s-1743 and Drug-Related-Side-Effects-and-Adverse-Reactions

Whether extending the treatment length and the use of high-dose esomeprazole may optimize the efficacy of Helicobacter pylori eradication remains unknown.. To compare the efficacy and tolerability of optimized 14 day sequential therapy and 10 day bismuth quadruple therapy containing high-dose esomeprazole in first-line therapy.. We recruited 620 adult patients (≥20 years of age) with H. pylori infection naive to treatment in this multicentre, open-label, randomized trial. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 14 day sequential therapy or 10 day bismuth quadruple therapy, both containing esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily. Those who failed after 14 day sequential therapy received rescue therapy with 10 day bismuth quadruple therapy and vice versa. Our primary outcome was the eradication rate in the first-line therapy. Antibiotic susceptibility was determined. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03156855.. The eradication rates of 14 day sequential therapy and 10 day bismuth quadruple therapy were 91.3% (283 of 310, 95% CI 87.4%-94.1%) and 91.6% (284 of 310, 95% CI 87.8%-94.3%) in the ITT analysis, respectively (difference -0.3%, 95% CI -4.7% to 4.4%, P = 0.886). However, the frequencies of adverse effects were significantly higher in patients treated with 10 day bismuth quadruple therapy than those treated with 14 day sequential therapy (74.4% versus 36.7% P < 0.0001). The eradication rate of 14 day sequential therapy in strains with and without 23S ribosomal RNA mutation was 80% (24 of 30) and 99% (193 of 195), respectively (P < 0.0001).. Optimized 14 day sequential therapy was non-inferior to, but better tolerated than 10 day bismuth quadruple therapy and both may be used in first-line treatment in populations with low to intermediate clarithromycin resistance.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antacids; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-Ulcer Agents; Bismuth; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Esomeprazole; Helicobacter Infections; Helicobacter pylori; Humans; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

It is unclear whether the s (-) form of esomeprazole (EPZ) has an improved safety profile when compared with its racemic form omeprazole (OPZ). We assessed the potential complications of these optical isomers when combined with cilostazol, clopidogrel, and prasugrel, which are frequently used concomitant medications.. Using two adverse event spontaneous reporting databases, Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) and FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), adverse event names for hemorrhage, venous/arterial embolization, and thrombus were obtained from the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities. Reported odds ratios were calculated using a 2 × 2 contingency table, and a signal was considered present if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval was >1.. In combination with cilostazol, a hemorrhagic signal for OPZ in JADER and arterial emboli and thrombus signals for EPZ were detected in both databases. In combination with clopidogrel, OPZ showed arterial emboli and thrombus signals in JADER and venous/arterial emboli and thrombus signals in FAERS, while EPZ displayed arterial emboli and thrombus signals in FAERS. In contrast, when in combination with prasugrel, there were no adverse event signals in either database.. This study has confirmed using big data, that EPZ, the optical isomer and racemic form of omeprazole, has the beneficial characteristics of being less sensitive to CYP, as was intended by its design.

Topics: Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Cilostazol; Clopidogrel; Databases, Factual; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Esomeprazole; Hemorrhage; Humans; Omeprazole; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; United States

Several studies have shown that Pylera. To evaluate whether Pylera. Two separate groups of patients were treated simultaneously. One group was treated with Pylera. Thirty-two patients were recruited for group A and thirty-three patients in group B. Eradication rates were 93.7% (30/32) and 90.9% (30/33), respectively, at intention-to-treat analysis, and 96.6% (29/30) and 93.3% (28/30), respectively, at per-protocol analysis. Adverse events occurred in 26 patients and led to the suspension of treatment in one patient in group A and in one patient in group B.. The results showed that Pylera® plus a PPI or ranitidine were equally effective in the population studied. The high cure rates of bismuth triple therapy (without an antisecretory drug) and the lack of susceptibility testing make it impossible to exclude the possibility that the results would have been similar if neither the PPI nor the ranitidine were given.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-Ulcer Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Esomeprazole; Female; Helicobacter Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Ranitidine; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Infliximab (IFX) is an anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha antibody used to treat inflammatory joint diseases. Infusion reactions (IR) can occur during and after intravenous administration and often require discontinuation of IFX therapy. This retrospective study aimed at evaluating the incidence of IR in patients with joint inflammatory diseases receiving IFX with and without premedication. Clinical charts of rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis patients receiving IFX from January 2002 to December 2014 were reviewed. Patients receiving only one premedication protocol over time were enrolled and clustered based on the type of premedication as follows: group 1 received no premedication; group 2 received paracetamol, esomeprazole, hydrocortisone, and chlorpheniramine maleate; group 3 received paracetamol, hydoxyzine, ranitidine, and 6-methylprednisolone. Adverse events were recorded during the infusion, in the following hours and at control visits. The charts of 105 patients treated with IFX were selected. IR were observed in 23/51 patients of group 1, in 7/35 patients of group 2, and none of 19 patients in group 3. IR incidence was significantly lower in the second (p = 0.021) and third (p < 0.001) compared to the first group. The incidence of IR was significantly lower in group 3 than group 2 (p < 0.043). Moreover, patients in group 1 had a relative risk of developing an IR 2.5 times higher than group 2. In our experience, the use of premedication significantly reduced the number of IR to IFX. In particular, the combination of paracetamol, hydroxyzine, 6-methylprednisolone and ranitidine was more efficacious than paracetamol, esomeprazole, hydrocortisone, and chlorpheniramine maleate combination protocol.

Topics: Acetaminophen; Adult; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Chlorpheniramine; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Esomeprazole; Female; Humans; Hydrocortisone; Hydroxyzine; Infliximab; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Methylprednisolone; Middle Aged; Premedication; Ranitidine; Retrospective Studies; Spondylitis, Ankylosing; Treatment Outcome; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha