of disease; CRu is defined as a CR, with a 1) residual lymph node mass >1.5 cm that has decreased by 75% in the sum of the product of the diameters (SPD). Individual nodes previously confluent decreased by more than 75% in the SPD compared with original mass; 2) indeterminate bone marrow; PR = is defined ≥50% decrease in 6 largest nodes or nodal masses. (NCT00737529)
Timeframe: From Day 1 of study treatment to progession or early treatment discontinuation; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; median duration of treatment was 94.5 days.
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | 29.9 |
The percentage of participants whose best response was CR or CRu. Participants who had discontinued before CR/CRu was observed, or changed to other anti-lymphoma treatments before a CR/CRu response had been observed, were considered as non-responders. CR is defined as the disappearance of all clinical and radiographic evidence of disease; CRu is defined as a CR, with a 1) residual lymph node mass >1.5 cm that has decreased by 75% in the sum of the product of the diameters (SPD). Individual nodes previously confluent decreased by more than 75% in the SPD compared with original mass; 2) indeterminate bone marrow. (NCT00737529)
Timeframe: From Day 1 of study drug to progression or early treatment discontinuation; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; Median duration of treatment was 94.5 days
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | 9.0 |
Time to Complete Response (CR+CRu) was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug to the date of the first occurrence of at least CRu and was calculated only for participants with CR or CRu. (NCT00737529)
Timeframe: From Day 1 of study drug to first documented CR/CRu or better; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; median duration of treatment was 94.5 days
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | 3.9 |
Time to Response was defined as the time from first dose of study drug to the date of the first response (having at least a PR) and was calculated only for responding participants. (NCT00737529)
Timeframe: From Day 1 of study drug to time of first documented PR or better; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; median duration of treatment was 94.5 days
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | 3.5 |
Adverse events were assessed using National Cancer Institute, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE), Version 3: according to the following scale: Grade 1 = Mild Adverse Event (AE), Grade 2 = Moderate AE, Grade 3 = Severe and Undesirable AE, Grade 4 = Life-threatening or Disabling AE, and Grade 5 = Death; Serious AEs (SAEs) are those that resulted in death, were life-threatening, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly, or resulted in an important medical event that may have jeopardized the patient or required medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. after the first dose of study drug and within 28 days after the last dose. A TEAE is defined as any AE occurring or worsening on or after the first dose of study drug and within 28 days after the last dose of study drug. (NCT00737529)
Timeframe: From the first dose of lenalidomide through 28 days after the last dose during the follow-up phase; median (minimum, maximum) duration of treatment was 94.0 (1.0, 1950 days)
Intervention | participants (Number) | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Any TEAE | Any TEAE Related to Investigational Product (IP) | Any TEAE Grade 3-5 AE | Any TEAE Grade 3 AE | Any TEAE Grade 4 AE | Any TEAE Grade 5 AE | Any Grade 3-5 AE Related to IP | Any Grade 3 AE Related to IP | Any Grade 4 AE Related to IP | Any Grade 5 AE Related to IP | Any TEAE Serious Adverse Event (SAE) | Any SAE Related to IP | Any TEAE Leading to Stopping of IP | Any Treatment Related AE Leading to Stopping IP | Any AE Leading to Dose Reduction | Any AE Leading to IP Interruption | Any Treatment Related AE Leading to Dose Reduction | Treatment Related AE Leading to IP Interruption | |
Lenalidomide | 132 | 118 | 106 | 101 | 57 | 18 | 90 | 88 | 41 | 2 | 70 | 30 | 28 | 16 | 55 | 81 | 52 | 66 |
Duration of response was defined as the time from when the first response of CR, CRu, or PR was first achieved until documented tumor progression, or until the participant died from any cause, whichever occurred first. Participants who did not progress or die at the time of analysis were censored at the last assessment date that the participant was known to be progression-free. Participants who received a new treatment without documented progression were censored at the last assessment date that the participant was known to be progression-free. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: From date of randomization to the data cut-off date of 07 March 2014; median study duration was 70.7 weeks for the lenalidomide arm and 69.3 weeks for the investigators choice arm
Intervention | Weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | 69.6 |
Investigators Choice | 45.1 |
Duration of response was defined as the time from when the first response of CR, CRu, or PR was first achieved until documented tumor progression, or until the participant died from any cause, whichever occurred first. Participants who did not progress or die at the time of analysis were censored at the last assessment date that the participant was known to be progression-free. Participants who received a new treatment without documented progression were censored at the last assessment date that the participant was known to be progression-free. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: From date of randomization to the study discontinuation date of 09 October 2018; median study duration was 103.9 weeks for lenalidomide and 87.0 weeks for the investigator choice arm
Intervention | Weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | 70.1 |
Investigators Choice | 91.7 |
Overall survival was defined as the time from randomization until death from any cause. Participants alive or lost to follow-up at the time of analysis were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: From date of randomization to the data cut-off date of 07 March 2014; overall median follow-up was 93.9 weeks
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | 121.0 |
Investigators Choice | 91.7 |
Overall survival was defined as the time from randomization until death from any cause. Participants alive or lost to follow-up at the time of analysis were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: From randomization to progression of disease or death; up to the study discontinuation date of 09 October 2018; overall median follow-up time was 285 weeks
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | 120.6 |
Investigators Choice | 91.7 |
PFS was defined as time of randomization to the first observation of disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever was first. If a participant had not progressed or died, PFS was censored at the time of last assessment when the participant was known not to have progressed. For participants who received other anti-lymphoma therapy with no evidence of progression, PFS was censored at time of last tumor assessment with no evidence of progression prior to the start of new anti-lymphoma treatment. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: From randomization to progression of disease or death; up to data cut off date of 07 March 2014; overall median follow-up time was 93.9 weeks
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | 37.6 |
Investigators Choice | 22.7 |
Kaplan Meier estimates of PFS were defined as the time from randomization to the first observation of disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever was first. If a participant had not progressed or died, PFS was censored at the time of last completed assessment when the participant was known not to have progressed. For participants who received other anti-lymphoma therapy with no evidence of progression, PFS was censored at time of last tumor assessment with no evidence of progression prior to the start of new anti-lymphoma treatment. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: From randomization to progression of disease or death; up to study discontinuation of 09 October 2018; overall median follow-up time was 285 weeks
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | 37.3 |
Investigators Choice | 23.6 |
