Page last updated: 2024-11-05

thalidomide and Abnormalities, Autosome

thalidomide has been researched along with Abnormalities, Autosome in 112 studies

Thalidomide: A piperidinyl isoindole originally introduced as a non-barbiturate hypnotic, but withdrawn from the market due to teratogenic effects. It has been reintroduced and used for a number of immunological and inflammatory disorders. Thalidomide displays immunosuppressive and anti-angiogenic activity. It inhibits release of TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR-ALPHA from monocytes, and modulates other cytokine action.
thalidomide : A racemate comprising equimolar amounts of R- and S-thalidomide.
2-(2,6-dioxopiperidin-3-yl)-1H-isoindole-1,3(2H)-dione : A dicarboximide that is isoindole-1,3(2H)-dione in which the hydrogen attached to the nitrogen is substituted by a 2,6-dioxopiperidin-3-yl group.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"The safety and efficacy of siltuximab (CNTO 328) was tested in combination with lenalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (RVD) in patients with newly-diagnosed, previously untreated symptomatic multiple myeloma."9.22Siltuximab (CNTO 328) with lenalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone in newly-diagnosed, previously untreated multiple myeloma: an open-label phase I trial. ( Berkova, Z; Champlin, RE; Cleeland, C; Feng, L; Mendoza, TR; Orlowski, RZ; Qazilbash, MH; Shah, JJ; Thomas, SK; Wang, M; Weber, DM, 2016)
"Lenalidomide is effective in low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with deletion 5q."9.16A phase II study of lenalidomide alone in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes with chromosome 5 abnormalities. ( Borthakur, G; Chen, Y; Cortes, J; Estrov, Z; Faderl, S; Kantarjian, H; Ravandi, F; Rey, K, 2012)
"Although the combination of lenalidomide and dexamethasone is effective therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, the influence of high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities on outcomes is unknown."9.14Influence of cytogenetics in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma treated with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone: adverse effect of deletion 17p13. ( Bahlis, NJ; Bruyere, H; Chang, H; Chen, C; Fu, T; Horsman, DE; Mansoor, A; Masih-Khan, E; Reece, D; Roland, B; Song, KW; Stewart, DA; Trieu, Y, 2009)
"Lenalidomide and azacitidine are active in patients with lower- and higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS)."9.14Phase I combination trial of lenalidomide and azacitidine in patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. ( Afable, M; Cuthbertson, D; Ganetsky, R; Ganetzky, R; Latham, D; List, AF; Loughran, TP; Maciejewski, JP; Paquette, R; Paulic, K; Saba, HI; Sekeres, MA, 2010)
"Lenalidomide was approved in Japan for the treatment of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes associated with a 5q deletion (del 5q-MDS) in August 2010."8.31Lenalidomide treatment of Japanese patients with myelodysplastic syndromes with 5q deletion: a post-marketing surveillance study. ( Aoki, Y; Minehata, K; Motegi, Y; Uno, S, 2023)
"The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) invited the manufacturer of lenalidomide (Celgene) to submit evidence of the clinical and cost effectiveness of the drug for treating adults with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) associated with deletion 5q cytogenetic abnormality, as part of the Institute's single technology appraisal (STA) process."7.83Lenalidomide for the Treatment of Low- or Intermediate-1-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes Associated with Deletion 5q Cytogenetic Abnormality: An Evidence Review of the NICE Submission from Celgene. ( Al, MJ; Armstrong, N; Blommestein, HM; Deshpande, S; Kleijnen, J; Noake, C; Riemsma, R; Ryder, S; Severens, JL; Worthy, G, 2016)
"Lenalidomide in combination with dexamethasone is an effective and well-established treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (rrMM) disease."7.80Lenalidomide in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma disease: feasibility and benefits of long-term treatment. ( Hahn-Ast, C; Kanz, L; Oehrlein, K; Rendl, C; Weisel, K; Zago, M, 2014)
"In the era of novel agents such as lenalidomide and bortezomib, risk stratification by chromosomal abnormalities may enable a more rational selection of therapeutic approaches in patients with multiple myeloma (MM)."7.77Chromosomal aberrations +1q21 and del(17p13) predict survival in patients with recurrent multiple myeloma treated with lenalidomide and dexamethasone. ( Goldschmidt, H; Hielscher, T; Hillengass, J; Ho, AD; Hose, D; Jauch, A; Klein, U; Neben, K; Raab, MS; Seckinger, A, 2011)
"This retrospective analysis investigated the prognostic value of del(13) and t(4;14) abnormalities and the impact of prior treatment on outcomes in 207 heavily pretreated patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) treated with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone."7.76Impact of high-risk cytogenetics and prior therapy on outcomes in patients with advanced relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma treated with lenalidomide plus dexaméthasone. ( Attal, M; Avet-Loiseau, H; Belhadj, K; Dorvaux, V; Fermand, JP; Garderet, L; Hulin, C; Minvielle, S; Moreau, P; Soulier, J; Yakoub-Agha, I, 2010)
"Previous literature suggests that cytogenetics may be used for risk-adapted therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM) treated with lenalidomide and dexamethasone."7.76Impact of genomic aberrations including chromosome 1 abnormalities on the outcome of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma treated with lenalidomide and dexamethasone. ( Chang, H; Chen, C; Jiang, A; Qi, C; Reece, D; Trieu, Y, 2010)
"Lenalidomide has been approved for the treatment of transfusion-dependent low- or intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) associated with a chromosome 5q deletion with or without additional cytogenetic abnormalities."7.73Cost effectiveness of lenalidomide in the treatment of transfusion-dependent myelodysplastic syndromes in the United States. ( Goss, TF; Hellström-Lindberg, E; Jädersten, M; Knight, R; List, AF; Schaefer, C; Szende, A; Totten, PJ, 2006)
"The myelodysplastic syndromes are a heterogeneous group of clonal diseases of haemopoiesis, which are a challenge for both biologists and clinicians."6.41Thalidomide in myelodysplastic syndromes. ( Pozzato, G; Zorat, F, 2002)
"Prognostic impact of specific chromosomal aberrations in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) treated with the novel agents is briefly described."5.39Gain(1)(q21) is an unfavorable genetic prognostic factor for patients with relapsed multiple myeloma treated with thalidomide but not for those treated with bortezomib. ( Adam, Z; Almasi, M; Berankova, K; Frohlich, J; Greslikova, H; Hajek, R; Jarkovsky, J; Jurczyszyn, A; Kaisarova, P; Krejci, M; Kuglik, P; Kupska, R; Melicharova, H; Mikulasova, A; Nemec, P; Penka, M; Sandecka, V; Sevcikova, S; Smetana, J; Zahradova, L; Zaoralova, R, 2013)
"The outcome of patients with multiple myeloma is dictated primarily by cytogenetic abnormalities and proliferative capacity of plasma cells."5.35Impact of risk stratification on outcome among patients with multiple myeloma receiving initial therapy with lenalidomide and dexamethasone. ( Bergsagel, PL; Buadi, F; Dalton, RJ; Dingli, D; Dispenzieri, A; Fonseca, R; Gertz, MA; Greipp, PR; Hayman, SR; Kapoor, P; Kumar, S; Kyle, RA; Lacy, MQ; Lust, JA; Mikhael, JR; Rajkumar, SV; Reeder, CB; Roy, V; Russell, SJ; Stewart, AK; Witzig, TE; Zeldenrust, SR, 2009)
"The safety and efficacy of siltuximab (CNTO 328) was tested in combination with lenalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (RVD) in patients with newly-diagnosed, previously untreated symptomatic multiple myeloma."5.22Siltuximab (CNTO 328) with lenalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone in newly-diagnosed, previously untreated multiple myeloma: an open-label phase I trial. ( Berkova, Z; Champlin, RE; Cleeland, C; Feng, L; Mendoza, TR; Orlowski, RZ; Qazilbash, MH; Shah, JJ; Thomas, SK; Wang, M; Weber, DM, 2016)
"Multiple myeloma (MM) is a heterogeneous disease, and the benefit from bortezomib treatment is not uniform among all patients subgroups."5.20Cytogenetic and clinical marks for defining high-risk myeloma in the context of bortezomib treatment. ( Acharya, C; An, G; Cheng, T; Deng, S; Feng, X; Hao, M; Li, Z; Qi, J; Qin, X; Qiu, L; Ru, K; Shi, L; Sui, W; Tai, YT; Wang, J; Xu, Y; Yi, S; Zang, M; Zhao, Y; Zou, D, 2015)
"Medical Research Council (MRC) Myeloma IX was a phase III trial evaluating bisphosphonate and thalidomide-based therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma."5.17Long-term follow-up of MRC Myeloma IX trial: Survival outcomes with bisphosphonate and thalidomide treatment. ( Bell, SE; Child, JA; Cook, G; Davies, FE; Drayson, MT; Gregory, WM; Jackson, GH; Morgan, GJ; Owen, RG; Ross, FM; Szubert, AJ, 2013)
"Lenalidomide is effective in low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with deletion 5q."5.16A phase II study of lenalidomide alone in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes with chromosome 5 abnormalities. ( Borthakur, G; Chen, Y; Cortes, J; Estrov, Z; Faderl, S; Kantarjian, H; Ravandi, F; Rey, K, 2012)
"Lenalidomide and azacitidine are active in patients with lower- and higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS)."5.14Phase I combination trial of lenalidomide and azacitidine in patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. ( Afable, M; Cuthbertson, D; Ganetsky, R; Ganetzky, R; Latham, D; List, AF; Loughran, TP; Maciejewski, JP; Paquette, R; Paulic, K; Saba, HI; Sekeres, MA, 2010)
"Although the combination of lenalidomide and dexamethasone is effective therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, the influence of high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities on outcomes is unknown."5.14Influence of cytogenetics in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma treated with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone: adverse effect of deletion 17p13. ( Bahlis, NJ; Bruyere, H; Chang, H; Chen, C; Fu, T; Horsman, DE; Mansoor, A; Masih-Khan, E; Reece, D; Roland, B; Song, KW; Stewart, DA; Trieu, Y, 2009)
"Total Therapy 2 examined the clinical benefit of adding thalidomide up-front to a tandem transplant regimen for newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma."5.13Thalidomide arm of Total Therapy 2 improves complete remission duration and survival in myeloma patients with metaphase cytogenetic abnormalities. ( Alsayed, Y; Anaissie, E; Barer, S; Barlogie, B; Crowley, J; Epstein, J; Haessler, J; Hollmig, K; Petty, N; Pineda-Roman, M; Shaughnessy, JD; Tricot, G; van Rhee, F; Waheed, S; Zangari, M; Zeldis, J, 2008)
"Melphalan was the first described treatment for patients with multiple myeloma in the 1960s and is still being used in clinical practice."4.81Treatment of myeloma: recent developments. ( Huijgens, PC; Zweegman, S, 2002)
"Lenalidomide was approved in Japan for the treatment of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes associated with a 5q deletion (del 5q-MDS) in August 2010."4.31Lenalidomide treatment of Japanese patients with myelodysplastic syndromes with 5q deletion: a post-marketing surveillance study. ( Aoki, Y; Minehata, K; Motegi, Y; Uno, S, 2023)
"The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) invited the manufacturer of lenalidomide (Celgene) to submit evidence of the clinical and cost effectiveness of the drug for treating adults with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) associated with deletion 5q cytogenetic abnormality, as part of the Institute's single technology appraisal (STA) process."3.83Lenalidomide for the Treatment of Low- or Intermediate-1-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes Associated with Deletion 5q Cytogenetic Abnormality: An Evidence Review of the NICE Submission from Celgene. ( Al, MJ; Armstrong, N; Blommestein, HM; Deshpande, S; Kleijnen, J; Noake, C; Riemsma, R; Ryder, S; Severens, JL; Worthy, G, 2016)
"Lenalidomide has demonstrated remarkable efficacy for therapy of lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) associated with 5q(-)."3.81Treatment of Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome With Lenalidomide in Clinical Routine in Austria. ( Aschauer, G; Burgstaller, S; Fiegl, M; Fridrik, M; Girschikofsky, M; Greil, R; Keil, F; Linkesch, W; Nösslinger, T; Petzer, A; Stauder, R, 2015)
"We conducted a retrospective analysis of lenalidomide with dexamethasone for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who were treated within the Korean patient access program."3.80Lenalidomide with dexamethasone treatment for relapsed/refractory myeloma patients in Korea-experience from 110 patients. ( Eom, HS; Jo, DY; Jun, HJ; Kim, JS; Kim, K; Kim, KH; Kim, SH; Kim, SJ; Kim, YS; Kwak, JY; Lee, JH; Lee, JJ; Lee, JO; Min, CK; Moon, JH; Mun, YC; Park, SK; Ryoo, HM; Suh, C; Voelter, V; Yoon, SS, 2014)
"Lenalidomide in combination with dexamethasone is an effective and well-established treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (rrMM) disease."3.80Lenalidomide in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma disease: feasibility and benefits of long-term treatment. ( Hahn-Ast, C; Kanz, L; Oehrlein, K; Rendl, C; Weisel, K; Zago, M, 2014)
"The use of new agents (NAs) such as bortezomib, thalidomide, and lenalidomide has extended the survival of patients with multiple myeloma (MM)."3.80Impacts of new agents for multiple myeloma on development of secondary myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia. ( Abe, Y; Hamano, A; Hattori, Y; Miyazaki, K; Nakagawa, Y; Sekine, R; Shingaki, S; Suzuki, K; Tsukada, N, 2014)
" Total therapy trials (TT; TT2(-/+) thalidomide) and TT3 (TT3a with bortezomib, thalidomide; TT3b with additional lenalidomide) offered the opportunity to examine the contribution of these immune-modulatory agents to MDS-associated cytogenetic abnormalities (MDS-CA) and clinical MDS or acute leukemia ("clinical MDS/AL")."3.79Risk factors for MDS and acute leukemia following total therapy 2 and 3 for multiple myeloma. ( Abdallah, AO; Bailey, C; Barlogie, B; Chauhan, N; Cottler-Fox, M; Crowley, J; Epstein, J; Heuck, CJ; Hoering, A; Johann, D; Muzaffar, J; Petty, N; Rosenthal, A; Sawyer, J; Sexton, R; Singh, Z; Usmani, SZ; van Rhee, F; Waheed, S; Yaccoby, S, 2013)
"While lenalidomide (LEN) shows high efficacy in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with del[5q], responses can be also seen in patients presenting without del[5q]."3.78Cytogenetic and molecular predictors of response in patients with myeloid malignancies without del[5q] treated with lenalidomide. ( Afable, M; Guinta, K; Jankowska, A; Jerez, A; List, AF; Maciejewski, J; Makishima, H; McGraw, KL; O'Keefe, CL; Sekeres, MA; Sugimoto, Y; Szpurka, H; Tiu, R; Traina, F; Visconte, V, 2012)
"In the era of novel agents such as lenalidomide and bortezomib, risk stratification by chromosomal abnormalities may enable a more rational selection of therapeutic approaches in patients with multiple myeloma (MM)."3.77Chromosomal aberrations +1q21 and del(17p13) predict survival in patients with recurrent multiple myeloma treated with lenalidomide and dexamethasone. ( Goldschmidt, H; Hielscher, T; Hillengass, J; Ho, AD; Hose, D; Jauch, A; Klein, U; Neben, K; Raab, MS; Seckinger, A, 2011)
"This retrospective analysis investigated the prognostic value of del(13) and t(4;14) abnormalities and the impact of prior treatment on outcomes in 207 heavily pretreated patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) treated with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone."3.76Impact of high-risk cytogenetics and prior therapy on outcomes in patients with advanced relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma treated with lenalidomide plus dexaméthasone. ( Attal, M; Avet-Loiseau, H; Belhadj, K; Dorvaux, V; Fermand, JP; Garderet, L; Hulin, C; Minvielle, S; Moreau, P; Soulier, J; Yakoub-Agha, I, 2010)
"Previous literature suggests that cytogenetics may be used for risk-adapted therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM) treated with lenalidomide and dexamethasone."3.76Impact of genomic aberrations including chromosome 1 abnormalities on the outcome of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma treated with lenalidomide and dexamethasone. ( Chang, H; Chen, C; Jiang, A; Qi, C; Reece, D; Trieu, Y, 2010)
"Lenalidomide has been approved for the treatment of transfusion-dependent low- or intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) associated with a chromosome 5q deletion with or without additional cytogenetic abnormalities."3.73Cost effectiveness of lenalidomide in the treatment of transfusion-dependent myelodysplastic syndromes in the United States. ( Goss, TF; Hellström-Lindberg, E; Jädersten, M; Knight, R; List, AF; Schaefer, C; Szende, A; Totten, PJ, 2006)
"Improvements in bone marrow fibrosis and serial reductions in lactate dehydrogenase >50% were noted in 17% and 50% of evaluable responders, respectively."2.80Ruxolitinib in combination with lenalidomide as therapy for patients with myelofibrosis. ( Borthakur, G; Cortes, J; Daver, N; Jabbour, E; Kadia, T; Kantarjian, H; Newberry, K; Pemmaraju, N; Pierce, S; Ravandi, F; Sasaki, K; Verstovsek, S; Wang, X; Zhou, L, 2015)
"We analyzed the prognostic impact of cytogenetic aberrations by fluorescence in situ hybridization at different cutoff values in a cohort of 333 patients with newly diagnosed myeloma and 92 patients with relapsed myeloma."2.80The impact of clone size on the prognostic value of chromosome aberrations by fluorescence in situ hybridization in multiple myeloma. ( Acharya, C; An, G; Anderson, KC; Cheng, T; Deng, S; Feng, X; Hao, M; Li, C; Li, Q; Li, Z; Qi, J; Qin, X; Qiu, L; Ru, K; Shi, L; Sui, W; Tai, YT; Wang, J; Xu, Y; Yi, S; Zang, M; Zhao, J; Zhao, Y; Zou, D, 2015)
"Detection of specific chromosomal abnormalities by FISH and metaphase cytogenetics allows risk stratification in multiple myeloma; however, gene expression profiling (GEP) based signatures may enable more specific risk categorization."2.76Impact of gene expression profiling-based risk stratification in patients with myeloma receiving initial therapy with lenalidomide and dexamethasone. ( Ahmann, GJ; Callander, NS; Fonseca, R; Greipp, PR; Haug, JL; Henderson, KJ; Jacobus, SJ; Kumar, SK; Rajkumar, SV; Siegel, DS; Uno, H; Van Wier, SA, 2011)
"Over two-thirds of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma are over 65 years."2.50Initial treatment of transplant-ineligible patients in multiple myeloma. ( Leleu, X; Mateos, MV; Palumbo, A; San Miguel, JF, 2014)
"We report the cases of 3 patients with hematological malignancies and complex karyotypes involving der(5; 17) (p10;q10), which results in the loss of 5q and 17p."2.50der(5;17)(p10;q10) is a recurrent but rare whole-arm translocation in patients with hematological neoplasms: a report of three cases. ( Aoyama, Y; Furukawa, Y; Harada, N; Kumura, T; Manabe, M; Mugitani, A; Ohta, T; Okita, J; Tarakuwa, T, 2014)
"POEMS syndrome is a clonal plasma cell disease characterized by polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, M protein, and skin changes."2.49New advances in the diagnosis and treatment of POEMS syndrome. ( Li, J; Zhou, DB, 2013)
"Chromosomal aberrations are frequently found in multiple myeloma cells and play a major role in patient outcome and management of the disease."2.47Clinical impact of chromosomal aberrations in multiple myeloma. ( Alici, E; Gahrton, G; Jansson, M; Nahi, H; Sutlu, T, 2011)
"Although various forms of chromosomal abnormalities have been detected in approximately 50-60% of patients with de novo MDS and in up to 80% of patients with therapy-related MDS, their molecular significance for pathogenesis and disease progression is not yet fully understood."2.47Cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities in myelodysplastic syndrome. ( Horiike, S; Kuroda, J; Nagoshi, H; Taniwaki, M, 2011)
"The treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) has undergone significant developments in recent years."2.46Current multiple myeloma treatment strategies with novel agents: a European perspective. ( Beksac, M; Bladé, J; Boccadoro, M; Cavenagh, J; Cavo, M; Dimopoulos, M; Drach, J; Einsele, H; Facon, T; Goldschmidt, H; Harousseau, JL; Hess, U; Ketterer, N; Kropff, M; Ludwig, H; Mendeleeva, L; Morgan, G; Palumbo, A; Plesner, T; San Miguel, J; Shpilberg, O; Sondergeld, P; Sonneveld, P; Zweegman, S, 2010)
"Treatment with lenalidomide was recently shown to be effective in MDS, particularly in those cases with del(5q), resulting in durable cytogenetic remission and hematological responses."2.44Evaluation of recurring cytogenetic abnormalities in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes. ( Le Beau, MM; Olney, HJ, 2007)
"Lenalidomide was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of International Prognostic Scoring System low or intermediate-1 risk myelodysplastic syndrome patients with chromosome 5q deletion."2.44Immunomodulatory drugs in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes. ( List, A; Ortega, J, 2007)
"Lenalidomide is an orally bioavailable analogue of thalidomide with more potent immunomodulatory, antiangiogenic, and antitumor activities than the parent compound and with a better safety profile."2.43Emerging data on IMiDs in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). ( List, AF, 2005)
"Multiple myeloma is the second most common hematologic malignancy, with approximately 15,000 new cases each year in the United States."2.41Recent advances in multiple myeloma. ( Berenson, JR; Sjak-Shie, NN; Vescio, RA, 2000)
"The myelodysplastic syndromes are a heterogeneous group of clonal diseases of haemopoiesis, which are a challenge for both biologists and clinicians."2.41Thalidomide in myelodysplastic syndromes. ( Pozzato, G; Zorat, F, 2002)
"The hereditary cases of microphthalmia in the mentally retarded are not all of the partially sex-linked type as has hitherto been stated."2.35The heterogeneity of microphthalmia in the mentally retarded. ( Warburg, M, 1971)
"High-risk cytogenetic abnormalities were not associated with the diffuse/variegated MRI pattern (p = 0."1.42Risk stratification model in elderly patients with multiple myeloma: clinical role of magnetic resonance imaging combined with international staging system and cytogenetic abnormalities. ( Chung, JS; Lee, GW; Lee, IS; Lee, JH; Lee, JJ; Lee, SM; Shin, DY; Song, IC; Song, MK, 2015)
" Repeated dosing of lenalidomide significantly lowered the IC50 of the responsive HMCL ALMC-1 (IC50 = 2."1.39Responsiveness of cytogenetically discrete human myeloma cell lines to lenalidomide: lack of correlation with cereblon and interferon regulatory factor 4 expression levels. ( Greenberg, AJ; Jelinek, DF; Kumar, SK; Rajkumar, SV; Walters, DK, 2013)
"Prognostic impact of specific chromosomal aberrations in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) treated with the novel agents is briefly described."1.39Gain(1)(q21) is an unfavorable genetic prognostic factor for patients with relapsed multiple myeloma treated with thalidomide but not for those treated with bortezomib. ( Adam, Z; Almasi, M; Berankova, K; Frohlich, J; Greslikova, H; Hajek, R; Jarkovsky, J; Jurczyszyn, A; Kaisarova, P; Krejci, M; Kuglik, P; Kupska, R; Melicharova, H; Mikulasova, A; Nemec, P; Penka, M; Sandecka, V; Sevcikova, S; Smetana, J; Zahradova, L; Zaoralova, R, 2013)
"The outcome of patients with multiple myeloma is dictated primarily by cytogenetic abnormalities and proliferative capacity of plasma cells."1.35Impact of risk stratification on outcome among patients with multiple myeloma receiving initial therapy with lenalidomide and dexamethasone. ( Bergsagel, PL; Buadi, F; Dalton, RJ; Dingli, D; Dispenzieri, A; Fonseca, R; Gertz, MA; Greipp, PR; Hayman, SR; Kapoor, P; Kumar, S; Kyle, RA; Lacy, MQ; Lust, JA; Mikhael, JR; Rajkumar, SV; Reeder, CB; Roy, V; Russell, SJ; Stewart, AK; Witzig, TE; Zeldenrust, SR, 2009)
"Lenalidomide is a very active drug in myelodysplastic syndrome with del (5q)."1.35Unusual clonal evolution involving 5q in a case of myelodysplastic syndrome with deletion 5q 31 treated with lenalidomide. ( Da Rocha, A; Eclache, V; Fenaux, P; Le Roux, G, 2008)
"Thalidomide was not mutagenic to 6 strains of Salmonella when tested both in the presence and absence of Aroclor-induced rat liver S9 mix."1.30Thalidomide: lack of mutagenic activity across phyla and genetic endpoints. ( Ashby, J; Callander, RD; Clay, P; Ferguson, MJ; Galloway, SM; Gaulden, ME; Greenwood, SK; Hill, RB; Kimber, I; Nivard, M; Parry, JM; Tinwell, H; Vogel, E; Williamson, J, 1997)

Research

Studies (112)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-199032 (28.57)18.7374
1990's1 (0.89)18.2507
2000's21 (18.75)29.6817
2010's56 (50.00)24.3611
2020's2 (1.79)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Buesche, G1
Teoman, H1
Schneider, RK1
Ribezzo, F1
Ebert, BL1
Giagounidis, A2
Göhring, G1
Schlegelberger, B1
Bock, O1
Ganser, A1
Aul, C2
Germing, U5
Kreipe, H1
Uno, S1
Motegi, Y1
Minehata, K1
Aoki, Y1
Wang, GM1
Yang, GZ1
Huang, ZX1
Zhong, YP1
Jin, FY1
Liao, AJ1
Wang, XM1
Fu, ZZ1
Liu, H1
Li, XL1
Zhou, JF1
Zhang, X1
Hu, Y1
Meng, FY1
Huang, XJ1
Chen, WM1
Lu, J2
Goldschmidt, H5
Lokhorst, HM1
Mai, EK1
van der Holt, B1
Blau, IW2
Zweegman, S3
Weisel, KC2
Vellenga, E1
Pfreundschuh, M1
Kersten, MJ1
Scheid, C1
Croockewit, S1
Raymakers, R1
Hose, D2
Potamianou, A1
Jauch, A2
Hillengass, J3
Stevens-Kroef, M1
Raab, MS2
Broijl, A1
Lindemann, HW1
Bos, GMJ1
Brossart, P1
van Marwijk Kooy, M1
Ypma, P1
Duehrsen, U1
Schaafsma, RM1
Bertsch, U1
Hielscher, T2
Jarari, L1
Salwender, HJ1
Sonneveld, P3
Avet-Loiseau, H3
Bahlis, NJ3
Chng, WJ2
Masszi, T1
Viterbo, L1
Pour, L1
Ganly, P1
Palumbo, A4
Cavo, M3
Langer, C1
Pluta, A3
Nagler, A1
Kumar, S2
Ben-Yehuda, D1
Rajkumar, SV5
San-Miguel, J1
Berg, D1
Lin, J1
van de Velde, H1
Esseltine, DL1
di Bacco, A1
Moreau, P4
Richardson, PG1
Wu, L1
Li, X1
Xu, F1
Zhang, Z1
Chang, C1
He, Q1
Usmani, SZ1
Sawyer, J1
Rosenthal, A1
Cottler-Fox, M1
Epstein, J2
Yaccoby, S1
Sexton, R1
Hoering, A3
Singh, Z1
Heuck, CJ1
Waheed, S3
Chauhan, N1
Johann, D1
Abdallah, AO1
Muzaffar, J1
Petty, N2
Bailey, C1
Crowley, J5
van Rhee, F5
Barlogie, B6
Braulke, F2
Jung, K1
Schanz, J2
Götze, K1
Müller-Thomas, C1
Platzbecker, U3
Brümmendorf, TH1
Bug, G1
Ottmann, O1
Giagounidis, AA2
Stadler, M1
Hofmann, WK1
Schafhausen, P1
Lübbert, M1
Schlenk, RF1
Ganster, C2
Pfeiffer, S1
Shirneshan, K2
Metz, M1
Detken, S1
Seraphin, J1
Jentsch-Ullrich, K1
Böhme, A1
Schmidt, B1
Trümper, L1
Haase, D2
Bao, L1
Lai, Y1
Liu, Y1
Qin, Y1
Zhao, X1
Lu, X1
Jiang, Q1
Huang, X1
Greenberg, AJ1
Walters, DK1
Kumar, SK2
Jelinek, DF1
Morgan, GJ1
Davies, FE1
Gregory, WM1
Bell, SE1
Szubert, AJ1
Cook, G2
Drayson, MT1
Owen, RG1
Ross, FM1
Jackson, GH1
Child, JA1
Kim, K1
Kim, SJ1
Voelter, V1
Suh, C1
Yoon, SS1
Lee, JJ2
Kwak, JY1
Ryoo, HM1
Kim, YS1
Moon, JH1
Park, SK1
Kim, SH1
Mun, YC1
Kim, JS1
Eom, HS1
Jo, DY1
Jun, HJ1
Kim, KH1
Lee, JO1
Lee, JH2
Min, CK1
Mateos, MV5
Leleu, X1
San Miguel, JF3
Manabe, M1
Okita, J1
Tarakuwa, T1
Harada, N1
Aoyama, Y1
Kumura, T1
Ohta, T1
Furukawa, Y1
Mugitani, A1
Rabin, N1
Lai, M1
Pratt, G1
Morgan, G2
Snowden, J1
Bird, J1
Bowcock, S1
Owen, R1
Yong, K1
Wechalaker, A1
Low, E1
Davies, F1
Hamano, A1
Shingaki, S1
Abe, Y1
Miyazaki, K1
Sekine, R1
Nakagawa, Y1
Tsukada, N1
Hattori, Y1
Suzuki, K2
Zago, M1
Oehrlein, K1
Rendl, C1
Hahn-Ast, C1
Kanz, L1
Weisel, K1
Ise, M1
Tsujimura, H1
Sakai, C1
Kumagai, K1
An, G2
Acharya, C2
Deng, S2
Yi, S2
Xu, Y2
Qin, X2
Sui, W2
Li, Z2
Shi, L2
Zang, M2
Feng, X2
Hao, M2
Zou, D2
Zhao, Y2
Qi, J2
Cheng, T2
Ru, K2
Wang, J2
Tai, YT2
Qiu, L2
Li, Q1
Li, C1
Zhao, J1
Anderson, KC2
Song, MK1
Chung, JS1
Song, IC1
Lee, SM1
Shin, DY1
Lee, GW1
Lee, IS1
Daver, N1
Cortes, J2
Newberry, K1
Jabbour, E1
Zhou, L1
Wang, X1
Pierce, S2
Kadia, T1
Sasaki, K1
Borthakur, G3
Ravandi, F3
Pemmaraju, N1
Kantarjian, H3
Verstovsek, S1
Dimopoulos, MA2
Song, KW2
Delforge, M1
Karlin, L1
Banos, A1
Oriol, A2
Garderet, L2
Ivanova, V1
Alegre, A1
Martinez-Lopez, J2
Chen, C3
Spencer, A1
Knop, S1
Renner, C1
Yu, X1
Hong, K1
Sternas, L1
Jacques, C1
Zaki, MH1
Salinas-Riester, G1
Blommestein, HM1
Armstrong, N1
Ryder, S1
Deshpande, S1
Worthy, G1
Noake, C1
Riemsma, R1
Kleijnen, J1
Severens, JL1
Al, MJ1
Aschauer, G1
Greil, R1
Linkesch, W1
Nösslinger, T1
Stauder, R1
Burgstaller, S1
Fiegl, M1
Fridrik, M1
Girschikofsky, M1
Keil, F1
Petzer, A1
Maurer, C1
Pflug, N1
Bahlo, J1
Kluth, S1
Rhein, C1
Cramer, P1
Gross-Ophoff, C1
Langerbeins, P1
Fink, AM1
Eichhorst, B1
Kreuzer, KA1
Fischer, N1
Tausch, E1
Stilgenbauer, S1
Böttcher, S1
Döhner, H1
Kneba, M1
Dreyling, M1
Binder, M1
Hallek, M1
Wendtner, CM1
Bergmann, M1
Fischer, K1
Shah, JJ1
Feng, L1
Thomas, SK1
Berkova, Z1
Weber, DM1
Wang, M1
Qazilbash, MH1
Champlin, RE1
Mendoza, TR1
Cleeland, C1
Orlowski, RZ2
Lonial, S1
Usmani, S1
Siegel, D2
Attal, M2
Kyle, RA2
Caers, J1
San Miguel, J2
van de Donk, NW1
Einsele, H2
Bladé, J3
Durie, BG1
Orlowski, R1
Zhang, L1
Pan, L1
Xiang, B1
Zhu, H1
Wu, Y1
Chen, M1
Guan, P1
Zou, X1
Valencia, CA1
Dong, B1
Li, J2
Xie, L1
Ma, H1
Wang, F1
Dong, T1
Shuai, X1
Niu, T1
Liu, T1
Drusbosky, L1
Medina, C1
Martuscello, R1
Hawkins, KE1
Chang, M1
Lamba, JK1
Vali, S1
Kumar, A1
Singh, NK1
Abbasi, T1
Sekeres, MA3
Mallo, M1
Sole, F1
Bejar, R1
Cogle, CR1
Ureshino, H1
Kizuka, H1
Kusaba, K1
Sano, H1
Nishioka, A1
Shindo, T1
Kubota, Y1
Ando, T1
Kojima, K1
Kimura, S1
Kapoor, P1
Fonseca, R3
Lacy, MQ1
Witzig, TE1
Hayman, SR1
Dispenzieri, A1
Buadi, F1
Bergsagel, PL3
Gertz, MA1
Dalton, RJ1
Mikhael, JR1
Dingli, D1
Reeder, CB1
Lust, JA1
Russell, SJ1
Roy, V1
Zeldenrust, SR1
Stewart, AK2
Greipp, PR2
Reece, D3
Fu, T1
Roland, B1
Chang, H3
Horsman, DE1
Mansoor, A1
Masih-Khan, E1
Trieu, Y2
Bruyere, H1
Stewart, DA1
O'Brien, S1
Faderl, S2
Bueso-Ramos, C1
Abruzzo, L1
Shan, J1
Issa, JP1
Garcia-Manero, G1
San-Miguel, JF2
Soulier, J1
Fermand, JP1
Yakoub-Agha, I1
Hulin, C1
Belhadj, K1
Dorvaux, V1
Minvielle, S1
Ludwig, H1
Beksac, M1
Boccadoro, M1
Cavenagh, J1
Dimopoulos, M1
Drach, J1
Facon, T1
Harousseau, JL1
Hess, U2
Ketterer, N1
Kropff, M1
Mendeleeva, L1
Plesner, T1
Shpilberg, O1
Sondergeld, P1
List, AF4
Cuthbertson, D1
Paquette, R1
Ganetzky, R1
Ganetsky, R1
Latham, D1
Paulic, K1
Afable, M2
Saba, HI1
Loughran, TP1
Maciejewski, JP1
Kurahashi, S1
Sawamoto, A1
Adachi, T1
Iwasaki, T1
Suzuki, H1
Sugimoto, T1
Narimatsu, H1
Hayakawa, F1
Sugiura, I1
Mittelman, M1
Oster, HS1
Hoffman, M1
Neumann, D1
Kastritis, E1
Christoulas, D1
Migkou, M1
Gavriatopoulou, M1
Gkotzamanidou, M1
Iakovaki, M1
Matsouka, C1
Mparmparoussi, D1
Roussou, M1
Efstathiou, E1
Terpos, E1
Jiang, A2
Qi, C1
Shaughnessy, JD4
Alsayed, Y2
Nair, B1
Anaissie, E4
Szymonifka, J1
Nahi, H1
Sutlu, T1
Jansson, M2
Alici, E1
Gahrton, G1
Mehta, J2
Klein, U1
Seckinger, A1
Ho, AD1
Neben, K1
Möllgård, L1
Saft, L1
Treppendahl, MB1
Dybedal, I1
Nørgaard, JM1
Astermark, J1
Ejerblad, E1
Garelius, H1
Dufva, IH1
Jädersten, M2
Kjeldsen, L1
Linder, O1
Nilsson, L1
Vestergaard, H1
Porwit, A1
Grønbæk, K1
Hellström-Lindberg, E2
Lindberg, EH1
Uno, H1
Jacobus, SJ1
Van Wier, SA1
Ahmann, GJ1
Henderson, KJ1
Callander, NS1
Haug, JL1
Siegel, DS1
Zhu, YX1
Braggio, E1
Shi, CX1
Bruins, LA1
Schmidt, JE1
Van Wier, S1
Chang, XB1
Bjorklund, CC1
Nagoshi, H1
Horiike, S1
Kuroda, J1
Taniwaki, M1
Sugimoto, Y1
Makishima, H1
Traina, F1
Visconte, V1
Jankowska, A1
Jerez, A1
Szpurka, H1
O'Keefe, CL1
Guinta, K1
Tiu, R1
McGraw, KL1
Maciejewski, J1
Grzasko, N2
Hus, M2
Chocholska, S2
Hajek, R3
Dmoszynska, A2
Chen, Y1
Estrov, Z1
Rey, K1
Jurczyszyn, A2
Walter-Croneck, A1
Morawska, M1
Gutiérrez, N1
Teruel, AI1
López de la Guía, A1
López, J1
Bengoechea, E1
Pérez, M1
Polo, M1
Palomera, L1
de Arriba, F1
González, Y1
Hernández, JM1
Granell, M1
Bello, JL1
Bargay, J1
Peñalver, FJ1
Ribera, JM1
Martín-Mateos, ML1
García-Sanz, R1
Lahuerta, JJ1
Sockel, K1
Bornhaeuser, M1
Mischak-Weissinger, E1
Trenschel, R1
Wermke, M1
Unzicker, C1
Kobbe, G1
Finke, J1
Mohr, B1
Greiner, J1
Beelen, D1
Thiede, C1
Ehninger, G1
Geyer, JT1
Verma, S1
Mathew, S1
Wang, YL1
Racchumi, J1
Espinal-Witter, R1
Subramaniyam, S1
Knowles, DM1
Orazi, A1
Gutierrez, NC1
Smetana, J1
Berankova, K1
Zaoralova, R1
Nemec, P1
Greslikova, H1
Kupska, R1
Mikulasova, A1
Frohlich, J1
Sevcikova, S1
Zahradova, L1
Krejci, M1
Sandecka, V1
Almasi, M1
Kaisarova, P1
Melicharova, H1
Adam, Z1
Penka, M1
Jarkovsky, J1
Kuglik, P1
Zhou, DB1
Strupp, C2
Hildebrandt, B2
Haas, R1
Gattermann, N1
BENDA, CE1
BAUGHMAN, FA1
YANZON, NA1
RODRIGUEZDEAGNESE, LR1
GIACOMELLO, G1
MALATESTA, P1
QUAGLIA, G1
JENSEN, MK1
Heinsch, M1
Nimer, SD1
List, A2
Dewald, G1
Bennett, J1
Raza, A1
Feldman, E1
Powell, B1
Greenberg, P1
Thomas, D1
Stone, R1
Reeder, C1
Wride, K1
Patin, J1
Schmidt, M1
Zeldis, J3
Knight, R2
Olney, HJ1
Le Beau, MM1
Goss, TF1
Szende, A1
Schaefer, C1
Totten, PJ1
Ortega, J1
Eclache, V1
Da Rocha, A1
Le Roux, G1
Fenaux, P1
Zangari, M2
Pineda-Roman, M2
Haessler, J2
Hollmig, K1
Tricot, G1
Barer, S1
Dhodapkar, M1
Jenkins, B1
Singhal, S1
Jagannath, S1
Ahrens, K1
Soukup, S1
Takacs, E1
Warkany, J1
Beckman, DA1
Brent, RL1
Ashby, J1
Tinwell, H1
Callander, RD1
Kimber, I1
Clay, P1
Galloway, SM1
Hill, RB1
Greenwood, SK1
Gaulden, ME1
Ferguson, MJ1
Vogel, E1
Nivard, M1
Parry, JM1
Williamson, J1
Sjak-Shie, NN1
Vescio, RA1
Berenson, JR1
Zorat, F1
Pozzato, G1
Huijgens, PC1
Jörgensen, G4
Bohm, R1
Nitsch, K1
Achs, R1
Harper, RG1
Shiono, H1
Shapiro, IuL1
Vaĭntrub, MIa1
Grinberg, KN1
Zhurkov, VS1
Holt, SB1
Kelsey, FO1
Kernis, MM1
Kucera, J1
Tuli, SM1
Shakibi, JG1
Watanabe, G1
Warburg, M1
Nager, GT1
Sax, K1
Sax, HJ1
Neuhäuser, G1
Hirth, L1
Döser, R1
Roux, C1
Emerit, I1
Taillemite, JL1
Vasilescu, V1
Cilievici, O1
Leahu, L1
Gordon, H1
Natarajan, AT1
Nilsson, R1

Clinical Trials (23)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Non-interventional, Observational Post-marketing Registry of Multiple Myeloma Adult Patients Treated With Revlimid (Lenalidomide) in China[NCT01947309]176 participants (Actual)Observational2013-11-30Terminated (stopped due to Business Decision)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study Comparing Oral Ixazomib (MLN9708) Plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Versus Placebo Plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Adult Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma[NCT01564537]Phase 3722 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-01Completed
A Phase II Study Incorporating Bone Marrow Microenvironment (ME) - Co-Targeting Bortezomib Into Tandem Melphalan-Based Autotransplants With DTPACE for Induction/Consolidation and Thalidomide + Dexamethasone for Maintenance[NCT00572169]Phase 3177 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Active, not recruiting
A Phase 2 Study Incorporating Bone Marrow Microenvironment (ME) Co-Targeting Bortezomib Into Tandem Melphalan-Based Autotransplants With DT PACE for Induction/Consolidation and Thalidomide + Dexamethasone for Maintenance[NCT00081939]Phase 2303 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-31Completed
Screening and Genetic Monitoring of Patients With MDS Under Different Treatment Modalities by Cytogenetic Analyses of Circulating CD34+Cells[NCT01355913]402 participants (Actual)Observational2008-10-31Completed
Evaluation of Ruxolitinib and Lenalidomide Combination as a Therapy for Patients With Myelofibrosis[NCT01375140]Phase 231 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-22Completed
A Phase 3, Muticenter, Randomized, Open-label Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Pomalidomide in Combination With Low-dose Dexamethasone Versus High-dose Dexamethasone in Subjects With Refractory or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma[NCT01311687]Phase 3455 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-11Completed
A phaseI/II Safety and Efficacy Trial of a Combination of Bendamustine, Rituximab and Lenalidomide (BRL) in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia[NCT01558167]Phase 1/Phase 222 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
An Open Label, Multicenter, Phase 2, Pilot Study, Evaluating Early Treatment With Bispecific T-cell Redirectors (Teclistamab and Talquetamab) in the Frontline Therapy of Newly Diagnosed High-risk Multiple Myeloma[NCT05849610]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-30Recruiting
A Phase I/II Study of Carfilzomib, Iberdomide (CC-220) and Dexamethasone (KID) in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Transplant Eligible Multiple Myeloma[NCT05199311]Phase 1/Phase 266 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-13Recruiting
A Multicenter, Single-Arm, Open-Label, Expanded Access Program for Lenalidomide With or Without Dexamethasone in Previously Treated Subjects With Multiple Myeloma[NCT00179647]Phase 31,913 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
Multicenter Open Label Phase 2 Single Arm Study of Ixazomib, Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Characterized With Genomic Abnormalities of Adverse Adverse Prognostic[NCT03683277]Phase 226 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-11-03Terminated (stopped due to Recruitment issue, 26 patients enrolled instead of 70 initially planned)
An Open-label, Phase II Study of Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (PDex) for Previously Treated Patients With AL Amyloidosis.[NCT01510613]Phase 228 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Completed
Mean Platelet Volume and Its Relation to Risk Stratification of Myelodysplastic Syndromes[NCT05204953]71 participants (Actual)Observational2013-10-31Completed
A Multicentre Phase II Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide in High-risk Myeloid Disease (High-risk MDS and AML) With a Karyotype Including Del(5q) or Monosomy 5[NCT00761449]Phase 228 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
A Randomized Phase III Study of CC-5013 Plus Dexamethasone Versus CC-5013 Plus Low Dose Dexamethasone in Multiple Myeloma With Thalidomide Plus Dexamethasone Salvage Therapy for Non-Responders[NCT00098475]Phase 3452 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-11-03Active, not recruiting
A National, Open-Label, Multicenter, Randomized, Comparative Phase III Study of Induction Treatment With Melphalan/Prednisone/Velcade Versus Thalidomide / Prednisone / Velcade and Maintenance Treatment With Thalidomide / Velcade Versus Prednisone / Velcad[NCT00443235]Phase 3260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-03-31Completed
A Prospective, Observational Study, to Evaluate the Maintenance With Bortezomib Plus Daratumumab (V-Dara) After Induction With Bortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone Plus Daratumumab (VMP-Dara) in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients Non-eligible for[NCT05218603]100 participants (Anticipated)Observational2021-11-30Recruiting
Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Phase III Study of REVLIMID (Lenalidomide) Versus Placebo in Patients With Low Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (Low and Intermediate-1 IPSS) With Alteration in 5q- and Anemia Without the Need of Transfusion.[NCT01243476]Phase 361 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
Phase II Clinical Protocol for the Treatment of Patients With Previously Untreated CLL With Four or Six Cycles of Fludarabine and Cyclophosphamide With Rituximab (FCR) Plus Lenalidomide Followed by Lenalidomide Consolidation/ Maintenance[NCT01723839]Phase 221 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-22Completed
Multi-center, Survival Data Collection in Subjects Previously Enrolled in Celgene Protocol CC-5013-MDS-003[NCT01099267]54 participants (Actual)Observational2010-03-01Completed
A Multicenter, Single-arm, Open-label Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide Monotherapy in Red Blood Cell Transfusion-dependent Subjects With Myelodysplastic Syndromes Associated With a Del(5q) Cytogenetic Abnormality.[NCT00065156]Phase 2148 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-06-01Completed
A Phase I/II Study of Bendamustine, Lenalidomide and Low-dose Dexamethasone, (BdL) for the Treatment of Patients With Relapsed Myeloma.[NCT01686386]Phase 1/Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-02-28Recruiting
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR was measured as the time in months from the date of first documentation of a confirmed response of PR or better (CR [including sCR] + PR+ VGPR) to the date of the first documented disease progression (PD) among participants who responded to the treatment. Response was assessed by the investigator using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Criteria. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each cycle (every 4 weeks) until disease progression up to approximately 38 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone26.0
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone21.7

