Page last updated: 2024-11-04

tetracaine and Pain

tetracaine has been researched along with Pain in 158 studies

Tetracaine: A potent local anesthetic of the ester type used for surface and spinal anesthesia.
tetracaine : A benzoate ester in which 4-N-butylbenzoic acid and 2-(dimethylamino)ethanol have combined to form the ester bond; a local ester anaesthetic (ester caine) used for surface and spinal anaesthesia.

Pain: An unpleasant sensation induced by noxious stimuli which are detected by NERVE ENDINGS of NOCICEPTIVE NEURONS.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"Compound lidocaine/prilocaine cream combined with tetracaine may be a more effective approach for preventing coughing and stabilising circulation during extubation following general anaesthesia."9.69Compound lidocaine/prilocaine cream combined with tetracaine prevents cough caused by extubation after general anaesthesia: a randomised controlled trial. ( Gao, J; Li, T; Li, Y; Wang, M; Zhang, E; Zhang, H; Zhang, L; Zhao, X, 2023)
"Lidocaine/tetracaine 7%/7% peel cream (L/T-pC) is very effective in reducing pain in several dermatological procedures, such as hair or tattoo laser removal or conventional photodynamic therapy associated pain."9.51Assessment of clinical efficacy of lidocaine/tetracaine 7%/7% peel cream in fractional microablative laser procedure-associated pain for facial skin aging treatment. A randomized, controlled, single-blind trial. ( Caprari, E; Milani, M; Viciguerra, MT, 2022)
"The 3P-trial has demonstrated that the preventive application of the self-occlusive lidocaine 7%-tetracaine 7% cream is very effective in reducing the procedure-associated pain during MAL-cPDT for the treatment of AK lesions."9.34Efficacy of lidocaine 7 %, tetracaine 7 % self-occlusive cream in reducing MAL-cPDT-associated pain in subjects with actinic keratosis: A randomized, single-blind, vehicle-controlled trial (The "3P-Trial"). ( Brumana, MB; Milani, M; Puviani, M, 2020)
"Local injection of lidocaine provided clinically similar analgesia compared to the lidocaine/tetracaine patch during I&D of skin abscesses in the ED."9.19Injectable lidocaine provides similar analgesia compared to transdermal lidocaine/tetracaine patch for the incision and drainage of skin abscesses: a randomized, controlled trial. ( Bourne, CL; Brewer, KL; House, J, 2014)
"Treating minor lacerations with lidocaine-epinephrine-tetracaine before wound closure with tissue adhesive reduced ratings of pain and increased the proportion of pain-free repairs among children aged 3 months to 17 years."9.17Efficacy of pain control with topical lidocaine-epinephrine-tetracaine during laceration repair with tissue adhesive in children: a randomized controlled trial. ( Duncan, MJ; Harman, S; Petrcich, W; Ying, Y; Zemek, R, 2013)
"To determine the effectiveness of lidocaine 2% gel vstetracaine 1% drops in primary pterygium surgery."9.14Randomised controlled trial on the effectiveness of lidocaine gel vs tetracaine drops as the sole topical anaesthetic agent for primary pterygium surgery. ( Cheng, LL; Lam, DS; Lam, PT; Lau, TT; Leung, GY; Young, AL, 2009)
"Tetracaine did not significantly decrease procedural pain in infants undergoing a venipuncture, when used in combination with routine sucrose administration."9.12How effective is tetracaine 4% gel, before a venipuncture, in reducing procedural pain in infants: a randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial. ( Blanchard, C; Gaboury, I; Hogan, DL; Lemyre, B; Moher, D; Sherlock, R, 2007)
"Tetracaine 4% when applied for 30 minutes was not beneficial in decreasing procedural pain associated with a PICC in very small infants."9.12How effective is tetracaine 4% gel, before a peripherally inserted central catheter, in reducing procedural pain in infants: a randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial [ISRCTN75884221]. ( Blanchard, C; Gaboury, I; Hogan, D; Lemyre, B; Moher, D; Sherlock, R, 2006)
"Compared with no treatment, pain scores were lower in the morphine and tetracaine-morphine groups during skin preparation (mean difference, -0."9.12Intravenous morphine and topical tetracaine for treatment of pain in [corrected] neonates undergoing central line placement. ( Lee, C; McNamara, PJ; Parvez, B; Shah, V; Taddio, A; Yip, A, 2006)
"To determine the effectiveness of lidocaine-adrenaline-tetracaine (LAT) in providing adequate anesthesia for the repair of finger lacerations and to monitor the risk of digital ischemia following application of LAT gel to finger lacerations."9.11The anesthetic effectiveness of lidocaine-adrenaline-tetracaine gel on finger lacerations. ( Bergholte, J; Brousseau, DC; Hennes, H; Kim, MK; White, NJ, 2004)
") ketamine sedation administered by nonanesthetist physicians for painful procedures."9.11Intravenous ketamine sedation for painful oncology procedures. ( Barbour, K; Evans, D; Kobe, J; Montgomery, CJ; Rogers, P; Turnham, L; Vandebeek, C; Wilson, L, 2005)
"When compared with placebo, tetracaine gel did not significantly reduce pain during or after PDT for small lesions of superficial basal cell carcinoma, Bowen's disease or actinic keratosis."9.11A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of tetracaine gel (Ametop) for pain relief during topical photodynamic therapy. ( Dawe, RS; Ferguson, J; Holmes, MV; Ibbotson, SH, 2004)
"Tetracaine gel was not effective for pain relief for PICC insertion in infants."9.10A randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of tetracaine gel for pain relief from peripherally inserted central catheters in infants. ( Ballantyne, M; Gibbins, S; McNair, C; Stevens, B; Ung, E, 2003)
"To compare the efficacy of lidocaine 2% gel with amethocaine 1% eyedrops as the sole anesthetic agent for one-stage adjustable suture strabismus surgery."9.10Comparison of lidocaine 2% gel versus amethocaine as the sole anesthetic agent for strabismus surgery. ( Fan, DS; Lam, DS; Wong, VW; Yip, WW; Yu, CB, 2003)
"Buffering of tetracaine hydrochloride significantly increases the pain of its instillation in healthy volunteers, suggesting that pain with instillation of ocular anesthetics is not dependent on low pH."9.10A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of buffered versus plain tetracaine in reducing the pain of topical ophthalmic anesthesia. ( Abel, S; Brizendine, EJ; Howard, JD; Root, T; Rusyniak, DE; Somerville, GG; Weaver, CS, 2003)
"Topical tetracaine attenuates the pain of infiltration of buffered lidocaine."9.08Topical tetracaine attenuates the pain of infiltration of buffered lidocaine. ( Asher, SL; Bartfield, JM; Lee, FS; Raccio-Robak, N; Salluzzo, RF, 1996)
"The efficacy of tetracaine cream versus that of lidocaine-prilocaine cream for the prevention of pain in children undergoing venipuncture was studied."9.08Tetracaine versus lidocaine-prilocaine for preventing venipuncture-induced pain in children. ( Egberts, AC; Lenderink, AW; Rijnvos, WP; ter Pelkwijk, NJ; van Kan, HJ, 1997)
"A prospective, randomised, double-masked, placebo-controlled study was carried out on 169 patients undergoing cataract extraction to compare the topical anaesthetic cream amethocaine with EMLA (eutetic mixture of local anaesthetic, lignocaine and prilocaine) and placebo in reducing pain during retrobulbar injection."9.07A comparison of amethocaine cream with lignocaine-prilocaine cream (EMLA) for reducing pain during retrobulbar injection. ( Joyce, PW; Kirby, J; Sunderraj, P; Villada, J; Watson, A, 1994)
"Lidocaine-prilocaine and tetracaine appear to be comparable for procedural pain relief when used as recommended."8.81Lidocaine-prilocaine cream versus tetracaine gel for procedural pain in children. ( Gurguis, MG; Koren, G; Taddio, A, 2002)
"Lidocaine infiltration was performed if any sign of pain was observed."7.71[Suture of skin lacerations using LAT gel (lidocaine, adrenaline, tetracaine)]. ( Alió Y Sanz, JL; Chipont Benabent, E; García-Hermosa, P, 2001)
"In a previous report, the incidence of tourniquet pain was found to be 25% with bupivacaine and 60% with tetracaine (P less than 0."7.67Decreased incidence of tourniquet pain during spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine. A possible explanation. ( Concepcion, MA; Covino, BG; Datta, S; Flanagan, H; Lambert, DH; Migliozzi, R; Stewart, A, 1988)
"Tetracaine gel was injected into the urethra 3 min before the procedure in group A, with patients receiving plain lubricant gel in group B at the same time."6.90Efficacy and Safety of COX-2 Inhibitor Parecoxib for Rigid Cystoscopy-related Pain Management in Male Patients: A Prospective, Randomized and Controlled Study. ( Song, ZS; Sun, JY; Xiao, XY; Zhang, XP, 2019)
"Pain was scored by their parents and a pediatric nurse."6.74Tetracaine (ametop) compared to placebo for reducing pain associated with intramuscular injection of palivizumab (synagis). ( Faschoway, GD; Newby, BD; Soukoroff, CI, 2009)
"Compound lidocaine/prilocaine cream combined with tetracaine may be a more effective approach for preventing coughing and stabilising circulation during extubation following general anaesthesia."5.69Compound lidocaine/prilocaine cream combined with tetracaine prevents cough caused by extubation after general anaesthesia: a randomised controlled trial. ( Gao, J; Li, T; Li, Y; Wang, M; Zhang, E; Zhang, H; Zhang, L; Zhao, X, 2023)
"Lidocaine/tetracaine 7%/7% peel cream (L/T-pC) is very effective in reducing pain in several dermatological procedures, such as hair or tattoo laser removal or conventional photodynamic therapy associated pain."5.51Assessment of clinical efficacy of lidocaine/tetracaine 7%/7% peel cream in fractional microablative laser procedure-associated pain for facial skin aging treatment. A randomized, controlled, single-blind trial. ( Caprari, E; Milani, M; Viciguerra, MT, 2022)
" Both 27 and 48 demonstrated robust activity in the acute rat monoiodoacetate-induced osteoarthritis model of pain, and subchronic dosing of 48 showed a shift to a lower EC50 over 7 days."5.43Substituted Indazoles as Nav1.7 Blockers for the Treatment of Pain. ( Daanen, JF; DeGoey, DA; El-Kouhen, OF; Fricano, MM; Frost, JM; Ghoreishi-Haack, N; Gum, RJ; Hsieh, GC; Kort, ME; Lundgaard, GL; Matulenko, MA; Neelands, T; Pai, M; Shi, L; Zhan, C; Zhang, XF, 2016)
"The 3P-trial has demonstrated that the preventive application of the self-occlusive lidocaine 7%-tetracaine 7% cream is very effective in reducing the procedure-associated pain during MAL-cPDT for the treatment of AK lesions."5.34Efficacy of lidocaine 7 %, tetracaine 7 % self-occlusive cream in reducing MAL-cPDT-associated pain in subjects with actinic keratosis: A randomized, single-blind, vehicle-controlled trial (The "3P-Trial"). ( Brumana, MB; Milani, M; Puviani, M, 2020)
" We assessed the efficacy of topical Ametop™ (tetracaine 4%) gel in reducing the pain associated with local anesthetic skin infiltration before neuraxial block in non-laboring women."5.22A randomized controlled trial comparing Ametop™ with placebo for reducing pain associated with local anesthetic skin infiltration before neuraxial anesthesia in parturients. ( Albert, A; Dube, A; Gunka, V; Kavanagh, T, 2016)
"Local injection of lidocaine provided clinically similar analgesia compared to the lidocaine/tetracaine patch during I&D of skin abscesses in the ED."5.19Injectable lidocaine provides similar analgesia compared to transdermal lidocaine/tetracaine patch for the incision and drainage of skin abscesses: a randomized, controlled trial. ( Bourne, CL; Brewer, KL; House, J, 2014)
"Treating minor lacerations with lidocaine-epinephrine-tetracaine before wound closure with tissue adhesive reduced ratings of pain and increased the proportion of pain-free repairs among children aged 3 months to 17 years."5.17Efficacy of pain control with topical lidocaine-epinephrine-tetracaine during laceration repair with tissue adhesive in children: a randomized controlled trial. ( Duncan, MJ; Harman, S; Petrcich, W; Ying, Y; Zemek, R, 2013)
"Sixty patients receiving intravitreal injections over 15 months for macular edema because of diabetes, age-related macular degeneration, or retinal vein occlusion who were randomized into 3 groups to receive 1 of 3 commonly used forms of anesthesia-TetraVisc, proparacaine HCl, or tetracaine HCl-before receiving intravitreal injection were studied."5.16Factors affecting patients' pain intensity during in office intravitreal injection procedure. ( Rifkin, L; Schaal, S, 2012)
"Both the lidocaine/tetracaine patch and subcutaneous injection of lidocaine provided comparable pain control during arterial catheter insertion."5.16Lidocaine/tetracaine patch (Rapydan) for topical anaesthesia before arterial access: a double-blind, randomized trial. ( Dunkler, D; Golescu, A; Grubhofer, G; Hoeferl, M; Hutschala, D; Jaeger, W; Mayer, L; Ruetzler, K; Sessler, DI; Sima, B; You, J, 2012)
"To determine the effectiveness of lidocaine 2% gel vstetracaine 1% drops in primary pterygium surgery."5.14Randomised controlled trial on the effectiveness of lidocaine gel vs tetracaine drops as the sole topical anaesthetic agent for primary pterygium surgery. ( Cheng, LL; Lam, DS; Lam, PT; Lau, TT; Leung, GY; Young, AL, 2009)
"Topical TetraVisc solution was superior to lidocaine 2% gel for pain control in patients undergoing clear corneal phacoemulsification."5.14Comparative efficacy of topical tetraVisc versus lidocaine gel in cataract surgery. ( Agarwal, S; Chalam, KV; Grover, S; Gupta, SK; Murthy, RK, 2009)
"Skin infiltration with lidocaine, although brief, can be very stressful, painful, and may perpetuate anxiety."5.13Brief report: a randomized controlled trial of Synera versus lidocaine for epidural needle insertion in labouring parturients. ( Allen, TK; George, RB; Habib, AS; Muir, HA, 2008)
"We compare the pain of intravenous (IV) cannulation in pediatric emergency department (ED) patients after applying a topical lidocaine/tetracaine patch versus placebo."5.13Warm lidocaine/tetracaine patch versus placebo before pediatric intravenous cannulation: a randomized controlled trial. ( Chipley, J; Chisena, EN; Gupta, N; Singer, AJ; Taira, BR, 2008)
"Compared with no treatment, pain scores were lower in the morphine and tetracaine-morphine groups during skin preparation (mean difference, -0."5.12Intravenous morphine and topical tetracaine for treatment of pain in [corrected] neonates undergoing central line placement. ( Lee, C; McNamara, PJ; Parvez, B; Shah, V; Taddio, A; Yip, A, 2006)
"Tetracaine 4% when applied for 30 minutes was not beneficial in decreasing procedural pain associated with a PICC in very small infants."5.12How effective is tetracaine 4% gel, before a peripherally inserted central catheter, in reducing procedural pain in infants: a randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial [ISRCTN75884221]. ( Blanchard, C; Gaboury, I; Hogan, D; Lemyre, B; Moher, D; Sherlock, R, 2006)
"Initial validation of ethyl chloride spray in minimising pain for children experiencing venepuncture in comparison to Ametop cream."5.12Comparison of ethyl chloride spray with topical anaesthetic in children experiencing venepuncture. ( Davies, EH; Molloy, A, 2006)
"Tetracaine did not significantly decrease procedural pain in infants undergoing a venipuncture, when used in combination with routine sucrose administration."5.12How effective is tetracaine 4% gel, before a venipuncture, in reducing procedural pain in infants: a randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial. ( Blanchard, C; Gaboury, I; Hogan, DL; Lemyre, B; Moher, D; Sherlock, R, 2007)
"To determine the effectiveness of lidocaine-adrenaline-tetracaine (LAT) in providing adequate anesthesia for the repair of finger lacerations and to monitor the risk of digital ischemia following application of LAT gel to finger lacerations."5.11The anesthetic effectiveness of lidocaine-adrenaline-tetracaine gel on finger lacerations. ( Bergholte, J; Brousseau, DC; Hennes, H; Kim, MK; White, NJ, 2004)
"When compared with placebo, tetracaine gel did not significantly reduce pain during or after PDT for small lesions of superficial basal cell carcinoma, Bowen's disease or actinic keratosis."5.11A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of tetracaine gel (Ametop) for pain relief during topical photodynamic therapy. ( Dawe, RS; Ferguson, J; Holmes, MV; Ibbotson, SH, 2004)
", Salt Lake City, UT), a eutectic mixture of lidocaine and tetracaine, for pain relief during venipuncture in children."5.11A randomized controlled trial to evaluate S-Caine patch for reducing pain associated with vascular access in children. ( Berde, CB; Hannallah, RS; Sethna, NF; Solodiuk, JC; Verghese, ST; Zurakowski, D, 2005)
") ketamine sedation administered by nonanesthetist physicians for painful procedures."5.11Intravenous ketamine sedation for painful oncology procedures. ( Barbour, K; Evans, D; Kobe, J; Montgomery, CJ; Rogers, P; Turnham, L; Vandebeek, C; Wilson, L, 2005)
"To compare the efficacy of lidocaine 2% gel with amethocaine 1% eyedrops as the sole anesthetic agent for one-stage adjustable suture strabismus surgery."5.10Comparison of lidocaine 2% gel versus amethocaine as the sole anesthetic agent for strabismus surgery. ( Fan, DS; Lam, DS; Wong, VW; Yip, WW; Yu, CB, 2003)
"The tetracaine patch produced effective pain relief during the venepuncture procedure in both term and pre-term infants."5.10Randomized trial of novel tetracaine patch to provide local anaesthesia in neonates undergoing venepuncture. ( Halliday, HL; Jones, DS; Long, CP; McCafferty, DF; Sittlington, NM; Woolfson, AD, 2003)
"Tetracaine gel was not effective for pain relief for PICC insertion in infants."5.10A randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of tetracaine gel for pain relief from peripherally inserted central catheters in infants. ( Ballantyne, M; Gibbins, S; McNair, C; Stevens, B; Ung, E, 2003)
"Buffering of tetracaine hydrochloride significantly increases the pain of its instillation in healthy volunteers, suggesting that pain with instillation of ocular anesthetics is not dependent on low pH."5.10A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of buffered versus plain tetracaine in reducing the pain of topical ophthalmic anesthesia. ( Abel, S; Brizendine, EJ; Howard, JD; Root, T; Rusyniak, DE; Somerville, GG; Weaver, CS, 2003)
"Lidocaine-prilocaine cream (EMLA) is currently standard therapy to alleviate procedural pain in children."5.09Relative efficacy of amethocaine gel and lidocaine-prilocaine cream for Port-a-Cath puncture in children. ( Bar-Oz, B; Bishai, R; Freedman, MH; Koren, G; Taddio, A, 1999)
"The efficacy of lignocaine-prilocaine cream (EMLA) and amethocaine gel (Ametop) in reducing the pain and distress of venepuncture was compared in a single-blind randomized study of 34 children aged 1-14 y."5.09Comparison of lignocaine-prilocaine cream and amethocaine gel for local analgesia before venepuncture in children. ( Choy, L; Collier, J; Watson, AR, 1999)
"Topical tetracaine attenuates the pain of infiltration of buffered lidocaine."5.08Topical tetracaine attenuates the pain of infiltration of buffered lidocaine. ( Asher, SL; Bartfield, JM; Lee, FS; Raccio-Robak, N; Salluzzo, RF, 1996)
"The efficacy of tetracaine cream versus that of lidocaine-prilocaine cream for the prevention of pain in children undergoing venipuncture was studied."5.08Tetracaine versus lidocaine-prilocaine for preventing venipuncture-induced pain in children. ( Egberts, AC; Lenderink, AW; Rijnvos, WP; ter Pelkwijk, NJ; van Kan, HJ, 1997)
"The objective of the study was to compare topical lidocaine adrenaline tetracaine (LAT gel) with injectable buffered lidocaine with epinephrine regarding pain of application or injection and anesthesia effectiveness."5.08Topical lidocaine adrenaline tetracaine (LAT gel) versus injectable buffered lidocaine for local anesthesia in laceration repair. ( Ernst, AA; Houry, D; Marvez-Valls, E; Mills, T; Minvielle, L; Nick, TG, 1997)
"A prospective, randomised, double-masked, placebo-controlled study was carried out on 169 patients undergoing cataract extraction to compare the topical anaesthetic cream amethocaine with EMLA (eutetic mixture of local anaesthetic, lignocaine and prilocaine) and placebo in reducing pain during retrobulbar injection."5.07A comparison of amethocaine cream with lignocaine-prilocaine cream (EMLA) for reducing pain during retrobulbar injection. ( Joyce, PW; Kirby, J; Sunderraj, P; Villada, J; Watson, A, 1994)
" The weighted mean difference in 100-mm visual analogue scale pain scores favored topical tetracaine over EMLA (-8."4.82Topical anesthetics for dermal instrumentation: a systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. ( Carr, DB; Eidelman, A; Lau, J; Weiss, JM, 2005)
"A topical formulation of the ester-type local anesthetic amethocaine (tetracaine) [Ametop ] is currently available for reducing pain from cutaneous procedures such as venipuncture."4.82A critical review of the topical local anesthetic amethocaine (Ametop) for pediatric pain. ( Koren, G; Lyszkiewicz, DA; O'Brien, L; Taddio, A, 2005)
"Lidocaine-prilocaine and tetracaine appear to be comparable for procedural pain relief when used as recommended."4.81Lidocaine-prilocaine cream versus tetracaine gel for procedural pain in children. ( Gurguis, MG; Koren, G; Taddio, A, 2002)
" Suturing is usually accompanied by perilesional administration of lidocaine, a local anaesthetic drug that improves pain tolerance."3.91Stability of a novel Lidocaine, Adrenaline and Tetracaine sterile thermosensitive gel: A ready-to-use formulation. ( Addobbati, R; Barbi, E; Loiacono, S; Maestro, A; Mamolo, MG; Maximova, N; Volpato, C; Zampieri, D; Zanon, D, 2019)
" In another experiment, the preparation was tested in a further 22 subjects for its pain-relieving effect during a standard palatal injection, and compared with 18% benzocaine/2% tetracaine gel."3.78Relief of palatal injection pain by liposome-encapsulated 2% lignocaine prepared by ultrasonic dental scaler. ( Paphangkorakit, J; Priprem, A; Sangsirinakagul, C, 2012)
" Injection of subconjunctival cefuroxime can be very painful, especially after phacoemulsification under topical anesthesia."3.71Topical anesthesia for phacoemulsification and painless subconjunctival antibiotic injection. ( Dinakaran, S; Kayarkar, VV, 2001)
"Lidocaine infiltration was performed if any sign of pain was observed."3.71[Suture of skin lacerations using LAT gel (lidocaine, adrenaline, tetracaine)]. ( Alió Y Sanz, JL; Chipont Benabent, E; García-Hermosa, P, 2001)
"In a previous report, the incidence of tourniquet pain was found to be 25% with bupivacaine and 60% with tetracaine (P less than 0."3.67Decreased incidence of tourniquet pain during spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine. A possible explanation. ( Concepcion, MA; Covino, BG; Datta, S; Flanagan, H; Lambert, DH; Migliozzi, R; Stewart, A, 1988)
"Tetracaine gel was injected into the urethra 3 min before the procedure in group A, with patients receiving plain lubricant gel in group B at the same time."2.90Efficacy and Safety of COX-2 Inhibitor Parecoxib for Rigid Cystoscopy-related Pain Management in Male Patients: A Prospective, Randomized and Controlled Study. ( Song, ZS; Sun, JY; Xiao, XY; Zhang, XP, 2019)
" Methemoglobin and oxygen saturation levels did not change compared with baseline after dosing with either treatment."2.90A Proof-of-concept Study Using Quantitative Sensory Threshold Analysis to Compare Two Intraoral Topical Anesthetics. ( Cooper, SA; Doyle, G; Farrar, JT; Giannakopoulos, H; Hersh, EV; Hutcheson, MC; Lesavoy, B; Mousavian, M; Secreto, S; Wang, P; Wang, S, 2019)
"Pain is common in men undergoing rigid cystoscopy."2.82Dorsal penile nerve block for rigid cystoscopy in men: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. ( Du, GZ; Hu, AM; Liu, J; Qiu, Y, 2016)
"Pain was scored by their parents and a pediatric nurse."2.74Tetracaine (ametop) compared to placebo for reducing pain associated with intramuscular injection of palivizumab (synagis). ( Faschoway, GD; Newby, BD; Soukoroff, CI, 2009)
"However, different conclusions may be reached about the effectiveness of analgesic interventions depending on the rater."2.74Reliability and validity of observer ratings of pain using the visual analog scale (VAS) in infants undergoing immunization injections. ( Goldbach, M; Ipp, M; Koren, G; O'Brien, L; Stephens, D; Taddio, A, 2009)
" Immediately following the procedure, the subjects, the investigator, and an independent observer rated pain intensity and adverse events were recorded."2.71Self-warming lidocaine/tetracaine patch effectively and safely induces local anesthesia during minor dermatologic procedures. ( Berman, B; de Araujo, T; Flores, J; Pariser, D; Pariser, R; Ramirez, CC, 2005)
"Pain was assessed using a validated adaptation of the neonatal facial coding system."2.69Does topical amethocaine gel reduce the pain of venepuncture in newborn infants? A randomised double blind controlled trial. ( Jain, A; Rutter, N, 2000)
"If untreated, the pain of circumcision causes both short and long term changes in infant behaviours."2.41Pain management for neonatal circumcision. ( Taddio, A, 2001)
" Physicians must adhere to recommendations to avoid mucous membrane contact and ensure appropriate dosing with these agents."2.40Topical anesthesia. ( Keyes, PD; Rizos, J; Tallon, JM, 1998)
"Although treating pain is associated with improved quality of life, most respondents did not support TA use in the ED."1.91Topical Anesthetics for Analgesia in Acute Corneal Abrasion: Eye Care Providers Survey. ( Anderson-Quiñones, C; Asbell, P; Tolley, EA; Vestal, R; Zhu, R, 2023)
" Both 27 and 48 demonstrated robust activity in the acute rat monoiodoacetate-induced osteoarthritis model of pain, and subchronic dosing of 48 showed a shift to a lower EC50 over 7 days."1.43Substituted Indazoles as Nav1.7 Blockers for the Treatment of Pain. ( Daanen, JF; DeGoey, DA; El-Kouhen, OF; Fricano, MM; Frost, JM; Ghoreishi-Haack, N; Gum, RJ; Hsieh, GC; Kort, ME; Lundgaard, GL; Matulenko, MA; Neelands, T; Pai, M; Shi, L; Zhan, C; Zhang, XF, 2016)
"Immunization pain is a global public health issue."1.34Routine immunization practices: use of topical anesthetics and oral analgesics. ( Ipp, M; Manley, J; Potash, L; Sgro, M; Shah, V; Taddio, A, 2007)
"Tetracaine alone was effective in providing tympanic membrane anesthesia in 95% of myringotomy without a tube (220 ears) and in 93% of myringotomy with a tube (139 ears)."1.31Tetracaine topical anesthesia for myringotomy. ( Hoffman, RA; Li, CL, 2001)
"If emergency physicians would treat the pain of their patients as they would want it to be treated in themselves or their families, then we will have made great strides as a specialty in mastering the art and science of analgesia."1.27Pain management in the child. ( Paris, PM, 1987)

