tedizolid and Disease-Models--Animal

When Zika virus emerged as a public health emergency there were no drugs or vaccines approved for its prevention or treatment. We used a high-throughput screen for Zika virus protease inhibitors to identify several inhibitors of Zika virus infection. We expressed the NS2B-NS3 Zika virus protease and conducted a biochemical screen for small-molecule inhibitors. A quantitative structure-activity relationship model was employed to virtually screen ∼138,000 compounds, which increased the identification of active compounds, while decreasing screening time and resources. Candidate inhibitors were validated in several viral infection assays. Small molecules with favorable clinical profiles, especially the five-lipoxygenase-activating protein inhibitor, MK-591, inhibited the Zika virus protease and infection in neural stem cells. Members of the tetracycline family of antibiotics were more potent inhibitors of Zika virus infection than the protease, suggesting they may have multiple mechanisms of action. The most potent tetracycline, methacycline, reduced the amount of Zika virus present in the brain and the severity of Zika virus-induced motor deficits in an immunocompetent mouse model. As Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs, the tetracyclines could be quickly translated to the clinic. The compounds identified through our screening paradigm have the potential to be used as prophylactics for patients traveling to endemic regions or for the treatment of the neurological complications of Zika virus infection.

Topics: Animals; Antiviral Agents; Artificial Intelligence; Chlorocebus aethiops; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; High-Throughput Screening Assays; Immunocompetence; Inhibitory Concentration 50; Methacycline; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Protease Inhibitors; Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship; Small Molecule Libraries; Vero Cells; Zika Virus; Zika Virus Infection

Buruli ulcer (BU), caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans, is currently treated with a daily combination of rifampin and either injectable streptomycin or oral clarithromycin. An intermittent oral regimen would facilitate treatment supervision. We first evaluated the bactericidal activity of newer antimicrobials against M. ulcerans using a BU animal model. The imidazopyridine amine telacebec (Q203) exhibited high bactericidal activity whereas tedizolid (an oxazolidinone closely related to linezolid), selamectin and ivermectin (two avermectine compounds) and the benzothiazinone PBTZ169 were not active. Consequently, telacebec was evaluated for its bactericidal and sterilizing activities in combined intermittent regimens. Telacebec given twice a week in combination with a long-half-life compound, either rifapentine or bedaquiline, sterilized mouse footpads in 8 weeks, i.e. after a total of only 16 doses, and prevented relapse during a period of 20 weeks after the end of treatment. These results are very promising for future intermittent oral regimens which would greatly simplify BU treatment in the field.

Topics: Animals; Antitubercular Agents; Buruli Ulcer; Diarylquinolines; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Imidazoles; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Mycobacterium ulcerans; Oxazolidinones; Piperidines; Pyridines; Rifampin; Tetrazoles

Rifampin (RIF) plus clarithromycin (CLR) for 8 weeks is now the standard of care for Buruli ulcer (BU) treatment, but CLR may not be an ideal companion for rifamycins due to bidirectional drug-drug interactions. The oxazolidinone linezolid (LZD) was previously shown to be active against

Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Buruli Ulcer; Clarithromycin; Disease Models, Animal; Female; Linezolid; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Mycobacterium ulcerans; Oxazolidinones; Rifampin; Tetrazoles

Few antibiotics are approved to treat Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia. Tedizolid is an oxazolidinone with potent in vitro activity against S. aureus and is currently under investigation for hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia. Limited data exist on the comparative efficacy of tedizolid versus current first-line treatments vancomycin and linezolid in the compromised host. Our objective was to compare the efficacy of human-simulated epithelial lining fluid (ELF) exposures of tedizolid, linezolid and vancomycin against S. aureus in neutropenic and immunocompetent murine pneumonia models.. Eight S. aureus isolates (four MRSA and four MSSA) were studied. Neutropenic and immunocompetent mice were inoculated intranasally with bacterial suspensions of 107 and 109 cfu/mL, respectively, then treated for up to 72 h with model-specific regimens of tedizolid, linezolid and vancomycin simulating human ELF exposures after clinical doses. Mice were sacrificed at 24, 48 or 72 h and changes in log10 cfu/lungs were compared with 0 h controls.. Mean bacterial burdens at 0 h were 5.81 and 8.17 log10 cfu/lungs for neutropenic and immunocompetent mice, respectively, and increased at 24 h in the absence of antibiotic treatment to 7.97 and 9.00 log10 cfu/lungs, respectively. In neutropenic and immunocompetent mice, tedizolid was associated with bacterial density changes of -2.69 ± 0.62 and -3.57 ± 0.88 log10 cfu/lungs at 72 h, respectively. In both models, tedizolid treatment produced greater bacterial reductions than vancomycin and was not statistically significantly different from linezolid.. Human-simulated ELF exposures of tedizolid demonstrated sustained efficacy in compromised and competent models of pneumonia. Validation of these findings in patients is warranted.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Colony Count, Microbial; Disease Models, Animal; Female; Linezolid; Lung; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Neutropenia; Oxazolidinones; Pneumonia, Staphylococcal; Protein Synthesis Inhibitors; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Vancomycin

