selinexor has been researched along with Sarcoma* in 6 studies
3 trial(s) available for selinexor and Sarcoma
Article | Year |
---|---|
Phase 1b study of combined selinexor and eribulin for the treatment of advanced solid tumors and triple-negative breast cancer.
Selinexor (KPT-330) is a potent inhibitor of exportin 1 (XPO1), in turn inhibiting tumor growth. Selinexor enhances the antitumor efficacy of eribulin in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in vitro and in vivo. Given the unmet medical need in TNBC and sarcoma, the authors explored the safety and efficacy of this combination.. The authors conducted a phase 1b trial of combined selinexor and eribulin using a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design in patients who had advanced solid tumors and in those who had TNBC in a dose-expansion cohort.. Patients with TNBC (N = 19), sarcoma (N = 9), and other cancers (N = 3) were enrolled in the dose-escalation cohort (N = 10) and in the dose-expansion cohort (N = 21). The median number lines of prior therapy received was four (range, from one to seven prior lines). The most common treatment-related adverse events for selinexor were nausea (77%), leukopenia (77%), anemia (68%), neutropenia (68%), and fatigue (48%). One dose-limiting toxicity occurred at the first dose level with prolonged grade 3 neutropenia. The recommended phase 2 dose was 80 mg of selinexor orally once per week and 1 mg/m. Selinexor and eribulin had an acceptable toxicity profile and modest overall efficacy with durable responses in select patients.. Effective therapies for advanced, triple-negative breast cancer and sarcoma represent an unmet need. Exportin 1 is associated with the transport of cancer-related proteins. Preclinical studies have demonstrated tumor growth inhibition and enhanced tumor sensitivity in patients who receive selinexor combined with eribulin. In this phase 1b study, the authors evaluated the safety profile and clinical activity of the combination of selinexor, a potent oral inhibitor of exportin 1, and eribulin in patients with advanced cancers enriched for triple-negative breast cancer or sarcoma. The combination was well tolerated; most adverse events were mild or moderate, reversible, and managed with dose modifications or growth factor support. The combination of selinexor and eribulin produced an antitumor response, particularly in some patients with triple-negative breast cancer. This work lays the foundation for prospective investigations of the role of selinexor and eribulin in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer. Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Humans; Neutropenia; Prospective Studies; Sarcoma; Soft Tissue Neoplasms; Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms | 2023 |
A phase 1b trial of selinexor, a first-in-class selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE), in combination with doxorubicin in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas (STS).
Selinexor is a first-in-class selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) compound with single-agent activity in soft tissue sarcoma (STS). The study's aim was to determine the safety and efficacy of selinexor in combination with doxorubicin in patients with locally advanced/metastatic STS.. This phase 1b study used a mTPI design. Patients received selinexor at either 60 or 80 mg weekly PO plus doxorubicin (75 mg/m. Twenty-five patients were enrolled (20 female, ECOG 0/1: 13/12, median age 57 years [range 21-74]). Disease subtypes included leiomyosarcoma (n = 6), malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour (n = 3) and other sarcomas (n = 16). Three (12%) and 22 (88%) patients were treated at 60 mg and 80 mg of selinexor, respectively. The most common ≥G3 drug-related adverse events (AEs) were haematological, including neutropenia (56%), febrile neutropenia (28%) and anaemia (24%). There were four dose-limiting toxicities (febrile neutropenia (x2), vomiting, fatigue) all at the 80 mg dose level. There was one death secondary to heart failure. Of the 24 evaluable patients, 5 (21%) had a partial response and 15 (63%) had SD as best response. The estimated median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5.5 (95% CI:4.1-5.7) and 10.5 (95% CI:7.5-14) months.. In a heterogeneous group of patients with locally advanced/metastatic STS, the combination of selinexor and doxorubicin fulfilled the prespecified boundary for tolerability. Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Doxorubicin; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hydrazines; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Non-Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Prognosis; Sarcoma; Tissue Distribution; Triazoles | 2021 |
Phase IB Study of Selinexor, a First-in-Class Inhibitor of Nuclear Export, in Patients With Advanced Refractory Bone or Soft Tissue Sarcoma.
We evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PKs), pharmacodynamics, safety, and efficacy of selinexor, an oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export compound, in patients with advanced soft tissue or bone sarcoma with progressive disease.. Fifty-four patients were treated with oral selinexor twice per week (on days 1 and 3) at one of three doses (30 mg/m(2), 50 mg/m(2), or flat dose of 60 mg) either continuously or on a schedule of 3 weeks on, 1 week off. PK analysis was performed under fasting and fed states (low v high fat content) and using various formulations of selinexor (tablet, capsule, or suspension). Tumor biopsies before and during treatment were evaluated for pharmacodynamic changes.. The most commonly reported drug-related adverse events (grade 1 or 2) were nausea, vomiting, anorexia, and fatigue, which were well managed with supportive care. Commonly reported grade 3 or 4 toxicities were fatigue, thrombocytopenia, anemia, lymphopenia, and leukopenia. Selinexor was significantly better tolerated when administered as a flat dose on an intermittent schedule. PK analysis of selinexor revealed a clinically insignificant increase (approximately 15% to 20%) in drug exposure when taken with food. Immunohistochemical analysis of paired tumor biopsies revealed increased nuclear accumulation of tumor suppressor proteins, decreased cell proliferation, increased apoptosis, and stromal deposition. Of the 52 patients evaluable for response, none experienced an objective response by RECIST (version 1.1); however, 17 (33%) showed durable (≥ 4 months) stable disease, including seven (47%) of 15 evaluable patients with dedifferentiated liposarcoma.. Selinexor was well tolerated at a 60-mg flat dose on a 3-weeks-on, 1-week-off schedule. There was no clinically meaningful impact of food on PKs. Preliminary evidence of anticancer activity in sarcoma was demonstrated. Topics: Active Transport, Cell Nucleus; Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Biopsy; Canada; Capsules; Disease Progression; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Compounding; Fasting; Female; Food-Drug Interactions; Humans; Hydrazines; Male; Middle Aged; New York City; Pharmaceutical Solutions; Postprandial Period; Sarcoma; Soft Tissue Neoplasms; Tablets; Time Factors; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles; Young Adult | 2016 |
3 other study(ies) available for selinexor and Sarcoma
Article | Year |
---|---|
Selinexor (KPT-330) Induces Tumor Suppression through Nuclear Sequestration of IκB and Downregulation of Survivin.
Topics: Animals; Apoptosis; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Nucleus; Cell Survival; Exportin 1 Protein; Humans; Hydrazines; I-kappa B Proteins; Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins; Karyopherins; Mice; NF-kappa B; Oligopeptides; Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear; Sarcoma; Survivin; Transcription Factor RelA; Triazoles; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays | 2017 |
Preclinical activity of selinexor, an inhibitor of XPO1, in sarcoma.
Selinexor is an orally bioavailable selective inhibitor of nuclear export that has been demonstrated to have preclinical activity in various cancer types and that is currently in Phase I and II clinical trials for advanced cancers. In this study, we evaluated the effects of selinexor in several preclinical models of various sarcoma subtypes. The efficacy of selinexor was investigated in vitro and in vivo using 17 cell lines and 9 sarcoma xenograft models including gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), liposarcoma (LPS), leiomyosarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, undifferentiated sarcomas, and alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS). Most sarcoma cell lines were sensitive to selinexor with IC50s ranging from 28.8 nM to 218.2 nM (median: 66.1 nM). Selinexor suppressed sarcoma tumor xenograft growth, including models of ASPS that were resistant in vitro. In GIST cells with KIT mutations, selinexor induced G1- arrest without attenuation of phosphorylation of KIT, AKT, or MAPK, in contrast to imatinib. In LPS cell lines with MDM2 and CDK4 amplification, selinexor induced G1-arrest and apoptosis irrespective of p53 expression or mutation and irrespective of RB expression. Selinexor increased p53 and p21 expression at the protein but not RNA level, indicating a post-transcriptional effect. These results indicate that selinexor has potent in vitro and in vivo activity against a wide variety of sarcoma models by inducing G1-arrest independent of known molecular mechanisms in GIST and LPS. These studies further justify the exploration of selinexor in clinical trials targeting various sarcoma subtypes. Topics: Animals; Apoptosis; Blotting, Western; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor; Exportin 1 Protein; Female; G1 Phase Cell Cycle Checkpoints; Humans; Hydrazines; Karyopherins; Mice, Nude; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit; Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction; Sarcoma; Signal Transduction; Triazoles; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays | 2016 |
Integrated genetic and pharmacologic interrogation of rare cancers.
Identifying therapeutic targets in rare cancers remains challenging due to the paucity of established models to perform preclinical studies. As a proof-of-concept, we developed a patient-derived cancer cell line, CLF-PED-015-T, from a paediatric patient with a rare undifferentiated sarcoma. Here, we confirm that this cell line recapitulates the histology and harbours the majority of the somatic genetic alterations found in a metastatic lesion isolated at first relapse. We then perform pooled CRISPR-Cas9 and RNAi loss-of-function screens and a small-molecule screen focused on druggable cancer targets. Integrating these three complementary and orthogonal methods, we identify CDK4 and XPO1 as potential therapeutic targets in this cancer, which has no known alterations in these genes. These observations establish an approach that integrates new patient-derived models, functional genomics and chemical screens to facilitate the discovery of targets in rare cancers. Topics: A549 Cells; Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cell Cycle; Cell Line, Tumor; CRISPR-Cas Systems; Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4; Doxorubicin; Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor; Exome; Exportin 1 Protein; Female; Genomics; Humans; Hydrazines; Karyopherins; Mice; Mice, Nude; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasm Transplantation; Piperazines; Pyridines; Rare Diseases; Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear; RNA Interference; Sarcoma; Sequence Analysis, RNA; Triazoles | 2016 |