surotomycin and Clostridium-Infections

Current guidelines recommend the use of vancomycin for the initial treatment of moderate to severe Clostridioides difficile Infection (CDI). Surotomycin, a novel antibiotic, has been utilized for the management of CDI with variable results.. A systematic literature search was performed using the following electronic databases [Medline, Embase, google scholar and Cochrane] for eligible studies. Randomized controlled trials comparing Surotomycin with Vancomycin for the CDI treatment were included. Demographic variables and outcomes (CDI resolution, CDI recurrence, B1/NAP1/027-specific strain treatment, B1/NAP1/027-strain recurrence, death not related to treatment) were analyzed. The primary outcome was clinical cure rate defined as the resolution of CDI at the end of the 10-day drug course.. Three RCTs met the inclusion criteria with a total of 1280 patients with CDI who received either surotomycin 250 mg twice daily (642 patients) or vancomycin 125 mg four times daily (638 patients). Clinical cure rates after 10 days of treatment with either surotomycin or vancomycin were not significantly different (pooled OR: 0.89, 95% CI 0.66-1.18, p=0.41). Sustained clinical response at clinical follow-up and the overall recurrence of CDI were also not significantly different between the two groups - pooled OR 1.15 (95% CI 0.89-1.50, p=0.29) and pooled OR 0.74 (95%CI 0.52- 1.04, p=0.08), respectively. With regards to the NAP1/BI/027 strain, patients in the surotomycin group had significantly lower rates of recurrence compared to vancomycin (pooled OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19-0.63, p<0.01).. Surotomycin is non-inferior to vancomycin and offers a promising alternative for the treatment and prevention of C. diff infection.

Topics: Bias; Clostridium Infections; Humans; Lipopeptides; Peptides, Cyclic; Vancomycin

Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) remain a challenge to treat clinically due primarily to limited number of antibiotics available and unacceptably high recurrence rates. Because of this, there has been significant demand for creating innovative therapeutics, which has resulted in the development of several novel antibiotics.. This review updates seven different antibiotics that are currently in development to treat CDI including fidaxomicin, surotomycin, ridinilazole, ramoplanin, cadazolid, LFF571, and CRS3123. Available preclinical and clinical data are compared between these antibiotics.. Many of these new antibiotics display almost ideal properties for antibiotics directed against CDI. Despite these properties, not all clinical development of these compounds has been successful. These studies have provided key insights into the pathogenesis of CDI and will continue to inform future drug development. Successful phase III clinical trials should result in several new and novel antibiotics to treat CDI.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Benzimidazoles; Benzopyrans; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clostridium Infections; Depsipeptides; Humans; Lipopeptides; Oxazolidinones; Peptides, Cyclic; Pyridines; Thiazoles; Thiophenes

Antibiotic development goals for CDI include potent antimicrobial effect against C. difficile, limited killing of host microbiota, potential effect on spores, and ability to interfere with toxin production. Cadazolid, a novel, non-absorbable hybrid antibiotic has many of these criteria. In phase I and II clinical trials, cadazolid was shown to be safe, well tolerated, and efficacious positioning itself as a potential future viable therapeutic option for CDI. Areas covered: This review provides an in-depth evaluation of the chemistry, microbiology, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and clinical trial results for cadazolid. Clinical therapeutic outcomes are compared between cadazolid, fidaxomicin, and surotomycin. Expert opinion: Preclinical and early clinical studies demonstrated that cadazolid has unique properties that will likely be valuable to treat CDI and reduce recurrent infection. With compelling phase II clinical results, results from the ongoing phase III trial will better define the role of cadazolid for treating CDI in the future.

Topics: Aminoglycosides; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Clostridioides difficile; Clostridium Infections; Fidaxomicin; Humans; Lipopeptides; Oxazolidinones; Peptides, Cyclic; Treatment Outcome

The primary challenge for treating Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) is maintenance of clinical response after the end of treatment (sustained clinical response). Disease recurrence following a positive clinical response occurs in approximately 6-25 % of patients after the first episode and in up to 65 % for subsequent recurrences. Surotomycin, a novel cyclic lipopeptide antibiotic with a core derived by Streptomyces roseosporus fermentation, disrupts C. difficile cellular membrane activity in both logarithmic and stationary phases and minimally disturbs normal gastrointestinal microbiota because of its lack of activity against Gram-negative anaerobes and facultative anaerobes. Preclinical and clinical evidence indicate that surotomycin has low oral bioavailability, allowing gastrointestinal tract concentrations to greatly exceed its minimum inhibitory concentration for C. difficile. Surotomycin is well tolerated and effective in hamster models of CDI. Phase 2 clinical evidence suggests that surotomycin (250 mg twice daily) is an effective CDI treatment, with statistically lower recurrence rates than vancomycin.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Biological Availability; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clostridioides difficile; Clostridium Infections; Gastrointestinal Microbiome; Humans; Lipopeptides; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Peptides, Cyclic

Clostridium difficile infection has attained high prominence given its prevalence and impacts on patients and healthcare institutions. Multiple new approaches to the prevention and treatment of C. difficile infection (CDI) are undergoing clinical trials.. Bezlotoxumab is a monoclonal antibody against toxin B that has successfully completed phase III studies, demonstrating a significant reduction in recurrent CDI when given with standard of care antibiotics. Antibiotics under development include cadazolid and ridinilazole, whereas surotomycin has had disappointing phase III results. Multiple live biotherapeutics are being developed, including freeze thawed and encapsulated versions of faecal microbiota transplantation to improve the practicality of treating patients with recurrent CDI. Alternatives to faecal microbiota transplantation, that aim to improve safety, including a microbial suspension, RBX2660, and a complex spore formulation, SER-109, have progressed to phase II studies. A nontoxigenic C. difficile strain has also shown promise to prevent recurrent CDI. In addition, three C. difficile vaccines have progressed to phase II/III clinical trials.. The diverse approaches to treating and preventing CDI offer substantial promise that new treatment options will soon emerge, particular ones that reduce the risk of recurrences.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Neutralizing; Benzimidazoles; Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies; Clostridioides difficile; Clostridium Infections; Fecal Microbiota Transplantation; Humans; Lipopeptides; Oxazolidinones; Peptides, Cyclic; Pyridines; Recurrence; Secondary Prevention

The effects of surotomycin (CB-183,315, MK-4261), a bactericidal cyclic lipopeptide, and vancomycin, the current standard-of-care for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), on intestinal pathogens and microbiota were evaluated parallel to a Phase 2 randomized, double-blind clinical trial.. The single-centre cohort included 26 patients receiving surotomycin [125 or 250 mg twice daily (n = 9 each)] or oral vancomycin [125 mg four times daily (n = 8)] for 10 days. Faecal samples were collected at days 0-42 to quantify both C. difficile by conventional culture and the major components of the microbiome by quantitative PCR.. Surotomycin 250 mg twice daily or vancomycin 125 mg four times daily reduced faecal C. difficile counts from ∼105-107 log10 cfu/g at baseline to ≤ 102 cfu/g by days 4-10 of treatment. Day 10 counts of C. difficile in 3/9 patients receiving surotomycin 125 mg twice daily remained detectable, including one patient who failed to achieve clinical cure. Bacteroidetes and Prevotella mean counts increased 0.7 log10 or remained unchanged with surotomycin 125 and 250 mg twice daily, respectively, whereas vancomycin reduced counts by 2.5-3.2 log10 (P < 0.02). Vancomycin reduced Firmicutes counts by 2.5-2.8 log10; surotomycin moderately suppressed these microbes in a dose-dependent manner.. In this Phase 2 trial substudy, compared with vancomycin 125 mg four times daily, surotomycin 250 mg twice daily is as active in vivo against C. difficile, but was more sparing of microbiota. Surotomycin is no longer in development due to failed Phase 3 efficacy results.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacteria; Bacterial Load; Bacteriological Techniques; Clostridium Infections; Double-Blind Method; Dysbiosis; Feces; Female; Gastrointestinal Microbiome; Humans; Lipopeptides; Male; Metagenomics; Middle Aged; Peptides, Cyclic; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction; Time Factors; Vancomycin; Young Adult

The available treatment options for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) are limited by high recurrence rates. Surotomycin was a novel bactericidal cyclic lipopeptide in development to treat CDI that demonstrated non-inferiority to vancomycin in a Phase 2 trial.. To assess surotomycin safety and clinical response (non-inferiority versus vancomycin) at the end of treatment (EOT) of CDI. Additionally, to assess surotomycin response over time and sustained response at 30-40 days post-EOT (superiority versus vancomycin).. Patients with CDI were randomized (1:1) to receive twice-daily oral surotomycin 250 mg alternating with twice-daily placebo or four-times-daily oral vancomycin 125 mg for 10 days in this Phase 3, double-blind, multicentre, international trial. Clinical response over time and sustained clinical response were monitored until the end of the trial, through a follow-up period of 30-40 days. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT01598311.. A total of 285 and 292 patients with confirmed CDI were randomized to receive surotomycin and vancomycin, respectively. Surotomycin-associated clinical response at EOT was non-inferior to vancomycin (surotomycin/vancomycin: 83.4%/82.1%; difference 1.4%, 95% CI - 4.9, 7.6). Following treatment with surotomycin, both clinical response over time (stratified log-rank test, P = 0.277) and sustained clinical response (63.3%/59.0%; difference 4.3%, 95% CI - 3.6, 12.2) did not demonstrate superiority versus vancomycin at end of trial. Both treatments were generally well tolerated.. Surotomycin demonstrated non-inferiority to vancomycin for CDI clinical response at EOT. Surotomycin did not demonstrate superiority to vancomycin for clinical response over time or sustained clinical response rate.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Clostridium Infections; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Lipopeptides; Middle Aged; Peptides, Cyclic; Placebos; Treatment Outcome; Vancomycin; Young Adult

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a major public health concern. Treatment with commonly prescribed antibiotics is associated with high rates of recurrence after initial cure. Here, we present the efficacy and safety of surotomycin, an orally administered, minimally absorbed, selective bactericidal cyclic lipopeptide, compared with vancomycin, in patients with CDI.. In this Phase 2, randomized, controlled, double-blind, non-inferiority, multicentre trial, participants received surotomycin 125 mg twice daily, surotomycin 250 mg twice daily or vancomycin 125 mg four times daily for 10 days. The primary efficacy outcome was clinical response at end of treatment. The registration number of the study on clinicaltrials.gov is NCT01085591.. Clinical cure rates were similar among treatment groups (92.4% for surotomycin 125 mg twice daily, 86.6% for surotomycin 250 mg twice daily and 89.4% for vancomycin). Recurrence rates were 27.9% for surotomycin 125 mg twice daily, 17.2% for surotomycin 250 mg twice daily and 35.6% for vancomycin. The lower recurrence rate with surotomycin 250 mg twice daily versus vancomycin was statistically significant (P = 0.035). Recurrence rates were statistically similar between the surotomycin dose groups (P = 0.193). Rates of sustained clinical response at end of study were 66.7% for surotomycin 125 mg twice daily, 70.1% for surotomycin 250 mg twice daily and 56.1% for vancomycin. Incidence of adverse events was similar among treatment arms.. Recurrence rates of CDI were lower with surotomycin with higher sustained clinical response rates compared with vancomycin, both of which may offer potential clinical benefits.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Clostridioides difficile; Clostridium Infections; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Lipopeptides; Male; Middle Aged; Peptides, Cyclic; Recurrence; Treatment Outcome; Vancomycin

To investigate the molecular epidemiology and antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridioides difficile isolates from patients with C. difficile infection (CDI) from two Phase 3 clinical trials of surotomycin.. In both trials [Protocol MK-4261-005 (NCT01597505) conducted across Europe, North America and Israel; and Protocol MK-4261-006 (NCT01598311) conducted across North America, Asia-Pacific and South America], patients with CDI were randomized (1:1) to receive oral surotomycin (250 mg twice daily) or oral vancomycin (125 mg four times per day) for 10 days. Stool samples were collected at baseline and C. difficile isolates were characterized by restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) and PCR ribotyping. Susceptibility testing was performed by agar dilution, according to CLSI recommendations.. In total, 1147 patients were included in the microbiological modified ITT population. Of 992 recovered isolates, 922 (92.9%) were typed. There was a high association between REA groups and their corresponding predominant PCR ribotype (RT) for BI, DH, G and CF strains. REA group A showed more diverse PCR RTs. Overall, the most common strain was BI/RT027 (20.3%) followed by Y/RT014/020 (15.0%) and DH/RT106 (7.2%). The BI/RT027 strain was particularly prevalent in Europe (29.9%) and Canada (23.6%), with lower prevalence in the USA (16.8%) and Australia/New Zealand (3.4%). Resistance was most prevalent in the BI/RT027 strain, particularly to metronidazole, vancomycin and moxifloxacin.. A wide variation in C. difficile strains, both within and across different geographical regions, was documented by both REA and ribotyping, which showed overall good correlation.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-Infective Agents; Asia; Canada; Clostridioides; Clostridioides difficile; Clostridium Infections; DNA Restriction Enzymes; Europe; Humans; Israel; Lipopeptides; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; North America; Peptides, Cyclic; Polymerase Chain Reaction; Prohibitins; Ribotyping; South America

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is the leading cause of hospital-acquired diarrhoea in developed countries. Metronidazole and vancomycin are the mainstay of treatment, although they are associated with treatment failure and recurrence. Novel agents have emerged to address these shortcomings. We investigated the in vitro activity of a novel agent, surotomycin (formerly CB-183,315), and seven other antimicrobial agents against clinical C. difficile isolates.. Antimicrobial susceptibility to surotomycin, fidaxomicin, metronidazole, vancomycin, clindamycin, rifaximin, moxifloxacin and tigecycline was determined for 100 contemporary clinical isolates of C. difficile collected in 2013. MICs were determined by agar dilution according to CLSI procedures. In addition, 10 strains with reduced susceptibility to metronidazole (n = 6) and vancomycin (n = 4) were also tested. Strains were PCR ribotyped.. The MICs of surotomycin for the 100 isolates ranged from ≤0.06 to 2 mg/L, with a geometric mean (GM) of 0.31 mg/L and an MIC50/90 of 0.25/0.5 mg/L. The MIC range of surotomycin was 0.25-1 mg/L (GM = 0.45 mg/L) for isolates with reduced metronidazole susceptibility and 0.125-0.5 mg/L (GM = 0.25 mg/L) for isolates with reduced vancomycin susceptibility. The three most common ribotypes were 001 (31.0%), 014/020 (17.0%) and 078/126 (17.0%). Ribotype 014/020 exhibited the lowest MICs of surotomycin (GM = 0.22 mg/L); the highest MICs were for ribotype 078/126 (GM = 0.72 mg/L).. Surotomycin exhibited potent in vitro activity against all the isolates tested, including those with elevated metronidazole and vancomycin MICs. The potential role of this agent in the treatment of CDI requires further clinical evaluation.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Infective Agents; Child; Child, Preschool; Clostridioides difficile; Clostridium Infections; Female; Genotype; Humans; Lipopeptides; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Middle Aged; Peptides, Cyclic; Ribotyping; Spain; Young Adult