s6c-sarafotoxin and Hypersensitivity

1. The contribution of endogenous endothelins to nociceptive responses elicited by ovalbumin (OVA) in the hind-paw of mice sensitised to this antigen (50 microg OVA+5 mg Al(OH)(3), s.c., 14 days beforehand) was investigated. 2. Sensitised mice exhibited greater nocifensive responsiveness to intraplantar (i.pl.) OVA (total licking time over first 30 min: 85.2+/-14.6 s at 0.3 microg; 152.6+/-35.6 s at 1 microg) than nonsensitised animals (29.3+/-7.4 s at 1 microg). Nocifensive responses of sensitised mice to 0.3 microg OVA were inhibited by morphine (3 mg kg(-1), s.c.) or local depletion of mast cells (four daily i.pl. injections of compound 48/80). 3. Pretreatment with i.v. bosentan (mixed ET(A)/ET(B) receptor antagonist; 52 micromol kg(-1)) or A-122722.5 (selective ET(A) receptor antagonist; 6 micromol kg(-1)) reduced OVA-induced licking from 124.8+/-20.6 s to 45.7+/-13.0 s and 64.2+/-12.1 s, respectively, whereas A-192621.1 (selective ET(B) receptor antagonist; 25 micromol kg(-1)) enhanced them to 259.2+/-39.6 s. 4. Local i.pl. pretreatment with BQ-123 or BQ-788 (selective ET(A) or ET(B) receptor antagonists, respectively, each at 3 nmol) reduced OVA-induced licking (from 106.2+/-15.2 to 57.0+/-9.4 s and from 118.6+/-10.5 to 76.8+/-14.7 s, respectively). Sarafotoxin S6c (selective ETB receptor agonist, 30 pmol, i.pl., 30 min after OVA) induced nocifensive responses in OVA-sensitised, but not in nonsensitised, animals. 5. Compound 48/80 (0.3 microg, i.pl.) induced nocifensive responses per se and potentiated those induced by i.pl. capsaicin (0.1 microg). Treatment with BQ-123 (3 nmol, i.pl.) reduced only the hyperalgesic effect of compound 48/80, whereas BQ-788 (3 nmol) was ineffective. 6. Thus, immune-mediated Type I hypersensitivity reactions elicit mast cell- and endothelin-dependent nociception in the mouse hind-paw, which are mediated locally by both ET(A) and ET(B) receptors. The nocifensive response to antigen is amenable to blockade by systemic treatment with dual ET(A)/ET(B) or selective ET(A) receptor antagonists, but is sharply potentiated by systemic selective ET(B) receptor antagonist treatment. The apparently distinct roles played by ET(B) receptors in this phenomenon at local and other sites remain to be characterised.

Topics: Animals; Antigens; Bosentan; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Endothelins; Hyperalgesia; Hypersensitivity; Indicators and Reagents; Male; Mice; Oligopeptides; Ovalbumin; p-Methoxy-N-methylphenethylamine; Pain; Peptides, Cyclic; Piperidines; Sulfonamides; Viper Venoms

The effects of endothelin (ET) agonists on airway mechanics and bronchial blood flow were studied as well as the effects of mixed ET-receptor antagonist bosentan on allergen-induced airway reactions in the pig. ET agonists [ET-1, ET-3, and the ET(B) receptor-selective agonist Sarafotoxin 6c (Sf6c)] were given as intravenous injections (0.4-200 pmol/kg) to eight anesthetized pigs. Bosentan (10 mg/kg iv) was then administered, and the injections were repeated. Only Sf6c caused a significant increase in airway resistance, and this response was blocked by bosentan. Sf6c and ET-1 (200 and 400 pmol/kg, respectively) were also given as aerosols to five pigs. Sf6c, but not ET-1, caused bronchoconstriction via this route. All agonists (intravenous) caused increases in bronchial vascular conductance, an effect that was blocked by an NO-synthase inhibitor (N(G)-nitro-L-arginine) but unaffected by a cyxlooxygenase inhibitor (diclofenac). Fourteen pigs were sensitized with ascaris suum antigen. Under anesthesia, eight pigs were pretreated with bosentan, and six pigs were controls. They were all challenged with allergen aerosol resulting in acute bronchoconstriction and elevation of ET-1 in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Bosentan did not affect the maximal acute airway obstruction but markedly increased baseline bronchial vascular conductance, suggesting a basal vascular tone regulated by ETs. In conclusion, ETs induce bronchoconstriction primarily via the ET(B) receptor in the pig. However, ETs are probably not involved in the allergen-induced acute bronchoconstriction in this model.

Topics: Acute Disease; Airway Resistance; Animals; Ascaris suum; Bosentan; Bronchi; Bronchoconstriction; Bronchoconstrictor Agents; Endothelin Receptor Antagonists; Endothelin-1; Endothelins; Hypersensitivity; Pulmonary Circulation; Sulfonamides; Swine; Viper Venoms