sacubitril and Hypertension

Sacubitril/valsartan has been demonstrated to reduce blood pressure in hypertensive patients, but the best dose remains unclear. We performed this network meta-analysis to determine the comparative efficacy and safety of three available doses of sacubitril/valsartan (i.e., 100, 200, and 400 mg).. We searched four databases for relevant studies published before January 2022. Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures in the sitting position (msSBP and msDBP) and ambulatory condition (24-h maSBP and maDBP) and adverse events (AEs) were assessed. Nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 5474 patients were included. Sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg once daily was slightly better than 400 mg once daily in lowering 24-h maDBP (MD, 1.31 mmHg; 95% CI 0.61-2.01 mmHg), slightly better than 100 mg once daily in lowering 24-h maSBP (MD, - 3.70 mmHg; 95% CI  - 6.22 to - 1.18 mmHg) and 24-h maDBP (MD, - 2.98; 95% CI - 5.11 to - 0.85), and slightly better than Valsartan 160 mg once daily in lowering 24-h maSBP (MD, - 3.23 mmHg; 95% CI, - 5.25 to - 1.21). 400 mg once daily of sacubitril/valsartan was better than 200 mg once daily in lowering msDBP (MD, - 9.38 mmHg; 95% CI - 17.79 to - 0.97 mmHg). Interestingly, 400 mg once daily of sacubitril/valsartan had fewer trial-specified AEs than 200 mg once daily (OR, 0.74; 95%CI 0.55-0.99). There was no statistical difference for the remaining comparisons.. In hypertensive patients, 200 mg once daily of sacubitril/valsartan may exert a greater reduction in ambulatory blood pressure than 100 mg once daily and 200 mg once daily may not be inferior to 400 mg once daily. Moreover, it is not clear that sacubitril/valsartan lowers blood pressure more than an angiotensin receptor blocker. Further trials are required to determine the incremental value of sacubitril/valsartan as an anti-hypertensive agent.

Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Drug Combinations; Essential Hypertension; Humans; Hypertension; Network Meta-Analysis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Since sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) has neprilysin inhibition and angiotensin receptor-blocking properties, it is anticipated to have strong antihypertensive effects. However, there is not enough evidence to compare the safety and efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan to those of olmesartan in patients with hypertension.. To compare the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan versus olmesartan in patients with hypertension.. This study follows the guidelines of the Cochrane Handbook. We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for relevant clinical trials. We extracted outcome endpoints regarding mean ambulatory systolic/diastolic blood pressure (maSBP/maDBP), mean sitting systolic/diastolic blood pressure (msSBP/msDBP), mean ambulatory/mean sitting pulse pressure (maPP/msPP), the proportion of patients achieving blood pressure control (< 140/90 mmHg), and adverse events. We used Review Manager Software for the conduction of the analysis of this study. The effect estimates of the studies were pooled as Mean difference or risk ratio and 95% confidence interval. We also conducted a subgroup analysis based on the dose of sacubitril/valsartan.. A total of six clinical trials were included. The studies showed an overall low risk of bias. The pooled effect estimate revealed that sacubitril/valsartan significantly reduces maSBP, maDBP, maPP, msSBP, and msDBP measurements compared with olmesartan (p < 0.001). A significantly higher portion of patients achieved blood pressure control in the sacubitril/valsartan group (p < 0.001). The test of subgroup difference showed that 400 mg dose is significantly more effective than 200 mg dose in reducing maSBP. Regarding the safety profile, olmesartan was associated with more side effects due to drug discontinuation and more serious side effects.. Sacubitril/valsartan or LCZ696 is more effective and safer than olmesartan for controlling blood pressure in patients with hypertension.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Blood Pressure; Drug Combinations; Essential Hypertension; Humans; Hypertension; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

This review aims to investigate the blood pressure (BP)-lowering effects of emerging drugs developed to treat diabetic kidney disease and heart failure (HF). We summarize the potential pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for mitigating hypertensive target organ damage and evaluating the available clinical data on these newer drugs.. Nonsteroidal dihydropyridine-based mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), dual angiotensin II receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (valsartan with sacubitril), sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), and soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators are new classes of chemical agents that have distinct mechanisms of action and have been shown to be effective for the treatment of cardiovascular (CV) disease (CVD), HF, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). These drugs can be used either alone or in combination with other antihypertensive and CV drugs. Among these, SGLT2i and valsartan with sacubitril offer new avenues to reduce CVD mortality. SGLT2i have a mild-to-moderate effect on BP lowering with a favorable effect on CV and renal hemodynamics and have been shown to produce a significant reduction in the incidence of major adverse CVD events (as monotherapy or add-on therapy) compared with controls (placebo or non-SGLT2i treatment). Most of the participants in these studies had hypertension (HTN) at baseline and were receiving antihypertensive therapy, including renin-angiotensin system blockers. The combination of valsartan with sacubitril also lowers BP in the short term and has demonstrated a striking reduction in CVD mortality and morbidity in HF patients with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. If widely adopted, these novel therapeutic agents hold significant promise for reducing the public health burden posed by HTN and CVD. Based on the results of several clinical trials and considering the high prevalence of HTN and T2D, these new classes of agents have emerged as powerful therapeutic tools in managing and lowering the BP of patients with diabetic kidney disease and HF.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Nephropathies; Drug Combinations; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors have multiple beneficial effects on the cardiovascular system. The angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril/valsartan has been shown to effectively reduce ambulatory 24-h blood pressure in patients with hypertension, and improvements in many aspects of hemodynamic function have also been reported. Overall hemodynamic effects on arterial stiffness and nocturnal blood pressure play an important role in the pathogenesis of hypertensive heart disease. Therefore, these could represent mechanistic targets underlying the effects of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors on the continuum of cardiovascular disease from hypertension to heart failure. Other potential mechanisms include reductions in circulating volume and sympathetic activity, both of which contribute to the protection against target organ damage and positive changes in cardiac biomarkers seen during angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor therapy. The mechanisms of action and beneficial effects of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors are complementary to those of a number of other treatment options for hypertension, suggesting the possibility of additive or even synergistic benefits. Based on available data, there are a number of patient groups who will benefit from antihypertensive treatment with an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, including those with salt-sensitive hypertension, structural hypertension, resistant hypertension, and hypertension in the presence of heart failure. Overall, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors regulate blood pressure and pulse pressure via multiple mechanisms and provide cardiovascular protection. This provides an option for effective intervention early in the vicious cycle of elevated blood pressure and central pressures with progression toward heart failure that should help to address the growing worldwide heart failure epidemic.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Hemodynamics; Humans; Hypertension; Neprilysin; Receptors, Angiotensin; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