OS in High-Risk Participants

Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. High-risk participants are defined as participants carrying cytogenic abnormalities: del(17), translocation t(4;14), or t(14;16) as reported by the central laboratory combined with those cases that lacked a central laboratory result but with known del (17), t(4;14), or t(14;16) by local laboratory. Cytogenetic abnormalities of del(13) and +1q are not included in the analysis. Participants without documentation of death at the time of the analysis were censored at the date when they were last known to be alive. Data is only reported for high-risk participants. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: From the time of screening until disease progression and thereafter every 12 weeks until death or study termination (up to approximately 97 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone46.9
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone30.9

Overall Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by the IRC

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with Complete Response (CR) including stringent complete response (sCR), very good partial response (VGPR) and Partial Response (PR) assessed by the IRC using IMWG criteria. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each cycle (every 4 weeks) until disease progression up to approximately 27 months(approximate median follow-up 15 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone78.3
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone71.5

Overall Response Rate in Participants Defined by Polymorphism

Data is reported for percentage of participants defined by polymorphism defined by polymorphisms in proteasome genes, such as polymorphism P11A in PSMB1 gene. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each cycle (every 4 weeks) until disease progression up to approximately 27 months (approximate median follow-up 15 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone80.3
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone75.7

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. Participants without documentation of death at the time of the analysis were censored at the date when they were last known to be alive. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until death (up to approximately 97 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone53.6
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone51.6

Overall Survival in High-Risk Participants Carrying Deletion 17 [Del(17)]

Overall survival is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. The high-risk participants whose myeloma carried del(17) subgroup was defined as the cases reported as positive for del(17) by the central laboratory combined with those cases that lacked a central laboratory result but with known del (17) by local laboratory. Participants without documentation of death at the time of the analysis were censored at the date when they were last known to be alive. Data is only reported high-risk participants with Del(17). (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: From the time of screening until disease progression and thereafter every 12 weeks until death or study termination (up to approximately 97 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone42.2
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone29.4

Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) and Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) as Assessed by the IRC

Response was assessed by the IRC using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Criteria. CR is defined as negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and; disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and; < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR is defined as Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level < 100 mg per 24 hours. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each cycle (every 4 weeks) until disease progression up to approximately 27 months (approximate median follow-up 15 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ixazomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone48.1
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone39.0

PFS in High-Risk Participants

Progression Free Survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Response was assessed by independent review committee (IRC) using IMWG response criteria. High-risk participants are defined as participants carrying cytogenic abnormalities: del(17), translocation t(4;14), or t(14;16) as reported by the central laboratory combined with those cases that lacked a central laboratory result but with known del (17), t(4;14), or t(14;16) by local laboratory. Cytogenetic abnormalities of del(13) and +1q are not included in the analysis. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until disease progression or death up to approximately 38 months (approximate median follow-up 15 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone18.7
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone9.3

Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)

Progression Free Survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Response including PD was assessed by independent review committee (IRC) using the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) response criteria. PD requires 1 of the following: Increase of ≥ 25% from nadir in: Serum M-component (absolute increase ≥ 0.5 g/dl); Urine M-component (absolute increase ≥ 200 mg/24 hours); In patients without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels (absolute increase > 10 mg/dl); Development of new or increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium > 11.5 mg/dl) attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disease. Status evaluated every 4 weeks until disease progression (PD) was confirmed. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until disease progression or death up to approximately 27 months (approximate median follow-up 15 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone20.6
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone14.7

Time to Progression (TTP) as Assessed by the IRC

TTP was measured as the time in months from the first dose of study treatment to the date of the first documented progressive disease (PD) as assessed by the IRC using IMWG criteria. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each cycle (every 4 weeks) until disease progression up to approximately 27 months (approximate median follow-up 15 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone22.4
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone17.6

Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer participants. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact).The EORTC-QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QOL Scale is scored between 0 and 100, where higher scores indicate better Global Health Status/QOL. Negative changes from baseline indicate deterioration in QOL or functioning and positive changes indicate improvement. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. High scores for the global and functional domains indicate higher quality of life or functioning. Higher scores on the symptom scales represent higher levels of symptomatology or problems. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT and follow-up (up to approximately 97 months)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Global Health Index: BaselineGlobal Health Index: End of TreatmentPhysical Functioning: BaselinePhysical Functioning: EOTRole Functioning: BaselineRole Functioning: EOTEmotional Functioning: BaselineEmotional Functioning: EOTCognitive Functioning: BaselineCognitive Functioning: EOTSocial Functioning: BaselineSocial Functioning: EOTFatigue: BaselineFatigue: EOTPain: BaselinePain: EOTNausea and Vomiting: BaselineNausea and Vomiting: EOTDyspnea: BaselineDyspnea: EOTInsomnia: BaselineInsomnia: EOTAppetite Loss: BaselineAppetite Loss: EOTConstipation: BaselineConstipation: EOTDiarrhea: BaselineDiarrhea: EOTFinancial Difficulties: BaselineFinancial Difficulties: EOT
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone58.4-6.070.0-4.768.4-8.675.1-2.181.9-7.677.9-6.938.46.038.02.75.03.421.25.727.40.916.94.712.2-1.36.317.216.70.5

Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer participants. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact).The EORTC-QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QOL Scale is scored between 0 and 100, where higher scores indicate better Global Health Status/QOL. Negative changes from baseline indicate deterioration in QOL or functioning and positive changes indicate improvement. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. High scores for the global and functional domains indicate higher quality of life or functioning. Higher scores on the symptom scales represent higher levels of symptomatology or problems. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT and follow-up (up to approximately 97 months)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Global Health Index: BaselineGlobal Health Index: End of TreatmentGlobal Health Index: Last Follow-upPhysical Functioning: BaselinePhysical Functioning: EOTPhysical Functioning: Last Follow-upRole Functioning: BaselineRole Functioning: EOTRole Functioning: Last Follow-upEmotional Functioning: BaselineEmotional Functioning: EOTEmotional Functioning: Last Follow-upCognitive Functioning: BaselineCognitive Functioning: EOTCognitive Functioning: Last Follow-upSocial Functioning: BaselineSocial Functioning: EOTSocial Functioning: Last Follow-upFatigue: BaselineFatigue: EOTFatigue: Last Follow-upPain: BaselinePain: EOTPain: Last Follow-upNausea and Vomiting: BaselineNausea and Vomiting: EOTNausea and Vomiting: Last Follow-upDyspnea: BaselineDyspnea: EOTDyspnea: Last Follow-upInsomnia: BaselineInsomnia: EOTInsomnia: Last Follow-upAppetite Loss: BaselineAppetite Loss: EOTAppetite Loss: Last Follow-upConstipation: BaselineConstipation: EOTConstipation: Last Follow-upDiarrhea: BaselineDiarrhea: EOTDiarrhea: Last Follow-upFinancial Difficulties: BaselineFinancial Difficulties: EOTFinancial Difficulties: Last Follow-up
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone56.4-6.016.767.3-6.20.064.4-8.6-16.775.3-6.1-25.081.6-5.8-50.075.3-7.90.039.56.722.238.53.80.06.00.633.323.72.30.030.5-0.533.315.36.50.013.52.233.38.110.80.018.61.3-33.3

Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Multiple Myeloma Module (QLQ-MY-20)

The EORTC-QLQ-MY-20 is a patient-completed, 20-question quality of life questionnaire that has 4 independent subscales, 2 functional subscales (body image, future perspective), and 2 symptoms scales (disease symptoms and side-effects of treatment). The participant answers questions about their health during the past week using a 4-point scale where 1=Not at All to 4=Very Much. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores on the symptom scales (e.g. Disease Symptoms, Side Effects of Treatment) represent higher levels of symptomatology or problems. High scores for Body Image and Future Perspective represent better quality of life or functioning. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT and follow-up (up to approximately 97 months)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Disease Symptoms: BaselineDisease Symptoms: EOTSide Effects of Treatment: BaselineSide Effects of Treatment: EOTSide Effects of Treatment: Last Follow-upBody Image: BaselineBody Image: EOTBody Image: Last Follow-upFuture Perspective: BaselineFuture Perspective: EOTFuture Perspective: Last Follow-up
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone30.41-2.5817.974.4337.0479.48-5.38-33.360.26-2.75-11.11

Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Multiple Myeloma Module (QLQ-MY-20)

The EORTC-QLQ-MY-20 is a patient-completed, 20-question quality of life questionnaire that has 4 independent subscales, 2 functional subscales (body image, future perspective), and 2 symptoms scales (disease symptoms and side-effects of treatment). The participant answers questions about their health during the past week using a 4-point scale where 1=Not at All to 4=Very Much. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores on the symptom scales (e.g. Disease Symptoms, Side Effects of Treatment) represent higher levels of symptomatology or problems. High scores for Body Image and Future Perspective represent better quality of life or functioning. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT and follow-up (up to approximately 97 months)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Disease Symptoms: BaselineDisease Symptoms: EOTDisease Symptoms: Last Follow-upSide Effects of Treatment: BaselineSide Effects of Treatment: EOTBody Image: BaselineBody Image: EOTFuture Perspective: BaselineFuture Perspective: EOT
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone29.71-2.351.1117.234.5278.00-0.2756.992.76

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score, laboratory values, vital sign measurements and reported adverse events (AEs) were collected and assessed to evaluate the safety of therapy throughout the study. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (example, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or congenital anomaly; or a medically important event. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: From the date of signing of the informed consent form through 30 days after the last dose of study drug up to approximately 115 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TEAEsSAEs
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone359205
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone357201

Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Pain Response

"Pain response was defined as 30% reduction from Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) worst pain score over the last 24 hours without an increase in analgesic (oral morphine equivalents) use at 2 consecutive evaluations. The BPI-SF contains 15 items designed to capture the pain severity (worst, least, average, and now [current pain]), pain location, medication to relieve the pain, and the interference of pain with various daily activities including general activity, mood, walking activity, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life. The pain severity items are rated on a 0 to 10 scale where: 0=no pain and 10=pain as bad as you can imagine and averaged for a total score of 0 (best) to 10 (Worst)." (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Baseline and end of treatment (EOT) (up to approximately 38 months)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
BaselineEOT
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone345145
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone351153

Plasma Concentration Over Time for Ixazomib

(NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and post-dose at multiple timepoints up to Cycle 10 Day 1 (each cycle length = 28 days)

Interventionμg/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1, 1 Hour Post-DoseCycle 1 Day 1, 4 Hours Post-DoseCycle 1 Day 14, Pre-DoseCycle 2 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 2 Day 14, Pre-DoseCycle 3 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 4 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 5 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 6 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 7 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 8 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 9 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 10 Day 1, Pre-Dose
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone0000000000000

Plasma Concentration Over Time for Ixazomib

(NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and post-dose at multiple timepoints up to Cycle 10 Day 1 (each cycle length = 28 days)

Interventionμg/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 1, 1 Hour Post-DoseCycle 1 Day 1, 4 Hours Post-DoseCycle 1 Day 14, Pre-DoseCycle 2 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 2 Day 14, Pre-DoseCycle 3 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 4 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 5 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 6 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 7 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 8 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 9 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 10 Day 1, Pre-Dose
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone4.7936.315.66.832.47.122.482.412.422.572.712.372.512.82

Percentage of Participants With Progression-Free Survival (PFS) at 3 Years From Initiation of Study Treatment

In patients with no confirmed Partial Response, Near Complete Response, or Complete Response, progression was defined as a >25% increase from baseline in myeloma protein production or other signs of disease progression such as hypercalcemia, etc. (NCT00081939)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Study Treatment77

Participants With Objective Response

To determine the efficacy of the combination of Ruxolitinib + Lenalidomide in patients with Myelofibrosis (MF). Objective response rate equals Complete and Partial Response, and Clinical Improvement as defined by International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT). Objective response rate (ORR), defined as a clinical improvement (CI), partial remission (PR), and complete remission (CR) according to the International Working Group (IWG) Criteria. Complete remission (CR): bone marrow blasts <5%, hemoglobin >/= 10, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >/= 1000, platelets >/= 100, <2% immature myeloid cell, spleen and liver not palpable. Partial Response (PR): CR plus one or more of the following: ANC >/= 1000, decreased platelets by 50%, hemoglobin >/= 8.5 but < 10, <2% immature myeloid cells. Clinical improvement (CI): hemoglobin increase of 2g/dl, transfusion independence or reduction splenomegaly and/or hepatomegaly >/= 50%, >/=50% reduction in MPN-SAF TSS (NCT01375140)
Timeframe: 3 cycles (28 days each) up to 3 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ruxolitinib + Lenalidomide7

Duration of Response

Duration of response (calculated for responders only) is defined as time from the initial documented response (partial response or better) to confirmed disease progression, based on IMWG criteria assessed by the Independent Response Adjudication Committee. (NCT01311687)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum time on follow-up was 93 weeks.

Interventionweeks (Median)
Pomalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone35.1
High-Dose Dexamethasone28.1

Overall Survival - Primary Analysis

Overall survival is calculated as the time from randomization to death from any cause. Overall survival was censored at the last date that the participant was known to be alive for participants who were alive at the time of analysis and for participants who were lost to follow-up before death was documented. (NCT01311687)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 07 September 2012. Maximum time on follow-up for survival was 70 weeks.

Interventionweeks (Median)
Pomalidomide Plus Low-Dose DexamethasoneNA
High-Dose Dexamethasone34.0

Overall Survival Based on the Final Dataset

Overall survival is calculated as the time from randomization to death from any cause. Overall survival was censored at the last date that the participant was known to be alive for participants who were alive at the time of analysis and for participants who were lost to follow-up before death was documented. (NCT01311687)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 29 August 2017. Maximum time on follow-up for survival was 324 weeks.

