sirolimus and Angina--Unstable

Percutaneous coronary intervention has been hampered by restenosis since its inception. Many research projects including the use of various devices and systemic drug administration have shown disappointing results. Recently, the advent of drug-eluting stents has reduced incidence of restenosis compared with bare metal stents. This article provides an overview of the developments of drug-eluting stents, their clinical impact on the treatment of acute coronary syndrome, and their future perspectives.

Topics: Angina, Unstable; Animals; Clinical Trials as Topic; Coronary Restenosis; Drug Delivery Systems; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Paclitaxel; Prognosis; Sirolimus; Stents; Syndrome

Topics: Angina, Unstable; Atherectomy, Coronary; Catheterization; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Death, Sudden, Cardiac; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Myocardial Infarction; Sirolimus; Stents; Syndrome

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Aged; Angina, Stable; Angina, Unstable; Antineoplastic Agents; Case-Control Studies; Coronary Stenosis; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polyesters; Polymers; Sirolimus; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Treatment Outcome

Polymer-free amphilimus-eluting stents (PF-AES) represent a novel elution technology in the current era of drug-eluting stents. The clinical safety and efficacy of PF-AES as compared with latest-generation permanent-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents (PP-ZES) have not yet been investigated in a large randomized trial.. In this physician-initiated, prospective, multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial, an all-comers population requiring percutaneous coronary intervention was enrolled across 3 European sites. Randomization (1:1 ratio) to PP-ZES or PF-AES was performed after stratification for troponin status and diabetes mellitus. In both treatment arms, troponin-positive patients were planned for 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy, whereas troponin-negative patients were planned for 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy. Outcome assessors were blinded to the allocated treatment. The device-oriented primary end point of target-lesion failure was defined as cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or target-lesion revascularization at 12-months as analyzed by modified intention-to-treat (80% power, and a 3.5% noninferiority margin).. In total, 1502 patients were randomized and 1491 treated with the assigned stent and available for follow-up. The primary end point occurred in 42 (5.6%) of the 744 patients receiving PP-ZES versus 46 (6.2%) of the 747 patients receiving PF-AES. PF-AES were clinically noninferior to PP-ZES (risk difference, 0.5%; upper limit 1-sided 95% confidence interval, 2.6%; P. PF-AES were noninferior to PP-ZES regarding target-lesion failure at 12 months. Findings regarding the secondary end point and prespecified subgroups were generally consistent with that of the primary end point.. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02328898.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Angina, Stable; Angina, Unstable; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Europe; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymers; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to explore the safety and efficacy of a dedicated drug-eluting stent for the treatment of coronary lesions with very small reference vessel diameter (RVD).. Smaller RVD is associated with increased risk for restenosis and target lesion failure (TLF) after stent implantation.. This was a prospective, single-arm, multicenter trial of the Resolute Onyx 2.0-mm zotarolimus-eluting stent. The primary endpoint was 12-month TLF, which was compared with a pre-specified performance goal. Subjects with stable or unstable angina or ischemia, target lesions ≤27 mm in length, and RVD ≥2.0 and <2.25 mm were eligible for enrollment. A subset of subjects underwent follow-up angiography at 13 months post-procedure.. A total of 101 subjects with 104 lesions were enrolled. The mean age was 67.3 ± 9.6 years, 47% of subjects had diabetes, the mean lesion length was 12.6 ± 6.3 mm, and the mean RVD was 1.91 ± 0.26 mm. The rate of TLF at 12 months was 5.0%, fulfilling the pre-specified performance goal of 19% (p < 0.001). The rates of target lesion revascularization and target vessel myocardial infarction were 2.0% and 3.0%, respectively. There were no episodes of stent thrombosis. In-stent late lumen loss was 0.26 ± 0.48 mm, and the rate of binary restenosis was 12.0%.. In this first report of a drug-eluting stent with a dedicated size to treat lesions with RVD <2.25 mm, the Resolute Onyx 2.0-mm zotarolimus-eluting stent was associated with a low rate of TLF and late lumen loss, without a signal for stent thrombosis. This novel-sized drug-eluting stent appears to be a feasible option for the treatment of coronary lesions in extremely small vessels. (Medtronic Resolute Onyx 2.0 mm Clinical Study; NCT02412501).

Topics: Aged; Angina, Stable; Angina, Unstable; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States

The aim of the present study was to compare vascular healing response between the first-generation sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) and the second-generation everolimus-eluting stent (EES) by using optical coherence tomography (OCT).. The RESET was a prospective, multicentre, randomised, open-label trial comparing EES and SES. Of the 3,197 patients enrolled in the RESET, nine-month follow-up OCT after stent implantation was performed in 100 patients (48 EES-treated lesions in 44 patients and 62 SES-treated lesions in 56 patients), thus constituting the OCT substudy population. The percentage of uncovered struts per lesion (8±15% vs. 14±19%, p=0.031) and cross-sections with >30% uncovered struts per lesion (6±14% vs. 18±29%, p=0.009) was significantly lower in EES compared with SES. The frequency of DES-treated lesions with incomplete stent apposition (8 [17%] vs. 29 [47%], p<0.001) was significantly lower in EES compared with SES. Intra-stent thrombus was comparably observed between EES and SES (1 [2%] vs. 5 [8%], p=0.229).. Compared with SES, EES was associated with a favourable vascular response at nine months after stent implantation.

Topics: Aged; Angina, Unstable; Antineoplastic Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Neointima; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Sirolimus; Tomography, Optical Coherence

The cobalt chromium everolimus-eluting stent (CoCr-EES) has shown the best safety and efficacy profile in the trials conducted so far. Recently, a new EES with a platinum-based platform (PtCr-EES) has been introduced in the market. There is only one study comparing both stents, but with important exclusion criteria.. We sought to evaluate clinical outcomes with the PtCr-EES compared with the CoCr-EES in an all-comers population. We have conducted a randomized all-comers study aimed to compare these stents in a real-practice scenario.. A total of 300 patients undergoing revascularization and suitable for long-term dual-antiplatelet therapy were randomized 1:1 to CoCr-EES or PtCr-EES. No exclusion criteria based on clinical presentation or lesion characteristics were applied.. The clinical and angiographic characteristics were well balanced in both groups without significant differences. At 18 months, the survival free from death and infarction was 93.9% for CoCr-EES and 91.3% for PtCr-EES (P=.3), the survival free from revascularization was 95.2% vs 94.5% (P=.6) and the survival free from death, infarction, and revascularization was 90.6% vs 88%, respectively (P=.4). The incidence of definite or probable thrombosis was 1.3% for CoCr-EES and 0.66% for PtCr-EES (P=.9). No cases of longitudinal stent compression were observed.. The results of this all-comers trial do not show significant differences between CoCr-EES and PtCr-EES. However, the sample size is not powered to exclude potential differences between stents.

