Page last updated: 2024-11-05

thalidomide and Diffuse Lymphocytic Lymphoma, Poorly-Differentiated

thalidomide has been researched along with Diffuse Lymphocytic Lymphoma, Poorly-Differentiated in 76 studies

Thalidomide: A piperidinyl isoindole originally introduced as a non-barbiturate hypnotic, but withdrawn from the market due to teratogenic effects. It has been reintroduced and used for a number of immunological and inflammatory disorders. Thalidomide displays immunosuppressive and anti-angiogenic activity. It inhibits release of TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR-ALPHA from monocytes, and modulates other cytokine action.
thalidomide : A racemate comprising equimolar amounts of R- and S-thalidomide.
2-(2,6-dioxopiperidin-3-yl)-1H-isoindole-1,3(2H)-dione : A dicarboximide that is isoindole-1,3(2H)-dione in which the hydrogen attached to the nitrogen is substituted by a 2,6-dioxopiperidin-3-yl group.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"In this review, the authors describe the pharmacological properties of lenalidomide, and the rational for its use in B-cell lymphomas; focusing on diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL)."8.93Lenalidomide for the treatment of B-cell lymphoma. ( Bouabdallah, R; Coso, D; Garciaz, S; Schiano de Colella, JM, 2016)
"In this review, the authors describe the pharmacological properties of lenalidomide, and the rational for its use in B-cell lymphomas; focusing on diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL)."4.93Lenalidomide for the treatment of B-cell lymphoma. ( Bouabdallah, R; Coso, D; Garciaz, S; Schiano de Colella, JM, 2016)
"Lenalidomide is an oral non-chemotherapy immunomodulator with direct and indirect effects on non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) cells and with single-agent activity in relapsed/refractory aggressive and indolent B-cell NHL, including mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and follicular lymphoma."4.91A comprehensive review of lenalidomide therapy for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. ( Chiappella, A; Czuczman, MS; Fowler, N; Goy, A; Habermann, TM; Hernandez-Ilizaliturri, FJ; Nowakowski, GS; Vitolo, U; Witzig, TE, 2015)
"Lenalidomide (LEN) is an immunomodulatory drug with US Food and Drug Administration approval for use in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), multiple myeloma (MM), and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL)."4.91Practical Management of Lenalidomide-Related Rash. ( Kurtin, SE; Ridgeway, JA; Tinsley, SM, 2015)
"Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), which accounts for about 6% of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), is characterized by the chromosomal translocation t(11;14)(q13;q32), resulting in de-regulated expression of cyclin D1."4.89Therapies for mantle cell lymphoma: current challenges and a brighter future. ( Skarbnik, AP; Smith, MR, 2013)
"Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory agent approved in the US for patients with relapsed/refractory MCL following bortezomib based on results from 3 multicenter phase II studies (2 including relapsed/refractory aggressive NHL and 1 focusing on MCL post-bortezomib)."2.84Long-term analysis of phase II studies of single-agent lenalidomide in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma. ( Casadebaig Bravo, ML; Drach, J; Fu, T; Goy, A; Habermann, TM; Kalayoglu Besisik, S; Luigi Zinzani, P; Ramchandren, R; Takeshita, K; Tuscano, JM; Witzig, TE; Zhang, L, 2017)
"Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory agent that has demonstrated clinical benefit for patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL); however, despite this observed clinical activity, the mechanism of action (MOA) of lenalidomide has not been characterized in this setting."2.84Activity of lenalidomide in mantle cell lymphoma can be explained by NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity. ( Apollonio, B; Chiu, H; Chopra, R; Couto, S; Flynt, E; Gandhi, AK; Hagner, PR; Ortiz, M; Ramsay, AG; Thakurta, A; Trotter, M; Waldman, MF; Wang, M, 2017)
"Thalidomide maintenance was associated with significant toxicity and was subsequently modified to rituximab maintenance."2.80Updated survival analysis of two sequential prospective trials of R-MACLO-IVAM followed by maintenance for newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma. ( Arteaga, AG; Goodman, D; Hoffman, J; Hosein, PJ; Lossos, IS; Reis, I; Rosenblatt, JD; Sandoval-Sus, JD; Stefanovic, A, 2015)
"Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory drug with effects on the immune system that may enhance antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity and reverse tumor-induced immune suppression."2.79Combined lenalidomide, low-dose dexamethasone, and rituximab achieves durable responses in rituximab-resistant indolent and mantle cell lymphomas. ( Ahmadi, T; Aqui, NA; Chong, EA; Gordon, A; Mato, AR; Nasta, SD; Schuster, SJ; Svoboda, J, 2014)
"Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory agent with proven tumoricidal and antiproliferative activity in MCL."2.78Single-agent lenalidomide in patients with mantle-cell lymphoma who relapsed or progressed after or were refractory to bortezomib: phase II MCL-001 (EMERGE) study. ( Cicero, S; Drach, J; Fu, T; Goy, A; Kalayoglu Besisik, S; Ramchandren, R; Sinha, R; Williams, ME; Witzig, TE; Zhang, L, 2013)
"Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory agent demonstrating antitumor and antiproliferative effects in MCL."2.78Long-term follow-up of lenalidomide in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma: subset analysis of the NHL-003 study. ( Czuczman, MS; Haioun, C; Li, J; Polikoff, J; Prandi, K; Reeder, CB; Tilly, H; Vose, JM; Witzig, TE; Zhang, L; Zinzani, PL, 2013)
" We aimed to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of lenalidomide when combined with rituximab in a phase 1 trial and to assess the efficacy and safety of this combination in a phase 2 trial in patients with relapsed or refractory MCL."2.77Lenalidomide in combination with rituximab for patients with relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma: a phase 1/2 clinical trial. ( Badillo, M; Bejarano, M; Bell, N; Byrne, C; Cabanillas, F; Champlin, R; Chen, W; Chen, Y; Fanale, M; Fayad, L; Feng, L; Fowler, N; Hagemeister, F; Hartig, K; Kwak, L; McLaughlin, P; Neelapu, SS; Newberry, KJ; Romaguera, J; Samaniego, F; Sun, L; Wagner-Bartak, N; Wang, M; Younes, A; Young, KH; Zeldis, J; Zhang, L, 2012)
"Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory agent with antitumor activity in B-cell malignancies."2.76An international phase II trial of single-agent lenalidomide for relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. ( Bouabdallah, R; Buckstein, R; Czuczman, MS; Ervin-Haynes, AL; Guo, P; Haioun, C; Pietronigro, D; Polikoff, JA; Reeder, CB; Tilly, H; Vose, JM; Witzig, TE; Zinzani, PL, 2011)
"Oral lenalidomide 25 mg was self-administered once daily on days 1-21 every 28 d for up to 52 weeks, according to tolerability or until disease progression."2.74Lenalidomide oral monotherapy produces a high response rate in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma. ( Ervin-Haynes, A; Habermann, TM; Justice, G; Lossos, IS; McBride, K; Pietronigro, D; Takeshita, K; Tuscano, JM; Vose, JM; Wiernik, PH; Wride, K; Zeldis, JB, 2009)
"Lenalidomide has activity in a variety of hematologic malignancies, including non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL)."2.73Lenalidomide monotherapy in relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. ( Cole, CE; Ervin-Haynes, A; Habermann, TM; Justice, G; Lam, W; Lossos, IS; McBride, K; Pietronigro, D; Takeshita, K; Tuscano, JM; Vose, JM; Wiernik, PH; Wride, K; Zeldis, JB, 2008)
"Lenalidomide is an oral immunomodulatory drug with significant activity in indolent B-cell and mantle cell lymphomas."2.53Clinical experience with lenalidomide alone or in combination with rituximab in indolent B-cell and mantle cell lymphomas. ( Martin, P; Ruan, J; Schuster, SJ; Shah, B, 2016)
"Lenalidomide is an approved medication for relapsed mantle cell lymphoma in patients who received at least two lines of therapy, including bortezomib."2.52Lenalidomide for mantle cell lymphoma. ( Goy, AH; Skarbnik, AP, 2015)
"Lenalidomide-based treatment showed clinical activity, with no unexpected toxicities, in patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma who previously failed ibrutinib therapy."1.46Observational study of lenalidomide in patients with mantle cell lymphoma who relapsed/progressed after or were refractory/intolerant to ibrutinib (MCL-004). ( Barnett, E; Bravo, MC; Ghosh, N; Goy, A; Hamadani, M; Lossos, IS; Martin, P; Phillips, T; Reeder, CB; Rule, S; Schuster, SJ; Wang, M, 2017)
"Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) with activity in lymphoid malignancies occurring primarily through immune modulation (eg, T-cell immune synapse enhancement and NK-cell/T-cell effector augmentation) and antiproliferative effects."1.42Lenalidomide in non-Hodgkin lymphoma: biological perspectives and therapeutic opportunities. ( Coyle, M; Evens, AM; Kritharis, A; Sharma, J, 2015)
"Lenalidomide was particularly active in this subgroup of tumors, targeting IRF4 expression and plasmacytic differentiation program, thus overcoming bortezomib resistance."1.40Synergistic antitumor activity of lenalidomide with the BET bromodomain inhibitor CPI203 in bortezomib-resistant mantle cell lymphoma. ( Balsas, P; Campo, E; Colomer, D; Martínez, A; Montraveta, A; Moros, A; Normant, E; Pérez-Galán, P; Rodríguez, V; Roué, G; Saborit-Villarroya, I; Sandy, P; Wiestner, A, 2014)
"Lenalidomide (Len) has been demonstrated to be one of the most efficient new treatment options."1.40Combination of lenalidomide with vitamin D3 induces apoptosis in mantle cell lymphoma via demethylation of BIK. ( Amiot, M; Brosseau, C; Dousset, C; Le Gouill, S; Maïga, S; Moreau, P; Pellat-Deceunynck, C; Touzeau, C, 2014)
"Lenalidomide treatment resulted in a significant reduction in the number of MCL-associated macrophages."1.39Lenalidomide inhibits lymphangiogenesis in preclinical models of mantle cell lymphoma. ( Chen, H; Fu, J; Herzog, BH; McDaniel, JM; Ruan, J; Sheng, M; Song, K; Xia, L, 2013)

Research

Studies (76)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's12 (15.79)29.6817
2010's62 (81.58)24.3611
2020's2 (2.63)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Husby, S1
Bæch-Laursen, C1
Eskelund, CW2
Favero, F1
Jespersen, JS1
Hutchings, M2
Pedersen, LB2
Niemann, CU2
Weischenfeldt, J1
Räty, R2
Larsen, TS1
Kolstad, A2
Jerkeman, M2
Grønbæk, K2
Alderuccio, JP1
Saul, EE1
Iyer, SG1
Reis, IM1
Alencar, AJ1
Rosenblatt, JD3
Lossos, IS6
Ma, J1
Wu, K1
Bai, W1
Cui, X1
Chen, Y2
Xie, Y2
Sun, B1
Fiskus, W1
Qian, Y1
Rajapakshe, K1
Raina, K1
Coleman, KG1
Crew, AP1
Shen, A1
Saenz, DT1
Mill, CP1
Nowak, AJ1
Jain, N1
Zhang, L9
Wang, M6
Khoury, JD1
Coarfa, C1
Crews, CM1
Bhalla, KN1
Witzig, TE5
Luigi Zinzani, P1
Habermann, TM4
Tuscano, JM3
Drach, J6
Ramchandren, R3
Kalayoglu Besisik, S3
Takeshita, K3
Casadebaig Bravo, ML2
Fu, T3
Goy, A5
Hagner, PR1
Chiu, H1
Ortiz, M1
Apollonio, B1
Couto, S1
Waldman, MF1
Flynt, E1
Ramsay, AG1
Trotter, M1
Gandhi, AK1
Chopra, R1
Thakurta, A1
Vidal-Crespo, A1
Rodriguez, V2
Matas-Cespedes, A1
Lee, E1
Rivas-Delgado, A1
Giné, E1
Navarro, A1
Beà, S2
Campo, E3
López-Guillermo, A1
Lopez-Guerra, M1
Roué, G3
Colomer, D3
Pérez-Galán, P2
Schuster, SJ5
Phillips, T1
Rule, S4
Hamadani, M1
Ghosh, N1
Reeder, CB3
Barnett, E1
Bravo, MC2
Martin, P4
Arcaini, L2
Lamy, T2
Walewski, J2
Belada, D2
Mayer, J2
Radford, J2
Jurczak, W3
Morschhauser, F2
Alexeeva, J2
Cabeçadas, J1
Pileri, SA3
Biyukov, T2
Patturajan, M2
Trnĕný, M2
Wader, KF1
Laurell, A1
Toldbod, H1
Dahl, C1
Kuitunen, H1
Geisler, CH2
Peitsch, WK1
Skarbnik, AP2
Smith, MR1
Xu, M1
Hou, Y1
Sheng, L1
Peng, J1
Sinha, R1
Williams, ME2
Cicero, S2
Zinzani, PL2
Vose, JM4
Czuczman, MS4
Haioun, C2
Polikoff, J1
Tilly, H2
Prandi, K1
Li, J1
Rivera-Rodriguez, N1
Cabanillas, F2
Ahmadi, T2
Chong, EA2
Gordon, A1
Aqui, NA2
Nasta, SD2
Svoboda, J3
Mato, AR2
Song, K1
Herzog, BH1
Sheng, M1
Fu, J1
McDaniel, JM1
Chen, H1
Ruan, J5
Xia, L1
Moros, A2
Bustany, S1
Cahu, J1
Saborit-Villarroya, I2
Martínez, A2
Sola, B1
Maddocks, K1
Blum, KA2
Montraveta, A1
Balsas, P1
Sandy, P1
Wiestner, A1
Normant, E1
Mishchenko, E1
Attias, D1
Tadmor, T1
Morrison, VA1
Jung, SH1
Johnson, J1
LaCasce, A1
Bartlett, NL1
Pitcher, BN1
Cheson, BD1
Brosseau, C1
Dousset, C1
Touzeau, C1
Maïga, S1
Moreau, P1
Amiot, M1
Le Gouill, S1
Pellat-Deceunynck, C1
Cosenza, M1
Civallero, M1
Pozzi, S1
Marcheselli, L1
Bari, A1
Sacchi, S1
Hao, Q1
Wei, X1
Yin, Q1
Mi, R1
Yuan, F1
Ai, H1
Wang, P1
Li, Y1
Song, Y1
Walsh, KM1
Nowakowski, GS1
Hernandez-Ilizaliturri, FJ1
Chiappella, A2
Vitolo, U3
Fowler, N2
Kritharis, A1
Coyle, M1
Sharma, J1
Evens, AM1
Hosein, PJ2
Sandoval-Sus, JD1
Goodman, D1
Arteaga, AG1
Reis, I1
Hoffman, J1
Stefanovic, A1
Robertson, MJ1
Avivi, I1
Rowe, JM1
Herbrecht, R1
Van Hoof, A1
Witzig, T1
Goy, AH1
Tinsley, SM1
Kurtin, SE1
Ridgeway, JA1
Smolewski, P1
Witkowska, M1
Robak, T1
Shah, B2
Smith, SM1
Furman, RR2
Christos, P1
Rodriguez, A1
Lewis, J1
Katz, O1
Coleman, M2
Leonard, JP4
Cheah, CY1
Seymour, JF1
Wang, ML1
Afanasyev, B1
Kaplanov, K1
Thyss, A1
Kuzmin, A1
Voloshin, S1
Kuliczkowski, K1
Giza, A1
Milpied, N1
Stelitano, C2
Marks, R1
Trümper, L1
Hutchinson, L1
Tsuda, K1
Tanimoto, T1
Komatsu, T1
Wu, C1
de Miranda, NF1
Chen, L1
Wasik, AM1
Mansouri, L1
Galazka, K1
Dlugosz-Danecka, M1
Machaczka, M1
Zhang, H1
Peng, R1
Morin, RD1
Rosenquist, R1
Sander, B1
Pan-Hammarström, Q1
Tempescul, A2
Ianotto, JC2
Bagacean, C1
Salaun, PY1
Bocsan, C1
Zdrenghea, M1
Garciaz, S1
Coso, D1
Schiano de Colella, JM1
Bouabdallah, R2
Zaja, F2
Ferrero, S1
Ferrari, A1
Salvi, F2
Arcari, A1
Musuraca, G1
Botto, B1
Spina, M1
Cellini, C1
Patti, C1
Liberati, AM1
Minotto, C1
Ceccarelli, M1
Volpetti, S2
Ferranti, A1
Drandi, D1
Montechiarello, E1
Ladetto, M1
Carmichael, J1
Fanin, R2
Wiernik, PH2
Justice, G2
Cole, CE1
Lam, W1
McBride, K2
Wride, K2
Pietronigro, D3
Ervin-Haynes, A2
Zeldis, JB2
Morel, F1
Marion, V1
De Braekeleer, M1
Berthou, C1
Qian, Z2
Cai, Z2
Sun, L3
Wang, H2
Bartlett, JB1
Yi, Q2
Richardson, SJ2
Eve, HE3
Copplestone, JA1
Dyer, MJ1
Rule, SA3
Morgensztern, D1
Coleman, F1
Escalón, MP1
Byrne, GE1
Walker, GR1
Dasanu, CA1
Reale, MA1
Bauer, F1
Cheung, K1
Faye, A1
Elstrom, R1
Lachs, M1
Hajjar, KA1
Buckstein, R1
Polikoff, JA1
Guo, P1
Ervin-Haynes, AL1
Cox, MC1
Mannino, G1
Lionetto, L1
Naso, V1
Simmaco, M1
Spiriti, MA1
De Luca, S1
Orsucci, L1
Levis, A1
Rusconi, C1
Ravelli, E1
Tucci, A1
Bottelli, C1
Balzarotti, M1
Brusamolino, E1
Bonfichi, M1
Sabattini, E1
Monagheddu, C1
Vacca, A1
Ria, R1
Fayad, L1
Wagner-Bartak, N1
Hagemeister, F1
Neelapu, SS1
Samaniego, F1
McLaughlin, P1
Fanale, M1
Younes, A1
Newberry, KJ1
Young, KH1
Champlin, R1
Kwak, L1
Feng, L1
Badillo, M1
Bejarano, M1
Hartig, K1
Chen, W1
Byrne, C1
Bell, N1
Zeldis, J1
Romaguera, J1
Dawar, R1
Hernandez-Ilizaliturri, F1
Carey, S1
Heise, CC1
Mamidipudi, V1
Shi, T1
Radford, JA1
Auer, RL1
Bullard, SH1
Dreyling, M2
Kluin-Nelemans, HC1
Klapper, W1
Vogt, N1
Delfau-Larue, MH1
Hutter, G1
Cheah, C1
Cortelazzo, S1
Pott, C1
Hess, G1
Visco, C1
Klener, P1
Aurer, I1
Unterhalt, M1
Ribrag, V1
Hoster, E1
Hermine, O2
Furtado, M1
Shah, N1
Levoguer, A1
Harding, S1
Zhao, HF1
Wei, XD1
Yin, QS1
Wilson, EA1
Jobanputra, S1
Jackson, R1
Parker, AN1
McQuaker, IG1
Horrobin, DF1
Damaj, G1
Lefrère, F1
Delarue, R1
Varet, B1
Furman, R1
Kaufmann, H3
Raderer, M2
Wöhrer, S1
Püspök, A1
Bankier, A1
Zielinski, C1
Chott, A1
Seidl, S1
Lenz, G1
Amen, K1
Urbauer, E1
Nösslinger, T1