The use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors is an important therapy for various cardiovascular diseases, such as hypertension, ischemic heart disease and heart failure (HF). In heart transplant recipients, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have been demonstrated to be a keystone for the treatment of hypertension with a wide spectrum of pleiotropic molecular effects ranging from improvement of the peripheral vascular system to regulation of the fluid and sodium balance. In addition, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors may be also useful in the prevention of graft failure, cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression. Further tailored multicenter and randomized studies are warranted to confirm the pleiotropic clinical effects of ACEi therapy in HTRs and to support more extended use in daily clinical practice. Finally in the near future, the use of novel pharmacological agents that inhibit the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) such as the neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril should be investigated in heart transplant recipients.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Heart Transplantation; Humans; Hypertension; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Renin-Angiotensin System

Hypertension is a leading cause of cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease, resulting in premature death and disability. The Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System (RAAS) blockers, including Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARBs), are used as first-line antihypertensive therapy to treat hypertensive patients with comorbidities, including diabetes, ischemic heart disease, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease. The use of RAS blockers is associated with the risks, such as hyperkalemia, angioedema, etc. The drugs potentiating them interact pharmacodynamically, resulting in adverse consequences. This review article focuses on the clinically important drug interactions of RAAS blockers.. The electronic databases, such as Medline/PubMed Central/PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), Embase, and reference lists were searched to identify relevant articles.. The risk of hyperkalemia may be enhanced potentially in patients receiving a RAS blocker and potassium-sparing diuretics, potassium supplements, trimethoprim, adrenergic betablockers, antifungal agents, calcineurin inhibitors, pentamidine, heparins or an NSAID, concomitantly. The patients taking ACE inhibitors and mTOR inhibitors, DPP4 inhibitors, alteplase, or sacubitril/valsartan concurrently may be at increased risk of developing angioedema.. Clinicians, pharmacists, and other healthcare practitioners should be accountable for medication safety. To avoid adverse implications, prescribers and pharmacists must be aware of the drugs that interact with RAAS blockers.

Topics: Angioedema; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Drug Interactions; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Hypertension; Potassium; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Renin-Angiotensin System

With the increase of hypertensive patients worldwide, the need for better antihypertensive drugs to achieve blood pressure standards and reduce complications is of great clinical significance. As an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, sacubitril/valsartan has been widely used in the treatment of heart failure, but its efficacy and safety in the treatment of middle-aged and elderly hypertensive patients are still controversial. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan and other antihypertensive drugs in the treatment of middle-aged and elderly patients with hypertension.. The databases of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were systematically searched from their establishment to February 2022 to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of sacubitril/valsartan and other antihypertensive drugs in the treatment of middle-aged and elderly hypertensive patients. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool was used to assess risk of bias for included studies, and the meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3.. In all, 7 studies which met the criteria were included, with a total sample size of 3,323 patients, including 1,899 patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan, and 1,424 patients treated with angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs). The meta-analysis showed that compared with other antihypertensive drugs, sacubitril/valsartan can significantly reduce mean reductions in sitting systolic blood pressure [mean difference (MD) =-4.70, 95% confidence interval (CI): -5.79 to -3.61, P<0.001], mean reductions in sitting diastolic blood pressure (MD =-2.29, 95% CI: -2.53 to -2.04, P<0.001), 24-hour mean reductions in ambulatory systolic blood pressure (MD =-3.36, 95% CI: -4.08 to -2.64, P<0.001), and 24-hour mean reductions in ambulatory diastolic blood pressure (MD =-1.49, 95% CI: -1.99 to -0.99, P<0.001), while there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events [odds ratio (OR) =1.14, 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.31, P=0.06], serious adverse events (OR =1.06, 95% CI: 0.64 to 1.76, P=0.81), and discontinuations due to adverse events (OR =0.86, 95% CI: 0.51 to 1.46, P=0.58).. Compared with other antihypertensive drugs, sacubitril/valsartan may be more effective in lowering blood pressure, and its safety may be comparable to that of ARBs. However, these results have to be confirmed by future RCTs with larger sample sizes and higher quality, and the long-term benefits of sacubitril/valsartan require further observation.

Topics: Aged; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Biphenyl Compounds; Humans; Hypertension; Middle Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Elevated blood pressure and hyperglycaemia frequently coexist and are both components of metabolic syndrome. Enhanced cardiovascular risk is strongly associated with diabetes and the occurrence of hypertension. Both hypertension and type 2 diabetes, if treated inappropriately, lead to serious complications, increasing the mortality of patients and generating much higher costs of health systems. This is why it is of great importance to find the missing link between hypertension and diabetes development and to simultaneously search for drugs influencing these two disorders or even drugs aimed at their pathological bases. Standard antihypertensive therapy mainly focuses on blood pressure reduction, while novel drugs also possess a wide range of pleiotropic modes of actions, such as cardio- and nephroprotective properties or body weight reduction. These properties are especially desirable in a situation when type 2 diabetes coexists with hypertension. This review describes the connections between diabetes and hypertension development and briefly summarises the current knowledge regarding attempts to define targets for the treatment of high blood pressure in diabetic patients. It also describes the standard hypotensive drugs preferred in patients with type 2 diabetes, as well as novel drugs, such as finerenone, esaxerenone, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 analogues and sacubitril/valsartan.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Antihypertensive Agents; Biphenyl Compounds; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypertension; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors

Despite the significant contribution of hypertension to the global burden of disease, disease control remains poor worldwide. Considering this unmet clinical need, several new antihypertensive drugs with novel mechanisms of action are under development.. The present review summarizes the recent advances in the development of emerging pharmacological agents for the management of hypertension. The latest technological innovations in the design of optimized formulations of available antihypertensive drugs and the potential role of the modification of intestinal microbiota to improve blood pressure (BP) control are also covered.. Significant efforts have been made to develop new antihypertensive agents with novel actions that target the main mechanisms involved in resistant hypertension. Sacubitril/valsartan may emerge as a potential first-line drug due to its superiority over renin angiotensin system inhibitors, and SGLT2 inhibitors can reduce BP in difficult-to-control hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes. In addition, firibastat and aprocitentan may expand the therapeutic options for resistant hypertension by novel mechanism of actions. Since gut dysbiosis not only leads to hypertension but also causes direct target organ damage, prebiotics and probiotics could represent a potential strategy to prevent or reduce the development of hypertension and to contribute to BP control.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Antihypertensive Agents; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypertension

Sacubitril-valsartan was recommended for heart failure (HF) and proven cost-effective in HF. Recently, sacubitril-valsartan has been recommended to treat hypertension by the Chinese expert consensus. The cost utility of sacubitril-valsartan for hypertension remains uninvestigated.. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to investigate the real efficacy of sacubitril-valsartan on blood pressure, compared with angiotensin receptor blockers or placebo. A lifetime Markov model was developed to compare the cost utility of sacubitril-valsartan vs. valsartan. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR), representing the ratio of incremental costs to the incremental utility. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was three times of per capita gross domestic product (GDP) in China in 2021. Sacubitril-valsartan was considered cost-effective if the ICUR obtained was lower than the WTP threshold, otherwise, sacubitril-valsartanis was not cost-effective.. Compared with valsartan, sacubitril-valsartan is more effective in reducing blood pressure and may result in more quality-adjusted life-year, although with higher costs. Sacubitril-valsartan is cost-effective for hypertension in the current China setting under the willingness-to-pay threshold of 3 times of per capita GDP.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Antihypertensive Agents; Biphenyl Compounds; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Middle Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Valsartan

Finding complementary compelling novel therapeutic agents for better control of blood pressure in people with resistant hypertension is moving into unchartered territory. The latest therapeutic developments explore approaches in the clinical arena that were either not examined or could only be examined in animal models two decades ago. Four main mechanisms have now been explored and operationalized in drug development: (a) mineralocorticoid receptor blockade using a nonsteroidal structure with many fewer side effects, (b) an aminopeptidase A inhibitor that has central effects on vasopressin, (c) a combined endothelin A and B receptor blocker and (d) an aldosterone synthase inhibitor devoid of glucocorticoid activity. All these agents are either completing Phase II development and starting Phase III or are involved in the ongoing recruitment of Phase III trials. Additionally, novel agents use antisense inhibition to block angiotensinogen development in the liver. These agents are discussed only for completeness, as they are still in Phase II trial development. Last, another agent that was initially being developed as an antihypertensive and once the data were reviewed by the company clearly showed efficacy as a heart failure agent was sacubitril/valsartan, which was ultimately approved. However, there are some discussions about reinvigorating the quest for an indication for hypertension, although no such steps have been formally initiated.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Animals; Antihypertensive Agents; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Hypertension; Neprilysin; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) are a new class of cardiovascular agents characterized by their dual action on the major regulators of the cardiovascular system, including the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and the natriuretic peptide (NP) system. The apparent clinical benefit of one ARNI, sacubitril/valsartan, as shown in clinical trials, has positioned the drug class as a first-line therapy in patients with heart failure, particularly with reduced ejection fraction. Accumulating evidence also suggests that sacubitril/valsartan is superior to conventional RAS blockers in lowering blood pressure in patients with hypertension. To decide whether to apply an ARNI to treat hypertension clinically, it is important to understand the potential properties of the drug in modulating multiple factors inside and outside the cardiovascular system beyond its effect on reducing peripheral blood pressure. In this context, ARNIs are distinct from preexisting antihypertensive medications in terms of the multiple actions of NPs in various organs and the pharmacological potential of neprilysin inhibitors to modulate multiple cardiac and noncardiac peptides. In particular, analysis of the clinical trials of sacubitril/valsartan implies that ARNIs can provide additional clinical benefits independent of their original purpose, including alleviation of glycemic control and renal impairment in patients with heart failure. Understanding the potential mechanisms of action of ARNIs will help interpret the relevance of their additional benefits beyond lowering blood pressure in hypertension. This review summarizes the comprehensive clinical evidence and relevance of ARNIs by specifically focusing on the potential properties of this new drug class in treating patients with hypertension.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Neprilysin; Receptors, Angiotensin; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Pre-heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (pre-HFpEF) is common and has no specific therapy aside from cardiovascular risk factor management.. To investigate the hypothesis that sacubitril/valsartan vs valsartan would reduce left atrial volume index using volumetric cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with pre-HFpEF.. The Personalized Prospective Comparison of ARNI [angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor] With ARB [angiotensin-receptor blocker] in Patients With Natriuretic Peptide Elevation (PARABLE) trial was a prospective, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized clinical trial carried out over 18 months between April 2015 and June 2021. The study was conducted at a single outpatient cardiology center in Dublin, Ireland. Of 1460 patients in the STOP-HF program or outpatient cardiology clinics, 461 met initial criteria and were approached for inclusion. Of these, 323 were screened and 250 asymptomatic patients 40 years and older with hypertension or diabetes, elevated B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) greater than 20 pg/mL or N-terminal pro-b-type natriuretic peptide greater than 100 pg/mL, left atrial volume index greater than 28 mL/m2, and preserved ejection fraction greater than 50% were included.. Patients were randomized to angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril/valsartan titrated to 200 mg twice daily or matching angiotensin receptor blocker valsartan titrated to 160 mg twice daily.. Maximal left atrial volume index and left ventricular end diastolic volume index, ambulatory pulse pressure, N-terminal pro-BNP, and adverse cardiovascular events.. Among the 250 participants in this study, the median (IQR) age was 72.0 (68.0-77.0) years; 154 participants (61.6%) were men and 96 (38.4%) were women. Most (n = 245 [98.0%]) had hypertension and 60 (24.0%) had type 2 diabetes. Maximal left atrial volume index was increased in patients assigned to receive sacubitril/valsartan (6.9 mL/m2; 95% CI, 0.0 to 13.7) vs valsartan (0.7 mL/m2; 95% CI, -6.3 to 7.7; P < .001) despite reduced markers of filling pressure in both groups. Changes in pulse pressure and N-terminal pro-BNP were lower in the sacubitril/valsartan group (-4.2 mm Hg; 95% CI, -7.2 to -1.21 and -17.7%; 95% CI, -36.9 to 7.4, respectively; P < .001) than the valsartan group (-1.2 mm Hg; 95% CI, -4.1 to 1.7 and 9.4%; 95% CI, -15.6 to 4.9, respectively; P < .001). Major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in 6 patients (4.9%) assigned to sacubitril/valsartan and 17 (13.3%) assigned to receive valsartan (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.89; adjusted P = .04).. In this trial of patients with pre-HFpEF, sacubitril/valsartan treatment was associated with a greater increase in left atrial volume index and improved markers of cardiovascular risk compared to valsartan. More work is needed to understand the observed increased cardiac volumes and long-term effects of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with pre-HFpEF.. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04687111.

Topics: Aged; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Heart Atria; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Neprilysin; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory; East Asian People; Essential Hypertension; Humans; Hypertension; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

To evaluate the impact of sacubitril/valsartan on blood pressure (BP), ventricular structure, and myocardial fibrosis compared with valsartan in perimenopausal hypertensive women.. This prospective, randomized, actively controlled, open-label study included 292 women with perimenopausal hypertension. They were randomly divided into two groups: sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg once daily and valsartan 160 mg once daily for 24 weeks. The relevant indicators of ambulatory BP, echocardiography, and myocardial fibrosis regulation were assessed at baseline and at 24 weeks.. The 24-h mean SBP after 24 weeks of treatment was 120.08 ± 10.47 mmHg in the sacubitril/valsartan group versus 121.00 ± 9.76 mmHg in the valsartan group ( P  = 0.457). After 24 weeks of treatment, there was no difference in central SBP between the sacubitril/valsartan and valsartan groups (117.17 ± 11.63 versus 116.38 ± 11.58, P  = 0.568). LVMI in the sacubitril/valsartan group was lower than that in the valsartan group at week 24 ( P  = 0.009). LVMI decreased by 7.23 g/m 2 from the baseline in the sacubitril/valsartan group and 3.70 g/m 2 in the valsartan group at 24 weeks ( P  = 0.000 versus 0.017). A statistically significant difference in LVMI between the two groups was observed at 24 weeks after adjusting for the baseline LVMI ( P  = 0.001). The levels of α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), connective tissue growth factor (CT-GF) and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) were reduced in the sacubitril/valsartan group compared with the baseline ( P  = 0.000, 0.005, and 0.000). LVMI between the two groups was statistically significant at 24 weeks after correcting for confounding factors 24-h mean SBP and 24-h mean DBP ( P  = 0.005). The LVMI, serum TGF-β, α-SMA, and CT-GF remained statistically significant between the two groups after further correcting the factors of age, BMI, and sex hormone levels ( P  < 0.05).. Sacubitril/valsartan could reverse ventricular remodeling more effectively than valsartan. The different effects of these two therapies on ventricular remodeling in perimenopausal hypertensive women might be because of their different effects on the down-regulation of fibrosis-related factors.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Perimenopause; Prospective Studies; Valsartan; Ventricular Remodeling

This phase III study assessed the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan compared with those of olmesartan in Japanese patients with essential hypertension. Patients (n = 1161, aged ≥20 years) with mild to moderate hypertension (mean sitting systolic blood pressure [msSBP] ≥150 to <180 mmHg) were randomized to receive sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg (n = 387), sacubitril/valsartan 400 mg (n = 385), or olmesartan 20 mg (n = 389) once daily for 8 weeks. The primary assessment was a reduction in msSBP from baseline with sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg vs. olmesartan 20 mg at Week 8. Secondary assessments included msSBP reduction with sacubitril/valsartan 400 mg vs. olmesartan at Week 8 and reductions in mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (msDBP), mean sitting pulse pressure (msPP), and overall blood pressure (BP) control rate for all treatment groups at Week 8. Sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg provided a significantly greater reduction in msSBP from baseline than olmesartan at Week 8 (between-treatment difference: -5.01 mmHg [95% confidence interval: -6.95 to -3.06 mmHg, P < 0.001 for noninferiority and superiority]). Greater reductions in msSBP with sacubitril/valsartan 400 mg vs. olmesartan, as well as in msDBP and msPP with both doses of sacubitril/valsartan vs. olmesartan (P < 0.05 for all), were also observed. Patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan achieved an overall higher BP control rate. The safety and tolerability profiles of sacubitril/valsartan were generally comparable to those of olmesartan. The adverse event rate with sacubitril/valsartan was not dose-dependent. Treatment with sacubitril/valsartan was effective and provided superior BP reduction, with a higher proportion of patients achieving target BP goals than treatment with olmesartan in Japanese patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Antihypertensive Agents; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure; Double-Blind Method; Essential Hypertension; Humans; Hypertension; Imidazoles; Japan; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan

Sacubitril valsartan and valsartan are the first new drugs approved for angiotensin receptor neprilysin lysine inhibitors (ARNIs) in outpatients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and hypertension. Compared with enalapril, sacubitril valsartan and valsartan have been shown to reduce the mortality and morbidity of cardiovascular diseases. However, there is little actual evidence regarding the efficacy of ARNIs in hypertensive patients with CHF.. From January 2019 to January 2021, 60 patients with hypertension and chronic heart failure were diagnosed and treated in our hospital. The patients were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, with 30 cases in each group. The control group was given valsartan, the observation group was given sacubitril valsartan, and both groups were treated for six months. The endothelium-dependent vasodilation (EDD) function of the brachial artery and serum nitric oxide (NO), endothelin-1 (ET-1), carotid artery intima-media thickness, and glomerular filtration, excess rate (eGFR), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were compared between the two groups of patients before and after treatment. The serum adiponectin (APN), matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels were compared before and after treatment.. The total effective rate of treatment in the research group was higher than that in the control group (. In the treatment of hypertension and chronic heart failure, sacubitril valsartan can improve the clinical symptoms of patients to the greatest extent and can significantly improve the levels of LVEF, LVEDD, NT-proBNP, heart function, and other indicators. Sacubitril valsartan can increase serum APN levels, reduce MMP-9 and BNP levels, and have good clinical effects. Sacubitril valsartan has a protective effect on the vascular endothelial function of patients with hypertension and CHF. However, these results need to be confirmed in studies involving more subjects and require longer follow-up times.

Topics: Adiponectin; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Carotid Intima-Media Thickness; Drug Combinations; Endothelium; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Matrix Metalloproteinase 9; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Stroke Volume; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

This study assessed the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in 23 hemodialysis patients with hypertension (mean age 70 years; male 69.6%) after switching from azilsartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker. Both at baseline and 3 months after the start of sacubitril/valsartan treatment, home blood pressure (BP), BP values during hemodialysis, and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level were measured. The mean dosage of azilsartan was 30 ± 10 mg/day at baseline and that of sacubitril/valsartan after 3 months of treatment was 204 ± 64 mg/day. After 3 months, significant reductions in mean morning home BP (155 ± 17/80 ± 12 to 147 ± 16/76 ± 11 mmHg), mean nighttime home systolic BP (153 ± 19 to 144 ± 16 mmHg), and median (IQRs) NT-proBNP level [8124 (2620-13 394) to 6271 (1570-9591) pg/mL] were observed (all P < .05), whereas BP values during hemodialysis did not change significantly. In hemodialysis patients, except for hypotension, sacubitril/valsartan was generally well tolerated, effectively controlled out-of-office BP, and improved NT-proBNP.

Topics: Aged; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

There is little information on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of sacubitril/valsartan (SV) in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD) complicated with hypertension or heart failure (HF). This study was designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of SV in PD patients with complications of hypertension or HF.. This was an open-label and cross-sectional study investigating PD patients diagnosed with hypertension or New York Heart Association Class II-IV HF. The concentrations of valsartan, sacubitril and sacubitrilat (LBQ657) were measured by ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry in plasma, urine and peritoneal dialysate samples. Pharmacodynamics were evaluated by comparing changes in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (msSBP), mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (msDBP), mean sitting heart rate, N-terminal-pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).. Forty patients with PD were enrolled including 27 (67.5%) patients with hypertension, 4 (10%) patients with HF and 9 (22.5%) patients with both hypertension and HF. This study included three treatment cohorts: 50 mg twice daily (BID), 100 mg once daily and 100 mg BID. The plasma maximum drug concentrations in the 100 mg BID group were 1995 ± 1499 ng/mL for valsartan, 171 ± 148 ng/mL for sacubitril and 13 686 ± 7418 ng/mL for LBQ657. The 24-h recovery rate of LBQ657 was 3.77% in urine and 2.23% in peritoneal dialysate. After taking SV, msSBP and msDBP decreased by 19.25 ± 10.32 mmHg and 10.10 ± 8.00 mmHg from baseline, respectively. NT-proBNP decreased by 1436.50 (0.00-18 198.00) from baseline, while LVEF increased by 5.00 (-0.25 to 9.25) from baseline after SV treatment.. PD and residual renal function contributed only to a minor degree to the elimination of LBQ657. Additionally, a dose of 100 mg BID SV is safe and effective in patients with PD with complications of hypertension or HF.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dialysis Solutions; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Peritoneal Dialysis; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

This study evaluated the effect of sacubtril/valsartan on cardiac remodeling, molecular and cellular adaptations in experimental (rat) model of hypertension-induced hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Thirty Wistar Kyoto rats, 10 healthy (control) and 20 rats with confirmed hypertension-induced hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HpCM), were used for this study. The HpCM group was further subdivided into untreated and sacubitril/valsartan-treated groups. Myocardial structure and function were assessed using echocardiography, Langendorff's isolated heart experiment, blood sampling and qualitative polymerase chain reaction. Echocardiographic examinations revealed protective effects of sacubitril/valsartan by improving left ventricular internal diameter in systole and diastole and fractional shortening. Additionally, sacubitril/valsartan treatment decreased systolic and diastolic blood pressures in comparison with untreated hypertensive rats. Moreover, sacubitril/valsartan treatment reduced oxidative stress and apoptosis (reduced expression of Bax and Cas9 genes) compared to untreated rats. There was a regular histomorphology of cardiomyocytes, interstitium, and blood vessels in treated rats compared to untreated HpCM rats which expressed hypertrophic cardiomyocytes, with polymorphic nuclei, prominent nucleoli and moderately dilated interstitium. In experimental model of hypertension-induced hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, sacubitril/valsartan treatment led to improved cardiac structure, haemodynamic performance, and reduced oxidative stress and apoptosis. Sacubitril/valsartan thus presents as a potential therapeutic strategy resulted in hypertension-induced hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Topics: Animals; Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic; Hypertension; Models, Theoretical; Myocytes, Cardiac; Rats; Rats, Inbred WKY; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Sacubitril/valsartan, a novel therapy in chronic heart failure (CHF), inhibits the breakdown of various peptides. However, whether or not sacubitril/valsartan administration affects urinary C-peptide levels is unclear. We herein report a 70-year-old man with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hypertension coexisting with CHF and nephrotic syndrome. The patient's urinary C-peptide levels dramatically increased after sacubitril/valsartan administration and decreased after discontinuation of the drug. Furthermore, sacubitril/valsartan administration to five other patients with hypertension and T2DM markedly increased urinary C-peptide levels. Thus, the insulin secretory capacity of patients with T2DM receiving sacubitril/valsartan may be overestimated when their urinary C-peptide level is measured.

Topics: Aged; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; C-Peptide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val, LCZ696), the world's first angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi), has been widely used in the treatment of heart failure. However, the use of Sac/Val in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF), especially AF with hypertension, has been less reported. We investigated the effect of Sac/Val on atrial remodeling and hypertension-related AF.. The AF induction rate and electrophysiological characteristics of spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) treated with Sac/Val or Val were detected by rapid atrial pacing and electrical mapping/optical mapping. The whole-cell patch-clamp and Western blot were used to observe electrical/structural remodeling of atrial myocytes/tissue of rats and atrium-derived HL-1 cells cultured under 40 mmHg in vitro.. Sac/Val can improve atrial structural and electrical remodeling induced by hypertension and reduce the AF susceptibility by inhibiting RAS and NEP. The above effects of Sac/Val were superior to Val alone.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensins; Animals; Antihypertensive Agents; Atrial Fibrillation; Atrial Remodeling; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Hypertension; Neprilysin; Rats; Rats, Inbred SHR; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of nifedipine controlled-release tablets combined with sacubitril valsartan in diabetic nephropathy (DN) patients with hypertension. One hundred and twelve DN patients with hypertension were enrolled. They were randomly divided into the control group (treated with nifedipine controlled-release tablets combined with valsartan) and the observation group (treated with nifedipine controlled-release tablets combined with sacubitril valsartan). Renal function, endothelial function and inflammatory response were examined. After three-months treatment, the levels of clinical indexes (glycosylated hemoglobin, fasting blood glucose, systolic and diastolic blood pressure), renal function indicators (urinary albumin excretion rate, blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine and cystatin C), endothelial function indicators (microalbumin, angiotensin II, thrombomodulin and cartilage oligomeric matrix protein) and inflammatory response factors (interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α) in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group. Nifedipine controlled-release tablets combined with sacubitril valsartan could effectively alleviate the progression of DN combined with hypertension.

Topics: Biphenyl Compounds; Delayed-Action Preparations; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetic Nephropathies; Drug Combinations; Humans; Hypertension; Nifedipine; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Heart failure (HF) is a significant event for public health. It has a prevalence between 1-2%, mortality rate between 7-17%, and hospitalization between 32-44%. This implies a risk to health and quality of life, but also great financial efforts for health systems. Sacubitril/valsartan is a medication recognized for its efficacy, and this consensus seeks to synthesize the available information regarding its use for the benefit of patients. This document consists of a description of the epidemiology of HF, pharmacology of the drug, clinical trials, use of the drug in cases with reduced ejection fraction, mildly reduced ejection fraction and preserved ejection fraction, available literature on HF guidelines, recommendations and conclusions.. La insuficiencia cardiaca (IC) es un evento significativo para la salud pública. Tiene una prevalencia entre el 1 y 2%, tasa de mortalidad entre el 7 y 17% y de hospitalización entre el 32 y 44%. Esto implica un riesgo a la salud y calidad de vida, pero también grandes esfuerzos financieros para los sistemas de salud. El sacubitrilo/valsartán es un medicamento reconocido por su eficacia, y este consenso busca sintetizar la información disponible respecto a su uso en búsqueda del beneficio de los pacientes. El presente documento se compone de una descripción de la epidemiología de la IC, farmacología del medicamento, estudios clínicos sobre este, uso del medicamento en casos con fracción de eyección reducida, fracción de eyección ligeramente reducida y fracción de eyección preservada, literatura disponible en guías de IC, recomendaciones y conclusiones.

Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Cardiology; Consensus; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Quality of Life; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; United States; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Growing evidences have confirmed the effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan (SV) on antihypertension and cardiac protection in general population. However, there was no prospective study about the effect and safety of SV on resistant hypertension and myocardial work in hemodialysis patients. In this single-center, prospective, before-after study, enrolled patients were endured with resistant hypertension for more than 6 months. Participants were initially instructed to take SV 50 mg twice daily, and the dosage was gradually increased up to 100 mg twice daily. The primary outcomes were blood pressure (BP) control, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), myocardial work (MW), fatigue and life quality. In addition, the adverse events were also recorded in this cohort. A total of 18 patients (34-64 years old) was finally enrolled and completed in this study. The SV-based regimen provided significantly mean sitting systolic BP (msSBP) and mean sitting diastolic BP (msDBP) reductions from baseline (-20.7/-8.3 mm Hg), respectively. The cardiac remodeling parameters were partially improved. Compared to the baseline, NT-proBNP was significantly reduced at week 4 (8119.50 [3710.75, 29300] pg/ml to 7216.50 [4124.75, 17455.00] pg/ml, p = .046), which was much lower at week 12 (3130.50 [2244.50, 9565.70] pg/ml, p = .037). Global MW index was higher at week 12 compared to the baseline (p = .026). MW efficiency was also improved accordingly compared to the baseline, even though the statistical difference was not significant (p = .226). Life quality and fatigue were improved at week 12 compared to the baseline (all p = .000). There was no serious adverse events were observed. SV safely and effectively controlled resistant hypertension and improved MW as well as life quality in hemodialysis patients.

Topics: Adult; Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Fatigue; Heart; Humans; Hypertension; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Renal Dialysis; Valsartan

Sacubitril/valsartan, simultaneously inhibits neprilysin and angiotensin II receptor, showed an effect in reducing blood pressure (BP). The authors aimed to study whether it can be used as an antihypertensive agent in patients with refractory hypertension who have already been treated. A total of 66 Chinese patients with refractory hypertension were enrolled. Patients received sacubitril/valsartan  200 instead of angiotensin II receptor blocker or angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor while other agents continued. If BP was uncontrolled after 4 weeks, sacubitril/valsartan was increased to 400 mg. The BP reduction was evaluated by office BP and ambulatory BP monitoring after 8-week treatment. The baseline office BP and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were 150.0/95.0 mmHg and 113.3 mmHg. BP and MAP reduced to 130.6/83.2 mmHg and 99.0 mmHg at week 8. Office BP and MAP reductions were 19.4/11.8 mmHg and 14.3 mmHg at endpoint (all p < .001). The 24-h, daytime and nighttime ambulatory BP were 146.2/89.1, 148.1/90.3, and 137.5/83.7 mmHg, respectively at baseline, and BP reduced to 129.6/79.8, 130.6/81.1, and 121.7/75.8 mmHg, respectively at week 8. The 24-h, daytime and nighttime ambulatory BP reductions were 16.6/9.3, 17.5/9.2, and 15.8/7.9 mmHg, respectively at endpoint (all p < .001). Sacubitril/valsartan significantly reduced office and ambulatory BP in refractory hypertension patients. Our study provided new evidence for sacubitril/valsartan in refractory hypertension.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Humans; Hypertension; Neprilysin; Receptors, Angiotensin; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Female sexual dysfunction is common in hypertension. The effects of sacubitril/valsartan (SAC/VAL) as a potential therapy for hypertension and heart failure have not been studied in relation to sexual function and genital fibrosis in female spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs). Thirty female SHRs were administered VAL, SAC/VAL, or saline. Ten normotensive female Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats were included in the control group. We assessed estrous cyclicity and sexual behavior in the female rats. In addition, the morphology of clitoral and vaginal tissues was evaluated by histological analyses. Western blotting and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays were used to assess the levels of fibrotic markers in vaginal and clitoral tissues. Furthermore, the protein levels of phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted from chromosome 10 (PTEN), phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K), and AKT expression were measured by Western blotting. SAC/VAL treatment improved hypertension-induced sexual dysfunction, exhibited as a prolonged estrus phase, increased receptivity and proceptive events, and decreased aggressive events, compared with those of VAL treatment and control SHRs without treatments. In addition, SAC/VAL-treated SHRs had lower levels of fibrotic markers, estradiol, and estrogen receptor α/β than the levels of VAL-treated SHRs or SHRs without treatment. Moreover, SAC/VAL decreased p-PTEN expression and increased p-PI3K and p-AKT expression at the protein level compared with those in VAL treatment alone. VAL and SAC/VAL treatments have significantly increased sexual receptivity and proceptivity, decreased aggressiveness, and improved the fibrosis of vaginal and clitoral tissues in female SHRs. However, SAC/VAL treatment shows more effective results compared with VAL treatment, which may be related to the PTEN/PI3K/AKT pathway.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Fibrosis; Hypertension; Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt; Rats; Rats, Inbred SHR; Rats, Inbred WKY; Valsartan

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Hypertension (HP) is associated with heart failure (HF). Sacubitril/valsartan (sac/val) has been approved for primary HP by China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA) in June 2021. The present study aimed to provide evidence on the effectiveness and safety of sac/val in Chinese patients complicated with HP and HF.. This retrospective study was conducted on adult patients diagnosed with HP and HF and treated with sac/val between July 2020 and December 2020. The potential risk factors for the discontinuation events caused by sac/val-related adverse events (AEs) were explored. The data, including blood pressure (BP), cardiac indicators, corresponding values on echocardiographic parameters, unplanned visits, and AEs throughout 3-12 months, were collected.. A total of 446 eligible patients were included in this study. The discontinuation events of sac/val were mainly attributed to its AEs (hypotension, hyperkalemia, and deterioration in kidney function). Univariate analysis revealed that history of chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, higher values of serum creatinine, serum uric acid, serum N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide, and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate were potential risk factors for discontinuation. Patients who maintained sac/val therapy throughout 3-12 months showed significantly improved values of clinical BP, cardiac indicators, and echocardiographic parameters compared to those at baseline (p < 0.0001).. Sac/val was effective on BP and improved cardiac function in patients complicated with HP and HF. The physicians should focus on patients with renal dysfunction to take timely precautions to improve tolerability for sac/val.

Topics: Adult; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Creatinine; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Retrospective Studies; Tetrazoles; Uric Acid; Valsartan

Hypertension is common in patients with heart failure (HF), but less is known about resistant hypertension.. This study sought to investigate apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH) in patients with HF in the SwedeHF (Swedish Heart Failure Registry), across the spectrum of HF phenotypes (heart failure with reduced ejection fraction [HFrEF], heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction [HFmrEF], and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction [HFpEF]).. aTRH was defined as systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg (≥135 mm Hg in diabetes) despite treatment with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, angiotensin receptor blocker, or sacubitril-valsartan, as well as a calcium-channel blocker and a diuretic; non-treatment-resistant hypertension (TRH) was defined as systolic blood pressure above these thresholds but not on the 3-drug combination; and normal blood pressure was defined as under these thresholds. In each left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) category, patient factors associated with aTRH and non-TRH and outcomes (HF hospitalization and cardiovascular death composite, its components, and all-cause death) according to hypertension category were examined.. Among 46,597 patients, aTRH was present in 2,693 (10%), 1,514 (14%), and 1,450 (17%) patients with HFrEF, HFmrEF, and HFpEF, respectively. Older age, obesity, diabetes, and kidney disease were associated with a greater likelihood of aTRH and non-TRH (vs normal blood pressure). Associations were generally similar irrespective of LVEF category. Compared with normal blood pressure, aTRH was associated with a lower adjusted risk of the composite outcome in HFrEF and HFmrEF (HR: 0.79 [95% CI: 0.74-0.85] and HR: 0.86 [95% CI: 0.77-0.96]) but not in HFpEF (HR: 0.93 [95% CI: 0.84-1.04]).. aTRH was most common in HFpEF and least common in HFrEF. Associated patient characteristics were similar irrespective of LVEF category. aTRH (vs normal blood pressure) was associated with a lower risk of first HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death in HFrEF and HFmrEF but not in HFpEF.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Phenotype; Prognosis; Registries; Stroke Volume; Sweden; Ventricular Function, Left

Cancer patients are at an increased risk of cardiovascular events. Both old-generation cytostatics/cytotoxics and new-generation "targeted" drugs can in fact damage cardiomyocytes, endothelial cells of veins and arteries, specialized cells of the conduction system, pericardium, and valves. A new discipline, cardio-oncology, has therefore developed with the aim of protecting cancer patients from cardiovascular events, while also providing them with the best possible oncologic treatment. Anthracyclines have long been known to elicit cardiotoxicity that, depending on treatment- or patient-related factors, may progress with a variable velocity toward cardiomyopathy and systolic heart failure. However, early compromise of diastolic function may precede systolic dysfunction, and a progression of early diastolic dysfunction to diastolic rather than systolic heart failure has been documented in long-term cancer survivors. This chapter first describes general notions about hypertension in the cancer patient and then moves on reviewing the pathophysiology and clinical trajectories of diastolic dysfunction, and the molecular mechanisms of anthracycline-induced diastolic dysfunction. Diastolic dysfunction can in fact be caused and/or aggravated by hypertension. Pharmacologic foundations and therapeutic opportunities to prevent or treat diastolic dysfunction before it progresses toward heart failure are also reviewed, with a special emphasis on the mechanisms of action of drugs that raised hopes to treat diastolic dysfunction in the general population (sacubitril/valsartan, guanylyl cyclase activators, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, ranolazine, inhibitors of type-2 sodium-glucose-inked transporter). Cardio-oncologists will be confronted with the risk:benefit ratio of using these drugs in the cancer patient.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Anthracyclines; Antineoplastic Agents; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiomyopathies; Endothelial Cells; Heart Failure, Systolic; Humans; Hypertension; Neoplasms

Metabolic syndrome is a disease the World Health Organization has called a new pandemic of the 21st century. Arterial hypertension is one of the criteria for this diagnosis and a determinant of damage to major target organs. The present clinical case demonstrates an experience of treatment of arterial hypertension associated with metabolic syndrome with a valsartan/sacubitril molecular complex.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Metabolic Syndrome; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Sacubitril/Valsartan, a dual inhibitor of the neprilysin and angiotensin receptor, exerts cardioprotective effects in heart failure. Little is known on the impact of Sacubitril/Valsartan in hypertensive patients early post myocardial infarction.. Spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) were pretreated by daily angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB; 30 mg/kg intraperitoneally), Sacubitril/Valsartan (ARNI; 60 mg/kg intraperitoneally) or the same dosage of physiological saline for 1 week. Then each group underwent myocardial infarction induction and received the same treatment for another week. The blood pressure and cardiac function were evaluated prior to sacrifice. We performed histological and molecular evaluation of fibrosis in vivo and in vitro.. The blood pressure was comparable between three groups both 1 week prior to and post myocardial infarction. ARNI and ARB restore the decreased ejection fraction (57.3 ± 7.6 vs. 42.9 ± 5.2%, P < 0.05; 54.3 ± 6.9 vs. 42.9 ± 5.2%, P < 0.01, respectively) and fractional shortening (31.6 ± 5.4 vs. 22.1 ± 3.1%, P < 0.05; 29.4 ± 4.5 vs. 22.1 ± 3.1%, P < 0.05, respectively) post myocardial infarction. The infarct size and collagen deposition were also significantly mitigated in ARNI and ARB groups. In addition, ARNI and ARB treatment reduced the expression of cardiac remodeling-related factors, such as Bnp, α-SMA, Vimentin, and Col1a1 (all P < 0.05 vs. MI group). Finally, ARNI and ARB decreased the expression of α-SMA in cardiac fibroblasts treated with Ang II.. In conclusion, pretreatment with ARNI maintained cardiac function and reduced myocardial fibrosis in myocardial infarction, probably prior to any anti-hypertensive effect.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Fibrosis; Heart Failure; Hypertension; Myocardial Infarction; Rats; Rats, Inbred SHR; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Even a slight increase in plasma N-terminal-pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro BNP) levels is associated with an incremental cardiovascular risk in a healthy cohort. Sacubitril/valsartan has recently been reimbursed in Japan for hypertension. Its impact on reducing plasma NT-pro BNP levels in hypertensive patients remains unknown.. Patients who received 3-month sacubitril/valsartan treatment for their hypertension were retrospectively included. Changes in plasma NT-pro BNP levels during 3-month sacubitril/valsartan therapy (on-treatment period) were compared with those during pre-treatment 3-month period without sacubitril/valsartan (pre-treatment period).. A total of 33 hypertensive patients {73 [64, 77] years old and systolic blood pressure 138 [134, 149] mmHg on median} were included. During a pre-treatment period, systolic blood pressure tended to decrease (P=0.091) whereas plasma NT-pro BNP levels remained unchanged {from 204 [132, 412] to 207 [107, 386] pg/mL, P=0.84}. During on-treatment period, both systolic pressure and plasma NT-pro BNP levels decreased significantly {P<0.001 and P=0.001, respectively, from 207 [107, 386] to 119 [64, 355] pg/mL in NT-pro BNP}. The amount of changes in plasma NT-pro BNP levels during on-treatment period was significantly higher than those during pre-treatment period {-51 [-158, -17] versus -12 [-28, 33] mmHg, P=0.001}.. Plasma NT-pro BNP levels decreased significantly following 3-month sacubitril/valsartan therapy. Its clinical implication requires further long-term studies.

Topics: Aged; Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Retrospective Studies; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring; Humans; Hypertension; Neprilysin; Pyrimidines; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Salt-sensitive (SS) hypertension is accompanied with severe cardiorenal complications. In this condition, elevated blood pressure (BP) resulting from salt retention is associated with counterintuitively lower levels of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP). In plasma, ANP is degraded by the neprilysin; therefore, pharmacological inhibition of this metalloprotease (i.e., with sacubitril) can be employed to increase ANP level. We have shown earlier that sacubitril in combination with valsartan (75 μg/day each) had beneficial effects on renal function in Dahl SS rats. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effects of a higher dose of sacubitril on renal damage in this model. To induce hypertension, male Dahl SS rats were fed a 4% NaCl diet (HS) for 21 days, and were administered sacubitril (125 μg/day) or vehicle

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Animals; Atrial Natriuretic Factor; Biphenyl Compounds; Disease Models, Animal; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Hypertension; Kidney Glomerulus; Male; Neprilysin; Rats; Rats, Inbred Dahl; Renal Insufficiency

[Figure: see text].

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Antihypertensive Agents; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Hypertension; Lisinopril; Liver; Mice; Mice, Transgenic; Neprilysin; Pyridines; Renin; Thiazepines