selinexor and Neoplasms

The nuclear transport proteins, importins and exportins (karyopherin-β proteins), may play an important role in cancer by transporting key mediators of oncogenesis across the nuclear membrane in cancer cells. During nucleocytoplasmic transport of tumor suppressor proteins and cell cycle regulators during the processing of these proteins, aberrant cellular growth signaling and inactivation of apoptosis can occur, both critical to growth and development of tumors. Karyopherin-β proteins bind to these cargo proteins and RanGTP for active transport across the nuclear membrane through the nuclear pore complex. Importins and exportins are overexpressed in multiple tumors including melanoma, pancreatic, breast, colon, gastric, prostate, esophageal, lung cancer, and lymphomas. Furthermore, some of the karyopherin-β proteins such as exportin-1 have been implicated in drug resistance in cancer. Importin and exportin inhibitors are being considered as therapeutic targets against cancer and have shown preclinical anticancer activity. Moreover, synergistic activity has been observed with various chemotherapeutic and targeted agents. However, clinical development of the exportin-1 inhibitor leptomycin B was stopped due to adverse events, including vomiting, anorexia, and dehydration. Selinexor, a selective nuclear export inhibitor, is being tested in multiple clinical trials both as a single agent and in combination with chemotherapy. Selinexor has demonstrated clinical activity in multiple cancers, especially acute myelogenous leukemia and multiple myeloma. The roles of other importin and exportin inhibitors still need to be investigated clinically. Targeting the key mediators of nucleocytoplasmic transport in cancer cells represents a novel strategy in cancer intervention with the potential to significantly affect outcomes.

Topics: Active Transport, Cell Nucleus; Animals; Cell Nucleus; Cell Transformation, Neoplastic; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Exportin 1 Protein; Humans; Hydrazines; Karyopherins; Neoplasms; ran GTP-Binding Protein; Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear; Signal Transduction; Triazoles

Clinical observations of cancer patients treated with selinexor have reported high incidence of nausea and anorexia. The study objective was to investigate the adoption of prophylactic olanzapine for the prevention of nausea, vomiting and anorexia in cancer patients receiving selinexor and standard chemotherapy.. We retrospectively reviewed supportive care interventions in patients receiving selinexor and recorded frequency of adverse events (NCI-CTAE). Association between categorical variables were analyzed using Fisher's exact tests; repeated measures analysis was performed to assess weight changes over time.. Of 124 evaluable patients, 83 (66.9%) were female, 93 were white (75.0%), and the most common cancer was ovarian (N = 30, 24.2%). One hundred and four patients (83.9%) received olanzapine, of which 93 (89.4%) were prophylactically treated, the majority (86.5%) receiving low 2.5 mg daily dose. Other anti-emetics included ondansetron in 90 patients (72.6%), dexamethasone prescribed in 50 patients (40.3%) and metoclopramide in 49 patients (39.5%), while aprepitant/fosaprepitant (N = 2, 1.6%) were prescribed infrequently. Cancer patients receiving prophylactic olanzapine (N = 93) compared to patients who never received olanzapine (N = 20) had more Grade 1 + anorexia (31.2% vs 20.0%), less nausea (53.8% vs 70.0%), less vomiting (33.3% vs 40.0%), and increased hyperglycemia (29.0% vs 10.0%), but differences were non-statistically significant. In addition, there was minimal weight loss over time in both groups and no statistically significant differences in weight loss between groups.. Prophylactic olanzapine decreased nausea, vomiting and maintained weight over 3 months but did not prevent anorexia in patients receiving selinexor and chemotherapy. Low dose olanzapine was well tolerated but associated with hyperglycemia.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anorexia; Antiemetics; Female; Humans; Hydrazines; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neoplasms; Olanzapine; Triazoles; Vomiting; Young Adult

