sacubitril and Ventricular-Dysfunction--Left

Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Heart failure (HF) represents a major global health and economic burden with still unacceptably high morbidity and mortality rates. In recent decades, novel therapeutic opportunities with a significant impact on HF outcomes have been introduced in addition to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, β-blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. These include drugs such as ivabradine, sacubitril-valsartan, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors. The availability of an extremely large pharmacological armamentarium to face this chronic global disease highlights the importance of assessing cost effectiveness to promote sustainable healthcare. In light of the recent approval of SGLT-2 inhibitors for the treatment of HF with reduced ejection fraction, including in individuals without type 2 diabetes mellitus, the aim of this review was to provide an updated comparative evaluation of the efficacy and cost effectiveness of different pharmacological treatments for the prevention (stage A) and treatment of asymptomatic (stage B) and symptomatic (stages C-D) left ventricular dysfunction.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Biphenyl Compounds; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

In this review, we discuss what is meant by "foundational" therapy for patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and the evidence supporting the use of the five agents that comprise this group of drugs i.e., sacubitril/valsartan, a beta-blocker, an aldosterone or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) and a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor. We review the conventional approach to sequencing these therapies in HFrEF and proposed new rapid sequencing strategies. We review a recent modelling study suggesting the optimal sequence of treatment includes a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibition and an MRA as the first two therapies. Finally, we review the important opportunity offered by hospitalization for worsening heart failure to initiate and optimize foundational therapies in patients at high risk of early adverse outcomes.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Glucose; Heart Failure; Humans; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Sodium; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Sacubitril/valsartan, the first angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor approved by the Food and Drug Administration for marketing, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization and improve symptoms in patients with chronic heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction. However, some researchers have also found that sacubitril/valsartan has an antiarrhythmic effect. The mechanism by which sacubitril/valsartan reduces the mortality associated with malignant ventricular arrhythmias is not precise. Many studies have concluded that ventricular arrhythmia is associated with a reduction in myocardial fibrosis. This article reviews the current understanding of the effects of sacubitril/valsartan on the reduction of ventricular arrhythmia and explains its possible mechanisms. The results of this study suggest that sacubitril/valsartan reduces the occurrence of appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks. Meanwhile, sacubitril/valsartan may reduce the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias by affecting 3 pathways of B-type natriuretic peptide, Angiotensin II, and Bradykinin. The conclusion of this study is that sacubitril/valsartan reduces the number of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks and ventricular arrhythmias in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Neprilysin; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Despite advances in cardiac care, patients remain at a high risk of death and the development of heart failure (HF) following myocardial infarction (MI). These risks are highest in patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF) or signs of HF immediately after MI. Drugs to mitigate these risks have been identified through the systematic evaluation of therapies with proven efficacy in patients with HF and reduced EF (HFrEF).. Although landmark studies in patients with HFrEF consistently exclude patients with recent MI, dedicated post-MI trials of these drugs have led to multiple therapies with proven benefit in these patients. However, not all therapies with proven efficacy in patients with chronic HF have been shown to provide benefit in the post-MI population, as recently evidenced by the discrepant results between chronic HF and post-MI trials of sacubitril-valsartan. Similarly, multiple trials of early and aggressive use of therapies effective in chronic heart failure immediately post-MI failed to demonstrate benefit or were associated with harm, emphasizing the vulnerability of the post-MI population.. Trials of patients at high risk of HF following MI have emphasized the differences between the post-MI and HFrEF populations and the necessity for dedicated trials in the post-MI population. This review summarizes trials studying the use of these therapies for at-risk patients following MI from therapies used in patients with HFrEF and exploring new potential therapies for this high-risk population.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Over the last decades, several classes of drugs have been introduced for the treatment of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Their use has been supported by randomized controlled trials that have demonstrated improved patient outcomes. However, these trials enrolled a small number of female patients and sometimes have reported gender-related differences regarding the efficacy of the treatments. The aim of this review is to revise the available data about the influence of gender on the optimal treatment and drug dose in patients with HFrEF.. Several gender-related differences in terms of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of the drugs have been described. These characteristics could be responsible for a different response and tolerability in men and women also when current recommended treatment of HFrEF is considered. Some studies have shown that, in women, lower doses of beta-blockers and inhibitors of renin angiotensin aldosterone system could be equally effective than higher doses in men, whereas sacubitril/valsartan could exert its favorable effect at greater values of left ventricular ejection fraction. Although there is evidence about differences in the response to treatment of HFrEF in men and women, this has not been sufficient for differentiating current recommended therapy. Further studies should better clarify if the treatment of HFrEF should be based also on the patients' gender.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Ventricular Function, Left

Sacubitril/valsartan has been approved for the management of heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction in adults. PANORAMA-HF trial (Prospective Trial to Assess the Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Neprilysin Inhibitor LCZ696 Versus Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor for the Medical Treatment of Pediatric HF) investigated its effects on clinical outcomes in pediatric patients with HF.. PANORAMA-HF is a multicenter, Phase II/III study using an adaptive, seamless, 2-part design. The study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of single doses of sacubitril/valsartan (Part 1), and the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril administered twice daily for 52 weeks (Part 2) in pediatric patients with HF due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction with biventricular heart physiology. An innovative trial design using a novel global rank assessment of severity was employed. For analysis, eligible patients were stratified into 3 age groups (Group 1, 6 to <18 years; Group 2a, 2 to <6 years; and Group 3a, 1 month to <2 years) and functional classification (New York Heart Association/Ross class I/II and III/IV).. We report the key demographic, baseline, and clinical characteristics of 375 pediatric patients randomized to receive the study medication. The mean age for patients in Groups 1, 2a, and 3a was 12.2, 3.2, and 1.3 years, respectively. About 70% of patients had a prior HF hospitalization, 85% had New York Heart Association/Ross class I/II HF, and ≈8% were angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker naïve.. Compared to other pediatric HF studies, PANORAMA-HF recruited a relatively homogeneous pediatric HF population across 3 age groups, enabling a more robust evaluation of pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and efficacy/safety of sacubitril/valsartan. Most patients had mildly symptomatic HF at baseline.. URL: https://www.. gov; Unique identifier: NCT02678312.

Topics: Adolescent; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Biphenyl Compounds; Child; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Prospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Angiotensin receptor blocker and a neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) has emerged as an innovative therapy for patients of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and tolerability of Sacubitril/Valsartan in patient with HFrEF in Pakistani population.. This proof-of-concept, open label non-randomized clinical trial was conducted at a tertiary care cardiac center of Karachi, Pakistan. Patients with HFrEF were prescribed with Sacubitril/Valsartan and followed for 12 weeks for the assessment of safety and tolerability. Safety measures included incidence of hypotension, renal dysfunction, hyperkalemia, and angioedema.. Among the 120 HFrEF patients, majority were male (79.2%) with means age of 52.73 ± 12.23 years. At the end of 12 weeks, four (3.3%) patients died and eight (6.7%) dropped out of the study. In the remaining 108 patients, 80.6% (87) of the patients were tolerant to the prescribed dose. Functional class improved gradually with 75.0% (81) in class I and 24.1% (26) in class II, and only one (0.9%) patient in class III at the end of 12 weeks. Hyperkalemia remains the main safety concern with incidence rate of 21.3% (23) followed by hypotension in 19.4% (21), and renal dysfunction in 3.7% (4) of the patients.. Sacubitril/Valsartan therapy in HFrEF patients is safe and moderately tolerated among the Pakistani population. It can be used as first line of treatment for these patients.. NCT05387967. Registered 24 May 2022-Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05387967.

Topics: Adult; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Hypotension; Kidney Diseases; Male; Middle Aged; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

We assessed a subset of the 5040 patients in VICTORIA receiving sacubitril/valsartan, either at randomization (n = 731) or post-randomization drop-in use (n = 425), to evaluate the relationship between the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with vericiguat.. The efficacy of vericiguat on the primary composite endpoint, heart failure (HF) hospitalization, and all-cause mortality was assessed. Safety outcomes included symptomatic hypotension, syncope, worsening renal function, and hyperkalaemia. At randomization, 731 patients received sacubitril/valsartan; they were more frequently from Western Europe or North America, had lower ejection fraction and systolic blood pressure, and more use of triple background HF therapy (65.9% vs. 58.6%), biventricular pacemakers (17.9% vs. 14.1%), or implantable cardioverter defibrillators (42.3% vs. 25.3%). For patients on versus not on sacubitril/valsartan at randomization, adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for vericiguat's treatment effect on the primary composite outcome, cardiovascular death, and HF hospitalization were 0.92 (0.71-1.19) versus 0.89 (0.80-0.98), 0.71 (0.45-1.12) versus 0.95 (0.82-1.11), and 0.98 (0.74-1.29) versus 0.87 (0.78-0.98), respectively. No significant interaction existed between sacubitril/valsartan and vericiguat's treatment effect (p-values for interaction: 0.81, 0.23 and 0.47, respectively). Post-randomization, more drop-in sacubitril/valsartan use occurred in those assigned to placebo (n = 238) versus vericiguat (n = 187) (p = 0.007). Symptomatic hypotension (21.0% vs. 23.1%; p = 0.41), renal dysfunction (29.9% vs. 31.9%; p = 0.50), and hyperkalaemia (10.3% vs. 7.9%; p = 0.20) in patients receiving sacubitril/valsartan (n = 992) for ≥3 months were not different by treatment arm.. Concomitant use of sacubitril/valsartan for at least 3 months did not alter the efficacy of vericiguat and was similarly safe and tolerated in both study arms. Sacubitril/valsartan was initiated more frequently after randomization in patients assigned to placebo versus vericiguat.. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02861534.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Hypotension; Pyrimidines; Stroke Volume; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

In patients who survive an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors decrease the risk of subsequent major cardiovascular events. Whether angiotensin-receptor blockade and neprilysin inhibition with sacubitril/valsartan reduce major coronary events more effectively than angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in high-risk patients with recent AMI remains unknown. We aimed to compare the effects of sacubitril/valsartan on coronary outcomes in patients with AMI.. We conducted a prespecified analysis of the PARADISE-MI trial (Prospective ARNI vs ACE Inhibitors Trial to Determine Superiority in Reducing Heart Failure Events After MI), which compared sacubitril/valsartan (97/103 mg twice daily) with ramipril (5 mg twice daily) for reducing heart failure events after myocardial infarction in 5661 patients with AMI complicated by left ventricular systolic dysfunction, pulmonary congestion, or both. In the present analysis, the prespecified composite coronary outcome was the first occurrence of death from coronary heart disease, nonfatal myocardial infarction, hospitalization for angina, or postrandomization coronary revascularization.. In survivors of an AMI with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and pulmonary congestion, sacubitril/valsartan-compared with ramipril-reduced the risk of a prespecified major coronary composite outcome. Dedicated studies are necessary to confirm this finding and elucidate its mechanism.. URL: https://www.. gov; Unique identifier: NCT02924727.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Angiotensins; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Neprilysin; Prospective Studies; Ramipril; Receptors, Angiotensin; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

In the Prospective Comparison of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) With ACEi to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure (PARADIGM-HF) study, treatment with sacubitril/valsartan reduced the primary outcome of cardiovascular (CV) death and heart failure (HF) hospitalization compared with enalapril in patients with chronic HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). A prospective randomized trial was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in Japanese HFrEF patients.Methods and Results:In the Prospective comparison of ARNI with ACEi to determine the noveL beneficiaL trEatment vaLue in Japanese Heart Failure patients (PARALLEL-HF) study, 225 Japanese HFrEF patients (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class II-IV, left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≤35%) were randomized (1 : 1) to receive sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg bid or enalapril 10 mg bid. Over a median follow up of 33.9 months, no significant between-group difference was observed for the primary composite outcome of CV death and HF hospitalization (HR 1.09; 95% CI 0.65-1.82; P=0.6260). Early and sustained reductions in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) from baseline were observed with sacubitril/valsartan compared with enalapril (between-group difference: Week 2: 25.7%, P<0.01; Month 6: 18.9%, P=0.01, favoring sacubitril/valsartan). There was no significant difference in the changes in NYHA class and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) clinical summary score at Week 8 and Month 6. Sacubitril/valsartan was well tolerated with fewer study drug discontinuations due to adverse events, although the sacubitril/valsartan group had a higher proportion of patients with hypotension.. In Japanese patients with HFrEF, there was no difference in reduction in the risk of CV death or HF hospitalization between sacubitril/valsartan and enalapril, and sacubitril/valsartan was safe and well tolerated.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Enalapril; Heart Failure; Humans; Japan; Prospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Ventricular Function, Left

Sacubitril/valsartan has changed the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), due to the positive effects on morbidity and mortality, partly mediated by left ventricular (LV) reverse remodelling (LVRR). The aim of this multicenter study was to identify echocardiographic predictors of LVRR after sacubitril/valsartan administration.. Patients with HFrEF requiring therapy with sacubitril/valsartan from 13 Italian centres were included. Echocardiographic parameters including LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) and global peak atrial longitudinal strain by speckle tracking echocardiography were measured to find the predictors of LVRR [= LV end-systolic volume reduction ≥10% and ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement ≥10% at follow-up] at 6 month follow-up as the primary endpoint. Changes in symptoms [New York Heart Association (NYHA) class] and neurohormonal activations [N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)] were also evaluated as secondary endpoints; 341 patients (excluding patients with poor acoustic windows and missing data) were analysed (mean age: 65 ± 10 years; 18% female, median LVEF 30% [inter-quartile range: 25-34]). At 6 month follow-up, 82 (24%) patients showed early complete response (LVRR and LVEF ≥ 35%), 55 (16%) early incomplete response (LVRR and LVEF < 35%), and 204 (60%) no response (no LVRR and LVEF < 35%). Non-ischaemic aetiology, a lower left atrial volume index, and a higher GLS were all independent predictors of LVRR at multivariable logistic analysis (all P < 0.01). A baseline GLS < -9.3% was significantly associated with early response (area under the curve 0.75, P < 0.0001). Left atrial strain was the best predictor of positive changes in NYHA class and NT-proBNP (all P < 0.05).. Speckle tracking echocardiography parameters at baseline could be useful to predict LVRR and clinical response to sacubitril-valsartan and could be used as a guide for treatment in patients with HFrEF.

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Echocardiography; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) improves left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction regardless of previous treatments. Improvements in LVEF may change eligibility for primary implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) placement. Awaiting LVEF improvement may expose patients to potential risks for arrhythmic complications.. The authors sought to develop a model predicting LVEF change after Sac/Val therapy.. A total of 416 persons with HF and LVEF of <35% were included in this analysis. Following initiation of Sac/Val, echocardiographic parameters were measured serially for 1 year. A machine learning algorithm was implemented to develop a risk model for predicting the persistence of LVEF of <35% after 1 year and was validated in a separate group of study participants.. Baseline LVEF, left ventricular mass index, HF duration, age, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide concentration at baseline and change by day 14, and body mass index were the most significant factors for identifying lack of LVEF improvement to ≥35% after 1 year. In the training and validation cohorts, the areas under the model curve for predicting lack of LVEF improvement were 0.92 and 0.86, respectively. Three categories of likelihood for LVEF of <35% after 1 year of Sac/Val treatment were developed based on the model predictions: 3.8%, 30.1%, and 83.7%. During follow-up, arrhythmia event rates were 0.9%, 2.9%, and 6.7% in these groups, respectively.. Many persons with HF with reduced ejection fraction eligible for ICD insertion experience an increase in LVEF to ≥35% after treatment with Sac/Val. Early identification of those less likely to improve their LVEF might allow for more refined selection of primary ICD candidates. (Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan Therapy on biomarkers, Myocardial Remodeling, and Outcomes [PROVE-HF]; NCT02887183).

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Ventricular Function, Left

Sacubitril/valsartan improves outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis). However, data on postdischarge outcomes in renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASi)-naïve patients are limited. We included Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years who were hospitalized for HFrEF in the Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure registry between October 2015 and June 2019, had part D prescription coverage, and were not on RASi therapy during the 6 months before hospital admission. We examined the associations between sacubitril/valsartan prescription at hospital discharge and outcomes at 30 days and 1 year after discharge using overlap-weighted median regression and Cox proportional hazards models. The end points included "home time" (defined as days alive and out of any health care institution), mortality, and rehospitalization. Among 3,572 patients with HFrEF and who are naïve to RASi therapy, at discharge, 290 (8.1%) were prescribed sacubitril/valsartan and 1,390 (38.9%) were prescribed ACEis and angiotensin receptor blockers. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, patients prescribed sacubitril/valsartan had a longer median home time (parameter estimate 27.0 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] 12.40 to 41.6, p <0.001) and lower all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.74, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.91, p = 0.004) at 1 year than patients not prescribed sacubitril/valsartan. The prescription of sacubitril/valsartan was not significantly associated with all-cause rehospitalization (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.03, p = 0.10) or heart failure rehospitalization (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.07, p = 0.19). In a restricted comparison of patients discharged on sacubitril/valsartan versus ACEis and angiotensin receptor blockers, there were no significant differences in the outcomes. In conclusion, in this contemporary population of RASi-naïve patients with HFrEF from routine clinical practice, compared with not initiating, the initiation of sacubitril/valsartan at discharge was associated with longer home time and improvements in overall survival.

Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Humans; Medicare; Patient Discharge; Renin-Angiotensin System; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; United States; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Heart failure (HF) is a significant event for public health. It has a prevalence between 1-2%, mortality rate between 7-17%, and hospitalization between 32-44%. This implies a risk to health and quality of life, but also great financial efforts for health systems. Sacubitril/valsartan is a medication recognized for its efficacy, and this consensus seeks to synthesize the available information regarding its use for the benefit of patients. This document consists of a description of the epidemiology of HF, pharmacology of the drug, clinical trials, use of the drug in cases with reduced ejection fraction, mildly reduced ejection fraction and preserved ejection fraction, available literature on HF guidelines, recommendations and conclusions.. La insuficiencia cardiaca (IC) es un evento significativo para la salud pública. Tiene una prevalencia entre el 1 y 2%, tasa de mortalidad entre el 7 y 17% y de hospitalización entre el 32 y 44%. Esto implica un riesgo a la salud y calidad de vida, pero también grandes esfuerzos financieros para los sistemas de salud. El sacubitrilo/valsartán es un medicamento reconocido por su eficacia, y este consenso busca sintetizar la información disponible respecto a su uso en búsqueda del beneficio de los pacientes. El presente documento se compone de una descripción de la epidemiología de la IC, farmacología del medicamento, estudios clínicos sobre este, uso del medicamento en casos con fracción de eyección reducida, fracción de eyección ligeramente reducida y fracción de eyección preservada, literatura disponible en guías de IC, recomendaciones y conclusiones.

Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Cardiology; Consensus; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Quality of Life; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; United States; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Comorbid heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with a very high risk of HF events. Sacubitril-valsartan, an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), and dapagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor, improve HF outcomes in these patients, but their comparative value for money in this patient population has not yet been determined.. We aimed to compare the cost needed to treat (CNT) to avoid an HF event with each drug.. CNT was estimated by multiplying the annualized number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one HF event by the annual cost of each therapy. HF events were defined as the first event of hospitalization for HF or cardiovascular mortality. Drug efficacy data were extracted from published secondary analyses of patients with DM in the DAPA-HF and PARADIGM-HF trials. Drug costs were estimated as 75% of the 2021 US National Average Drug Acquisition Cost listing. Sensitivity analysis was performed on parameters that may have affected the CNT.. The annualized NNT was 24 (95% confidence interval [CI] 16-54) for dapagliflozin and 57 (95% CI 31-433) for the ARNI. At an annual cost of $US4523 and 5099, respectively, the CNT was $US108,563 (95% CI 72,375-244,267) for dapagliflozin and $US290,671 (95% CI 158,084-2,208,079) for the ARNI.. Dapagliflozin seems to offer greater value for money than the ARNI for patients with HFrEF and DM. Our results provide support for contemporary guidelines advocating the use of dapagliflozin in these patients.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Benzhydryl Compounds; Biphenyl Compounds; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Glucosides; Heart Failure; Humans; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

There is increasing evidence supporting the efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan for treating left heart failure, but few studies have investigated its effects on right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. This study aimed to explore the effects of sacubitril/valsartan on RV dysfunction among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).. A total of 93 patients with HFrEF with RV dysfunction who were hospitalized from January 2018 through June 2019 were included in this retrospective observational study. All patients received their first sacubitril/valsartan treatment as in patients during the study period. We excluded 11 patients who were lost to follow-up or had incomplete heart echocardiography data. After 6 months of follow-up, we re-evaluated New York Heart Association Functional Classification and performed echocardiography to identify changes in relevant variables after treatment.. At baseline, 24% of the patients had an initial sacubitril/valsartan regimen of 12/13 mg twice daily and 76% of the patients had an initial dose of 24/26 mg twice daily. During follow-up, 27% of patients increased their dosage to 49/50 mg twice daily, 68% of patients were taking 24/26 mg twice daily, and 5% of the patients were still taking 12/13 mg twice daily. We found that sacubitril/valsartan treatment was associated with significant improvements in the following RV function indicators: tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, tricuspid annular s' peak velocity (S'), RV fractional area change, and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP). Crude linear regression analysis revealed that a tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion improvement was positively correlated with a change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and negatively correlated with a change in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV). However, these correlations were nonexistent after adjusting for multiple echocardiographic variables.. In patients with RV dysfunction and HFrEF, sacubitril/valsartan may improve RV remodeling. This influence may be independent of left cardiac remodeling.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Ventricular Dysfunction, Right; Ventricular Function, Left

The effects of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) were recently reported. However, the hemodynamic impact of this well-established treatment in patients with HFrEF has been poorly systematically researched.. We aimed to investigate the hemodynamic effects of sacubitril/valsartan among patients with HFrEF.. Between 2016 and 2020, we retrospectively collected data for patients with HFrEF treated at the University Medical Center Mannheim, Germany. Data for 240 patients with HFrEF were available. We systematically analyzed echocardiographic parameters, all-cause hospitalization, and congestion rate.. The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improved from a median (minimum; maximum) of 28% (3; 65) before initiation of sacubitril/valsartan to a median of 34% (13; 64) at 24-month follow-up (p < 0.001). Systolic pulmonary atrial pressure (PAPsys) decreased from a median of 30 mmHg (13; 115) to 25 mmHg (20; 80) at 24-month follow-up (p = 0.005). The median (minimum; maximum) tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion improved from 17 mm (3; 31) at baseline to 20 mm (9; 30) at 12-month follow-up (p = 0.007). The incidence of severe and moderate mitral, tricuspid, and aortic valvular insufficiency improved after treatment. Hospitalization and congestion rates reduced at 24-month follow-up. The mortality rate in echocardiographic and functional nonresponders was higher than in responders (12.1 vs. 5.2%; p = 0.1 and 11.3 vs. 3.1%; p = 0.01, respectively).. Follow-up 24 months after starting treatment with sacubitril/valsartan revealed sustained improvements in echocardiographic parameters, including LVEF, PAPsys, and cardiac valvular insufficiency. Rates of all-cause hospitalization and congestion had decreased significantly at follow-up. The mortality rate was higher in echocardiographic and functional nonresponders.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Hemodynamics; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Ventricular Function, Left

This study aims to investigate the dosage pattern, efficacy, and safety of sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) in Chinese heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients regarding real-world settings. Patients from 27 centers with a confirmed diagnosis of HFrEF and initiated Sac/Val treatment were enrolled. The primary objective was to evaluate the dosage pattern and change of heart failure status. In a final cohort of 983 patients, outpatient Sac/Val treatment demonstrated a similar beneficial effect in NT-proBNP and cardiac function. After initiating the treatment, overall and sub-population showed similar safety and efficacy. Patients who received a higher dose of Sac/Val (> 200 mg/d) demonstrated better improvement in LV function and reduction of NT-proBNP regardless of adjustment. Among Chinese HFrEF patients, Sac/Val showed a comparable reduction in NT-proBNP and improvement in cardiac function. Data further support guideline recommendations of Sac/Val in Chinese population. Optimal up-titration might provide further benefits. Further long-term and prognostic studies are needed.

Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; China; Heart Failure; Humans; Neprilysin; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are influenced by access and adherence to guideline-directed medical therapy. Our objective was to study the association between annual household income and: (1) the odds of having a claim for sacubitril/valsartan among insured patients with HFrEF and (2) medication adherence (measured as the proportion of days covered). We hypothesized that lower annual household income is associated with decreased odds of having a claim for and adhering to sacubitril/valsartan.. Using the Optum de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart, patients with HFrEF and ≥6 months of enrollment for follow-up (2016-2020) were included. Covariates included age, sex, race, ethnicity, educational attainment, US region, number of prescribed medications, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. Prescription for sacubitril/valsartan was defined by the presence of a claim within 6 months of HFrEF diagnosis. Adherence was defined as proportion of days covered ≥80%. We fit multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models and hierarchical logistic regression accounting for covariates.. Among 322 007 individuals with incident HFrEF, 135 282 had complete data for analysis. Of the patients eligible for sacubitril/valsartan, 4.7% (6372) had a claim within 6 months of HFrEF diagnosis. Following multivariable adjustment, individuals in the lowest annual income category (<$40 000) were significantly less likely (odds ratio, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.76-0.90]) to have a sacubitril/valsartan claim within 6 months of HFrEF diagnosis than those in the highest annual income category (≥$100 000). Annual income <$40 000 was associated with lower odds of proportion of days covered ≥80% compared with income ≥$100 000 (odds ratio, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.59-0.83]).. Lower household income is associated with decreased likelihood of a sacubitril/valsartan claim and medication adherence within 6 months of HFrEF diagnosis, even after adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical factors. Future analyses are needed to identify additional social factors associated with delays in sacubitril/valsartan initiation and long-term adherence.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Up to 20% of patients in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) trials are not taking diuretic agents at baseline, but little is known about them.. The aim of this study was to examine outcomes in patients with HFrEF not taking diuretic medications and after diuretic medications are started.. Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared between patients taking or not taking diuretic drugs at baseline in the ATMOSPHERE (Aliskiren Trial of Minimizing Outcomes for Patients With Heart Failure) and PARADIGM-HF (Prospective Comparison of ARNI With ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure Trial) trials combined. Patients starting diuretic medications were also compared with those remaining off diuretic drugs during follow-up. Symptoms (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score [KCCQ-CSS]), hospitalization for worsening heart failure (HF), mortality, and kidney function (estimated glomerular filtration rate slope) were examined.. At baseline, the 3,079 of 15,415 patients (20%) not taking diuretic medications had a less severe HF profile, less neurohumoral activation, and better kidney function. They were less likely to experience the primary outcome (hospitalization for HF or cardiovascular death) than patients taking diuretic agents (adjusted HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.74-0.80; P < 0.001) and death of any cause. Commencement of a diuretic drug was associated with higher subsequent risk for death (adjusted HR: 2.05; 95% CI: 1.99-2.11; P < 0.001) and greater decreases in KCCQ-CSS and estimated glomerular filtration rate. The 5 strongest predictors of initiation of diuretic medications were higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, higher body mass index, older age, history of diabetes, and worse KCCQ-CSS. In PARADIGM-HF, fewer patients who were treated with sacubitril/valsartan commenced diuretic agents (OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.58-0.88; P = 0.002).. Patients with HFrEF not taking diuretic medications and those who remained off them had better outcomes than patients treated with diuretic agents or who commenced them.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Diuretics; Heart Failure; Humans; Prospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

The angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) demonstrated to be superior to enalapril in reducing hospitalizations, cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in patients with ambulatory heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), in particular when it is maximally up-titrated. Unfortunately, the target dose is achieved in less than 50% of HFrEF patients, thus undermining the beneficial effects on the outcomes. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the role of Sac/Val and its titration dose on reverse cardiac remodelling and determine which echocardiographic index best predicts the up-titration success.. From January 2020 to June 2021, we retrospectively identified 95 patients (65.6 [59.1-72.8] years; 15.8% females) with chronic HFrEF who were prescribed Sac/Val from the HF Clinics of 5 Italian University Hospitals and evaluated the tolerability of Sac/Val high dose (the ability of the patient to achieve and stably tolerate the maximum dose) as the primary endpoint in the cohort. We used a multivariable logistic regression analysis, with a stepwise backward selection method, to determine the independent predictors of Sac/Val maximum dose tolerability, using, as candidate predictors, only variables with a P-value < 0.1 in the univariate analyses. Candidate predictors identified for the multivariable backward logistic regression analysis were age, sex, body mass index (BMI), chronic kidney disease (CKD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dyslipidaemia, atrial fibrillation, systolic blood pressure (SBP), baseline tolerability of ACEi/ARBs maximum dose, left ventricle global longitudinal strain (LVgLS), LV ejection fraction (EF), tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), right ventricle (RV) fractional area change (FAC), RV global and free wall longitudinal strain (RVgLS and RV-FW-LS). After the multivariable analysis, only one categorical (ACEi/ARBs maximum dose at baseline) and three continuous (younger age, higher SBP, and higher TAPSE), resulted significantly associated with the study outcome variable with a strong discriminatory capacity (area under the curve 0.874, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.794-0.954) to predict maximum Sac/Val dose tolerability.. Our study is the first to analyse the potential role of echocardiography and, in particular, of RV dysfunction, measured by TAPSE, in predicting Sac/Val maximum dose tolerability. Therefore, patients with RV dysfunction (baseline TAPSE <16 mm, in our cohort) might benefit from a different strategy to titrate Sac/Val, such as starting from the lowest dose and/or waiting for a more extended period of observation before attempting with the higher doses.

Topics: Aged; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

The prevalence of chronic heart failure (CHF) is up to 1-2% of the adult population in developed countries, rising to >10% after the age of 70. Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains a prevalent clinical syndrome associated with significant morbidity and mortality.. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan in a group of ambulatory patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and its effect on the hemodynamic, metabolic, renal, and cardiac remodeling parameters.. From January 2018 to May 2021, 106 patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) were prospectively enrolled. Patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan (ARNI) were compared with an arm of the same size (n = 53) and matched by age and gender who were taking a standard optimal medical therapy for HFrEF.. The 106 patients completing the study were characterized by age: 69.5 ± 8.0, 64% are male gender. The mean duration of follow-up in the 2 treatment arms was 12 months. In the ARNI arm, we evaluate the hemodynamic, metabolic, renal, and cardiac remodeling parameters upon the initial evaluation and at the end of the follow-up after 12 months treatment with sacubitril/valsartan. The LVEF values increased significantly (p < 0.001) in the ARNI arm compared to the OMT arm, 42.1 % vs. 30.1%. The LVMI decreased from a baseline value of 153.1 g/m2 to 147.8 g/m2 with significant improvement only in the arm treated with ARNI. The eGFR values increased significantly (p < 0.001) in the ARNI arm compared to the OMT arm 70.1 vs. 64.9 mL/min/1.73 m2. Initiation and titration of sacubitril-valsartan was associated with a reduction in NT-pro-BNP concentration, the values of NT-pro-BNP improved significantly only in the arm treated with ARNI 3107.1 vs. 5678.2. Mortality and re-hospitalization due to HF were lower in the arm treated with ARNI compared to the control (20.3 vs. 32.4 % and 25.3 vs. 46.6 %, respectively; p < 0.05).. Sacubitril/valsartan is an important advancement in the treatment of HFrEF. Sacubitril/valsartan induce "hemodynamic recovery". This study provides real-world data demonstrating incremental improvements in functional and echocardiographic outcomes in optimally treated patients with HFrEF switched to sacubitril/valsartan in ambulatory setting.

Topics: Aged; Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Ventricular Remodeling

Sacubitril/valsartan (SAC/VAL) has been used in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) could benefit the HFrEF patients with wide QRS durations. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical impacts of SAC/VAL on reverse cardiac remodelling in CRT-eligible and CRT-ineligible HFrEF patients with different QRS durations.. The TAROT-HF study was a multicentre, observational study enrolling patients who initiated SAC/VAL from 10 hospitals since 2017. Patients with baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35% were classified into two groups: (i) Group 1: CRT-eligible group, patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) morphology plus QRS duration ≥130 ms or non-LBBB morphology plus QRS duration ≥150 ms; and (ii) Group 2: CRT-ineligible group. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for confounders, and 1168 patients were analysed. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. The improvements in LVEF and left ventricular end-systolic volume index (LVESVi) were more significant in Group 2 than in Group 1 after 1 year SAC/VAL treatment (LVEF: 8.4% ± 11.3% vs. 4.5% ± 8.1%, P < 0.001; change percentages in LVESVi: -14.4% ± 25.9% vs. -9.6% ± 23.1%, P = 0.004). LVEF improving to ≥50% in Groups 1 and 2 constituted 5.2% and 20.2% after 1 year SAC/VAL treatment (P < 0.001). Multivariate analyses showed that wide QRS durations were negatively associated with the reverse cardiac remodelling in these HFrEF patients with SAC/VAL treatment.. Despite SAC/VAL treatment, wide QRS durations are associated with lower degrees of left ventricular improvement than narrow ones in the HFrEF patients. Optimal intervention timing for the CRT-eligible patients requires further investigation.

Topics: Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Bundle-Branch Block; Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy; Electrocardiography; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Ventricular Function, Left; Ventricular Remodeling

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Health Expenditures; Heart Failure; Humans; Medicare; Retrospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; United States; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Although previous cost-effectiveness evaluations of sacubitril/valsartan have demonstrated cardiovascular and economic benefits in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), whether sacubitril/valsartan is cost-effective for reducing the need for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation and the risk of death in ICD-eligible patients has not been investigated in patients with HFrEF. Herein, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of sacubitril/valsartan versus standard of care in reducing the need for ICD implantation and the death rate in HFrEF. A Markov model was developed from the Qatari hospital perspective, comprised of 'survival' and 'death' health states, and was based on 1-monthly Markovian cycles, a 20-years follow-up horizon, and a 3% discount rate. The model inputs were obtained from the literature and local sources. Sacubitril/valsartan resulted in a relative increase of 0.04 quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and 0.67 years of life lived (YLL)/person, with an incremental cost increase of QAR13,952 (USD3,832). Sacubitril/valsartan was associated with incremental cost effectiveness ratio of QAR341,113 (USD93,687)/QALYs gained and QAR24,431 (USD6,710)/YLL. Sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness, with the cost-effectiveness maintained in ≥96.5% of simulated cases. To conclude, sacubitril/valsartan is a cost-effective alternative to standard care against QALY gained and YLL in reducing the need for an ICD therapy and the rate of death among ICD-eligible HFrEF patients.

Topics: Cost-Benefit Analysis; Defibrillators, Implantable; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Humans; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

The left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) and left atrial reservoir strain (LARS) are considered as sensitive and reliable markers of cardiac remodeling and function. However, their temporal changes during optimal management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are unknown.. This study investigated the time trajectories of the LARS and LVGLS in patients with HFrEF treated with angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, and assessed whether the LARS and LVGLS could define left heart reverse remodeling (LHRR) and reflect the treatment response and prognosis.. Using a retrospective cohort of patients with HFrEF prescribed sacubitril/valsartan, we assessed the time trajectories of the LVGLS and LARS in 409 patients (1,258 echocardiograms), and investigated their association with the occurrence of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), after the determination of LHRR, during a median follow-up of 27.1 (IQR: 18.3-36.3) months.. Among patients with HFrEF prescribed sacubitril/valsartan, both the LVGLS and LARS improved over time. The improvements in the LVGLS and LARS were prominent within 6 months of sacubitril/valsartan treatment: the LVGLS improved from 10.2% (IQR: 7.9%-12.7%) to 13.9% (IQR: 10.5%-16.3%) (P < 0.001), and the LARS improved from 11.4% (IQR: 8.4%-15.6%) to 15.9% (IQR: 11.5%-21.4%) (P < 0.001). These improvements were larger among patients who did not experience the study outcome than in patients with events. Improvement in the LVGLS to ≥13% and LARS to ≥12.5% (ie, complete LHRR) was significantly associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular death and HHF, and this association was stronger than that of changes in other conventional echocardiographic parameters.. In patients with HFrEF treated with sacubitril/valsartan, the LVGLS and LARS were improved, typically within 6 months of treatment. Complete LHRR, defined by improvement in the LVGLS and LARS, can be an indicator of treatment response and prognosis.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Humans; Neprilysin; Predictive Value of Tests; Retrospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Ventricular Function, Left; Ventricular Remodeling

Sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) improves outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Data about the immediate, short-, and intermediate-term hemodynamic effects of S/V are limited.. In this prospective observational study, 37 outpatients with chronic HFrEF were treated with S/V according to current guideline recommendations. Next to clinical, laboratory and echocardiographic parameters, haemodynamic variables were assessed non-invasively by use of inert gas rebreathing and bioimpedance cardiography at baseline and at 2-week, 3-month and 6-month follow-up. The course of variables throughout the study and the relationship between variables were analysed using fractional polynomials.. S/V treatment resulted in short- and intermediate-term improvements in NYHA functional class (2.3 ± 0.6 at baseline vs. 1.9 ± 0.5 at 6-month follow-up, p = 0.14), 6-min walk test (453 ± 110 vs. 528 ± 98 m, p = 0.02), ejection fraction (31 ± 9 vs. 36 ± 12%, p = 0.13), pulmonary artery pressure (39 ± 10 vs. 31 ± 10 mmHg, p = 0.02), and NT-proBNP values (1702 (782-2897 vs. 1004 (599-1627) ng/L, p = 0.03). In addition, S/V caused immediate decreases in systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) and systolic blood pressure (SBP), which were associated with a simultaneous drop in stroke volume (SV) and cardiac index (CI). However, while SVRI and SBP remained at low levels during further treatment, SV and CI restored rapidly and increased to slightly higher levels thereafter.. The vasodilative effects of S/V result in immediate reductions in SVRI, SBP, SV and CI. However, S/V induces reverse cardiac remodelling, which is apparent shortly after treatment initiation and leads to improvements of clinical, functional, echocardiographic, laboratory and haemodynamic variables.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Hemodynamics; Humans; Outpatients; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Doses of sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) achieved in clinical trials of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are often not reached in clinical practice.. The purpose of this study was to investigate associations among Sac/Val doses and changes in prognostic biomarkers, health status, and cardiac remodeling among individuals with HFrEF through 12 months of treatment with Sac/Val administered per usual care.. A total of 794 persons with HFrEF (ejection fraction [EF] ≤40%) were categorized according to average daily doses of Sac/Val divided into tertiles. Change from baseline to 12 months in biomarkers (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T, soluble ST2, atrial natriuretic peptide, urinary cyclic guanosine monophosphate), Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-23 scores, and parameters of cardiac reverse remodeling (left ventricular EF, indexed left atrial and ventricular volumes, and E/e') were assessed.. The average daily dose was 112 mg in Tertile 1 (low dose), 342 mg in Tertile 2 (moderate dose), and 379 mg in Tertile 3 (high dose). Similar changes in prognostic biomarkers were observed in all dose tertiles. Gains in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-23 scores were comparable regardless of dose category. Consistent reverse cardiac remodeling in all dose categories occurred; the median absolute left ventricular EF improvement across HF dose groups was 9.3%, 8.7%, and 10.2%, for low, moderate, and high doses, respectively; similar improvements in left atrial and ventricular volumes and E/e' were also observed across dose categories.. Among patients with HFrEF, similar improvement in prognostic biomarkers, health status, and cardiac remodeling were observed across various Sac/Val doses. (Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan Therapy on Biomarkers, Myocardial Remodeling and Outcomes [PROVE-HF]; NCT02887183.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Atrial Natriuretic Factor; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Guanosine Monophosphate; Heart Failure; Humans; Interleukin-1 Receptor-Like 1 Protein; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Stroke Volume; Troponin T; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Ventricular Remodeling

We investigated the incremental advantage in terms of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) reduction in patients affected by heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) treated with sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) versus patients treated with S/V only.. Consecutive adult patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≤40% who were followed in our outpatient clinic from January 2016 to December 2019 and treated with S/V were analysed.. Out of eligible 147 patients, 99 were treated with S/V+MRA at baseline and 48 patients were treated with S/V. Patients treated with S/V+MRA were significantly younger (61.5 vs 67.8 years, p=0.006), had better basal renal function (serum creatinine 1.2 vs 1.4 mg/dL, p=0.006) and lower LVEF (30.9% vs 33.1%, p=0.039). At follow-up at 8-16 months, 84 out of 99 patients continued to be on S/V+MRA, and 39 out of 48 patients continued to be on S/V. Between these two groups, at follow-up, LVEF did not vary significantly, ΔNT-proBNP was not significantly different (-215.7 vs -165.9 pg/mL, p=0.93) and neither was the rate of hospitalisation for heart failure (9.5% vs 12.8%, p=0.58). Using general linear models, both age and basal NT-proBNP influenced significantly ΔNT-proBNP (respectively, p=0.002; p=0.005), while treatment with S/V+MRA versus S/V only did not significantly influence ΔNT-proBNP (p=0.462).. Even with the limitations of a small retrospective study, our results generate the hypothesis that MRA might not provide any additional value in patients with HFrEF treated with S/V. Larger studies are needed to test if MRA should remain a standard treatment in patients with HFrEF treated with S/V.

Topics: Heart Failure; Humans; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Retrospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Ventricular Function, Left

To compare baseline characteristics of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) initiated on sacubitril/valsartan compared with patients continued on conventional heart failure (HF)-treatment in a European out-patient setting.. Between July 2016 and July 2019, ARIADNE enrolled 8787 outpatients aged ≥18 years with HFrEF from 17 European countries. Choice of therapy was solely at the investigators' discretion. In total, 4173 patients were on conventional HF-treatment (non-S/V group), while 4614 patients were on sacubitril/valsartan either at enrolment or started sacubitril/valsartan within 1 month of enrolment (S/V group). Of these, 2108 patients started sacubitril/valsartan treatment ±1 month around enrolment [restricted S/V (rS/V) group]. The average age of the patients was 68 years. Patients on S/V were more likely to have New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV symptoms (50.3%, 44.6%, 32.1% in rS/V, S/V, and non-S/V, respectively) and had lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; 32.3%, 32.7%, and 35.4% in rS/V, S/V, and non-S/V, respectively; P < 0.0001). The most frequently received HF treatments were angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEI/ARB; ∼84% in non-S/V), followed by β-blockers (∼80%) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs; 53%). The use of triple HF therapy (ACEI/ARB/angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor with β-blockers and MRA) was higher in the S/V groups than non-S/V group (48.2%, 48.2%, and 40.2% in rS/V, S/V, and non-S/V, respectively).. In this large multinational HFrEF registry, patients receiving sacubitril/valsartan tended to be younger with lower LVEF and higher NYHA class. Fewer than half of the patients received triple HF therapy.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Humans; Registries; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Ventricular Function, Left

Previous literature has suggested a potential diuretic sparing effect as early as 6 months following sacubitril-valsartan initiation in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF); however, whether this effect manifests earlier after initiation is unclear. Objective: To evaluate the acute diuretic-sparing effects of sacubitril-valsartan.. This was a single-center, retrospective analysis of outpatients with HFrEF initiated on sacubitril-valsartan with follow up within 90 ± 30 days and a concomitant loop diuretic prescription. The primary outcome was the percent of patients with an increase, decrease or no change in loop diuretic total daily dose (TDD). Key secondary outcomes included change in loop diuretic TDD (mg furosemide equivalents) and hospital admissions or emergency department (ED) visits.. A total of 145 patients were included (overall cohort) with 120 continuing sacubitril-valsartan at follow up (on-treatment cohort). In the on-treatment cohort, 20% (n = 24) had a reduction in loop diuretic TDD and 10% had an increase (n = 12). Median change in loop diuretic TDD was unchanged from baseline to follow up (p 0.13). In patients on >80 mg TDD of furosemide at baseline (n = 9), mean change was-53 ± 44 mg (p 0.006). Hospitalizations (6.2%) and ED visits (0.7%) for heart failure were infrequent.. Patients may require a loop diuretic dose reduction within 2-3 months following sacubitril-valsartan initiation. This diuretic-sparing effect appears larger in those on higher baseline loop diuretic doses, and closer follow up may be warranted for these patients.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Diuretics; Drug Combinations; Furosemide; Heart Failure; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Sodium Potassium Chloride Symporter Inhibitors; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Left ventricular (LV) remodelling is a major mechanism underlying disease progression in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (EF). Previous studies that LVEF improvement and reverse remodelling can be achieved after therapy with Sacubitril/Valsartan in real-world settings. Therefore, we sought to investigate possible predictors of LV remodelling, in particular echocardiographic parameters derived by Tissue Doppler Imaging.. Patients with chronic HF, LV dysfunction (EF < 35%), NYHA class II-III were followed up between September 2016 and January 2019. All patients underwent clinical and echocardiography follow up at baseline and after 12 months of therapy with sacubitril/valsartan.. Fifty-four consecutive outpatients were enrolled in the study. At follow-up visit LVEF (38 ± 9 vs. 30 ± 5%,. Treatment with sacubitril/valsartan in patients with systolic dysfunction is associated with an improvement in LVEF in a real world scenario. Smaller LV volumes are associated with better reverse LV remodelling.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Chronic Disease; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Ventricular Function, Left; Ventricular Remodeling