tak-385 and Prostatic-Neoplasms

Relugolix (Orgovyx. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), a key component of prostate cancer treatment, reduces testosterone production to slow disease progression. Relugolix (Orgovyx

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Leuprolide; Male; Prostatic Neoplasms; Testosterone

Androgen deprivation therapy, primarily via a gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor agonist or antagonist together with or without an androgen receptor antagonist, remains the mainstay of medical treatment for advanced prostate cancer. Meanwhile, relugolix has been developed as the first orally active, non-peptide, selective antagonist for the gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor. Previous randomized studies involving patients with prostate cancer have demonstrated comparable efficacy in androgen suppression between relugolix vs other gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists or agonists. This review summarizes available data on the design and development of relugolix and its therapeutic application, and discusses if relugolix represents a promising oral alternative to injectable androgen deprivation therapy. Based on current published evidence, further investigation is likely required to determine the actual clinical benefits of relugolix therapy against prostate cancer.

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Androgens; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Male; Prostatic Neoplasms; Receptors, LHRH

Hormonal therapy is the standard of care in prostate cancer treatment. The approval of the first oral androgen deprivation therapy, relugolix, to treat prostate cancer patients provides an opportunity to review adherence to oral and injectable/implantable hormonal therapies to aid patients and physicians in making informed decisions.. A PubMed search for available literature on adherence to hormonal therapy in prostate cancer was conducted, including published data on relugolix.. Adherence to oral antiandrogen therapy was above 90% by medication possession ratio in several studies worldwide and from 75% to 91% by proportion of days covered. For injectable/implantable androgen deprivation therapy, adherence to treatment ranged from 71% to 95%. In general, 60% and 29% of injections were reported to be delayed by more than 1 week and 2 weeks, respectively, with some patients experiencing testosterone increases (tests above 50 ng/dL). Although real-world data on adherence to relugolix are currently unavailable, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics models demonstrated that, if necessary, treatment interruption up to 7 days would still maintain testosterone suppression levels.. In general, adherence to hormonal therapy is high in prostate cancer. Studies revealed that adherence to injectable androgen deprivation therapy dosing schedules is important to maintain castrate levels. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics models showed that relugolix treatment interruption up to 7 days had minimal impact on testosterone suppression levels.

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Androgens; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Humans; Male; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms; Testosterone

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is an integral component in the management of prostate cancer across multiple disease states. Traditionally, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists constituted the backbone of ADT. However, gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor hormone (GnRH) antagonists also are available, which offer faster testosterone suppression and reduced likelihood of ADT-related adverse effects compared with LHRH agonists, including the potential for fewer ADT-associated major cardiac events. Until recently, all forms of LHRH agonists and GnRH antagonist formulations were of parenteral administration. However, recently relugolix gained Food and Drug Administration approval as the first oral GnRH antagonist. Relugolix achieves faster and more complete testosterone suppression compared with an LHRH agonist. This translates to more rapid prostate-specific antigen response compared with LHRH agonists. After discontinuation of relugolix, testosterone recovers faster than after GnRH agonists or injectable GnRH antagonist therapy. Overall, these factors provide opportunities for more precisely defined ADT duration when combined with radiation therapy. The rapid onset and offset of testosterone suppression with relugolix may require physicians to rethink the mechanism and goals of ADT when prescribing. As an oral formulation, relugolix enables patients to avoid pain and injection site reactions, limit extra office visits for injections, and achieve a shorter duration of experiencing the side effects of castrate testosterone levels. This convenience and tolerability may enhance physicians' willingness to prescribe ADT and patients' feeling of control during their ADT course, but the potential advantages are accompanied by the risks of patients choosing to discontinue therapy to escape side effects of ADT. This article focuses on different aspects of what is known and unknown regarding the optimal use of ADT and radiation therapy, and how relugolix, due to its properties, fit into our current treatment paradigms for localized prostate cancer.