Time to Response was defined as the time from first dose of study drug to the date of the first response (having at least a PR) and was calculated only for responding participants. ). Participants with progression at the time of analysis were censored at the first assessment date that the participant was known to have progressed. Participants with SD at the time of analysis were censored at the last assessment date that the participant was known to be progression-free. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: From randomization of study drug to time of first documented PR or better response; up to data cut-off date of 07 March 2014; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for the lenalidomide arm and 13.1 weeks for the investigators choice arm
Intervention | Weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | 18.7 |
Investigators Choice | NA |
Time to first response was defined as the time from first dose of study drug to the date of the first response (having at least a PR). Participants with progression at the time of analysis were censored at the first assessment date that the participant was known to have progressed. Participants with SD at the time of analysis were censored at the last assessment date that the subject was known to be progression-free. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: From date of randomization to the study discontinuation date of 09 October 2018; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm
Intervention | Weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | 23.9 |
Investigators Choice | 40.0 |
Time to progression (TTP) was defined as the time from randomization until objective tumor progression. Time to progression did not include deaths. Participants without progression at the time of analysis were censored at the last assessment date that the participant was known to be progression-free. Participants who received a new anti-lymphoma treatment without documented progression were censored at the last assessment date that the participant was known to be progression-free. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: From date of randomization to the data cut-off date of 07 March 2014; median study duration was 70.7 weeks for the lenalidomide arm and 69.3 weeks for the investigators choice arm
Intervention | Weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | 39.3 |
Investigators Choice | 24.7 |
Time to progression (TTP) was defined as the time from randomization until objective tumor progression. Time to progression did not include deaths. Participants without progression at the time of analysis were censored at the last assessment date that the participant was known to be progression-free. Participants who received a new anti-lymphoma treatment without documented progression were censored at the last assessment date that the participant was known to be progression-free. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: From date of randomization to the study discontinuation date of 09 October 2018; median study duration was 103.9 weeks for lenalidomide and 87.0 weeks for the investigator choice arm
Intervention | Weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | 39.3 |
Investigators Choice | 24.7 |
Time to treatment failure was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug to discontinuation of treatment for any reason, including disease progression assessed by the investigator, treatment toxicity, or death. Participants who were on-treatment or completed the treatment according to the protocol were censored at the last date of drug intake. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: From the date of the first treatment to the data cut-off date of 07 March 2014; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for the lenalidomide arm and 13.1 weeks for the investigators choice arm
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | 24.4 |
Investigators Choice | 17.9 |
Time to treatment failure was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug to discontinuation of treatment for any reason, including disease progression assessed by the investigator, treatment toxicity, or death. Participants who were on-treatment or completed the treatment according to the protocol were censored at the last date of drug intake. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: From date of first dose of treatment to the study discontinuation date of 09 October 2018; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | 24.4 |
Investigators Choice | 17.9 |
The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Appetite Loss Domain to Treatment Scale was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | -4.8 |
Investigators Choice | -4.1 |
The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Cognitive Functioning Scale ranges from 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | 3.2 |
Investigators Choice | 2.9 |
The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Constipation Scale was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | -0.3 |
Investigators Choice | -3.5 |
"The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact).~The EORTC QLQ-C30 Diarhoea Scale was scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement." (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and time of discontinuation from treatment visit.Up to final data cut-0ff date of 07 March 2014
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | -7.2 |
Investigators Choice | -5.8 |
The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Dyspnoea Domain to Treatment Scale was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | -7.3 |
Investigators Choice | -5.8 |
The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Emotional Functioning Scale ranges from 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | 6.9 |
Investigators Choice | 3.7 |
The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Fatigue Scale was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | -4.9 |
Investigators Choice | -2.9 |
The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Financial Problems Domain Scale was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | -10.9 |
Investigators Choice | -2.3 |
The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status / QoL Domain to Treatment Scale was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing a higher quality of life. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | 4.6 |
Investigators Choice | 5.6 |
The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Insomnia Scale was scored between 0 and 100, with a high score representing worse symptomatic expression. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | -12.8 |
Investigators Choice | -7.6 |
The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Nausea and Vomiting Scale was scored between 0 and 100, with a high score representing worse symptomatic expression. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | -2.3 |
Investigators Choice | -0.6 |
The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Pain Scale was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and time of discontinuation from treatment visit.Up to final data cut-0ff date of 07 March 2014
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | -5.8 |
Investigators Choice | -3.5 |
The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Scale ranges from 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | 3.4 |
Investigators Choice | -1.8 |
The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Role Functioning Scale ranges from 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | 3.1 |
Investigators Choice | 5.0 |
The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Social Functioning Scale ranges from 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | 5.1 |
Investigators Choice | 3.8 |
Overall Response Rate (ORR) was defined as the percentage of participants whose best response was Complete Response (CR), Complete Response unconfirmed (CRu) or Partial Response (PR). Participants who discontinued before any response had been observed or changed to other anti-lymphoma treatments before response had been observed, were considered as non-responders. Tumor Response was assessed by a modification of the International Lymphoma Workshop Response Criteria, IWRC, Cheson, 1999; CR is defined as the disappearance of all clinical and radiographic evidence of disease; CRu is defined as a CR, with a 1) residual lymph node mass >1.5 cm that has decreased by 75% in the sum of the product of the diameters (SPD). Individual nodes previously confluent decreased by more than 75% in the SPD compared with original mass; 2) indeterminate bone marrow; PR = is defined ≥50% decrease in 6 largest nodes or nodal masses. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: From date of randomization to the data cut-off date of 07 March 2014; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for the lenalidomide arm and 13.1 weeks for the investigators choice arm
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | 40.0 |
Investigators Choice | 10.7 |