Research

Studies (158)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-199022 (13.92)18.7374
1990's34 (21.52)18.2507
2000's62 (39.24)29.6817
2010's32 (20.25)24.3611
2020's8 (5.06)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Chowdhury, S1
Chafeev, M1
Liu, S1
Sun, J1
Raina, V1
Chui, R1
Young, W1
Kwan, R1
Fu, J1
Cadieux, JA1
Bregman, H1
Berry, L1
Buchanan, JL1
Chen, A1
Du, B1
Feric, E1
Hierl, M1
Huang, L1
Immke, D1
Janosky, B1
Johnson, D1
Li, X1
Ligutti, J1
Liu, D1
Malmberg, A1
Matson, D1
McDermott, J1
Miu, P1
Nguyen, HN1
Patel, VF1
Waldon, D1
Wilenkin, B1
Zheng, XM1
Zou, A1
McDonough, SI1
DiMauro, EF1
Macsari, I1
Besidski, Y1
Csjernyik, G1
Nilsson, LI1
Sandberg, L1
Yngve, U1
Ahlin, K1
Bueters, T1
Eriksson, AB1
Lund, PE1
Venyike, E1
Oerther, S1
Hygge Blakeman, K1
Luo, L1
Arvidsson, PI1
Frost, JM1
DeGoey, DA2
Shi, L1
Gum, RJ2
Fricano, MM2
Lundgaard, GL2
El-Kouhen, OF2
Hsieh, GC1
Neelands, T2
Matulenko, MA2
Daanen, JF1
Pai, M2
Ghoreishi-Haack, N2
Zhan, C2
Zhang, XF2
Kort, ME2
Teng, M1
Wu, W1
Li, Z1
Yang, G1
Qin, J1
Wang, Y1
Hu, Z1
Dong, H1
Hou, L1
Hu, G1
Shen, L1
Zhang, Y1
Li, J1
Chen, S1
Tian, J1
Ye, L1
Zhang, J1
Wang, H1
Patel, MV1
Peltier, HM1
Koenig, JR1
C Scanio, MJ1
Hudzik, T1
Gintant, G1
Martin, R1
McGaraughty, S1
Xu, J1
Bow, D1
Kalvass, JC1
Kym, PR1
Jimenez-Cauhe, J1
Boixeda, P1
Cornejo, P1
Fernandez, S1
Vitale, M1
Serra, C1
Scribner-O'Pray, M1
Taylor, ED1
Krause, E1
Nickel, A1
Bergmann, KR1
Zhang, E1
Zhao, X1
Li, T2
Wang, M1
Gao, J1
Zhang, H1
Li, Y1
Zhang, L1
Anderson-Quiñones, C1
Zhu, R1
Tolley, EA1
Vestal, R1
Asbell, P1
Brumana, MB1
Milani, M2
Puviani, M1
Brignardello-Petersen, R1
Caprari, E1
Viciguerra, MT1
Boyd, BM1
Snyder, R1
Lambert, C1
Goldman, RD1
Hersh, EV1
Secreto, S1
Wang, S1
Giannakopoulos, H1
Mousavian, M1
Lesavoy, B1
Hutcheson, MC1
Farrar, JT1
Wang, P1
Doyle, G1
Cooper, SA1
Sun, JY1
Song, ZS1
Zhang, XP1
Xiao, XY1
Zanon, D2
Volpato, C1
Addobbati, R1
Loiacono, S1
Maestro, A1
Barbi, E2
Maximova, N1
Mamolo, MG1
Zampieri, D1
Harman, S1
Zemek, R1
Duncan, MJ1
Ying, Y1
Petrcich, W1
Nalamachu, S1
Nalamasu, R1
Jenkins, J1
Marriott, T1
Berant, R1
Scolnik, D1
Huang, P1
Gopal, L1
Kumar, CM1
Lander, JA2
Weltman, BJ2
So, SS2
Girard, N1
Bourne, CL1
Brewer, KL1
House, J1
Lamberton, JA1
Oesterle, LJ1
Shellhart, WC1
Newman, SM1
Harrell, RE1
Tilliss, T1
Singh, N1
Carey, CM1
Qiu, Y1
Hu, AM1
Liu, J1
Du, GZ1
Kavanagh, T1
Dube, A1
Albert, A1
Gunka, V1
Piao, LH1
Fujita, T1
Yu, T1
Kumamoto, E1
Cozzi, G1
Borrometi, F1
Benini, F1
Neri, E1
Rusalen, F1
Celentano, L1
Schreiber, S1
Ronfani, L1
Foster, JP1
Taylor, C1
Spence, K1
Nichani, J1
Camilleri, AE1
Broomfield, S1
Saeed, S1
Martinson, AJ1
Leffingwell, FE1
MOORE, DC2
Young, AL1
Leung, GY1
Cheng, LL1
Lau, TT1
Lam, PT1
Lam, DS3
Sawyer, J1
Febbraro, S1
Masud, S1
Ashburn, MA1
Campbell, JC1
Soltani, AE1
Ganji, M1
Goodarzi, M1
Moghimi, S1
Kapellou, O2
Newbury, C1
Herd, DW1
Chalam, KV1
Murthy, RK1
Agarwal, S1
Gupta, SK1
Grover, S1
Luo, DQ1
Yang, W1
Taddio, A9
O'Brien, L3
Ipp, M3
Stephens, D1
Goldbach, M2
Koren, G5
Reznik, DS1
Jeske, AH1
Chen, JW1
English, J1
Newby, BD1
Faschoway, GD1
Soukoroff, CI1
Wang, DQ1
Soltesz, S1
Dittrich, K1
Teschendorf, P1
Fuss, I1
Molter, G1
Dang, D1
Robinson, PC1
Winnicki, S1
Jersmann, HP1
Rifkin, L1
Schaal, S1
Ravishankar, N1
Elliot, SC1
Beardow, Z1
Mallick, A1
Paphangkorakit, J1
Sangsirinakagul, C1
Priprem, A1
Ruetzler, K1
Sima, B1
Mayer, L1
Golescu, A1
Dunkler, D1
Jaeger, W1
Hoeferl, M1
You, J1
Sessler, DI1
Grubhofer, G1
Hutschala, D1
Zhu, ZH1
Zheng, J1
Ying, LY1
Zhu, BW1
Qian, J1
Ma, ZX1
Tran, NQ1
Pretto, JJ1
Worsnop, CJ1
Mayevsky, A1
Barbiro-Michaely, E1
Ligeti, L1
MacLaughlin, AC1
Igarashi, H1
Sato, S1
Shiraishi, Y1
Weaver, CS1
Rusyniak, DE1
Brizendine, EJ1
Abel, S1
Somerville, GG1
Howard, JD1
Root, T1
Raymond, P1
Yu, CB1
Wong, VW1
Fan, DS1
Yip, WW1
Doshi, SN1
Friedman, PM2
Marquez, DK1
Goldberg, LH1
Chen, JZ2
Alexiades-Armenakas, MR1
Bernstein, LJ2
Jacobson, LG2
Geronemus, RG2
WIEDLING, S1
TEGNER, C1
KOMROWER, GM1
THORNTON, JA1
Long, CP1
McCafferty, DF3
Sittlington, NM1
Halliday, HL1
Woolfson, AD3
Jones, DS1
Aaron, SD1
Vandemheen, KL1
Naftel, SA1
Lewis, MJ1
Rodger, MA1
Ballantyne, M1
McNair, C1
Ung, E1
Gibbins, S1
Stevens, B1
Rogers, TL1
Ostrow, CL1
Holmes, MV1
Dawe, RS1
Ferguson, J1
Ibbotson, SH1
Zempsky, WT1
Cravero, JP1
White, NJ1
Kim, MK1
Brousseau, DC1
Bergholte, J1
Hennes, H1
Evans, D1
Turnham, L1
Barbour, K1
Kobe, J1
Wilson, L1
Vandebeek, C1
Montgomery, CJ1
Rogers, P1
Sethna, NF1
Verghese, ST1
Hannallah, RS1
Solodiuk, JC1
Zurakowski, D1
Berde, CB1
Berman, B1
Flores, J1
Pariser, D1
Pariser, R1
de Araujo, T1
Ramirez, CC1
Lyszkiewicz, DA1
Bakus, AD1
Garden, JM1
Yaghmai, D1
Eidelman, A1
Weiss, JM1
Lau, J1
Carr, DB1
Liu, Y1
Ye, X1
Feng, X1
Zhou, G1
Rong, Z1
Fang, C1
Chen, H1
Li, SF1
Flannigan, K1
Lupow, J1
Lee, C1
Yip, A1
Parvez, B1
McNamara, PJ1
Shah, V2
Changez, M2
Chander, J1
Dinda, AK1
Liu, DT1
Lee, VY1
Chan, WM1
Davies, EH1
Molloy, A1
O'Riordan, JM1
Fitzgerald, E1
Gowing, C1
O'Grady, H1
Feeley, TM1
Tierney, S1
Lemyre, B2
Sherlock, R2
Hogan, D1
Gaboury, I2
Blanchard, C2
Moher, D2
Proudfoot, C1
Gamble, C1
Llewellyn, N1
Liley, A1
Cropper, J1
Hutchison, L1
Hogan, DL1
Curry, SE1
Finkel, JC1
Manley, J1
Potash, L1
Sgro, M1
George, RB1
Habib, AS1
Allen, TK1
Muir, HA1
Shah, VS1
Hancock, R1
Shah, P1
Ohlsson, A1
Singer, AJ1
Taira, BR1
Chisena, EN1
Gupta, N1
Chipley, J1
Lawson, RA1
Smart, NG1
Gudgeon, AC1
Morton, NS1
Noorily, AD1
Otto, RA1
Noorily, SH1
Joyce, PW1
Sunderraj, P1
Villada, J1
Kirby, J1
Watson, A1
Schilling, CG1
Bank, DE1
Borchert, BA1
Klatzko, MD1
Uden, DL1
Ernst, AA2
Marvez-Valls, E2
Nick, TG2
Weiss, SJ1
Molodecka, J1
Stenhouse, C1
Jones, JM1
Tomlinson, A1
Smith, GA3
Strausbaugh, SD3
Harbeck-Weber, C3
Shields, BJ3
Powers, JD3
Hackenberg, D1
Sumi, M1
Sakura, S1
Kosaka, Y1
Claoué, C1
Callear, AB1
Kawano, T1
Shiraishi, S1
Nakamura, T1
Yokoo, H1
Takasaki, M1
Bartfield, JM1
Lee, FS1
Raccio-Robak, N1
Salluzzo, RF1
Asher, SL1
Wang, GK1
Vladimirov, M1
Quan, C1
Mok, WM1
Thalhammer, JG1
Anthony, DC1
van Kan, HJ1
Egberts, AC1
Rijnvos, WP1
ter Pelkwijk, NJ1
Lenderink, AW1
Handley, J1
Allen, G1
Hung, OR1
Comeau, L1
Riley, MR1
Tan, S1
Whynot, S1
Mezei, M1
Mills, T1
Minvielle, L1
Houry, D1
Cohen, DM2
Li, HS1
Monhemius, R1
Simpson, BA1
Roberts, MH3
Barrett, T1
Keyes, PD1
Tallon, JM1
Rizos, J1
Shafi, T1
Koay, P1
Nuseir, K1
Heidenreich, BA1
Proudfit, HK1
Browne, J1
Raza, A1
Awad, I1
Tan, B1
McAdoo, J1
Shorten, G1
Bishai, R1
Bar-Oz, B1
Freedman, MH1
Choy, L1
Collier, J1
Watson, AR1
Gillow, T1
Scotcher, SM1
Deutsch, J1
While, A1
Quinlan, MP1
Wolfe, R1
Carlin, JB1
Varshney, M1
Johnson, ME1
Jain, A1
Rutter, N1
Kayarkar, VV1
Dinakaran, S1
Speirs, AF1
Taylor, KH1
Joanes, DN1
Girdler, NM1
Moore, J1
Maehara, Y1
Kusunoki, S1
Kawamoto, M1
Yuge, O1
Okida, M1
Kinoshita, H1
Nakagawa, I1
Nakao, M1
Sasaki, H1
Chipont Benabent, E1
García-Hermosa, P1
Alió Y Sanz, JL1
Hoffman, RA1
Li, CL1
Nott, MR1
Gurguis, MG1
Gill, CJ1
Orr, DL1
Foldvari, M1
Moreland, A1
Smith, T1
Vickers, ER1
Punnia-Moorthy, A1
Terenzi, MG1
Rees, H1
Neels, JT1
Wong, S1
Hart, LL1
Boston, V1
Gibbons, JJ1
Concepcion, MA2
Lambert, DH3
Welch, KA1
Covino, BG2
Stewart, A1
Datta, S1
Flanagan, H1
Migliozzi, R1
Llewelyn, MB1
Azami, J1
Paris, PM1
Urmey, WF1
Vagner, EA1
Zaugol'nikov, VS1
Plaksin, SA1
Torbin, VV1
Matveev, AT1
Rocco, AG1
Raymond, SA1
Murray, E1
Dhingra, U1
Freiberger, D1
Kobal, G1
Ewers, HJ1
Black, RG1
Bonica, JJ2
Haler, D1
Akamatsu, TJ1
Watt, MJ1
Akhtar, M1
Atkinson, RS1
Aberg, G1

Clinical Trials (30)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Double-blind, Cross-over, Incomplete Factorial Study to Assess the Local Anesthetic Efficacy and Safety of CTY-5339 Anesthetic Spray (CTY-5339A) When Applied to the Gingival Mucosal Tissue in Normal Volunteers[NCT03233737]Phase 275 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-15Completed
Comparison of 2 Application Techniques for LET (Lidocaine 4%; Epinephrine 0.1%; Tetracaine 0.5%) Gel Used Prior to Simple Laceration Repair[NCT04536493]Phase 448 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-06-19Completed
A Randomized Trial of Intranasal Fentanyl Versus Placebo as an Adjunct to Lidocaine Infiltration in Adults Undergoing Abscess Incision and Drainage in the Emergency[NCT03872700]Phase 349 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-08-01Completed
Efficacy of Combined Ibuprofen and Acetaminophen Therapy Versus Ibuprofen Alone Versus Placebo Alone for Pain of Initial Orthodontic Wire Insertion: a Randomized Controlled Trial[NCT04059172]Early Phase 1375 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-12-10Recruiting
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block for Rigid Cystoscopy in Men: a Single-center, Randomized, Double-blind and Placebo-controlled Study[NCT02502487]258 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-30Completed
A New Method for Pain Relief, Intravenous Cannulation in Pediatric Patients; A Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial.[NCT04246255]Phase 480 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-02-03Completed
Distraction in the Emergency Using Virtual Reality for Intravenous Needs in Children to Improve Comfort (DEVINCI): A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial[NCT03750578]62 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-12-17Completed
A Randomized Controlled Study of Compound Lidocaine Cream to Prevent Postoperative Agitation in Patients With Endotracheal Intubation for General Anesthesia[NCT02017392]Phase 42,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-12-31Not yet recruiting
Effect of Synera in Reducing Pain Associated With Venipuncture and Superficial Dermatologic Procedures[NCT01744197]Phase 261 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
Clinical Comparison of Two Anesthetic Preparations for Intravitreal Injection[NCT01087489]53 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
Comparison Between 2% Lidocaine Gel and 5% Tetracaine Eye Drop as Topical Anesthesia in Phacoemulsification[NCT03143452]72 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-01Completed
Topical Anesthesia of Tetracaine Hydrochloride Jelly on Cervix After Hysteroscopic Uterine Stent Insertion[NCT02863679]84 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-31Completed
Comparing The Effectiveness of Tracing Image and Coloring for Kids-Book With Two Active Distractions on Pain and Fear in Children During Venipuncture: A Randomized Controlled Trial[NCT04983303]150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-08-01Not yet recruiting
Comparing The Effectiveness of Tracing Image and Coloring for Kids-Book With Two Passive Distractions on Pain and Fear in Children During Peripheral Intravenous Cannulation: A Randomized Controlled Trial[NCT04977323]150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-07-28Not yet recruiting
A Comparison of Amethocaine Creams Versus Liposomal Lidocaine Cream as Pain Reliever Prior to Venipuncture in Children at the Paediatric Emergency Department.[NCT00353002]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-31Withdrawn
A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Evaluate Pain and Anxiety During Venipuncture in Pediatric Patients With or Without Pre-treatment by a Topical Anesthetic[NCT00676364]Phase 4114 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-03-31Completed
Randomized Controlled Trial of IN Midazolam vs IN Dexmedetomidine vs IN Ketamine Evaluating Length of Stay After Medication Administration and Anxiolysis During Minimal Procedures in Pediatric Population in Pediatric Emergency Department[NCT05934669]Phase 490 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-31Not yet recruiting
Prospective Evaluation of Topical Analgesia Using a Lidocaine/Prilocaine Cream for Laceration Repair in the Emergency Department[NCT03071601]Phase 4132 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-12-01Completed
Tetracaine (Ametop®) Compared to Placebo for Reducing Pain Associated With Intramuscular Injection of Palivizumab (Synagis®) - A Pilot Study[NCT00484393]Phase 47 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
The Efficacy of the Eutectic Mixture of Local Anesthetics (EMLA) Cream Versus the Synera Patch for Pain Reduction During Venipuncture in Children[NCT00530803]Phase 2100 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Completed
Systemic Analgesia and Local Anaesthesia for Percutaneous Venous Catheter Placement in Preterm Neonates[NCT00213200]Phase 3108 participants Interventional2003-07-31Completed
Topical Analgesia Before Inhalational Anaesthesia: A Retrospective Observational Study[NCT04959409]500 participants (Actual)Observational2020-08-01Completed
Does Rapydan Influence Routine Clinical Chemistry and Hematology Measurements?[NCT00765934]25 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-11-30Completed
Effective Analgesia Using the 5 S's During Routine Immunizations at 2 and 4 Months[NCT01368861]230 participants (Actual)Observational2010-06-30Completed
Childhood Immunization: Reducing Immunization Distress (RID) Using Multi-Modal Distraction[NCT01379885]77 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Terminated (stopped due to Estimated sample size not achieved due to decline in number of eligible patients and difficulty recruiting and retaining research staff.)
Local Anaesthesia [Topical Amethocaine Gel (Ametop)] for Intramuscular Injection in Term Neonates: A Randomized Controlled Trial.[NCT00267111]Phase 2110 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-07-31Completed
Cefazolin-Lidocaine Solution for Reducing Pain Associated With Subconjunctival Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Vitreo-Retinal Surgery[NCT02324166]Phase 454 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-01-31Not yet recruiting
Comparing Topical Tetracaine Drops to Topical Focal Phenol for Local Anesthesia During Intratympanic Steroid Injection[NCT04794842]Early Phase 180 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-08-01Active, not recruiting
Efficacy of Ethyl Chloride Topical Anesthesia Application on the Pain Perception During Intra-oral Injections in Children in Comparison to Benzocaine Gel- a Single-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.[NCT06011005]42 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-01Recruiting
The Effect of Sonophoresis on Topical Anesthesia: a Clinical Trial[NCT01283490]Phase 150 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Stage I: Duration of Anesthesia as Measured by Heat Sensation Threshold (QST Heat) for One Spray CTY-5339-A Compared to One Spray CTY-5339-CB Compared to One Spray CTY-5339-P (Placebo: Vehicle Control)

"The duration of effect, was defined as the time from onset to treatment failure, as measured by QST Heat score. QST Heat scores were the temperature where the sensation of a heat stimuli was felt: ranging from 35 ºC to a maximum of 50.5 ºC with intervals of 0.5 ºC, at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point. The QST Heat-based Duration of effect was calculated by the length of time in minutes from onset of anesthesia to the absence of anesthesia where Onset of anesthesia was defined by PPT unless specific QST thresholds were not met. After Onset had been established, absence of analgesia or offset was the first of two time points with consecutive occurrences of regression or absence of analgesia. Reports of QST heat pain temperature by ≥ 3 °C of the Baseline QST indicated analgesia; while a report of similar (<3 °C) than Baseline indicated regression or absence of analgesia. Stage I outcome." (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Up to one hour post-application

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-A42.5
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-CB6.1
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-P5

Stage I: Duration of Anesthesia as Measured by Pin Prick Test (PPT) for One Spray CTY-5339-A Compared to One Spray CTY-5339-CB Compared to One Spray CTY-5339-P (Placebo: Vehicle Control)