Interventionweeks (Median)
Pomalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone56.1
High-Dose Dexamethasone35.3

Overall Survival With a Later Cut-off Date

Overall survival is calculated as the time from randomization to death from any cause. Overall survival was censored at the last date that the participant was known to be alive for participants who were alive at the time of analysis and for participants who were lost to follow-up before death was documented. (NCT01311687)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum time on follow-up for survival was 93 weeks.

Interventionweeks (Median)
Pomalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone54.0
High-Dose Dexamethasone34.9

Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response According to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Uniform Response Criteria

Objective response is defined as a best overall response of stringent complete response (SCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR) or partial response (PR) based on the Independent Response Adjudication Committee: SCR: CR and normal free light chain (FLC) ratio and no clonal cells in bone marrow; CR: Negative serum and urine on immunofixation, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and ≤ 5% plasma cells in bone marrow; VGPR: Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or ≥ 90% reduction in serum M-protein and urine M-protein level < 100 mg/24 hours; PR: ≥ 50% reduction of serum M-Protein and reduction in urinary M-protein by ≥ 90% or to < 200 mg/24 hours. In addition to the above, if present at baseline a ≥ 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas is also required. (NCT01311687)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum time on follow-up was 93 weeks.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pomalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone23.5
High-Dose Dexamethasone3.9

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Criteria

Objective response defined as a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on the Independent Response Adjudication Committee: CR requires all of the following: - Absence of original monoclonal paraprotein in serum and urine by immunofixation maintained at least 42 days. - <5% plasma cell in bone marrow aspirate and on bone marrow biopsy, if performed. - No increase in size or number of lytic bone lesions. - Disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas. PR requires all of the following: - ≥ 50% reduction in level of serum monoclonal paraprotein, maintained at least 42 days. - Reduction in 24-hour urinary light chain extraction by ≥ 90% or to < 200 mg, maintained at least 42 days. - For patients with non-secretory myeloma, ≥ 50% reduction in plasma cells in bone marrow aspirate and on biopsy, if performed, for at least 42 days. - ≥ 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas. - No increase in size or number of lytic bone lesions. (NCT01311687)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum time on follow-up was 93 weeks.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pomalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone22.2
High-Dose Dexamethasone3.3

Progression-free Survival (PFS) - Primary Analysis

Progression-free survival was calculated as the time from randomization to disease progression as determined by the Independent Response Adjudication Committee based on the International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response criteria (IMWG), or death on study, whichever occurred earlier. Progressive disease required 1 of the following: • Increase of ≥ 25% from nadir in: o Serum M-component (absolute increase ≥ 0.5 g/dl); o Urine M-component (absolute increase ≥ 200 mg/24 hours); o Bone marrow plasma cell percentage (absolute % ≥ 10%); • Development of new or increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; • Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium > 11.5 mg/dl) attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disease. (NCT01311687)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 07 September 2012. Maximum duration of follow-up for PFS assessments was 57 weeks.

Interventionweeks (Median)
Pomalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone15.7
High-Dose Dexamethasone8.0

Progression-free Survival (PFS) With a Later Cut-off Date

Progression-free survival was calculated as the time from randomization to disease progression as determined by the Independent Response Adjudication Committee based on the International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response criteria (IMWG), or death on study, whichever occurred earlier. Progressive disease requires 1 of the following: • Increase of ≥ 25% from nadir in: o Serum M-component (absolute increase ≥ 0.5 g/dl); o Urine M-component (absolute increase ≥ 200 mg/24 hours); o Bone marrow plasma cell percentage (absolute % ≥ 10%); • Development of new or increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; • Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium > 11.5 mg/dl) attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disease. (NCT01311687)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum duration of follow-up for PFS assessments was 74 weeks.

Interventionweeks (Median)
Pomalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone16.0
High-Dose Dexamethasone8.1

Time to Improvement in Bone Pain

"Time to improvement in bone pain is defined as the time from randomization to at least one category improvement from Baseline in bone pain category. Bone pain was categorized (from best to worst) according to answers to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire for patients with Multiple Myeloma Module (QLQ-MY20), Question 1, Have you had bone aches or pain?: 1) Not at all, 2) A little, 3) Quite a bit, or 4) Very much." (NCT01311687)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum time on follow-up was 93 weeks.

Interventionweeks (Median)
Pomalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone5.7
High-Dose Dexamethasone4.1

Time to Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status

Time to improvement in ECOG performance status defined as the time from randomization until at least a one category improvement from Baseline in ECOG performance status score. The categories of the ECOG Performance Status Scale are as follows: -0: Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction; -1: Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry our work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light housework, office work; -2: Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours. Patients with a score of 3, 4 or 5 were excluded from participating in the study. (NCT01311687)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum time on follow-up was 93 weeks.

Interventionweeks (Median)
Pomalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone8.1
High-Dose Dexamethasone4.3

Time to Improvement in Renal Function

Time to improvement in renal function is defined as the time from randomization to at least one category improvement from Baseline in renal function. Renal Function was categorized as (from best to worst): - Normal: creatinine clearance ≥80 mL/min; - Grade 1: creatinine clearance ≥60 to <80 mL/min; - Grade 2 : creatinine clearance ≥45 to < 60 mL/min. Participants with creatinine clearance < 45 mL/min at baseline were excluded from the study. (NCT01311687)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum time on follow-up was 93 weeks.

Interventionweeks (Median)
Pomalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone4.6
High-Dose Dexamethasone4.1

Time to Progression

Time to progression (TTP) is calculated as the time from randomization to the first documented progression confirmed by a blinded, independent Response Adjudication Committee and based on the International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response criteria (IMWG). Progressive disease requires 1 of the following: • Increase of ≥ 25% from nadir in: o Serum M-component (absolute increase ≥ 0.5 g/dl); o Urine M-component (absolute increase ≥ 200 mg/24 hours); o Bone marrow plasma cell percentage (absolute % ≥ 10%); • Development of new or increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; • Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium > 11.5 mg/dl) attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disease. (NCT01311687)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum time on follow-up was 93 weeks.

Interventionweeks (Median)
Pomalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone20.0
High-Dose Dexamethasone9.0

Time to Response

Time to response is calculated as the time from randomization to the initial documented response (partial response or better) based on IMWG criteria. SCR: CR and normal free light chain (FLC) ratio and no clonal cells in bone marrow; CR: Negative serum and urine on immunofixation, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and ≤ 5% plasma cells in bone marrow; VGPR: Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or ≥ 90% reduction in serum M-protein and urine M-protein level < 100 mg/24 hours; PR: ≥ 50% reduction of serum M-Protein and reduction in urinary M-protein by ≥ 90% or to < 200 mg/24 hours. If present at baseline a ≥ 50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas is also required. (NCT01311687)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum time on follow-up was 93 weeks.

Interventionweeks (Median)
Pomalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone8.1
High-Dose Dexamethasone10.5

Time to the First Hemoglobin Improvement

Time to increased hemoglobin, defined as the time from randomization to at least one category improvement from Baseline in common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) grade for hemoglobin level. Hemoglobin categories are: 1) Normal; 2) CTCAE Grade 1: < lower limit of normal (LLN) to 10.0 g/dL; 3) CTCAE Grade 2: < 10.0 to <8.0 g/dL. Participants with CTCAE Grade 3 anemia or worse at Baseline were excluded from the study. (NCT01311687)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum time on follow-up was 93 weeks.

Interventionweeks (Median)
Pomalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone3.4
High-Dose Dexamethasone1.3

Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Emotional Functioning Domain

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used in clinical research to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Emotional Functioning Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating better functioning/support. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement. (NCT01311687)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Baseline), and Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 2, Day 1Cycle 3, Day 1Cycle 4, Day 1Cycle 5 Day 1Cycle 6, Day 1
High-Dose Dexamethasone-2.87-5.66-6.31-8.64-4.17
Pomalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone1.222.402.441.910.19

Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Fatigue Domain

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used in clinical research to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Fatigue Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating a higher level of symptoms. Negative change from Baseline values indicate reduction in fatigue (i.e. improvement in symptom) and positive values indicate increases in fatigue (i.e. worsening of symptom). (NCT01311687)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Baseline), and Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 2, Day 1Cycle 3, Day 1Cycle 4, Day 1Cycle 5 Day 1Cycle 6, Day 1
High-Dose Dexamethasone4.037.769.439.4710.49
Pomalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone2.433.261.710.210.99

Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Pain Domain

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used in clinical research to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Pain Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating a higher level of symptoms. Negative change from Baseline values indicate reductions in pain (i.e. improvement in symptom) and positive values indicate increases in pain (i.e. worsening of symptom). (NCT01311687)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Baseline), and Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 2, Day 1Cycle 3, Day 1Cycle 4, Day 1Cycle 5 Day 1Cycle 6, Day 1
High-Dose Dexamethasone0.362.833.032.4710.19
Pomalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone-2.70-3.58-2.41-1.64-2.40

Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Domain

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used in clinical research to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating better functioning/support. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement. (NCT01311687)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Baseline), and Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 2, Day 1Cycle 3, Day 1Cycle 4, Day 1Cycle 5 Day 1Cycle 6, Day 1
High-Dose Dexamethasone-3.96-9.69-8.08-5.43-4.81
Pomalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone-2.32-0.560.170.910.54

Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-MY20 Side Effects Domain

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Questionnaire for Patients with Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) is a 20-question tool used in clinical research to assess health-related quality of life in multiple myeloma patients. The QLQ-MY20 includes four domains (Disease Symptoms, Side-Effects of Treatment, Body Image and Future Perspective). The EORTC QLQ-MY20 Side Effects Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score reflecting a higher level of symptoms. Negative change from Baseline values indicate reduction in side effects (i.e.improvement in symptom) and positive values indicate increase in side effects (i.e. worsening of symptom). (NCT01311687)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Baseline), and Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 2, Day 1Cycle 3, Day 1Cycle 4, Day 1Cycle 5 Day 1Cycle 6, Day 1
High-Dose Dexamethasone2.615.357.466.897.30
Pomalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone2.713.263.734.744.55

Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status Domain

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QOL scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating better Global Health Status/QOL. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in QOL or functioning and positive values indicate improvement. (NCT01311687)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Baseline), and Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 2, Day 1Cycle 3, Day 1Cycle 4, Day 1Cycle 5 Day 1Cycle 6, Day 1
High-Dose Dexamethasone-3.75-2.36-3.030.00-0.93
Pomalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone0.522.670.800.51-2.51

Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Disease Symptoms

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Questionnaire for Patients with Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) is a 20-question tool used in clinical research to assess health-related quality of life in multiple myeloma patients. The QLQ-MY20 includes four domains (Disease Symptoms, Side-Effects of Treatment, Body Image and Future Perspective). The EORTC QLQ-MY20 Disease Symptoms Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score reflecting a higher level of symptoms. Negative change from Baseline values indicate reduction (i.e. improvement) in symptoms and positive values indicate increase (i.e. worsening) of symptoms. (NCT01311687)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Baseline), and Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 2, Day 1Cycle 3, Day 1Cycle 4, Day 1Cycle 5 Day 1Cycle 6, Day 1
High-Dose Dexamethasone-1.070.971.351.482.12
Pomalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone-0.50-1.36-1.15-0.530.60

Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Utility Index Score

"EQ-5D is a self-administered questionnaire that assesses health-related quality of life (QOL). The EQ-5D descriptive health profile comprises five dimensions of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Each dimension has 3 levels of response: No problem (1), some problems (2), and extreme problems (3). A unique EQ-5D health state is defined by combining one level from each of the five dimensions into a single utility index score. EQ-5D index values range from -0.59 to 1.00 where an EQ-5D score of 1.00 equals perfect health, a score of 0 equals death and a score of -0.59 equals worst imaginable health state. A positive change from Baseline score indicates improvement in health status. A negative change from Baseline score indicates worsening in health status. Negative scores represent the possible though unlikely situation that a patient's QOL is worse than death, i.e. they would rather be dead than living with that QOL" (NCT01311687)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Baseline), and Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 2, Day 1Cycle 3, Day 1Cycle 4, Day 1Cycle 5, Day 1Cycle 6, Day 1
High-Dose Dexamethasone-0.02-0.06-0.07-0.04-0.12
Pomalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone-0.030.010.040.010.03

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

An adverse event is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen in a participant during the course of a study. A serious AE is any AE occurring at any dose that: • Results in death; • Is life-threatening; • Requires or prolongs existing inpatient hospitalization; • Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; • Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; • Constitutes an important medical event. The Investigator assessed the relationship of each AE to study drug and graded the severity according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 4.0): Grade 1 = Mild (no limitation in activity or intervention required); Grade 2 = Moderate (some limitation in activity; no/minimal medical intervention required); Grade 3 = Severe (marked limitation in activity; medical intervention required, hospitalization possible); Grade 4 = Life-threatening; Grade 5 = Death. (NCT01311687)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug through to 30 days after the last dose as of the end of the study (29 August 2017); maximum time on treatment was 297, 269, and 239 weeks in the Pomalidomide + LD-Dex, HD-Dex, and cross-over groups respectively.

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any adverse eventGrade 3-4 adverse eventsAE related to pomalidomideAE related to dexamethasoneAE related to either study drugGrade 3-4 AE related to pomalidomideGrade 3-4 AE related to dexamethasoneGrade 3-4 AE related to either study drugGrade 5 adverse eventsSerious adverse events (SAEs)SAE related to pomalidomideSAE related to dexamethasoneSAE related to either study drugSAE leading to discontinuation of pomalidomideSAE leading to discontinuation of dexamethasoneSAE leading to discontinuation of either study druAE leading to discontinuation of pomalidomideAE leading to discontinuation of dexamethasoneAE leading to discontinuation of either study drug
HD-Dex / Pomalidomide1181151162614101111111
High-Dose Dexamethasone1491270115115070702180036360141401616
Pomalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone29826625120527119911421246195897398202023303438

Time to First Worsening of Quality of Life (QOL) Domains

Time to worsening in quality of life domains was calculated as the time from Baseline to the first worsened minimally important difference (MID), defined as the smallest change in a QOL score considered important to patients that would lead the patient or clinician to consider a change in therapy. MID thresholds were calculated in Standard Error of Measurement (SEM) units using the Baseline QOL data. Based on the MID, participants were classified as worsened according to the following: For the EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status and functional scales and the EQ-5D health utility score, participants were classified as worsened if their change from Baseline score was less than -1 SEM. For the EORTC QLQ-C30 symptom scores (fatigue and pain) and EORTC QLQ-MY20 disease symptoms and side effects scales, participants were classified as worsened if their change from Baseline score was greater than 1 SEM. See previous outcome measures for definitions of each scale. (NCT01311687)
Timeframe: Assessed on Day 1 of the first 6 treatment cycles.