Overall Response Rate (ORR) was defined as the percentage of participants whose best response was Complete Response, Complete Response unconfirmed or Partial Response. Participants who had discontinued before any response has been observed or changed to other anti-lymphoma treatments before response had been observed, were considered as non-responders. Tumor Response was assessed by a modification of the International Lymphoma Workshop Response Criteria, IWRC, Cheson, 1999; CR is defined as the disappearance of all clinical and radiographic evidence of disease; CRu is defined as a CR, with a 1) residual lymph node mass >1.5 cm that has decreased by 75% in the sum of the product of the diameters (SPD). Individual nodes previously confluent decreased by more than 75% in the SPD compared with original mass; 2) indeterminate bone marrow; PR = is defined ≥50% decrease in 6 largest nodes or nodal masses. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: From date of randomization to the study discontinuation date of 09 October 2018; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | 45.9 |
Investigators Choice | 22.6 |
Tumor control rate was defined as the percentage of participants with a complete response (CR), unconfirmed complete response (CRu), partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD). Tumor Response was assessed by a modification of the International Lymphoma Workshop Response Criteria, IWRC, Cheson, 1999); CR is defined as the disappearance of all clinical and radiographic evidence of disease; CRu is defined as a CR, with a 1) residual lymph node mass >1.5 cm that has decreased by 75% in the sum of the product of the diameters (SPD). Individual nodes previously confluent decreased by more than 75% in the SPD compared with original mass; 2) indeterminate bone marrow; PR = is defined ≥50% decrease in 6 largest nodes or nodal masses. Stable disease (SD) is defined as less than a PR (see above) but is not progressive disease or relapsed disease. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: From date of randomization to the data cut-off date of 07 March 2014; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for the lenalidomide arm and 13.1 weeks for the investigators choice arm
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | 69.4 |
Investigators Choice | 63.1 |
Tumor control rate was defined as the percentage of participants with a complete response (CR), unconfirmed complete response (CRu), partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD). Tumor Response was assessed by a modification of the International Lymphoma Workshop Response Criteria, IWRC, Cheson, 1999); CR is defined as the disappearance of all clinical and radiographic evidence of disease; CRu is defined as a CR, with a 1) residual lymph node mass >1.5 cm that has decreased by 75% in the sum of the product of the diameters (SPD). Individual nodes previously confluent decreased by more than 75% in the SPD compared with original mass; 2) indeterminate bone marrow; PR = is defined ≥50% decrease in 6 largest nodes or nodal masses. Stable disease (SD) is defined as less than a PR (see above) but is not progressive disease or relapsed disease. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: From date of randomization to the discontinuation date of 09 October 2018; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for the lenalidomide arm and 13.1 weeks for the investigators choice arm
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | 70.0 |
Investigators Choice | 65.5 |
The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Appetite Loss Domain was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Change from Baseline to Cycle 3 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Cycle 5 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Cycle 7 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Cycle 9 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Treatment Discontinuation | |
Investigators Choice | 16.2 | -0.8 | 5.1 | -12.5 | -11.1 | 5.4 |
Lenalidomide | 18.1 | 2.5 | 1.9 | -2.3 | -4.3 | 4.8 |
The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Cognitive Functioning Domain ranges from 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Change from Baseline to Cycle 3 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Cycle 5 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Cycle 7 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Cycle 9 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Treatment Discontinuation | |
Investigators Choice | 83.6 | -2.3 | 1.3 | 4.2 | 5.6 | -2.3 |
Lenalidomide | 84.6 | 0.0 | -1.9 | -3.2 | -2.5 | -5.1 |
The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Constipation Domain was scored between 0 and 100, with a high score representing worse symptomatic expression. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Change from Baseline to Cycle 3 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Cycle 5 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Cycle 7 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Cycle 9 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Treatment Discontinuation | |
Investigators Choice | 8.6 | -0.8 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 |
Lenalidomide | 12.5 | 6.3 | 4.2 | 3.5 | -0.7 | 10.2 |
The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Diarhoea Domain was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Change from Baseline to Cycle 3 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Cycle 5 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Cycle 7 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Cycle 9 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Treatment Discontinuation | |
Investigators Choice | 12.6 | -3.1 | 1.3 | -4.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Lenalidomide | 15.7 | -3.5 | -4.2 | 2.4 | -2.1 | 1.6 |
The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Dyspnoea Domain was scored between 0 and 100, with a high score representing worse symptomatic expression. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Change from Baseline to Cycle 3 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Cycle 5 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Cycle 7 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Cycle 9 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Treatment Discontinuation | |
Investigators Choice | 21.2 | -0.8 | 0.0 | 4.2 | 5.6 | 0.8 |
Lenalidomide | 26.5 | -1.6 | -1.4 | -2.9 | 1.4 | 6.0 |
The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Emotional Domain ranges from 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Change from Baseline to Cycle 3 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Cycle 5 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Cycle 7 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Cycle 9 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Treatment Discontinuation | |
Investigators Choice | 78.5 | 1.3 | 1.3 | -3.1 | 1.4 | -1.5 |
Lenalidomide | 73.7 | 3.4 | 3.6 | 8.1 | 4.5 | -1.3 |
The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Fatigue Domain was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Change from Baseline to Cycle 3 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Cycle 5 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Cycle 7 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Cycle 9 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Treatment Discontinuation | |
Investigators Choice | 39.2 | 2.1 | 3.4 | -6.9 | -7.4 | 2.6 |
Lenalidomide | 40.2 | 0.1 | -3.2 | -1.0 | -3.9 | 5.2 |
The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Financial Problems Domain was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Change from Baseline to Cycle 3 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Cycle 5 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Cycle 7 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Cycle 9 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Treatment Discontinuation | |
Investigators Choice | 10.8 | -0.8 | -3.8 | -4.2 | -5.6 | 1.6 |
Lenalidomide | 19.5 | -7.0 | -7.0 | -2.9 | -9.2 | -4.3 |
The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status / QoL Domain was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing a higher quality of life. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Change from Baseline to Cycle 3 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Cycle 5 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Cycle 7 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Cycle 9 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Treatment Discontinuation | |
Investigators Choice | 58.4 | 2.3 | 3.2 | 7.3 | 8.3 | -1.0 |
Lenalidomide | 59.0 | -3.4 | -0.7 | 1.0 | 4.3 | -5.8 |
