scirpentriol and Poultry-Diseases

Graded levels of the Fusarium mycotoxins, scirpentriol (STO), 15-monoacetoxyscirpenol (15-MAS), 4,15-diacetoxyscirpenol (4,15-DAS), and 3,4,15-triacetoxyscirpenol (TAS), were fed to chicks until 3 wk of age. The primary wing feathers, which were scored visually on a scale of 1 to 5 using a newly created scoring scheme, were altered in a dose-related fashion by 15-MAS [minimum effective dose (MED) = .5 microgram/g diet], 4,15-DAS (MED = 2 micrograms/g), and STO (MED = 4 micrograms/g) but not by TAS (MED greater than 8 micrograms/g). The minimum growth inhibitory doses were 2 micrograms/g for STO, 15-MAS, and 4,15-DAS and 8 micrograms/g for TAS. The main alteration of the feathers was a frayed and missing web on the medial side of the distal half of the feather. The shafts of the feathers tended to have an accentuated medial curve. These results imply that the feather alterations associated with corn and feed infested with Fusarium spp. might be caused by trichothecene mycotoxins such as the scirpenols.

Topics: Acetylation; Animal Feed; Animals; Chickens; Feathers; Food Microbiology; Fusarium; Male; Mycotoxins; Poultry Diseases; T-2 Toxin

Dietary scirpentriol (STO), triacetoxyscirpenol (TAS), monoacetoxyscirpenol (MAS), and diacetoxyscirpenol (DAS), mycotoxins produced by Fusarium species, were compared for their ability to cause mouth lesions when graded dietary levels (0, 1, 2, 4, and 8 micrograms STO or TAS/g; 0, .5, 1, 2, and 4 micrograms MAS or DAS/g) were fed to male broiler chickens for 21 days after hatching. The mouth lesions provoked by each scirpenol were dose-related. The minimum effective doses (MED) were 4, 2, 1, and .5 micrograms/g for TAS, STO, DAS, and MAS, respectively, whether the number of affected birds or the number of affected mouth parts (angles, upper beak, lower beak, and tongue) was the measured response. Lesion sites in the mouth varied with the toxin. The rank orders from greatest to least affected sites were angles, upper beak, lower beak, and tongue for TAS and STO, upper beak, lower beak, angles, and tongue for MAS, and upper beak, lower beak, tongue, and angles for DAS. Mouth lesions were clearly visible with each toxin after feeding for 1 wk and the numbers of affected mouth parts almost tripled after 2 wk exposure. During Week 3 of exposure, only the increase caused by MAS was significant (P less than .05). The MED for growth inhibition were 2, 2, 2, and 8 micrograms/g for STO, MAS, DAS, and TAS, respectively. Thus, mouth lesions were of equal or greater sensitivity than growth inhibition as an indicator of scirpenol toxicity. It would appear that the discovery of mouth lesions in birds justifies a mold and mycotoxin control program.

Topics: Acetylation; Animal Feed; Animals; Chickens; Food Microbiology; Fusarium; Male; Mouth Diseases; Mycotoxicosis; Mycotoxins; Poultry Diseases; Random Allocation; T-2 Toxin; Trichothecenes; Weight Gain