selinexor and Lymphoma--Large-B-Cell--Diffuse

The efficacy of selinexor, the first commercially available exportin inhibitor, has been evaluated in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who have received at least 2 lines of therapy. Its role in treatment of DLBCL requires a review of current evidence.. This review describes the pharmacology of selinexor and the clinical trials of the medication for the treatment of patients with DLBCL. To clarify the role of selinexor in the treatment of DLBCL, a PubMed search was performed for articles on currently available treatments for relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL.. Selinexor, which is administered orally, benefits from an advantageous pharmacokinetic profile with toxicity limited to hematological and digestive side effects. It has little or no interaction with other medications and no dose adjustment is required for patients with renal or hepatic impairment. Selinexor has been assessed for treatment of R/R DLBCL in one phase I and one phase II trial. Those studies found a 28% overall response rate, including 12% complete remission, with a median duration of response of 9.3 months. If selinexor's effectiveness as monotherapy is limited, it remains an option when there are no other therapeutic possibilities and can then give long-lasting responses.

Topics: Humans; Hydrazines; Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse; Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin; Triazoles

Post CAR-T failures represent a new unmet need in R/R LBCL. The prognosis is usually very poor and standard treatment options that can guide clinicians are, unfortunately, not available. While polatuzumab, tafasitamab, selinexor, and loncastuximab tesirine are available as SOC since they are FDA approved, data is lacking in the post CAR-T setting. However, they could be used in the absence of other treatment options (clinical trials). A selected group of patients may be treated with checkpoint inhibitors, likely low tumor burden or low proliferative lymphomas or those with PD-L1 expression. For localized relapses, radiation therapy could be considered. A main consideration should be given to clinical trials. So far, it appears that bi-specific antibodies have the best encouraging data (high response rates) with manageable toxicities and logistics; thus, we recommend clinicians to enroll patients in clinical trials utilizing these agents. Other cell therapies (such as dual CAR-T or allogeneic products) should also be considered; however, challenges with logistics and further immunosuppression (especially if patients had prolonged cytopenias from prior CAR-T therapy) may affect its applicability right after CAR-T relapse. It is unclear whether these options will lead to long-term remissions; thus, consolidation with stem cell transplantation (either auto or allogeneic SCT) could be considered in eligible patients.

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Consolidation Chemotherapy; Humans; Hydrazines; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Immunoconjugates; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Radiotherapy; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen; Stem Cell Transplantation; Treatment Failure; Triazoles

Exportin 1 (XPO1), also known as chromosome region maintenance protein 1, plays a crucial role in maintaining cellular homeostasis via the regulated export of a range of cargoes, including proteins and several classes of RNAs, from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. Dysregulation of this protein plays a pivotal role in the development of various solid and haematological malignancies. Furthermore, XPO1 is associated with resistance to several standard-of-care therapies, including chemotherapies and targeted therapies, making it an attractive target of novel cancer therapies. Over the years, a number of selective inhibitors of nuclear export have been developed. However, only selinexor has been clinically validated. The novel mechanism of action of XPO1 inhibitors implies a different toxicity profile to that of other agents and has proved challenging in certain settings. Nonetheless, data from clinical trials have led to the approval of the XPO1 inhibitor selinexor (plus dexamethasone) as a fifth-line therapy for patients with multiple myeloma and as a monotherapy for patients with relapsed and/or refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma. In this Review, we summarize the progress and challenges in the development of nuclear export inhibitors and discuss the potential of emerging combination therapies and biomarkers of response.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Cell Line, Tumor; Dexamethasone; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Exportin 1 Protein; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Hydrazines; Karyopherins; Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear; Triazoles

In June 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration granted accelerated approval to selinexor for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), not otherwise specified, including DLBCL arising from follicular lymphoma, after at least two lines of systemic therapy. Approval was based on SADAL, a multicenter trial of selinexor monotherapy in patients with DLBCL after two to five systemic regimens. Efficacy was based on independent review committee-assessed objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response using Lugano criteria. In 134 patients treated with the approved dosage (60 mg orally on days 1 and 3 of each week), the ORR was 29% (95% confidence interval, 22-38), with complete response in 13% and with 38% of responses lasting at least 6 months. Gastrointestinal toxicity developed in 80% of patients, hyponatremia in 61%, central neurological toxicity (such as dizziness and mental status changes) in 25%, and ocular toxicity in 18%. New or worsening grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia, lymphopenia, neutropenia, anemia, or hyponatremia developed in ≥15%. Adverse reactions led to selinexor dose interruption in 61% of patients, dose reduction in 49%, and permanent discontinuation in 17%, with thrombocytopenia being the leading cause of dose modifications. Postmarketing studies will evaluate reduced dosages of selinexor and further evaluate clinical benefit in patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Selinexor is a new potential option for adults with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified, in the third-line setting or beyond. Toxicities are typically manageable but can be difficult to tolerate and necessitate close monitoring and supportive care.

Topics: Humans; Hydrazines; Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Neutropenia; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles

Topics: Active Transport, Cell Nucleus; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Biomarkers, Tumor; Humans; Hydrazines; Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Triazoles

The most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in adults is diffuse large B-cell (DLBCL). There is a historical unmet need for more effective therapies in the 2nd and 3rd line setting. Emerging immunochemotherapies have shown activity in small studies of heavily pre-treated patients with prolonged remissions achieved in some patients. Anti-CD19 CAR (chimeric antigen receptor) T cells are potentially curative in the 3rd line and beyond setting and are under investigation in earlier lines of therapy. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADC's) such as polatuzumab vedotin targeting the pan-B-cell marker CD79b has proven effectiveness in multiply-relapsed DLBCL patients. Tafasitamab (MOR208) is an anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody producing prolonged remissions when combined with Lenalidomide (LEN) in patients who were not candidates for salvage chemotherapy or autologous stem cell transplant. Selinexor, an oral, small-molecule selective inhibitor of XPO1-mediated nuclear export (SINE), demonstrated prolonged activity against heavily-pretreated DLBCL without cumulative toxicity and is being investigated as part of an oral, chemotherapy-free regimen for relapsed aggressive lymphoma. This article reviews current strategies and novel therapies for relapsed/refractory DLBCL.

Topics: Adoptive Transfer; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Humans; Hydrazines; Immunoconjugates; Lenalidomide; Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse; Triazoles

Despite a number of treatment options, patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) whose disease has become refractory to treatment have a poor prognosis. Selinexor is a novel, oral drug that is approved to treat patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL. In this post hoc analysis of the SADAL study, a multinational, open-label study, we evaluated subpopulations to determine if response to single agent selinexor is impacted by number of lines of prior treatment, autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), response to first and most recent therapies, and time to progressive disease.. Patients (n = 134) with DLBCL after 2-5 prior therapies were enrolled in SADAL and received 60mg selinexor twice weekly.. The median overall survival was 9.0 months and median progression free survival was 2.6 months. Patients who had the best overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate were those who had prior ASCT (42.5% and 50.0%) or responded to last line of therapy (35.9% and 43.5%). Patients with primary refractory DLBCL also showed responses (ORR 21.8%). Adverse events between subgroups were similar to the overall study population, the most common being thrombocytopenia (29.1%), fatigue (7.5%), and nausea (6.0%).. Regardless of prior therapy and disease refractory status, selinexor treatment demonstrated results consistent with its novel mechanism of action and lack of cross-resistance. Thus, single agent oral selinexor can induce deep, durable, and tolerable responses in patients with DLBCL who have recurrent disease after several chemoimmunotherapy combination regimens.

Topics: Humans; Hydrazines; Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse; Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin; Triazoles

Dual blockade of Bruton's tyrosine kinase with ibrutinib and selinexor has potential to deepen responses for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).. In this phase I study (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02303392), adult patients with CLL/NHL, relapsed/refractory to ≥1 prior therapy were enrolled. Patients received weekly oral selinexor and daily oral ibrutinib in 28-day cycles until progression or intolerance. Primary objective was to determine MTD.. Included patients had CLL (n = 16) or NHL (n = 18; 9 Richter transformation, 6 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and 3 mantle cell lymphoma). Median prior therapies were 4 (range = 1-14) and 59% previously received ibrutinib. The established MTD was 40 mg of selinexor (days 1, 8, 15) and 420 mg daily ibrutinib. Common nonhematologic adverse events were fatigue (56%), nausea (53%), anorexia (41%), and diarrhea (41%) and were mostly low grade. Overall response rate was 32%. An additional 47% achieved stable disease (SD), some prolonged (up to 36 months). Median progression-free survival for patients with CLL and NHL was 8.9 [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.9-16.1] and 2.7 (95% CI, 0.7-5.4) months, respectively. For patients with CLL who did not receive prior ibrutinib, only 20% (1/5) progressed. Estimated 2-year overall survival was 73.7% (95% CI, 44.1-89.2) and 27.8% (95% CI, 10.1-48.9) for patients with CLL and NHL, respectively.. The selinexor and ibrutinib combination has demonstrated tolerability in patients with relapsed/refractory CLL/NHL. Responses were durable. Notable responses were seen in patients with CLL with minimal prior therapy. Future study of this combination will focus on efforts to deepen remissions in patients with CLL receiving ibrutinib therapy.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Humans; Hydrazines; Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell; Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse; Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Triazoles

Patients with RR DLBCL who have received ≥ 2 lines of therapy have limited treatment options and an expected overall survival (OS) of < 6 months. The SADAL study evaluated single-agent oral selinexor in patients with RR DLBCL and demonstrated an overall response rate (ORR) of 29.1% with median duration of response (DOR) of 9.3 months. The analyses described here evaluated a number of subpopulations in order to understand how response correlates with survival outcomes in order to identify patients who could most optimally benefit from selinexor treatment. Median age was 67 years; 44.8% of patients were ≥ 70 years of age. The median OS was 9.0 months (95% CI 6.2, 13.7) at a median follow-up of 14.8 months. The median OS was not reached in patients with a CR or PR, while patients who did not respond have a median OS of 4.9 months (p < 0.0001). Patients < 70 years had an OS of 11.1 months compared with 7.8 months in patients ≥ 70 years. Among patients with or without prior ASCT, the median OS was 10.9 and 7.8 months, respectively. Among patients with disease refractory to the most recent DLBCL treatment regimen, the median OS was 7.0 months compared with 11.1 months for disease not refractory to the most recent treatment. In a patient population in which survival is expected to be < 6 months, treatment with single-agent oral selinexor was associated with a median survival of 9 months. Increased median OS observed in patients responding to selinexor was consistent across subgroups regardless of age, prior ASCT therapy, or refractory status. Randomized studies of selinexor in combination with a variety of other anti-DLBCL agents are planned. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02227251) on August 28, 2014. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02227251 .

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Humans; Hydrazines; Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles

Relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive cancer with a median overall survival of less than 6 months. We aimed to assess the response to single-agent selinexor, an oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export, in patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL who had no therapeutic options of potential clinical benefit.. SADAL was a multicentre, multinational, open-label, phase 2b study done in 59 sites in 19 countries. Patients aged 18 years or older with pathologically confirmed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or less, who had received two to five lines of previous therapies, and progressed after or were not candidates for autologous stem-cell transplantation were enrolled. Germinal centre B-cell or non-germinal centre B-cell tumour subtype and double or triple expressor status were determined by immunohistochemistry and double or triple hit status was determined by cytogenetics. Patients received 60 mg selinexor orally on days 1 and 3 weekly until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The study was initially designed to evaluate both 60 mg and 100 mg twice-weekly doses of selinexor; however, the 100 mg dose was discontinued in the protocol (version 7.0) on March 29, 2017, when an improved therapeutic window was observed at 60 mg. Primary outcome was overall response rate. The primary outcome and safety were assessed in all patients who received 60 mg selinexor under protocol version 6.0, or enrolled under protocol versions 7.0 or higher and received at least one dose of selinexor. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02227251 (active but not enrolling).. Between Oct 21, 2015, and Nov 2, 2019, 267 patients were randomly assigned, with 175 allocated to the 60 mg group and 92 to the discontinued 100 mg group. 48 patients assigned to the 60 mg group were excluded due to enrolment before version 6.0 of the protocol; the remaining 127 patients received selinexor 60 mg and were included in analyses of primary outcome and safety. The overall response rate was 28% (36/127; 95% CI 20·7-37·0); 15 (12%) achieved a complete response and 21 (17%) a partial response. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (n=58), neutropenia (n=31), anaemia (n=28), fatigue (n=14), hyponatraemia (n=10), and nausea (n=8). The most common serious adverse events were pyrexia (n=9), pneumonia (n=6), and sepsis (n=6). There were no deaths judged as related to treatment with selinexor.. Single-drug oral selinexor induced durable responses and had a manageable adverse events profile in patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL who received at least two lines of previous chemoimmunotherapy. Selinexor could be considered a new oral, non-cytotoxic treatment option in this setting.. Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease-Free Survival; Exportin 1 Protein; Female; Humans; Hydrazines; Karyopherins; Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse; Male; Middle Aged; Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear; Triazoles

Selinexor (KPT-330), a small-molecule inhibitor of exportin-1 (XPO1, CRM1) with potent anticancer activity, has recently been granted FDA approval for treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), with a number of additional indications currently under clinical investigation. Since selinexor has often demonstrated synergy when used in combination with other drugs, notably bortezomib and dexamethasone, a more comprehensive approach to uncover new beneficial interactions would be of great value. Moreover, stratifying patients, personalizing therapeutics and improving clinical outcomes requires a better understanding of the genetic vulnerabilities and resistance mechanisms underlying drug response. Here, we used CRISPR-Cas9 loss-of-function chemogenetic screening to identify drug-gene interactions with selinexor in chronic myeloid leukemia, multiple myeloma and DLBCL cell lines. We identified the TGFβ-SMAD4 pathway as an important mediator of resistance to selinexor in multiple myeloma cells. Moreover, higher activity of this pathway correlated with prolonged progression-free survival in multiple myeloma patients treated with selinexor, indicating that the TGFβ-SMAD4 pathway is a potential biomarker predictive of therapeutic outcome. In addition, we identified ASB8 (ankyrin repeat and SOCS box containing 8) as a shared modulator of selinexor sensitivity across all tested cancer types, with both ASB8 knockout and overexpression resulting in selinexor hypersensitivity. Mechanistically, we showed that ASB8 promotes selinexor-induced proteasomal degradation of XPO1. This study provides insight into the genetic factors that influence response to selinexor treatment and could support both the development of predictive biomarkers as well as new drug combinations.

Topics: Active Transport, Cell Nucleus; Humans; Hydrazines; Karyopherins; Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse; Multiple Myeloma; Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling Proteins

High grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 rearrangements (HGBCL-DH) represents an uncommon B-cell lymphoma (BCL) with aggressive clinical courses and poor prognosis. Despite revolutionary therapeutic advances in BCL, there has been limited treatment progress in HGBCL-DH, thus necessitating additional therapeutic strategies for HGBCL-DH. This study demonstrated that the BET antagonist INCB057643 synergized with the XPO1 inhibitors (selinexor and eltanexor) to decrease cell viability and increase cell apoptosis in HGBCL-DH cells with or without TP53 mutations. As anticipated, the combined treatment of INCB057643 with selinexor slowed tumor growth and reduced the tumor burden in TP53-mutated HGBCL-DH xenografts. Mechanistically, MYC functional inhibition was a potential molecular mechanism underlying the synergy of the combined INCB057643 and selinexor treatment in HGBCL-DH cells independent of TP53 mutation status. In TP53 mutated HGBCL-DH cells, inducing DNA damage and impairing the DNA damage response (DDR) were involved in the therapeutic interaction of the combined regimen. In TP53 wild-type cells, the molecular mechanism was linked with upregulation of p53 levels and activation of its targeted pathways, rather than dysregulation of the DDR. Collectively, we might provide a potential promising combination therapy regimen for the management of HGBCL-DH. Clinical evaluations are warranted to confirm this conclusion.

Topics: Down-Regulation; Humans; Lymphoma, B-Cell; Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc

The SADAL study evaluated oral selinexor in patients with relapsed and/or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) after at least 2 prior lines of systemic therapy. In this post-hoc analysis, we analyzed the outcomes of the SADAL study by DLBCL subtype to determine the effects of DLBCL subtypes on efficacy and tolerability of selinexor.. Data from 134 patients in SADAL were analyzed by DLBCL subtypes for overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), duration of treatment response, progression-free survival, and adverse events rate.. ORR in the entire cohort was 29.1%, and similar in patients with germinal center (GCB) versus non-GCB DLBCL (31.7% vs. 24.2%, P = 0.45); transformed DLBCL showed a trend towards higher ORR than de novo DLBCL: 38.7% vs. 26.2% (P = 0.23). Despite similar prior treatment regimens and baseline characteristics, patients with DLBCL and normal C-MYC/BCL-2 protein expression levels had a significantly higher ORR (46.2% vs.14.8%, P = 0.012) and significantly longer OS (medians 13.7 vs. 5.1 months, hazard ratio 0.43 [95% CI, 0.23-0.77], P = 0.004) as compared with those whose DLBCL had C-MYC and BCL-2 overexpression. Among patients who had normal expression levels of either C-MYC or BCL-2 and baseline hemoglobin levels ≥ 10g/dL, ORR was 51.5% (n = 47), with median OS of 15.5 months and median PFS of 4.6 months. Similar rates of adverse events were noted in all subgroups.. Overall, single agent oral selinexor showed strong responses in patients with limited treatment alternatives regardless of germinal center B-cell type or disease origin.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Humans; Hydrazines; Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles

Characterize the population PK and exposure-response (ER) relationships of selinexor in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) (efficacy endpoints) or other non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) patients (safety endpoints) to determine the optimal dose in patients with DLBCL.. This work included patients from seven clinical studies, with 800 patients for PK, 175 patients for efficacy and 322 patients for safety analyses. Logistic regression models and Cox-regression models were used for binary and time-to-event endpoints, respectively. Model-based simulations were performed to justify dose based on balance between efficacy and safety outcome.. Selinexor pharmacokinetics were well-described by a two-compartment model with body weight as a significant covariate on clearance and central volume of distribution and gender on clearance. Overall response rate (ORR) in patients with DLBCL increased with day 1 C. Simulations of the safety and efficacy ER models suggested that, compared to a starting dose of 60 mg twice weekly (BIW), a 40 mg BIW regimen resulted in an absolute decrease in AE probabilities between 1.9 and 5.3%, with a clinically significant absolute efficacy decrease of 4.7% in ORR. The modeling results support that 60 mg BIW is the optimal dose in patients with DLBCL.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clinical Studies as Topic; Female; Humans; Hydrazines; Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse; Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles; Young Adult

Topics: Active Transport, Cell Nucleus; Humans; Hydrazines; Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse; Triazoles

Topics: Artifacts; Humans; Hydrazines; Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse; Triazoles

Topics: Artifacts; Humans; Hydrazines; Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse; Triazoles

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Central Nervous System Neoplasms; Compassionate Use Trials; Humans; Hydrazines; Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Middle Aged; Salvage Therapy; Triazoles