The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Insomnia Domain was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Change from Baseline to Cycle 3 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Cycle 5 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Cycle 7 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Cycle 9 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Treatment Discontinuation | |
Investigators Choice | 25.7 | -4.7 | -6.4 | -16.7 | -16.7 | 0.8 |
Lenalidomide | 29.4 | -7.6 | -5.2 | -1.8 | -7.1 | -3.2 |
The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Nausea and Vomiting Domain was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Change from Baseline to Cycle 3 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Cycle 5 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Cycle 7 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Cycle 9 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Treatment Discontinuation | |
Investigators Choice | 3.8 | 0.4 | 5.8 | 2.1 | 2.8 | 6.6 |
Lenalidomide | 4.9 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 5.3 | -0.7 | 0.5 |
The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Pain Domain was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Cycle 3 Day 1 | Cycle 5 Day 1 | Cycle 7 Day 1 | Cycle 9 Day 1 | Treatment Discontinuation | |
Investigators Choice | 13.7 | -1.2 | -2.6 | 0.0 | -2.8 | 3.5 |
Lenalidomide | 22.6 | -2.2 | -0.2 | 3.2 | -3.2 | 4.6 |
The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Scale ranges from 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Change from Baseline to Cycle 3 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Cycle 5 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Cycle 7 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Cycle 9 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Treatment Discontinuation | |
Investigators Choice | 78.9 | -3.7 | -2.1 | 4.2 | 11.1 | -5.1 |
Lenalidomide | 71.8 | -0.5 | 1.6 | 2.4 | 2.8 | -5.6 |
The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Role Functioning Scale ranges from 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Change from Baseline to Cycle 3 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Cycle 5 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Cycle 7 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Cycle 9 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Treatment Discontinuation | |
Investigators Choice | 73.9 | 3.5 | -6.4 | 0.0 | 13.9 | -4.3 |
Lenalidomide | 71.5 | -4.8 | 1.4 | 0.3 | 1.8 | -9.1 |
The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Social Functioning Domain ranges from 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Change from Baseline to Cycle 3 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Cycle 5 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Cycle 7 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Cycle 9 Day 1 | Change from Baseline to Treatment Discontinuation | |
Investigators Choice | 78.4 | -1.2 | -4.5 | 2.1 | 0.0 | -2.7 |
Lenalidomide | 74.9 | -1.0 | 1.6 | -1.5 | 4.3 | -5.1 |
Adverse events were assessed using National Cancer Institute, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE), Version 3: according to the following scale: Grade 1 = Mild Adverse Event (AE), Grade 2 = Moderate AE, Grade 3 = Severe and Undesirable AE, Grade 4 = Life-threatening or Disabling AE, and Grade 5 = Death; Serious AEs (SAEs) are those that resulted in death, were life-threatening, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly, or resulted in an important medical event that may have jeopardized the patient or required medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. after the first dose of study drug and within 28 days after the last dose. A Treatment Emergent Adverse event (TEAE) is defined as any AE occurring or worsening on or after the first dose of study drug and within 28 days after the last dose of study drug. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: From the date of the first dose of study drug to 28 days after the last dose, up to the study discontinuation date of 09 October 2018; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigators choice arm
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Any TEAE | Any TEAE Grade 3 AE | Any TEAE Grade 4 AE | Any TEAE Grade 5 AE | Any TEAE Related to the IP | Any Grade 3 AE Related to IP | Any Grade 4 AE Related to IP | Any Grade 5 AE Related to IP | Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE) | Any SAE Related to IP | Any TEAE Leading to Stopping of IP | Any Treatment Related AE Leading to Stopping IP | TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction/Interruption | Related AE Leading to Dose Reduct/Interruption | TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction | Related AE Leading to Dose Reduction | TEAE Leading to Dose Interruption | Related AE Leading to Dose Interruption | |
Investigators Choice | 69 | 49 | 29 | 2 | 51 | 36 | 19 | 0 | 22 | 12 | 14 | 7 | 33 | 29 | 13 | 10 | 28 | 25 |
Lenalidomide | 159 | 126 | 56 | 15 | 141 | 106 | 46 | 0 | 75 | 38 | 31 | 18 | 114 | 103 | 72 | 69 | 110 | 98 |
"Kaplan-Meier estimates for the duration of response were calculated for responders and defined as the time from at least a partial response (PR) to progression of disease (PD) or death due to Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.~For response assessment criteria (per Cheson, 1999) see the primary outcome measure in this results posting." (NCT00413036)
Timeframe: Up to 1459 days
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | 18.4 |
"Kaplan-Meier estimate of progression-free survival is defined as start of study drug therapy to the first observation of progressive disease or death due to any cause, whichever comes first.~Response assessed according to Cheson, Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1999. Full definition of progressive disease, refer to Cheson article.~Progressive Disease(PD): Appearance of new lesion during/end of therapy; >=50% increase from lowest measurement in SPD." (NCT00413036)
Timeframe: Up to 1459 days
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | 4.5 |
"Kaplan-Meier estimate of time-to-progression is calculated as time from the start of study drug therapy to the first observation of disease progression.~Response assessed according to Cheson, Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1999. Full definition of progressive disease, refer to Cheson article.~Progressive Disease(PD): Appearance of new lesion during/end of therapy; >=50% increase from lowest measurement in SPD." (NCT00413036)
Timeframe: Up to 1459 days
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | 4.5 |
"Response assessed according to Cheson, Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1999. Full definitions, refer to Cheson article.~Complete Response(CR): Complete disappearance of all detectable disease and disease-related symptoms if present before therapy; normalization of lab abnormalities assignable to NHL. If bone marrow involved before treatment, must be cleared on repeat biopsy.~Complete Response Unconfirmed(CRu): CR, with one of the following: 1)residual lymph node mass >1.5 cm that has decreased by 75% in the sum of the product of the diameters(SPD). Individual nodes previously confluent decreased by more than 75% in the SPD compared with original mass; 2)indeterminate bone marrow.~Partial Response(PR): >50% decrease in 6 largest nodes or nodal masses. Nodes selected according to Cheson.~Stable Disease(SD): Less than PR, but not progressive disease.~Progressive Disease(PD): Appearance of new lesion during/end of therapy; >=50% increase from lowest measurement in SPD." (NCT00413036)
Timeframe: Up to 1459 days
Intervention | Participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Complete Response (CR) | Complete Response Unconfirmed (CRu) | Partial Response (PR) | Stable Disease (SD) | Progressive Disease | |
Lenalidomide | 7 | 21 | 40 | 71 | 78 |
The primary endpoint of overall response rate will be estimated and a 95% confidence interval will be estimated via binomial proportions. (NCT01472562)
Timeframe: 30 months
Intervention | percentage of patients (Number) |
---|---|
All Patients | 92 |
The duration of response was calculated as the first response assessment demonstrating evidence of at least a partial response to the first documentation of progressive disease (as determined by computed tomography scan) or death due to NHL, whichever occurred first. For participants without documentation of progression, the duration of response was censored at the last date of tumor assessment indicating no progression. Median was based on the Kaplan-Meier estimate. (NCT00179660)
Timeframe: From enrollment through study completion. Median duration on study was 3.7 months, with a maximum of 32.5 months.
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | 10.2 |
The duration of tumor control was calculated as the time from the first response assessment demonstrating at least stable disease to the first documentation of progressive disease or death due to NHL. For participants without documentation of progression, the duration of response was censored at the last date of tumor assessment indicating no progression. Median was based on the Kaplan-Meier estimate. (NCT00179660)
Timeframe: From enrollment through study completion. Median duration on study was 3.7 months, with a maximum of 32.5 months.
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | 6.0 |
"Response was defined as participants with a complete response (CR), unconfirmed complete response (Cru) or partial response (PR), assessed using the International Workshop Lymphoma Response Criteria (IWLRC) and based on best responses as determined by the investigator.~CR: Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical and radiographic evidence of disease, disappearance of any disease-related symptoms, and normalization of biochemical abnormalities.~Cru: Criteria for CR above but with 1 or more of the following:~A residual lymph node mass > 1.5 cm in greatest transverse diameter that has regressed by more than 75% in the sum of the products of diameters (SPD)~Indeterminate bone marrow (increased number or size of aggregates without cytologic or architectural atypia).~PR: 50% decrease in SPD of the 6 largest dominant nodes or nodal masses. No increase in the size of other nodes, liver, or spleen. Splenic and hepatic nodules must regress by at least 50% in the SPD." (NCT00179660)
Timeframe: From enrollment through study completion. Median duration on study was 3.7 months, with a maximum of 32.5 months.
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | 34.7 |
"Tumor control was defined as participants with a complete response, unconfirmed complete response, partial response or stable disease (SD), assessed using the International Workshop Lymphoma Response Criteria (IWLRC) and based on best responses as determined by the investigator.~SD was defined as a response less than a PR (see above) but not Progressive Disease (PD).~PD was defined as~≥ 50 % increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously identified abnormal node for partial responders or non-responders.~Appearance of any new lesion during or at the end of therapy." (NCT00179660)
Timeframe: From enrollment through study completion. Median duration on study was 3.7 months, with a maximum of 32.5 months.
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | 59.2 |
"Progression-free survival was defined as the time from the start of study drug therapy to the first observation of disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever came first.~Participants who withdrew for any reason or received another NHL therapy including stem cell transplantation without documented progressive disease were censored on the date of their last adequate response assessment indicating no progression (or last adequate assessment prior to receiving other NHL therapy). Participants who were still active without progressive disease at the time of the data cut-off date were censored on the date of their last adequate response assessment." (NCT00179660)
Timeframe: From enrollment through study completion. Median duration on study was 3.7 months, with a maximum of 32.5 months.
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide | 3.6 |
"The Investigator determined the relationship between the administration of study drug and the occurrence of an AE as suspected if the temporal relationship of the adverse event to study drug administration made a causal relationship possible, and other drugs, therapeutic interventions, or underlying conditions did not provide a sufficient explanation for the observed event.~The Investigator graded the severity of AEs according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) criteria and the following scale:~Grade 1 = Mild~Grade 2 = Moderate~Grade 3 = Severe~Grade 4 = Life threatening~Grade 5 = Death~A Serious AE is defined as any AE which results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or constitutes an important medical event." (NCT00179660)
Timeframe: From the start of study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug. Maximum time on study drug was 15.2 months.