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Male; Phenylurea Compounds; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrimidinones; Testosterone

This is a summary of a research study (known as a clinical trial) called HERO. The HERO study compared how well relugolix and leuprolide worked in lowering blood testosterone to sustained castration levels in men with advanced prostate cancer. Sustained castration is a blood testosterone level below 50 ng/dl from Day 29 through 48 weeks of treatment.. Researchers looked at 930 adult men with advanced prostate cancer: 622 of these men took relugolix (by mouth once daily) and 308 received leuprolide (injected every 3 months). The HERO study showed that more men taking relugolix (97%) achieved sustained castration through 48 weeks than men receiving leuprolide (89%). This decrease in testosterone also happened more quickly in men taking relugolix. In 184 men who were followed up for 90 days after completing treatment, blood levels of testosterone returned to normal in more men who took relugolix than men who received leuprolide. Side effects were similar among men taking relugolix or receiving leuprolide, and most were identified as mild or moderate in terms of how bad they were.. In men with advanced prostate cancer and compared with those receiving leuprolide, more men taking relugolix had lower levels of blood testosterone. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT number: NCT03085095.

Topics: Adult; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Humans; Ipilimumab; Language; Leuprolide; Male; Melanoma; Phenylurea Compounds; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrimidinones; Testosterone

Relugolix is the first oral gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor antagonist. Based on the phase III HERO trial results, relugolix received Food and Drug Administration approval for adult patients with advanced prostate cancer (PCa).. We provide an overview of the preclinical and clinical development of relugolix and its role in the current treatment landscape of PCa.. Relugolix leads to rapid inhibition of testicular production of testosterone and its rapid recovery upon discontinuation. In the HERO trial, relugolix was associated with a superior cardiovascular safety profile compared to GnRH agonists. These attributes make relugolix a promising therapy for patients with preexisting cardiovascular comorbidities, those pursuing intermittent androgen deprivation therapy, and those who desire rapid testosterone recovery during 'off-treatment' periods. In the HERO trial, very few patients received concomitant enzalutamide (n = 17, 2.7%) or docetaxel (n < 10, 1.3%). Safety of relugolix has not been established in combination with many androgen-receptor-axis targeted therapies (e.g. abiraterone, apalutamide), cabazitaxel, or lutetium Lu 177 vipivotide tetraxetan, which precludes its use in combination with these agents. In addition, being an oral drug, relugolix may also be associated with challenges of affordability, adherence, and compliance in this predominantly elderly population.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Androgen Antagonists; Androgens; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Male; Phenylurea Compounds; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrimidinones; Testosterone

Degarelix is associated with high rates of injection site reaction. The US Food and Drug Administration approved relugolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist, for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer patients.. This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of relugolix versus degarelix.. A systematic search was performed using major web databases for studies published before January 30, 2021, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) extension statement for a network meta-analysis. Studies that compared the efficacy (12-mo castration rate with testosterone ≤50 ng/dl) and safety (adverse events [AEs]) of relugolix or degarelix and of the control group (GnRH agonists) were included. We used the Bayesian approach in the network meta-analysis.. Four studies (n = 2059) met our eligibility criteria. The main efficacy analysis was conducted for two different treatments (relugolix and all doses of degarelix vs GnRH agonists); relugolix (risk ratio [RR] 1.09, 95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.95-1.23) and degarelix (RR 0.98, 95% CrI: 0.91-1.06) were not associated with different 12-mo castration rates. In the subgroup analysis, degarelix 480 mg was significantly associated with a lower castration rate (RR 0.46, 95% CrI: 0.07-0.92). In all efficacy ranking analyses, relugolix achieved the best rank. The safety analyses showed that relugolix (RR 0.99, 95% CrI: 0.6-1.6 and RR 0.72, 95% CrI: 0.4-1.3, respectively) and degarelix (RR 1.1, 95% CrI: 0.75-1.35 and RR 1.05, 95% CrI: 0.42-2.6, respectively) were not associated with either all AE or serious AE rates. In the ranking analyses, degarelix achieved the worst rank of all AEs and the best rank of serious AEs. Relugolix (RR 0.44, 95% CrI: 0.16-1.2) and degarelix (RR 0.74, 95% CrI: 0.37-1.52) were not associated with different cardiovascular event (CVE) rates; both were associated with lower CVE rates than GnRH agonists in the ranking analyses.. We found that the efficacy and safety of relugolix are comparable with those of degarelix, albeit with no injection site reaction. Such data should be interpreted with caution until large-scale direct comparison studies with a longer follow-up are available.. We found that relugolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist, has comparable efficacy and safety with degarelix, a parenteral GnRH antagonist, for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer patients.

Topics: Bayes Theorem; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Male; Network Meta-Analysis; Oligopeptides; Phenylurea Compounds; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrimidinones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; United States

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor agonists are still the most commonly used androgen deprivation treatment (ADT) drugs for prostate cancer in clinical practice. Currently, the GnRH receptor antagonists used for endocrine therapy for prostate cancer primarily include degarelix and relugolix (TAK-385). The former is administered by subcutaneous injection, while the latter is an oral drug. Compared to GnRH agonists, GnRH antagonists reduce serum testosterone levels more rapidly without an initial testosterone surge or subsequent microsurges. This review focuses on the mechanism of action of GnRH antagonists and agonists, the developmental history of GnRH antagonists, and emerging data from clinical studies of the two antagonists used as endocrine therapy for prostate cancer.

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Antineoplastic Agents; Humans; Male; Oligopeptides; Phenylurea Compounds; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrimidinones; Receptors, LHRH

Present highlights from recent research examining the treatment of advanced prostate cancer.. Although debate remains about the optimal sequencing of docetaxel and novel androgen directed therapies in addition to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in the treatment of men with new metastatic prostate cancer, the novel LHRH antagonist relugolix seems poised to become an appealing option in a choice of initial ADT. Novel radioisotopes, genomically selected therapies, and immune therapy combinations show progress in opening up new treatment options for men with castration-resistant prostate cancer.. Although no clear consensus has emerged, evolving data continue to refine the selection of systemic therapies in treatment naïve metastatic prostate cancer. With potentially less cardiotoxic androgen deprivation therapies, novel radioisotopes, targeted pharmaceuticals, and immune therapy combinations, progress appears to be on the horizon in improving outcomes for men with advanced prostate cancer.

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Humans; Male; Neoplasm Metastasis; Phenylurea Compounds; Prostatic Neoplasms; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Pyrimidinones; Radiopharmaceuticals; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) comes in several forms, such as surgical castration or medical castration using gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist or GnRH antagonist therapy. ADT is a critical treatment for high-risk and metastatic prostate cancer. There are important differences between GnRH agonists and antagonists. Here we review the mechanism of action between GnRH agonists and antagonists and the studies that led to the approval of degarelix. We also comment on the potential risks and benefits of degarelix, particularly when it comes to cardiovascular health. Finally, we describe an oral GnRH antagonist, which is not currently used in prostate cancer, but is included for completeness.

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Male; Oligopeptides; Phenylurea Compounds; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrimidinones

Recently, LHRH antagonists have been established in the management of advanced prostate cancer, although the vast majority of Medical Oncologists and Urologists still prefer the LHRH agonists. Areas Covered: In this article we assess the therapeutic outcomes and the safety of the LHRH antagonists (mainly degarelix) compared to the LHRH agonists. Expert Commentary: Relevant studies demonstrated that LHRH antagonists are at least non-inferior to the LHRH agonists regarding therapeutic efficacy and safety, while there is potential benefit over the LHRH agonists in terms of cardiovascular morbidity and disease control. Disadvantages regarding formulation and frequency of administration are currently seem to be improving, as a 3-month depot of degarelix is evaluated and relugolix, an investigational orally administered is undergoing phase I studies, while the results of relative comparative studies are warranted.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Delayed-Action Preparations; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Male; Oligopeptides; Phenylurea Compounds; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrimidinones

To characterize the impact of concomitant prostate cancer treatments with the use of relugolix, the oral GnRH receptor antagonist, in advanced prostate cancer, a subgroup and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses of the HERO study was undertaken.. Overall, 934 patients were randomized 2:1 to receive relugolix 120 mg orally once daily or leuprolide injections every 12 weeks for 48 weeks. In the setting of rising PSA, patients could receive enzalutamide or docetaxel 2 months after study initiation. Assessments included sustained testosterone suppression to castrate levels (<50 ng/dL) through 48 weeks and safety parameters. Subgroups analyzed included patients with or without concomitant enzalutamide or docetaxel. A sensitivity analysis of the primary endpoint was performed excluding patients who received concomitant therapies that may affect testosterone. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses of 20 participants in the relugolix treatment group assessed the net effect of enzalutamide on exposure to relugolix.. Overall, 125 patients (13.4%) took concomitant therapies that could impact testosterone levels. Enzalutamide (n = 23) was the most frequently used therapy in the relugolix (2.7%) and leuprolide groups (1.9%). Docetaxel (n = 13) was used by 1.3% and 1.6% of patients in the relugolix and leuprolide groups, respectively. All other relevant concomitant therapy were used in <1% of population. Sensitivity analysis showed concomitant therapy did not impact the testosterone levels. Castration rates were similar with and without concomitant use of enzalutamide or docetaxel. No clinically relevant differences in adverse events were observed between subgroups in either treatment group. No differences in relugolix C. Treatment with relugolix was associated with similar efficacy and safety profiles with and without concomitant enzalutamide or docetaxel. Standard-of-care use of relugolix in combination with these agents is supported by these data.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Docetaxel; Humans; Leuprolide; Male; Prostatic Neoplasms; Testosterone

Cardiovascular (CV) events are the leading cause of death in prostate cancer. Men with prostate cancer are likely to have CV risk factors and use CV-related concomitant medications. In the phase 3 HERO study, a 54% lower incidence of major adverse cardiac events was reported in men treated with the oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor antagonist, relugolix, vs leuprolide. Herein, we characterize the impact of concomitant CV therapies on efficacy and safety in the HERO study.. In HERO, 930 men with advanced prostate cancer (APC) were randomized 2:1 and treated with relugolix (120 mg orally once daily; after single 360 mg loading dose) or leuprolide (injections every 3 months) for 48 weeks. Subgroups analyzed included men who received antihypertensives, antithrombotics, or lipid-modifying therapies (LMAs), as well as the most common drug classes (> 10%) and single most common agent within each class. Assessments included sustained testosterone suppression to castrate levels (< 50 ng/dL) through 48 weeks and safety.. Antihypertensives, antithrombotics, and LMAs were utilized by 52.7%, 39.1%, and 39.6% of men in HERO, respectively. In the main subgroups, point estimates for sustained castration rates were generally consistent with overall estimates of relugolix and leuprolide observed in the overall population. Sustained castration rates were also mostly consistent for men taking the most common drug classes and individual agents in each class (losartan [n = 103]: relugolix, 95.4% vs leuprolide, 80.6%; amlodipine [n = 229]: 97.2% vs 85.5%; metoprolol [n = 88]: 95.7% vs 86.9%; acetylsalicylic acid [n = 259]: 97.0% vs 92.1%; clopidogrel [n = 43]: 96.4% vs 86.7%; simvastatin [n = 78]: 98.0% vs 87.3%). Incidence and types of adverse events (AEs) among men who received these medications were mostly consistent with overall population results, with some increases in grade ≥ 3 and fatal AEs.. Relugolix suppressed testosterone and was generally well tolerated when given with concomitant CV agents.. Clinical Trial ID NCT03085095.. Data presented at 15th Annual Genitourinary Cancers Symposium; February 17-19, 2022, San Francisco, CA, USA [Abstract 101, Poster board E11]. The published abstract from this presentation can be found at https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2022.40.6_suppl.101 .