In a mouse peritonitis model, tedizolid was comparable to linezolid and daptomycin against an

Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacterial Proteins; Daptomycin; Disease Models, Animal; Enterococcus faecalis; Enterococcus faecium; Female; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Linezolid; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Mice; Mice, Inbred ICR; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Oxazolidinones; Peritonitis; Staphylococcus; Tetrazoles

The antibacterial efficacies of tedizolid phosphate (TZD), linezolid, and vancomycin regimens simulating human exposures at the infection site against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) were compared in an in vivo mouse pneumonia model. Immunocompetent BALB/c mice were orally inoculated with one of three strains of MRSA and subsequently administered 20 mg/kg TZD every 24 hours (q24h), 120 mg/kg linezolid q12h, or 25 mg/kg vancomycin q12h over 24 h. These regimens produced epithelial lining fluid exposures comparable to human exposures observed following intravenous regimens of 200 mg TZD q24h, 600 mg linezolid q12h, and 1 g vancomycin q12h. The differences in CFU after 24 h of treatment were compared between control and treatment groups. Vehicle-dosed control groups increased in bacterial density an average of 1.1 logs. All treatments reduced the bacterial density at 24 h with an average of 1.2, 1.6, and 0.1 logs for TZD, linezolid, and vancomycin, respectively. The efficacy of TZD versus linezolid regimens against the three MRSA isolates was not statistically different (P > 0.05), although both treatments were significantly different from controls. In contrast, the vancomycin regimen was significantly different from TZD against one MRSA isolate and from linezolid against all isolates. The vancomycin regimen was less protective than either the TZD or linezolid regimens, with overall survival of 61.1% versus 94.7% or 89.5%, respectively. At human simulated exposures to epithelial lining fluid, vancomycin resulted in minimal reductions in bacterial counts and higher mortality compared to those of either TZD or linezolid. TZD and linezolid showed similar efficacies in this MRSA pneumonia model.

Topics: Acetamides; Administration, Oral; Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Colony Count, Microbial; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Linezolid; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Oxazolidinones; Pneumonia, Staphylococcal; Survival Rate; Tetrazoles; Vancomycin

Two recently synthesized oxazolidinones: (R)-3-(4-(2-(2-methyltetrazol-5-yl)-pyridin-5-yl)-3-fluorophenyl)-5-hydroxymethyloxazolidin-2-one (DA-7157) and its corresponding pro-drug (R)-3-(4-(2-(2-methyltetrazol-5-yl)-pyridin-5-yl)-3-fluorophenyl)-2-oxo-5-oxazolidinyl) methyl disodium phosphate (DA-7218), have shown very good activity against several Gram positive bacteria, including Nocardia and Mycobacterium. In the present work we evaluated the therapeutic in vivo effects of DA-7218 on Nocardia brasiliensis. We first determined the plasma concentration of the prodrug in BALB/c mice using several doses and then tested its activity in an in vivo experimental actinomycetoma murine model. At the end of treatment, there was a statistically significant difference between the three drug receiving groups (25, 12.5 and 5 mg/kg) and the control group(saline solution) (p=0.001), proving that DA-7218 is effective for the treatment of experimental murine actinomycetoma. This compound could be a potential option for patients affected with mycetoma by Nocardia brasiliensis.

Topics: Acetamides; Actinomycosis; Animals; Disease Models, Animal; Linezolid; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Mycetoma; Nocardia; Nocardia Infections; Organophosphates; Oxazoles; Oxazolidinones; Prodrugs; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome