sacubitril and Heart-Failure

To summarize cost-effectiveness (CE) evidence of sacubitril/valsartan for the treatment of heart failure (HF) patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The impact of different modeling approaches and parameters on the CE results is also described.. We included 44 CE models [39 from 37 publications (22 full-texts; 15 conference-abstracts) and 5 HTAs; Europe, n = 20; North and South Americas, n = 14; Asia and Australia, n = 10]. Most models adopted a Markov structure with constant transition probabilities of events (n = 27) or a mix of Markov and regression-based models (n = 16), with variations in structural assumptions and chosen parameters. Study authors concluded sacubitril/valsartan to be a cost-effective therapy in 37/41 models in chronic HFrEF patients and 2/3 models in hospitalized patients stabilized after an acute decompensation for HF. CE models showing sacubitril/valsartan not to be a cost-effective treatment generally modeled a shorter time horizon. Effect of sacubitril/valsartan on cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, cost, duration of effect and time horizon was the main model drivers.. Most evidence indicated sacubitril/valsartan is cost-effective in HFrEF. The use of a lifetime horizon is recommended in future models as HF is a chronic disease. Data on the CE of sacubitril/valsartan in the inpatient setting were limited and further research is warranted.

Topics: Cost-Benefit Analysis; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Data on the effects of sacubitril/valsartan compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEI/ARB) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are limited.. To evaluate the comparative effects between sacubitril/valsartan and ACEI/ARB on HRQoL, a systematic review and meta-analysis were performed.. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to March 2, 2022 for randomized controlled trials that compared the HRQoL scores, including Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ), or Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form Health Survey 12 or 36 (SF-12/36), between sacubitril/valsartan and ACEI/ARB. After screening, studies that met the inclusion criteria were eventually included and analyzed.. A total of 8 studies with 17 390 patients (8693 patients used sacubitril/valsartan, and 8697 patients used ACEI/ARB) were included in this study. Five of these studies used KCCQ, 1 used SF-12/36, 1 used MLHFQ, and 1 used both KCCQ and SF-12/36. The KCCQ overall summary score and its subscales were significantly higher in sacubitril/valsartan compared with ACEI/ARB in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction, but were similar in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction. Sacubitril/valsartan conferred similar HRQoL scores in MLHFQ and SF-12/36 to ACEI/ARB. The most frequently reported adverse event for sacubitril/valsartan is hypotension and the risk is higher than for ACEI/ARB.. Sacubitril/valsartan may have the potential to improve HRQoL in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction compared with ACEI/ARB. Hypotension is the most common adverse event with sacubitril/valsartan compared with ACEI/ARB. The results of this study may contribute to the rational use of sacubitril/valsartan.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypotension; Quality of Life; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

The impact of sacubitril-valsartan on heart failure (HF) patients with preserved ejection fractions (HFpEF) is uncertain. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to explore the clinical advantages and safety of sacubitril-valsartan in patients with HFpEF.. PubMed and Web of Science were searched without any restrictions from inception to 8 May 2022 to identify valuable articles. The studies that met the inclusion criteria were analyzed.. Four trials, with a total of 7008 patients were included. Compared with valsartan, sacubitril-valsartan significantly reduced the rate of HF decompensation and of the combined end point of HF decompensation and all-cause mortality. All-cause mortality, New York Heart Association class improvement and rate of hyperkalemia were not significantly different between the two groups. Regarding safety, sacubitril-valsartan was more likely to increase the risk of hypotension.. This meta-analysis suggests that sacubitril-valsartan may be an effective strategy to reduce HF decompensation events in patients with HFpEF.Systematic Review registration: CRD42022336077.

Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Controversy has persisted over the clinical benefits of low-dose sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure (HF).. Low-dose sacubitril/valsartan might also be effective and safe in HF patients.. Electronic databases including PubMed, Ovid, and Cochrane Library were systematically retrieved from inception to August 5, 2021. Review manager 5.4 and Stata 15.1 were employed in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Key efficacy outcomes of interest included HF hospitalization, all-cause mortality, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), together with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class. The safety outcome was systolic blood pressure (SBP). The grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation approach was conducted to evaluate the quality of evidence for each outcome.. A total of 1269 studies were screened and 9 real-world studies met the inclusion criteria were included in the meta-analysis, with 1697 participants. Compared with low-dose sacubitril/valsartan, high-dose sacubitril/valsartan significantly reduced the risk of HF hospitalization (odds ratio [OR]: 0.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.27-0.61, p < .0001) and the risk of all-cause mortality (OR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.11-0.47, p < .0001). However, there were no appreciable differences in improvements of NYHA (OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.15-2.35, p = .45), changes of LVEF (mean difference [MD]: 2.73%, 95% CI: -2.24% to 7.7%, p = .28), changes of NT-proBNP (MD: 43.09, 95% CI: -28.41 to 114.59, p = .24) and changes of SBP (MD: 3.01, 95% CI: -4.62 to 10.64, p = .44) between groups with low-dose and high-dose sacubitril/valsartan.. Compared with high-dose sacubitril/valsartan, low-dose sacubitril/valsartan was associated with increased risks of HF hospitalization and all-cause mortality. However, no distinct between-group differences in improvements of NYHA, changes of LVEF, changes of NT-proBNP and changes of SBP were observed.

Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

Sacubitril/valsartan reduces all-cause mortality in heart failure (HF) patients compared to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs). ACEIs/ARBs have been shown to decrease the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF). We hypothesized sacubitril-valsartan decreases the incidence of AF compared to ACEis/ARBs.. Clinicaltrials.gov was searched for trials by terms sacubitril/valsartan, entresto, sacubitril, valsartan. Randomized controlled human trials of sacubitril/valsartan reporting AF were included. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers. Data was pooled using a random effect model. Publication bias was evaluated by funnel plots.. A total of 11 trials including 11,458 patients on sacubitril/valsartan and 10,128 patients on ACEI/ARBs were identified. A total of 284 AF events were reported in the sacubitril/valsartan group compared to 256 AF events in ACEIs/ARBs. Patients on sacubitril/valsartan were as likely as patients on ACEIs/ARBs to develop AF (pooled odds ratio [OR] = 1.091, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.917-1.298, p = .324). Six atrial flutter (AFl) events were reported in six trials; 48 out of 9165 patients in the sacubitril/valsartan group developed AFl compared to 46 out of 8759 in ACEi/ARBs group. There was no difference in AFl risk between the two groups (pooled OR = 1.028, 95% CI = 0.681-1.553, p = .894). Finally, sacubitril/valsartan did not reduce the risk of atrial arrhythmias (AF + AFl) compared to ACEi/ARBs (pooled OR = 1.081, 95% CI = 0.922-1.269, p = .337).. Although sacubitril/valsartan reduces mortality compared to ACEIs/ARBs in HF patients, they do not reduce AF risk compared to these drugs.

Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Atrial Fibrillation; Heart Failure; Humans; Incidence; Valsartan

Sacubitril/valsartan (Entresto) is the first drug approved for the treatment of symptomatic chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in adult patients. There have been no reports of hepatotoxicity secondary to sacubitril/valsartan administration. Here, we report the first case of severe liver injury caused by sacubitril/valsartan.. A 90-year-old female patient taking sacubitril/valsartan was admitted due to chronic heart failure. Subsequently, the patient developed serious liver injury with increased hepatic transaminases.. Drug-induced liver injury, sacubitril/valsartan-related. No liver injury caused by other reasons was observed after thorough examination. After the withdrawal of sacubitril/valsartan, the liver function of the patient gradually returned to normal.. We chose general liver protection methods to improve her hepatic function, including magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate at 100 mg daily and polyene phosphatidylcholine capsules at 456 mg 3 times daily. We consulted with a hepatologist to discuss the best plan for her treatment. The last, we stopped sacubitril/valsartan.. After the withdrawal of sacubitril/valsartan, the liver function of the patient gradually returned to normal.. Sacubitril/valsartan-induced liver injury is very rare. Clinicians should pay particular attention to the possibility of hepatotoxicity during sacubitril/valsartan treatment.

Topics: Adult; Aged, 80 and over; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury, Chronic; Drug Combinations; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan

Heart Failure (HF) is among the major causes of global morbidity as well as mortality. Increased prevalence, frequent and prolonged hospitalization, rehospitalization, long-term consumption of healthcare resources, absenteeism, and death upsurge the economic burden linked to HF. For decades, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEIs), Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers (ARBs), Beta-Blockers (BBs), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), have remained the mainstay of the standard of care for HF management. Despite their proven efficacy and cost-effectiveness, HF remains a global pandemic and is still increasing in prevalence. Sacubitril/ Valsartan (SAC/VAL) is an Angiotensin Receptor/Neprilysin Inhibitor (ARNI) that proved out to be a game-changer drug in HF treatment. Recent data indicated that SAC/VAL is more efficient and can improve the overall quality of life of HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) with fewer side effects. It is now incorporated in the guidelines as an alternative to ACEIs or ARBs to lower morbidity in addition to mortality in HFrEF patients. This review article will discuss the current guidelines-approved indications and highlight the potential emerging indications, in addition to the currently ongoing clinical trials that will expand the use of SAC/VAL.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Humans; Quality of Life; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan

The prevalence and mortality of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are high in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, there is still a lack of recommendations for the medication therapy of these patients in the guideline so far.. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all the studies assessing medication therapy for patients with CKD and HFpEF by July 21, 2021. Pooled analysis was performed using a random-effect model and the quality assessment was performed. In our research, we followed to the Preferred Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO.. We finally identified six studies, three of which were randomized controlled trials and the others were retrospective cohort studies. The results of meta-analysis including three retrospective cohort studies showed that renin-angiotensin system inhibitors had significantly reduced all-cause mortality by 14% (3 studies, 3816 patients, HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.79-0.95; I. For patients with CKD and HFpEF, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors is associated with significant benefits in all-cause mortality and all-cause hospitalization but has no significant effect on hospitalization for heart failure. The subgroup analysis of one RCT study focused on ARNI showed that although long-term treatment with sacubitril-valsartan may reduce the risk of hospitalization for heart failure and cardiovascular death, more studies are needed to confirm that.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Retrospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Valsartan

Heart failure (HF) represents a major global health and economic burden with still unacceptably high morbidity and mortality rates. In recent decades, novel therapeutic opportunities with a significant impact on HF outcomes have been introduced in addition to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, β-blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. These include drugs such as ivabradine, sacubitril-valsartan, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors. The availability of an extremely large pharmacological armamentarium to face this chronic global disease highlights the importance of assessing cost effectiveness to promote sustainable healthcare. In light of the recent approval of SGLT-2 inhibitors for the treatment of HF with reduced ejection fraction, including in individuals without type 2 diabetes mellitus, the aim of this review was to provide an updated comparative evaluation of the efficacy and cost effectiveness of different pharmacological treatments for the prevention (stage A) and treatment of asymptomatic (stage B) and symptomatic (stages C-D) left ventricular dysfunction.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Biphenyl Compounds; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

In recent trials, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors proved effective as treatment for heart failure. However, the relative efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan against SGLT2 inhibitor in patients with heart failure remains unknown. Hence, we performed a network meta-analysis to compare the effects of sacubitril/valsartan against SGLT2 inhibitors on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart failure.. Four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, SCOPUS) were searched for randomised-controlled trials (RCTs) published from 1st January 2000 to 25th September 2021. Two additional systematic reviews were conducted for RCTs of enalapril and valsartan to establish a common comparator arm. Frequentist network meta-analysis models were utilised to summarise the studies.. Twenty-five RCTs were included, comprising a combined cohort of 47,275 patients. Network meta-analysis demonstrated that compared to SGLT2 inhibitors, sacubitril/valsartan achieved a larger hazard rate reduction in the composite of heart failure hospitalisation and cardiovascular death (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.86; 95% CI 0.75-0.98), cardiovascular death (HR: 0.78; 95% CI 0.65-0.94), and a larger mean change in systolic blood pressure at 8 or more months (weighted mean difference [WMD]: - 7.08 mmHg; 95% CI - 8.28 to - 5.89). There were no significant differences in treatment effects across heart failure hospitalisation, all-cause mortality, diastolic blood pressure at 12 weeks, and systolic blood pressure at 2-4 months. In patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, sacubitril/valsartan achieved a 20% hazard rate reduction for cardiovascular death compared to SGLT2 inhibitors.. In patients with heart failure, sacubitril/valsartan was demonstrated to be superior to SGLT2 inhibitors in the treatment effect for the composite of heart failure hospitalisation and cardiovascular death, cardiovascular death, and long-term blood pressure.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Glucose; Heart Failure; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Sodium; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Besides the well-recognized risk factors, novel conditions increasing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are emerging. Undesirable emotions and behavior such as anxiety and depression, appear to participate in worsening cardiovascular pathologies. On the other hand, deteriorating conditions of the heart and vasculature result in disturbed mental and emotional health. The pathophysiological background of this bidirectional interplay could reside in an inappropriate activation of vegetative neurohormonal and other humoral systems in both cardiovascular and psychological disturbances. This results in circulus vitiosus potentiating mental and circulatory disorders. Thus, it appears to be of utmost importance to examine the alteration of emotions, cognition, and behavior in cardiovascular patients. In terms of this consideration, recognizing the potential of principal cardiovascular drugs to interact with the mental state in patients with heart or vasculature disturbances is unavoidable, to optimize their therapeutic benefit. In general, beta-blockers, central sympatholytics, ACE inhibitors, ARBs, aldosterone receptor blockers, sacubitril/valsartan, and fibrates are considered to exert anxiolytic effect in animal experiments and clinical settings. Statins and some beta-blockers appear to have an equivocal impact on mood and anxiety and ivabradine expressed neutral psychological impact. It seems reasonable to suppose that the knowledge of a patient's mood, cognition, and behavior, along with applying careful consideration of the choice of the particular cardiovascular drug and respecting its potential psychological benefit or harm might improve the individualized approach to the treatment of cardiovascular disorders.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Anxiety; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Humans

This study assessed changes in B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) treated with sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) according to standard prescribing information.. Through inhibition of neprilysin, Sac/Val may increase BNP concentrations.. In an individual patient analysis from the EVALUATE-HF (Study of Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan vs. Enalapril on Aortic Stiffness in Patients With Mild to Moderate HF With Reduced Ejection Fraction) (n = 221) and the PROVE-HF (Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan Therapy on Biomarkers, Myocardial Remodeling and Outcomes) (n = 146) studies, we examined changes in BNP, N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP), and urinary cyclic guanosine monophosphate (ucGMP) from baseline to week 4 and week 12.. Median (IQRs) concentration of BNP at baseline, week 4, and week 12 were 145 [IQR: 55-329], 136 [IQR: 50-338], and 135 [IQR: 51-299] ng/L, respectively. There was no significant change from baseline to week 4 (0% [-30% to +41%]; P = 0.36) or week 12 (+1% [-36% to +50%]; P = 0.97). By week 12, one-half of the study participants had a BNP decline. There was no association between Sac/Val dose and BNP changes. Change in BNP was directly associated with change in NT-proBNP (rho: = 0.81; P < 0.001), which decreased by -30% (-50% to -8%) and -32% (-54% to -1%) to weeks 4 and 12 (P < 0.001 for both). In contrast, change in BNP was only weakly associated with change in ucGMP (rho: = 0.19; P < 0.001). Increases in ucGMP were observed regardless of whether BNP was decreased (+11% [-34% to +115%]), unchanged (+34% [-15% to +205%]), or increased (+57% [-12% to +14%]).. In this pooled analysis of patients with HFrEF with standard indications for Sac/Val treatment, there was no significant overall increase in BNP concentrations, and patients demonstrated increase in ucGMP regardless of the trajectory of BNP change. (Study of Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan vs. Enalapril on Aortic Stiffness in Patients With Mild to Moderate HF With Reduced Ejection Fraction [EVALUATE-HF]; NCT02874794) (Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan Therapy on Biomarkers, Myocardial Remodeling and Outcomes [PROVE-HF]; NCT02887183).

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Diuretics; Drug Combinations; Enalapril; Heart Failure; Humans; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Vasodilator Agents

Heart failure is associated with notable morbidity and mortality, and therefore, novel therapies are needed. This minireview focused on the effects and mechanisms of action of sacubitril/valsartan, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and vericiguat in heart failure patients. A systematic review of the current literature was conducted. Seventeen randomised clinical trials regarding the effects of these drug classes were included. The mechanism of action of each treatment could improve pathophysiological imbalances present in heart failure. All three drug classes revealed a reduction in hospitalisations for heart failure or death from cardiovascular causes in patients with reduced ejection fraction. Sacubitril/valsartan also reduced hospitalisations and death from cardiovascular causes in patients with mid-range ejection fraction, but not in patients with preserved ejection fraction. The sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, sotagliflozin and empagliflozin, reduced hospitalisations and death from cardiovascular causes in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction. None of the three drug classes was associated with a higher prevalence of treatment discontinuation due to increases in adverse effects in large-scale randomised clinical trials compared with placebo. Further studies are required to clarify the extent of effects of these medications in different subpopulations-especially in patients with mid-range and preserved ejection fraction.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Glucose; Heart Failure; Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring; Humans; Pyrimidines; Sodium; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan

Cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) is a critical problem with an impact on both oncological and cardiovascular prognosis, especially when it prevents patients from receiving cancer treatment. However, there are very limited data on the efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan in the prevention and treatment of cardiotoxicity. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the potential benefit of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with CTRCD.. The databases included MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, Scopus and Cochrane Central up to January 20, 2022. All pre-clinical and clinical studies including observational studies (cohorts, case-control, cross-sectional and case reports) that used sacubitril/valsartan for prevention or treatment of CTRCD. The primary effectiveness endpoints was CTRCD, defined as a clinically significant change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at the end of the follow-up.. And after applying the eligibility criteria, 12 articles (9 in humans and 3 preclinical studies) were included in this systematic review. The 3 preclinical studies demonstrated beneficial effects in preventing, attenuating and/or delaying the onset of myocardial damage at the cellular level, ventricular dysfunction and remodeling. Regardind human studies, most of them were composed of case reports. The largest study consisted of a retrospective multicentric cohort with 64 patients.. All clinical studies have demonstrated that used Sac/Val in human showed a significant increase in LVEF, and when reported, a reduction in left ventricular volume and NT-proBNP (or BNP). Randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm this hypothesis.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Cross-Sectional Studies; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

This review aims to investigate the blood pressure (BP)-lowering effects of emerging drugs developed to treat diabetic kidney disease and heart failure (HF). We summarize the potential pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for mitigating hypertensive target organ damage and evaluating the available clinical data on these newer drugs.. Nonsteroidal dihydropyridine-based mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), dual angiotensin II receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (valsartan with sacubitril), sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), and soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators are new classes of chemical agents that have distinct mechanisms of action and have been shown to be effective for the treatment of cardiovascular (CV) disease (CVD), HF, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). These drugs can be used either alone or in combination with other antihypertensive and CV drugs. Among these, SGLT2i and valsartan with sacubitril offer new avenues to reduce CVD mortality. SGLT2i have a mild-to-moderate effect on BP lowering with a favorable effect on CV and renal hemodynamics and have been shown to produce a significant reduction in the incidence of major adverse CVD events (as monotherapy or add-on therapy) compared with controls (placebo or non-SGLT2i treatment). Most of the participants in these studies had hypertension (HTN) at baseline and were receiving antihypertensive therapy, including renin-angiotensin system blockers. The combination of valsartan with sacubitril also lowers BP in the short term and has demonstrated a striking reduction in CVD mortality and morbidity in HF patients with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. If widely adopted, these novel therapeutic agents hold significant promise for reducing the public health burden posed by HTN and CVD. Based on the results of several clinical trials and considering the high prevalence of HTN and T2D, these new classes of agents have emerged as powerful therapeutic tools in managing and lowering the BP of patients with diabetic kidney disease and HF.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Nephropathies; Drug Combinations; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

infarction (AMI) can be reduced by the use of sacubitril/valsartan. However, the therapeutic effects of sacubitril/valsartan in clinical settings are inconsistent. In this paper, the related research on the application of sacubitril/valsartan in AMI was comprehensively searched, in order to explore the clinical efficacy and safety of early application of sacubitril/valsartan after AMI.. English databases, including American National Library of Medicine, Medline, and Embase, and Chinese databases, including Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and VIP, were searched using a combination of the following search terms: AMI, acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), acute non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), sacubitril/valsartan sodium tablets, and angiotensin receptor enkephalinase inhibitors. The experimental group was given Sacubitril/Valsartan sodium tablets, while the control group was given angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEI/ARB). Cochrane Handbook 5.0 risk assessment table were used for quality assessment and bias risk assessment.. A total of 5 articles were included in the meta-analysis. The total incidence of adverse cardiovascular events in the sacubitril/valsartan group was significantly lower than that in the control group {relative risk (RR) =0.61 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.46, 0.82], significance testing Z=3.36, and P=0.0008}. The difference between the rehospitalization rate of the sacubitril/valsartan group and control group was statistically significant [RR =0.67 (95% CI: 0.47, 0.95), significance testing Z=2.23, and P=0.03]. The difference in low blood pressure between the sacubitril/valsartan group and the control group was statistically significant [RR =1.28 (95% CI: 1.18, 1.40), significance testing Z=5.58, and P<0.00001]. The difference in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) between the sacubitril/valsartan group and control group was statistically significant [mean difference (MD) =3.09 (95% CI: 1.69, 4.49), significance testing Z=4.33, and P<0.0001].. Sacubitril/valsartan was found to inhibit ventricular remodeling after AMI, improve cardiac function, and reduce the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events after myocardial infarction, the rehospitalization rate, and the mortality rate.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; United States; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

Sacubitril/valsartan is an angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor that the Food and Drug Administration has indicated to reduce the risk of cardiovascular hospitalization and death in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction below normal and with no specified ejection-fraction cut-off. However, clinically significant patient groups were excluded or minimally represented in sacubitril/valsartan's pivotal clinical trials. Clinicians often encounter scenarios in which a sacubitril/valsartan off-label use may be beneficial, but limited resources are available to evaluate the efficacy and safety in these patients. This state-of-the-art review describes contemporary literature for sacubitril/valsartan Food and Drug Administration off-label indications to help clinicians assess its appropriateness in these selected, clinically important groups of patients: those with acute decompensated heart failure, acute coronary syndrome, peripartum cardiomyopathy, chemotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy, adult congenital heart disease, cardiomyopathy in dialysis patients, right ventricular failure, or durable left ventricular assist device.

Topics: Adult; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiomyopathies; Drug Combinations; Heart Defects, Congenital; Heart Failure; Humans; Neprilysin; Off-Label Use; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

Heart failure (HF) is a clinical syndrome with symptoms and or signs caused by a structural and/or functional cardiac abnormality and associated with elevated natriuretic peptide levels and/or objective evidence of pulmonary or systemic congestion. It is classified according to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF): HF with reduced EF (HFrEF) with an LVEF of ≤40%, HF with mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF) with an LVEF of 41 to 49%, HF with preserved EF (HFpEF) with an LVEF of ≥50%, and HF with improved EF (HFimpEF) with a baseline LVEF of ≤40%, a ≥ 10% increase from baseline LVEF, and a second measurement of LVEF of >40%. Despite the remarkable progress in the management of HF over the past decades, its prognosis is still poor with higher rates of mortality and hospitalization due to worsening HF. Therefore, the development of novel strategies including pharmacologic therapy is needed to further improve its prognosis. Recent large-scale clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of newer pharmacological agents including angiotensin II receptor/neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), sacubitril/valsartan, type 2 sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT2) inhibitors, dapagliflozin, empagliflozin and sotagliflozin, and soluble guanylyl cyclase (sGC) stimulator, vericiguat, and cardiac myosin activator, omecamtiv mecarbil. This review focuses the recent advances in the pharmacological agents for treatment of chronic heart failure, including their mechanisms of action, the evidence based on the clinical trials, and the guideline recommendations for their use.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiac Myosins; Chronic Disease; Glucose; Heart Failure; Humans; Neprilysin; Receptors, Angiotensin; Sodium; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2; Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase; Stroke Volume; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibition is a mainstay of the pharmacological treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). In the last years RAAS blockade has been improved by the introduction of the Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor (ARNI) sacubitril/valsartan, that combines RAAS inhibition with the block of neprilysin, boosting the positive effects of natriuretic peptides. The PARADIGM-HF trial demonstrated a significant advantage of sacubitril/valsartan over enalapril on the reduction of cardiovascular (CV) mortality and heart failure hospitalizations rates. Then, several randomized clinical trials and observational studies investigated its role in different clinical settings and its efficacy has been fully recognized in the most recent HFrEF European and USA guidelines. The effects of sacubitril/valsartan on major CV outcomes are associated with reduction of NT-proBNP levels and reverse cardiac remodeling and mitral regurgitation, recognized as one of the mechanistic effects of the drug explaining the favorable prognostic effects. A careful evaluation of patients' clinical profile is relevant to implement the use of ARNI in the clinical practice and to obtain the maximal treatment efficacy. The present Position Paper reports the opinion of the Italian Society of Cardiology on the optimal blockade of the RAAS system in HF patients with the aim of fostering widespread implementation of scientific evidence and practice guidelines in the medical community.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiology; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Neprilysin; Renin-Angiotensin System; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors have multiple beneficial effects on the cardiovascular system. The angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril/valsartan has been shown to effectively reduce ambulatory 24-h blood pressure in patients with hypertension, and improvements in many aspects of hemodynamic function have also been reported. Overall hemodynamic effects on arterial stiffness and nocturnal blood pressure play an important role in the pathogenesis of hypertensive heart disease. Therefore, these could represent mechanistic targets underlying the effects of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors on the continuum of cardiovascular disease from hypertension to heart failure. Other potential mechanisms include reductions in circulating volume and sympathetic activity, both of which contribute to the protection against target organ damage and positive changes in cardiac biomarkers seen during angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor therapy. The mechanisms of action and beneficial effects of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors are complementary to those of a number of other treatment options for hypertension, suggesting the possibility of additive or even synergistic benefits. Based on available data, there are a number of patient groups who will benefit from antihypertensive treatment with an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, including those with salt-sensitive hypertension, structural hypertension, resistant hypertension, and hypertension in the presence of heart failure. Overall, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors regulate blood pressure and pulse pressure via multiple mechanisms and provide cardiovascular protection. This provides an option for effective intervention early in the vicious cycle of elevated blood pressure and central pressures with progression toward heart failure that should help to address the growing worldwide heart failure epidemic.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Hemodynamics; Humans; Hypertension; Neprilysin; Receptors, Angiotensin; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

The use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors is an important therapy for various cardiovascular diseases, such as hypertension, ischemic heart disease and heart failure (HF). In heart transplant recipients, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have been demonstrated to be a keystone for the treatment of hypertension with a wide spectrum of pleiotropic molecular effects ranging from improvement of the peripheral vascular system to regulation of the fluid and sodium balance. In addition, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors may be also useful in the prevention of graft failure, cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression. Further tailored multicenter and randomized studies are warranted to confirm the pleiotropic clinical effects of ACEi therapy in HTRs and to support more extended use in daily clinical practice. Finally in the near future, the use of novel pharmacological agents that inhibit the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) such as the neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril should be investigated in heart transplant recipients.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Heart Transplantation; Humans; Hypertension; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Renin-Angiotensin System

This review of chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), including new and emerging evidence for treatment of patients with this condition, is intended to offer data supporting the use of specific agents for this patient population.. Chronic heart failure is a major health concern affecting millions of Americans annually and remains a significant burden on the healthcare system. Heart failure is divided into categories based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Current treatments for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, defined by an LVEF of less than 40%, involve a variety of agents with established morbidity and mortality benefits. This is in stark contrast to directed treatments for patients with HFpEF, defined by an LVEF of greater than 50%. Treatments for this form of heart failure have been elusive until recently, when studies were published with sacubitril/valsartan and empagliflozin. Results of the PARAGON-HF trial suggested benefit from sacubitril/valsartan in patients with an ejection fraction between 45% and 57%, leading to its approval in 2021 as the first medication indicated for treatment of patients with a preserved ejection fraction. Months later, the results of the EMPEROR-Preserved trial demonstrated a statistically significant benefit in the composite outcome of heart failure hospitalizations and cardiovascular death in patients with HFpEF taking empagliflozin. This medication has yet to gain approval for HFpEF; however, these data along with ongoing and future trials will likely impact standard treatment for these patients.. The PARAGON-HF and EMPEROR-Preserved trials will serve as the foundation for a new era in the treatment of HFpEF.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

Frailty is highly prevalent in heart failure populations and a major risk factor for adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and adverse drug events (ADEs). This review aimed to describe the prevalence, causality and severity of ADRs or ADEs from heart failure medications among frail compared with non-frail older adults.. A systematic search of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Ageline, CINAHL, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, PsychInfo, Scopus, registries and citations prior to 18 May 2021 was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 checklist. Risk of bias and quality of evidence were assessed. Eligible studies included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies of people diagnosed with heart failure, aged ≥ 65 years, with frailty defined by an objective measurement, and reported ADRs/ADEs from/with heart failure medications.. Two reviewers screened 2419 articles; interrater reliability kappa = 0.88. Three observational studies (n = 2596), a secondary analysis of two RCTs (n = 2098) and two cohort studies (n = 498) were included in a narrative synthesis. Frail patients in randomised trials of sacubitril/valsartan, aliskiren, or enalapril had twice the risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 2.09, 1.62-2.71) and hospitalisations (HR 1.82, 1.37-2.41) compared with robust patients, which may reflect responsiveness to medications and/or factors unrelated to medication use. Hospitalisations from falls, tiredness and nausea were probably attributable to digoxin and possibly preventable according to the Naranjo and Hallas scales, respectively.. The potential harms from heart failure medications in frail older people are poorly studied and understood. Clinical trials and pharmacovigilance studies should include frailty as a covariate to inform medication optimisation for this vulnerable and growing population.. Prospero registration number: CRD 42021253762.

Topics: Aged; Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Frailty; Heart Failure; Humans; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Prevalence

Heart failure is one of the cardiovascular diseases that impacts the geriatric population. As new clinical trials investigating heart failure are conducted, groundbreaking information is assessable to further evolve the treatment. To correctly improve the quality of life of elderly patients, it is critical to evaluate the safety and efficacy of new and improved therapy regimens.. In reviewal of the 2021 and 2022 updated guidelines, the safety and efficacy of the newly indicated medications will be addressed. The new indications cover sacubitril/valsartan and two SGLT2 inhibitors: dapagliflozin and empagliflozin. An introduction to the medications discussed covers the pharmacology before addressing the efficacy and safety considerations in the elderly population. Furthermore, prime drug-drug interactions associated with the two classes of medications will be considered as well as providing possible solutions to further create the safest drug therapy for geriatric patients with common comorbidities.. The two classes of medications, the ARNI and SGLT2 inhibitors, are well-tolerated amongst the elderly population. With the release of new guidelines, the updated medications will provide safer and better therapy in this disease state for geriatrics. One major limitation includes the high cost of these brand-named medications.

Topics: Aged; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Quality of Life; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan

In this review, we discuss what is meant by "foundational" therapy for patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and the evidence supporting the use of the five agents that comprise this group of drugs i.e., sacubitril/valsartan, a beta-blocker, an aldosterone or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) and a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor. We review the conventional approach to sequencing these therapies in HFrEF and proposed new rapid sequencing strategies. We review a recent modelling study suggesting the optimal sequence of treatment includes a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibition and an MRA as the first two therapies. Finally, we review the important opportunity offered by hospitalization for worsening heart failure to initiate and optimize foundational therapies in patients at high risk of early adverse outcomes.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Glucose; Heart Failure; Humans; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Sodium; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Sacubitril/valsartan, the first angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor approved by the Food and Drug Administration for marketing, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization and improve symptoms in patients with chronic heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction. However, some researchers have also found that sacubitril/valsartan has an antiarrhythmic effect. The mechanism by which sacubitril/valsartan reduces the mortality associated with malignant ventricular arrhythmias is not precise. Many studies have concluded that ventricular arrhythmia is associated with a reduction in myocardial fibrosis. This article reviews the current understanding of the effects of sacubitril/valsartan on the reduction of ventricular arrhythmia and explains its possible mechanisms. The results of this study suggest that sacubitril/valsartan reduces the occurrence of appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks. Meanwhile, sacubitril/valsartan may reduce the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias by affecting 3 pathways of B-type natriuretic peptide, Angiotensin II, and Bradykinin. The conclusion of this study is that sacubitril/valsartan reduces the number of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks and ventricular arrhythmias in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Neprilysin; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Heart failure (HF) treatment has changed substantially over the last 30 years, leading to significant reductions in mortality and hospital admissions in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Currently, the optimization of guideline-directed chronic HF therapy remains the mainstay to further improve quality of life, mortality, and HF hospitalizations for patients with HFrEF. The angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) has an important role in the treatment of patients with HFrEF. The PARADIGM-HF (Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure) randomized controlled trial has established solid evidence for the treatment of HFrEF in various subgroups. Apart from HFrEF, several studies have been conducted using S/V in various indications: patients hospitalized with acute decompensated HF, HF with preserved ejection fraction, acute myocardial infarction with reduced ejection fraction, uncontrolled and resistant hypertension, and chronic kidney disease. Data from the German Institute for Drug Use Evaluation reveal that implementation of S/V has increased steadily over time and, by the end of 2021, an estimated 266 000 patients were treated with S/V in Germany. The estimated cumulative real-world patient exposure is >5.5 million patient-treatment years worldwide. The number of patients treated with S/V largely exceeds the number of patients treated in clinical trials, and the current indication for S/V is larger than the strict inclusion/exclusion criteria of the randomized trials. Especially elderly patients, women, and patients with more and more severe comorbidities are underrepresented in the clinical trials. We therefore aimed to summarize the importance of S/V in HF in terms of efficacy and safety in clinical trials and daily clinical practice.

Topics: Aged; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Quality of Life; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Sacubitril/valsartan is a first-in-class Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi) to be approved for the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The combination tablet has become a mainstay of treatment in the management of heart failure (HF) due to its composite inhibition of the neurohumoral system. There is growing support to show that sacubitril/valsartan may enhance glycaemic control through the augmentation of neprilysin substrates - in particular, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1). Given that HF and Diabetes Mellitus (DM) frequently coexist, with 44% of patients hospitalised with heart failure also having diabetes as a co-morbidity, it is plausible that sacubitril/valsartan may represent a novel way to address glucose intolerance in HF. However, the role of neprilysin in the degradation of GLP-1 raises important clinical considerations such as the risk of hypoglycaemia and potential drug-drug interactions in patients with and without concurrent DM. We review the current body of research addressing the effect of neprilysin inhibition on GLP-1 receptor signalling and discuss the implications for treatment of HF and DM.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycemic Control; Heart Failure; Humans; Neprilysin; Receptors, Angiotensin; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Despite advances in cardiac care, patients remain at a high risk of death and the development of heart failure (HF) following myocardial infarction (MI). These risks are highest in patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF) or signs of HF immediately after MI. Drugs to mitigate these risks have been identified through the systematic evaluation of therapies with proven efficacy in patients with HF and reduced EF (HFrEF).. Although landmark studies in patients with HFrEF consistently exclude patients with recent MI, dedicated post-MI trials of these drugs have led to multiple therapies with proven benefit in these patients. However, not all therapies with proven efficacy in patients with chronic HF have been shown to provide benefit in the post-MI population, as recently evidenced by the discrepant results between chronic HF and post-MI trials of sacubitril-valsartan. Similarly, multiple trials of early and aggressive use of therapies effective in chronic heart failure immediately post-MI failed to demonstrate benefit or were associated with harm, emphasizing the vulnerability of the post-MI population.. Trials of patients at high risk of HF following MI have emphasized the differences between the post-MI and HFrEF populations and the necessity for dedicated trials in the post-MI population. This review summarizes trials studying the use of these therapies for at-risk patients following MI from therapies used in patients with HFrEF and exploring new potential therapies for this high-risk population.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Sacubitril-valsartan was recommended for heart failure (HF) and proven cost-effective in HF. Recently, sacubitril-valsartan has been recommended to treat hypertension by the Chinese expert consensus. The cost utility of sacubitril-valsartan for hypertension remains uninvestigated.. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to investigate the real efficacy of sacubitril-valsartan on blood pressure, compared with angiotensin receptor blockers or placebo. A lifetime Markov model was developed to compare the cost utility of sacubitril-valsartan vs. valsartan. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR), representing the ratio of incremental costs to the incremental utility. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was three times of per capita gross domestic product (GDP) in China in 2021. Sacubitril-valsartan was considered cost-effective if the ICUR obtained was lower than the WTP threshold, otherwise, sacubitril-valsartanis was not cost-effective.. Compared with valsartan, sacubitril-valsartan is more effective in reducing blood pressure and may result in more quality-adjusted life-year, although with higher costs. Sacubitril-valsartan is cost-effective for hypertension in the current China setting under the willingness-to-pay threshold of 3 times of per capita GDP.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Antihypertensive Agents; Biphenyl Compounds; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Middle Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Valsartan

Heart failure (HF) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, with nearly half of all HF-related deaths resulting from sudden cardiac death (SCD), most often from an arrhythmic event. The pathophysiologic changes that occur in response to the hemodynamic stress of HF may lead to increased arrhythmogenesis. Theoretically, medications that block these arrhythmogenic substrates would decrease the risk of SCD. The combined angiotensin receptor and neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi; tradename Entresto) is the newest commercially available medication for the treatment of heart failure.. We reviewed and synthesized the available literature regarding sacubitril/valsartan and its effects on cardiac rhythm. ARNi has been shown to decrease cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Emerging evidence suggests that ARNi also may play a role in reducing arrhythmogenesis and thereby SCD.. This review summarizes the current data regarding this ARNi and its potential antiarrhythmic effects.

Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Death, Sudden, Cardiac; Heart Failure; Humans; Neprilysin; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan

The approval of new heart failure (HF) therapies has slowed over the past two decades in part due to the high costs of conducting large randomized clinical trials that are needed to adequately power major clinical endpoint studies. Several biomarkers have been identified reflecting different elements of HF pathophysiology, with possible applications in diagnosis, risk stratification, treatment monitoring, and even in the design of clinical trials. Biomarkers could potentially be used to refine study inclusion criteria to enable enrolment of patients who are more likely to respond to a therapeutic intervention, despite being at sufficient risk to meet pre-determined study endpoint rates. When there is a close relationship between biomarker levels and clinical endpoints, changes in biomarker levels after a given treatment can act as a surrogate endpoint, potentially reducing the duration and cost of a clinical trial. Natriuretic peptides have been widely used in clinical trials with a variable amount of added value, which such variation being probably due to the absence of a close pathophysiological connection to the study drug. Notable exceptions to this include sacubitril/valsartan and vericiguat. Future studies should seek to adopt unbiased approaches for discovery of true companion diagnostics; with -omics-based tools, biomarkers might be more precisely selected for use in clinical trials to identify responses that closely reflect the biological effects of the drug under investigation. Finally, biomarkers associated with cardiac damage and remodelling, such as cardiac troponin, could be employed as safety endpoints provided that standardization between different assays is achieved.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiology; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is present in nearly half of patients with heart failure. The prevalence of heart failure with normal or near-normal ejection fractions increases more rapidly than in patients with reduced ejection fractions. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), aldosterone antagonist, β-blocker, and calcium channel blocker have not shown significant efficacy in HFpEF clinical trials. Sacubitril/Valsartan, combined angiotensin receptor blocker (Valsartan) with neprilysin inhibitor (Sacubitril), was the first-of-its-kind angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) to be developed. It has shown significant efficacy on HFpEF in recent studies. It is considered that most of the current Sacubitril/Valsartan studies are still concentrated in the field of heart failure, especially heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This review discusses the latest advances in cardiovascular, renal, and metabolic aspects of Sacubitril/Valsartan, mainly in HFpEF, providing more evidence for further future research on Sacubitril/Valsartan and raising issues that should be paid attention. At the same time, this review will introduce the academic consensus on Sacubitril/Valsartan in treating HFpEF in China.

Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Biphenyl Compounds; Calcium Channel Blockers; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Neprilysin; Receptors, Angiotensin; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Since initial publication of the PARADIGM-HF trial in 2014, sacubitril/valsartan has been investigated in various settings to establish optimal use, further expanding its indications in patients with heart failure (HF). Although numerous studies have been published, until recently these have primarily involved post hoc analyses from the PARADIGM-HF study itself with a consistent focus on use of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This has led to a gap in the literature regarding utility of sacubitril/valsartan in other HF subpopulations. The aim of this review is to provide a summary of recent clinical trials further expanding use and guideline recommendations for sacubitril/valsartan. The findings of 15 studies, including clinical trials and post hoc analyses, are summarized and describe the use of sacubitril/valsartan in additional HF subpopulations, such as HFrEF following hospitalization for acute decompensated HF and advanced HF, HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and HF postmyocardial infarction. In addition, three studies investigating timing of initiation, dose titration regimens, and cost-effectiveness are examined. Select ongoing trials are also reviewed to demonstrate the continued commitment to further advance care of patients with HF. This comprehensive review serves as a resource for health care providers who pursue optimal utilization of sacubitril/valsartan in their respective clinical practices.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Valsartan

Over the last decades, several classes of drugs have been introduced for the treatment of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Their use has been supported by randomized controlled trials that have demonstrated improved patient outcomes. However, these trials enrolled a small number of female patients and sometimes have reported gender-related differences regarding the efficacy of the treatments. The aim of this review is to revise the available data about the influence of gender on the optimal treatment and drug dose in patients with HFrEF.. Several gender-related differences in terms of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of the drugs have been described. These characteristics could be responsible for a different response and tolerability in men and women also when current recommended treatment of HFrEF is considered. Some studies have shown that, in women, lower doses of beta-blockers and inhibitors of renin angiotensin aldosterone system could be equally effective than higher doses in men, whereas sacubitril/valsartan could exert its favorable effect at greater values of left ventricular ejection fraction. Although there is evidence about differences in the response to treatment of HFrEF in men and women, this has not been sufficient for differentiating current recommended therapy. Further studies should better clarify if the treatment of HFrEF should be based also on the patients' gender.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Ventricular Function, Left

Sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) is a pharmaceutical strategy that increases natriuretic peptide levels by inhibiting neprilysin and regulating the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone pathway, blocking AT1 receptors. The data for this innovative medication are mainly based on the PARADIGM-HF study, which included heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)-diagnosed patients and indicated a major improvement in morbidity and mortality when S/V is administrated compared to enalapril. A large part of the observed favorable results is related to significant reverse cardiac remodeling confirmed in two prospective trials, PROVE-HF and EVALUATE-HF. Furthermore, according to a subgroup analysis from the PARAGON-HF research, S/V shows benefits in HFrEF and in many subjects having preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), which indicated a decrease in HF hospitalizations among those with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 57%. This review examines the proven benefits of S/V and highlights continuing research in treating individuals with varied HF characteristics. The article analyses published data regarding both the safeness and efficacy of S/V in patients with HF, including decreases in mortality and hospitalization, increased quality of life, and reversible heart remodeling. These benefits led to the HF guidelines recommendations updating and inclusion of S/V combinations a key component of HFrEF treatment.

