sildenafil-citrate and Urinary-Retention

To compare the efficacy and adverse events of sildenafil monotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with its FDA-approved counterpart, tadalafil.. In this single-arm self-controlled clinical trial, 33 patients were enrolled. All patients underwent a 6-week treatment with sildenafil, followed by a 4-week washout period and finally a 6-week treatment with tadalafil. Patients were examined on each appointment and post-void residual (PVR) urine, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Quality of life index (IPSS-QoL index) were recorded subsequently. Efficacy of each drug regimen was then evaluated by comparing these outcome parameters.. Both sildenafil and tadalafil were shown to improve PVR (both p < .001), IPSS (both p < .001) and IPSS- QoL index (both p < .001) significantly. Sildenafil was more effective than tadalafil in reducing PVR (mean difference (95%CI) = 9.91% (4.11, 15.72), p < .001) and ameliorating IPSS-QoL index (mean difference (95%CI) = 19.3% (4.47, 34.41), p = .027). Moreover, although not significant, sildenafil reduced IPSS more than tadalafil (mean difference (95%CI) = 3.33% (-0.22, 6.87), p = .065). Concurrent erectile dysfunction did not affect responsiveness to therapy with either sildenafil or tadalafil but age was inversely related to post-treatment IPSS in both sildenafil (B = 0.21 (0.04, 0.37), p = .015) and tadalafil (B = 0.14 (0.02, 0.26), p = .021) regimens with a more prominent role in responsiveness to sildenafil (β = 0.31) compared to tadalafil (β = 0.19).. Considering the significantly better improvement of PVR and IPSS-Qol index with sildenafil, this drug can be nominated as a suitable alternative for tadalafil as a BPH treatment, especially in younger patients who don't have any contraindications.

Topics: Erectile Dysfunction; Humans; Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms; Male; Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors; Prostatic Hyperplasia; Quality of Life; Sildenafil Citrate; Tadalafil; Treatment Outcome; Urinary Retention

Women with the primary disorder of sphincter relaxation find voiding difficult. Studies have identified neuronal nitric oxide synthase in the female urethral sphincter, and nitric oxide donors have been shown to decrease sphincter pressures. The aim of our study was to determine if sildenafil could improve sphincter relaxation and thereby increase flow rates and improve bladder emptying.. Twenty women with complete (5), partial retention or obstructed voiding (15) with a maximum flow rate (Qmax) of less than 15 ml/min with an elevated maximal urethral closure pressure (92--age cm H(2)O) and sphincter volume (>1.6 cm(3)) were included in the study. The study was a double-blind, randomised, placebo-control, crossover design, with patients taking sildenafil or placebo, and with measurement of flow rate and residual volume at baseline and after each treatment phase. Voiding diary, quality of life, and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) data were also collected.. No statistical significant difference was seen in any voiding parameters and diaries when sildenafil citrate was compared with placebo. There was a significant mean decrease in IPSS of 3.64 between baseline and the sildenafil phase (p=0.0083), but not when compared with placebo. In the subgroup of women with partial retention and obstructed voiding (15/20), there was a statistically significant increase in Qmax of 4.7 ml/sec (p=0.025) between sildenafil and baseline; however this difference was not seen when compared with placebo.. This is the first study looking at sildenafil in voiding dysfunction in women. Clinical improvements with sildenafil were not significant when compared with placebo. Sildenafil was not effective as a therapeutic pharmacologic agent in this group of patients.

Topics: Adult; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Muscle Relaxation; Muscle, Smooth; Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors; Piperazines; Purines; Sildenafil Citrate; Sulfones; Syndrome; Urinary Retention