Topics: Aged; Angina, Stable; Angina, Unstable; Chromium Alloys; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Equipment Failure; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platinum; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

This first-in-human multicenter study sought to examine prospectively the safety and efficacy of a new, cobalt chromium thin-strut, coronary absorbable polymer-coated, sirolimus-eluting stent.. Bioabsorbable polymers on drug-eluting stents may lower the long-term risks of inflammation, delayed healing, and adverse events.. We enrolled patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease with stable or unstable angina pectoris and >50% diameter stenosis, amenable to coverage with a ≤23-mm long stent in a vessel 2.5 to 3.5 mm in diameter. All patients received dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation. Patients, in groups of 10, underwent repeat angiography, intravascular ultrasound, and optical coherence tomography at 4, 6, or 8 months, and all patients were seen or contacted at 18 months of follow-up.. The median (range) in-stent late lumen loss (LLL) was 0.03 mm (-0.22 to 0.21 mm), 0.10 mm (-0.03 to 1.2 mm), and 0.08 mm (-0.01 to 0.28 mm), at 4, 6, and 8 months, respectively. At 18 months, the median in-stent LLL was 0.08 mm (-0.30 to 0.46 mm). On optical coherence tomography, the proportion of uncovered stent struts decreased from a median of 7.3% (range 0.4% to 46.3%) at 4 months to 0% (range: 0% to 3.4%) at 18 months. The percentage of neointimal volume obstruction by intravascular ultrasound increased from a median of 5.3% to 9.1% between 4 and 6 months and remained nearly unchanged thereafter through 18 months of follow-up. The only recorded major adverse cardiac event was a myocardial infarction.. At 18 months of follow-up, this absorbable polymer-coated, cobalt chromium sirolimus-eluting stent was associated with a low and stable in-stent LLL, complete strut coverage, and no stent thrombosis. (First-In-Human Trial of the MiStent Drug-Eluting Stent [DES] in Coronary Artery Disease [DESSOLVE-I]; NCT01247428).

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angina, Stable; Angina, Unstable; Australia; Belgium; Cardiovascular Agents; Chromium Alloys; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Neointima; New Zealand; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Polymers; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Severity of Illness Index; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional

The Nobori stent is a new drug-eluting stent (DES) with biodegradable polymer coating limited to the abluminal side of stents. Biolimus A9 is a novel sirolimus derivative specifically developed for DES, and polymer load 15.6 μg of biolimus A9 per 1 mm of stent. A non-randomized multicenter trial was conducted in Japan. Twenty-two de novo lesions were treated by Nobori stents and biolimus A9 concentration in whole blood was serially measured at 14 predetermined time points using a validated chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assay. The C max was 85.3 ± 37.9 pg/mL (min-max 46.7-169 pg/mL) in the 18 mm cohort and 198 ± 81 pg/mL (min-max 82.5-365 pg/mL) in the ≥ 28 mm cohort and no early or late bursts of biolimus A9 release were documented. After 4 weeks, no measurable concentration of biolimus A9 was observed in any patient. Estimated AUC0-t was 1.12 ± 1.16 ng/mL h in the 18 mm group, and 5.93 ± 4.41 ng/mL h for the ≥ 28 mm group. A significant association between loaded biolimus A9 dose adjusted by patient weight and pharmacokinetic parameters was observed. The systemic exposure of biolimus A9 eluting from the Nobori stent was low and proportional to the loaded amount of biolimus A9, and clearance from the blood was rapid. These findings suggest that the Nobori stent is feasible and safe. Systemic lower exposure of biolimus A9 after Nobori stent implantation may have beneficial effects on stent endothelialization.

Topics: Aged; Angina Pectoris; Angina, Unstable; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Area Under Curve; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Risk Assessment; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Age is an important determinant of outcomes in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This report from the randomised multicentre SPIRIT III trial compares the outcomes in elderly and younger patients treated with everolimus-eluting stent (EES) versus paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES).. A total of 1,002 patients with stable or unstable angina or inducible ischaemia undergoing PCI were randomised in a 2:1 ratio to receive EES or PES. Outcomes were examined across the randomised groups as a function of age and stent type. Patients ≥65 years of age (elderly) treated with EES vs. PES had lower in-segment late lumen loss (0.11±0.32 mm vs. 0.38±0.55 mm, respectively, p=0.0002) and lower rates of binary in-segment restenosis (3.4% vs. 15.5%, p = 0.004) at eight months, along with a 48% lower incidence of 3-year target vessel failure (TVF=cardiac death, myocardial infarction and ischaemia-driven target vessel revascularisation [TVR]; 10.8% vs. 20.8%, p=0.009), mainly due to a lower incidence of TVR (5.4% vs. 9.2%, p=0.20). Among EES patients, elderly compared to younger patients had comparable rates of binary in-segment restenosis (3.4% vs. 5.6%, p=0.44) at eight months but paradoxically lower rates of TVF (10.8% vs. 17.1%, p=0.03) at three years. Among PES patients, elderly compared to younger patients had a higher rate of binary in-segment restenosis (15.5% vs. 3.4%, p=0.01) at eight months and no difference in the rate of 3-year TVF (20.8% vs. 19.4%, p=0.77) .There was a significant interaction between stent assignment, age ≥65 years and 8-month angiographic in-segment late loss (p=0.001).. Implantation of both EES and PES appeared to be safe in elderly patients, however EES compared to PES was more effective due to enhanced 3-year MACE- and TVF-free outcomes. Further research should clarify age-specific mechanisms of neointimal response after treatment with drug-eluting stents.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Angina Pectoris; Angina, Unstable; Angioplasty, Balloon, Laser-Assisted; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Incidence; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Myocardial Ischemia; Paclitaxel; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

It is unclear whether edge segments have different responses to paclitaxel eluting stent (PES) and sirolimus eluting stent (SES) implantation in patients with unstable angina. This study aimed to compare the different vascular edge responses in patients with unstable angina and single de novo coronary lesion treated with SES and PES.. Two hundred and fifty-five patients with unstable angina and single de novo lesion were randomly assigned to PES and SES groups. Serial volumetric intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) images were taken immediately after stenting and at an eight-month follow-up. Five-mm edge segments proximal and distal to the stents were analyzed.. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. At proximal-edge segment, the vessel area decreased and the plaque area increased significantly in the PES group as compared with the SES group. A significant net loss of lumen area was found in the PES group (from (11.10 +/- 3.12) mm(2) at baseline to (9.92 +/- 3.59) mm(2) at the follow-up, P < 0.001). At the distal-edge segment, the net loss of lumen area in the PES group (from (7.71 +/- 2.81) mm(2) at baseline to (6.66 +/- 2.29) mm(2) at the follow-up, P < 0.001) was attributed to a significant increase of plaque area. Proximal-edge stenosis was commonly seen in the PES group (20.0%) as compared with the SES group (5.0%, P = 0.001). This correlated with the higher incidence of target lesion revascularization in the PES group (P = 0.03). Subsegmentally, the smallest Delta lumen area was located at 2 mm proximally in both groups, at 0 mm distally in the PES group, and at 1 mm distally in the SES group.. The two groups demonstrated negative remodeling of edge segments. PES was less effective than SES in inhibiting the growth of plaque within the first 1-mm length proximal to the stent.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angina, Unstable; Coronary Angiography; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Paclitaxel; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography

Inflammatory markers are elevated in acute coronary syndromes, and are also known to play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of neointimal proliferation and stent restenosis. Drug-eluting stents (DESs) have been shown to decrease stent restenosis in different studies. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of treatment with DESs on systemic inflammatory response in patients with unstable angina pectoris who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We compared plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), human tumor necrosis factor alpha (Hu TNF-alpha), and interleukin 6 (IL-6) levels after DES (dexamethasone-eluting stent [DEXES], and sirolimuseluting stent [SES]) implantation with levels after bare metal stent (BMS) implantation. We performed PCI with a single stent in 90 patients (62 men; 59 +/- 9 years of age; n = 30 in the BMS group, n = 30 in the DEXES group, n = 30 in the SES group) who had acute coronary syndrome. Plasma hsCRP, Hu TNF-alpha, and IL-6 levels were determined before intervention and at 24 h, 48 h, and 1 week after PCI. The results were as follows. Plasma hsCRP levels at 48 h (11.19 +/- 4.54, 6.43 +/- 1.63 vs 6.23 +/- 2.69 mg/l, P = 0.001) after stent implantation were significantly higher in the BMS group than in the DES group; this effect persisted for 7 days (P = 0.001). Plasma Hu TNF-alpha levels at each time point were higher in the SES group than in the BMS and DEXES groups (P < 0.05). The time course of Hu TNF-alpha values was similar in all groups. Although IL-6 levels at baseline and at 24 and 48 h showed no statistically significant difference between the study groups, postprocedural values at 7 days were slightly statistically significant in the SES group (P = 0.045). Drug-eluting stents showed significantly lower plasma hsCRP levels after PCI compared with BMSs. This may reflect the potent effects of DESs on acute inflammatory reactions induced by PCI.

Topics: Angina, Unstable; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; C-Reactive Protein; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Dexamethasone; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Inflammation Mediators; Interleukin-6; Male; Metals; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

The SIRIUS study was a double-blinded, randomized trial of the sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) to evaluate its effect on the rate of restenosis. The present report is a retrospective analysis of short- and long-term outcomes of SESs compared with bare metal stents (BMSs) in a subgroup of patients with unstable angina enrolled in the trial. Of 1,058 patients randomized in SIRIUS, 533 (50.4%) had unstable angina pectoris and 490 had stable angina. In the unstable angina group, patients treated with SESs and BMSs had similar clinical and angiographic characteristics. The stenting procedure was highly successful in the 2 groups (95.9% and 97.4%, respectively) with similar immediate angiographic results and short-term (in-hospital) clinical event rates. At 1-year follow-up, compared with BMSs, patients with unstable angina treated with SESs had significantly lower rates of target lesion revascularization (5.5% vs 22.3%, p <0.0001), target vessel failure (10.9% vs 26.3%, p <0.0001), and major adverse cardiac events (8.4% vs 24.8%, p <0.0001). Stent thrombosis was a rare event, with only 1 patient (0.4%) in each group during the first 30 days. Late thrombosis occurred in 2 patients (0.7%) in the BMS group but in none of the SES group. In conclusion, in the higher risk subgroup of patients with unstable angina, SESs are as safe as BMSs in decreasing restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization. This is reflected by a significant decrease in major adverse cardiac events and target vessel failure. Patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention who meet the entry criteria of the SIRIUS study should be preferentially treated with SESs.

Topics: Angina, Unstable; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Retreatment; Retrospective Studies; Safety; Sirolimus; Stents; Survival Rate; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

To compare polytetrafluoroethylene stent graft (PTFE) with sirolimus and bare metal stents in reducing in-stent restenosis in native coronary vessels in patients with acute coronary syndrome.. The study included patients who underwent stent implantation in acute coronary syndrome from January 2003 to May 2004. The patients (n=119) were randomized either to stent graft group (n=40), sirolimus eluting stent group (n=39), or bare metal stent group (n=40). The main outcome measure of the study was the incidence restenosis at 6-month. The secondary outcome was 6-month major adverse coronary event rate.. The incidence of 6-month major adverse coronary events was similar in all three groups (8 events in stent graft, 9 in sirolimus eluting stent, and 16 in bare metal stent group events). The target lesion revascularization was higher in the bare metal stent group (P=0.044). Restenosis rate, at six-month follow-up was higher in the bare metal stent group compared with the stent graft and sirolimus eluting stent groups. The percent diameter stenosis in the follow-up was significantly higher in the bare metal stent group (P=0.005). The late loss was significantly lower in the sirolimus eluting stent group (mean+/-standard deviation, 0.2+/-0.5 mm), compared with the bare metal stent group (0.7+/-0.7 mm, P=0.034). There was a trend of lower late loss in the stent graft group than in the bare metal stent group.. Three groups of stents implanted in patients with acute coronary syndrome did not differ in the incidence of major adverse cardiac events. Sirolimus-eluting stents had a lower incidence of in-stent restenosis than bare metal stent group. Stent graft implanted in native coronary arteries appears to be safe and efficient in patients with acute coronary syndrome, but a significant reduction in in-stent restenosis was not achieved.

Topics: Angina, Unstable; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Female; Humans; Male; Metals; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Polytetrafluoroethylene; Sirolimus; Stents

We examined the impact of gender on outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention using sirolimus-eluting stents (SES).. Although gender-specific differences in outcome after implantation of bare-metal stents (BMS) have been described, there are no data assessing outcomes of women treated with SES.. We performed a patient-level pooled analysis from 4 randomized SES versus BMS trials (RAVEL [Randomized Comparison of a Sirolimus-Eluting Stent with a Standard Stent for Coronary Revascularization], SIRIUS [SIRolImUS-coated Bx Velocity balloon expandable stent in the treatment of patients with de novo coronary artery lesions], E-SIRIUS [Sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of patients with long atherosclerotic lesions in small coronary arteries], and C-SIRIUS [Canadian study of the sirolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of patients with long de novo lesions in small native coronary arteries]) and analyzed outcomes as a function of gender.. Of 1,748 patients, 1,251 were men and 497 were women. A total of 878 patients were randomized to SES (629 men and 249 women), and 870 patients were randomized to BMS (622 men and 248 women). Compared with men, women were older and more frequently had diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and congestive heart failure. Although overall clinical outcomes were similar in both genders, treatment with SES was associated with significant (p < 0.0001) reductions in rates of in-segment binary restenosis both in women (6.3% vs. 43.8%) and in men (6.4% vs. 35.6%), resulting in a significant reduction in 1-year major adverse cardiac events, driven by a lower incidence of target lesion revascularization/target vessel revascularization in both genders. By multivariable analysis, female gender was not an independent predictor of in-segment binary restenosis or clinical outcomes regardless of stent type.. In this analysis, despite less favorable baseline clinical and angiographic features in women compared with men, the angiographic and clinical benefits of SES were independent of gender.

Topics: Aged; Angina, Unstable; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Sex Factors; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Recent human trials with rapamycin-eluting stents have shown very low restenosis rates. However, the high costs of these devices preclude their use in routine angioplasty, especially when considering multiple stenting. We evaluated whether orally administered rapamycin inhibits in-stent neointimal growth in patients with unstable angina.. We enrolled 15 patients successfully treated with the implantation of a single stent in a single de novo lesion in native coronary arteries. Correct stent expansion and apposition were corroborated with intravascular ultrasound scanning in all patients. Patients received aspirin, clopidogrel, and atorvastatin for 6 months. Rapamycin was administered in a loading dose of 5 mg, followed by 2 mg/day for 4 weeks.. The reference diameter was 3.4 +/- 0.4 mm, lesion length was 11.2 +/- 2 mm, lesion type B1 was 36%, and lesion type B2 was 64%. After the procedure, in-stent minimal lumen diameter and diameter stenosis (DS) were 3.3 +/- 0.4 mm and 0.3% +/- 7.5%, respectively. At 10 days, plasma levels of rapamycin were 7.95 +/- 2.6 ng/mL. At 6 months, angiographic determinations demonstrated an in-stent minimal lumen diameter of 2 +/- 1 mm, an in-stent DS of 41.3% +/- 28.0%, and an in-stent late loss of 1.4 +/- 1.1 mm. Binary restenosis (>50% DS) was present in 6 of 15 patients (40%). Target lesion revascularization (coronary artery bypass grafting) was performed in 2 of 15 patients (13.3%). There were no serious adverse events during the 6-month period of follow-up, but 1 patient had severe heartburn caused by esophagitis, and another patient had herpes zoster at the end of the protocol.. Oral rapamycin was well tolerated, but did not suppress in-stent neointimal growth in this small group of patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Angina, Unstable; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Combined Modality Therapy; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Vessels; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Pilot Projects; Sirolimus; Stents; Tunica Intima

The COMBO biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent includes endothelial progenitor cell capture (EPC) technology for rapid endothelialization, which may offer advantage in acute coronary syndromes (ACS). We sought to analyze the performance of the COMBO stent by ACS status and ACS subtype.. The COMBO collaboration (n = 3614) is a patient-level pooled dataset from the MASCOT and REMEDEE registries. We evaluated outcomes by ACS status, and ACS subtype in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-STEMI (NSTEMI) versus unstable angina (UA). The primary endpoint was 1-year target lesion failure (TLF), composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target lesion revascularization. Secondary outcomes included stent thrombosis (ST).. We compared 1965 (54%) ACS and 1649 (46.0%) non-ACS patients. ACS presentations included 40% (n = 789) STEMI, 31% (n = 600) NSTEMI, and 29% (n = 576) UA patients. Risk of 1-year TLF was greater in ACS patients (4.5% vs. 3.3%, HR 1.51 95% CI 1.01-2.25, p = 0.045) without significant differences in definite/probable ST (1.1% vs 0.5%, HR 2.40, 95% CI 0.91-6.31, p = 0.08). One-year TLF was similar in STEMI, NSTEMI, and UA (4.8% vs 4.8% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.60), but definite/probable ST was higher in STEMI patients (1.9% vs 0.5% vs 0.7%, p = 0.03). Adjusted outcomes were not different in MI versus UA patients.. Despite the novel EPC capture technology, COMBO stent PCI was associated with somewhat greater risk of 1-year TLF in ACS than in non-ACS patients, without significant differences in stent thrombosis. No differences were observed in 1-year TLF among ACS subtypes.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Angina, Unstable; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Endothelial Progenitor Cells; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Angina, Unstable; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Polymers; Prosthesis Design; Prosthesis Failure; Sirolimus; Tomography, Optical Coherence

Women with acute myocardial infarction (MI) undergoing mechanical reperfusion remain at increased risk of adverse cardiac events and mortality compared with their male counterparts. Whether the benefits of new-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) are preserved in women with acute MI remains unclear.. To investigate the long-term safety and efficacy of new-generation DES vs early-generation DES in women with acute MI.. Collaborative, international, individual patient-level data of women enrolled in 26 randomized clinical trials of DES were analyzed between July and December 2016. Only women presenting with an acute coronary syndrome were included. Study population was categorized according to presentation with unstable angina (UA) vs acute MI. Acute MI included non-ST-segment elevation MI (NSTEMI) or ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI).. Randomization to early- (sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stents) vs new-generation (everolimus-, zotarolimus-, or biolimus-eluting stents) DES.. Composite of death, MI or target lesion revascularization, and definite or probable stent thrombosis at 3-year follow-up.. Overall, the mean age of participants was 66.8 years. Of 11 577 women included in the pooled data set, 4373 (37.8%) had an acute coronary syndrome as clinical presentation. Of these 4373 women, 2176 (49.8%) presented with an acute MI. In women with acute MI, new-generation DES were associated with lower risk of death, MI or target lesion revascularization (14.9% vs 18.4%; absolute risk difference, -3.5%; number needed to treat [NNT], 29; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61-0.99), and definite or probable stent thrombosis (1.4% vs 4.0%; absolute risk difference, -2.6%; NNT, 46; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.19-0.69) without evidence of interaction for both end points compared with women without acute MI (P for interaction = .59 and P for interaction = .31, respectively). A graded absolute benefit with use of new-generation DES was observed in the transition from UA, to NSTEMI, and to STEMI (for death, MI, or target lesion revascularization: UA, -0.5% [NNT, 222]; NSTEMI, -3.1% [NNT, 33]; STEMI, -4.0% [NNT, 25] and for definite or probable ST: UA, -0.4% [NNT, 278]; NSTEMI, -2.2% [NNT, 46]; STEMI, -4.0% [NNT, 25]).. New-generation DES are associated with consistent and durable benefits over 3 years in women presenting with acute MI. The magnitude of these benefits appeared to be greater per increase in severity of acute coronary syndrome.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Angina, Unstable; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Middle Aged; Mortality; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Proportional Hazards Models; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Sirolimus; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Aged; Angina, Unstable; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Poland; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Second-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs) have shown higher safety and efficacy compared with first-generation DESs. This effect was achieved by improving biocompatibility using an interalia cobalt-chromium construction, thinner stent struts and biodegradable polymers.. To assess clinical and angiographic outcomes of patients receiving a novel second-generation cobalt-chromium sirolimus-eluting stent.. A total of 424 consecutive patients who received an Alex stent were enrolled in the registry from January to December 2012. The primary outcome measure was the occurrence of 12-month major cardiac adverse events, defined as cases of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization. Quantitative coronary angiography for 240 randomly selected patients was performed by an independent Corelab.. The primary endpoint occurred in 31 of 424 patients (7.3%). The rates of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization were 3.3, 2.6 and 3.5%, respectively. According to the definition established by the Academic Research Foundation, definitive and probable stent thrombosis (ST) occurred in 1.6% (7/424) of patients, including six cases of early ST and one case of late ST. The acute device success rate was 98.5%.. The ALEX Registry provides evidence for the safety and effectiveness of the study device in a relevant population. Quantitative analysis showed a satisfactory performance of the study device for complex coronary lesions. The 12-month rates of major cardiac adverse event and ST were similar to those of other second-generation DES registries.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Aged; Angina, Stable; Angina, Unstable; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Ischemia; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymers; Registries; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Adult; Angina, Unstable; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Aneurysm; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Algorithms; Angina, Unstable; Automation; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted; Male; Middle Aged; Neointima; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Predictive Value of Tests; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome; Wound Healing

