sitafloxacin and Escherichia-coli-Infections

sitafloxacin has been researched along with Escherichia-coli-Infections* in 3 studies

Trials

1 trial(s) available for sitafloxacin and Escherichia-coli-Infections

ArticleYear
A randomized controlled trial of sitafloxacin vs. ertapenem as a switch therapy after treatment for acute pyelonephritis caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli: A pilot study.
    Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy, 2017, Volume: 23, Issue:8

    The overuse and misuse of carbapenems have contributed to the antibiotic resistance crisis. The role of oral fluoroquinolones as a switch therapy for the treatment of urinary tract infection from Escherichia coli (ESBL-EC) is limited.. To compare the clinical and bacteriological efficacy of sitafloxacin and ertapenem for non-bacteremic acute pyelonephritis caused by ESBL-EC.. A prospective randomized controlled trial of patients with acute pyelonephritis caused by ESBL-EC was performed as a pilot study. One of the carbapenems was initially given to the patients. After day 3, patients were randomized to receive either sitafloxacin or ertapenem.. Thirty-six patients were enrolled: 19 (52.8%) in the sitafloxacin group and 17 (47.2%) in the ertapenem group. There was no statistically significant difference in baseline characteristics between the two groups except a lower proportion of previous urinary catheter insertion in the sitafloxacin group (15.8% vs. 52.9%, p = 0.018). Signs and symptoms at presentation were similar between the two groups except a higher proportion of patients with chills in the sitafloxacin group (68.4% vs. 29.4%, p = 0.019). At day 10, all but one patient in the ertapenem group had clinical cure. Microbiological eradication was comparable between the sitafloxacin and ertapenem groups (84.2% vs. 75%, p = 0.677). There were no significant adverse effects.. Treatment of non-bacteremic acute pyelonephritis caused by ESBL-EC with carbapenem followed by oral sitafloxacin is effective and well-tolerated. Sitafloxacin may be considered as an alternative choice of switch therapy in this clinical setting.

    Topics: Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; beta-Lactamases; beta-Lactams; Ertapenem; Escherichia coli; Escherichia coli Infections; Female; Fluoroquinolones; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Pyelonephritis

2017

Other Studies

2 other study(ies) available for sitafloxacin and Escherichia-coli-Infections

ArticleYear
Sitafloxacin has a potent activity for eradication of extended spectrum β-lactamase-producing fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli forming intracellular bacterial communities in uroepithelial cells.
    Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy, 2020, Volume: 26, Issue:12

    Eradication of asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) before urological procedures is important to reduce the risk for infectious complications after surgery. However, the appropriate regimen for antimicrobial treatment has not been fully determined. We experienced continuous (over 10 months) isolation of extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli from urine of an asymptomatic patient. The four isolates obtained (SMESC1 to 4) were international high-risk clones of O25b:H4-ST131-H30R, and originated from one strain, as revealed by the whole genome sequences. Although the patient received meropenem (MEPM) and fosfomycin (FOM), to which the strains were susceptible before the urological procedures, they could not be eradicated.. To explore the reason for the continuous isolation even after MEPM and FOM administration, antimicrobial killing of adherent and/or intracellular bacterial communities (IBC) formed by coculture of the E. coli cells and T24 bladder epithelial cells were examined.. FOM and levofloxacin did not decrease viable E. coli cells compared with gentamicin. MEPM partly decreased them, and sitafloxacin (STFX) decreased them most potently. These observations indicate that E. coli can survive in the urinary tract under antimicrobial administration, and some antimicrobials such as FOM and MEPM cannot eradicate E. coli in uroepithelial cells. Adhesion on urinary epithelial cells and/or IBC formation might result in continuous isolation from the urinary tract and recurrence of ASB and urinary tract infections.. The present study suggests that STFX is a promising optional agent for the eradication of ESBL-producing fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli in the urinary tract before urological procedures.

    Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; beta-Lactamases; Escherichia coli; Escherichia coli Infections; Fluoroquinolones; Humans; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Urinary Tract Infections

2020
Selective culture of Escherichia coli to prevent infective complications of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: Clinical efficacy and analysis of characteristics of quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli.
    International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2019, Volume: 26, Issue:6

    To evaluate a regimen of targeted prophylaxis using rectal swab culture in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy, and to investigate the characteristics of isolated fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli.. A prospective study was carried out from June 2013 through December 2014. Rectal swabs were cultured on agar plates containing either 2 μg/mL levofloxacin or 1 μg/mL sitafloxacin before transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Patients with susceptible organisms received levofloxacin or sitafloxacin, whereas those with resistant organisms received directed antimicrobial prophylaxis according to the results of the antimicrobial susceptibility test. Patients with infectious complications after prostate biopsy were identified, and characteristics of patients carrying fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli were analyzed.. A total of 397 men underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Of these patients, 74 (18.6%) had fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli. All fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli were susceptible to amikacin and meropenem. The risk factor for possible fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli was age of ≥73 years. Three (0.7%) patients who received appropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis had high-grade fever after the prostate biopsy. However, the pathogens were not fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli.. Targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy can be associated with reducing severe infectious complications caused by fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli.

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Escherichia coli; Escherichia coli Infections; Fluoroquinolones; Humans; Image-Guided Biopsy; Japan; Levofloxacin; Logistic Models; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Prospective Studies; Prostate; Quinolones; Rectum; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional

2019