Clinical Trials (19)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Phase II Study of Rituximab in Combination With Methotrexate, Doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide, Leucovorin, Vincristine, Ifosfamide, Etoposide, Cytarabine and Mesna (R-MACLO/VAM) in Patients With Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma[NCT00878254]Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-25Active, not recruiting
Phase II Study of Rituximab in Combination With Methotrexate, Doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide, Leucovorin, Vincristine, Ifosfamide, Etoposide, Cytarabine and Mesna (MACLO/IVAM) in Patients With Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma[NCT00450801]Phase 222 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-04-30Completed
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm, Open-Label Study To Determine The Efficacy And Safety Of Single-Agent Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) In Patients With Mantel Cell NHL Who Have Relapsed Or Progressed After Treatment With Bortezomib Or Are Refractory To Bortez[NCT00737529]Phase 2134 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-22Completed
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized Open-Label Study To Determine the Efficacy of Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) Versus Investigator's Choice in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma[NCT00875667]Phase 2254 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
A Multicenter, Observational Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) in Subjects With Mantle Cell Lymphoma Who Have Relapsed or Progressed After Treatment With Ibrutinib or Are Refractory or Intolerant to Ibrutinib.[NCT02341781]30 participants (Actual)Observational2015-04-30Completed
A Phase II Trial of Ibrutinib, Lenalidomide and Rituximab for Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma[NCT02460276]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-30Completed
Phase Ib Dose Finding Study of Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Inhibitor, Ibrutinib (PCI-32765) Plus Lenalidomide / Rituximab in Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL)[NCT02446236]Phase 127 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-18Active, not recruiting
A Phase II, Multicenter, Single-Arm, Open-Label Study To Evaluate The Safety And Efficacy Of Single-Agent Lenalidomide (Revlimid®, CC-5013) in Subjects With Relapsed Or Refractory Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma[NCT00413036]Phase 2217 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
A Phase 3 Open-Label Randomized Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Plus Lenalidomide (CC-5013) Versus Rituximab Plus Chemotherapy in Subjects With Previously Untreated Follicular Lymphoma[NCT01476787]Phase 3255 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-29Active, not recruiting
Lenalidomide to Reverse Drug Resistance After Lenvatinib Combined With PD-1 Inhibitors in the First-line Treatment of Advanced HCC :a Prospective, Exploratory, Single-arm, Open-label, Multi-center Clinical Study[NCT05831969]Phase 223 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-05Not yet recruiting
Phase II Study of Lenalidomide Plus Rituximab in Patients With Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma[NCT01472562]Phase 238 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-29Completed
Bortezomib Combined With Fludarabine and Cytarabine for Mantle Cell Lymphoma Patients:a Single Arm, Open-labelled, Phase 2 Study[NCT03016988]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-01-31Not yet recruiting
A Phase II, Multicenter, Single-Arm, Open-Label Study To Evaluate The Safety And Efficacy Of Single-Agent Lenalidomide (Revlimid®, CC-5013) In Subjects With Relapsed Or Refractory Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma[NCT00179660]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Completed
A Phase II Study of MK 2206 in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma[NCT01466868]Phase 222 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Terminated (stopped due to Regarding the comments of the iDSMB, the sponsor decided to stop the inclusions)
Long-term Follow-up and/or Continued Thalidomide (THALOMID®) Maintenance Therapy for Patients Enrolled on Clinical Trial 20030165[NCT02507336]Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-24Completed
Phase II Trial of Anti-Angiogenic Therapy With RT-PEPC in Patients With Relapsed Mantle Cell Lymphoma[NCT00151281]Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-11-30Completed
Salvage Treatment With Lenalidomide and Dexamethaosne(LEN-DEX) in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL)[NCT00786851]Phase 233 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
Lenalidomide and Rituximab Treatment of Relapsed Mantle Cell Lymphoma and Diffuse Large B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, Transformed Large Cell Lymphoma, and/or Grade 3 Follicular Lymphoma (Follicular Cleaved Large Cell Lymphoma or Follicular Non-Cleaved La[NCT00294632]Phase 1/Phase 254 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
[NCT00261612]Phase 216 participants Interventional2005-01-31Active, not recruiting
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Number of Patients Experiencing Adverse Events.

Number of patients experiencing adverse events during the course of protocol therapy. (NCT00450801)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
R-MACLO Cycles22
R-IVAM Cycles22
Thalidomide Therapy19

Response Rate

Percentage of participants achieving complete response (CR) to protocol therapy according to International Working Group Response Criteria for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) using the CT imaging method. Patients were classified by best tumor response; CR was defined as normalization of the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), complete disappearance of disease-related symptoms and lymph nodes, and clearance of lymphoma from involved organs; complete response unconfirmed (CRu) as a residual lymph node greater than 1.5 cm in greatest transverse diameter that had regressed by more than 75% or an indeterminate bone marrow examination; partial response (PR) as greater than 50% reduction in the involved lymph nodes, or disappearance of the involved lymph nodes but persistent bone marrow involvement; relapse/progression as new or increased lymph nodes, organomegaly, or reappearance of bone marrow involvement. (NCT00450801)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
R-MACLO-IVAM-T100

Overall Survival Rate

Percentage of participants who are alive up to five years after receipt of protocol therapy. (NCT00450801)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
1-year rate overall survival Rate2-year overall survival Rate3-year overall survival rate4-year overall survival rate5-year overall survival rate
R-MACLO-IVAM-T9696968787

Progression-free Survival Rate

Percentage of participants achieving progression-free survival at 1, 3 and 5 years after the start of protocol therapy, based upon the International Working Group Response Criteria for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL). Progression is defined as a ≥ 50% increase from nadir in the product of the two largest perpendicular diameters (PPD-size) of any previously identified abnormal node, or appearance of any new lesion. (NCT00450801)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
1 year progression-free survival3 year progression-free survival5-year progression-free survival
R-MACLO-IVAM-T917869

Kaplan Meier Estimate of Duration of Complete Response (DoCR) (CR+CRu) According to the Independent Review Committee

Kaplan Meier estimates for the duration of CR/CRu was calculated from the date of the first occurrence of CR/CRu to the date of documented disease progression or death (without documented progression) for participants who obtained a CR/CRu; participants who had not progressed (or died) were censored at the last valid assessment. (NCT00737529)
Timeframe: From Day 1 of study drug to progression or early discontinuation; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; median time in follow-up was 16.34 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Lenalidomide24.43

Kaplan Meier Estimate of Duration of Response (DoR) According to the Independent Review Committee

Kaplan Meier estimate for the duration of response (DoR) was calculated from the date of the first occurrence of initial response for responders (demonstrating evidence of at least a PR) to the date of first documented disease progression (any new lesion or increase by ≥ 50% of previously involved sites from nadir) or death (without documented progression) for participants who responded; participants who had not progressed (or died) were censored at the last valid assessment. (NCT00737529)
Timeframe: From Day 1 of study drug to progression or early treatment discontinuation; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; Median duration of treatment was 94.5 days.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Lenalidomide16.64

Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to Progression (TTP) According to the Independent Review Committee

Kaplan Meier estimate of time to progression was calculated as time from the start of the study drug therapy to the first observation of disease progression. Participants who died without progression were censored at the date of death; otherwise, the censoring rules presented above for PFS applied to the analysis of TTP. Progressive Disease(PD): Appearance of new lesion or increase by ≥50% from previously involved sites from nadir (NCT00737529)
Timeframe: From Day 1 of study drug to first documented time of progression; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; median time in follow-up was 16.34 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Lenalidomide5.46

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) According to the Independent Review Committee

Kaplan Meier estimates of PFS was defined as the start of study drug therapy to the first observation of disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever comes first. If a participant had not progressed or died, PFS was censored at the time of last adequate assessment when the participant was known not to have progressed. For participants who received other anti-lymphoma therapy with no evidence of progression, PFS was censored at time of last adequate tumor assessment with no evidence of progression prior to the start of new anti-lymphoma treatment. (NCT00737529)
Timeframe: From Day 1 of study drug to first documented date of disease progression; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; median time in follow-up was 16.34 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Lenalidomide4.01

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Time to Treatment Failure (TTF) According to the Independent Review Committee

Time to treatment failure (TTF) was calculated from the start of study drug therapy to early discontinuation from treatment due to any cause, including disease progression, toxicity, or death and was based on site-reported data. (NCT00737529)
Timeframe: From Day 1 of study drug to first documented time of treatment failure; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; median duration of treatment was 94.5 days

Interventionmonths (Median)
Lenalidomide3.75

Overall Survival (OS)

Kaplan Meier estimate of overall survival was calculated from the time the first dose of study drug to death from any cause. Participants who had not died were censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive. (NCT00737529)
Timeframe: From Day 1 of study drug to first documented date of progressive disease or death; up to the final data cut-off date of 30 March 2017; median duration of follow-up for surviving participants was 62.94 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Lenalidomide19.50

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Overall Response According to the Independent Review Committee (IRC)

Overall Response Rate (ORR) was defined as the percentage of participants whose best response was Complete Response, Complete Response unconfirmed or Partial Response. Participants who had discontinued before any response has been observed, or changed to other anti-lymphoma treatments before response had been observed, were considered as non-responders. Tumor Response was assessed by a modification of the International Lymphoma Workshop Response Criteria, IWRC, Cheson, 1999); CR is defined as the disappearance of all clinical and radiographic evidence of disease; CRu is defined as a CR, with a 1) residual lymph node mass >1.5 cm that has decreased by 75% in the sum of the product of the diameters (SPD). Individual nodes previously confluent decreased by more than 75% in the SPD compared with original mass; 2) indeterminate bone marrow; PR = is defined ≥50% decrease in 6 largest nodes or nodal masses. (NCT00737529)
Timeframe: From Day 1 of study treatment to progession or early treatment discontinuation; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; median duration of treatment was 94.5 days.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Lenalidomide29.9

Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response (CR) /Complete Response Unconfirmed (CRu) According to the Independent Review Committee

The percentage of participants whose best response was CR or CRu. Participants who had discontinued before CR/CRu was observed, or changed to other anti-lymphoma treatments before a CR/CRu response had been observed, were considered as non-responders. CR is defined as the disappearance of all clinical and radiographic evidence of disease; CRu is defined as a CR, with a 1) residual lymph node mass >1.5 cm that has decreased by 75% in the sum of the product of the diameters (SPD). Individual nodes previously confluent decreased by more than 75% in the SPD compared with original mass; 2) indeterminate bone marrow. (NCT00737529)
Timeframe: From Day 1 of study drug to progression or early treatment discontinuation; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; Median duration of treatment was 94.5 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Lenalidomide9.0

Time to Complete Response (CR+CRu) According to the Independent Review Committee

Time to Complete Response (CR+CRu) was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug to the date of the first occurrence of at least CRu and was calculated only for participants with CR or CRu. (NCT00737529)
Timeframe: From Day 1 of study drug to first documented CR/CRu or better; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; median duration of treatment was 94.5 days

Interventionmonths (Median)
Lenalidomide3.9

Time to Response (TTR)

Time to Response was defined as the time from first dose of study drug to the date of the first response (having at least a PR) and was calculated only for responding participants. (NCT00737529)
Timeframe: From Day 1 of study drug to time of first documented PR or better; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; median duration of treatment was 94.5 days

Interventionmonths (Median)
Lenalidomide3.5

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Adverse events were assessed using National Cancer Institute, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE), Version 3: according to the following scale: Grade 1 = Mild Adverse Event (AE), Grade 2 = Moderate AE, Grade 3 = Severe and Undesirable AE, Grade 4 = Life-threatening or Disabling AE, and Grade 5 = Death; Serious AEs (SAEs) are those that resulted in death, were life-threatening, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly, or resulted in an important medical event that may have jeopardized the patient or required medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. after the first dose of study drug and within 28 days after the last dose. A TEAE is defined as any AE occurring or worsening on or after the first dose of study drug and within 28 days after the last dose of study drug. (NCT00737529)
Timeframe: From the first dose of lenalidomide through 28 days after the last dose during the follow-up phase; median (minimum, maximum) duration of treatment was 94.0 (1.0, 1950 days)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any TEAEAny TEAE Related to Investigational Product (IP)Any TEAE Grade 3-5 AEAny TEAE Grade 3 AEAny TEAE Grade 4 AEAny TEAE Grade 5 AEAny Grade 3-5 AE Related to IPAny Grade 3 AE Related to IPAny Grade 4 AE Related to IPAny Grade 5 AE Related to IPAny TEAE Serious Adverse Event (SAE)Any SAE Related to IPAny TEAE Leading to Stopping of IPAny Treatment Related AE Leading to Stopping IPAny AE Leading to Dose ReductionAny AE Leading to IP InterruptionAny Treatment Related AE Leading to Dose ReductionTreatment Related AE Leading to IP Interruption
Lenalidomide132118106101571890884127030281655815266

Kaplan Meier Estimate for Duration of Response (DOR) According to the IRC Central Review

Duration of response was defined as the time from when the first response of CR, CRu, or PR was first achieved until documented tumor progression, or until the participant died from any cause, whichever occurred first. Participants who did not progress or die at the time of analysis were censored at the last assessment date that the participant was known to be progression-free. Participants who received a new treatment without documented progression were censored at the last assessment date that the participant was known to be progression-free. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: From date of randomization to the data cut-off date of 07 March 2014; median study duration was 70.7 weeks for the lenalidomide arm and 69.3 weeks for the investigators choice arm

InterventionWeeks (Median)
Lenalidomide69.6
Investigators Choice45.1

Kaplan Meier Estimate for Duration of Response as Assessed by the Investigator at the Final Analysis

Duration of response was defined as the time from when the first response of CR, CRu, or PR was first achieved until documented tumor progression, or until the participant died from any cause, whichever occurred first. Participants who did not progress or die at the time of analysis were censored at the last assessment date that the participant was known to be progression-free. Participants who received a new treatment without documented progression were censored at the last assessment date that the participant was known to be progression-free. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: From date of randomization to the study discontinuation date of 09 October 2018; median study duration was 103.9 weeks for lenalidomide and 87.0 weeks for the investigator choice arm

InterventionWeeks (Median)
Lenalidomide70.1
Investigators Choice91.7

Kaplan Meier Estimate for Overall Survival (OS) According to the IRC Central Review

Overall survival was defined as the time from randomization until death from any cause. Participants alive or lost to follow-up at the time of analysis were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: From date of randomization to the data cut-off date of 07 March 2014; overall median follow-up was 93.9 weeks

Interventionweeks (Median)
Lenalidomide121.0
Investigators Choice91.7

Kaplan Meier Estimate for Overall Survival as Assessed by the Investigator at the Final Analysis

Overall survival was defined as the time from randomization until death from any cause. Participants alive or lost to follow-up at the time of analysis were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: From randomization to progression of disease or death; up to the study discontinuation date of 09 October 2018; overall median follow-up time was 285 weeks

Interventionweeks (Median)
Lenalidomide120.6
Investigators Choice91.7

Kaplan Meier Estimate for Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Independent Review Committee (IRC) Central Review

PFS was defined as time of randomization to the first observation of disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever was first. If a participant had not progressed or died, PFS was censored at the time of last assessment when the participant was known not to have progressed. For participants who received other anti-lymphoma therapy with no evidence of progression, PFS was censored at time of last tumor assessment with no evidence of progression prior to the start of new anti-lymphoma treatment. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: From randomization to progression of disease or death; up to data cut off date of 07 March 2014; overall median follow-up time was 93.9 weeks

Interventionweeks (Median)
Lenalidomide37.6
Investigators Choice22.7

Kaplan Meier Estimate for Progression Free Survival by Investigator's Assessment at the Final Analysis

Kaplan Meier estimates of PFS were defined as the time from randomization to the first observation of disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever was first. If a participant had not progressed or died, PFS was censored at the time of last completed assessment when the participant was known not to have progressed. For participants who received other anti-lymphoma therapy with no evidence of progression, PFS was censored at time of last tumor assessment with no evidence of progression prior to the start of new anti-lymphoma treatment. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: From randomization to progression of disease or death; up to study discontinuation of 09 October 2018; overall median follow-up time was 285 weeks

Interventionweeks (Median)
Lenalidomide37.3
Investigators Choice23.6

Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to First Response (TTFR) According to the IRC Central Review

Time to Response was defined as the time from first dose of study drug to the date of the first response (having at least a PR) and was calculated only for responding participants. ). Participants with progression at the time of analysis were censored at the first assessment date that the participant was known to have progressed. Participants with SD at the time of analysis were censored at the last assessment date that the participant was known to be progression-free. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: From randomization of study drug to time of first documented PR or better response; up to data cut-off date of 07 March 2014; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for the lenalidomide arm and 13.1 weeks for the investigators choice arm

InterventionWeeks (Median)
Lenalidomide18.7
Investigators ChoiceNA

Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to First Response as Assessed by the Investigator at the Final Analysis

Time to first response was defined as the time from first dose of study drug to the date of the first response (having at least a PR). Participants with progression at the time of analysis were censored at the first assessment date that the participant was known to have progressed. Participants with SD at the time of analysis were censored at the last assessment date that the subject was known to be progression-free. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: From date of randomization to the study discontinuation date of 09 October 2018; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm

InterventionWeeks (Median)
Lenalidomide23.9
Investigators Choice40.0

Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to Progression According to the IRC Central Review

Time to progression (TTP) was defined as the time from randomization until objective tumor progression. Time to progression did not include deaths. Participants without progression at the time of analysis were censored at the last assessment date that the participant was known to be progression-free. Participants who received a new anti-lymphoma treatment without documented progression were censored at the last assessment date that the participant was known to be progression-free. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: From date of randomization to the data cut-off date of 07 March 2014; median study duration was 70.7 weeks for the lenalidomide arm and 69.3 weeks for the investigators choice arm

InterventionWeeks (Median)
Lenalidomide39.3
Investigators Choice24.7

Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to Progression as Assessed by the Investigator at the Final Analysis

Time to progression (TTP) was defined as the time from randomization until objective tumor progression. Time to progression did not include deaths. Participants without progression at the time of analysis were censored at the last assessment date that the participant was known to be progression-free. Participants who received a new anti-lymphoma treatment without documented progression were censored at the last assessment date that the participant was known to be progression-free. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: From date of randomization to the study discontinuation date of 09 October 2018; median study duration was 103.9 weeks for lenalidomide and 87.0 weeks for the investigator choice arm

InterventionWeeks (Median)
Lenalidomide39.3
Investigators Choice24.7

Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to Treatment Failure (TTF) as Assessed by the Investigator

Time to treatment failure was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug to discontinuation of treatment for any reason, including disease progression assessed by the investigator, treatment toxicity, or death. Participants who were on-treatment or completed the treatment according to the protocol were censored at the last date of drug intake. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: From the date of the first treatment to the data cut-off date of 07 March 2014; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for the lenalidomide arm and 13.1 weeks for the investigators choice arm

Interventionweeks (Median)
Lenalidomide24.4
Investigators Choice17.9

Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to Treatment Failure as Assessed by the Investigator at the Final Analysis

Time to treatment failure was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug to discontinuation of treatment for any reason, including disease progression assessed by the investigator, treatment toxicity, or death. Participants who were on-treatment or completed the treatment according to the protocol were censored at the last date of drug intake. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: From date of first dose of treatment to the study discontinuation date of 09 October 2018; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm

Interventionweeks (Median)
Lenalidomide24.4
Investigators Choice17.9

Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Appetite Loss Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Appetite Loss Domain to Treatment Scale was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lenalidomide-4.8
Investigators Choice-4.1

Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Cognitive Functioning Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Cognitive Functioning Scale ranges from 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lenalidomide3.2
Investigators Choice2.9

Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Constipation Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Constipation Scale was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lenalidomide-0.3
Investigators Choice-3.5

Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Diarhoea Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit

"The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact).~The EORTC QLQ-C30 Diarhoea Scale was scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement." (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and time of discontinuation from treatment visit.Up to final data cut-0ff date of 07 March 2014

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lenalidomide-7.2
Investigators Choice-5.8

Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Dyspnoea Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Dyspnoea Domain to Treatment Scale was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lenalidomide-7.3
Investigators Choice-5.8

Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Emotional Functioning Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Emotional Functioning Scale ranges from 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lenalidomide6.9
Investigators Choice3.7

Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Fatigue Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Fatigue Scale was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lenalidomide-4.9
Investigators Choice-2.9

Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Financial Problems Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Financial Problems Domain Scale was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lenalidomide-10.9
Investigators Choice-2.3

Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status / QoL Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status / QoL Domain to Treatment Scale was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing a higher quality of life. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lenalidomide4.6
Investigators Choice5.6

Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Insomnia Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Insomnia Scale was scored between 0 and 100, with a high score representing worse symptomatic expression. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lenalidomide-12.8
Investigators Choice-7.6

Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Nausea and Vomiting Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Nausea and Vomiting Scale was scored between 0 and 100, with a high score representing worse symptomatic expression. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lenalidomide-2.3
Investigators Choice-0.6

Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Pain Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Pain Scale was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and time of discontinuation from treatment visit.Up to final data cut-0ff date of 07 March 2014

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lenalidomide-5.8
Investigators Choice-3.5

Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Scale ranges from 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lenalidomide3.4
Investigators Choice-1.8

Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Role Functioning Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Role Functioning Scale ranges from 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lenalidomide3.1
Investigators Choice5.0

Maximum Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Social Functioning Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Social Functioning Scale ranges from 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Lenalidomide5.1
Investigators Choice3.8

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Overall Response According to the IRC Central Review

Overall Response Rate (ORR) was defined as the percentage of participants whose best response was Complete Response (CR), Complete Response unconfirmed (CRu) or Partial Response (PR). Participants who discontinued before any response had been observed or changed to other anti-lymphoma treatments before response had been observed, were considered as non-responders. Tumor Response was assessed by a modification of the International Lymphoma Workshop Response Criteria, IWRC, Cheson, 1999; CR is defined as the disappearance of all clinical and radiographic evidence of disease; CRu is defined as a CR, with a 1) residual lymph node mass >1.5 cm that has decreased by 75% in the sum of the product of the diameters (SPD). Individual nodes previously confluent decreased by more than 75% in the SPD compared with original mass; 2) indeterminate bone marrow; PR = is defined ≥50% decrease in 6 largest nodes or nodal masses. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: From date of randomization to the data cut-off date of 07 March 2014; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for the lenalidomide arm and 13.1 weeks for the investigators choice arm

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Lenalidomide40.0
Investigators Choice10.7

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Overall Response as Assessed by the Investigator at the Final Analysis

Overall Response Rate (ORR) was defined as the percentage of participants whose best response was Complete Response, Complete Response unconfirmed or Partial Response. Participants who had discontinued before any response has been observed or changed to other anti-lymphoma treatments before response had been observed, were considered as non-responders. Tumor Response was assessed by a modification of the International Lymphoma Workshop Response Criteria, IWRC, Cheson, 1999; CR is defined as the disappearance of all clinical and radiographic evidence of disease; CRu is defined as a CR, with a 1) residual lymph node mass >1.5 cm that has decreased by 75% in the sum of the product of the diameters (SPD). Individual nodes previously confluent decreased by more than 75% in the SPD compared with original mass; 2) indeterminate bone marrow; PR = is defined ≥50% decrease in 6 largest nodes or nodal masses. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: From date of randomization to the study discontinuation date of 09 October 2018; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Lenalidomide45.9
Investigators Choice22.6

Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response, Unconfirmed Complete Response, Partial Response and Stable Disease According to the IRC Central Review

Tumor control rate was defined as the percentage of participants with a complete response (CR), unconfirmed complete response (CRu), partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD). Tumor Response was assessed by a modification of the International Lymphoma Workshop Response Criteria, IWRC, Cheson, 1999); CR is defined as the disappearance of all clinical and radiographic evidence of disease; CRu is defined as a CR, with a 1) residual lymph node mass >1.5 cm that has decreased by 75% in the sum of the product of the diameters (SPD). Individual nodes previously confluent decreased by more than 75% in the SPD compared with original mass; 2) indeterminate bone marrow; PR = is defined ≥50% decrease in 6 largest nodes or nodal masses. Stable disease (SD) is defined as less than a PR (see above) but is not progressive disease or relapsed disease. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: From date of randomization to the data cut-off date of 07 March 2014; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for the lenalidomide arm and 13.1 weeks for the investigators choice arm

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Lenalidomide69.4
Investigators Choice63.1

Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response, Unconfirmed Complete Response, Partial Response and Stable Disease at the Final Analysis

Tumor control rate was defined as the percentage of participants with a complete response (CR), unconfirmed complete response (CRu), partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD). Tumor Response was assessed by a modification of the International Lymphoma Workshop Response Criteria, IWRC, Cheson, 1999); CR is defined as the disappearance of all clinical and radiographic evidence of disease; CRu is defined as a CR, with a 1) residual lymph node mass >1.5 cm that has decreased by 75% in the sum of the product of the diameters (SPD). Individual nodes previously confluent decreased by more than 75% in the SPD compared with original mass; 2) indeterminate bone marrow; PR = is defined ≥50% decrease in 6 largest nodes or nodal masses. Stable disease (SD) is defined as less than a PR (see above) but is not progressive disease or relapsed disease. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: From date of randomization to the discontinuation date of 09 October 2018; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for the lenalidomide arm and 13.1 weeks for the investigators choice arm

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Lenalidomide70.0
Investigators Choice65.5

Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Appetite Loss Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Appetite Loss Domain was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Cycle 3 Day 1Change from Baseline to Cycle 5 Day 1Change from Baseline to Cycle 7 Day 1Change from Baseline to Cycle 9 Day 1Change from Baseline to Treatment Discontinuation
Investigators Choice16.2-0.85.1-12.5-11.15.4
Lenalidomide18.12.51.9-2.3-4.34.8

Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Cognitive Functioning Domain

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Cognitive Functioning Domain ranges from 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Cycle 3 Day 1Change from Baseline to Cycle 5 Day 1Change from Baseline to Cycle 7 Day 1Change from Baseline to Cycle 9 Day 1Change from Baseline to Treatment Discontinuation
Investigators Choice83.6-2.31.34.25.6-2.3
Lenalidomide84.60.0-1.9-3.2-2.5-5.1

Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Constipation

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Constipation Domain was scored between 0 and 100, with a high score representing worse symptomatic expression. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Cycle 3 Day 1Change from Baseline to Cycle 5 Day 1Change from Baseline to Cycle 7 Day 1Change from Baseline to Cycle 9 Day 1Change from Baseline to Treatment Discontinuation
Investigators Choice8.6-0.81.30.00.00.8
Lenalidomide12.56.34.23.5-0.710.2

Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Diarhoea

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Diarhoea Domain was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Cycle 3 Day 1Change from Baseline to Cycle 5 Day 1Change from Baseline to Cycle 7 Day 1Change from Baseline to Cycle 9 Day 1Change from Baseline to Treatment Discontinuation
Investigators Choice12.6-3.11.3-4.20.00.0
Lenalidomide15.7-3.5-4.22.4-2.11.6

Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Dyspnoea Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Dyspnoea Domain was scored between 0 and 100, with a high score representing worse symptomatic expression. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Cycle 3 Day 1Change from Baseline to Cycle 5 Day 1Change from Baseline to Cycle 7 Day 1Change from Baseline to Cycle 9 Day 1Change from Baseline to Treatment Discontinuation
Investigators Choice21.2-0.80.04.25.60.8
Lenalidomide26.5-1.6-1.4-2.91.46.0

Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Emotional Functioning Domain

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Emotional Domain ranges from 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Cycle 3 Day 1Change from Baseline to Cycle 5 Day 1Change from Baseline to Cycle 7 Day 1Change from Baseline to Cycle 9 Day 1Change from Baseline to Treatment Discontinuation
Investigators Choice78.51.31.3-3.11.4-1.5
Lenalidomide73.73.43.68.14.5-1.3

Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Fatigue Domain

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Fatigue Domain was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Cycle 3 Day 1Change from Baseline to Cycle 5 Day 1Change from Baseline to Cycle 7 Day 1Change from Baseline to Cycle 9 Day 1Change from Baseline to Treatment Discontinuation
Investigators Choice39.22.13.4-6.9-7.42.6
Lenalidomide40.20.1-3.2-1.0-3.95.2

Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Financial Problems Domain to Treatment Discontinuation Visit

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Financial Problems Domain was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Cycle 3 Day 1Change from Baseline to Cycle 5 Day 1Change from Baseline to Cycle 7 Day 1Change from Baseline to Cycle 9 Day 1Change from Baseline to Treatment Discontinuation
Investigators Choice10.8-0.8-3.8-4.2-5.61.6
Lenalidomide19.5-7.0-7.0-2.9-9.2-4.3

Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status / QoL Domain

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status / QoL Domain was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing a higher quality of life. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Cycle 3 Day 1Change from Baseline to Cycle 5 Day 1Change from Baseline to Cycle 7 Day 1Change from Baseline to Cycle 9 Day 1Change from Baseline to Treatment Discontinuation
Investigators Choice58.42.33.27.38.3-1.0
Lenalidomide59.0-3.4-0.71.04.3-5.8

Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Insomnia Domain

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Insomnia Domain was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Cycle 3 Day 1Change from Baseline to Cycle 5 Day 1Change from Baseline to Cycle 7 Day 1Change from Baseline to Cycle 9 Day 1Change from Baseline to Treatment Discontinuation
Investigators Choice25.7-4.7-6.4-16.7-16.70.8
Lenalidomide29.4-7.6-5.2-1.8-7.1-3.2

Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Nausea / Vomiting Domain

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Nausea and Vomiting Domain was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Cycle 3 Day 1Change from Baseline to Cycle 5 Day 1Change from Baseline to Cycle 7 Day 1Change from Baseline to Cycle 9 Day 1Change from Baseline to Treatment Discontinuation
Investigators Choice3.80.45.82.12.86.6
Lenalidomide4.92.52.65.3-0.70.5

Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Pain Domain

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Pain Domain was scored between 0 and 100, with a higher score representing worse symptomatic expression. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineCycle 3 Day 1Cycle 5 Day 1Cycle 7 Day 1Cycle 9 Day 1Treatment Discontinuation
Investigators Choice13.7-1.2-2.60.0-2.83.5
Lenalidomide22.6-2.2-0.23.2-3.24.6

Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Domain

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Scale ranges from 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Cycle 3 Day 1Change from Baseline to Cycle 5 Day 1Change from Baseline to Cycle 7 Day 1Change from Baseline to Cycle 9 Day 1Change from Baseline to Treatment Discontinuation
Investigators Choice78.9-3.7-2.14.211.1-5.1
Lenalidomide71.8-0.51.62.42.8-5.6

Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Role Functioning Domain

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Role Functioning Scale ranges from 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Cycle 3 Day 1Change from Baseline to Cycle 5 Day 1Change from Baseline to Cycle 7 Day 1Change from Baseline to Cycle 9 Day 1Change from Baseline to Treatment Discontinuation
Investigators Choice73.93.5-6.40.013.9-4.3
Lenalidomide71.5-4.81.40.31.8-9.1

Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Social Functioning Domain

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Social Functioning Domain ranges from 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: Baseline known as screening visit, after cycle 2 (C3D1), after Cycle 4 (C5D1), after Cycle 6, (C7D1), after Cycle 8, (C9D1) and at discontinuation; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Cycle 3 Day 1Change from Baseline to Cycle 5 Day 1Change from Baseline to Cycle 7 Day 1Change from Baseline to Cycle 9 Day 1Change from Baseline to Treatment Discontinuation
Investigators Choice78.4-1.2-4.52.10.0-2.7
Lenalidomide74.9-1.01.6-1.54.3-5.1

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

Adverse events were assessed using National Cancer Institute, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE), Version 3: according to the following scale: Grade 1 = Mild Adverse Event (AE), Grade 2 = Moderate AE, Grade 3 = Severe and Undesirable AE, Grade 4 = Life-threatening or Disabling AE, and Grade 5 = Death; Serious AEs (SAEs) are those that resulted in death, were life-threatening, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly, or resulted in an important medical event that may have jeopardized the patient or required medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. after the first dose of study drug and within 28 days after the last dose. A Treatment Emergent Adverse event (TEAE) is defined as any AE occurring or worsening on or after the first dose of study drug and within 28 days after the last dose of study drug. (NCT00875667)
Timeframe: From the date of the first dose of study drug to 28 days after the last dose, up to the study discontinuation date of 09 October 2018; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigators choice arm

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any TEAEAny TEAE Grade 3 AEAny TEAE Grade 4 AEAny TEAE Grade 5 AEAny TEAE Related to the IPAny Grade 3 AE Related to IPAny Grade 4 AE Related to IPAny Grade 5 AE Related to IPAny Serious Adverse Event (SAE)Any SAE Related to IPAny TEAE Leading to Stopping of IPAny Treatment Related AE Leading to Stopping IPTEAE Leading to Dose Reduction/InterruptionRelated AE Leading to Dose Reduct/InterruptionTEAE Leading to Dose ReductionRelated AE Leading to Dose ReductionTEAE Leading to Dose InterruptionRelated AE Leading to Dose Interruption
Investigators Choice694929251361902212147332913102825
Lenalidomide159126561514110646075383118114103726911098

Duration of Response as Determined by Central Review

"Kaplan-Meier estimates for the duration of response were calculated for responders and defined as the time from at least a partial response (PR) to progression of disease (PD) or death due to Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.~For response assessment criteria (per Cheson, 1999) see the primary outcome measure in this results posting." (NCT00413036)
Timeframe: Up to 1459 days

InterventionMonths (Median)
Lenalidomide18.4

Progression-free Survival as Determined by Central Review

"Kaplan-Meier estimate of progression-free survival is defined as start of study drug therapy to the first observation of progressive disease or death due to any cause, whichever comes first.~Response assessed according to Cheson, Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1999. Full definition of progressive disease, refer to Cheson article.~Progressive Disease(PD): Appearance of new lesion during/end of therapy; >=50% increase from lowest measurement in SPD." (NCT00413036)
Timeframe: Up to 1459 days

InterventionMonths (Median)
Lenalidomide4.5

Time to Progression as Determined by Central Review

"Kaplan-Meier estimate of time-to-progression is calculated as time from the start of study drug therapy to the first observation of disease progression.~Response assessed according to Cheson, Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1999. Full definition of progressive disease, refer to Cheson article.~Progressive Disease(PD): Appearance of new lesion during/end of therapy; >=50% increase from lowest measurement in SPD." (NCT00413036)
Timeframe: Up to 1459 days

InterventionMonths (Median)
Lenalidomide4.5

Participants Categorized by Best Response as Determined by Central Review

"Response assessed according to Cheson, Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1999. Full definitions, refer to Cheson article.~Complete Response(CR): Complete disappearance of all detectable disease and disease-related symptoms if present before therapy; normalization of lab abnormalities assignable to NHL. If bone marrow involved before treatment, must be cleared on repeat biopsy.~Complete Response Unconfirmed(CRu): CR, with one of the following: 1)residual lymph node mass >1.5 cm that has decreased by 75% in the sum of the product of the diameters(SPD). Individual nodes previously confluent decreased by more than 75% in the SPD compared with original mass; 2)indeterminate bone marrow.~Partial Response(PR): >50% decrease in 6 largest nodes or nodal masses. Nodes selected according to Cheson.~Stable Disease(SD): Less than PR, but not progressive disease.~Progressive Disease(PD): Appearance of new lesion during/end of therapy; >=50% increase from lowest measurement in SPD." (NCT00413036)
Timeframe: Up to 1459 days

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Complete Response (CR)Complete Response Unconfirmed (CRu)Partial Response (PR)Stable Disease (SD)Progressive Disease
Lenalidomide721407178

Overall Response Rate

The primary endpoint of overall response rate will be estimated and a 95% confidence interval will be estimated via binomial proportions. (NCT01472562)
Timeframe: 30 months

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
All Patients92

Duration of Response

The duration of response was calculated as the first response assessment demonstrating evidence of at least a partial response to the first documentation of progressive disease (as determined by computed tomography scan) or death due to NHL, whichever occurred first. For participants without documentation of progression, the duration of response was censored at the last date of tumor assessment indicating no progression. Median was based on the Kaplan-Meier estimate. (NCT00179660)
Timeframe: From enrollment through study completion. Median duration on study was 3.7 months, with a maximum of 32.5 months.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Lenalidomide10.2

Duration of Tumor Control

The duration of tumor control was calculated as the time from the first response assessment demonstrating at least stable disease to the first documentation of progressive disease or death due to NHL. For participants without documentation of progression, the duration of response was censored at the last date of tumor assessment indicating no progression. Median was based on the Kaplan-Meier estimate. (NCT00179660)
Timeframe: From enrollment through study completion. Median duration on study was 3.7 months, with a maximum of 32.5 months.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Lenalidomide6.0

Percentage of Participants With Response

"Response was defined as participants with a complete response (CR), unconfirmed complete response (Cru) or partial response (PR), assessed using the International Workshop Lymphoma Response Criteria (IWLRC) and based on best responses as determined by the investigator.~CR: Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical and radiographic evidence of disease, disappearance of any disease-related symptoms, and normalization of biochemical abnormalities.~Cru: Criteria for CR above but with 1 or more of the following:~A residual lymph node mass > 1.5 cm in greatest transverse diameter that has regressed by more than 75% in the sum of the products of diameters (SPD)~Indeterminate bone marrow (increased number or size of aggregates without cytologic or architectural atypia).~PR: 50% decrease in SPD of the 6 largest dominant nodes or nodal masses. No increase in the size of other nodes, liver, or spleen. Splenic and hepatic nodules must regress by at least 50% in the SPD." (NCT00179660)
Timeframe: From enrollment through study completion. Median duration on study was 3.7 months, with a maximum of 32.5 months.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Lenalidomide34.7

Percentage of Participants With Tumor Control

"Tumor control was defined as participants with a complete response, unconfirmed complete response, partial response or stable disease (SD), assessed using the International Workshop Lymphoma Response Criteria (IWLRC) and based on best responses as determined by the investigator.~SD was defined as a response less than a PR (see above) but not Progressive Disease (PD).~PD was defined as~≥ 50 % increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously identified abnormal node for partial responders or non-responders.~Appearance of any new lesion during or at the end of therapy." (NCT00179660)
Timeframe: From enrollment through study completion. Median duration on study was 3.7 months, with a maximum of 32.5 months.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Lenalidomide59.2

Progression-free Survival

"Progression-free survival was defined as the time from the start of study drug therapy to the first observation of disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever came first.~Participants who withdrew for any reason or received another NHL therapy including stem cell transplantation without documented progressive disease were censored on the date of their last adequate response assessment indicating no progression (or last adequate assessment prior to receiving other NHL therapy). Participants who were still active without progressive disease at the time of the data cut-off date were censored on the date of their last adequate response assessment." (NCT00179660)
Timeframe: From enrollment through study completion. Median duration on study was 3.7 months, with a maximum of 32.5 months.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Lenalidomide3.6

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

"The Investigator determined the relationship between the administration of study drug and the occurrence of an AE as suspected if the temporal relationship of the adverse event to study drug administration made a causal relationship possible, and other drugs, therapeutic interventions, or underlying conditions did not provide a sufficient explanation for the observed event.~The Investigator graded the severity of AEs according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) criteria and the following scale:~Grade 1 = Mild~Grade 2 = Moderate~Grade 3 = Severe~Grade 4 = Life threatening~Grade 5 = Death~A Serious AE is defined as any AE which results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or constitutes an important medical event." (NCT00179660)
Timeframe: From the start of study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug. Maximum time on study drug was 15.2 months.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any adverse eventAdverse event related to study drugGrade 3-5 adverse eventGrade 3-5 adverse event related to study drugSerious adverse eventSerious adverse event related to study drugAE leading to discontinuation of study drugRelated AE leading to study drug discontinuationAE leading to dose reduction or interruption
Lenalidomide494236272169428

Dynamic Levels of Plasma VEGF

Stromal angiogenesis was assessed using blood vascular and perivascular markers, including VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, CD34, and a-SMA, as well as lymphatic vascular markers ofVEGFR-3, podoplanin, and Lyve-1. (NCT00151281)
Timeframe: 38 months

Interventionpg/mL (Median)
RT-PEPC Drug Therapy109.5

Overall Survival and Progression Free Survival

measured by overall Response Rate (ORR), which includes Complete response and partial response. (NCT00151281)
Timeframe: 38 months

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Study Treatment Arm73

Asses the Toxicity Profiles

Toxicities were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0. (NCT00151281)
Timeframe: 38 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Grade 3 or 4 neutropeniaAnemiaThrombocytopeniaFatigueConstipationCoughNauseaNeuropathyDyspneaRash
RT-PEPC Drug Therapy141422141413131110

The Quality of Life (QoL) of Patients Receiving RT-PEPC Treatment

"QoL assessments were obtained with version 3 of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) instrument. The FACT-G is comprised of four subscales: physical well-being (7-items, score range 0-28), social/family well-being (7-items, score range 0-28), emotional well-being (6-items, score range 0-24), and functional well-being (7-items, score range 0-28). Users of the FACT-G are able to generate an overall score and four subscale scores with ranges and distributions that are sample-specific. All questions in the FACT-G use a 5-point rating scale (0 = Not at all to 4 = Very much) A higher number indicates a better Quality of Life, and has a possible range of 0-108 points.~ANOVA was used to compare the difference in the means of total score among the different time points (baseline, every 2M until 6M, and every 6M until PD). The mean of the total FACT-G scores at baseline and mean of total score at all timepoints (using ANOVA) are reported below." (NCT00151281)
Timeframe: baseline, every 2 months until Month 6, and every 6 months until disease progression

InterventionFACT-G score (Mean)
Mean FACT-G Score at baselineMean Total FACT-G Score between all time points
RT-PEPC Drug Therapy83.389.4

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Lenalidomide in Combination With Rituximab

MTD is defined as the highest dose level in which 1 or fewer participants experienced a dose limiting toxicity (DLT) in 6 participants treated. DLT is any grade III or IV toxicity during the first 28 days (first cycle) of therapy. (NCT00294632)
Timeframe: 28 days of cycle 1

Interventionmg (Number)
Phase I: Lenalidomide + Rituximab20

Objective Response Rate of Participants Treated With Lenalidomide 20 mg: Overall Response as % of Participants With Complete or Partial Response

Objective response rate defined as percentage of participants with complete or partial response after 2 cycles of therapy maintained for one month. Objective response monitored using Simon's optimal 2-stage design. (NCT00294632)
Timeframe: 56 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Lenalidomide + Rituximab57

Reviews

16 reviews available for thalidomide and Diffuse Lymphocytic Lymphoma, Poorly-Differentiated

ArticleYear
Therapies for mantle cell lymphoma: current challenges and a brighter future.
    Discovery medicine, 2013, Volume: 15, Issue:82

    Topics: Antibodies; Antineoplastic Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Combined Modality Therapy; Cyclin D1; E

2013
Therapeutic effects of thalidomide in hematologic disorders: a review.
    Frontiers of medicine, 2013, Volume: 7, Issue:3

    Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Clinical Trials as Topic; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematologic Neoplasms; Hum

2013
Recent advances in the management of mantle cell lymphoma.
    Current opinion in oncology, 2013, Volume: 25, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antineopla

2013
Ibrutinib in B-cell Lymphomas.
    Current treatment options in oncology, 2014, Volume: 15, Issue:2

    Topics: Adenine; Agammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine Kinase; Antineoplastic Agents; Boronic Acids; Bortezomib; Clin

2014
A comprehensive review of lenalidomide therapy for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2015, Volume: 26, Issue:8

    Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bendamustine

2015
Lenalidomide for mantle cell lymphoma.
    Expert review of hematology, 2015, Volume: 8, Issue:3

    Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Animals; Humans; Immunologic Factors; Lenalidomide; Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell;

2015
Practical Management of Lenalidomide-Related Rash.
    Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia, 2015, Volume: 15 Suppl

    Topics: Exanthema; Humans; Lenalidomide; Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell; Multiple Myeloma; Thalidomide

2015
Treatment options for mantle cell lymphoma.
    Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy, 2015, Volume: 16, Issue:16

    Topics: Adenine; Antineoplastic Agents; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation;

2015
Mantle Cell Lymphoma.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2016, Apr-10, Volume: 34, Issue:11

    Topics: Adenine; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bendamustine Hydroch

2016
Clinical experience with lenalidomide alone or in combination with rituximab in indolent B-cell and mantle cell lymphomas.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2016, Volume: 27, Issue:7

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; B-Lymphocytes; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Drug-Relat

2016
Lenalidomide for the treatment of B-cell lymphoma.
    Expert opinion on investigational drugs, 2016, Volume: 25, Issue:9

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Trials as Topic; Disease-Free Survival; Hum

2016
The emerging role of lenalidomide in the management of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).
    Best practice & research. Clinical haematology, 2012, Volume: 25, Issue:2

    Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clini

2012
Autologous transplantation and management of younger patients with mantle cell lymphoma.
    Best practice & research. Clinical haematology, 2012, Volume: 25, Issue:2

    Topics: Age Factors; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols;

2012
Update on the molecular pathogenesis and clinical treatment of mantle cell lymphoma: report of the 11th annual conference of the European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Network.
    Leukemia & lymphoma, 2013, Volume: 54, Issue:4

    Topics: Age Factors; Antineoplastic Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell; Thalido

2013
[Thalidomide combined with interferon in relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma: two cases report and literatures review].
    Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi, 2012, Volume: 33, Issue:9

    Topics: Humans; Interferons; Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell; Male; Middle Aged; Thalidomide

2012
Treatment of mantle cell lymphoma: targeting the microenvironment.
    Expert review of anticancer therapy, 2005, Volume: 5, Issue:3

    Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplasti

2005

Trials

27 trials available for thalidomide and Diffuse Lymphocytic Lymphoma, Poorly-Differentiated

ArticleYear
R-MACLO-IVAM regimen followed by maintenance therapy induces durable remissions in untreated mantle cell lymphoma - Long term follow up results.
    American journal of hematology, 2021, 06-01, Volume: 96, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cyclopho

2021
R-MACLO-IVAM regimen followed by maintenance therapy induces durable remissions in untreated mantle cell lymphoma - Long term follow up results.
    American journal of hematology, 2021, 06-01, Volume: 96, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cyclopho

2021
R-MACLO-IVAM regimen followed by maintenance therapy induces durable remissions in untreated mantle cell lymphoma - Long term follow up results.
    American journal of hematology, 2021, 06-01, Volume: 96, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cyclopho

2021
R-MACLO-IVAM regimen followed by maintenance therapy induces durable remissions in untreated mantle cell lymphoma - Long term follow up results.
    American journal of hematology, 2021, 06-01, Volume: 96, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cyclopho

2021
Long-term analysis of phase II studies of single-agent lenalidomide in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma.
    American journal of hematology, 2017, Volume: 92, Issue:10

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anemia; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease-Free Su

2017
Activity of lenalidomide in mantle cell lymphoma can be explained by NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity.
    British journal of haematology, 2017, Volume: 179, Issue:3

    Topics: Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing; Adenine; Coculture Techniques; Cytotoxicity, Immunologic; Dose

2017
Prospective subgroup analyses of the randomized MCL-002 (SPRINT) study: lenalidomide versus investigator's choice in relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma.
    British journal of haematology, 2018, Volume: 180, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Follow-Up Studies

2018
Ibrutinib, lenalidomide, and rituximab in relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (PHILEMON): a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial.
    The Lancet. Haematology, 2018, Volume: 5, Issue:3

    Topics: Adenine; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers, Tumor;

2018
Single-agent lenalidomide in patients with mantle-cell lymphoma who relapsed or progressed after or were refractory to bortezomib: phase II MCL-001 (EMERGE) study.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2013, Oct-10, Volume: 31, Issue:29

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents; Boronic Acids; Borte

2013
Single-agent lenalidomide in patients with mantle-cell lymphoma who relapsed or progressed after or were refractory to bortezomib: phase II MCL-001 (EMERGE) study.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2013, Oct-10, Volume: 31, Issue:29

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents; Boronic Acids; Borte

2013
Single-agent lenalidomide in patients with mantle-cell lymphoma who relapsed or progressed after or were refractory to bortezomib: phase II MCL-001 (EMERGE) study.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2013, Oct-10, Volume: 31, Issue:29

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents; Boronic Acids; Borte

2013
Single-agent lenalidomide in patients with mantle-cell lymphoma who relapsed or progressed after or were refractory to bortezomib: phase II MCL-001 (EMERGE) study.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2013, Oct-10, Volume: 31, Issue:29

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents; Boronic Acids; Borte

2013
Long-term follow-up of lenalidomide in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma: subset analysis of the NHL-003 study.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2013, Volume: 24, Issue:11

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug-Related Si

2013
Long-term follow-up of lenalidomide in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma: subset analysis of the NHL-003 study.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2013, Volume: 24, Issue:11

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug-Related Si

2013
Long-term follow-up of lenalidomide in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma: subset analysis of the NHL-003 study.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2013, Volume: 24, Issue:11

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug-Related Si

2013
Long-term follow-up of lenalidomide in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma: subset analysis of the NHL-003 study.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2013, Volume: 24, Issue:11

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug-Related Si

2013
Combined lenalidomide, low-dose dexamethasone, and rituximab achieves durable responses in rituximab-resistant indolent and mantle cell lymphomas.
    Cancer, 2014, Jan-15, Volume: 120, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antineoplastic Combined Chem

2014
Combination biologic therapy without chemotherapy as initial treatment for mantle cell lymphoma: multi- center phase II study of lenalidomide plus rituximab.
    Clinical advances in hematology & oncology : H&O, 2014, Volume: 12, Issue:2 Suppl 6

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antineoplastic Combined Chem

2014
Therapy with bortezomib plus lenalidomide for relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma: final results of a phase II trial (CALGB 50501).
    Leukemia & lymphoma, 2015, Volume: 56, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bortezomib; Disease-

2015
Combination of Lenalidomide and Rituximab Overcomes Rituximab Resistance in Patients with Indolent B-cell and Mantle Cell Lymphomas.
    Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2015, Apr-15, Volume: 21, Issue:8

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Drug Resistance, Neo

2015
Updated survival analysis of two sequential prospective trials of R-MACLO-IVAM followed by maintenance for newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma.
    American journal of hematology, 2015, Volume: 90, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols;

2015
Longer-term follow-up and outcome by tumour cell proliferation rate (Ki-67) in patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma treated with lenalidomide on MCL-001(EMERGE) pivotal trial.
    British journal of haematology, 2015, Volume: 170, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Biomarkers, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Dise

2015
Lenalidomide plus Rituximab as Initial Treatment for Mantle-Cell Lymphoma.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2015, Nov-05, Volume: 373, Issue:19

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antineoplastic Combined Chem

2015
Lenalidomide versus investigator's choice in relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL-002; SPRINT): a phase 2, randomised, multicentre trial.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2016, Volume: 17, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents; Confidence Intervals; Disease-Free Survival; D

2016
Second-line rituximab, lenalidomide, and bendamustine in mantle cell lymphoma: a phase II clinical trial of the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi.
    Haematologica, 2017, Volume: 102, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bendamustine Hydrochloride;

2017
Lenalidomide monotherapy in relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2008, Oct-20, Volume: 26, Issue:30

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease-Free Survival;

2008
Lenalidomide monotherapy in relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2008, Oct-20, Volume: 26, Issue:30

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease-Free Survival;

2008
Lenalidomide monotherapy in relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2008, Oct-20, Volume: 26, Issue:30

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease-Free Survival;

2008
Lenalidomide monotherapy in relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2008, Oct-20, Volume: 26, Issue:30

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease-Free Survival;

2008
Lenalidomide monotherapy in relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2008, Oct-20, Volume: 26, Issue:30

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease-Free Survival;

2008
Lenalidomide monotherapy in relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2008, Oct-20, Volume: 26, Issue:30

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease-Free Survival;

2008
Lenalidomide monotherapy in relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2008, Oct-20, Volume: 26, Issue:30

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease-Free Survival;

2008
Lenalidomide monotherapy in relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2008, Oct-20, Volume: 26, Issue:30

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease-Free Survival;

2008
Lenalidomide monotherapy in relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2008, Oct-20, Volume: 26, Issue:30

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease-Free Survival;

2008
Lenalidomide oral monotherapy produces a high response rate in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma.
    British journal of haematology, 2009, Volume: 145, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Ad

2009
High rate and prolonged duration of complete remissions induced by rituximab, methotrexate, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, ifosfamide, etoposide, cytarabine, and thalidomide (R-MACLO-IVAM-T), a modification of the National Cancer Institute 89
    Leukemia & lymphoma, 2010, Volume: 51, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antineoplastic Combined

2010
High rate and prolonged duration of complete remissions induced by rituximab, methotrexate, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, ifosfamide, etoposide, cytarabine, and thalidomide (R-MACLO-IVAM-T), a modification of the National Cancer Institute 89
    Leukemia & lymphoma, 2010, Volume: 51, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antineoplastic Combined

2010
High rate and prolonged duration of complete remissions induced by rituximab, methotrexate, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, ifosfamide, etoposide, cytarabine, and thalidomide (R-MACLO-IVAM-T), a modification of the National Cancer Institute 89
    Leukemia & lymphoma, 2010, Volume: 51, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antineoplastic Combined

2010
High rate and prolonged duration of complete remissions induced by rituximab, methotrexate, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, ifosfamide, etoposide, cytarabine, and thalidomide (R-MACLO-IVAM-T), a modification of the National Cancer Institute 89
    Leukemia & lymphoma, 2010, Volume: 51, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antineoplastic Combined

2010
Durable responses with the metronomic rituximab and thalidomide plus prednisone, etoposide, procarbazine, and cyclophosphamide regimen in elderly patients with recurrent mantle cell lymphoma.
    Cancer, 2010, Jun-01, Volume: 116, Issue:11

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antineoplas

2010
An international phase II trial of single-agent lenalidomide for relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2011, Volume: 22, Issue:7

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Internatio

2011
An international phase II trial of single-agent lenalidomide for relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2011, Volume: 22, Issue:7

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Internatio

2011
An international phase II trial of single-agent lenalidomide for relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2011, Volume: 22, Issue:7

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Internatio

2011
An international phase II trial of single-agent lenalidomide for relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2011, Volume: 22, Issue:7

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Internatio

2011
Salvage treatment with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma: clinical results and effects on microenvironment and neo-angiogenic biomarkers.
    Haematologica, 2012, Volume: 97, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers; Dexamethasone;

2012
Lenalidomide in combination with rituximab for patients with relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma: a phase 1/2 clinical trial.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2012, Volume: 13, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherap

2012
Single-agent lenalidomide in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma: results from a UK phase II study suggest activity and possible gender differences.
    British journal of haematology, 2012, Volume: 159, Issue:2

    Topics: Adiponectin; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Humans;

2012
Antitumor activity of rituximab plus thalidomide in patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma.
    Blood, 2004, Oct-15, Volume: 104, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease

2004
Does the combination of rituximab and thalidomide influence the long-term perspectives of advanced-stage MCL?
    Nature clinical practice. Oncology, 2005, Volume: 2, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antineoplastic Combined Chemot

2005
Thromboembolic events during treatment with thalidomide.
    Blood, 2002, Jun-01, Volume: 99, Issue:11

    Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antineoplas

2002

Other Studies

33 other studies available for thalidomide and Diffuse Lymphocytic Lymphoma, Poorly-Differentiated

ArticleYear
Clonal hematopoiesis is associated with hematological toxicity during lenalidomide-based therapy for MCL.
    Leukemia, 2022, Volume: 36, Issue:12

    Topics: Clonal Hematopoiesis; Hematopoiesis; Humans; Lenalidomide; Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell; Neoplasm Recurrenc

2022
Synergistic Cytotoxicity of Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Mantle Cell Lymphoma via Cereblon-dependent Targeting of the IL-6/STAT3/PI3K Axis.
    EBioMedicine, 2017, Volume: 20

    Topics: Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Apoptosi

2017
BET protein proteolysis targeting chimera (PROTAC) exerts potent lethal activity against mantle cell lymphoma cells.
    Leukemia, 2018, Volume: 32, Issue:2

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Azepines; Cell Line, Tumor; Humans; Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell

2018
The Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor CC-292 shows activity in mantle cell lymphoma and synergizes with lenalidomide and NIK inhibitors depending on nuclear factor-κB mutational status.
    Haematologica, 2017, Volume: 102, Issue:11

    Topics: Acrylamides; Agammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine Kinase; Antineoplastic Agents; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm;

2017
Observational study of lenalidomide in patients with mantle cell lymphoma who relapsed/progressed after or were refractory/intolerant to ibrutinib (MCL-004).
    Journal of hematology & oncology, 2017, 11-02, Volume: 10, Issue:1

    Topics: Adenine; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Disease Progression; Female; Humans; Lenalidomide; Lymphoma, Mantl

2017
Apremilast in a patient with psoriasis and mantle cell lymphoma under maintenance treatment with rituximab.
    Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG, 2019, Volume: 17, Issue:3

    Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Humans; Lymphoma, Man

2019
Lenalidomide inhibits lymphangiogenesis in preclinical models of mantle cell lymphoma.
    Cancer research, 2013, Dec-15, Volume: 73, Issue:24

    Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Animals; Cell Movement; Disease Models, Animal; Humans; Lenalidomide; Lymph

2013
Antitumoral activity of lenalidomide in in vitro and in vivo models of mantle cell lymphoma involves the destabilization of cyclin D1/p27KIP1 complexes.
    Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2014, Jan-15, Volume: 20, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Transformation, Neop

2014
Synergistic antitumor activity of lenalidomide with the BET bromodomain inhibitor CPI203 in bortezomib-resistant mantle cell lymphoma.
    Leukemia, 2014, Volume: 28, Issue:10

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Boronic Acids; Bortezomib; Cell Differentiation; Cell Line, Tumor; D

2014
Response of cutaneous lesion of mantle cell lymphoma to lenalidomide.
    International journal of hematology, 2014, Volume: 100, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Humans; Immunologic Factors; Lenalidomide; Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell; Male; Skin; Ski

2014
Combination of lenalidomide with vitamin D3 induces apoptosis in mantle cell lymphoma via demethylation of BIK.
    Cell death & disease, 2014, Aug-28, Volume: 5

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins; bcl-2 Homo

2014
The combination of bortezomib with enzastaurin or lenalidomide enhances cytotoxicity in follicular and mantle cell lymphoma cell lines.
    Hematological oncology, 2015, Volume: 33, Issue:4

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Bortezomib; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Cell Survival; Drug Synergi

2015
[Thalidomide combined with interferon in 12 cases of relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma].
    Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi, 2014, Volume: 35, Issue:11

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Humans; Interferons; Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell; Recurren

2014
Lenalidomide in non-Hodgkin lymphoma: biological perspectives and therapeutic opportunities.
    Blood, 2015, Apr-16, Volume: 125, Issue:16

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm;

2015
Haematological cancers: Lenalidomide--SPRINT to a new standard?
    Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2016, Volume: 13, Issue:4

    Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents; Female; Humans; Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell; Male; Neoplas

2016
Lenalidomide plus Rituximab for Mantle-Cell Lymphoma.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2016, 02-25, Volume: 374, Issue:8

    Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Female; Huma

2016
Lenalidomide plus Rituximab for Mantle-Cell Lymphoma.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2016, 02-25, Volume: 374, Issue:8

    Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Female; Huma

2016
Chemotherapy of mantle cell lymphoma relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.
    Prescrire international, 2016, Volume: 25, Issue:170

    Topics: Adenine; Antineoplastic Agents; Bendamustine Hydrochloride; Bortezomib; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17;

2016
Genetic heterogeneity in primary and relapsed mantle cell lymphomas: Impact of recurrent CARD11 mutations.
    Oncotarget, 2016, Jun-21, Volume: 7, Issue:25

    Topics: Adenine; CARD Signaling Adaptor Proteins; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Genetic Heterogeneity; Guanylat

2016
Late relapsing mantle cell lymphoma showing preserved sensitivity to single-agent lenalidomide.
    International journal of hematology, 2016, Volume: 104, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Humans; Immunologic Factors; Lenalidomide; Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell; Recurrence; Remission Induct

2016
Lenalidomide, as a single agent, induces complete remission in a refractory mantle cell lymphoma.
    Annals of hematology, 2009, Volume: 88, Issue:9

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Female; Humans; Lenalidomide; Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell; Recurrence; Remiss

2009
Synergistic antitumor effects of lenalidomide and rituximab on mantle cell lymphoma in vitro and in vivo.
    American journal of hematology, 2009, Volume: 84, Issue:9

    Topics: Animals; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antineoplastic Combined Che

2009
Activity of thalidomide and lenalidomide in mantle cell lymphoma.
    Acta haematologica, 2010, Volume: 123, Issue:1

    Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antibody-Dependent Cell Cytotoxicity

2010
Mantle cell lymphoma arising in a multiple myeloma patient responding to lenalidomide.
    Leukemia research, 2010, Volume: 34, Issue:7

    Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antineoplas

2010
Recent advances in the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma: a post-ASH 2009 discussion.
    Clinical advances in hematology & oncology : H&O, 2010, Volume: 8, Issue:4

    Topics: Bendamustine Hydrochloride; Humans; Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins; Lenalidomide; Lym

2010
Lenalidomide-induced tumour flare reaction in mantle cell lymphoma.
    British journal of haematology, 2010, Volume: 151, Issue:4

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Drug Eruptions; Fatal Outcome; Female; Humans; Lenalidomide; Leukocytosis; Ly

2010
Lenalidomide synergizes with dexamethasone to induce growth arrest and apoptosis of mantle cell lymphoma cells in vitro and in vivo.
    Leukemia research, 2011, Volume: 35, Issue:3

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Apoptosis; Blotting, Western; Cell Cycle; C

2011
Lenalidomide for aggressive B-cell lymphoma involving the central nervous system?
    American journal of hematology, 2011, Volume: 86, Issue:11

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Central Nervous System Neoplasms; Chromatography, Liquid; Humans; Lenal

2011
Abnormal serum free light chain ratio predicts poor overall survival in mantle cell lymphoma.
    British journal of haematology, 2013, Volume: 160, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Biomarkers, Tumor; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Immunoglobulin Light Chains; Lenalid

2013
Response to thalidomide in chemotherapy-resistant mantle cell lymphoma: a case report.
    British journal of haematology, 2002, Volume: 119, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Fatal Outcome; Huma

2002
A low toxicity maintenance regime, using eicosapentaenoic acid and readily available drugs, for mantle cell lymphoma and other malignancies with excess cyclin D1 levels.
    Medical hypotheses, 2003, Volume: 60, Issue:5

    Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Cell Cycle; Clotrimazole; Cyclin D1; Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors; Eicosapenta

2003
Thalidomide therapy induces response in relapsed mantle cell lymphoma.
    Leukemia, 2003, Volume: 17, Issue:9

    Topics: Aged; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Drug Resistance, Neop

2003
Managing patients with multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma: where are we now?
    ONS connect, 2007, Volume: 22, Issue:8 Suppl

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boronic Acids; Bortezomib; Drug Monitoring; Humans; Lenalidomide; Lymphoma, M

2007