Carboplatin and paclitaxel (CT) is one of the standard chemotherapy regimens used in various tumor types. Preclinical models have suggested that selinexor, a first-in-class oral potent selective inhibitor of nuclear export Exportin-1, and CT exerts antitumor activity in multiple malignancies.. This was a single-center, multi-arm phase Ib study utilizing a "basket type" expansion. CT and selinexor was employed as one of the 13 parallel arms. Advanced relapsed/refractory solid tumors following standard therapy or where the addition of selinexor to standard regimens deemed appropriate, were eligible.. Of 13 patients treated, 12 patients were evaluable for response. The most common cancers were breast (n = 4), esophageal (n = 2), ovarian (n = 2) and non-small cell lung cancers (n = 2). All 13 patients had at least one treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and the most common were neutropenia (85%), leukopenia (85%), thrombocytopenia (85%), anemia (69%), nausea (54%), vomiting (46%), and fatigue (46%). One patient at 60 mg QW experienced DLT with grade 3 nausea and vomiting lasting 3 days. Unconfirmed partial response (uPR) was observed in 3 patients; one patient each with esophageal, breast, and ovarian cancer. One patient with esophageal adenocarcinoma had confirmed PR, however, was discontinued from the study due to clinical progression. Five patients achieved stable disease (SD). Disease control rate was 8%. Majority of patients (77%), including two patients who had uPR, had prior exposure to carboplatin and/or paclitaxel. Time-to-treatment failure (TTF) ranged from 1 to 153 weeks.. The RP2D of selinexor was 60 mg QW in combination with CT. The combination conferred viable clinical activity with durable objective responses which should further be explored in tumor types for which CT is used as standard of care. Trial information.. gov Identifier: NCT02419495. Sponsor(s): Karyopharm Therapeutics. (Trial registration: NCT02419495. Registered 14 April 2015, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02419495 ).

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carboplatin; Female; Humans; Hydrazines; Lung Neoplasms; Nausea; Neoplasms; Ovarian Neoplasms; Paclitaxel; Thrombocytopenia; Triazoles; Vomiting

Background Selinexor, a first-in-class, oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) compound inhibits Exportin-1(XPO1), had demonstrated synergistic activity with many chemotherapies and conferred in vivo antitumor efficacy in hematologic as well as solid tumors. Methods This open-label, single-center, multi-arm phase 1b study used a standard 3 + 3 design and a "basket type" expansion. Selinexor with intravenous topotecan was given in one of the 13 parallel arms. Patients with advanced or metastatic relapsed/refractory solid tumors following prior systemic therapy, or in whom the addition of selinexor to standard chemotherapy deemed appropriate, were eligible. Results Fourteen patients with the median age of 61 years (range, 22-68years) were treated, and the most common cancer types were gynecological cancers; ovarian (n = 5), endometrial (n = 2), and 1 each with fallopian tube and vaginal cancers. Of the 14 patients treated, 12 (86 %) had at least one treatment-related adverse event (TRAE). The most common TRAEs were anemia (71 %), thrombocytopenia (57 %), hyponatremia (57 %), vomiting (57 %), fatigue (50 %), nausea (50 %), and neutropenia (36 %). Two patients had dose limiting toxicities. One patient dosed at selinexor 80 mg had grade 3 nausea and vomiting and one patient dosed at selinexor 60 mg experienced grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Of the 13 efficacy evaluable patients, one (8 %) with endometrial cancer achieved unconfirmed partial response (uPR) and the time-to-treatment failure (TTF) was 48 weeks, whereas 6 of the 13 (46 %) patients had stable disease (SD) contributing to the clinical benefit rate of 46 %. The median TTF for all patients was 9 weeks (range, 2-48weeks). Conclusions Once weekly selinexor in combination with topotecan was viable and showed some preliminary tumor efficacy. The recommend phase 2 dose of selinexor was 60 mg once weekly in combination with IV topotecan.Trial registration: NCT02419495. Registered 14 April 2015, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02419495.

Topics: Active Transport, Cell Nucleus; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Exportin 1 Protein; Female; Humans; Hydrazines; Karyopherins; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear; Topotecan; Triazoles

This study shows the ability of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors to lower atrial natriuretic peptide levels and improve glycaemic control, which may benefit the cardiovascular system.. The correlation between SE and AL/CRC is stronger than that between AL or CRC alone. This suggests that in a research setting, when cycloplegic refraction is difficult to perform on 3-year-old children, AL/CRC may be the next best reference for refractive error.. In the research setting, AL/CRC may be the next best reference for refractive error over AL alone when cycloplegic refraction is unavailable in 3-year old children.

Topics: Active Transport, Cell Nucleus; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Natriuretic Factor; Benzhydryl Compounds; Benzylamines; Biopsy; Blood Glucose; Blood Transfusion; Cholesterol, LDL; Combined Modality Therapy; Cyclams; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Disease Progression; Drug Administration Schedule; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; Female; Glucosides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor; Hamstring Muscles; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Heterocyclic Compounds; Hodgkin Disease; Humans; Hydrazines; Immunohistochemistry; Insulin-Secreting Cells; Leg; Male; Middle Aged; Muscle Strength; Neoplasms; Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation; Range of Motion, Articular; Recurrence; Remission Induction; Research Design; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction; Soccer; Sodium-Glucose Transport Proteins; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Transplantation Conditioning; Transplantation, Autologous; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles; Young Adult

Oncolytic viruses exploited for cancer therapy have been developed to selectively infect, replicate, and kill cancer cells to inhibit tumor growth. However, in some cancer cells, oncolytic viruses are often limited in completing their full replication cycle, forming progeny virions, and/or spreading in the tumor bed because of the heterogeneous cell types within the tumor bed. Here, we report that the nuclear export pathway regulates oncolytic myxoma virus (MYXV) infection and cytoplasmic viral replication in a subclass of human cancer cell types where viral replication is restricted. Inhibition of the XPO-1 (exportin 1) nuclear export pathway with nuclear export inhibitors can overcome this restriction by trapping restriction factors in the nucleus and allow significantly enhanced viral replication and killing of cancer cells. Furthermore, knockdown of XPO-1 significantly enhanced MYXV replication in restrictive human cancer cells and reduced the formation of antiviral granules associated with RNA helicase DHX9. Both. We demonstrated that a combination of nuclear export inhibitor selinexor and oncolytic MYXV significantly enhanced viral replication, reduced cancer cell proliferation, reduced tumor burden, and enhanced the overall survival of animals. Thus, selinexor and oncolytic MYXV can be used as potential new anticancer therapy.

Topics: Active Transport, Cell Nucleus; Animals; Humans; Mice; Myxoma virus; Neoplasms; Oncolytic Viruses; Proteomics

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are clonal malignancies of multipotent hematopoietic stem cells, characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis leading to cytopenia. Hypomethylating agents, including azacitidine, have been used for treating MDS with some success; however, the overall survival rate remains poor and, therefore, finding new therapies is necessary. Selinexor, which exerts anticancer effects against some hematologic tumors, is a nuclear export protein inhibitor that blocks cell proliferation and induces apoptosis in various cancer cell lines. We investigated the effects of combined selinexor and azacitidine administration on two MDS cell lines, namely SKM-1 and MUTZ-1. Cells were subjected to a proliferation assay, and the effects of each drug alone, and in combination, were compared. Changes in apoptosis and the cell cycle between groups were also analyzed. Western blotting was conducted to identify the underlying mechanism of action of combined selinexor and azacitidine therapy. The results revealed that the combination of selinexor and azacitidine synergistically inhibited MDS cell proliferation and arrested the cell cycle at the G2/M phase. This combination also promoted MDS cell apoptosis and enhanced p53 accumulation in the nucleus, thereby allowing p53 to be activated and to function as a tumor suppressor. Overall, our results indicate that the combination of selinexor and azacitidine may be a promising approach for treating MDS.

Topics: Azacitidine; Humans; Hydrazines; Myelodysplastic Syndromes; Neoplasms; Triazoles; Tumor Suppressor Protein p53

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells directed against CD19 (CD19.CAR T cells) have yielded impressive clinical responses in the treatment of patients with lymphoid malignancies. However, resistance and/or relapse can limit treatment outcome. Risk of tumor escape can be reduced by combining treatment strategies. Selective inhibitors of nuclear export (SINEs) directed against nuclear exportin‑1 (XPO1) have demonstrated anti‑tumor efficacy in several hematological malignancies. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the combination of CAR T cells with the SINE compounds eltanexor and selinexor. As expected, eltanexor and selinexor were toxic to CD19‑positive malignant cells and the sensitivity of cells towards SINEs correlated with the levels of XPO1‑expression in ALL cell lines. When SINEs and CAR T cells were simultaneously combined, SINEs exerted toxicity towards CAR T cells and impaired their function affecting cytotoxicity and cytokine release ability. Flow cytometry and western blot analysis revealed that eltanexor decreased the cytoplasmic concentration of the transcription factor phosphorylated‑STAT3 in CAR T cells. Due to CAR T‑cell toxicity, sequential use of SINEs and CAR T cells was evaluated: Cytotoxicity of CAR T cells increased significantly when target cells were pre‑treated with the SINE compound eltanexor. In addition, exhaustion of CAR T cells decreased when target cells were pre‑treated with eltanexor. In summary, whereas the concomitant use of SINEs and CAR T cells does not seem advisable, sequential use of SINEs and CAR T cells might improve the anti‑tumor efficacy of CAR T cells.

Topics: Active Transport, Cell Nucleus; Antigens, CD19; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Cell Survival; Coculture Techniques; Combined Modality Therapy; Cytoplasm; Exportin 1 Protein; Humans; Hydrazines; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Karyopherins; Neoplasms; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen; Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear; STAT3 Transcription Factor; Time Factors; Triazoles

The tumor suppressor protein p53 is central to the cellular stress response and may be a predictive biomarker for cancer treatments. Upon stress, wildtype p53 accumulates in the nucleus where it enforces cellular responses, including cell cycle arrest and cell death. p53 is so dominant in its effects, that p53 enforcement - or - restoration therapy is being studied for anti-cancer therapy. Two mechanistically distinct small molecules that act via p53 are the selective inhibitor of nuclear export, selinexor, and MDM2 inhibitor, nutlin-3a. Here, individual cells are studied to define cell cycle response signatures, which captures the variability of responses and includes the impact of loss of p53 expression on cell fates. The individual responses are then used to build the population level response. Matched cell lines with and without p53 expression indicate that while loss-of-function results in altered cell cycle signatures to selinexor treatment, it does not diminish overall cell loss. On the contrary, response to single-agent nutlin-3a shows a strong p53-dependence. Upon treatment with both selinexor and nutlin-3a there are combination effects in at least some cell lines - even when p53 is absent. Collectively, the findings indicate that p53 does act downstream of selinexor and nutlin-3a, and that p53 expression is dispensable for selinexor to cause cell death, but nutlin-3a response is more p53-dependent. Thus, TP53 disruption and lack of expression may not predict poor cell response to selinexor, and selinexor's mechanism of action potentially provides for strong efficacy regardless of p53 function.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Cell Cycle; Cell Cycle Checkpoints; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Lineage; Cell Survival; Exportin 1 Protein; G1 Phase; Humans; Hydrazines; Imidazoles; Karyopherins; Neoplasms; Piperazines; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2; Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear; Triazoles; Tumor Suppressor Protein p53

Selinexor, a selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) compound targeting exportin-1, has previously been shown to inhibit melanoma cell growth

Topics: Animals; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Agents; B7-H1 Antigen; Cell Line, Tumor; CTLA-4 Antigen; Disease Models, Animal; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Synergism; Exportin 1 Protein; Humans; Hydrazines; Immunomodulation; Karyopherins; Melanoma, Experimental; Mice; Neoplasms; Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear; T-Lymphocytes; Triazoles

Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Exportin 1 Protein; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Humans; Hydrazines; Karyopherins; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Neoplasms; Nuclear Pore; Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear; Signal Transduction; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles