sirolimus and Hematologic-Neoplasms

Post transplant cyclophosphamide (PT/Cy) in association to other immunosuppressive agents or alone has emerged as a promising pharmacological strategy in the setting of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT). Its safety profile and effectiveness in reducing GvHD (acute GvHD incidence comprised between 15 and 30%, chronic GvHD 20-30% in the haploidentical setting) contributed to the spreading of this technique all over the world. Areas covered: This review summarizes the use of PT/Cy in the setting of allo-HCT, both for oncological and non-malignant hematological diseases. Recent studies showed the feasibility of more intense conditioning regimens instead of the original NMAC. The use of peripheral blood stem cells instead of bone marrow as graft source (slightly increase of acute GvHD grade 2 but no differences in survival outcomes) was another significant variation to the original protocol. Later on, PT/Cy alone or in combination with other immunosuppressive agents (ATG, sirolimus, cyclosporine) were tested in the HLA-matched donor setting where lower GvHD rates are reported (acute GvHD grade 3 of 5-10% and chronic GvHD of 10-20%) Expert commentary: The best graft source and type of donor is still ongoing. Moreover, the research of the best pharmacological partner of PT/Cy remains an open question.

Topics: Acute Disease; Allografts; Antilymphocyte Serum; Cyclophosphamide; Cyclosporine; Drug Therapy, Combination; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematologic Neoplasms; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Sirolimus

It is widely demonstrated that the PI3K-AKT-mTOR signalling is critical in normal myeloid and lymphoid development and function. Thus, it is not strange that this pathway is often deregulated in haematological tumours, providing a strong preclinical rationale for the use of drugs targeting the PI3K-AKT-mTOR axis in haematological malignancies. The main focus of this review is to examine the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR, also termed mechanistic target of rapamycin [MTOR]) signalling pathways and to provide a brief overview of rapalogs and second-generation mTOR inhibitors used to target its aberrant activation in cancer treatment. We will also discuss the results obtained with the use of these agents in patients with acute leukaemia, Hodgkin lymphoma, non-Hodgkin lymphomas, multiple myeloma and Waldenström macroglobulinaemia. Ongoing clinical trials in haematological malignancies that are investigating first- and second-generation mTOR inhibitors as single agents and as components of combination regimens are also presented.

Topics: Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Clinical Trials as Topic; Everolimus; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Phosphoinositide-3 Kinase Inhibitors; Signal Transduction; Sirolimus; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) kinase is a key element of intracellular signal transduction, responsible for the regulation of cell growth and proliferation. Since abnormal activation of the mTOR pathway was found in several tumors, including human malignancies, it may be an attractive target for antineoplastic treatment. The first identified mTOR inhibitor was rapamycin (sirolimus). Subsequently, the most potent rapamycin analogues (rapalogues), such as everolimus, temsirolimus and deforolimus, have been developed. After encouraging preclinical experiments, several clinical trials testing the rapalogues in monotherapy or in combinations with other cytotoxic agents have been conducted in patients with hematological malignancies. Results of these studies, described in this review, indicate that inhibition of the mTOR pathway may be a very promising strategy of anti-tumor treatment in several types of lymphomas and leukemias. Recently, a second generation of more effective mTOR inhibitors has been developed. These are currently being assessed in preclinical, Phase I or I/II clinical studies.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Signal Transduction; Sirolimus; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) regulates protein synthesis in addition to cell growth and cell proliferation. Elucidation of the roles of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt/mTOR pathway in the regulation of the pathogenesis of hematological neoplasms has led to the development and clinical evaluation of agents targeting this pathway for the treatment of leukemia and lymphomas. Clinical trials conducted to date have shown modest responses to mTOR inhibition in patients with various hematological malignancies. Novel agents that simultaneously target mTOR complex 2 (mTORC2) or AKT in addition to mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) may offer an opportunity to improve therapeutic efficacy.

Topics: Animals; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Sirolimus; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a key regulator of cell growth and survival in mammalian cells. mTOR pathways are frequently dysregulated in various malignancies, providing targets for new anticancer drugs and therapeutic strategies. Here, we summarize the clinical experience of trials using the first generation of mTOR inhibitors, the rapalogs, and highlight the development of the next generation of catalytic inhibitors of the pathway.. mTOR inhibitors have shown major clinical activity in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma and two rapalogs have been approved for treatment of this malignancy. Recently, clinically significant trials with these agents were conducted in mantle cell lymphoma, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and astrocytomas. There are also promising results emerging in sarcomas, breast cancer and lung carcinoma. Multiple agents targeting mTOR, belonging to the new class of catalytic inhibitors with activity against both mTORC1 and mTORC2, are currently in various stages of preclinical and clinical development.. The rapalogs are the first mTOR inhibitors to show promising, yet modest, antitumor effects. To fully exploit the potential of targeting this pathway, it will be important to better understand the mechanisms of action and precise targets of the various inhibitors. Moreover, definition of biomarkers of susceptibility and identification of predictors and/or correlates to drug resistance will substantially advance this area.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Neoplasms; Sirolimus; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a serine/threonine kinase that functions as a key regulator of cell growth, protein synthesis, and cell-cycle progression through interactions with a number of signalling pathways, including PI3K/AKT, ras, TCL1, and BCR/ABL. Many haematological malignancies have aberrant activation of the mTOR and related signalling pathways. Accordingly, mTOR inhibitors, a class of signal transduction inhibitors that were originally developed as immunosuppressive agents, are being investigated in preclinical models and clinical trials for a number of haematological malignancies. Sirolimus and second-generation mTOR inhibitors, such as temsirolimus and everolimus, are safe and relatively well-tolerated, making them potentially attractive as single agents or in combination with conventional cytotoxics and other targeted therapies. Promising early clinical data suggests activity of mTOR inhibitors in a number of haematological diseases, including acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, chronic myeloid leukaemia, mantle cell lymphoma, anaplastic large cell lymphoma, and lymphoproliferative disorders. This review describes the rationale for using mTOR inhibitors in a variety of haematological diseases with a focus on their use in leukaemia.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Autoimmune Diseases; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Leukemia; Lymphoproliferative Disorders; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Protein Kinases; Signal Transduction; Sirolimus; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway regulates translation of key proteins that contribute to the pathogenesis of advanced hematologic malignancies. Inhibitors of mTOR (temsirolimus, everolimus, and deforolimus) constitute a new class of antitumor agents, with potential for treatment of relapsed and/or refractory hematologic malignancies. Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) was the first hematologic malignancy in which mTOR inhibition was explored as a treatment strategy, owing to its characteristic overexpression of cyclin D1, a G1 cyclin regulated by mTOR signaling. Temsirolimus and everolimus exhibited antitumor activity against relapsed, refractory disease in phase II studies. In a randomized phase III trial, once-weekly intravenous temsirolimus 175 mg for 3 weeks followed by 75 mg once weekly was recently shown to improve progression-free survival (p=0.0009) and objective response rate (p=0.0019) versus investigator's choice of therapy in relapsed or refractory MCL. Evidence of antitumor activity seen in early clinical trials for other non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes, multiple myeloma, and myeloid leukemias supports further studies of mTOR inhibitors, alone or in combination strategies, in these diseases. Overall, the clinical findings to date strengthen mTOR inhibition as a novel and promising strategy for the treatment of certain hematologic malignancies, particularly for MCL.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Cyclin D1; Everolimus; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins; Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell; Models, Biological; Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases; Sirolimus; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

Activation of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling occurs in a wide variety of human tumors and can lead to increased susceptibility to mTOR inhibitors. Temsirolimus, a novel analog of rapamycin, has shown promising preclinical and early clinical anti-tumor activity in various solid and hematologic tumor types, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy or other targeted agents. Randomized phase III trials have already demonstrated significant clinical benefits of treatment with single-agent temsirolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma and relapsed and/or refractory mantle cell lymphoma. Other malignancies studied in the phase I and II trial settings include glioblastoma, breast cancer, endometrial cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphomas, and multiple myeloma. This article reviews a comprehensive collection of the clinical trial results reported to date for temsirolimus in various solid and hematologic malignancies, as well as current strategies being tested in ongoing trials. The findings with temsirolimus in multiple tumors provide a valuable framework for future development of temsirolimus and other mTOR inhibitors.

Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Neoplasms; Sirolimus

The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3-K)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signal transduction pathway integrates signals from multiple receptor tyrosine kinases to control cell proliferation and survival. Key components of the pathway are the lipid kinase PI3-K, the small guanosine triphosphate-binding protein Rheb, and the protein kinases Akt and mTOR. Important natural inhibitors of the pathway include the lipid phosphatase PTEN and the tuberous sclerosis complex. Several components of this pathway are targeted by investigational antineoplastic agents. Rapamycin (sirolimus), the prototypic mTOR inhibitor, exhibits activity in acute myeloid leukemia. Three rapamycin analogs, temsirolimus, everolimus, and AP23573, are in clinical trials for various hematologic malignancies. Temsirolimus has produced a 38% overall response rate in relapsed mantle cell lymphoma, and AP23573 has demonstrated activity in acute leukemia. Everolimus is undergoing clinical testing in lymphoma (Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin) and multiple myeloma. In addition, perifosine, an inhibitor of Akt activation that exhibits substantial antimyeloma activity in preclinical models, is being examined in relapsed multiple myeloma. Based on results obtained to date, it appears that inhibitors of the PI3-K/mTOR pathway hold promise as single agents and in combination for hematologic malignancies.

Topics: Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases; Phosphoinositide-3 Kinase Inhibitors; Protein Kinases; Signal Transduction; Sirolimus; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

Reflecting its critical role in integrating cell growth and division with the cellular nutritional environment, the mammalian target of rapamycin *(mTOR) is a highly conserved downstream effector of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt (protein kinase B) signaling pathway. mTOR activates both the 40S ribosomal protein S6 kinase (p70s6k) and the eukaryotic initiation factor 4E-binding protein-1. As a consequence of inhibiting its downstream messengers, mTOR inhibitors prevent cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) activation, inhibit retinoblastoma protein phosphorylation, and accelerate the turnover of cyclin D1, leading to a deficiency of active CDK4/cyclin D1 complexes, all of which may help cause GI phase arrest. Constitutive activation of the PI3K/Akt kinases occur in human leukemias. FLT3, VEGF, and BCR-ABL mediate their activities via mTOR. New rapamycin analogs including CCI-779, RAD001, and AP23573, are entering clinical studies for patients with hematologic malignancies.

Topics: Everolimus; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Leukemia; Protein Kinases; Sirolimus; Substrate Specificity; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a downstream effector of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt (protein kinase B) signaling pathway, which mediates cell survival and proliferation. mTOR regulates essential signal-transduction pathways, is involved in the coupling of growth stimuli with cell cycle progression, and initiates mRNA translation in response to favorable nutrient environments. mTOR is involved in regulating many aspects of cell growth, including membrane traffic, protein degradation, protein kinase C signaling, ribosome biogenesis, and transcription. Because mTOR activates both the 40S ribosomal protein S6 kinase (p70s6k) and the eukaryotic initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1, its inhibitors cause G1-phase cell cycle arrest. Inhibitors of mTOR also prevent cyclin dependent kinase (CDK) activation, inhibit retinoblastoma protein phosphorylation, and accelerate the turnover of cyclin D1, leading to a deficiency of active CDK4/cyclin D1 complexes, all of which may help cause G1-phase arrest. It is known that the phosphatase and tensin homologue tumor suppressor gene (PTEN) plays a major role in embryonic development, cell migration, and apoptosis. Malignancies with PTEN mutations, which are associated with constitutive activation of the PI3K/Akt pathway, are relatively resistant to apoptosis and may be particularly sensitive to mTOR inhibitors. Rapamycin analogs with relatively favorable pharmaceutical properties, including CCI-779, RAD001, and AP23573, are under investigation in patients with hematologic malignancies.

Topics: Apoptosis; Cell Division; Cell Survival; Cyclin-Dependent Kinases; Enzyme Activation; Everolimus; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Genes, Tumor Suppressor; Germ-Line Mutation; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Phosphoric Monoester Hydrolases; Protein Kinases; PTEN Phosphohydrolase; Signal Transduction; Sirolimus; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases; Tumor Suppressor Proteins

Cyclosporine microemulsion (CyA) and tacrolimus (Tac) are the principal immunosuppressants prescribed for adult and pediatric renal transplantation. In the majority of patients, these calcineurin inhibitors have been used in combination with other immunosuppressive drugs, such as azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). In this review we will address the question of what calcineurin inhibitor we should use in an individual pediatric renal transplant patient. Well-designed randomized studies in children showed no difference in short-term patient and graft survival with cyclosporine microemulsion and tacrolimus. However Tac is significantly more effective than CyA microemulsion in preventing acute rejection after renal transplantation in a pediatric population when used in conjunction with azathioprine and corticosteroids. This difference disappears when calcineurin inhibitors are used in combination with MMF as both Tac and CyA produce similar rejection rates and graft survival. However, Tac is associated with improved graft function at 1 and 2 yr post-transplant. Adverse events of hypomagnesaemia and diarrhea seem to be higher in Tac group whereas hypertrichosis, flu syndrome and gum hyperplasia occurs more frequently in the CyA group. The incidence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus was almost identical between Tac and CyA treated patients. The recommendation drawn from the available data is that both CyA and Tac can be used safely and effectively in children. However Tac may be preferable to CyA because of steroid sparing effect and less hirsutism. We recommend that cyclosporine should be chosen when patients experience Tac-related adverse events. Nevertheless, the best calcineurin inhibitor should be decided on individual patients according to variable risk factors, such as risk of rejection in sensitized patient or delayed graft function. The possibility of adverse events should also be considered.

Topics: Azathioprine; Calcineurin Inhibitors; Child; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cyclosporine; Growth and Development; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Hyperlipidemias; Hypertension; Immunosuppressive Agents; Kidney Transplantation; Mycophenolic Acid; Postoperative Care; Sirolimus; Tacrolimus

Most hematologic malignancies are characterized by initial responsiveness to chemotherapeutic regimens, but many patients still die from their disease. Among the agents currently in clinical development, there is a strong rationale for evaluating rapamycin derivatives. Rapamycin was originally developed as an immunosuppressant and is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of kidney allograft transplant rejection. Two related compounds, RAD001 and CCI-779, are under development as cancer therapeutics. Rapamcyin binds to the immunophilin FK506-binding protein 12 and this protein/drug complex binds to and inhibits the activity of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). Among its many functions, mTOR regulates the translation of a specific subset of mRNA transcripts that encode for proteins involved in regulating the G1 to S phase transition. This review focuses on recent advances in the understanding of the mechanisms of cell growth inhibition by rapamycin, clinical trial results for the 2 agents being developed as cancer agents, and the rationale supporting the evaluation of this class of agent in hematological malignancies.

Topics: Cell Cycle; Clinical Trials as Topic; Enzyme Inhibitors; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Protein Kinases; Sirolimus; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

Topics: Adult; Aged; Allografts; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematologic Neoplasms; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Sirolimus; Survival Rate; Tacrolimus; Unrelated Donors

No gold standard has been established as a primary endpoint in trials of initial treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and evidence showing the association of any proposed primary endpoint with clinical benefit has not been conclusively demonstrated. To address this gap, we analyzed outcomes in a cohort of 328 patients enrolled in a prospective, multicenter, observational study within 3 months after diagnosis of chronic GVHD. Complete and partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease were defined according to the 2014 National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease. Success was defined as complete or partial response with no secondary systemic treatment or recurrent malignancy at 1 year after enrollment. Success was observed in fewer than 20% of the patients. The burden of disease manifestations at 1 year was lower for patients in this category than for those with stable or progressive disease. Systemic treatment ended earlier, and subsequent mortality was lower among patients with complete or partial response than among those with stable or progressive disease and those who had received secondary systemic treatment. We conclude that survival with a complete or partial response and no previous secondary systemic treatment or recurrent malignancy at 1 year after initial systemic therapy is associated with clinical benefit, a critical characteristic for consideration as a primary endpoint in a pivotal clinical trial. This prospective observational study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00637689.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Calcineurin Inhibitors; Chronic Disease; Disease Progression; Endpoint Determination; Female; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematologic Neoplasms; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Photopheresis; Prednisone; Prospective Studies; Recurrence; Rituximab; Severity of Illness Index; Sirolimus; Survival Analysis; Transplantation Conditioning; Transplantation, Homologous; United States

The use of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) to reduce the risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) requires intensive post-transplantation toxicity monitoring. Sirolimus-based GVHD prophylaxis is associated with a favorable toxicity profile and requires less intensive monitoring. However, the efficacy of sirolimus-based regimen compared with CNI-based regimen has not been evaluated in the setting of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) double umbilical cord blood (UCB) HCT. We compared outcomes of patients receiving sirolimus/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (n = 37) or cyclosporine (CSA)/MMF (n = 123) in an ongoing phase II study of RIC UCB transplantation. In multiple regression analysis, sirolimus/MMF did not influence the risk of grades II to IV or grades III and IV acute GVHD. In addition, there was no association between type of GVHD prophylaxis and hematopoietic engraftment. Infection density analysis found a significantly lower risk of infections with sirolimus/MMF between days +46 and +180 after HCT compared with CSA/MMF (3.4 versus 6.3 per 1000 patient-days, P = .03); however, no difference was observed before day +45. Sirolimus/MMF use resulted in no thrombotic microangiopathy, fewer instances of elevated serum creatinine >2 mg/dL (14% versus 45%; P <.01), and similar rates of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (2.7% versus 4%; P = .68), compared with CSA/MMF. Disease-free survival at 1 year was 51% for sirolimus/MMF and 41% for CSA/MMF (P = .41), and sirolimus/MMF use did not influence the risk of nonrelapse mortality or survival. In conclusion, sirolimus/MMF GVHD prophylaxis was better tolerated and resulted in similar rates of GVHD and survival as compared to CSA/MMF after RIC double UCB transplantation.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Calcineurin Inhibitors; Cord Blood Stem Cell Transplantation; Cyclosporine; Female; Graft Survival; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Infections; Male; Middle Aged; Mycophenolic Acid; Premedication; Sirolimus; Survival Analysis; Time Factors; Transplantation Conditioning; Young Adult

Large studies, mostly based on series of patients receiving CSA/tacrolimus (TKR) plus MTX as immunoprophylaxis, have demonstrated a deleterious effect on survival of the presence of a single mismatch out of eight loci after allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (alloHSCT). We retrospectively analyzed a series of 159 adult patients who received sirolimus(SRL)/TKR prophylaxis after alloHSCT. We compared overall outcomes according to HLA compatibility in A, B, C and DRB1 loci at the allele level: 7/8 (n=20) vs 8/8 (n=139). Donor type was unrelated in 95% vs 70% among 7/8 vs 8/8 pairs, respectively (P=0.01). No significant differences were observed in 3-year OS (68 vs 62%), 3-year EFS (53 vs 49%) and 1-year non-relapse mortality (9 vs 13%). Cumulative incidence of grades II-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) was significantly higher in 7/8 alloHSCT (68% vs 42%, P<0.001) but no significant differences were found for III-IV aGVHD (4.5% vs 11%), overall (35% vs 53%) and extensive (20% vs 35%) chronic GHVD in 7/8 vs 8/8 subgroups, respectively. In summary, the present study indicates favorable outcomes after alloHSCT using the combination of SRL/TKR combination as GVHD prophylaxis with OS in the range of 55-70%, and non-significant differences in overall outcomes, irrespective of the presence of any mismatches at obligatory loci.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Allografts; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematologic Neoplasms; HLA Antigens; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Sirolimus; Stem Cell Transplantation; Survival Rate; Tacrolimus; Transplantation Conditioning

Effective pharmacological strategies employed in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation should prevent serious chronic graft-versus-host disease and facilitate donor-recipient immune tolerance. Based on demonstrated pro-tolerogenic activity, sirolimus (rapamycin) is an agent with promise to achieve these goals. In a long-term follow-up analysis of a randomized phase II trial comparing sirolimus/tacrolimus versus methotrexate/tacrolimus for graft-versus-host disease prevention in matched sibling or unrelated donor transplant, we examined the impact of prolonged sirolimus administration (≥ 1 year post-transplant). Median follow-up time for surviving patients at time of this analysis was 41 months (range 27-60) for sirolimus/tacrolimus and 49 months (range 29-63) for methotrexate/tacrolimus. Sirolimus/tacrolimus patients had significantly lower National Institutes of Health Consensus moderate-severe chronic graft-versus-host disease (34% vs. 65%; P=0.004) and late acute graft-versus-host disease (20% vs. 43%; P=0.04). While sirolimus/tacrolimus patients had lower prednisone exposure and earlier discontinuation of tacrolimus (median time to tacrolimus discontinuation 368 days vs. 821 days; P=0.002), there was no significant difference in complete immune suppression discontinuation (60-month estimate: 43% vs. 31%; P=0.78). Prolonged sirolimus administration represents a viable approach to mitigate risk for moderate-severe chronic and late acute graft-versus-host disease. Further study of determinants of successful immune suppression discontinuation is needed.

Topics: Acute Disease; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Chronic Disease; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematologic Neoplasms; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Methotrexate; Severity of Illness Index; Siblings; Sirolimus; Survival Analysis; Tacrolimus; Transplantation Conditioning; Transplantation, Homologous; Treatment Outcome; Unrelated Donors

Several studies have examined sirolimus-based immune suppression for the prevention of graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, but little is known regarding its effects on quality of life. The current study reports on changes in quality of life to Day 360 in a randomized phase II trial of sirolimus and tacrolimus versus methotrexate and tacrolimus. Quality of life was assessed prior to transplant and on Days 30, 90, 180, 270, and 360 with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bone Marrow Transplant Trial Outcome Index. Random effects models examined the effects of study arm on change in Trial Outcome Index scores from Day 30 to 360, controlling for base-line Trial Outcome Index. The sirolimus/tacrolimus arm (n=37) showed less improvement in Trial Outcome Index scores over time compared to the methotrexate/tacrolimus arm (n=34) (P=0.02). Patients receiving sirolimus and tacrolimus were more likely to endorse nausea and a lack of energy over time (PS≤0.01). These data suggest that sirolimus-based immune suppression is associated with less improvement in quality of life in the first year post-transplant compared to methotrexate/tacrolimus. Quality of life differences may be due to increased fatigue and nausea in patients treated with sirolimus. These findings should be considered in the clinical management of patients treated with sirolimus. (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier:00803010).

Topics: Adult; Aged; Female; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematologic Neoplasms; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Quality of Life; Sirolimus; Transplantation Conditioning; Transplantation, Homologous; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) form the foundation of current graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis regimens. We hypothesized that a CNI-free regimen consisting of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and brief-course sirolimus would reduce chronic GVHD and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) after reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT). Twenty-six patients (median age, 61 years) underwent unmanipulated PBSCT from an 8/8 locus-matched donor (matched related donor, n = 17; natched unrelated donor, n = 9). GVHD prophylaxis consisted of PTCy and brief-course sirolimus. Donor engraftment occurred in all patients. The cumulative incidence (CI) of grade II-IV acute GVHD, grade III-IV acute GVHD, and chronic GVHD was 46%, 15%, and 31% respectively. One-year NRM was 4%. The median time to immunosuppression discontinuation was day +138. With a median follow-up of 20 months, the estimated 2-year overall survival was 71%, estimated disease-free survival was 64%, and estimated relapse incidence was 32%. In patients with a lymphoid malignancy (eg, chronic lymphoblastic leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Hodgkin disease), 2-year disease-free survival was 100%, and there were no relapses. Good immune reconstitution was evidenced by low cytomegalovirus reactivation rate of 21% (4 of 19 at-risk patients). GVHD prophylaxis with PTCy and sirolimus achieves consistent donor engraftment, low rates of chronic GVHD and NRM, and excellent outcomes in recipients of HLA-identical related and unrelated donor allogeneic PBSCT.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Calcineurin Inhibitors; Cyclophosphamide; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematologic Neoplasms; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation; Prospective Studies; Sirolimus; Tissue Donors; Transplantation Chimera; Transplantation Conditioning

Compromised quality of life (QoL) is a frequent consequence of treatment-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD). Here, we report on the assessment of QoL in a subgroup of 22 patients with a median age of 54 (17-70) yr receiving an everolimus-based salvage therapy at a single center for their steroid-refractory cGvHD. Five patients suffered from mild, 13 from moderate, and four from severe cGvHD according to NIH consensus criteria when everolimus was introduced. Median treatment duration was 390 d ranging from 86 to 814 d. We performed actual and retrospective assessments of QoL (EuroQol EQ-5D questionnaire) and degree of bother experienced by cGvHD symptoms (Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale). Seventeen of 22 patients showed an improved QoL according to the EQ-5D visual analog scale (37.5% vs. 70.0%; p < 0.001), and a decline in the median Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale was noted in 20 of 22 patients (28 vs. 17; p < 0.001). Furthermore, an improvement was noted in each of the five dimensions of the EQ-5D descriptive system. These data even when limited by their retrospective nature suggest that beyond physical responses everolimus may have contributed to the rebuilding of patients' QoL.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Chronic Disease; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glucocorticoids; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematologic Neoplasms; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Prognosis; Quality of Life; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Salvage Therapy; Severity of Illness Index; Sirolimus; Surveys and Questionnaires; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases; Transplantation, Homologous; Young Adult

In experimental models, ex vivo induced T-cell rapamycin resistance occurred independent of T helper 1 (Th1)/T helper 2 (Th2) differentiation and yielded allogeneic CD4(+) T cells of increased in vivo efficacy that facilitated engraftment and permitted graft-versus-tumor effects while minimizing graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). To translate these findings, we performed a phase 2 multicenter clinical trial of rapamycin-resistant donor CD4(+) Th2/Th1 (T-Rapa) cells after allogeneic-matched sibling donor hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for therapy of refractory hematologic malignancy. T-Rapa cell products, which expressed a balanced Th2/Th1 phenotype, were administered as a preemptive donor lymphocyte infusion at day 14 post-HCT. After T-Rapa cell infusion, mixed donor/host chimerism rapidly converted, and there was preferential immune reconstitution with donor CD4(+) Th2 and Th1 cells relative to regulatory T cells and CD8(+) T cells. The cumulative incidence probability of acute GVHD was 20% and 40% at days 100 and 180 post-HCT, respectively. There was no transplant-related mortality. Eighteen of 40 patients (45%) remain in sustained complete remission (range of follow-up: 42-84 months). These results demonstrate the safety of this low-intensity transplant approach and the feasibility of subsequent randomized studies to compare T-Rapa cell-based therapy with standard transplantation regimens.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Cytokines; Drug Resistance; Female; Gene Expression Profiling; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematologic Neoplasms; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Lymphocyte Transfusion; Male; Middle Aged; Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis; Remission Induction; Sirolimus; Th1 Cells; Th2 Cells; Time Factors; Transplantation, Homologous; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Different types of graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis have been proposed in the setting of reduced intensity and non-myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation. An alternative combination with sirolimus and tacrolimus has recently been tested although comparative studies against the classical combination of a calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolate mofetil or methotrexate are lacking. We describe the results of a prospective, multicenter trial using sirolimus + tacrolimus as immunoprophylaxis, and compare this approach with our previous experience using cyclosporine + mycophenolate in the setting of unrelated donor transplantation setting after reduced-intensity conditioning. Forty-five patients received cyclosporine + mycophenolate between 2002 and mid-2007, while the subsequent 50 patients, who were transplanted from late 2007, were given sirolimus + tacrolimus. No significant differences were observed in terms of hematopoietic recovery or acute graft-versus-host disease overall, although gastrointestinal acute graft-versus-host disease grade ≥ 2 was more common in the cyclosporine + mycophenolate group (55% versus 21%, respectively, P=0.003). The 1-year cumulative incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease was 50% versus 90% for the patients treated with the sirolimus- versus cyclosporine-based regimen, respectively (P<0.001), while the incidence of extensive chronic disease was 27% versus 49%, respectively (P=0.043). The 2-year non-relapse mortality rate was 18% versus 38% for patients receiving the sirolimus- versus the cyclosporine-based regimen, respectively (P=0.02). The event-free survival and overall survival at 2 years were 53% versus 29% (P=0.028) and 70% versus 45% (P=0.018) among patients receiving the sirolimus- versus the cyclosporine-based regimen, respectively. In conclusion, in the setting of reduced intensity transplantation from an unrelated donor, promising results can be achieved with the combination of sirolimus + tacrolimus, due to a lower risk of chronic graft-versus-host disease and non-relapse mortality, which translates into better event-free and overall survival rates, in comparison with those achieved with cyclosporine + mycophenolate.

Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Combined Modality Therapy; Cyclosporine; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematologic Neoplasms; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Infections; Male; Middle Aged; Mycophenolic Acid; Prospective Studies; Sirolimus; Survival Rate; Tacrolimus; Time Factors; Transplantation Conditioning; Transplantation, Homologous; Treatment Outcome; Unrelated Donors; Young Adult

There is evidence suggesting that sirolimus, in combination with tacrolimus, is active in the prevention of graft-versus-host disease. Sirolimus-based immune suppression may suppress alloreactive T cells, while sparing the survival and function of regulatory T cells.. We conducted a randomized trial to compare the impact of sirolimus/tacrolimus against that of methotrexate/tacrolimus on the prevention of graft-versus-host disease and regulatory T-cell reconstitution.. Seventy-four patients were randomized 1:1 to sirolimus/tacrolimus or methotrexate/tacrolimus, stratified for type of donor (sibling or unrelated) and the patients' age. The rate of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease at 100 days was 43% (95% CI: 27-59%) in the sirolimus/tacrolimus group and 89% (95% CI: 72-96%) in the methotrexate/tacrolimus group (P<0.001). The rate of moderate/severe chronic graft-versus-host disease was 24% (95% CI: 7-47%) in the sirolimus/tacrolimus group and 64% (95% CI: 41-79%) in the methotrexate/tacrolimus group (P=0.008). Overall survival and patient-reported quality of life did not differ between the two groups. On days 30 and 90 post-transplant, sirolimus-treated patients had a significantly greater proportion of regulatory T cells among the CD4(+) cells in the peripheral blood, and isolated regulatory T cells were functional.. These data demonstrate that sirolimus/tacrolimus prevents grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease and moderate-severe chronic graft-versus-host disease more effectively than does methotrexate/tacrolimus, and supports regulatory T-cell reconstitution following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Case-Control Studies; Combined Modality Therapy; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematologic Neoplasms; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasm Staging; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Sirolimus; Survival Rate; T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory; Tacrolimus; Transplantation, Homologous; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) syndromes are reported to occur with increased frequency in transplant patients treated with siroliumus combined with a calcineurin inhibitor. We performed a retrospective study of all pediatric transplant patients at City of Hope who were administered combined tacrolimus/sirolimus (TAC/SIR) to determine the occurrence of TMA.. This analysis includes 41 consecutive patients between the ages of 2 and 20 (median age 9.1) who received an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant from any source and also received TAC/SIR for prevention or treatment of GVHD. Of those 41 patients, 20 received TAC/SIR as GVHD prohpylaxis and were designated the preventative group (PG), while 21 received TAC/SIR as treatment for GVHD and were designated the therapy group (TG). TMA occurrence in both groups was documented from day -1 of transplant to day 60 for the PG, and until 30 days after last dose for the TG. TMA was defined according to 2005 consensus criteria.. Five of twenty patients in the PG, and five of twenty one in the TG, experienced TMA, with an overall rate of 23.8% for the population. All ten patients with TMA showed elevated levels of TAC, SIR or both and nine of ten suffered from organ injury due to regimen-related toxicity or GVHD.. Physicians should exercise caution in the use of TAC/SIR in pediatric patients due to a high rate of TMA. It is not recommended for heavily pre-treated patients and peak levels of TAC/SIR must be very carefully controlled.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematologic Neoplasms; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Tacrolimus; Thrombotic Microangiopathies; Time Factors; Transplantation, Homologous

Previous studies have shown that adding sirolimus to a tacrolimus/mini-methotrexate regimen (Tac/Sir/MTX) as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis produces low rates of acute GVHD (aGVHD) after reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). To assess whether posttransplantation methotrexate MTX can be safely eliminated altogether, we conducted a prospective clinical trial testing the combination of T and Sir alone (tac/sir) as GVHD prophylaxis after RIC SCT from matched related donors. We compared the results with patients who received (Tac/Sir/MTX) as GVHD prophylaxis after RIC SCT from matched related donors in a previous prospective study. Patients in both groups received i.v. fludarabine (Flu) 30 mg/m(2)/day and i.v. busulfan (Bu) 0.8 mg/kg/day on days -5 to -2 as conditioning, followed by transplantation of unmanipulated filgrastim-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCS). After transplantation, patients in both groups received Tac and Sir orally starting on day -3, with doses adjusted to achieve trough serum levels of 5 to 10 ng/mL and 3 to 12 ng/mL, respectively. The patients in the Tac/Sir/MTX group also received mini-MTX therapy (5 mg/m(2) i.v.) on days +1, +3, and +6. Filgrastim 5 microg/kg/day s.c. was started on day +1 and continued until neutrophil engraftment. Twenty-nine patients received the Tac/Sir regimen, and 46 patients received the Tac/Sir/MTX regimen. The 2 groups were balanced in terms of age, sex, and disease characteristics. Engraftment was brisk and donor chimerism after transplantation robust in both groups. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV aGVHD was similar in the 2 groups (17% for Tac/Sir versus 11% for Tac/Sir/MTX; P = .46). There also were no differences between the 2 groups in cumulative incidence of extensive chronic GVHD (cGVHD), treatment-related mortality (TRM), disease relapse, or survival. The Tac/Sir combination for GVHD prophylaxis is well tolerated and associated with a low incidence of aGVHD in matched related donor RIC SCT. The omission of mini-MTX from the Tac/Sir GVHD prophylaxis regimen appears to have no adverse effect on the development of aGVHD.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Adult; Age Factors; Female; Graft Survival; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation; Prospective Studies; Sex Factors; Sirolimus; Tacrolimus; Transplantation Conditioning; Transplantation, Homologous

We assessed the combination of sirolimus, tacrolimus, and low-dose methotrexate as acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) prophylaxis after reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation from matched related (MRD, n = 46) and unrelated (URD, n = 45) donors. All patients received fludarabine and intravenous busulfan conditioning followed by transplantation of mobilized PBSC. The median time to neutrophil engraftment was 13 days. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV and III-IV aGVHD were 16% and 7%, respectively. There was no difference in the incidence of aGVHD between MRD and URD cohorts. Two-year cumulative incidence of extensive chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was 40%. Relapse-free survival (RFS) at 2 years was 34%: 21% in MRD and 45% in URD. Overall survival (OS) at 2 years was 59%: 47% in MRD and 67% in URD. High levels (>90%) of donor derived hematopoiesis were achieved in 59% of patients early after transplantation. The addition of sirolimus to tacrolimus and low-dose methotrexate as GVHD prophylaxis following RIC with fludarabine and low-dose intravenous busulfan is associated with rapid engraftment, low rates of aGVHD, and achievement of high levels of donor chimerism.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Busulfan; Female; Graft Survival; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematologic Neoplasms; Histocompatibility Testing; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation; Premedication; Sirolimus; Tacrolimus; Tissue Donors; Transplantation Conditioning; Transplantation, Homologous; Vidarabine

Deforolimus (AP23573), a novel non-prodrug rapamycin analogue, inhibits the mammalian target of rapamycin, a downstream effector of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt and nutrient-sensing pathways. A phase 2 trial was conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of single-agent deforolimus in patients with relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies.. Eligible patients were assigned to one of five disease-specific, parallel cohorts and given 12.5 mg deforolimus as a 30-minute infusion once daily for 5 days every 2 weeks. A Simon two-stage design was used for each cohort. Safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor response were assessed.. Fifty-five patients received deforolimus as follows: cohort 1 23 acute myelogenous leukemia, two myelodysplastic syndrome and one chronic myelogenous leukemia in nonlymphoid blast phase; cohort 2, one acute lymphocytic leukemia; cohort 3, nine agnogenic myeloid metaplasia; cohort 4, eight chronic lymphocytic leukemia; cohort 5, nine mantle cell lymphoma and two T-cell leukemia/lymphoma. Most patients were heavily pretreated. Of the 52 evaluable patients, partial responses were noted in five (10%), two of seven agnogenic myeloid metaplasia and three of nine mantle cell lymphoma. Hematologic improvement/stable disease was observed in 21 (40%). Common treatment-related adverse events, which were generally mild and reversible, were mouth sores, fatigue, nausea, and thrombocytopenia. Decreased levels of phosphorylated 4E-BP1 in 9 of 11 acute myelogenous leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome patients after therapy showed mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition by deforolimus.. Deforolimus was well-tolerated in patients with heavily pretreated hematologic malignancies, and antitumor activity was observed. Further investigation of deforolimus alone and in combination with other therapeutic agents is warranted in patients with selected hematologic malignancies.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Cohort Studies; Female; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Sirolimus; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