"The duration of effect, was defined as the length of time in minutes from onset of anesthesia to the absence of anesthesia.Onset was the time point at which the PPT average pain score was less than the Baseline PPT average score by any amount. Also, in 10 minutes or less, the subject must have had a lower PPT average pain score of ≥ 1 unit than Baseline. Absence of anesthesia was defined as follows: After Onset had been established, absence was the first of two time points with consecutive occurrences of regression of absence of analgesia. Reports of less pain by ≥1 unit than Baseline indicated analgesia; while a report of similar (< 1 unit) or more pain than Baseline indicated regression or absence of analgesia. The minimum onset time was 1 minute. PPT scores were assessed using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) Numerical Rating Scale at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.~Stage I outcome." (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Up to one hour post-application

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-A49.2
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-CB21.3
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-P25.2

Stage I: Duration of Minimal Pain for Pin Prick Test (PPT) (≤2 on Numerical Rating Scale Pain Scale)

"Response at a time point is defined as having the PPT average pain score of ≤2. PPT scores were assessed using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) Numerical Rating Scale at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.~Stage I outcome." (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Up to one hour post-application

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-A14.5
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-CB2.9
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-P0.2

Stage I: Onset of Anesthesia for Heat Sensation Threshold (QST Heat)

"Onset of anesthesia was defined by Pin Prick Test (PPT) unless specific QST thresholds were not met.~If the PPT Onset was 5 minutes or less, then QST must have been greater than the Baseline QST temperature at 5 minutes by any amount and QST must have been ≥ 3 °C of the Baseline QST at 5 or 10 minutes.~If the PPT Onset was 10 minutes, then QST must have been ≥ 3 °C of the Baseline QST temperature at 10 minutes.~If PPT did not achieve Onset, then QST alone could have achieved onset at either 5 or 10 minutes if QST was greater than the Baseline QST temperature at 5 or 10 minutes by any amount and the QST was ≥ 3 °C of the Baseline QST at 5 or 10 minutes.~QST Heat scores were the temperature where the sensation of a heat stimuli was felt: ranging from 35 ºC to a maximum of 50.5 ºC with intervals of 0.5 ºC, at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.~Stage I outcome." (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Up to one hour post-application

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-A2.0
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-CB0.4
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-P0.8

Stage I: Onset of Anesthesia for Pin Prick Test (PPT)

"Onset of anesthesia was the time point at which the PPT average pain score was less than the Baseline PPT average score by any amount. Also, in 10 minutes or less, the subject must have had a lower PPT average pain score of ≥ 1 unit than the Baseline PPT. Onset was expected to be between 1 and 5 minutes. PPT scores were assessed using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) Numerical Rating Scale at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.~Stage I outcome." (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Up to one hour post-application

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-A1.3
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-CB1.2
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-P2.8

Stage I: Percentage of Subjects Reaching Maximum Heat for Heat Sensation Threshold (QST Heat)

"QST Heat scores were the temperature where the sensation of a heat stimuli was felt: ranging from 35 ºC to a maximum of 50.5 ºC with intervals of 0.5 ºC, at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point. Reaching maximum heat for QST Heat was defined as subjects reaching the maximum temperature without reporting pain at one or more time points.~Stage I outcome." (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Any time within one hour post-application

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-A5
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-CB0
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-P0

Stage I: Percentage of Subjects Reaching Minimal Pain on Pin Prick Test (PPT) (≤2 on Numerical Rating Scale Pain Scale)

"Response is defined as a subject having a PPT average pain score of ≤2 recorded at any single time point where PPT was performed. PPT scores were assessed using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) Numerical Rating Scale at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.~Stage I outcome." (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Any time within one hour post-application

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-A10
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-CB9
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-P2

Stage II: Duration of Anesthesia as Measured by Heat Sensation Threshold (QST Heat) for One Spray CTY-5339-A Compared to One Spray CTY-5339-CB

"The duration of effect, was defined as the time from onset to treatment failure, as measured by QST Heat score. QST Heat scores were the temperature where the sensation of a heat stimuli was felt: ranging from 35 ºC to a maximum of 50.5 ºC with intervals of 0.5 ºC, at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point. The QST Heat-based Duration of effect was calculated by the length of time in minutes from onset of anesthesia to the absence of anesthesia where Onset of anesthesia was defined by PPT unless specific QST thresholds were not met. After Onset had been established, absence of analgesia or offset was the first of two time points with consecutive occurrences of regression or absence of analgesia. Reports of QST heat pain temperature by ≥ 3 °C of the Baseline QST indicated analgesia; while a report of similar (<3 °C) than Baseline indicated regression or absence of analgesia. Stage" (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Up to one hour post-application

Interventionminutes (Mean)
One Spray CTY-5339-A45.5
One Spray CTY-5339-CB40.8

Stage II: Duration of Anesthesia as Measured by Pin Prick Test (PPT) for One Spray CTY-5339-A Compared to One Spray CTY-5339-CB

"The duration of effect, was defined as the length of time in minutes from onset of anesthesia to the absence of anesthesia.Onset was the time point at which the PPT average pain score was less than the Baseline PPT average score by any amount. Also, in 10 minutes or less, the subject must have had a lower PPT average pain score of ≥ 1 unit than Baseline. Absence of anesthesia was defined as follows: After Onset had been established, absence was the first of two time points with consecutive occurrences of regression of absence of analgesia. Reports of less pain by ≥1 unit than Baseline indicated analgesia; while a report of similar (< 1 unit) or more pain than Baseline indicated regression or absence of analgesia. The minimum onset time was 1 minute. PPT scores were assessed using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) Numerical Rating Scale at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.~Stage II outcome." (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Up to one hour post-application

Interventionminutes (Mean)
One Spray CTY-5339-A14.6
One Spray CTY-5339-CB7.4

Stage II: Duration of Minimal Pain for Pin Prick Test (PPT) (≤2 on Numerical Rating Scale Pain Scale)

"Response at a time point is defined as having the PPT average pain score of ≤2. PPT scores were assessed using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) Numerical Rating Scale at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.~Stage II outcome." (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Up to one hour post-application

Interventionminutes (Mean)
One Spray CTY-5339-A14.6
One Spray CTY-5339-CB7.4

Stage II: Onset of Anesthesia for Heat Sensation Threshold (QST Heat)

"Onset of anesthesia was defined by Pin Prick Test (PPT) unless specific QST thresholds were not met.~If the PPT Onset was 5 minutes or less, then QST must have been greater than the Baseline QST temperature at 5 minutes by any amount and QST must have been ≥ 3 °C of the Baseline QST at 5 or 10 minutes.~If the PPT Onset was 10 minutes, then QST must have been ≥ 3 °C of the Baseline QST temperature at 10 minutes.~If PPT did not achieve Onset, then QST alone could have achieved onset at either 5 or 10 minutes if QST was greater than the Baseline QST temperature at 5 or 10 minutes by any amount and the QST was ≥ 3 °C of the Baseline QST at 5 or 10 minutes.~QST Heat scores were the temperature where the sensation of a heat stimuli was felt: ranging from 35 ºC to a maximum of 50.5 ºC with intervals of 0.5 ºC, at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.~Stage II outcome." (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Up to one hour post-application

Interventionminutes (Mean)
One Spray CTY-5339-A1
One Spray CTY-5339-CB1.3

Stage II: Onset of Anesthesia for Pin Prick Test (PPT)

"Onset of anesthesia was the time point at which the PPT average pain score was less than the Baseline PPT average score by any amount. Also, in 10 minutes or less, the subject must have had a lower PPT average pain score of ≥ 1 unit than the Baseline PPT. Onset was expected to be between 1 and 5 minutes. PPT scores were assessed using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) Numerical Rating Scale at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.~Stage II outcome." (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Up to one hour post-application

Interventionminutes (Mean)
One Spray CTY-5339-A1.1
One Spray CTY-5339-CB1.1

Stage II: Percentage of Subjects Reaching Maximum Heat for Heat Sensation Threshold (QST Heat)

"QST Heat scores were the temperature where the sensation of a heat stimuli was felt: ranging from 35 ºC to a maximum of 50.5 ºC with intervals of 0.5 ºC, at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point. Reaching maximum heat for QST Heat was defined as subjects reaching the maximum temperature without reporting pain at one or more time points.~Stage II outcome." (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Any time within one hour post-application

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
One Spray CTY-5339-A7
One Spray CTY-5339-CB5

Stage II: Percentage of Subjects Reaching Minimal Pain on Pin Prick Test (PPT) (≤2 on Numerical Rating Scale Pain Scale)

"Response is defined as a subject having a PPT average pain score of ≤2 recorded at any single time point where PPT was performed. PPT scores were assessed using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) Numerical Rating Scale at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.~Stage II outcome." (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Any time within one hour post-application

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
One Spray CTY-5339-A50
One Spray CTY-5339-CB50

Stage I: Percentage of Responders for Heat Sensation Threshold (QST Heat) at Each Time Point

"Response at a time point is defined as an increase of QST heat pain temperature by ≥ 3 degrees C compared to the Baseline QST. QST Heat scores were the temperature where the sensation of a heat stimuli was felt: ranging from 35 ºC to a maximum of 50.5 ºC with intervals of 0.5 ºC, at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.~Stage I outcome." (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Time of application up to one hour post-application

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Responded to treatment at the 1 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 2 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 3 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 4 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 5 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 10 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 15 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 20 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 25 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 30 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 35 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 40 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 45 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 50 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 55 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 60 minute time point
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-A7788899998666666
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-CB2333332211100000
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-P4444444410000000

Stage I: Percentage of Responders for Pin Prick Test (PPT) at Each Time Point

"Response at at time point is defined as when the PPT average pain score was less than the Baseline PPT average score by any amount. PPT scores were assessed using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) Numerical Rating Scale at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.~Stage I outcome." (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Time of application up to one hour post-application

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Responded to treatment at the 1 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 2 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 3 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 4 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 5 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 10 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 15 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 20 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 25 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 30 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 35 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 40 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 45 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 50 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 55 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 60 minute time point
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-A8910101010101099987766
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-CB810101010108442211111
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-P4333233222222222

Stage I: Sum of Pain Intensity Differences (SPID) for Pin Prick Test (PPT) (Post-hoc)

"SPID was calculated as a sum of the delta PPT scores at each time point until the designated time point. The delta PPT score is defined as the change in PPT score from baseline. PPT scores were assessed using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) Numerical Rating Scale at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.~The total possible scale range was from -100 (best) to +100 (worst) for SPID at the 30 minute time point, and from -160 (best) to +160 (worst) for SPID at the 60 minute time point Lower scores signify a better outcome (less sensitive to pain than at baseline = less pain with therapy = therapy was more effective).~Stage I outcome." (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Up to one hour post-application

,,
Interventionscore (Mean)
SPID at the 30 minute time pointSPID at the 60 minute time point
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-A-82.1-128.1
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-CB-37.8-44.0
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-P-29.3-53.3

Stage I: Sum of Temperature Differences (STID) for Heat Sensation Threshold (QST Heat) (Post-hoc)

"STID was calculated as a sum of the delta QST Heat scores at each time point until the designated time point. The delta QST Heat score is defined as the change in QST Heat score from baseline. QST Heat scores were the temperature where the sensation of a heat stimuli was felt: ranging from 35 ºC to a maximum of 50.5 ºC with intervals of 0.5 ºC, at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.~The total possible scale range was from -155 ºC (best) to +155 ºC (worst) for STID at the 30 minute time point, and from -248 ºC (best) to +248 ºC (worst) for SPID at the 60 minute time point Lower scores signify a better outcome (less sensitive to pain than at baseline = less pain with therapy = therapy was more effective).~Stage I outcome." (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Up to one hour post-application

,,
InterventionDegrees Celcius (ºC) (Mean)
STID at the 30 minute time pointSTID at the 60 minute time point
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-A153.0320.2
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-CB10.426.1
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-P72.5134.6

Stage II: Percentage of Responders for Heat Sensation Threshold (QST Heat) at Each Time Point

"Response at a time point is defined as an increase of QST heat pain temperature by ≥ 3 degrees C compared to the Baseline QST.~QST Heat scores were the temperature where the sensation of a heat stimuli was felt: ranging from 35 ºC to a maximum of 50.5 ºC with intervals of 0.5 ºC, at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.~Stage II outcome." (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Up to one hour post-application

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Responded to treatment at the 1 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 2 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 3 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 4 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 5 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 10 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 15 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 20 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 25 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 30 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 35 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 40 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 45 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 50 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 55 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 60 minute time point
One Spray CTY-5339-A36373737373838363228242219171413
One Spray CTY-5339-CB2930303031343129241915151212119

Stage II: Percentage of Responders for Pin Prick Test (PPT) at Each Time Point

"Response at at time point is defined as when the PPT average pain score was less than the Baseline PPT average score by any amount. PPT scores were assessed using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) Numerical Rating Scale at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.~Stage II outcome." (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Up to one hour post-application

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Responded to treatment at the 1 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 2 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 3 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 4 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 5 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 10 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 15 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 20 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 25 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 30 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 35 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 40 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 45 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 50 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 55 minute time pointResponded to treatment at the 60 minute time point
One Spray CTY-5339-A47505049494949494846433632252019
One Spray CTY-5339-CB46484848494948464542342721202018

Stage II: Sum of Pain Intensity Differences (SPID) for Pin Prick Test (PPT) (Post-hoc)

"SPID was calculated as a sum of the delta PPT scores at each time point until the designated time point. The delta PPT score is defined as the change in PPT score from baseline. PPT scores were assessed using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) Numerical Rating Scale at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.~The total possible scale range was from -100 (best) to +100 (worst) for SPID at the 30 minute time point, and from -160 (best) to +160 (worst) for SPID at the 60 minute time point Lower scores signify a better outcome (less sensitive to pain than at baseline = less pain with therapy = therapy was more effective).~Stage II outcome." (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Up to one hour post-application

,
Interventionscore (Mean)
SPID at the 30 minute time pointSPID at the 60 minute time point
One Spray CTY-5339-A-85.2-122.6
One Spray CTY-5339-CB-63.2-86.6

Stage II: Sum of Temperature Differences (STID) for Heat Sensation Threshold (QST Heat) (Post-hoc)

"STID was calculated as a sum of the delta QST Heat scores at each time point until the designated time point. The delta QST Heat score is defined as the change in QST Heat score from baseline. QST Heat scores were the temperature where the sensation of a heat stimuli was felt: ranging from 35 ºC to a maximum of 50.5 ºC with intervals of 0.5 ºC, at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.~The total possible scale range was from -155 ºC (best) to +155 ºC (worst) for STID at the 30 minute time point, and from -248 ºC (best) to +248 ºC (worst) for SPID at the 60 minute time point Lower scores signify a better outcome (less sensitive to pain than at baseline = less pain with therapy = therapy was more effective).~Stage II outcome." (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Up to one hour post-application

,
InterventionDegrees Celcius (ºC) (Mean)
STID at the 30 minute time pointSTID at the 60 minute time point
One Spray CTY-5339-A136.5214
One Spray CTY-5339-CB96.6149.1

NRS Pain Score After Blunt Dissection

Patient reported NRS pain scores after Blunt Dissection. The NRS for pain is a reliable and validated measure of pain intensity ranging from 0 - no pain, to 10 - worst pain imaginable. (NCT03872700)
Timeframe: Measured once anytime up to 60 minutes following intranasal administration

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Intranasal Fentanyl4.1
Placebo4.4

NRS Pain Score After Irrigation

Patient reported NRS pain scores after Irrigation. The NRS for pain is a reliable and validated measure of pain intensity ranging from 0 - no pain, to 10 - worst pain imaginable. (NCT03872700)
Timeframe: Measured once anytime up to 60 minutes following intranasal administration

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Intranasal Fentanyl3.4
Placebo2.6

NRS Pain Score After Lidocaine Injection

Patient reported NRS pain scores after Lidocaine injection. The NRS for pain is a reliable and validated measure of pain intensity ranging from 0 - no pain, to 10 - worst pain imaginable. (NCT03872700)
Timeframe: Following Lidocaine injection measured once anytime up to 12 minutes after intranasal administration

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Intranasal Fentanyl8.4
Placebo8.0

NRS Pain Score After Packing of Abscess

Patient reported pain after Packing of abscess. The NRS for pain is a reliable and validated measure of pain intensity ranging from 0 - no pain, to 10 - worst pain imaginable. (NCT03872700)
Timeframe: Measured once at the time of completion of application of the bandage, up to 60 minutes following intranasal administration

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Intranasal Fentanyl4.5
Placebo3.9

NRS Pain Score Following Incision

Patient reported NRS pain scores following Incision. The NRS for pain is a reliable and validated measure of pain intensity ranging from 0 - no pain, to 10 - worst pain imaginable. (NCT03872700)
Timeframe: Measured once anytime up to 60 minutes following intranasal administration

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Intranasal Fentanyl3.9
Placebo3.9

Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score at Baseline

Patient reported pain scores at baseline. The NRS for pain is a reliable and validated measure of pain intensity ranging from 0 - no pain, to 10 - worst pain imaginable. (NCT03872700)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Intranasal Fentanyl8.3
Placebo8.1

Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score for Overall Procedure

Patient reported pain scores for overall Procedure assessed immediately after placement of dressing at the end of procedure. The NRS for pain is a reliable and validated measure of pain intensity ranging from 0 - no pain, to 10 - worst pain imaginable. (NCT03872700)
Timeframe: Measured once following placement of dressing at completion of procedure, up to 60 minutes following intranasal administration

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Intranasal Fentanyl6.2
Placebo7.0

Breath Rate After Withdrawal of Cystoscope

(NCT02502487)
Timeframe: after withdrawal of cystoscope

Interventiontimes per minute (Mean)
Tetracaine Gel Group19.7
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Group19.4
Combination Group19.4

Breath Rate at Cystoscopic Inspection of External Sphincter

(NCT02502487)
Timeframe: at cystoscopic inspection of external sphincter

Interventiontimes per minute (Mean)
Tetracaine Gel Group20.1
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Group19.8
Combination Group19.8

Breath Rate at Cystoscopic Inspection of Penile and Bulbar Urthra

(NCT02502487)
Timeframe: at cystoscopic inspection of penile and bulbar Urthra

Interventiontimes per minute (Mean)
Tetracaine Gel Group20.0
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Group19.8
Combination Group19.6

Breath Rate Before Gel Administration

(NCT02502487)
Timeframe: before gel administration

Interventiontimes per minute (Mean)
Tetracaine Gel Group19.8
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Group19.6
Combination Group19.5

Heart Rate After Withdrawal of Cystoscope

(NCT02502487)
Timeframe: after withdrawal of cystoscope

InterventionBeats per minute (Mean)
Tetracaine Gel Group76.7
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Group72.3
Combination Group71.6

Heart Rate at Cystoscopic Inspection of External Sphincter

(NCT02502487)
Timeframe: at cystoscopic inspection of external sphincter

InterventionBeats per minute (Mean)
Tetracaine Gel Group96.7
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Group90.2
Combination Group86.2

Heart Rate at Cystoscopic Inspection of Penile and Bulbar Urthra

(NCT02502487)
Timeframe: at cystoscopic inspection of penile and bulbar urethra

InterventionBeats per minute (Mean)
Tetracaine Gel Group84.8
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Group83.8
Combination Group81.1

Heart Rate Before Gel Administration

(NCT02502487)
Timeframe: before gel administration

InterventionBeats per minute (Mean)
Tetracaine Gel Group75.0
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Group75.9
Combination Group73.6

Mean Arterial Pressure After Withdrawal of Cystoscope

(NCT02502487)
Timeframe: after withdrawal of cystoscope

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Tetracaine Gel Group99.3
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Group95.7
Combination Group95.2

Mean Arterial Pressure at Cystoscopic Inspection of External Sphincter

(NCT02502487)
Timeframe: at cystoscopic inspection of external sphincter

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Tetracaine Gel Group113.7
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Group105.8
Combination Group104.8

Mean Arterial Pressure at Cystoscopic Inspection of Penile and Bulbar Urthra

(NCT02502487)
Timeframe: at cystoscopic inspection of penile and bulbar urthra

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Tetracaine Gel Group100
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Group99.8
Combination Group98.2

Mean Arterial Pressure Before Gel Administration

(NCT02502487)
Timeframe: before gel administration

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Tetracaine Gel Group95.3
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Group96.6
Combination Group95.1

Oxygen Saturation by Pulse After Withdrawal of Cystoscope

(NCT02502487)
Timeframe: after withdrawal of cystoscope

Interventionpercentage (Median)
Tetracaine Gel Group99
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Group98
Combination Group99

Oxygen Saturation by Pulse at Cystoscopic Inspection of External Sphincter

(NCT02502487)
Timeframe: at cystoscopic inspection of external sphincter

Interventionpercentage (Median)
Tetracaine Gel Group99
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Group98
Combination Group99

Oxygen Saturation by Pulse at Cystoscopic Inspection of Penile and Bulbar Urthra

(NCT02502487)
Timeframe: at cystoscopic inspection of penile and bulbar urthra

Interventionpercentage (Median)
Tetracaine Gel Group99
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Group98
Combination Group99

Oxygen Saturation by Pulse Before Gel Administration

(NCT02502487)
Timeframe: before gel administration

Interventionpercentage (Median)
Tetracaine Gel Group99
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Group98
Combination Group99

Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain

A visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10 was used to assess the patients' pain during the procedure. 0 means no pain, 1 to 3 means mild pain, 4 to 7 means moderate pain, and 8 to 10 means severe pain. Patients were asked the VAS score to express the degree of pain at each time point. (NCT02502487)
Timeframe: after withdrawal of cystoscope

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Tetracaine Gel Group0
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Group0
Combination Group0

Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain

A visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10 was used to assess the patients' pain during the procedure. 0 means no pain, 1 to 3 means mild pain, 4 to 7 means moderate pain, and 8 to 10 means severe pain. Patients were asked the VAS score to express the degree of pain at each time point. (NCT02502487)
Timeframe: at cystoscopic inspection of external sphincter

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Tetracaine Gel Group6
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Group4
Combination Group4

Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain

A visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10 was used to assess the patients' pain during the procedure. 0 means no pain, 1 to 3 means mild pain, 4 to 7 means moderate pain, and 8 to 10 means severe pain. Patients were asked the VAS score to express the degree of pain at each time point. (NCT02502487)
Timeframe: at cystoscopic inspection of penile and bulbar urethra

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Tetracaine Gel Group1
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Group1
Combination Group1

Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain

A visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10 was used to assess the patients' pain during the procedure. 0 means no pain, 1 to 3 means mild pain, 4 to 7 means moderate pain, and 8 to 10 means severe pain. Patients were asked the VAS score to express the degree of pain at each time point. (NCT02502487)
Timeframe: at cystoscopic inspection of prostate and bladder

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Tetracaine Gel Group2
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Group0
Combination Group0

Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain

A visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10 was used to assess the patients' pain during the procedure. 0 means no pain, 1 to 3 means mild pain, 4 to 7 means moderate pain, and 8 to 10 means severe pain. Patients were asked the VAS score to express the degree of pain at each time point. (NCT02502487)
Timeframe: before gel administration

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Tetracaine Gel Group0
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Group0
Combination Group0

Global Assessment of Satisfaction With Venipuncture

Rates of Satisfied and very satisfied are used to be compared between two groups. (NCT01744197)
Timeframe: 30 minutes after the venipuncture.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Synera74.0
Placebo53.7

Percentage of Patients With No or Minor Pain (VAS<3)

The primary efficacy endpoint is the subject's report of pain intensity regarding the venipuncture using a 0-10 VAS. The VAS <3 is considered as patients with no or minor pain and would be compared between 2 groups. (NCT01744197)
Timeframe: 30 minutes after the venipuncture.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Synera38.0
Placebo21.3

Percentage of Patients With No Pain (VAS=0)

The primary efficacy endpoint is the subject's report of pain intensity regarding the venipuncture using a 0-10 VAS. The VAS =0 is considered as patients with no pain and would also be compared between 2 groups. (NCT01744197)
Timeframe: 30 minutes after the venipuncture.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Synera19.4
Placebo8.3

Discomfort Level and Patient Satisfaction With the Preparation Protocol and Intravitreal Injection

"Discomfort according to the Eye Sensation Scale: 1-none, 2- mild, 3- moderate, 4- severe, 5- extremely severe~Patient satisfaction scale: 1=very unsatisfied, 2=unsatisfied, 3=neutral, 4=satisfied, 5= extremely satisfied" (NCT01087489)
Timeframe: immediately after injection, 1- hour later, and next day

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Discomfort during anesthetic preparationDiscomfort during needle penetrationSatisfaction with entire prep and injectionDiscomfort 1 h after injectionDiscomfort day after injectionNext day satisfaction with injection
3.5% Ophthalmic Lidocaine Gel2.092.04.52.11.64.3
4% Liquid Lidocaine Method2.11.74.32.41.84.3

Intraocular Pressure Change After Intravitreal Injection With Each Anesthetic Method, Results Reported in mmHg

intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured immediately after the injection, and at 5, 10, and 15 minutes after the injection (until it was 30 mmHg or below). Prior to injection IOP and post-injection IOP were compared to find the IOP change after injection. (NCT01087489)
Timeframe: immediately after injection, at 5, 10, 15 minutes

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
baseline IOP before injectionIOP change after 0.05 cc injection
3.5% Ophthalmic Lidocaine Gel15.930.9
4% Liquid Lidocaine Method15.525.7

Presence and Severity of Keratopathy and the Size of Subconjunctival Hemorrhage

"Presence of corneal staining after the injection:~Quadrants of fluorescein staining: 0 1 2 3 4~Density of staining: 0- None 1- Mild 2- Moderate 3- Severe 4- corneal abrasion~Size of subconjunctival hemorrhage:~in clock hours" (NCT01087489)
Timeframe: within 10 minutes of the injection

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Corneal fluorescein stainingDensity of corneal staining
3.5% Ophthalmic Lidocaine Gel2.31.3
4% Liquid Lidocaine Method3.01.9

Anxiety of Venipuncture

Participant anxiety was measured by the study participant and the objective observer before (anticipatory), during (venipuncture) and after (recovery) venipuncture using a validated visual analog scale (VAS). The VAS is a validated scale that is used to detect small changes in many types of observations. The scale ranges from 0-100 scores on a scale, and here the higher scores indicate higher anxiety levels. Only the participant's mean venipuncture (during venipuncture) anxiety scores are presented in outcome measure results here. (NCT00676364)
Timeframe: During venipuncture

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
ControI Group Receiving Placebo Cream43.1
Investigational Group40.5

Pain From Venipuncture

"Pain was measured immediately after venipuncture by the participant using the six-point FACES scale. FACES in not an acronym, but rather a description of a pain scale that uses pictures of faces in various states of pain. The FACES pain scale is a common scale used to measure pain with scores on a scale. The scale we used had six points from zero (0) to five (5) indicating different levels of pain. Lower scores indicate lower levels of pain, and higher scores indicate higher levels of pain." (NCT00676364)
Timeframe: Pain was measured immediately after venipuncture.

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
ControI Group Receiving Placebo Cream2.2
Investigational Group Receiving 4% Lidocaine Cream2.1

To Determine if a Difference in Pain Scale Ratings is Detectable Following Intramuscular Palivizumab Injection That Was Pre-treated With Placebo or Tetracaine.

Parent score 1-10 (1 representing no pain and 10 representing extreme pain) FLACC (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) Score 0-10 (at baseline and post injection) (0 representing no pain and 10 representing extreme pain) Change in FLACC score (NCT00484393)
Timeframe: 2 visits, 1 month apart

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Parent scoreFLACC at baselineFLACC post injectionChange in FLACC
Placebo7.31.69.37.7
Tetracaine7.31.78.46.7

Blinded Observer's Subjective Ratings of Participants' Pain Level at Tourniquet Placement, Using a 6-point NRS

The NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) is a 6-point rating scale where 0= no pain and 5 = worst pain. Blinded observers reported their own subjective evaluation of the level of pain experienced by the participants at tourniquet placement. Total number of participants subjectively evaluated as experiencing each pain level is reported. (NCT00530803)
Timeframe: before venipuncture

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Participants evaluated at NRS = 0 (No pain)Participants evaluated at NRS = 1Participants evaluated at NRS = 2Participants evaluated at NRS = 3Participants evaluated at NRS = 4Participants evaluated at NRS = 5
EMLA Cream4162100
Synera Patch3765110

Blinded Observer's Subjective Ratings of the Participant's Pain Level at 5 Minutes Post Venipuncture Procedure, Using a 6-point NRS

The NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) is a 6-point rating scale where 0= no pain and 5 = worst pain. Blinded observers reported their own subjective evaluation of the level of pain participants were experiencing 5 minutes after the venipuncture was completed. Total number of participants subjectively evaluated as experiencing each pain level is reported. (NCT00530803)
Timeframe: 5 minutes post venipuncture

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Participants evaluated at NRS = 0 (No pain)Participants evaluated at NRS = 1Participants evaluated at NRS = 2Participants evaluated at NRS = 3Participants evaluated at NRS = 4Participants evaluated at NRS = 5
EMLA Cream4531100
Synera Patch4541000

Blinded Observer's Subjective Ratings of the Participant's Pain Level at Needle Insertion, Using a 6-point NRS

The NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) is a 6-point rating scale where 0= no pain and 5 = worst pain. Blinded observers reported their own subjective evaluation of the level of pain experienced by the participants at needle insertion. Total number of participants subjectively evaluated as experiencing each pain level is reported. (NCT00530803)
Timeframe: during needle insertion

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Participants evaluated at NRS = 0 (No pain)Participants evaluated at NRS = 1Participants evaluated at NRS = 2Participants evaluated at NRS = 3Participants evaluated at NRS = 4Participants evaluated at NRS = 5
EMLA Cream32142200
Synera Patch25129220

Parent Rating of Child's Pain Using a 6-point NRS

The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) is a 6-point rating scale where 0= no pain and 5 = worst pain. Parents reported their own subjective evaluation of participants pain level. Each participant had only one parental assessment. Total number of parental assessment for each pain level on the 6-point NRS is reported as total number of participants experiencing that pain level. (NCT00530803)
Timeframe: immediately after venipuncture is completed

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
number of participants with NRS=0 (no pain)number of participants with NRS=1number of participants with NRS=2number of participants with NRS=3number of participants with NRS=4number of participants with NRS=5
EMLA Cream4261100
Synera Patch4151201

Participants Self-rating of Pain Using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale.

"Participants were asked to report their level of pain using a 6-point Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale ranging from 0, no pain, to 5, the most pain you can have. The Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale is a validated tool for measuring pain in patients as young as 3 years old. A FACES pain score less than or equal to 2 is considered no pain to mild pain, and is clinically acceptable. Studies have shown average FACES pain scores for children receiving vascular access with placebo to be 2.2 to 3.5." (NCT00530803)
Timeframe: immediately after completion of venipuncture

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Participants with FACES Score = 0 (No pain)Participants with FACES Score = 1Participants with FACES Score = 2Participants with FACES Score = 3Participants with FACES Score = 4Participants with FACES Score = 5
EMLA Cream4262000
Synera Patch3883100

Pain Scores Assessed by Neonatal Facial Action

The presence or absence of 3 facial actions (brow bulge, eyes squeeze and deepening of the nasolabial furrow) were scored in 2 second intervals for the first 20 seconds (or less if the phase lasted < 20 seconds) of each procedure phase from the videotapes by a trained research assistant. The data were then collapsed for each facial action into the percentage of time the infant expressed the action. An overall pain score was computed by summing the percentage scores for the three facial actions and then dividing by three. The score ranged from 0% to 100% with higher values suggesting more pain. (NCT00267111)
Timeframe: For the purpose of analysis IM injection procedure was divided into 4 phases: baseline , cleansing, injection and recovery phases.. For each phase facial actions were scored for the first 20 seconds or less if the phase lasted < 20 seconds.

,
InterventionPercentage of time (Mean)
BaselineCleaningInjectionRecovery
1 g Amethocaine Gel 4%14307079
Placebo Group18447576

Visual Analogue Scale

"Parents and nurses were asked to assess the infant's pain response during the procedure using Visual analogue scale (VAS) on an unmarked horizontal 10 cm continuous line where 0=no pain on the left side and 10=worst possible pain on the right side. Parents and nurses were trained to use the VAS prior to the IM injection." (NCT00267111)
Timeframe: During the entire procedure

,
InterventionCms (Mean)
Parents VAS ratingNurses VAS rating
Amethocaine Gel 4% Group4.65.0
Placebo Group4.64.9

Reviews

14 reviews available for tetracaine and Pain

ArticleYear
Factors Associated With Low Procedural Pain Scores Among 1- to 5-Year-Old Patients Undergoing Facial Laceration Repair.
    Pediatric emergency care, 2023, Mar-01, Volume: 39, Issue:3

    Topics: Anti-Anxiety Agents; Child, Preschool; Epinephrine; Humans; Infant; Lacerations; Lidocaine; Pain; Pa

2023
WITHDRAWN: EMLA and Amethocaine for reduction of children's pain associated with needle insertion.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2014, Mar-13, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Anesthetics, Local; Child; Child, Preschool; Humans; Infant; Lidocaine; Lidocaine, Prilo

2014
Topical anaesthesia for needle-related pain in newborn infants.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2017, 02-04, Volume: 2

    Topics: Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Catheterization; Drug Combinations; Humans; Infant, Newborn;

2017
Blood sampling in infants (reducing pain and morbidity).
    BMJ clinical evidence, 2009, Jan-07, Volume: 2009

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Analgesics; Blood Specimen Collection; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Infant; Pa

2009
Blood sampling in infants (reducing pain and morbidity).
    BMJ clinical evidence, 2011, Apr-05, Volume: 2011

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Analgesics; Blood Specimen Collection; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Infant; Pa

2011
LOCAL ANESTHETICS.
    Progress in medicinal chemistry, 1963, Volume: 19

    Topics: Analgesia; Anesthetics; Anesthetics, Local; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Benzoates; Cough; Ethers; Ketones;

1963
The use of EMLA cream to decrease venipuncture pain in children.
    Journal of pediatric nursing, 2004, Volume: 19, Issue:1

    Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Child; Child Welfare; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Iontophoresis

2004
The use of EMLA cream to decrease venipuncture pain in children.
    Journal of pediatric nursing, 2004, Volume: 19, Issue:1

    Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Child; Child Welfare; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Iontophoresis

2004
The use of EMLA cream to decrease venipuncture pain in children.
    Journal of pediatric nursing, 2004, Volume: 19, Issue:1

    Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Child; Child Welfare; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Iontophoresis

2004
The use of EMLA cream to decrease venipuncture pain in children.
    Journal of pediatric nursing, 2004, Volume: 19, Issue:1

    Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Child; Child Welfare; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Iontophoresis

2004
The use of EMLA cream to decrease venipuncture pain in children.
    Journal of pediatric nursing, 2004, Volume: 19, Issue:1

    Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Child; Child Welfare; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Iontophoresis

2004
The use of EMLA cream to decrease venipuncture pain in children.
    Journal of pediatric nursing, 2004, Volume: 19, Issue:1

    Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Child; Child Welfare; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Iontophoresis

2004
The use of EMLA cream to decrease venipuncture pain in children.
    Journal of pediatric nursing, 2004, Volume: 19, Issue:1

    Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Child; Child Welfare; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Iontophoresis

2004
The use of EMLA cream to decrease venipuncture pain in children.
    Journal of pediatric nursing, 2004, Volume: 19, Issue:1

    Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Child; Child Welfare; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Iontophoresis

2004
The use of EMLA cream to decrease venipuncture pain in children.
    Journal of pediatric nursing, 2004, Volume: 19, Issue:1

    Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Child; Child Welfare; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Iontophoresis

2004
A critical review of the topical local anesthetic amethocaine (Ametop) for pediatric pain.
    Paediatric drugs, 2005, Volume: 7, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Anesthetics, Local; Biological Availability; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Child; Child, Pr

2005
Topical anesthetics for dermal instrumentation: a systematic review of randomized, controlled trials.
    Annals of emergency medicine, 2005, Volume: 46, Issue:4

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anesthetics, Local; Biopsy, N

2005
EMLA and amethocaine for reduction of children's pain associated with needle insertion.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2006, Jul-19, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Anesthetics, Local; Child; Child, Preschool; Humans; Infant; Lidocaine; Lidocaine, Prilo

2006
Topical anesthesia.
    Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 1998, Volume: 44

    Topics: Adult; Anesthetics, Combined; Anesthetics, Local; Child; Cocaine; Drug Combinations; Epinephrine; Hu

1998
Potential neurotoxicity of spinal anesthesia with lidocaine.
    Mayo Clinic proceedings, 2000, Volume: 75, Issue:9

    Topics: Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Anesthesia, Spinal; Anesthetics, Local; Animals; Bupivacain

2000
Pain management for neonatal circumcision.
    Paediatric drugs, 2001, Volume: 3, Issue:2

    Topics: Acetaminophen; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Combined; Anesthetics, Local; Circumcision, Male; Hum

2001
Lidocaine-prilocaine cream versus tetracaine gel for procedural pain in children.
    The Annals of pharmacotherapy, 2002, Volume: 36, Issue:4

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Adolescent; Anesthetics, Local; Child; Child, Preschool; Gels; Humans; Infa

2002

Trials

84 trials available for tetracaine and Pain

ArticleYear
Compound lidocaine/prilocaine cream combined with tetracaine prevents cough caused by extubation after general anaesthesia: a randomised controlled trial.
    BMC anesthesiology, 2023, 01-03, Volume: 23, Issue:1

    Topics: Airway Extubation; Anesthesia, General; Anesthetics, Local; Cough; COVID-19; Double-Blind Method; Ep

2023
Efficacy of lidocaine 7 %, tetracaine 7 % self-occlusive cream in reducing MAL-cPDT-associated pain in subjects with actinic keratosis: A randomized, single-blind, vehicle-controlled trial (The "3P-Trial").
    Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy, 2020, Volume: 30

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anesthetics, Local; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Keratosis, Actinic;

2020
Assessment of clinical efficacy of lidocaine/tetracaine 7%/7% peel cream in fractional microablative laser procedure-associated pain for facial skin aging treatment. A randomized, controlled, single-blind trial.
    Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2022, Volume: 21, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Anesthetics, Local; Emollients; Female; Humans; Lidocaine; Male; Middle Aged; Pain; Prospecti

2022
A Proof-of-concept Study Using Quantitative Sensory Threshold Analysis to Compare Two Intraoral Topical Anesthetics.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2019, Volume: 41, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Adolescent; Adult; Anesthetics, Local; Benzocaine; Cross-Over Studies; Doub

2019
Efficacy and Safety of COX-2 Inhibitor Parecoxib for Rigid Cystoscopy-related Pain Management in Male Patients: A Prospective, Randomized and Controlled Study.
    Current medical science, 2019, Volume: 39, Issue:1

    Topics: Ambulatory Care Facilities; Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors; Cystoscopy; Double-Blind Method; Humans; In

2019
Efficacy of pain control with topical lidocaine-epinephrine-tetracaine during laceration repair with tissue adhesive in children: a randomized controlled trial.
    CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2013, Sep-17, Volume: 185, Issue:13

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adolescent; Anesthetics, Local; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Combination

2013
Comparison of postoperative redness of eyes after sub-Tenon's block and topical anaesthesia following phacoemulsification cataract surgery.
    British journal of anaesthesia, 2014, Volume: 112, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Eye Hemorrhage; Female; Humans; Lidocaine; Male; Nerve

2014
Injectable lidocaine provides similar analgesia compared to transdermal lidocaine/tetracaine patch for the incision and drainage of skin abscesses: a randomized, controlled trial.
    The Journal of emergency medicine, 2014, Volume: 47, Issue:3

    Topics: Abscess; Adolescent; Adult; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Double-Blind Method; Female; Huma

2014
Comparison of pain perception during miniscrew placement in orthodontic patients with a visual analog scale survey between compound topical and needle-injected anesthetics: A crossover, prospective, randomized clinical trial.
    American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics, 2016, Volume: 149, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Adolescent; Adult; Anesthesia, Dental; Anesthetics, Combined; Anesthetics,

2016
Dorsal penile nerve block for rigid cystoscopy in men: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Trials, 2016, Mar-18, Volume: 17, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Amides; Anesthetics, Combined; Anesthetics, Local; China; Clinical Protocols; Cystoscopy; Dou

2016
A randomized controlled trial comparing Ametop™ with placebo for reducing pain associated with local anesthetic skin infiltration before neuraxial anesthesia in parturients.
    International journal of obstetric anesthesia, 2016, Volume: 27

    Topics: Adult; Anesthesia, Epidural; Anesthesia, Obstetrical; Anesthetics, Local; Double-Blind Method; Femal

2016
First-time success with needle procedures was higher with a warm lidocaine and tetracaine patch than an eutectic mixture of lidocaine and prilocaine cream.
    Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992), 2017, Volume: 106, Issue:5

    Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Catheterization, Peripheral; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Hot Temperature; H

2017
Optimizing local anesthesia for grommet insertion: eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics versus Ametop: a randomized clinical trial.
    Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology, 2008, Volume: 29, Issue:5

    Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Lidocaine; Lidocaine, Prilocaine Drug Combination;

2008
Randomised controlled trial on the effectiveness of lidocaine gel vs tetracaine drops as the sole topical anaesthetic agent for primary pterygium surgery.
    Eye (London, England), 2009, Volume: 23, Issue:7

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Adult; Aged; Anesthetics, Local; Female; Gels; Humans; Lidocaine; Male; Mid

2009
Heated lidocaine/tetracaine patch (Synera, Rapydan) compared with lidocaine/prilocaine cream (EMLA) for topical anaesthesia before vascular access.
    British journal of anaesthesia, 2009, Volume: 102, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adolescent; Adult; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Combined; Anesthetics,

2009
Heated lidocaine/tetracaine patch (Synera, Rapydan) compared with lidocaine/prilocaine cream (EMLA) for topical anaesthesia before vascular access.
    British journal of anaesthesia, 2009, Volume: 102, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adolescent; Adult; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Combined; Anesthetics,

2009
Heated lidocaine/tetracaine patch (Synera, Rapydan) compared with lidocaine/prilocaine cream (EMLA) for topical anaesthesia before vascular access.
    British journal of anaesthesia, 2009, Volume: 102, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adolescent; Adult; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Combined; Anesthetics,

2009
Heated lidocaine/tetracaine patch (Synera, Rapydan) compared with lidocaine/prilocaine cream (EMLA) for topical anaesthesia before vascular access.
    British journal of anaesthesia, 2009, Volume: 102, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adolescent; Adult; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Combined; Anesthetics,

2009
Cooling tetracaine to reduce pain of instillation before surgery.
    Eye (London, England), 2009, Volume: 23, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Anesthetics, Local; Cold Temperature; Female; Humans; Instillation, Drug; Male; Middle Aged; O

2009
Amethocaine versus EMLA for successful intravenous cannulation in a children's emergency department: a randomised controlled study.
    Emergency medicine journal : EMJ, 2009, Volume: 26, Issue:7

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Adolescent; Anesthetics, Combined; Anesthetics, Local; Catheterization; Chi

2009
Comparative efficacy of topical tetraVisc versus lidocaine gel in cataract surgery.
    BMC ophthalmology, 2009, Aug-17, Volume: 9

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anesthetics, Local; Female; Humans; Lens Implantat

2009
Comparative efficacy of topical tetraVisc versus lidocaine gel in cataract surgery.
    BMC ophthalmology, 2009, Aug-17, Volume: 9

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anesthetics, Local; Female; Humans; Lens Implantat

2009
Comparative efficacy of topical tetraVisc versus lidocaine gel in cataract surgery.
    BMC ophthalmology, 2009, Aug-17, Volume: 9

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anesthetics, Local; Female; Humans; Lens Implantat

2009
Comparative efficacy of topical tetraVisc versus lidocaine gel in cataract surgery.
    BMC ophthalmology, 2009, Aug-17, Volume: 9

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anesthetics, Local; Female; Humans; Lens Implantat

2009
Reliability and validity of observer ratings of pain using the visual analog scale (VAS) in infants undergoing immunization injections.
    Pain, 2009, Dec-15, Volume: 147, Issue:1-3

    Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Case-Control Studies; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Infant; Male; Observa

2009
Comparative efficacy of 2 topical anesthetics for the placement of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices.
    Anesthesia progress, 2009,Autumn, Volume: 56, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anesthesia, Dental; Anesthetics, Combined; Anesthetics, Local; Benzocaine;

2009
Tetracaine (ametop) compared to placebo for reducing pain associated with intramuscular injection of palivizumab (synagis).
    Journal of pediatric nursing, 2009, Volume: 24, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Anesthetics, Local; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Human

2009
[Clinical observation on effect of auricular point injection combined with superficial anesthesia for nasal endoscopy surgery].
    Zhongguo zhen jiu = Chinese acupuncture & moxibustion, 2009, Volume: 29, Issue:8

    Topics: Acupuncture Points; Adult; Aged; Anesthesia; Anesthetics, Local; Ear; Endoscopy; Female; Humans; Inj

2009
[Topical anesthesia before vascular access in children. Comparison of a warmth-producing lidocaine-tetracaine patch with a lidocaine-prilocaine patch].
    Der Anaesthesist, 2010, Volume: 59, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adolescent; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Behavior; Child; Child

2010
Factors affecting patients' pain intensity during in office intravitreal injection procedure.
    Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2012, Volume: 32, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Analysis of Variance; Anesthesia; Anesthetics, Local; Diabetic Retinopathy; Female; Humans; In

2012
A comparison of Rapydan® patch and Ametop® gel for venous cannulation.
    Anaesthesia, 2012, Volume: 67, Issue:4

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Combined; Anesth

2012
Lidocaine/tetracaine patch (Rapydan) for topical anaesthesia before arterial access: a double-blind, randomized trial.
    British journal of anaesthesia, 2012, Volume: 109, Issue:5

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetic

2012
A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of topical amethocaine in reducing pain during arterial puncture.
    Chest, 2002, Volume: 122, Issue:4

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Aged; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Arteries; Blood Gas Analysis;

2002
A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of buffered versus plain tetracaine in reducing the pain of topical ophthalmic anesthesia.
    Annals of emergency medicine, 2003, Volume: 41, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Adult; Anesthesia, Local; Buffers; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method;

2003
Comparison of lidocaine 2% gel versus amethocaine as the sole anesthetic agent for strabismus surgery.
    Ophthalmology, 2003, Volume: 110, Issue:7

    Topics: Adult; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Double-Blind Method; Female; Gels; Humans; Lidocaine;

2003
Thirty-minute application of the S-Caine peel prior to nonablative laser treatment.
    Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.], 2003, Volume: 29, Issue:10

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Anesthetics, Local; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans;

2003
Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies evaluating the S-Caine Peel for induction of local anesthesia before long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser therapy for leg veins.
    Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.], 2003, Volume: 29, Issue:10

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Adult; Anesthetics, Local; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Humans;

2003
Randomized trial of novel tetracaine patch to provide local anaesthesia in neonates undergoing venepuncture.
    British journal of anaesthesia, 2003, Volume: 91, Issue:4

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Double-Blind Method; Female; Human

2003
Topical tetracaine prior to arterial puncture: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
    Respiratory medicine, 2003, Volume: 97, Issue:11

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Adult; Aged; Anesthetics, Local; Blood Gas Analysis; Double-Blind Method; F

2003
A randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of tetracaine gel for pain relief from peripherally inserted central catheters in infants.
    Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses, 2003, Volume: 3, Issue:6

    Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Catheterization, Peripheral; Double-Blind Method; Gels; Humans; Infant; Pain; Te

2003
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of tetracaine gel (Ametop) for pain relief during topical photodynamic therapy.
    The British journal of dermatology, 2004, Volume: 150, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anesthetics, Local; Bowen's Disease; Carcin

2004
The anesthetic effectiveness of lidocaine-adrenaline-tetracaine gel on finger lacerations.
    Pediatric emergency care, 2004, Volume: 20, Issue:12

    Topics: Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Child; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epinephrine; Female; Finger

2004
Topical 4% amethocaine gel reduces the pain of subcutaneous measles-mumps-rubella vaccination.
    Pediatrics, 2004, Volume: 114, Issue:6

    Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Iatrogenic Disease; Infant; Injections, Sub

2004
Intravenous ketamine sedation for painful oncology procedures.
    Paediatric anaesthesia, 2005, Volume: 15, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Analgesics; Anesthetics, Local; Biopsy, Needle; Bone Marrow Examination; Child; Child, P

2005
A randomized controlled trial to evaluate S-Caine patch for reducing pain associated with vascular access in children.
    Anesthesiology, 2005, Volume: 102, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Catheters, Indwelling; Chi-Square Distribution; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Combinatio

2005
Self-warming lidocaine/tetracaine patch effectively and safely induces local anesthesia during minor dermatologic procedures.
    Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.], 2005, Volume: 31, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anesthetics, Local; Dermatologic Surgical

2005
Evaluation of the S-Caine Peel for induction of local anesthesia for laser-assisted tattoo removal: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study.
    Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.], 2005, Volume: 31, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Adult; Anesthetics, Local; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female;

2005
Menthol facilitates the skin analgesic effect of tetracaine gel.
    International journal of pharmaceutics, 2005, Nov-23, Volume: 305, Issue:1-2

    Topics: Adult; Anesthetics, Local; Animals; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb

2005
Discomfort and tetracaine.
    Ophthalmology, 2006, Volume: 113, Issue:1

    Topics: Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Cold Temperature; Cross-Over Studies; Drug Storage; Hot Tempe

2006
Intravenous morphine and topical tetracaine for treatment of pain in [corrected] neonates undergoing central line placement.
    JAMA, 2006, Feb-15, Volume: 295, Issue:7

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Analgesics, Opioid; Anesthetics, Local; Catheterization, Central Venous; Do

2006
Comparison of ethyl chloride spray with topical anaesthetic in children experiencing venepuncture.
    Paediatric nursing, 2006, Volume: 18, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adolescent; Aerosols; Analgesia; Anesthetics, Local; Attitude to Health;

2006
How effective is tetracaine 4% gel, before a peripherally inserted central catheter, in reducing procedural pain in infants: a randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial [ISRCTN75884221].
    BMC medicine, 2006, May-03, Volume: 4

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Anesthetics, Local; Catheterization, Central Venous; Double-Blind Method; E

2006
Does amethocaine gel influence blood results obtained from capillary sampling?
    Paediatric nursing, 2006, Volume: 18, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adult; Alanine Transaminase; Alkaline Phosphatase; Anesthetics, Local; As

2006
How effective is tetracaine 4% gel, before a venipuncture, in reducing procedural pain in infants: a randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial.
    BMC pediatrics, 2007, Feb-08, Volume: 7

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Analysis of Variance; Anesthetics, Local; Double-Blind Method; Female; Gels

2007
Use of the Synera patch for local anesthesia before vascular access procedures: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
    Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2007, Volume: 8, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adult; Anesthetics, Local; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female

2007
Brief report: a randomized controlled trial of Synera versus lidocaine for epidural needle insertion in labouring parturients.
    Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2008, Volume: 55, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adult; Analgesia, Epidural; Analgesia, Obstetrical; Anesthetics, Local; D

2008
Topical amethocaine gel 4% for intramuscular injection in term neonates: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2008, Volume: 30, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Anesthetics, Local; Attitude of Health Personnel; Crying; Double-Blind Meth

2008
Warm lidocaine/tetracaine patch versus placebo before pediatric intravenous cannulation: a randomized controlled trial.
    Annals of emergency medicine, 2008, Volume: 52, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adolescent; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Catheterization, Perip

2008
Evaluation of an amethocaine gel preparation for percutaneous analgesia before venous cannulation in children.
    British journal of anaesthesia, 1995, Volume: 75, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Anesthetics, Local; Catheterization, Peripheral; Child; Child, Preschool;

1995
Evaluation of an amethocaine gel preparation for percutaneous analgesia before venous cannulation in children.
    British journal of anaesthesia, 1995, Volume: 75, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Anesthetics, Local; Catheterization, Peripheral; Child; Child, Preschool;

1995
Evaluation of an amethocaine gel preparation for percutaneous analgesia before venous cannulation in children.
    British journal of anaesthesia, 1995, Volume: 75, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Anesthetics, Local; Catheterization, Peripheral; Child; Child, Preschool;

1995
Evaluation of an amethocaine gel preparation for percutaneous analgesia before venous cannulation in children.
    British journal of anaesthesia, 1995, Volume: 75, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Anesthetics, Local; Catheterization, Peripheral; Child; Child, Preschool;

1995
Intranasal anesthetic effects of lidocaine and tetracaine compared.
    Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 1995, Volume: 113, Issue:4

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Adult; Anesthetics, Local; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Lidocaine; Middl

1995
A comparison of amethocaine cream with lignocaine-prilocaine cream (EMLA) for reducing pain during retrobulbar injection.
    Eye (London, England), 1994, Volume: 8 ( Pt 4)

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anesthetics, Local; Cataract Extraction; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinat

1994
Tetracaine, epinephrine (adrenalin), and cocaine (TAC) versus lidocaine, epinephrine, and tetracaine (LET) for anesthesia of lacerations in children.
    Annals of emergency medicine, 1995, Volume: 25, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Anesthesia, Local; Child; Child, Preschool; Cocaine; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinati

1995
LAT (lidocaine-adrenaline-tetracaine) versus TAC (tetracaine-adrenaline-cocaine) for topical anesthesia in face and scalp lacerations.
    The American journal of emergency medicine, 1995, Volume: 13, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Anesthetics, Local; Cocaine; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Drug Costs; Epinephrine;

1995
Comparison of percutaneous anaesthesia for venous cannulation after topical application of either amethocaine or EMLA cream.
    British journal of anaesthesia, 1994, Volume: 72, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Catheterization, Peripheral; Double-Blind

1994
Comparison of topical anesthetics without cocaine to tetracaine-adrenaline-cocaine and lidocaine infiltration during repair of lacerations: bupivacaine-norepinephrine is an effective new topical anesthetic agent.
    Pediatrics, 1996, Volume: 97, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adolescent; Anesthetics, Local; Bupivacaine; Child; Child, Preschool; Coc

1996
The effect of temperature on the discomfort caused by topical local anaesthesia.
    Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 1995, Volume: 88, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Anesthetics, Local; Humans; Lidocaine; Middle Aged; Pain; Pain Measurement; Procaine; Temperat

1995
[Comparison of analgesic effect of lidocaine tape versus eutectic mixture of lidocaine and tetracaine during infiltration of local anesthetics before epidural block].
    Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology, 1996, Volume: 45, Issue:9

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Adult; Anesthesia, Epidural; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Combined; Anes

1996
Topical tetracaine attenuates the pain of infiltration of buffered lidocaine.
    Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 1996, Volume: 3, Issue:11

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Adolescent; Adult; Anesthetics, Local; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans;

1996
Tetracaine versus lidocaine-prilocaine for preventing venipuncture-induced pain in children.
    American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, 1997, Feb-15, Volume: 54, Issue:4

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Adolescent; Anesthetics, Local; Child; Child, Preschool; Dosage Forms; Drug

1997
Effect of percutaneous local anaesthetics on pain reduction during pulse dye laser treatment of portwine stains.
    British journal of anaesthesia, 1997, Volume: 78, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Hu

1997
Comparative topical anaesthesia of EMLA and liposome-encapsulated tetracaine.
    Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 1997, Volume: 44, Issue:7

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Adult; Anesthetics, Local; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Drug Ca

1997
Topical lidocaine adrenaline tetracaine (LAT gel) versus injectable buffered lidocaine for local anesthesia in laceration repair.
    The Western journal of medicine, 1997, Volume: 167, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Adolescent; Adult; Anesthetics, Combined; Anesthetics, Local; Child; Child,

1997
New non-cocaine-containing topical anesthetics compared with tetracaine-adrenaline-cocaine during repair of lacerations.
    Pediatrics, 1997, Volume: 100, Issue:5

    Topics: Adolescent; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Combined; Anesthetics, Local; Child; Child, Preschool; C

1997
Prilocaine-phenylephrine and bupivacaine-phenylephrine topical anesthetics compared with tetracaine-adrenaline-cocaine during repair of lacerations.
    The American journal of emergency medicine, 1998, Volume: 16, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Bupivacaine; Child; Child, Preschool; Cocaine; De

1998
Randomised prospective masked study comparing patient comfort following the instillation of topical proxymetacaine and amethocaine.
    The British journal of ophthalmology, 1998, Volume: 82, Issue:11

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anesthetics, Local; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans;

1998
The effects of EMLA and a topical formulation of 4% amethocaine (Ametop) on pain associated with retrobulbar injection.
    Anaesthesia, 1999, Volume: 54, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Cataract Extraction; Female; Humans;

1999
Relative efficacy of amethocaine gel and lidocaine-prilocaine cream for Port-a-Cath puncture in children.
    Pediatrics, 1999, Volume: 104, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Catheterization, Central Venous; Catheters, Indwe

1999
Relative efficacy of amethocaine gel and lidocaine-prilocaine cream for Port-a-Cath puncture in children.
    Pediatrics, 1999, Volume: 104, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Catheterization, Central Venous; Catheters, Indwe

1999
Relative efficacy of amethocaine gel and lidocaine-prilocaine cream for Port-a-Cath puncture in children.
    Pediatrics, 1999, Volume: 104, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Catheterization, Central Venous; Catheters, Indwe

1999
Relative efficacy of amethocaine gel and lidocaine-prilocaine cream for Port-a-Cath puncture in children.
    Pediatrics, 1999, Volume: 104, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Catheterization, Central Venous; Catheters, Indwe

1999
Comparison of lignocaine-prilocaine cream and amethocaine gel for local analgesia before venepuncture in children.
    Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992), 1999, Volume: 88, Issue:9

    Topics: Adolescent; Analgesia; Anesthetics, Combined; Anesthetics, Local; Anxiety; Child; Child, Preschool;

1999
Efficacy of supplementary intracameral lidocaine in routine phacoemulsification under topical anesthesia.
    Ophthalmology, 1999, Volume: 106, Issue:11

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Combined; Anesthetics, Local; Anterior Cham

1999
Does topical amethocaine gel reduce the pain of venepuncture in newborn infants? A randomised double blind controlled trial.
    Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition, 2000, Volume: 83, Issue:3

    Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Crying; Double-Blind Method; Facial Expression; Female; Gels; Humans; Infant, Ne

2000
A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, comparative study of topical skin analgesics and the anxiety and discomfort associated with venous cannulation.
    British dental journal, 2001, Apr-28, Volume: 190, Issue:8

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adult; Analysis of Variance; Anesthesia, Dental; Anesthetics, Combined; A

2001
No more tears: a randomized controlled double-blind trial of Amethocaine gel vs. placebo in the management of procedural pain in neonates.
    Journal of advanced nursing, 2001, Volume: 34, Issue:4

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Anesthetics, Local; Catheterization, Peripheral; Clinical Nursing Researc

2001
A prospective multicenter trial to determine the incidence of transient neurologic symptoms after spinal anesthesia with phenylephrine added to 0.5% tetracaine.
    Hiroshima journal of medical sciences, 2001, Volume: 50, Issue:2

    Topics: Anesthesia, Spinal; Anesthetics, Local; Double-Blind Method; Elective Surgical Procedures; Female; G

2001
EMLA or Ametop, and for how long?
    Anaesthesia, 2001, Volume: 56, Issue:10

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anesthetics, Combined; Anesthetics, Local; Drug Administ

2001
A double-blind crossover comparison of topical anesthetics.
    Journal of the American Dental Association (1939), 1979, Volume: 98, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Adult; Anesthetics, Local; Benzocaine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Double-Bli

1979
A clinical evaluation of three topical anaesthetic agents.
    Australian dental journal, 1992, Volume: 37, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Anesthetics, Local; Benzocaine; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Injec

1992
Tetracaine/adrenaline/cocaine for local anesthesia.
    DICP : the annals of pharmacotherapy, 1990, Volume: 24, Issue:12

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Child; Cocaine; Double-Blind Method; Drug

1990
Tourniquet pain during spinal anesthesia: a comparison of plain solutions of tetracaine and bupivacaine.
    Anesthesia and analgesia, 1988, Volume: 67, Issue:9

    Topics: Aged; Anesthesia, Spinal; Bupivacaine; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nerve Fibers; Nervous Syst

1988
[Effect of peridural analgesia on blood gas composition and central hemodynamics in patients with closed trauma of the chest].
    Vestnik khirurgii imeni I. I. Grekova, 1985, Volume: 135, Issue:7

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anesthesia, Epidural; Clinical Trials as Topic; Hemodynamics; Humans; Middl

1985
Clinical comparison of bupivacaine and amethocaine: onset and duration in extradural blockade.
    Anaesthesia, 1970, Volume: 25, Issue:1

    Topics: Abdomen; Anesthesia, Spinal; Anilides; Epinephrine; Female; Genital Diseases, Female; Humans; Pain;

1970

Other Studies

60 other studies available for tetracaine and Pain

ArticleYear
Discovery of XEN907, a spirooxindole blocker of NaV1.7 for the treatment of pain.
    Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 2011, Jun-15, Volume: 21, Issue:12

    Topics: Analgesics; Gene Expression Regulation; HEK293 Cells; Humans; Indoles; Inhibitory Concentration 50;

2011
Identification of a potent, state-dependent inhibitor of Nav1.7 with oral efficacy in the formalin model of persistent pain.
    Journal of medicinal chemistry, 2011, Jul-14, Volume: 54, Issue:13

    Topics: Acetamides; Administration, Oral; Analgesics; Animals; Binding Sites; Cell Line; ERG1 Potassium Chan

2011
3-Oxoisoindoline-1-carboxamides: potent, state-dependent blockers of voltage-gated sodium channel Na(V)1.7 with efficacy in rat pain models.
    Journal of medicinal chemistry, 2012, Aug-09, Volume: 55, Issue:15

    Topics: Amides; Analgesics; Animals; Arthritis, Experimental; Carrageenan; CHO Cells; Chronic Pain; Cricetin

2012
Substituted Indazoles as Nav1.7 Blockers for the Treatment of Pain.
    Journal of medicinal chemistry, 2016, Apr-14, Volume: 59, Issue:7

    Topics: Analgesics; Animals; Disease Models, Animal; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Electrophysiology; Ev

2016
Discovery of aminocyclohexene analogues as selective and orally bioavailable hNav1.7 inhibitors for analgesia.
    Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 2017, 11-15, Volume: 27, Issue:22

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Analgesics; Animals; Binding Sites; Cyclohexenes; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9; Dis

2017
Discovery of (R)-(3-fluoropyrrolidin-1-yl)(6-((5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-2-yl)oxy)quinolin-2-yl)methanone (ABBV-318) and analogs as small molecule Na
    Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 2022, 06-01, Volume: 63

    Topics: Humans; Pain; Pain Management; Protein Isoforms; Sodium Channels; Structure-Activity Relationship

2022
Real-life experience of a lidocaine/tetracaine self-occluding topical anesthetic for dermatological procedures.
    Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2022, Volume: 21, Issue:7

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Anesthetics, Local; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Lidocaine; Pain; Pain Meas

2022
Topical Anesthetics for Analgesia in Acute Corneal Abrasion: Eye Care Providers Survey.
    Eye & contact lens, 2023, Apr-01, Volume: 49, Issue:4

    Topics: Analgesia; Anesthetics, Local; Corneal Injuries; Humans; Pain; Quality of Life; Surveys and Question

2023
Topical Cetacaine is probably more effective in preventing pain than benzocaine and an eutectic mixture of local anesthetic before palatal infiltration in children.
    Journal of the American Dental Association (1939), 2020, Volume: 151, Issue:10

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Anesthetics, Local; Benzalkonium Compounds; Benzocaine; Cetrimonium Compoun

2020
Tetracaine Challenges Old Dogma for Emergency Department Management of Corneal Abrasion Pain and Beckons a Definitive Study.
    Annals of emergency medicine, 2018, Volume: 71, Issue:6

    Topics: Emergency Service, Hospital; Humans; Lidocaine; Pain; Tetracaine

2018
Pain management for children needing laceration repair.
    Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2018, Volume: 64, Issue:12

