st-1481 and Prostatic-Neoplasms

The efficacy of current therapy for hormone-refractory prostate cancer is still unsatisfactory and new agents and therapeutic modalities are needed. The aims of the present work were to examine the in vitro activity and mechanisms of action of different antitumor drug combinations in hormone-resistant prostate cancer (HRPC) cell lines.. The activity of docetaxel (Doc), cisplatin (Cis), oxaliplatin (Oxa), SN-38 and ST1481, singly or in combination, was assessed in different HRPC cell lines (PC3, parental DU145 and taxane-resistant DU145-R) by SRB test. Apoptosis was evaluated by TUNEL and ANN-V assays. Extrusion pump activity was studied by Hoechst 33342 assay, while gene expression related to drug efflux mechanisms and DNA damage repair was analyzed by RT-PCR.. Doc induced a high cytocidal effect in the HRPC cells, whereas Cis, Oxa, SN-38 and ST1481 exerted prevalently cytostatic activity. Doc followed by ST1481 proved to be the most effective drug sequence among those investigated, producing an important synergistic effect (R.I. from 2.0 to 5.2) in all the tested cell lines. Moreover, this sequence induced a significant downregulation of xenobiotic extrusion pump and DNA damage repair gene expression. ST1481 synergistically increased the cytocidal effect of Doc, probably through a downregulation of extrusion pump activity and DNA damage repair-related genes.. Our results show that the Doc --> ST1481 sequence effectively reduces the cancer cell population and restores Doc activity in taxane-resistant HRPC, indicating its potential usefulness as first- or second-line treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Camptothecin; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Cisplatin; Docetaxel; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Drug Synergism; Gene Expression; Humans; Irinotecan; Male; Organoplatinum Compounds; Oxaliplatin; Prostatic Neoplasms; Taxoids

Since the intrinsic resistance of prostate carcinoma likely reflects a low susceptibility to drug-induced apoptosis, in this study we explored the possibility of sensitizing prostate carcinoma cells to apoptosis by combination of TRAIL with camptothecins. Indeed, these agents are known to activate different pathways of apoptosis. Topotecan- and gimatecan induced moderate up-regulation of TRAIL-R1 and -R2 which resulted in a different cell response to the combination in androgen-independent cells (DU-145 and PC-3). In DU-145 cells apoptosis was increased by lower TRAIL concentrations and was earlier than in PC-3 cells, as shown using Annexin V-binding assay. The relative resistance of PC-3 cells to drug-induced apoptosis was associated with constitutive Akt activation, higher levels of cFLIP-L and Bcl-2, and lower levels of Bax. The different expression/activation of apoptosis-related factors appears to influence the sensitization of prostate carcinoma cells by TRAIL. Potentiation of camptothecin-induced apoptosis by TRAIL appears dependent on cooperation between extrinsic and intrinsic pathways, as documented by loss of the sensitization to apoptosis following reduction of caspase 8 after small interfering RNA transfection. The efficacy of the approach may be critically dependent on the intrinsic susceptibility to apoptosis of different tumors. These observations support that the activation of multiple signals could enhance apoptotic response and suggest the therapeutic interest of the TRAIL/camptothecin combination.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Apoptosis; Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins; Camptothecin; Caspase 8; Caspases; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Combinations; Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor; Drug Synergism; Gene Silencing; Genetic Vectors; Humans; Male; Membrane Glycoproteins; Prostatic Neoplasms; Receptors, TNF-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand; Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor; RNA, Small Interfering; TNF-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand; Topotecan; Transfection; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; Up-Regulation

ST1481, a lead compound of a novel potent 7-substituted lipophilic camptothecin series, is able to overcome several mechanisms of drug resistance and was selected for clinical development. This study was designed to examine the antitumor activity of ST1481 in the treatment of preclinical models of human p53-defective hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma (DU145, PC3, and JCA-1) and to explore the cellular bases of the efficacy of camptothecins. A cellular pharmacology study (cytotoxicity, apoptosis, cellular drug accumulation, DNA damage, and cell cycle perturbation) was performed in DU145 and PC3 cells, characterized by a different cell cycle checkpoint status. The introduction of wild-type p53 in PC3 cells appreciably decreased the drug sensitivity. The 7-substituted camptothecins exhibited a high cytotoxic potency that paralleled their relative ability to induce DNA damage and a substantially increased cellular accumulation as compared to topotecan. The cytotoxic effect of camptothecins in DU145 cells was associated with arrest in S phase and early activation of apoptosis, whereas PC3 cells responded to drugs by a persistent block in G2 phase with a cytostatic effect and a late apoptosis. The efficiency of S phase checkpoint in DU145 cells was supported by a time-dependent decrease of DNA synthesis following treatment. In spite of an apparent cytostatic response and apoptosis resistance, the PC3 tumor was more responsive to in vivo treatment with camptothecins than the DU145 model. Indeed, the therapeutic outcome did not reflect the cell susceptibility to early activation of apoptosis. We suggest that cell death in PC3 cells is a delayed event consequent to persistent arrest in G2 and insufficient repair of DNA damage. ST1481 was appreciably more effective than topotecan in all tested tumors. In conclusion, the results indicated a relevant efficacy of camptothecins against human prostate carcinoma models, in spite of p53 alterations. Although p53 status could influence DNA damage and cell cycle checkpoints, p53 mutation was not a determinant of resistance. The results support that, in addition to the extent and persistence of topoisomerase I-mediated DNA damage, cell cycle checkpoints and DNA damage signaling pathways are critical determinants of tumor responsiveness to camptothecins. A role of cell cycle checkpoints activated by DNA damage in cell response is supported by the modulation of transcriptional profile.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Camptothecin; Cell Cycle; Cell Division; DNA Damage; DNA, Neoplasm; Humans; Male; Prostatic Neoplasms; Topotecan; Tumor Cells, Cultured