Page last updated: 2024-11-05

thalidomide and Diarrhea

thalidomide has been researched along with Diarrhea in 43 studies

Thalidomide: A piperidinyl isoindole originally introduced as a non-barbiturate hypnotic, but withdrawn from the market due to teratogenic effects. It has been reintroduced and used for a number of immunological and inflammatory disorders. Thalidomide displays immunosuppressive and anti-angiogenic activity. It inhibits release of TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR-ALPHA from monocytes, and modulates other cytokine action.
thalidomide : A racemate comprising equimolar amounts of R- and S-thalidomide.
2-(2,6-dioxopiperidin-3-yl)-1H-isoindole-1,3(2H)-dione : A dicarboximide that is isoindole-1,3(2H)-dione in which the hydrogen attached to the nitrogen is substituted by a 2,6-dioxopiperidin-3-yl group.

Diarrhea: An increased liquidity or decreased consistency of FECES, such as running stool. Fecal consistency is related to the ratio of water-holding capacity of insoluble solids to total water, rather than the amount of water present. Diarrhea is not hyperdefecation or increased fecal weight.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"Adults (≥18 years of age) with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (baseline PGA ≥3, BSA affected ≥10%, PASI ≥12) took oral apremilast (30 mg twice daily) for 8 weeks."9.34Apremilast with Add-On Calcipotriene/Betamethasone Dipropionate for Treating Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis. ( Bagel, J; Hetzel, A; Nelson, E; Riley, C, 2020)
"Apremilast, an oral, small-molecule phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis."9.24The efficacy and safety of apremilast, etanercept and placebo in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: 52-week results from a phase IIIb, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (LIBERATE). ( Bewley, A; Day, RM; Goncalves, J; Gooderham, M; Green, L; Khanskaya, I; Piguet, V; Reich, K; Shah, K; Soung, J; Zhang, Z, 2017)
"Randomized, controlled trials demonstrated efficacy and safety of apremilast for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis."9.24Long-term safety and tolerability of apremilast in patients with psoriasis: Pooled safety analysis for ≥156 weeks from 2 phase 3, randomized, controlled trials (ESTEEM 1 and 2). ( Cather, JC; Chen, R; Crowley, J; Day, RM; Ferrándiz, C; Goncalves, J; Joly, P; Papp, KA; Peris, K; Shah, K; Thaçi, D, 2017)
"Panobinostat 20 mg in combination with bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone is an efficacious and well tolerated regimen for patients with relapsed multiple myeloma."9.22Bortezomib, thalidomide, dexamethasone, and panobinostat for patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MUK-six): a multicentre, open-label, phase 1/2 trial. ( Brown, SR; Cavenagh, J; Cook, G; Flanagan, L; Gregory, W; Hall, A; Kishore, B; Low, E; Oakervee, H; Popat, R; Streetly, M; Yong, K, 2016)
"We previously reported a phase 1b dose-escalation study of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and low-dose dexamethasone (CRd) in relapsed or progressive multiple myeloma where the maximum planned dose (MPD) was carfilzomib 20 mg/m2 days 1 and 2 of cycle 1 and 27 mg/m2 days 8, 9, 15, 16, and thereafter; lenalidomide 25 mg days 1 to 21; and dexamethasone 40 mg once weekly on 28-day cycles."9.17Phase 2 dose-expansion study (PX-171-006) of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and low-dose dexamethasone in relapsed or progressive multiple myeloma. ( Alsina, M; Bensinger, W; Huang, M; Kavalerchik, E; Martin, T; Niesvizky, R; Orlowski, RZ; Siegel, DS; Wang, M, 2013)
"Carfilzomib, a selective proteasome inhibitor, has shown safety and efficacy in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma."9.17Phase Ib dose-escalation study (PX-171-006) of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and low-dose dexamethasone in relapsed or progressive multiple myeloma. ( Alsina, M; Bensinger, WI; Kunkel, LA; Lee, S; Martin, TG; Niesvizky, R; Orlowski, RZ; Siegel, DS; Wang, M; Wong, AF, 2013)
"Irinotecan plus fuorouracil and leucovorin without oral intake of thalidomide is as effective and tolerable as irinotecan plus fuorouracil and leucovorin combined with oral thalidomide for advanced colorectal cancer."9.12[A randomized trial of irinotecan plus fuorouracil and leucovorin with thalidomide versus without thalidomide in the treatment for advanced colorectal cancer]. ( Chu, DT; Li, J; Qin, SK; Song, SP; Zhang, HG; Zhang, YJ, 2007)
"Thalidomide, an anti-angiogenic agent, does not have a good therapeutic effect for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma when used alone."9.11Effects of the combined treatment with thalidomide, megestrol and interleukine-2 in cirrhotic patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. A pilot study. ( Bendini, C; Bernardi, M; Cantarini, MC; Cappa, FM; Magini, G; Santi, V; Trevisani, F; Zambruni, A, 2005)
"A phase II trial is beginning using thalidomide as a treatment for chronic diarrhea in HIV-infected patients."9.08Thalidomide for diarrhea. ( , 1996)
"Celgene Corporation initiated a phase II safety and efficacy trial for Synovir (thalidomide) in the treatment of chronic intractable diarrhea in HIV-positive patients."9.08Thalidomide used to treat chronic diarrhea in HIV-positive patients. ( , 1996)
"To review the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of apremilast and determine its role relative to other agents in the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis."8.93Apremilast: A Novel Drug for Treatment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis. ( Bank, M; Haber, SL; Hamilton, S; Leong, SY; Pierce, E, 2016)
"Lenalidomide is a potent, novel thalidomide analog that has demonstrated promising clinical activity in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM)."8.84Lenalidomide: a new agent for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. ( Tariman, JD, 2007)
"Objective To evaluate the safety profile of ixazomib combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in clinical practice in Japan through an all-case post-marketing surveillance."8.12Safety Profile of Ixazomib in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma in Japan: An All-case Post-marketing Surveillance. ( Chou, T; Hashimoto, M; Hiraizumi, M; Hoshino, M; Kakimoto, Y; Shimizu, K, 2022)
"Apremilast is a novel oral phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor approved for psoriasis treatment."7.88Apremilast in psoriasis - a prospective real-world study. ( Herman, R; Monshi, B; Posch, C; Rappersberger, K; Richter, L; Sanlorenzo, M; Vujic, I, 2018)
"Apremilast is a novel oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor effective for psoriasis."7.88Real-world use of apremilast for patients with psoriasis in Japan. ( Hioki, T; Kamiya, K; Kishimoto, M; Komine, M; Ohtsuki, M; Sugai, J, 2018)
"In order to evaluate the main adverse effects of drug protocols using bortezomib and/or thalidomide for the treatment of multiple myeloma, we conducted a prospective study."7.83Pharmacovigilance of patients with multiple myeloma being treated with bortezomib and/or thalidomide. ( Atalla, A; Castro, TB; Hallack Neto, AE; Ribeiro, LC, 2016)
"Elucidate the mechanisms of induction of delayed diarrhea and determine the effects of the cytokine production inhibitor pentoxifylline (PTX) and thalidomide (TLD) in the experimental model of intestinal mucositis, induced by CPT-11."7.74Role of cytokines (TNF-alpha, IL-1beta and KC) in the pathogenesis of CPT-11-induced intestinal mucositis in mice: effect of pentoxifylline and thalidomide. ( Brito, GA; Carvalho, SB; Cunha, FQ; Melo, ML; Ribeiro, RA; Silva, JV; Soares, PM; Soares, RC; Souza, MH; Vale, ML, 2008)
" The most common adverse events (≥5% of patients) through week 52 were diarrhea (28."6.87Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast in Systemic- and Biologic-Naive Patients With Moderate Plaque Psoriasis: 52-Week Results of UNVEIL. ( Bagel, J; Chen, R; Duffin, KC; Goncalves, J; Jackson, JM; Lebwohl, M; Levi, E; Stein Gold, L, 2018)
" Most common adverse events (AEs) with placebo, apremilast 20 and apremilast 30 (0-16 weeks) were nasopharyngitis (8."6.84Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in the treatment of Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Efficacy, safety and tolerability results from a phase 2b randomized controlled trial. ( Chen, P; Day, RM; Imafuku, S; Komine, M; Maroli, A; Nemoto, O; Ohtsuki, M; Okubo, Y; Petric, R, 2017)
"During the 24 weeks of treatment, diarrhea was observed in four patients, and diarrhea and nausea were observed in one patient."5.56Combination therapy of apremilast and biologics in patients with psoriasis showing biologic fatigue. ( Sugai, S; Taguchi, R; Takamura, S; Teraki, Y, 2020)
"The addition of thalidomide to pyrotinib is expected to increase the clinical benefit in advanced NSCLC patients with HER2 exon 20 insertions, and reduce the incidence of pyrotinib-related diarrhea."5.41Pyrotinib combined with thalidomide in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients harboring HER2 exon 20 insertions (PRIDE): protocol of an open-label, single-arm phase II trial. ( Ai, X; Chen, Z; Jian, H; Li, Z; Lu, S; Song, Z; Yu, Y; Zhou, Z, 2021)
"Adults (≥18 years of age) with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (baseline PGA ≥3, BSA affected ≥10%, PASI ≥12) took oral apremilast (30 mg twice daily) for 8 weeks."5.34Apremilast with Add-On Calcipotriene/Betamethasone Dipropionate for Treating Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis. ( Bagel, J; Hetzel, A; Nelson, E; Riley, C, 2020)
"Several drugs are used to treat diarrhea, but the infection is frequently not cleared and the symptoms recur."5.30Thalidomide shows benefit for microsporidial diarrhea. ( Bartnof, HS, 1997)
"Randomized, controlled trials demonstrated efficacy and safety of apremilast for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis."5.24Long-term safety and tolerability of apremilast in patients with psoriasis: Pooled safety analysis for ≥156 weeks from 2 phase 3, randomized, controlled trials (ESTEEM 1 and 2). ( Cather, JC; Chen, R; Crowley, J; Day, RM; Ferrándiz, C; Goncalves, J; Joly, P; Papp, KA; Peris, K; Shah, K; Thaçi, D, 2017)
"Apremilast, an oral, small-molecule phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis."5.24The efficacy and safety of apremilast, etanercept and placebo in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: 52-week results from a phase IIIb, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (LIBERATE). ( Bewley, A; Day, RM; Goncalves, J; Gooderham, M; Green, L; Khanskaya, I; Piguet, V; Reich, K; Shah, K; Soung, J; Zhang, Z, 2017)
"Panobinostat 20 mg in combination with bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone is an efficacious and well tolerated regimen for patients with relapsed multiple myeloma."5.22Bortezomib, thalidomide, dexamethasone, and panobinostat for patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MUK-six): a multicentre, open-label, phase 1/2 trial. ( Brown, SR; Cavenagh, J; Cook, G; Flanagan, L; Gregory, W; Hall, A; Kishore, B; Low, E; Oakervee, H; Popat, R; Streetly, M; Yong, K, 2016)
"We previously reported a phase 1b dose-escalation study of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and low-dose dexamethasone (CRd) in relapsed or progressive multiple myeloma where the maximum planned dose (MPD) was carfilzomib 20 mg/m2 days 1 and 2 of cycle 1 and 27 mg/m2 days 8, 9, 15, 16, and thereafter; lenalidomide 25 mg days 1 to 21; and dexamethasone 40 mg once weekly on 28-day cycles."5.17Phase 2 dose-expansion study (PX-171-006) of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and low-dose dexamethasone in relapsed or progressive multiple myeloma. ( Alsina, M; Bensinger, W; Huang, M; Kavalerchik, E; Martin, T; Niesvizky, R; Orlowski, RZ; Siegel, DS; Wang, M, 2013)
"Carfilzomib, a selective proteasome inhibitor, has shown safety and efficacy in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma."5.17Phase Ib dose-escalation study (PX-171-006) of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and low-dose dexamethasone in relapsed or progressive multiple myeloma. ( Alsina, M; Bensinger, WI; Kunkel, LA; Lee, S; Martin, TG; Niesvizky, R; Orlowski, RZ; Siegel, DS; Wang, M; Wong, AF, 2013)
" These included Grade 3 neutropenia precluding planned paclitaxel therapy (n = 3), grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity (n = 2), chest pain (n = 1) and pulmonary embolism (n = 1)."5.14A modular Phase I study of lenalidomide and paclitaxel in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer following prior taxane therapy. ( Bekele, NB; Carter, CM; Mathew, P; Pagliaro, L; Tannir, N; Tu, SM, 2010)
"Irinotecan plus fuorouracil and leucovorin without oral intake of thalidomide is as effective and tolerable as irinotecan plus fuorouracil and leucovorin combined with oral thalidomide for advanced colorectal cancer."5.12[A randomized trial of irinotecan plus fuorouracil and leucovorin with thalidomide versus without thalidomide in the treatment for advanced colorectal cancer]. ( Chu, DT; Li, J; Qin, SK; Song, SP; Zhang, HG; Zhang, YJ, 2007)
"Thalidomide, an anti-angiogenic agent, does not have a good therapeutic effect for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma when used alone."5.11Effects of the combined treatment with thalidomide, megestrol and interleukine-2 in cirrhotic patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. A pilot study. ( Bendini, C; Bernardi, M; Cantarini, MC; Cappa, FM; Magini, G; Santi, V; Trevisani, F; Zambruni, A, 2005)
"Irinotecan is the only accepted second-line treatment for colorectal cancer in the USA."5.09Effect of thalidomide on gastrointestinal toxic effects of irinotecan. ( Broadwater, R; Govindarajan, R; Hauer-Jensen, M; Heaton, KM; Lang, NP; Zeitlin, A, 2000)
"Thalidomide may be an effective therapy for diarrhea and weight loss from E."5.08Thalidomide: a novel therapy for microsporidiosis. ( Barrett, M; Ellis, D; Francis, N; Gazzard, B; Rowbottom, A; Sharpstone, D; Tovey, G, 1997)
"Celgene Corporation initiated a phase II safety and efficacy trial for Synovir (thalidomide) in the treatment of chronic intractable diarrhea in HIV-positive patients."5.08Thalidomide used to treat chronic diarrhea in HIV-positive patients. ( , 1996)
"A phase II trial is beginning using thalidomide as a treatment for chronic diarrhea in HIV-infected patients."5.08Thalidomide for diarrhea. ( , 1996)
"To review the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of apremilast and determine its role relative to other agents in the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis."4.93Apremilast: A Novel Drug for Treatment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis. ( Bank, M; Haber, SL; Hamilton, S; Leong, SY; Pierce, E, 2016)
"Lenalidomide is a potent, novel thalidomide analog that has demonstrated promising clinical activity in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM)."4.84Lenalidomide: a new agent for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. ( Tariman, JD, 2007)
"Objective To evaluate the safety profile of ixazomib combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in clinical practice in Japan through an all-case post-marketing surveillance."4.12Safety Profile of Ixazomib in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma in Japan: An All-case Post-marketing Surveillance. ( Chou, T; Hashimoto, M; Hiraizumi, M; Hoshino, M; Kakimoto, Y; Shimizu, K, 2022)
"We present a series of general and specific recommendations based on pathophysiologic considerations for managing the most common adverse effects of apremilast that lead to treatment discontinuation: diarrhea, nausea, and headache."4.02Multidisciplinary Management of the Adverse Effects of Apremilast. ( Alonso Suárez, J; Beltrán Catalán, E; Blasco Maldonado, C; Daudén Tello, E; García-Merino, A; Herrero Manso, MC; Jiménez Morales, A; Marín-Jiménez, I; Martín-Arranz, MD; Porta Etessam, J; Rodríguez-Sagrado, MA; Rosas Gómez de Salazar, J; Salgado-Boquete, L; Trujillo Martín, E, 2021)
"Apremilast is a "small molecule," an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor indicated for the twice-daily treatment of adults with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA)."3.91Skin involvement in patients with psoriatic arthritis: preliminary results of treatment with apremilast in real world setting. ( Campanati, A; Diotallevi, F; Molinelli, E; Offidani, A; Radi, G, 2019)
"Apremilast is a novel oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor effective for psoriasis."3.88Real-world use of apremilast for patients with psoriasis in Japan. ( Hioki, T; Kamiya, K; Kishimoto, M; Komine, M; Ohtsuki, M; Sugai, J, 2018)
"Apremilast is a novel oral phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor approved for psoriasis treatment."3.88Apremilast in psoriasis - a prospective real-world study. ( Herman, R; Monshi, B; Posch, C; Rappersberger, K; Richter, L; Sanlorenzo, M; Vujic, I, 2018)
"In order to evaluate the main adverse effects of drug protocols using bortezomib and/or thalidomide for the treatment of multiple myeloma, we conducted a prospective study."3.83Pharmacovigilance of patients with multiple myeloma being treated with bortezomib and/or thalidomide. ( Atalla, A; Castro, TB; Hallack Neto, AE; Ribeiro, LC, 2016)
"Elucidate the mechanisms of induction of delayed diarrhea and determine the effects of the cytokine production inhibitor pentoxifylline (PTX) and thalidomide (TLD) in the experimental model of intestinal mucositis, induced by CPT-11."3.74Role of cytokines (TNF-alpha, IL-1beta and KC) in the pathogenesis of CPT-11-induced intestinal mucositis in mice: effect of pentoxifylline and thalidomide. ( Brito, GA; Carvalho, SB; Cunha, FQ; Melo, ML; Ribeiro, RA; Silva, JV; Soares, PM; Soares, RC; Souza, MH; Vale, ML, 2008)
"The clinical use of irinotecan (CPT-11) is hindered by dose-limiting diarrhea and myelosuppression."3.73Pharmacokinetic mechanisms for reduced toxicity of irinotecan by coadministered thalidomide. ( Bian, JS; Boelsterli, UA; Chan, E; Chan, SY; Chen, YZ; Duan, W; Ho, PC; Hu, ZP; Huang, M; Ng, KY; Yang, XX; Zhou, SF, 2006)
"Dose-limiting diarrhea and myelosuppression compromise the success of irinotecan (7-ethyl-10-[4-[1-piperidino]-1-piperidino]carbonyloxycamptothecin) (CPT-11)-based chemotherapy."3.73A mechanistic study on reduced toxicity of irinotecan by coadministered thalidomide, a tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor. ( Bian, JS; Chan, E; Duan, W; Hu, ZP; Huang, M; Li, X; Sheu, FS; Wang, JC; Xu, AL; Yang, XX; Zhang, Q; Zhou, SF; Zhu, YZ, 2006)
" The most common adverse events (≥5% of patients) through week 52 were diarrhea (28."2.87Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast in Systemic- and Biologic-Naive Patients With Moderate Plaque Psoriasis: 52-Week Results of UNVEIL. ( Bagel, J; Chen, R; Duffin, KC; Goncalves, J; Jackson, JM; Lebwohl, M; Levi, E; Stein Gold, L, 2018)
" Most common adverse events (AEs) with placebo, apremilast 20 and apremilast 30 (0-16 weeks) were nasopharyngitis (8."2.84Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in the treatment of Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Efficacy, safety and tolerability results from a phase 2b randomized controlled trial. ( Chen, P; Day, RM; Imafuku, S; Komine, M; Maroli, A; Nemoto, O; Ohtsuki, M; Okubo, Y; Petric, R, 2017)
"Capecitabine was administered orally twice a day at a dose of 1, 250 mg/m(2) for 14-day followed by 7-day rest and oral thalidomide 100 mg was given daily without interruption until disease progression or occurrence of unacceptable toxicity."2.78[Effect of second-line treatment with capecitabine and thalidomide in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer]. ( Li, CH; Ma, TH; Shi, SB; Tang, XY, 2013)
"Apremilast is a novel oral PDE4 enzyme inhibitor capable of blocking leukocyte production of IL-12, IL-23, TNF-a, INF- with subsequent suppression of Th1 and Th17-mediated immune responses, and proven clinical efficacy for psoriasis as well as rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis."2.77Apremilast for discoid lupus erythematosus: results of a phase 2, open-label, single-arm, pilot study. ( De Souza, A; Franks, AG; Merola, JF; Oliver, S; Strober, BE, 2012)
"Lenalidomide appears to be efficacious and safe in patients with refractory CLE, but clinical relapse is frequent after its withdrawal."2.77Efficacy and safety of lenalidomide for refractory cutaneous lupus erythematosus. ( Ávila, G; Cortés-Hernández, J; Ordi-Ros, J; Vilardell-Tarrés, M, 2012)
"Oral lenalidomide 25 mg was self-administered once daily on days 1 to 21 of every 28-day cycle for up to 52 weeks as tolerated, or until disease progression."2.74Lenalidomide oral monotherapy produces durable responses in relapsed or refractory indolent non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma. ( Cole, C; Ervin-Haynes, A; Justice, G; Kaplan, H; Moore, T; Pietronigro, D; Reeder, C; Takeshita, K; Voralia, M; Vose, JM; Wiernik, PH; Witzig, TE; Zeldis, JB, 2009)
"Recent clinical studies have demonstrated a reduction of irinotecan (CPT-11) gastrointestinal toxicities when the CPT-11 is administered in combination with thalidomide in patients with diagnosis of colorectal cancer."2.72Irinotecan in combination with thalidomide in patients with advanced solid tumors: a clinical study with pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic evaluation. ( Allegrini, G; Amatori, F; Bocci, G; Cerri, E; Cupini, S; Danesi, R; Del Tacca, M; Di Paolo, A; Falcone, A; Marcucci, L; Masi, G, 2006)
"During the 24 weeks of treatment, diarrhea was observed in four patients, and diarrhea and nausea were observed in one patient."1.56Combination therapy of apremilast and biologics in patients with psoriasis showing biologic fatigue. ( Sugai, S; Taguchi, R; Takamura, S; Teraki, Y, 2020)
"Several drugs are used to treat diarrhea, but the infection is frequently not cleared and the symptoms recur."1.30Thalidomide shows benefit for microsporidial diarrhea. ( Bartnof, HS, 1997)

Research

Studies (43)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19901 (2.33)18.7374
1990's6 (13.95)18.2507
2000's11 (25.58)29.6817
2010's20 (46.51)24.3611
2020's5 (11.63)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Ai, X1
Song, Z1
Jian, H1
Zhou, Z1
Chen, Z1
Yu, Y1
Li, Z1
Lu, S1
Kakimoto, Y1
Hoshino, M1
Hashimoto, M1
Hiraizumi, M1
Shimizu, K1
Chou, T1
Takamura, S1
Sugai, S1
Taguchi, R1
Teraki, Y1
Daudén Tello, E1
Alonso Suárez, J1
Beltrán Catalán, E1
Blasco Maldonado, C1
Herrero Manso, MC1
Jiménez Morales, A1
Marín-Jiménez, I1
Martín-Arranz, MD1
García-Merino, A1
Porta Etessam, J1
Rodríguez-Sagrado, MA1
Rosas Gómez de Salazar, J1
Trujillo Martín, E1
Salgado-Boquete, L1
Bagel, J2
Nelson, E1
Riley, C1
Hetzel, A1
Ohtsuki, M2
Okubo, Y1
Komine, M2
Imafuku, S1
Day, RM3
Chen, P1
Petric, R1
Maroli, A1
Nemoto, O1
Crowley, J1
Thaçi, D1
Joly, P1
Peris, K1
Papp, KA1
Goncalves, J3
Chen, R2
Shah, K2
Ferrándiz, C1
Cather, JC1
Vujic, I1
Herman, R1
Sanlorenzo, M1
Posch, C1
Monshi, B1
Rappersberger, K1
Richter, L1
Stein Gold, L1
Lebwohl, M1
Jackson, JM1
Levi, E1
Duffin, KC1
Lee, EB1
Amin, M1
Egeberg, A1
Wu, JJ1
Ighani, A1
Georgakopoulos, JR1
Shear, NH1
Walsh, S1
Yeung, J1
Kishimoto, M1
Hioki, T1
Kamiya, K1
Sugai, J1
Radi, G1
Campanati, A1
Diotallevi, F1
Molinelli, E1
Offidani, A1
Niesvizky, R2
Martin, TG1
Bensinger, WI1
Alsina, M2
Siegel, DS2
Kunkel, LA1
Wong, AF1
Lee, S1
Orlowski, RZ2
Wang, M2
Shi, SB1
Ma, TH1
Tang, XY1
Li, CH1
Martin, T1
Bensinger, W1
Kavalerchik, E1
Huang, M3
Pawlyn, C1
Khan, MS1
Muls, A1
Sriskandarajah, P1
Kaiser, MF1
Davies, FE1
Morgan, GJ1
Andreyev, HJ1
Haber, SL1
Hamilton, S1
Bank, M1
Leong, SY1
Pierce, E1
Castro, TB1
Hallack Neto, AE1
Atalla, A1
Ribeiro, LC1
Reich, K1
Gooderham, M1
Green, L1
Bewley, A1
Zhang, Z1
Khanskaya, I1
Piguet, V1
Soung, J1
Popat, R1
Brown, SR1
Flanagan, L1
Hall, A1
Gregory, W1
Kishore, B1
Streetly, M1
Oakervee, H1
Yong, K1
Cook, G1
Low, E1
Cavenagh, J1
Witzig, TE1
Wiernik, PH1
Moore, T1
Reeder, C1
Cole, C1
Justice, G1
Kaplan, H1
Voralia, M1
Pietronigro, D1
Takeshita, K1
Ervin-Haynes, A1
Zeldis, JB1
Vose, JM1
Mathew, P1
Tannir, N1
Tu, SM1
Carter, CM1
Bekele, NB1
Pagliaro, L1
Wolf, JL1
Siegel, D1
Goldschmidt, H1
Hazell, K1
Bourquelot, PM1
Bengoudifa, BR1
Matous, J1
Vij, R1
de Magalhaes-Silverman, M1
Abonour, R1
Anderson, KC1
Lonial, S1
De Souza, A1
Strober, BE1
Merola, JF1
Oliver, S1
Franks, AG1
Cortés-Hernández, J1
Ávila, G1
Vilardell-Tarrés, M1
Ordi-Ros, J1
Cappa, FM1
Cantarini, MC1
Magini, G1
Zambruni, A1
Bendini, C1
Santi, V1
Bernardi, M1
Trevisani, F1
Allegrini, G1
Di Paolo, A1
Cerri, E1
Cupini, S1
Amatori, F1
Masi, G1
Danesi, R1
Marcucci, L1
Bocci, G1
Del Tacca, M1
Falcone, A1
Yang, XX2
Hu, ZP2
Chan, SY1
Duan, W2
Ho, PC1
Boelsterli, UA1
Ng, KY1
Chan, E2
Bian, JS2
Chen, YZ1
Zhou, SF2
Xu, AL1
Zhu, YZ1
Sheu, FS1
Zhang, Q1
Li, X1
Wang, JC1
Melo, ML1
Brito, GA1
Soares, RC1
Carvalho, SB1
Silva, JV1
Soares, PM1
Vale, ML1
Souza, MH1
Cunha, FQ1
Ribeiro, RA1
Zhang, HG1
Li, J1
Qin, SK1
Zhang, YJ1
Song, SP1
Chu, DT1
Tariman, JD1
Nicolasora, NP1
Reddy, P1
Kaul, DR1
Sharpstone, D2
Rowbottom, A2
Nelson, M1
Gazzard, B2
Francis, N1
Tovey, G1
Ellis, D1
Barrett, M1
Surawicz, CM1
Govindarajan, R1
Heaton, KM1
Broadwater, R1
Zeitlin, A1
Lang, NP1
Hauer-Jensen, M1
Bartnof, HS1
Tchekmedyian, NS1
Sugiyama, Y1

Clinical Trials (12)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Safety and Efficacy of Pyrotinib Combined With Thalidomide in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With HER2 Exon 20 Insertions: A Prospective, Single-arm, Open-label Phase II Study[NCT04382300]Phase 239 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-06-30Recruiting
A Phase 2B, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Efficacy and Safety Study of Two Doses of Apremilast (CC-10004) In Japanese Subjects With Moderate-To-Severe Plaque-Type Psoriasis[NCT01988103]Phase 2254 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-09Completed
A Pilot Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast in Patients of Chronic and Recurrent Erythema Nodosum Leprosum[NCT04822909]Phase 410 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-15Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast in Patients With Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis[NCT06032858]Phase 430 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-03-06Completed
A Phase 4, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast (CC-10004) in Subjects With Moderate Plaque Psoriasis[NCT02425826]Phase 4221 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-20Completed
Phase 1b Multicenter Dose Escalation Study of Carfilzomib With Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone for Safety and Activity in Relapsed Multiple Myeloma[NCT00603447]Phase 184 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
A Phase 3B, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of Apremilast (CC-10004), Etanercept, And Placebo, In Subjects With Moderate To Severe Plaque Psoriasis[NCT01690299]Phase 3250 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-01Completed
A Phase I/IIa Trial of VTD-panobinostat Treatment and Panobinostat Maintenance in Relapsed and Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients[NCT02145715]Phase 1/Phase 254 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-01-31Active, not recruiting
A Prospective, Multicenter, Single Arm, Phase II Clinical Trial of Clarithromycin, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (BiRd Regimen) in the Treatment of the First Relapsed Multiple Myeloma[NCT04063189]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-03-21Recruiting
A Phase II, Multicenter, Single-Arm, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Single-Agent Lenalidomide (Revlimid®, CC-5013) in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma[NCT00179673]Phase 243 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Completed
Phase II Study To Evaluate The Safety And Efficacy Of Lenalidomide For The Treatment Of Refractory Cutaneous Lupus[NCT01408199]Phase 415 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
Study of the Effect of Glutamine Supplementation on Chemotherapy Induced Toxicities in Breast Cancer Patients- A Prospective, Randomised, Single Blind, Three Arm, Phase Four Prevention Trial[NCT00772824]Phase 423 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-31Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Change From Baseline in Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score of the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-item (SF-36) Health Survey Version 2.0 at Week 16

SF-36 is a 36-item general health status instrument often used in clinical trials and health services research. It consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life (better functioning) (NCT01988103)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.59
Apremilast 20mg-0.71
Apremilast 30mg0.27

Change From Baseline in Pruritus Visual Analogue Scale 100-mm (VAS) at Week 16

The pruritus visual analog scale (VAS) was used to measure the amount of itching and discomfort a participant experiences. Participant's assessment of pruritus (Itch) asked: On average, how much itch have you had because of your condition in the past week? Higher scores correspond to more severe symptom or disease. The participant places a vertical line on a 100-mm VAS on which the left-hand boundary represents no itch at all and the right-hand boundary represents the worst itch imaginable. The distance from the vertical line to the left-hand boundary is recorded. VAS scores range from 0 to 100 mm, where higher scores correspond to worse pruritis (itch). (NCT01988103)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo7.1
Apremilast 20mg-7.5
Apremilast 30mg-17.7

Change From Baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Week 16

"Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) was developed as a practical questionnaire for use in a dermatology clinical setting to assess limitations related to the impact of skin disease. The instrument contains 10 items dealing with the participants skin. With the exception of Item Number 7, the participant responds on a four-point scale, ranging from Very Much (score 3) to Not at All or Not relevant (score 0). Item Number 7 is a multi-part item, the first part of which ascertains whether the participant's skin prevented them from working or studying (Yes or No, scores 3 or 0 respectively), and if No, then the participant is asked how much of a problem the skin has been at work or study over the past week, with response alternatives being A lot, A little, or Not at all (scores 2, 1, or 0 respectively). The DLQI total score has a possible range from 0 to 30, with 30 corresponding to the worst quality of life, and 0 corresponding to the best." (NCT01988103)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo1.3
Apremilast 20mg-0.5
Apremilast 30mg-2.2

Percent Change From Baseline in the Psoriasis Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16

"BSA is a measurement of involved skin. The overall BSA affected by psoriasis is estimated based on the palm area of the subject's hand (entire palmar surface or handprint including the fingers), which equates to approximately 1% of total body surface area." (NCT01988103)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo7.5
Apremilast 20mg-21.6
Apremilast 30mg-30.5

Percent Change From Baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score

The PASI is a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. The PASI is a validated instrument that has become standard in clinical trials for psoriasis. The PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting a greater disease severity. (NCT01988103)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-3.7
Apremilast 20mg-33.1
Apremilast 30mg-43.1

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement From Baseline (Response) Reduction in the PASI-50 at Week 16

PASI-50 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 50% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 16. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The PASI score was set to missing if any severity score or degree of involvement is missing. (NCT01988103)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo21.4
Apremilast 20mg41.2
Apremilast 30mg50.6

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) From Baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI-75) at Week 16

PASI-75 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 16. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The PASI score was set to missing if any severity score or degree of involvement was missing. (NCT01988103)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo7.1
Apremilast 20mg23.5
Apremilast 30mg28.2

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) With at Least 2 Point Reduction From Baseline to Week 16

The sPGA is a measure of psoriasis disease severity at the time of evaluation by the Investigator. It does not compare assessments across visits or rely on investigator recall or prior disease. The sPGA is a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (clear, except for residual discoloration) to 5 (severe; majority of plaques have severe thickness, erythema, and scaling). The investigator examines all of the lesions on the participant and assigns a score ranging from 0 to 5 for thickness, erythema and degree of scaling. Scores for thickness, erythema and scaling are then summed and the mean of these 3 scores equals the overall sPGA score. (NCT01988103)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo8.8
Apremilast 20mg23.9
Apremilast 30mg29.6

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) in the During the Apremilast-exposure Period

An AE was any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen in a participant during the course of study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the participant's health, including laboratory test values regardless of etiology. Any worsening (ie, any clinically significant adverse change in the frequency or intensity of a preexisting condition) was considered an AE. A serious AE (SAE) is any untoward adverse event that is fatal, life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, requires or prolongs existing in-patient hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or a condition that may jeopardize the patient or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. An AE is a treatment emergent AE if the AE start date is on or after the date of the first dose of study drug and no later than 28 days after the last dose. (NCT01988103)
Timeframe: From the first dose of apremilast (either Week 0 or Week 16 for participants originally randomized to placebo who were re-randomized at Week 16) until 28 days after the last dose of apremilast.

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
≥ At Least 1 TEAE≥ 1 Drug-related TEAR≥ At Least 1 Severe TEAE≥ 1 Serious TEAEAny Serious Drug-related TEAE≥ 1 TEAE leading to Drug Interruption≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Drug Withdrawal≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Death
Apremilast 20mg9434121156191
Apremilast 30mg89372202100

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) in the Placebo Controlled Phase

An AE was any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence, that may appear or worsen in a participant during the course of study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the participant's health, including laboratory test values regardless of etiology. Any worsening (ie, any clinically significant adverse change in the frequency or intensity of a preexisting condition) was considered an AE. A serious AE (SAE) is any untoward adverse event that is fatal, life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, requires or prolongs existing in-patient hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or a condition that may jeopardize the patient or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. An AE is a treatment emergent AE if the AE start date is on or after the date of the first dose of study drug and no later than 28 days after the last dose. (NCT01988103)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
≥ At least 1 TEAE≥ 1 Drug-related TEAE≥ At least 1 Severe TEAE≥ 1 Serious TEAEAny Serious Drug-related TEAE≥ 1 TEAE leading to Drug Interruption≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Drug Withdrawal≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Death
Apremilast 20mg49184422100
Apremilast 30mg4425000060
Placebo358100240

Mean Change From Baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Week 16

"DLQI is a simple, compact, and practical questionnaire for use in a dermatology clinical setting to assess limitations related to the impact of skin disease. The instrument contains ten items dealing with the participant's skin. With the exception of Item Number 7, the participant responds on a four-point scale, ranging from Very Much (score 3) to Not at All or Not relevant (score 0). Item Number 7 is a multi-part item, the first part of which ascertains whether the participant's skin prevented them from working or studying (Yes or No, scores 3 or 0 respectively), and if No, then the participant is asked how much of a problem the skin has been at work or study over the past week, with response alternatives being A lot, A little, or Not at all (scores 2, 1, or 0 respectively). The DLQI total score is derived by summing all item scores, which has a possible range of 0 to 30, with 30 corresponding to the worst quality of life, and 0 corresponding to the best." (NCT02425826)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16 (end of phase)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-2.4
Apremilast-4.8

Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area Severity Index Score (PASI) at Week 16

The PASI score is a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. (NCT02425826)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16 (end of phase)

Interventionpercentage change (Mean)
Placebo-3.87
Apremilast-40.72

Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in the Product of BSA (%) and the sPGA Which is Considered as the Total Psoriasis Severity Index at Week 16

"BSA is a measurement of involved skin. The overall BSA affected by psoriasis is estimated based on the palm area of the participant's hand (entire palmar surface or handprint including the fingers), which equates to approximately 1% of total body surface area. The sPGA is a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (clear), 1 (almost clear), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), to 4 (severe), 5 (very severe) incorporating a separate assessment of the severity of the three primary signs of the plaques of all involved areas: erythema, scaling and plaque elevation with an overall sPGA calculated as (E + I + D)/3. Scores for each assessment are rounded to the nearest whole number to result in the final score. The range of BSA*sPGA mean percentage change from baseline to week 16 (end of phase) were -100 to 344.4 and -100 to 100 for the placebo and apremilast groups respectively. Higher scores represented worse outcomes." (NCT02425826)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16 (end of phase)

Interventionpercentage change (Mean)
Placebo-10.17
Apremilast-48.07

Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in the Product of BSA (%) x sPGA at Week 52

"BSA is a measurement of involved skin. The overall BSA affected by psoriasis is estimated based on the palm area of the participant's hand (entire palmar surface or handprint including the fingers), which equates to approximately 1% of total body surface area. The sPGA is a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (clear), 1 (almost clear), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), to 4 (severe), 5 (very severe) incorporating a separate assessment of the severity of the three primary signs of the plaques of all involved areas: erythema, scaling and plaque elevation with an overall sPGA calculated as (E + I + D)/3. Scores for each assessment are rounded to the nearest whole number to result in the final score." (NCT02425826)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52

Interventionpercentage change (Mean)
Placebo-Apremilast-42.23
Apremilast-55.45

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Clear (0) or Very Mild (1) on Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Scale at Week 16 From Baseline

The PtGA response rate is defined as the percentage of participants achieving 0 (clear) or 1 (very mild) on the PtGA scale at Week 16. The PtGA is the assessment by the participant of the overall disease severity at the time of evaluation. The PtGA is a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe). (NCT02425826)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16 (end of phase)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo20.5
Apremilast33.8

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a sPGA Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) at Week 16 From Baseline

The sPGA is an assessment by the investigator of the overall disease severity at the time of evaluation. Erythema (E), induration (I), and desquamation (D) are scored on a 6-point scale, ranging from 0 (clear) to 5 (very severe), with an overall sPGA calculated as (E + I + D)/3. Scores for each assessment are averaged and rounded to the nearest whole number to result in the final sPGA score. (NCT02425826)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16 (end of phase)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo9.6
Apremilast30.4

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 50% Improvement (Response) in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)-50 From Baseline at Week 16.

The PASI score is a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. (NCT02425826)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16 (end of phase)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo24.7
Apremilast53.4

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 75% Improvement (Response) in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)-75 From Baseline at Week 16

The PASI score is a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. (NCT02425826)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16 (end of phase)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo8.2
Apremilast21.6

Percentage of Participants With Scalp Psoriasis Who Achieved a Clear (0) or Minimal (1) on Scalp Physician's Global Assessment (ScPGA) Scale at Week 16.

The ScPGA assessed scalp involvement, if present at baseline. The 6-point ScPGA scale includes three dimensions (Plaque Thickening, Scaling, and Erythema) and a global assessment. Scores range from 0 (clear), 1 (minimal), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (severe), to 5 (very severe). Analysis of ScPGA was restricted to the participants with scalp involvement at baseline. (NCT02425826)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16 (end of phase)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo38.2
Apremilast50.0

Mean Change From Baseline in Pruritus Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

The Pruritus VAS assessment was conducted at the baseline visit and each post-baseline visit. The participant was asked to place a vertical stroke on a 100 mm VAS on which the left-hand boundary (0) represents no itch, and the right-hand boundary (100) represents itch as severe as can be imagined. The distance from the mark to the left-hand boundary will be recorded. The Pruritus VAS score ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores correspond to more severe symptom. (NCT02425826)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 1 and 16 (end of phase)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 1Week 16
Apremilast-13.9-19.2
Placebo-9.6-10.2

Number of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Apremilast-Exposure Phase

Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are defined as any AEs that begin or worsen on or after the start of study drug through 28 days after the last dose of study drug or study treatment discontinuation date, whichever was later. A serious AE (SAE) is any untoward adverse event that is fatal, life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, requires or prolongs existing in-patient hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is a condition that may jeopardize the patient or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. (NCT02425826)
Timeframe: Date of first dose of apremilast during the placebo controlled phase or date of first dose of apremilast after week 16; overall maximum duration of exposure was 61.5 weeks during apremilast-exposure phase

Interventionparticipants (Number)
≥ At Least 1 TEAE≥ 1 Drug-related TEAE≥ At Least 1 Severe TEAE≥ At Least 1 Serious TEAE≥ 1 Serious Drug-related TEAE≥ 1 TEAE leading to drug withdrawal≥ 1 TEAE Leading to drug interruptionAny TEAE leading to death
Apremilast14298510114270

Number of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Placebo Controlled Phase

Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are defined as any AEs that begin or worsen on or after the start of study drug through 28 days after the last dose of study drug or study treatment discontinuation date, whichever was later. A serious AE (SAE) is any untoward adverse event that is fatal, life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, requires or prolongs existing in-patient hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is a condition that may jeopardize the patient or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. (NCT02425826)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug to Week 16; maximum duration of exposure was 20.1 weeks during placebo controlled phase

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
≥ At Least 1 TEAE≥ 1 Drug-related TEAE≥ At Least 1 Severe TEAE≥ At Least 1 Serious TEAE≥ 1 Serious Drug-related TEAE≥ 1 TEAE leading to drug withdrawal≥ 1 TEAE Leading to drug interruptionAny TEAE leading to death
Apremilast9271330590
Placebo3521100330

Percentage of Participants With Scalp Psoriasis Who Were Initially Randomized to Apremilast and Maintained the Scalp Physician's Global Assessment (ScPGA) Response From Week 16 to Week 52.

The ScPGA will assess scalp involvement, if present at baseline. The 6-point ScPGA scale includes three dimensions (Plaque Thickening, Scaling, and Erythema) and a global assessment with scores range from 0 (clear), 1 (minimal), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (severe), to 5 (very severe). Analysis of ScPGA is restricted to the participants with scalp involvement at baseline. (NCT02425826)
Timeframe: Week 16 to Week 52

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Responder status at Week 16Responder status maintained at Week 52
Apremilast50.080.4

Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Version II at Week 16

The TSQM version II is an 11-question self-administered instrument to understand a participation's satisfaction with the current therapy. The TSQM scale comprises four domains, on which participants evaluate their medication (i.e., effectiveness, side effects, convenience and global satisfaction. TSQM scores range from 0 to 100 for each domain; a higher score mean indicates higher satisfaction with treatment. (NCT02425826)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16 (end of phase)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
TSQM-EffectivenessTSQM-Side EffectsTSQM-ConvenienceTSQM-Global Satisfaction
Apremilast57.2578.5066.9363.24
Placebo38.8175.0065.6848.74

Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Version II at Week 52

The TSQM version II is an 11-question self-administered instrument to understand a participants satisfaction on the current therapy. The TSQM scale comprises four domains, on which participants evaluate their medication (i.e., effectiveness, side effects, convenience and global satisfaction. TSQM scores range from 0 to 100 for each domain; a higher score indicates higher satisfaction with treatment. (NCT02425826)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 52

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
TSQM-EffectivenessTSQM-Side EffectsTSQM-ConvenienceTSQM-Global Satisfaction
Apremilast54.1375.4571.7659.92
Placebo-Apremilast57.6877.2972.7459.24

Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities

"Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as any of the following events assessed as related to carfilzomib, lenalidomide, or dexamethasone: Nonhematologic~≥ Grade 2 neuropathy with pain~≥ Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity (excluding nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, hyperglycemia due to dexamethasone, and rash due to lenalidomide)~≥ Grade 3 nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea uncontrolled by maximal supportive therapy~≥ Grade 4 fatigue persisting > 7 days~Treatment delay for toxicity > 21 days~Hematologic~Grade 4 neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] < 500/mm³) > 7 days~Febrile neutropenia (ANC < 1,000/mm³ with fever ≥ 38.3ºC)~Grade 4 thrombocytopenia (platelets < 25,000/mm³) for > 7 days despite holding treatment, or Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia associated with bleeding~Treatment delay for toxicity > 21 days.~The maximum-tolerated dose was defined as the dose level below which a drug-related DLT was observed in ≥ 33% of participants in a cohort." (NCT00603447)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1: CFZ 15 mg/m² + LEN 10 mg0
2: CFZ 15 mg/m² + LEN 15 mg0
3: CFZ 15 mg/m² + LEN 20 mg0
4: CFZ 20 mg/m² + LEN 20 mg0
5: CFZ 20 mg/m² + LEN 25 mg0
6: CFZ 20/27 mg/m² + LEN 25 mg1

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

"Treatment-related are those AEs with possible or probable relationship to carfilzomib, lenalidomide or dexamethasone as assessed by the Investigator. The severity of each adverse event was graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 3.0, per the following: Grade 1 = Mild, Grade 2 = Moderate, Grade 3 = Severe, Grade 4 = Life-threatening and Grade 5 = Death.~Serious adverse events were defined as AEs meeting one of the following: death, life-threatening, required or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, a congenital anomaly/birth defect in the offspring of an exposed participant, important medical events that may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above, or pregnancy or suspected pregnancy." (NCT00603447)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study drug until 30 days after the last dose; 1 to 52 months, with an average of 12 months.

,,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any adverse eventTreatment-related adverse eventGrade 3 or higher adverse eventTreatment-related Grade 3 or higher adverse eventSerious adverse eventAE leading to discontinuation of any study drugAE leading to discontinuation of carfilzomibDeaths within 30 days of last dose of study drug
1: CFZ 15 mg/m² + LEN 10 mg64513100
2: CFZ 15 mg/m² + LEN 15 mg65643100
3: CFZ 15 mg/m² + LEN 20 mg88874310
4: CFZ 20 mg/m² + LEN 20 mg64644420
5: CFZ 20 mg/m² + LEN 25 mg66663210
6: CFZ 20/27 mg/m² + LEN 25 mg88886310
7: CFZ 20/27 mg/m² + LEN 25 mg44434138221893

Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score In Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo and Etanercept and Placebo at Week 16

"DLQI is a simple, compact, and practical questionnaire for use in a dermatology clinical setting to assess limitations related to the impact of skin disease. The instrument contains ten items dealing with the participant's skin. With the exception of Item Number 7, the participant responds on a four-point scale, ranging from Very Much (score 3) to Not at All or Not relevant (score 0). Item Number 7 is a multi-part item, the first part of which ascertains whether the participant's skin prevented them from working or studying (Yes or No, scores 3 or 0 respectively), and if No, then the participant is asked how much of a problem the skin has been at work or study over the past week, with response alternatives being A lot, A little, or Not at all (scores 2, 1, or 0 respectively). The DLQI total score is derived by summing all item scores, which has a possible range of 0 to 30, with 30 corresponding to the worst quality of life, and 0 corresponding to the best." (NCT01690299)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-3.9
Apremilast 30mg Plus Placebo Injection-8.4
Etanercept 50mg Plus Placebo Tablet-7.8

Change From Baseline in the Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score of the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-item (SF-36) Health Survey Version 2.0 in Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo and Etanercept and Placebo at Week 16

The SF-36 is a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Scores from the 8 scales were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population to have a mean of 50 and variance = 10, with higher scores indicating better health. From these 8 scale, two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS), both having the same mean of 50 and variance = 10 as noted for the individual scales for the U.S. general population, and with higher scores indicating better health. For MCS, change from baseline was calculated, where change = visit value - baseline value. (NCT01690299)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo2.6
Apremilast Plus Placebo Injection3.5
Etanercept Plus Placebo Tablets4.8

Percent Change From Baseline in the Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) for Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo and Etanercept and Placebo at Week 16

"BSA is a measurement of involved skin. The overall BSA affected by psoriasis was estimated based on the palm area of the participant's hand (entire palmar surface or handprint including the fingers), which equates to approximately 1% of total body surface area. BSA percent change from baseline was determined at each visit of the study, and is calculated as 100*(post-baseline BSA - baseline BSA) / baseline BSA." (NCT01690299)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-16.3
Apremilast Plus Placebo Injection-47.7
Etanercept Plus Placebo Tablets-56.1

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement (Response) in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI-50) for Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo and Etanercept and Placebo at Week 16

PASI-50 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 50% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 16. The PASI score was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The PASI score was set to missing if any severity score or degree of involvement was missing. (NCT01690299)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo33.3
Apremilast Plus Placebo Injection62.7
Etanercept Plus Placebo Tablet83.1

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) for the Comparison Between Etanercept 50mg SC QW and Placebo at Week 16

PASI-75 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 16. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The PASI score was set to missing if any severity score or degree of involvement was missing. (NCT01690299)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo11.9
Etanercept 50mg Plus Placebo Tablet48.2

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI-75) for the Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo at Week 16 From Baseline

PASI-75 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 16. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The PASI score was set to missing if any severity score or degree of involvement was missing. (NCT01690299)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo11.9
Apremilast Plus Placebo Injection39.8

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Lattice System Physician's Global Assessment (LS-PGA) Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear at Week 16 in Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo and Etanercept and Placebo at Week 16

The Lattice System Physician's Global Assessment is a global assessment performed by the investigator of psoriasis severity. Integrating ranges of BSA involvement with assessments of overall plaque severity (using a 4 point scale from none to marked for the signs of plaque elevation, erythema and scale), the LS-PGA produces an overall assessment of psoriasis severity on an 8-point scale, ranging from clear to very severe. To determine the final score, the lattice portion is governed by the BSA and among the plaque qualities, weights plaque elevation as most important, erythema next, and scale least. (NCT01690299)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo6.0
Apremilast Plus Placebo Injection24.1
Etanercept Plus Placebo Tablets22.9

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) With at Least 2 Points Reduction for Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo and Etanercept and Placebo at Week 16

The sPGA is an assessment by the Investigator of the overall disease severity at the time of evaluation. The sPGA is a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe), incorporating an assessment of the severity of the three primary signs of the disease: erythema, scaling and plaque elevation. When making the assessment of overall severity, the Investigator should factor in areas that have already been cleared (ie, have scores of 0) and not just evaluate remaining lesions for severity, ie, the severity of each sign is averaged across all areas of involvement, including cleared lesions. In the event of different severities across disease signs, the sign that is the predominant feature of the disease should be used to help determine the sPGA score. (NCT01690299)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo3.6
Apremilast Plus Placebo Injection21.7
Etanercept Plus Placebo Tablet28.9

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Apremilast-exposure Period

A TEAE in the apremilast-exposure phase is an AE with a start date on or after the date of the first dose of study drug and no later than 28 days after the last dose of study drug. An AE is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen during the study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the subject's health, including laboratory test values, regardless of etiology. Any worsening (ie, any clinically significant adverse change in the frequency or intensity of a preexisting condition) should be considered an AE. A serious AE (SAE) is any untoward AE that is fatal, life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, requires or prolongs existing in-patient hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is a condition that may jeopardize or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. (NCT01690299)
Timeframe: From the first dose of apremilast (either Week 0 for participants originally randomized to apremilast or Week 16 for those originally randomized to placebo or etanercept who were switched to apremilast at week 16) until 28 days after last apremilast dose

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any TEAEAny Drug-related TEAEAny Severe TEAEAny Serious TEAEAny Serious Drug-related TEAEAny TEAE Leading to Drug InterruptionAny TEAE Leading to Drug WithdrawalAny TEAE Leading to Death
Apremilast/Apremilast71367621370
Etanercept/Apremilast5415741720
Placebo/Apremilast4523452830

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled Phase

A TEAE is an AE with a start date on or after the date of the first dose of study drug and no later than 28 days after the last dose of study drug for participants who discontinued early. An AE is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen during the study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the patient's health, including laboratory test values, regardless of etiology. Any worsening (ie, clinically significant adverse change in frequency or intensity of a preexisting condition) should be considered an AE. A serious AE (SAE) is any untoward AE that is fatal, life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, requires or prolongs existing in-patient hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is a condition that may jeopardize or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes above. (NCT01690299)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 16; mean duration of exposure was 14.90 weeks for placebo group, 15.13 weeks for apremilast group and 15.87 weeks for Etanercept group

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any TEAEAny Drug-related TEAEAny Severe TEAEAny Serious TEAEAny Serious Drug-related TEAEAny TEAE Leading to Drug InterruptionAny TEAE Leading to Drug WithdrawalAny TEAE Leading to Death
Apremilast Plus Placebo Injection5927332930
Etanercept Plus Placebo Tablets4421321320
Placebo4517200120

Psoriasis Flare/Rebound

Psoriasis flare is an AE and represents an atypical or unusual worsening of disease during treatment. It is defined as a sudden intensification of psoriasis requiring medical intervention or a diagnosis of new generalized erythrodermic, inflammatory, or pustular psoriasis. Rebound is an AE and is defined as a severe and sudden worsening of disease that occurs after treatment has been discontinued. This exacerbation is characterized by a PASI ≥125% of baseline or a new generalized pustular, erythrodermic, or more inflammatory psoriasis after stopping therapy. (NCT01690299)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 16; Placebo controlled phase

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any psoriasis flare captured as a TEAEAny psoriasis rebound captured as a TEAEThose with PASI ≥125% baseline score and D/C APR
Apremilast Plus Placebo Injection100
Etanercept Plus Placebo Tablets000
Placebo301

Psoriasis Flare/Rebound

Psoriasis flare is an AE and represents an atypical or unusual worsening of disease during treatment. It is defined as a sudden intensification of psoriasis requiring medical intervention or a diagnosis of new generalized erythrodermic, inflammatory, or pustular psoriasis. Rebound is an AE and is defined as a severe and sudden worsening of disease that occurs after treatment has been discontinued. This exacerbation is characterized by a PASI ≥125% of baseline or a new generalized pustular, erythrodermic, or more inflammatory psoriasis after stopping therapy. PASI ≥125% of baseline score at any visit after the last dose date for those who discontinued within the phase. (NCT01690299)
Timeframe: From the first dose of apremilast (either Week 0 or Week 16 for participants originally randomized to placebo or etanercept who were switched at Week 16) until 28 days after the last dose of apremilast.

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any psoriasis flare captured as a TEAEAny psoriasis rebound captured as a TEAEThose with PASI ≥125% baseline score and D/C APR
Apremilast/Apremilast420
Etanercept/Apremilast071
Placebo/Apremilast110

Percentage of Participants With Response

"Response was defined as participants with a complete response (CR), unconfirmed complete response (Cru) or partial response (PR), assessed using the International Workshop Lymphoma Response Criteria (IWLRC) and based on best responses as determined by the investigator. CR: Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical and radiographic evidence of disease, disappearance of any disease-related symptoms, and normalization of biochemical abnormalities.~Cru: Criteria for CR above but with 1 or more of the following:~A residual lymph node mass > 1.5 cm in greatest transverse diameter that has regressed by more than 75% in the sum of the products of diameters (SPD)~Indeterminate bone marrow (increased number or size of aggregates without cytologic or architectural atypia).~PR: ≥ 50% decrease in SPD of the 6 largest dominant nodes or nodal masses. No increase in the size of other nodes, liver, or spleen. Splenic and hepatic nodules must regress by at least 50% in the SPD." (NCT00179673)
Timeframe: From enrollment through study completion. Median duration on study was 4.4 months with a maximum of 32 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Lenalidomide23.3

Percentage of Participants With Tumor Control

"Tumor control was defined as participants with a complete response, unconfirmed complete response, partial response or stable disease (SD), assessed using the International Workshop Lymphoma Response Criteria (IWLRC) and based on best responses as determined by the investigator.~SD was defined as a response less than a PR (see above) but not Progressive Disease (PD).~PD was defined as~≥ 50 % increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously identified abnormal node for partial responders or non-responders.~Appearance of any new lesion during or at the end of therapy." (NCT00179673)
Timeframe: From enrollment through study completion. Median duration on study was 4.4 months with a maximum of 32 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Lenalidomide60.5

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Progression-free survival was defined as the time from the start of study drug therapy to the first observation of disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever came first. Participants who withdrew for any reason or received another NHL therapy including stem cell transplantation without documented progressive disease were censored on the date of their last adequate response assessment indicating no progression (or last adequate assessment prior to receiving other NHL therapy). Participants who were still active without progressive disease at the time of the data cut-off date were censored on the date of their last adequate response assessment. (NCT00179673)
Timeframe: From enrollment through study completion. Median duration on study was 4.4 months with a maximum of 32 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Lenalidomide4.4

The Duration of Response

The duration of response was calculated as the first response assessment demonstrating evidence of at least a partial response to the first documentation of progressive disease (as determined by computed tomography scan) or death due to NHL, whichever occurred first. For participants without documentation of progression, the duration of response was censored at the last date of tumor assessment indicating no progression. Median was based on the Kaplan-Meier estimate. (NCT00179673)
Timeframe: From enrollment through study completion. Median duration on study was 4.4 months with a maximum of 32 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
LenalidomideNA

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

"The Investigator determined the relationship between the administration of study drug and the occurrence of an AE as suspected if the temporal relationship of the adverse event to study drug administration made a causal relationship possible, and other drugs, therapeutic interventions, or underlying conditions did not provide a sufficient explanation for the observed event.~The Investigator graded the severity of AEs according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) criteria and the following scale:~Grade 1 = Mild~Grade 2 = Moderate~Grade 3 = Severe~Grade 4 = Life threatening~Grade 5 = Death~A Serious AE is defined as any AE which results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or constitutes an important medical event." (NCT00179673)
Timeframe: From the start of study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug. Maximum time on study drug was 13.8 months.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
At least one Adverse Event (AE)≥ 1 AE related to study drugGrade (GR) 3-5 AEGrade 3-5 AE related to study drugSerious adverse event (SAE)SAE related to study drugAE leading to discontinuation of study drugRelated AE leading to study drug discontinuationAE leading to dose reduction or interruption
Lenalidomide4237272418109527

Reviews

3 reviews available for thalidomide and Diarrhea

ArticleYear
Apremilast: A Novel Drug for Treatment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis.
    The Annals of pharmacotherapy, 2016, Volume: 50, Issue:4

    Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Diarrhea; Headache; Humans; Nausea; Psoriasis; Thalidomi

2016
Lenalidomide: a new agent for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.
    Clinical journal of oncology nursing, 2007, Volume: 11, Issue:4

    Topics: Anorexia; Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Constipation; Diarrhea; Drug Eruptions; Drug Monitoring;

2007
[Several problems of drug therapy in pregnancy].
    Iryo, 1971, Volume: 25, Issue:9

    Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antineoplastic Agents; Antitubercular Agents; Ca

1971

Trials

22 trials available for thalidomide and Diarrhea

ArticleYear
Pyrotinib combined with thalidomide in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients harboring HER2 exon 20 insertions (PRIDE): protocol of an open-label, single-arm phase II trial.
    BMC cancer, 2021, Sep-16, Volume: 21, Issue:1

    Topics: Acrylamides; Aminoquinolines; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocol

2021
Apremilast with Add-On Calcipotriene/Betamethasone Dipropionate for Treating Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis.
    Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD, 2020, Dec-01, Volume: 19, Issue:12

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adult; Aerosols; Aged; Betamethasone; Calcitriol; Diarrhea; Drug Combinat

2020
Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in the treatment of Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Efficacy, safety and tolerability results from a phase 2b randomized controlled trial.
    The Journal of dermatology, 2017, Volume: 44, Issue:8

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Diarrhea; Dose-Response Relati

2017
Long-term safety and tolerability of apremilast in patients with psoriasis: Pooled safety analysis for ≥156 weeks from 2 phase 3, randomized, controlled trials (ESTEEM 1 and 2).
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2017, Volume: 77, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Cardiovascular Diseases; Depression; Diarrhea; Femal

2017
Long-term safety and tolerability of apremilast in patients with psoriasis: Pooled safety analysis for ≥156 weeks from 2 phase 3, randomized, controlled trials (ESTEEM 1 and 2).
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2017, Volume: 77, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Cardiovascular Diseases; Depression; Diarrhea; Femal

2017
Long-term safety and tolerability of apremilast in patients with psoriasis: Pooled safety analysis for ≥156 weeks from 2 phase 3, randomized, controlled trials (ESTEEM 1 and 2).
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2017, Volume: 77, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Cardiovascular Diseases; Depression; Diarrhea; Femal

2017
Long-term safety and tolerability of apremilast in patients with psoriasis: Pooled safety analysis for ≥156 weeks from 2 phase 3, randomized, controlled trials (ESTEEM 1 and 2).
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2017, Volume: 77, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Cardiovascular Diseases; Depression; Diarrhea; Femal

2017
Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast in Systemic- and Biologic-Naive Patients With Moderate Plaque Psoriasis: 52-Week Results of UNVEIL.
    Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD, 2018, Feb-01, Volume: 17, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Biological Factors; Diarrhea; Double-Blind Method; F

2018
Phase Ib dose-escalation study (PX-171-006) of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and low-dose dexamethasone in relapsed or progressive multiple myeloma.
    Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2013, Apr-15, Volume: 19, Issue:8

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Dexamethasone; Diarr

2013
[Effect of second-line treatment with capecitabine and thalidomide in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer].
    Zhonghua zhong liu za zhi [Chinese journal of oncology], 2013, Volume: 35, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Capecitabine; Deoxycytidine; Diarrhea;

2013
Phase 2 dose-expansion study (PX-171-006) of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and low-dose dexamethasone in relapsed or progressive multiple myeloma.
    Blood, 2013, Oct-31, Volume: 122, Issue:18

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Dexamethasone; Diarr

2013
The efficacy and safety of apremilast, etanercept and placebo in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: 52-week results from a phase IIIb, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (LIBERATE).
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2017, Volume: 31, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Diarrhea; Double-Blind Method; Etanercept; Female; H

2017
Bortezomib, thalidomide, dexamethasone, and panobinostat for patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MUK-six): a multicentre, open-label, phase 1/2 trial.
    The Lancet. Haematology, 2016, Volume: 3, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bortezomib; Constipation; Dexamethasone; Diarr

2016
Bortezomib, thalidomide, dexamethasone, and panobinostat for patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MUK-six): a multicentre, open-label, phase 1/2 trial.
    The Lancet. Haematology, 2016, Volume: 3, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bortezomib; Constipation; Dexamethasone; Diarr

2016
Bortezomib, thalidomide, dexamethasone, and panobinostat for patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MUK-six): a multicentre, open-label, phase 1/2 trial.
    The Lancet. Haematology, 2016, Volume: 3, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bortezomib; Constipation; Dexamethasone; Diarr

2016
Bortezomib, thalidomide, dexamethasone, and panobinostat for patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MUK-six): a multicentre, open-label, phase 1/2 trial.
    The Lancet. Haematology, 2016, Volume: 3, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bortezomib; Constipation; Dexamethasone; Diarr

2016
Lenalidomide oral monotherapy produces durable responses in relapsed or refractory indolent non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2009, Nov-10, Volume: 27, Issue:32

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Constipation; Diarrhea;

2009
A modular Phase I study of lenalidomide and paclitaxel in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer following prior taxane therapy.
    Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2010, Volume: 65, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Anemia; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bridged-Ring Compounds; Combined Modal

2010
Phase II trial of the pan-deacetylase inhibitor panobinostat as a single agent in advanced relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
    Leukemia & lymphoma, 2012, Volume: 53, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Area Under Curve; Boronic Acids; Bortezomib; Diarrhea; Drug Admi

2012
Apremilast for discoid lupus erythematosus: results of a phase 2, open-label, single-arm, pilot study.
    Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD, 2012, Volume: 11, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Diarrhea; Female; Headache; Humans; Intention to Treat Analysis; Lupus Erythematosus, D

2012
Efficacy and safety of lenalidomide for refractory cutaneous lupus erythematosus.
    Arthritis research & therapy, 2012, Dec-07, Volume: 14, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Diarrhea; Drug Resistance; Female; Humans; Immunologic Factors; Lenalid

2012
Effects of the combined treatment with thalidomide, megestrol and interleukine-2 in cirrhotic patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. A pilot study.
    Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver, 2005, Volume: 37, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; alpha-Fetoproteins; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Prot

2005
Irinotecan in combination with thalidomide in patients with advanced solid tumors: a clinical study with pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic evaluation.
    Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2006, Volume: 58, Issue:5

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy

2006
[A randomized trial of irinotecan plus fuorouracil and leucovorin with thalidomide versus without thalidomide in the treatment for advanced colorectal cancer].
    Zhonghua zhong liu za zhi [Chinese journal of oncology], 2007, Volume: 29, Issue:3

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Camptotheci

2007
Thalidomide: a novel therapy for microsporidiosis.
    Gastroenterology, 1997, Volume: 112, Issue:6

    Topics: Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; Adult; Animals; Diarrhea; Female; Humans; Male; Microsporidiosis

1997
Effect of thalidomide on gastrointestinal toxic effects of irinotecan.
    Lancet (London, England), 2000, Aug-12, Volume: 356, Issue:9229

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Camptothecin; Col

2000
Thalidomide used to treat chronic diarrhea in HIV-positive patients.
    Journal of the International Association of Physicians in AIDS Care, 1996, Volume: 2, Issue:5

    Topics: Cachexia; Diarrhea; Double-Blind Method; HIV Infections; Humans; Thalidomide; Treatment Outcome

1996
Thalidomide for diarrhea.
    GMHC treatment issues : the Gay Men's Health Crisis newsletter of experimental AIDS therapies, 1996, Volume: 10, Issue:4

    Topics: Diarrhea; HIV Infections; Humans; Quality of Life; Thalidomide; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; Weight

1996

Other Studies

18 other studies available for thalidomide and Diarrhea

ArticleYear
Safety Profile of Ixazomib in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma in Japan: An All-case Post-marketing Surveillance.
    Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2022, May-01, Volume: 61, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dex

2022
Combination therapy of apremilast and biologics in patients with psoriasis showing biologic fatigue.
    The Journal of dermatology, 2020, Volume: 47, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Biological Products; Dermatologic Agents; Diar

2020
Multidisciplinary Management of the Adverse Effects of Apremilast.
    Actas dermo-sifiliograficas, 2021, Volume: 112, Issue:2

    Topics: Combined Modality Therapy; Diarrhea; Disease Management; Headache; Humans; Nausea; Patient Care Team

2021
Apremilast in psoriasis - a prospective real-world study.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2018, Volume: 32, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthralgia; Body Weight; Diarrhea; Drug Substi

2018
Adverse events associated with apremilast use and withdrawal for psoriasis in a real-world setting.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2018, Volume: 32, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Diarrhea; Female; Headache; Humans; Male; Middle Age

2018
Long-term 52-week trends in apremilast safety outcomes for treatment of psoriasis in clinical practice: a multicentre, retrospective case series.
    The British journal of dermatology, 2019, Volume: 180, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Diarrhea; Female; Headache; Humans; Long-Term Care;

2019
Real-world use of apremilast for patients with psoriasis in Japan.
    The Journal of dermatology, 2018, Volume: 45, Issue:11

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Diarrhea; Female; Headache;

2018
Skin involvement in patients with psoriatic arthritis: preliminary results of treatment with apremilast in real world setting.
    Giornale italiano di dermatologia e venereologia : organo ufficiale, Societa italiana di dermatologia e sifilografia, 2019, Volume: 154, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Diarrhea; Fe

2019
Lenalidomide-induced diarrhea in patients with myeloma is caused by bile acid malabsorption that responds to treatment.
    Blood, 2014, Oct-09, Volume: 124, Issue:15

    Topics: Aged; Bile Acids and Salts; Diarrhea; Female; Humans; Lenalidomide; Malabsorption Syndromes; Male; M

2014
Pharmacovigilance of patients with multiple myeloma being treated with bortezomib and/or thalidomide.
    Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas, 2016, Volume: 49, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocol

2016
Pharmacokinetic mechanisms for reduced toxicity of irinotecan by coadministered thalidomide.
    Current drug metabolism, 2006, Volume: 7, Issue:4

    Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Blood Proteins; Camptothecin; C

2006
A mechanistic study on reduced toxicity of irinotecan by coadministered thalidomide, a tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor.
    The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 2006, Volume: 319, Issue:1

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Apoptosis; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B

2006
Role of cytokines (TNF-alpha, IL-1beta and KC) in the pathogenesis of CPT-11-induced intestinal mucositis in mice: effect of pentoxifylline and thalidomide.
    Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2008, Volume: 61, Issue:5

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Camptothecin; Chemokines; Diarrhea; Disease Models, Anim

2008
Biopsy-proven adenoviral diarrhea responding to low-dose cidofovir.
    Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society, 2008, Volume: 10, Issue:5

    Topics: Adenoviridae; Adenovirus Infections, Human; Aged; Antigens, Viral; Antiviral Agents; Biopsy; Cidofov

2008
The treatment of microsporidial diarrhoea with thalidomide.
    AIDS (London, England), 1995, Volume: 9, Issue:6

    Topics: AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections; Animals; Diarrhea; Humans; Male; Microsporida; Microsporidios

1995
Thalidomide for AIDS diarrhea?
    The American journal of gastroenterology, 1997, Volume: 92, Issue:12

    Topics: AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections; Animals; Antiprotozoal Agents; Diarrhea; Humans; Microsporida

1997
Thalidomide shows benefit for microsporidial diarrhea.
    BETA : bulletin of experimental treatments for AIDS : a publication of the San Francisco AIDS Foundation, 1997

    Topics: Antiprotozoal Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diarrhea; HIV Infections; Microsporidiosis; Thalidom

1997
Thalidomide and irinotecan-associated diarrhea.
    American journal of clinical oncology, 2002, Volume: 25, Issue:3

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Camptothecin; Diarrhea;

2002