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Anesthetics, Local; Child; Drug Combinations; Epinephrine; Humans; Lacera

2018
Stability of a novel Lidocaine, Adrenaline and Tetracaine sterile thermosensitive gel: A ready-to-use formulation.
    European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2019, Aug-01, Volume: 136

    Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Epinephrine; Gels; Lidocaine; Pain; Pain Measurement;

2019
An open-label pilot study evaluating the effectiveness of the heated lidocaine/tetracaine patch for the treatment of pain associated with carpal tunnel syndrome.
    Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain, 2014, Volume: 14, Issue:7

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adult; Carpal Tunnel Syndrome; Drug Combinations; Female; Hot Temperature

2014
Topical lidocaine-epinephrine-tetracaine is effective in reducing pain during laceration repair with tissue adhesive in children.
    Evidence-based nursing, 2014, Volume: 17, Issue:4

    Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Epinephrine; Female; Humans; Lidocaine; Male; Pain; Tetracaine

2014
Evidence appraisal of Harman S, Zemek R, Duncan MJ, Ying Y, Petrcich W. Efficacy of pain control with topical lidocaine-epinephrine-tetracaine during laceration repair with tissue adhesive in children: a randomized controlled trial. CMAJ. 2013;185(13):E62
    AORN journal, 2014, Volume: 99, Issue:4

    Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Epinephrine; Female; Humans; Lidocaine; Male; Pain; Tetracaine

2014
Presynaptic facilitation by tetracaine of glutamatergic spontaneous excitatory transmission in the rat spinal substantia gelatinosa - Involvement of TRPA1 channels.
    Brain research, 2017, 02-15, Volume: 1657

    Topics: Acetanilides; Amides; Anesthetics, Local; Animals; Bupivacaine; Capsaicin; Excitatory Postsynaptic P

2017
FURTHER EXPERIENCES WITH PONTOCAINE-DEXTROSE EPHEDRINE FOR SPINAL ANALGESIA.
    California medicine, 1948, Volume: 69, Issue:2

    Topics: Analgesia; Ephedrine; Glucose; Humans; Pain; Pain Management; Tetracaine

1948
Pontocaine hydrochloride for brachial block analgesia; 150 cases.
    Anesthesiology, 1948, Volume: 9, Issue:3

    Topics: Analgesia; Pain; Pain Management; Tetracaine

1948
A comparison of topical application of 1% tetracaine gel before and after the procedure in removal of cutaneous pigmentation with Q-switched neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet laser (1064/532 nm).
    Photomedicine and laser surgery, 2010, Volume: 28, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anesthetics, Local; Female; Gels; Humans; Lasers,

2010
The safety of flexible fibre-optic bronchoscopy and proceduralist-administered sedation: a tertiary referral centre experience.
    Internal medicine journal, 2012, Volume: 42, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Biopsy; Bronchoscopy; Conscious Sedation; Dyspnea; Femal

2012
Relief of palatal injection pain by liposome-encapsulated 2% lignocaine prepared by ultrasonic dental scaler.
    The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery, 2012, Volume: 50, Issue:8

    Topics: Adult; Anesthesia, Dental; Anesthetics, Local; Benzocaine; Female; Humans; Injections; Lidocaine; Li

2012
Cross-over study of topical anaesthesia with tetracaine solution for transoral rigid laryngoscopy.
    The Journal of laryngology and otology, 2012, Volume: 126, Issue:11

    Topics: Adult; Anesthesia, Local; Cross-Over Studies; Female; Humans; Laryngeal Diseases; Laryngoscopy; Lido

2012
Effects of euthanasia on brain physiological activities monitored in real-time.
    Neurological research, 2002, Volume: 24, Issue:7

    Topics: Amides; Animals; Brain; Brain Ischemia; Carbon Dioxide; Cats; Cerebrovascular Circulation; Drug Comb

2002
Saddle block using 10-20% tetracaine for patients with perineal pain due to recurrent rectal cancer.
    Anesthesiology, 2003, Volume: 98, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anesthetics, Local; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence,

2003
Bye-bye benzocaine?
    Nursing, 2003, Volume: 33, Issue:7

    Topics: 4-Aminobenzoic Acid; Anesthetics, Local; Benzalkonium Compounds; Benzocaine; Cetrimonium Compounds;

2003
TO-DAY'S DRUGS. LOCAL ANALGESICS.
    British medical journal, 1964, Nov-28, Volume: 2, Issue:5421

    Topics: Analgesia; Analgesics; Dibucaine; Lidocaine; Pain; Pharmacology; Procaine; Tetracaine; Toxicology

1964
RECENT ADVANCES IN LOCAL ANALGESIA. CLINICAL EXPERIENCE WITH PRILOCAINE.
    Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 1965, Volume: 58

    Topics: Analgesia; Anesthesia; Anesthesia, Conduction; Anesthesia, Obstetrical; Anesthetics; Anesthetics, Lo

1965
The use of pontocaine hydrochloride for nerve block and infiltration analgesia, therapeutic, and diagnostic blocks; 1004 cases.
    Anesthesiology, 1950, Volume: 11, Issue:1

    Topics: Analgesia; Anesthesia; Humans; Nerve Block; Pain; Tetracaine

1950
Relief of pain and anxiety in pediatric patients in emergency medical systems.
    Pediatrics, 2004, Volume: 114, Issue:5

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Analgesics; Anesthetics, Combined; Anxiety; Child; Conscious Sedation; Emergen

2004
Relief of pain and anxiety in pediatric patients in emergency medical systems.
    Pediatrics, 2004, Volume: 114, Issue:5

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Analgesics; Anesthetics, Combined; Anxiety; Child; Conscious Sedation; Emergen

2004
Relief of pain and anxiety in pediatric patients in emergency medical systems.
    Pediatrics, 2004, Volume: 114, Issue:5

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Analgesics; Anesthetics, Combined; Anxiety; Child; Conscious Sedation; Emergen

2004
Relief of pain and anxiety in pediatric patients in emergency medical systems.
    Pediatrics, 2004, Volume: 114, Issue:5

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Analgesics; Anesthetics, Combined; Anxiety; Child; Conscious Sedation; Emergen

2004
Relief of pain and anxiety in pediatric patients in emergency medical systems.
    Pediatrics, 2004, Volume: 114, Issue:5

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Analgesics; Anesthetics, Combined; Anxiety; Child; Conscious Sedation; Emergen

2004
Relief of pain and anxiety in pediatric patients in emergency medical systems.
    Pediatrics, 2004, Volume: 114, Issue:5

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Analgesics; Anesthetics, Combined; Anxiety; Child; Conscious Sedation; Emergen

2004
Relief of pain and anxiety in pediatric patients in emergency medical systems.
    Pediatrics, 2004, Volume: 114, Issue:5

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Analgesics; Anesthetics, Combined; Anxiety; Child; Conscious Sedation; Emergen

2004
Relief of pain and anxiety in pediatric patients in emergency medical systems.
    Pediatrics, 2004, Volume: 114, Issue:5

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Analgesics; Anesthetics, Combined; Anxiety; Child; Conscious Sedation; Emergen

2004
Relief of pain and anxiety in pediatric patients in emergency medical systems.
    Pediatrics, 2004, Volume: 114, Issue:5

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Analgesics; Anesthetics, Combined; Anxiety; Child; Conscious Sedation; Emergen

2004
Transdermal permeation of tetracaine hydrochloride by lecithin microemulsion: in vivo.
    Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces, 2006, Mar-01, Volume: 48, Issue:1

    Topics: 1-Propanol; Administration, Cutaneous; Anesthetics, Local; Animals; Catalase; Drug Carriers; Emulsio

2006
Pain induced by phacoemulsification without sedation using topical or peribulbar anesthesia.
    Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 2006, Volume: 32, Issue:1

    Topics: Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Combined; Anesthetics, Local; Bupivacaine; Conscious Sedation; Human

2006
Topical local anaesthetic (tetracaine) reduces pain from botulinum toxin injections for axillary hyperhidrosis.
    The British journal of surgery, 2006, Volume: 93, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Anesthetics, Local; Axilla; Botulinum Toxins, Type A; Humans; Hyperhidrosis; Injections; Neur

2006
Site-specific skin reactions to amethocaine.
    Paediatric nursing, 2006, Volume: 18, Issue:5

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adolescent; Age Distribution; Anesthetics, Local; Child; Child, Preschool

2006
Routine immunization practices: use of topical anesthetics and oral analgesics.
    Pediatrics, 2007, Volume: 120, Issue:3

    Topics: Acetaminophen; Administration, Oral; Administration, Topical; Adult; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Anest

2007
Routine immunization practices: use of topical anesthetics and oral analgesics.
    Pediatrics, 2007, Volume: 120, Issue:3

    Topics: Acetaminophen; Administration, Oral; Administration, Topical; Adult; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Anest

2007
Routine immunization practices: use of topical anesthetics and oral analgesics.
    Pediatrics, 2007, Volume: 120, Issue:3

    Topics: Acetaminophen; Administration, Oral; Administration, Topical; Adult; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Anest

2007
Routine immunization practices: use of topical anesthetics and oral analgesics.
    Pediatrics, 2007, Volume: 120, Issue:3

    Topics: Acetaminophen; Administration, Oral; Administration, Topical; Adult; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Anest

2007
Intrathecal hyperbaric 0.5% tetracaine as a possible cause of transient neurologic toxicity.
    Anesthesia and analgesia, 1996, Volume: 82, Issue:5

    Topics: Anesthesia, Spinal; Anesthetics, Local; Female; Humans; Injections, Spinal; Leg; Middle Aged; Pain;

1996
Delivery of topical anesthesia.
    Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 1996, Volume: 22, Issue:2

    Topics: Acetylcholine; Administration, Topical; Anesthetics, Local; Drug Combinations; Drug Delivery Systems

1996
N-butyl tetracaine as a neurolytic agent for ultralong sciatic nerve block.
    Anesthesiology, 1996, Volume: 85, Issue:6

    Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Animals; Autonomic Nervous System; Cells, Cultured; Nerve Block; Pain; Rats; Sci

1996
Supraspinal inhibition of nociceptive dorsal horn neurones in the anaesthetized rat: tonic or dynamic?
    The Journal of physiology, 1998, Jan-15, Volume: 506 ( Pt 2)

    Topics: Anesthesia; Anesthetics, Local; Animals; Efferent Pathways; Electromyography; Electrophysiology; Evo

1998
The antinociception produced by microinjection of a cholinergic agonist in the ventromedial medulla is mediated by noradrenergic neurons in the A7 catecholamine cell group.
    Brain research, 1999, Mar-20, Volume: 822, Issue:1-2

    Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Animals; Antimutagenic Agents; Carbachol; Cholinergic Agonists; Cobalt; Female;

1999
Sample-size calculation for a log-transformed outcome measure.
    Controlled clinical trials, 1999, Volume: 20, Issue:6

    Topics: Algorithms; Anesthetics, Local; Case-Control Studies; Child; Humans; Influenza Vaccines; Injections,

1999
Aerosol-OT microemulsions as transdermal carriers of tetracaine hydrochloride.
    Drug development and industrial pharmacy, 2000, Volume: 26, Issue:5

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Aerosols; Anesthetics, Local; Animals; Drug Carriers; Emulsions; Mice; My

2000
Topical anesthesia for phacoemulsification and painless subconjunctival antibiotic injection.
    Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 2001, Volume: 27, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Cefuroxime; Cephalosporins; Con

2001
[Suture of skin lacerations using LAT gel (lidocaine, adrenaline, tetracaine)].
    Archivos de la Sociedad Espanola de Oftalmologia, 2001, Volume: 76, Issue:8

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anesthetics, Local; Child; Child, Preschool; Dermatologic Surgical Procedur

2001
Tetracaine topical anesthesia for myringotomy.
    The Laryngoscope, 2001, Volume: 111, Issue:9

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Ambulatory Surgical Procedures;

2001
Topical liposomal tetracaine for pain relief of intralesional interferon injections in the treatment of condylomata acuminata.
    International journal of dermatology, 1992, Volume: 31, Issue:12

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Adult; Condylomata Acuminata; Drug Carriers; Female; Humans; Injections, In

1992
The pontine parabrachial region mediates some of the descending inhibitory effects of stimulating the anterior pretectal nucleus.
    Brain research, 1992, Oct-30, Volume: 594, Issue:2

    Topics: Animals; Brain Stem; Electric Stimulation; Laminectomy; Male; Neural Pathways; Neurons; Pain; Pons;

1992
Compatibility of hydromorphone hydrochloride and tetracaine hydrochloride.
    American journal of hospital pharmacy, 1991, Volume: 48, Issue:8

    Topics: Drug Incompatibility; Drug Interactions; Humans; Hydromorphone; Pain; Tetracaine; Time Factors

1991
Clinical experiences with a novel percutaneous amethocaine preparation: prevention of pain due to venepuncture in children.
    British journal of clinical pharmacology, 1990, Volume: 30, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Bloodletting; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Humans; Infant; Male; Ointments; Pain; Pr

1990
Tourniquet pain during bupivacaine and tetracaine spinal anesthesia.
    Anesthesia and analgesia, 1989, Volume: 69, Issue:3

    Topics: Anesthesia, Spinal; Bupivacaine; Humans; Pain; Tetracaine; Tourniquets

1989
Decreased incidence of tourniquet pain during spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine. A possible explanation.
    Anesthesia and analgesia, 1988, Volume: 67, Issue:9

    Topics: Action Potentials; Anesthesia, Spinal; Animals; Bupivacaine; Nerve Fibers; Neural Conduction; Pain;

1988
Brainstem mechanisms of antinociception. Effects of electrical stimulation and injection of morphine into the nucleus raphe magnus.
    Neuropharmacology, 1986, Volume: 25, Issue:7

    Topics: Analgesia; Animals; Electric Stimulation Therapy; Morphine; Pain; Raphe Nuclei; Rats; Tetracaine

1986
Pain management in the child.
    Emergency medicine clinics of North America, 1987, Volume: 5, Issue:4

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Anesthetics, Local; Child; Child, Preschool; Cocaine; Drug Combinations; Em

1987
Spinal anesthesia associated with reversal of myocardial ischemia.
    Anesthesia and analgesia, 1986, Volume: 65, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Anesthesia, Spinal; Blood Pressure; Coronary Disease; Electrocardiography; Heart Rate; Hemodyn

1986
Differential spread of blockade of touch, cold, and pinprick during spinal anesthesia.
    Anesthesia and analgesia, 1985, Volume: 64, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Anesthesia, Spinal; Cold Temperature; Epinephrine; Female; Humans; Lidocaine; Male; Mid

1985
Pain-related electrical potentials of the human nasal mucosa elicited by chemical stimulation.
    Pain, 1985, Volume: 22, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Electroencephalography; Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory; Female; Galvanic Skin Response; Hum

1985
[Clinical studies on subjective sensation in administration of the local anesthetic tonexol spray].
    ZWR, 1972, Jan-10, Volume: 81, Issue:1

    Topics: Acridines; Adolescent; Aerosols; Anesthesia, Dental; Anesthetics, Local; Child; Humans; Pain; Smell;

1972
Analgesic blocks.
    Postgraduate medicine, 1973, Volume: 53, Issue:6

    Topics: Analgesia; Anesthesia, Conduction; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Autonomic Nerve Block; Bup

1973
The effect of "Noxyflex" (Noxytioline) on the behaviour of animals which have been infected intraperitoneally with suspensions of faeces.
    International journal of clinical pharmacology, therapy and toxicology, 1974, Volume: 9, Issue:2

    Topics: Animals; Anti-Infective Agents; Behavior, Animal; Disease Models, Animal; Feces; Injections, Intrape

1974
Spinal and extradural analgesia-anesthesia for parturition.
    Clinical obstetrics and gynecology, 1974, Volume: 17, Issue:2

    Topics: Analgesia; Anesthesia, Epidural; Anesthesia, Obstetrical; Anesthesia, Spinal; Anesthetics, Local; Bu

1974
[A method for evaluation of topical anesthetics in man].
    Arzneimittel-Forschung, 1970, Volume: 20, Issue:10

    Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Anilides; Dental Pulp Test; Humans; Lip; Methods; Pain; Pipecolic Acids; Tetraca

1970