sitagliptin-phosphate and Nausea

Exenatide is an incretin mimetic, while sitagliptin and vildagliptin are incretin enhancers used as adjunctive therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes failing oral agents. Sitagliptin and vildagliptin can also be used as monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled by diet.. To provide a critical review of clinical trials of exenatide, sitagliptin and vildagliptin.. Review of Phase III clinical trials based on Medline search published up to April 2008.. The use of exenatide is associated with reduction in average hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels of approximately 0.8% compared with baseline. The corresponding reduction with either sitagliptin or vildagliptin is 0.7%. The actions of incretin-based drugs predominantly target postprandial hyperglycemia. Treatment-related hypoglycemia is generally mild, and mainly occurs when used with sulfonylureas (SUs). Exenatide treatment leads to a mild weight loss of around 2 kg after 30 weeks, whereas sitagliptin and vildagliptin have generally neutral effect on weight. Sitagliptin and vildagliptin are well tolerated in trials lasting up to 52 weeks. Meanwhile, 5 - 10% of patients cannot tolerate exenatide due to adverse effects, mainly nausea and vomiting. The three drugs are limited by the lack of long-term safety and efficacy data, as well as by their high cost.. Exenatide, sitagliptin and vildagliptin are useful add-on therapy for type 2 diabetes that is suboptimally controlled on oral agents, particularly when there is concern about weight gain and hypoglycemia, or when postprandial hyperglycemia is the major cause of inadequate glycemic control. Sitagliptin and vildagliptin may be used as monotherapy in patients who cannot tolerate metformin or SU, and sitagliptin may be used as alternative to metformin in renal insufficiency.

Topics: Adamantane; Body Weight; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exenatide; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Insulin; Insulin Secretion; Nausea; Nitriles; Peptides; Pyrazines; Pyrrolidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, Glucagon; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Triazoles; Venoms; Vildagliptin; Vomiting

To assess the safety and efficacy of monotherapy with once-weekly subcutaneous (s.c.) semaglutide vs sitagliptin in Japanese people with type 2 diabetes (T2D).. In this phase IIIa randomized, open-label, parallel-group, active-controlled, multicentre trial, Japanese adults with T2D treated with diet and exercise only or oral antidiabetic drug monotherapy (washed out during the run-in period) received once-weekly s.c. semaglutide (0.5 or 1.0 mg) or once-daily oral sitagliptin 100 mg. The primary endpoint was number of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) after 30 weeks.. Overall, 308 participants were randomized and exposed to treatment, with similar baseline characteristics across the groups. In total, 2.9% of participants in both the semaglutide 0.5 mg and the sitagliptin group prematurely discontinued treatment, compared with 14.7% in the semaglutide 1.0 mg group. The majority of discontinuations in the semaglutide 0.5 and 1.0 mg groups were attributable to adverse events (AEs). More TEAEs were reported in semaglutide- vs sitagliptin-treated participants (74.8%, 71.6% and 66.0% in the semaglutide 0.5 mg, semaglutide 1.0 mg and sitagliptin groups, respectively). AEs were mainly mild to moderate. Gastrointestinal AEs, most frequently reported with semaglutide, diminished in frequency over time. The mean glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c [baseline 8.1%]) decreased by 1.9% and 2.2% with semaglutide 0.5 and 1.0 mg, respectively, vs 0.7% with sitagliptin (estimated treatment difference [ETD] vs sitagliptin -1.13%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.32; -0.94, and -1.44%, 95% CI -1.63; -1.24; both P < .0001). Body weight (baseline 69.3 kg) was reduced by 2.2 and 3.9 kg with semaglutide 0.5 and 1.0 mg, respectively (ETD -2.22 kg, 95% CI -3.02; -1.42 and -3.88 kg, 95% CI -4.70; -3.07; both P < .0001).. In Japanese people with T2D, more TEAEs were reported with semaglutide than with sitagliptin; however, the semaglutide safety profile was similar to that of other glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists. Semaglutide significantly reduced HbA1c and body weight compared with sitagliptin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Constipation; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diarrhea; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Follow-Up Studies; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Incretins; Injections, Subcutaneous; Japan; Nausea; Patient Dropouts; Severity of Illness Index; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Weight Loss

To assess the effect of baseline body mass index (BMI) and the occurrence of nausea and/or vomiting on weight loss induced by semalgutide, a once-weekly glucagon-like peptide 1 analogue for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Semaglutide demonstrated superior reductions in HbA1c and superior weight loss (by 2.3-6.3 kg) versus different comparators across the SUSTAIN 1 to 5 trials; the contributing factors to weight loss are not established.. Subjects with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (drug-naïve or on background treatment) were randomized to subcutaneous semaglutide 0.5 mg (excluding SUSTAIN 3), 1.0 mg (all trials), or comparator (placebo, sitagliptin, exenatide extended release or insulin glargine). Subjects were subdivided by baseline BMI and reporting (yes/no) of any nausea and/or vomiting. Change from baseline in body weight was assessed within each trial and subgroup. A mediation analysis separated weight loss into direct or indirect (mediated by nausea or vomiting) effects.. Clinically relevant weight-loss differences were observed across all BMI subgroups, with a trend towards higher absolute weight loss with higher baseline BMI. Overall, 15.2% to 24.0% and 21.5% to 27.2% of subjects experienced nausea or vomiting with semaglutide 0.5 and 1.0 mg, respectively, versus 6.0% to 14.1% with comparators. Only 0.07 to 0.5 kg of the treatment difference between semaglutide and comparators was mediated by nausea or vomiting (indirect effects).. In SUSTAIN 1 to 5, semaglutide-induced weight loss was consistently greater versus comparators, regardless of baseline BMI. The contribution of nausea or vomiting to this weight loss was minor.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting; Weight Loss

Early initiation of combination therapy using antihyperglycemic agents is recommended for treating type 2 diabetes (T2D). The present multicenter double-blind randomized parallel-group study examined the efficacy and safety of a sitagliptin and metformin fixed-dose combination (Sita/Met) compared with glimepiride in T2D patients as initial treatment.. Type 2 diabetes patients (aged ≥18 years) were randomized to Sita/Met or glimepiride for 30 weeks after a wash-off run-in period. The primary endpoint was change from baseline (CFB) in HbA1c. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients achieving target goal (HbA1c < 7.0 % [53 mmol/mol]) and CFB in fasting plasma glucose (FPG). Safety assessments comprised weight gain from baseline and the incidence of adverse events (AEs).. In total, 292 patients were randomized to Sita/Met (n = 147) or glimepiride (n = 145). After 30 weeks, Sita/Met demonstrated superiority over glimepiride in reducing HbA1c (-1.49 % vs -0.71 %, respectively; between-group difference - 0.78 %; P < 0.001). A significantly higher proportion of patients achieved the target goal with Sita/Met (81.2 %) than with glimepiride (40.1 %; P < 0.001). Greater reduction in FPG occurred with Sita/Met than with glimepiride (least-squares mean difference - 23.5 mg/dL; P < 0.001). Both drugs were generally well tolerated. Hypoglycemia events and weight gain were significantly lower in patients with Sita/Met than with glimepiride (5.5 % vs 20.1 % and -0.83 vs +0.90 kg, respectively; both P < 0.001). No serious drug-related AEs or deaths were reported.. Compared with glimepiride, Sita/Met as an initial treatment led to significantly greater improvements in glycemic control and body weight changes, with a lower incidence of hypoglycemia, over 30 weeks.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diarrhea; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dyspepsia; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Infections; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Nausea; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Treatment Outcome

To compare the efficacy and safety of liraglutide versus sitagliptin as add-on to metformin after 26 weeks of treatment in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).. This 26-week open-label, active comparator trial (NCT02008682) randomized patients (aged 18-80 years) with T2DM inadequately controlled with metformin [glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) 7.0-10.0% (53-86 mmol/mol)] 1 : 1 to once-daily subcutaneously administered liraglutide 1.8 mg (n = 184) or once-daily oral sitagliptin 100 mg (n = 184), both as add-on to metformin. The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline to week 26.. Liraglutide was superior to sitagliptin in reducing HbA1c from baseline [8.1% (65 mmol/mol)] to 26 weeks, as evidenced by estimated mean HbA1c change of -1.65% (-18.07 mmol/mol) versus -0.98% (-10.72 mmol/mol), respectively [estimated treatment difference for liraglutide vs sitagliptin of -0.67% (95% CI -0.86, -0.48) or -7.35 mmol/mol (95% CI -9.43; -5.26); p < 0.0001]. More patients receiving liraglutide (76.5%) than sitagliptin (52.6%) achieved the HbA1c target of <7.0% (53 mmol/mol) at week 26 [odds ratio 3.65 (95% CI 2.18, 6.12); p < 0.0001]. Reductions in fasting plasma glucose, 7-point self-measured plasma glucose and body weight were greater with liraglutide than with sitagliptin (p < 0.0001 for all). More patients experienced nausea (14.8% vs 0.5%), diarrhoea (8.2% vs 2.2%) and decreased appetite (10.9% vs 0.5%) with liraglutide than sitagliptin. Two hypoglycaemic episodes were confirmed for liraglutide and one for sitagliptin; none were severe or nocturnal.. Liraglutide provided better glycaemic control and greater body weight reduction than sitagliptin when administered as add-on to metformin. More patients had nausea, diarrhoea and decreased appetite with liraglutide versus sitagliptin.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anorexia; Asian People; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; China; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diarrhea; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Liraglutide; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Nausea; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