Topics: Aldosterone; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensins; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Enalapril; Heart Failure; Humans; Natriuretic Peptides; Neprilysin; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Renin; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

Sacubitril/valsartan and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)/angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB) therapies were reported to affect glycaemic control and the development of diabetes mellitus (DM), but the findings are inconsistent. We examined the evidence for the effects of sacubitril/valsartan and ACEI/ARB in DM by conducting a meta-analysis.. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library), Embase, PubMed, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for data from randomised clinical trials (RCTs) that evaluated the efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan and ACEI/ARB in patients, as of May 25, 2022. Patients were grouped by their disease background at baseline. The main outcomes were the number of new-onset DM and hypoglycaemia, elevated glycaemia, inadequate DM control, diabetes treatment, and diabetic complications, from baseline to the end of the trials. The risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (ROB 2). The quality of the evidence was evaluated according to the Recommendations for Assessment, Development, and Evaluation guidelines. The meta-analysis of the incidence of various outcomes was conducted using fixed or random effects models. The results are expressed as binary risk, 95% confidence interval (CI), and relative risk (RR). The Mantel-Haenszel method and Z test were used to determine the overall results and determine the significance of the RR.. This study included 31 RCTs and 86,809 subjects. Compared with placebo, sacubitril/valsartan treatment significantly reduced the risk of new-onset DM among all patients (RR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.64-0.95), patients with heart failure (HF) (RR = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.12-0.48), HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (RR = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.12-0.50), and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (RR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.34-0.85). In contrast, sacubitril/valsartan treatment significantly increased the risk of hypoglycaemia among all patients (RR = 1.91, 95% CI: 1.05-3.47), patients with not all-DM (defined as part of the study population having DM at baseline) (RR = 5.71, 95% CI: 2.02-16.21), and patients with HFpEF (RR = 7.06, 95% CI: 2.10-23.76). Compared with ACEI/ARB, sacubitril/valsartan treatment significantly increased the risk of hypoglycaemia among patients with HF (RR 1.85, 95% CI 1.12-3.06, p = 0.02) and HFpEF (RR 3.59, 95% CI 1.51-8.55, p = 0.004). Compared with placebo, ACEI/ARB treatment did significantly reduce the risk of new-onset DM among all patients (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.77-0.93, p = 0.0007) and patients with not all-HF (defined as part of the study population having HF at baseline) (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.82-0.93, p<0.0001) and HFpEF (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.44-0.83, p = 0.002), diabetes complications among patients with non-HF (/not all-DM) (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.76-0.99, p = 0.04), and subsequent diabetes treatment among patients with new-onset DM (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.58-0.84, p = 0.0002) and significantly increased the risk of hypoglycaemia among patients with not all-DM (RR 2.06, 95% CI 1.172-3.61, p = 0.01).. The results of our study, especially in reducing glycaemia and new-onset DM, revealed that sacubitril/valsartan had a positive effect on the control of glycaemia and the development of DM. ACEI/ARB also had a beneficial effect but the effect was weaker than that of sacubitril/valsartan. The above effects varied across diseases but the evidence was strongest in patients with HF.. CRD42022336311.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

In clinical practice, many patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are either not prescribed guideline-directed medical therapies for which they are eligible or are prescribed therapies at sub-target doses. The objective of this study was to examine the factors associated with not receiving guideline-directed medical therapies or receiving sub-target doses. We conducted a systematic review of articles published between January 2014 and May 2019 that described dosing patterns and factors associated with non-use and sub-target dosing of HFrEF therapies in clinical practice. Thirty-seven studies were included. The percentages of patients reaching target doses for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, sacubitril/valsartan, beta-blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists ranged from 4 to 55%, 11 to 87%, 4 to 60%, and 22 to 80%, respectively. Older age and worsening renal function were associated with non-use and sub-target dosing, lower body mass index was commonly associated with non-use, and hyperkalemia and hypotension were commonly associated with sub-target dosing. In conclusion, several common patient characteristics are associated with non-use and sub-target dosing of medical therapy for HFrEF. These high-risk groups are in particular need of further studies to improve implementation of available medications and to define the role of novel therapies.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Humans; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Stroke Volume

The short-term mortality and rehospitalization rates after admission for acute heart failure (AHF) remain high, despite the high level of adherence to contemporary practice guidelines. Observational data from non-randomized studies in AHF strongly support the in-hospital administration of oral evidence-based modifying chronic heart failure (HF) medications (i.e., b-blockers, ACE inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists) to reduce morbidity and mortality. Interestingly, a well-designed prospective randomized multicenter study (PIONEER-HF) showed an improved clinical outcome and stress/injury biomarker profile after in-hospital administration of sacubitril/valsartan (sac/val) as compared to enalapril, in hemodynamically stable patients with AHF. However, sac/val implementation during hospitalization remains suboptimal due to the lack of an integrated individualized plan or well-defined appropriateness criteria for transition to oral therapies, an absence of specific guidelines regarding dose selection and the up-titration process, and uncertainty regarding patient eligibility.In the present expert consensus position paper, clinical practical recommendations are proposed, together with an action plan algorithm, to encourage and facilitate sac/val administration during hospitalization after an AHF episode with the aim of improving efficiencies of care and resource utilization.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensins; Biphenyl Compounds; Consensus; Heart Failure; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Neprilysin; Prospective Studies; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, Angiotensin; Stroke Volume; Treatment Outcome

In PARADIGM-HF, sacubitril/valsartan showed a significant reduction in mortality and hospitalization for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Despite proven efficacy, sacubitril/valsartan has moderate uptake in clinical practice. This study explores the safety profile of sacubitril/valsartan by comparing adverse events in RCT and real-world use.. We studied hypotension, renal dysfunction, hyperkalemia, and angioedema associated with sacubitril/valsartan in RCTs and pharmacovigilance databases. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed with six RCTs investigating sacubitril/valsartan vs. control/comparators in heart failure patients. WHO's VigiBase, FAERS, and EMA's EudraVigilance were mined to obtain spontaneously reported real-world adverse events. Disproportionality analysis was performed with the FDA's OpenVigil 2.0.. Six RCTs enrolled 15,538 patients with heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fractions. There was no statistical difference for the composite of hypotension, renal dysfunction, hyperkalemia, and angioedema between sacubitril/valsartan and its comparators viz. ACEi or ARBs (OR 1.23, CI 0.98-1.56; p = 0.08). A total of 103,038 adverse events were registered in the spontaneous reporting systems. Hypotension was the most reported adverse event. Proportions of composite adverse events were 20% in VigiBase, 17% in FAERS, and 39% with EudraVigilance. Disproportionality analysis showed a lower risk of adverse events with sacubitril/valsartan than other guideline-directed heart failure medications used in clinical practice.. With increased uptake of sacubitril/valsartan, risks of hypotension, renal dysfunction, hyperkalemia, and angioedema appear low and acceptable in RCTs and global clinical practice.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angioedema; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Hypotension; Kidney Diseases; Pharmacovigilance; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan

After initial strategies targeting inotropism and congestion, the neurohormonal interpretative model of heart failure (HF) pathophysiology has set the basis for current pharmacological management of HF, as most of guideline recommended drug classes, including beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, blunt the activation of detrimental neurohormonal axes, namely sympathetic and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone (RAAS) systems. More recently, sacubitril/valsartan, a first-in-class angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor, combining inhibition of RAAS and potentiation of the counter-regulatory natriuretic peptide system, has been consistently demonstrated to reduce mortality and HF-related hospitalization. A number of novel pharmacological approaches have been tested during the latest years, leading to mixed results. Among them, drugs acting directly at a second messenger level, such as the soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator vericiguat, or other addressing myocardial energetics and mitochondrial function, such as elamipretide or omecamtiv-mecarbil, will likely change the therapeutic management of patients with HF. Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, initially designed for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus, have been recently demonstrated to improve outcome in HF, although mechanisms of their action on cardiovascular system are yet to be elucidated. Most of these emerging approaches have shifted the therapeutic target from neurohormonal systems to the heart, by improving cardiac contractility, metabolism, fibrosis, inflammation, and remodeling. In the present paper, we review from a pathophysiological perspective current and novel therapeutic strategies in chronic HF.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Heart Failure; Humans; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles

Heart failure (HF) has high event rates, mortality, and is challenging to manage in clinical practice. Clinical management is complicated by complex therapeutic strategies in a population with a high prevalence of comorbidity and general frailty. In the last four years, an abundance of research has become available to support multidisciplinary management of heart failure from within the hospital through to discharge and primary care as well as supporting diagnosis and comorbidity management. Within the hospital setting, recent evidence supports sacubitril-valsartan combination in frail, deteriorating or de novo patients with LVEF≤40%. Furthermore, new strategies such as SGLT2 inhibitors and vericiguat provide further benefit for patients with decompensating HF. Studies with tafamidis report major clinical benefits specifically for patients with ATTR cardiac amyloidosis, a remaining underdiagnosed and undertreated disease. New evidence for medical interventions supports his bundle pacing to reduce QRS width and improve haemodynamics as well as ICD defibrillation for non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. The Mitraclip reduces hospitalisations and mortality in patients with symptomatic, secondary mitral regurgitation and ablation reduces mortality and hospitalisations in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation. In end-stage HF, the 2018 French Heart Allocation policy should improve access to heart transplants for stable, ambulatory patients and, mechanical circulatory support should be considered to avoid deteriorating on the waiting list. In the community, new evidence supports that improving discharge education, treatment and patient support improves outcomes. The authors believe that this review fills the gap between the guidelines and clinical practice and provides practical recommendations to improve HF management.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Hospitals; Humans; Patient Discharge

The significant morbidity and mortality associated with heart failure with reduced (HFrEF) or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) justify the search for novel therapeutic agents. The nitric oxide (NO)-soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC)-cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) pathway plays an important role in the regulation of cardiovascular function. This pathway is disrupted in HF resulting in decreased protection against myocardial injury. The sGC activator cinaciguat increases cGMP levels by direct, NO-independent activation of sGC, and may be particularly effective in conditions of increased oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction, and then reduced NO levels, but this comes at the expense of a greater risk of hypotension. Conversely, sGC stimulators (riociguat and vericiguat) enhance sGC sensitivity to endogenous NO, and then exert a more physiological action. The phase 3 VICTORIA trial found that vericiguat is safe and effective in patients with HFrEF and recent HF decompensation. Therefore, adding vericiguat may be considered in individual patients with HFrEF, particularly those at higher risk of HF hospitalization; the efficacy of the sacubitril/valsartan-vericiguat combination in HFrEF is currently unknown.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Cyclic GMP; Heart Failure; Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring; Humans; Nitric Oxide; Pyrimidines; Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase; Stroke Volume

To investigate the efficacy and safety of sacubitril-valsartan in patients with heart failure, relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were analyzed.. We used Cochrane Library, PubMed web of science, CNKI, VIP, Medline, ISI Web of Science, CBMdisc, and Wanfang database to conduct a systematic literature research. A fixed-effects model was used to evaluate the standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals. We conducted sensitivity analysis and analyzed publication bias to comprehensively estimate the efficacy and safety of sacubitril-valsartan in patients with heart failure.. Among 132 retrieved studies, 5 relevant RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. The result showed that left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was improved after sacubitril-valsartan in patients with heart failure, with an SMD (95% CI of 1.1 [1.01, 1.19] and P < .00001 fixed-effects model). Combined outcome indicators showed that, combined outcome indicators showed that, compared with control group, the left ventricular volume index (LAVI) (WMD = -2.18, 95% CI [-3.63, -0.74], P = .003), the E/e' (WMD = -1.01, 95% CI [-1.89, -0.12], P = .03), the cardiovascular death (RR = 0.89, 95% CI [0.83, 0.96], P = .003], and the rehospitalization rate of heart failure (RR = 0.83, 95% CI [0.78, 0.88], P < .01) decreased more significantly, but it had no effect on renal function (WMD = 0.74, 95% CI [0.54, 1.01], P = .06).. The present meta-analysis suggested that sacubitril-valsartan may improve the cardiac function of heart failure. Given the limited number of included studies, additional large sample-size RCTs are required to determine the long-term effect of cardiac function of sacubitril-valsartan in patients with heart failure.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacoeconomic value of sacubitril-valsartan for the treatment of heart failure (HF). PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, Scopus, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases were searched systematically and the retrieval time ended in August 2019. According to the criteria of inclusion and exclusion, the quality of studies included was evaluated as per the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) scale, and the results were extracted and analyzed systematically. The total of 11 cost-effectiveness studies was identified, 10 were performed in the developed countries and 1 in Thailand. All the patients in the studies had chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Totally, the quality of all the 11 studies was reported to be of an average score of 20.5. Study perspective and time horizons were described in the 11 studies. All included studies discounted the cost or effectiveness. Only 1 study estimated direct and indirect costs; 10 studies evaluated direct cost. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of sacubitril-valsartan treating HFrEF was $13,150 per quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) in Thailand and $86,735 in Singapore. In European countries, the ICER was from $21,786 to $34,576 per QALY and mean value was $25,410.6 per QALY. In the USA, ICER values ranged from $47,099 to $143,891 per QALY, and mean value was $73,383.5 per QALY; ICER was $30,090 per QALY in Colombia. With the exception of Thailand and Singapore, the ICER of other countries in the included literature was below the implemented country-specific thresholds. Based on existing literatures, with the exception of Thailand and Singapore, sacubitril-valsartan for the treatment of HFrEF is a better cost-effective therapy with ICER basically below the implemented country-specific thresholds. Sacubitril-valsartan was not considered a cost-effective treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in Thailand and Singapore with the current economic evaluation evidences, but with the willingness-to-pay (WTP) of other counties, sacubitril-valsartan was found to be a cost-effective treatment compared with comparator. Drug cost, time horizon, and hospitalization were the most influential variables across studies. Four studies indicated that with the longer time horizon, the lower ICER value would gain. Further studies are warranted to better evaluate comprehensive utility value of sacubit

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is highly prevalent in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and increases the risk of overall and cardiovascular (CV) mortality. Despite evidence supporting the effectiveness of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is), angiotensin receptor blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in decreasing mortality in patients with CHF, CKD hampers the optimization of standard pharmacologic therapy for heart failure. Therefore, other treatment options are needed to optimize treatment outcomes in CHF patients with CKD. The first-in-class angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, sacubitril/valsartan, has a complementary activity that counteracts the potential unwanted long-term effects of over-activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Sacubitril/valsartan reduced the risk of CV mortality compared to standard therapy with an ACE-I in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in the PARADIGM-HF trial and has been shown to be safe and effective in a broad range of HFrEF patients. However, data on the efficacy and tolerability of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with more advanced CKD are limited. This review discusses the evidence for the role of sacubitril/valsartan in providing additional renal benefit in patients with HFrEF. Data from clinical trials and real-world experience in patients with HFrEF and advanced CKD support the benefits of dual angiotensin/neprilysin inhibition across the breadth of kidney disease stages, including patients with significant renal impairment that was not reported in the pivotal PARADIGM-HF trial, and suggests a central role for the cardiac benefits of sacubitril/valsartan in nephroprotection.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) are a new class of cardiovascular agents characterized by their dual action on the major regulators of the cardiovascular system, including the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and the natriuretic peptide (NP) system. The apparent clinical benefit of one ARNI, sacubitril/valsartan, as shown in clinical trials, has positioned the drug class as a first-line therapy in patients with heart failure, particularly with reduced ejection fraction. Accumulating evidence also suggests that sacubitril/valsartan is superior to conventional RAS blockers in lowering blood pressure in patients with hypertension. To decide whether to apply an ARNI to treat hypertension clinically, it is important to understand the potential properties of the drug in modulating multiple factors inside and outside the cardiovascular system beyond its effect on reducing peripheral blood pressure. In this context, ARNIs are distinct from preexisting antihypertensive medications in terms of the multiple actions of NPs in various organs and the pharmacological potential of neprilysin inhibitors to modulate multiple cardiac and noncardiac peptides. In particular, analysis of the clinical trials of sacubitril/valsartan implies that ARNIs can provide additional clinical benefits independent of their original purpose, including alleviation of glycemic control and renal impairment in patients with heart failure. Understanding the potential mechanisms of action of ARNIs will help interpret the relevance of their additional benefits beyond lowering blood pressure in hypertension. This review summarizes the comprehensive clinical evidence and relevance of ARNIs by specifically focusing on the potential properties of this new drug class in treating patients with hypertension.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Neprilysin; Receptors, Angiotensin; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

This study compared the effectiveness of sacubitril/valsartan (SV) vs. valsartan (V) for treating persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) after radio-frequency catheter ablation (RFCA).. Patients with persistent AF who received RFCA were randomly assigned to the SV or V treatment group with the intervention lasting for 12 months. The primary outcome included any atrial arrhythmia episode lasting ≥ 30 s after a 3-month blanking period. The secondary outcome included any atrial arrhythmia episode lasting ≥ 24 h or requiring cardioversion after a 3-month blanking period. The H2FPEF score was used to assess the possibility of patients suffering from heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.. A total of 143 patients with persistent AF who received RFCA were randomized for the study, with 5 patients failing to follow-up. Among them, 29 (42%) out of 69 patients receiving V and 15 (21.7%) out of 69 patients receiving SV reached the primary endpoint (P < 0.001). A total of 26 (37.7%) out of 69 patients receiving V and 7 (10.1%) out of 69 patients receiving SV reached the secondary endpoint (P < 0.001). A decrease in the H2FPEF score after a 1-year follow-up seemed to be related to the recurrence of AF (OR, 0.065; 95% CI: 0.018-0.238, P < 0.001).. SV can decrease AF recurrence after catheter ablation in patients with persistent AF at the 1-year follow-up. The mechanism for this process may be related to the reduction in the H2FPEF score in patients with preserved ejection fraction heart failure.

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Heart Failure; Humans; Recurrence; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan

Diabetes mellitus is associated with worse outcomes and lower attainment of disease-modifying therapies in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This post hoc analysis of TRANSITION compared the patterns of tolerability and uptitration of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with HFrEF stabilized after hospital admission due to acute decompensated HF depending on the presence or absence of diabetes as a co-morbidity.. TRANSITION, a randomized, open-label study compared sacubitril/valsartan initiation pre-discharge vs. post-discharge (up to14 days) in 991 patients hospitalized for acutely decompensated HFrEF. The impact of diabetes status on tolerability and safety was studied at 10-week and 26-week post-randomization.. Among the 991 patients analysed at baseline, 460 (46.4%) had diabetes and exhibited a higher risk profile. At 10 weeks, sacubitril/valsartan target dose (97/103 mg bid) was achieved in a similar proportion of patients in each subgroup, when initiated pre-discharge or post-discharge respectively [diabetes subgroup: 47% (n = 105/226) vs. 50% (n = 115/228); relative risk ratio (RRR), 0.923; P = 0.412; non-diabetes subgroup: 45% (n = 119/267) vs. 51% (n = 133/261); RRR, 0.878; P = 0.155]. The proportions of patients achieving and maintaining either 49/51 mg or 97/103 mg bid [diabetes subgroup: 61.1% (n = 138/226) vs. 67.5% (n = 154/228); RRR, 0.909; P = 0.175; non-diabetes subgroup: 62.9% [n = 168/267] vs 69.3% [n = 181/261]; RRR, 0.906; P = 0.118] or any dose for ≥2 weeks leading to Week 10 [diabetes subgroup: 85% (n = 192/226) vs. 88.2% (n = 201/228); RRR, 0.966; P = 0.356; non-diabetes subgroup: 86.9% (n = 232/267) vs. 90.8% (n = 237/261); RRR, 0.963; P = 0.215] were also similar in each subgroup, when initiated pre-discharge or post-discharge, respectively. At 10 weeks, hypotension and renal dysfunction rates were similar, although hyperkalaemia was higher among patients with diabetes (15.9% vs. 9.5%). The rate of permanent discontinuation due to adverse events was similar in the diabetes and non-diabetes subgroups at 10 weeks, respectively: pre-discharge (7.5% vs. 7.1%) or post-discharge (5.7% vs. 4.2%). Similar patterns of uptitration and tolerability were observed at 26 weeks. Cardiac biomarkers including NT-proBNP (P < 0.005) and hs-TnT (P < 0.005) reduced significantly from baseline levels in both subgroups at Weeks 4 and 10; however, the response was greater among patients without diabetes. Mortality (diabetes vs. non-diabetes subgroups: 3.3% vs 4.0%; P = 0.438) and HF rehospitalization (diabetes vs. non-diabetes subgroups: 36.3% vs. 33.0%; P = 0.295) did not differ between the groups at 26 weeks.. Despite a higher risk profile among patients with diabetes, sacubitril/valsartan initiation either before or shortly after discharge in hospitalized patients with HFrEF resulted in comparable rates of dose up-titration and tolerability as in those without diabetes.

Topics: Aftercare; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Diabetes Mellitus; Heart Failure; Humans; Patient Discharge; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

To determine the efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan plus dapagliflozin in the treatment of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) due to left heart disease and to explore new treatment regimen for PAH due to left heart disease.. This study is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) study of 120 patients with PAH due to left heart disease admitted to the cardiovascular department of our hospital from Dec. 2019 to Dec. 2021. The patients were randomized 1:1 to the study group and control group. All patients were given baseline treatments targeting left heart disease and symptoms of PAH. In addition to the baseline treatments, patients in the control group were given sacubitril/valsartan tablets, while patients in the study group were given sacubitril/valsartan tablets plus dapagliflozin tablets. After 6 months of treatment, parameters including left heart function and exercise tolerance, Hemodynamics (left ventricular end systolic diameter [LVSED], left ventricular end diastolic diameter [LVEDD], left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF], 6 min walk distance (6MWD), mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP)), vascular endothelial function (plasma endothelin (ET) -1 and nitric oxide [NO]), heart failure markers (plasma N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)], inflammatory factors (serum C reactive protein [CRP], interleukin (IL)-6, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α], and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were assessed in both groups.. Both groups had reduced LVESD and LVEDD, increased LVEF, and extended 6MWD after 6 months of treatment. The improvements in these parameters were significantly greater in the study group than in the control group (all. Sacubitril/valsartan plus dapagliflozin in the treatment with PAH due to left heart disease can improve left heart function of patients by improving vascular endothelial functions and alleviating inflammation, which helps to reduce the PAH process. Therefore, this combination treatment is safe and effective in PAH due to left heart disease.

Topics: Heart Diseases; Heart Failure; Humans; Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension; Stroke Volume; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

As sacubitril/valsartan may potentiate early natriuresis, expert consensus documents recommend diuretic dose reduction on first initiation. However, there are limited data on the effects of sacubitril/valsartan on the background of varying diuretic regimens or on diuretic requirements over time in heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).. Patients with HFpEF on higher baseline diuretic doses were at heightened risk of HF events, but similarly benefited from sacubitril/valsartan with a consistent safety profile across a range of diuretic doses. Initiation of sacubitril/valsartan was associated with modestly lower new loop diuretic requirement in follow-up.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Diuretics; Drug Combinations; Furosemide; Heart Failure; Humans; Sodium Potassium Chloride Symporter Inhibitors; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Sacubitril/valsartan has been approved for the management of heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction in adults. PANORAMA-HF trial (Prospective Trial to Assess the Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Neprilysin Inhibitor LCZ696 Versus Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor for the Medical Treatment of Pediatric HF) investigated its effects on clinical outcomes in pediatric patients with HF.. PANORAMA-HF is a multicenter, Phase II/III study using an adaptive, seamless, 2-part design. The study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of single doses of sacubitril/valsartan (Part 1), and the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril administered twice daily for 52 weeks (Part 2) in pediatric patients with HF due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction with biventricular heart physiology. An innovative trial design using a novel global rank assessment of severity was employed. For analysis, eligible patients were stratified into 3 age groups (Group 1, 6 to <18 years; Group 2a, 2 to <6 years; and Group 3a, 1 month to <2 years) and functional classification (New York Heart Association/Ross class I/II and III/IV).. We report the key demographic, baseline, and clinical characteristics of 375 pediatric patients randomized to receive the study medication. The mean age for patients in Groups 1, 2a, and 3a was 12.2, 3.2, and 1.3 years, respectively. About 70% of patients had a prior HF hospitalization, 85% had New York Heart Association/Ross class I/II HF, and ≈8% were angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker naïve.. Compared to other pediatric HF studies, PANORAMA-HF recruited a relatively homogeneous pediatric HF population across 3 age groups, enabling a more robust evaluation of pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and efficacy/safety of sacubitril/valsartan. Most patients had mildly symptomatic HF at baseline.. URL: https://www.. gov; Unique identifier: NCT02678312.

Topics: Adolescent; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Biphenyl Compounds; Child; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Prospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

The PARAGON-HF trial studied the effect of sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) compared with valsartan (Val) on clinical outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) or mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF). Further data are needed regarding the use of Sac/Val in these groups with EF and with recent worsening heart failure (WHF) events and in key populations not broadly represented in the PARAGON-HF trial, including those with de novo HF, the severely obese and Black patients.. The PARAGLIDE-HF trial is a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial of Sac/Val vs Val that enrolled patients at 100 sites. Medically stable patients ≥ 18 years old with EF > 40%, amino terminal-pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels ≥ 500 pg/mL and within 30 days of a WHF event were eligible for participation. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to Sac/Val vs Val. The primary efficacy endpoint is time-averaged proportional change in NT-proBNP from baseline through Weeks 4 and 8. Secondary endpoints include clinical outcomes during follow-up and additional biomarker assessments. Safety endpoints include symptomatic hypotension, worsening renal function and hyperkalemia.. The PARAGLIDE-HF trial enrolled a broad and diverse range of patients with heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction and will inform clinical practice by providing evidence about the safety, tolerability and efficacy of Sac/Val vs Val in those with a recent WHF event.

Topics: Adolescent; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Pre-heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (pre-HFpEF) is common and has no specific therapy aside from cardiovascular risk factor management.. To investigate the hypothesis that sacubitril/valsartan vs valsartan would reduce left atrial volume index using volumetric cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with pre-HFpEF.. The Personalized Prospective Comparison of ARNI [angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor] With ARB [angiotensin-receptor blocker] in Patients With Natriuretic Peptide Elevation (PARABLE) trial was a prospective, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized clinical trial carried out over 18 months between April 2015 and June 2021. The study was conducted at a single outpatient cardiology center in Dublin, Ireland. Of 1460 patients in the STOP-HF program or outpatient cardiology clinics, 461 met initial criteria and were approached for inclusion. Of these, 323 were screened and 250 asymptomatic patients 40 years and older with hypertension or diabetes, elevated B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) greater than 20 pg/mL or N-terminal pro-b-type natriuretic peptide greater than 100 pg/mL, left atrial volume index greater than 28 mL/m2, and preserved ejection fraction greater than 50% were included.. Patients were randomized to angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril/valsartan titrated to 200 mg twice daily or matching angiotensin receptor blocker valsartan titrated to 160 mg twice daily.. Maximal left atrial volume index and left ventricular end diastolic volume index, ambulatory pulse pressure, N-terminal pro-BNP, and adverse cardiovascular events.. Among the 250 participants in this study, the median (IQR) age was 72.0 (68.0-77.0) years; 154 participants (61.6%) were men and 96 (38.4%) were women. Most (n = 245 [98.0%]) had hypertension and 60 (24.0%) had type 2 diabetes. Maximal left atrial volume index was increased in patients assigned to receive sacubitril/valsartan (6.9 mL/m2; 95% CI, 0.0 to 13.7) vs valsartan (0.7 mL/m2; 95% CI, -6.3 to 7.7; P < .001) despite reduced markers of filling pressure in both groups. Changes in pulse pressure and N-terminal pro-BNP were lower in the sacubitril/valsartan group (-4.2 mm Hg; 95% CI, -7.2 to -1.21 and -17.7%; 95% CI, -36.9 to 7.4, respectively; P < .001) than the valsartan group (-1.2 mm Hg; 95% CI, -4.1 to 1.7 and 9.4%; 95% CI, -15.6 to 4.9, respectively; P < .001). Major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in 6 patients (4.9%) assigned to sacubitril/valsartan and 17 (13.3%) assigned to receive valsartan (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.89; adjusted P = .04).. In this trial of patients with pre-HFpEF, sacubitril/valsartan treatment was associated with a greater increase in left atrial volume index and improved markers of cardiovascular risk compared to valsartan. More work is needed to understand the observed increased cardiac volumes and long-term effects of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with pre-HFpEF.. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04687111.

Topics: Aged; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Heart Atria; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Neprilysin; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Angiotensin receptor blocker and a neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) has emerged as an innovative therapy for patients of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and tolerability of Sacubitril/Valsartan in patient with HFrEF in Pakistani population.. This proof-of-concept, open label non-randomized clinical trial was conducted at a tertiary care cardiac center of Karachi, Pakistan. Patients with HFrEF were prescribed with Sacubitril/Valsartan and followed for 12 weeks for the assessment of safety and tolerability. Safety measures included incidence of hypotension, renal dysfunction, hyperkalemia, and angioedema.. Among the 120 HFrEF patients, majority were male (79.2%) with means age of 52.73 ± 12.23 years. At the end of 12 weeks, four (3.3%) patients died and eight (6.7%) dropped out of the study. In the remaining 108 patients, 80.6% (87) of the patients were tolerant to the prescribed dose. Functional class improved gradually with 75.0% (81) in class I and 24.1% (26) in class II, and only one (0.9%) patient in class III at the end of 12 weeks. Hyperkalemia remains the main safety concern with incidence rate of 21.3% (23) followed by hypotension in 19.4% (21), and renal dysfunction in 3.7% (4) of the patients.. Sacubitril/Valsartan therapy in HFrEF patients is safe and moderately tolerated among the Pakistani population. It can be used as first line of treatment for these patients.. NCT05387967. Registered 24 May 2022-Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05387967.

Topics: Adult; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Hypotension; Kidney Diseases; Male; Middle Aged; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Global longitudinal strain (GLS) and global circumferential strain (GCS) have been shown to be impaired in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. We sought to assess whether treating patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction with sacubitril/valsartan would significantly improve GLS and GCS compared with valsartan alone.. PARAMOUNT (Prospective Comparison of ARNI With ARB on Management of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Trial) was a phase II, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind multicenter trial in 301 patients with New York Heart Association functional class II-III heart failure, a left ventricular ejection fraction of 45%, and an N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide of ≥400 pg/mL. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to sacubitril/valsartan titrated to 200 mg twice daily or valsartan titrated to 160 mg twice daily for 36 weeks. We assessed changes in the GLS and the GCS from baseline to 36 weeks, adjusting for baseline value, in patients with sufficient imaging quality for 2-dimensitonal speckle tracking analysis at both timepoints (n = 60 sacubitril/valsartan, n = 75 valsartan only). GCS was significantly improved at 36 weeks in the sacubitril/valsartan group when compared with the valsartan group (Δ4.42%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-8.17, P = .021), with no significant difference observed in GLS (Δ0.25%, 95% CI, -1.19 to 1.70, P = .73). Patients with a history of hospitalization for heart failure had a differentially greater improvement in GCS when treated with sacubitril/valsartan.. In patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, sacubitril/valsartan improved GCS but not GLS when compared with valsartan during a 36-week period. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00887588.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

To evaluate the impact of sacubitril/valsartan on blood pressure (BP), ventricular structure, and myocardial fibrosis compared with valsartan in perimenopausal hypertensive women.. This prospective, randomized, actively controlled, open-label study included 292 women with perimenopausal hypertension. They were randomly divided into two groups: sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg once daily and valsartan 160 mg once daily for 24 weeks. The relevant indicators of ambulatory BP, echocardiography, and myocardial fibrosis regulation were assessed at baseline and at 24 weeks.. The 24-h mean SBP after 24 weeks of treatment was 120.08 ± 10.47 mmHg in the sacubitril/valsartan group versus 121.00 ± 9.76 mmHg in the valsartan group ( P  = 0.457). After 24 weeks of treatment, there was no difference in central SBP between the sacubitril/valsartan and valsartan groups (117.17 ± 11.63 versus 116.38 ± 11.58, P  = 0.568). LVMI in the sacubitril/valsartan group was lower than that in the valsartan group at week 24 ( P  = 0.009). LVMI decreased by 7.23 g/m 2 from the baseline in the sacubitril/valsartan group and 3.70 g/m 2 in the valsartan group at 24 weeks ( P  = 0.000 versus 0.017). A statistically significant difference in LVMI between the two groups was observed at 24 weeks after adjusting for the baseline LVMI ( P  = 0.001). The levels of α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), connective tissue growth factor (CT-GF) and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) were reduced in the sacubitril/valsartan group compared with the baseline ( P  = 0.000, 0.005, and 0.000). LVMI between the two groups was statistically significant at 24 weeks after correcting for confounding factors 24-h mean SBP and 24-h mean DBP ( P  = 0.005). The LVMI, serum TGF-β, α-SMA, and CT-GF remained statistically significant between the two groups after further correcting the factors of age, BMI, and sex hormone levels ( P  < 0.05).. Sacubitril/valsartan could reverse ventricular remodeling more effectively than valsartan. The different effects of these two therapies on ventricular remodeling in perimenopausal hypertensive women might be because of their different effects on the down-regulation of fibrosis-related factors.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Perimenopause; Prospective Studies; Valsartan; Ventricular Remodeling

The PARAGLIDE-HF trial demonstrated reductions in natriuretic peptides with sacubitril/valsartan compared with valsartan in patients with heart failure (HF) with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction who had a recent worsening HF event, but was not adequately powered to examine clinical outcomes. PARAGON-HF included a subset of PARAGLIDE-HF-like patients who were recently hospitalized for HF. Participant-level data from PARAGLIDE-HF and PARAGON-HF were pooled to better estimate the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in reducing cardiovascular and renal events in HF with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction.. Both PARAGLIDE-HF and PARAGON-HF were multicentre, double-blind, randomized, active-controlled trials of sacubitril/valsartan vs. valsartan in patients with HF with mildly reduced or preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF >40% in PARAGLIDE-HF and ≥45% in PARAGON-HF). In the pre-specified primary analysis, we pooled participants in PARAGLIDE-HF (all of whom were enrolled during or within 30 days of a worsening HF event) with a 'PARAGLIDE-like' subset of PARAGON-HF (those hospitalized for HF within 30 days). We also pooled the entire PARAGLIDE-HF and PARAGON-HF populations for a broader context. The primary endpoint for this analysis was the composite of total worsening HF events (including first and recurrent HF hospitalizations and urgent visits) and cardiovascular death. The secondary endpoint was the pre-specified renal composite endpoint for both studies (≥50% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate from baseline, end-stage renal disease, or renal death). Compared with valsartan, sacubitril/valsartan significantly reduced total worsening HF events and cardiovascular death in both the primary pooled analysis of participants with recent worsening HF [n = 1088; rate ratio (RR) 0.78; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61-0.99; P = 0.042] and in the pooled analysis of all participants (n = 5262; RR 0.86; 95% CI: 0.75-0.98; P = 0.027). In the pooled analysis of all participants, first nominal statistical significance was reached by Day 9 after randomization, and treatment benefits were larger in those with LVEF ≤60% (RR 0.78; 95% CI 0.66-0.91) compared with those with LVEF >60% (RR 1.09; 95% CI 0.86-1.40; Pinteraction = 0.021). Sacubitril/valsartan was also associated with lower rates of the renal composite endpoint in the primary pooled analysis [hazard ratio (HR) 0.67; 95% CI 0.43-1.05; P = 0.080] and the pooled analysis of all participants (HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.44-0.83; P = 0.002).. In pooled analyses of PARAGLIDE-HF and PARAGON-HF, sacubitril/valsartan reduced cardiovascular and renal events among patients with HF with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction. These data provide support for use of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with HF with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction, particularly among those with an LVEF below normal, regardless of care setting.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

U.S. guidelines recommend consideration of sacubitril/valsartan in chronic heart failure (HF) and mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction (EF). Whether initiation is safe and effective in EF >40% after a worsening heart failure (WHF) event is unknown.. PARAGLIDE-HF (Prospective comparison of ARNI with ARB Given following stabiLization In DEcompensated HFpEF) assessed sacubitril/valsartan vs valsartan in EF >40% following a recent WHF event.. PARAGLIDE-HF is a double-blind, randomized controlled trial of sacubitril/valsartan vs valsartan in patients with EF >40% enrolled within 30 days of a WHF event. The primary endpoint was time-averaged proportional change in amino terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) from baseline through Weeks 4 and 8. A secondary hierarchical outcome (win ratio) consisted of: 1) cardiovascular death; 2) HF hospitalizations; 3) urgent HF visits; and 4) change in NT-proBNP.. In 466 patients (233 sacubitril/valsartan; 233 valsartan), time-averaged reduction in the NT-proBNP was greater with sacubitril/valsartan (ratio of change: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.73-0.999; P = 0.049). The hierarchical outcome favored sacubitril/valsartan but was not significant (unmatched win ratio: 1.19; 95% CI: 0.93-1.52; P = 0.16). Sacubitril/valsartan reduced worsening renal function (OR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.40-0.93) but increased symptomatic hypotension (OR: 1.73; 95% CI: 1.09-2.76). There was evidence of a larger treatment effect in the subgroup with EF ≤60% for NT-proBNP change (0.78; 95% CI: 0.61-0.98) and the hierarchical outcome (win ratio: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.09-1.95).. Among patients with EF >40% stabilized after WHF, sacubitril/valsartan led to greater reduction in plasma NT-proBNP levels and was associated with clinical benefit compared with valsartan alone, despite more symptomatic hypotension. (Prospective comparison of ARNI with ARB Given following stabiLization In DEcompensated HFpEF; NCT03988634).

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Angiotensins; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypotension; Neprilysin; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of death and morbidity in patients with end-stage renal disease. Sacubitril/valsartan (SAC/VAL) can reduce the risk of cardiovascular mortality among patients with heart failure (HF). The present study set out to evaluate the efficacy of SAC/VAL in the treatment of patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD) (HFpEF&PD).. A total of 160 patients with HFpEF&PD were enrolled and randomly divided into the control group (N = 80) and SAC/VAL group (N = 80). The cardiac function efficacy, HF scoring efficacy, echocardiographic parameters, serological indicators, and 6-minute walking test were compared before and after treatment.. After 6 months of treatment, the total number of patients who responded to treatment in the SAC/VAL group was higher than that of the control group in terms of cardiac function and HF scoring efficacy. After treatment, levels of early diastolic/late diastolic filling velocity and left ventricular ejection fraction were increased in both groups, while the levels of left atrial diameter, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, left ventricular end-systolic diameter, inter-ventricular septal diameter, and left ventricular posterior wall diameter were decreased; the NT-proBNP levels were diminished in both groups, while hemoglobin levels and the 6-minute walk distance were increased; the systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and 24-h ultrafiltration volume were lowered in all patients. The changes in these indexes in the SAC/VAL group were more obvious than those in the controls.. SAC/VAL can significantly improve cardiac function in patients with HFpEF&PD.

Topics: Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

Adrenomedullin is a vasodilatory peptide with a role in microcirculatory and endothelial homeostasis. Adrenomedullin is a substrate for neprilysin and may therefore play a role in beneficial effects of sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) treatment.. Mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM) was measured in 156 patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) treated with Sac/Val and 264 patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) randomized to treatment with Sac/Val or valsartan. Echocardiography and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire results were collected at baseline and after 6 and 12 months in the HFrEF cohort. Median (Q1-Q3) baseline MR-proADM concentrations were 0.80 (0.59-0.99) nmol/L in HFrEF and 0.88 (0.68-1.20) nmol/L in HFpEF. After 12 weeks of treatment with Sac/Val, MR-proADM increased by median 49% in HFrEF and 60% in HFpEF, while there were no significant changes in valsartan-treated patients (median 2%). Greater increases in MR-proADM were associated with higher Sac/Val doses. Changes in MR-proADM correlated weakly with changes in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, cardiac troponin T and urinary cyclic guanosine monophosphate. Increases in MR-proADM were associated with decreases in blood pressure, but not significantly associated with changes in echocardiographic parameters or health status.. MR-proAD concentrations rise substantially following treatment with Sac/Val, in contrast to no change from valsartan. Change in MR-proADM from neprilysin inhibition did not correlate with improvements in cardiac structure and function or health status. More data are needed regarding the role of adrenomedullin and its related peptides in the treatment of heart failure.. PROVE-HF ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02887183, PARAMOUNT ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00887588.

Topics: Adrenomedullin; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Microcirculation; Neprilysin; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Anemia is common in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and is associated with poor clinical outcomes. Renin-angiotensin system blockers lower hemoglobin and may induce anemia.. The authors investigated whether concomitant neprilysin inhibition might ameliorate this effect of renin-angiotensin system blockers in PARADIGM-HF (Prospective comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and morbidity in Heart Failure).. Anemia was defined as hemoglobin <120 g/L in women and <130 g/L in men at screening. The authors investigated the effect of randomized treatment on clinical outcomes according to anemia status, change in hemoglobin from baseline, and the incidence of anemia.. Of 8,239 participants with a baseline hemoglobin measurement, 1,677 (20.4%) were anemic. Patients with anemia had a more severe heart failure profile, worse kidney function, greater neurohormonal derangement, and worse clinical outcomes. Sacubitril/valsartan, compared with enalapril, decreased the risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization similarly in patients with (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.71-1.00) and without anemia (HR: 0.78 [95% CI: 0.71-0.87]; P value for interaction = 0.478). Between baseline and 12 months, hemoglobin decreased by 1.5 g/L (95% CI: 1.2-1.7 g/L) with sacubitril/valsartan compared with 2.3 g/L (95% CI: 2.0-2.6 g/L) with enalapril: mean difference 0.8 g/L (95% CI: 0.5-1.2 g/L; P < 0.001). Patients assigned to sacubitril/valsartan were less likely to develop anemia at 12 months (321 of 2,806 [11.4%]) compared with patients randomized to enalapril (440 of 2,824 [15.6%]) (OR: 0.70 [95% CI: 0.60-0.81]; P < 0.001). These findings were similar in PARAGON-HF (Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ARB Global Outcomes in HF with Preserved Ejection Fraction) (sacubitril/valsartan vs valsartan). There was biomarker evidence of increased iron utilization with sacubitril/valsartan.. Irrespective of anemia status, sacubitril/valsartan compared with enalapril, decreased mortality and hospitalization. Hemoglobin decreased less with sacubitril/valsartan and the incidence of new anemia was lower with sacubitril/valsartan. (Prospective comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and morbidity in Heart Failure [PARADIGM-HF] trial; NCT01035255).

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Anemia; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Drug Combinations; Enalapril; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan

Sudden death is a leading cause of mortality in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). In PARADIGM-HF, sacubitril/valsartan reduced the incidence of sudden death. The purpose of this post hoc study was to analyse the effect of sacubitril/valsartan, compared to enalapril, on the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias.. Adverse event reports related to ventricular arrhythmias were examined in PARADIGM-HF. The effect of randomized treatment on two arrhythmia outcomes was analysed: ventricular arrhythmias and the composite of a ventricular arrhythmia, implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shock or resuscitated cardiac arrest. The risk of death related to a ventricular arrhythmia was examined in time-updated models. The interaction between heart failure aetiology, or baseline ICD/cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) use, and the effect of sacubitril/valsartan was analysed. Of the 8399 participants, 333 (4.0%) reported a ventricular arrhythmia and 372 (4.4%) the composite arrhythmia outcome. Ventricular arrhythmias were associated with higher mortality. Compared with enalapril, sacubitril/valsartan reduced the risk of a ventricular arrhythmia (hazard ratio [HR] 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62-0.95; p = 0.015) and the composite arrhythmia outcome (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.97; p = 0.025). The treatment effect was maintained after adjustment and accounting for the competing risk of death. Baseline ICD/CRT-D use did not modify the effect of sacubitril/valsartan, but aetiology did: HR in patients with an ischaemic aetiology 0.93 (95% CI 0.71-1.21) versus 0.53 (95% CI 0.37-0.78) in those without an ischaemic aetiology (p for interaction = 0.020).. Sacubitril/valsartan reduced the incidence of investigator-reported ventricular arrhythmias in patients with HFrEF. This effect may have been greater in patients with a non-ischaemic aetiology.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP) is a cardioprotective peptide with high affinity for the ectoenzyme neutral endopeptidase (neprilysin). We aimed to determine whether angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor treatment acutely affects circulating concentrations of bioactive CNP and its molecular amino-terminal precursor (NT-proCNP).. We included 9 and 10 healthy young men in 2 randomized crossover trials with sacubitril/valsartan vs control (Trial 1) and sacubitril/valsartan and sitagliptin vs sitagliptin (Trial 2). The participants were randomized to a single dose of sacubitril/valsartan (194/206 mg) or control at the first visit 30 min prior to a standardized meal intake. We obtained blood samples at 12 time points over 5 h and measured plasma concentrations of NT-proCNP in both trials and CNP in Trial 2.. NT-proCNP concentrations increased 3.5 h after sacubitril/valsartan treatment, and at 4.5 h concentrations were 42% and 65% higher compared with control in Trial 1 and Trial 2, respectively. The total area under the curve (tAUC)15-270 min was 22% higher (P = 0.007) in Trial 1 and 17% higher with treatment (P = 0.017) in Trial 2. Concentrations of bioactive CNP followed a similar temporal pattern with an increase of 93% at 4.5 h and a 31% higher tAUC15-270 min compared with control (P = 0.001) in Trial 2.. Sacubitril/valsartan augments circulating concentrations of both bioactive CNP and NT-proCNP in healthy young men. The increase in bioactive CNP is most likely caused by de novo synthesis and secretion rather than diminished breakdown through neprilysin inhibition.ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT03717688.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Natriuretic Peptide, C-Type; Neprilysin; Peptide Fragments; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Sacubitril valsartan and valsartan are the first new drugs approved for angiotensin receptor neprilysin lysine inhibitors (ARNIs) in outpatients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and hypertension. Compared with enalapril, sacubitril valsartan and valsartan have been shown to reduce the mortality and morbidity of cardiovascular diseases. However, there is little actual evidence regarding the efficacy of ARNIs in hypertensive patients with CHF.. From January 2019 to January 2021, 60 patients with hypertension and chronic heart failure were diagnosed and treated in our hospital. The patients were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, with 30 cases in each group. The control group was given valsartan, the observation group was given sacubitril valsartan, and both groups were treated for six months. The endothelium-dependent vasodilation (EDD) function of the brachial artery and serum nitric oxide (NO), endothelin-1 (ET-1), carotid artery intima-media thickness, and glomerular filtration, excess rate (eGFR), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were compared between the two groups of patients before and after treatment. The serum adiponectin (APN), matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels were compared before and after treatment.. The total effective rate of treatment in the research group was higher than that in the control group (. In the treatment of hypertension and chronic heart failure, sacubitril valsartan can improve the clinical symptoms of patients to the greatest extent and can significantly improve the levels of LVEF, LVEDD, NT-proBNP, heart function, and other indicators. Sacubitril valsartan can increase serum APN levels, reduce MMP-9 and BNP levels, and have good clinical effects. Sacubitril valsartan has a protective effect on the vascular endothelial function of patients with hypertension and CHF. However, these results need to be confirmed in studies involving more subjects and require longer follow-up times.

Topics: Adiponectin; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Carotid Intima-Media Thickness; Drug Combinations; Endothelium; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Matrix Metalloproteinase 9; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Stroke Volume; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

In patient with symptomatic heart failure sacubitril valsartan has been found to reduces the risk of hospitalization and death from cardiovascular causes more effectively then angiotensin converting enzymes inhibitor trail comparing the effect of these drugs in acute myocardial infarction is lacking.. We randomly assigned patient with acute myocardial infarction complicated with reduced LVEF, or pulmonary congestion to recieve sacubitril 97mg-valsartan 103mg and ramipril 5mg twice daily the primary outcome was death from cardiovascular causes or incident heart failure, outpatient symptomatic heart failure or heart failure leading to hospitalization whichever occure first.. Total 566 patient was taken in randomization 283 receive sacubitril-valsartan and 283 receive ramipril over a median of 22 months total outcome occure in 138 patient in sacubitril-valsartan group and in137 patient with ramipril group(hazard ratio 0.90: 95%confidence interval death from cardiovascular causes or hospitalization for heart failure occure i 10.9% patient reciveing sacubitril-valsartan and in 11.8%patient with ramipril group death from cardiovascular causes is 5.9 and 6.7% respectively death from anyother causes is 7.5 and 8.5 % respectively in both sacubitril-valsartan and ramipril group.. Sacubitril-valsartan was not associated with significantly lower incidence of death from cardiovascular causes or incidents heart failure then ramipril in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Neprilysin; Ramipril; Receptors, Angiotensin; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan

N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and soluble ST2 (sST2) provide complementary prognostic information in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We aimed to assess the association between changes in these markers with changes in cardiac structure, function and health status.. Patients in the EVALUATE-HF trial (n = 464) were randomized to sacubitril/valsartan or enalapril for 12 weeks, followed by 12-week open-label sacubitril/valsartan. Cardiac biomarkers, echocardiography, and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaires (KCCQ) were completed at baseline, and after 12 and 24 weeks. A total of 410 patients (88%) had serial biomarker measurements available (mean age 67 ± 9 years, 75% male and 75% white). After 24 weeks of treatment, NT-proBNP, sST2 and cTnT decreased by median (Q1, Q3) -31% (-55%, +6%), -6% (-19%, +8%) and - 3% (-13%, +8%), respectively (all p < 0.001). Decreases in NT-proBNP were associated with reductions in cardiac volumes and improvements in systolic and diastolic function and health status. Decreases in cTnT were associated with reductions in left ventricular mass, but not with changes in left ventricular function or KCCQ. Decreases in sST2 were consistently associated with improvements in health status, but not with measures of cardiac structure or function. There was no effect modification from treatment on the associations investigated (p for interaction >0.05) CONCLUSION: In HFrEF, serial changes in NT-proBNP correlate with changes in several key measures of cardiac structure and health status. cTnT changes correlate with changes in left ventricular mass and sST2 with changes in health status. These data highlight possible complementary pathophysiologic implications of changes in NT-proBNP, cTnT and sST2.. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02874794.

Topics: Aged; Aminobutyrates; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Health Status; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Peptide Fragments; Stroke Volume; Troponin T; Valsartan

Sacubitril/valsartan is a neprilysin-inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker used for the treatment of heart failure. Recently, a post-hoc analysis of a 3-year randomized controlled trial showed improved glycaemic control with sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure and type 2 diabetes. We previously reported that sacubitril/valsartan combined with a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor increases active glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) in healthy individuals. We now hypothesized that administration of sacubitril/valsartan with or without a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor would lower postprandial glucose concentrations (primary outcome) in patients with type 2 diabetes via increased active GLP-1.. We performed a crossover trial in 12 patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes. A mixed meal was ingested following five respective interventions: (a) a single dose of sacubitril/valsartan; (b) sitagliptin; (c) sacubitril/valsartan + sitagliptin; (d) control (no treatment); and (e) valsartan alone. Glucose, gut and pancreatic hormone responses were measured.. Postprandial plasma glucose increased by 57% (incremental area under the curve 0-240 min) (p = .0003) and increased peak plasma glucose by 1.7 mM (95% CI: 0.6-2.9) (p = .003) after sacubitril/valsartan compared with control, whereas postprandial glucose levels did not change significantly after sacubitril/valsartan + sitagliptin. Glucagon, GLP-1 and C-peptide concentrations increased after sacubitril/valsartan, but insulin and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide did not change.. The glucose-lowering effects of long-term sacubitril/valsartan treatment reported in patients with heart failure and type 2 diabetes may not depend on changes in entero-pancreatic hormones. Neprilysin inhibition results in hyperglucagonaemia and this may explain the worsen glucose tolerance observed in this study.. gov (NCT03893526).

Topics: Aged; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Combinations; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucose Tolerance Test; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Neprilysin; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan

We assessed a subset of the 5040 patients in VICTORIA receiving sacubitril/valsartan, either at randomization (n = 731) or post-randomization drop-in use (n = 425), to evaluate the relationship between the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with vericiguat.. The efficacy of vericiguat on the primary composite endpoint, heart failure (HF) hospitalization, and all-cause mortality was assessed. Safety outcomes included symptomatic hypotension, syncope, worsening renal function, and hyperkalaemia. At randomization, 731 patients received sacubitril/valsartan; they were more frequently from Western Europe or North America, had lower ejection fraction and systolic blood pressure, and more use of triple background HF therapy (65.9% vs. 58.6%), biventricular pacemakers (17.9% vs. 14.1%), or implantable cardioverter defibrillators (42.3% vs. 25.3%). For patients on versus not on sacubitril/valsartan at randomization, adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for vericiguat's treatment effect on the primary composite outcome, cardiovascular death, and HF hospitalization were 0.92 (0.71-1.19) versus 0.89 (0.80-0.98), 0.71 (0.45-1.12) versus 0.95 (0.82-1.11), and 0.98 (0.74-1.29) versus 0.87 (0.78-0.98), respectively. No significant interaction existed between sacubitril/valsartan and vericiguat's treatment effect (p-values for interaction: 0.81, 0.23 and 0.47, respectively). Post-randomization, more drop-in sacubitril/valsartan use occurred in those assigned to placebo (n = 238) versus vericiguat (n = 187) (p = 0.007). Symptomatic hypotension (21.0% vs. 23.1%; p = 0.41), renal dysfunction (29.9% vs. 31.9%; p = 0.50), and hyperkalaemia (10.3% vs. 7.9%; p = 0.20) in patients receiving sacubitril/valsartan (n = 992) for ≥3 months were not different by treatment arm.. Concomitant use of sacubitril/valsartan for at least 3 months did not alter the efficacy of vericiguat and was similarly safe and tolerated in both study arms. Sacubitril/valsartan was initiated more frequently after randomization in patients assigned to placebo versus vericiguat.. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02861534.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Hypotension; Pyrimidines; Stroke Volume; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Frailty is an increasingly common problem, and frail patients are less likely to receive new pharmacologic therapies because the risk-benefit profile is perceived to be less favorable than in nonfrail patients.. This study investigated the efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan according to frailty status in 4,796 patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction randomized in the PARAGON-HF (Prospective Comparison of ARNI With ARB Global Outcomes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction) trial.. Frailty was measured by using the Rockwood cumulative deficit approach. The primary endpoint was total heart failure hospitalizations or cardiovascular death.. A frailty index (FI) was calculable in 4,795 patients. In total, 45.2% had class 1 frailty (FI ≤0.210, not frail), 43.5% had class 2 frailty (FI 0.211-0.310, more frail), and 11.4% had class 3 frailty (FI ≥0.311, most frail). There was a graded relationship between FI class and the primary endpoint, with a significantly higher risk associated with greater frailty (class 1: reference; class 2 rate ratio: 2.19 [95% CI: 1.85-2.60]; class 3 rate ratio: 3.29 [95% CI: 2.65-4.09]). The effect of sacubitril/valsartan vs valsartan on the primary endpoint from lowest to highest FI class (as a rate ratio) was: 0.98 [95% CI: 0.76-1.27], 0.92 [95% CI: 0.76-1.12], and 0.69 [95% CI: 0.51-0.95]), respectively (P. Frailty was common in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and associated with worse outcomes. Compared with valsartan, sacubitril/valsartan seemed to show a greater reduction in the primary endpoint with increasing frailty, although this was not significant when FI was examined as a categorical variable. (Prospective Comparison of ARNI With ARB Global Outcomes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction [PARAGON-HF]; NCT01920711).

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Frailty; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

The win ratio can incorporate different types of outcomes and enhance statistical power, making it a useful method for analysing composite outcomes in cardiovascular trials. The application of this approach to the PARADISE-MI trial provides an additional perspective into understanding the effects of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with acute myocardial infarction.. We conducted a post-hoc analysis of the PARADISE-MI trial, which randomly assigned patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, pulmonary congestion, or both to receive either sacubitril/valsartan (97 mg of sacubitril and 103 mg of valsartan twice daily) or ramipril (5 mg twice daily) in addition to guideline-recommended therapy. The principal composite outcome was analysed in the hierarchical order of death due to cardiovascular causes, first hospitalization for heart failure, and first outpatient episode of symptomatic heart failure. We included events confirmed by the clinical events classification (CEC) committee as well as events identified by investigators that did not meet study definitions. Results were analysed by the unmatched win-ratio method. A win ratio that exceeds 1.00 reflects a better outcome. A total of 5661 patients underwent randomization; 2830 were assigned to receive sacubitril/valsartan and 2831 to receive ramipril. The hierarchical analysis of the principal composite outcome demonstrated a larger number of wins (1 265 767 [15.7%]) than losses (1 079 502 [13.4%]) in the sacubitril/valsartan group (win ratio of 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.33; p = 0.015). Sensitivity analyses using alternative definitions of the composite outcome showed results similar to those of the principal analysis, except for analysis restricted to events that met CEC definitions (win ratio of 1.11, 95% CI 0.96-1.30; p = 0.16).. In this post-hoc analysis of the PARADISE-MI trial using the win ratio and including investigator-identified events not having CEC confirmation, sacubitril/valsartan was superior to ramipril among high-risk survivors of acute myocardial infarction.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Neprilysin; Ramipril; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

The valsartan-sacubitril therapy improved the outcomes of patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) of a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). In ADHF patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), it is not yet clear whether the same treatment regimen may be safely used to treat ADHF.. For this study, HFpEF patients hospitalized due to ADHF were enrolled. Following hemodynamic stabilization, patients were randomized into two groups that were treated with enalapril or sacubitril-valsartan. In this trial, the primary efficacy outcomes were changes in echocardiographic parameters and NT-proBNP levels from baseline to 8 weeks treatment.. ARNI treatment resulted in a significant decrease in NT-proBNP levels and an increase in LVEF in patients with HFpEF. However, HFpEF patients that underwent ARNI treatment achieved better outcomes than did patients that underwent ACEI treatment.. Sacubitril-valsartan treatment, which lowered NT-proBNP levels and improved cardiac function, was more effective in HFpEF patients with acute decompensated heart failure than enalapril.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensins; Biphenyl Compounds; Echocardiography; Enalapril; Heart Failure; Humans; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Neprilysin; Peptide Fragments; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Many patients present with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) after acute anterior wall ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of preprocedural sacubitril/valsartan on N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with acute anterior STEMI undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. We enrolled patients with acute anterior wall STEMI who underwent emergency PCI at The Affiliated Hospital of Putian University from January 2019 to January 2021. Prior to PCI, patients were randomized to receive sacubitril/valsartan or valsartan. Nonculprit lesion vessels that require PCI were excluded. The primary endpoints included changes in NT-pro-BNP, LVEF, and rehospitalization for heart failure (HF) during the follow-up period.. Out of 109 patients who were randomized, 55 were assigned to receive sacubitril/valsartan and 54 were assigned to receive valsartan. The decrease in NT-pro-BNP concentrations and the increase in LVEF were significantly greater in the sacubitril/valsartan group than in the valsartan group.. In patients with acute anterior wall STEMI undergoing emergency PCI, preprocedural initiation of sacubitril/valsartan therapy increased LVEF and lower NT-pro-BNP concentrations compared with valsartan therapy.

Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

In patients who survive an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors decrease the risk of subsequent major cardiovascular events. Whether angiotensin-receptor blockade and neprilysin inhibition with sacubitril/valsartan reduce major coronary events more effectively than angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in high-risk patients with recent AMI remains unknown. We aimed to compare the effects of sacubitril/valsartan on coronary outcomes in patients with AMI.. We conducted a prespecified analysis of the PARADISE-MI trial (Prospective ARNI vs ACE Inhibitors Trial to Determine Superiority in Reducing Heart Failure Events After MI), which compared sacubitril/valsartan (97/103 mg twice daily) with ramipril (5 mg twice daily) for reducing heart failure events after myocardial infarction in 5661 patients with AMI complicated by left ventricular systolic dysfunction, pulmonary congestion, or both. In the present analysis, the prespecified composite coronary outcome was the first occurrence of death from coronary heart disease, nonfatal myocardial infarction, hospitalization for angina, or postrandomization coronary revascularization.. In survivors of an AMI with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and pulmonary congestion, sacubitril/valsartan-compared with ramipril-reduced the risk of a prespecified major coronary composite outcome. Dedicated studies are necessary to confirm this finding and elucidate its mechanism.. URL: https://www.. gov; Unique identifier: NCT02924727.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Angiotensins; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Neprilysin; Prospective Studies; Ramipril; Receptors, Angiotensin; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Heart failure (HF) is associated with poor health-related quality of life (HRQL). Patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have similar HRQL impairment as those with reduced ejection fraction. This study describes the impact of sacubitril/valsartan on HRQL in patients with HFpEF enrolled in the PARAGON-HF trial.. Patients completed the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and EuroQol (EQ-5D) at randomization, 4, 8 months, and annually thereafter. Changes in HRQL scores were evaluated using repeated measures models adjusted for treatment, baseline values and region. The pre-specified principal efficacy assessment was at 8 months at which time patients randomized to sacubitril/valsartan had borderline higher KCCQ clinical summary score (CSS) with least squares mean (LSM) adjusted difference of 1.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.0, 2.1; p = 0.051). Including all visits up to 36 months, the LSM difference in KCCQ-CSS favoured sacubitril/valsartan with average adjusted difference of 1.1 (95% CI 0.1, 2.0; p = 0.034). Patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan had greater odds of clinically meaningful improvement (≥5-point increase) in KCCQ-CSS (odds ratio 1.31; 95% CI 1.06, 1.61) at 8 months. At 8 months, there was no significant difference in the EQ visual analogue scale between the treatment arms, but sacubitril/valsartan was associated with higher EQ-5D utility score (US-based) with LSM adjusted difference of 0.01 (95% CI 0.00, 0.02; p = 0.019).. Compared with valsartan, sacubitril/valsartan had a borderline benefit on KCCQ-CSS at 8 months in patients with HFpEF. This benefit became more significant when data from all visits up to 36 months were included. This modest overall benefit was also supported by greater odds of patients reporting a clinically meaningful improvement in HRQL with sacubitril/valsartan.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Quality of Life; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) sacubitril-valsartan has been recommended as one of the first-line therapies in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. However, whether ARNI could benefit patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) by improving left ventricular (LV) remodeling remains unknown. The primary objective of the PERI-STEMI trial is to assess whether sacubitril-valsartan is more effective in preventing adverse LV remodeling for patients with STEMI than enalapril.. We hypothesize that sacubitril/valsartan is superior to enalapril in preventing adverse LV remodeling evaluated by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging at the 6-month follow-up.. PERI-STEMI is an investigator-initiated, prospective, multi-center, randomized, open-label, superiority trial with blinded evaluation of outcomes. A total of 376 first-time STEMI patients with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) within 12 h after symptom onset will be randomized to sacubitril-valsartan or enalapril treatment. All the patients will receive a baseline cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) examination at 4-7 days post-PPCI. The primary endpoint is the change of indexed LV mass at the 6-month follow-up CMR.. Enrollment of the first patient is planned in November 2021. Recruitment is anticipated to last for 12-18 months and patients will be followed for 5 years after randomization. The study is expected to complete in June 2027.. The results of the PERI-STEMI trial are expected to provide CMR evidence on whether ARNI could benefit patients with STEMI, so as to facilitate the strategy of CMR-based risk stratification and therapy selection for these patients. PERI-STEMI is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04912167).

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Enalapril; Heart Failure; Humans; Prospective Studies; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Ventricular Remodeling

In the Prospective Comparison of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) With ACEi to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure (PARADIGM-HF) study, treatment with sacubitril/valsartan reduced the primary outcome of cardiovascular (CV) death and heart failure (HF) hospitalization compared with enalapril in patients with chronic HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). A prospective randomized trial was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in Japanese HFrEF patients.Methods and Results:In the Prospective comparison of ARNI with ACEi to determine the noveL beneficiaL trEatment vaLue in Japanese Heart Failure patients (PARALLEL-HF) study, 225 Japanese HFrEF patients (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class II-IV, left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≤35%) were randomized (1 : 1) to receive sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg bid or enalapril 10 mg bid. Over a median follow up of 33.9 months, no significant between-group difference was observed for the primary composite outcome of CV death and HF hospitalization (HR 1.09; 95% CI 0.65-1.82; P=0.6260). Early and sustained reductions in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) from baseline were observed with sacubitril/valsartan compared with enalapril (between-group difference: Week 2: 25.7%, P<0.01; Month 6: 18.9%, P=0.01, favoring sacubitril/valsartan). There was no significant difference in the changes in NYHA class and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) clinical summary score at Week 8 and Month 6. Sacubitril/valsartan was well tolerated with fewer study drug discontinuations due to adverse events, although the sacubitril/valsartan group had a higher proportion of patients with hypotension.. In Japanese patients with HFrEF, there was no difference in reduction in the risk of CV death or HF hospitalization between sacubitril/valsartan and enalapril, and sacubitril/valsartan was safe and well tolerated.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Enalapril; Heart Failure; Humans; Japan; Prospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Ventricular Function, Left

The 4822 patients randomized in the PARAGON-HF trial were a subset of 5746 initially eligible patients who entered sequential run-in periods. We identified patient factors associated with study discontinuation during the run-in period and estimated the implications of these discontinuations for the overall study result.. We utilized multivariable logistic regression models to identify patient factors associated with study discontinuation during the run-in period. The efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan in a broader cohort approximating the full run-in population was estimated by weighting randomized patients according to the inverse probability of run-in completion. A total of 924 (16.1%) subjects failed to complete the run-in period. In multivariable models, non-completion was associated with region other than Central Europe, lower systolic blood pressure, lower serum sodium, lower haemoglobin, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, higher New York Heart Association functional class, prior heart failure (HF) hospitalization, and lack of prior use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors or beta-blocker. In repeat analysis of the effect of randomized treatment in PARAGON-HF giving greater weight to participants resembling those who failed to complete the run-in period, the incidence of HF hospitalizations and cardiovascular death was higher, and sacubitril/valsartan treatment reduced the composite of total HF hospitalizations and cardiovascular death compared with valsartan (rate ratio 0.86; 95% confidence interval 0.74-1.00).. Patients with more advanced HF were at higher risk for non-completion of the run-in period in PARAGON-HF. Re-analysis of study outcomes accounting for the effect of run-in non-completion did not alter the estimated treatment effects of sacubitril/valsartan vs. valsartan.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Heart failure and sleep-disordered breathing have been increasingly recognized as co-occurring conditions. Their bidirectional relationship warrants investigation into whether heart failure therapy improves sleep and sleep-disordered breathing. We sought to explore the effect of treatment with sacubitril/valsartan on sleep-related endpoints from the AWAKE-HF study.. AWAKE-HF was a randomized, double-blind study conducted in 23 centers in the United States. Study participants with heart failure with reduced rejection fraction and New York Heart Association class II or III symptoms were randomly assigned to receive treatment with either sacubitril/valsartan or enalapril. All endpoints were assessed at baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment. Portable sleep-monitoring equipment was used to measure the apnea-hypopnea index, including obstructive and central events. Total sleep time, wake after sleep onset and sleep efficiency were exploratory measures assessed using wrist actigraphy.. 140 patients received treatment in the double-blind phase (sacubitril/valsartan, n = 70; enalapril, n = 70). At baseline, 39% and 40% of patients randomly assigned to receive sacubitril/valsartan or enalapril, respectively, presented with undiagnosed, untreated, moderate-to-severe sleep-disordered breathing (≥ 15 events/h), and nearly all had obstructive sleep apnea. After 8 weeks of treatment, the mean 4% apnea-hypopnea index changed minimally from 16.3/h to 15.2/h in the sacubitril/valsartan group and from 16.8/h to 17.6/h in the enalapril group. Mean total sleep time was long at baseline and decreased only slightly in both treatment groups at week 8 (-14 and -11 minutes for sacubitril/valsartan and enalapril, respectively), with small changes in wake after sleep onset and sleep efficiency in both groups.. In a cohort of patients with heart failure with reduced rejection fraction who met prescribing guidelines for sacubitril/valsartan, one-third had undiagnosed moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea. The addition of sacubitril/valsartan therapy did not significantly improve sleep-disordered breathing or sleep duration or efficiency. Patients who meet indications for treatment with sacubitril/valsartan should be evaluated for sleep-disordered breathing.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Enalapril; Heart Failure; Humans; Sleep; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Wakefulness

Pediatric heart failure (HF) is an important clinical disease with high hospitalization rates, morbidity, mortality and medical costs. Sacubitril/valsartan (also known as Entresto), was approved for the treatment of adult HF and is recently used in pediatrics. However, clinical therapy on children is more challenging than adults, and the pharmacokinetics of Entresto in children are still largely unknown and urgently needed. Herein, we aim to develop a simple and sensitive analytic method to monitor Entresto in pediatric patients, which is of great importance for individualized safe medication in children. Specifically, a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method for simultaneously quantification of valsartan, sacubitril and its bio-active metabolite sacubitrilat in human plasma has been developed and validated in pediatric patients. Plasma samples were pretreated with acetonitrile for protein precipitation. Elution was performed on X Select HSS T3 column (2.1 × 100 mm, 5 µm; Waters) column using an isocratic mobile phase process consisting of 0.1% formic acid aqueous solution and 0.1% formic acid acetonit rile with a total run time of 3.0 min. Valsartan-d3, sacubitrilin-d4 and sacubitrilat-d4 were used as the corresponding deuterium internal standards. According to the Bioanalytical Method Validation Guidance for Industry, the method was validated in the range of 0.5-5000 ng/mL. Intra- and inter-day accuracy of sacubitril,valsartan and sacubitrilat ranged from 93%- 108%, 98%- 109%, 91%- 102%, respectively, with relative standard deviation of precision ranging from 2.0% to 5.1%, 2.4%- 7.5%, 1,3%- 7.4%. The proposed method demonstrated good accuracy, precision and linearity. The matrix factors normalized by internal standard meet the acceptance criteria. The method was fully validated and applied in 39 children. Trough concentration of the three substances to be measured were: valsartan (11.3-938.0 ng/mL), sacubitril (0.5-395.5 ng/mL) and sacubitrilat (522.1-4890.0 ng/mL). Overall, this is the first study to simultaneously determined the plasma valsartan, sacubitril and sacubitrilat concentrations in children, which is believed to facilitate the clinical management of pediatric HF.

Topics: Adult; Antihypertensive Agents; Child; Chromatography, Liquid; Heart Failure; Humans; Reproducibility of Results; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Cardiac ischemia-related myocardial damage has been considered a major reason for heart failure. We aimed to investigate the role of levosimendan (LEVO) in comparison to ramipril and sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) in preventing damage associated with isoproterenol (ISO) induced myocardial infarction.. Myocardial infarction was induced by injecting subcutaneous isoproterenol (5 mg/kg once for 7 consecutive days) to establish an experimental heart failure model. Simultaneously, LEVO (1 mg/kg/day), ramipril (3mg/kg/day) and Sac/Val (68 mg/kg/day) suspension were administered orally for four weeks.. We observed a significant correlation between ISO-induced ischemia with cardiac remodeling and alterations in myocardial architecture. LEVO, ramipril, and Sac/Val significantly prevented lipid peroxidation and damaged antioxidant enzymes like superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione and thioredoxin reductase. We also observed their ameliorative effects in myocardium's cardiac hypertrophy, evidenced by reduced heart weight to body weight ratio and transforming growth factor β related collagen deposition. LEVO, ramipril, and Sac/Val also maintained cardiac biomarkers like lactate dehydrogenase, creatine kinase-MB, brain natriuretic peptide and cardiac Troponin-I, indicating reduced myocardial damage that was further demonstrated by histopathological examination. Decreased sarcoplasmic endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ATPase2a and sodium-calcium exchanger-1 protein depletion after LEVO, ramipril, and Sac/Val administration indicated improved Ca2+ homeostasis during myocardial contractility.. Our findings suggest that LEVO has comparable effects to ramipril, and Sac/Val in preventing myocardial damage via balancing oxidant-antioxidant system, decreased collagen deposition, reduced myocardial stress as well as improved Ca2+ homeostasis during myocardial contractility.

Topics: Antioxidants; Calcium; Collagen; Heart Failure; Hemodynamics; Humans; Isoproterenol; Myocardial Infarction; Ramipril; Simendan; Valsartan

Guidelines recommend early initiation of multiple guideline-directed medical therapies (GDMTs) to reduce mortality/rehospitalization in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. Understanding GDMT use is critical to improving clinical practice.. This study sought to describe GDMT use in Japan, Sweden, and the United States in contemporary real-world settings.. EVOLUTION HF (Utilization of Dapagliflozin and Other Guideline Directed Medical Therapies in Heart Failure Patients: A Multinational Observational Study Based on Secondary Data) is an observational cohort study using routine-care databases. Patients initiating any GDMT within 12 months of a hospitalization for heart failure (hHF) discharge were included. Dapagliflozin (the only sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor approved at study onset), sacubitril/valsartan, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), beta-blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) were considered separately. Doses and discontinuation were assessed in the 12 months following initiation. Target dose was defined as ≥100% of the guideline-recommended dose.. Overall, 266,589 patients were included. Mean times from hHF to GDMT initiation were longer for novel GDMTs (dapagliflozin or sacubitril/valsartan) than for other GDMTs: 39 and 44 vs 12 to 13 days (Japan), 44 and 33 vs 22 to 31 days (Sweden), and 33 and 19 vs 18 to 24 days (United States). Pooled across countries, proportions of patients who discontinued therapy (not including switches from ACE inhibitor or ARB to sacubitril/valsartan) within 12 months were 23.5% (dapagliflozin), 26.4% (sacubitril/valsartan), 38.4% (ACE inhibitors), 33.4% (ARBs), 25.2% (beta-blockers), and 42.2% (MRAs). Corresponding target dose achievements were 75.7%, 28.2%, 20.1%, 6.7%, 7.2%, and 5.1%, respectively.. Initiation of novel GDMTs is delayed compared with other GDMTs. Few patients received target doses of GDMTs requiring uptitration. Persistence was higher for dapagliflozin than other GDMTs.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; United States; Valsartan

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a complex neurodegenerative disease. There is epidemiological evidence that heart failure (HF) patients are at higher risk of developing AD, and the impact of sacubitril/valsartan, the first angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) approved for HF, on cognitive functions is still controversial. To investigate the effect of sacubitril/valsartan on cognitive functions in colchicine-induced AD rat model. Forty adult male Wistar rats were equally allocated into four groups (each of 10 rats): Group I: normal control, Group II: intracerebroventricular injection of colchicine (15 μg/5 μl/bilaterally), Group III: colchicine (15 μg/5 μl/bilaterally, icv) + oral sacubitril/valsartan (100 mg/kg/day) for 25 days, and Group IV: colchicine (15 μg/5 μl/bilaterally, icv) + oral valsartan (50 mg/kg/day) for 25 days. Behavioral assessment was done using Morris water maze and passive avoidance tasks. Biochemically, β-amyloid (1-40 and 1-42) peptides, oxidative stress (malondialdehyde and superoxide dismutase) and inflammatory (tumor necrosis factor-alpha) parameters were measured in hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. Sacubitril/valsartan exaggerated colchicine-induced cognitive impairment in both Morris water maze and passive avoidance tasks and was associated with significant increase in β-amyloid accumulation, oxidative stress, and inflammation versus valsartan. Sacubitril/valsartan caused deleterious effect on cognitive impairment and biochemical alterations in colchicine-induced AD rat model. Hence, special caution should be taken following long-term intake of ARNI on cognitive functions.

Topics: Alzheimer Disease; Amyloid beta-Peptides; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Cognitive Dysfunction; Colchicine; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Male; Neurodegenerative Diseases; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Registries; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Sodium Potassium Chloride Symporter Inhibitors; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan

Sacubitril/valsartan has changed the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), due to the positive effects on morbidity and mortality, partly mediated by left ventricular (LV) reverse remodelling (LVRR). The aim of this multicenter study was to identify echocardiographic predictors of LVRR after sacubitril/valsartan administration.. Patients with HFrEF requiring therapy with sacubitril/valsartan from 13 Italian centres were included. Echocardiographic parameters including LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) and global peak atrial longitudinal strain by speckle tracking echocardiography were measured to find the predictors of LVRR [= LV end-systolic volume reduction ≥10% and ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement ≥10% at follow-up] at 6 month follow-up as the primary endpoint. Changes in symptoms [New York Heart Association (NYHA) class] and neurohormonal activations [N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)] were also evaluated as secondary endpoints; 341 patients (excluding patients with poor acoustic windows and missing data) were analysed (mean age: 65 ± 10 years; 18% female, median LVEF 30% [inter-quartile range: 25-34]). At 6 month follow-up, 82 (24%) patients showed early complete response (LVRR and LVEF ≥ 35%), 55 (16%) early incomplete response (LVRR and LVEF < 35%), and 204 (60%) no response (no LVRR and LVEF < 35%). Non-ischaemic aetiology, a lower left atrial volume index, and a higher GLS were all independent predictors of LVRR at multivariable logistic analysis (all P < 0.01). A baseline GLS < -9.3% was significantly associated with early response (area under the curve 0.75, P < 0.0001). Left atrial strain was the best predictor of positive changes in NYHA class and NT-proBNP (all P < 0.05).. Speckle tracking echocardiography parameters at baseline could be useful to predict LVRR and clinical response to sacubitril-valsartan and could be used as a guide for treatment in patients with HFrEF.

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Echocardiography; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Sacubitril/valsartan was demonstrated to reduce hospitalization rate and mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Data on the effects of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with a systemic right ventricle are still lacking.. Patients with transposition of the great arteries following Senning/Mustard procedure or congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries with impaired systemic right ventricle systolic function were prospectively included. Primary end points included sacubitril/valsartan safety and efficacy. Primary efficacy end points were NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) and systolic function improvement. Secondary end points included New York Heart Association class, 6-minute walking distance, and quality of life change.. Fifty patients (38±12 years, 60% male, 35% congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries) were included and followed for 1 year. No major adverse events occurred. Two (4%) patients ceased treatment due to hypotension and 1 (2%) developed a nephrotic syndrome. The target dose was reached in 20 (42%) patients. NT-proBNP values decreased significantly immediately after treatment initiation, while returned to baseline at 1 year. Echocardiography showed progressive fractional area change increase (29.2±5.8 versus 34.9±5.1%;. Our data showed that sacubitril/valsartan is well tolerated and is associated with systemic right ventricle remodeling and improved systolic function as well as improved clinical status, supporting its use in this complex population.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Congenitally Corrected Transposition of the Great Arteries; Drug Combinations; Female; Heart Failure; Heart Ventricles; Humans; Male; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Transposition of Great Vessels; Valsartan

Sacubitril/Valsartan (Sac-Val) has improved clinical prognosis in patients affected by heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Comorbidities have a crucial impact on clinical presentation and prognosis in HF patients. Cognitive impairment (CoI) and Depression are a very common comorbidity in patients with HF and is widely recognized as a specific determinant of chronic disability, and HF patients with poor physical functional performance in Short physical performance battery (SPPB) showed a worse prognosis. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the potential effects of Sac-Val on functional, humoral, and cognitive aspects, evaluated by performing comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA), in a cohort of elderly HFrEF. We studied 61 patients (51 men and 10 women, mean age 76.4 ± 5.1 years) suffering from HFrEF. After 6 months follow-up, we observed a significant improvement in humoral and functional parameters of CGA, renal function, NTpro-BNP levels and echocardiographic parameters. In the whole population, multivariate analysis shows that changes of Cardiac Index, NT-proBNP and Respiratory rate contributed for 26.0%, 9.7% and 4.8% to GDS variability, respectively, and the whole model accounted for a 41.1% of GDS variation; moreover changes of Global longitudinal strain, estimated glomerular filtration rate, Cardiac Index and BMI contributed for 23.9%, 11.7%, 5.4% and 4.0% to SPPB variability, respectively, and the whole model accounted for a 45% of SPPB variation. This represents the first real-world study carried out in an elderly population suffering from chronic HFrEF with numerous comorbidities, in which treatment with Sac-Val for 6 months induced important improvements in clinical, humoral, hemodynamic, and functional outcomes, without adverse effects on cognitive performance.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Drug Combinations; Female; Geriatric Assessment; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Guidelines classify sacubitril/valsartan as a significant part of medical treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Data have shown that the HbA1c levels in patients with diabetes mellitus could be impacted by sacubitril/valsartan. A possible positive effect in diabetes patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan on outcome and echocardiography parameters is not well studied yet.. The aim of the present study was to compare the impact of sacubitril/valsartan on life-threatening arrhythmias, atrial fibrillation, different echocardiography parameters and congestion rate in patients suffering from HFrEF according to the diagnosis diabetes mellitus or no diabetes mellitus.. Consecutive 240 patients with HFrEF from 2016 to 2020 were treated with sacubitril/valsartan and separated to concomitant diabetes mellitus (n = 87, median age 68 years interquartile range (IQR) [32-87]) or no diabetes mellitus (n = 153, median age 66 year IQR [34-89]). Different comorbidities and outcome data were evaluated over a follow-up period of 24 months. Arterial hypertension (87% vs. 64%; P < 0.01) and coronary artery disease (74% vs. 60%; P = 0.03) were more often documented in patients with diabetes mellitus compared with patients without diabetes mellitus. Over the follow-up of 24 months several changes were noted in both subgroups: Median left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) increased significantly in non-diabetes (27% IQR [3-44] at baseline to 35% IQR [13-64]; P < 0.001), but not in diabetic patients (29% IQR [10-65] at baseline to 30% IQR [13-55]; P = 0.11). Accordingly, NT-proBNP and troponin-I levels decreased significantly in non-diabetes patients (NT-brain natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP] from median 1445 pg/mL IQR [12.6-74 676] to 491 pg/mL IQR [13-4571]; P < 0.001, troponin-I levels from 0.099 ng/mL IQR [0.009-138.69] to 0.023 ng/mL IQR [0.006-0.635]; P < 0.001), but not in diabetic patients (NT-proBNP from 1395 pg/mL IQR [100-29 924] to 885 pg/mL IQR [159-4331]; P = 0.06, troponin-I levels from 0.05 ng/mL IQR [0.013-103.0] to 0.020 ng/mL IQR [0.015-0.514]; P = 0.27). No significant change of laboratory parameters e. g. glomerular filtration rate, potassium level and creatinine levels were found in diabetes or non-diabetes patients. Comparing further echocardiography data, left atrial surface area, right atrial surface area, E/A ratio did not show a significant change either in the diabetes or non-diabetes group. However, the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion was significantly increased in non-diabetes mellitus patients (from 17 mm IQR [3-31] to 18 mm [2.5-31]; P = 0.04), and not in diabetic s patients (17.5 mm IQR [8-30] to 18 mm IQR [14-31]; P = 0.70); the systolic pulmonary artery pressure remained unchanged in both groups. During follow-up, a similar rate of ventricular tachyarrhythmias was observed in both groups. The congestion rate decreased significantly in both groups, in diabetes patients (44.4% before sacubitril/valsartan and 13.5% after 24 months treatment; P = 0.0009) and in non-diabetic patients (28.4% before sacubitril/valsartan and 8.4% after 24 months treatment; P = 0.0004). The all-cause mortality rate was. Sacubitril/valsartan reverses cardiac remodelling in non-diabetes patients. However, it reduces the congestion rate in diabetes and non-diabetes patients. The rates of ventricular tachyarrhythmias were similar in DM compared with non-DM over follow-up. The mortality rate remained to be over follow-up higher in diabetes patients compared with non-diabetes; however, it was lower compared with published data on diabetes and concomitant HFrEF not treated with sacubitril/valsartan.

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Diabetes Mellitus; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Tachycardia, Ventricular; Tetrazoles; Troponin I; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

Sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) improves left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction regardless of previous treatments. Improvements in LVEF may change eligibility for primary implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) placement. Awaiting LVEF improvement may expose patients to potential risks for arrhythmic complications.. The authors sought to develop a model predicting LVEF change after Sac/Val therapy.. A total of 416 persons with HF and LVEF of <35% were included in this analysis. Following initiation of Sac/Val, echocardiographic parameters were measured serially for 1 year. A machine learning algorithm was implemented to develop a risk model for predicting the persistence of LVEF of <35% after 1 year and was validated in a separate group of study participants.. Baseline LVEF, left ventricular mass index, HF duration, age, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide concentration at baseline and change by day 14, and body mass index were the most significant factors for identifying lack of LVEF improvement to ≥35% after 1 year. In the training and validation cohorts, the areas under the model curve for predicting lack of LVEF improvement were 0.92 and 0.86, respectively. Three categories of likelihood for LVEF of <35% after 1 year of Sac/Val treatment were developed based on the model predictions: 3.8%, 30.1%, and 83.7%. During follow-up, arrhythmia event rates were 0.9%, 2.9%, and 6.7% in these groups, respectively.. Many persons with HF with reduced ejection fraction eligible for ICD insertion experience an increase in LVEF to ≥35% after treatment with Sac/Val. Early identification of those less likely to improve their LVEF might allow for more refined selection of primary ICD candidates. (Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan Therapy on biomarkers, Myocardial Remodeling, and Outcomes [PROVE-HF]; NCT02887183).

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Ventricular Function, Left

As a first-line therapy, sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) plays a significant role in the treatment of heart failure. However, its effect on renal function is still uncertain. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Clinical Trials for randomized controlled trials to evaluate the effect of S/V on renal function in patients. The results are reported as the mean difference, relative ratio, and 95% confidence intervals. A total of 13 randomized controlled trials were included (19,367 patients). Among them, 11 studies focused on patients with heart failure, 1 on patients with acute myocardial infarction, and 1 on patients with chronic kidney disease. We found that fewer worsening renal function events, elevated creatine level events, and severe hyperkalemia events (blood potassium >6.0 mmol/L) occurred in the S/V group than those in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor (RASi) group. The estimated glomerular filtration rate decreased in both the S/V group and the RASi group, but the change was more obvious in the RASi group. There was no significant difference in hyperkalemia events (blood potassium >5.5 mmol/L) between the 2 groups. Subgroup analysis showed that with the extension of follow-up time (>6 months), worsening renal function events occurred less frequently in the S/V group than in the RASi group. Existing evidence has shown that S/V is superior to RASi in general renal safety. Perhaps with the prolongation of treatment time, the advantages of S/V are more obvious.

Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Enzyme Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Kidney; Potassium; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Heart failure (HF) patients discharged from a hospital are at a high risk of death and rehospitalization. Scarce data are available on the use of sacubitril / valsartan in this population in Poland.. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of sacubitril / valsartan in the group of Polish patients who participated in the TRANSITION study with the patients recruited at other sites.. This is a post hoc secondary analysis of the TRANSITION study comparing sacubitril / valsartan initiation pre- vs postdischarge in 991 patients hospitalized for acute decompensated HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The Polish subgroup consisted of 104 patients.. Significant differences were identified in the characteristics of Polish vs non‑Polish populations. At baseline, the Polish population showed higher proportion of men, higher body mass index, lower heart rate, N‑terminal pro-B‑type natriuretic peptide and high‑sensitivity troponin T levels, and significantly lower New York Heart Association class. The Polish patients were better managed in terms of implanted electrotherapy devices, percutaneous coronary interventions, and drug therapy, and were more often hospitalized. The primary end point of achieving the target dose of sacubitril / valsartan at treatment week 10 was met by 45.6% of the Polish patients and 48.4% of the non‑Polish population (P = 0.61). Approximately 90% of the Polish patients received and maintained any sacubitril / valsartan dose for 2 weeks over 10‑week treatment vs 87.5% of the non‑Polish patients (P = 0.36). The rate of permanent sacubitril / valsartan treatment discontinuation was low in both Polish (3.9%) and non‑Polish populations (6.4%) (P = 0.33).. Sacubitril / valsartan can be used safely in the early period after an episode of acute HF both in the Polish and non‑Polish patients with HFrEF, and the likelihood to achieve the maximum dose is the same despite significant differences between the studied populations.

Topics: Aftercare; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Patient Discharge; Poland; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

The time-dependent changes in the natriuretic peptide families during sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) treatment remain obscure in the Asian heart failure (HF) cohort. Eighty-one outpatients with compensated HF were analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups based on the administration of S/V (n = 42) or angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I; n = 39). Changes to the natriuretic peptide families and the daily dose of loop diuretics were evaluated 3 and 6 months after the intervention. The atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) level was significantly increased (102 [63-160] pg/mL to 283 [171-614] pg/mL [3 months]; 409 [210-726] pg/mL [6 months]) in the S/V group but not in the ACE-I group. The dose of furosemide was significantly decreased during the six-month follow-up period in the S/V group (40 [20-40] mg to 20 [10-20] mg) but not in the ACE-I group. A multivariate logistic regression model showed that the presence of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) and HF with a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (HFpEF) was independently associated with a high delta-ANP ratio (≥ 4.5 ANP value on the start date/ANP value at 6 months; the mean value was used as the cutoff value) (odds ratio [OR]: 4.649, 95% CI 1.032-20.952 and OR: 7.558, 95% CI 1.427-40.042). The plasma level of ANP was increased, and the loop diuretic dose was decreased by the addition of neprilysin inhibitor therapy in patients with compensated HF. In patients with HFpEF and complicated persistent AF, neprilysin inhibitor therapy was associated with an increase in ANP.

Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Natriuretic Peptides; Neprilysin; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Vasodilator Agents; Ventricular Function, Left

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Valsartan

This study assessed the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in 23 hemodialysis patients with hypertension (mean age 70 years; male 69.6%) after switching from azilsartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker. Both at baseline and 3 months after the start of sacubitril/valsartan treatment, home blood pressure (BP), BP values during hemodialysis, and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level were measured. The mean dosage of azilsartan was 30 ± 10 mg/day at baseline and that of sacubitril/valsartan after 3 months of treatment was 204 ± 64 mg/day. After 3 months, significant reductions in mean morning home BP (155 ± 17/80 ± 12 to 147 ± 16/76 ± 11 mmHg), mean nighttime home systolic BP (153 ± 19 to 144 ± 16 mmHg), and median (IQRs) NT-proBNP level [8124 (2620-13 394) to 6271 (1570-9591) pg/mL] were observed (all P < .05), whereas BP values during hemodialysis did not change significantly. In hemodialysis patients, except for hypotension, sacubitril/valsartan was generally well tolerated, effectively controlled out-of-office BP, and improved NT-proBNP.

Topics: Aged; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Elevated BNP and the N-terminal fragment of the proBNP (NT-proBNP) are hallmarks of heart failure (HF). Generally, both biomarkers parallel each other. In patients receiving sacubitril/valsartan, BNP remained stable while NT-proBNP decreased. As BNP and NT-proBNP assays have limited specificity due to cross-reactivity, we quantified by mass spectrometry (MS) the contributing molecular species.. We included 356 healthy volunteers, 100 patients with acute dyspnoea (49 acute decompensated HF; 51 dyspnoea of non-cardiac origin), and 73 patients with chronic HF and reduced ejection fraction treated with sacubitril/valsartan. BNP and NT-proBNP immunoreactivities (BNPir and NT-proBNPir) were measured by immunoassays (Abbott ARCHITECT and Roche Diagnostics proBNPII) and proBNP-derived peptides and glycosylation at serine 44 by MS on plasma samples.. BNPir corresponded to the sum of proBNP1-108, BNP1-32, BNP3-32, and BNP5-32 (R2 = 0.9995), while NT-proBNPir corresponded to proBNP1-108 and NT-proBNP1-76 not glycosylated at serine 44 (R2 = 0.992). NT-proBNPir was better correlated (R2 = 0.9597) than BNPir (R2 = 0.7643) with proBNP signal peptide (a surrogate of proBNP production). In patients receiving sacubitril/valsartan, non-glycosylated NT-proBNP1-76 remained constant (P = 0.84) despite an increase in NT-proBNP1-76 and its glycosylation (P < 0.0001). ProBNP1-108 remained constant (P = 0.12) while its glycosylation increased (P < 0.0001), resulting in a decrease in non-glycosylated proBNP1-108 (P < 0.0001), and in NT-proBNPir.. Glycosylation interfered with NT-proBNPir measurement, explaining the discrepant evolution of these 2 biomarkers in patients receiving sacubitril/valsartan. Both BNPir and NT-proBNPir are surrogates of proBNP1-108 production, NT-proBNPir being more robust in the clinical contexts studied.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Biomarkers; Dyspnea; Heart Failure; Humans; Mass Spectrometry; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Peptide Fragments; Serine; Valsartan

There is little information on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of sacubitril/valsartan (SV) in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD) complicated with hypertension or heart failure (HF). This study was designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of SV in PD patients with complications of hypertension or HF.. This was an open-label and cross-sectional study investigating PD patients diagnosed with hypertension or New York Heart Association Class II-IV HF. The concentrations of valsartan, sacubitril and sacubitrilat (LBQ657) were measured by ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry in plasma, urine and peritoneal dialysate samples. Pharmacodynamics were evaluated by comparing changes in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (msSBP), mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (msDBP), mean sitting heart rate, N-terminal-pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).. Forty patients with PD were enrolled including 27 (67.5%) patients with hypertension, 4 (10%) patients with HF and 9 (22.5%) patients with both hypertension and HF. This study included three treatment cohorts: 50 mg twice daily (BID), 100 mg once daily and 100 mg BID. The plasma maximum drug concentrations in the 100 mg BID group were 1995 ± 1499 ng/mL for valsartan, 171 ± 148 ng/mL for sacubitril and 13 686 ± 7418 ng/mL for LBQ657. The 24-h recovery rate of LBQ657 was 3.77% in urine and 2.23% in peritoneal dialysate. After taking SV, msSBP and msDBP decreased by 19.25 ± 10.32 mmHg and 10.10 ± 8.00 mmHg from baseline, respectively. NT-proBNP decreased by 1436.50 (0.00-18 198.00) from baseline, while LVEF increased by 5.00 (-0.25 to 9.25) from baseline after SV treatment.. PD and residual renal function contributed only to a minor degree to the elimination of LBQ657. Additionally, a dose of 100 mg BID SV is safe and effective in patients with PD with complications of hypertension or HF.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dialysis Solutions; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Peritoneal Dialysis; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

The aim of this study was to determine the safety and feasibility of in-hospital sacubitril/valsartan initiation after clinical stabilization in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) and reduced ejection fraction (EF).. This retrospective, multicenter observational study included patients admitted for ADHF in 2 Italian centers between February 2017 and January 2022. Feasibility was evaluated by assessing the proportion of patients discharged on sacubitril/valsartan. Key safety endpoints were the incidences of adverse events during hospitalization and during follow-up planned at 1 month, 3-6 months and 12-18 months after discharge.. One hundred and twenty-two patients were included. Median age was 71 (60-78) years, 78% male, 63% New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III at admission with a median left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) of 25% (20-30). During hospitalization, 94 (77%) patients were treated with intravenous diuretics, 39 (32%) with inotrope/vasopressor, 51 (42%) with continuous positive airway pressure ventilation and 7 (6%) were assisted with an intra-aortic balloon pump. Median time from hospitalization to sacubitril/valsartan initiation was 4 (2-7) days. Sacubitril/valsartan was started at a dosage of 12/13 mg in 52 (43%) patients, 24/26 mg in 61 (50%) patients and 49/51 mg in 8 (7%) patients. Overall, 111 (91%) patients were discharged on sacubitril/valsartan. At 12-18-month follow-up, the vast majority of patients were still on sacubitril/valsartan therapy.. In-hospital initiation of sacubitril/valsartan treatment in real-world ADHF patients may be a safe and feasible treatment option.

Topics: Aged; Aminobutyrates; Antihypertensive Agents; Biphenyl Compounds; Feasibility Studies; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Neprilysin; Retrospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

Topics: Heart Failure; Humans; Mass Spectrometry; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Natriuretic Peptides; Peptide Fragments; Valsartan

Some patients with heart failure may experience transient changes in kidney function upon transition to sacubitril/valsartan. Whether such changes portend adverse outcomes or influence long-term treatment benefits with sacubitril/valsartan continuation is unknown.. This investigation aimed to evaluate the association between the occurrence of moderate estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline (>15%) after initial exposure to sacubitril/valsartan and subsequent cardiovascular outcomes and its treatment benefits in PARADIGM-HF and PARAGON-HF.. In sequential run-in phases, patients were titrated to enalapril 10 mg twice daily and then sacubitril/valsartan 97 mg/103 mg twice daily (in PARADIGM-HF) or valsartan 80 mg twice daily and then sacubitril/valsartan 49 mg/51 mg twice daily (in PARAGON-HF).. Moderate eGFR decline when transitioning from RASi to sacubitril/valsartan is not consistently associated with adverse outcomes, and its long-term benefits are retained in heart failure across a broad range of eGFR declines. Early eGFR changes should not deter continuation of sacubitril/valsartan or stall uptitration. (Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 Compared to Valsartan, on Morbidity and Mortality in Heart Failure Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction [PARAGON-HF]; NCT01920711; Prospective Comparison of Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitors with Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure [PARADIGM-HF]; NCT01035255).

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Enzyme Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Humans; Kidney; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan

The amount of evidence for guideline-directed new heart failure (HFrEF) disease-modifying drugs in the context of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is relatively modest, especially in end-stage CKD. We report a case of dramatic reverse remodelling and disease regression in a naïve HFrEF young woman on haemodialysis treated with sacubitril/valsartan and SGLT2i. At 10-month follow-up, the patient normalized left ventricle and atrial volumes and improved ejection fraction to the normal range, assessed both by echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance. Cardiac biomarkers and exercise performance improved consensually. The haemodialysis protocol and the loop diuretic dose were unchanged within the whole period.

Topics: Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Background Out-of-pocket costs have significant implications for patients with heart failure and should ideally be incorporated into shared decision-making for clinical care. High out-of-pocket cost is one potential reason for the slow uptake of newer guideline-directed medical therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. This study aims to characterize patient-cardiologist discussions involving out-of-pocket costs associated with sacubitril/valsartan during the early postapproval period. Methods and Results We conducted content analysis on 222 deidentified transcripts of audio-recorded outpatient encounters taking place between 2015 and 2018 in which cardiologists (n=16) and their patients discussed whether to initiate, continue, or discontinue sacubitril/valsartan. In the 222 included encounters, 100 (45%) contained discussions about cost. Cost was discussed in a variety of contexts: when sacubitril/valsartan was initiated, not initiated, continued, and discontinued. Of the 97 cost conversations analyzed, the majority involved isolated discussions about insurance coverage (64/97 encounters; 66%) and few addressed specific out-of-pocket costs or affordability (28/97 encounters; 29%). Discussion of free samples of sacubitril/valsartan was common (52/97 encounters; 54%), often with no discussion of a longer-term plan for addressing cost. Conclusions Although cost conversations were somewhat common in patient-cardiologist encounters in which sacubitril/valsartan was discussed, these conversations were generally superficial, rarely addressing affordability or cost-value judgments. Cardiologists frequently provided patients with a course of free sacubitril/valsartan samples without a plan to address the cost after the samples ran out.

Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiologists; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Combinations; Health Expenditures; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Sacubitril/valsartan is a commonly used medicine for treating heart failure (HF) patients, but the treatment effects significantly vary. Neprilysin (NEP) and carboxylesterase 1 (CES1) play an important role in the efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between NEP and CES1 gene polymorphisms and the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan treatment in HF patients.. Genotyping of 10 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the NEP and CES1 genes in 116 HF patients was performed by the Sequenom MassARRAY method, and logistic regression and haplotype analysis were used to evaluate the associations between SNPs and the clinical efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in HF patients.. A total of 116 Chinese patients with HF completed the whole trial, and T variations in rs701109 in NEP gene were an independent risk factor (P = 0.013, OR = 3.292, 95% CI:1.287-8.422) for the clinical efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan. Furthermore, haplotype analysis of 6 NEP SNPs (including rs701109) was performed and showed that the CGTACC and TGTACC haplotypes were significantly associated with clinical efficacy (OR = 0.095, 95%CI: 0.012-0.723, P = 0.003; OR = 5.586, 95% CI: 1.621-19.248, P = 0.005). Moreover, no association was found between SNPs of other selected genes in terms of efficacy in HF patients, and no association was observed between SNPs and symptomatic hypotension.. Our results suggest an association between rs701109 and sacubitril/valsartan response in HF patients. Symptomatic hypotension is not associated with the presence of NEP polymorphisms.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; East Asian People; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypotension; Neprilysin; Polymorphism, Genetic; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan

Sacubitril/valsartan has shown effectiveness in reducing hospitalization compared with valsartan in HFpEF patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We aimed to investigate the cost effectiveness of sacubitril/valsartan as an alternative to valsartan in Chinese patients with heart failure with HFpEF.. A Markov model was built to investigate the cost effectiveness of sacubitril/valsartan as an alternative to valsartan in Chinese patients with HFpEF, from the healthcare system perspective. The time horizon was a lifetime, with a cycle length of 1 month. Costs were obtained from local information or published papers, discounted at a rate of 0.05 for future costs. The transition probability and utility were based on other studies. The primary outcome of the study was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Sacubitril/valsartan was considered cost effective if the ICER obtained was lower than the willingness-to-pay threshold of US dollars (US$) 12,551.5 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, as well as scenario analysis, were performed to test robustness.. Over a lifetime simulation, a 73-year-old Chinese patient with HFpEF could gain 6.44 QALYs (9.15 life-years) if sacubitril/valsartan plus standard treatment was administered, and 6.37 QALYs (9.07 life-years) if valsartan plus standard treatment was prescribed. The corresponding costs in both groups were US$12,471 and US$8663, respectively. The ICER was US$49,019/QALY (US$46,610/life-year), higher than the willingness-to-pay threshold. Sensitivity analyses and scenario analysis showed that our results were robust.. Adding sacubitril/valsartan to standard treatment as an alternative to valsartan for the treatment of HFpEF resulted in more effectiveness but higher costs. Sacubitril/valsartan was likely to not be cost effective in Chinese patients with HFpEF. The cost of sacubitril/valsartan needs to reduce to 34% of its current price to be cost effective in this population. Studies based on real-world data are needed to confirm our conclusions.

Topics: Aged; Biphenyl Compounds; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Cost-Effectiveness Analysis; Delivery of Health Care; Drug Combinations; East Asian People; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Valsartan

In real-world clinical practice, the initiation and up-titration of sacubitril/valsartan remain challenging due to symptomatic hypotension in patients with acute myocardial infarction(AMI). The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of different initial timing and dosage of sacubitril/valsartan in AMI patients.. This prospective and observational cohort study enrolled AMI patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI), and were categorized according to the initial timing and average daily doses of sacubitril/valsartan prescription. The primary endpoint was defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, recurrent AMI, coronary revascularization, heart failure(HF) hospitalization and ischaemic stroke. Secondary outcomes included the new-onset HF, and the composite endpoints in AMI patients complicated with HF at baseline.. The study population consisted of 915 AMI patients. After a median follow-up of 38 months, early use or high dosage of sacubitril/valsartan was associated with an improvement in primary endpoint as well as the incidence of new-onset HF. Early use of sacubitril/valsartan also ameliorated the primary endpoint in AMI patients with left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF) ≤50% as well as LVEF>50%. Besides, early use of sacubitril/valsartan improved the clinical outcomes in AMI patients complicated with HF at baseline. The low dose was well tolerated and may be associated with similar outcomes compared with high dose under some circumstances(LVEF>50% or HF at baseline).. Early use or high dosage of sacubitril/valsartan medication is associated with an improvement in clinical outcome. The low dose of sacubitril/valsartan is well tolerated and may be an acceptable alternative strategy.

Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Brain Ischemia; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Stroke; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

The study aims to explore the real-world titration patterns of sacubitril/valsartan in a chronic heart failure (HF) follow-up management system and the effect on the recovery of ventricular remodelling and cardiac function in China.. This is a single-centre, observational study of 153 adult outpatients with HF and reduced ejection fraction who were managed in the chronic HF follow-up management system and prescribed with sacubitril/valsartan from August 2017 to August 2021 in China. All patients tried to titrated sacubitril/valsartan to the tolerant dose during follow-up. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who reached and maintained the target dose of sacubitril/valsartan. The main secondary outcomes were the changes in left atrium diameter, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from baseline to 12 months. Among the patients, 69.3% were male, with a median age of 49 years. The baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) was 117.6 ± 18.3 mmHg before starting the treatment of sacubitril/valsartan. Benefiting from the management system, 117 (76.5%) patients achieved the target dose of sacubitril/valsartan, and the median time to reach the target dose was 3 (IQR 1-5) months. Advanced age and lower SBP may be predictors of failure to reach the target dose. Compared with baseline, standard treatment resulted in a pronounced improvement in left ventricular geometry and cardiac function. The patients showed a significant increase in LVEF [28 (IQR 21-34) % vs. 42 (IQR 37.0-54.3) %, P < 0.001], with a great reduction in left atrium diameter [45 (IQR 40.3-51.0) mm vs. 41 (IQR 37.0-45.3) mm, P < 0.001] and LVEDD [65 (IQR 60.0-70.3) mm vs. 55 (IQR 52-62) mm, P < 0.001] during 12 month follow-up. Of patients, 36.5% had a LVEF ≥50%, 54.1% had LVEF >40%, and 81.1% experienced an increase in LVEF of ≥10%. After 12 month follow-up, the proportion of patients with New York Heart Association classification I or II increased from 41.8% to 96.4%. Additionally, there was a significant improvement in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (P < 0.001). At Month 12, 50% of patients achieved the target dose of beta-blockers. No serious adverse events caused by sacubitril/valsartan were observed during the follow-up.. Optimising HF follow-up management was essential and effective in a real-world clinical setting; the majority could reach the target dose of sacubitril/valsartan within the management system and achieve a remarkable improvement in cardiac function and ventricular remodelling.

Topics: Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left; Ventricular Remodeling

Right ventricular (RV) function is a major prognostic factor in patients with cardiopulmonary disease. Effective medical therapies are available for left heart failure, but they are usually less effective or even ineffective in right heart failure. Here, we tested the hypothesis that LCZ696 (sacubitril/valsartan) can attenuate pressure overload-induced RV remodeling by inhibiting pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 4 (PDK4).. Adult male C57 mice were subjected to transverse aortic constriction (TAC), pulmonary artery constriction (PAC), or sham surgery. Bioinformatics analysis was used to screen for common differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between TAC and PAC. Chemical compounds targeting DEGs were predicted by molecular docking analysis. Effects of LCZ696 on PAC-induced RV remodeling and the associated PDK4-related mechanisms were investigated.. We found 60 common DEGs between PAC and TAC, and Pdk4 was one of the downregulated DEGs. From 47 chemical compounds with potential cardiovascular activity and PDK4 protein binding ability, we selected LCZ696 to treat PAC-induced RV remodeling because of its high docking score for binding PDK4. Compared with vehicle-treated PAC mice, LCZ696-treated mice had significantly smaller RV wall thickness and RV diameters, less myocardial fibrosis, lower expression of PDK4 protein, and less phosphorylation of glycogen synthase kinase-3β (p-GSK3β). In PAC mice, overexpression of Pdk4 blocked the inhibitory effect of LCZ696 on RV remodeling, whereas conditional knockout of Pdk4 attenuated PAC-induced RV remodeling.. Pdk4 is a common therapeutic target for pressure overload-induced left ventricular and RV remodeling, and LCZ696 attenuates RV remodeling by downregulating Pdk4 and inhibiting PDK4/p-GSK3β signal.

Topics: Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Combinations; Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 beta; Heart Failure; Hypertension, Pulmonary; Male; Mice; Molecular Docking Simulation; Valsartan; Ventricular Remodeling

To evaluate the efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan for the treatment of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) after cardiac valve surgery (CVS).. Data were collected from 259 patients who underwent CVS due to valvular heart disease and were admitted to the hospital with CHF from January 2018 to December 2020. The patients were divided into Group A (treatment with sacubitril/valsartan) and Group B (treatment without sacubitril/valsartan). The duration of treatment and follow-up was 6 months. The two groups' prior and clinical characteristics, post-treatment data, mortality, and follow-up data were analysed.. The effective rate of Group A was higher than that of Group B (82.56% versus 65.52%, P < 0.05). The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, %) was improved in both groups. The final value minus the initial value was (11.14 ± 10.16 versus 7.15 ± 11.18, P = 0.004). The left ventricular end-diastolic/-systolic diameter (LVEDD/LVESD, mm) in Group A decreased more than in Group B. The final value minus the initial value was (-3.58 ± 9.21 versus - 0.27 ± 14.44, P = 0.026; -4.21 ± 8.15 versus - 1.14 ± 12.12, P = 0.016, respectively). Both groups decreased the N-terminal prohormone of B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP, pg/ml). The final value minus initial value was [-902.0(-2226.0, -269.5) versus - 535.0(-1738, -7.0), P = 0.029]. The systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP, mmHg) in Group A decreased more than in Group B. The final value minus the initial value was (-13.13 ± 23.98 versus - 1.81 ± 10.89, P < 0.001; -8.28 ± 17.79 versus - 2.37 ± 11.41, P = 0.005, respectively). Liver and renal insufficiency, hyperkalaemia, symptomatic hypotension, angioedema, and acute heart failure had no statistical differences between the two groups.. Sacubitril/valsartan can effectively improve the cardiac function of patients with CHF after CVS by increasing LVEF and reducing LVEDD, LVESD, NT-proBNP, and BP, with good safety.

Topics: Heart Failure; Heart Valves; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Valsartan

The aim of this study was to determine how sacubitril/valsartan compared with valsartan in an outpatient setting affects left ventricular remodeling in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and functional (or secondary) mitral regurgitation (SMR) due to the effect of dual inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system and neprilysin. The outpatient study included 90 patients with chronic SMR who were followed up for 12 months. They received sacubitril/valsartan or valsartan instead of the more commonly used angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril for heart failure, in addition to standard medical therapy for heart failure. The difference in NT-proBNP change between groups was the primary endpoint. Changes in effective regurgitation orifice area, left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic volume indices, left atrial volume index, E/e' index, and exercise tolerance on the 6-minute walk test were secondary endpoints. In the treatment efficacy analysis, NT-proBNP levels decreased significantly by 37% in the sacubitril/valsartan group and by 11% in the valsartan group (P<0.001). Ejection fraction and exercise tolerance (increase in walking distance in the 6-min test) increased in the sacubitril/valsartan group (P<0.05). Also, in this group, the effective area of the regurgitation orifice, the left atrial volume index, the E/e' index, and the indices of the end-systolic and end-diastolic volume of the left ventricle (P<0.05) decreased more pronouncedly. Compared with valsartan, treatment with sacubitril/valsartan led to a significant improvement in cardiac remodeling in patients with SMR and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

Topics: Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Neprilysin; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left; Ventricular Remodeling

Sacubitril/valsartan, a novel therapy in chronic heart failure (CHF), inhibits the breakdown of various peptides. However, whether or not sacubitril/valsartan administration affects urinary C-peptide levels is unclear. We herein report a 70-year-old man with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hypertension coexisting with CHF and nephrotic syndrome. The patient's urinary C-peptide levels dramatically increased after sacubitril/valsartan administration and decreased after discontinuation of the drug. Furthermore, sacubitril/valsartan administration to five other patients with hypertension and T2DM markedly increased urinary C-peptide levels. Thus, the insulin secretory capacity of patients with T2DM receiving sacubitril/valsartan may be overestimated when their urinary C-peptide level is measured.

Topics: Aged; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; C-Peptide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Atrial Natriuretic Factor; Heart Failure; Humans; Leukocytes, Mononuclear; Mitochondria; Mitophagy; Reactive Oxygen Species; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

This study aimed to estimate the financial and economic impact of sacubitril/valsartan compared with enalapril for the treatment and prevention of hospitalization/rehospitalization because of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).. The budget impact analysis was guided by the Philippine Reference Case and ISPOR's Principles of Good Practice for Budget Impact Analysis. A government-funded healthcare payer perspective and a societal perspective were considered. Data collection was guided by the pathways of disease progression and care. Collection of costing data followed a bottom-up approach. The model was based on a Markov model used in a study in Thailand.. Over the next 5 years, there will be 17 625 less hospitalizations (∼5.1% less than enalapril arm) and 7968 less cardiovascular-related deaths (∼7.0% less than enalapril arm). In 5 years, the total cost of treating patients with HFrEF with sacubitril/valsartan at current market coverage and annual growth conditions is ₱15.430 billion, which is ₱11.077 billion higher than fully treating with enalapril only. The total required additional investment with treatment of sacubitril/valsartan compared with the full enalapril arm are ₱407 million (at 30-day coverage), ₱800 million (at 60-day coverage), and ₱1.181 billion (at 90-day coverage). If hospitalizations costs alone are considered, only the 30-day coverage is cost-saving. If a societal perspective is considered, all options are cost-saving where at least ₱4.003 billion is saved by the economy.. The initial investment required to treat patients with HFrEF with sacubitril/valsartan is high; nevertheless, the year-on-year cost deficit shrinks in favor of investing in sacubitril/valsartan treatment.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Enalapril; Heart Failure; Humans; Philippines; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Natriuretic Peptides; Phenotype; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of enhanced external counter pulsation (EECP) plus sacubitril/valsartan in the treatment of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and the effect on ankle-arm index and cardiac function.. In this retrospective study, 106 patients with chronic heart failure treated in our hospital from September 2020 to April 2022 were recruited and randomly assigned to receive either sacubitril/valsartan (observation group) or EECP plus sacubitril/valsartan (combination group) alternately at the point of admission, with 53 patients in each group. Outcome measures included clinical efficacy, ankle brachial index (ABI), cardiac function indices [N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide precursor (NT-proBNP), 6 min walking distance (6MWD), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)], and adverse events.. EECP plus sacubitril/valsartan resulted in significantly higher treatment efficiency and ABI levels vs. sacubitril/valsartan (p<0.05). Patients receiving combined therapy showed significantly lower NT-proBNP levels than those given monotherapy (p<0.05). EECP plus sacubitril/valsartan resulted in longer 6MWD and higher LVEF than sacubitril/valsartan alone (p<0.05). No significant differences were observed in the adverse events between the two groups (p>0.05).. EECP plus sacubitril/valsartan substantially improves the ABI levels, cardiac functions, and exercise tolerance of patients with chronic heart failure, with a high safety profile. EECP improves blood supply to myocardial ischemic tissues by increasing ventricular diastolic blood return and blood perfusion to ischemic myocardium, raises aortic diastolic pressure, restores pumping function, improves LVEF, and reduces NT-proBNP secretion.

Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Ankle; Ankle Brachial Index; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

Topics: Aged; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; United States; Valsartan

Management of patients affected by heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) has deeply changed thanks to novel pharmacological therapies, such as Sacubitril/Valsartan, which assured morbidity and mortality advantages in this population. These effects may be mediated by both left atrial (LA) and ventricular reverse remodeling, although left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) recovery still represents the main parameter of treatment response.. In this prospective, observational study, 66 patients with HFrEF and naïve from Sacubitril/Valsartan were enrolled. All patients were evaluated at baseline, at 3 months and 12 months from therapy initiation. Echocardiographic parameters, including speckle tracking analysis, LA functional and structural metrics, were collected at three timepoints. The endpoints of our study were: (1) to evaluate the effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan on echo measurements; (2) to assess the predictive role of early modifications of these parameters (expressed as ∆ 3-0 months) on long-term LVEF significant recovery, defined as >15% improvement from baseline.. The majority of echocardiographic parameters evaluated progressively improved during the observation period, including LVEF, ventricular volumes and LA metrics. ∆(3-0 months) of LV Global Longitudinal Strain (LVGLS) and LA Reservoir Strain (LARS) were associated with significant LVEF improvement at 12 months (p < 0.001 and p = 0.019 respectively). A cut-off of ∆(3-0 months) LVGLS of 3% and of ∆(3-0 months) LARS of 2% could predict LVEF recovery with satisfactory sensitivity and specificity.. LV and LA strain analysis may identify patients who adequately respond to HFrEF medical treatment and should be routinely used in the evaluation of these patients.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Prospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

In the real-world setting, data regarding renal decline following sacubitril/valsartan treatment are lacking. This study aimed to develop a scoring system to predict renal outcome in sacubitril/valsartan-treated patients.. Between 2017 and 2018, a total of 1505 heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) undergoing sacubitril/valsartan treatment were consecutively enrolled from 10 hospitals to serve as the derivation cohort. Another 1620 HFrEF patients receiving sacubitril/valsartan were included as the validation cohort. Worsening renal function (WRF) was defined as a serum creatinine increase of >0.3 mg/dL and/or >25 % at 8 months of sacubitril/valsartan treatment. The derivation cohort was used to identify independent predictive factors for WRF through multivariate analysis, which were then used to develop the risk score system.. Among the 3125 HFrEF patients, 689 (22.0 %) patients had WRF at 8 months following sacubitril/valsartan treatment. In the derivation cohort, six prognostic factors (age, functional class, history of peripheral arterial disease, diabetes mellitus, gout or hyperuricemia, and serum albumin level) were independently associated with WRF, and were combined into a risk predicting score. This score showed accurate discrimination in the derivation and validation cohorts (Harrell's concordance indexes 0.74 and 0.71, 95 % confidence intervals 0.71-0.78 and 0.69-0.74, respectively). Patients with a higher risk score experienced a more rapid decline in renal function, poorer clinical outcomes, and a higher rate of discontinuation of sacubitril/valsartan treatment.. This study developed a score for WRF after sacubitril/valsartan treatment, which may assist clinicians with risk stratification and therapeutic decision-making.

Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Humans; Kidney; Risk Assessment; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan

There are few contemporary data on outcomes, costs, and treatment following a hospitalization for heart failure (hHF) in epidemiologically representative cohorts.. This study sought to describe rehospitalizations, hospitalization costs, use of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) (renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, sacubitril/valsartan, beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors), and mortality after hHF.. EVOLUTION HF (Utilization of Dapagliflozin and Other Guideline Directed Medical Therapies in Heart Failure Patients: A Multinational Observational Study Based on Secondary Data) is an observational, longitudinal cohort study using data from electronic health records or claims data sources in Japan, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Adults with a first hHF discharge between 2018 and 2022 were included. The 1-year event rates per 100 patient-years (ERs) for death and rehospitalizations (with a primary diagnosis of heart failure (HF), chronic kidney disease [CKD], myocardial infarction, stroke, or peripheral artery disease) were calculated. Hospital health care costs were cumulatively summarized. Cumulative GDMT use was assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimates.. Of 263,525 patients, 28% died within the first year post-hHF (ER: 28.4 [95% CI: 27.0-29.9]). Rehospitalizations were mainly driven by HF (ER: 13.6 [95% CI: 9.8-17.4]) and CKD (ER: 4.5 [95% CI: 3.6-5.3]), whereas the ERs for myocardial infarction, stroke, and peripheral artery disease were lower. Health care costs were predominantly driven by HF and CKD. Between 2020 and 2022, use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, sacubitril/valsartan, beta-blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists changed little, whereas uptake of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors increased 2- to 7-fold.. Incident post-hHF rehospitalization risks and costs were high, and GDMT use changed little in the year following discharge, highlighting the need to consider earlier and greater implementation of GDMT to manage risks and reduce costs.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Adult; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Glucose; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Myocardial Infarction; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Sodium; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Stroke; Stroke Volume; United States; Valsartan

Sacubitril/valsartan is a mainstay of the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF); however, its effects on exercise performance yielded conflicting results. Aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of sacubitril/valsartan on exercise parameters and echocardiographic and biomarker changes at different drug doses.. We prospectively enrolled consecutive HFrEF outpatients eligible to start sacubitril/valsartan. Patients underwent clinical assessment, cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET), blood sampling, echocardiography, and completed the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12). Sacubitril/valsartan was introduced at 24/26 mg b.i.d. dose and progressively uptitrated in a standard monthly-based fashion to 97/103 mg b.i.d. or maximum tolerated dose. Study procedures were repeated at each titration visit and 6 months after reaching the maximum tolerated dose.. Ninety-six patients completed the study, 73 (75%) reached maximum sacubitril/valsartan dose. We observed a significant improvement in functional capacity across all study steps: oxygen intake increased, at peak exercise (from 15.6 ± 4.5 to 16.5 ± 4.9 mL/min/kg; p trend = 0.001), while minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production relationship reduced in patients with an abnormal value at baseline. Sacubitril/valsartan induced positive left ventricle reverse remodeling (EF from 31 ± 5 to 37 ± 8%; p trend < 0.001), while NT-proBNP reduced from 1179 [610-2757] to 780 [372-1344] pg/ml (p trend < 0.0001). NYHA functional class and the subjective perception of limitation in daily life at KCCQ-12 significantly improved. The Metabolic Exercise Cardiac Kidney Index (MECKI) score progressively improved from 4.35 [2.42-7.71] to 2.35% [1.24-4.96], p = 0.003.. A holistic and progressive HF improvement was observed with sacubitril/valsartan in parallel with quality of life. Likewise, a prognostic enhancement was observed.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Exercise Tolerance; Heart Failure; Humans; Prognosis; Quality of Life; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan

Despite previous studies showing that patients with low systolic blood pressure (sBP) in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) has a poor prognosis, it has few treatment options. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) in HFrEF patients with hypotension. We included 43 consecutive HFrEF patients with sBP < 100 mmHg despite guideline-directed medical therapy for at least 3 months and who received S/V between September 2020 and July 2021. Patients admitted for acute heart failure were excluded and 29 patients were evaluated for safety endpoints. Furthermore, patients who performed non-pharmacological therapy or died within 1 month were excluded, finally, 25 patients were evaluated for efficacy endpoints. The mean initial S/V dose was 53.0 ± 20.5 mg/day and the mean dosage was increased to 84.0 ± 34.5 mg/day in 1 month. Serum N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) values significantly decreased from 2200 [interquartile range (IQR): 1462-3666] pg/ml to 1409 (IQR: 964-2451) pg/ml. (p < 0.0001). No significant change in sBP occurred (pre-sBP: 93.2 ± 4.9 mmHg, post-sBP: 93.4 ± 9.6 mmHg, p = 0.91), and no patients discontinued the S/V due to symptomatic hypotension in 1 month after S/V initiation. S/V can be safely introduced in HFrEF patients with hypotension to reduce serum NT-proBNP values. Thus, S/V may be useful for the treatment of HFrEF patients with hypotension.

Topics: Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypotension; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Value-based care is the foundation of population health. The Health care Economic Efficiency Ratio (HEERO) scoring system is a promising new tool to measure the cost benefits of care in our Accountable Care Organization. HEERO score compares actual costs spent (utilizing insurance claims) and expected costs spent (estimated using the Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services Risk score). Scores <1 suggest economic benefit. Sacubitril/valsartan has been shown to decrease readmissions for patients with heart failure (HF) and decrease health care costs. We explored the utility of sacubitril/valsartan in reducing HEERO scores and decreasing overall health care expenditure in patients with HF. Patients with HF in the population health cohort were enrolled. HEERO score was calculated for patients taking sacubitril/valsartan and other HF medications at 3-month intervals up to a year. We compared the average and total health care expenditure and inpatient days for patients on sacubitril/valsartan, spironolactone, β blocker (BB) along with spironolactone, BB and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker. For patients on sacubitril/valsartan, HEERO scores and inpatient days decreased (decreased health care expenditure) as the number of days of utilization increased (p <0.0001). In total, 270+ days of sacubitril/valsartan decreased health care costs by 22%. This cost reduction was mainly attributed to decreased inpatient days. Additionally, the combination of sacubitril/valsartan, spironolactone, and BB showed decreased HEERO score and inpatient days compared with spironolactone, BB and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker in male patients. Sacubitril/valsartan use beyond 270 days resulted in decreased health care expenditure in a population health cohort compared with other HF medications. This economic benefit is achieved through the reduction in hospitalizations. Sacubitril/valsartan is an integral part of value-based care providing high-value, cost-effective care, and bolstering the economic wellbeing of patient care. Payor sources should consider this in subsidizing the cost of the medicine.

Topics: Aged; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Drug Combinations; Health Care Costs; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Medicare; Spironolactone; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; United States; Valsartan

Sacubitril/valsartan (SAC/VAL), an angiotensin receptor blocker-neprilysin inhibitor, has been widely used to treat several types of heart failure. Nevertheless, the effects of drugs in mitral regurgitation patients, from the molecular level to therapeutic effects, remain unclear. This study investigates the roles of SAC/VAL on cardiac function, mitochondrial quality, autophagy, mitophagy, and natriuretic peptides in a rat model of chronic mitral regurgitation. Male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent MR induction (n = 16) and sham surgeries (n = 8). Four weeks post-surgery confirmed MR rats were randomly divided into MR (n = 8) and SAC/VAL (n = 8) groups. The SAC/VAL group was administered SAC/VAL, whereas the MR and the sham rats received vehicle via oral gavage daily for 8 weeks. Cardiac geometry, function, and myocardial fibrosis were assessed by echocardiography and histopathology. Spectrophotometry and real-time PCR were performed to assess the pharmacological effects on mitochondrial quality, autophagy, mitophagy, and natriuretic peptides. MR rats demonstrated significant left heart dilation and left ventricular systolic dysfunction compared with the sham group, which could be significantly improved by SAC/VAL. In addition, SAC/VAL significantly reduced myocardial cardiac remodeling and fibrosis in MR rats. SAC/VAL improved the mitochondrial quality by attenuating mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production and mitochondrial depolarization compared with the MR group. Also, the upregulation of autophagy-related, mitophagy-related, and natriuretic peptide system gene expression in MR rats was attenuated by SAC/VAL treatment. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that SAC/VAL treatment could provide numerous beneficial effects in MR conditions, suggesting that this drug may be an effective treatment for MR.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Male; Mitral Valve Insufficiency; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Remodeling

Conflicting results have been reported in the literature on the potential antiarrhythmic effect of sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The objectives of this study were: 1- to evaluate the long term effects of sacubitril/valsartan on arrhythmic burden in HFrEF patients; 2- to evaluate the correlation between the reduction of premature ventricular complexes during f-up and reverse remodelling.. We identified 255 consecutive HFrEF patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan between March 2017 and May 2020 and followed by the Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplant Unit of IRCCS San Matteo Hospital in Pavia (Italy). Within this subgroup, 153 patients underwent 24 h-Holter-ECG or implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) interrogation at baseline, at 12 months (t1) and at 24 months (t2) and transthoracic echocardiography at baseline and after 12 months after the beginning of sacubitril/valsartan. Cardiac-related hospitalizations were analyzed in the 12 months preceding and during 24 months following the drug starting date.. Global burden of 24-h premature ventricular complexes (PVC) was significantly reduced at 12 months (t1) and at 24 months (t2) as compared to the same period before treatment (1043 [304-3360] vs 768 [82-2784] at t1 vs 114 [9-333] at t2, P = 0.000). In the subgroup of patients implanted with biventricular ICD (n = 30), the percentage of biventricular pacing increased significantly (96% [94-99] vs 98% [96-99] at t1 vs 98%[97-100] at t2; P = 0.027). The burden of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia and sustained ventricular tachycardia did not change from baseline to t1 and t2, but a reduction of patients with at least one ICD appropriate shock was reported. The correlations between reduction in 24 h PVC and reduction in LV-ESVi or improvement in LVEF were not statistically significant (respectively R = 0.144, P = 0.197 and R = -0.190, P = 0.074). Heart failure related hospitalizations decreased during follow up (11.1% in the year before treatment vs 4.6% at t1 and 4.6% at t2; P = 0.040).. Sacubitril/valsartan reduced the number of premature ventricular complexes and increased the percentage of biventricular pacing in a cohort of HFrEF patients already on optimal medical therapy. PVC reduction did not correlate with reverse left ventricular remodelling. Whether sacubitril/valsartan has any direct antiarrhythmic effects is an issue to be better explored in future studies.

Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Tachycardia, Ventricular; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left; Ventricular Remodeling

Sacubitril/valsartan improves outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis). However, data on postdischarge outcomes in renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASi)-naïve patients are limited. We included Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years who were hospitalized for HFrEF in the Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure registry between October 2015 and June 2019, had part D prescription coverage, and were not on RASi therapy during the 6 months before hospital admission. We examined the associations between sacubitril/valsartan prescription at hospital discharge and outcomes at 30 days and 1 year after discharge using overlap-weighted median regression and Cox proportional hazards models. The end points included "home time" (defined as days alive and out of any health care institution), mortality, and rehospitalization. Among 3,572 patients with HFrEF and who are naïve to RASi therapy, at discharge, 290 (8.1%) were prescribed sacubitril/valsartan and 1,390 (38.9%) were prescribed ACEis and angiotensin receptor blockers. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, patients prescribed sacubitril/valsartan had a longer median home time (parameter estimate 27.0 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] 12.40 to 41.6, p <0.001) and lower all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.74, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.91, p = 0.004) at 1 year than patients not prescribed sacubitril/valsartan. The prescription of sacubitril/valsartan was not significantly associated with all-cause rehospitalization (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.03, p = 0.10) or heart failure rehospitalization (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.07, p = 0.19). In a restricted comparison of patients discharged on sacubitril/valsartan versus ACEis and angiotensin receptor blockers, there were no significant differences in the outcomes. In conclusion, in this contemporary population of RASi-naïve patients with HFrEF from routine clinical practice, compared with not initiating, the initiation of sacubitril/valsartan at discharge was associated with longer home time and improvements in overall survival.

Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Humans; Medicare; Patient Discharge; Renin-Angiotensin System; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; United States; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Topics: Heart Failure; Humans; Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and pulmonary hypertension have poor survival, and established medical therapies for both conditions are not available. In this retrospective study of 69 patients with HFpEF and either isolated postcapillary pulmonary hypertension (IpcPH, n = 53) or combined postcapillary and precapillary pulmonary hypertension (CpcPH, n = 16), we investigated the effects of sacubitril/valsartan on pulmonary hypertension measured using right heart catheterization at baseline (ie, presacubitril/valsartan) and 99 (94-123) days after switching to sacubitril/valsartan. After switching to sacubitril/valsartan, right heart catheterization showed significantly lower pulmonary artery pressures (systolic/diastolic/mean) in both patient groups compared with presacubitril/valsartan [IpcPH: 44 (38-52)/15 (12-19)/28 (22-33) mm Hg vs. 47 (40-55)/18 (15-23)/31 (26-35) mm Hg, P < 0.01; CpcPH: 54 (43-57)/18 (12-23)/34 (30-36) mm Hg vs. 61 (50-79)/24 (19-30)/40 (31-53) mm Hg, P < 0.05]. The median sacubitril/valsartan dose at follow-up was 24/26 (24/26-49/51) mg twice daily in both patients with IpcPH and CpcPH. Clinically, the New York Heart Association functional class improved by at least 1 class in 32 of 69 patients ( P < 0.01). In conclusion, sacubitril/valsartan therapy improves pulmonary hypertension in patients with HFpEF and either IpcPH or CpcPH. Further prospective randomized trials are needed for confirmation of our results.

Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Hemodynamics; Humans; Hypertension, Pulmonary; Retrospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Topics: Antihypertensive Agents; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Stroke Volume; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and soluble interleukin 1 receptor-like 1 ST2 (sST2) are biomarkers used to grade heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) severity. Both are potential targets of HFrEF treatment, but the first is associated with the patient's hemodynamic status, while the second is more indicative of the inflammatory status and of myocardial fibrosis. The aim of this study was to assess the kinetics of these biomarkers after treatment with sacubitril/valsartan in HFrEF.. We analyzed blood samples of patients with HFrEF at baseline (before sacubitril/valsartan treatment), after 1, 2, and 3 months (respectively, after a month taking the 24/26 - 49/51 - 97/103 mg twice daily, or b.i.d., doses), and 6 months after the maximum-tolerated dose was reached (end study).. We obtained samples from 72 patients with HFrEF (age 64.0 ± 10.5 years, 83% males). NT-proBNP and sST2 values progressively and significantly reduced to 37% and 16%, respectively, with a greater reduction for NT-proBNP (p < 0.001). Specifically, NT-proBNP reduced from 1144 [593-2586] pg/mL to 743 [358-1524] pg/mL and sST2 from 27.3 [20.5-35.0] ng/mL to 23.1 [15.9-30.7] ng/mL, p for trend < 0.001 in both cases. The reduction of the two biomarkers over time occurred with statistically significant different kinetics: deferred for sST2 and faster for NT-proBNP. No significant changes in renal function and potassium levels were recorded.. These findings suggest that, in patients with HF, sacubitril/valsartan effects on the cardiovascular system share a double pathway: a first, hemodynamic, faster pathway and a second, non-hemodynamic anti-fibrotic, delayed one. Both likely contribute to the sacubitril/valsartan benefits in HFrEF.

Topics: Aged; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Peptide Fragments; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Quality of Life; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan

沙库巴曲缬沙坦作为一种新型的血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂，已经成为射血分数降低的心力衰竭（HFrEF）患者的一线用药，同时，沙库巴曲缬沙坦也具有降压作用，所以，目前对于合并低血压的HFrEF（HFrEF-LSBP）患者能否从沙库巴曲缬沙坦中获益存在争议。该文对低血压对沙库巴曲缬沙坦滴定的影响进行综述，并提出了HFrEF-LSBP患者中滴定沙库巴曲缬沙坦的策略，为该类患者的治疗提供参考。.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypotension; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

Heart failure (HF) is a significant event for public health. It has a prevalence between 1-2%, mortality rate between 7-17%, and hospitalization between 32-44%. This implies a risk to health and quality of life, but also great financial efforts for health systems. Sacubitril/valsartan is a medication recognized for its efficacy, and this consensus seeks to synthesize the available information regarding its use for the benefit of patients. This document consists of a description of the epidemiology of HF, pharmacology of the drug, clinical trials, use of the drug in cases with reduced ejection fraction, mildly reduced ejection fraction and preserved ejection fraction, available literature on HF guidelines, recommendations and conclusions.. La insuficiencia cardiaca (IC) es un evento significativo para la salud pública. Tiene una prevalencia entre el 1 y 2%, tasa de mortalidad entre el 7 y 17% y de hospitalización entre el 32 y 44%. Esto implica un riesgo a la salud y calidad de vida, pero también grandes esfuerzos financieros para los sistemas de salud. El sacubitrilo/valsartán es un medicamento reconocido por su eficacia, y este consenso busca sintetizar la información disponible respecto a su uso en búsqueda del beneficio de los pacientes. El presente documento se compone de una descripción de la epidemiología de la IC, farmacología del medicamento, estudios clínicos sobre este, uso del medicamento en casos con fracción de eyección reducida, fracción de eyección ligeramente reducida y fracción de eyección preservada, literatura disponible en guías de IC, recomendaciones y conclusiones.

Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Cardiology; Consensus; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Quality of Life; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; United States; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Sacubitril/valsartan improves outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction. However, the relationship between longitudinal changes in natriuretic peptides and echocardiographic parameters in patients with HF treated with sacubitril/valsartan across the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) range is not fully understood.In patients with HF treated with sacubitril/valsartan, comprehensive data on natriuretic peptides, including atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), N-terminal pro-brain-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), BNP, and echocardiography, were measured after 6 months of treatment. We assessed the change in natriuretic peptides and echocardiographic parameters in LVEF classification subgroups.Among 49 patients, the median ANP concentration increased from 55 pg/mL at baseline to 78 pg/mL (P < 0.001). The NT-proBNP concentration decreased from 250 pg/mL to 146 pg/mL (P < 0.001). No significant change was observed in the BNP concentration (P = 0.640). The trajectories of each natriuretic peptide in patients with LVEF > 40% (n = 22) were similar to those in individuals with LVEF ≤ 40% (n = 27). Regardless of LVEF classification, echocardiography at 6 months showed a significant improvement in LVEF, left ventricular end-diastolic volume, and the ratio of early diastolic mitral inflow velocity to early diastolic mitral annulus velocity (E/e'). The reduction in natriuretic peptide concentration was related to LV reverse remodeling and decreased left and right atrial pressures assessed by E/e' and inferior vena cava diameter.Sacubitril/valsartan induced an increase in ANP, a reduction in NT-proBNP, and no change in plasma BNP, regardless of LVEF. It caused LV reverse remodeling, and the natriuretic peptide concentration changes were associated with structural and functional echocardiographic parameters.

Topics: Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Traction; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left; Ventricular Remodeling

Heart failure (HF) management has markedly improved, but a clinically meaningful improvement in functional capacity and quality of life is perhaps more important for patients than living longer.. This study aimed to review the improvement in quality of life with sacubitril/valsartan in patients with HF and reduced/preserved ejection fraction (EF) from prospective clinical trials.. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies published from inception to July 2021. A total of 6 clinical trials and 16854 patients with HF were included. The primary outcome was the change from baseline in KCCQ clinical summary score. The secondary outcomes were scores in other domains of KCCQ, the occurrence of serious adverse events (AEs), and overall mortality. P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.. Treatment of sacubitril/valsartan showed significantly higher KCCQ-CSS compared to the control (WMD=0.975, 95% CI: 0.885, 1.064, p<0.001; I2=94.8%, pheterogeneity<0.001). A significant decrease in the mortality rate was observed in the sacubitril/valsartan group compared to the control group (RR=0.895, 95%CI:0.831, 0.965, p=0.004; I2=43.6%, pheterogeneity=0.150). Nevertheless, no significant reduction in the occurrence of serious AEs was found among HF patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan compared to the control group (RR=0.950, 95%CI: 0.879, 1.027, p<0.001; I2=68.1%, pheterogeneity=0.024).. Our study demonstrated that sacubitril/valsartan might significantly improve the HRQL compared to other treatments according to the results in KCCQ-CSS and some subdomains in the KCCQ index during the follow-up in patients with HF.. O manejo da insuficiência cardíaca (IC) tem melhorado acentuadamente, mas uma melhora clinicamente significativa na capacidade funcional e na qualidade de vida talvez seja mais importante para os pacientes do que viver mais.. Este estudo teve como objetivo revisar a melhora na qualidade de vida com sacubitril/valsartan em pacientes com IC e fração de ejeção (FE) reduzida/preservada a partir de ensaios clínicos prospectivos.. PubMed, Embase e Cochrane Library foram pesquisados em busca de ensaios clínicos randomizados (ECRs) e estudos de coorte prospectivos publicados desde o início até julho de 2021. Um total de 6 ensaios clínicos e 16.854 pacientes com IC foram incluídos. O desfecho primário foi a alteração da linha de base na pontuação do resumo clínico do KCCQ. Os desfechos secundários foram pontuações em outros domínios do KCCQ, ocorrência de eventos adversos graves (EAs) e mortalidade geral. Valores de p < 0,05 foram considerados estatisticamente significativos.. O tratamento de sacubitril/valsartan mostrou KCCQ-CSS significativamente maior em comparação com o controle (DMP=0,975, IC 95%:0,885, 1,064, p<0,001; I2=94,8%, pheterogeneidade<0,001). Uma diminuição significativa na taxa de mortalidade foi observada no grupo sacubitril/valsartan em comparação com o grupo controle (RR=0,895, IC 95%: 0,831, 0,965, p=0,004; I2=43,6%, pheterogeneidade=0,150). No entanto, nenhuma redução significativa na ocorrência de EAs graves foi encontrada entre pacientes com IC tratados com sacubitril/valsartan em comparação com o grupo controle (RR=0,950, IC 95%: 0,879, 1,027, p<0,001; I2=68,1%, pheterogeneidade= 0,024).. Nosso estudo demonstrou que o sacubitril/valsartan pode melhorar significativamente a QVRS em comparação com outros tratamentos de acordo com os resultados do KCCQ-CSS e alguns subdomínios do índice KCCQ durante o acompanhamento em pacientes com IC.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Quality of Life; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

This study investigates the effect of sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) in patients diagnosed with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) without systolic heart failure (SHF).Nonvalvular AF patients without SHF admitted to the People's Hospital of Bortala Mongol Autonomous Prefecture from December 2020 to December 2021 were enrolled and randomly divided into Sac/Val treatment group (group T) and valsartan treatment group (group C, control). For subgroup analysis, patients were divided into subgroups with and without diastolic heart failure (DHF). After 1-month adaptive phase and subsequent 3-month treatment period, patients were followed up in the cardiology clinic. Plasma levels of biochemical markers and echocardiographic parameters before and after treatment were evaluated, and DHF scores were computed to assess diastolic function.Of 61 enrolled patients, 46 patients completed follow-up. Sac/Val treatment did not increase the percentage of sinus rhythm. Although N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) expression tended to be reduced in both groups after 3 months of treatment, the differences compared with respective baseline levels and between groups were not significant. According to subgroup analysis, although NT-proBNP expression in the subgroup with DHF was lower at follow-up compared to baseline, the difference was not statistically significant. Similarly, no marked differences in echocardiographic parameters or tissue Doppler parameters related to DHF were detected between the groups (P > 0.05). Additionally, a subgroup analysis found no significant variations in the echocardiographic measures (P > 0.05).Sac/Val is not superior to valsartan for the short-term treatment of patients suffering with AF without SHF in improving NT-proBNP level and cardiac function.

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Biomarkers; Heart Failure; Heart Failure, Systolic; Humans; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Pharmacists' care in heart failure (HF) management has been shown to better clinical outcomes, including use of guideline-directed medical therapy and hospital readmission, although the impact observed has varied among studies.. To investigate the rates of all-cause hospitalization and hospitalization from HF (hHF) and changes in surrogate markers (left-ventricular ejection fraction, New York Heart Association Functional Classification [NYHA FC], diuretic requirements) for patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) on angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi) therapy optimized within a pharmacist clinic.. Retrospective chart review of patients with HFrEF on sacubitril/valsartan from July 7, 2015, through January 1, 2018.. For the primary outcome analysis, 70 patients with pre/post hospitalization data had a reduction in the rate of all-cause hospitalization from 45.7% in the 12 months prior to ARNi therapy initiation to 24.3% during the first year on optimized ARNi therapy (. Real-world use of sacubitril/valsartan optimized within a pharmacist clinic was associated with reduced prevalence of all-cause and hHF during the first year of ARNi therapy. This study corroborates pharmacist involvement in HF management, which could be used to support further research and expanded pharmacist services.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiology; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Heart Failure, Systolic; Humans; Pharmacists; Retrospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Echocardiography; Heart Failure; Humans; Incidence; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

This work aims to describe the clinical characteristics and therapeutic management and to determine cardiovascular outcomes after one year of follow-up in a contemporaneous population with heart failure (HF) with and without type 2 diabetes in Spain. These factors were also analyzed in the DAPA-HF-like population (patients who met most inclusion criteria of the DAPA-HF trial) and in patients treated with SGLT2 inhibitors at baseline.. This work is an observational, retrospective, population-based study using the BIG-PAC database. The index date was January 1, 2019. People aged ≥ 18 years who received care for HF in 2019 were selected. Events that occurred in 2019 were analyzed.. We identified 21,851 patients with HF (age 78.0 ± 11.3 years, 53.0% men, 50.9% with HF with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, 44.5% in NYHA functional class II). HF prevalence was 1.88% and incidence was 2.83 per 1,000 person-years. Regarding HF treatments, 66.1% were taking renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, 69.4% beta blockers, 31.2% aldosterone antagonists, and 7.5% sacubitril/valsartan. During the year of follow-up, 29.8% had HF decompensation which led to hospitalization (mean time to first event of 120.9 ± 72.5 days), 12.3% died, and 8.1% died during hospitalization. Events were more common among patients with type 2 diabetes. Hospitalizations for HF were more common in the DAPA-HF-like population.. In Spain, the population with HF is elderly and has many comorbidities. Approximately half of patients have HF with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. There is room for improvement in HF management, particularly through the use of drugs that reduce both HF hospitalization and mortality, in order to reduce the burden of HF.

Topics: Aged; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Retrospective Studies; Spain; Stroke Volume; Treatment Outcome; Ventricular Function, Left

The angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) sacubitril/valsartan and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor dapagliflozin have been shown to reduce rehospitalization and cardiac mortality in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We aimed to compare the long-term cardiac and all-cause mortality of ARNI and dapagliflozin combination therapy against ARNI monotherapy in patients with HFrEF. This retrospective study involved 244 patients with HF with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II-IV symptoms and ejection fraction ≤40%. The patients were divided into 2 groups: ARNI monotherapy and ARNI+dapagliflozin. Median follow-up was 2.5 (.16-3.72) years. One hundred and seventy-five (71.7%) patients were male, and the mean age was 65.9 (SD, 10.2) years. Long-term cardiac mortality rates were significantly lower in the ARNI+dapagliflozin group (7.4%) than in the ARNI monotherapy group (19.5%) (

Topics: Aged; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Benzhydryl Compounds; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Glucosides; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Retrospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

The use of sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) has been strongly supported by the results of recent randomized clinical trials. Upon this evidence, international recommendations and consensus documents propose the inclusion of SGLT2i among the first-line classes for HFrEF management. Subsequent analyses of treatment subgroups have been performed to investigate the effects of SGLT2i in patients treated with first-line classes including sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val), showing a consistent reduction of cardiovascular outcomes with a good safety profile of SGLT2i in combination with the other classes. Accordingly, SGLT2i are recommended also in combination with Sac/Val. This association, however, may require caution before being translated into guideline-directed medical therapy in clinical practice, since the proportion of patients receiving Sac/Val and SGLT2i in the available studies was poorly represented. In order to support an effective and safe sequencing or a simultaneous initiation of these 2 drug classes, pragmatic and real-world clinical studies would be helpful.

Topics: Algorithms; Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Stroke Volume; Valsartan

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Echocardiography; Heart Failure; Humans; Incidence; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Comorbid heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with a very high risk of HF events. Sacubitril-valsartan, an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), and dapagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor, improve HF outcomes in these patients, but their comparative value for money in this patient population has not yet been determined.. We aimed to compare the cost needed to treat (CNT) to avoid an HF event with each drug.. CNT was estimated by multiplying the annualized number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one HF event by the annual cost of each therapy. HF events were defined as the first event of hospitalization for HF or cardiovascular mortality. Drug efficacy data were extracted from published secondary analyses of patients with DM in the DAPA-HF and PARADIGM-HF trials. Drug costs were estimated as 75% of the 2021 US National Average Drug Acquisition Cost listing. Sensitivity analysis was performed on parameters that may have affected the CNT.. The annualized NNT was 24 (95% confidence interval [CI] 16-54) for dapagliflozin and 57 (95% CI 31-433) for the ARNI. At an annual cost of $US4523 and 5099, respectively, the CNT was $US108,563 (95% CI 72,375-244,267) for dapagliflozin and $US290,671 (95% CI 158,084-2,208,079) for the ARNI.. Dapagliflozin seems to offer greater value for money than the ARNI for patients with HFrEF and DM. Our results provide support for contemporary guidelines advocating the use of dapagliflozin in these patients.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Benzhydryl Compounds; Biphenyl Compounds; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Glucosides; Heart Failure; Humans; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Sacubitril/valsartan was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2015 to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction defined as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40%. This approval was based on PARADIGM-HF trial. Subsequently, PARAGON-HF was conducted to support a claim for sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), defined as LVEF ≥ 45%. PARAGON-HF failed to meet the pre-defined threshold for statistical significance for the primary composite endpoint. However, analysis of the primary endpoint by LVEF as a continuous variable demonstrated that sacubitril/valsartan was efficacious in patients with mildly abnormal LVEF similar to patients with LVEF ≤ 40% evaluated in PARADIGM-HF. This led to a broader indication for sacubitril/valsartan-"to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure in adult patients with chronic heart failure. Benefits are most clearly evident in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) below normal. LVEF is a variable measure, so use clinical judgment in deciding whom to treat." This article describes the rationale for a revised indication for sacubitril/valsartan, emphasizes the need to go beyond a dichotomous classification of HF based on a traditional LVEF cut-off and clarifies that the product label for sacubitril/valsartan does not refer to HFpEF.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Humans; Spironolactone; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

Sacubitril/valsartan, an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), significantly reduces mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, a considerable number of patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan experience hypotension, oliguria, progressive azotemia, and renal failure as adverse events. These issues have been linked to significant gaps in the usage and dosing of guideline-directed medical therapy with ARNI in patients with HFrEF. We herein report a relevant case of pathologically proven acute tubular necrosis after the first dose of sacubitril/valsartan, highlighting the importance of optimizing the medical therapy in an outpatient with HFrEF.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Necrosis; Neprilysin; Receptors, Angiotensin; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan

There is increasing evidence supporting the efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan for treating left heart failure, but few studies have investigated its effects on right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. This study aimed to explore the effects of sacubitril/valsartan on RV dysfunction among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).. A total of 93 patients with HFrEF with RV dysfunction who were hospitalized from January 2018 through June 2019 were included in this retrospective observational study. All patients received their first sacubitril/valsartan treatment as in patients during the study period. We excluded 11 patients who were lost to follow-up or had incomplete heart echocardiography data. After 6 months of follow-up, we re-evaluated New York Heart Association Functional Classification and performed echocardiography to identify changes in relevant variables after treatment.. At baseline, 24% of the patients had an initial sacubitril/valsartan regimen of 12/13 mg twice daily and 76% of the patients had an initial dose of 24/26 mg twice daily. During follow-up, 27% of patients increased their dosage to 49/50 mg twice daily, 68% of patients were taking 24/26 mg twice daily, and 5% of the patients were still taking 12/13 mg twice daily. We found that sacubitril/valsartan treatment was associated with significant improvements in the following RV function indicators: tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, tricuspid annular s' peak velocity (S'), RV fractional area change, and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP). Crude linear regression analysis revealed that a tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion improvement was positively correlated with a change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and negatively correlated with a change in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV). However, these correlations were nonexistent after adjusting for multiple echocardiographic variables.. In patients with RV dysfunction and HFrEF, sacubitril/valsartan may improve RV remodeling. This influence may be independent of left cardiac remodeling.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Ventricular Dysfunction, Right; Ventricular Function, Left

Three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography and 3D strain parameters have been used for a comprehensive quantitative assessment of left ventricular (LV) myocardial dynamics. So far, there are no data on sacubitril/valsartan effects on cardiac functions and LV reverse remodeling using 3D echocardiography. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of sacubitril/valsartan on the LV functions using two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography, 3D echocardiography, and the 3D strain parameters.. A single-center prospective cohort study which included 100 heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients with guidelines-approved indications for sacubitril/valsartan treatment. Patients received a short course (3-month) of sacubitril/valsartan. 3-month follow-up 2D, 3D echocardiographic parameters, and 3D strain were compared to baseline parameters.. The results of the study revealed a significant improvement in left ventricular dynamic functions at 3-month follow-up with an improvement in left ventricular systolic function (mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increased from 27.65±4.98% to 32.89±6.03%, P<0.001). Comparison of HFrEF patients with ischemic and non-ischemic etiologies showed that echocardiographic parameters significantly improved in both groups after 3 months of sacubitril/valsartan treatment. There was no statistically significant difference between both groups regarding echocardiographic parameters at baseline and 3-month follow-up.. In a single-center prospective observational cohort study evaluating the effects of short-term (3-month course) sacubitril/valsartan treatment on LV dynamics assessed by 3D echocardiography and 3D strain, sacubitril/valsartan was associated with a significant improvement of LV systolic functions and reverse remodeling effects in both ischemic and non-ischemic HFrEF patients.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional; Heart Failure; Humans; Prospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left; Ventricular Remodeling

Heart failure (HF) is one of the main comorbidities in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis (HD). Sacubitril/valsartan (SAC/VAL) is widely used in HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) or HF mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF). However, the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic properties of SAC/VAL in HD patients with HF remain uncertain.. This study aimed to analyze the efficacy and PK properties of SAC/VAL in HD patients with HFrEF or HFmrEF.. HD patients with HFrEF or HFmrEF were treated with SAC/VAL 50 or 100 mg twice a day (BID) and the concentrations of valsartan and LBQ657 (active metabolite of SAC) were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry during HD and on the days between HD sessions (interval days). N-terminal-pro B-type natriuretic peptide and high-sensitivity troponin T were measured, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was evaluated by echocardiography.. The mean maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) of LBQ657 and VAL on the interval days were 15.46 ± 6.01 and 2.57 ± 1.23 mg/L, respectively. Compared with previous values in patients with severe renal impairment and healthy volunteers, these levels both remained within the safe concentration ranges during treatment with SAC/VAL 100 mg BID. Moreover, SAC/VAL significantly improved LVEF in HD patients with HFrEF or HFmrEF (p < 0.05).. HD did not remove the SAC metabolite LBQ657 or VAL in patients with HF. However, SAC/VAL 100 mg BID was safe and effective in patients undergoing HD.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Humans; Renal Dialysis; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

In the heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) PARAGON-HF trial, sacubitril/valsartan vs. valsartan improved mortality/morbidity in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) below median (57%). We assessed eligibility for sacubitril/valsartan based on four scenarios.. In real-world HFpEF (LVEF ≥ 45%) with N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and cardiac structure/function assessed, eligibility for sacubitril/valsartan was according to PARAGON-HF complete criteria 34%, pragmatic criteria 63%, LVEF below lower limit of normal range 5.4%, and LVEF below mean of normal range 41%. Cardiac structural impairment was almost ubiquitous. Ineligibility was more due to exclusion criteria than failing to meet inclusion criteria.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Clinical Trials as Topic; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Stroke Volume; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a heterogeneous syndrome. In heart failure (HF) classifications, right ventricle (RV) function was for a long time unrecognized in favor of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The response to sacubitril/valsartan might differ according to phenotypes and the impact of right ventricular characteristics on this response remains controversial.. First, we applied clustering analysis in a HFrEF population undergoing sacubitril/valsartan treatment according to guidelines, to identify phenotypes and their associated clinical outcomes. Secondly, we evaluated RV-remodeling.. It is a prospective, observational, single-center study conducted on 108 symptomatic patients (mean age 66 ±12.8 years, 22.2% women). First, the clustering analysis was applied in a HFrEF population undergoing sacubitril/valsartan treatment, according to the guidelines, in order to identify phenotypes and clinical outcomes associated with them. Secondly, we evaluated RV-remodeling.. Two distinct clusters were identified. Among the differences between phenotypes, RV (tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) 16 ±4 mm compared to 19 ±4 mm, p < 0.001; RV free wall strain -19 ±5% compared to -21 ±4%, p = 0.046; RV fraction area change (FAC) 31 ±9% compared to 38 ±9%, p < 0.001), LV-filling pressure (E-wave deceleration time 138 (median: 41) ms compared to 180 (median: 94) ms, p < 0.001; E/e' 16.7 (median: 8.0) ms compared to 13.0 (median: 9.7) ms, p = 0.02) and creatinine level (106 ±34 μmol/L compared to 90 ±19 μmol/L, p = 0.002) were substantially different at the initiation of therapy. Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) or death occurred in 38 out of 107 patients: 51.1% in cluster 1 compared to 24.2% in cluster 2 (p = 0.0074). A significant improvement in RV-functional parameters was observed under treatment. The TAPSE improved and correlated with the change in left ventricular (LV) function. Yet, it did not correlate with systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) and LV end-diastolic diameter.. The HFrEF phenotype characterized by more severe RV dysfunction has a worse prognosis during sacubitril/valsartan therapy. Both RVand LV functions significantly improve when the patient is treated with sacubitril/valsartan.

Topics: Aged; Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Cluster Analysis; Drug Combinations; Female; Heart Failure; Heart Failure, Systolic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

No data on the add-on sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) therapy among cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D) nonresponder patients are currently available in literature. We conducted a prospective observational study including 190 CRT-D nonresponder patients with symptomatic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction despite the optimal medical therapy from at least 1 year. The primary endpoint was the rate of additional responders (left ventricular end-systolic volume reduction >15%) at 12 months from the introduction of S/V therapy. At the end of the 12 months follow-up, 37 patients (19.5%) were deemed as "additional responders" to the combination use of CRT + S/V therapy. The only clinical predictor of additional response was a lower left ventricular ejection fraction [OR 0.881 (0.815-0.953), P = 0.002] at baseline. At 12 months follow-up, there were significant improvements in heart failure (HF) symptoms and functional status [New York Heart Association 2 (2-3) vs. 1 (1-2), P < 0.001; physical activity duration/day: 10 (8-12) vs. 13 (10-18) hours, P < 0.001]. Compared with the 12 months preceding S/V introduction, there were significant reductions in the rate of HF rehospitalization (35.5% vs. 19.5%, P < 0.001), in atrial tachycardia/atrial fibrillation burden [6.0 (5.0-8.0) % vs. 0 (0-2.0) %, P < 0.001] and in the proportions of patients experiencing ventricular arrhythmias (21.6% vs. 6.3%; P < 0.001). Our results indicate that S/V add-on therapy in CRT-D nonresponder patients is associated with 19.5% of additional responders, a reduction in HF symptoms and rehospitalizations, AF burden, and ventricular arrhythmias.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Atrial Fibrillation; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

Regarding the drug interactions between sacubitril/valsartan and statins, we identified 3 reports of rhabdomyolysis with high-potency statins. However, it remains unknown whether the combined use of these medications could lead to additive or synergistic effects on rhabdomyolysis. This study aims to assess the disproportionality in reporting rhabdomyolysis for these medications when used alone or in combination. Case reports from the United States Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System from 1991 to Q4/2020 were used. Queries extracted reports based on exposure to statins alone, sacubitril/valsartan alone, and statin+sacubitril/valsartan each. Proportional reporting ratios (PRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, where a lower limit of the 95% CI (Lower 95% CI) value of ≥2.0 was interpreted as a safety signal. Lower 95% CIs for statins other than rosuvastatin alone demonstrated no potential safety signals for rhabdomyolysis, death, or the control event. The PRRs and 95% CI for rhabdomyolysis were 2.39 (2.01 to 2.84) with rosuvastatin alone and 2.06 (2.01 to 2.12) for sacubitril/valsartan alone. For atorvastatin+sacubitril/valsartan, the PRR and 95% CI were 0.95 (0.64 to 1.40). Statin+sacubitril/valsartan was not associated with a safety signal. However, rosuvastatin alone and sacubitril/valsartan alone were associated with rhabdomyolysis.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Rhabdomyolysis; Rosuvastatin Calcium; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; United States; Valsartan

In the year 2021, the universal definition and classification of heart failure (HF) was published that defines HF as a clinical syndrome with symptoms and/or signs caused by a cardiac abnormality and corroborated by elevated natriuretic peptide levels or objective evidence of cardiogenic congestion. This definition and the classification of HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), mildly reduced, and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is consistent with the 2021 ESC Guidelines on HF. Among several other new recommendations, these guidelines give a Class I indication for the use of the sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors dapagliflozin and empagliflozin in HFrEF patients. As the first evidence-based treatment for HFpEF, in the EMPEROR-Preserved trial, empagliflozin reduced the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death and HF hospitalizations. Several reports in 2021 have provided novel and detailed analyses of device and medical therapy in HF, especially regarding sacubitril/valsartan, SGLT2 inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, ferric carboxymaltose, soluble guanylate cyclase activators, and cardiac myosin activators. In patients hospitalized with COVID-19, acute HF and myocardial injury is quite frequent, whereas myocarditis and long-term damage to the heart are rather uncommon.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiomyopathies; COVID-19; Heart Failure; Humans; SARS-CoV-2; Stroke Volume

Advances in cancer therapy have resulted in more cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD), which is the main cause of death in older female survivors of breast cancer. Traditionally, guideline-recommended medications for heart failure, such as beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEIs/ARBs), are commonly used to prevent or attenuate CTRCD. However, sometimes their effectiveness is not satisfactory. Recently, the drug combination of sacubitril plus valsartan has been proven to be more beneficial for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in the long term compared with an ACEI/ARB alone. However, there is a lack of evidence of the efficacy and safety of this drug combination in CTRCD. We report a case of worsening CTRCD, despite treatment with traditional medications, in which the patient improved after changing perindopril to sacubitril/valsartan. The patient's heart function greatly improved after changing this ACEI to sacubitril/valsartan. Changing an ACEI/ARB to sacubitril/valsartan in patients with worsening chemotherapy-induced heart failure is appropriate. Further studies with a high level of evidence are required to assess the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan for CTRCD.

Topics: Aged; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Neoplasms; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan

Sacubitril/valsartan improves outcome in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF, HFrEF). However, little is known about possible mechanisms underlying this favourable effect.. To assess changes in echocardiographically-derived hemodynamic profiles induced by sacubitril/valsartan and their impact on outcome.. At baseline, 29% had profile-A, 15% had profile-B, 32% profile-C, and 24% profile-D. After 12 months, the hemodynamic profile improved in 53% of patients (all profile-A achievers, or profile-D patients achieving either C or B profile), while it remained unchanged in 39% patients and worsened in 9%. Prevalence of improved profile progressively increased with increasing dose of sacubitril/valsartan (P < 0.0001). After the second echocardiography, patients were followed up 12.6 ± 7.6 months: event-rate was lower in patients with improved profile (12.3%, 95%CI: 9.4-16.1) compared to patients in whom hemodynamic profile remained unchanged (29.9%, 24.0-37.3) or worsened (31.2%, 20.7-46.9, P < 0.0001). Improved hemodynamic profile was associated with favourable outcome independent of LVEF and other covariates (HR 0.65, 95%CI: 0.45-0.95, P < 0.05).. In HFrEF patients, the beneficial prognostic effects of sacubitril/valsartan are associated with improvement in hemodynamic conditions.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Echocardiography; Heart Failure; Hemodynamics; Humans; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan

Heart failure (HF) is a systemic inflammatory disorder with infections being an important cause of morbidity and mortality. We asked if HF patients have a higher susceptibility to infections compared with the general population and if a subtle secondary immunodeficiency facilitates infectious complications.. In a cohort of 92 patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction, we analysed recirculating lymphocyte subpopulations, serum immunoglobulin levels, and specific antibody titres against pneumococcal antigens. We quantified susceptibility to infections of the respiratory tract with a validated questionnaire and compared it to the general population. Susceptibility to infections of the respiratory tract was comparable in HF patients and the general population. Hypogammaglobulinaemia was present in 16% of HF patients, but anti-pneumococcal titres showed no evidence of specific secondary antibody deficiency. Relative lymphopaenia in our HF cohort was due to B lymphocytopenia with a relative reduction in naive B-cells and expansion of memory B-cells while CD4+ and CD8+ T-lymphocytes as well as NK-cell counts were comparable between HF and healthy donors. The intake of the angiotensin receptor neprilysin (CD10) inhibitor (ARNI) sacubitril/valsartan was associated with increased B-lymphocyte counts, possibly by an increased output of CD10+ transitional B lymphocytes from the bone marrow.. Despite a reduction of B lymphocytes in HF and mild hypogammaglobulinaemia, patients showed no evidence of secondary immunodeficiency or increased susceptibility to infections. The relevance of B-cell lymphopenia in HF patients and modulation of B-cell counts under ARNI treatment remains to be investigated.

Topics: Adaptive Immunity; Adult; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles

Rising drug costs have increased interest in performance-linked reimbursement (PLR) contracts that tie payment to patient outcomes. PLR is theoretically attractive to payers interested in reducing the risk of overpaying for expensive drugs, to manufacturers working to improve early drug adoption, and to patients seeking improved access. Multiple PLR contracts were developed for sacubitril-valsartan. We evaluated how the characteristics of a PLR contract influence its performance.. We used a published cost-effectiveness model of sacubitril-valsartan. We evaluated hypothetical PLR contracts that adjusted drug payment based on observed therapy effectiveness. Ideally, these contracts reduce the uncertainty around the value obtained with purchasing sacubitril-valsartan. By reducing the financial risk in covering an ineffective therapy, PLR incentivizes insurers to increase patient access. We measured the uncertainty in value as the SD of the incremental net monetary benefit (INMB), an estimate of therapy value incorporating costs and clinical benefits. We evaluated the change in INMB SD under a variety of different assumptions regarding contract design, therapy effectiveness, and population characteristics.. Over 2 years, sacubitril-valsartan led to 0.042 additional quality-adjusted life-years at an incremental cost of $4916. Using a willingness-to-pay of $150 000 per quality-adjusted life-year, this led to a mean INMB across simulations of $1416 (SD, $1720). A PLR contract that adjusted payment based on cardiovascular mortality reduced the INMB SD moderately by 20.7% while a contract based on all-cause mortality was more effective (INMB SD reduction of 27.3%). A contract based on heart failure hospitalization reduction was ineffective. PLR effectiveness increased with greater uncertainty regarding therapy effectiveness or in sicker cohorts (eg, New York Heart Association Class III/IV heart failure). Contracts required precise estimates of treatment effect in addition to trust or verifiability between manufacturers and payers concerning patient selection.. The development of accurate prospective estimates of treatment effectiveness using actual enrollee characteristics will be critical for successful PLR. If able to meet these requirements, PLRs could incentivize insurers to expand access to expensive treatments by reducing financial risk.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Humans; Prospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Sacubitril/valsartan is the first-in-class angiotensin-receptor neprilysin inhibitor approved in 2015 for the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). On 16 February 2021, the Food and Drug Administration acknowledged that "Benefits are most clearly evident in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction below normal," thus potentially extending the use in subjects with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).. The authors outline the regulatory history, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and risk-benefit profile of sacubitril/valsartan in HFrEF and HFpEF. A critical cross-trial comparison is presented, including sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), together with an insight into the latest European Society of Cardiology guidelines, where the new category of heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction is introduced.. Sacubitril/valsartan is a foundation of the pharmacological armamentarium in HFrEF to counteract the neuro-hormonal changes and reverse cardiac remodeling, together with beta-blockers, SGLT2i and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. The optimal sequence algorithm is an evolving issue, and the authors provide the reader with their personal perspective. A multidisciplinary management is encouraged to minimize the therapeutic inertia and manage tolerability issues, thus supporting adherence. Pragmatic trials, pharmacovigilance, and high-quality real-world evidence are crucial toward personalized safe prescribing of sacubitril/valsartan.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

The angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), sacubitril/valsartan, has been shown to be effective in treatment of patients with heart failure (HF), but limited data are available in patients with advanced disease. This retrospective observational study assessed the effects of ARNI treatment in patients with advanced HF.. We reviewed medical records of all advanced HF patients evaluated at our centre for unconventional therapies from September 2016 to January 2019. We studied 44 patients who started ARNI therapy and who had a haemodynamic assessment before beginning ARNI and after 6 ± 2 months. The primary endpoint was variation in pulmonary pressures and filling pressures at 6 months after starting ARNI therapy. Mean patient age was 51.6 ± 7.4 years; 84% were male. At 6 ± 2 months after starting ARNI, there was significant reduction of systolic pulmonary artery pressure [32 mmHg, interquartile range (IQR) 27-45 vs. 25 mmHg, IQR 22.3-36.5; P < 0.0001] and mean pulmonary artery pressure (20 mmHg, IQR 15.3-29.8 vs. 17 mmHg, IQR 13-24.8; P = 0.046). Five of 22 patients (23%) were deferred from the heart transplant list because of improvement, whereas four were listed de novo. After 23 ± 9 months, three patients were treated with a left ventricular assist device implantation, whereas six patients underwent heart transplantation (one in emergency conditions for refractory ventricular tachycardia).. Sacubitril/valsartan is effective in reducing filling pressures and pulmonary pressures in patients with advanced HF. The absence of adverse events during follow-up suggests that sacubitril/valsartan is safe and well-tolerated in this cohort of patients.

Topics: Adult; Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Natriuretic peptides (NPs) are now routinely incorporated as key inclusion criteria in clinical trials of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) as objective measures of risk. An early amendment in PARAGON-HF required all participants to have elevated NP concentrations, but some were enrolled pre-amendment, providing a unique opportunity to understand the influence of enrolment pathway in HFpEF clinical trials.. Among 4796 participants in PARAGON-HF, 193 (4.0%) did not meet the final NP-based enrolment criteria (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide >300 pg/ml for patients in sinus rhythm or >900 pg/ml for patients in atrial fibrillation/flutter). These patients had lower rates of the primary endpoint of total heart failure hospitalizations and cardiovascular death as compared with patients meeting final enrolment criteria (8.6 [6.7-11.2] events per 100 patient-years vs. 14.0 [13.4-14.7] events per 100 patient-years; p = 0.01). The rate ratio for the treatment effect comparing sacubitril/valsartan with valsartan was 0.85 (95% confidence interval 0.74-0.99; p = 0.04) in those who met final criteria.. Natriuretic peptides are an important tool in HFpEF clinical trials to objectively affirm diagnoses and enrich clinical event rates.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Humans; Natriuretic Peptides; Stroke Volume; Valsartan; Vasodilator Agents

Currently, data on sacubitril/valsartan therapy from the real-world settings are scarce and the predictors of a good clinical responsiveness to this drug are unknown.. To assess efficacy and safety profile of sacubitril/valsartan and to identify predictors for a better clinical outcome.. Clinical, laboratory and echocardiographic data of 95 chronic heart failure (CHF) patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) were retrospectively analyzed. A good efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan was defined as the fulfilment of at least 2 of the following criteria: improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) or functional status, and reduction of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels or hospitalization rates.. Under sacubitril/valsartan, major improvements were observed in LVEF, the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, NT-proBNP levels, and hospitalization rates. Patients with a good efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan were characterized by initially worse LVEF (median (interquartile range (IQR)): 29.0% (23.0-33.0%) compared to 32.0% (28.5-38.0%) with more frequent nonischemic etiology (65.4% compared to 41.9%) and hospitalizations for CHF/month (0.016 (0.004-0.057) compared to 0.000 (0.000-0.012)), lower cholesterol (42.3% compared to 65.1%), higher C-reactive protein (CRP) levels at baseline (0.5 mg/L (0.5-1.0 mg/L) compared to 0.5 mg/L (0.5-0.5 mg/L)), and a shorter timespan between CHF diagnosis and the start of sacubitril/valsartan treatment (66.0 (11.0-127.0) compared to 111 (73.0-211.0) months) (p < 0.05 each). In a multivariate Cox analysis, only the last 2 parameters were shown to be independent predictors of good clinical responsiveness to sacubitril/valsartan (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.263, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = [1.048; 1.521]; HR = 0.992, 95% CI = [0.987; 0.997], p < 0.05, respectively).. Sacubitril/valsartan improved LVEF, NYHA class, NT-proBNP levels, and hospitalization rates, mostly without relevant side effects. The independent predictors of a good clinical efficacy were higher CRP levels at baseline and a shorter delay between CHF diagnosis and the initialization of sacubitril/valsartan therapy.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Outpatients; Retrospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Arrest; Heart Failure; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Prospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Echo-derived haemodynamic classification, based on forward-flow and left ventricular (LV) filling pressure (LVFP) correlates, has been proposed to phenotype patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). To assess the prognostic relevance of baseline echocardiographically defined haemodynamic profile in ambulatory HFrEF patients before starting sacubitril/valsartan.. Echocardiographically-derived haemodynamic classification identifies ambulatory HFrEF patients with different risk profiles. In real-world HFrEF outpatients, sacubitril/valsartan is effective in improving outcome across different haemodynamic profiles.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Hemodynamics; Humans; Prognosis; Stroke Volume; Valsartan

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Humans; Pilot Projects; Stroke Volume; Valsartan

The induction of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress has been reported as a key contributor to the cardiotoxicity of doxorubicin. Previous in vitro and in vivo studies suggest that sacubitril/valsartan, a novel angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, could be effective against doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. However, the precise mechanisms are not fully understood. Therefore, we investigated whether the cardioprotective effects of sacubitril/valsartan are associated with ER stress modulation in a rat model of doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were treated with intraperitoneal injections of doxorubicin (15 mg/kg; cumulative) or saline for 3 weeks. From the day before the first treatment, control animals were gavaged daily with water (n = 8), whereas doxorubicin-treated animals were gavaged daily with water (n = 8) or sacubitril/valsartan (60 mg/kg/day; n = 8) for 6 weeks. Echocardiography was performed 6 weeks after the initiation of doxorubicin. In addition, serum troponin I and N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide levels were determined, and the extent of apoptosis and protein levels related to ER stress in the cardiac tissue and doxorubicin-treated H9c2 cardiomyocytes were analyzed. Sacubitril/valsartan significantly reduced doxorubicin-induced cardiac dysfunction and apoptosis in the myocardium. In addition, sacubitril/valsartan significantly downregulated the expression levels of proteins related to apoptosis and ER stress, including BAX, caspase 3, GRP78, PERK, IRE-1α, ATF-6, eIF-2α, ATF-4, and CHOP, in the myocardium of a rat model of doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity in vivo and doxorubicin-treated H9c2 cardiomyocytes in vitro. Sacubitril/valsartan significantly alleviated doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity, which may be associated with the reduction of ER stress.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiotoxicity; Doxorubicin; Drug Combinations; Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress; Heart Failure; Male; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Valsartan; Water

Despite considerable advances in the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) over the last 60 years, mortality and morbidity remains high. Fortunately, in the last years, further developments expanded the toolbox for HF treatment.. The authors provide an overview of recent developments in HF treatment and bring the recommendations in the HF guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology into perspective.. Nowadays, basic pharmacological treatment of patients with HFrEF consists of a combination of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors/angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), and the SGLT2 inhibitors dapagliflozin or empagliflozin. Treatment initiation of all four drug classes should be fast and simultaneous. In some cases, the ARNI sacubitril/valsartan may be initiated even in ACE inhibitor-naïve patients. Further HF treatment has to be individualized. Another important point is that both SGLT2 inhibitors and vericiguat can be used in patients with severely reduced kidney function. Finally, an important piece in the HF management puzzle is the treatment of its comorbidities. For instance, patients hospitalized for acute HF decompensation should be systematically screened for iron deficiency, since HF patients with proven iron deficiency benefit from intravenous ferric carboxymaltose.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Neprilysin; Stroke Volume; Valsartan

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

The present study sought to examine the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown measures on the prescription of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure (HF) in Italy.. Data from Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) monitoring registries were analysed. The sacubitril/valsartan monitoring registry is based on 6-month prescriptions. A monthly aggregation on new activations throughout the observational period was computed. From March to December 2020, the initiation of new HF patients on sacubitril/valsartan decreased by nearly 40% with prescriptions dropping to values similar to 2018 when the registry was still operated off-line. A slight increase in prescriptions was observed after the lockdown measures were lifted, but prescriptions remained constantly below the pre-lockdown period.. A marked and worrisome decline during the COVID-19 pandemic in the activation of a life-saving treatment such as sacubitril/valsartan was observed. This decline was clearly linked to the lockdown measures instated to counteract the COVID-19 pandemic. Upcoming studies should analyse the occurrence of new cases of HF as well as the severity of patients admitted to hospitals and their mortality compared to pre-pandemic levels.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Communicable Disease Control; COVID-19; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Pandemics; Prescriptions; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan

The use of sacubitril/valsartan has been fully recognized in the most recent European and American guidelines that recommend in class I the prescription of this drug in heart failure patients with reduced systolic function. Besides the effects on cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalization, sacubitril/valsartan significantly reduces NT-proBNP levels and improves cardiac remodeling, recognized as one of the mechanistic effects of the drug that is linked to favorable prognostic effects. A careful evaluation of the patients' clinical profile is needed to implement the use of sacubitril/valsartan into clinical practice and to make the treatment successful. This second part of the position paper focuses on the mechanistic effects of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors and on its placement in current guidelines, also suggesting the use of sacubitril/valsartan in specific clinical settings.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiology; Heart Failure; Humans; Renin-Angiotensin System; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone (RAAS) system inhibition is a mainstay of the pharmacological treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and has been implemented by the introduction of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI), that combine RAAS inhibition with the inhibition of neprilysin, enhancing the favorable effects of natriuretic peptides. The PARADIGM-HF trial demonstrated a favorable effect of sacubitril/valsartan over enalapril in terms of mortality and heart failure hospitalization rate reduction. Then several randomized clinical trials and observational studies confirmed the favorable role of ARNI in different clinical scenarios, supporting the guideline class I recommendation for the use of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with reduced systolic function. The first part of this position paper summarizes the history of RAAS inhibition and reports the results of ARNI trials that support the recommendations of the most recent guidelines.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiology; Clinical Trials as Topic; Heart Failure; Humans; Renin-Angiotensin System; Tetrazoles

The effects of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) were recently reported. However, the hemodynamic impact of this well-established treatment in patients with HFrEF has been poorly systematically researched.. We aimed to investigate the hemodynamic effects of sacubitril/valsartan among patients with HFrEF.. Between 2016 and 2020, we retrospectively collected data for patients with HFrEF treated at the University Medical Center Mannheim, Germany. Data for 240 patients with HFrEF were available. We systematically analyzed echocardiographic parameters, all-cause hospitalization, and congestion rate.. The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improved from a median (minimum; maximum) of 28% (3; 65) before initiation of sacubitril/valsartan to a median of 34% (13; 64) at 24-month follow-up (p < 0.001). Systolic pulmonary atrial pressure (PAPsys) decreased from a median of 30 mmHg (13; 115) to 25 mmHg (20; 80) at 24-month follow-up (p = 0.005). The median (minimum; maximum) tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion improved from 17 mm (3; 31) at baseline to 20 mm (9; 30) at 12-month follow-up (p = 0.007). The incidence of severe and moderate mitral, tricuspid, and aortic valvular insufficiency improved after treatment. Hospitalization and congestion rates reduced at 24-month follow-up. The mortality rate in echocardiographic and functional nonresponders was higher than in responders (12.1 vs. 5.2%; p = 0.1 and 11.3 vs. 3.1%; p = 0.01, respectively).. Follow-up 24 months after starting treatment with sacubitril/valsartan revealed sustained improvements in echocardiographic parameters, including LVEF, PAPsys, and cardiac valvular insufficiency. Rates of all-cause hospitalization and congestion had decreased significantly at follow-up. The mortality rate was higher in echocardiographic and functional nonresponders.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Hemodynamics; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Ventricular Function, Left

In congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries, the morphological right ventricle supports the systemic circulation. This chronic exposure to pressure overload ultimately leads to systemic right ventricular (sRV) dysfunction and heart failure. Pharmacological options for the treatment of sRV failure are poorly defined and no solid recommendations are made in the most recent guidelines. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors are a new class of antihyperglycaemic drugs that have been demonstrated to significantly reduce the risk of worsening heart failure and death from cardiovascular causes in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, yet no data are available in sRV patients. We report on the treatment and clinical follow-up of a patient with advanced heart failure and poor sRV function in the context of congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries, who did not tolerate sacubitril/valsartan and had a high burden of heart-failure-related hospitalizations. Treatment with dapagliflozin was well tolerated and resulted in (small) subjective and objective functional and echocardiographic improvement and a reduction in heart-failure-related hospitalizations.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Congenitally Corrected Transposition of the Great Arteries; Glucose; Heart Failure; Humans; Sodium; Stroke Volume; Transposition of Great Vessels; Ventricular Dysfunction, Right; Ventricular Function, Left

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Kidney; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Rhabdomyolysis; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has currently become a major concern in the aging society owing to its substantial and growing prevalence. Recent investigations regarding sacubitril/valsartan have suggested that there is a gender difference in the efficacy of the medication in HFpEF cohort. However, information of gender difference in clinical profiles, examination, and prognosis have not been well investigated. The present study aimed to evaluate the differences in baseline characteristics and outcomes between women and men in a Japanese HFpEF cohort. We analyzed the data from our prospective, observational, and multicenter cohort study. Overall, 1036 consecutive patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure were enrolled. We defined patients with an ejection fraction (EF) of ≥ 50% as HFpEF. Patients with severe valvular disease were excluded; the remaining 379 patients (women: n = 201, men: n = 178) were assessed. Women were older than men [median: 85 (79-89) years vs. 83 (75-87) years, p = 0.013]. Diabetes mellitus, hyperuricemia, and coronary artery disease were more prevalent in men than in women (34.8% vs. 23.9%, p = 0.019, 23.6% vs. 11.4%, p = 0.002, and 23.0% vs. 11.9%, p = 0.005, respectively). EF was not significantly different between women and men. The cumulative incidence of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for congestive heart failure (CHF) was significantly lower in women than in men (log-rank p = 0.040). Women with HFpEF were older and less often exhibited an ischemic etiology; further, they were associated with a lower risk for cardiovascular death or hospitalization for CHF compared with men in the Japanese population.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Cohort Studies; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Prognosis; Prospective Studies; Sex Factors; Stroke Volume

Severe heart failure in chronic hemodialysis (HD) patients is a great treatment challenge. Here we reported a chronic HD patient with the lowest ejection fraction reported so far and hypotension who well tolerated and benefited from angiotensin-receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) treatment.. This case was a 67 year old lady with decompensated heart failure and hypotension who was on regular HD. Intensified hemofiltration failed to improve her heart failure symptoms and was also retarded by hypotension.. Chronic HD with decompensated heart failure.. In addition to regular HD, low does sacubitril/valsartan was initiated and titrated from 12/13 mg to 24/26 mg twice daily.. Sacubitril/valsartan treatment was well tolerated and did not affect ultrafiltration during HD treatment. Transthoracic echocardiology at 3 months after initiation of ARNI treatment indicated significant improvement of both systolic and diastolic cardiac function. The patient has improved from New York Heart Association class 4 to class 2.. Low does ARNI treatment could effectively improve cardiac function in HD patients with heart failure and hypotension. It was also safe and well tolerated.

Topics: Aged; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypotension; Neprilysin; Renal Dialysis; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Valsartan

In this study, the authors sought to assess the relationship between AFF and outcomes, the treatment response to sacubitril/valsartan and first-detected AFF in patients with HFpEF enrolled in the PARAGON-HF trial.. Atrial fibrillation and flutter (AFF) are common in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and increase the risk of adverse outcomes.. A total of 4,776 patients formed 3 groups: those with AFF according to electrocardiography (ECG) at enrollment (n = 1,552; 33%), those with history of AFF but without AFF on ECG at enrollment (n = 1,005; 21%), and those without history of AFF or AFF on ECG at enrollment (n = 2,219, 46%). We assessed outcomes, treatment response to sacubitril/valsartan in each group, and the risk associated with first-detected AFF in patients without any known AFF. The primary outcome was a composite of total heart failure hospitalizations and cardiovascular death.. History of AFF and AFF at enrollment were associated with higher risk of the primary outcome (risk ratio [RR]: 1.36 [95% CI: 1.12-1.65] and RR: 1.31 [1.11-1.54], respectively), than no AFF. Neither history of AFF nor AFF at enrollment modified the treatment effect of sacubitril/valsartan. Post randomization AFF occurred in 12% of patients without previous AFF and was associated with 2.8-fold higher risk of the primary outcome, but it was not influenced by sacubitril/valsartan.. History of AFF and AFF on ECG at enrollment were associated with a higher risk of the primary outcome. First-detected AFF was not influenced by sacubitril/valsartan, yet it was associated with increased risk of all subsequent outcomes and may represent a potential target for future HFpEF trials. (Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 Compared to Valsartan, on Morbidity and Mortality in Heart Failure Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction [PARAGON-HF]; NCT01920711).

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Atrial Fibrillation; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) treatment is beneficial in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but its mode of action remains elusive, although it involves the increase in ANP (atrial natriuretic peptide).. Combining mass spectrometry and enzymatic assay in the plasma of 73 HFrEF patients treated with S/V and controls, we deciphered proANP processing that converts proANP into 4 vasoactive peptides.. We found that proANP processing is sequential and involved meprin B, ECE (endothelin-converting enzyme) 1, and ANPEP (aminopeptidase N). This processing is limited in HFrEF patients via the downregulation of proANP production, corin, and meprin B activities by miR-425 and miR1-3p. S/V restored or compensated proANP processing by downregulating miR-425 and miR1-3p, hence increasing levels of proANP-derived bioactive peptides. In contrast, S/V directly and indirectly partially inhibited ECE1 and ANPEP. ECE1 partial inhibition resulted in a lower-than-expected increase in ET1 (endothelin 1), tilting the vasoactive balance toward vasodilation, and possibly hypotension. Furthermore, proANP glycosylation interferes with the midregional proANP assay -a clinical surrogate for proANP production, preventing any pathophysiological interpretation of the results. The analysis of S/V dose escalation with respect to baseline treatments suggests S/V-specific effects.. These findings offer mechanistic evidence to the natriuretic peptide -defective state in HFrEF, which is improved by S/V. These data also strongly suggests that S/V increases plasma ANP by multiple mechanisms that involve 2 microRNAs, besides its protection from NEP (neprilysin) cleavage. Altogether, these data provide new insights on HFrEF pathophysiology and the mode of action of S/V.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Atrial Natriuretic Factor; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypotension; MicroRNAs; Neprilysin; Stroke Volume; Valsartan

This study aims to investigate the dosage pattern, efficacy, and safety of sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) in Chinese heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients regarding real-world settings. Patients from 27 centers with a confirmed diagnosis of HFrEF and initiated Sac/Val treatment were enrolled. The primary objective was to evaluate the dosage pattern and change of heart failure status. In a final cohort of 983 patients, outpatient Sac/Val treatment demonstrated a similar beneficial effect in NT-proBNP and cardiac function. After initiating the treatment, overall and sub-population showed similar safety and efficacy. Patients who received a higher dose of Sac/Val (> 200 mg/d) demonstrated better improvement in LV function and reduction of NT-proBNP regardless of adjustment. Among Chinese HFrEF patients, Sac/Val showed a comparable reduction in NT-proBNP and improvement in cardiac function. Data further support guideline recommendations of Sac/Val in Chinese population. Optimal up-titration might provide further benefits. Further long-term and prognostic studies are needed.

Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; China; Heart Failure; Humans; Neprilysin; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

In clinical trials, sacubitril/valsartan has demonstrated significant survival benefits compared to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEi/ARB). Whether older patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) benefit as much, due to higher rates of comorbidities, frailty and drug discontinuation, is unknown.. Using a cohort of Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized with HFrEF between 2016 and 2018, we determined all-cause mortality and HF-readmission rates among patients not given ACEi/ARB or sacubitril/valsartan at hospital discharge, by age. We then used risk reductions from the SOLVD, PARADIGM-HF and PIONEER-HF trials to estimate the benefits of ACEi/ARB and sacubitril/valsartan. We then incorporated age-specific estimates of drug discontinuation from Medicare. A Markov decision process model was used to simulate 5-year survival and estimate number needed to treat, comparing discharge on ACEi/ARB vs sacubitril/valsartan by age. After accounting for drug discontinuation rates, which were surprisingly slightly higher among those discharged on ACEi/ARB (2.3%/month vs 1.9%/month), there was a small but significant survival advantage to discharge on sacubitril/valsartan over 5 years (+0.81 months [95% CI 0.80, 0.81]). The benefit of sacubitril/valsartan over ACEi/ARB did not decrease with increasing age - the number needed to treat among 66 to 74-year-old patients was 84 and among 85+ year-old patients was 67.. Even after accounting for "real world" rates of drug discontinuation, discharge on sacubitril/valsartan after conferred a small, but significant, survival advantage which does not appear to wane with increasing age.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Biphenyl Compounds; Decision Support Techniques; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Medicare; Patient Discharge; Stroke Volume; Survival Analysis; United States; Valsartan

Outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are influenced by access and adherence to guideline-directed medical therapy. Our objective was to study the association between annual household income and: (1) the odds of having a claim for sacubitril/valsartan among insured patients with HFrEF and (2) medication adherence (measured as the proportion of days covered). We hypothesized that lower annual household income is associated with decreased odds of having a claim for and adhering to sacubitril/valsartan.. Using the Optum de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart, patients with HFrEF and ≥6 months of enrollment for follow-up (2016-2020) were included. Covariates included age, sex, race, ethnicity, educational attainment, US region, number of prescribed medications, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. Prescription for sacubitril/valsartan was defined by the presence of a claim within 6 months of HFrEF diagnosis. Adherence was defined as proportion of days covered ≥80%. We fit multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models and hierarchical logistic regression accounting for covariates.. Among 322 007 individuals with incident HFrEF, 135 282 had complete data for analysis. Of the patients eligible for sacubitril/valsartan, 4.7% (6372) had a claim within 6 months of HFrEF diagnosis. Following multivariable adjustment, individuals in the lowest annual income category (<$40 000) were significantly less likely (odds ratio, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.76-0.90]) to have a sacubitril/valsartan claim within 6 months of HFrEF diagnosis than those in the highest annual income category (≥$100 000). Annual income <$40 000 was associated with lower odds of proportion of days covered ≥80% compared with income ≥$100 000 (odds ratio, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.59-0.83]).. Lower household income is associated with decreased likelihood of a sacubitril/valsartan claim and medication adherence within 6 months of HFrEF diagnosis, even after adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical factors. Future analyses are needed to identify additional social factors associated with delays in sacubitril/valsartan initiation and long-term adherence.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Angiotensin inhibition remains a cornerstone for pharmacologic management of heart failure (HF), despite being associated with decreased hemoglobin (Hb) levels. To investigate the effect of anemia and its treatment on patients with HF treated with sacubitril-valsartan (S/V), we conducted a retrospective study involving patients with recorded left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEFs) of < 40% between January 2017 and December 2019. We identified 677 patients, 37.7% of whom received S/V. The median follow-up period was 868 days. Anemia was associated with significantly decreased survival, increased mortality rates, and higher all-cause hospitalizations in S/V-using patients. We further analyzed 236 patients with HF who had recorded renal function, LVEF, and Hb at the initiation of S/V therapy to identify Hb patterns after S/V therapy. Of these patients, 35.6% exhibited decreasing Hb 12 months after S/V initiation, which was associated with a lower survival rate. Among the patients who were not prescribed anemia medications, Hb of ≥ 12 (vs. < 12 g/dL) was associated with a higher survival rate; this association was absent among the patients undergoing anemia treatment. These results emphasize that consistent screening and treatment for anemia should be implemented to reduce the morbidity and mortality of patients with HF receiving S/V.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Anemia; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan

Prior studies have not fully characterized the haemodynamic effects of the angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and pulmonary hypertension (HFpEF-PH). The aim of the Treatment of PH With Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker and Neprilysin Inhibitor in HFpEF Patients With CardioMEMS Device (ARNIMEMS-HFpEF) study is to assess pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) dynamics by means of implanted PAP monitors in patients with HFpEF-PH treated with sacubitril/valsartan.. This single-arm, investigator-initiated, interventional study included 14 consecutive ambulatory symptomatic HFpEF-PH patients who underwent CardioMEMS implantation prior to enrolment [mean ejection fraction 60.4 ± 7.2%, baseline mean PAP (mPAP) 33.9 ± 7.6 mmHg]. Daily PAP values were examined during three periods: a 6 week period after CardioMEMS implantation and before sacubitril/valsartan treatment (pre-ARNI), a 6 week period with sacubitril/valsartan treatment (ARNI ON), and a 6 week period of sacubitril/valsartan withdrawal (ARNI OFF). The primary endpoint was change in mPAP with and without sacubitril/valsartan. Secondary endpoints included changes in 6 min walking distance, B-line sum in lung ultrasound, and quality of life (QoL). During the study period, 1717 mPAP measurements were recorded. Between pre-ARNI vs. ARNI ON, mPAP significantly declined by -4.99 mmHg [95% confidence interval (CI) -5.55 to -4.43]. Between ARNI ON vs. ARNI OFF, mPAP significantly increased by +2.84 mmHg [95% CI +2.26 to +3.42]. Between pre-ARNI vs. ARNI ON, we found an improvement in 6 min walking distance, B-lines, and QoL. Mean loop diuretic management did not differ between periods.. Sacubitril/valsartan significantly reduced mPAP in patients with HFpEF-PH, independent of loop diuretic management, together with improvement in functional capacity, lung congestion, and QoL. Sacubitril/valsartan may be a therapeutic alternative in HFpEF-PH.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Arterial Pressure; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension, Pulmonary; Neprilysin; Quality of Life; Sodium Potassium Chloride Symporter Inhibitors; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Collagen is a major component of the skin's support system, allowing for its firmness, elasticity, and mechanical strength. Skin collagen production decreases as we age and is associated with increased sagging, wrinkling, and thinning. The Renin-Angiotensin System (RAS) is a key hormonal system that changes with age and affects multiple organ systems. The primary health benefits of Angiotensin (Ang) receptor type1 (AT

Topics: Aged; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Biphenyl Compounds; Collagen; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Neprilysin; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan

This new and simple conversion formula of BNP and NT-proBNP with eGFR and BMI is potentially useful in clinical practice.

Topics: Biomarkers; Cohort Studies; Heart Failure; Humans; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Peptide Fragments

Sacubitril/valsartan, an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, has been shown to significantly reduce cardiovascular mortality, heart failure hospitalizations, and all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. This study aims to investigate the long-term impact of the sacubitril/valsartan combination on lipid parameters in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.. For this single-center retrospective cross-sectional study, data of patients using sacubitril/valsartan because of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction were collected. In addition to routine controls, the patients' lipid levels were measured at 3-month intervals. The parameters that were obtained over 3 years included total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglyceride, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels.. A total of 192 patients with a functional capacity New York Heart Association II-V, and who were using sacubitril/valsartan because of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, were included in this study. Independent of statin use, there was a decrease in total cholesterol levels (196.1 ± 44.8 mg/dL vs 161.5 ± 41.7 mg/dL, p < 0.001) and triglyceride levels (159.1 ± 10.4 mg/dL vs 121.4 ± 6.9 mg/dL, p < 0.001), and there was an improvement in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (44.9 ± 1.9 mg/dL vs 48.2 ± 2.4 mg/dL, p < 0.001) when comparing baseline levels with third-year levels.. Sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, independent of statin use, may cause a decrease in total cholesterol and triglyceride levels and an improvement in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Cholesterol; Cross-Sectional Studies; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Lipids; Lipoproteins, HDL; Retrospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Triglycerides; Valsartan

Hypertension (HP) is associated with heart failure (HF). Sacubitril/valsartan (sac/val) has been approved for primary HP by China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA) in June 2021. The present study aimed to provide evidence on the effectiveness and safety of sac/val in Chinese patients complicated with HP and HF.. This retrospective study was conducted on adult patients diagnosed with HP and HF and treated with sac/val between July 2020 and December 2020. The potential risk factors for the discontinuation events caused by sac/val-related adverse events (AEs) were explored. The data, including blood pressure (BP), cardiac indicators, corresponding values on echocardiographic parameters, unplanned visits, and AEs throughout 3-12 months, were collected.. A total of 446 eligible patients were included in this study. The discontinuation events of sac/val were mainly attributed to its AEs (hypotension, hyperkalemia, and deterioration in kidney function). Univariate analysis revealed that history of chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, higher values of serum creatinine, serum uric acid, serum N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide, and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate were potential risk factors for discontinuation. Patients who maintained sac/val therapy throughout 3-12 months showed significantly improved values of clinical BP, cardiac indicators, and echocardiographic parameters compared to those at baseline (p < 0.0001).. Sac/val was effective on BP and improved cardiac function in patients complicated with HP and HF. The physicians should focus on patients with renal dysfunction to take timely precautions to improve tolerability for sac/val.

Topics: Adult; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Creatinine; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Retrospective Studies; Tetrazoles; Uric Acid; Valsartan

Hypertension is common in patients with heart failure (HF), but less is known about resistant hypertension.. This study sought to investigate apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH) in patients with HF in the SwedeHF (Swedish Heart Failure Registry), across the spectrum of HF phenotypes (heart failure with reduced ejection fraction [HFrEF], heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction [HFmrEF], and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction [HFpEF]).. aTRH was defined as systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg (≥135 mm Hg in diabetes) despite treatment with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, angiotensin receptor blocker, or sacubitril-valsartan, as well as a calcium-channel blocker and a diuretic; non-treatment-resistant hypertension (TRH) was defined as systolic blood pressure above these thresholds but not on the 3-drug combination; and normal blood pressure was defined as under these thresholds. In each left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) category, patient factors associated with aTRH and non-TRH and outcomes (HF hospitalization and cardiovascular death composite, its components, and all-cause death) according to hypertension category were examined.. Among 46,597 patients, aTRH was present in 2,693 (10%), 1,514 (14%), and 1,450 (17%) patients with HFrEF, HFmrEF, and HFpEF, respectively. Older age, obesity, diabetes, and kidney disease were associated with a greater likelihood of aTRH and non-TRH (vs normal blood pressure). Associations were generally similar irrespective of LVEF category. Compared with normal blood pressure, aTRH was associated with a lower adjusted risk of the composite outcome in HFrEF and HFmrEF (HR: 0.79 [95% CI: 0.74-0.85] and HR: 0.86 [95% CI: 0.77-0.96]) but not in HFpEF (HR: 0.93 [95% CI: 0.84-1.04]).. aTRH was most common in HFpEF and least common in HFrEF. Associated patient characteristics were similar irrespective of LVEF category. aTRH (vs normal blood pressure) was associated with a lower risk of first HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death in HFrEF and HFmrEF but not in HFpEF.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Phenotype; Prognosis; Registries; Stroke Volume; Sweden; Ventricular Function, Left

Up to 20% of patients in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) trials are not taking diuretic agents at baseline, but little is known about them.. The aim of this study was to examine outcomes in patients with HFrEF not taking diuretic medications and after diuretic medications are started.. Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared between patients taking or not taking diuretic drugs at baseline in the ATMOSPHERE (Aliskiren Trial of Minimizing Outcomes for Patients With Heart Failure) and PARADIGM-HF (Prospective Comparison of ARNI With ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure Trial) trials combined. Patients starting diuretic medications were also compared with those remaining off diuretic drugs during follow-up. Symptoms (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score [KCCQ-CSS]), hospitalization for worsening heart failure (HF), mortality, and kidney function (estimated glomerular filtration rate slope) were examined.. At baseline, the 3,079 of 15,415 patients (20%) not taking diuretic medications had a less severe HF profile, less neurohumoral activation, and better kidney function. They were less likely to experience the primary outcome (hospitalization for HF or cardiovascular death) than patients taking diuretic agents (adjusted HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.74-0.80; P < 0.001) and death of any cause. Commencement of a diuretic drug was associated with higher subsequent risk for death (adjusted HR: 2.05; 95% CI: 1.99-2.11; P < 0.001) and greater decreases in KCCQ-CSS and estimated glomerular filtration rate. The 5 strongest predictors of initiation of diuretic medications were higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, higher body mass index, older age, history of diabetes, and worse KCCQ-CSS. In PARADIGM-HF, fewer patients who were treated with sacubitril/valsartan commenced diuretic agents (OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.58-0.88; P = 0.002).. Patients with HFrEF not taking diuretic medications and those who remained off them had better outcomes than patients treated with diuretic agents or who commenced them.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Diuretics; Heart Failure; Humans; Prospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Proteomics; Sex Characteristics; Valsartan

Hyperkalaemia frequently leads to interruption and discontinuation of neurohormonal antagonists, which may worsen heart failure prognosis. Some studies suggested that sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors reduce hyperkalaemia, an effect that may have important clinical implications. This analysis evaluates the effect of empagliflozin on the occurrence of hyper- and hypokalaemia in HF.. EMPEROR-Pooled (i.e. EMPEROR-Reduced and EMPEROR-Preserved combined) included 9583 patients with available serum potassium levels at baseline (98.6% of the total EMPEROR-Pooled population, n = 9718). Hyperkalaemia was identified by investigators' reports of adverse events, and by a laboratory serum potassium value above 5.5 mmol/L and 6.0 mmol/L. The main outcome was a composite of investigator-reported hyperkalaemia or initiation of potassium binders. Patients with high potassium at baseline were more frequently diagnosed with diabetes and ischaemic HF aetiology and had lower left ventricular ejection fraction and estimated glomerular filtration rate but were more frequently treated with sacubitril/valsartan or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. Empagliflozin (compared with placebo) reduced the composite of investigator-reported hyperkalaemia or initiation of potassium binders [6.5% vs. 7.7%, hazard ratio (HR) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-0.95, P = 0.01]. Empagliflozin reduced hyperkalaemia rates regardless of the definition used (serum potassium >5.5 mmol/l: 8.6% vs. 9.9%, HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.74-0.97, P = 0.017; serum potassium >6.0 mmol/l: 1.9% vs. 2.9%, HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.48-0.81, P < 0.001). The incidence of hypokalaemia (investigator-reported or serum potassium <3.0 mmol/l) was not significantly increased with empagliflozin.. Empagliflozin reduced the incidence of hyperkalaemia without significant increase in hypokalaemia.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Benzhydryl Compounds; Biphenyl Compounds; Glucosides; Heart Failure; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Hypokalemia; Potassium; Stroke Volume; Ventricular Function, Left

Sacubitril-valsartan has been shown to have superior effects over angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in patients with heart failure (HF). However, the effects of sacubitril-valsartan have never been systematically evaluated. Therefore, we performed a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sacubitril-valsartan in patients with HF.. We selected 8 databases, including PubMed, the Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, the Chinese Science Journal Database, Wanfang Data, and the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database. The search time was from database establishment to March 2022. Two reviewers will screen the records and include quality studies according to inclusion criteria independently. Two reviewers will assess the risk of bias of the included studies by the "Risk of Bias Assessment Tool" of the Cochrane Handbook for randomized controlled trials. Statistical analysis will be performed with Review Manager software 5.3.. A synthesis of current evidence of sacubitril-valsartan for treating HF will be provided in this protocol.. The results of this study will provide a theoretical basis for the clinical use of sacubitril-valsartan to treat HF.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Neprilysin; Stroke Volume; Systematic Reviews as Topic; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan

Sacubitril/valsartan is strongly supported in guidelines for the management of heart failure, but suboptimal adherence and treatment non-persistence may limit the population-level benefit that this therapy might otherwise offer.. We identified a cohort of Medicare beneficiaries (2014-2017) initiating sacubitril/valsartan after ≥6 months of continuous enrolment. We assessed adherence as the proportion of days covered (PDC) and proportion of patients non-persistent (having no prescription available) at 180 days after initiation. We fit a multivariable negative binomial model with a count of adherent days to evaluate independent factors associated with of sacubitril/valsartan adherence. Among 27 063 new sacubitril/valsartan users, most (n = 17 663, 65%) were prescribed low-dose at 24 mg/26 mg and most (n = 19 984, 74%) were switched from prior angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEi/ARB) rather than being RASi treatment naïve. Median 180-day PDC was 86% (25th-75th percentiles 58-98%). Black patients, those with high comorbid disease burden (≥8 comorbidities), and patients with recent hospitalization within 30 days had fewer adherent days, while those treated with preceding ACEi/ARB had more adherent days. Thirty-four percent of patients did not have an active sacubitril/valsartan prescription at day 180. Among these, few had preceding dose down-titrations (6% among patients on 49 mg/51 mg and 9% among patients on 97 mg/103 mg) and 68% did not have a subsequent ACEi/ARB prescription. Among patients who remained persistent, dose up-titrations occurred in 29% of patients who started on 24 mg/26 mg and 27% of patients on 49 mg/51 mg.. Overall adherence to sacubitril/valsartan among Medicare beneficiaries is acceptable, but is lower in Black patients, those with higher comorbidities or those who started therapy after recent hospitalization. While broad implementation of guideline-directed medical therapy is a key priority, additional focused efforts to improve adherence early after hospitalization and among at-risk patients are needed in parallel.

Topics: Aged; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Biphenyl Compounds; Cohort Studies; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Medicare; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; United States; Valsartan

Metabolic syndrome is a disease the World Health Organization has called a new pandemic of the 21st century. Arterial hypertension is one of the criteria for this diagnosis and a determinant of damage to major target organs. The present clinical case demonstrates an experience of treatment of arterial hypertension associated with metabolic syndrome with a valsartan/sacubitril molecular complex.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Metabolic Syndrome; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

The angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) demonstrated to be superior to enalapril in reducing hospitalizations, cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in patients with ambulatory heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), in particular when it is maximally up-titrated. Unfortunately, the target dose is achieved in less than 50% of HFrEF patients, thus undermining the beneficial effects on the outcomes. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the role of Sac/Val and its titration dose on reverse cardiac remodelling and determine which echocardiographic index best predicts the up-titration success.. From January 2020 to June 2021, we retrospectively identified 95 patients (65.6 [59.1-72.8] years; 15.8% females) with chronic HFrEF who were prescribed Sac/Val from the HF Clinics of 5 Italian University Hospitals and evaluated the tolerability of Sac/Val high dose (the ability of the patient to achieve and stably tolerate the maximum dose) as the primary endpoint in the cohort. We used a multivariable logistic regression analysis, with a stepwise backward selection method, to determine the independent predictors of Sac/Val maximum dose tolerability, using, as candidate predictors, only variables with a P-value < 0.1 in the univariate analyses. Candidate predictors identified for the multivariable backward logistic regression analysis were age, sex, body mass index (BMI), chronic kidney disease (CKD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dyslipidaemia, atrial fibrillation, systolic blood pressure (SBP), baseline tolerability of ACEi/ARBs maximum dose, left ventricle global longitudinal strain (LVgLS), LV ejection fraction (EF), tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), right ventricle (RV) fractional area change (FAC), RV global and free wall longitudinal strain (RVgLS and RV-FW-LS). After the multivariable analysis, only one categorical (ACEi/ARBs maximum dose at baseline) and three continuous (younger age, higher SBP, and higher TAPSE), resulted significantly associated with the study outcome variable with a strong discriminatory capacity (area under the curve 0.874, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.794-0.954) to predict maximum Sac/Val dose tolerability.. Our study is the first to analyse the potential role of echocardiography and, in particular, of RV dysfunction, measured by TAPSE, in predicting Sac/Val maximum dose tolerability. Therefore, patients with RV dysfunction (baseline TAPSE <16 mm, in our cohort) might benefit from a different strategy to titrate Sac/Val, such as starting from the lowest dose and/or waiting for a more extended period of observation before attempting with the higher doses.

Topics: Aged; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular (RV) cardiomyopathy is an autosomal dominant inherited cardiomyopathy that is characterized by an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias, sudden cardiac death and, less commonly, heart failure. The authors present the case of a 36-year-old woman with familial lamin cardiomyopathy with positive. The authors present the case of a 36-year-old woman who was found to have arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, a rare inherited cardiomyopathy. This condition is caused by various mutations that lead to cardiac muscle cells being replaced with fibrofatty tissue and manifests as heart arrhythmias, sudden cardiac death or heart failure. The patient presented with symptoms of right heart failure. Imaging found a new reduction in right ventricular function, confirming the diagnosis of right heart failure. The patient was treated initially with diuretics. However, her symptoms persisted despite treatment and sacubitril–valsartan was started, after which she symptomatically improved. Repeat imaging showed improvement in right ventricular function with sacubitril–valsartan therapy.

Topics: Adult; Aminobutyrates; Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiomyopathies; Contrast Media; Diuretics; Drug Combinations; Female; Gadolinium; Heart Failure; Humans; Valsartan

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are often complicated with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, several drugs, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), have not shown apparent benefits in terms of morbidity and mortality of HFpEF. PARAMOUNT and other studies have shown the potential benefits of Sacubitril/Valsartan on patients with HFpEF, but its effects on renal function and the effect of low-dose Sacubitril/Valsartan in actual clinical conditions have not been thoroughly evaluated. In our longitudinal and observational research, 353 patients were followed up for 12 weeks. We evaluated renal function [urinary protein, serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)] and cardiac function [NT-proBNP (brain natriuretic peptide), New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left atrial width and left ventricular end-diastolic width] at baseline and during follow-up. Worsening renal function (WRF) was defined as an increased serum creatinine≥26.5umol/L or decreased eGFR≥20%. The decline of eGFR in the Sacubitril/Valsartan group was slower than that in the control group (p = 0.021). The outcome of proteinuria in the ACEI/ARB group was significantly better than that in the Sacubitril/Valsartan group (p = 0.001). In terms of echocardiogram, the average left atrial width in Sacubitril/Valsartan group decreased by 1.38 ± 3.02 mm, which was significantly lower than that in the ACEI/ARB group (p = 0.02). The increase of urine protein class in the ACEI/ARB group increased the risk of WRF with statistical significance (OR = 2.36, 95%CI 1.01-5.49, p = 0.047), but no statistical significance was found in all the patients or Sacubitril/Valsartan group. In conclusion, Sacubitril/Valsartan could more effectively slow down renal function decline and reverse myocardial remodeling in patients with CKD and HFpEF than ACEI/ARB, even at low doses, though its protective effect on urinary protein is not as good as that of ACEI/ARB.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Biphenyl Compounds; Creatinine; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Kidney; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

Compared with enalapril, sacubitril/valsartan lowered HbA1c and reduced new insulin therapy in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and diabetes in the PARADIGM-HF trial. We sought to assess the glycemic effects of sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and diabetes, and across the spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in heart failure and diabetes.. We compared the effect of sacubitril/valsartan, relative to valsartan, on HbA1c, new insulin therapy and hypoglycemia in the randomized controlled trial PARAGON-HF, and performed pooled analyses of PARAGON-HF and PARADIGM-HF.. Sacubitril/valsartan reduced HbA1c and new insulin therapy in patients with heart failure and diabetes across the spectrum of LVEF but may be associated with a slightly higher risk for hypoglycemia. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01920711.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus; Enalapril; Glycated Hemoglobin; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Insulins; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

The PARADISE-MI study compared standard treatment with an ACE inhibitor (ramipril) after an acute myocardial infarction with the newer sacubitril/ valsartan combination (so-called ARNI) medication in 5661 patients. Most patients had a reduced cardiac function (40% ejection fraction or less) and in about 50% of patients it was accompanied by complaints of congestion. The expected 15% reduction in primary endpoint cardiovascular death or rehospitalization or extra visits for heart failure was not met after 22 months. The study is characterized by an increased incidence of symptomatic hypotension of 28,3% in the group treated with the ARNI, compared to an incidence of 21,9% in the group treated with the ACE inhibitor. The interpretation of the trial is hampered by the mixed design of prevention and treatment trial for heart failure. A continuing careful approach is advised with ACE inhibitors as first choice in the first week(s) after myocardial infarction.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Neprilysin; Receptors, Angiotensin; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome

Natriuretic peptide system (NPS) is a group of peptide hormones or paracrine factors, including atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), and natriuretic peptide precursor C (NPC), that are structurally related. The physiological effects of NPS include natriuresis, increased glomerular filtration rate, inhibition release of renin, vasopressin, and aldosterone, sympathetic inhibition, vasodilatations, and prevents cardiac hypertrophy and remodeling. ANP has immunological effects, as it is produced locally from immune cells; it regulates innate and adaptive immune responses. Metabolism and degradation of ANP are achieved by neutral endopeptidase (NEP), also known as neprilysin. Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic may lead to acute lung injury (ALI) and/or respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The underlying causes of inflammatory and immunological disorders in patients with severe Covid-19 are connected to the immune over-stimulation with the subsequent release of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Covid-19 severity is linked with high ANP serum levels regardless of acute cardiac injury. Inflammatory stimuli appear to be linked with the release of NPs, which anti-inflammatory effects prevent the development of ALI/ARDS in Covid-19. Therefore, neprilysin inhibitors like sacubitril increase endogenous NPs and may reduce the risk of ALI in Covid-19 due to the potentiation of endogenous anti-inflammatory effects of NPs. However, sacubitril increases gastrin-releasing peptide, cathepsin G and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines that are inactivated by neprilysin. In conclusion, NPs and neprilysin have cardio-pulmonary protective effects against Covid-19-induced ALI/ARDS. Neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril has dual protective and harmful effects regarding metabolizing vasoactive peptides by neprilysin. These findings require potential reevaluation of the effect of neprilysin inhibitors in managing Covid-19.

Topics: Aldosterone; Aminobutyrates; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Atrial Natriuretic Factor; Biphenyl Compounds; Cathepsin G; COVID-19 Drug Treatment; Cytokines; Gastrin-Releasing Peptide; Heart Failure; Humans; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Natriuretic Peptides; Neprilysin; Renin; Respiratory Distress Syndrome; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

The prevalence of chronic heart failure (CHF) is up to 1-2% of the adult population in developed countries, rising to >10% after the age of 70. Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains a prevalent clinical syndrome associated with significant morbidity and mortality.. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan in a group of ambulatory patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and its effect on the hemodynamic, metabolic, renal, and cardiac remodeling parameters.. From January 2018 to May 2021, 106 patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) were prospectively enrolled. Patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan (ARNI) were compared with an arm of the same size (n = 53) and matched by age and gender who were taking a standard optimal medical therapy for HFrEF.. The 106 patients completing the study were characterized by age: 69.5 ± 8.0, 64% are male gender. The mean duration of follow-up in the 2 treatment arms was 12 months. In the ARNI arm, we evaluate the hemodynamic, metabolic, renal, and cardiac remodeling parameters upon the initial evaluation and at the end of the follow-up after 12 months treatment with sacubitril/valsartan. The LVEF values increased significantly (p < 0.001) in the ARNI arm compared to the OMT arm, 42.1 % vs. 30.1%. The LVMI decreased from a baseline value of 153.1 g/m2 to 147.8 g/m2 with significant improvement only in the arm treated with ARNI. The eGFR values increased significantly (p < 0.001) in the ARNI arm compared to the OMT arm 70.1 vs. 64.9 mL/min/1.73 m2. Initiation and titration of sacubitril-valsartan was associated with a reduction in NT-pro-BNP concentration, the values of NT-pro-BNP improved significantly only in the arm treated with ARNI 3107.1 vs. 5678.2. Mortality and re-hospitalization due to HF were lower in the arm treated with ARNI compared to the control (20.3 vs. 32.4 % and 25.3 vs. 46.6 %, respectively; p < 0.05).. Sacubitril/valsartan is an important advancement in the treatment of HFrEF. Sacubitril/valsartan induce "hemodynamic recovery". This study provides real-world data demonstrating incremental improvements in functional and echocardiographic outcomes in optimally treated patients with HFrEF switched to sacubitril/valsartan in ambulatory setting.

Topics: Aged; Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Ventricular Remodeling

Heart failure (HF) is a syndrome in which the heart pump function is impaired and cardiac output is insufficient to satisfy the basic metabolic need of the whole body. Recently, research has shown that Sacubitril-Valsartan improves cardiac function in cardiovascular diseases. However, the role of Sacubitril-Valsartan in HF deserves a further exploration.. We established a CHF animal model and an Ang-II-induced cell model. Echocardiography analysis was used to measure cardiac function. Masson's trichrome staining was conducted to analyze collagen deposition. Protein levels were determined by Western blot analysis.. Functionally, Sacubitril-Valsartan treatment alleviated cardiac dysfunction, myocardial injury and collagen deposition in vivo. Moreover, Sacubitril-Valsartan treatment inhibited cell apoptosis and collagen production in vitro. Mechanistically, Sacubitril-Valsartan treatment inactivated the MAPK/ERK signaling by suppressing the phosphorylated p38 and ERK protein levels. The final rescue assays demonstrated that activation of MAPK/ERK signaling reversed the effect of Sacubitril-Valsartan on cell apoptosis and collagen deposition.. Sacubitril-Valsartan ameliorated HF by inhibiting cardiac remodeling potentially via MAPK/ERK signaling.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Remodeling

The treatment of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) has recently been greatly improved, especially with the widespread use of sacubitril/valsartan (ARNI) combination therapy. We know that ARNI-like drugs can significantly improve the symptoms of heart failure with reducing ejection fraction. However, clinical studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of ARNI in DCM-associated arrhythmia are limited, and whether individuals with arrhythmia would benefit from ARNI remains controversial. In this case, we report a patient with complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB) associated with DCM whose CLBBB returned to normal after treatment with ARNI.. A 38-year-old man was admitted to the hospital for 20 days for idiopathic paroxysmal dyspnea. He presented with exacerbated dyspnea symptoms at night, accompanied by cough and sputum.. Physical examination revealed a grade 4/6 systolic murmur could be heard in the apical area of the heart and mild edema was present in both lower limbs. Laboratory examination found that the B-type natriuretic peptide was significantly increased. Echocardiography indicated left atrial internal diameter, right ventricular internal diameter, and left ventricular diastolic diameter were enlarged and ejection fraction was significantly decreased. Besides, the pulsation of the wall was diffusely attenuated. Electrocardiogram was suggestive of tachycardia and CLBBB. A diagnosis of DCM with CLBBB was considered based on a comprehensive evaluation of the physical examination, laboratory examination, echocardiography and electrocardiogram.. The patient was treated with ARNI at a dose of 50 mg (twice a day) at first, gradually increasing to the target dose (200 mg, twice a day) in the following 9 months as shown in Table 1, along with metoprolol 25 mg (once a day [qd]), diuretics 20 mg (qd), and aldosterone 20 mg (qd).. After treatment with ARNI during the 9-month follow-up, the patient's symptoms improved, and CLBBB returned to normal.. Clinical studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of ARNI in DCM-associated arrhythmia are limited, and whether individuals with arrhythmia would benefit from ARNI remains controversial. This report will help to instruct the clinical treatment of DCM patients with CLBBB and the potential application of ARNI.

Topics: Adult; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Bundle-Branch Block; Cardiomyopathy, Dilated; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiotoxicity; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Neoplasms; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

To evaluate the cost-benefit of sacubitril/valsartan in adults with heart failure (HF) enrolled in a state Medicaid plan to prevent HF-related hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits.. Retrospective, claims-based, cost-benefit study.. This exploratory cost-benefit study evaluated Massachusetts Medicaid (MassHealth) members with HF who had an initial pharmacy claim for sacubitril/valsartan between July 7, 2015, and August 31, 2018 (index date). Efficacy outcomes, HF-related hospitalizations and ED visits, and cost outcomes for HF-related medical and pharmacy claims were compared 1 year pre- and post index date. Benefit-cost ratio and net benefit were calculated for all members. A subgroup analysis evaluated the outcomes for members who were adherent to sacubitril/valsartan.. A total of 22 members were identified for the study. There were fewer hospitalizations and ED visits post sacubitril/valsartan initiation in the overall population (post vs pre-: 23 vs 26) and among 12 members adherent to sacubitril/valsartan (10 vs 12). The median (IQR) cost for hospitalizations and ED visits was lower during the postindex period ($576 [$19,439] vs $132 [$11,692]) whereas the median (IQR) cost for HF pharmacotherapies was greater during the postindex period ($4578 [$3033] vs $270 [$255]). The benefit-cost ratio and net benefit were 0.91 and -$336, respectively, for all members and 1.43 and $2337, respectively, for members adherent to sacubitril/valsartan.. The benefit as demonstrated by the cost avoidance of HF-related hospitalizations and ED visits did not outweigh the additional costs of sacubitril/valsartan, but cost-benefit was observed in members who were adherent to sacubitril/valsartan.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Medicaid; Retrospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Worsening renal function may impact long-term outcomes in heart failure (HF). However, little is known about the longitudinal trajectories in renal function in relation to HF hospitalization or how this high-risk clinical event impacts renal outcomes.. In PARAGON-HF, we evaluated the association between recency of prior HF hospitalization (occurring pre-randomization) and subsequent first renal composite outcome: (i) time to ≥50% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR); (ii) development of end-stage renal disease; or (iii) death attributable to renal causes. A total of 2306 (48.1%) patients had a history of prior HF hospitalization. Incident rates of the renal outcome were highest in those most recently hospitalized and decreased with longer time from last hospitalization. Treatment effect on the renal outcome of sacubitril/valsartan versus valsartan was similar between patients with (hazard ratio [HR] 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.24-0.76) and without (HR 0.63; 95% CI: 0.33-1.18; p. Heart failure hospitalization denotes increased risk for kidney disease progression which continues following recovery from HF decompensation in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction.. PARAGON-HF (Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ARB Global Outcomes in HF with Preserved Ejection Fraction), ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01920711.

Topics: Aftercare; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Humans; Kidney; Patient Discharge; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring; Humans; Pyrimidines; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Sacubitril/Valsartan, a dual inhibitor of the neprilysin and angiotensin receptor, exerts cardioprotective effects in heart failure. Little is known on the impact of Sacubitril/Valsartan in hypertensive patients early post myocardial infarction.. Spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) were pretreated by daily angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB; 30 mg/kg intraperitoneally), Sacubitril/Valsartan (ARNI; 60 mg/kg intraperitoneally) or the same dosage of physiological saline for 1 week. Then each group underwent myocardial infarction induction and received the same treatment for another week. The blood pressure and cardiac function were evaluated prior to sacrifice. We performed histological and molecular evaluation of fibrosis in vivo and in vitro.. The blood pressure was comparable between three groups both 1 week prior to and post myocardial infarction. ARNI and ARB restore the decreased ejection fraction (57.3 ± 7.6 vs. 42.9 ± 5.2%, P < 0.05; 54.3 ± 6.9 vs. 42.9 ± 5.2%, P < 0.01, respectively) and fractional shortening (31.6 ± 5.4 vs. 22.1 ± 3.1%, P < 0.05; 29.4 ± 4.5 vs. 22.1 ± 3.1%, P < 0.05, respectively) post myocardial infarction. The infarct size and collagen deposition were also significantly mitigated in ARNI and ARB groups. In addition, ARNI and ARB treatment reduced the expression of cardiac remodeling-related factors, such as Bnp, α-SMA, Vimentin, and Col1a1 (all P < 0.05 vs. MI group). Finally, ARNI and ARB decreased the expression of α-SMA in cardiac fibroblasts treated with Ang II.. In conclusion, pretreatment with ARNI maintained cardiac function and reduced myocardial fibrosis in myocardial infarction, probably prior to any anti-hypertensive effect.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Fibrosis; Heart Failure; Hypertension; Myocardial Infarction; Rats; Rats, Inbred SHR; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Sacubitril/valsartan has been approved for the treatment of heart failure (HF) patients with reduced ejection fraction; since then, it gradually became a new star drug in the therapy of HF. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of sacubitril/valsartan remains under investigation. Thus far, only a few bibliometric studies have systematically analyzed the application of sacubitril/valsartan.. Publications on sacubitril/valsartan were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection on April 29, 2021. Data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2019 (Redmond, WA), VOS viewer (Redmond, WA), and Cite Space V (Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA).. A total of 1309 publications on sacubitril/valsartan published from 1995 to 2021 were retrieved. The number of publications regarding sacubitril/valsartan increased sharply in the last 6 years (2015-2021), and American scholars authored >40% of those publications. Most were published in the European Journal of Heart Failure, the United States was the bellwether with a solid academic reputation in this area. Solomon published the highest number of related articles and was the most frequently cited author. "Heart failure" was the leading research hotspot. The keywords, "inflammation," "fibrosis," and "oxidative stress" appeared most recently as research fronts.. Research attention should be focused on clinical trial outcomes. Considering its effectiveness in HF, the mechanisms and further applications of sacubitril/valsartan may become research hotspots in the future and should be closely examined.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Bibliometrics; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; United States; Valsartan

Sacubitril/valsartan (SAC/VAL) has been used in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) could benefit the HFrEF patients with wide QRS durations. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical impacts of SAC/VAL on reverse cardiac remodelling in CRT-eligible and CRT-ineligible HFrEF patients with different QRS durations.. The TAROT-HF study was a multicentre, observational study enrolling patients who initiated SAC/VAL from 10 hospitals since 2017. Patients with baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35% were classified into two groups: (i) Group 1: CRT-eligible group, patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) morphology plus QRS duration ≥130 ms or non-LBBB morphology plus QRS duration ≥150 ms; and (ii) Group 2: CRT-ineligible group. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for confounders, and 1168 patients were analysed. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. The improvements in LVEF and left ventricular end-systolic volume index (LVESVi) were more significant in Group 2 than in Group 1 after 1 year SAC/VAL treatment (LVEF: 8.4% ± 11.3% vs. 4.5% ± 8.1%, P < 0.001; change percentages in LVESVi: -14.4% ± 25.9% vs. -9.6% ± 23.1%, P = 0.004). LVEF improving to ≥50% in Groups 1 and 2 constituted 5.2% and 20.2% after 1 year SAC/VAL treatment (P < 0.001). Multivariate analyses showed that wide QRS durations were negatively associated with the reverse cardiac remodelling in these HFrEF patients with SAC/VAL treatment.. Despite SAC/VAL treatment, wide QRS durations are associated with lower degrees of left ventricular improvement than narrow ones in the HFrEF patients. Optimal intervention timing for the CRT-eligible patients requires further investigation.

Topics: Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Bundle-Branch Block; Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy; Electrocardiography; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Ventricular Function, Left; Ventricular Remodeling

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiotoxicity; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Neoplasms; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

The article discusses the problem of improving the effectiveness of treatment of heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (HFpEF). The relative "failure" of early studies with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors was largely due to the lack of understanding that patients with HFpEF represent a heterogeneous group with various etiological factors and pathogenetic mechanisms of the disease. Therefore, the so-called personalized approach should be used in the treatment of these patients. This approach is based on the identification of clearly defined disease phenotypes, each characterized by a set of demographic, pathogenetic, and clinical characteristics. Based on the literature and own experience, the authors consider four main phenotypes of HFpEF: 1) phenotype with brain natriuretic peptide "deficiency" syndrome associated with moderate/severe left ventricular hypertrophy; 2) cardiometabolic phenotype; 3) phenotype with mixed pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular failure; and 4) cardiac amyloidosis phenotype. In the treatment of patients with phenotype 1, it seems preferable to use the valsartan + sacubitril (possibly in combination with spironolactone) combination treatment; with phenotype 2, the empagliflozin treatment is the best; with phenotype 3, the phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor sildenafil; and with phenotype 4, transthyretin stabilizers. Certain features of different phenotypes overlap and may change as the disease progresses. Nevertheless, the isolation of these phenotypes is advisable to prioritize the choice of drug therapy. Thus, the diuretic treatment (preferably torasemide) should be considered in the presence of congestion, regardless of the HFpEF phenotype; the valsartan + sacubitril and spironolactone treatment is appropriate not only in the shortage of brain natriuretic peptide but also in the presence of concentric left ventricular hypertrophy (except for the amyloidosis phenotype); and the treatment with empagliflozin and statins may be considered in all situations where pro-inflammatory mechanisms are involved.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Amyloidosis; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Phenotype; Spironolactone; Stroke Volume; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

Despite the relevant advances achieved thanks to the traditional step-by-step therapeutic approach, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. The pathogenesis of HFrEF is complex, with the implication of various neurohormonal systems, including activation of deleterious pathways (i.e. renin-angiotensin-aldosterone, sympathetic, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 [SGLT2] systems) and the inhibition of protective pathways (i.e. natriuretic peptides and the guanylate cyclase system). Therefore, the burden of HF can only be reduced through a comprehensive approach that involves all evidence-based use of available HF drugs targeting the neurohormonal systems involved.. We performed a critical analysis of evidence from recent clinical trials and assessed the effects of HF therapies on hemodynamics and renal function.. HF therapy must be adapted to the clinical profile (i.e. congestion, blood pressure, heart rate, renal function, and electrolytes). Consequently, blood pressure is reduced by beta blockers, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors, sacubitril/valsartan, and, minimally, by SGLT2 inhibitors and vericiguat; heart rate decreases with beta blockers and ivabradine; and renal function is impaired and potassium are levels increased with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors and sacubitril/valsartan. Practical recommendations on how to individualize HF therapy according to patient profile are provided.

Topics: Aldosterone; Ambulatory Care; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensins; Biphenyl Compounds; Guanylate Cyclase; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Humans; Ivabradine; Natriuretic Peptides; Potassium; Renin; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Stroke Volume; Valsartan

The association between cardiac complications, such as heart failure (HF), and chronic kidney disease (CKD) is well known. In this study, we examined the effectiveness and safety of treatment with neprilysin inhibition in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (stage 3b-4).. This single-centre, longitudinal, retrospective study of 31 months duration involved consecutive patients with CKD and HF with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) who started treatment with sacubitril/valsartan. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR), cardiovascular risk factors, proteinuria, potassium, echocardiographic parameters and admissions for heart failure were analysed.. The study comprised 25 patients with a median age of 73.2 ± 5.9 years. The most frequent aetiology of heart failure was ischemic heart disease. The median GFR was 29.4 ± 8.3 ml/min/1.73 m. This study shows that sacubitril/valsartan may play a beneficial role in patients who have advanced CKD and HFrEF, with a satisfactory safety profile.

Topics: Aged; Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Retrospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Health Expenditures; Heart Failure; Humans; Medicare; Retrospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; United States; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycemic Control; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan

Given the various effects of sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure, a deeper understanding of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) actions is warranted. Natriuresis is a fundamental action of ANP in acute heart failure (AHF), whereas the diuretic effect of ANP is different in each patient according to the diversity of renal response to ANP, which is affected by baseline plasma ANP status and deficiency of circulating ANP. Meanwhile, associations between other neuroendocrine hormones and the diuretic response to ANP are unclear. This study investigated the impact of pivotal neuroendocrine hormones on the diuretic effects of exogenous ANP, carperitide.. Plasma ANP, renin, aldosterone, and vasopressin levels and the diuretic effect of 0.0125 μg/kg/min of carperitide alone for the first 6 h were prospectively evaluated in 75 patients with AHF. Lower ANP levels were significantly associated with a greater diuretic response to exogenous ANP (r = -0.35, P = 0.002). Additionally, higher vasopressin levels were significantly related to the poor diuretic effects of exogenous ANP (r = -0.54, P < 0.001). Plasma ANP and vasopressin concentrations were not significantly correlated (r = 0.19, P = 0.10). Baseline systolic blood pressure, renal function, and prior use of loop diuretics did not predict the diuretic response to exogenous ANP, whereas vasopressin levels independently predicted a diuretic response to exogenous ANP (P < 0.001), as well as lower plasma ANP levels (P = 0.027).. Vasopressin status was significantly associated with the diuretic response to exogenous ANP in AHF, independent of plasma ANP status. The results may provide a better understanding of the actions of sacubitril/valsartan.

Topics: Atrial Natriuretic Factor; Diuretics; Heart Failure; Humans; Neurosecretory Systems; Valsartan; Vasopressins

There is a lack of epidemiological data around heart failure (HF) in Latin America; the potential impact description of this disease in middle-income countries is relevant.. This study aimed to describe the characteristics and healthcare resource utilization patterns of HF patients at baseline and six-month follow-up.. This retrospective observational study used data from the RECOLFACA (. This study analyzed 2,045 patients (42.8% female) with a mean age of 67.71 ± 13.64 years. The most common etiologies were ischemic (44.4%) and hypertensive heart disease (38.5%). At baseline, 53.4% of patients were classified with NYHA class II, and 73.6% had a reduced left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF). A year prior to entering the registry, patients were hospitalized an average of 1.4 ± 1.1 times due to HF. Prescription of evidence-based treatment at baseline included sacubitril/valsartan (10%), ACEI (33%), ARB (41%), beta-blocker (79%), diuretics (68%), and MRA (56%). The average quality of life score measured using the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire was 78.7 ± 20.8 at baseline and 82.3 ± 20.1 at the six-month follow-up. The mortality rate was 6.7%.. The use of information from the RECOLFACA registry allowed characterization as well as analyses of healthcare resource utilization of patients with heart failure in Colombia. The results of this study show that multiple evidence-based treatments for HF are being widely used in Colombia, but there seems to be room for improvement regarding some interventions for the treatment of patients with HF.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Quality of Life; Registries; Stroke Volume; Treatment Outcome

Although previous cost-effectiveness evaluations of sacubitril/valsartan have demonstrated cardiovascular and economic benefits in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), whether sacubitril/valsartan is cost-effective for reducing the need for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation and the risk of death in ICD-eligible patients has not been investigated in patients with HFrEF. Herein, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of sacubitril/valsartan versus standard of care in reducing the need for ICD implantation and the death rate in HFrEF. A Markov model was developed from the Qatari hospital perspective, comprised of 'survival' and 'death' health states, and was based on 1-monthly Markovian cycles, a 20-years follow-up horizon, and a 3% discount rate. The model inputs were obtained from the literature and local sources. Sacubitril/valsartan resulted in a relative increase of 0.04 quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and 0.67 years of life lived (YLL)/person, with an incremental cost increase of QAR13,952 (USD3,832). Sacubitril/valsartan was associated with incremental cost effectiveness ratio of QAR341,113 (USD93,687)/QALYs gained and QAR24,431 (USD6,710)/YLL. Sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness, with the cost-effectiveness maintained in ≥96.5% of simulated cases. To conclude, sacubitril/valsartan is a cost-effective alternative to standard care against QALY gained and YLL in reducing the need for an ICD therapy and the rate of death among ICD-eligible HFrEF patients.

Topics: Cost-Benefit Analysis; Defibrillators, Implantable; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Humans; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Female; Fibrosis; Heart Failure; Rats; Rats, Inbred SHR; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

HFrEF (heart failure with reduced ejection fraction) with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 25-30 % was detected in a 79-year-old man. For further treatment, inpatient cardiac rehabilitation war carried out.. At the start of the cardiac rehabilitation, patient complained of shortness of breath with little exertion, corresponding to NYHA III. Drug therapy included empagliflozin 10 mg, sacubitril/valsartan 24/26 mg, edoxaban 60 mg, torasemide 5 mg, verapamil 80 mg and amiodarone 200 mg.. The daily blood sugar profile showed hypoglycemia with values ​​< 3.7 mmol/l (< 67 mg/dl). After consultation with the patient, these occurred with normal food intake and were symptomatic in form of dizziness during the period of hypoglycaemia.. Symptomatic hypoglycaemia on SGLT2(sodium-glucose linked transporter 2)-inhibitor therapy in a patient with HFrEF without diabetes mellitus.. The therapy with empaglifozin was stopped and a new daily blood sugar profile was carried out, which no longer showed any hypoglycaemic values.. The presented case raises awareness of the side effect of hypoglycaemia, which occurs very rarely with SGLT2 inhibitors in studies in patients with HFrEF without the presence of diabetes mellitus.. Bei einem 79-jährigen wurde eine HFrEF (heart failure with reduced ejection fraction) mit einer linksventrikulären Ejektionsfraktion von 25–30 % nachgewiesen. Zur weiteren Behandlung wurde eine kardiologische Rehabilitationsmaßnahme durchgeführt.. Bei Antritt der AHB klagte der Patient über Luftnot bei geringer Belastung entsprechend dem Stadium NYHA III. Die medikamentöse Therapie beinhaltete Empagliflozin 10 mg, Sacubitril/Valsartan 24/26 mg, Edoxaban 60 mg, Torasemid 5 mg, Verapamil 80 mg sowie Amiodaron 200 mg.. Im Blutzucker-Tagesprofil zeigten sich Hypoglykämien mit Werten < 3,7 mmol/l (< 67 mg/dl). Nach Rücksprache mit dem Patienten traten diese unter normaler Nahrungsaufnahme auf und waren in Form von Schwindel im Zeitraum der Hypoglykämien symptomatisch.. Symptomatische Hypoglykämie unter SGLT2(sodium-glucose linked transporter 2)-Inhibitor-Therapie bei einem Patienten mit HFrEF ohne Diabetes mellitus.. Die Therapie mit Empagliflozin wurde beendet und ein erneutes Blutzucker-Tagesprofil durchgeführt – dieses zeigte keine hypoglykämischen Werte mehr.. Der hier vorgestellte Fall sensibilisiert für die unter SGLT2-Inhibitoren in Studien sehr selten auftretende Nebenwirkung der Hypoglykämie bei Patienten mit HFrEF ohne Vorliegen eines Diabetes mellitus.

Topics: Aged; Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Male; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Ventricular Function, Left

The left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) and left atrial reservoir strain (LARS) are considered as sensitive and reliable markers of cardiac remodeling and function. However, their temporal changes during optimal management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are unknown.. This study investigated the time trajectories of the LARS and LVGLS in patients with HFrEF treated with angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, and assessed whether the LARS and LVGLS could define left heart reverse remodeling (LHRR) and reflect the treatment response and prognosis.. Using a retrospective cohort of patients with HFrEF prescribed sacubitril/valsartan, we assessed the time trajectories of the LVGLS and LARS in 409 patients (1,258 echocardiograms), and investigated their association with the occurrence of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), after the determination of LHRR, during a median follow-up of 27.1 (IQR: 18.3-36.3) months.. Among patients with HFrEF prescribed sacubitril/valsartan, both the LVGLS and LARS improved over time. The improvements in the LVGLS and LARS were prominent within 6 months of sacubitril/valsartan treatment: the LVGLS improved from 10.2% (IQR: 7.9%-12.7%) to 13.9% (IQR: 10.5%-16.3%) (P < 0.001), and the LARS improved from 11.4% (IQR: 8.4%-15.6%) to 15.9% (IQR: 11.5%-21.4%) (P < 0.001). These improvements were larger among patients who did not experience the study outcome than in patients with events. Improvement in the LVGLS to ≥13% and LARS to ≥12.5% (ie, complete LHRR) was significantly associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular death and HHF, and this association was stronger than that of changes in other conventional echocardiographic parameters.. In patients with HFrEF treated with sacubitril/valsartan, the LVGLS and LARS were improved, typically within 6 months of treatment. Complete LHRR, defined by improvement in the LVGLS and LARS, can be an indicator of treatment response and prognosis.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Humans; Neprilysin; Predictive Value of Tests; Retrospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Ventricular Function, Left; Ventricular Remodeling

Diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM) is linked to disturbance in cardiac glucose handling and increased cardiac glycogen storage. This study tested the potential role of sacubitril/valsartan on the progression of DCM in high fat diet (HFD)/streptozotocin (STZ)-induced type 2 diabetic rats compared to valsartan alone, including their effects on the cardiac glycophagy process.. Rats were fed on HFD for 6 weeks followed by single low-dose STZ (35 mg/kg). After confirming hyperglycemia, diabetic rats were continued on HFD and divided into three subgroups: Untreated-diabetic, Valsartan-treated diabetic and Sacubitril/valsartan-treated diabetic groups; in addition to a control group. Changes in ECG, blood glucose, serum insulin, lipid profile, and Homeostasis model of assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) were assessed and the degree of cardiac fibrosis was examined. Cardiac glycogen content and glycophagy process were evaluated.. Sacubitril/valsartan administration to diabetic rats resulted in improvement of metabolic changes more than valsartan alone. Also, sacubitril/valsartan effectively prevented diabetes-associated cardiac hypertrophy, QTc prolongation, and fibrosis. Finally, cardiac glycogen concentrations in diabetic rats were decreased by sacubitril/valsartan combination, coupled with significant induction of glycophagy process in the diabetic rats' heart.. Sacubitril/valsartan therapy provides a more favorable metabolic and cardioprotective response compared to valsartan alone in a rat model of DCM. These findings may be due to a direct cardioprotective impact of sacubitril/valsartan and secondary beneficial effects of improved hyperglycemia and dyslipidemia. In addition, these beneficial cardiac effects could be attributed to the induction of the glycophagy process and alleviating cardiac glycogen overload.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental; Diabetic Cardiomyopathies; Drug Combinations; Glycogen; Heart Failure; Hyperglycemia; Mice; Rats; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for 15-20% of patients with heart failure (HF) in India. Diagnosis is by clinical features supported by biomarkers and echocardiography. Lifestyle modifications, control of risk factors to optimum levels, and treatment of comorbidities are essential in the management of HFpEF. Spironolactone and sacubitril-valsartan [angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI)] are beneficial in subsets of HFpEF, especially with lower range of ejection fraction (EF). Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i)-empagliflozin and dapagliflozin and probably sotagliflozin are the only currently available drugs which have shown benefits in HFpEF, mostly by reducing hospitalizations. The benefit of SGLT2i is evident in both diabetic and nondiabetic subsets.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Physicians; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles

Adherence to guidelines for the management of heart failure (HF) has been shown to be a strong predictor of reduced hospitalisations. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate the adherence of West African cardiologists to guidelines for the management of HF.. This was a prospective cross-sectional multicentric study (Côte d'Ivoire, Togo, Benin and Burkina-Faso). The "ADDress your Heart" survey developed was administered online to assess cardiologists' adherence to the guidelines for the management of heart failure.. 62.3% of the 106 participants reported that they followed the guidelines closely. The therapeutic classes indicated as first-line by the latest guidelines were insufficiently suggested by physicians: 57.5% for mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, 41.5% for gliflozins and 30.1% for sacubitril-valsartan In univariate logistic regression, affiliation with a teaching hospital OR [95% CI] = 3.0 [1.3-6.8], p < 0.01 ; access to scientific cardiology journals OR [95 % CI] = 3.4 [1.3-8.9], p = 0.01; and frequent attendance at conferences OR [95% CI]=1.8 [1.2-2.9], p < 0.01, were associated with guideline compliance. These factors persisted in multivariate analysis.. Adherence of West African cardiologists to guidelines on the management of heart failure was moderate. If affiliation to a university hospital is difficult to apply to all cardiologists, access to scientific cardiology journals and frequent attendance in conference should be encouraged.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiologists; Cross-Sectional Studies; Heart Failure; Humans; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Prospective Studies; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Valsartan

Even a slight increase in plasma N-terminal-pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro BNP) levels is associated with an incremental cardiovascular risk in a healthy cohort. Sacubitril/valsartan has recently been reimbursed in Japan for hypertension. Its impact on reducing plasma NT-pro BNP levels in hypertensive patients remains unknown.. Patients who received 3-month sacubitril/valsartan treatment for their hypertension were retrospectively included. Changes in plasma NT-pro BNP levels during 3-month sacubitril/valsartan therapy (on-treatment period) were compared with those during pre-treatment 3-month period without sacubitril/valsartan (pre-treatment period).. A total of 33 hypertensive patients {73 [64, 77] years old and systolic blood pressure 138 [134, 149] mmHg on median} were included. During a pre-treatment period, systolic blood pressure tended to decrease (P=0.091) whereas plasma NT-pro BNP levels remained unchanged {from 204 [132, 412] to 207 [107, 386] pg/mL, P=0.84}. During on-treatment period, both systolic pressure and plasma NT-pro BNP levels decreased significantly {P<0.001 and P=0.001, respectively, from 207 [107, 386] to 119 [64, 355] pg/mL in NT-pro BNP}. The amount of changes in plasma NT-pro BNP levels during on-treatment period was significantly higher than those during pre-treatment period {-51 [-158, -17] versus -12 [-28, 33] mmHg, P=0.001}.. Plasma NT-pro BNP levels decreased significantly following 3-month sacubitril/valsartan therapy. Its clinical implication requires further long-term studies.

Topics: Aged; Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Retrospective Studies; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

The treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction HFrEF (< 40%) uses hygienic-dietary rules combined with beta-blockers, renin-angiotensin system blockers RASB (alone or in combination with Sacubitril) and spironolactone. Dapagliflozin (SGLT2 inhibitor) has proven its effectiveness in reducing morbi-mortality in patients with HF. However, its effects on echocardiographic parameters are less known.. To describe the impact of the addition of Dapagliflozin to conventional treatment on echocardiographic parameters in patients with HFrEF < 40%.. Observational, single-center and non-randomized study involving patients with HFrEF < 40%. This group was compared to a cohort of 50 patients with HfrEF < 40% under conventional treatment without Dapagliflozin (taken from the HF register of our center and whose management dates back to before the adoption of this molecule in the HF ESC-2021 guidelines) to assess the ultrasound impact of Dapagliflozin.. 43 patients aged between 40 and 68 years with HfrEF < 40% on Beta-blocker, BSRA, Spironolactone and Dapagliflozin 10 mg/d. The mean EF was 33% ± 3 (30-39%), mean LVd diameter 64 mm ± 6 (55-71 mm) and mean longitudinal strain at -11% ± 4. These patients were compared to a cohort of 50 patients with the same profile without Dapagliflozin. After a follow-up of 7 months (5-8 months): The average EF increased to 37% with 11 patients EF > 40% against 35% and 5 patients EF > 40% for the group without Dapagliflozin (P 0.057), average LVd at 61 mm versus 66 mm in the group without Dapagliflozin (P 0.095), Mean longitudinal strain at -14% (6 patients < -15) versus -12% (1 patient <-15) in the group without Dapagliflozin (P 0.046).. In a population of patients with HfrEF < 40% under conventional treatment for HF, the prescription of Dapagliflozin is associated with an improvement of echocardiographic parameters (EF and longitudinal strain). MOTS-CLéS: Série;Dapagliflozine;insuffisance cardiaque;strain;ProBNP;dysfonction VG.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Adult; Aged; Aminobutyrates; Benzhydryl Compounds; Biphenyl Compounds; Echocardiography; Glucosides; Heart Failure; Humans; Middle Aged; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Spironolactone; Stroke Volume

Several different B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) assays are used clinically for diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of heart failure (HF). BNP binds weakly to neprilysin and is cleaved in multiple areas adjacent to the binding sites for the antibodies used in these immunoassays. We assessed the changes in BNP following neprilysin inhibition as measured by 3 immunoassays that recognize different epitopes.. Among 130 participants with HF with reduced ejection fraction, blood was collected prior to treatment with sacubitril/valsartan (sac/val) and then repeatedly measured through 52 weeks of treatment. BNP concentrations were measured with 3 widely used BNP assays (Siemens, Abbott, and Quidel).. Study participants had a mean age of 65 ± 13 years and 76% were men. The median BNP concentration at baseline was 133 ng/L by the Siemens assay, 127 ng/L by the Abbott assay, and 141 ng/L by the Quidel assay. Following initiation of sac/val, there were significantly greater declines in BNP measured by Quidel and Abbott (P = 0.009 and P < 0.001), respectively (both with N-terminal capture antibodies), compared to Siemens (with C-terminal capture antibodies). The difference from baseline was not statistically significant until after week 12 (mean -10.1% for Quidel and -14.3% for Abbott) compared to non-significant differences before 12 weeks (mean -4.5% for Quidel and -6.0% for Abbott).. Following initiation of sac/val, BNP measurements may modestly differ depending on the assay method used, particularly after a few months of treatment. Whether these differences relate to neprilysin-mediated degradation of antibody binding sites deserves further study.. PROVE-HF ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02887183.

Topics: Aged; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensins; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Neprilysin; Receptors, Angiotensin

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiomyopathies; Catecholamines; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Paraganglioma; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Although sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) is indicated for the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), gaps in care continue to exist for those with newer onset HFrEF vs those with longer durations of disease.. We categorized 794 persons with HFrEF (EF of ≤40%) according to a HF duration of less than 12 months, 12-24 months, 24-60 months, and more than> 60 months. After the initiation of Sac/Val, concentrations of N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide, high sensitivity cardiac troponin T, and soluble ST2 were measured, and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire 23 scores were obtained serially from baseline to 12 months. The left ventricular ejection fraction was measured by echocardiography. Significant decreases in the concentrations of N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide, high sensitivity cardiac troponin T, and soluble ST2 were observed regardless of HF duration (P < .001). Comparable gains in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire 23 scores were achieved in all HF duration categories. Moreover, consistent reverse cardiac remodeling in all HF duration categories occurred, with the absolute left ventricular ejection fraction improvement by 12 months across HF duration groups of 12.2%, 6.9%, 8.5%, and 8.6% for HF duration of less than 12 months, 12-24 months, 24-60 months, and more than 60 months, respectively.. The initiation of Sac/Val decreases prognostic biomarkers, improves health status, and reverses cardiac remodeling processes, regardless of HF duration.. We categorized 794 persons with heart failure owing to a low ejection fraction according to disease duration into 4 groups: less than 12 months, 12-24 months, 24-60 months, and more than 60 months. After the initiation of sacubitril/valsartan (Entresto), we found that regardless of the duration of heart failure significant improvements occurred in cardiac biomarkers, patients felt better with improved health status and on testing with cardiac ultrasound examination, improvement in heart size, and function occurred. These results suggest that, regardless of heart failure duration, patients with a reduced ejection fraction would benefit from use of sacubitril/valsartan for their care.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiomyopathies; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Interleukin-1 Receptor-Like 1 Protein; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Troponin T; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left; Ventricular Remodeling

Sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) improves outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Data about the immediate, short-, and intermediate-term hemodynamic effects of S/V are limited.. In this prospective observational study, 37 outpatients with chronic HFrEF were treated with S/V according to current guideline recommendations. Next to clinical, laboratory and echocardiographic parameters, haemodynamic variables were assessed non-invasively by use of inert gas rebreathing and bioimpedance cardiography at baseline and at 2-week, 3-month and 6-month follow-up. The course of variables throughout the study and the relationship between variables were analysed using fractional polynomials.. S/V treatment resulted in short- and intermediate-term improvements in NYHA functional class (2.3 ± 0.6 at baseline vs. 1.9 ± 0.5 at 6-month follow-up, p = 0.14), 6-min walk test (453 ± 110 vs. 528 ± 98 m, p = 0.02), ejection fraction (31 ± 9 vs. 36 ± 12%, p = 0.13), pulmonary artery pressure (39 ± 10 vs. 31 ± 10 mmHg, p = 0.02), and NT-proBNP values (1702 (782-2897 vs. 1004 (599-1627) ng/L, p = 0.03). In addition, S/V caused immediate decreases in systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) and systolic blood pressure (SBP), which were associated with a simultaneous drop in stroke volume (SV) and cardiac index (CI). However, while SVRI and SBP remained at low levels during further treatment, SV and CI restored rapidly and increased to slightly higher levels thereafter.. The vasodilative effects of S/V result in immediate reductions in SVRI, SBP, SV and CI. However, S/V induces reverse cardiac remodelling, which is apparent shortly after treatment initiation and leads to improvements of clinical, functional, echocardiographic, laboratory and haemodynamic variables.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Hemodynamics; Humans; Outpatients; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Mitral Valve Insufficiency; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

Sacubitril valsartan (lcz696) has been demonstrated as a substitute for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers for the treatment of heart failure. This research is aimed at examining the effects of lcz696 and its target molecules on myocardial infarction (MI). A rat model of MI was induced by left anterior descending artery ligation and treated with lcz696. Lcz696 treatment significantly reduced cardiac injury and heart failure, restored the left ventricular fractional shortening and ejection fraction, and reduced oxidative stress and inflammatory responses in rat myocardium. By analyzing the heart failure-related GSE47495 dataset and performing gene ontology (GO) functional enrichment analysis, we obtained histone lysine methyltransferase SUV39H1 and secreted phosphoprotein 1 (SPP1) as two molecules implicated in the oxidative stress and inflammation processes. An elevation of SUV39H1 whereas a decline of SPP1 were detected in cardiac tissues after lcz696 treatment. Enrichments of SUV39H1 and H3K9me3 at the SPP1 promoter were identified by chromatin immunoprecipitation assay. SUV39H1 catalyzed H3K9me3 modification to suppress the expression of SPP1. Preconditioning of SUV39H1 silencing blocked the protective roles of lcz696, but SPP1 silencing alleviated the myocardial injury. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that lcz696 enhances cardiac function and alleviates MI in rats through a SUV39H1/SPP1 axis.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Histone-Lysine N-Methyltransferase; Methyltransferases; Myocardial Infarction; Neprilysin; Osteopontin; Rats; Repressor Proteins; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Doses of sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) achieved in clinical trials of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are often not reached in clinical practice.. The purpose of this study was to investigate associations among Sac/Val doses and changes in prognostic biomarkers, health status, and cardiac remodeling among individuals with HFrEF through 12 months of treatment with Sac/Val administered per usual care.. A total of 794 persons with HFrEF (ejection fraction [EF] ≤40%) were categorized according to average daily doses of Sac/Val divided into tertiles. Change from baseline to 12 months in biomarkers (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T, soluble ST2, atrial natriuretic peptide, urinary cyclic guanosine monophosphate), Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-23 scores, and parameters of cardiac reverse remodeling (left ventricular EF, indexed left atrial and ventricular volumes, and E/e') were assessed.. The average daily dose was 112 mg in Tertile 1 (low dose), 342 mg in Tertile 2 (moderate dose), and 379 mg in Tertile 3 (high dose). Similar changes in prognostic biomarkers were observed in all dose tertiles. Gains in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-23 scores were comparable regardless of dose category. Consistent reverse cardiac remodeling in all dose categories occurred; the median absolute left ventricular EF improvement across HF dose groups was 9.3%, 8.7%, and 10.2%, for low, moderate, and high doses, respectively; similar improvements in left atrial and ventricular volumes and E/e' were also observed across dose categories.. Among patients with HFrEF, similar improvement in prognostic biomarkers, health status, and cardiac remodeling were observed across various Sac/Val doses. (Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan Therapy on Biomarkers, Myocardial Remodeling and Outcomes [PROVE-HF]; NCT02887183.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Atrial Natriuretic Factor; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Guanosine Monophosphate; Heart Failure; Humans; Interleukin-1 Receptor-Like 1 Protein; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Stroke Volume; Troponin T; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Ventricular Remodeling

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiovascular Agents; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Stroke Volume; Valsartan

The effects of adding a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor to a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) or an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) in patients with heart failure (HF) and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are uncertain, even though the use of all three drugs is recommended in recent guidelines.. The efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin added to background MRA or ARNI therapy was examined in patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF enrolled in the DELIVER trial. The primary outcome was the composite of worsening HF or cardiovascular death. Of 6263 patients, 2667 (42.6%) were treated with an MRA and 301 (4.8%) with an ARNI at baseline. Patients taking either were younger, more often men and had lower systolic blood pressure and ejection fraction; they were also more likely to have prior HF hospitalization. The benefit of dapagliflozin was similar whether patients were receiving these therapies. The hazard ratio for the effect of dapagliflozin compared to placebo on the primary outcome was 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-1.01) for MRA non-users versus 0.76 (95% CI 0.64-0.91) for MRA users (p. The efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin were similar, regardless of background treatment with an MRA or ARNI. SGLT2 inhibitors may be added to other treatments recommended in recent guidelines for HFmrEF/HFpEF.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypotension; Male; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) improves outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).. In this study, the authors sought to explore age differences in effects of Sac/Val on biomarkers, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)-23 scores and cardiac remodeling.. After initiation and titration of Sac/Val, concentrations of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-cTnT), and soluble suppressor of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) were measured and KCCQ-23 scores obtained from baseline to 12 months. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and indexed left ventricular end-systolic (LVESVi) and indexed left ventricular end-diastolic (LVEDVi) and left atrial volume index (LAVi) volumes were measured with the use of echocardiography. Safety end points were assessed. Age-stratified analysis was performed for groups aged <65, 65-74, and ≥75 years.. Among 794 participants with HFrEF (mean age 65.1 years, 28.5% women), compared with patients aged <65 years (n = 369), 65-74 years (n = 237), and those aged ≥75 years (n = 188), had similar reductions in hs-cTnT and sST2, but less NT-proBNP reduction (-45.6% vs -40.2% vs -30.5%, respectively; P = 0.02). Gains in KCCQ-23 were smaller (+11.8 vs +11.4 vs +6.0 points; P = 0.03) in patients aged ≥75 years, although similar proportions of each age group achieved ≥10-point and ≥20-point increases in KCCQ-23 by month 12. Improvements in LVEF, LVEDVi, LVESVi, and LAVi were similar among age groups. Incidence of safety end points was also similar.. Sac/Val resulted in significant improvements in prognostic biomarkers and measures of cardiac remodeling and health status from baseline to month 12 across age categories. Older study participants showed somewhat blunted reduction in NT-proBNP and less improvement in KCCQ-23 overall summary scores. (Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan Therapy on Biomarkers, Myocardial Remodeling, and Outcomes [PROVE-HF]; NCT02887183).

Topics: Aged; Biomarkers; Female; Health Status; Heart Atria; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Stroke Volume; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left; Ventricular Remodeling

We investigated the incremental advantage in terms of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) reduction in patients affected by heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) treated with sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) versus patients treated with S/V only.. Consecutive adult patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≤40% who were followed in our outpatient clinic from January 2016 to December 2019 and treated with S/V were analysed.. Out of eligible 147 patients, 99 were treated with S/V+MRA at baseline and 48 patients were treated with S/V. Patients treated with S/V+MRA were significantly younger (61.5 vs 67.8 years, p=0.006), had better basal renal function (serum creatinine 1.2 vs 1.4 mg/dL, p=0.006) and lower LVEF (30.9% vs 33.1%, p=0.039). At follow-up at 8-16 months, 84 out of 99 patients continued to be on S/V+MRA, and 39 out of 48 patients continued to be on S/V. Between these two groups, at follow-up, LVEF did not vary significantly, ΔNT-proBNP was not significantly different (-215.7 vs -165.9 pg/mL, p=0.93) and neither was the rate of hospitalisation for heart failure (9.5% vs 12.8%, p=0.58). Using general linear models, both age and basal NT-proBNP influenced significantly ΔNT-proBNP (respectively, p=0.002; p=0.005), while treatment with S/V+MRA versus S/V only did not significantly influence ΔNT-proBNP (p=0.462).. Even with the limitations of a small retrospective study, our results generate the hypothesis that MRA might not provide any additional value in patients with HFrEF treated with S/V. Larger studies are needed to test if MRA should remain a standard treatment in patients with HFrEF treated with S/V.

Topics: Heart Failure; Humans; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Retrospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Ventricular Function, Left

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Although the beneficial effect of sacubitril/valsartan (SAC/VAL) compared to enalapril was consistent across ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) groups, the PARADIGM-HF study did not analyse the effect of ventricular remodelling on patients with different aetiologies, which may affect clinical treatment outcomes. This study aimed to compare left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) following SAC/VAL treatment and its association with clinical outcomes.. A total of 1576 patients were analysed. Patients were grouped by LVEF changes following SAC/VAL treatment for 8-month period. LVEF improvement ≥15% was defined as 'significant improvement', and <5% or worse was classified as 'lack of improvement'. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death and unplanned hospitalization for heart failure. Patients with NICM had lower baseline LVEF but improvement was significantly greater comparing to those with ICM (baseline 28.0 ± 7.7% vs. 30.1 ± 7.1%, P < 0.001, LVEF increase of 11.1 ± 12.6% vs. 6.7 ± 10.2%, P < 0.001). The effect of functional improvement of SAC/VAL on NICM patients showed bimodal distribution. Primary endpoints were inversely associated with LVEF changes in NICM patients: adjusted hazard ratio was 0.42 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31-0.58, P < 0.001] for NICM patients with significant improvement, and was 1.73 (95% CI 1.38-2.16, P < 0.001) for NICM patients but lack of improvement. Primary endpoints of ICM patients did not demonstrate an association with LVEF changes.. Patients with NICM had higher degree of LVEF improvement than those with ICM following SAC/VAL treatment, and significant improvement of LVEF in NICM patients indicates favourable outcome.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left; Ventricular Remodeling

To describe the epidemiology and treatment of a large contemporary cohort of patients with heart failure (HF).. Observational, retrospective, population-based study using the BIG-PAC database, which includes people aged ≥ 18 years seeking care for HF between 2017 and 2019. The main variables were the prevalence/annual incidence rate, comorbidities, clinical variables, and medication administered.. We identified 19 762 patients with HF from a total of 1 189 003 persons seeking medical attention from 2017 to 2019 (2019: mean age, 78.3 years; 53.0% men). Distribution by type of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was as follows: 51.7% reduced, 40.2% preserved, and 8.1% mid-range. In 2019, the prevalence was 1.89% (95%CI, 1.70-2.08), with an incidence rate of 2.78 new cases per 1000 persons/y. No statistically significant differences were observed in prevalence and/or incidence from 2017 to 2019. Among patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), 64% received beta-blockers, 80.5% angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blockers or sacubitril-valsartan, and 29.8% an aldosterone antagonist. In addition, from the diagnosis (baseline) to 24 months of follow-up, there was discreet treatment optimization, which was notable in the first 3 to 6 months.. Epidemiological data on HF remained stable during the study period, with a lower prevalence than that reported in non-population-based studies. There is wide room for improvement in the optimization of medical treatment of HFrEF.

Topics: Aged; Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Retrospective Studies; Spain; Stroke Volume; Ventricular Function, Left

To compare baseline characteristics of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) initiated on sacubitril/valsartan compared with patients continued on conventional heart failure (HF)-treatment in a European out-patient setting.. Between July 2016 and July 2019, ARIADNE enrolled 8787 outpatients aged ≥18 years with HFrEF from 17 European countries. Choice of therapy was solely at the investigators' discretion. In total, 4173 patients were on conventional HF-treatment (non-S/V group), while 4614 patients were on sacubitril/valsartan either at enrolment or started sacubitril/valsartan within 1 month of enrolment (S/V group). Of these, 2108 patients started sacubitril/valsartan treatment ±1 month around enrolment [restricted S/V (rS/V) group]. The average age of the patients was 68 years. Patients on S/V were more likely to have New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV symptoms (50.3%, 44.6%, 32.1% in rS/V, S/V, and non-S/V, respectively) and had lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; 32.3%, 32.7%, and 35.4% in rS/V, S/V, and non-S/V, respectively; P < 0.0001). The most frequently received HF treatments were angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEI/ARB; ∼84% in non-S/V), followed by β-blockers (∼80%) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs; 53%). The use of triple HF therapy (ACEI/ARB/angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor with β-blockers and MRA) was higher in the S/V groups than non-S/V group (48.2%, 48.2%, and 40.2% in rS/V, S/V, and non-S/V, respectively).. In this large multinational HFrEF registry, patients receiving sacubitril/valsartan tended to be younger with lower LVEF and higher NYHA class. Fewer than half of the patients received triple HF therapy.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Humans; Registries; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Ventricular Function, Left

Despite the use of optimal medical therapy, heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains a leading cause of morbidity, mortality and health care costs. The introduction of angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) had a revolutionary impact on the treatment of patients with HFrEF. The aim of the study was to monitor over time the perceived quality of life, the physical performance, the trend of BNP and NT-ProBNP and the NYHA functional class in patients with HFrEF during treatment with sacubitril/valsartan.. We enrolled 37 patients (63±10 years old, 76% men) who underwent a total of one-year follow-up. All patients underwent clinical evaluation, 6MWT, blood analysis (in particular, NT-pro-BNP and BNP, renal function test); Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and the NYHA functional class assessment were also performed, at the beginning of the study and after 3, 6 and 12 months of therapy.. We observed at each follow-up a significant improvement of KCCQ score, 6MWT, NT-ProBNP, BNP and NYHA class. However, analyzing the ∆% of variation of each single parameter, the improvement was not uniform in time. We also observed that only 37% of patients tolerated the full recommended dose of sacubitril/valsartan (97/103 mg b.i.d.); of the remaining, 40% tolerated the intermediate dose (49/51 mg b.i.d.) and 23% the minimum (24/26 md b.i.d.).. Sacubitril/valsartan therapy improves significantly quality of life, physical effort resistance, BNP and NT-ProBNP and NYHA functional class in patients with HFrEF. Although not all the patients tolerated the maximum recommended dose, the beneficial effects were significant even at lower doses.

Topics: Aged; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neprilysin; Outpatients; Quality of Life; Receptors, Angiotensin; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

Previous literature has suggested a potential diuretic sparing effect as early as 6 months following sacubitril-valsartan initiation in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF); however, whether this effect manifests earlier after initiation is unclear. Objective: To evaluate the acute diuretic-sparing effects of sacubitril-valsartan.. This was a single-center, retrospective analysis of outpatients with HFrEF initiated on sacubitril-valsartan with follow up within 90 ± 30 days and a concomitant loop diuretic prescription. The primary outcome was the percent of patients with an increase, decrease or no change in loop diuretic total daily dose (TDD). Key secondary outcomes included change in loop diuretic TDD (mg furosemide equivalents) and hospital admissions or emergency department (ED) visits.. A total of 145 patients were included (overall cohort) with 120 continuing sacubitril-valsartan at follow up (on-treatment cohort). In the on-treatment cohort, 20% (n = 24) had a reduction in loop diuretic TDD and 10% had an increase (n = 12). Median change in loop diuretic TDD was unchanged from baseline to follow up (p 0.13). In patients on >80 mg TDD of furosemide at baseline (n = 9), mean change was-53 ± 44 mg (p 0.006). Hospitalizations (6.2%) and ED visits (0.7%) for heart failure were infrequent.. Patients may require a loop diuretic dose reduction within 2-3 months following sacubitril-valsartan initiation. This diuretic-sparing effect appears larger in those on higher baseline loop diuretic doses, and closer follow up may be warranted for these patients.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Diuretics; Drug Combinations; Furosemide; Heart Failure; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Sodium Potassium Chloride Symporter Inhibitors; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Chagas cardiomyopathy is the most prevalent non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy in Latin America, with high morbidity and mortality even today. Treatment of these patients is based on the use of medications for heart failure. This study evaluated a case series of patients with Chagas heart disease who used sacubitril/valsartan at a referral hospital for this disease in Brazil. After 6 months, there was a symptomatic improvement in these individuals assessed by the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, with a 44.3% reduction in the absolute number of patients classified as III-IV in the period (P = 0.035), but without changes in the parameters on the echocardiogram for reverse ventricular remodelling. There was a high mortality rate and number of hospitalizations. These results emphasize the importance of studying the use of sacubitril/valsartan in Chagas heart disease to better describe its effectiveness considering the particularities of these individuals.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Echocardiography; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan

Left ventricular (LV) remodelling is a major mechanism underlying disease progression in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (EF). Previous studies that LVEF improvement and reverse remodelling can be achieved after therapy with Sacubitril/Valsartan in real-world settings. Therefore, we sought to investigate possible predictors of LV remodelling, in particular echocardiographic parameters derived by Tissue Doppler Imaging.. Patients with chronic HF, LV dysfunction (EF < 35%), NYHA class II-III were followed up between September 2016 and January 2019. All patients underwent clinical and echocardiography follow up at baseline and after 12 months of therapy with sacubitril/valsartan.. Fifty-four consecutive outpatients were enrolled in the study. At follow-up visit LVEF (38 ± 9 vs. 30 ± 5%,. Treatment with sacubitril/valsartan in patients with systolic dysfunction is associated with an improvement in LVEF in a real world scenario. Smaller LV volumes are associated with better reverse LV remodelling.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Chronic Disease; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Ventricular Function, Left; Ventricular Remodeling

The authors sought to investigate associations between sacubitril/valsartan adherence and clinical outcomes after hospitalization for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).. Sacubitril/valsartan improves outcomes in HFrEF, though the extent to which medication adherence is associated with outcomes in routine care is less well characterized.. The authors analyzed patients aged ≥65 years hospitalized for HFrEF within the Get With the Guidelines-Heart Failure registry linked with Medicare claims between October 2015 and September 2018 who were discharged with sacubitril/valsartan. Sacubitril/valsartan adherence was assessed using medication fills to calculate proportion of days covered (PDC) through 90 days postdischarge. Associations between postdischarge adherence (PDC < or ≥80%) and risk of readmission and death within 1 year were examined by comparing cumulative incidences and adjusted event rates.. Among 897 patients prescribed sacubitril/valsartan at discharge, 295 (32.9%) had PDC ≥80% and 602 (67.1%) had PDC <80%. Baseline characteristics were balanced between groups. Compared with patients with PDC <80%, patients with PDC ≥80% had a significantly lower adjusted hazard of all-cause rehospitalization (HR: 0.66 [95% CI: 0.48-0.89]) and death (HR: 0.42 [95% CI: 0.22-0.79]) at 90 days and at 1 year (HR: 0.69 [95% CI: 0.56-0.86] and HR: 0.53 [95% CI: 0.38-0.74], respectively). For every 5 percentage point increase in PDC, patients experienced a significant reduction in rehospitalization (HR: 0.98 [95% CI: 0.97-0.99]) and death (HR: 0.96 [95% CI: 0.94-0.97]) at 1 year.. In patients hospitalized for HFrEF and discharged on sacubitril/valsartan, high adherence to sacubitril/valsartan within 90 days after discharge was associated with substantially lower rates of readmission and death. Additional efforts to improve adherence with sacubitril/valsartan and other guideline-directed medical therapies in HFrEF are warranted.

Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Humans; Medicare; Patient Discharge; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; United States; Valsartan

Topics: Aftercare; Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Patient Discharge; Stroke Volume; Valsartan

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Valsartan

Background Sacubitril/valsartan, a first-in-class angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor, received US Food and Drug Administration approval in 2015 for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Our objective was to describe the sacubitril/valsartan initiation rate, associated characteristics, and 6-month follow-up dosing among veterans with HFrEF who are renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor (RAASi) naïve. Methods and Results Retrospective cohort study of veterans with HFrEF who are RAASi naïve defined as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40%; ≥1 in/outpatient heart failure visit, first RAASi (sacubitril/valsartan, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor [ACEI]), or angiotensin-II receptor blocker [ARB]) fill from July 2015 to June 2019. Characteristics associated with sacubitril/valsartan initiation were identified using Poisson regression models. From July 2015 to June 2019, we identified 3458 sacubitril/valsartan and 29 367 ACEI or ARB initiators among veterans with HFrEF who are RAASi naïve. Sacubitril/valsartan initiation increased from 0% to 26.5%. Sacubitril/valsartan (versus ACEI or ARB) initiators were less likely to have histories of stroke, myocardial infarction, or hypertension and more likely to be older and have diabetes mellitus and lower LVEF. At 6-month follow-up, the prevalence of ≥50% target daily dose for sacubitril/valsartan, ACEI, and ARB initiators was 23.5%, 43.2%, and 47.1%, respectively. Conclusions Sacubitril/valsartan initiation for HFrEF in the Veterans Administration increased in the 4 years immediately following Food and Drug Administration approval. Sacubitril/valsartan (versus ACEI or ARB) initiators had fewer baseline cardiovascular comorbidities and the lowest proportion on ≥50% target daily dose at 6-month follow-up. Identifying the reasons for lower follow-up dosing of sacubitril/valsartan could support guideline recommendations and quality improvement strategies for patients with HFrEF.

Topics: Aldosterone; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Humans; Renin-Angiotensin System; Retrospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left; Veterans

Heart failure (HF) causes significant morbidity and mortality, but the rates and characteristics of people with HF in Australia are not well studied. SHAPE set out to describe the characteristics of HF patients seen in the real-world setting.. We analysed anonymized patient data extracted from the clinical software of 43 participating GP clinics for the 5 year period from 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2018. Patients were stratified into 'definite' and 'probable' HF based on a hierarchy of selection criteria and analysed for their clinical characteristics. Symptoms and signs of HF and ejection fraction data were searched for within the free text of the medical notes.. Heart failure is poorly documented in general practice records and may be contributing to untoward downstream effects, such as low documentation of echocardiography, poor use of guideline recommended therapies and frequent use of medications that may worsen HF.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aminobutyrates; Australia; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; General Practice; Heart Failure; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Ventricular Function, Left

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring; Humans; Hypertension; Neprilysin; Pyrimidines; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

In the PARADIGM-HF trial, sacubitril/valsartan demonstrated a 20% reduction in mortality and heart failure hospitalization compared with standard angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy. Despite this and a class I indication, drug diffusion has been much slower than anticipated. This study aims to examine the variation in early diffusion of sacubitril/valsartan and describe the factors associated with high and low rates of early use.. Annual, cross-sectional analyses between January 2016 and December 2018.. We created a nationally representative cohort of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction fully enrolled in parts A, B, and D for at least 1 year between 2016 and 2018. Sacubitril/valsartan use was determined using National Drug Codes. We generated age, sex, and race-adjusted rates of sacubitril/valsartan prescribing by hospital referral region from 2016 to 2018. We also examined the factors associated with high and low rates of early use.. Early use rates of sacubitril/valsartan were low: 1.9% in 2016, 3.3% in 2017, and 4.0% in 2018. Even after controlling for out-of-pocket co-payments, there was substantial geographic variation in early use, with most early use concentrated in the Northeast and South.. There has been substantial variation in the early diffusion of sacubitril/valsartan. In addition to drug cost, geographic prescribing patterns appear to play a major role in early drug diffusion.

Topics: Aged; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Cross-Sectional Studies; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Medicare; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; United States; Valsartan

Heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is associated with high rates of hospitalization and death. It also has a negative impact on patients' functional capacity and quality of life, as well as on healthcare costs. In recent years, new HFrEF prognosis-modifying drugs have emerged, leading to intense debate within the international scientific community toward a paradigm shift for the management of HFrEF. In this article, we report the contribution of a Portuguese HF expert panel to the ongoing debate. Based on the most recently published clinical evidence, and the panel members' clinical judgment, three key principles are highlighted: (i) sacubitril/valsartan should be preferred as first-line therapy for HFrEF, instead of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker; (ii) the four foundation HFrEF drugs are the angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor, beta-adrenergic blocking agents, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors, regardless of the presence of type-2 diabetes mellitus; (iii) these four HFrEF drug classes should be introduced over a short-term period of four to six weeks, guided by a safety protocol, followed by a dose up-titration period of 8 weeks.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Consensus; Heart Failure; Humans; Prognosis; Quality of Life; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Arabs; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Infant; Morbidity; Pilot Projects; Retrospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

Heart failure therapy involves the use of a number drugs that significantly affect potassium levels. While diuretics decrease potassium levels, others (angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, AT2 receptor blockers, sacubitril/valsartan, spironolactone) increase. Patients also have several comorbidities that can significantly reduce renal function and thus affect the resulting potassium level. Decreased or elevated potassium levels can be very dangerous for the patient and therefore need to be monitored. In recent years, the results of several studies have been published that have focused on potassium levels and mortality and have shown that the optimal potassium levels in patients with heart failure should be between 4-5 mmol/L.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Diuretics; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Potassium; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Valsartan

The impact of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in heart failure (HF) patients is important and prevention of SCD is a reasonable and clinically justified endpoint if associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality. According to literature, in HF with reduced ejection fraction, only three classes of agents were found effective in reducing SCD and all-cause mortality: beta-blockers, mineralcorticoid receptor antagonists and, more recently, angiotensin-receptor neprilysin-inhibitors. In the PARADIGM trial that tested sacubitril/valsartan vs. enalapril, the 20% relative risk reduction in cardiovascular deaths obtained with sacubitril/valsartan was attributable to reductions in the incidence of both SCD and death due to HF worsening and this effect can be added to the known positive effect of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in appropriately selected patients. In order to maximize the implementation of all the available treatments, patients with HF should be included in virtuous networks with a dialogue between all the physician involved, with commitment by all these physicians for appropriate decision-making on application of pharmacological and device treatments according to available evidence, as well as commitment for drug titration before and after device implant, taking advantage from remote monitoring, and with the safety of back up device therapy when indicated. There are potential synergistic effects of drug therapy, with all the therapies acting on neuro-hormonal and sympathetic activation, but specifically with sacubitril/valsartan, and device therapy, in particular cardiac resynchronization therapy, with added incremental benefits on positive cardiac remodelling, prevention of HF progression, and prevention of ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Biphenyl Compounds; Death, Sudden, Cardiac; Drug Combinations; Enalapril; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome

The Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor sacubitril-valsartan (ARNI) and dapagliflozin, a sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitor, reduce the risk of heart failure hospitalization (hHF) and cardiovascular (CV) mortality in patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Their comparative value for money is undetermined. Therefore, our aim was to compare the cost per outcome implications of utilizing dapagliflozin vs. ARNI for preventing heart failure (HF) events of non-diabetic patients with HFrEF.. We calculated the cost needed to treat (CNT) to prevent one HF event. The cost needed to treat was estimated by multiplying the annualized number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one event by each therapy's annual cost. Efficacy estimates were extracted from published secondary analyses of non-diabetic patients in DAPA-HF and PARADIGM-HF trials. Drug costs were estimated as 75% of the 2020 US National Average Drug Acquisition Cost listing. Sensitivity analysis was performed to mitigate differences between the trial's populations and drug costs in various countries.The annualized NNT to prevent one HF event for dapagliflozin was 31 (95% CI 21-71) vs. 33 (95% CI 24-62) for ARNI. The CNT of dapagliflozin in the US is $141 112 (95% CI $95 592-$323 192) compared to $158 169 (95% CI $115 032-$297 166) for sacubitril-valsartan. The CNT results were sensitive to drug costs in various countries.. Dapagliflozin and ARNI provide comparable value for money for preventing HF events in non-diabetic patients with HFrEF. In healthcare settings where dapagliflozin's price is significantly lower than ARNI, it provides superior value for money.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Benzhydryl Compounds; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Glucosides; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Valsartan

The treatment with sacubitril/valsartan in patients suffering from chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction increases left ventricular ejection fraction and decreases the risk of sudden cardiac death. We conducted a retrospective analysis regarding the impact of age differences on the treatment outcome of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Patients were defined as adults if ≤65 years (n = 51) and older if >65 years of age (n = 76). The incidence of ventricular arrhythmias at 1-year follow-up was comparable in both groups (30.8 vs 26.5%; p = 0.71). The mortality rate in adult patients is significantly lower as compared with older patients (2 vs 14.5%; log-rank = 0.04). Older patients may suffer remarkably more side effects than adult patients (21.1 vs 11.8%; p = 0.03).. Lay abstract Many patients still die from heart failure (HF). Better drugs for this condition were developed over the past 20 years. The drug combination sacubitril/valsartan improves heart function and might lower the risk of sudden cardiac death from a fast heart rate (ventricular arrythmia). More research is needed on the effect of sacubitril/valsartan on older patients with HF. We wanted to see how sacubitril/valsartan affects older patients with HF. Seventy-six patients above 65 years of age were compared with 51 patients below 65 years. A year later, the number of ventricular arrhythmias was similar in both groups. Side effects were more common in older patients. At 2 years, there were more deaths in the older group. In summary, side effects of sacubitril/valsartan could be an obstacle to treating older patients. Finding better concepts to treat older patients with a weak heart remains necessary.

Topics: Adult; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

Over recent years, new evolution in guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) contributes to clinical benefits in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The additional medical expenditure may be a concern due to the current financial constraint. This study aimed to investigate the medical costs and clinical effectiveness of contemporary GDMT in recently hospitalized HFrEF patients.. Acutely decompensated hospitalized HFrEF patients from two multicenter cohorts of different periods were retrospectively analyzed. A propensity score matching was performed to adjust the baseline characteristics. Annual medication costs, risks of mortality, and recurrent heart failure hospitalizations (HFH) were compared.. Following 1:2 propensity score matching, there were 426 patients from the 2017-2018 cohort using sacubitril/valsartan, while 852 patients from 2013 to 2014 did not use so at discharge. Baseline characteristics were similar, whereas the sacubitril/valsartan users were more likely to receive beta-blockers, ivabradine and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists at discharge (79.3% vs 60.4%, 23.2% vs 0%, and 64.1% vs 49.8%, p < 0.001). The 2017-2018 cohort produced more medication costs by 1277 United States dollar (USD) per person per year, while it resulted in lower rates of HFH and all-cause mortality (10.3 vs 20.3 and 48.8 vs 79.9 per 100 person-year, p < 0.001). Costs of preventing a mortality event and a HFH event with contemporary treatments were 15 758 USD (95% confidence interval [CI] 10 436-29 244) and 5317 USD (95% CI 3388-10 098), respectively.. The higher adoption of GDMT was associated with greater medical expenses but better clinical outcomes in recently decompensated HFrEF patients.

Topics: Aged; Aminobutyrates; Antihypertensive Agents; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Health Expenditures; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Propensity Score; Retrospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan

Circulating Neprilysin (sNEP) has emerged as a potential prognostic biomarker in heart failure (HF). In PARAGON-HF benefit of sacubitril/valsartan was only observed in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤57%. We aimed to assess the prognostic value of sNEP in outpatients with HF and LVEF >57%, in comparison with patients with LVEF ≤57%.. Consecutive HF outpatients were included from May-2006 to February-2016. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause death or HF hospitalization and the main secondary endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization. For the later competing risk methods were used.. sNEP was measured in 1428 patients (age 67.7±12.7, 70.3% men, LVEF 35.8% ±14), 144 of which had a LVEF >57%. sNEP levels did not significantly differ between LVEF groups (p = 0.31). During a mean follow-up of 6±3.9 years, the primary endpoint occurred in 979 patients and the secondary composite endpoint in 714 (in 111 and 84 of the 144 patients with LVEF >57%, respectively). sNEP was significantly associated with both composite endpoints. Age- and sex- adjusted Cox regression analyses showed higher hazard ratios for sNEP in patients with LVEF >57%, both for the primary (HR 1.37 [1.16-1.61] vs. 1.04 [0.97-1.11]) and the secondary (HR 1.38 [1.21-1.55] vs. 1.11 [1.04-1.18]) composite endpoints.. sNEP prognostic value in patients with HF and LVEF >57% outperforms that observed in patients with lower LVEF. Precision medicine using sNEP may identify HF patients with preserved LVEF that may benefit from treatment with sacubitril/valsartan.

Topics: Aged; Aminobutyrates; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neprilysin; Prognosis; Proportional Hazards Models; Stroke Volume; Valsartan

Acute heart failure (AHF) is a highly prevalent clinical entity in individuals older than 45 years in Spain. AHF is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and is the leading cause of hospitalisation for individuals older than 65 years in Spain, a quarter of whom die within 1 year of the hospitalisation. In recent years, there has been an upwards trend in hospitalisations for AHF, which increased 76.7% from 2003 to 2013. Readmissions at 30 days for AHF have also increased (from 17.6% to 22.1%), at a relative mean rate of 1.36% per year, with the consequent increase in the use of resources and the economic burden for the healthcare system. The aim of this document (developed by the Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation Group of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine) is to guide specialists on the most important aspects of treatment and follow-up for patients with AHF during hospitalisation and the subsequent follow-up. The main recommendations listed in this document are as follows: 1) At admission, perform a comprehensive assessment, considering the patient's standard treatment and comorbidities, given that these determine the disease prognosis to a considerable measure. 2) During the first few hours of hospital care, decongestive treatment is a priority, and a staged diuretic therapeutic approach based on the patient's response is recommended. 3) To manage patients in the stable phase, consider starting and/or adjusting evidence-based drug treatment (e.g., sacubitril/valsartan or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers, beta blockers and aldosterone antagonists). 4) At hospital discharge, use a checklist to optimise the patient's management and identify the most efficient options for maintaining continuity of care after discharge.

Topics: Acute Disease; Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Consensus; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Hospitals; Humans

To assess the effectiveness of sacubitril/valsartan versus angiotensin receptor antagonist therapy for prevention of heart failure (HF)-related hospitalization and all-cause hospitalization in a large cohort of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).. Retrospective cohort study.. IBM. Patients aged 18 years or older with their first HFrEF hospitalization on or after January 1, 2015, who initiated sacubitril/valsartan or angiotensin receptor antagonist after hospital discharge.. Sacubitril/Valsartan versus Angiotensin receptor antagonist.. The index date was the first sacubitril/valsartan or angiotensin receptor antagonist fill date. After 1 up to 3 propensity score matching, Cox proportional hazards regression was used with robust variance estimators to compare HF-related and all-cause hospitalizations between treatments. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the main analysis. After propensity score matching, 1,088 sacubitril/valsartan and 2,839 angiotensin receptor antagonist new users were included. The crude incidence of HF-related hospitalization was 13 per 100 person-years for sacubitril/valsartan users and 18 per 100 person-years for angiotensin receptor antagonist users. Compared with angiotensin receptor antagonist use, sacubitril/valsartan use was associated with 27% lower risk of HF-related hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-0.91; p = 0.006) and 31% lower risk of all-cause hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.79; p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed no significant heterogeneity, including subpopulations with chronic kidney disease or coronary artery disease.. Compared with angiotensin receptor antagonists, sacubitril/valsartan was associated with lower risk of HF-related and all-cause hospitalizations. Our data suggest that, when added sequentially, sacubitril/valsartan should be the preferred initial agent over angiotensin receptor antagonists.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Humans; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Retrospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Pulmonary Artery; Stroke Volume; Valsartan

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biphenyl Compounds; Chronic Disease; Defibrillators, Implantable; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Valsartan

Male apolipoprotein E-knockout mice fed a high-fat diet were divided into control (CTL), valsartan (30 mg/kg) (VAL), sacubitril (30 mg/kg) (SAC), and valsartan plus sacubitril (30 mg/kg each) (VAL/SAC) groups after 4 weeks of prefeeding and were subsequently treated for 12 weeks.. The VAL/SAC group exhibited significantly higher serum brain natriuretic peptide levels; more subtle changes in left ventricular systolic diameter, fractional shortening, and ejection fraction, and significantly higher expression levels of natriuretic peptide precursor B and markers of angiogenesis, including clusters of differentiation 34, vascular endothelial growth factor A, and monocyte chemotactic protein 1, than the CTL group.. Valsartan plus sacubitril preserved left ventricular systolic function in apolipoprotein E-knockout mice fed a high-fat diet. This result suggests that myocardial angiogenic factors induced by ARNI might provide cardioprotective effects.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Animals; Apolipoproteins; Biphenyl Compounds; Diet, High-Fat; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Male; Mice; Mice, Knockout; Neprilysin; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

The aim of this study was to characterise clinical priority of adverse events with sacubitril/valsartan for targeting preventive measures.. We used the US Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system (worldwide pharmacovigilance database) to compare adverse events recording sacubitril/valsartan as suspect with other cardiovascular drugs. Disproportionality analyses were performed by calculating the reporting odds ratios, deemed significant when the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval was greater than 1. Clinical priority was assigned to adverse events with significant disproportionality by scoring (range 0-10 points) five features (number of events, magnitude of the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval, mortality frequency, important/designated medical event, biological plausibility).. Sacubitril/valsartan was recorded in 20,021 reports, with 178 adverse events associated with significant disproportionality: 71.9%, 25.9% and 2.2% were classified as weak, moderate and strong clinical priorities, respectively. Increased reporting emerged for several cardiovascular adverse events, including 'renal failure' (N = 388; lower limit of the 95% confidence interval 2.26), 'hyperkalaemia' (314; 2.42) and 'angioedema' (309; 1.56). Sudden cardiac death (priority score 9 points) was the only designated medical event with strong clinical priority. Notably, sudden cardiac death occurred early after sacubitril/valsartan administration (average onset 124 days), with concomitant drugs known for pro-arrhythmic potential (e.g. amiodarone, escitalopram, mirtazapine, loop diuretics) in 26.2% of records.. The increased cardiovascular reporting of sacubitril/valsartan in the real world was largely predictable from pre-approval evidence, underlying disease and likely patients' comorbidities. The unexpected reporting of sudden cardiac death occurred well before the complete development of positive electrical remodelling induced by sacubitril/valsartan, and calls for stringent clinical monitoring (to reduce the pro-arrhythmic burden related to co-medications), and further investigation on appropriate combination with other preventive measures.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration; Valsartan

The Comparison of Sacubitril-Valsartan versus Enalapril on Effect on NT-proBNP in Patients Stabilised from an Acute Heart Failure Episode (PIONEER-HF) trial demonstrated significant reductions in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide. Our study explored the cost-effectiveness of the use of sacubitril-valsartan versus enalapril in acute decompensated heart failure from the Australian healthcare perspective.. A Markov model was designed using data from the PIONEER-HF trial to model the clinical progress and costs of patients over a lifetime time horizon. The model consisted of three health states: 'alive and event-free', 'alive after non-fatal hospitalisation for acute decompensated heart failure' or 'dead'. Costs and utilities were estimated from published sources. The cost of sacubitril-valsartan (per the Australian pharmaceutical benefits schedule) was AU$7.08/day. Outcomes of interest were the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life year gained and cost per year of life saved. Cost and benefits were discounted at 5.0% per annum.. Compared to enalapril, sacubitril-valsartan was estimated to cost an additional AU$7464 (discounted) per person, but lead to 0.127 years of life saved (discounted) and 0.096 quality-adjusted life years gained (discounted) over a lifetime analysis. These equated to incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of AU$58,629/year of life saved (US$41,795, EU€58,629, GBP£32,001) and AU$77,889/quality-adjusted life year gained (US$55,526, EU€49,202, GBP£42,504). We have assumed a threshold of AU$50,000/quality-adjusted life year gained to suggest cost-effectiveness.. At its current acquisition price, sacubitril-valsartan in comparison to enalapril is not likely to be cost-effective in the management of acute decompensated heart failure in Australia. A price reduction of more than 25% would confer cost-effectiveness.

Topics: Australia; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Enalapril; Heart Failure; Humans; Valsartan

Sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) has shown promise as a tool for decreasing cardiovascular hospitalization and associated mortality among certain patients with heart failure and has been found to exhibit potential renoprotective and antiarrhythmic activity. This report is describing the case of a patient that suffered acute myocardial infarction within one month after undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) stent implantation and who underwent standard guideline-directed medical treatment. Upon readmission, echocardiographic evaluation revealed enlargement of the left heart and reduced ejection fraction. While hospitalized, treatment with S/V was begun. Following sustained treatment with this drug for five months, the patient exhibited vascular remodeling, a 30% injection fraction improvement, a 15 mm reduction in left ventricular diastolic diameter, and a significant change in functional class from class III to I. Overall, this case report emphasizes the association between S/V treatment and reverse ventricular remodeling in a patient that experienced cardiomegaly following AMI.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiomegaly; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Ventricular Function, Left

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Humans; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Peptide Fragments; Stroke Volume; Valsartan; Wind