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Any adverse event | Adverse event related to study drug | Grade 3-5 adverse event | Grade 3-5 adverse event related to study drug | Serious adverse event | Serious adverse event related to study drug | AE leading to discontinuation of study drug | Related AE leading to study drug discontinuation | AE leading to dose reduction or interruption | |
Lenalidomide | 49 | 42 | 36 | 27 | 21 | 6 | 9 | 4 | 28 |
Stromal angiogenesis was assessed using blood vascular and perivascular markers, including VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, CD34, and a-SMA, as well as lymphatic vascular markers ofVEGFR-3, podoplanin, and Lyve-1. (NCT00151281)
Timeframe: 38 months
Intervention | pg/mL (Median) |
---|---|
RT-PEPC Drug Therapy | 109.5 |
measured by overall Response Rate (ORR), which includes Complete response and partial response. (NCT00151281)
Timeframe: 38 months
Intervention | percentage of patients (Number) |
---|---|
Study Treatment Arm | 73 |
Toxicities were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0. (NCT00151281)
Timeframe: 38 months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia | Anemia | Thrombocytopenia | Fatigue | Constipation | Cough | Nausea | Neuropathy | Dyspnea | Rash | |
RT-PEPC Drug Therapy | 14 | 1 | 4 | 22 | 14 | 14 | 13 | 13 | 11 | 10 |
"QoL assessments were obtained with version 3 of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) instrument. The FACT-G is comprised of four subscales: physical well-being (7-items, score range 0-28), social/family well-being (7-items, score range 0-28), emotional well-being (6-items, score range 0-24), and functional well-being (7-items, score range 0-28). Users of the FACT-G are able to generate an overall score and four subscale scores with ranges and distributions that are sample-specific. All questions in the FACT-G use a 5-point rating scale (0 = Not at all to 4 = Very much) A higher number indicates a better Quality of Life, and has a possible range of 0-108 points.~ANOVA was used to compare the difference in the means of total score among the different time points (baseline, every 2M until 6M, and every 6M until PD). The mean of the total FACT-G scores at baseline and mean of total score at all timepoints (using ANOVA) are reported below." (NCT00151281)
Timeframe: baseline, every 2 months until Month 6, and every 6 months until disease progression
Intervention | FACT-G score (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Mean FACT-G Score at baseline | Mean Total FACT-G Score between all time points | |
RT-PEPC Drug Therapy | 83.3 | 89.4 |
MTD is defined as the highest dose level in which 1 or fewer participants experienced a dose limiting toxicity (DLT) in 6 participants treated. DLT is any grade III or IV toxicity during the first 28 days (first cycle) of therapy. (NCT00294632)
Timeframe: 28 days of cycle 1
Intervention | mg (Number) |
---|---|
Phase I: Lenalidomide + Rituximab | 20 |
Objective response rate defined as percentage of participants with complete or partial response after 2 cycles of therapy maintained for one month. Objective response monitored using Simon's optimal 2-stage design. (NCT00294632)
Timeframe: 56 days
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Lenalidomide + Rituximab | 57 |
16 reviews available for thalidomide and Diffuse Lymphocytic Lymphoma, Poorly-Differentiated
Article | Year |
---|---|
Therapies for mantle cell lymphoma: current challenges and a brighter future.
Topics: Antibodies; Antineoplastic Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Combined Modality Therapy; Cyclin D1; E | 2013 |
Therapeutic effects of thalidomide in hematologic disorders: a review.
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Clinical Trials as Topic; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematologic Neoplasms; Hum | 2013 |
Recent advances in the management of mantle cell lymphoma.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antineopla | 2013 |
Ibrutinib in B-cell Lymphomas.
Topics: Adenine; Agammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine Kinase; Antineoplastic Agents; Boronic Acids; Bortezomib; Clin | 2014 |
A comprehensive review of lenalidomide therapy for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bendamustine | 2015 |
Lenalidomide for mantle cell lymphoma.
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Animals; Humans; Immunologic Factors; Lenalidomide; Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell; | 2015 |
Practical Management of Lenalidomide-Related Rash.
Topics: Exanthema; Humans; Lenalidomide; Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell; Multiple Myeloma; Thalidomide | 2015 |
Treatment options for mantle cell lymphoma.
Topics: Adenine; Antineoplastic Agents; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; | 2015 |
Mantle Cell Lymphoma.
Topics: Adenine; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bendamustine Hydroch | 2016 |
Clinical experience with lenalidomide alone or in combination with rituximab in indolent B-cell and mantle cell lymphomas.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; B-Lymphocytes; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Drug-Relat | 2016 |
Lenalidomide for the treatment of B-cell lymphoma.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Trials as Topic; Disease-Free Survival; Hum | 2016 |
The emerging role of lenalidomide in the management of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clini | 2012 |
Autologous transplantation and management of younger patients with mantle cell lymphoma.
Topics: Age Factors; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; | 2012 |
Update on the molecular pathogenesis and clinical treatment of mantle cell lymphoma: report of the 11th annual conference of the European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Network.
Topics: Age Factors; Antineoplastic Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell; Thalido | 2013 |
[Thalidomide combined with interferon in relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma: two cases report and literatures review].
Topics: Humans; Interferons; Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell; Male; Middle Aged; Thalidomide | 2012 |
Treatment of mantle cell lymphoma: targeting the microenvironment.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplasti | 2005 |
27 trials available for thalidomide and Diffuse Lymphocytic Lymphoma, Poorly-Differentiated
Article | Year |
---|---|
R-MACLO-IVAM regimen followed by maintenance therapy induces durable remissions in untreated mantle cell lymphoma - Long term follow up results.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cyclopho | 2021 |
R-MACLO-IVAM regimen followed by maintenance therapy induces durable remissions in untreated mantle cell lymphoma - Long term follow up results.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cyclopho | 2021 |
R-MACLO-IVAM regimen followed by maintenance therapy induces durable remissions in untreated mantle cell lymphoma - Long term follow up results.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cyclopho | 2021 |
R-MACLO-IVAM regimen followed by maintenance therapy induces durable remissions in untreated mantle cell lymphoma - Long term follow up results.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cyclopho | 2021 |
Long-term analysis of phase II studies of single-agent lenalidomide in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anemia; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease-Free Su | 2017 |
Activity of lenalidomide in mantle cell lymphoma can be explained by NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity.
Topics: Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing; Adenine; Coculture Techniques; Cytotoxicity, Immunologic; Dose | 2017 |
Prospective subgroup analyses of the randomized MCL-002 (SPRINT) study: lenalidomide versus investigator's choice in relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Follow-Up Studies | 2018 |
Ibrutinib, lenalidomide, and rituximab in relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (PHILEMON): a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial.