We assessed the combination of sirolimus and tacrolimus without methotrexate after myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation from 53 matched related donors (MRDs) and 30 unrelated donors (URDs). All patients received cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation conditioning followed by transplantation of mobilized peripheral blood stem cells. The median time to neutrophil engraftment was 14 days. The median time to platelet engraftment was 12 days. No differences between MRD and URD cohorts was noted. The incidence of grade II-IV and III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were 20.5% and 4.8%. The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was 59.1%. There were no differences in acute or chronic GVHD incidence between MRD and URD cohorts. The omission of methotrexate was associated with low transplant-related toxicity, with 30-day and 100-day treatment-related mortality rates of 0% and 4.8%. Relapse-free survival at 1 and 2 years was 72.3% and 68.5%, respectively. Overall survival at 1 and 2 years was 77.1% and 72.2%, respectively. There were no differences in relapse-free or overall survival between MRD and URD cohorts. The substitution of sirolimus for methotrexate as GVHD prophylaxis is associated with rapid engraftment, a low incidence of acute GVHD, minimal transplant-related toxicity, and excellent survival. Differences between MRD and URD cohorts are not evident when effective GVHD prophylaxis is used.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation; Sirolimus; Survival Rate; Tacrolimus; Tissue Donors; Transplantation Conditioning

Methotrexate in combination with a calcineurin inhibitor is a standard graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylactic regimen in allogeneic stem cell transplantation. However, methotrexate is associated with delayed engraftment, mucositis, idiopathic pneumonia syndrome, and other transplant-related complications. Sirolimus, a novel immunosuppressant without methotrexate's toxicities, has been used successfully in solid organ transplantation. We hypothesized that replacing methotrexate with sirolimus would preserve effective prophylaxis of GVHD while minimizing transplant-related toxicity after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. We enrolled 30 patients in a phase II study to test the efficacy of tacrolimus in combination with sirolimus in lieu of methotrexate in preventing GVHD after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation from HLA-matched related donors. Grade II GVHD occurred in 3 patients (10%), and no patient developed grade III or IV GVHD. Neutrophil and platelet engraftment were prompt, occurring on days 14 and 13, respectively. All patients survived to hospital discharge (median, 18 days), and peritransplantation toxicity was mild. Four patients developed thrombotic microangiopathy, and 3 patients developed hepatic veno-occlusive disease. Chronic GVHD occurred in 11 patients. Relapse-free and overall survival at 100 days were 93% and 97%, respectively, and were 71% and 67% at 1 year. Causes of death included relapse (n = 6), veno-occlusive disease (n = 1), and late pulmonary toxicity (n = 1). Sirolimus in combination with tacrolimus is a promising alternative to methotrexate-based regimens for GVHD prophylaxis after matched related donor peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Mucositis was modest, engraftment was prompt, and transplant-related toxicity was modest. Methotrexate-free, sirolimus-based GVHD prophylactic regimens should be tested in randomized trials against the current standard of care.

Topics: Adult; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Graft Survival; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematologic Neoplasms; Histocompatibility Testing; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation; Sirolimus; Survival Analysis; Tacrolimus; Treatment Outcome

While tacrolimus and sirolimus (T/S)-based graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis has been effective in preventing acute GvHD post hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), its efficacy and long-term outcome in matched (MUD) and mismatched unrelated donor (mMUD) setting is not well defined.. Herein, we evaluated a consecutive case-series of 482 patients who underwent unrelated donor HCT (2005-2013) with T/S-based GvHD prophylaxis.. With a median follow-up of 6.2 years (range = 2.4-11.3), the 5-year overall survival (OS) and relapse/progression-free survival were 47.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 43.0-52.0) and 43.6% (95% CI: 39.1-48.1), respectively; and the 5-year cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and relapse were 24.9%, and 31.5%, respectively. In this cohort, mMUD was associated with worse OS (39.0% versus 50.7% at 5 y; P = 0.034), primarily due to greater risk of NRM (33.5% versus 21.7%; P = 0.038). While rates of relapse, acute (II-IV or III-IV) or chronic GvHD (limited or extensive) were not different, death caused by chronic GvHD (20.8% versus 12.8%; P = 0.022) and infection (33.0% versus 18.1%; P < 0.01) were significantly greater in mMUD. In multivariable analysis, high-risk disease (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.21, 95% CI: 1.16-4.23; P < 0.01) and mMUD (HR = 1.55, 95% CI: 1.15-2.08; P = 0.004) were independent predictive factors for OS.. T/S-based GvHD prophylaxis is an effective and acceptable GvHD prophylactic regimen. However, survival after mMUD remained poor, possibly related to the severity of chronic GvHD.

Topics: Chronic Disease; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Forecasting; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematologic Neoplasms; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Histocompatibility Testing; HLA Antigens; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Survival Rate; Tacrolimus; Transplantation Conditioning; Transplantation, Homologous; United States; Unrelated Donors

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Female; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematologic Neoplasms; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Sirolimus; Survival Analysis; Tacrolimus; Transplantation Conditioning; Transplantation, Homologous

Topics: Adult; Aged; Chemoprevention; Cyclophosphamide; Female; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematologic Neoplasms; Histocompatibility Testing; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation; Sirolimus; Transplantation Conditioning

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients are at risk of invasive fungal infections and prophylaxis with azole agents is common practice. The concomitant use of these agents with sirolimus and tacrolimus for the prevention of graft-versus-host disease may result in excessive immunosuppression or toxicity.. This retrospective study identified hospitalized patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation between August 2009 and April 2011 at Rush University Medical Center. From this group, patients who underwent concomitant tacrolimus, sirolimus, and azole therapy were included for evaluation. The immunosuppression dosing in conjunction with azole use at discharge was analyzed to develop a dosing algorithm dependent on whether fluconazole, posaconazole, or voriconazole was used.. A total of 36 patients were screened for inclusion, of which 8 were excluded due to acute renal failure and/or hemolysis. The remaining patients were stratified by the azole they were concomitantly taking with tacrolimus and sirolimus. The fluconazole arm required the lowest magnitude of dose reductions, while voriconazole required the greatest.. Dose reductions of 50-75% for both sirolimus and tacrolimus, in combination with standard dosing of azole antifungal agents, were necessary to achieve therapeutic drug concentrations for immunosuppressants and potentially avoid toxicities.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Algorithms; Antifungal Agents; Azoles; Drug Dosage Calculations; Female; Fluconazole; Hematologic Neoplasms; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Mycoses; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Tacrolimus; Triazoles; Voriconazole; Young Adult

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Allografts; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematologic Neoplasms; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Mycophenolic Acid; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Survival Rate; Tacrolimus

Antifungal prophylaxis with azoles is considered standard in allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (allo-HSCT). Although sirolimus is being used increasingly for the prevention of GVHD, it is a substrate of CYP3A4, which is inhibited by voriconazole, and concurrent administration can lead to significantly increased exposure to sirolimus. We identified 67 patients with hematologic malignancies who underwent allo-HSCT with sirolimus, tacrolimus and low-dose MTX and received concomitant voriconazole prophylaxis from April 2008 to June 2011. All patients underwent a non-myeloablative or reduced-intensity conditioned allo-HSCT. Patients received sirolimus and voriconazole concurrently for a median of 113 days. The median daily dose reduction of sirolimus at the start of coadministration was 90%. The median serum sirolimus trough levels before and at steady state of coadministration were 5.8 ng/mL (range: 0-47.6) and 6.1 ng/mL (range: 1-14.2) (P=0.45), respectively. One patient with an average sirolimus level of 6 ng/mL developed sirolimus-related thrombotic microangiopathy that resolved after sirolimus discontinuation. No sinusoidal obstructive syndrome was reported. Seventeen patients (25%) prematurely discontinued voriconazole because of the adverse events. Only two patients (3%) presented with possible invasive fungal infections at day 100. We demonstrate that sirolimus and voriconazole coadministration with an empiric 90% sirolimus dose reduction and close monitoring of sirolimus trough levels is safe and well tolerated.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Antifungal Agents; Drug Interactions; Female; Hematologic Neoplasms; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Sirolimus; Transplantation, Homologous; Voriconazole; Young Adult

Th17 cells contribute to severe GVHD in murine bone marrow transplantation. Targeted deletion of the RORγt transcription factor or blockade of the JAK2-STAT3 axis suppresses IL-17 production and alloreactivity by Th17 cells. Here, we show that pSTAT3 Y705 is increased significantly in CD4(+) T cells among human recipients of allogeneic HCT before the onset of Grade II-IV acute GVHD. Examination of target-organ tissues at the time of GVHD diagnosis indicates that the amount of RORγt + Th17 cells is significantly higher in severe GVHD. Greater accumulation of tissue-resident Th17 cells also correlates with the use of MTX- compared with Rapa-based GVHD prophylaxis, as well as a poor therapeutic response to glucocorticoids. RORγt is optimally suppressed by concurrent neutralization of TORC1 with Rapa and inhibition of STAT3 activation with S3I-201, supporting that mTOR- and STAT3-dependent pathways converge upon RORγt gene expression. Rapa-resistant T cell proliferation can be totally inhibited by STAT3 blockade during initial allosensitization. We conclude that STAT3 signaling and resultant Th17 tissue accumulation are closely associated with acute GVHD onset, severity, and treatment outcome. Future studies are needed to validate the association of STAT3 activity in acute GVHD. Novel GVHD prevention strategies that incorporate dual STAT3 and mTOR inhibition merit investigation.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Allografts; Aminosalicylic Acids; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Marrow Transplantation; CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Dendritic Cells; Female; Glucocorticoids; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Lymphocyte Culture Test, Mixed; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Nuclear Receptor Subfamily 1, Group F, Member 3; Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation; Phosphorylation; Prospective Studies; Protein Processing, Post-Translational; Receptors, Interleukin-6; Sirolimus; STAT3 Transcription Factor; Th17 Cells; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway is a major therapeutic target in the treatment of hematological malignancies, as it controls cellular events of high importance for regulation of mRNA translation and protein production. Rapalogs, or first-generation mTOR inhibitors, have produced only modest clinical benefits so far. Limitations to rapalogs likely result from the partial inhibition of mTORC1 substrates and lack of effects on mTORC2. Efforts toward the development of agents with more potent and complete inhibitory effects on the mTOR pathway have resulted in the development of catalytic mTOR inhibitors. Key preclinical and early clinical investigations of several catalytic mTOR inhibitors and potential resistance mechanisms to their activities are summarized here.

Topics: Benzamides; Benzoxazoles; Biocatalysis; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Imidazoles; Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1; Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 2; Morpholines; Multiprotein Complexes; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Signal Transduction; Sirolimus; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases; Treatment Outcome; Triazines

The mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) controls cell growth and enlargement and has been found to be aberrant in a wide variety of malignancies. Although mTOR is already an attractive antineoplastic target, overexpression or aberrant expression of mTOR may also provide an opportunity to further increase the size differential between malignant and normal cells, providing an opportunity to amplify and exploit cell size differences between neoplastic cells and their normal counterparts using physiochemical treatment modalities. Therefore, this study sought to quantify the concentration response and time course effects of rapamycin on cell cycle entry, cell enlargement, and cell proliferation in U937 human monocytic leukemia and human hematopoietic stem cells (hHSCs). In addition, the effects of combination treatment with mTOR inhibitors (rapamycin, everolimus, and temsirolimus) and cytoskeletal-directed agents (cytochalasin B and vincristine) in leukemic cells (U937, THP1, K562, Molt-4, and L1210) were assessed for potential drug synergy. While both U937 cells and hHSCs exhibited a marked reduction in cell volume, U937 cells were able to proliferate in the presence of rapamycin ranging from 0.5 nM to 10 μM (10,000 nM), whereas hHSCs were able to proliferate only at lower concentrations, and were completely inhibited from proliferation by 8 nM rapamycin. These effects were observed with as little as 0.5 nM rapamycin, demonstrating the profound affinity the compound has for FK-binding protein 12 (FKBP12), which subsequently forms the FKBP12/rapamycin complex to inhibit mTOR. Rapamycin continued to exert effects on cell size and proliferation even at 10 μM, without producing marked cytotoxicity. Although cytochalasin B and vincristine were unable to substantially enlarge rapamycin-treated leukemia cells, it appears that rapamycin and its associated analogs everolimus and temsirolimus have notable synergistic potential with microfilament-disrupting cytochalasin B and microtubule-disrupting vincristine as assessed by comparative effects on cell growth, annexin V staining, IC30 isobolograms, and Chou-Talalay statistics. These observations indicate a potentially novel therapeutic rationale for hematological malignancies and for other cancers to elicit the preferential destruction of neoplastic cells that aberrantly express mTOR.

Topics: Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Cell Size; Cytoskeleton; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Hematologic Neoplasms; Hematopoietic Stem Cells; Humans; Sirolimus; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases; U937 Cells

Oral mucositis (OM) is a side effect of intensive chemotherapy and radiation and has been reported to affect 75-100% of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients. The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of OM in patients conditioned with myeloablative conditioning (MAC) to reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) and to determine the effect of a new oral care protocol.. The study involved 171 HSCT recipients, with hematological malignancies transplanted between 2007 and 2011. Median age of the patients was 50 years (range 12-71). Ninety-nine (58%) received RIC and 72 received MAC. Clinical features of OM were recorded from day -3 before to day +25 after HSCT using the World Health Organization (WHO) scoring system and the oral mucositis assessment score (OMAS).. Overall, 87% of the patients developed OM of any severity, which peaked on days 10-11. The mean WHO score was 1.7. In multivariate analysis, the severity of OM was associated with MAC (relative hazard (RH) 1.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.37-1.80, p < 0.001), all donor-recipient gender combinations except female-to-male (RH = 1.26, 95% CI 1.10-1.4, p = 0.001), and early year of HSCT (RH = 0.84, 95%CI 0.7-0.96, p = 0.013). There was a correlation between long hospitalization and OM (day 15, r = 0.31, p < 0.001). There was a good correlation between the WHO and OMAS scoring systems for OM (r = 0.74, p < 0.001).. Oral mucositis was reduced in patients treated with RIC and in patients treated during recent years, when oral care was intensified. Increased scores of OM prolonged hospitalization.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Busulfan; Child; Cyclophosphamide; Female; Hematologic Neoplasms; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Oral Hygiene; Prednisone; Sirolimus; Stomatitis; Transplantation Conditioning; Vidarabine; Whole-Body Irradiation; Young Adult

We investigated sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as GVHD prophylaxis in patients with advanced hematological malignancies receiving myeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) from HLA-identical sibling donors. On the basis of pre-study stopping rules, the trial was closed to accrual after enrollment of 11 adult patients. In all, 7 of the 11 patients received BU-containing preparative regimens. Sirolimus was discontinued in three patients because of the toxicity-related events of severe sinusoidal obstructive syndrome, portal vein thrombosis, altered mental status and in one patient because of the risk of poor wound healing. In all, 6 of the 11 patients developed grade II-IV acute GVHD (AGVHD) a median of 15.5 days post HCT. Two of three patients with grade IV AGVHD had sirolimus discontinued by 9 days post HCT. All patients responded to AGVHD therapy without GVHD-related deaths. There were two non-relapse- and two relapse-related deaths. At a median follow-up of 38 months (2-47 months), 7 of 11 patients were alive without disease. MMF and sirolimus GVHD prophylaxis did not reduce the risk of AGVHD, however, there were no GVHD-related deaths. The severe toxicities in the patients receiving the BU-containing preparative regimens limited the continued use of sirolimus and MMF for the prevention of AGVHD.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematologic Neoplasms; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Mycophenolic Acid; Sirolimus; Transplantation Conditioning; Transplantation, Homologous; Unrelated Donors

Sirolimus is used in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCTs) for prevention and treatment of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Posaconazole is used in this population for invasive fungal disease (IFD) prophylaxis and treatment. As posaconazole strongly inhibits CYP3A4, concurrent administration of sirolimus, a CYP3A4 substrate, and posaconazole has been reported to increase sirolimus drug exposure substantially. Coadministration of posaconazole and sirolimus is contraindicated by the manufacturer of posaconazole. We identified 15 patients who underwent HSCTs at our institution receiving a steady-state dose of sirolimus who subsequently started posaconazole therapy from January 2006 to March 2009. We recorded baseline characteristics, drug administration details, and potential adverse effects related to either drug. All patients underwent HSCTs for treatment of hematologic malignancy. All patients were initially prescribed sirolimus for GVHD prophylaxis and continued therapy after developing GVHD. Twelve patients (80%) received posaconazole for IFD prophylaxis in the setting of GVHD and 3 (20%) for IFD treatment. Patients received sirolimus and posaconazole concurrently for a median of 78 days (interquartile range [IQR] 25-177; range, 6-503). The median daily dose of sirolimus (2 mg/day) before initiation of posaconazole was reduced 50% to a median daily dose of 1 mg/day at steady state. Six patients experienced sirolimus trough levels greater than 12 ng/mL during coadministration, but only 1 patient experienced an adverse event potentially associated with sirolimus exposure during the first month of coadministration. This patient's sirolimus dose was empirically reduced by only 30% on posaconazole initiation. Concurrent sirolimus and posaconazole use seems to be well tolerated with a 33% to 50% empiric sirolimus dose reduction and close monitoring of serum sirolimus trough levels at the time of posaconazole initiation.

Topics: Adult; Antifungal Agents; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Dosage Calculations; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematologic Neoplasms; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Mycoses; Sirolimus; Transplantation, Homologous; Triazoles

Topics: Female; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematologic Neoplasms; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Male; Methotrexate; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Sirolimus; Tacrolimus

Methotrexate (MTX) is a standard agent used in combination with calcineurin inhibitors for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell (HCT) transplantation. We retrospectively compared the incidence of acute GVHD (aGVHD), transplant-related morbidity, and mortality in patients given sirolimus/tacrolimus ± antithymocyte globulin (ATG) versus MTX/tacrolimus or cyclosporine and allogeneic transplantation for hematologic malignancies. Between January 1, 2005, and April 30, 2009, 106 consecutive patients received peripheral blood HCT or bone marrow grafts after 1 of 6 myeloablative conditioning regimens. The incidence of grade II-IV aGVHD was 18.6% in patients who received sirolimus/tacrolimus compared to 48.9% who received MTX (P = .001). The incidence of grade III-IV aGVHD was 5% and 17% (P = .045), respectively. There was no difference in overall survival (OS) between the groups (P = .160). Chronic GVHD (cGVHD) occurred in 40.4% who received sirolimus and 41.9% receiving MTX (P = .89). The incidence of thrombotic microangiopathy or interstitial pneumonitis was not significantly different between groups. The reduction in the risk of severe aGVHD was offset by an increased (20% versus 4%, P = .015) incidence of and mortality from sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (SOS). Sirolimus/tacrolimus appears to reduce the incidence of aGVHD after conventional allotransplantion compared to MTX-calcineurin inhibitor prophylaxis; however, this did not improve survival.

Topics: Adult; Antilymphocyte Serum; Calcineurin Inhibitors; Cyclosporine; Female; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematologic Neoplasms; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Lung Diseases, Interstitial; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Survival Analysis; Tacrolimus; Thrombotic Microangiopathies; Transplantation Conditioning; Transplantation, Homologous; Young Adult

Glucocorticoids have gone unchallenged as an essential component of primary therapy for acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) despite limited complete response rates and adverse effects from this therapy. The role for alternate immunosuppressive agents as primary aGHVD treatment remains unexamined. In a series of 10 patients at high risk for corticosteroid toxicity or leukemia relapse who developed biopsy-proven grade II-III aGVHD after hematopoietic cell transplantation, we report that primary therapy with sirolimus resulted in durable complete remission of aGVHD in 5 (50%) without requirement for glucocorticoids. Mild chronic GVHD (cGVHD) developed in 4 (40%). Projected overall survival (OS) at 18 months is 79% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 38.1%-94.3%), and projected relapse-free survival (RFS) at 15 months is 70% (95% CI: 32.9%-89.2%). Sirolimus was well tolerated with mild and reversible thrombotic microangiopathy occurring in 2 patients. This experience provides preliminary evidence for the efficacy of sirolimus as a sole primary therapy in the treatment of aGVHD.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematologic Neoplasms; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Sirolimus; Survival Rate; Transplantation, Homologous

Topics: Anemia, Sickle Cell; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Antigens, CD20; Benzamides; Benzenesulfonates; CD40 Antigens; Diphenylamine; Hematologic Neoplasms; Hematology; Humans; Ki-1 Antigen; Leukemia, Myeloid; Lymphoma; MAP Kinase Kinase Kinases; Niacinamide; Phenylurea Compounds; Pyridines; Sirolimus; Sorafenib

We studied antitumor effects of receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib (formerly SU11248) against a variety of hematologic malignancies including the following leukemias: eosinophilic (EOL-1), acute myeloid (THP-1, U937, Kasumi-1), biphenotypic (MV4-11), acute lymphoblastic (NALL-1, Jurkat, BALL-2, PALL-1, PALL-2), blast crisis of chronic myeloid (KU812, Kcl-22, K562), and adult T-cell (MT-1, MT-2, MT-4), as well as non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (KS-1, Dauji, Akata) and multiple myeloma (U266). Thymidine uptake studies showed that sunitinib was active against EOL-1, MV4-11, and Kasumi-1 cells, which possessed activating mutations of the PDGFRalpha, FLT-3, and c-KIT genes, respectively, with IC(50)s of <30 nmol/L. In addition, sunitinib inhibited the proliferation of freshly isolated leukemia cells from patients possessing mutations in FLT3 gene. Annexin V staining showed that sunitinib induced apoptosis of these cells. Sunitinib inhibited phosphorylation of FLT3 and PDGFRalpha in conjunction with blockade of mammalian target of rapamycin signaling in MV4-11 and EOL-1 cells, respectively. Interestingly, rapamycin analogue RAD001 enhanced the ability of sunitinib to inhibit the proliferation of leukemia cells and down-regulate levels of mammalian target of rapamycin effectors p70 S6 kinase and eukaryotic initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1 in these cells. Taken together, sunitinib may be useful for treatment of individuals with leukemias possessing activation mutation of tyrosine kinase, and the combination of sunitinib and RAD001 represents a promising novel treatment strategy.

Topics: Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing; Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Cell Cycle Proteins; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Drug Synergism; Everolimus; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Indoles; Leukemia; Mutation; Phosphoproteins; Protein Kinases; Pyrroles; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Ribosomal Protein S6 Kinases, 70-kDa; Signal Transduction; Sirolimus; Sunitinib; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

Topics: Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Protein Kinases; Sirolimus; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases