sanorg-34006 and Hemorrhage

The aim was to review the relative efficacy and safety of anticoagulation for managing venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cancer.. A systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out. On 17 May 2018 the MEDLINE and Scopus databases were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Eligible RCTs had to be performed in patients with cancer exclusively or to report results on a subset of patients with cancer. The main study outcomes (efficacy/recurrent VTE and safety/bleeding events) were expressed as risk ratios (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). The quality of evidence was assessed following the GRADE method.. Twenty-three RCTs with 6980 patients were identified. Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) were more effective than vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in preventing recurrent VTE (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.45-0.75) and deep vein thrombosis (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.29-0.69) but not pulmonary embolism (PE), bleeding, or overall mortality. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were more effective than VKAs in preventing recurrent VTE (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.45-0.95) but not DVT, PE, overall mortality, or bleeding. However, anti-Xa DOACs were more effective (RR for VTE 0.64, 95% CI 0.42-0.97) and caused less bleeding than VKAs, although major bleeding was reduced only with DOACs not requiring initial parenteral anticoagulation (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.21-0.97). In a direct comparison, DOACs were more effective than LMWHs in preventing VTE recurrence (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.45-0.90) but caused more major bleeding (RR 1.75, 95% CI 1.10-2.77), with no difference in fatal bleeding and overall mortality. Quality of evidence, where sufficient, was mostly moderate or high.. Compared with VKAs, LMWHs and DOACs are more effective in treating VTE, but the former caused less bleeding. DOACs are more effective than LMWHs in preventing VTE recurrence but may carry a higher risk of major bleeding, pending additional information by ongoing trials.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Fondaparinux; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Oligosaccharides; Pulmonary Embolism; Secondary Prevention; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis; Vitamin K

Cancer increases the risk of thromboembolic events, especially in people receiving anticoagulation treatments.. To compare the efficacy and safety of low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs), direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for the long-term treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in people with cancer.. We conducted a literature search including a major electronic search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2016, Issue 1), MEDLINE (Ovid), and Embase (Ovid); handsearching conference proceedings; checking references of included studies; use of the 'related citation' feature in PubMed and a search for ongoing studies in trial registries. As part of the living systematic review approach, we run searches continually, incorporating new evidence after it is identified. Last search date 14 May 2018.. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the benefits and harms of long-term treatment with LMWHs, DOACs or VKAs in people with cancer and symptomatic VTE.. We extracted data in duplicate on study characteristics and risk of bias. Outcomes included: all-cause mortality, recurrent VTE, major bleeding, minor bleeding, thrombocytopenia, and health-related quality of life (QoL). We assessed the certainty of the evidence at the outcome level following the GRADE approach (GRADE handbook).. Of 15,785 citations, including 7602 unique citations, 16 RCTs fulfilled the eligibility criteria. These trials enrolled 5167 people with cancer and VTE.Low molecular weight heparins versus vitamin K antagonistsEight studies enrolling 2327 participants compared LMWHs with VKAs. Meta-analysis of five studies probably did not rule out a beneficial or harmful effect of LMWHs compared to VKAs on mortality up to 12 months of follow-up (risk ratio (RR) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88 to 1.13; risk difference (RD) 0 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 45 fewer to 48 more; moderate-certainty evidence). Meta-analysis of four studies did not rule out a beneficial or harmful effect of LMWHs compared to VKAs on major bleeding (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.55 to 2.12; RD 4 more per 1000, 95% CI 19 fewer to 48 more, moderate-certainty evidence) or minor bleeding (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.27; RD 38 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 92 fewer to 47 more; low-certainty evidence), or thrombocytopenia (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.69). Meta-analysis of five studies showed that LMWHs probably reduced the recurrence of VTE compared to VKAs (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.77; RD 53 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 29 fewer to 72 fewer, moderate-certainty evidence).Direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonistsFive studies enrolling 982 participants compared DOACs with VKAs. Meta-analysis of four studies may not rule out a beneficial or harmful effect of DOACs compared to VKAs on mortality (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.21; RD 12 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 51 fewer to 37 more; low-certainty evidence), recurrent VTE (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.31; RD 14 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 27 fewer to 12 more; low-certainty evidence), major bleeding (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.57, RD 8 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 22 fewer to 20 more; low-certainty evidence), or minor bleeding (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.22; RD 21 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 54 fewer to 28 more; low-certainty evidence). One study reporting on DOAC versus VKA was published as abstract so is not included in the main analysis.Direct oral anticoagulants versus low molecular weight heparinsTwo studies enrolling 1455 participants compared DOAC with LMWH. The study by Raskob did not rule out a beneficial or harmful effect of DOACs compared to LMWH on mortality up to 12 months of follow-up (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.25; RD 27 more per 1000, 95% CI 30 fewer to 95 more; low-certainty evidence). The data also showed that DOACs may have shown a likely reduction in VTE recurrence up to 12 months. For the long-term treatment of VTE in people with cancer, evidence shows that LMWHs compared to VKAs probably produces an important reduction in VTE and DOACs compared to LMWH, may likely reduce VTE but may increase risk of major bleeding. Decisions for a person with cancer and VTE to start long-term LMWHs versus oral anticoagulation should balance benefits and harms and integrate the person's values and preferences for the important outcomes and alternative management strategies.Editorial note: this is a living systematic review (LSR). LSRs offer new approaches to review updating in which the review is continually updated, incorporating relevant new evidence as it becomes available. Please refer to the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for the current status of this review.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Azetidines; Benzimidazoles; Benzylamines; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Oligosaccharides; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

Standard treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is based on antithrombotic therapy, initially with parenteral administration of unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) for five to seven days, then subsequent long-term therapy with oral vitamin K antagonists (e.g. warfarin). Pentasaccharides are novel anticoagulants that may be favourable over standard therapy due to their predictable effect, no need for frequent monitoring or re-dosing, and few known drug interactions. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, a harmful effect of heparins, appears to be rare during treatment with pentasaccharides.. To assess the efficacy and harms of pentasaccharides for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis.. The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist (CIS) searched the Specialised Register (22 March 2017) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2017, Issue 2) (searched 22 March 2017). We searched clinical trials databases for details of ongoing or unpublished studies and the reference lists of relevant articles for additional citations.. We included randomised controlled trials in which people 18 years of age or older with a DVT confirmed by standard imaging techniques were allocated to receive a pentasaccharide (fondaparinux, idraparinux, or idrabiotaparinux) for the treatment of DVT in comparison with standard therapy or other treatments.. We extracted data characterising the included trials according to the methods, participants, interventions, and outcomes. We assessed risk of bias using Cochrane's 'Risk of bias' tool and employed the GRADE methodology to evaluate the quality of the evidence.The main primary outcome for efficacy was recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), and the main primary outcome for harm was major and clinically relevant bleeding. Since our outcomes were dichotomous, we calculated the risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). We combined the effects of different comparisons through a meta-analysis using a fixed-effect model.. We included five randomised controlled trials of 6981 participants comparing pentasaccharides with standard therapy or other pentasaccharides. The quality of the evidence varied depending on the outcome and was judged as of moderate to very low quality. We downgraded the quality of the evidence due to risk of bias or imprecision, or both.Two studies evaluated fondaparinux, at doses of 5.0 mg, 7.5 mg, and 10.0 mg, plus vitamin K antagonist in comparison with standard therapy. A meta-analysis of these two studies showed no clear difference in the risk of recurrent VTE (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.47; 2658 participants); moderate-quality evidence. The frequencies of major bleeding were similar between interventions in the initial period of treatment (approximately five days) (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.39 to 3.44; 2645 participants) and at three months' follow-up (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.71; 2645 participants). We judged the quality of the evidence as moderate.One study (757 participants) compared idrabiotaparinux (3.0 mg) with idraparinux (2.5 mg) and demonstrated no clear difference in the risk of recurrent VTE at six months' follow-up (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.69); low-quality evidence. Major bleeding during the initial treatment period was not reported. Major bleeding at six-month follow-up was less frequent in participants receiving idrabiotaparinux versus participants treated with idraparinux (RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.71); low-quality evidence.The effect of an initial treatment with LMWH followed by three months of idraparinux (10 mg) showed no clear difference from standard therapy for risk of recurrent VTE (RR 1.51, 95% CI 0.26 to 8.90; 263 participants); very low-quality evidence; one study. Major bleeding during the initial treatment period was not reported. The frequency of major and other clinically relevant bleeding at three months' follow-up ranged from 2% to 15% in participants receiving LMWH and increasing doses of idraparinux of 2.5 mg, 5 mg, 7.5 mg, or 10 mg. When dosage groups were combined, there was no clear difference in major plus other clinically relevant bleeding or in major bleeding alone between the idraparinux treatment group and the standard therapy group (RR 1.30, 95% CI 0.70 to 2.40; 659 participants; RR 3.76, 95% CI 0.50 to 28.19; 659 participants, respectively); very low-quality evidence.One study (2904 participants) compared idraparinux (2.5 mg) to standard therapy. There was no clear difference in the risk of recurrent VTE at thre. We found moderate-quality evidence that the effects of fondaparinux at doses of 5.0 mg, 7.5 mg, and 10.0 mg plus vitamin K antagonist are similar in terms of recurrent VTE and risk of major bleeding compared with standard treatment for DVT.Low-quality evidence suggests equal efficacy of idraparinux at 2.5 mg and the equimolar dose of 3.0 mg of idrabiotaparinux with regard to recurrent VTE, but a higher frequency of major bleeding was observed in participants treated with idraparinux.We judged evidence on the effectiveness of idraparinux compared with standard therapy, with or without initial treatment with LMWH, and on associated bleeding risk to be low to very low quality, therefore we have very limited confidence in the estimated effects.The observed similar effectiveness in terms of recurrent DVT and harmful effects in terms of bleeding risk with fondaparinux plus vitamin K antagonist compared to standard treatment for DVT suggest that it may be an alternative to conventional anticoagulants for the treatment of DVT in certain circumstances.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Biotin; Fondaparinux; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Oligosaccharides; Polysaccharides; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Time Factors; Venous Thrombosis

This study was designed to compare efficacy and safety among novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), which have not been directly compared in randomized control trials to date.. We performed network meta-analyses of randomized control trials in preventing thromboembolic events and major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for published studies and various registries of clinical trials for unpublished studies were searched for 2002-2013. All phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of NOACs (apixaban, edoxaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban), idraparinux, and ximelagatran were reviewed.. A systematic literature search identified nine phase III RCTs for primary analyses. The efficacy of each NOAC was similar with respect to our primary composite endpoint following adjustment for open label designs [odds ratios (ORs) versus vitamin K antagonists: apixaban 0.79; dabigatran 150mg 0.77; edoxaban 60mg 0.87; rivaroxaban 0.86] except for dabigatran 110mg and edoxaban 30mg. Apixaban and edoxaban 30mg and 60mg had significantly fewer major bleeding events than dabigatran 150mg, ricvaroxaban, and vitamin K antagonists. All NOACs were similar in reducing secondary endpoints with the exception of dabigatran 110mg and 150mg which were associated with a significantly greater incidence of myocardial infarction compared to apixaban, edoxaban 60mg, and rivaroxaban.. Our indirect comparison with adjustment for study design suggests that the efficacy of the examined NOACs is similar across drugs, but that some differences in safety and risk of myocardial infarction exist, and that open label study designs appear to overestimate safety and treatment efficacy. Differences in study design should be taken into account in the interpretation of results from RCTs of NOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Odds Ratio; Oligosaccharides; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K

For more than 50 years, heparin(s) and warfarin have been the most important anticoagulant agents, and clinicians are accustomed to their specific antidotes (protamine sulfate and vitamin K/plasma [or factor concentrates], respectively). Recently, there has been an explosion of novel anticoagulant development: ideally, these newer agents should have advantages over traditional anticoagulants, such as fewer side effects, a more predictable pharmacokinetic profile (and potentially no need for monitoring), minimal drug-drug interactions, and so forth. But, unlike the older agents, the newer anticoagulants do not have specific antidotes. There is increasing focus on the use of nonspecific procoagulants, such as non-activated and activated prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) and recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa), to manage major bleeding or need for emergency invasive procedures. This paper reviews several of the novel anticoagulants and presents the available evidence for their "reversal". Based on extrapolation from animal models, clinical anecdote, and an understanding of their mechanism of action, we recommend treating major bleeding complications of DTIs, as follows (in descending order of preference): activated PCCs; rFVIIa; and (non-activated) PCCs. For management of fondaparinux-associated bleeding, rFVIIa has some rationale (for which we provide an illustrative case). The increasing use of novel anticoagulants will require physicians to have an understanding of rational approaches to "reverse" their anticoagulant effects when true antidotes do not exist.

Topics: Animals; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation Factors; Factor VIIa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fondaparinux; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Humans; Oligosaccharides; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Polysaccharides; Warfarin

To evaluate the use of recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) to reverse major bleeding from newer parenteral anticoagulant therapy.. MEDLINE/PubMed was searched from January 2000 through December 2009 using the terms recombinant factor VIIa, rFVIIa, NovoSeven, enoxaparin, argatroban, fondaparinux, lepirudin, bivalirudin, idraparinux, nadroparin, hirudin, and desirudin. References of identified articles were reviewed.. Data evaluating the role of rFVIIa to reverse major bleeding from newer parenteral anticoagulant therapy is limited to case reports and small laboratory investigations. Laboratory investigations suggest that rFVIIa may be effective in reversing the hemostatic effects of newer parenteral anticoagulants. In most case reports analyzed, standard interventions for bleeding (eg, fresh frozen plasma, packed red blood cells) were attempted prior to using rFVIIa. Sixteen published cases describe the use of rFVIIa to reverse major bleeding from low-molecular-weight heparins, synthetic pentasaccharides, and direct thrombin inhibitors. Initial doses ranged from 20 to 120 mug/kg. rFVIIa was considered effective or partially effective based upon clinical response in 13 cases. Use was not effective in 3 cases because of a thrombotic event, no change in hemostasis, and death from bleeding complications. As thrombosis is the major safety concern, an individualized risk-benefit assessment is required prior to the use of rFVIIa therapy to restore hemostasis.. rFVIIa may be considered to manage major refractory bleeding from newer parenteral anticoagulant agents when the benefit is thought to outweigh the thrombotic risk.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Factor VIIa; Fondaparinux; Hemorrhage; Hemostatics; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Oligosaccharides; Polysaccharides; Recombinant Proteins; Thrombin

Idraparinux is an analogue of fondaparinux binding with high affinity to antithrombin. It was designed for weekly, rather than daily, administration, with an exceptionally long half-life. One potential problem with small heparin-like fragments of this type is the difficulty of neutralising excessive activity in the case of side-effects or overdose. The efficacy of idraparinux was was proven in clinical studies with patients suffering from venous thromboembolism (VTE) or atrial fibrillation. Due to major bleeding events during treatment for more than six months the development of idraparinux was stopped. Idrabiotaparinux has an attached biotin moiety at the non-reducing end unit, which allows its neutralisation with avidin, an egg-derived protein with low antigenicity. This compound is currently investigated in clinical trials for prevention of recurrent VTE in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. The future of idrabiotaparinux depends also on the safety and efficacy of avidin.

Topics: Animals; Anticoagulants; Antithrombin III; Atrial Fibrillation; Avidin; Biotin; Carbohydrate Conformation; Carbohydrate Sequence; Drug Design; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Fondaparinux; Hemorrhage; Heparin Antagonists; Humans; Molecular Sequence Data; Molecular Structure; Oligosaccharides; Polysaccharides; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Structure-Activity Relationship; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

Simple bleeding risk scores have been proposed to predict bleeding events, in patients anticoagulated using non-warfarin anticoagulants. We compared the relative predictive values of two bleeding risk scores, HAS-BLED and ORBIT, in non-warfarin anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).. In a post-hoc ancillary analysis of 'clinically relevant bleeding' events amongst 2283 patients in the idraparinux arm in the AMADEUS trial. The two scores performed modestly in predicting both bleeding outcomes, although there was a trend for better HAS-BLED score performance in predicting any clinically relevant bleeding [c-indexes in HAS-BLED vs. ORBIT; 0.61 (95% CI; 0.58-0.64) vs. 0.58 (95% CI; 0.55-0.61); c-index difference=0.03, z-score=1.84, p=0.06)]. Using the HAS-BLED score compared with the ORBIT score correctly and significantly reclassified 15.6% of the population (95% CI: 4.3 to 27.0; p=0.007). Decision curve analyses confirmed the increasing ability to correctly identify patients who would bleed using the HAS-BLED score versus the ORBIT score, over a wide range of thresholds for any clinically relevant bleeding risk predictions.. In this comparison of the HAS-BLED and ORBIT scores in a cohort of non-warfarin anticoagulated patients with AF, we show that the HAS-BLED score more accurately predicted any clinically relevant bleeding amongst patients with AF who were anticoagulated with a non-warfarin anticoagulant, when compared with the ORBIT score.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Oligosaccharides; Predictive Value of Tests; Research Design; Risk Assessment; Stroke

Limited data are available on the impact of renal function on the outcome of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).. AMADEUS was a multicentre, randomized, open-label non-inferiority study that compared fixed-dose idraparinux with conventional anticoagulation by dose-adjusted vitamin K antagonists. We performed a post hoc analysis to assess the impact of renal function on the outcomes of anticoagulated AF patients. The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of stroke/systemic embolism (SE). The principal safety outcome of this analysis was major bleeding. We calculated c-indexes, reflecting the ability for discriminating diseased vs. non-diseased patients, and the net reclassification improvement (NRI, an index of inferior/superior performance of risk estimation scores). Of 4576 patients, 45 strokes and 103 major bleeding events occurred following an average follow-up of 325 ± 164 days. Patients with CrCl >90 mL/min had an annual stroke/SE rate of 0.6% compared with 0.8% for those with CrCl 60-90 mL/min and 2.2% for those with CrCl <60 mL/min (P < 0.001 for linear association). After adjusting for stroke risk factors, patients with CrCl <60 mL/min had more than two-fold higher risk of stroke/SE and almost 60% higher risk of major bleeding compared with those with CrCl ≥60. In patients with the CHA2DS2VASc score 1-2, CrCl <60 mL/min was associated with eight-fold higher stroke risk. When added to the CHA2DS2VASc or CHADS2 scores, CrCl <60 mL/min did not improve the c-indexes for CHADS2 (P = 0.054) or CHA2DS2VASc (P = 0.63) but resulted in significant NRI (0.26, P = 0.02) in this anticoagulated trial cohort.. Renal impairment (CrCl <60 mL/min) doubles the risk of stroke and increased the risk of major bleeding by almost 60% in anticoagulated patients with AF. Renal impairment was additive to stroke risk prediction scores based on a significant NRI, but no significant improvement in discrimination ability (based on c-indexes) for CHA2DS2VASc or CHADS2 was observed.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Oligosaccharides; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk Assessment; ROC Curve; Stroke; Vitamin K

The aim of the current analysis was to identify independent predictors of the overall clinical outcome of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), including both stroke/thromboembolism and/or major bleeding. Given the overlap between stroke and bleeding risk factors, a composite risk-stratification score for stroke/thromboembolism or bleeding could potentially be developed.. We used data from the vitamin K antagonist (VKA) arm (n = 2,293; 65% men; mean age 70 ± 9 years) of the AMADEUS (Evaluating the Use of SR34006 Compared to Warfarin or Acenocoumarol in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) trial, which was a multicenter, randomized, open-label noninferiority study that compared fixed-dose idraparinux with VKA in patients with AF. We defined two composite end points: end point 1 was the combination of stroke/thromboembolism or major bleeding; end point 2 was defined as the combination of stroke, systemic or venous embolism, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, or major bleeding.. The independent predictors for composite end point 1 were age (P = .014), previous stroke/transient ischemic attack (P = .049), aspirin use (P = .002), and time in therapeutic range (P = .007). For composite end point 2, similar predictors were evident, plus left ventricular dysfunction (P = .011). Based on the regression models, two novel composite risk-prediction scores were developed and were validated externally in a "real-world" cohort of 441 outpatients with AF receiving anticoagulation treatment. Both composite scores 1 and 2 demonstrated numerically higher discriminatory performance (area under the curve [AUC], 0.728; 95% CI, 0.659-0.798 and AUC, 0.707; 95% CI, 0.655-0.758, for end points 1 and 2, respectively) and a positive net reclassification when compared with currently used risk models (CHADS2 [congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥ 75 years, diabetes, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack], CHA2DS2VASc [cardiac failure or dysfunction, hypertension, age ≥ 75 years [doubled], diabetes, stroke (doubled)-vascular disease, age 65 to 74 years, and sex category (female)], and HAS-BLED [hypertension, abnormal renal/liver function, stroke, bleeding history or predisposition, labile international normalized ratio, elderly, drugs/alcohol concomitantly]), but the differences were not statistically significant.. We have developed and validated two novel composite scores for stroke/thromboembolism/bleeding that offer good discriminatory and predictive performance. However, these composite risk scores did not perform better than the easier and more practical "traditional" stroke and bleeding risk scores that are currently in use, which allow greater practicality and a more personalized balancing of risks.

Topics: Acenocoumarol; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Area Under Curve; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Statistical; Oligosaccharides; Regression Analysis; Reproducibility of Results; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Idraparinux, a long acting inhibitor of factor (F) Xa, is as effective as standard anticoagulant therapy for patients with symptomatic deep venous thrombosis. We investigated the potential use of the biotinylated molecule, idrabiotaparinux. Biotinylation enables reversal of the anticoagulant effect.. We performed a randomized double-blind trial in 757 patients with symptomatic deep venous thrombosis, comparing equimolar doses of idrabiotaparinux (3 mg) with idraparinux (2.5 mg), both given subcutaneously, once weekly for 6 months. Inhibition of FXa activity was measured at days 15, 36, 57, 92 and 183. The efficacy outcome was recurrent venous thromboembolism. The safety outcomes were clinically relevant bleeding and death.. Inhibition of FXa was similar in the two treatment groups at each time point of measurement. Recurrent venous thromboembolism during the 6-month treatment period occurred in nine of 386 patients (2.3%) in the idrabiotaparinux group and in 12 of 371 patients (3.2%) in the idraparinux group, a difference of - 0.9% (95% confidence interval, -3.2-1.4%). The incidence of clinically relevant bleeding was 5.2% in the idrabiotaparinux group and 7.3% in the idraparinux group (P = 0.29), a difference of - 2.1% (95% confidence interval, -5.6-1.4%). Six patients (1.6%) who received idrabiotaparinux died, compared with 12 patients (3.2%) given idraparinux, a difference of - 1.7% (95% confidence interval, -3.9-0.5%).. Idrabiotaparinux has a similar time course of FXa inhibition, efficacy and safety to idraparinux for the treatment of deep venous thrombosis.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Biotin; Blood Coagulation; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Europe; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Injections, Subcutaneous; Male; Middle Aged; Oligosaccharides; Recurrence; Risk Assessment; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States; Venous Thrombosis

This study aimed to assess the impact of combination antithrombotic therapy on stroke and bleeding risk compared with anticoagulation therapy only in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).. Post hoc analysis of 4,576 patients with AF (mean ± SD age, 70.1 ± 9.1 years; men, 66.5%) enrolled in the Evaluating the Use of SR34006 Compared to Warfarin or Acenocoumarol in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (AMADEUS) trial were randomized to receive either subcutaneous idraparinux (2.5 mg weekly) (n = 2,283) or dose-adjusted vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) (international normalized ratio, 2.0-3.0) (n = 2,293). Of these patients, 848 (18.5%) received antiplatelet therapy (aspirin, clopidogrel, ticlopidine, etc) in addition to anticoagulation treatment (combination antithrombotic therapy).. A total of 572 (15.3% per year) clinically relevant bleeding and 103 (2.6% per year) major bleeding events occurred. Patients receiving combination antithrombotic therapy had a 2.3- to 2.5-fold increased risk of clinically relevant bleeding events and major bleeding events, respectively, compared with those receiving anticoagulation therapy only. Multivariate analyses (hazard ratio, 95% CI) revealed that the risk of clinically relevant bleeding was significantly increased by age 65 to 74 years (1.44, 1.14-1.82) and ≥ 75 years (1.59, 1.24-2.04, P = .001) and by combination antithrombotic therapy (2.47, 2.07-2.96, P < .0001). The same held true for major bleeding events, with analogous figures for age 65 to 74 years (2.26, 1.08-4.71) and ≥ 75 years (4.19, 1.98-8.87, P = .0004) and for combination antithrombotic therapy (2.23, 1.49-3.34, P < .0001). Combination antithrombotic therapy was not associated with a decrease in ischemic stroke risk compared with anticoagulation therapy only (11 [1.4% per year] vs 22 [0.7% per year]; adjusted hazard ratio, 2.01; 95% CI, 0.94-4.30; P = .07).. Combination antithrombotic therapy increases the risk of clinically relevant bleeding and major bleeding in patients with AF and does not appear to reduce the risk of stroke.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; England; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Injections, Subcutaneous; Male; Oligosaccharides; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prognosis; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

Standard treatment with heparin followed by vitamin K antagonists is frequently complicated by bleeding and recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients with VTE. To compare the efficacy, safety and overall survival of long-term idraparinux treatment to standard therapy in cancer patients we conducted a post-hoc analysis in the subgroup of non-active and active cancer patients included in the Van Gogh DVT clinical trial. The cancer patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and without pulmonary embolism (PE) were randomised to standard treatment or a once-weekly subcutaneous injection of idraparinux (2.5 mg), a synthetic pentasaccharide. 421 cancer patients were included. A total of 220 patients received idraparinux and 201 were allocated to standard therapy for three months (8%) or six months (92%). A recurrent VTE was observed during the first six months in 2.5% (n=5) of the idraparinux recipients compared to 6.4% (n=12) in the standard therapy group (hazard ratio 0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]; 0.14-1.11). The rate of bleeding was comparable (odds ratio 0.89, 95% CI; 0.50-1.59). The outcomes were similar at three months after randomisation in all patients. Of the idraparinux recipients, 22.7% (n=50) died during the study period compared to 48 patients (23.9%) in the standard treatment group (hazard ratio 0.99, 95% CI; 0.66-1.48). In conclusion, no significant safety or survival differences were observed between cancer patients with DVT treated with idraparinux for six months compared to standard therapy. Fewer recurrent VTEs were observed in the idraparinux group; however, this was not statistically significant and also because of study limitations this should be interpreted with caution.

Topics: Aged; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Oligosaccharides; Recurrence; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thrombosis

Vitamin K antagonists, the current standard treatment for prophylaxis against stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation, require regular monitoring and dose adjustment; an unmonitored, fixed-dose anticoagulant regimen would be preferable. The aim of this randomised, open-label non-inferiority trial was to compare the efficacy and safety of idraparinux with vitamin K antagonists.. Patients with atrial fibrillation at risk for thromboembolism were randomly assigned to receive either subcutaneous idraparinux (2.5 mg weekly) or adjusted-dose vitamin K antagonists (target of an international normalised ratio of 2-3). Assessment of outcome was done blinded to treatment. The primary efficacy outcome was the cumulative incidence of all stroke and systemic embolism. The principal safety outcome was clinically relevant bleeding. Analyses were done by intention to treat; the non-inferiority hazard ratio was set at 1.5. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00070655.. The trial was stopped after randomisation of 4576 patients (2283 to receive idraparinux, 2293 to receive vitamin K antagonists) and a mean follow-up period of 10.7 (SD 5.4) months because of excess clinically relevant bleeding with idraparinux (346 cases vs 226 cases; 19.7 vs 11.3 per 100 patient-years; p<0.0001). There were 21 instances of intracranial bleeding with idraparinux and nine with vitamin K antagonists (1.1 vs 0.4 per 100 patient-years; p=0.014); elderly patients and those with renal impairment were at greater risk of such complications. There were 18 cases of thromboembolism with idraparinux and 27 cases with vitamin K antagonists (0.9 vs 1.3 per 100 patient-years; hazard ratio 0.71, 95% CI 0.39-1.30; p=0.007), satisfying the non-inferiority criterion. There were 62 deaths with idraparinux and 61 with vitamin K anatagonists (3.2 vs 2.9 per 100 patient-years; p=0.49).. In patients with atrial fibrillation at risk for thromboembolism, long-term treatment with idraparinux was no worse than vitamin K antagonists in terms of efficacy, but caused significantly more bleeding.

Topics: Acenocoumarol; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Oligosaccharides; Risk Factors; Single-Blind Method; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Venous thromboembolism is treated with unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin, followed by a vitamin K antagonist. We investigated the potential use of idraparinux, a long-acting inhibitor of activated factor X, as a substitute for standard therapy.. We conducted two randomized, open-label noninferiority trials involving 2904 patients with deep-vein thrombosis and 2215 patients with pulmonary embolism to compare the efficacy and safety of idraparinux versus standard therapy. Patients received either subcutaneous idraparinux (2.5 mg once weekly) or a heparin followed by an adjusted-dose vitamin K antagonist for either 3 or 6 months. The primary efficacy outcome was the 3-month incidence of symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism (nonfatal or fatal).. In the study of patients with deep venous thrombosis, the incidence of recurrence at day 92 was 2.9% in the idraparinux group as compared with 3.0% in the standard-therapy group (odds ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63 to 1.50), a result that satisfied the prespecified noninferiority requirement. At 6 months, the hazard ratio for idraparinux was 1.01. The rates of clinically relevant bleeding at day 92 were 4.5% in the idraparinux group and 7.0% in the standard-therapy group (P=0.004). At 6 months, bleeding rates were similar. In the study of patients with pulmonary embolism, the incidence of recurrence at day 92 was 3.4% in the idraparinux group and 1.6% in the standard-therapy group (odds ratio, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.21 to 3.78), a finding that did not meet the noninferiority requirement.. In patients with deep venous thrombosis, once-weekly subcutaneous idraparinux for 3 or 6 months had an efficacy similar to that of heparin plus a vitamin K antagonist. However, in patients with pulmonary embolism, idraparinux was less efficacious than standard therapy. (ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00067093 [ClinicalTrials.gov] and NCT00062803 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Topics: Anticoagulants; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Oligosaccharides; Pulmonary Embolism; Recurrence; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thrombosis; Vitamin K

The extended use of vitamin K antagonists for prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism is often constrained by risk-benefit limitations and inconvenience. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a 6-month extension of prophylaxis against recurrent venous thromboembolism with idraparinux in patients who had initially received 6 months of prophylaxis with an anticoagulant.. We randomly assigned patients who had completed 6 months of prophylaxis with idraparinux or a vitamin K antagonist and in whom extended anticoagulation was warranted to receive once-weekly injections of 2.5 mg of idraparinux or placebo for 6 months without monitoring. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were recurrent venous thromboembolism and major bleeding.. Of 1215 patients, 6 of 594 (1.0%) in the idraparinux group and 23 of 621 (3.7%) in the placebo group had recurrent venous thromboembolism (P=0.002). Major bleeding occurred in 11 patients (1.9%) in the idraparinux group and in none in the placebo group (P<0.001). Of these 11 episodes, 3 were fatal intracranial hemorrhages. As compared with patients whose initial treatment was a vitamin K antagonist, patients whose initial treatment was idraparinux who were assigned to 6 months in the placebo group had a lower incidence of recurrent thromboembolism (0.7% vs. 5.9%); patients who received 6 additional months of idraparinux therapy had a higher incidence of major bleeding (3.1% vs. 0.9%).. During a 6-month extension of thromboprophylaxis, idraparinux was effective in preventing recurrent thromboembolism but was associated with an increased risk of a major hemorrhage. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00071279 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Injections, Subcutaneous; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Oligosaccharides; Pulmonary Embolism; Secondary Prevention; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thrombosis; Vitamin K

Vitamin K antagonists for secondary prevention in patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) require monitoring and dose adjustments. The synthetic factor Xa inhibitor, SanOrg34006, has predictable pharmacokinetics and may be administered once weekly without dose adjustments.. After 5-7 days of enoxaparin treatment, patients with proximal DVT were randomized to receive 2.5, 5.0, 7.5 or 10 mg of SanOrg34006 subcutaneously once weekly or warfarin (INR, 2.0-3.0) for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of change in thrombotic burden, as assessed by ultrasonography and perfusion lung scanning at baseline and week 12 +/- 1, and clinical thromboembolic events. This outcome was classified as normalization, no relevant change, or deterioration. Other outcomes were major and other clinically relevant bleeding.. A total of 659 patients were randomized and treated. In 614 (93%) patients the primary efficacy outcome was evaluable. The rates of normalization and deterioration were similar in all SanOrg34006 groups (P = 0.4) and did not differ from the warfarin group. There was a clear dose-response for major bleeding among patients treated with SanOrg34006 (P = 0.003). Patients receiving 2.5 mg SanOrg34006 had less bleeding than did warfarin recipients (P = 0.03).. SanOrg34006 dosed at 2.5 mg appears as effective as higher dosages and warfarin for secondary prevention in DVT and was not associated with major bleeding. Therefore, 2.5 mg of SanOrg34006 administered subcutaneously once weekly might be a suitable alternative to dose-adjusted oral vitamin K antagonist.

Topics: Antithrombins; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Oligosaccharides; Safety; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography; Venous Thrombosis; Vitamin K

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Oligosaccharides; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Predictive Value of Tests; Proportional Hazards Models; Risk Assessment

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Oligosaccharides; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Topics: Half-Life; Hemorrhage; Humans; Oligosaccharides; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence

Therapy for venous thromboembolism (VTE) currently involves a minimum of 3 months of anticoagulation. After cessation of therapy, however, recurrent venous thrombosis occurs at rates of 6 to 9% per year. Clinical trials have demonstrated the benefits of extending anticoagulation beyond 3 months for the prevention of recurrent VTE events. Despite this, many eligible patients do not receive the required thromboprophylaxis and the incidence of recurrent VTE remains too high for a preventable condition. A reason for failure to use prophylaxis is the fear of bleeding complications with current oral anticoagulants such as warfarin. Warfarin has an unpredictable pharmacokinetic profile and a variable dose-response relationship that requires frequent coagulation monitoring and dose adjustments to maintain a target intensity that is both safe and effective. Alternative strategies for long-term prophylaxis, which may potentially provide more consistent anticoagulant responses and reduce coagulation monitoring requirements, include the use of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), treatment with warfarin at a lower intensity, and the introduction of novel anticoagulants. The long-term use of LMWH has been found to be a particularly favorable treatment option for cancer patients in whom it is difficult to control the intensity of anticoagulation. In clinical trials, LMWH significantly reduced the risk of recurrent VTE without increasing bleeding risk. The parenteral administration of the LMWHs, however, is a drawback for long-term use in the outpatient setting. A clinical trial assessing the efficacy and safety of long-term low-intensity warfarin treatment found this therapy to be better than placebo, but another study showed that conventional intensity warfarin was significantly more efficacious than low-intensity warfarin. New therapies in development that may offer improved safety-efficacy profiles are the synthetic pentasaccharides fondaparinux and idraparinux and the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran. Parenterally administered fondaparinux has been shown to be as effective as LMWH for the acute treatment (5 to 7 days) of symptomatic deep vein thrombosis. Idraparinux, with once-weekly parenteral dosing, is currently being assessed in phase III clinical trials for the long-term secondary prevention of VTE. Ximelagatran is the first oral agent in the new class direct thrombin inhibitors. With a fast onset of action and oral administration, ximelagatran is a

Topics: Anticoagulants; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Fondaparinux; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Myocardial Ischemia; Oligosaccharides; Polysaccharides; Recurrence; Thrombin; Time Factors; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Biopsy, Fine-Needle; Drainage; Drugs, Investigational; Factor VIIa; Hemoptysis; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Lung; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Oligosaccharides; Pulmonary Embolism; Recombinant Proteins; Thoracic Diseases