sulindac and Adenocarcinoma

NSAIDs are known to be inhibitors of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) accounting for their anti-inflammatory and anti-tumor activities. However, the anti-tumor activity cannot be totally attributed to their COX-2 inhibitory activity as these drugs can also inhibit the growth and tumor formation of COX-2-null cell lines. Several potential targets aside from COX-2 for NSAIDs have been proposed. 15-Hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (15-PGDH), a key prostaglandin catabolic enzyme, was recently shown to be a tumor suppressor. Effects of NSAIDs on 15-PGDH expression were therefore studied. Flurbiprofen, indomethacin and other NSAIDs stimulated 15-PGDH activity in colon cancer HT29 cells as well as in lung cancer A549 cells and glioblastoma T98G cells. (R)-flurbiprofen and sulindac sulfone, COX-2 inactive analogs, also stimulated 15-PGDH activity indicating induction of 15-PGDH is independent of COX-2 inhibition. Stimulation of 15-PGDH expression and activity by NSAIDs was examined in detail in colon cancer HT29 cells using flurbiprofen as a stimulant. Flurbiprofen stimulated 15-PGDH expression and activity by increasing transcription and translation and by decreasing the turnover of 15-PGDH. Mechanism of stimulation of 15-PGDH expression is not clear. Protease(s) involved in the turnover of 15-PGDH remains to be identified. However, flurbiprofen down-regulated matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) which was shown to degrade 15-PGDH, but up-regulated tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1), an inhibitor of MMP-9 contributing further to a slower turnover of 15-PGDH. Taken together, NSAIDs may up-regulate 15-PGDH by increasing the protein expression as well as decreasing the turnover of 15-PGDH in cancer cells.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenocarcinoma of Lung; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Cell Line, Tumor; Colonic Neoplasms; Cyclooxygenase 2; Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors; Enzyme Activation; Flurbiprofen; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Glioblastoma; Humans; Hydroxyprostaglandin Dehydrogenases; Indomethacin; Kinetics; Lung Neoplasms; Matrix Metalloproteinase 9; Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitors; Mice; Signal Transduction; Sulindac; Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase-1; Up-Regulation

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenomatous Polyps; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Aspirin; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cyclooxygenase 2; Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors; Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Humans; Isoenzymes; Male; Membrane Proteins; Mice; Prostaglandin-Endoperoxide Synthases; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sulindac

This multicenter, phase II clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the activity of the combination of docetaxel and exisulind in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who failed a prior platinum-containing regimen.. Patients with measurable disease and adequate organ function received exisulind (250 mg) given orally, twice daily, and docetaxel (36 mg/m) administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 4-week cycle for up to six cycles. In the absence of disease progression or intolerable side effects, patients continued taking 250 mg of exisulind orally, twice daily.. Thirty-three patients (median age 60 years; range 34-77; median performance status 1) were enrolled. There were no objective responses documented. Sixteen patients [48%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 31%-66%] had stable disease after 8 weeks of treatment. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.1 months (95% CI: 1.5-3.2 months); median overall survival time was 8.0 months (range 0.2-25.9 months). Toxicity was moderate, with dose adjustment for adverse event/toxicity required for docetaxel or exisulind in 13 (39.3%) patients. Grade 3/4 lymphopenia, neutropenia, and anemia occurred in 48.5%, 12.1%, and 9.1% of patients, respectively. Grade 3 or greater toxicity was seen in 12.1%, 6.1%, and 3% of patients for nausea/vomiting, dyspnea, and abdominal pain, respectively.. Treatment with exisulind and weekly docetaxel was not active in NSCLC patients who failed a prior platinum-containing regimen. Further study of this combination does not seem warranted.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Large Cell; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Combined Modality Therapy; Docetaxel; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Prognosis; Radiotherapy Dosage; Remission Induction; Sulindac; Survival Rate; Taxoids; Treatment Outcome

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the main known precursor condition of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). BE is defined by the presence of metaplasia above the normal squamous columnar junction and has mainly been attributed to gastroesophageal reflux disease and chronic reflux esophagitis. Thus, the rising incidence of EAC in the Western world is probably mediated by chronic esophageal inflammation, secondary to gastroesophageal reflux disease in combination with environmental risk factors such as a Western diet and obesity. However, (at present) risk prediction tools and endoscopic surveillance have shown limited effectiveness. Chemoprevention as an adjunctive approach remains an attractive option to reduce the incidence of neoplastic disease. Here, we investigate the feasibility of chemopreventive approaches in BE and EAC via inhibition of inflammatory signaling in a transgenic mouse model of BE and EAC (L2-IL1B mice), with accelerated tumor formation on a high-fat diet (HFD). L2-IL1B mice were treated with the IL-1 receptor antagonist Anakinra and the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) aspirin or Sulindac. Interleukin-1b antagonism reduced tumor progression in L2-IL1B mice with or without a HFD, whereas both NSAIDs were effective chemoprevention agents in the accelerated HFD-fed L2-IL1B mouse model. Sulindac treatment also resulted in a marked change in the immune profile of L2-IL1B mice. In summary, anti-inflammatory treatment of HFD-treated L2-IL1B mice acted protectively on disease progression. These results from a mouse model of BE support results from clinical trials that suggest that anti-inflammatory medication may be effective in the chemoprevention of EAC.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Chemoprevention; Diet, High-Fat; Disease Models, Animal; Esophageal Neoplasms; Mice; Phenotype; Sulindac

β-lapachone, a major component in an ethanol extract of Tabebuia avellanedae bark, is a promising potential therapeutic drug for various tumors, including lung cancer, the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. In the first part of this study, we found that apoptotic cell death induced in lung cancer cells by high concentrations of β-lapachone was mediated by increased activation of the pro-apoptotic factor JNK and decreased activation of the cell survival/proliferation factors PI3K, AKT, and ERK. In addition, β-lapachone toxicity was positively correlated with the expression and activity of NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) in the tumor cells. In the second part, we found that the FDA-approved non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug sulindac and its metabolites, sulindac sulfide and sulindac sulfone, increased NQO1 expression and activity in the lung adenocarcinoma cell lines CL1-1 and CL1-5, which have lower NQO1 levels and lower sensitivity to β-lapachone treatment than the A549 cell lines, and that inhibition of NQO1 by either dicoumarol treatment or NQO1 siRNA knockdown inhibited this sulindac-induced increase in β-lapachone cytotoxicity. In conclusion, sulindac and its metabolites synergistically increase the anticancer effects of β-lapachone primarily by increasing NQO1 activity and expression, and these two drugs may provide a novel combination therapy for lung cancers.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenocarcinoma of Lung; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antineoplastic Agents; Cell Line, Tumor; Drug Synergism; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; NAD(P)H Dehydrogenase (Quinone); Naphthoquinones; Sulindac; Up-Regulation

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs such as sulindac sulfide have shown promising antineoplastic activity in multiple tumor types, but toxicities resulting from COX inhibition limit their use in cancer therapy. We recently described a N,N-dimethylethyl amine derivative of sulindac sulfide, sulindac sulfide amide (SSA), that does not inhibit COX-1 or -2, yet displays potent tumor cell growth-inhibitory activity. Here, we studied the basis for the growth-inhibitory effects of SSA on human lung adenocarcinoma cell lines. SSA potently inhibited the growth of lung tumor cells with IC50 values of 2 to 5 μmol/L compared with 44 to 52 μmol/L for sulindac sulfide. SSA also suppressed DNA synthesis and caused a G0-G1 cell-cycle arrest. SSA-induced cell death was associated with characteristics of autophagy, but significant caspase activation or PARP cleavage was not observed after treatment at its IC50 value. siRNA knockdown of Atg7 attenuated SSA-induced autophagy and cell death, whereas pan-caspase inhibitor ZVAD was not able to rescue viability. SSA treatment also inhibited Akt/mTOR signaling and the expression of downstream proteins that are regulated by this pathway. Overexpression of a constitutively active form of Akt was able to reduce autophagy markers and confer resistance to SSA-induced cell death. Our findings provide evidence that SSA inhibits lung tumor cell growth by a mechanism involving autophagy induction through the suppression of Akt/mTOR signaling. This unique mechanism of action, along with its increased potency and lack of COX inhibition, supports the development of SSA or related analogs for the prevention and/or treatment of lung cancer.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenocarcinoma of Lung; Antineoplastic Agents; Autophagy; Cell Cycle; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Cell Survival; Humans; Inhibitory Concentration 50; Lung Neoplasms; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt; Ribosomal Protein S6 Kinases, 70-kDa; Signal Transduction; Sulindac; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

The non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug sulindac is an effective chemopreventive agent in sporadic colorectal cancer but its potential benefit in mismatch repair deficient cancers remains to be defined. We wanted to determine whether genetic defects that are relevant for colorectal cancer, such as Msh2 or p53 deficiency, would influence the efficiency of sulindac chemoprevention or increase the side effects.. Msh2 or p53 deficient and wild-type mice received feed containing 160-320 ppm sulindac for up to 25 weeks with or without a concurrent treatment with the carcinogen azoxymethane. Colon tissue was analysed by histopathology and molecular biology methods.. We show that sulindac prevented azoxymethane-induced distal colon tumours in all mice. In the proximal colon, however, sulindac induced new inflammatory lesions on the mucosal folds, which further developed into adenocarcinoma in up to 18-25% of the p53 or Msh2 deficient mice but rarely in wild-type mice. This region in the proximal colon was characterised by a distinct profile of pro- and anti-inflammatory factors, which were modulated by the sulindac diet, including upregulation of hypoxia inducible factor 1α and macrophage inflammatory protein 2.. These data show that the sulindac diet promotes carcinogenesis in the mouse proximal colon possibly through chronic inflammation. Sulindac has both beneficial and harmful effects in vivo, which are associated with different microenvironments within the colon of experimental mice. Deficiency for the Msh2 or p53 tumour suppressor genes increases the harmful side effects of long-term sulindac treatment in the mouse colon.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Anticarcinogenic Agents; Apoptosis; Azoxymethane; Carcinogens; Cell Transformation, Neoplastic; Colon; Colonic Neoplasms; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Gene Expression Regulation; Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha Subunit; Inflammation Mediators; Intestinal Mucosa; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Mice, Knockout; MutS Homolog 2 Protein; Precancerous Conditions; Sulindac; Tumor Suppressor Protein p53

Evidence supports the protective role of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) and statins against colon cancer. Experiments were designed to evaluate the efficacies atorvastatin and NSAIDs administered individually and in combination against colon tumor formation. F344 rats were fed AIN-76A diet, and colon tumors were induced with azoxymethane. One week after the second azoxymethane treatment, groups of rats were fed diets containing atorvastatin (200 ppm), sulindac (100 ppm), naproxen (150 ppm), or their combinations with low-dose atorvastatin (100 ppm) for 45 weeks. Administration of atorvastatin at 200 ppm significantly suppressed both adenocarcinoma incidence (52% reduction, P = 0.005) and multiplicity (58% reduction, P = 0.008). Most importantly, colon tumor multiplicities were profoundly decreased (80%-85% reduction, P < 0.0001) when given low-dose atorvastatin with either sulindac or naproxen. Also, a significant inhibition of colon tumor incidence was observed when given a low-dose atorvastatin with either sulindac (P = 0.001) or naproxen (P = 0.0005). Proliferation markers, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, cyclin D1, and β-catenin in tumors of rats exposed to sulindac, naproxen, atorvastatin, and/or combinations showed a significant suppression. Importantly, colon adenocarcinomas from atorvastatin and NSAIDs fed animals showed reduced key inflammatory markers, inducible nitric oxide synthase and COX-2, phospho-p65, as well as inflammatory cytokines, TNF-α, interleukin (IL)-1β, and IL-4. Overall, this is the first report on the combination treatment using low-dose atorvastatin with either low-dose sulindac or naproxen, which greatly suppress the colon adenocarcinoma incidence and multiplicity. Our results suggest that low-dose atorvastatin with sulindac or naproxen might potentially be useful combinations for colon cancer prevention in humans.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Anticholesteremic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Atorvastatin; Azoxymethane; beta Catenin; Carcinogens; Colonic Neoplasms; Cyclin D1; eIF-2 Kinase; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; Heptanoic Acids; Immunoenzyme Techniques; Interleukin-4; Male; Naproxen; Nitric Oxide Synthase Type II; Pyrroles; Rats; Rats, Inbred F344; Signal Transduction; Sulindac; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs including sulindac are well documented to be highly effective for cancer chemoprevention. However, their cyclooxygenase (COX)-inhibitory activities cause severe gastrointestinal, renal, and cardiovascular toxicities, limiting their chronic use. Recent studies suggest that COX-independent mechanisms may be responsible for the chemopreventive benefits of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and support the potential for the development of a novel generation of sulindac derivatives lacking COX inhibition for cancer chemoprevention. A prototypic sulindac derivative with a N,N-dimethylammonium substitution called sulindac sulfide amide (SSA) was recently identified to be devoid of COX-inhibitory activity yet displays much more potent tumor cell growth-inhibitory activity in vitro compared with sulindac sulfide. In this study, we investigated the androgen receptor (AR) signaling pathway as a potential target for its COX-independent antineoplastic mechanism and evaluated its chemopreventive efficacy against prostate carcinogenesis using the transgenic adenocarcinoma of mouse prostate model. The results showed that SSA significantly suppressed the growth of human and mouse prostate cancer cells expressing AR in strong association with G(1) arrest, and decreased AR level and AR-dependent transactivation. Dietary SSA consumption dramatically attenuated prostatic growth and suppressed AR-dependent glandular epithelial lesion progression through repressing cell proliferation in the transgenic adenocarcinoma of mouse prostate mice, whereas it did not significantly affect neuroendocrine carcinoma growth. Overall, the results suggest that SSA may be a chemopreventive candidate against prostate glandular epithelial carcinogenesis.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Animals; Anticarcinogenic Agents; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Chemoprevention; Disease Models, Animal; Growth Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Mice, Transgenic; Prostaglandin-Endoperoxide Synthases; Prostatic Neoplasms; Receptors, Androgen; Sulindac

Constitutive activation of the signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (Stat3) has been detected in various human cancers and has been linked to tumor development and progression. Oncogenic Stat3 signaling results in induction of specific target genes, among which survivin is implicated in the proliferation and survival of cancer cells. Targeting of Stat3 constitutive expression by the nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) sulindac has been demonstrated to exert antineoplastic effects in oral squamous cell carcinoma cells in vitro and in vivo.. The expression and functional role of Stat3 and survivin was evaluated in 2 salivary gland adenocarcinoma cell lines (HSY and HSG). In addition, the effects of the NSAID sulindac and other cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors on Stat3 and survivin expression and on cell proliferation and apoptosis of HSY and HSG cells were analyzed.. Messenger RNA and protein expression of Stat3 and survivin was detected in HSY and HSG cell lines. Treatment of these cells with siRNA against Stat3 or survivin inhibited cell proliferation and induced apoptosis. Moreover, Stat3 siRNA treatment down-regulated the protein and mRNA expression of survivin, and survivin forced expression partially reversed the antineoplastic effects of Stat3 siRNA treatment. Treatment of HSY and HSG cells with the NSAID sulindac, but not other COX inhibitors, induced significant decreases in cell proliferation and increases in apoptosis, accompanied by down-regulation of Stat3 and survivin expression. In contrast, survivin forced expression or transfection with constitutively active Stat3 attenuated the effects of sulindac on cell growth and apoptosis.. Taken together, these data support the importance of the constitutive Stat3 signaling for growth and survival of salivary gland cancer cells through the induction of survivin. Inhibition of the oncogenic Stat3-survivin pathway in these cells can be achieved by selective targeting techniques or treatment with the NSAID sulindac and holds promise for the treatment of salivary gland cancer.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Humans; Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins; Microtubule-Associated Proteins; RNA, Messenger; Salivary Gland Neoplasms; Signal Transduction; STAT3 Transcription Factor; Sulindac; Survivin

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs such as sulindac have shown promising antineoplastic activity, although toxicity from cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibition and the suppression of prostaglandin synthesis limits their use for chemoprevention. Previous studies have concluded that the mechanism responsible for their antineoplastic activity may be COX independent. To selectively design out the COX inhibitory activity of sulindac sulfide (SS), in silico modeling studies were done that revealed the crucial role of the carboxylate moiety for COX-1 and COX-2 binding. These studies prompted the synthesis of a series of SS derivatives with carboxylate modifications that were screened for tumor cell growth and COX inhibitory activity. A SS amide (SSA) with a N,N-dimethylethyl amine substitution was found to lack COX-1 and COX-2 inhibitory activity, yet potently inhibit the growth of human colon tumor cell lines, HT-29, SW480, and HCT116 with IC(50) values of 2 to 5 micromol/L compared with 73 to 85 micromol/L for SS. The mechanism of growth inhibition involved the suppression of DNA synthesis and apoptosis induction. Oral administration of SSA was well-tolerated in mice and generated plasma levels that exceeded its in vitro IC(50) for tumor growth inhibition. In the human HT-29 colon tumor xenograft mouse model, SSA significantly inhibited tumor growth at a dosage of 250 mg/kg. Combined treatment of SSA with the chemotherapeutic drug, Camptosar, caused a more sustained suppression of tumor growth compared with Camptosar treatment alone. These results indicate that SSA has potential safety and efficacy advantages for colon cancer chemoprevention as well as utility for treating malignant disease if combined with chemotherapy.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Apoptosis; Camptothecin; Cell Division; Cell Line, Tumor; Colonic Neoplasms; Cyclooxygenase 1; Cyclooxygenase 2; Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors; Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor; Humans; Irinotecan; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Mice; Mice, Nude; Models, Molecular; Neoplasm Proteins; Protein Conformation; Sulindac; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays

Pharmacological activators of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARgamma) inhibit growth of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines in vitro and in xenograft models. Because these agents engage off-target pathways, we have assessed the effects of PPARgamma by overexpressing the protein in NSCLC cells. We reported previously that increased PPARgamma inhibits transformed growth and invasiveness and promotes epithelial differentiation in a panel of NSCLC expressing oncogenic K-Ras. These cells express high levels of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and produce high levels of prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)). The goal of these studies was to identify the molecular mechanisms whereby PPARgamma inhibits tumorigenesis. Increased PPARgamma inhibited expression of COX-2 protein and promoter activity, resulting in decreased PGE(2) production. Suppression of COX-2 was mediated through increased activity of the tumor suppressor phosphatase and tensin homolog, leading to decreased levels of phospho-Akt and inhibition of nuclear factor-kappaB activity. Pharmacological inhibition of PGE(2) production mimicked the effects of PPARgamma on epithelial differentiation in three-dimensional culture, and exogenous PGE(2) reversed the effects of increased PPARgamma activity. Transgenic mice overexpressing PPARgamma under the control of the surfactant protein C promoter had reduced expression of COX-2 in type II cells and were protected against developing lung tumors in a chemical carcinogenesis model. These data indicate that high levels of PGE(2) as a result of elevated COX-2 expression are critical for promoting lung tumorigenesis and that the antitumorigenic effects of PPARgamma are mediated in part through blocking this pathway.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cell Line, Tumor; Culture Media; Cyclooxygenase 2; Dinoprostone; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Enzyme Activation; Enzyme Inhibitors; Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect; Humans; Luciferases; Lung Neoplasms; Mice; Mice, Mutant Strains; Mice, Transgenic; Neoplasms, Experimental; NF-kappa B; Organ Culture Techniques; PPAR gamma; Promoter Regions, Genetic; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt; PTEN Phosphohydrolase; Sulindac; Transfection; Transgenes

It is known that cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 expression is increased in Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinomas. We studied COX-2 expression and the effect sulindac has on the genesis of Barrett's esophagus and adenocarcinoma in rats undergoing esophagogastroduodenal anastomosis (EGDA).. Fifty-one rats were divided into a control group (n=27), a 500 ppm sulindac-treated group (n=15) and 1000 ppm sulindac-treated group (n=9). Randomly selected rats were killed by diethyl ether inhalation at 20 and 40 weeks after surgery.. At 40 weeks, rats treated with 1000 ppm sulindac showed narrower esophageal diameter and milder inflammation than the control rats. At 40 weeks, the incidence of Barrett's esophagus was similar between control and sulindac-treated groups, but the incidence of adenocarcinoma was significantly lower in the 1000 ppm sulindac-treated group than either the control or 500 ppm sulindac-treated groups. COX-2 was significantly increased in the lower esophagus of control rats killed at 40 weeks. Cyclin D1 expression was negligible in the sulindac- treated group compared with the control group.. We suggest that the chemopreventive effect of sulindac is related to decreased COX-2 and cyclin D1 expression, which may be influenced by reduced inflammation.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Barrett Esophagus; Blotting, Western; Cyclin D1; Cyclooxygenase 2; Duodenogastric Reflux; Esophageal Neoplasms; Immunohistochemistry; Male; Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Sulindac

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs such as sulindac inhibit human colorectal carcinogenesis through a mechanism involving the direct inhibition of cyclooxygenase (Cox)-2. However, a wealth of recent evidence indicates that these agents might elicit their effects through mechanisms independently of Cox-2. In this study, we investigated the effects of sulindac and its metabolite, sulindac sulfide on modulation of the critical survival kinase, protein kinase B (PKB). Here, we demonstrate for the first time that treatment with either sulindac or sulindac sulfide results in a decrease in PKB activity, and we provide compelling evidence that this occurs through two distinct mechanisms. Additionally, we report that overexpression of, and conditional activation of PKB attenuates the apoptotic effects of sulindac, but not for sulindac sulfide - the metabolic metabolite of sulindac. We also demonstrate that treatment with sulindac sulfide, but not sulindac, results in a very early robust activation of both caspase-8 and -9. Furthermore, we show that the apoptotic effects of sulindac sulfide can be reverted by both the caspase-8 and -9 inhibitors. Evidence is provided to indicate that PKB is targeted by robust caspase activation due to sulindac sulfide. Hence, further investigation into the mechanisms regulating conversion of sulindac to sulindac sulfide (or direct use of the latter compound), may enhance our ability to target cancers with enhanced signaling through the growth factor-->phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Cell Death; Cell Line, Tumor; Colonic Neoplasms; Flow Cytometry; Humans; Kinetics; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt; Sulindac

Cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors have antitumorigenic activity and increase the expression of the early growth response gene Egr-1, a tumor suppressor gene and transcription factor. In this study, we have investigated the gene regulatory and anti-invasive activity of two traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), sulindac sulfide and indomethacin. These compounds inhibited tumor cell invasion and induced Egr-1 expression in lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells. Overexpression of Egr-1 reduced cellular invasion in the Matrigel system, whereas suppression of Egr-1 by small interference RNA (siRNA) attenuated the inhibition of Matrigel invasion by these compounds, indicating that Egr-1 is responsible for the decrease in invasion reported following treatment with NSAIDs. Egr-1-overexpressing cells were analyzed for genes involved in invasion and metastasis. Thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1) an antiangiogenic and anti-invasion protein was up-regulated by Egr-1 overexpression, which was confirmed following treatment with sulindac sulfide. Furthermore, the induction of TSP-1 by sulindac sulfide was blocked by Egr-1 siRNA. When TSP-1 was sequestered by the addition of anti-TSP-1 antibody, the inhibition of invasion by sulindac sulfide was attenuated, indicating that TSP-1 is involved in the inhibition of invasion by NSAIDs. We used the Min mouse model to determine if sulindac sulfide would increase Egr-1 and TSP-1 in vivo, because this model is widely used to study the effects of NSAIDs on tumor formation. Treatment of Min mice with concentrations of sulindac sulfide that inhibit tumor formation increased the expression of Egr-1 and TSP-1 in colonic tissues and in the polyps of these mice. This is the first report suggesting that COX inhibitors suppress tumor cell invasion via TSP-1, which occurs downstream of Egr-1.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Cell Line, Tumor; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors; Early Growth Response Protein 1; Genes, Tumor Suppressor; Humans; Indomethacin; Lung Neoplasms; Mice; Neoplasm Invasiveness; RNA, Messenger; RNA, Small Interfering; Sulindac; Thrombospondin 1

Cell migration is essential for invasive and metastatic phenotypes of cancer cells. Potential chemopreventive agents of cancer-sulindac sulfide, caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE), curcumin, and (+)-catechin-have been reported to interfere with several types of intracellular signaling. In this study, we examined the effects of these agents on transforming growth factor-beta(TGF-beta)-induced motility and Akt phosphorylation in A549 cells. Judged by gold particle phagokinesis assay, sulindac sulfide, CAPE, and curcumin suppressed the motility of A549 cells promoted by TGF-beta. LY294002, a specific inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase(PI3K)/Akt signaling, also suppressed TGF-beta-induced motility and Akt phosphorylation. Sulindac sulfide and CAPE, but not curcumin, suppressed TGF-beta-induced Akt phosphorylation. We conclude that sulindac sulfide and CAPE suppress the motility promoted by TGF-beta in lung adenocarcinoma cells through the suppression of Akt. Our observations raise the possibility that these agents, except for (+)-catechin, can be applied not only as chemopreventive agents but also as anti-metastatic therapy.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Antineoplastic Agents; Caffeic Acids; Catechin; Cell Movement; Curcumin; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Neovascularization, Pathologic; NF-kappa B; Phenylethyl Alcohol; Phosphoinositide-3 Kinase Inhibitors; Phosphorylation; Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases; Proto-Oncogene Proteins; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt; Sulindac; Transforming Growth Factor beta; Tumor Cells, Cultured

Epidemiologic studies have revealed a decreased risk of colon cancer among people who have regularly taken cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors such as aspirin or other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Whereas the selective COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib and exisulind, a metabolic product of sulindac, have gained increasing attention as efficacious chemopreventive agents against colon and prostate cancer, not much is known about the underlying molecular targets and mechanisms. Moreover, the side effects of NSAIDs are a major obstacle for large-scale application to the prevention of cancer in humans; for example, in the United States in 1998, there were 16,550 deaths from NSAID-induced gastrointestinal complications. The toxicity associated with these compounds is raising concerns, and more needs to be known about their mode of action and molecular targets.. We used the transgenic mouse prostate (TRAMP) model, which exhibits similarities with human prostate cancer, including epithelial origin, progression from the PIN stage to adenocarcinoma, and metastasis by a transgene that is hormonally regulated by androgens. In addition to histologically analyzing the PIN lesions of the dorsolateral prostate from TRAMP mice, we delineated the molecular targets and mechanisms of celecoxib and exisulind against mouse PIN lesions. We performed Western blot analysis of the total protein lysate from the tissues of mouse PIN lesions to measure the level of expression of androgen receptor, vascular endothelial growth factor, nuclear factor-kappaB p65, BclII, AKT (total and phosphorylated Ser473), p53, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21WAF1/CIP1, p27, BAX, and caspase-3 to demonstrate the COX-2-independent mechanism involved in the inhibition of PIN lesions of the dorsolateral prostate by both celecoxib and exisulind.. We found for the first time that (a) both celecoxib and exisulind as dietary supplements induce strong inhibitory effects against prostate cancer at doses of 800 and 500 ppm, respectively, after 16 weeks; (b) the histologic analysis of the dorsolateral prostate after 2 weeks of treatment indicated a reduction of PIN lesions from 75% to 19% with celecoxib and to 16% with exisulind; (c) more importantly, those few PINs and adenocarcinomas in the groups treated with celecoxib or exisulind showed more apoptotic cells, lower levels of proliferating cell nuclear antigen, and a lower number of mitotic cells. To understand the molecular mechanisms involved in the inhibition of PIN lesions, first, we examined the expression of molecular targets involved in angiogenesis and inflammatory processes. It was clearly evident from Western blot analysis of the total protein lysate derived from the dorsolateral prostate tissues with PIN lesions that expression of androgen receptor, vascular endothelial growth factor, nuclear factor-kappaB p65, and BclII is down-regulated more effectively by celecoxib. Down-regulation of AKT protein (total and phosphorylated at Ser473) signaling by celecoxib clearly indicates an inhibition of the survival gene and the pathological process that could otherwise lead to adenocarcinoma.. Overall, the findings from this study clearly show the effectiveness of celecoxib and exisulind in reducing the PIN lesions by modulating a cascade of molecular targets involved in COX-2-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Whereas these agents are already in clinical trial or in use as chemopreventive agents, findings from this study demonstrate the difference in their mode of action, thus helping us to understand the side effects.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Apoptosis; Blotting, Western; Celecoxib; Dietary Supplements; Dinoprostone; Disease Models, Animal; Immunohistochemistry; Male; Mice; Mice, Transgenic; Models, Biological; Phosphorylation; Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Sulfonamides; Sulindac; Time Factors; Transgenes

Surgery is the definitive treatment in familial adenomatous polyposis coli (FAP). Proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis is recommended for the majority of FAP patients. Only in patients with attenuated FAP, is a colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) accepted, although the risk for rectum carcinoma remains increased. Sulindac, a chemoprophylactic agent, regresses colorectal adenomas in patients with FAP. Under systemic Sulindac-therapy, three carcinomas in the rectum after colectomy with IRA have been described. We report the first known case of rectum carcinoma in a patient with FAP, 51 months after IRA and local Sulindac therapy.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenomatous Polyposis Coli; Adult; Antineoplastic Agents; Colectomy; Colonic Pouches; Humans; Ileum; Proctoscopy; Rectal Neoplasms; Rectum; Sulindac; Suppositories; Time Factors

Colony stimulating factors (CSF) promote leukocyte survival by reducing apoptotic cell death. However, their effects on non-leukocyte cell types are unclear. Reduced apoptosis in colon epithelial cells is thought to contribute to the initiation of cancer. Here, we report diminished spontaneous apoptosis of human colon epithelial HT-29 cells in the presence of macrophage-CSF or granulocyte macrophage-CSF. Moreover, reduced apoptosis induced by sulindac sulfide was also observed with macrophage-CSF. Granulocyte-CSF failed to modify spontaneous or sulindac sulfide induced apoptosis. It seems, therefore, that the action of CSFs on apoptosis is not confined to haematopoietic cells but may be extended to stromal cells.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Apoptosis; Colonic Neoplasms; Depression, Chemical; Epithelial Cells; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor; Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor; Humans; Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor; Neoplastic Stem Cells; Stromal Cells; Sulindac; Tumor Cells, Cultured

The cornerstone of the systemic treatment of advanced colorectal cancer is 5-fluorouracil.However, 5-fluorouracil-induced apoptosis is dependent on p53, a tumor suppressor gene that is lost or inactivated in at least 85% of human colorectal cancers. Here we show that tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL)/Apo2L triggers caspase-8-mediated truncation of BID, mitochondrial activation of caspase-9, and apoptosis in both p53(+/+) or p53(-/-) isogenic HCT116 colorectal cancer cells. TRAIL/Apo2L also sensitizes both p53(+/+) or p53(-/-) colorectal cancer cells to ionizing radiation. In contrast, we find that TRAIL/Apo2L fails to activate caspase-9 or induce apoptosis in isogenic HCT116 colorectal cancer cells that are deficient in BAX, a proapoptotic gene that is mutated in >50% of colorectal cancers of the microsatellite mutator phenotype. Loss of BAX also renders colorectal cancer cells resistant to TRAIL/Apo2L-mediated radiosensitization. We additionally demonstrate that TRAIL/Apo2L-induced death of p53(+/+)- or p53(-/-)- BAX-proficient but not BAX-deficient colorectal cancer cells is augmented by reducing nuclear factor-kappaB-dependent expression of Bcl-x(L) with either a peptide that disrupts the inhibitor of kappaB kinase complex or the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, sulindac sulfide. These results indicate that the combination of TRAIL/Apo2L with either irradiation or sulindac may be highly effective against both p53-proficient and p53-deficient colorectal cancers; however, BAX-deficient tumors may evade elimination by TRAIL/Apo2L-based regimens. Our findings may aid the development and genotype-specific application of TRAIL/Apo2L-based combinatorial regimens for the treatment of colorectal cancers.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Amino Acid Sequence; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins; bcl-2-Associated X Protein; bcl-X Protein; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Synergism; Genes, p53; Humans; I-kappa B Kinase; Membrane Glycoproteins; Molecular Sequence Data; NF-kappa B; Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases; Proto-Oncogene Proteins; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2; Recombinant Proteins; Sulindac; TNF-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand; Tumor Cells, Cultured; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Green tea is the most effective beverage for cancer prevention in humans. Looking at the concept of combination cancer chemoprevention, we previously reported the synergistic effects of (-)-epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) with sulindac, and the additive effects of EGCG with tamoxifen, on cancer-preventive activity in human lung cancer cell line PC-9. This paper reports confirmation of the synergistic effects of EGCG with sulindac on the inhibition of intestinal tumors in multiple intestinal neoplasia (Min) mice. Treatment with both green tea extract and sulindac significantly reduced the number of tumors from 72.3 +/- 28.3 to 32.0 +/- 18.7 tumors per mouse, a decrease of 44.3%, whereas treatment with green tea extract alone or with sulindac alone reduced it to 56.7 +/- 3.5 and 49.0 +/- 12.7, respectively. The results also indicated that green tea extract inhibited tumor growth in Min mice almost as potently as sulindac itself did. The three treated groups did not show any adenocarcinomas, whereas 10.8% of the control group did. Since cancer-preventive agents like sulindac and tamoxifen are associated with adverse effects, we discuss the possibility of non-toxic, combination cancer chemoprevention with green tea, looking at the goal of truly effective cancer prevention.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Animals; Catechin; Intestinal Neoplasms; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Mice, Mutant Strains; Plant Extracts; Sulindac; Tea

Beta-catenin acts as a transcriptional coactivator by forming a complex with T-cell factor/lymphoid enhancer factor (TCF/LEF) DNA-binding proteins. Aberrant transactivation of a certain set of target genes by beta-catenin and TCF4 complexes has been implicated in familial and sporadic colorectal tumorigenesis. A colorectal cancer cell line, DLD-1, becomes irregularly multilayered, when maintained confluent for 2-3 weeks, and forms numerous dome-like polypoid foci piled-up over the surface of cell sheets. By the use of a strict tetracycline-regulation system, we found that the continuous suppression of beta-catenin/TCF4-mediated gene transactivation by dominant-negative TCF4B (deltaN30) reduced these piled-up foci and restored a simple monolayer of polarized columnar cells resembling normal intestinal epithelium. The restoration of epithelial cell polarity was evident in two ways: (a) the formation of microvilli over the apical surface; and (b) the distribution of a tight junction protein, ZO-1, to the lateral plasma membrane. Retroviral expression of stabilized beta-catenin (deltaN89) induced the formation of similar piled-up foci in untransformed IEC6 intestinal epithelial cells. Sulindac, a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug effective against colorectal tumorigenesis in familial adenomatous polyposis syndrome, suppressed the formation of foci. The loss of epithelial cell polarity may be a critical cellular event driving beta-catenin/TCF4-mediated intestinal tumorigenesis.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Amino Acid Sequence; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; beta Catenin; Cell Division; Cell Membrane; Cell Polarity; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cytoskeletal Proteins; Doxycycline; Epithelial Cells; Genes, MDR; Humans; Intestinal Mucosa; Membrane Proteins; Molecular Sequence Data; Phosphoproteins; Rats; Retroviridae; Sulindac; TCF Transcription Factors; Trans-Activators; Transcription Factor 7-Like 2 Protein; Transcription Factors; Transcriptional Activation; Tumor Cells, Cultured; Zonula Occludens-1 Protein

Nitric oxide-releasing nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NO-NSAIDs), consisting of a known nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and a nitric oxide (NO)-releasing group, are reported safer than NSAIDS: To assess their potential in colon cancer chemoprevention, we studied in vitro the effect of NO-aspirin, NO-sulindac, and NO-ibuprofen on colonocyte kinetics. These three NO-NSAIDs reduced the growth of cultured HT-29 colon adenocarcinoma cells much more effectively than the corresponding NSAIDs; e.g., at 24 h, their IC(50) values were as follows: (a) aspirin, >5000 microM; (b) NO-aspirin, 1 microM; (c) sulindac, 750 microM; (d) NO-sulindac, 150 microM; (e) ibuprofen, >1000 microM; and (f) NO-ibuprofen, 42 microM. This effect was due to inhibition of proliferation and induction of apoptosis and perhaps to the induction of novel cell changes, characterized by extensive DNA degradation. NO-NSAIDs also blocked the G(0)-G(1) to S cell cycle transition. Their superior effectiveness compared with traditional NSAIDs, combined with their reported safety, makes them promising candidates for chemopreventive agents against colon cancer.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Anticarcinogenic Agents; Apoptosis; Aspirin; Cell Cycle; Cell Division; Colon; Colonic Neoplasms; Growth Inhibitors; HT29 Cells; Humans; Ibuprofen; Nitric Oxide Donors; Sulindac; Tumor Cells, Cultured

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) reduce the incidence of colon cancer, but their use is limited by toxicity in the gastrointestinal tract. The coupling of a nitric oxide-releasing moiety to NSAIDs strongly reduces these side effects. We demonstrated that the NO-releasing sulindac (nitrosulindac) has much more potent effects on colon adenocarcinoma cell lines compared to sulindac. Moreover, it could inhibit the growth of cells in soft agar experiments, demonstrating the antineoplastic activity at low concentration of nitrosulindac. However, this reduction in the growth of colon cancer cells seemed to be independent of the classical apoptosis pathway and could be explained by a cytostatic effect. Nitrosulindac caused a light perturbation of the cell cycle parameters not linked to a modification of the levels of p21 or the proliferating cell nuclear antigen. Moreover, neither sulindac, nor nitrosulindac, were able to inhibit the NF-kappa B pathway. These data suggested that nitrosulindac could be a better solution compared to other NSAIDs in the treatment of colon cancer.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antineoplastic Agents; Caspase 3; Caspases; Cell Division; Colonic Neoplasms; Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21; Cyclins; Cyclooxygenase 2; Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor; Humans; Isoenzymes; Membrane Proteins; NF-kappa B; Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen; Prostaglandin-Endoperoxide Synthases; Sulindac; Tumor Cells, Cultured

In previous studies, we have found that expression of 15-lipoxygenase-1 (15-LOX-1) and its main product, 13-S-hydroxyoctadecadienoic acid, are decreased in human colorectal cancers and that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can therapeutically induce 15-LOX-1 expression to trigger apoptosis in human colorectal cancer cells. NSAIDs similarly induce apoptosis in esophageal cancer cells, although the mechanisms of these effects remain to be defined. In the present study, we tested whether 15-LOX-1 is down-regulated in human esophageal cancers using paired normal and tumor human surgical samples and whether NSAIDs can up-regulate 15-LOX-1 to restore apoptosis in esophageal cancer cells. We found that: (a) 15-LOX-1 was down-regulated in human esophageal carcinomas; (b) NSAIDs induced 15-LOX-1 expression during apoptosis in esophageal cancer cells; and (c) 15-LOX-1 inhibition suppressed NSAID-induced apoptosis, which was restored by 13-S-hydroxyoctadecadienoic acid but not by its parent compound, linoleic acid. These findings demonstrate that 15-LOX-1 is down-regulated in human esophageal carcinomas and that NSAIDs induce apoptosis in esophageal cancer cells via up-regulation of 15-LOX-1. They also support the concept that the loss of the proapoptotic role of 15-LOX-1 in epithelial cancers is not limited to human colorectal cancers.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Apoptosis; Arachidonate 15-Lipoxygenase; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Enzyme Induction; Esophageal Neoplasms; Gene Expression Regulation, Enzymologic; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Humans; Linoleic Acids; Nitrobenzenes; Sulfonamides; Sulindac; Up-Regulation

Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression is up-regulated in several types of human cancers and has also been directly linked to carcinogenesis. To investigate the role of COX-2 in pancreatic cancer, we evaluated COX-2 protein expression in primary human pancreatic adenocarcinomas (n = 23) and matched normal adjacent tissue (n = 11) by immunoblot analysis. COX-2 expression was found to be significantly elevated in the pancreatic tumor specimens compared with normal pancreatic tissue. To examine whether the elevated levels of COX-2 protein observed in pancreatic tumors correlated with the presence of oncogenic K-ras, we determined the K-ras mutation status in a subset of the tumors and corresponding normal tissues. The presence of oncogenic K-ras did not correlate with the level of COX-2 protein expressed in the pancreatic adenocarcinomas analyzed. These observations were also confirmed in a panel of human pancreatic tumor cell lines. Furthermore, in the pancreatic tumor cell line expressing the highest level of COX-2 (BxPC-3), COX-2 expression was demonstrated to be independent of Erk1/2 activation. The lack of correlation between COX-2 and oncogenic K-ras expression suggests that Ras activation may not be sufficient to induce COX-2 expression in pancreatic tumor cells and that the aberrant activation of signaling pathways other than Ras may be required for up-regulating COX-2 expression. We also report that the COX inhibitors sulindac, indomethacin and NS-398 inhibit cell growth in both COX-2-positive (BxPC-3) and COX-2-negative (PaCa-2) pancreatic tumor cell lines. However, suppression of cell growth by indomethacin and NS-398 was significantly greater in the BxPC-3 cell line compared with the PaCa-2 cell line (P = 0.004 and P < 0.001, respectively). In addition, the three COX inhibitors reduce prostaglandin E(2) levels in the BxPC-3 cell line. Taken together, our data suggest that COX-2 may play an important role in pancreatic tumorigenesis and therefore be a promising chemotherapeutic target for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Animals; Cell Line, Transformed; Codon; Cricetinae; Cyclooxygenase 2; Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors; Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors; Dinoprostone; Enzyme Induction; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Genes, ras; Humans; Indomethacin; Isoenzymes; Membrane Proteins; Mesocricetus; Neoplasm Proteins; Nitrobenzenes; Pancreas; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Point Mutation; Prostaglandin-Endoperoxide Synthases; Signal Transduction; Sulfonamides; Sulindac

The efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is considered to be a result of their inhibitory effect on cyclooxygenase (COX) activity. Here, we report that flufenamic acid shows two opposing effects on COX-2 expression; it induces COX-2 expression in the colon cancer cell line (HT-29) and macrophage cell line (RAW 264.7); conversely, it inhibits tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha)- or lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced COX-2 expression. This inhibition correlates with the suppression of TNFalpha- or LPS-induced NFkappaB activation by flufenamic acid. The inhibitor of extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase, p38, or NFkappaB does not affect the NSAID-induced COX-2 expression. These results suggest that the NSAID-induced COX-2 expression is not mediated through activation of NFkappaB and mitogen-activated protein kinases. An activator of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, 15-deoxy-Delta(12,14)-prostaglandin J(2), also induces COX-2 expression and inhibits TNFalpha-induced NFkappaB activation and COX-2 expression. Flufenamic acid and 15-deoxy-Delta(12,14)-prostaglandin J(2) also inhibit LPS-induced expression of inducible form of nitric-oxide synthase and interleukin-1alpha in RAW 264.7 cells. Together, these results indicate that the NSAIDs inhibit mitogen-induced COX-2 expression while they induce COX-2 expression. Furthermore, the results suggest that the anti-inflammatory effects of flufenamic acid and some other NSAIDs are due to their inhibitory action on the mitogen-induced expression of COX-2 and downstream markers of inflammation in addition to their inhibitory effect on COX enzyme activity.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Colonic Neoplasms; Cyclooxygenase 2; Enzyme Induction; Flufenamic Acid; Gene Expression Regulation, Enzymologic; Humans; Isoenzymes; Lipopolysaccharides; Macrophages; Membrane Proteins; Nitric Oxide Synthase; Nitric Oxide Synthase Type II; Prostaglandin D2; Prostaglandin-Endoperoxide Synthases; Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear; Sulindac; Transcription Factors; Tumor Cells, Cultured; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Epidemiological and model studies with laboratory animals have provided evidence that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs reduce the risk of colon cancer. Sulindac, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, has been shown to inhibit azoxymethane (AOM)-induced colon carcinogenesis in rats when administered continuously before, during, and after carcinogen treatment (initiation and postinitiation periods) or when given continuously beginning 14 weeks after carcinogen administration (promotion/ progression stage). The present study was designed to investigate the chemopreventive efficacy of sulindac sulfone (exisulind), the sulfone metabolite of sulindac, when administered during the promotion/progression stage of colon carcinogenesis in comparison to the effect during the initiation and postinitiation periods. We have also studied the modulating effect of exisulind on colonic tumor apoptosis. At 5 weeks of age, groups of male F344 rats were fed diets containing 0%, 0.06%, and 0.12% exisulind. At 7 weeks of age, groups of animals were injected s.c. with AOM (15 mg/kg body weight, once weekly for 2 weeks). Animals intended for the promotion/progression study and receiving 0% exisulind were switched to an experimental diet containing 0.12% exisulind at 14 weeks after the second AOM treatment. All rats remained on their respective dietary regimens until the termination of the study, 50 weeks after the second AOM injection. Colon tumors were evaluated histopathologically for tumor type. Administration of 0.06% and 0.12% exisulind during the initiation and postinitiation periods significantly inhibited the incidence and multiplicity of invasive and/or noninvasive adenocarcinomas of the colon. The inhibition of colon tumorigenesis by exisulind was associated with a significant retardation of body weight gain shortly after sulfone administration and increased apoptosis in the colon tumors. In contrast, administration of the higher dose (0.12%) of exisulind during the promotion/progression stage had only minimal effects on colon tumorigenesis and apoptosis in the colon tumors, suggesting that early administration, but not late administration, may be required for chemopreventive efficacy of this drug.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Administration, Oral; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Anticarcinogenic Agents; Apoptosis; Azoxymethane; Carcinogens; Cell Transformation, Neoplastic; Colonic Neoplasms; Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors; Disease Progression; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Male; Neoplasm Invasiveness; Rats; Rats, Inbred F344; Sulindac; Weight Gain

S-methylmethane thiosulfonate (S-MMTS), isolated from cauliflower and having antiproliferative activity, and the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug sulindac have been shown to inhibit chemically induced colon carcinogenesis when they are administered during the initiation and/ or post-initiation stages. The present study was designed to investigate the chemopreventive efficacy of 80 p.p.m. S-MMTS administered during the initiation and post-initiation stages and of S-MMTS and sulindac administered together at low doses (40 and 160 p.p.m., respectively) during the promotion/progression phases (late in the premalignant stage) of colon carcinogenesis. At 5 weeks of age, groups of male F344 rats were fed diets containing 0 (control diet) or 80 p.p.m. S-MMTS. At 7 and 8 weeks of age all rats except those in the vehicle-treated groups were given s.c. injections of 15 mg/kg body wt azoxymethane (AOM). Rats receiving the control diet and intended for the study of inhibition of colon carcinogenesis during the promotion/progression phases were continued on the control diet for 14 weeks after the second AOM treatment; they were then switched to experimental diets containing 80 p.p.m. S-MMTS, 160 p.p.m. sulindac or 40 p.p.m. S-MMTS plus 160 p. p.m. sulindac. The rats were maintained on their respective dietary regimens until 52 weeks after carcinogen treatment and were then killed. Colon tumors were evaluated histopathologically. Administration of 80 p.p.m. S-MMTS alone during the initiation and post-initiation stages and promotion/progression stages had no significant effect on colon tumor inhibition. In contrast, the administration of 160 p.p.m. sulindac during the promotion/progression stages did significantly inhibit total colon tumor multiplicity (P < 0.05). Moreover, co-administration of 40 p.p. m. S-MMTS with 160 p.p.m. sulindac during the promotion/progression stages suppressed the incidence and multiplicity of non-invasive adenocarcinomas (P < 0.05-0.01) and multiplicity of invasive and total adenocarcinomas of the colon to a significant degree (P < 0. 05-0.01). These findings have potential clinical implications.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenoma; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating; Azoxymethane; Carcinogens; Colonic Neoplasms; Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor; Drug Therapy, Combination; Male; Methyl Methanesulfonate; Rats; Rats, Inbred F344; Sulindac

Cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 mRNA and protein expression were found to be frequently elevated in human pancreatic adenocarcinomas and cell lines derived from such tumors. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated cytoplasmic COX-2 expression in 14 of 21 (67%) pancreatic carcinomas. The level of COX-2 mRNA was found to be elevated in carcinomas, relative to histologically normal pancreas from a healthy individual, as assessed by reverse transcription-PCR. COX-2 protein expression was detected by the Western blot assay in three of five pancreatic carcinoma cell lines (BxPC-3, Capan-1, and MDAPanc-3), whereas COX-1 protein was detected in two of the five cell lines (BxPC-3 and Capan-1). Increased levels of COX-2 mRNA were found in four of five cell lines, and only in PANC-1 cells was the low level of transcript comparable to that in the normal pancreas. The level of COX-2 mRNA was positively correlated with the differentiation status of the tumor of origin for each cell line, COX-2 protein expression was up-regulated by epidermal growth factor when the cells were grown in absence of serum. Finally, two nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, sulindac sulfide and NS398, produced a dose-dependent inhibition of cell proliferation in all pancreatic cell lines tested. No correlation was found between the level of COX-2 or COX-1 expression and the extent of growth inhibition. Treatment of BxPC-3 cells with sulindac sulfide and NS398 resulted in an induction of COX-2 expression. Our findings indicate that COX-2 up-regulation is a frequent event in pancreatic cancers and suggest that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs may be useful in the chemoprevention and therapy of pancreatic carcinoma.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Cell Division; Cyclooxygenase 1; Cyclooxygenase 2; Epidermal Growth Factor; Humans; Isoenzymes; Membrane Proteins; Nitrobenzenes; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Prostaglandin-Endoperoxide Synthases; RNA, Messenger; Sulfonamides; Sulindac; Tumor Cells, Cultured

Sulindac sulfide (SS), the active metabolite of the colon cancer chemopreventive compound sulindac, inhibits the proliferation of HT-29 colon cancer cells mainly by inducing cell quiescence. We determined by bivariate flow-cytometric analysis both the DNA and cyclin protein content of individual cells. Thus, we assessed in detail the expression of several cyclins during the cell-cycle phases and demonstrated that SS (i) decreases the expression of cyclins B1 and E and (ii) increases the expression of cyclins D1, D2 and D3, particularly in the G1 phase of the cell cycle. SS-induced apoptotic cells expressed both E- and D-type cyclins but not cyclin B1. The changes in cyclin expression combined with reduced catalytic activity of cyclin-dependent kinases could explain in molecular terms the anti-proliferative effect of SS on HT-29 colon cancer cells. These changes may contribute to the chemopreventive effect of sulindac.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Cell Cycle; Cell Division; Colonic Neoplasms; Cyclin B; Cyclin B1; Cyclin D1; Cyclins; HT29 Cells; Humans; Sulindac

Like adenomatous polyps in familial adenomatous polyposis, some sporadic colorectal polyps have been reported to regress in response to sulindac administration. However, a rapidly growing invasive rectal cancer developed in one of 15 patients with sulindac-treated sporadic adenomatous colorectal polyps 16 months after sulindac treatment. In this patient, both the adenomatous polyp that responded partially to sulindac and the rectal cancer developing after sulindac therapy showed immunostaining for cyclooxygenase-2. Although short term sulindac therapy seems to be able to cause some adenomatous colorectal polyps to regress, 4 months of sulindac therapy may not reliably prevent colorectal cancer development in these patients.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenomatous Polyps; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Colonic Polyps; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms, Second Primary; Rectal Neoplasms; Sulindac

The nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug sulindac (sulfoxide) is known to cause regression and prevent recurrence of adenomas in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. The mechanism of action does not appear to require inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis since the sulfone metabolite of sulindac (FGN-1) retains the antineoplastic properties of sulindac but lacks inhibitory effects on cyclooxygenase, types 1 and 2. FGN-1 has been shown to induce apoptosis in a variety of tumor cell lines, and selective apoptosis of neoplastic cells has been proposed to account for its antineoplastic properties. Since angiogenesis is necessary for tumor progression and may be related to apoptosis, it is possible that inhibition of angiogenesis may also contribute to the antineoplastic properties of sulindac or FGN-1. In order to test this possibility, cells derived from several different types of human lung tumors were grafted intradermally in Balb/c mice. Sulindac sulfoxide and its sulfide and sulfone metabolites were administered for 3 days orally, in a daily dose of 0.025-0.5 mg, and angiogenesis was measured after 72 h using a previously described method. The results showed that sulindac sulfoxide and sulfone statistically inhibited angiogenesis.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Transplantation; Neovascularization, Pathologic; Sulindac

Recent evidence supports the theory that tumor growth in vivo depends on evasion of normal homeostatic control mechanisms that operate through induction of cell death by apoptosis. This study tested the hypothesis that several potential chemopreventive agents share the ability to induce apoptosis and that inhibition of apoptosis is a mechanism of tumor promoters. The present study was designed to investigate whether the chemopreventive properties of sulindac, curcumin, and phenylethyl-3-methylcaffeate (PEMC) and the tumor-promoting activity of 6-phenylhexyl isothiocyanate (PHITC) that were observed in our previous studies are associated with the induction or inhibition of apoptosis in azoxymethane (AOM)-induced colon tumors in male F344 rats. At 5 weeks of age, groups of rats were fed control (modified AIN-76A) diet or diets containing 320 ppm of sulindac, 2000 ppm of curcumin, 750 ppm of PEMC, or 640 ppm of PHITC. At 7 weeks of age, all rats except those intended for vehicle (normal saline) treatment were given AOM (15 mg/kg body weight) once weekly for 2 weeks. To study the effect of sulindac administered during promotion/progression stage, the rats were fed the control diet initially and then fed the experimental diet containing 320 ppm of sulindac 14 weeks after the second AOM treatment. The rats were sacrificed 52 weeks after carcinogen treatment, and their colonic tumors were subjected to histopathological evaluation and the appearance of apoptosis. In the current study, chronic administration of sulindac, curcumin, and PEMC or sulindac given only during promotion/progression significantly increased the apoptotic index (percentage of apoptosis) as compared to administration of the control diet; the apoptotic indices in the control, sulindac, curcumin, and PEMC diets were 8.3, 17.6, 17.7, and 18.5%, respectively, and in sulindac administered during promotion/progression stage, the apoptotic index was 19.1%. However, dietary PHITC blocked the process of apoptosis during colon carcinogenesis. The apoptotic index in PHITC diet was 7.0%. Taken together, our data show that chemopreventive properties of agents are correlated with the degree of apoptosis. Therefore apoptosis seems to be a reliable biomarker for the evaluation of potential agents for cancer prevention.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Anticarcinogenic Agents; Apoptosis; Azoxymethane; Biomarkers, Tumor; Caffeic Acids; Carcinogens; Colonic Neoplasms; Curcumin; Isothiocyanates; Male; Rats; Rats, Inbred F344; Sulindac

We evaluated the effect of sulindac sulfide (SS), which reduces cell number and induces apoptosis in cultured colon cancer cells (CCCs), on expression of the proliferation markers PCNA and Ki-67 in HT-29 and HCT-15 CCCs; only the former express cyclooxygenases. DNA content and PCNA/Ki-67 expression were analyzed by bivariate flow cytometry. SS inhibited cell proliferation, determined by the reduced expression of PCNA and Ki-67, roughly by half at 72 h, and induced apoptosis (accounting for about two-thirds and one-third of the reduction in cell number, respectively). A similar effect of SS occurred in HT-29 and HCT-15 CCCs, and also in non-colonic cells, indicating that this rather general effect of SS on cultured cells is not dependent on inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Biomarkers, Tumor; Cell Count; Cell Cycle; Cell Division; Colonic Neoplasms; HL-60 Cells; HT29 Cells; Humans; Ki-67 Antigen; Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen; Sulindac

Sulindac causes regression of and prevents recurrence of colonic adenomas in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Although cell cycle arrest and apoptosis have been proposed, the mechanism of action is poorly understood. In this study, we characterized the growth-inhibitory effects of active metabolites of sulindac in cultured colon adenocarcinoma cells by determining the contribution of apoptosis and cell cycle arrest and the requirement for cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibition and p53 involvement and compared the effects of sulindac metabolites with the chemotherapeutic drug, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Time course and dose-response experiments demonstrated that increased apoptosis paralleled the growth-inhibitory effects of the sulfide and sulfone. A relationship among a series of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was observed between potency for growth inhibition and ability to induce apoptosis but not potency to inhibit COX. For example, the sulfone was at least 5000-fold less potent than the sulfide for inhibiting COX but only 6.5-fold less potent for inducing apoptosis. Moreover, the prostaglandin analogue, dimethyl-prostaglandin E2, failed to reverse the apoptosis-inducing effects of the sulfide. Sulindac metabolites caused G1 cell cycle arrest in proliferating cells but were comparably effective in nonproliferating cells. In contrast, 5-FU treatment was less effective in nonproliferating cells. Combined treatment with sulindac metabolites and 5-FU did not result in an additive apoptotic response. Treatment of cells with 5-FU increased p53 protein levels, whereas sulindac metabolites did not induce expression. Saos-2 cells, which lack p53, responded to sulindac metabolites but not 5-FU. These results show that apoptosis primarily contributes to growth inhibition by sulindac metabolites. The biochemical pathway does not require COX inhibition or p53 induction and appears to be fundamentally different from the apoptotic response to 5-FU.

Topics: 16,16-Dimethylprostaglandin E2; Adenocarcinoma; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Apoptosis; Cell Cycle; Cell Division; Cell Survival; Colonic Neoplasms; Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fluorouracil; Growth Inhibitors; Humans; Prostaglandin-Endoperoxide Synthases; Sulindac; Time Factors; Tumor Cells, Cultured; Tumor Suppressor Protein p53

We assessed the effect of sulindac sulfide (SS), a colon cancer chemopreventive agent, on the proliferation and apoptosis in the colon cancer cell lines HCT-15 and HT-29. We applied a triparameter flow cytometric analysis that simultaneously determined DNA content, expression of Ki-67 or proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), and extent of DNA strand breaks by TUNEL (TdT-mediated dUTP nick end labeling). HCT-15 and HT-29 cells were exposed to SS 200 microM and 175 microM, respectively, for up to 72 h. As expected, SS inhibited proliferation and induced apoptosis. SS also induced several subpopulations of cells defined by their expression of proliferation markers and DNA strand breaks. By 72 h the rapidly proliferating cells [PCNA/Ki-67(+)/TUNEL(-)] were reduced from > 90% to about one third. Of the remaining cells, about one third were apoptotic [PCNA/Ki-67(-)/TUNEL(+)] and one third were quiescent [PCNA/Ki-67(-)/TUNEL(-)]. Another subpopulation was detected that was PCNA/Ki-67(+)/TUNEL(+), some had a dominant subdiploid peak and over half were in S or G2/M phases by DNA content. Thus, a subpopulation of apoptotic cells strongly expressed PCNA and Ki-67, suggesting that their specificity as proliferation markers may need reassessment. Similar results were obtained with the HL-60 promyelocytic cell line.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Antineoplastic Agents; Cell Division; Colonic Neoplasms; DNA Fragmentation; DNA, Neoplasm; HL-60 Cells; HT29 Cells; Humans; Ki-67 Antigen; Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen; Sulindac; Tumor Cells, Cultured

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs lower the incidence of and mortality from colon cancer. Sulindac reduces the number and size of polyps in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. We have shown that sulindac and sulindac sulfide reversibly reduce the proliferation rate of HT-29 colon cancer cells, alter their morphology, induce them to accumulate in the G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle, and sulindac sulfide induces cell death by apoptosis. In this study we confirmed that sulindac and sulindac sulfide prevent HT-29 cells from progressing from the G0/G1 into the S phase. This block in cell cycle progression is associated with an initial rise, then an abrupt decrease in the levels of p34cdc2 protein. Sulindac and sulindac sulfide decrease the levels of mitotic cyclins, induce the levels of p21WAF-1/cip1, and reduce the total levels of pRB, with a relative increase in the amount of the underphosphorylated form of pRB in a time- and concentration-dependent manner. In addition, these compounds reduce the levels of mutant p53. These responses are not associated with intestinal cell differentiation and occur independent of the ability of these compounds to induce apoptosis. We conclude that sulindac and sulindac sulfide reduce the levels of major components of the molecular cell cycle machinery and alter the levels of several tumor suppressor proteins in a manner consistent with cell cycle quiescence. These mechanisms may be operative in vivo to account, in part, for the anti-neoplastic effects of these compounds.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Blotting, Western; Cell Cycle; Cell Division; Cell Line; Colonic Neoplasms; Cyclins; Genes, p53; Genes, Retinoblastoma; Humans; Mitosis; Retinoblastoma Protein; Sulindac; Tumor Suppressor Protein p53

Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), have cancer preventive and tumor regressive effects in the human colon. They lower the incidence of and mortality from colorectal cancer and sulindac reduces the number and size of polyps in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. We studied the effect of sulindac, and its metabolite sulindac sulfide, on the proliferation of HT-29 colon adenocarcinoma cells. Both compounds reduced the proliferation rate of these cells, changed their morphology, and caused them to accumulate in the G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle. These responses were time- and concentration-dependent and reversible. In addition, these compounds reduced the level and activity of several cyclin-dependent kinases (cdks), which regulate cell cycle progression. Sulindac and sulindac sulfide also induced apoptosis in these cells at concentrations that affected their proliferation, morphology, and cell cycle phase distribution. Sulindac sulfide was approximately sixfold more potent than sulindac in inducing these cellular responses. Our results indicate that inhibition of cell cycle progression and induction of apoptotic cell death contribute to the anti-proliferative effects of sulindac and sulindac sulfide in HT-29 cells. These findings may be relevant to the cancer preventive and tumor regressive effects of these compounds in humans.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Amino Acid Sequence; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Apoptosis; CDC2 Protein Kinase; CDC2-CDC28 Kinases; Cell Cycle; Cell Division; Colonic Neoplasms; Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 2; Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4; Cyclin-Dependent Kinases; DNA, Neoplasm; Humans; Leukemia, Promyelocytic, Acute; Molecular Sequence Data; Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases; Proto-Oncogene Proteins; Sulindac; Tumor Cells, Cultured

Sulindac is reported to induce regression of colonic adenomas. However, its role as a chemoprophylactic agent for people with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is under consideration.. This case report describes a patient with FAP in whom rectal adenocarcinoma developed 37 years after prophylactic colectomy and 15 months after beginning a course of sulindac. She received endoscopic follow-ups every 3 months during 15 months of 150-mg twice-daily sulindac administration. At 12 months, an endoscopic examination was unremarkable; at 15 months, endoscopic examination revealed several polyps and a flat ulcerated lesion.. Rectal carcinoma developed in a patient 15 months after beginning chemoprophylaxis: there was metastatic adenocarcinoma in 6 of 20 perirectal lymph nodes. In addition to the carcinoma, rectal mucosa contained two adenomas and multiple foci of adenomatous changes in flat mucosa.. Sulindac may not alter the pathogenesis of FAP. Patients undergoing sulindac chemoprevention must be monitored closely, including endoscopic examination. Endoscopic surveillance should include an aggressive biopsy approach because the absence of polyps does not prove the absence of neoplastic change.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenomatous Polyposis Coli; Aged; Colectomy; Female; Humans; Rectal Neoplasms; Sulindac

Epidemiological and laboratory animal model studies have suggested that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs reduce the risk of development of colon cancer. The present study was designed to investigate the chemopreventive action of 160 and 320 ppm (equivalent to 40 and 80% maximum tolerated doses) sulindac, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, fed during initiation and postinitiation stages and 320 ppm sulindac fed during promotion/progression stages of azoxymethane-induced colon carcinogenesis in male F344 rats. Also investigated was the modulating effect of this agent on the colonic mucosal and tumor phospholipase A2, phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C, lipoxygenase, and cyclooxygenase activities. At 5 weeks of age, groups of male F344 rats were fed control diet or diets containing 160 and 320 ppm of sulindac. At 7 weeks of age, all animals except those in the vehicle-treated groups were given two weekly s.c. injections of azoxymethane at a dose rate of 15 mg/kg body weight/week. Animals intended for tumor promotion/progression study were administered 320 ppm of sulindac in diet starting at 14 weeks after a second azoxymethane treatment. All animals continued on their respective dietary regimen until the termination of the experiment at 52 weeks after the carcinogen treatment. Colonic tumors were evaluated histopathologically. Colonic mucosa and tumors were analyzed for phospholipase A2, phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C, prostaglandin E2, cyclooxygenase, and lipoxygenase activities. The levels of sulindac and its metabolites in stomach, cecal, and fecal contents and in serum were analyzed. The results indicate that dietary sulindac at 160 and 320 ppm levels inhibited the incidence of invasive and noninvasive adenocarcinomas of the colon (P < 0.01-0.001) as well as their multiplicity (P < 0.01-0.0001) in a dose-dependent manner. Also, feeding sulindac during promotion/progression stages significantly suppressed the incidence (P < 0.0001) and multiplicity (P < 0.0001) of colonic adenocarcinomas. Dietary sulindac also suppressed the colon tumor volume by > 52-62% compared to the control diet. Dietary sulindac significantly decreased the activities of phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C (32-51%) and levels of prostaglandin E2 (> 40%) in the colonic mucosa and tumors, but it had no significant (P > 0.05) effect on phospholipase A2 activity. The formation of cyclooxygenase metabolites, particularly prostaglandin E2, prosta

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Animals; Azoxymethane; Colonic Neoplasms; Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor; Hydroxyeicosatetraenoic Acids; Male; Pharmaceutical Vehicles; Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-Diphosphate; Phosphatidylinositol Diacylglycerol-Lyase; Phosphatidylinositol Phosphates; Phosphoinositide Phospholipase C; Phospholipases A; Phospholipases A2; Phosphoric Diester Hydrolases; Prostaglandins; Rats; Rats, Inbred F344; Sulindac; Thromboxanes

Sulindac, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, causes regression of polyps in familial polyposis coli and may prevent new lesions. However, it is not clear whether the effect of sulindac in preventing polyps also applies to carcinoma. This case report describes a patient with familial polyposis coli who developed a carcinoma in a rectal segment after subtotal colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis. She had been treated with 450 mg sulindac daily for 28 months and was free of polyps during the latter 12 months of this period. However, despite intensive endoscopic follow-up, she developed an adenocarcinoma of the rectum. This finding may have important implications for our understanding of the development of colon cancer in familial polyposis coli and the use of sulindac to prevent it. Development of de novo carcinoma in microadenomatous tissue of the rectal mucosa, which bypasses the polyp-cancer sequence, must be considered as a possibility in these patients.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenomatous Polyposis Coli; Adult; Anastomosis, Surgical; Colectomy; Female; Humans; Ileum; Postoperative Period; Rectal Neoplasms; Rectum; Sulindac

Sulindac (cis-5-fluoro-2-methyl-1-[p-(methylsulfinyl) benzylidene] indene-3-acetic acid), an inhibitor of prostaglandin synthesis, has been reported to cause regression of colon polyps in patients with familial polyposis coli and Gardner's syndrome. We examined the effect of sulindac on the growth of primary colon carcinomas in rats. Colon tumors were induced in 18 rats by repeated subcutaneous administration of dimethylhydrazine. The site and diameter of each tumor were measured via laparotomy and colonoscopy. Rats were randomized to receive either sulindac (10 mg/kg) twice daily or vehicle (0.5% methylcellulose). After 4 weeks of treatment, the site and size of tumors in the colon were again recorded. In eight rats receiving sulindac, no new tumors were identified, while in 10 control rats, 13 additional tumors were found after treatment. There was a significantly greater increase in size of the tumors in the control group (56.4 mm for 26 tumors) compared with the rats receiving sulindac (9.3 mm for 14 tumors). We report that sulindac inhibits the rate of development and the rate of growth of colon tumors in the rat.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenoma; Animals; Carcinoma; Colonic Neoplasms; Dimethylhydrazines; Male; Random Allocation; Rats; Rats, Inbred Strains; Remission Induction; Sulindac

Sulindac, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, has been reported to lead to tumour regression in cases of human polyposis coli. We have investigated the effects of this drug on the growth of 1,2-dimethylhydrazine (DMH)-induced mouse colonic tumours. In one experiment, DMH and oral sulindac were administered concurrently to a group of mice for a period of up to 24 weeks, while a control group of animals received DMH only for the same period. Sulindac caused a significant reduction in both the number of mice with colonic tumours and the number of tumours per mouse. In a second experiment, two groups of mice which had already been treated with DMH for 17 weeks received either sulindac or not for 78 days. In this experiment sulindac had no effect. These results demonstrate that sulindac has a protective effect against the chemical induction of colonic tumours in mice, but does not cause the regression of established tumours.

Topics: 1,2-Dimethylhydrazine; Adenocarcinoma; Adenoma; Animals; Carcinogens; Colonic Neoplasms; Dimethylhydrazines; Female; Indenes; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Sulindac