tetracaine has been researched along with Pain in 158 studies
Tetracaine: A potent local anesthetic of the ester type used for surface and spinal anesthesia.
tetracaine : A benzoate ester in which 4-N-butylbenzoic acid and 2-(dimethylamino)ethanol have combined to form the ester bond; a local ester anaesthetic (ester caine) used for surface and spinal anaesthesia.
Pain: An unpleasant sensation induced by noxious stimuli which are detected by NERVE ENDINGS of NOCICEPTIVE NEURONS.
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"Compound lidocaine/prilocaine cream combined with tetracaine may be a more effective approach for preventing coughing and stabilising circulation during extubation following general anaesthesia." | 9.69 | Compound lidocaine/prilocaine cream combined with tetracaine prevents cough caused by extubation after general anaesthesia: a randomised controlled trial. ( Gao, J; Li, T; Li, Y; Wang, M; Zhang, E; Zhang, H; Zhang, L; Zhao, X, 2023) |
"Lidocaine/tetracaine 7%/7% peel cream (L/T-pC) is very effective in reducing pain in several dermatological procedures, such as hair or tattoo laser removal or conventional photodynamic therapy associated pain." | 9.51 | Assessment of clinical efficacy of lidocaine/tetracaine 7%/7% peel cream in fractional microablative laser procedure-associated pain for facial skin aging treatment. A randomized, controlled, single-blind trial. ( Caprari, E; Milani, M; Viciguerra, MT, 2022) |
"The 3P-trial has demonstrated that the preventive application of the self-occlusive lidocaine 7%-tetracaine 7% cream is very effective in reducing the procedure-associated pain during MAL-cPDT for the treatment of AK lesions." | 9.34 | Efficacy of lidocaine 7 %, tetracaine 7 % self-occlusive cream in reducing MAL-cPDT-associated pain in subjects with actinic keratosis: A randomized, single-blind, vehicle-controlled trial (The "3P-Trial"). ( Brumana, MB; Milani, M; Puviani, M, 2020) |
"Local injection of lidocaine provided clinically similar analgesia compared to the lidocaine/tetracaine patch during I&D of skin abscesses in the ED." | 9.19 | Injectable lidocaine provides similar analgesia compared to transdermal lidocaine/tetracaine patch for the incision and drainage of skin abscesses: a randomized, controlled trial. ( Bourne, CL; Brewer, KL; House, J, 2014) |
"Treating minor lacerations with lidocaine-epinephrine-tetracaine before wound closure with tissue adhesive reduced ratings of pain and increased the proportion of pain-free repairs among children aged 3 months to 17 years." | 9.17 | Efficacy of pain control with topical lidocaine-epinephrine-tetracaine during laceration repair with tissue adhesive in children: a randomized controlled trial. ( Duncan, MJ; Harman, S; Petrcich, W; Ying, Y; Zemek, R, 2013) |
"To determine the effectiveness of lidocaine 2% gel vstetracaine 1% drops in primary pterygium surgery." | 9.14 | Randomised controlled trial on the effectiveness of lidocaine gel vs tetracaine drops as the sole topical anaesthetic agent for primary pterygium surgery. ( Cheng, LL; Lam, DS; Lam, PT; Lau, TT; Leung, GY; Young, AL, 2009) |
"Tetracaine did not significantly decrease procedural pain in infants undergoing a venipuncture, when used in combination with routine sucrose administration." | 9.12 | How effective is tetracaine 4% gel, before a venipuncture, in reducing procedural pain in infants: a randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial. ( Blanchard, C; Gaboury, I; Hogan, DL; Lemyre, B; Moher, D; Sherlock, R, 2007) |
"Tetracaine 4% when applied for 30 minutes was not beneficial in decreasing procedural pain associated with a PICC in very small infants." | 9.12 | How effective is tetracaine 4% gel, before a peripherally inserted central catheter, in reducing procedural pain in infants: a randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial [ISRCTN75884221]. ( Blanchard, C; Gaboury, I; Hogan, D; Lemyre, B; Moher, D; Sherlock, R, 2006) |
"Compared with no treatment, pain scores were lower in the morphine and tetracaine-morphine groups during skin preparation (mean difference, -0." | 9.12 | Intravenous morphine and topical tetracaine for treatment of pain in [corrected] neonates undergoing central line placement. ( Lee, C; McNamara, PJ; Parvez, B; Shah, V; Taddio, A; Yip, A, 2006) |
"To determine the effectiveness of lidocaine-adrenaline-tetracaine (LAT) in providing adequate anesthesia for the repair of finger lacerations and to monitor the risk of digital ischemia following application of LAT gel to finger lacerations." | 9.11 | The anesthetic effectiveness of lidocaine-adrenaline-tetracaine gel on finger lacerations. ( Bergholte, J; Brousseau, DC; Hennes, H; Kim, MK; White, NJ, 2004) |
") ketamine sedation administered by nonanesthetist physicians for painful procedures." | 9.11 | Intravenous ketamine sedation for painful oncology procedures. ( Barbour, K; Evans, D; Kobe, J; Montgomery, CJ; Rogers, P; Turnham, L; Vandebeek, C; Wilson, L, 2005) |
"When compared with placebo, tetracaine gel did not significantly reduce pain during or after PDT for small lesions of superficial basal cell carcinoma, Bowen's disease or actinic keratosis." | 9.11 | A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of tetracaine gel (Ametop) for pain relief during topical photodynamic therapy. ( Dawe, RS; Ferguson, J; Holmes, MV; Ibbotson, SH, 2004) |
"Tetracaine gel was not effective for pain relief for PICC insertion in infants." | 9.10 | A randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of tetracaine gel for pain relief from peripherally inserted central catheters in infants. ( Ballantyne, M; Gibbins, S; McNair, C; Stevens, B; Ung, E, 2003) |
"To compare the efficacy of lidocaine 2% gel with amethocaine 1% eyedrops as the sole anesthetic agent for one-stage adjustable suture strabismus surgery." | 9.10 | Comparison of lidocaine 2% gel versus amethocaine as the sole anesthetic agent for strabismus surgery. ( Fan, DS; Lam, DS; Wong, VW; Yip, WW; Yu, CB, 2003) |
"Buffering of tetracaine hydrochloride significantly increases the pain of its instillation in healthy volunteers, suggesting that pain with instillation of ocular anesthetics is not dependent on low pH." | 9.10 | A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of buffered versus plain tetracaine in reducing the pain of topical ophthalmic anesthesia. ( Abel, S; Brizendine, EJ; Howard, JD; Root, T; Rusyniak, DE; Somerville, GG; Weaver, CS, 2003) |
"Topical tetracaine attenuates the pain of infiltration of buffered lidocaine." | 9.08 | Topical tetracaine attenuates the pain of infiltration of buffered lidocaine. ( Asher, SL; Bartfield, JM; Lee, FS; Raccio-Robak, N; Salluzzo, RF, 1996) |
"The efficacy of tetracaine cream versus that of lidocaine-prilocaine cream for the prevention of pain in children undergoing venipuncture was studied." | 9.08 | Tetracaine versus lidocaine-prilocaine for preventing venipuncture-induced pain in children. ( Egberts, AC; Lenderink, AW; Rijnvos, WP; ter Pelkwijk, NJ; van Kan, HJ, 1997) |
"A prospective, randomised, double-masked, placebo-controlled study was carried out on 169 patients undergoing cataract extraction to compare the topical anaesthetic cream amethocaine with EMLA (eutetic mixture of local anaesthetic, lignocaine and prilocaine) and placebo in reducing pain during retrobulbar injection." | 9.07 | A comparison of amethocaine cream with lignocaine-prilocaine cream (EMLA) for reducing pain during retrobulbar injection. ( Joyce, PW; Kirby, J; Sunderraj, P; Villada, J; Watson, A, 1994) |
"Lidocaine-prilocaine and tetracaine appear to be comparable for procedural pain relief when used as recommended." | 8.81 | Lidocaine-prilocaine cream versus tetracaine gel for procedural pain in children. ( Gurguis, MG; Koren, G; Taddio, A, 2002) |
"Lidocaine infiltration was performed if any sign of pain was observed." | 7.71 | [Suture of skin lacerations using LAT gel (lidocaine, adrenaline, tetracaine)]. ( Alió Y Sanz, JL; Chipont Benabent, E; García-Hermosa, P, 2001) |
"In a previous report, the incidence of tourniquet pain was found to be 25% with bupivacaine and 60% with tetracaine (P less than 0." | 7.67 | Decreased incidence of tourniquet pain during spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine. A possible explanation. ( Concepcion, MA; Covino, BG; Datta, S; Flanagan, H; Lambert, DH; Migliozzi, R; Stewart, A, 1988) |
"Tetracaine gel was injected into the urethra 3 min before the procedure in group A, with patients receiving plain lubricant gel in group B at the same time." | 6.90 | Efficacy and Safety of COX-2 Inhibitor Parecoxib for Rigid Cystoscopy-related Pain Management in Male Patients: A Prospective, Randomized and Controlled Study. ( Song, ZS; Sun, JY; Xiao, XY; Zhang, XP, 2019) |
"Pain was scored by their parents and a pediatric nurse." | 6.74 | Tetracaine (ametop) compared to placebo for reducing pain associated with intramuscular injection of palivizumab (synagis). ( Faschoway, GD; Newby, BD; Soukoroff, CI, 2009) |
"Compound lidocaine/prilocaine cream combined with tetracaine may be a more effective approach for preventing coughing and stabilising circulation during extubation following general anaesthesia." | 5.69 | Compound lidocaine/prilocaine cream combined with tetracaine prevents cough caused by extubation after general anaesthesia: a randomised controlled trial. ( Gao, J; Li, T; Li, Y; Wang, M; Zhang, E; Zhang, H; Zhang, L; Zhao, X, 2023) |
"Lidocaine/tetracaine 7%/7% peel cream (L/T-pC) is very effective in reducing pain in several dermatological procedures, such as hair or tattoo laser removal or conventional photodynamic therapy associated pain." | 5.51 | Assessment of clinical efficacy of lidocaine/tetracaine 7%/7% peel cream in fractional microablative laser procedure-associated pain for facial skin aging treatment. A randomized, controlled, single-blind trial. ( Caprari, E; Milani, M; Viciguerra, MT, 2022) |
" Both 27 and 48 demonstrated robust activity in the acute rat monoiodoacetate-induced osteoarthritis model of pain, and subchronic dosing of 48 showed a shift to a lower EC50 over 7 days." | 5.43 | Substituted Indazoles as Nav1.7 Blockers for the Treatment of Pain. ( Daanen, JF; DeGoey, DA; El-Kouhen, OF; Fricano, MM; Frost, JM; Ghoreishi-Haack, N; Gum, RJ; Hsieh, GC; Kort, ME; Lundgaard, GL; Matulenko, MA; Neelands, T; Pai, M; Shi, L; Zhan, C; Zhang, XF, 2016) |
"The 3P-trial has demonstrated that the preventive application of the self-occlusive lidocaine 7%-tetracaine 7% cream is very effective in reducing the procedure-associated pain during MAL-cPDT for the treatment of AK lesions." | 5.34 | Efficacy of lidocaine 7 %, tetracaine 7 % self-occlusive cream in reducing MAL-cPDT-associated pain in subjects with actinic keratosis: A randomized, single-blind, vehicle-controlled trial (The "3P-Trial"). ( Brumana, MB; Milani, M; Puviani, M, 2020) |
" We assessed the efficacy of topical Ametop™ (tetracaine 4%) gel in reducing the pain associated with local anesthetic skin infiltration before neuraxial block in non-laboring women." | 5.22 | A randomized controlled trial comparing Ametop™ with placebo for reducing pain associated with local anesthetic skin infiltration before neuraxial anesthesia in parturients. ( Albert, A; Dube, A; Gunka, V; Kavanagh, T, 2016) |
"Local injection of lidocaine provided clinically similar analgesia compared to the lidocaine/tetracaine patch during I&D of skin abscesses in the ED." | 5.19 | Injectable lidocaine provides similar analgesia compared to transdermal lidocaine/tetracaine patch for the incision and drainage of skin abscesses: a randomized, controlled trial. ( Bourne, CL; Brewer, KL; House, J, 2014) |
"Treating minor lacerations with lidocaine-epinephrine-tetracaine before wound closure with tissue adhesive reduced ratings of pain and increased the proportion of pain-free repairs among children aged 3 months to 17 years." | 5.17 | Efficacy of pain control with topical lidocaine-epinephrine-tetracaine during laceration repair with tissue adhesive in children: a randomized controlled trial. ( Duncan, MJ; Harman, S; Petrcich, W; Ying, Y; Zemek, R, 2013) |
"Sixty patients receiving intravitreal injections over 15 months for macular edema because of diabetes, age-related macular degeneration, or retinal vein occlusion who were randomized into 3 groups to receive 1 of 3 commonly used forms of anesthesia-TetraVisc, proparacaine HCl, or tetracaine HCl-before receiving intravitreal injection were studied." | 5.16 | Factors affecting patients' pain intensity during in office intravitreal injection procedure. ( Rifkin, L; Schaal, S, 2012) |
"Both the lidocaine/tetracaine patch and subcutaneous injection of lidocaine provided comparable pain control during arterial catheter insertion." | 5.16 | Lidocaine/tetracaine patch (Rapydan) for topical anaesthesia before arterial access: a double-blind, randomized trial. ( Dunkler, D; Golescu, A; Grubhofer, G; Hoeferl, M; Hutschala, D; Jaeger, W; Mayer, L; Ruetzler, K; Sessler, DI; Sima, B; You, J, 2012) |
"To determine the effectiveness of lidocaine 2% gel vstetracaine 1% drops in primary pterygium surgery." | 5.14 | Randomised controlled trial on the effectiveness of lidocaine gel vs tetracaine drops as the sole topical anaesthetic agent for primary pterygium surgery. ( Cheng, LL; Lam, DS; Lam, PT; Lau, TT; Leung, GY; Young, AL, 2009) |
"Topical TetraVisc solution was superior to lidocaine 2% gel for pain control in patients undergoing clear corneal phacoemulsification." | 5.14 | Comparative efficacy of topical tetraVisc versus lidocaine gel in cataract surgery. ( Agarwal, S; Chalam, KV; Grover, S; Gupta, SK; Murthy, RK, 2009) |
"Skin infiltration with lidocaine, although brief, can be very stressful, painful, and may perpetuate anxiety." | 5.13 | Brief report: a randomized controlled trial of Synera versus lidocaine for epidural needle insertion in labouring parturients. ( Allen, TK; George, RB; Habib, AS; Muir, HA, 2008) |
"We compare the pain of intravenous (IV) cannulation in pediatric emergency department (ED) patients after applying a topical lidocaine/tetracaine patch versus placebo." | 5.13 | Warm lidocaine/tetracaine patch versus placebo before pediatric intravenous cannulation: a randomized controlled trial. ( Chipley, J; Chisena, EN; Gupta, N; Singer, AJ; Taira, BR, 2008) |
"Compared with no treatment, pain scores were lower in the morphine and tetracaine-morphine groups during skin preparation (mean difference, -0." | 5.12 | Intravenous morphine and topical tetracaine for treatment of pain in [corrected] neonates undergoing central line placement. ( Lee, C; McNamara, PJ; Parvez, B; Shah, V; Taddio, A; Yip, A, 2006) |
"Tetracaine 4% when applied for 30 minutes was not beneficial in decreasing procedural pain associated with a PICC in very small infants." | 5.12 | How effective is tetracaine 4% gel, before a peripherally inserted central catheter, in reducing procedural pain in infants: a randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial [ISRCTN75884221]. ( Blanchard, C; Gaboury, I; Hogan, D; Lemyre, B; Moher, D; Sherlock, R, 2006) |
"Initial validation of ethyl chloride spray in minimising pain for children experiencing venepuncture in comparison to Ametop cream." | 5.12 | Comparison of ethyl chloride spray with topical anaesthetic in children experiencing venepuncture. ( Davies, EH; Molloy, A, 2006) |
"Tetracaine did not significantly decrease procedural pain in infants undergoing a venipuncture, when used in combination with routine sucrose administration." | 5.12 | How effective is tetracaine 4% gel, before a venipuncture, in reducing procedural pain in infants: a randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial. ( Blanchard, C; Gaboury, I; Hogan, DL; Lemyre, B; Moher, D; Sherlock, R, 2007) |
"To determine the effectiveness of lidocaine-adrenaline-tetracaine (LAT) in providing adequate anesthesia for the repair of finger lacerations and to monitor the risk of digital ischemia following application of LAT gel to finger lacerations." | 5.11 | The anesthetic effectiveness of lidocaine-adrenaline-tetracaine gel on finger lacerations. ( Bergholte, J; Brousseau, DC; Hennes, H; Kim, MK; White, NJ, 2004) |
"When compared with placebo, tetracaine gel did not significantly reduce pain during or after PDT for small lesions of superficial basal cell carcinoma, Bowen's disease or actinic keratosis." | 5.11 | A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of tetracaine gel (Ametop) for pain relief during topical photodynamic therapy. ( Dawe, RS; Ferguson, J; Holmes, MV; Ibbotson, SH, 2004) |
", Salt Lake City, UT), a eutectic mixture of lidocaine and tetracaine, for pain relief during venipuncture in children." | 5.11 | A randomized controlled trial to evaluate S-Caine patch for reducing pain associated with vascular access in children. ( Berde, CB; Hannallah, RS; Sethna, NF; Solodiuk, JC; Verghese, ST; Zurakowski, D, 2005) |
") ketamine sedation administered by nonanesthetist physicians for painful procedures." | 5.11 | Intravenous ketamine sedation for painful oncology procedures. ( Barbour, K; Evans, D; Kobe, J; Montgomery, CJ; Rogers, P; Turnham, L; Vandebeek, C; Wilson, L, 2005) |
"To compare the efficacy of lidocaine 2% gel with amethocaine 1% eyedrops as the sole anesthetic agent for one-stage adjustable suture strabismus surgery." | 5.10 | Comparison of lidocaine 2% gel versus amethocaine as the sole anesthetic agent for strabismus surgery. ( Fan, DS; Lam, DS; Wong, VW; Yip, WW; Yu, CB, 2003) |
"The tetracaine patch produced effective pain relief during the venepuncture procedure in both term and pre-term infants." | 5.10 | Randomized trial of novel tetracaine patch to provide local anaesthesia in neonates undergoing venepuncture. ( Halliday, HL; Jones, DS; Long, CP; McCafferty, DF; Sittlington, NM; Woolfson, AD, 2003) |
"Tetracaine gel was not effective for pain relief for PICC insertion in infants." | 5.10 | A randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of tetracaine gel for pain relief from peripherally inserted central catheters in infants. ( Ballantyne, M; Gibbins, S; McNair, C; Stevens, B; Ung, E, 2003) |
"Buffering of tetracaine hydrochloride significantly increases the pain of its instillation in healthy volunteers, suggesting that pain with instillation of ocular anesthetics is not dependent on low pH." | 5.10 | A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of buffered versus plain tetracaine in reducing the pain of topical ophthalmic anesthesia. ( Abel, S; Brizendine, EJ; Howard, JD; Root, T; Rusyniak, DE; Somerville, GG; Weaver, CS, 2003) |
"Lidocaine-prilocaine cream (EMLA) is currently standard therapy to alleviate procedural pain in children." | 5.09 | Relative efficacy of amethocaine gel and lidocaine-prilocaine cream for Port-a-Cath puncture in children. ( Bar-Oz, B; Bishai, R; Freedman, MH; Koren, G; Taddio, A, 1999) |
"The efficacy of lignocaine-prilocaine cream (EMLA) and amethocaine gel (Ametop) in reducing the pain and distress of venepuncture was compared in a single-blind randomized study of 34 children aged 1-14 y." | 5.09 | Comparison of lignocaine-prilocaine cream and amethocaine gel for local analgesia before venepuncture in children. ( Choy, L; Collier, J; Watson, AR, 1999) |
"Topical tetracaine attenuates the pain of infiltration of buffered lidocaine." | 5.08 | Topical tetracaine attenuates the pain of infiltration of buffered lidocaine. ( Asher, SL; Bartfield, JM; Lee, FS; Raccio-Robak, N; Salluzzo, RF, 1996) |
"The efficacy of tetracaine cream versus that of lidocaine-prilocaine cream for the prevention of pain in children undergoing venipuncture was studied." | 5.08 | Tetracaine versus lidocaine-prilocaine for preventing venipuncture-induced pain in children. ( Egberts, AC; Lenderink, AW; Rijnvos, WP; ter Pelkwijk, NJ; van Kan, HJ, 1997) |
"The objective of the study was to compare topical lidocaine adrenaline tetracaine (LAT gel) with injectable buffered lidocaine with epinephrine regarding pain of application or injection and anesthesia effectiveness." | 5.08 | Topical lidocaine adrenaline tetracaine (LAT gel) versus injectable buffered lidocaine for local anesthesia in laceration repair. ( Ernst, AA; Houry, D; Marvez-Valls, E; Mills, T; Minvielle, L; Nick, TG, 1997) |
"A prospective, randomised, double-masked, placebo-controlled study was carried out on 169 patients undergoing cataract extraction to compare the topical anaesthetic cream amethocaine with EMLA (eutetic mixture of local anaesthetic, lignocaine and prilocaine) and placebo in reducing pain during retrobulbar injection." | 5.07 | A comparison of amethocaine cream with lignocaine-prilocaine cream (EMLA) for reducing pain during retrobulbar injection. ( Joyce, PW; Kirby, J; Sunderraj, P; Villada, J; Watson, A, 1994) |
" The weighted mean difference in 100-mm visual analogue scale pain scores favored topical tetracaine over EMLA (-8." | 4.82 | Topical anesthetics for dermal instrumentation: a systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. ( Carr, DB; Eidelman, A; Lau, J; Weiss, JM, 2005) |
"A topical formulation of the ester-type local anesthetic amethocaine (tetracaine) [Ametop ] is currently available for reducing pain from cutaneous procedures such as venipuncture." | 4.82 | A critical review of the topical local anesthetic amethocaine (Ametop) for pediatric pain. ( Koren, G; Lyszkiewicz, DA; O'Brien, L; Taddio, A, 2005) |
"Lidocaine-prilocaine and tetracaine appear to be comparable for procedural pain relief when used as recommended." | 4.81 | Lidocaine-prilocaine cream versus tetracaine gel for procedural pain in children. ( Gurguis, MG; Koren, G; Taddio, A, 2002) |
" Suturing is usually accompanied by perilesional administration of lidocaine, a local anaesthetic drug that improves pain tolerance." | 3.91 | Stability of a novel Lidocaine, Adrenaline and Tetracaine sterile thermosensitive gel: A ready-to-use formulation. ( Addobbati, R; Barbi, E; Loiacono, S; Maestro, A; Mamolo, MG; Maximova, N; Volpato, C; Zampieri, D; Zanon, D, 2019) |
" In another experiment, the preparation was tested in a further 22 subjects for its pain-relieving effect during a standard palatal injection, and compared with 18% benzocaine/2% tetracaine gel." | 3.78 | Relief of palatal injection pain by liposome-encapsulated 2% lignocaine prepared by ultrasonic dental scaler. ( Paphangkorakit, J; Priprem, A; Sangsirinakagul, C, 2012) |
" Injection of subconjunctival cefuroxime can be very painful, especially after phacoemulsification under topical anesthesia." | 3.71 | Topical anesthesia for phacoemulsification and painless subconjunctival antibiotic injection. ( Dinakaran, S; Kayarkar, VV, 2001) |
"Lidocaine infiltration was performed if any sign of pain was observed." | 3.71 | [Suture of skin lacerations using LAT gel (lidocaine, adrenaline, tetracaine)]. ( Alió Y Sanz, JL; Chipont Benabent, E; García-Hermosa, P, 2001) |
"In a previous report, the incidence of tourniquet pain was found to be 25% with bupivacaine and 60% with tetracaine (P less than 0." | 3.67 | Decreased incidence of tourniquet pain during spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine. A possible explanation. ( Concepcion, MA; Covino, BG; Datta, S; Flanagan, H; Lambert, DH; Migliozzi, R; Stewart, A, 1988) |
"Tetracaine gel was injected into the urethra 3 min before the procedure in group A, with patients receiving plain lubricant gel in group B at the same time." | 2.90 | Efficacy and Safety of COX-2 Inhibitor Parecoxib for Rigid Cystoscopy-related Pain Management in Male Patients: A Prospective, Randomized and Controlled Study. ( Song, ZS; Sun, JY; Xiao, XY; Zhang, XP, 2019) |
" Methemoglobin and oxygen saturation levels did not change compared with baseline after dosing with either treatment." | 2.90 | A Proof-of-concept Study Using Quantitative Sensory Threshold Analysis to Compare Two Intraoral Topical Anesthetics. ( Cooper, SA; Doyle, G; Farrar, JT; Giannakopoulos, H; Hersh, EV; Hutcheson, MC; Lesavoy, B; Mousavian, M; Secreto, S; Wang, P; Wang, S, 2019) |
"Pain is common in men undergoing rigid cystoscopy." | 2.82 | Dorsal penile nerve block for rigid cystoscopy in men: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. ( Du, GZ; Hu, AM; Liu, J; Qiu, Y, 2016) |
"Pain was scored by their parents and a pediatric nurse." | 2.74 | Tetracaine (ametop) compared to placebo for reducing pain associated with intramuscular injection of palivizumab (synagis). ( Faschoway, GD; Newby, BD; Soukoroff, CI, 2009) |
"However, different conclusions may be reached about the effectiveness of analgesic interventions depending on the rater." | 2.74 | Reliability and validity of observer ratings of pain using the visual analog scale (VAS) in infants undergoing immunization injections. ( Goldbach, M; Ipp, M; Koren, G; O'Brien, L; Stephens, D; Taddio, A, 2009) |
" Immediately following the procedure, the subjects, the investigator, and an independent observer rated pain intensity and adverse events were recorded." | 2.71 | Self-warming lidocaine/tetracaine patch effectively and safely induces local anesthesia during minor dermatologic procedures. ( Berman, B; de Araujo, T; Flores, J; Pariser, D; Pariser, R; Ramirez, CC, 2005) |
"Pain was assessed using a validated adaptation of the neonatal facial coding system." | 2.69 | Does topical amethocaine gel reduce the pain of venepuncture in newborn infants? A randomised double blind controlled trial. ( Jain, A; Rutter, N, 2000) |
"If untreated, the pain of circumcision causes both short and long term changes in infant behaviours." | 2.41 | Pain management for neonatal circumcision. ( Taddio, A, 2001) |
" Physicians must adhere to recommendations to avoid mucous membrane contact and ensure appropriate dosing with these agents." | 2.40 | Topical anesthesia. ( Keyes, PD; Rizos, J; Tallon, JM, 1998) |
"Although treating pain is associated with improved quality of life, most respondents did not support TA use in the ED." | 1.91 | Topical Anesthetics for Analgesia in Acute Corneal Abrasion: Eye Care Providers Survey. ( Anderson-Quiñones, C; Asbell, P; Tolley, EA; Vestal, R; Zhu, R, 2023) |
" Both 27 and 48 demonstrated robust activity in the acute rat monoiodoacetate-induced osteoarthritis model of pain, and subchronic dosing of 48 showed a shift to a lower EC50 over 7 days." | 1.43 | Substituted Indazoles as Nav1.7 Blockers for the Treatment of Pain. ( Daanen, JF; DeGoey, DA; El-Kouhen, OF; Fricano, MM; Frost, JM; Ghoreishi-Haack, N; Gum, RJ; Hsieh, GC; Kort, ME; Lundgaard, GL; Matulenko, MA; Neelands, T; Pai, M; Shi, L; Zhan, C; Zhang, XF, 2016) |
"Immunization pain is a global public health issue." | 1.34 | Routine immunization practices: use of topical anesthetics and oral analgesics. ( Ipp, M; Manley, J; Potash, L; Sgro, M; Shah, V; Taddio, A, 2007) |
"Tetracaine alone was effective in providing tympanic membrane anesthesia in 95% of myringotomy without a tube (220 ears) and in 93% of myringotomy with a tube (139 ears)." | 1.31 | Tetracaine topical anesthesia for myringotomy. ( Hoffman, RA; Li, CL, 2001) |
"If emergency physicians would treat the pain of their patients as they would want it to be treated in themselves or their families, then we will have made great strides as a specialty in mastering the art and science of analgesia." | 1.27 | Pain management in the child. ( Paris, PM, 1987) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 22 (13.92) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 34 (21.52) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 62 (39.24) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 32 (20.25) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 8 (5.06) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Chowdhury, S | 1 |
Chafeev, M | 1 |
Liu, S | 1 |
Sun, J | 1 |
Raina, V | 1 |
Chui, R | 1 |
Young, W | 1 |
Kwan, R | 1 |
Fu, J | 1 |
Cadieux, JA | 1 |
Bregman, H | 1 |
Berry, L | 1 |
Buchanan, JL | 1 |
Chen, A | 1 |
Du, B | 1 |
Feric, E | 1 |
Hierl, M | 1 |
Huang, L | 1 |
Immke, D | 1 |
Janosky, B | 1 |
Johnson, D | 1 |
Li, X | 1 |
Ligutti, J | 1 |
Liu, D | 1 |
Malmberg, A | 1 |
Matson, D | 1 |
McDermott, J | 1 |
Miu, P | 1 |
Nguyen, HN | 1 |
Patel, VF | 1 |
Waldon, D | 1 |
Wilenkin, B | 1 |
Zheng, XM | 1 |
Zou, A | 1 |
McDonough, SI | 1 |
DiMauro, EF | 1 |
Macsari, I | 1 |
Besidski, Y | 1 |
Csjernyik, G | 1 |
Nilsson, LI | 1 |
Sandberg, L | 1 |
Yngve, U | 1 |
Ahlin, K | 1 |
Bueters, T | 1 |
Eriksson, AB | 1 |
Lund, PE | 1 |
Venyike, E | 1 |
Oerther, S | 1 |
Hygge Blakeman, K | 1 |
Luo, L | 1 |
Arvidsson, PI | 1 |
Frost, JM | 1 |
DeGoey, DA | 2 |
Shi, L | 1 |
Gum, RJ | 2 |
Fricano, MM | 2 |
Lundgaard, GL | 2 |
El-Kouhen, OF | 2 |
Hsieh, GC | 1 |
Neelands, T | 2 |
Matulenko, MA | 2 |
Daanen, JF | 1 |
Pai, M | 2 |
Ghoreishi-Haack, N | 2 |
Zhan, C | 2 |
Zhang, XF | 2 |
Kort, ME | 2 |
Teng, M | 1 |
Wu, W | 1 |
Li, Z | 1 |
Yang, G | 1 |
Qin, J | 1 |
Wang, Y | 1 |
Hu, Z | 1 |
Dong, H | 1 |
Hou, L | 1 |
Hu, G | 1 |
Shen, L | 1 |
Zhang, Y | 1 |
Li, J | 1 |
Chen, S | 1 |
Tian, J | 1 |
Ye, L | 1 |
Zhang, J | 1 |
Wang, H | 1 |
Patel, MV | 1 |
Peltier, HM | 1 |
Koenig, JR | 1 |
C Scanio, MJ | 1 |
Hudzik, T | 1 |
Gintant, G | 1 |
Martin, R | 1 |
McGaraughty, S | 1 |
Xu, J | 1 |
Bow, D | 1 |
Kalvass, JC | 1 |
Kym, PR | 1 |
Jimenez-Cauhe, J | 1 |
Boixeda, P | 1 |
Cornejo, P | 1 |
Fernandez, S | 1 |
Vitale, M | 1 |
Serra, C | 1 |
Scribner-O'Pray, M | 1 |
Taylor, ED | 1 |
Krause, E | 1 |
Nickel, A | 1 |
Bergmann, KR | 1 |
Zhang, E | 1 |
Zhao, X | 1 |
Li, T | 2 |
Wang, M | 1 |
Gao, J | 1 |
Zhang, H | 1 |
Li, Y | 1 |
Zhang, L | 1 |
Anderson-Quiñones, C | 1 |
Zhu, R | 1 |
Tolley, EA | 1 |
Vestal, R | 1 |
Asbell, P | 1 |
Brumana, MB | 1 |
Milani, M | 2 |
Puviani, M | 1 |
Brignardello-Petersen, R | 1 |
Caprari, E | 1 |
Viciguerra, MT | 1 |
Boyd, BM | 1 |
Snyder, R | 1 |
Lambert, C | 1 |
Goldman, RD | 1 |
Hersh, EV | 1 |
Secreto, S | 1 |
Wang, S | 1 |
Giannakopoulos, H | 1 |
Mousavian, M | 1 |
Lesavoy, B | 1 |
Hutcheson, MC | 1 |
Farrar, JT | 1 |
Wang, P | 1 |
Doyle, G | 1 |
Cooper, SA | 1 |
Sun, JY | 1 |
Song, ZS | 1 |
Zhang, XP | 1 |
Xiao, XY | 1 |
Zanon, D | 2 |
Volpato, C | 1 |
Addobbati, R | 1 |
Loiacono, S | 1 |
Maestro, A | 1 |
Barbi, E | 2 |
Maximova, N | 1 |
Mamolo, MG | 1 |
Zampieri, D | 1 |
Harman, S | 1 |
Zemek, R | 1 |
Duncan, MJ | 1 |
Ying, Y | 1 |
Petrcich, W | 1 |
Nalamachu, S | 1 |
Nalamasu, R | 1 |
Jenkins, J | 1 |
Marriott, T | 1 |
Berant, R | 1 |
Scolnik, D | 1 |
Huang, P | 1 |
Gopal, L | 1 |
Kumar, CM | 1 |
Lander, JA | 2 |
Weltman, BJ | 2 |
So, SS | 2 |
Girard, N | 1 |
Bourne, CL | 1 |
Brewer, KL | 1 |
House, J | 1 |
Lamberton, JA | 1 |
Oesterle, LJ | 1 |
Shellhart, WC | 1 |
Newman, SM | 1 |
Harrell, RE | 1 |
Tilliss, T | 1 |
Singh, N | 1 |
Carey, CM | 1 |
Qiu, Y | 1 |
Hu, AM | 1 |
Liu, J | 1 |
Du, GZ | 1 |
Kavanagh, T | 1 |
Dube, A | 1 |
Albert, A | 1 |
Gunka, V | 1 |
Piao, LH | 1 |
Fujita, T | 1 |
Yu, T | 1 |
Kumamoto, E | 1 |
Cozzi, G | 1 |
Borrometi, F | 1 |
Benini, F | 1 |
Neri, E | 1 |
Rusalen, F | 1 |
Celentano, L | 1 |
Schreiber, S | 1 |
Ronfani, L | 1 |
Foster, JP | 1 |
Taylor, C | 1 |
Spence, K | 1 |
Nichani, J | 1 |
Camilleri, AE | 1 |
Broomfield, S | 1 |
Saeed, S | 1 |
Martinson, AJ | 1 |
Leffingwell, FE | 1 |
MOORE, DC | 2 |
Young, AL | 1 |
Leung, GY | 1 |
Cheng, LL | 1 |
Lau, TT | 1 |
Lam, PT | 1 |
Lam, DS | 3 |
Sawyer, J | 1 |
Febbraro, S | 1 |
Masud, S | 1 |
Ashburn, MA | 1 |
Campbell, JC | 1 |
Soltani, AE | 1 |
Ganji, M | 1 |
Goodarzi, M | 1 |
Moghimi, S | 1 |
Kapellou, O | 2 |
Newbury, C | 1 |
Herd, DW | 1 |
Chalam, KV | 1 |
Murthy, RK | 1 |
Agarwal, S | 1 |
Gupta, SK | 1 |
Grover, S | 1 |
Luo, DQ | 1 |
Yang, W | 1 |
Taddio, A | 9 |
O'Brien, L | 3 |
Ipp, M | 3 |
Stephens, D | 1 |
Goldbach, M | 2 |
Koren, G | 5 |
Reznik, DS | 1 |
Jeske, AH | 1 |
Chen, JW | 1 |
English, J | 1 |
Newby, BD | 1 |
Faschoway, GD | 1 |
Soukoroff, CI | 1 |
Wang, DQ | 1 |
Soltesz, S | 1 |
Dittrich, K | 1 |
Teschendorf, P | 1 |
Fuss, I | 1 |
Molter, G | 1 |
Dang, D | 1 |
Robinson, PC | 1 |
Winnicki, S | 1 |
Jersmann, HP | 1 |
Rifkin, L | 1 |
Schaal, S | 1 |
Ravishankar, N | 1 |
Elliot, SC | 1 |
Beardow, Z | 1 |
Mallick, A | 1 |
Paphangkorakit, J | 1 |
Sangsirinakagul, C | 1 |
Priprem, A | 1 |
Ruetzler, K | 1 |
Sima, B | 1 |
Mayer, L | 1 |
Golescu, A | 1 |
Dunkler, D | 1 |
Jaeger, W | 1 |
Hoeferl, M | 1 |
You, J | 1 |
Sessler, DI | 1 |
Grubhofer, G | 1 |
Hutschala, D | 1 |
Zhu, ZH | 1 |
Zheng, J | 1 |
Ying, LY | 1 |
Zhu, BW | 1 |
Qian, J | 1 |
Ma, ZX | 1 |
Tran, NQ | 1 |
Pretto, JJ | 1 |
Worsnop, CJ | 1 |
Mayevsky, A | 1 |
Barbiro-Michaely, E | 1 |
Ligeti, L | 1 |
MacLaughlin, AC | 1 |
Igarashi, H | 1 |
Sato, S | 1 |
Shiraishi, Y | 1 |
Weaver, CS | 1 |
Rusyniak, DE | 1 |
Brizendine, EJ | 1 |
Abel, S | 1 |
Somerville, GG | 1 |
Howard, JD | 1 |
Root, T | 1 |
Raymond, P | 1 |
Yu, CB | 1 |
Wong, VW | 1 |
Fan, DS | 1 |
Yip, WW | 1 |
Doshi, SN | 1 |
Friedman, PM | 2 |
Marquez, DK | 1 |
Goldberg, LH | 1 |
Chen, JZ | 2 |
Alexiades-Armenakas, MR | 1 |
Bernstein, LJ | 2 |
Jacobson, LG | 2 |
Geronemus, RG | 2 |
WIEDLING, S | 1 |
TEGNER, C | 1 |
KOMROWER, GM | 1 |
THORNTON, JA | 1 |
Long, CP | 1 |
McCafferty, DF | 3 |
Sittlington, NM | 1 |
Halliday, HL | 1 |
Woolfson, AD | 3 |
Jones, DS | 1 |
Aaron, SD | 1 |
Vandemheen, KL | 1 |
Naftel, SA | 1 |
Lewis, MJ | 1 |
Rodger, MA | 1 |
Ballantyne, M | 1 |
McNair, C | 1 |
Ung, E | 1 |
Gibbins, S | 1 |
Stevens, B | 1 |
Rogers, TL | 1 |
Ostrow, CL | 1 |
Holmes, MV | 1 |
Dawe, RS | 1 |
Ferguson, J | 1 |
Ibbotson, SH | 1 |
Zempsky, WT | 1 |
Cravero, JP | 1 |
White, NJ | 1 |
Kim, MK | 1 |
Brousseau, DC | 1 |
Bergholte, J | 1 |
Hennes, H | 1 |
Evans, D | 1 |
Turnham, L | 1 |
Barbour, K | 1 |
Kobe, J | 1 |
Wilson, L | 1 |
Vandebeek, C | 1 |
Montgomery, CJ | 1 |
Rogers, P | 1 |
Sethna, NF | 1 |
Verghese, ST | 1 |
Hannallah, RS | 1 |
Solodiuk, JC | 1 |
Zurakowski, D | 1 |
Berde, CB | 1 |
Berman, B | 1 |
Flores, J | 1 |
Pariser, D | 1 |
Pariser, R | 1 |
de Araujo, T | 1 |
Ramirez, CC | 1 |
Lyszkiewicz, DA | 1 |
Bakus, AD | 1 |
Garden, JM | 1 |
Yaghmai, D | 1 |
Eidelman, A | 1 |
Weiss, JM | 1 |
Lau, J | 1 |
Carr, DB | 1 |
Liu, Y | 1 |
Ye, X | 1 |
Feng, X | 1 |
Zhou, G | 1 |
Rong, Z | 1 |
Fang, C | 1 |
Chen, H | 1 |
Li, SF | 1 |
Flannigan, K | 1 |
Lupow, J | 1 |
Lee, C | 1 |
Yip, A | 1 |
Parvez, B | 1 |
McNamara, PJ | 1 |
Shah, V | 2 |
Changez, M | 2 |
Chander, J | 1 |
Dinda, AK | 1 |
Liu, DT | 1 |
Lee, VY | 1 |
Chan, WM | 1 |
Davies, EH | 1 |
Molloy, A | 1 |
O'Riordan, JM | 1 |
Fitzgerald, E | 1 |
Gowing, C | 1 |
O'Grady, H | 1 |
Feeley, TM | 1 |
Tierney, S | 1 |
Lemyre, B | 2 |
Sherlock, R | 2 |
Hogan, D | 1 |
Gaboury, I | 2 |
Blanchard, C | 2 |
Moher, D | 2 |
Proudfoot, C | 1 |
Gamble, C | 1 |
Llewellyn, N | 1 |
Liley, A | 1 |
Cropper, J | 1 |
Hutchison, L | 1 |
Hogan, DL | 1 |
Curry, SE | 1 |
Finkel, JC | 1 |
Manley, J | 1 |
Potash, L | 1 |
Sgro, M | 1 |
George, RB | 1 |
Habib, AS | 1 |
Allen, TK | 1 |
Muir, HA | 1 |
Shah, VS | 1 |
Hancock, R | 1 |
Shah, P | 1 |
Ohlsson, A | 1 |
Singer, AJ | 1 |
Taira, BR | 1 |
Chisena, EN | 1 |
Gupta, N | 1 |
Chipley, J | 1 |
Lawson, RA | 1 |
Smart, NG | 1 |
Gudgeon, AC | 1 |
Morton, NS | 1 |
Noorily, AD | 1 |
Otto, RA | 1 |
Noorily, SH | 1 |
Joyce, PW | 1 |
Sunderraj, P | 1 |
Villada, J | 1 |
Kirby, J | 1 |
Watson, A | 1 |
Schilling, CG | 1 |
Bank, DE | 1 |
Borchert, BA | 1 |
Klatzko, MD | 1 |
Uden, DL | 1 |
Ernst, AA | 2 |
Marvez-Valls, E | 2 |
Nick, TG | 2 |
Weiss, SJ | 1 |
Molodecka, J | 1 |
Stenhouse, C | 1 |
Jones, JM | 1 |
Tomlinson, A | 1 |
Smith, GA | 3 |
Strausbaugh, SD | 3 |
Harbeck-Weber, C | 3 |
Shields, BJ | 3 |
Powers, JD | 3 |
Hackenberg, D | 1 |
Sumi, M | 1 |
Sakura, S | 1 |
Kosaka, Y | 1 |
Claoué, C | 1 |
Callear, AB | 1 |
Kawano, T | 1 |
Shiraishi, S | 1 |
Nakamura, T | 1 |
Yokoo, H | 1 |
Takasaki, M | 1 |
Bartfield, JM | 1 |
Lee, FS | 1 |
Raccio-Robak, N | 1 |
Salluzzo, RF | 1 |
Asher, SL | 1 |
Wang, GK | 1 |
Vladimirov, M | 1 |
Quan, C | 1 |
Mok, WM | 1 |
Thalhammer, JG | 1 |
Anthony, DC | 1 |
van Kan, HJ | 1 |
Egberts, AC | 1 |
Rijnvos, WP | 1 |
ter Pelkwijk, NJ | 1 |
Lenderink, AW | 1 |
Handley, J | 1 |
Allen, G | 1 |
Hung, OR | 1 |
Comeau, L | 1 |
Riley, MR | 1 |
Tan, S | 1 |
Whynot, S | 1 |
Mezei, M | 1 |
Mills, T | 1 |
Minvielle, L | 1 |
Houry, D | 1 |
Cohen, DM | 2 |
Li, HS | 1 |
Monhemius, R | 1 |
Simpson, BA | 1 |
Roberts, MH | 3 |
Barrett, T | 1 |
Keyes, PD | 1 |
Tallon, JM | 1 |
Rizos, J | 1 |
Shafi, T | 1 |
Koay, P | 1 |
Nuseir, K | 1 |
Heidenreich, BA | 1 |
Proudfit, HK | 1 |
Browne, J | 1 |
Raza, A | 1 |
Awad, I | 1 |
Tan, B | 1 |
McAdoo, J | 1 |
Shorten, G | 1 |
Bishai, R | 1 |
Bar-Oz, B | 1 |
Freedman, MH | 1 |
Choy, L | 1 |
Collier, J | 1 |
Watson, AR | 1 |
Gillow, T | 1 |
Scotcher, SM | 1 |
Deutsch, J | 1 |
While, A | 1 |
Quinlan, MP | 1 |
Wolfe, R | 1 |
Carlin, JB | 1 |
Varshney, M | 1 |
Johnson, ME | 1 |
Jain, A | 1 |
Rutter, N | 1 |
Kayarkar, VV | 1 |
Dinakaran, S | 1 |
Speirs, AF | 1 |
Taylor, KH | 1 |
Joanes, DN | 1 |
Girdler, NM | 1 |
Moore, J | 1 |
Maehara, Y | 1 |
Kusunoki, S | 1 |
Kawamoto, M | 1 |
Yuge, O | 1 |
Okida, M | 1 |
Kinoshita, H | 1 |
Nakagawa, I | 1 |
Nakao, M | 1 |
Sasaki, H | 1 |
Chipont Benabent, E | 1 |
García-Hermosa, P | 1 |
Alió Y Sanz, JL | 1 |
Hoffman, RA | 1 |
Li, CL | 1 |
Nott, MR | 1 |
Gurguis, MG | 1 |
Gill, CJ | 1 |
Orr, DL | 1 |
Foldvari, M | 1 |
Moreland, A | 1 |
Smith, T | 1 |
Vickers, ER | 1 |
Punnia-Moorthy, A | 1 |
Terenzi, MG | 1 |
Rees, H | 1 |
Neels, JT | 1 |
Wong, S | 1 |
Hart, LL | 1 |
Boston, V | 1 |
Gibbons, JJ | 1 |
Concepcion, MA | 2 |
Lambert, DH | 3 |
Welch, KA | 1 |
Covino, BG | 2 |
Stewart, A | 1 |
Datta, S | 1 |
Flanagan, H | 1 |
Migliozzi, R | 1 |
Llewelyn, MB | 1 |
Azami, J | 1 |
Paris, PM | 1 |
Urmey, WF | 1 |
Vagner, EA | 1 |
Zaugol'nikov, VS | 1 |
Plaksin, SA | 1 |
Torbin, VV | 1 |
Matveev, AT | 1 |
Rocco, AG | 1 |
Raymond, SA | 1 |
Murray, E | 1 |
Dhingra, U | 1 |
Freiberger, D | 1 |
Kobal, G | 1 |
Ewers, HJ | 1 |
Black, RG | 1 |
Bonica, JJ | 2 |
Haler, D | 1 |
Akamatsu, TJ | 1 |
Watt, MJ | 1 |
Akhtar, M | 1 |
Atkinson, RS | 1 |
Aberg, G | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A Double-blind, Cross-over, Incomplete Factorial Study to Assess the Local Anesthetic Efficacy and Safety of CTY-5339 Anesthetic Spray (CTY-5339A) When Applied to the Gingival Mucosal Tissue in Normal Volunteers[NCT03233737] | Phase 2 | 75 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2017-06-15 | Completed | ||
Comparison of 2 Application Techniques for LET (Lidocaine 4%; Epinephrine 0.1%; Tetracaine 0.5%) Gel Used Prior to Simple Laceration Repair[NCT04536493] | Phase 4 | 48 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2019-06-19 | Completed | ||
A Randomized Trial of Intranasal Fentanyl Versus Placebo as an Adjunct to Lidocaine Infiltration in Adults Undergoing Abscess Incision and Drainage in the Emergency[NCT03872700] | Phase 3 | 49 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2019-08-01 | Completed | ||
Efficacy of Combined Ibuprofen and Acetaminophen Therapy Versus Ibuprofen Alone Versus Placebo Alone for Pain of Initial Orthodontic Wire Insertion: a Randomized Controlled Trial[NCT04059172] | Early Phase 1 | 375 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2019-12-10 | Recruiting | ||
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block for Rigid Cystoscopy in Men: a Single-center, Randomized, Double-blind and Placebo-controlled Study[NCT02502487] | 258 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-06-30 | Completed | |||
A New Method for Pain Relief, Intravenous Cannulation in Pediatric Patients; A Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial.[NCT04246255] | Phase 4 | 80 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2020-02-03 | Completed | ||
Distraction in the Emergency Using Virtual Reality for Intravenous Needs in Children to Improve Comfort (DEVINCI): A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial[NCT03750578] | 62 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2018-12-17 | Completed | |||
A Randomized Controlled Study of Compound Lidocaine Cream to Prevent Postoperative Agitation in Patients With Endotracheal Intubation for General Anesthesia[NCT02017392] | Phase 4 | 2,000 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2013-12-31 | Not yet recruiting | ||
Effect of Synera in Reducing Pain Associated With Venipuncture and Superficial Dermatologic Procedures[NCT01744197] | Phase 2 | 61 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2013-01-31 | Completed | ||
Clinical Comparison of Two Anesthetic Preparations for Intravitreal Injection[NCT01087489] | 53 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2010-04-30 | Completed | |||
Comparison Between 2% Lidocaine Gel and 5% Tetracaine Eye Drop as Topical Anesthesia in Phacoemulsification[NCT03143452] | 72 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2016-12-01 | Completed | |||
Topical Anesthesia of Tetracaine Hydrochloride Jelly on Cervix After Hysteroscopic Uterine Stent Insertion[NCT02863679] | 84 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2016-05-31 | Completed | |||
Comparing The Effectiveness of Tracing Image and Coloring for Kids-Book With Two Active Distractions on Pain and Fear in Children During Venipuncture: A Randomized Controlled Trial[NCT04983303] | 150 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2021-08-01 | Not yet recruiting | |||
Comparing The Effectiveness of Tracing Image and Coloring for Kids-Book With Two Passive Distractions on Pain and Fear in Children During Peripheral Intravenous Cannulation: A Randomized Controlled Trial[NCT04977323] | 150 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2021-07-28 | Not yet recruiting | |||
A Comparison of Amethocaine Creams Versus Liposomal Lidocaine Cream as Pain Reliever Prior to Venipuncture in Children at the Paediatric Emergency Department.[NCT00353002] | 0 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2006-07-31 | Withdrawn | |||
A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Evaluate Pain and Anxiety During Venipuncture in Pediatric Patients With or Without Pre-treatment by a Topical Anesthetic[NCT00676364] | Phase 4 | 114 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2003-03-31 | Completed | ||
Randomized Controlled Trial of IN Midazolam vs IN Dexmedetomidine vs IN Ketamine Evaluating Length of Stay After Medication Administration and Anxiolysis During Minimal Procedures in Pediatric Population in Pediatric Emergency Department[NCT05934669] | Phase 4 | 90 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2024-01-31 | Not yet recruiting | ||
Prospective Evaluation of Topical Analgesia Using a Lidocaine/Prilocaine Cream for Laceration Repair in the Emergency Department[NCT03071601] | Phase 4 | 132 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2017-12-01 | Completed | ||
Tetracaine (Ametop®) Compared to Placebo for Reducing Pain Associated With Intramuscular Injection of Palivizumab (Synagis®) - A Pilot Study[NCT00484393] | Phase 4 | 7 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2007-11-30 | Completed | ||
The Efficacy of the Eutectic Mixture of Local Anesthetics (EMLA) Cream Versus the Synera Patch for Pain Reduction During Venipuncture in Children[NCT00530803] | Phase 2 | 100 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2007-06-30 | Completed | ||
Systemic Analgesia and Local Anaesthesia for Percutaneous Venous Catheter Placement in Preterm Neonates[NCT00213200] | Phase 3 | 108 participants | Interventional | 2003-07-31 | Completed | ||
Topical Analgesia Before Inhalational Anaesthesia: A Retrospective Observational Study[NCT04959409] | 500 participants (Actual) | Observational | 2020-08-01 | Completed | |||
Does Rapydan Influence Routine Clinical Chemistry and Hematology Measurements?[NCT00765934] | 25 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2009-11-30 | Completed | |||
Effective Analgesia Using the 5 S's During Routine Immunizations at 2 and 4 Months[NCT01368861] | 230 participants (Actual) | Observational | 2010-06-30 | Completed | |||
Childhood Immunization: Reducing Immunization Distress (RID) Using Multi-Modal Distraction[NCT01379885] | 77 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2011-06-30 | Terminated (stopped due to Estimated sample size not achieved due to decline in number of eligible patients and difficulty recruiting and retaining research staff.) | |||
Local Anaesthesia [Topical Amethocaine Gel (Ametop)] for Intramuscular Injection in Term Neonates: A Randomized Controlled Trial.[NCT00267111] | Phase 2 | 110 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2003-07-31 | Completed | ||
Cefazolin-Lidocaine Solution for Reducing Pain Associated With Subconjunctival Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Vitreo-Retinal Surgery[NCT02324166] | Phase 4 | 54 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2015-01-31 | Not yet recruiting | ||
Comparing Topical Tetracaine Drops to Topical Focal Phenol for Local Anesthesia During Intratympanic Steroid Injection[NCT04794842] | Early Phase 1 | 80 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2021-08-01 | Active, not recruiting | ||
Efficacy of Ethyl Chloride Topical Anesthesia Application on the Pain Perception During Intra-oral Injections in Children in Comparison to Benzocaine Gel- a Single-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.[NCT06011005] | 42 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2023-09-01 | Recruiting | |||
The Effect of Sonophoresis on Topical Anesthesia: a Clinical Trial[NCT01283490] | Phase 1 | 50 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2011-02-28 | Completed | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
"The duration of effect, was defined as the time from onset to treatment failure, as measured by QST Heat score. QST Heat scores were the temperature where the sensation of a heat stimuli was felt: ranging from 35 ºC to a maximum of 50.5 ºC with intervals of 0.5 ºC, at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point. The QST Heat-based Duration of effect was calculated by the length of time in minutes from onset of anesthesia to the absence of anesthesia where Onset of anesthesia was defined by PPT unless specific QST thresholds were not met. After Onset had been established, absence of analgesia or offset was the first of two time points with consecutive occurrences of regression or absence of analgesia. Reports of QST heat pain temperature by ≥ 3 °C of the Baseline QST indicated analgesia; while a report of similar (<3 °C) than Baseline indicated regression or absence of analgesia. Stage I outcome." (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Up to one hour post-application
Intervention | minutes (Mean) |
---|---|
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-A | 42.5 |
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-CB | 6.1 |
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-P | 5 |
"The duration of effect, was defined as the length of time in minutes from onset of anesthesia to the absence of anesthesia.Onset was the time point at which the PPT average pain score was less than the Baseline PPT average score by any amount. Also, in 10 minutes or less, the subject must have had a lower PPT average pain score of ≥ 1 unit than Baseline. Absence of anesthesia was defined as follows: After Onset had been established, absence was the first of two time points with consecutive occurrences of regression of absence of analgesia. Reports of less pain by ≥1 unit than Baseline indicated analgesia; while a report of similar (< 1 unit) or more pain than Baseline indicated regression or absence of analgesia. The minimum onset time was 1 minute. PPT scores were assessed using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) Numerical Rating Scale at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.~Stage I outcome." (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Up to one hour post-application
Intervention | minutes (Mean) |
---|---|
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-A | 49.2 |
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-CB | 21.3 |
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-P | 25.2 |
"Response at a time point is defined as having the PPT average pain score of ≤2. PPT scores were assessed using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) Numerical Rating Scale at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.~Stage I outcome." (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Up to one hour post-application
Intervention | minutes (Mean) |
---|---|
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-A | 14.5 |
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-CB | 2.9 |
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-P | 0.2 |
"Onset of anesthesia was defined by Pin Prick Test (PPT) unless specific QST thresholds were not met.~If the PPT Onset was 5 minutes or less, then QST must have been greater than the Baseline QST temperature at 5 minutes by any amount and QST must have been ≥ 3 °C of the Baseline QST at 5 or 10 minutes.~If the PPT Onset was 10 minutes, then QST must have been ≥ 3 °C of the Baseline QST temperature at 10 minutes.~If PPT did not achieve Onset, then QST alone could have achieved onset at either 5 or 10 minutes if QST was greater than the Baseline QST temperature at 5 or 10 minutes by any amount and the QST was ≥ 3 °C of the Baseline QST at 5 or 10 minutes.~QST Heat scores were the temperature where the sensation of a heat stimuli was felt: ranging from 35 ºC to a maximum of 50.5 ºC with intervals of 0.5 ºC, at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.~Stage I outcome." (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Up to one hour post-application
Intervention | minutes (Mean) |
---|---|
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-A | 2.0 |
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-CB | 0.4 |
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-P | 0.8 |
"Onset of anesthesia was the time point at which the PPT average pain score was less than the Baseline PPT average score by any amount. Also, in 10 minutes or less, the subject must have had a lower PPT average pain score of ≥ 1 unit than the Baseline PPT. Onset was expected to be between 1 and 5 minutes. PPT scores were assessed using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) Numerical Rating Scale at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.~Stage I outcome." (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Up to one hour post-application
Intervention | minutes (Mean) |
---|---|
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-A | 1.3 |
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-CB | 1.2 |
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-P | 2.8 |
"QST Heat scores were the temperature where the sensation of a heat stimuli was felt: ranging from 35 ºC to a maximum of 50.5 ºC with intervals of 0.5 ºC, at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point. Reaching maximum heat for QST Heat was defined as subjects reaching the maximum temperature without reporting pain at one or more time points.~Stage I outcome." (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Any time within one hour post-application
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-A | 5 |
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-CB | 0 |
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-P | 0 |
"Response is defined as a subject having a PPT average pain score of ≤2 recorded at any single time point where PPT was performed. PPT scores were assessed using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) Numerical Rating Scale at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.~Stage I outcome." (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Any time within one hour post-application
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-A | 10 |
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-CB | 9 |
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-P | 2 |
"The duration of effect, was defined as the time from onset to treatment failure, as measured by QST Heat score. QST Heat scores were the temperature where the sensation of a heat stimuli was felt: ranging from 35 ºC to a maximum of 50.5 ºC with intervals of 0.5 ºC, at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point. The QST Heat-based Duration of effect was calculated by the length of time in minutes from onset of anesthesia to the absence of anesthesia where Onset of anesthesia was defined by PPT unless specific QST thresholds were not met. After Onset had been established, absence of analgesia or offset was the first of two time points with consecutive occurrences of regression or absence of analgesia. Reports of QST heat pain temperature by ≥ 3 °C of the Baseline QST indicated analgesia; while a report of similar (<3 °C) than Baseline indicated regression or absence of analgesia. Stage" (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Up to one hour post-application
Intervention | minutes (Mean) |
---|---|
One Spray CTY-5339-A | 45.5 |
One Spray CTY-5339-CB | 40.8 |
"The duration of effect, was defined as the length of time in minutes from onset of anesthesia to the absence of anesthesia.Onset was the time point at which the PPT average pain score was less than the Baseline PPT average score by any amount. Also, in 10 minutes or less, the subject must have had a lower PPT average pain score of ≥ 1 unit than Baseline. Absence of anesthesia was defined as follows: After Onset had been established, absence was the first of two time points with consecutive occurrences of regression of absence of analgesia. Reports of less pain by ≥1 unit than Baseline indicated analgesia; while a report of similar (< 1 unit) or more pain than Baseline indicated regression or absence of analgesia. The minimum onset time was 1 minute. PPT scores were assessed using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) Numerical Rating Scale at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.~Stage II outcome." (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Up to one hour post-application
Intervention | minutes (Mean) |
---|---|
One Spray CTY-5339-A | 14.6 |
One Spray CTY-5339-CB | 7.4 |
"Response at a time point is defined as having the PPT average pain score of ≤2. PPT scores were assessed using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) Numerical Rating Scale at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.~Stage II outcome." (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Up to one hour post-application
Intervention | minutes (Mean) |
---|---|
One Spray CTY-5339-A | 14.6 |
One Spray CTY-5339-CB | 7.4 |
"Onset of anesthesia was defined by Pin Prick Test (PPT) unless specific QST thresholds were not met.~If the PPT Onset was 5 minutes or less, then QST must have been greater than the Baseline QST temperature at 5 minutes by any amount and QST must have been ≥ 3 °C of the Baseline QST at 5 or 10 minutes.~If the PPT Onset was 10 minutes, then QST must have been ≥ 3 °C of the Baseline QST temperature at 10 minutes.~If PPT did not achieve Onset, then QST alone could have achieved onset at either 5 or 10 minutes if QST was greater than the Baseline QST temperature at 5 or 10 minutes by any amount and the QST was ≥ 3 °C of the Baseline QST at 5 or 10 minutes.~QST Heat scores were the temperature where the sensation of a heat stimuli was felt: ranging from 35 ºC to a maximum of 50.5 ºC with intervals of 0.5 ºC, at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.~Stage II outcome." (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Up to one hour post-application
Intervention | minutes (Mean) |
---|---|
One Spray CTY-5339-A | 1 |
One Spray CTY-5339-CB | 1.3 |
"Onset of anesthesia was the time point at which the PPT average pain score was less than the Baseline PPT average score by any amount. Also, in 10 minutes or less, the subject must have had a lower PPT average pain score of ≥ 1 unit than the Baseline PPT. Onset was expected to be between 1 and 5 minutes. PPT scores were assessed using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) Numerical Rating Scale at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.~Stage II outcome." (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Up to one hour post-application
Intervention | minutes (Mean) |
---|---|
One Spray CTY-5339-A | 1.1 |
One Spray CTY-5339-CB | 1.1 |
"QST Heat scores were the temperature where the sensation of a heat stimuli was felt: ranging from 35 ºC to a maximum of 50.5 ºC with intervals of 0.5 ºC, at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point. Reaching maximum heat for QST Heat was defined as subjects reaching the maximum temperature without reporting pain at one or more time points.~Stage II outcome." (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Any time within one hour post-application
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
One Spray CTY-5339-A | 7 |
One Spray CTY-5339-CB | 5 |
"Response is defined as a subject having a PPT average pain score of ≤2 recorded at any single time point where PPT was performed. PPT scores were assessed using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) Numerical Rating Scale at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.~Stage II outcome." (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Any time within one hour post-application
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
One Spray CTY-5339-A | 50 |
One Spray CTY-5339-CB | 50 |
"Response at a time point is defined as an increase of QST heat pain temperature by ≥ 3 degrees C compared to the Baseline QST. QST Heat scores were the temperature where the sensation of a heat stimuli was felt: ranging from 35 ºC to a maximum of 50.5 ºC with intervals of 0.5 ºC, at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.~Stage I outcome." (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Time of application up to one hour post-application
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Responded to treatment at the 1 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 2 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 3 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 4 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 5 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 10 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 15 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 20 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 25 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 30 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 35 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 40 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 45 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 50 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 55 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 60 minute time point | |
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-A | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-CB | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-P | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"Response at at time point is defined as when the PPT average pain score was less than the Baseline PPT average score by any amount. PPT scores were assessed using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) Numerical Rating Scale at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.~Stage I outcome." (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Time of application up to one hour post-application
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Responded to treatment at the 1 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 2 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 3 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 4 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 5 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 10 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 15 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 20 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 25 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 30 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 35 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 40 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 45 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 50 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 55 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 60 minute time point | |
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-A | 8 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-CB | 8 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-P | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
"SPID was calculated as a sum of the delta PPT scores at each time point until the designated time point. The delta PPT score is defined as the change in PPT score from baseline. PPT scores were assessed using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) Numerical Rating Scale at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.~The total possible scale range was from -100 (best) to +100 (worst) for SPID at the 30 minute time point, and from -160 (best) to +160 (worst) for SPID at the 60 minute time point Lower scores signify a better outcome (less sensitive to pain than at baseline = less pain with therapy = therapy was more effective).~Stage I outcome." (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Up to one hour post-application
Intervention | score (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
SPID at the 30 minute time point | SPID at the 60 minute time point | |
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-A | -82.1 | -128.1 |
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-CB | -37.8 | -44.0 |
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-P | -29.3 | -53.3 |
"STID was calculated as a sum of the delta QST Heat scores at each time point until the designated time point. The delta QST Heat score is defined as the change in QST Heat score from baseline. QST Heat scores were the temperature where the sensation of a heat stimuli was felt: ranging from 35 ºC to a maximum of 50.5 ºC with intervals of 0.5 ºC, at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.~The total possible scale range was from -155 ºC (best) to +155 ºC (worst) for STID at the 30 minute time point, and from -248 ºC (best) to +248 ºC (worst) for SPID at the 60 minute time point Lower scores signify a better outcome (less sensitive to pain than at baseline = less pain with therapy = therapy was more effective).~Stage I outcome." (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Up to one hour post-application
Intervention | Degrees Celcius (ºC) (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
STID at the 30 minute time point | STID at the 60 minute time point | |
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-A | 153.0 | 320.2 |
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-CB | 10.4 | 26.1 |
Stage I: One Spray CTY-5339-P | 72.5 | 134.6 |
"Response at a time point is defined as an increase of QST heat pain temperature by ≥ 3 degrees C compared to the Baseline QST.~QST Heat scores were the temperature where the sensation of a heat stimuli was felt: ranging from 35 ºC to a maximum of 50.5 ºC with intervals of 0.5 ºC, at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.~Stage II outcome." (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Up to one hour post-application
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Responded to treatment at the 1 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 2 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 3 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 4 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 5 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 10 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 15 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 20 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 25 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 30 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 35 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 40 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 45 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 50 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 55 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 60 minute time point | |
One Spray CTY-5339-A | 36 | 37 | 37 | 37 | 37 | 38 | 38 | 36 | 32 | 28 | 24 | 22 | 19 | 17 | 14 | 13 |
One Spray CTY-5339-CB | 29 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 31 | 34 | 31 | 29 | 24 | 19 | 15 | 15 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 9 |
"Response at at time point is defined as when the PPT average pain score was less than the Baseline PPT average score by any amount. PPT scores were assessed using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) Numerical Rating Scale at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.~Stage II outcome." (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Up to one hour post-application
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Responded to treatment at the 1 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 2 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 3 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 4 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 5 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 10 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 15 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 20 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 25 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 30 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 35 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 40 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 45 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 50 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 55 minute time point | Responded to treatment at the 60 minute time point | |
One Spray CTY-5339-A | 47 | 50 | 50 | 49 | 49 | 49 | 49 | 49 | 48 | 46 | 43 | 36 | 32 | 25 | 20 | 19 |
One Spray CTY-5339-CB | 46 | 48 | 48 | 48 | 49 | 49 | 48 | 46 | 45 | 42 | 34 | 27 | 21 | 20 | 20 | 18 |
"SPID was calculated as a sum of the delta PPT scores at each time point until the designated time point. The delta PPT score is defined as the change in PPT score from baseline. PPT scores were assessed using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) Numerical Rating Scale at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.~The total possible scale range was from -100 (best) to +100 (worst) for SPID at the 30 minute time point, and from -160 (best) to +160 (worst) for SPID at the 60 minute time point Lower scores signify a better outcome (less sensitive to pain than at baseline = less pain with therapy = therapy was more effective).~Stage II outcome." (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Up to one hour post-application
Intervention | score (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
SPID at the 30 minute time point | SPID at the 60 minute time point | |
One Spray CTY-5339-A | -85.2 | -122.6 |
One Spray CTY-5339-CB | -63.2 | -86.6 |
"STID was calculated as a sum of the delta QST Heat scores at each time point until the designated time point. The delta QST Heat score is defined as the change in QST Heat score from baseline. QST Heat scores were the temperature where the sensation of a heat stimuli was felt: ranging from 35 ºC to a maximum of 50.5 ºC with intervals of 0.5 ºC, at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.~The total possible scale range was from -155 ºC (best) to +155 ºC (worst) for STID at the 30 minute time point, and from -248 ºC (best) to +248 ºC (worst) for SPID at the 60 minute time point Lower scores signify a better outcome (less sensitive to pain than at baseline = less pain with therapy = therapy was more effective).~Stage II outcome." (NCT03233737)
Timeframe: Up to one hour post-application
Intervention | Degrees Celcius (ºC) (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
STID at the 30 minute time point | STID at the 60 minute time point | |
One Spray CTY-5339-A | 136.5 | 214 |
One Spray CTY-5339-CB | 96.6 | 149.1 |
Patient reported NRS pain scores after Blunt Dissection. The NRS for pain is a reliable and validated measure of pain intensity ranging from 0 - no pain, to 10 - worst pain imaginable. (NCT03872700)
Timeframe: Measured once anytime up to 60 minutes following intranasal administration
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Fentanyl | 4.1 |
Placebo | 4.4 |
Patient reported NRS pain scores after Irrigation. The NRS for pain is a reliable and validated measure of pain intensity ranging from 0 - no pain, to 10 - worst pain imaginable. (NCT03872700)
Timeframe: Measured once anytime up to 60 minutes following intranasal administration
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Fentanyl | 3.4 |
Placebo | 2.6 |
Patient reported NRS pain scores after Lidocaine injection. The NRS for pain is a reliable and validated measure of pain intensity ranging from 0 - no pain, to 10 - worst pain imaginable. (NCT03872700)
Timeframe: Following Lidocaine injection measured once anytime up to 12 minutes after intranasal administration
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Fentanyl | 8.4 |
Placebo | 8.0 |
Patient reported pain after Packing of abscess. The NRS for pain is a reliable and validated measure of pain intensity ranging from 0 - no pain, to 10 - worst pain imaginable. (NCT03872700)
Timeframe: Measured once at the time of completion of application of the bandage, up to 60 minutes following intranasal administration
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Fentanyl | 4.5 |
Placebo | 3.9 |
Patient reported NRS pain scores following Incision. The NRS for pain is a reliable and validated measure of pain intensity ranging from 0 - no pain, to 10 - worst pain imaginable. (NCT03872700)
Timeframe: Measured once anytime up to 60 minutes following intranasal administration
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Fentanyl | 3.9 |
Placebo | 3.9 |
Patient reported pain scores at baseline. The NRS for pain is a reliable and validated measure of pain intensity ranging from 0 - no pain, to 10 - worst pain imaginable. (NCT03872700)
Timeframe: Baseline
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Fentanyl | 8.3 |
Placebo | 8.1 |
Patient reported pain scores for overall Procedure assessed immediately after placement of dressing at the end of procedure. The NRS for pain is a reliable and validated measure of pain intensity ranging from 0 - no pain, to 10 - worst pain imaginable. (NCT03872700)
Timeframe: Measured once following placement of dressing at completion of procedure, up to 60 minutes following intranasal administration
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Fentanyl | 6.2 |
Placebo | 7.0 |
(NCT02502487)
Timeframe: after withdrawal of cystoscope
Intervention | times per minute (Mean) |
---|---|
Tetracaine Gel Group | 19.7 |
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Group | 19.4 |
Combination Group | 19.4 |
(NCT02502487)
Timeframe: at cystoscopic inspection of external sphincter
Intervention | times per minute (Mean) |
---|---|
Tetracaine Gel Group | 20.1 |
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Group | 19.8 |
Combination Group | 19.8 |
(NCT02502487)
Timeframe: at cystoscopic inspection of penile and bulbar Urthra
Intervention | times per minute (Mean) |
---|---|
Tetracaine Gel Group | 20.0 |
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Group | 19.8 |
Combination Group | 19.6 |
(NCT02502487)
Timeframe: before gel administration
Intervention | times per minute (Mean) |
---|---|
Tetracaine Gel Group | 19.8 |
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Group | 19.6 |
Combination Group | 19.5 |
(NCT02502487)
Timeframe: after withdrawal of cystoscope
Intervention | Beats per minute (Mean) |
---|---|
Tetracaine Gel Group | 76.7 |
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Group | 72.3 |
Combination Group | 71.6 |
(NCT02502487)
Timeframe: at cystoscopic inspection of external sphincter
Intervention | Beats per minute (Mean) |
---|---|
Tetracaine Gel Group | 96.7 |
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Group | 90.2 |
Combination Group | 86.2 |
(NCT02502487)
Timeframe: at cystoscopic inspection of penile and bulbar urethra
Intervention | Beats per minute (Mean) |
---|---|
Tetracaine Gel Group | 84.8 |
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Group | 83.8 |
Combination Group | 81.1 |
(NCT02502487)
Timeframe: before gel administration
Intervention | Beats per minute (Mean) |
---|---|
Tetracaine Gel Group | 75.0 |
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Group | 75.9 |
Combination Group | 73.6 |
(NCT02502487)
Timeframe: after withdrawal of cystoscope
Intervention | mmHg (Mean) |
---|---|
Tetracaine Gel Group | 99.3 |
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Group | 95.7 |
Combination Group | 95.2 |
(NCT02502487)
Timeframe: at cystoscopic inspection of external sphincter
Intervention | mmHg (Mean) |
---|---|
Tetracaine Gel Group | 113.7 |
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Group | 105.8 |
Combination Group | 104.8 |
(NCT02502487)
Timeframe: at cystoscopic inspection of penile and bulbar urthra
Intervention | mmHg (Mean) |
---|---|
Tetracaine Gel Group | 100 |
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Group | 99.8 |
Combination Group | 98.2 |
(NCT02502487)
Timeframe: before gel administration
Intervention | mmHg (Mean) |
---|---|
Tetracaine Gel Group | 95.3 |
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Group | 96.6 |
Combination Group | 95.1 |
(NCT02502487)
Timeframe: after withdrawal of cystoscope
Intervention | percentage (Median) |
---|---|
Tetracaine Gel Group | 99 |
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Group | 98 |
Combination Group | 99 |
(NCT02502487)
Timeframe: at cystoscopic inspection of external sphincter
Intervention | percentage (Median) |
---|---|
Tetracaine Gel Group | 99 |
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Group | 98 |
Combination Group | 99 |
(NCT02502487)
Timeframe: at cystoscopic inspection of penile and bulbar urthra
Intervention | percentage (Median) |
---|---|
Tetracaine Gel Group | 99 |
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Group | 98 |
Combination Group | 99 |
(NCT02502487)
Timeframe: before gel administration
Intervention | percentage (Median) |
---|---|
Tetracaine Gel Group | 99 |
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Group | 98 |
Combination Group | 99 |
A visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10 was used to assess the patients' pain during the procedure. 0 means no pain, 1 to 3 means mild pain, 4 to 7 means moderate pain, and 8 to 10 means severe pain. Patients were asked the VAS score to express the degree of pain at each time point. (NCT02502487)
Timeframe: after withdrawal of cystoscope
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
Tetracaine Gel Group | 0 |
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Group | 0 |
Combination Group | 0 |
A visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10 was used to assess the patients' pain during the procedure. 0 means no pain, 1 to 3 means mild pain, 4 to 7 means moderate pain, and 8 to 10 means severe pain. Patients were asked the VAS score to express the degree of pain at each time point. (NCT02502487)
Timeframe: at cystoscopic inspection of external sphincter
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
Tetracaine Gel Group | 6 |
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Group | 4 |
Combination Group | 4 |
A visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10 was used to assess the patients' pain during the procedure. 0 means no pain, 1 to 3 means mild pain, 4 to 7 means moderate pain, and 8 to 10 means severe pain. Patients were asked the VAS score to express the degree of pain at each time point. (NCT02502487)
Timeframe: at cystoscopic inspection of penile and bulbar urethra
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
Tetracaine Gel Group | 1 |
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Group | 1 |
Combination Group | 1 |
A visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10 was used to assess the patients' pain during the procedure. 0 means no pain, 1 to 3 means mild pain, 4 to 7 means moderate pain, and 8 to 10 means severe pain. Patients were asked the VAS score to express the degree of pain at each time point. (NCT02502487)
Timeframe: at cystoscopic inspection of prostate and bladder
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
Tetracaine Gel Group | 2 |
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Group | 0 |
Combination Group | 0 |
A visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10 was used to assess the patients' pain during the procedure. 0 means no pain, 1 to 3 means mild pain, 4 to 7 means moderate pain, and 8 to 10 means severe pain. Patients were asked the VAS score to express the degree of pain at each time point. (NCT02502487)
Timeframe: before gel administration
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
Tetracaine Gel Group | 0 |
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Group | 0 |
Combination Group | 0 |
Rates of Satisfied and very satisfied are used to be compared between two groups. (NCT01744197)
Timeframe: 30 minutes after the venipuncture.
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Synera | 74.0 |
Placebo | 53.7 |
The primary efficacy endpoint is the subject's report of pain intensity regarding the venipuncture using a 0-10 VAS. The VAS <3 is considered as patients with no or minor pain and would be compared between 2 groups. (NCT01744197)
Timeframe: 30 minutes after the venipuncture.
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Synera | 38.0 |
Placebo | 21.3 |
The primary efficacy endpoint is the subject's report of pain intensity regarding the venipuncture using a 0-10 VAS. The VAS =0 is considered as patients with no pain and would also be compared between 2 groups. (NCT01744197)
Timeframe: 30 minutes after the venipuncture.
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Synera | 19.4 |
Placebo | 8.3 |
"Discomfort according to the Eye Sensation Scale: 1-none, 2- mild, 3- moderate, 4- severe, 5- extremely severe~Patient satisfaction scale: 1=very unsatisfied, 2=unsatisfied, 3=neutral, 4=satisfied, 5= extremely satisfied" (NCT01087489)
Timeframe: immediately after injection, 1- hour later, and next day
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Discomfort during anesthetic preparation | Discomfort during needle penetration | Satisfaction with entire prep and injection | Discomfort 1 h after injection | Discomfort day after injection | Next day satisfaction with injection | |
3.5% Ophthalmic Lidocaine Gel | 2.09 | 2.0 | 4.5 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 4.3 |
4% Liquid Lidocaine Method | 2.1 | 1.7 | 4.3 | 2.4 | 1.8 | 4.3 |
intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured immediately after the injection, and at 5, 10, and 15 minutes after the injection (until it was 30 mmHg or below). Prior to injection IOP and post-injection IOP were compared to find the IOP change after injection. (NCT01087489)
Timeframe: immediately after injection, at 5, 10, 15 minutes
Intervention | mmHg (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
baseline IOP before injection | IOP change after 0.05 cc injection | |
3.5% Ophthalmic Lidocaine Gel | 15.9 | 30.9 |
4% Liquid Lidocaine Method | 15.5 | 25.7 |
"Presence of corneal staining after the injection:~Quadrants of fluorescein staining: 0 1 2 3 4~Density of staining: 0- None 1- Mild 2- Moderate 3- Severe 4- corneal abrasion~Size of subconjunctival hemorrhage:~in clock hours" (NCT01087489)
Timeframe: within 10 minutes of the injection
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Corneal fluorescein staining | Density of corneal staining | |
3.5% Ophthalmic Lidocaine Gel | 2.3 | 1.3 |
4% Liquid Lidocaine Method | 3.0 | 1.9 |
Participant anxiety was measured by the study participant and the objective observer before (anticipatory), during (venipuncture) and after (recovery) venipuncture using a validated visual analog scale (VAS). The VAS is a validated scale that is used to detect small changes in many types of observations. The scale ranges from 0-100 scores on a scale, and here the higher scores indicate higher anxiety levels. Only the participant's mean venipuncture (during venipuncture) anxiety scores are presented in outcome measure results here. (NCT00676364)
Timeframe: During venipuncture
Intervention | scores on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
ControI Group Receiving Placebo Cream | 43.1 |
Investigational Group | 40.5 |
"Pain was measured immediately after venipuncture by the participant using the six-point FACES scale. FACES in not an acronym, but rather a description of a pain scale that uses pictures of faces in various states of pain. The FACES pain scale is a common scale used to measure pain with scores on a scale. The scale we used had six points from zero (0) to five (5) indicating different levels of pain. Lower scores indicate lower levels of pain, and higher scores indicate higher levels of pain." (NCT00676364)
Timeframe: Pain was measured immediately after venipuncture.
Intervention | scores on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
ControI Group Receiving Placebo Cream | 2.2 |
Investigational Group Receiving 4% Lidocaine Cream | 2.1 |
Parent score 1-10 (1 representing no pain and 10 representing extreme pain) FLACC (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) Score 0-10 (at baseline and post injection) (0 representing no pain and 10 representing extreme pain) Change in FLACC score (NCT00484393)
Timeframe: 2 visits, 1 month apart
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Parent score | FLACC at baseline | FLACC post injection | Change in FLACC | |
Placebo | 7.3 | 1.6 | 9.3 | 7.7 |
Tetracaine | 7.3 | 1.7 | 8.4 | 6.7 |
The NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) is a 6-point rating scale where 0= no pain and 5 = worst pain. Blinded observers reported their own subjective evaluation of the level of pain experienced by the participants at tourniquet placement. Total number of participants subjectively evaluated as experiencing each pain level is reported. (NCT00530803)
Timeframe: before venipuncture
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Participants evaluated at NRS = 0 (No pain) | Participants evaluated at NRS = 1 | Participants evaluated at NRS = 2 | Participants evaluated at NRS = 3 | Participants evaluated at NRS = 4 | Participants evaluated at NRS = 5 | |
EMLA Cream | 41 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Synera Patch | 37 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
The NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) is a 6-point rating scale where 0= no pain and 5 = worst pain. Blinded observers reported their own subjective evaluation of the level of pain participants were experiencing 5 minutes after the venipuncture was completed. Total number of participants subjectively evaluated as experiencing each pain level is reported. (NCT00530803)
Timeframe: 5 minutes post venipuncture
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Participants evaluated at NRS = 0 (No pain) | Participants evaluated at NRS = 1 | Participants evaluated at NRS = 2 | Participants evaluated at NRS = 3 | Participants evaluated at NRS = 4 | Participants evaluated at NRS = 5 | |
EMLA Cream | 45 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Synera Patch | 45 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) is a 6-point rating scale where 0= no pain and 5 = worst pain. Blinded observers reported their own subjective evaluation of the level of pain experienced by the participants at needle insertion. Total number of participants subjectively evaluated as experiencing each pain level is reported. (NCT00530803)
Timeframe: during needle insertion
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Participants evaluated at NRS = 0 (No pain) | Participants evaluated at NRS = 1 | Participants evaluated at NRS = 2 | Participants evaluated at NRS = 3 | Participants evaluated at NRS = 4 | Participants evaluated at NRS = 5 | |
EMLA Cream | 32 | 14 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Synera Patch | 25 | 12 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) is a 6-point rating scale where 0= no pain and 5 = worst pain. Parents reported their own subjective evaluation of participants pain level. Each participant had only one parental assessment. Total number of parental assessment for each pain level on the 6-point NRS is reported as total number of participants experiencing that pain level. (NCT00530803)
Timeframe: immediately after venipuncture is completed
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
number of participants with NRS=0 (no pain) | number of participants with NRS=1 | number of participants with NRS=2 | number of participants with NRS=3 | number of participants with NRS=4 | number of participants with NRS=5 | |
EMLA Cream | 42 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Synera Patch | 41 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
"Participants were asked to report their level of pain using a 6-point Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale ranging from 0, no pain, to 5, the most pain you can have. The Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale is a validated tool for measuring pain in patients as young as 3 years old. A FACES pain score less than or equal to 2 is considered no pain to mild pain, and is clinically acceptable. Studies have shown average FACES pain scores for children receiving vascular access with placebo to be 2.2 to 3.5." (NCT00530803)
Timeframe: immediately after completion of venipuncture
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Participants with FACES Score = 0 (No pain) | Participants with FACES Score = 1 | Participants with FACES Score = 2 | Participants with FACES Score = 3 | Participants with FACES Score = 4 | Participants with FACES Score = 5 | |
EMLA Cream | 42 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Synera Patch | 38 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
The presence or absence of 3 facial actions (brow bulge, eyes squeeze and deepening of the nasolabial furrow) were scored in 2 second intervals for the first 20 seconds (or less if the phase lasted < 20 seconds) of each procedure phase from the videotapes by a trained research assistant. The data were then collapsed for each facial action into the percentage of time the infant expressed the action. An overall pain score was computed by summing the percentage scores for the three facial actions and then dividing by three. The score ranged from 0% to 100% with higher values suggesting more pain. (NCT00267111)
Timeframe: For the purpose of analysis IM injection procedure was divided into 4 phases: baseline , cleansing, injection and recovery phases.. For each phase facial actions were scored for the first 20 seconds or less if the phase lasted < 20 seconds.
Intervention | Percentage of time (Mean) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Cleaning | Injection | Recovery | |
1 g Amethocaine Gel 4% | 14 | 30 | 70 | 79 |
Placebo Group | 18 | 44 | 75 | 76 |
"Parents and nurses were asked to assess the infant's pain response during the procedure using Visual analogue scale (VAS) on an unmarked horizontal 10 cm continuous line where 0=no pain on the left side and 10=worst possible pain on the right side. Parents and nurses were trained to use the VAS prior to the IM injection." (NCT00267111)
Timeframe: During the entire procedure
Intervention | Cms (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Parents VAS rating | Nurses VAS rating | |
Amethocaine Gel 4% Group | 4.6 | 5.0 |
Placebo Group | 4.6 | 4.9 |
14 reviews available for tetracaine and Pain
Article | Year |
---|---|
Factors Associated With Low Procedural Pain Scores Among 1- to 5-Year-Old Patients Undergoing Facial Laceration Repair.
Topics: Anti-Anxiety Agents; Child, Preschool; Epinephrine; Humans; Infant; Lacerations; Lidocaine; Pain; Pa | 2023 |
WITHDRAWN: EMLA and Amethocaine for reduction of children's pain associated with needle insertion.
Topics: Adolescent; Anesthetics, Local; Child; Child, Preschool; Humans; Infant; Lidocaine; Lidocaine, Prilo | 2014 |
Topical anaesthesia for needle-related pain in newborn infants.
Topics: Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Catheterization; Drug Combinations; Humans; Infant, Newborn; | 2017 |
Blood sampling in infants (reducing pain and morbidity).
Topics: Administration, Oral; Analgesics; Blood Specimen Collection; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Infant; Pa | 2009 |
Blood sampling in infants (reducing pain and morbidity).
Topics: Administration, Oral; Analgesics; Blood Specimen Collection; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Infant; Pa | 2011 |
LOCAL ANESTHETICS.
Topics: Analgesia; Anesthetics; Anesthetics, Local; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Benzoates; Cough; Ethers; Ketones; | 1963 |
The use of EMLA cream to decrease venipuncture pain in children.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Child; Child Welfare; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Iontophoresis | 2004 |
The use of EMLA cream to decrease venipuncture pain in children.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Child; Child Welfare; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Iontophoresis | 2004 |
The use of EMLA cream to decrease venipuncture pain in children.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Child; Child Welfare; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Iontophoresis | 2004 |
The use of EMLA cream to decrease venipuncture pain in children.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Child; Child Welfare; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Iontophoresis | 2004 |
The use of EMLA cream to decrease venipuncture pain in children.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Child; Child Welfare; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Iontophoresis | 2004 |
The use of EMLA cream to decrease venipuncture pain in children.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Child; Child Welfare; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Iontophoresis | 2004 |
The use of EMLA cream to decrease venipuncture pain in children.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Child; Child Welfare; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Iontophoresis | 2004 |
The use of EMLA cream to decrease venipuncture pain in children.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Child; Child Welfare; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Iontophoresis | 2004 |
The use of EMLA cream to decrease venipuncture pain in children.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Child; Child Welfare; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Iontophoresis | 2004 |
A critical review of the topical local anesthetic amethocaine (Ametop) for pediatric pain.
Topics: Adolescent; Anesthetics, Local; Biological Availability; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Child; Child, Pr | 2005 |
Topical anesthetics for dermal instrumentation: a systematic review of randomized, controlled trials.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anesthetics, Local; Biopsy, N | 2005 |
EMLA and amethocaine for reduction of children's pain associated with needle insertion.
Topics: Adolescent; Anesthetics, Local; Child; Child, Preschool; Humans; Infant; Lidocaine; Lidocaine, Prilo | 2006 |
Topical anesthesia.
Topics: Adult; Anesthetics, Combined; Anesthetics, Local; Child; Cocaine; Drug Combinations; Epinephrine; Hu | 1998 |
Potential neurotoxicity of spinal anesthesia with lidocaine.
Topics: Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Anesthesia, Spinal; Anesthetics, Local; Animals; Bupivacain | 2000 |
Pain management for neonatal circumcision.
Topics: Acetaminophen; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Combined; Anesthetics, Local; Circumcision, Male; Hum | 2001 |
Lidocaine-prilocaine cream versus tetracaine gel for procedural pain in children.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Adolescent; Anesthetics, Local; Child; Child, Preschool; Gels; Humans; Infa | 2002 |
84 trials available for tetracaine and Pain
Article | Year |
---|---|
Compound lidocaine/prilocaine cream combined with tetracaine prevents cough caused by extubation after general anaesthesia: a randomised controlled trial.
Topics: Airway Extubation; Anesthesia, General; Anesthetics, Local; Cough; COVID-19; Double-Blind Method; Ep | 2023 |
Efficacy of lidocaine 7 %, tetracaine 7 % self-occlusive cream in reducing MAL-cPDT-associated pain in subjects with actinic keratosis: A randomized, single-blind, vehicle-controlled trial (The "3P-Trial").
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anesthetics, Local; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Keratosis, Actinic; | 2020 |
Assessment of clinical efficacy of lidocaine/tetracaine 7%/7% peel cream in fractional microablative laser procedure-associated pain for facial skin aging treatment. A randomized, controlled, single-blind trial.
Topics: Adult; Anesthetics, Local; Emollients; Female; Humans; Lidocaine; Male; Middle Aged; Pain; Prospecti | 2022 |
A Proof-of-concept Study Using Quantitative Sensory Threshold Analysis to Compare Two Intraoral Topical Anesthetics.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Adolescent; Adult; Anesthetics, Local; Benzocaine; Cross-Over Studies; Doub | 2019 |
Efficacy and Safety of COX-2 Inhibitor Parecoxib for Rigid Cystoscopy-related Pain Management in Male Patients: A Prospective, Randomized and Controlled Study.
Topics: Ambulatory Care Facilities; Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors; Cystoscopy; Double-Blind Method; Humans; In | 2019 |
Efficacy of pain control with topical lidocaine-epinephrine-tetracaine during laceration repair with tissue adhesive in children: a randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adolescent; Anesthetics, Local; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Combination | 2013 |
Comparison of postoperative redness of eyes after sub-Tenon's block and topical anaesthesia following phacoemulsification cataract surgery.
Topics: Aged; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Eye Hemorrhage; Female; Humans; Lidocaine; Male; Nerve | 2014 |
Injectable lidocaine provides similar analgesia compared to transdermal lidocaine/tetracaine patch for the incision and drainage of skin abscesses: a randomized, controlled trial.
Topics: Abscess; Adolescent; Adult; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Double-Blind Method; Female; Huma | 2014 |
Comparison of pain perception during miniscrew placement in orthodontic patients with a visual analog scale survey between compound topical and needle-injected anesthetics: A crossover, prospective, randomized clinical trial.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Adolescent; Adult; Anesthesia, Dental; Anesthetics, Combined; Anesthetics, | 2016 |
Dorsal penile nerve block for rigid cystoscopy in men: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Adult; Amides; Anesthetics, Combined; Anesthetics, Local; China; Clinical Protocols; Cystoscopy; Dou | 2016 |
A randomized controlled trial comparing Ametop™ with placebo for reducing pain associated with local anesthetic skin infiltration before neuraxial anesthesia in parturients.
Topics: Adult; Anesthesia, Epidural; Anesthesia, Obstetrical; Anesthetics, Local; Double-Blind Method; Femal | 2016 |
First-time success with needle procedures was higher with a warm lidocaine and tetracaine patch than an eutectic mixture of lidocaine and prilocaine cream.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Catheterization, Peripheral; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Hot Temperature; H | 2017 |
Optimizing local anesthesia for grommet insertion: eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics versus Ametop: a randomized clinical trial.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Lidocaine; Lidocaine, Prilocaine Drug Combination; | 2008 |
Randomised controlled trial on the effectiveness of lidocaine gel vs tetracaine drops as the sole topical anaesthetic agent for primary pterygium surgery.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Adult; Aged; Anesthetics, Local; Female; Gels; Humans; Lidocaine; Male; Mid | 2009 |
Heated lidocaine/tetracaine patch (Synera, Rapydan) compared with lidocaine/prilocaine cream (EMLA) for topical anaesthesia before vascular access.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adolescent; Adult; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Combined; Anesthetics, | 2009 |
Heated lidocaine/tetracaine patch (Synera, Rapydan) compared with lidocaine/prilocaine cream (EMLA) for topical anaesthesia before vascular access.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adolescent; Adult; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Combined; Anesthetics, | 2009 |
Heated lidocaine/tetracaine patch (Synera, Rapydan) compared with lidocaine/prilocaine cream (EMLA) for topical anaesthesia before vascular access.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adolescent; Adult; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Combined; Anesthetics, | 2009 |
Heated lidocaine/tetracaine patch (Synera, Rapydan) compared with lidocaine/prilocaine cream (EMLA) for topical anaesthesia before vascular access.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adolescent; Adult; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Combined; Anesthetics, | 2009 |
Cooling tetracaine to reduce pain of instillation before surgery.
Topics: Aged; Anesthetics, Local; Cold Temperature; Female; Humans; Instillation, Drug; Male; Middle Aged; O | 2009 |
Amethocaine versus EMLA for successful intravenous cannulation in a children's emergency department: a randomised controlled study.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Adolescent; Anesthetics, Combined; Anesthetics, Local; Catheterization; Chi | 2009 |
Comparative efficacy of topical tetraVisc versus lidocaine gel in cataract surgery.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anesthetics, Local; Female; Humans; Lens Implantat | 2009 |
Comparative efficacy of topical tetraVisc versus lidocaine gel in cataract surgery.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anesthetics, Local; Female; Humans; Lens Implantat | 2009 |
Comparative efficacy of topical tetraVisc versus lidocaine gel in cataract surgery.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anesthetics, Local; Female; Humans; Lens Implantat | 2009 |
Comparative efficacy of topical tetraVisc versus lidocaine gel in cataract surgery.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anesthetics, Local; Female; Humans; Lens Implantat | 2009 |
Reliability and validity of observer ratings of pain using the visual analog scale (VAS) in infants undergoing immunization injections.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Case-Control Studies; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Infant; Male; Observa | 2009 |
Comparative efficacy of 2 topical anesthetics for the placement of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anesthesia, Dental; Anesthetics, Combined; Anesthetics, Local; Benzocaine; | 2009 |
Tetracaine (ametop) compared to placebo for reducing pain associated with intramuscular injection of palivizumab (synagis).
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Anesthetics, Local; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Human | 2009 |
[Clinical observation on effect of auricular point injection combined with superficial anesthesia for nasal endoscopy surgery].
Topics: Acupuncture Points; Adult; Aged; Anesthesia; Anesthetics, Local; Ear; Endoscopy; Female; Humans; Inj | 2009 |
[Topical anesthesia before vascular access in children. Comparison of a warmth-producing lidocaine-tetracaine patch with a lidocaine-prilocaine patch].
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adolescent; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Behavior; Child; Child | 2010 |
Factors affecting patients' pain intensity during in office intravitreal injection procedure.
Topics: Aged; Analysis of Variance; Anesthesia; Anesthetics, Local; Diabetic Retinopathy; Female; Humans; In | 2012 |
A comparison of Rapydan® patch and Ametop® gel for venous cannulation.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Combined; Anesth | 2012 |
Lidocaine/tetracaine patch (Rapydan) for topical anaesthesia before arterial access: a double-blind, randomized trial.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetic | 2012 |
A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of topical amethocaine in reducing pain during arterial puncture.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Aged; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Arteries; Blood Gas Analysis; | 2002 |
A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of buffered versus plain tetracaine in reducing the pain of topical ophthalmic anesthesia.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Adult; Anesthesia, Local; Buffers; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; | 2003 |
Comparison of lidocaine 2% gel versus amethocaine as the sole anesthetic agent for strabismus surgery.
Topics: Adult; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Double-Blind Method; Female; Gels; Humans; Lidocaine; | 2003 |
Thirty-minute application of the S-Caine peel prior to nonablative laser treatment.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Anesthetics, Local; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; | 2003 |
Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies evaluating the S-Caine Peel for induction of local anesthesia before long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser therapy for leg veins.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Adult; Anesthetics, Local; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Humans; | 2003 |
Randomized trial of novel tetracaine patch to provide local anaesthesia in neonates undergoing venepuncture.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Double-Blind Method; Female; Human | 2003 |
Topical tetracaine prior to arterial puncture: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Adult; Aged; Anesthetics, Local; Blood Gas Analysis; Double-Blind Method; F | 2003 |
A randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of tetracaine gel for pain relief from peripherally inserted central catheters in infants.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Catheterization, Peripheral; Double-Blind Method; Gels; Humans; Infant; Pain; Te | 2003 |
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of tetracaine gel (Ametop) for pain relief during topical photodynamic therapy.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anesthetics, Local; Bowen's Disease; Carcin | 2004 |
The anesthetic effectiveness of lidocaine-adrenaline-tetracaine gel on finger lacerations.
Topics: Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Child; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epinephrine; Female; Finger | 2004 |
Topical 4% amethocaine gel reduces the pain of subcutaneous measles-mumps-rubella vaccination.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Iatrogenic Disease; Infant; Injections, Sub | 2004 |
Intravenous ketamine sedation for painful oncology procedures.
Topics: Adolescent; Analgesics; Anesthetics, Local; Biopsy, Needle; Bone Marrow Examination; Child; Child, P | 2005 |
A randomized controlled trial to evaluate S-Caine patch for reducing pain associated with vascular access in children.
Topics: Adolescent; Catheters, Indwelling; Chi-Square Distribution; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Combinatio | 2005 |
Self-warming lidocaine/tetracaine patch effectively and safely induces local anesthesia during minor dermatologic procedures.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anesthetics, Local; Dermatologic Surgical | 2005 |
Evaluation of the S-Caine Peel for induction of local anesthesia for laser-assisted tattoo removal: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Adult; Anesthetics, Local; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female; | 2005 |
Menthol facilitates the skin analgesic effect of tetracaine gel.
Topics: Adult; Anesthetics, Local; Animals; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Comb | 2005 |
Discomfort and tetracaine.
Topics: Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Cold Temperature; Cross-Over Studies; Drug Storage; Hot Tempe | 2006 |
Intravenous morphine and topical tetracaine for treatment of pain in [corrected] neonates undergoing central line placement.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Analgesics, Opioid; Anesthetics, Local; Catheterization, Central Venous; Do | 2006 |
Comparison of ethyl chloride spray with topical anaesthetic in children experiencing venepuncture.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adolescent; Aerosols; Analgesia; Anesthetics, Local; Attitude to Health; | 2006 |
How effective is tetracaine 4% gel, before a peripherally inserted central catheter, in reducing procedural pain in infants: a randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial [ISRCTN75884221].
Topics: Administration, Topical; Anesthetics, Local; Catheterization, Central Venous; Double-Blind Method; E | 2006 |
Does amethocaine gel influence blood results obtained from capillary sampling?
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adult; Alanine Transaminase; Alkaline Phosphatase; Anesthetics, Local; As | 2006 |
How effective is tetracaine 4% gel, before a venipuncture, in reducing procedural pain in infants: a randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Analysis of Variance; Anesthetics, Local; Double-Blind Method; Female; Gels | 2007 |
Use of the Synera patch for local anesthesia before vascular access procedures: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adult; Anesthetics, Local; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female | 2007 |
Brief report: a randomized controlled trial of Synera versus lidocaine for epidural needle insertion in labouring parturients.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adult; Analgesia, Epidural; Analgesia, Obstetrical; Anesthetics, Local; D | 2008 |
Topical amethocaine gel 4% for intramuscular injection in term neonates: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Anesthetics, Local; Attitude of Health Personnel; Crying; Double-Blind Meth | 2008 |
Warm lidocaine/tetracaine patch versus placebo before pediatric intravenous cannulation: a randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adolescent; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Catheterization, Perip | 2008 |
Evaluation of an amethocaine gel preparation for percutaneous analgesia before venous cannulation in children.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Anesthetics, Local; Catheterization, Peripheral; Child; Child, Preschool; | 1995 |
Evaluation of an amethocaine gel preparation for percutaneous analgesia before venous cannulation in children.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Anesthetics, Local; Catheterization, Peripheral; Child; Child, Preschool; | 1995 |
Evaluation of an amethocaine gel preparation for percutaneous analgesia before venous cannulation in children.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Anesthetics, Local; Catheterization, Peripheral; Child; Child, Preschool; | 1995 |
Evaluation of an amethocaine gel preparation for percutaneous analgesia before venous cannulation in children.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Anesthetics, Local; Catheterization, Peripheral; Child; Child, Preschool; | 1995 |
Intranasal anesthetic effects of lidocaine and tetracaine compared.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Adult; Anesthetics, Local; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Lidocaine; Middl | 1995 |
A comparison of amethocaine cream with lignocaine-prilocaine cream (EMLA) for reducing pain during retrobulbar injection.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anesthetics, Local; Cataract Extraction; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinat | 1994 |
Tetracaine, epinephrine (adrenalin), and cocaine (TAC) versus lidocaine, epinephrine, and tetracaine (LET) for anesthesia of lacerations in children.
Topics: Adolescent; Anesthesia, Local; Child; Child, Preschool; Cocaine; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinati | 1995 |
LAT (lidocaine-adrenaline-tetracaine) versus TAC (tetracaine-adrenaline-cocaine) for topical anesthesia in face and scalp lacerations.
Topics: Adult; Anesthetics, Local; Cocaine; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Drug Costs; Epinephrine; | 1995 |
Comparison of percutaneous anaesthesia for venous cannulation after topical application of either amethocaine or EMLA cream.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Catheterization, Peripheral; Double-Blind | 1994 |
Comparison of topical anesthetics without cocaine to tetracaine-adrenaline-cocaine and lidocaine infiltration during repair of lacerations: bupivacaine-norepinephrine is an effective new topical anesthetic agent.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adolescent; Anesthetics, Local; Bupivacaine; Child; Child, Preschool; Coc | 1996 |
The effect of temperature on the discomfort caused by topical local anaesthesia.
Topics: Aged; Anesthetics, Local; Humans; Lidocaine; Middle Aged; Pain; Pain Measurement; Procaine; Temperat | 1995 |
[Comparison of analgesic effect of lidocaine tape versus eutectic mixture of lidocaine and tetracaine during infiltration of local anesthetics before epidural block].
Topics: Administration, Topical; Adult; Anesthesia, Epidural; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Combined; Anes | 1996 |
Topical tetracaine attenuates the pain of infiltration of buffered lidocaine.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Adolescent; Adult; Anesthetics, Local; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; | 1996 |
Tetracaine versus lidocaine-prilocaine for preventing venipuncture-induced pain in children.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Adolescent; Anesthetics, Local; Child; Child, Preschool; Dosage Forms; Drug | 1997 |
Effect of percutaneous local anaesthetics on pain reduction during pulse dye laser treatment of portwine stains.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Hu | 1997 |
Comparative topical anaesthesia of EMLA and liposome-encapsulated tetracaine.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Adult; Anesthetics, Local; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Drug Ca | 1997 |
Topical lidocaine adrenaline tetracaine (LAT gel) versus injectable buffered lidocaine for local anesthesia in laceration repair.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Adolescent; Adult; Anesthetics, Combined; Anesthetics, Local; Child; Child, | 1997 |
New non-cocaine-containing topical anesthetics compared with tetracaine-adrenaline-cocaine during repair of lacerations.
Topics: Adolescent; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Combined; Anesthetics, Local; Child; Child, Preschool; C | 1997 |
Prilocaine-phenylephrine and bupivacaine-phenylephrine topical anesthetics compared with tetracaine-adrenaline-cocaine during repair of lacerations.
Topics: Adolescent; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Bupivacaine; Child; Child, Preschool; Cocaine; De | 1998 |
Randomised prospective masked study comparing patient comfort following the instillation of topical proxymetacaine and amethocaine.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anesthetics, Local; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; | 1998 |
The effects of EMLA and a topical formulation of 4% amethocaine (Ametop) on pain associated with retrobulbar injection.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Cataract Extraction; Female; Humans; | 1999 |
Relative efficacy of amethocaine gel and lidocaine-prilocaine cream for Port-a-Cath puncture in children.
Topics: Adolescent; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Catheterization, Central Venous; Catheters, Indwe | 1999 |
Relative efficacy of amethocaine gel and lidocaine-prilocaine cream for Port-a-Cath puncture in children.
Topics: Adolescent; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Catheterization, Central Venous; Catheters, Indwe | 1999 |
Relative efficacy of amethocaine gel and lidocaine-prilocaine cream for Port-a-Cath puncture in children.
Topics: Adolescent; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Catheterization, Central Venous; Catheters, Indwe | 1999 |
Relative efficacy of amethocaine gel and lidocaine-prilocaine cream for Port-a-Cath puncture in children.
Topics: Adolescent; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Catheterization, Central Venous; Catheters, Indwe | 1999 |
Comparison of lignocaine-prilocaine cream and amethocaine gel for local analgesia before venepuncture in children.
Topics: Adolescent; Analgesia; Anesthetics, Combined; Anesthetics, Local; Anxiety; Child; Child, Preschool; | 1999 |
Efficacy of supplementary intracameral lidocaine in routine phacoemulsification under topical anesthesia.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Combined; Anesthetics, Local; Anterior Cham | 1999 |
Does topical amethocaine gel reduce the pain of venepuncture in newborn infants? A randomised double blind controlled trial.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Crying; Double-Blind Method; Facial Expression; Female; Gels; Humans; Infant, Ne | 2000 |
A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, comparative study of topical skin analgesics and the anxiety and discomfort associated with venous cannulation.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adult; Analysis of Variance; Anesthesia, Dental; Anesthetics, Combined; A | 2001 |
No more tears: a randomized controlled double-blind trial of Amethocaine gel vs. placebo in the management of procedural pain in neonates.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Anesthetics, Local; Catheterization, Peripheral; Clinical Nursing Researc | 2001 |
A prospective multicenter trial to determine the incidence of transient neurologic symptoms after spinal anesthesia with phenylephrine added to 0.5% tetracaine.
Topics: Anesthesia, Spinal; Anesthetics, Local; Double-Blind Method; Elective Surgical Procedures; Female; G | 2001 |
EMLA or Ametop, and for how long?
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anesthetics, Combined; Anesthetics, Local; Drug Administ | 2001 |
A double-blind crossover comparison of topical anesthetics.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Adult; Anesthetics, Local; Benzocaine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Double-Bli | 1979 |
A clinical evaluation of three topical anaesthetic agents.
Topics: Adult; Anesthetics, Local; Benzocaine; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Injec | 1992 |
Tetracaine/adrenaline/cocaine for local anesthesia.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Child; Cocaine; Double-Blind Method; Drug | 1990 |
Tourniquet pain during spinal anesthesia: a comparison of plain solutions of tetracaine and bupivacaine.
Topics: Aged; Anesthesia, Spinal; Bupivacaine; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nerve Fibers; Nervous Syst | 1988 |
[Effect of peridural analgesia on blood gas composition and central hemodynamics in patients with closed trauma of the chest].
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anesthesia, Epidural; Clinical Trials as Topic; Hemodynamics; Humans; Middl | 1985 |
Clinical comparison of bupivacaine and amethocaine: onset and duration in extradural blockade.
Topics: Abdomen; Anesthesia, Spinal; Anilides; Epinephrine; Female; Genital Diseases, Female; Humans; Pain; | 1970 |
60 other studies available for tetracaine and Pain
Article | Year |
---|---|
Discovery of XEN907, a spirooxindole blocker of NaV1.7 for the treatment of pain.
Topics: Analgesics; Gene Expression Regulation; HEK293 Cells; Humans; Indoles; Inhibitory Concentration 50; | 2011 |
Identification of a potent, state-dependent inhibitor of Nav1.7 with oral efficacy in the formalin model of persistent pain.
Topics: Acetamides; Administration, Oral; Analgesics; Animals; Binding Sites; Cell Line; ERG1 Potassium Chan | 2011 |
3-Oxoisoindoline-1-carboxamides: potent, state-dependent blockers of voltage-gated sodium channel Na(V)1.7 with efficacy in rat pain models.
Topics: Amides; Analgesics; Animals; Arthritis, Experimental; Carrageenan; CHO Cells; Chronic Pain; Cricetin | 2012 |
Substituted Indazoles as Nav1.7 Blockers for the Treatment of Pain.
Topics: Analgesics; Animals; Disease Models, Animal; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Electrophysiology; Ev | 2016 |
Discovery of aminocyclohexene analogues as selective and orally bioavailable hNav1.7 inhibitors for analgesia.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Analgesics; Animals; Binding Sites; Cyclohexenes; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9; Dis | 2017 |
Discovery of (R)-(3-fluoropyrrolidin-1-yl)(6-((5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-2-yl)oxy)quinolin-2-yl)methanone (ABBV-318) and analogs as small molecule Na
Topics: Humans; Pain; Pain Management; Protein Isoforms; Sodium Channels; Structure-Activity Relationship | 2022 |
Real-life experience of a lidocaine/tetracaine self-occluding topical anesthetic for dermatological procedures.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Anesthetics, Local; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Lidocaine; Pain; Pain Meas | 2022 |
Topical Anesthetics for Analgesia in Acute Corneal Abrasion: Eye Care Providers Survey.
Topics: Analgesia; Anesthetics, Local; Corneal Injuries; Humans; Pain; Quality of Life; Surveys and Question | 2023 |
Topical Cetacaine is probably more effective in preventing pain than benzocaine and an eutectic mixture of local anesthetic before palatal infiltration in children.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Anesthetics, Local; Benzalkonium Compounds; Benzocaine; Cetrimonium Compoun | 2020 |
Tetracaine Challenges Old Dogma for Emergency Department Management of Corneal Abrasion Pain and Beckons a Definitive Study.
Topics: Emergency Service, Hospital; Humans; Lidocaine; Pain; Tetracaine | 2018 |
Pain management for children needing laceration repair.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Anesthetics, Local; Child; Drug Combinations; Epinephrine; Humans; Lacera | 2018 |
Stability of a novel Lidocaine, Adrenaline and Tetracaine sterile thermosensitive gel: A ready-to-use formulation.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Epinephrine; Gels; Lidocaine; Pain; Pain Measurement; | 2019 |
An open-label pilot study evaluating the effectiveness of the heated lidocaine/tetracaine patch for the treatment of pain associated with carpal tunnel syndrome.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adult; Carpal Tunnel Syndrome; Drug Combinations; Female; Hot Temperature | 2014 |
Topical lidocaine-epinephrine-tetracaine is effective in reducing pain during laceration repair with tissue adhesive in children.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Epinephrine; Female; Humans; Lidocaine; Male; Pain; Tetracaine | 2014 |
Evidence appraisal of Harman S, Zemek R, Duncan MJ, Ying Y, Petrcich W. Efficacy of pain control with topical lidocaine-epinephrine-tetracaine during laceration repair with tissue adhesive in children: a randomized controlled trial. CMAJ. 2013;185(13):E62
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Epinephrine; Female; Humans; Lidocaine; Male; Pain; Tetracaine | 2014 |
Presynaptic facilitation by tetracaine of glutamatergic spontaneous excitatory transmission in the rat spinal substantia gelatinosa - Involvement of TRPA1 channels.
Topics: Acetanilides; Amides; Anesthetics, Local; Animals; Bupivacaine; Capsaicin; Excitatory Postsynaptic P | 2017 |
FURTHER EXPERIENCES WITH PONTOCAINE-DEXTROSE EPHEDRINE FOR SPINAL ANALGESIA.
Topics: Analgesia; Ephedrine; Glucose; Humans; Pain; Pain Management; Tetracaine | 1948 |
Pontocaine hydrochloride for brachial block analgesia; 150 cases.
Topics: Analgesia; Pain; Pain Management; Tetracaine | 1948 |
A comparison of topical application of 1% tetracaine gel before and after the procedure in removal of cutaneous pigmentation with Q-switched neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet laser (1064/532 nm).
Topics: Administration, Topical; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anesthetics, Local; Female; Gels; Humans; Lasers, | 2010 |
The safety of flexible fibre-optic bronchoscopy and proceduralist-administered sedation: a tertiary referral centre experience.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Biopsy; Bronchoscopy; Conscious Sedation; Dyspnea; Femal | 2012 |
Relief of palatal injection pain by liposome-encapsulated 2% lignocaine prepared by ultrasonic dental scaler.
Topics: Adult; Anesthesia, Dental; Anesthetics, Local; Benzocaine; Female; Humans; Injections; Lidocaine; Li | 2012 |
Cross-over study of topical anaesthesia with tetracaine solution for transoral rigid laryngoscopy.
Topics: Adult; Anesthesia, Local; Cross-Over Studies; Female; Humans; Laryngeal Diseases; Laryngoscopy; Lido | 2012 |
Effects of euthanasia on brain physiological activities monitored in real-time.
Topics: Amides; Animals; Brain; Brain Ischemia; Carbon Dioxide; Cats; Cerebrovascular Circulation; Drug Comb | 2002 |
Saddle block using 10-20% tetracaine for patients with perineal pain due to recurrent rectal cancer.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anesthetics, Local; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, | 2003 |
Bye-bye benzocaine?
Topics: 4-Aminobenzoic Acid; Anesthetics, Local; Benzalkonium Compounds; Benzocaine; Cetrimonium Compounds; | 2003 |
TO-DAY'S DRUGS. LOCAL ANALGESICS.
Topics: Analgesia; Analgesics; Dibucaine; Lidocaine; Pain; Pharmacology; Procaine; Tetracaine; Toxicology | 1964 |
RECENT ADVANCES IN LOCAL ANALGESIA. CLINICAL EXPERIENCE WITH PRILOCAINE.
Topics: Analgesia; Anesthesia; Anesthesia, Conduction; Anesthesia, Obstetrical; Anesthetics; Anesthetics, Lo | 1965 |
The use of pontocaine hydrochloride for nerve block and infiltration analgesia, therapeutic, and diagnostic blocks; 1004 cases.
Topics: Analgesia; Anesthesia; Humans; Nerve Block; Pain; Tetracaine | 1950 |
Relief of pain and anxiety in pediatric patients in emergency medical systems.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Analgesics; Anesthetics, Combined; Anxiety; Child; Conscious Sedation; Emergen | 2004 |
Relief of pain and anxiety in pediatric patients in emergency medical systems.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Analgesics; Anesthetics, Combined; Anxiety; Child; Conscious Sedation; Emergen | 2004 |
Relief of pain and anxiety in pediatric patients in emergency medical systems.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Analgesics; Anesthetics, Combined; Anxiety; Child; Conscious Sedation; Emergen | 2004 |
Relief of pain and anxiety in pediatric patients in emergency medical systems.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Analgesics; Anesthetics, Combined; Anxiety; Child; Conscious Sedation; Emergen | 2004 |
Relief of pain and anxiety in pediatric patients in emergency medical systems.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Analgesics; Anesthetics, Combined; Anxiety; Child; Conscious Sedation; Emergen | 2004 |
Relief of pain and anxiety in pediatric patients in emergency medical systems.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Analgesics; Anesthetics, Combined; Anxiety; Child; Conscious Sedation; Emergen | 2004 |
Relief of pain and anxiety in pediatric patients in emergency medical systems.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Analgesics; Anesthetics, Combined; Anxiety; Child; Conscious Sedation; Emergen | 2004 |
Relief of pain and anxiety in pediatric patients in emergency medical systems.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Analgesics; Anesthetics, Combined; Anxiety; Child; Conscious Sedation; Emergen | 2004 |
Relief of pain and anxiety in pediatric patients in emergency medical systems.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Analgesics; Anesthetics, Combined; Anxiety; Child; Conscious Sedation; Emergen | 2004 |
Transdermal permeation of tetracaine hydrochloride by lecithin microemulsion: in vivo.
Topics: 1-Propanol; Administration, Cutaneous; Anesthetics, Local; Animals; Catalase; Drug Carriers; Emulsio | 2006 |
Pain induced by phacoemulsification without sedation using topical or peribulbar anesthesia.
Topics: Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Combined; Anesthetics, Local; Bupivacaine; Conscious Sedation; Human | 2006 |
Topical local anaesthetic (tetracaine) reduces pain from botulinum toxin injections for axillary hyperhidrosis.
Topics: Adult; Anesthetics, Local; Axilla; Botulinum Toxins, Type A; Humans; Hyperhidrosis; Injections; Neur | 2006 |
Site-specific skin reactions to amethocaine.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adolescent; Age Distribution; Anesthetics, Local; Child; Child, Preschool | 2006 |
Routine immunization practices: use of topical anesthetics and oral analgesics.
Topics: Acetaminophen; Administration, Oral; Administration, Topical; Adult; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Anest | 2007 |
Routine immunization practices: use of topical anesthetics and oral analgesics.
Topics: Acetaminophen; Administration, Oral; Administration, Topical; Adult; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Anest | 2007 |
Routine immunization practices: use of topical anesthetics and oral analgesics.
Topics: Acetaminophen; Administration, Oral; Administration, Topical; Adult; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Anest | 2007 |
Routine immunization practices: use of topical anesthetics and oral analgesics.
Topics: Acetaminophen; Administration, Oral; Administration, Topical; Adult; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Anest | 2007 |
Intrathecal hyperbaric 0.5% tetracaine as a possible cause of transient neurologic toxicity.
Topics: Anesthesia, Spinal; Anesthetics, Local; Female; Humans; Injections, Spinal; Leg; Middle Aged; Pain; | 1996 |
Delivery of topical anesthesia.
Topics: Acetylcholine; Administration, Topical; Anesthetics, Local; Drug Combinations; Drug Delivery Systems | 1996 |
N-butyl tetracaine as a neurolytic agent for ultralong sciatic nerve block.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Animals; Autonomic Nervous System; Cells, Cultured; Nerve Block; Pain; Rats; Sci | 1996 |
Supraspinal inhibition of nociceptive dorsal horn neurones in the anaesthetized rat: tonic or dynamic?
Topics: Anesthesia; Anesthetics, Local; Animals; Efferent Pathways; Electromyography; Electrophysiology; Evo | 1998 |
The antinociception produced by microinjection of a cholinergic agonist in the ventromedial medulla is mediated by noradrenergic neurons in the A7 catecholamine cell group.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Animals; Antimutagenic Agents; Carbachol; Cholinergic Agonists; Cobalt; Female; | 1999 |
Sample-size calculation for a log-transformed outcome measure.
Topics: Algorithms; Anesthetics, Local; Case-Control Studies; Child; Humans; Influenza Vaccines; Injections, | 1999 |
Aerosol-OT microemulsions as transdermal carriers of tetracaine hydrochloride.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Aerosols; Anesthetics, Local; Animals; Drug Carriers; Emulsions; Mice; My | 2000 |
Topical anesthesia for phacoemulsification and painless subconjunctival antibiotic injection.
Topics: Aged; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Cefuroxime; Cephalosporins; Con | 2001 |
[Suture of skin lacerations using LAT gel (lidocaine, adrenaline, tetracaine)].
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anesthetics, Local; Child; Child, Preschool; Dermatologic Surgical Procedur | 2001 |
Tetracaine topical anesthesia for myringotomy.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Ambulatory Surgical Procedures; | 2001 |
Topical liposomal tetracaine for pain relief of intralesional interferon injections in the treatment of condylomata acuminata.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Adult; Condylomata Acuminata; Drug Carriers; Female; Humans; Injections, In | 1992 |
The pontine parabrachial region mediates some of the descending inhibitory effects of stimulating the anterior pretectal nucleus.
Topics: Animals; Brain Stem; Electric Stimulation; Laminectomy; Male; Neural Pathways; Neurons; Pain; Pons; | 1992 |
Compatibility of hydromorphone hydrochloride and tetracaine hydrochloride.
Topics: Drug Incompatibility; Drug Interactions; Humans; Hydromorphone; Pain; Tetracaine; Time Factors | 1991 |
Clinical experiences with a novel percutaneous amethocaine preparation: prevention of pain due to venepuncture in children.
Topics: Adolescent; Bloodletting; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Humans; Infant; Male; Ointments; Pain; Pr | 1990 |
Tourniquet pain during bupivacaine and tetracaine spinal anesthesia.
Topics: Anesthesia, Spinal; Bupivacaine; Humans; Pain; Tetracaine; Tourniquets | 1989 |
Decreased incidence of tourniquet pain during spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine. A possible explanation.
Topics: Action Potentials; Anesthesia, Spinal; Animals; Bupivacaine; Nerve Fibers; Neural Conduction; Pain; | 1988 |
Brainstem mechanisms of antinociception. Effects of electrical stimulation and injection of morphine into the nucleus raphe magnus.
Topics: Analgesia; Animals; Electric Stimulation Therapy; Morphine; Pain; Raphe Nuclei; Rats; Tetracaine | 1986 |
Pain management in the child.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Anesthetics, Local; Child; Child, Preschool; Cocaine; Drug Combinations; Em | 1987 |
Spinal anesthesia associated with reversal of myocardial ischemia.
Topics: Aged; Anesthesia, Spinal; Blood Pressure; Coronary Disease; Electrocardiography; Heart Rate; Hemodyn | 1986 |
Differential spread of blockade of touch, cold, and pinprick during spinal anesthesia.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Anesthesia, Spinal; Cold Temperature; Epinephrine; Female; Humans; Lidocaine; Male; Mid | 1985 |
Pain-related electrical potentials of the human nasal mucosa elicited by chemical stimulation.
Topics: Adult; Electroencephalography; Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory; Female; Galvanic Skin Response; Hum | 1985 |
[Clinical studies on subjective sensation in administration of the local anesthetic tonexol spray].
Topics: Acridines; Adolescent; Aerosols; Anesthesia, Dental; Anesthetics, Local; Child; Humans; Pain; Smell; | 1972 |
Analgesic blocks.
Topics: Analgesia; Anesthesia, Conduction; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Autonomic Nerve Block; Bup | 1973 |
The effect of "Noxyflex" (Noxytioline) on the behaviour of animals which have been infected intraperitoneally with suspensions of faeces.
Topics: Animals; Anti-Infective Agents; Behavior, Animal; Disease Models, Animal; Feces; Injections, Intrape | 1974 |
Spinal and extradural analgesia-anesthesia for parturition.
Topics: Analgesia; Anesthesia, Epidural; Anesthesia, Obstetrical; Anesthesia, Spinal; Anesthetics, Local; Bu | 1974 |
[A method for evaluation of topical anesthetics in man].
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Anilides; Dental Pulp Test; Humans; Lip; Methods; Pain; Pipecolic Acids; Tetraca | 1970 |