sulindac and Liver-Cirrhosis--Alcoholic

sulindac has been researched along with Liver-Cirrhosis--Alcoholic* in 3 studies

Other Studies

3 other study(ies) available for sulindac and Liver-Cirrhosis--Alcoholic

ArticleYear
Reversible acute decrease in renal function by NSAIDs in cirrhosis.
    The American journal of the medical sciences, 1987, Volume: 294, Issue:3

    The effects of sulindac were compared with those of ibuprofen or naproxen on creatinine clearance and urinary prostanoids in patients with severe alcoholic cirrhosis. Sulindac caused acute declines in all renal parameters in four of five patients. The effect occurred with serum concentrations of the active sulfide metabolite comparable to those in patients with no hepatic impairment. The patient who was not affected had less effects on urinary PGE2 and TxB2 and no effect on 6-keto PGF1 alpha. In this patient, dosing with ibuprofen caused pronounced declines in all urinary prostanoids and a decrease in creatinine clearance. Two other patients treated with ibuprofen and one treated with naproxen also suffered decrements in all parameters. In conclusion, sulindac had suppressant effects on renal prostanoids associated with declines in creatinine clearance in these patients with cirrhosis, indicating a need for similar cautions with its use as with other NSAIDs.

    Topics: Acute Disease; Creatinine; Female; Humans; Ibuprofen; Indenes; Kidney; Liver Cirrhosis, Alcoholic; Male; Middle Aged; Naproxen; Prostaglandins; Sulindac; Urodynamics

1987
Effects of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs on renal function in patients with renal insufficiency and in cirrhotics.
    American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation, 1986, Volume: 8, Issue:5

    We have assessed the effects of acute and chronic administration of etodolac, ketoprofen, and indomethacin on renal function in patients with mild to moderate chronic renal insufficiency (CRI). We studied 18 normal volunteers and 24 patients with CRI due to hypertension and/or diabetes mellitus with creatinine clearances between 19 and 83 mL/min/1.73 m2. Clearance studies were performed with the first dose of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) to compare acute effects of the agent with a no-drug control. Subjects then received the NSAID for three to five days and, on the last day of study, underwent another clearance study to assess the effects of a single dose of NSAID superimposed on chronic dosing. With each dose of each NSAID, inulin and paraaminohippurate (PAH) clearances and fractional excretion of NA+ decreased. However, the baseline control collections after chronic dosing did not differ from the no-drug control periods. Hence, the decline in renal function with each dose is transient, and no overall adverse effect on renal function occurred with chronic dosing. In five patients with cirrhosis, we assessed the renal sparing effects of sulindac. After equilibration on a fixed sodium intake, they received a 200-mg dose of sulindac. In one patient, no adverse effect occurred; the remaining patients suffered declines in creatinine clearance of 29%, 87%, 37%, and 37%, respectively. This effect was transient and returned to control values six to eight hours after sulindac administration. At the time of maximal depression of renal function, serum concentrations of sulindac sulfide were comparable to those in subjects with normal hepatic function.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

    Topics: Acetates; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Creatinine; Dinoprostone; Etodolac; Humans; Indomethacin; Ketoprofen; Kidney; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Kidney Function Tests; Liver Cirrhosis, Alcoholic; Prostaglandins E; Sulindac

1986
Effects of sulindac and ibuprofen in patients with cirrhosis and ascites. An explanation for the renal-sparing effect of sulindac.
    Gastroenterology, 1986, Volume: 90, Issue:1

    Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs impair renal function in susceptible patients with cirrhosis and ascites. A new antiinflammatory drug, sulindac, is reported not to affect renal function. To evaluate its renal-sparing mechanism, sulindac was administered for 5 days and ibuprofen for 1 day to 10 patients and paraaminohippurate and inulin clearances, serum and urine eicosanoids, and serum and urine sulindac metabolites were monitored. Ibuprofen reduced renal clearances in the 5 subjects with greatest sodium retention, whereas sulindac had no effect. Plasma concentration of the active sulfide metabolite was markedly increased in liver patients, and this concentration correlated with the inhibition of serum thromboxane (r = 0.75, p = 0.01). The percent inhibition of serum thromboxane with sulindac administration correlated with the inhibition of urinary eicosanoids (r = 0.68-0.81, all p less than 0.02). Ibuprofen was generally a more potent inhibitor of serum and urine eicosanoids. Thus, a major factor in the renal-sparing effect of sulindac appears to be its less potent inhibition of renal and extrarenal cyclooxygenase systems.

    Topics: 6-Ketoprostaglandin F1 alpha; Adult; Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors; Dinoprostone; Humans; Ibuprofen; Indenes; Kidney; Kidney Function Tests; Liver Cirrhosis, Alcoholic; Middle Aged; Prostaglandins E; Renal Circulation; Sulindac; Thromboxane B2; Time Factors

1986