Topics: Angina, Unstable; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Automation; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Imaging, Three-Dimensional; Male; Middle Aged; Retreatment; Risk Assessment; Severity of Illness Index; Sirolimus; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Failure; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Patency

Topics: Angina, Unstable; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Thrombosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Hyperplasia; Male; Middle Aged; Neointima; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Predictive Value of Tests; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Thrombectomy; Time Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome

A 62-year-old male patient presented with acute non-ST elevation myocardial infarction. He underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention with implantation of an everolimus-eluting stent in the left anterior descending coronary artery. Six months later, he discontinued clopidogrel. Two weeks later, he presented with unstable angina. Despite the unremarkable electrocardiography, cardiac biomarkers, and coronary angiography, optical coherence tomography revealed a thrombus extending throughout the stent, with uncovered and malapposed stent struts in its proximal part. Thrombectomy was performed. The patient was discharged on dual antiplatelet therapy. Eight months later, the follow-up coronary angiography reassured a patent stent with adequate flow and no evidence of thrombi.

Topics: Angina, Unstable; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Sirolimus; Thrombectomy; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Presence of allergy to iodinated contrast may prevent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to be performed. We present a 76-year-old male with a history of allergic reaction to iodinated contrast who successfully underwent intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and a Doppler guidewire-guided PCI. Stent size was determined based on IVUS. After PCI, stent expansion and a lack of edge dissection or incomplete apposition were confirmed by IVUS and a good antegrade coronary flow was confirmed by a Doppler guidewire. Thus, PCI without contrast injection under IVUS and a Doppler guidewire-guidance may be feasible in selected patients with allergy to iodinated contrast.

Topics: Aged; Angina, Unstable; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Contraindications; Contrast Media; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Humans; Hypersensitivity; Iodine; Male; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Doppler; Ultrasonography, Interventional

Limited data is available on the long-term outcome after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation for in-stent restenosis.. In 3 centers, consecutive patients (n=100) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for in-stent restenosis (n=110) were treated with SES: 28 lesions were focal, 40 diffuse, 17 proliferative, and 15 totally occluded (reference vessel diameter: 3.0+/-0.2 mm, lesion length: 13.8+/-5.7 mm).. SES implantation was successful in all patients. The mean follow-up was 50+/-12 months. The main univariate predictive factor of definite (4%) or probable (4%) SES thrombosis was revascularization without SES in a non-target site during the initial procedure (p<0.01). Repeated target lesion revascularization (TLR) was performed in 8 patients (8%) at 1 year, in 10 patients (10%) at 4 years. A cardiac event related to the SES occurred in 14 patients (14%) at one year, 17 patients (17%) at 4 years, and were associated with unstable angina (p<0.05), multivessel disease (p<0.02) and revascularization without SES in another site of the target vessel during the initial procedure (p<0.01).. SESs are effective at 4 years in the treatment of high risk patients with complex in-stent restenosis, with a low risk of TLR but a high risk of stent thrombosis. Most of cardiac events related to the target vessel occur during the first year, and are associated to a revascularization without SES in another site during the first procedure.

Topics: Aged; Angina, Unstable; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Metals; Middle Aged; Predictive Value of Tests; Registries; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors

This paper studies in-stent restenosis (ISR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) following bare-metal stent (BMS) and drug-eluting stent (DES) in all consecutive patients between 2004 and 2007 undergoing PCI for ISR lesions at our centre.. We compared the clinical presentation, pattern and angiographic outcomes in 838 patients with BMS ISR (487) and SES ISR (351). About 18% of the patients presented with acute coronary syndrome with 2% presenting as ST elevation myocardial infarction, similar in both groups. Angiographic pattern was predominantly focal with SES ISR (47%SES ISR vs. 19% BMS ISR; p<0.001) and diffuse with BMS ISR (SES ISR 16% vs. BMS ISR 36%; p=0.003). In our series the use of balloon angioplasty was higher for the treatment of SES ISR patients as compared to BMS ISR (41.6% vs. 18.3%; p<0.001) and the usage of stent was higher in BMS ISR patients (38.6% vs. 23.4%; p<0.001). Angiographic recurrent restenosis with conventional treatment in a consecutive series of patients was 38.6% and target lesion revascularisation was seen in 33.6%. These outcomes were seen slightly higher in SES ISR group (41.1% vs. 36.9%, p=ns). We have identified unstable angina at presentation (OR 3.02; 95%CI: 1.58-5.77, p=0.001), focal pattern of ISR (OR 0.50; 95% CI: .25-.99, p=0.04), stent usage (OR .25; 95% CI .13-.47, p<0.001), and baseline% diameter stenosis (OR1.03; 95%CI: 1.03-1.06, p=0.01) as independent predictors of BMS ISR recurrent restenosis. Unstable angina, focal pattern of ISR, reference vessel diameter, and% diameter stenosis were shown to be independent predictors of SES ISR.. ISR is not a benign condition, and one fifth of the patients presented with acute coronary syndrome. The pattern of restenosis is predominantly non-focal with BMS ISR and focal with SES ISR. Recurrent restenosis rates are high following conventional treatment and further optimal therapies mainly with SES ISR needs to defined.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Angina, Unstable; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Chi-Square Distribution; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Japan; Logistic Models; Male; Metals; Middle Aged; Odds Ratio; Prosthesis Design; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Severity of Illness Index; Sirolimus; Stents; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Angina, Unstable; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Bypass; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Imaging, Three-Dimensional; Lipids; Male; Middle Aged; Sirolimus; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Failure

The aim of this study was to compare the frequency of incomplete stent apposition (ISA) and struts not covered by tissue at long-term follow-up (as assessed by optical coherence tomography [OCT]) in drug-eluting stents (DES) implanted during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) versus DES implanted for unstable and stable angina.. Incomplete stent apposition and the absence of strut endothelialization might be linked to stent thrombosis. DES implanted for STEMI might have a higher risk of thrombosis.. Consecutive patients in whom OCT was performed at least 6 months after DES implantation were included in the study. Stent struts were classified on the basis of the presence or absence of ISA and tissue coverage.. Forty-seven lesions in 43 patients (1,356 frames, 10,140 struts) were analyzed (49% stable angina, 17% unstable angina, 34% STEMI). Median follow-up time was 9 (range 7 to 72) months. Drug-eluting stents implanted during primary PCI presented ISA more often than DES implanted in stable/unstable angina patients (75% vs. 25.8%, p = 0.001). The frequency of uncovered struts was also higher in the STEMI group (93.8% vs. 67.7%, p = 0.048). On multivariate analysis, DES implantation in STEMI was the only independent predictor of ISA (odds ratio: 9.8, 95% confidence interval: 2.4 to 40.4, p = 0.002) and the presence of uncovered struts at follow-up (odds ratio: 9.5, 95% confidence interval: 1.0 to 90.3, p = 0.049).. DES implanted for STEMI had a higher frequency of incompletely apposed struts and uncovered struts as assessed by OCT at follow-up. DES implantation during primary PCI in STEMI was an independent predictor of ISA and the presence of uncovered struts at follow-up.

Topics: Angina Pectoris; Angina, Unstable; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Endothelium, Vascular; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Paclitaxel; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Tomography, Optical Coherence

(1) Angioplasty is one method of unblocking a stenosed coronary artery. A metal stent is sometimes placed in the vessel lumen. Drug-eluting stents coated with an immunosuppressant or cytotoxic drug have been developed with the objective of reducing the risk of recurrent stenosis; (2) We examined the available literature on the efficacy and adverse effects of drug-eluting stents, based on the standard Prescrire methodology; (3) We found a plethora of clinical trials of drug-eluting stents, and numerous meta-analyses, reflecting the broad economic implications of the market for these devices. Yet drug-eluting stents appear to be no more effective than bare metal stents in reducing overall morality, cardiac mortality, the risk of myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis. Few follow-up data are available beyond 4 years; (4) Revascularisation of the treated coronary artery was about half as frequent with drug-eluting stents as with bare metal stents. However, the apparent advantage is difficult to quantify because in some trials the decision to re-operate was based solely on angiographic criteria, leading to more frequent revascularization. Sirolimus-eluting stents appear to be slightly more effective than paclitaxel-eluting stents in terms of the revascularisation rate; (5) In contrast, late thrombosis (more than a year after stent placement) seems to be more frequent with drug-eluting stents than with bare metal stents. This risk can be reduced by long-term antiplatelet treatment (with clopidogrel plus aspirin), but the benefit is offset by the accompanying increased risk of severe haemorrhagic events. Serious allergic reactions have also been reported; (6) In most cases, especially when the risk of restenosis is low or moderate, it is better to use a bare metal stent. Coronary artery bypass grafting should be considered when there is a high risk of restenosis. Drug-eluting stents are just one alternative to surgery.

Topics: Angina, Unstable; Angioplasty, Balloon; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Clinical Trials as Topic; Coated Materials, Biocompatible; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Bypass; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Hypersensitivity; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Paclitaxel; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

The incidence of definite stent thrombosis (ST) after use of drug-eluting stents (DES), as defined by the Academic Research Consortium, is known to be lower in Japan than in western countries. However, a statistical difference in the incidence of early definite ST (EDST) associated with the unrestricted use of DES has not yet been documented. Therefore, the incidence of EDST in our Japanese institute after unrestricted use of DES was retrospectively compared with those reported in western mega-studies.. During the 40 months from August 2004 to November 2007 (before approval of clopidogrel in Japan), DES were implanted in 3605 lesions in 1885 patients in our institute; lesion- and patient-associated percentages of DES use were 95.2% and 94.7%, respectively. Mean stent length per lesion was 33.2 mm, emergent procedures and ST-elevation myocardial infarctions made up 33.7% and 16.4% of the procedures, respectively, intravascular ultrasonography was used 96.0% of the time, a distal protection device for acute coronary syndrome was used 68.7% of the time, and the mean maximum inflation pressure was 19.5 atm. EDST was observed in five lesions (0.139%) in four patients (0.212%). The incidence of patient-associated EDST at our center was significantly lower than in four western mega-studies (0.736%, 66 of 8970 patients; 0.634%, 149 of 23,500; 0.595%, 52 of 8402; 0.997%, 20 of 2006) (p<0.05, <0.01, <0.05, <0.01, respectively, using a chi(2)-test).. Due to differences in procedural approaches in Japan, the incidence of EDST after unrestricted use of DES was significantly lower than in western countries.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Angina, Unstable; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug-Eluting Stents; Europe; Humans; Incidence; Japan; Paclitaxel; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Ticlopidine; United States

Preprocedual C-reactive protein (CRP) has been reported to correlate with in-stent restenosis following bare-metal stent implantation. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of preprocedural inflammation on neointimal hyperplasia assessed by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) following everolimus-eluting stent (EES) implantation.. We identified 134 patients meeting the following criteria: 1) patients treated with EES; 2) those with stable or unstable angina; and 3) patients available for high-sensitivity (hs)-CRP before the procedure and volumetric IVUS analysis at follow up. We divided the patients into two groups on the basis of hs-CRP levels (< 3 or > or = 3 mg/L) before the procedure and compared IVUS parameters. Volume index (volume/length) was calculated for vessel (VVI), plaque (PVI), neointima (NIV), stent (SVI), and lumen (LVI). Percent neointimal volume (%NIV) was calculated as (NIV/SVI) x 100. Cross-sectional narrowing (CSN) was defined as neointimal area divided by stent area (%).. There was no significant difference in VVI, PVI, or LVI at either baseline or 8-month follow up between the two groups. At 8-month follow up, there was also no significant difference in %NIV (4.93 +/- 5.66% vs. 4.98 +/- 5.25% p = 0.959) and maximum %CSN (16.81 +/- 13.62% vs. 18.14 +/- 13.91%; p = 0.608) as well as VVI, PVI, and LVI between the two groups. Furthermore, hs-CRP did not correlate with %NIV (r = 0.044; p = 0.610) and maximum %CSN (r = 0.086, p = 0.321) at follow up. There was no significant difference in incidence of late-acquired incomplete stent apposition between the two groups (1.2% vs. 0%; p = 0.512).. Our results suggest that preprocedural inflammation does not affect neointimal hyperplasia following EES implantation.

Topics: Aged; Angina, Unstable; C-Reactive Protein; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hyperplasia; Immunosuppressive Agents; Inflammation; Male; Middle Aged; Sirolimus; Tunica Intima; Ultrasonography, Interventional

A 69 year old man was admitted with unstable angina (Class IIB). He had a history of chronic renal impairment, diabetes mellitus, hypertension and coronary bypass surgery in 1997 (LIMA graft to the LAD anf diagonal branch, saphenous vein grafts to the RCA and first marginal branch of LCx.. Coronary angiography.. Unstable angina (Class IIB). Occlusion of the LCx and RCA. Functionally occluded LIMA on the LAD and diagonal branch. Diffuse disease of the LAD with two significant lesions at the LAD-first diagonal and mid-distal LAD.. Revascularisation.

Topics: Aged; Angina, Unstable; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Chronic Disease; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Bypass; Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Complications; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Hemodynamics; Humans; Hypertension; Kidney Diseases; Male; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

The aim of the present study was to compare lesion morphologies after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation between patients with unstable angina pectoris (UAP) and stable angina pectoris (SAP) with the use of optical coherence tomography (OCT).. The lesion morphologies before and after coronary stenting have been proposed as important predictors of clinical outcome. The high resolution of OCT provides detailed information of coronary vessel wall.. We enrolled 55 patients (UAP: n = 24, SAP: n = 31), and examined lesion morphologies by using OCT at pre- and post-SES implantation and 9 months' follow-up.. The incidence of plaque rupture (42% vs. 3%, p < 0.001), intracoronary thrombus (67% vs. 3%, p < or = 0.001) and thin-capped fibroatheroma (cap thickness <65 microm; 46% vs. 3%, p < 0.001) at pre-intervention was significantly greater in UAP than that in SAP. Although stent profiles and procedural characteristics were not different between the 2 groups, inadequate stent apposition (67% vs. 32%, p = 0.038) and tissue protrusion (79% vs. 42%, p = 0.005) after percutaneous coronary intervention were observed more frequently in patients with UAP. Plaque rupture was significantly increased after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with UAP (42% to 75%, p = 0.018), and the persistence of core cavity after plaque rupture (28% vs. 4%, p = 0.031) at 9 months' follow-up was observed more frequently in UAP patients compared with SAP patients. At 9 months' follow-up, the incidence of inadequately apposed stent (33% vs. 4%, p = 0.012) and partially uncovered stent by neointima (72% vs. 37%, p = 0.019) was significantly greater in UAP patients than that in SAP patients. All patients took aspirin and ticlopidine during follow-up period, and no patients had stent thrombosis or adverse coronary events.. Serial OCT examinations demonstrated markedly different vascular response up to 9 months after SES implantation between UAP and SAP patients. Although the inadequate lesion morphologies after stenting were observed more frequently in UAP patients, these findings were not associated with adverse outcomes in patients with antiplatelet therapy.

Topics: Aged; Angina Pectoris; Angina, Unstable; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Observer Variation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Rupture; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Angina Pectoris; Angina, Unstable; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Predictive Value of Tests; Rupture; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome; Wound Healing

Coronary stent fracture is a rare but potentially serious complication of coronary artery stenting. In light of the non-specific presentation of stent fracture, it is also an easily missed complication. In order to ensure rapid recognition and treatment of this entity, physicians must be aware of its existence and its possibility under the right circumstances. We present the case of a 61-year-old Guyanese male who presented with unstable angina secondary to a stent fracture within two weeks of elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for in-stent restenosis.

Topics: Angina, Unstable; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Diagnosis, Differential; Electrocardiography; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prosthesis Failure; Sirolimus; Stents

We sought to evaluate the impact of unstable coronary artery disease (CAD) on short- and mid-term outcomes in patients with multivessel disease treated by multiple sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) as part of ARTS II (Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study Part II).. The differential safety/efficacy profile of SES when implanted in patients with unstable angina (UA) in comparison with stable angina (SA) undergoing multivessel intervention is largely unknown.. Between February 2003 and November 2003, 607 patients at 45 participating centers were treated; 221 of them (36%) presented with UA.. At 30 days, the cumulative rate of death, myocardial infarction-defined as any creatine kinase (CK)/CK-myocardial band elevation beyond the upper limit of normal-cerebrovascular accident, and repeat revascularization (i.e., major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events [MACCEs]) was 19.9% in both groups. Angiographic subacute stent occlusion was documented in 1 (0.5%) and 4 (1%) patients in the UA and SA groups, respectively. At 1 year, the cumulative incidence of MACCEs was 27.1% in the UA and 24.9% in the SA group (p = 0.56). Two late occlusions occurred, both in the SA group. After adjustment for baseline and procedural characteristics, the presence of UA was not identified as an independent predictor of MACCE (hazard ratio 0.94; 95% confidence interval 0.41 to 2.12; p = 0.88). These findings remained consistent after increasing the CK/CK-myocardial band threshold to define periprocedural myocardial infarction up to at least 3 or 5 times the upper limit of normal.. In ARTS II, an unstable clinical presentation did not exert a negative impact on short- and mid-term outcome after SES implantation for multivessel disease. (ARTS II Trial; ; NCT00235170).

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angina, Unstable; Clinical Trials as Topic; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Delivery Systems; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Myocardial Revascularization; Sirolimus; Stents; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Confirming complete neointimal coverage after implantation of a drug-eluting stent is clinically important because incomplete stent coverage is responsible for late thrombosis and sudden cardiac death. Optical coherence tomography is a high-resolution (approximately 10 microm) imaging technique capable of detecting a thin layer of neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) inside a sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) and stent malapposition. This investigation evaluated stent exposure and malapposition 3 months after SES implantation using optical coherence tomography in a different clinical presentations, such as acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and non-ACS. Motorized optical coherence tomographic pullback (1 mm/s) was performed at 3-month follow-up to examine consecutive implanted 31 SESs in 21 lesions in 21 patients (9 with ACS and 12 with non-ACS). NIH thickness inside each strut and percent NIH area in each cross section were measured. In total, 4,516 struts in 567-mm single-stented segments were analyzed. Overall, NIH thickness and percent NIH area were 29 +/- 41 microm and 10 +/- 4%, respectively. Rates of exposed struts and exposed struts with malapposition were 15% and 6%, respectively. These were more frequent in patients with ACS than in those with non-ACS (18% vs 13%, p <0.0001; 8% vs 5%, p <0.005, respectively). In conclusion, neointimal coverage over a SES at 3-month follow-up is incomplete in ACS and non-ACS. Our study suggests that dual antiplatelet therapy might be continued >3 months after SES implantation.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anatomy, Cross-Sectional; Angina, Unstable; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Fibrinolytic Agents; Follow-Up Studies; Foreign-Body Migration; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Stents; Surface Properties; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Tunica Intima

Topics: Aged; Angina, Unstable; Coronary Occlusion; Drug Delivery Systems; Drug-Eluting Stents; Equipment Failure; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Sirolimus; Ultrasonography, Interventional

Sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) have been shown to decrease restenosis compared with bare metal stents (BMSs). Currently, there are limited data on the long-term efficacy of these devices in a real-world patient population. Furthermore, the potential of a late restenotic phenomenon has not yet been excluded. From April to October 2002, 508 consecutive patients with de novo lesions exclusively treated with SESs were enrolled and compared with 450 patients treated with BMSs in the preceding 6 months (control group). Patients in the SES group more frequently had multivessel disease and type C lesions, received more stents, and had more bifurcation stenting. After 3 years, the cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiac events (comprising death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization) was significantly lower in the SES group compared with the pre-SES group (18.9% vs 24.7%, hazards ratio 0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.56 to 0.96, p = 0.026). The 3-year risk of target lesion revascularization was 7.5% in the SES group versus 12.6% in the pre-SES group (hazards ratio 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.38 to 0.87, p = 0.01). In conclusion, the unrestricted use of SESs is safe and superior to the use of BMSs. The beneficial effects, reported after 1 and 2 years in reducing major adverse cardiac events, persisted with no evidence of a clinical late restenotic "catch-up" phenomenon.

Topics: Age Factors; Angina, Unstable; Angioplasty, Balloon; Case-Control Studies; Coronary Restenosis; Diabetes Mellitus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hypertension; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Netherlands; Prosthesis Design; Registries; Regression Analysis; Shock, Cardiogenic; Sirolimus; Stents

Topics: Aged; Angina, Unstable; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Drug Delivery Systems; Equipment Failure; Humans; Male; Metals; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning; Polymers; Retreatment; Severity of Illness Index; Sirolimus; Stents

We evaluated C-reactive protein increases after implantation of bare metal stents in 200 patients and sirolimus-eluting stents in 100 patients. The magnitude of change in C-reactive protein was comparable between groups. Clinical follow-up showed a relation between the postprocedural C-reactive protein increase and outcome that was significant in the bare metal stent group, which accounted for the most of events, but not in the sirolimus-eluting stent group.

Topics: Aged; Angina, Unstable; C-Reactive Protein; Coronary Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Metals; Middle Aged; Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; Prognosis; Sirolimus; Statistics as Topic; Stents; Survival Rate

Between April 2002 and May 2004, 174 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcational lesions with sirolimus-eluting stents were identified. Two strategies were used: stenting only 1 branch (group 1S, n = 57) or stenting both branches (group 2S, n = 117). The incidence of major adverse cardiac events was evaluated in the hospital and at 9-month follow-up. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups with regard to the incidence of target lesion revascularization (5.4% vs 8.9%, p = 0.76), target vessel revascularization (5.4% vs 11.1%, p = 0.51), and cumulative major adverse cardiac events (18.9% vs 23.3%, p = 0.76) at 9 months.

Topics: Aged; Angina, Unstable; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Death, Sudden, Cardiac; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Stents

Topics: Adult; Angina, Unstable; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coated Materials, Biocompatible; Coronary Restenosis; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Angiography; Male; Paclitaxel; Risk Assessment; Sirolimus; Stents; Treatment Failure; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional; Vascular Patency

This study evaluated and compared the efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents (n = 145 patients) with that of paclitaxel-eluting stents (n = 148 patients) in 293 consecutive unselected patients who had diabetes mellitus. Baseline clinical characteristics and presentations were similar: mean age of 64 years, 50% presented with unstable angina or myocardial infarction, and 66% had multivessel disease. Angiographic and procedural characteristics differed, with more complex lesions and more vein grafts managed in the paclitaxel-eluting stent group. Overall mean stented length was 46 +/- 32 mm. There were no differences in unadjusted outcomes by stent type (1-year major adverse cardiac event rates of 20.4% for sirolimus-eluting stents vs 15.6% for paclitaxel-eluting stents, p = 0.12) or when adjusted for multivariate predictors (adjusted hazard ratio 0.68, 95% confidence interval 0.37 to 1.24, p = 0.21). Independent predictors of outcome in patients who had diabetes mellitus were stenting of the left main artery, stenting of the left anterior descending artery, creatinine clearance, and female gender. Patients who required insulin had a significantly higher, crude major adverse cardiac event rate at 1 year compared with those who used oral agents, but this rate became nonsignificant when adjusted for independent predictors of outcome.

Topics: Aged; Angina, Unstable; Diabetes Complications; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Netherlands; Paclitaxel; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Registries; Sirolimus; Stents; Treatment Outcome

The US Food and Drug Administration recently issued a warning of subacute thrombosis and hypersensitivity reactions to sirolimus-eluting stents (Cypher). The cause and incidence of these events have not been determined.. We present findings of a 58-year-old man who died of late stent thrombosis 18 months after receiving 2 Cypher stents for unstable angina. Although angiographic and intravascular ultrasound results at 8 months demonstrated the absence of neointimal formation, vessel enlargement was present. An autopsy showed aneurysmal dilation of the stented arterial segments with a severe localized hypersensitivity reaction consisting predominantly of T lymphocytes and eosinophils.. The known pharmacokinetic elution profile of Cypher stents and the presence of polymer fragments surrounded by giant cells and eosinophils suggest that a reaction to the polymer may have caused late stent thrombosis. Careful long-term follow-up of patients with vessel enlargement after Cypher stent placement is recommended.

Topics: Angina, Unstable; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug Delivery Systems; Fatal Outcome; Humans; Hypersensitivity; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Sirolimus; Stents; Ultrasonography