Topics: Antihypertensive Agents; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Fibrinolytic Agents; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Leuprolide; Male; Prostatic Neoplasms; Testosterone

External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with neoadjuvant/adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is an established treatment option to prolong survival for patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer (PCa). Relugolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor antagonist, was evaluated in this clinical setting in comparison with degarelix, an injectable GnRH antagonist.. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of relugolix to achieve and maintain castration.. A phase 2 open-label study was conducted in 103 intermediate-risk PCa patients undergoing primary EBRT and neoadjuvant/adjuvant ADT between June 2014 and December 2015.. Patients randomly assigned (3:2) to 24-wk treatment with either daily oral relugolix or 4-wk subcutaneous depot degarelix (reference control).. The primary endpoint was the rate of effective castration (testosterone <1.73nmol/l) in relugolix patients between 4 and 24 wk of treatment. Secondary endpoints included rate of profound castration (testosterone <0.7nmol/l), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, prostate volume, quality of life (QoL) assessed using the Aging Males' Symptoms scale, and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life (30-item EORTC core questionnaire [EORTC QLQ-C30] and 25-item EORTC prostate cancer module [EORTC QLQ-PR25]) questionnaires, and safety. No formal statistical comparisons with degarelix were planned.. Castration rates during treatment were 95% and 82% with relugolix and 89% and 68% with degarelix for 1.73 and 0.7nmol/l thresholds, respectively. Median time to castration in the relugolix arm was 4 d. During treatment, PSA levels and prostate volumes were reduced in both groups. Three months after discontinuing treatment, 52% of men on relugolix and 16% on degarelix experienced testosterone recovery (statistical significance of differences not tested). Mean and median QoL scores improved following treatment discontinuation. The most common adverse event was hot flush (relugolix 57%; degarelix 61%). Lack of blinding was a potential limitation.. Relugolix achieved testosterone suppression to castrate levels within days and maintained it over 24 wk with a safety profile consistent with its mechanism of action.. Oral once-daily relugolix may be a novel oral alternative to injectable androgen deprivation therapies.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Male; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Phenylurea Compounds; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrimidinones; Risk Assessment

Injectable luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists (e.g., leuprolide) are the standard agents for achieving androgen deprivation for prostate cancer despite the initial testosterone surge and delay in therapeutic effect. The efficacy and safety of relugolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, as compared with those of leuprolide are not known.. In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients with advanced prostate cancer, in a 2:1 ratio, to receive relugolix (120 mg orally once daily) or leuprolide (injections every 3 months) for 48 weeks. The primary end point was sustained testosterone suppression to castrate levels (<50 ng per deciliter) through 48 weeks. Secondary end points included noninferiority with respect to the primary end point, castrate levels of testosterone on day 4, and profound castrate levels (<20 ng per deciliter) on day 15. Testosterone recovery was evaluated in a subgroup of patients.. A total of 622 patients received relugolix and 308 received leuprolide. Of men who received relugolix, 96.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 94.9 to 97.9) maintained castration through 48 weeks, as compared with 88.8% (95% CI, 84.6 to 91.8) of men receiving leuprolide. The difference of 7.9 percentage points (95% CI, 4.1 to 11.8) showed noninferiority and superiority of relugolix (P<0.001 for superiority). All other key secondary end points showed superiority of relugolix over leuprolide (P<0.001). The percentage of patients with castrate levels of testosterone on day 4 was 56.0% with relugolix and 0% with leuprolide. In the subgroup of 184 patients followed for testosterone recovery, the mean testosterone levels 90 days after treatment discontinuation were 288.4 ng per deciliter in the relugolix group and 58.6 ng per deciliter in the leuprolide group. Among all the patients, the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events was 2.9% in the relugolix group and 6.2% in the leuprolide group (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.88).. In this trial involving men with advanced prostate cancer, relugolix achieved rapid, sustained suppression of testosterone levels that was superior to that with leuprolide, with a 54% lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events. (Funded by Myovant Sciences; HERO ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03085095.).

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Cardiovascular Diseases; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Injections, Subcutaneous; Leuprolide; Male; Middle Aged; Phenylurea Compounds; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrimidinones; Testosterone

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Asian People; Humans; Kallikreins; Male; Phenylurea Compounds; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrimidinones; Receptors, LHRH; Testosterone

TAK-385 is a highly selective, oral, nonpeptide GnRH antagonist being investigated as a possible prostate cancer treatment.. The objectives were to evaluate safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of TAK-385 on LH and testosterone.. This was a three-part, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 dose-escalation study in 176 healthy male UK volunteers.. Part 1, single doses of TAK-385 (0 [placebo], 80, 120, 180, or 360 mg). Part 2, 14-day TAK-385 (0, 20, 40, 80, or 180 mg) daily. Part 3, 28-day TAK-385 (40 [with loading dose], 60, 80, or 160 mg) or placebo daily. Parts 2 and 3 included men aged 40-75 years.. Main outcome measures included plasma concentrations of TAK-385, LH, and testosterone.. Oral TAK-385 was readily absorbed, and steady state was reached in ≤ 14 days. Food reduced TAK-385 systemic exposure by 47-52%. Mean serum testosterone levels declined ≤ 6 hours after TAK-385 administration. Loading doses up to 360 mg on day 1 or 360 mg on day 1 followed by 240 mg on day 2 reduced the time to achieve castrate testosterone levels from ≥ 7 to <3 days. TAK-385 doses ≥ 80 mg/d achieved sustained medical castration and trough TAK-385 concentrations >4 ng/mL. After discontinuation of TAK-385 on day 28, testosterone levels normalized in most subjects in ≤ 28 days. Common adverse events included bradycardia, headache, and hot flush (all grade ≤ 2).. Oral TAK-385 (40-180 mg/d) was well tolerated and effectively lowered testosterone in healthy men. Planned phase 2 doses in men with hormone-sensitive prostate cancer are 80 and 120 mg/d.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Castration; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Food-Drug Interactions; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Luteinizing Hormone; Male; Middle Aged; Phenylurea Compounds; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrimidinones; Testosterone; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Relugolix, the first orally active, nonpeptide gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist, is approved in the United States and the European Union for the treatment of adult patients with advanced prostate cancer. The recommended dosing regimen is a 360-mg loading dose followed by a 120-mg daily dose. Relugolix and testosterone concentration data and clinical information from two phase I studies, two phase II studies, and the phase III safety and efficacy study (HERO) were used to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model and a semimechanistic population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PopPK/PD) model that characterized relugolix exposure and its relationship to testosterone concentrations. Age, body weight, and Black/African American race had at most minimal effects on relugolix exposure or testosterone concentrations with no clinical relevance. Simulations using the PopPK/PD model confirmed the recommended dosing regimen of relugolix, with the median simulated testosterone concentrations predicted to achieve castration levels (< 50 ng/dL) and profound castration levels (< 20 ng/dL) by day 2 and day 9, respectively, and demonstrated that 97.3% and 85.5% of the patients remained at castration levels (< 50 ng/dL) upon temporary interruption of treatment for 7 days and 14 days, respectively. Collectively, simulations based on the PopPK and PopPK/PD models were consistent with actual data from clinical studies, reflecting the high predictiveness of the models and supporting the reliability of model-based simulations. These models can be used to provide guidance regarding dosing recommendations under various circumstances (e.g., temporary interruption of treatment, if needed) for relugolix.

Topics: Adult; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Male; Prostatic Neoplasms; Reproducibility of Results; Testosterone; United States

We highlight concerns regarding the approval of relugolix for patients with prostate cancer. These include the unsuitable comparator arm and primary endpoint in the HERO trial, as well as potential selection bias and the poor representativeness of the trial population. Dosing adherence to a daily tablet may also be an issue in comparison to injections at 3-mo intervals. Rigorous postmarketing trials of relugolix assessing clinically meaningful endpoints for these patients are needed.

Topics: Humans; Male; Phenylurea Compounds; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrimidinones; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

The single-arm, open-label, multicenter, phase II Apa-RP study evaluates the biochemical recurrence (confirmed prostate-specific antigen [PSA] > 0.2 ng/mL)-free rate in patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer (HR-LPC) after radical prostatectomy following adjuvant apalutamide and androgen-deprivation therapy. In this substudy, relugolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, was evaluated in combination with apalutamide.. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the approved standard maintenance dose of relugolix in combination with apalutamide sustains castrate testosterone levels (< 50 ng/dL).. Twelve patients with HR-LPC who met all the main study criteria were included in the substudy. Patients received relugolix monotherapy for 2 weeks (loading dose [360 mg] at Day - 14 then 120 mg/day daily until Day - 1), then daily relugolix (120 mg) with apalutamide (240 mg) from Day 1 to Day 28. Endpoints were rate of maintained castration (testosterone < 50 ng/dL) through Day 28 (primary) and safety (secondary).. All 12 patients received relugolix and apalutamide and achieved castrate testosterone levels after 2-week relugolix monotherapy (median testosterone 348.5 ng/dL and 8.7 ng/dL at Days - 14 and - 1). All 11 patients who had testosterone measured at Day 28 maintained castrate testosterone (median 10.0 ng/dL) without relugolix dose adjustment. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in nine patients during relugolix monotherapy and in eight patients during relugolix + apalutamide coadministration. Hot flush was the most common TEAE reported, in six and four patients, respectively.. Relugolix administered at approved standard doses concurrently with apalutamide was effective in maintaining castrate testosterone levels in HR-LPC without new safety signals.. NCT04523207, 21 August 2020.. The Apa-RP study evaluates the combination of apalutamide with drugs that lower male sex hormones for reducing the risk of prostate cancer recurrence. Patients in this study had their prostate gland surgically removed and were at high risk for disease recurrence. Relugolix, a newly approved oral drug for advanced prostate cancer, lowers blood testosterone (the primary male sex hormone) and, in combination with apalutamide, may reduce the risk of prostate cancer recurrence. The Apa-RP substudy goal was to test whether relugolix lowers blood testosterone and maintains these low levels when administered with apalutamide. Researchers looked at the testosterone levels of 12 patients with early prostate cancer who received standard doses of relugolix alone for 2 weeks followed by apalutamide and relugolix for an additional 28 days. Testosterone was measured before and after 2 weeks of relugolix treatment, and then again 28 days after apalutamide was added. All 12 substudy patients achieved low testosterone levels (< 50 ng/dL) after 2 weeks of relugolix treatment. Testosterone was measured at Day 28 of relugolix + apalutamide treatment in 11 patients, all of whom maintained low testosterone without adjustment of their relugolix dose. Adverse effects were consistent with those previously reported for each drug when administered alone. All 12 patients completed the substudy and moved onto the main study, the longer-term results of which will be reported in the future. In summary, relugolix administered at the same time as apalutamide was effective in maintaining low testosterone levels in patients with prostate cancer, without any new safety concerns.

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Humans; Male; Prostatic Neoplasms; Testosterone

Relugolix is the newest form of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) approved for prostate cancer. However, as an oral drug, several real-world concerns exist, particularly medication compliance, safety with other androgen receptor-targeted agents, and financial burden to patients.. A single institution retrospective chart review was conducted evaluating all patients who were prescribed relugolix for any prostate cancer indication from January 1, 2021 to January 31, 2022. Demographic data, cardiac risk factors, concomitant therapy usage, and PSA/testosterone levels, were abstracted from the chart review. Adverse effects were obtained by examining progress notes. Compliance was assessed by clinic notes as well as prescription fills by specialty pharmacy records. The reasons patients did not fill or discontinued the medication were noted.. Hundred and one patients were prescribed relugolix, and 91 patients consented to research. Seventy-one (78%) patients filled the prescription to relugolix, with a median follow-up of 5 months. Prescription fill data were available for 45 (63%) patients, with 94% of days covered. The most commonly reported reason not to fill was cost at 50%. Sixty-six (93%) patients reported never missing a dose. PSA levels were available in 71 (100%) patients with 69 (97%) showing stable or improved PSA. Testosterone levels were available in 61 (86%) of patients, which showed 61 (100%) stable or successful castration. Twenty-four (34%) patients used relugolix in combination. No new major safety signals were seen in combination therapy. Nineteen (27%) patients had switched to another form of ADT. Fifteen of these (79%) felt similar or better on relugolix therapy.. Compliance with relugolix seemed acceptable. No major new safety signals were seen, even in combination. Among patients who switched therapy, most tolerated relugolix similarly or better than the previous form of ADT. The cost was a major reason for patients not initiating and for discontinuing therapy.

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Androgens; Humans; Male; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Testosterone

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has been a mainstay of prostate cancer treatment for decades. Relugolix was FDA-approved in 2020 and is currently the only ADT option via an oral route. While the opportunity to use an oral medication for this indication has some advantages, a balanced discussion is required to understand in what clinical settings this agent truly has benefit over long-acting injectable formulations of ADT. Furthermore, patient preference, compliance, financial toxicity, and perhaps most importantly, pharmacologic characteristics must be considered.

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Humans; Male; Phenylurea Compounds; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrimidinones

Topics: Humans; Male; Phenylurea Compounds; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrimidinones; Testosterone

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Androgens; Humans; Male; Phenylurea Compounds; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrimidinones

Androgen deprivation therapy using gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues is standard treatment for intermediate and advanced prostate cancer. GnRH agonist therapy results in an initial testosterone flare, and increased metabolic and cardiovascular risks. The GnRH antagonist relugolix is able to reduce serum testosterone levels in men with prostate cancer without inducing testosterone flare. In the HERO Phase III trial, relugolix was superior to leuprolide acetate at rapidly reducing testosterone and continuously suppressing testosterone, with faster post-treatment recovery of testosterone levels. Relugolix was associated with a 54% lower incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events than leuprolide acetate. As the first oral GnRH antagonist approved for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer, relugolix offers a new treatment option.. Lay abstract The male sex hormone testosterone promotes the growth of prostate cancer cells. Some drug treatments for prostate cancer, such as gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor agonists and antagonists, work to reduce the production of testosterone. However, GnRH receptor agonists like leuprolide acetate can increase testosterone levels at first, before reducing it, and this temporary increase can cause side effects, such as bone pain. Drugs of this type have also been linked to a higher risk of heart attacks, strokes, and death. Relugolix works a different way; it is a GnRH receptor antagonist that reduces testosterone without an initial increase. A clinical study showed that relugolix reduced testosterone levels more quickly than leuprolide acetate, a commonly used injectable drug for the treatment of prostate cancer. After stopping treatment, levels of testosterone in the blood returned to normal faster in men who received relugolix than in men who received leuprolide acetate. Men who received relugolix had a lower incidence of heart attacks, strokes, and death compared with men who received leuprolide acetate. The US FDA approved relugolix as the first oral, once-daily GnRH receptor antagonist for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer, offering men a new treatment option.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Incidence; Leuprolide; Male; Phenylurea Compounds; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrimidinones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Testosterone; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Androgens; Humans; Male; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Phenylurea Compounds; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrimidinones; Receptors, LHRH

Prostate cancer (PC) care is rapidly evolving, with improved treatment options and outcomes. Trials recently published in the New England Journal of Medicine report on an oral lutenizing-hormone-releasing hormone antagonist with superior endocrine and tolerability profiles and positive outcomes for non-metastatic PC with androgen receptor antagonists, respectively.

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Androgens; Humans; Male; Phenylurea Compounds; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrimidinones

Results from the phase 3 HERO trial(NCT03085095), presented during the 2020 American Society of Clinical Oncology Virtual Scientific Program, indicated that relugolix (Relumina) demonstrated superiority over leuprolide (Lupron) in sustained testosterone suppression through 48 weeks, fast testosterone recovery after discontinuation, and a 50% reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with advanced prostate cancer.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Humans; Leuprolide; Male; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Neoplasm Staging; Phenylurea Compounds; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrimidinones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, LHRH; Testosterone

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Androgens; Humans; Male; Phenylurea Compounds; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrimidinones

Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Androgens; Humans; Male; Phenylurea Compounds; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrimidinones

The orally active nonpeptide gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-receptor antagonist relugolix (Relumina) is being developed by Takeda and ASKA Pharmaceutical as a treatment for various sex hormone related disorders. Relugolix was recently approved for marketing in Japan as a treatment for symptoms associated with uterine fibroids, and studies evaluating the efficacy of the drug as treatment for endometriosis-associated pain and prostate cancer are currently underway. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of relugolix leading to this first approval for the treatment of symptoms associated with uterine fibroids.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Approval; Endometriosis; Female; Hormone Antagonists; Humans; Japan; Leiomyoma; Male; Middle Aged; Phenylurea Compounds; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrimidinones; Receptors, LHRH; Treatment Outcome