spirapril and Kidney-Failure--Chronic

The evidence from recent clinical outcome trials in arterial hypertension (AH) and the treatment guidelines from national and international authorities have placed a clear emphasis on "tight" blood pressure (BP) control. This has been particularly well illustrated in the treatment of patients with diabetes mellitus and AH where "tight" BP control clearly improves the outcome with reduced numbers of fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events. Whilst the clinical trials in AH have identified benefits through BP reduction with a range of antihypertensive drugs there is a considerable volume of evidence to suggest that the optimal treatment for diabetic nephropathy and microalbuminuria should be based upon ACE inhibition. It is widely held that inhibition of intra-renal renin angiotensin systems leads to greater benefit than can be achieved by hemodynamic changes alone. Thus, management of AH and nephropathy in both DM and other forms of renal disease revolves around BP reduction through an ACE inhibitor-based treatment regimen. Where there is renal failure it may be prudent to administer a drug such as spirapril which has non-renal elimination mechanisms and which has been shown to have no accumulation problems or increased adverse effects.

Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Blood Pressure; Diabetic Nephropathies; Enalapril; Humans; Hypertension; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Prognosis; Renal Circulation

The management of hypertension and nephropathy, in both diabetes and other forms of renal disease, is usually based on blood pressure reduction through an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor-based treatment regimen. With particular respect to the choice of ACE inhibitor drug, there are no definitive direct comparisons in the treatment of renal disease. In terms of blood pressure reduction, however, there is evidence that spirapril is at least as effective as the reference ACE inhibitor, enalapril. However, patients with diabetic nephropathy and/or chronic renal failure are at potential risk from drug accumulation if the preferred agent relies predominantly on glomerular filtration for its elimination. In this respect spirapril may have an advantage because it has been shown that there are no clinically relevant increases in the spirapril(at) concentrations (24 h post-dose) even in the setting of advanced renal failure (creatinine clearance <20 ml/min). Thus, there is no requirement to modify the dose and no concerns about drug accumulation or the potential for exaggerated therapeutic or adverse effects. In summary, an ACE inhibitor drug is seen as an integral component of the drug treatment regimen for patients with nephropathy. Where there is renal failure it may be prudent to administer a drug, such as spirapril, which also has alternative elimination mechanisms.

Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Blood Pressure; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetic Nephropathies; Enalapril; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic

Treatment of hypertension in patients with chronic renal failure has been shown to postpone the decline in renal function. Treatment with an ACE inhibitor has been shown to be superior to conventional antihypertensive treatment, but it is not known how an ACE inhibitor compares to treatment with a calcium channel blocker or to treatment with a combination of these drugs. The aim of the study was to evaluate the rate of decline in GFR in patients with chronic renal failure and hypertension treated with isradipine and spirapril as monotherapy and in combination.. Sixty patients with chronic renal failure and hypertension were enrolled in the study. After enrollment, patients were followed prospectively for 6 months in the outpatient clinic on their usual antihypertensive medication, and then randomized to a double-blinded comparison of either spirapril 6 mg daily, isradipine 5 mg daily or spirapril 3 mg and isradipine 2.5 mg daily. After randomization, patients were followed for 21 months or until the need for dialysis. Every 3 months before and 3.5 months after randomization the glomerular filtration rate was measured by 51Cr-EDTA clearance and the effective renal plasma flow evaluated using the renal clearance of paraaminohippuric acid.. Blood pressure and the decline in glomerular filtration rate did not differ between the groups before randomization. After randomization, the mean decline in the glomerular filtration rate was -0.32 ml/(min x month x 1.73 m2) in the spirapril group, -0.58 ml/(min x month x 1.73 m2) in the isradipine group and -0.14 ml/(min x month x 1.73 m2) in the combination group (p = 0.38). Twelve patients, 4 in each group, reached end-stage renal failure. No significant difference was found with respect to diastolic (p = 0.10) or systolic blood pressure (p = 0.08) during the treatment period, but a trend towards a better blood pressure control in the combination group was present. During treatment, the rate of decline in renal plasma flow did not differ significantly between the groups (p = 0.09), neither did the changes in filtration fraction (FF) (p = 0.58) nor the mean FF (p = 0.22) during the treatment.. Our study indicated differences between the 3 treatment modalities in favor of combined therapy with respect to both the rate of decline in GFR and blood pressure control, but the differences where insignificant. Thus, the treatments might differ, but we were unable to confirm this because of large variation in GFR and small sample size.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Blood Pressure; Calcium Channel Blockers; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enalapril; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Hypertension, Renal; Isradipine; Kidney; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Renal Plasma Flow, Effective

In the present study we investigated the effect of a single dose, and 3 months of treatment with spirapril on kidney function, renin-angiotensin system, renal handling of sodium and blood pressure, in patients with reduced kidney function (serum creatinine 1.5-3 mg%) and hypertension. A single dose of 6 mg spirapril given at the beginning of the study did not affect glomerular filtration rate (GFR), renal plasma flow (RPF), angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) activity, plasma renin activity (PRA) or renal handling of sodium. When the single dose of spirapril was given after 3 months of treatment with this agent, renal hemodynamics and PRA did not change. ACE activity, which was depressed by the previous spirapril treatment, decreased further (from 9.5 +/- 3.1 to 1.4 +/- 1.0 nmol/ml/min), (p < 0.05). Administration of 6 mg spirapril o.d. for 3 months did not have any effect on GFR or RPF. Serum ACE activity decreased from 92.1 +/- 8.0 to 5.1 +/- 2.6 nmol/ml/min (p < 0.05) and PRA increased from 1.4 +/- 1.2 to 4.1 +/- 3.6 ng/ml/min (p < 0.05). Plasma aldosterone did not change. Similar results were obtained when spirapril was combined with 5 mg isradipine in the initial and final single dose, or in the 3 months' treatment (5 mg o.d.). Blood pressure was normalized in 38% of the patients who received spirapril and in 71% of the patients who received spirapril and isradipine. Thus, (a) treatment with spirapril in patients with mild to moderate chronic renal insufficiency was not associated with deleterious effects on kidney function; (b) spirapril in a dose of 6 mg alone or in combination with 5 mg isradipine is effective in reducing blood pressure in hypertensive patients with reduced kidney function.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enalapril; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Isradipine; Kidney; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male; Middle Aged; Time Factors

Spirapril is a recent ACE inhibitor with a both renal and hepatic elimination pathway. In order to determine its tolerability, primarily the impact on renal function, Spirapril was tested in a single-blind trial with a 2-week placebo run-in phase and a 4-week active treatment period. Forty-nine patients (34 males and 15 females) with varying degrees of renal impairment were included. Their pretreatment diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ranged from 95 to 115 mm Hg. Spirapril was administered in oral doses of 6 mg once daily.. Forty-four patients completed the study. Four patients dropped out due to side effects, 1 patient was withdrawn from the study due to lack of antihypertensive efficacy. 48% of the completers with renal failure achieved a normalized diastolic blood pressure (DBP < or = 90 mm Hg) or a reduction in DBP of > or = 10 mm Hg; the corresponding figure for patients with normal renal function was 31%. Renal function was assessed in the beginning and at the end of the active Spirapril treatment period using Tc-99m-DTPA-clearance (representing glomerular filtration rate), J-131-hippuran-clearance (representing renal plasma flow) and creatinine clearance. Particularly in patients with renal impairment, Spirapril did not deteriorate renal function as given by these parameters. Regression analysis revealed a linear correlation between total plasma clearance of the active metabolite Spiraprilate and creatinine clearance. There was no evidence for drug accumulation.. In patients with renal impairment the pharmacokinetic results indicate a non-renal elimination of the drug. Spirapril 6 mg once daily is concluded to be a well tolerated antihypertensive therapy for patients with mild to moderate hypertension and varying degrees of chronic renal failure.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Creatinine; Enalapril; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Kidney Function Tests; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Middle Aged

In this single-blind trial with a 2-week placebo run-in followed by a 4-week active-treatment period, patients were given 6 mg of spirapril once daily. Forty-nine hypertensive men and women were recruited; all had pretreatment diastolic blood pressures (DBP) of 95-115 mmHg with varying degrees of renal impairment. Regression analysis of pharmacokinetic parameters C(max)ss (the maximum steady-state drug concentration in plasma during a dosing interval), Cl/f (total plasma clearance) and k (elimination rate constant) of spirapril on creatinine clearance (Clcr) showed that the pharmacokinetics of spirapril were not significantly influenced by the degree of renal impairment. C(max)ss values of spiraprilat, however, increased with decreasing Clcr, and AUC(l)ss (area under the concentration-time curve during a dosing interval) values also increased. Regression analysis of the pharmacokinetic parameters C(max)ss, Clm/fm (total plasma clearance) and lambda 1 (rate constant of the first disposition phase) of spiraprilat on Clcr showed that Clm/fm as well as lambda 1 were linearly correlated with Clcr (p < 0.01). However, the results indicate that, even when renal elimination is completely blocked, there is significant elimination of spiraprilat through a non-renal pathway. In conclusion, the risk of drug accumulation after multiple dosing is minimal as the presence of a substantial non-renal spiraprilat elimination was consistently demonstrated.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Creatinine; Enalapril; Female; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male; Middle Aged; Regression Analysis; Single-Blind Method

In a single-blind trial with a 2-week placebo run-in phase and a 4-week active-treatment period, spirapril at 6 mg once daily was administered to 49 consecutive hypertensive patients (34 men and 15 women). All had pretreatment diastolic blood pressures (DBP) of 95-115 mmHg and varying degrees of renal impairment. At the end of the placebo run-in and at the end of active treatment, renal function was assessed using the following procedures: technetium 99m-DTPA clearance [for glomerular filtration rate (GFR)]; radioiodine (131I)-labelled sodium iodohippurate (Hippuran) clearance [for renal plasma flow (RPF)]; creatinine clearance (Clcr). No statistically significant differences were found in GFR or Clcr during spirapril treatment. In renally impaired patients, RPF remained virtually unchanged whereas, in patients with normal Clcr, there was an increase of around 10% during active treatment. At the end of the study, 48% of the patients with renal failure achieved normalization of DBP (< or = 90 mmHg) and/or a DBP reduction of > or = 10 mmHg; the corresponding rate for patients with normal renal function was 31%. In conclusion, in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension and varying degrees of renal impairment, spirapril at 6 mg once daily is an efficacious and well tolerated antihypertensive therapy.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Blood Pressure; Enalapril; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Kidney; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male; Middle Aged; Single-Blind Method

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors may cause a further decrease in renal function in patients who already have renal failure. The acute effects of the ACE inhibitor spirapril on renal function were investigated in 10 patients with mild-to-moderate renal failure (serum creatinine of 1.5-2.5 mg/dl). Acute oral administration of spirapril at 6 mg resulted in decreases in inulin clearance (from 53.7 +/- 12.8 to 44.6 +/- 8.8 ml/min; p < 0.02; n = 5) and in PAH clearances (from 215 +/- 141.9 to 184 +/- 37.8 ml/min; p < 0.006; n = 5). However, when the acute administration of 6 mg of spirapril was given concomitantly with isradipine at 5 mg, there were no changes in these renal function parameters.

Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Drug Combinations; Enalapril; Humans; Isradipine; Kidney; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Time Factors