,
Interventiondays (Median)
Global Health StatusPhysical FunctioningEmotional FunctioningFatiguePainDisease SymptomsSide Effects of TreatmentHealth Utility
High-Dose Dexamethasone576785578510685162
Pomalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone71128146589212790225

Overall Incidence of Adverse Events

Data from all subjects who received any study drug were included in the analysis. Adverse events were classified using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) classification system. A subject having the same event more than once was counted only once. Adverse events were summarized by worst NCI (National Cancer Institute) CTCAE (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) VERSION 3.0 grade. Incidence was defined as the number of subjects who experienced an adverse event within their period of participation in this study. (NCT00179647)
Timeframe: Median time-on-study=18.3 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Lenalidomide1877

Proportion of Patients With Objective Response (First Phase, Step 1)

"Objective response is defined as either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Patients who have complete disappearance of an M-protein and no evidence of myeloma in the bone marrow are considered to have CR. PR requires all the following: (1) ≥50% reduction in the level of the serum monoclonal paraprotein. (2) Reduction in 24-hour urinary light chain excretion either by ≥90% or to <200 mg. (3)For patients with non-secretory (or oligosecretory) myeloma only, a ≥50% reduction in plasma cells in a bone marrow aspirate and on trephine biopsy must be documented. (4)50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytoma (by radiography or clinical examination). (5) No increase in the number or size of lytic bone lesions (development of a compression fracture does not exclude response).~As the expansion phase was a substudy terminated early with only 7 patients enrolled, the clinical results presented are mainly for the first phase only." (NCT00098475)
Timeframe: Assessed every 4 weeks for 16 weeks during Step 1

InterventionProportion of patients (Number)
Arm I (Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone)0.79
Arm II (Lenalidomide, Low-dose Dexamethasone)0.683

Proportion of Patients With Objective Response (First Phase, Step 2)

"Objective response is defined as either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Patients who have complete disappearance of an M-protein and no evidence of myeloma in the bone marrow are considered to have CR. PR requires all the following: (1) ≥50% reduction in the level of the serum monoclonal paraprotein. (2) Reduction in 24-hour urinary light chain excretion either by ≥90% or to <200 mg. (3)For patients with non-secretory (or oligosecretory) myeloma only, a ≥50% reduction in plasma cells in a bone marrow aspirate and on trephine biopsy must be documented. (4)50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytoma (by radiography or clinical examination). (5) No increase in the number or size of lytic bone lesions (development of a compression fracture does not exclude response).~As the expansion phase was a substudy terminated early with only 7 patients enrolled, the clinical results presented are mainly for the first phase only." (NCT00098475)
Timeframe: Assessed every 4 weeks for 16 weeks during Step 2

InterventionProportion of patients (Number)
Arm I (Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone)0
Arm II (Lenalidomide, Low-dose Dexamethasone)0

Complete Response

Analysis of the Primary Endpoint: The complete responses will be estimated by the number of patients with CR divided by the total number of evaluable patients. (NCT01723839)
Timeframe: 28 day cycle, up to 4 cycles

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
FCR With Lenalidomide45

Overall Response Rate

Analysis of the other Secondary Endpoints: The overall response rate will be estimated by the number of patients with complete and partial responses divided by the total number of evaluable patients. (NCT01723839)
Timeframe: 28 day cycle, up to 6 cycles

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
FCR With Lenalidomide95

Kaplan Meier Estimate for Overall Survival

Overall survival was measured from the start of therapy in CC-5013-MDS-003 to the date of death from any cause. Results include data collected during the extension follow-up. (NCT01099267)
Timeframe: up to 7 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Lenalidomide39.47

Kaplan Meier Estimate for Progression to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Progression to AML was measured from the start of therapy in CC-5013-MDS-003 to the date AML was diagnosed. Results include data collected during the extension follow-up. (NCT01099267)
Timeframe: up to 7 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
LenalidomideNA

Cause of Death for Participants Who Died

Summary of the cause of death for participants from MDS-003 who died as of the time of the extension study follow-up. (NCT01099267)
Timeframe: up to 7 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Disease progression - AMLDisease progression - MDSInfection - SepsisInfection - RespiratoryInfection - Infection (not specified)Cardiac - Cardiac heart failureCardiac - Myocardial infarctionCardiac - Sudden deathHemorrhage - Cerebral hemorrhageHemorrhage - Gastrointestinal hemorrhageHemorrhage - Unknown originNeoplasm - EndometrialNeoplasm - Lung CancerNeoplasm - OvarianOther Events - Multi-organ failureGastrointestinal - Intestinal perforationVenous-thromboembolic - Pulmonary embolismOthers - Cause of death unknown
Lenalidomide24794393131111121129

Participants Status Regarding Progression to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) as of the Time of the Extension Study Follow-up

Count of participants who progressed to AML at the time of the extension study follow-up. (NCT01099267)
Timeframe: up to 7 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Progressed to AMLDid not progress to AMLUnknown
Lenalidomide368625

Participants Survival Status as of the Time of the Extension Study Follow-up

Count of participants who were alive or deceased at the time of the extension study follow-up. (NCT01099267)
Timeframe: up to 7 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
DeceasedAliveUnknown
Lenalidomide1012918

Change in Hemoglobin Concentration From Baseline to Maximum Value During Response Period for Responders

The change from baseline in hemoglobin for participants who became RBC-transfusion independent. The maximum hemoglobin value obtained during the response period is used in the calculation of change from baseline. (NCT00065156)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -54 to Day 0), During study (Day 1 up to 2 years)

Interventiong/dL (Mean)
Lenalidomide6.1

Kaplan Meier Estimate for Duration of Transfusion Independence Response

Duration of response is measured from the first of the consecutive 56 days during which the participant was free of RBC transfusions to the date of the first RBC transfusion after this period. Duration of response was censored at the date of last visit for participants who maintained transfusion independence. (NCT00065156)
Timeframe: up to 2 years

Interventionweeks (Median)
Lenalidomide97.0

Participants Who Achieved Red Blood Cell (RBC) -Transfusion Independence

"Number of participants who achieved RBC-transfusion independence, which was defined as the absence of an intravenous infusion of any RBC transfusion during any consecutive rolling 56 days during the treatment period (eg, Days 1 to 56, Days 2 to 57, Days 3 to 58, etc), and accompanied by at least a 1 g/dL increase from screening/baseline in hemoglobin." (NCT00065156)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Lenalidomide59

Participants With a >= 50% Decrease From Baseline in Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Requirements Over Any Consecutive 56 Days During Study

A participant was categorized as having a transfusion reduction response if there was a ≥ 50% decrease from pretreatment transfusion requirements (before the start of the study mediation) compared to any consecutive 56 days during the study (i.e. post treatment). (NCT00065156)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -54 to Day 0), During study (Day 1 up to 2 years)

Interventionparticipant (Number)
Lenalidomide70

Time to Transfusion Independence

"Transfusion independence was defined as the absence of an intravenous infusion of any RBC transfusion during any consecutive rolling 56 days during the treatment period (e.g., Days 1 to 56, Days 2 to 57, Days 3 to 58, etc.), and accompanied by at least a 1 g/dL increase from screening/baseline in hemoglobin. Time to transfusion independence was defined as the day of the first dose of study drug to the first day of the first 56-day RBC transfusion-free period." (NCT00065156)
Timeframe: up to 2 years

Interventionweeks (Mean)
Lenalidomide6.2

Participant Counts of Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) Response

"Major neutrophil response: participants with a minimum pretreatment ANC concentration of < 1500/mm^3 in all values obtained within 56 days of start of treatment, a ≥ 100% increase or an absolute increase of~≥ 500/mm^3, whichever was greater (at least to be ≥ 500/mm^3), sustained for 56 consecutive days. Minor neutrophil response: participants with a minimum pretreatment ANC concentration of < 1500/mm^3, an increase in ANC concentration of ≥ 100% sustained for 56 consecutive days." (NCT00065156)
Timeframe: up to 2 years

Interventionparticipant (Number)
MajorMinorNone
Lenalidomide9018

Participant Counts of Cytogenetic Response

"Participants deemed evaluable by the central cytogenetic review had their cytogenetic response categorized as major or minor. A major cytogenetic response was defined as ≥ 20 metaphases recorded at baseline, and at least~1 post baseline evaluation with ≥ 20 metaphases analyzed with no abnormal metaphases observed. A minor cytogenetic response was defined as ≥ 20 metaphases analyzed at baseline, and at least 1 post baseline evaluation with ≥ 20 metaphases analyzed with a ≥ 50% reduction in the proportion of hematopoietic cells with cytogenetic abnormalities compared with baseline." (NCT00065156)
Timeframe: up to 2 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
MajorMinorNone
Lenalidomide182014

Participant Counts of Platelet Response

"Major platelet response: participants with a minimum pretreatment platelet of <100,000/mm^3 in all values within 56 days of start of treatment, an absolute increase of ≥30,000/mm^3 sustained for ≥56 consecutive days. In platelet transfusion-dependent participants, a major response was stabilization of platelet counts and platelet transfusion independence.~Minor platelet response: participants with a minimum pretreatment platelet of <100,000/mm^3, a ≥ 50% increase in platelet count with a net increase >10,000/mm^3 for a consecutive 56-day period in the absence of platelet transfusions." (NCT00065156)
Timeframe: up to 2 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
MajorMinorNone
Lenalidomide2013

Participants Who Relapsed or Maintained Their Transfusion Independence After Achieving Transfusion Independence During the Study

"Transfusion independence was defined as the absence of an intravenous infusion of any RBC transfusion during any consecutive rolling 56 days during the treatment period (e.g., Days 1 to 56, Days 2 to 57, Days 3 to 58, etc.), and accompanied by at least a 1 g/dL increase from screening/baseline in hemoglobin. Participants who relapsed required a transfusion after the period of transfusion independence. Participants who maintained transfusion independence did not require a transfusion during the remainder of the study." (NCT00065156)
Timeframe: up to 2 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Relapsed (had a transfusion after response)Maintained transfusion independence
Lenalidomide3524

Participants With Adverse Experiences

"Counts of study participants who had adverse events (AEs) during the study. A participant with multiple occurrences of an adverse event within a category is counted only once in that category. Adverse events were evaluated by the investigator.~The National Cancer Institute (NCI)'s Common Toxicity Criteria for AEs (NCI CTC) was used to grade AE severity. Severity grade 3= severe and undesirable AE. Severity grade 4= life-threatening or disabling AE." (NCT00065156)
Timeframe: Up to 2 Years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
At least one AEAt least one AE related to study drugAt least one NCI CTC grade 3-4 AEAt least one NCI CTC grade 3-4 AE related to drugAt least one serious AEAt least one serious AE related to study drugAE leading to dose reduction or interruptionAE leading to discontinuation of study drug
Lenalidomide148143140131894013147

Participants With Bone Marrow Progression

"Bone marrow aspirate was assessed by a central reviewer. Progression is represented in two categories according to changes from baseline in French-American-British (FAB) classification (see Baseline Characteristics):~Baseline classification of refractory anemia (RA) or refractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts (RARS) to a during treatment (plus 30 days) classification of refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB).~Any baseline FAB classification to a during treatment (plus 30 days) classification of acute myeloid leukemia (AML)." (NCT00065156)
Timeframe: up to 2 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
RA/RARS to RAEBRA/RARS/RAEB/CMML to AML
Lenalidomide116

Participants With Complete or Partial Bone Marrow Improvement

Bone marrow aspirates were assessed by a central reviewer. A complete bone marrow improvement required a baseline French-American-British (FAB) classification (see Baseline Characteristics) of refractory anemia (RA), refractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts (RARS), refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB) or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) and a during study assessment of no MDS. A partial bone marrow improvement reflected an improved FAB classification compared to baseline (e.g. RARS to RA) but evidence of MDS continued to exist. (NCT00065156)
Timeframe: up to 2 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete bone marrow improvementPartial bone marrow improvement
Lenalidomide2215

Reviews

29 reviews available for thalidomide and Abnormalities, Autosome

ArticleYear
Initial treatment of transplant-ineligible patients in multiple myeloma.
    Expert review of hematology, 2014, Volume: 7, Issue:1

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Chromosome Aberrations; Glucocor

2014
der(5;17)(p10;q10) is a recurrent but rare whole-arm translocation in patients with hematological neoplasms: a report of three cases.
    Acta haematologica, 2014, Volume: 132, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anemia, Refractory, with Excess of Blasts; Aneuploidy; Antineoplastic Combi

2014
5q- syndrome-like features as the first manifestation of myelodysplastic syndrome in a patient with an unbalanced whole-arm translocation der(5;19)(p10;q10).
    International journal of hematology, 2017, Volume: 105, Issue:5

    Topics: Anemia, Macrocytic; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azacitidine; Carboplatin; Chromo

2017
How to treat a newly diagnosed young patient with multiple myeloma.
    Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2009

    Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boronic Acids; Bortezomib; Chrom

2009
Current multiple myeloma treatment strategies with novel agents: a European perspective.
    The oncologist, 2010, Volume: 15, Issue:1

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boronic Acids; Bortezomib; Ch

2010
The lower risk MDS patient at risk of rapid progression.
    Leukemia research, 2010, Volume: 34, Issue:12

    Topics: Age Factors; alpha Catenin; Antigens, Differentiation; Antineoplastic Agents; Axl Receptor Tyrosine

2010
Clinical impact of chromosomal aberrations in multiple myeloma.
    Journal of internal medicine, 2011, Volume: 269, Issue:2

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boronic Acids; Bortezomib; Chromosome Aberrations; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Tr

2011
Genomic stratification of multiple myeloma treated with novel agents.
    Leukemia & lymphoma, 2012, Volume: 53, Issue:2

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boronic Acids; Bortezomib; Chromosome Aberrations; Genomics; Humans; Lenalido

2012
Cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities in myelodysplastic syndrome.
    Current molecular medicine, 2011, Volume: 11, Issue:8

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Azacitidine; Chromosome Aberrations; Humans; Lenalidomide; Mutation;

2011
New advances in the diagnosis and treatment of POEMS syndrome.
    British journal of haematology, 2013, Volume: 161, Issue:3

    Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Bevacizumab; Boronic Acids; Bortezomib; Castleman Disease; Chromo

2013
Emerging data on IMiDs in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).
    Seminars in oncology, 2005, Volume: 32, Issue:4 Suppl 5

    Topics: Chromosome Aberrations; Erythroid Cells; Humans; Immunologic Factors; Lenalidomide; Myelodysplastic

2005
[The plasma cell myeloma--molecular pathogenesis and target therapies].
    Therapeutische Umschau. Revue therapeutique, 2006, Volume: 63, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols

2006
Clinical management of myelodysplastic syndromes with interstitial deletion of chromosome 5q.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2006, Jun-01, Volume: 24, Issue:16

    Topics: Anemia, Hypochromic; Azacitidine; Bone Marrow; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 5; E

2006
Evaluation of recurring cytogenetic abnormalities in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes.
    Leukemia research, 2007, Volume: 31, Issue:4

    Topics: Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 5; Humans; Karyotyping; Lenalidomide; Myelodysplast

2007
Immunomodulatory drugs in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes.
    Current opinion in oncology, 2007, Volume: 19, Issue:6

    Topics: Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 5; Clinical Trials as Topic; H

2007
Mechanisms of teratogenesis.
    Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology, 1984, Volume: 24

    Topics: Aminopterin; Androgens; Animals; Antithyroid Agents; Chromosome Aberrations; Coumarins; Diethylstilb