To confirm superiority on glycaemic control by switching from sitagliptin to liraglutide 1.8 mg/d versus continued sitagliptin.. A randomized, multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled trial across 86 office- or hospital-based sites in North America, Europe and Asia. Subjects with type 2 diabetes who had inadequate glycaemic control (glycated haemoglobin [HbA1c] 7.5-9.5% on sitagliptin (100 mg/d) and metformin (≥1500 mg daily) for ≥90 days were randomized to either switch to liraglutide (n = 203) or continue sitagliptin (n = 204), both with metformin. The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline to week 26. Change in body weight was a confirmatory secondary endpoint.. Greater reduction in mean HbA1c was achieved with liraglutide than with continued sitagliptin [-1.14% vs. -0.54%; estimated mean treatment difference (ETD): -0.61% (95% CI -0.82 to -0.40; p < 0.0001)], confirming superiority of switching to liraglutide. Body weight was reduced more with liraglutide [-3.31 kg vs. -1.64 kg; ETD: -1.67 kg (95% CI -2.34 to -0.99; p < 0.0001)]. Nausea was more common with liraglutide [44 subjects (21.8%)] than with continued sitagliptin [16 (7.8%)]. Three subjects (1.5%) taking sitagliptin reported a confirmed hypoglycaemic episode.. Subjects insufficiently controlled with sitagliptin who switch to liraglutide can obtain clinically relevant reductions in glycaemia and body weight, without compromising safety. A switch from sitagliptin to liraglutide provides an option for improved management of type 2 diabetes while still allowing patients to remain on dual therapy.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Asia; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Substitution; Drug Therapy, Combination; Europe; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Liraglutide; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Nausea; North America; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Treatment Outcome

To assess the efficacy and safety of switching from sitagliptin to liraglutide in metformin-treated adults with type 2 diabetes.. In an open-label trial, participants randomized to receive either liraglutide (1.2 or 1.8 mg/day) or sitagliptin (100 mg/day), each added to metformin, continued treatment for 52 weeks. In a 26-week extension, sitagliptin-treated participants were randomly allocated to receive instead liraglutide at either 1.2 or 1.8 mg/day, while participants originally randomized to receive liraglutide continued unchanged.. Although 52 weeks of sitagliptin changed glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) by -0.9% from baseline, additional decreases occurred after switching to liraglutide (1.2 mg/day, -0.2%, P = 0.006; 1.8 mg/day, -0.5%, P = 0.0001). Conversion to liraglutide was associated with reductions in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (1.2 mg/day, -0.8 mmol/L, P = 0.0004; 1.8 mg/day, -1.4 mmol/L, P < 0.0001) and body weight (1.2 mg/day, -1.6 kg; 1.8 mg/day, -2.5 kg; both P < 0.0001) and with an increased proportion of patients reaching HbA(1c) <7% (from ∼30% to ∼50%). Overall treatment satisfaction, assessed by the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire, improved after switching to liraglutide (pooled 1.2 and 1.8 mg/day, 1.3; P = 0.0189). After switching, mostly transient nausea occurred in 21% of participants, and minor hypoglycemia remained low (3-4% of participants). Continuing liraglutide treatment at 1.2 mg/day and 1.8 mg/day for 78 weeks reduced HbA(1c) (baseline 8.3 and 8.4%, respectively) by -0.9 and -1.3%, respectively; FPG by -1.3 and -1.7 mmol/L, respectively; and weight by -2.6 and -3.1 kg, respectively, with 9-10% of participants reporting minor hypoglycemia.. Glycemic control, weight, and treatment satisfaction improved after switching from sitagliptin to liraglutide, albeit with a transient increase in gastrointestinal reactions.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Liraglutide; Metformin; Nausea; Patient Satisfaction; Pyrazines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles

Topics: Abdominal Pain; Acute Disease; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Nausea; Pancreas; Pancreatitis; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting