s6c-sarafotoxin and Pain

1. The contribution of endogenous endothelins to nociceptive responses elicited by ovalbumin (OVA) in the hind-paw of mice sensitised to this antigen (50 microg OVA+5 mg Al(OH)(3), s.c., 14 days beforehand) was investigated. 2. Sensitised mice exhibited greater nocifensive responsiveness to intraplantar (i.pl.) OVA (total licking time over first 30 min: 85.2+/-14.6 s at 0.3 microg; 152.6+/-35.6 s at 1 microg) than nonsensitised animals (29.3+/-7.4 s at 1 microg). Nocifensive responses of sensitised mice to 0.3 microg OVA were inhibited by morphine (3 mg kg(-1), s.c.) or local depletion of mast cells (four daily i.pl. injections of compound 48/80). 3. Pretreatment with i.v. bosentan (mixed ET(A)/ET(B) receptor antagonist; 52 micromol kg(-1)) or A-122722.5 (selective ET(A) receptor antagonist; 6 micromol kg(-1)) reduced OVA-induced licking from 124.8+/-20.6 s to 45.7+/-13.0 s and 64.2+/-12.1 s, respectively, whereas A-192621.1 (selective ET(B) receptor antagonist; 25 micromol kg(-1)) enhanced them to 259.2+/-39.6 s. 4. Local i.pl. pretreatment with BQ-123 or BQ-788 (selective ET(A) or ET(B) receptor antagonists, respectively, each at 3 nmol) reduced OVA-induced licking (from 106.2+/-15.2 to 57.0+/-9.4 s and from 118.6+/-10.5 to 76.8+/-14.7 s, respectively). Sarafotoxin S6c (selective ETB receptor agonist, 30 pmol, i.pl., 30 min after OVA) induced nocifensive responses in OVA-sensitised, but not in nonsensitised, animals. 5. Compound 48/80 (0.3 microg, i.pl.) induced nocifensive responses per se and potentiated those induced by i.pl. capsaicin (0.1 microg). Treatment with BQ-123 (3 nmol, i.pl.) reduced only the hyperalgesic effect of compound 48/80, whereas BQ-788 (3 nmol) was ineffective. 6. Thus, immune-mediated Type I hypersensitivity reactions elicit mast cell- and endothelin-dependent nociception in the mouse hind-paw, which are mediated locally by both ET(A) and ET(B) receptors. The nocifensive response to antigen is amenable to blockade by systemic treatment with dual ET(A)/ET(B) or selective ET(A) receptor antagonists, but is sharply potentiated by systemic selective ET(B) receptor antagonist treatment. The apparently distinct roles played by ET(B) receptors in this phenomenon at local and other sites remain to be characterised.

Topics: Animals; Antigens; Bosentan; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Endothelins; Hyperalgesia; Hypersensitivity; Indicators and Reagents; Male; Mice; Oligopeptides; Ovalbumin; p-Methoxy-N-methylphenethylamine; Pain; Peptides, Cyclic; Piperidines; Sulfonamides; Viper Venoms

In some diseases in which endothelin-1 production increases, e.g. prostate cancer, endothelin-1 is considered to be involved in the generation of pain. In the present study, we investigated the effects of a selective endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonist, (E)-N-[6-methoxy-5-(2-methoxyphenoxy)[2,2'-bipyrimidin]-4-yl]-2-phenylethenesulfonamide monopotassium salt (YM598), on the nociception potentiated by endothelin-1 in a cancer inoculation-induced pain model in mice, induced by inoculation of the androgen-independent human prostate cancer cell line PPC-1 into the hind paws of severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mice. No pain responses were observed in the sham-operated mice, whereas monophasic pain responses were observed in the PPC-1-inoculated mice. Endothelin-1 (1 to 10 pmol/paw) but not sarafotoxin S6c potentiated the pain response in prostate cancer-inoculated mice. Both YM598 and atrasentan (0.3 to 3 mg/kg, p.o.) significantly inhibited the endothelin-1 (10 pmol/paw)-induced potentiation of nociception in a dose-dependent manner. These results suggest that selective endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonists might relieve pain in patients with various diseases in which endothelin-1 production is increased, e.g. prostate cancer.

Topics: Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Animals; Atrasentan; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Endothelin A Receptor Antagonists; Endothelin-1; Hindlimb; Male; Mice; Mice, SCID; Pain; Prostatic Neoplasms; Pyrimidines; Pyrrolidines; Sulfonamides; Time Factors; Viper Venoms

Endothelins (ET-1, ET-2 or ET-3) or endothelin precursors (big-ET-1[1-38], big-ET-2[1-37] or big-ET-3[1-41]) injected i.p. in mice have previously been shown to elicit a characteristic nociceptive behavioral response. In this study, we investigated the endothelin receptor type (ETA or ETB) that mediates this behavioral response. Mice were injected i.p. with ET-1, ET-2, ET-3, big-ET-1[1-38], big-ET-2[1-37], big-ET-3[1-41], sarafotoxin S6a, sarafotoxin S6b, sarafotoxin S6c, ET-1 with Ala substitutions for Cys3 and Cys11 or His-Leu-Asp-Ile-Ile-Trp, and quantal dose-response curves were obtained for each of the compounds (except the latter). Co-administration of enzyme inhibitors with the big-endothelins was used to establish the requisite conversion to endothelins and big-ET-1[22-38], big-ET-2[22-37] and ET-3[22-41] amide, and the ETA-selective antagonist cyclo[-D-Asp-Pro-D-Val-Leu-D-Trp-] was used to determine receptor specificity. The ED50 values were 2.9, 3.3 and 23.9 micrograms/kg i.p. for ET-1, ET-2 and ET-3, respectively, 0.6, 0.6 and 13.1 micrograms/kg i.p. for sarafotoxin S6a, sarafotoxin S6b and sarafotoxin S6c, respectively, and 5.3 micrograms/kg i.p. for ET-1 with Ala substitutions for Cys3 and Cys11. Big-ET-1[22-38], big-ET-2[22-37], big-ET-3[22-41] amide and ET-C produced less than 25% effect up to 2000 micrograms/kg. The big-ET-1-induced effects were blocked by the enzyme inhibitors phosphoramidon and thiorphan (ID50 = 0.9 mg/kg) but not by ubenimex (bestatin), captopril or perindopril. Cyclo[-D-Asp-Pro-D-Val-Leu-D-Trp-] blocked ET-1- and ET-2-induced effects but not ET-3-, ACh- or phenyl-p-quinone-induced effects. These results suggest that endothelin-induced nociceptive behavioral response in mice can be mediated via both ET receptor types, ETA and ETB. Further, the ET-1 carboxy-terminal hexapeptide is insufficient to produce the effect, and the Cys3-Cys11 disulfide bridge of ET-1 is not required.

Topics: Animals; Endothelins; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred ICR; Pain; Peptide Fragments; Peptides, Cyclic; Receptor, Endothelin A; Receptor, Endothelin B; Receptors, Endothelin; Viper Venoms

Endothelin (ET)-A and ET-B receptors have been reported to exist in the spinal cord but the roles of ET-A and ET-B receptors in the spinal cord are poorly understood. To gain a better understanding of the roles of ET-A and ET-B receptors in nociceptive information transmission in the spinal cord, this study evaluated the effects of ET-1, ET-3, Sarafotoxin S6c (an ET-B receptor-selective agonist) and (R)2-[(R)-2-[(S)-2-[[1- (hexahydro-1H-azepinyl)]carbonyl]amino-4-methyl-pentanoyl]amino-3- [3-(1-methyl-1H-indolyl)]propionyl]amino-3-(2-pyridyl)propionic acid (FR139317, an ET-A receptor-selective antagonist) on the agitation behavior evoked by formaldehyde solution injection and on the thermal nociceptive test. The s.c. injection of formaldehyde solution into the hind paw evoked a biphasic flinching (phase 1, 0-9 min; phase 2, 10-60 min) of the injected paw. For the purpose of data analysis, phase 2 was further divided into two phases (phase 2a, 10-34 min; phase 2b, 35-60 min). Intrathecal injection of ET-1 depressed the phase 1 and 2 flinching behavior in a dose-dependent manner and this ET-1 effect was antagonized by FR139317. Intrathecal injection of either ET-3 or Sarafotoxin S6c enhanced the phase 2a flinching behavior in a dose-dependent manner. Intrathecal injection of the highest doses of ET-1, ET-3 and Sarafotoxin S6c had no effect on the thermal nociceptive test. These data indicate that ET-A and ET-B receptors have a powerful effect on spinal nociceptive processing evoked by formaldehyde solution injection but not that evoked by thermal stimulation.

Topics: Animals; Arginine; Azepines; Behavior, Animal; Endothelin Receptor Antagonists; Endothelins; Formaldehyde; Indoles; Male; NG-Nitroarginine Methyl Ester; Pain; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptors, Endothelin; Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate; Spinal Cord; Viper Venoms