sirolimus and Esophageal-Stenosis

To investigate whether temporary placement of a paclitaxel or rapamycin eluting stent is more effective to reduce stenting induced inflammatory reaction and scaring than a bared stent in benign cardia stricture models.. Eighty dog models of stricture were randomly divided into a control group (CG, n=20, no stent insertion), a bare stent group (BSG, n=20), a paclitaxel eluting (Pacl-ESG, n=20) and a rapamycin eluting stent group (Rapa-ESG, n=20), with one-week stent retention. Lower-oesophageal-sphincter pressure (LOSP), 5-minute barium height (5-mBH) and cardia diameter were assessed before, immediately after the procedure, and regularly for 6 months. Five dogs in each group were euthanized for histological examination at each follow-up assessment.. Stent insertion was well tolerated, with similar migration rates in three groups. At 6 months, LOSP and 5-mBH improved in Pacl-ESG and Rapa-ESG compared to BSG (p<0.05), with no difference between Pacl-ESG and Rapa-ESG (p>0.05). Cardia kept more patency in the Pacl-ESG and Rapa-ESG than in BSG (p<0.05). Reduced peak inflammatory reactions and scarring occurred in the Pacl-ESG and Rapa-ESG compared to BSG (p<0.05), with a similar outcome in the Pacl-ESG and Rapa-ESG (p>0.05).. Paclitaxel or rapamycin-eluting stents insertion led to better outcomes than bare stents in benign cardia stricture models.

Topics: Animals; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Cardia; Cicatrix; Constriction, Pathologic; Disease Models, Animal; Dogs; Drug-Eluting Stents; Esophageal Sphincter, Lower; Esophageal Stenosis; Female; Humans; Inflammation; Male; Manometry; Paclitaxel; Random Allocation; Sirolimus; Time Factors

The aim of the current study was to assess whether placement of the biodegradable rapamycin-eluting nano-fiber membrane-covered metal stent is followed by less fibroblast proliferation and tissue hyperplasia compared with bare stents in experimental stricture in a dog model.. A total of 80 dog models of stricture were randomly divided into a control group (n = 20, no stent insertion), a bare stent group (BSG, n = 20, 1-week retention), and two drug-eluting stent sub-groups (DESG-1w, n = 20, 1-week retention; DESG-4w, n = 20, 4-week retention). Lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure, 5-minute barium height (5-mBH), and cardia diameter were assessed before, immediately after the procedure, and regularly thereafter for 6 months. Five dogs in each group were euthanized for histological examination at each follow-up assessment.. Stent insertion was well tolerated, with similar migration rates (0 % in BSG vs. 7.5 % in DESGs; P = 0.5441). At 6 months, LES pressure and 5-mBH improved in DESG-1w (26.70 ± 5.02 mmHg and 6.50 ± 2.98 cm) and DESG-4w (20.16 ± 5.50 mmHg and 1.54 ± 0.98 cm) compared with BSG (39.94 ± 5.22 mmHg and 11.1 ± 5.46 cm) (P < 0.05), with DESG-4w being more stable than DESG-1w (P < 0.05). The cardia maintained greater patency in the DESGs (7.10 ± 3.09 mm in DESG-1w; 9.16 ± 3.77 mm in DESG-4w) than in the BSG (1.86 ± 2.45 mm; P < 0.05). Reduced peak inflammatory reactions and scarring occurred in DESGs compared with the BSG (P < 0.05), with a better outcome in DESG-4w than in DESG-1w (P < 0.05).. In this experimental stricture model, rapamycin-eluting stents were more effective than bare stents for the reduction of fibroblast proliferation and tissue hyperplasia after stent placement. Furthermore, 4-week retention of the drug-eluting stent led to a better outcome than 1-week retention.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Animals; Cardia; Cell Proliferation; Constriction, Pathologic; Disease Models, Animal; Dogs; Drug-Eluting Stents; Esophageal Sphincter, Lower; Esophageal Stenosis; Female; Fibroblasts; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Manometry; Nanofibers; Pressure; Random Allocation; Sirolimus

Topics: Animals; Cardia; Cell Proliferation; Drug-Eluting Stents; Esophageal Sphincter, Lower; Esophageal Stenosis; Female; Fibroblasts; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Sirolimus