temocapril-hydrochloride and Diabetic-Angiopathies

temocapril-hydrochloride has been researched along with Diabetic-Angiopathies* in 2 studies

Trials

2 trial(s) available for temocapril-hydrochloride and Diabetic-Angiopathies

ArticleYear
Effect on coronary flow velocity reserve in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: comparison between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist.
    American heart journal, 2006, Volume: 151, Issue:4

    The effects of angiotensin antagonists on coronary circulation in type 2 diabetes are unclear. We aimed to assess whether 4 weeks of treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist improves coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) in patients with type 2 diabetes.. Twenty-four asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned to temocapril (2 mg/d) or candesartan (8 mg/d). Coronary flow velocity reserve, calculated as the ratio of adenosine-induced hyperemic to basal coronary flow velocity, was measured with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography. Coronary flow velocity reserve measurement and venous blood sampling were performed before and after 4 weeks of treatment. We also obtained CFVR and venous blood data in the 8 healthy controls.. Coronary flow velocity reserve was significantly lower in patients than controls (temocapril group 2.74 +/- 0.28, candesartan group 2.65 +/- 0.30, controls 3.53 +/- 0.23, P < .0001 for both, respectively). Blood pressure was reduced in both diabetic groups (n = 12 each) similarly 4 weeks after treatment. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in venous blood data before or after treatment. However, CFVR increased significantly in the temocapril group (2.74 +/- 0.28 to 3.31 +/- 0.36, P < .0001), but not in the candesartan group (2.65 +/- 0.30 to 2.71 +/- 0.43, P = ns).. Coronary flow velocity reserve in patients with type 2 diabetes improved after treatment with temocapril but not with candesartan, suggesting that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, but not angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist, might have beneficial effects on coronary microangiopathy associated with type 2 diabetes.

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Flow Velocity; Coronary Circulation; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Exercise Test; Female; Hemodynamics; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Single-Blind Method; Tetrazoles; Thiazepines

2006
Antiproteinuric effects of combined antihypertensive therapies in patients with overt type 2 diabetic nephropathy.
    Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2002, Volume: 25, Issue:6

    Combined antihypertensive therapy plays a crucial role in achieving targeted blood pressure reductions and renoprotection. We therefore compared the antihypertensive and antiproteinuric effects of combined therapy with either a calcium channel blocker (CCB) plus an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) or an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) plus an ARB in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated by overt nephropathy and mild to moderate hypertension. After a 12-week dietary control period, diabetic patients with mildly to moderately impaired renal function were randomly assigned to either a CCB (amlodipine 5 mg once daily) or an ACE-I (temocapril 2 mg once daily) for 12 weeks (monotherapy period). Both groups then received add-on therapy with an ARB (candesartan 4 mg once daily) for an additional 12 weeks. During the monotherapy period, blood pressure was decreased equally well in both groups. Daily urinary protein excretion remained unchanged in the CCB-treated group (control period, 4.0 +/- 1.8 g/day vs. CCB period, 4.1 +/- 1.9 g/day; ns; n = 8), but decreased in the ACE-I-treated group (control period, 4.3 +/- 1.8 g/day vs. ACE-I period, 3.5 +/- 1.7 g/day; p < 0.05; n = 9). After the combined therapy period, blood pressure was decreased to the same degree in both groups. Although ARB plus CCB significantly reduced urinary protein excretion (to 3.5 +/- 1.5 g/day; p < 0.05 vs. control period; n = 8), a more profound reduction was achieved with ARB plus ACE-I (to 2.6 +/- 1.3 g/day; p < 0.01 vs. control period; n = 9). Monotherapy with the ACE-I increased the serum potassium concentration, and this elevation was sustained after addition of the ARB. In contrast, the serum potassium concentration was not influenced by monotherapy with the CCB, but was significantly increased after addition of the ARB. A decreased hematocrit was observed in the ARB plus ACE-I group. The present study suggests that combined antihypertensive therapy with either a CCB plus an ARB or an ACE-I plus an ARB exerts an antiproteinuric effect in patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy with mildly impaired renal function. Although the latter combination had a more profound effect, it was associated with an increased serum potassium concentration and worsening of renal anemia. Thus, the combination of a CCB and an ARB should be the first line antihypertensive therapy in those with overt diabetic nephropathy. The long-term efficacy of these combined antihyperten

    Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Calcium Channel Blockers; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Diabetic Nephropathies; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Proteinuria; Tetrazoles; Thiazepines; Treatment Outcome

2002