Topics: Adenine; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers, Tumor; | 2018 |
Single-agent lenalidomide in patients with mantle-cell lymphoma who relapsed or progressed after or were refractory to bortezomib: phase II MCL-001 (EMERGE) study.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents; Boronic Acids; Borte | 2013 |
Single-agent lenalidomide in patients with mantle-cell lymphoma who relapsed or progressed after or were refractory to bortezomib: phase II MCL-001 (EMERGE) study.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents; Boronic Acids; Borte | 2013 |
Single-agent lenalidomide in patients with mantle-cell lymphoma who relapsed or progressed after or were refractory to bortezomib: phase II MCL-001 (EMERGE) study.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents; Boronic Acids; Borte | 2013 |
Single-agent lenalidomide in patients with mantle-cell lymphoma who relapsed or progressed after or were refractory to bortezomib: phase II MCL-001 (EMERGE) study.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents; Boronic Acids; Borte | 2013 |
Long-term follow-up of lenalidomide in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma: subset analysis of the NHL-003 study.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug-Related Si | 2013 |
Long-term follow-up of lenalidomide in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma: subset analysis of the NHL-003 study.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug-Related Si | 2013 |
Long-term follow-up of lenalidomide in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma: subset analysis of the NHL-003 study.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug-Related Si | 2013 |
Long-term follow-up of lenalidomide in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma: subset analysis of the NHL-003 study.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug-Related Si | 2013 |
Combined lenalidomide, low-dose dexamethasone, and rituximab achieves durable responses in rituximab-resistant indolent and mantle cell lymphomas.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antineoplastic Combined Chem | 2014 |
Combination biologic therapy without chemotherapy as initial treatment for mantle cell lymphoma: multi- center phase II study of lenalidomide plus rituximab.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antineoplastic Combined Chem | 2014 |
Therapy with bortezomib plus lenalidomide for relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma: final results of a phase II trial (CALGB 50501).
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bortezomib; Disease- | 2015 |
Combination of Lenalidomide and Rituximab Overcomes Rituximab Resistance in Patients with Indolent B-cell and Mantle Cell Lymphomas.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Drug Resistance, Neo | 2015 |
Updated survival analysis of two sequential prospective trials of R-MACLO-IVAM followed by maintenance for newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; | 2015 |
Longer-term follow-up and outcome by tumour cell proliferation rate (Ki-67) in patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma treated with lenalidomide on MCL-001(EMERGE) pivotal trial.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Biomarkers, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Dise | 2015 |
Lenalidomide plus Rituximab as Initial Treatment for Mantle-Cell Lymphoma.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antineoplastic Combined Chem | 2015 |
Lenalidomide versus investigator's choice in relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL-002; SPRINT): a phase 2, randomised, multicentre trial.
Topics: Aged; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents; Confidence Intervals; Disease-Free Survival; D | 2016 |
Second-line rituximab, lenalidomide, and bendamustine in mantle cell lymphoma: a phase II clinical trial of the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bendamustine Hydrochloride; | 2017 |
Lenalidomide monotherapy in relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease-Free Survival; | 2008 |
Lenalidomide monotherapy in relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease-Free Survival; | 2008 |
Lenalidomide monotherapy in relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease-Free Survival; | 2008 |
Lenalidomide monotherapy in relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease-Free Survival; | 2008 |
Lenalidomide monotherapy in relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease-Free Survival; | 2008 |
Lenalidomide monotherapy in relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease-Free Survival; | 2008 |
Lenalidomide monotherapy in relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease-Free Survival; | 2008 |
Lenalidomide monotherapy in relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease-Free Survival; | 2008 |
Lenalidomide monotherapy in relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease-Free Survival; | 2008 |
Lenalidomide oral monotherapy produces a high response rate in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Ad | 2009 |
High rate and prolonged duration of complete remissions induced by rituximab, methotrexate, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, ifosfamide, etoposide, cytarabine, and thalidomide (R-MACLO-IVAM-T), a modification of the National Cancer Institute 89
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antineoplastic Combined | 2010 |
High rate and prolonged duration of complete remissions induced by rituximab, methotrexate, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, ifosfamide, etoposide, cytarabine, and thalidomide (R-MACLO-IVAM-T), a modification of the National Cancer Institute 89
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antineoplastic Combined | 2010 |
High rate and prolonged duration of complete remissions induced by rituximab, methotrexate, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, ifosfamide, etoposide, cytarabine, and thalidomide (R-MACLO-IVAM-T), a modification of the National Cancer Institute 89
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antineoplastic Combined | 2010 |
High rate and prolonged duration of complete remissions induced by rituximab, methotrexate, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, ifosfamide, etoposide, cytarabine, and thalidomide (R-MACLO-IVAM-T), a modification of the National Cancer Institute 89
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antineoplastic Combined | 2010 |
Durable responses with the metronomic rituximab and thalidomide plus prednisone, etoposide, procarbazine, and cyclophosphamide regimen in elderly patients with recurrent mantle cell lymphoma.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antineoplas | 2010 |
An international phase II trial of single-agent lenalidomide for relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Internatio | 2011 |
An international phase II trial of single-agent lenalidomide for relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Internatio | 2011 |
An international phase II trial of single-agent lenalidomide for relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Internatio | 2011 |
An international phase II trial of single-agent lenalidomide for relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Internatio | 2011 |
Salvage treatment with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma: clinical results and effects on microenvironment and neo-angiogenic biomarkers.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers; Dexamethasone; | 2012 |
Lenalidomide in combination with rituximab for patients with relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma: a phase 1/2 clinical trial.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherap | 2012 |
Single-agent lenalidomide in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma: results from a UK phase II study suggest activity and possible gender differences.
Topics: Adiponectin; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Humans; | 2012 |
Antitumor activity of rituximab plus thalidomide in patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma.
Topics: Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease | 2004 |
Does the combination of rituximab and thalidomide influence the long-term perspectives of advanced-stage MCL?
Topics: Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antineoplastic Combined Chemot | 2005 |
Thromboembolic events during treatment with thalidomide.
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antineoplas | 2002 |
33 other studies available for thalidomide and Diffuse Lymphocytic Lymphoma, Poorly-Differentiated
Article | Year |
---|---|
Clonal hematopoiesis is associated with hematological toxicity during lenalidomide-based therapy for MCL.