1984
Recent advances in multiple myeloma.
    Current opinion in hematology, 2000, Volume: 7, Issue:4

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone Marrow; Bone Marrow Transplantation; Chromosome

2000
Thalidomide in myelodysplastic syndromes.
    Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie, 2002, Volume: 56, Issue:1

    Topics: Anemia, Refractory; Anemia, Refractory, with Excess of Blasts; Antineoplastic Agents; Chromosome Abe

2002
Treatment of myeloma: recent developments.
    Anti-cancer drugs, 2002, Volume: 13, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Ch

2002
[Human genetic aspects of inborn ear, nose, and throat diseases].
    HNO, 1985, Volume: 33, Issue:6

    Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Abnormalities, Multiple; Acrocephalosyndactylia; Child, Preschool; Chro

1985
Dermatoglyphics.
    American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1968, Aug-01, Volume: 101, Issue:7

    Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Anemia, Sickle Cell; Anencephaly; Cerebral Palsy; Chromosome Aberration

1968
[Diseases and dermatoglyphics].
    Nihon hoigaku zasshi = The Japanese journal of legal medicine, 1970, Volume: 24, Issue:6

    Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Abnormalities, Multiple; Bone and Bones; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromo

1970
[Teratogenic and mutagenic effects of anticonvulsive and psychotropic drugs (review of the literature)].
    Zhurnal nevropatologii i psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova (Moscow, Russia : 1952), 1972, Volume: 72, Issue:6

    Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Abnormalities, Multiple; Animals; Anticonvulsants; Antidepressive Agent

1972
Drugs in pregnancy and their effects on pre- and postnatal development.
    Research publications - Association for Research in Nervous and Mental Disease, 1973, Volume: 51

    Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Alkylating Agents; Animals; Anticonvulsants; Antimetabolites; Central N

1973
Principles of teratology.
    Obstetrics and gynecology annual, 1972, Volume: 1, Issue:0

    Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Amniocentesis; Animals; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Disorders; C

1972
Certain causes of congenital malformations in Homo sapiens and their prevention.
    Journal of the Indian Medical Association, 1967, Dec-01, Volume: 49, Issue:11

    Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Abortion, Therapeutic; Aminopterin; Antigen-Antibody Reactions; Chromos

1967
Etiology of congenital heart disease.
    Henry Ford Hospital medical journal, 1969,Summer, Volume: 17, Issue:2

    Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Animals; Anticonvulsants; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Disorders;

1969
[Experimental epidemiology].
    Saishin igaku. Modern medicine, 1971, Volume: 26, Issue:10

    Topics: Animals; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Disorders; Cleft Palate; Congenital Abnormalities; Diabe

1971
The heterogeneity of microphthalmia in the mentally retarded.
    Birth defects original article series, 1971, Volume: 7, Issue:3

    Topics: Abnormalities, Multiple; Abortifacient Agents; Adolescent; Adult; Brain Injuries; Child, Preschool;

1971

Trials

22 trials available for thalidomide and Abnormalities, Autosome

ArticleYear
Bortezomib before and after high-dose therapy in myeloma: long-term results from the phase III HOVON-65/GMMG-HD4 trial.
    Leukemia, 2018, Volume: 32, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Bortezomib; Chromosome Aberrations; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hematopoieti

2018
Ixazomib significantly prolongs progression-free survival in high-risk relapsed/refractory myeloma patients.
    Blood, 2017, 12-14, Volume: 130, Issue:24

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Chromosome Aberrations

2017
Low RPS14 expression in MDS without 5q - aberration confers higher apoptosis rate of nucleated erythrocytes and predicts prolonged survival and possible response to lenalidomide in lower risk non-5q- patients.
    European journal of haematology, 2013, Volume: 90, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Apoptosis; Bone Marrow Cells; C

2013
Molecular cytogenetic monitoring from CD34+ peripheral blood cells in myelodysplastic syndromes: first results from a prospective multicenter German diagnostic study.
    Leukemia research, 2013, Volume: 37, Issue:8

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antigens, CD34; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azac

2013
Long-term follow-up of MRC Myeloma IX trial: Survival outcomes with bisphosphonate and thalidomide treatment.
    Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2013, Nov-01, Volume: 19, Issue:21

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Density Conservation Agents; Chromosome Aberrations; Diphosphonates; Hum

2013
Cytogenetic and clinical marks for defining high-risk myeloma in the context of bortezomib treatment.
    Experimental hematology, 2015, Volume: 43, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Boronic Acids; Bortezomib; Chromosome Aberrat

2015
The impact of clone size on the prognostic value of chromosome aberrations by fluorescence in situ hybridization in multiple myeloma.
    Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2015, May-01, Volume: 21, Issue:9

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bortezomib; Chromosome Aberrations; Cyclophosphamide

2015
Ruxolitinib in combination with lenalidomide as therapy for patients with myelofibrosis.
    Haematologica, 2015, Volume: 100, Issue:8

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone Marrow; Chromos

2015
Cytogenetics and long-term survival of patients with refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma treated with pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone.
    Haematologica, 2015, Volume: 100, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Chromosome Aberratio

2015
Bendamustine and rituximab in combination with lenalidomide in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
    European journal of haematology, 2016, Volume: 97, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bendamustine Hydrochloride; Chromosome Aberrat

2016
Siltuximab (CNTO 328) with lenalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone in newly-diagnosed, previously untreated multiple myeloma: an open-label phase I trial.
    Blood cancer journal, 2016, Feb-12, Volume: 6

    Topics: Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bortezomib; Chromosome

2016
Influence of cytogenetics in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma treated with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone: adverse effect of deletion 17p13.
    Blood, 2009, Jul-16, Volume: 114, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Deletion;

2009
Influence of cytogenetics in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma treated with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone: adverse effect of deletion 17p13.
    Blood, 2009, Jul-16, Volume: 114, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Deletion;

2009
Influence of cytogenetics in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma treated with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone: adverse effect of deletion 17p13.
    Blood, 2009, Jul-16, Volume: 114, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Deletion;

2009
Influence of cytogenetics in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma treated with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone: adverse effect of deletion 17p13.
    Blood, 2009, Jul-16, Volume: 114, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Deletion;

2009
Phase I combination trial of lenalidomide and azacitidine in patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2010, May-01, Volume: 28, Issue:13

    Topics: Aged; Azacitidine; Chromosome Aberrations; DNA Methylation; DNA Modification Methylases; DNA Mutatio

2010
Clinical effect of increasing doses of lenalidomide in high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia with chromosome 5 abnormalities.
    Haematologica, 2011, Volume: 96, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Base Sequence; Biomarkers, Tumor; Chromosome Aberrat

2011
Impact of gene expression profiling-based risk stratification in patients with myeloma receiving initial therapy with lenalidomide and dexamethasone.
    Blood, 2011, Oct-20, Volume: 118, Issue:16

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Chromosome Aberrations; Dexamethasone; Female; Gene Expression Profilin

2011
A phase II study of lenalidomide alone in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes with chromosome 5 abnormalities.
    Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia, 2012, Volume: 12, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosomes, Human, Pai

2012
Maintenance therapy with bortezomib plus thalidomide or bortezomib plus prednisone in elderly multiple myeloma patients included in the GEM2005MAS65 trial.
    Blood, 2012, Sep-27, Volume: 120, Issue:13

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boronic Acids; Bortezomib;

2012
Maintenance therapy with bortezomib plus thalidomide or bortezomib plus prednisone in elderly multiple myeloma patients included in the GEM2005MAS65 trial.
    Blood, 2012, Sep-27, Volume: 120, Issue:13

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boronic Acids; Bortezomib;

2012
Maintenance therapy with bortezomib plus thalidomide or bortezomib plus prednisone in elderly multiple myeloma patients included in the GEM2005MAS65 trial.
    Blood, 2012, Sep-27, Volume: 120, Issue:13

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boronic Acids; Bortezomib;

2012
Maintenance therapy with bortezomib plus thalidomide or bortezomib plus prednisone in elderly multiple myeloma patients included in the GEM2005MAS65 trial.
    Blood, 2012, Sep-27, Volume: 120, Issue:13

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boronic Acids; Bortezomib;

2012
Early results of total therapy II in multiple myeloma: implications of cytogenetics and FISH.
    International journal of hematology, 2002, Volume: 76 Suppl 1

    Topics: Aged; Chromosome Aberrations; Cytogenetic Analysis; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; In Situ Hybridization

2002
Lenalidomide in the myelodysplastic syndrome with chromosome 5q deletion.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2006, Oct-05, Volume: 355, Issue:14

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bone Marrow; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosome

2006
Lenalidomide in the myelodysplastic syndrome with chromosome 5q deletion.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2006, Oct-05, Volume: 355, Issue:14

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bone Marrow; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosome

2006
Lenalidomide in the myelodysplastic syndrome with chromosome 5q deletion.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2006, Oct-05, Volume: 355, Issue:14

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bone Marrow; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosome

2006
Lenalidomide in the myelodysplastic syndrome with chromosome 5q deletion.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2006, Oct-05, Volume: 355, Issue:14

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bone Marrow; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosome

2006
Lenalidomide in the myelodysplastic syndrome with chromosome 5q deletion.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2006, Oct-05, Volume: 355, Issue:14

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bone Marrow; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosome

2006
Lenalidomide in the myelodysplastic syndrome with chromosome 5q deletion.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2006, Oct-05, Volume: 355, Issue:14

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bone Marrow; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosome

2006
Lenalidomide in the myelodysplastic syndrome with chromosome 5q deletion.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2006, Oct-05, Volume: 355, Issue:14

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bone Marrow; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosome

2006
Lenalidomide in the myelodysplastic syndrome with chromosome 5q deletion.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2006, Oct-05, Volume: 355, Issue:14

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bone Marrow; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosome

2006
Lenalidomide in the myelodysplastic syndrome with chromosome 5q deletion.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2006, Oct-05, Volume: 355, Issue:14

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bone Marrow; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosome

2006
Lenalidomide in the myelodysplastic syndrome with chromosome 5q deletion.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2006, Oct-05, Volume: 355, Issue:14

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bone Marrow; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosome

2006
Lenalidomide in the myelodysplastic syndrome with chromosome 5q deletion.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2006, Oct-05, Volume: 355, Issue:14

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bone Marrow; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosome

2006
Lenalidomide in the myelodysplastic syndrome with chromosome 5q deletion.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2006, Oct-05, Volume: 355, Issue:14

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bone Marrow; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosome

2006
Lenalidomide in the myelodysplastic syndrome with chromosome 5q deletion.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2006, Oct-05, Volume: 355, Issue:14

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bone Marrow; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosome

2006
Lenalidomide in the myelodysplastic syndrome with chromosome 5q deletion.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2006, Oct-05, Volume: 355, Issue:14

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bone Marrow; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosome

2006
Lenalidomide in the myelodysplastic syndrome with chromosome 5q deletion.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2006, Oct-05, Volume: 355, Issue:14

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bone Marrow; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosome

2006
Lenalidomide in the myelodysplastic syndrome with chromosome 5q deletion.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2006, Oct-05, Volume: 355, Issue:14

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bone Marrow; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosome

2006
Lenalidomide in the myelodysplastic syndrome with chromosome 5q deletion.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2006, Oct-05, Volume: 355, Issue:14

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bone Marrow; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosome

2006
Lenalidomide in the myelodysplastic syndrome with chromosome 5q deletion.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2006, Oct-05, Volume: 355, Issue:14

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bone Marrow; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosome

2006
Lenalidomide in the myelodysplastic syndrome with chromosome 5q deletion.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2006, Oct-05, Volume: 355, Issue:14

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bone Marrow; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosome

2006
Lenalidomide in the myelodysplastic syndrome with chromosome 5q deletion.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2006, Oct-05, Volume: 355, Issue:14

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bone Marrow; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosome

2006
Lenalidomide in the myelodysplastic syndrome with chromosome 5q deletion.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2006, Oct-05, Volume: 355, Issue:14

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bone Marrow; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosome

2006
Lenalidomide in the myelodysplastic syndrome with chromosome 5q deletion.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2006, Oct-05, Volume: 355, Issue:14

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bone Marrow; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosome

2006
Lenalidomide in the myelodysplastic syndrome with chromosome 5q deletion.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2006, Oct-05, Volume: 355, Issue:14

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bone Marrow; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosome

2006
Lenalidomide in the myelodysplastic syndrome with chromosome 5q deletion.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2006, Oct-05, Volume: 355, Issue:14

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bone Marrow; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosome

2006
Lenalidomide in the myelodysplastic syndrome with chromosome 5q deletion.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2006, Oct-05, Volume: 355, Issue:14

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bone Marrow; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosome

2006
Eight-year median survival in multiple myeloma after total therapy 2: roles of thalidomide and consolidation chemotherapy in the context of total therapy 1.
    British journal of haematology, 2008, Volume: 141, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Chromosome Aberrations; Combined Modality Ther

2008
Thalidomide arm of Total Therapy 2 improves complete remission duration and survival in myeloma patients with metaphase cytogenetic abnormalities.
    Blood, 2008, Oct-15, Volume: 112, Issue:8

    Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Chromosome Aberrations; Cytogenetics; Disease-Free Survival; Follow-Up Stud

2008
First thalidomide clinical trial in multiple myeloma: a decade.
    Blood, 2008, Aug-15, Volume: 112, Issue:4

    Topics: Chromosome Aberrations; Disease-Free Survival; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunoglobulin lambda-Chai

2008

Other Studies

61 other studies available for thalidomide and Abnormalities, Autosome

ArticleYear
Evolution of severe (transfusion-dependent) anaemia in myelodysplastic syndromes with 5q deletion is characterized by a macrophage-associated failure of the eythropoietic niche.
    British journal of haematology, 2022, Volume: 198, Issue:1

    Topics: Anemia; Animals; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 5; Humans; Le

2022
Lenalidomide treatment of Japanese patients with myelodysplastic syndromes with 5q deletion: a post-marketing surveillance study.
    International journal of hematology, 2023, Volume: 118, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 5; Ea

2023
[A prospective multi-center trial of non-interventional and observational study of lenalidomide in Chinese patients with multiple myeloma].
    Zhonghua nei ke za zhi, 2017, Jul-01, Volume: 56, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Chromosome Aberrations; Dexamethasone; Disease

2017
Risk factors for MDS and acute leukemia following total therapy 2 and 3 for multiple myeloma.
    Blood, 2013, Jun-06, Volume: 121, Issue:23

    Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boronic Acid

2013
Risk factors for MDS and acute leukemia following total therapy 2 and 3 for multiple myeloma.
    Blood, 2013, Jun-06, Volume: 121, Issue:23

    Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boronic Acid

2013
Risk factors for MDS and acute leukemia following total therapy 2 and 3 for multiple myeloma.
    Blood, 2013, Jun-06, Volume: 121, Issue:23

    Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boronic Acid

2013
Risk factors for MDS and acute leukemia following total therapy 2 and 3 for multiple myeloma.
    Blood, 2013, Jun-06, Volume: 121, Issue:23

    Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boronic Acid

2013
CXCR4 is a good survival prognostic indicator in multiple myeloma patients.
    Leukemia research, 2013, Volume: 37, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers, Tumor; B

2013
Responsiveness of cytogenetically discrete human myeloma cell lines to lenalidomide: lack of correlation with cereblon and interferon regulatory factor 4 expression levels.
    European journal of haematology, 2013, Volume: 91, Issue:6

    Topics: Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing; Apoptosis; Cell Cycle Checkpoints; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Prol

2013
Lenalidomide with dexamethasone treatment for relapsed/refractory myeloma patients in Korea-experience from 110 patients.
    Annals of hematology, 2014, Volume: 93, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boronic Acids; Bortezomib; Chromosome A

2014
United Kingdom Myeloma Forum position statement on the use of consolidation and maintenance treatment in myeloma.
    International journal of laboratory hematology, 2014, Volume: 36, Issue:6

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boronic Acids; Bortezomib; Chromosome Aberrations; C

2014
Impacts of new agents for multiple myeloma on development of secondary myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia.
    [Rinsho ketsueki] The Japanese journal of clinical hematology, 2014, Volume: 55, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Boronic Acids; Bortezomib; Chromosome Aberrat

2014
Lenalidomide in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma disease: feasibility and benefits of long-term treatment.
    Annals of hematology, 2014, Volume: 93, Issue:12

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Allografts; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boronic

2014
Hepatic extramedullary disease in multiple myeloma with 17p deletion.
    Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia, 2014, Volume: 14, Issue:5

    Topics: Aneuploidy; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boronic Acids;

2014
Risk stratification model in elderly patients with multiple myeloma: clinical role of magnetic resonance imaging combined with international staging system and cytogenetic abnormalities.
    Acta haematologica, 2015, Volume: 134, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boronic Acids; Bortezomib; Chromosome Aberrati

2015
Influence of total genomic alteration and chromosomal fragmentation on response to a combination of azacitidine and lenalidomide in a cohort of patients with very high risk MDS.
    Leukemia research, 2015, Volume: 39, Issue:10

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azacitidine; Chromosome Abe

2015
Lenalidomide for the Treatment of Low- or Intermediate-1-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes Associated with Deletion 5q Cytogenetic Abnormality: An Evidence Review of the NICE Submission from Celgene.
    PharmacoEconomics, 2016, Volume: 34, Issue:1

    Topics: Anemia, Macrocytic; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 5; Cost-Be

2016
Treatment of Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome With Lenalidomide in Clinical Routine in Austria.
    Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia, 2015, Volume: 15, Issue:11

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anemia, Macrocytic; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Austria; Chromosome Abe

2015
Treatment of multiple myeloma with high-risk cytogenetics: a consensus of the International Myeloma Working Group.
    Blood, 2016, 06-16, Volume: 127, Issue:24

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bortezomib; Chromosome Aberrations; Combined Modalit

2016
Treatment of multiple myeloma with high-risk cytogenetics: a consensus of the International Myeloma Working Group.
    Blood, 2016, 06-16, Volume: 127, Issue:24

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bortezomib; Chromosome Aberrations; Combined Modalit

2016
Treatment of multiple myeloma with high-risk cytogenetics: a consensus of the International Myeloma Working Group.
    Blood, 2016, 06-16, Volume: 127, Issue:24

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bortezomib; Chromosome Aberrations; Combined Modalit

2016
Treatment of multiple myeloma with high-risk cytogenetics: a consensus of the International Myeloma Working Group.
    Blood, 2016, 06-16, Volume: 127, Issue:24

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bortezomib; Chromosome Aberrations; Combined Modalit

2016
Potential role of exosome-associated microRNA panels and in vivo environment to predict drug resistance for patients with multiple myeloma.
    Oncotarget, 2016, May-24, Volume: 7, Issue:21

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Biomarkers, Tumor; Bortezomib; C-Reactive Protein; Chromosome Aberrations; Ch

2016
Computational drug treatment simulations on projections of dysregulated protein networks derived from the myelodysplastic mutanome match clinical response in patients.
    Leukemia research, 2017, Volume: 52

    Topics: Chromosome Aberrations; Cohort Studies; Computational Biology; Computer Simulation; Drug Resistance,

2017
Impact of risk stratification on outcome among patients with multiple myeloma receiving initial therapy with lenalidomide and dexamethasone.
    Blood, 2009, Jul-16, Volume: 114, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Chromosome Aberrations; Dexamethasone; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Humans; Lenalidom

2009
The heterogeneous prognosis of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and chromosome 5 abnormalities: how does it relate to the original lenalidomide experience in MDS?
    Cancer, 2009, Nov-15, Volume: 115, Issue:22

    Topics: Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 5; Female; Humans; Lenalidomid

2009
Impact of high-risk cytogenetics and prior therapy on outcomes in patients with advanced relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma treated with lenalidomide plus dexaméthasone.
    Leukemia, 2010, Volume: 24, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Boronic Acids; Bortezomib; Chromosome Aberrations; Dexamethasone; Dr

2010
[Analysis of high-risk multiple myeloma patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy].
    [Rinsho ketsueki] The Japanese journal of clinical hematology, 2010, Volume: 51, Issue:3

    Topics: Boronic Acids; Bortezomib; Chromosome Aberrations; Female; Humans; Male; Multiple Myeloma; Periphera

2010
Treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with lenalidomide and dexamethasone with or without bortezomib: prospective evaluation of the impact of cytogenetic abnormalities and of previous therapies.
    Leukemia, 2010, Volume: 24, Issue:10

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boronic Acids; Bortezomib; Chromosome Aberrati

2010
Impact of genomic aberrations including chromosome 1 abnormalities on the outcome of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma treated with lenalidomide and dexamethasone.
    Leukemia & lymphoma, 2010, Volume: 51, Issue:11

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Chromosome Aberratio

2010
International staging system and metaphase cytogenetic abnormalities in the era of gene expression profiling data in multiple myeloma treated with total therapy 2 and 3 protocols.
    Cancer, 2011, Mar-01, Volume: 117, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Chromosome Aberrations; Cli

2011
Total therapy 2 in treatment of multiple myeloma: questions about gene expression profiling and treatment-related mortality.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2011, Feb-10, Volume: 29, Issue:5

    Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Chromosome Aberrations; Clinical Trials as Topic; Gene Expression Profiling

2011
Chromosomal aberrations +1q21 and del(17p13) predict survival in patients with recurrent multiple myeloma treated with lenalidomide and dexamethasone.
    Cancer, 2011, May-15, Volume: 117, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Chromosome Aberratio

2011
Cereblon expression is required for the antimyeloma activity of lenalidomide and pomalidomide.
    Blood, 2011, Nov-03, Volume: 118, Issue:18

    Topics: Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing; Antineoplastic Agents; Biomarkers, Pharmacological; Biomarkers

2011
Cytogenetic and molecular predictors of response in patients with myeloid malignancies without del[5q] treated with lenalidomide.
    Journal of hematology & oncology, 2012, Mar-05, Volume: 5

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 5; DN

2012
1q21 amplification with additional genetic abnormalities but not isolated 1q21 gain is a negative prognostic factor in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma treated with thalidomide-based regimens.
    Leukemia & lymphoma, 2012, Volume: 53, Issue:12

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Chromosome Aberratio

2012
Additional genetic abnormalities significantly worsen poor prognosis associated with 1q21 amplification in multiple myeloma patients.
    Hematological oncology, 2013, Volume: 31, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; beta 2-Microglobulin

2013
Lenalidomide maintenance after allogeneic HSCT seems to trigger acute graft-versus-host disease in patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes or acute myeloid leukemia and del(5q): results of the LENAMAINT trial.
    Haematologica, 2012, Volume: 97, Issue:9

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 5; Female; Humans; Leukemia,

2012
Bone marrow morphology predicts additional chromosomal abnormalities in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome with del(5q).
    Human pathology, 2013, Volume: 44, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Marrow; Cell Transformation, Neoplastic;

2013
Improving overall survival and overcoming adverse prognosis in the treatment of cytogenetically high-risk multiple myeloma.
    Blood, 2013, Feb-07, Volume: 121, Issue:6

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boronic Acids; Bortezomib; Chromosome Aberrations; D

2013
Improving overall survival and overcoming adverse prognosis in the treatment of cytogenetically high-risk multiple myeloma.
    Blood, 2013, Feb-07, Volume: 121, Issue:6

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boronic Acids; Bortezomib; Chromosome Aberrations; D

2013
Improving overall survival and overcoming adverse prognosis in the treatment of cytogenetically high-risk multiple myeloma.
    Blood, 2013, Feb-07, Volume: 121, Issue:6

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boronic Acids; Bortezomib; Chromosome Aberrations; D

2013
Improving overall survival and overcoming adverse prognosis in the treatment of cytogenetically high-risk multiple myeloma.
    Blood, 2013, Feb-07, Volume: 121, Issue:6

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boronic Acids; Bortezomib; Chromosome Aberrations; D

2013
Gain(1)(q21) is an unfavorable genetic prognostic factor for patients with relapsed multiple myeloma treated with thalidomide but not for those treated with bortezomib.
    Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia, 2013, Volume: 13, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Boronic Acids; Bortezomib; Chromosome Aberrat

2013
Cytogenetic response to thalidomide treatment in three patients with myelodysplastic syndrome.
    Leukemia, 2003, Volume: 17, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Chromosome Aberrations; Female; Humans; Karyotyping; Male; Middle Aged; Myelodysplastic Syndro

2003
[AN UNUSUAL CASE OF DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER--PROBABLY BASED ON PRENATAL THALIDOMIDE DAMAGE, WITH CHROMOSOMAL ANALYSIS].
    Die Medizinische Welt, 1963, Aug-24, Volume: 34

    Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Child; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Disorders; Developmental Disa

1963
[COMMENTARIES ABOUT 107 CONGENITAL MALFORMATIONS].
    La Semana medica, 1963, Oct-21, Volume: 123

    Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Aminopterin; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Disorders; Congenital A

1963
ACTION OF THALIDOMIDE ON RADICAL MERISTEMS OF ALLIUM CEPA.
    Nature, 1964, Feb-29, Volume: 201

    Topics: Cell Division; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Disorders; Meristem; Onions; Pharmacology; Plants;

1964
CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS IN HUMAN CELLS INDUCED BY THALIDOMIDE IN VITRO: PRELIMINARY REPORT.
    Acta medica Scandinavica, 1965, Volume: 177

    Topics: Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Disorders; Chromosomes; In Vitro Techniques; Lymphocytes; Pharmac

1965
Prognosis of patients with del(5q) MDS and complex karyotype and the possible role of lenalidomide in this patient subgroup.
    Annals of hematology, 2005, Volume: 84, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosomes, Human, Pai

2005
Cost effectiveness of lenalidomide in the treatment of transfusion-dependent myelodysplastic syndromes in the United States.
    Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center, 2006, Volume: 13 Suppl

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Blood Transfusion; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosomes,

2006
Unusual clonal evolution involving 5q in a case of myelodysplastic syndrome with deletion 5q 31 treated with lenalidomide.
    Haematologica, 2008, Volume: 93, Issue:2

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 5; Drug Resistance; Female;

2008
[Cytogenetic and clinical studies in thalidomide damaged children with ear malformations].
    Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ohren- Nasen- und Kehlkopfheilkunde, 1966, Volume: 186, Issue:3

    Topics: Child, Preschool; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosomes; Culture Techniques; Cytogenetics; Ear; Female

1966
Chromosome changes in embryos treated with various teratogens.
    Journal of embryology and experimental morphology, 1967, Volume: 18, Issue:2

    Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Animals; Chlorambucil; Chromosome Aberrations; Diet; Female; Hydroxyure

1967
Thalidomide: lack of mutagenic activity across phyla and genetic endpoints.
    Mutation research, 1997, Dec-12, Volume: 396, Issue:1-2

    Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Animals; Biotransformation; Cells, Cultured; CHO Cells; Chromosome Aber

1997
Another chance for thalidomide?
    Lancet (London, England), 1966, Jan-08, Volume: 1, Issue:7428

    Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Child, Preschool; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Disorders; Culture

1966
[Abnormalities in the field of otorhinolaryngology. Genetic report].
    Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ohren- Nasen- und Kehlkopfheilkunde, 1972, Volume: 202, Issue:1

    Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Abnormalities, Multiple; Acrocephalosyndactylia; Chromosome Aberrations

1972
[Malformations in otorhinolaryngology. Genetic report].
    Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ohren- Nasen- und Kehlkopfheilkunde, 1972, Volume: 202, Issue:2

    Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Abnormalities, Multiple; Child; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Diso

1972
[Genetic analysis of skeletal diseases. Genetic report].
    Der Radiologe, 1973, Volume: 13, Issue:4

    Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Abnormalities, Multiple; Bone and Bones; Bone Diseases; Child; Chromoso

1973
The significance of dermatoglyphics in medicine. A short survey and summary.
    Clinical pediatrics, 1973, Volume: 12, Issue:8

    Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Disorders; Chromosomes, Human, 13-15

1973
Prospects and limitations of epidemiology in human teratology.
    Acta Universitatis Carolinae. Medica. Monographia, 1973, Volume: 56

    Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Carcinogens; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Disorders; Congenital A

1973
Congenital aural atresia: anatomy and surgical management.
    Birth defects original article series, 1971, Volume: 07, Issue:4

    Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Chromosome Aberrations; Congenital Abnormalities; Ear; Female; Follow-U

1971
Radiomimetic beverages, drugs, and mutagens.
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1966, Volume: 55, Issue:6

    Topics: Antiemetics; Benzamides; Beverages; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Disorders; Coffee; Cyclizine;

1966
[Drug-induced chromosome aberrations].
    Hippokrates, 1970, Volume: 41, Issue:3

    Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Animals; Chromosome Aberrations; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse

1970
[Skin ridges and skin furrows in dysmelia].
    Medizinische Klinik, 1970, Mar-20, Volume: 65, Issue:12

    Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Abnormalities, Multiple; Child; Child, Preschool; Chromosome Aberration

1970
Report of Inter-Society Commission for Heart Disease Resources. Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease. Primary prevention of congenital heart disease.
    Circulation, 1970, Volume: 41, Issue:6

    Topics: Child; Chromosome Aberrations; Female; Fetal Death; Heart Defects, Congenital; Humans; Infant; Infan

1970
Chromosomal breakage and teratogenesis.
    Teratology, 1971, Volume: 4, Issue:3

    Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Animals; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosom

1971
[Research on the action of thalidomide on cells cultured in vitro].
    Studii si cercetari de fiziologie, 1968, Volume: 13, Issue:4

    Topics: Cell Nucleus; Chromosome Aberrations; Culture Techniques; HeLa Cells; Mitosis; Polyploidy; Thalidomi

1968
Genetical, social, and medical aspects of abortion.
    South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde, 1968, Jul-20, Volume: 42, Issue:28

    Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Abortion, Criminal; Abortion, Legal; Abortion, Therapeutic; Adolescent;

1968
Studies on the cytological effects of thalidomide and its hydrolytic products.
    Die Naturwissenschaften, 1966, Volume: 53, Issue:11

    Topics: Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosomes; Cytogenetics; Magnoliopsida; Thalidomide; Thymidine

1966