Topics: Clonal Hematopoiesis; Hematopoiesis; Humans; Lenalidomide; Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell; Neoplasm Recurrenc | 2022 |
Synergistic Cytotoxicity of Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Mantle Cell Lymphoma via Cereblon-dependent Targeting of the IL-6/STAT3/PI3K Axis.
Topics: Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Apoptosi | 2017 |
BET protein proteolysis targeting chimera (PROTAC) exerts potent lethal activity against mantle cell lymphoma cells.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Azepines; Cell Line, Tumor; Humans; Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell | 2018 |
The Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor CC-292 shows activity in mantle cell lymphoma and synergizes with lenalidomide and NIK inhibitors depending on nuclear factor-κB mutational status.
Topics: Acrylamides; Agammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine Kinase; Antineoplastic Agents; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; | 2017 |
Observational study of lenalidomide in patients with mantle cell lymphoma who relapsed/progressed after or were refractory/intolerant to ibrutinib (MCL-004).
Topics: Adenine; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Disease Progression; Female; Humans; Lenalidomide; Lymphoma, Mantl | 2017 |
Apremilast in a patient with psoriasis and mantle cell lymphoma under maintenance treatment with rituximab.
Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Humans; Lymphoma, Man | 2019 |
Lenalidomide inhibits lymphangiogenesis in preclinical models of mantle cell lymphoma.
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Animals; Cell Movement; Disease Models, Animal; Humans; Lenalidomide; Lymph | 2013 |
Antitumoral activity of lenalidomide in in vitro and in vivo models of mantle cell lymphoma involves the destabilization of cyclin D1/p27KIP1 complexes.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Transformation, Neop | 2014 |
Synergistic antitumor activity of lenalidomide with the BET bromodomain inhibitor CPI203 in bortezomib-resistant mantle cell lymphoma.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Boronic Acids; Bortezomib; Cell Differentiation; Cell Line, Tumor; D | 2014 |
Response of cutaneous lesion of mantle cell lymphoma to lenalidomide.
Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Humans; Immunologic Factors; Lenalidomide; Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell; Male; Skin; Ski | 2014 |
Combination of lenalidomide with vitamin D3 induces apoptosis in mantle cell lymphoma via demethylation of BIK.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins; bcl-2 Homo | 2014 |
The combination of bortezomib with enzastaurin or lenalidomide enhances cytotoxicity in follicular and mantle cell lymphoma cell lines.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Bortezomib; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Cell Survival; Drug Synergi | 2015 |
[Thalidomide combined with interferon in 12 cases of relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma].
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Humans; Interferons; Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell; Recurren | 2014 |
Lenalidomide in non-Hodgkin lymphoma: biological perspectives and therapeutic opportunities.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; | 2015 |
Haematological cancers: Lenalidomide--SPRINT to a new standard?
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents; Female; Humans; Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell; Male; Neoplas | 2016 |
Lenalidomide plus Rituximab for Mantle-Cell Lymphoma.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Female; Huma | 2016 |
Lenalidomide plus Rituximab for Mantle-Cell Lymphoma.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Female; Huma | 2016 |
Chemotherapy of mantle cell lymphoma relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.
Topics: Adenine; Antineoplastic Agents; Bendamustine Hydrochloride; Bortezomib; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17; | 2016 |
Genetic heterogeneity in primary and relapsed mantle cell lymphomas: Impact of recurrent CARD11 mutations.
Topics: Adenine; CARD Signaling Adaptor Proteins; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Genetic Heterogeneity; Guanylat | 2016 |
Late relapsing mantle cell lymphoma showing preserved sensitivity to single-agent lenalidomide.
Topics: Aged; Humans; Immunologic Factors; Lenalidomide; Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell; Recurrence; Remission Induct | 2016 |
Lenalidomide, as a single agent, induces complete remission in a refractory mantle cell lymphoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Female; Humans; Lenalidomide; Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell; Recurrence; Remiss | 2009 |
Synergistic antitumor effects of lenalidomide and rituximab on mantle cell lymphoma in vitro and in vivo.
Topics: Animals; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antineoplastic Combined Che | 2009 |
Activity of thalidomide and lenalidomide in mantle cell lymphoma.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antibody-Dependent Cell Cytotoxicity | 2010 |
Mantle cell lymphoma arising in a multiple myeloma patient responding to lenalidomide.
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antineoplas | 2010 |
Recent advances in the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma: a post-ASH 2009 discussion.
Topics: Bendamustine Hydrochloride; Humans; Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins; Lenalidomide; Lym | 2010 |
Lenalidomide-induced tumour flare reaction in mantle cell lymphoma.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Drug Eruptions; Fatal Outcome; Female; Humans; Lenalidomide; Leukocytosis; Ly | 2010 |
Lenalidomide synergizes with dexamethasone to induce growth arrest and apoptosis of mantle cell lymphoma cells in vitro and in vivo.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Apoptosis; Blotting, Western; Cell Cycle; C | 2011 |
Lenalidomide for aggressive B-cell lymphoma involving the central nervous system?
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Central Nervous System Neoplasms; Chromatography, Liquid; Humans; Lenal | 2011 |
Abnormal serum free light chain ratio predicts poor overall survival in mantle cell lymphoma.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Biomarkers, Tumor; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Immunoglobulin Light Chains; Lenalid | 2013 |
Response to thalidomide in chemotherapy-resistant mantle cell lymphoma: a case report.
Topics: Aged; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Fatal Outcome; Huma | 2002 |
A low toxicity maintenance regime, using eicosapentaenoic acid and readily available drugs, for mantle cell lymphoma and other malignancies with excess cyclin D1 levels.
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Cell Cycle; Clotrimazole; Cyclin D1; Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors; Eicosapenta | 2003 |
Thalidomide therapy induces response in relapsed mantle cell lymphoma.
Topics: Aged; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Drug Resistance, Neop | 2003 |
Managing patients with multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma: where are we now?
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boronic Acids; Bortezomib; Drug Monitoring; Humans; Lenalidomide; Lymphoma, M | 2007 |