s-1743 and Critical-Illness

To assess the efficacy and safety of esomeprazole in preventing upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding in critically ill Chinese patients, using cimetidine as an active comparator.. A pre-specified non-inferiority limit (5%) was used to compare rates of significant upper GI bleeding in this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, phase 3 study across 27 intensive care units in China. Secondary endpoints included safety and tolerability measures. Patients required mechanical ventilation and had at least one additional risk factor for stress ulcer bleeding. Patients were randomized to receive either active esomeprazole 40 mg, as a 30-min intravenous (IV) infusion twice daily, and an IV placebo cimetidine infusion or active cimetidine 50 mg/h, as a continuous infusion following an initial bolus of 300 mg, and placebo esomeprazole injections, given up to 14 days. Patients were blinded using this double-dummy technique.. Of 274 patients, 2.7% with esomeprazole and 4.6% with cimetidine had significant upper GI bleeding (bright red blood in the gastric tube not clearing after lavage or persistent Gastroccult-positive "coffee grounds" material). Non-inferiority of esomeprazole to cimetidine was demonstrated. The safety profiles of both drugs were similar and as expected in critically ill patients.. Esomeprazole is effective in preventing upper GI bleeding in critically ill Chinese patients, as demonstrated by the non-inferiority analysis using cimetidine as an active control.. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02157376.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Cimetidine; Critical Illness; Double-Blind Method; Esomeprazole; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged

Thiopental is a thiobarbiturate given in the case of brain injuries to reduce intracranial pressure and to manage cerebral ischemia. A pharmacokinetic model has been described previously in critically ill patients with a different therapeutic strategy. New treatment options prompted us to investigate if drug-drug interactions occur. A new model is proposed describing the influence of concomitant administration of esomeprazole on the distribution of thiopental.. The study population comprised 52 critically ill patients (body weight 47.1-114 kg) aged 18-78 years who had been admitted into the critical care unit for treatment of intracranial hypertension. A total mean dose of 282.8 ± 172.7 mg/kg was given in 96 ± 72 h. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed by using a nonlinear mixed-effect population model.. A one-compartment open model with first-order elimination identified two covariates, namely, body weight on clearance and volume of distribution, and the administration of esomeprazole on volume of distribution. The mean values (% relative standard error) for total clearance (CL) and for central volume of distribution (Vd) in patients with and without concomitant esomeprazole were 5.3 L/h (9.2 %) and 256.1 (6.4 %) and 153.2 l (19.2 %), respectively.. Based on these results, we conclude that concomitant administration of esomeprazole increases the volume of distribution and the half-live of thiopental. This drug-drug interaction should be considered when a target concentration has to be reached.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Ulcer Agents; Brain Injuries; Critical Illness; Drug Interactions; Esomeprazole; Female; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Thiopental; Young Adult

A widely held belief contends that food-induced proton pump activation is important for optimal proton pump inhibitor-induced inhibition of gastric acid secretion. This study was undertaken to assess intragastric acid control with intravenous (IV) esomeprazole in critically ill patients.. This open-label, single-arm, exploratory trial was conducted at five university or regional hospital intensive care units in the US. Adult patients admitted to an intensive care unit who required mechanical ventilation and had at least one additional risk factor for stress-induced ulcer received twice-daily IV esomeprazole 40 mg for 48 hours and could continue for another 24 hours if no prepyloric enteral feedings were planned.. D9612L00107; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00428701.. The primary efficacy variable was the linear-interpolated percentage of time intragastric pH was > or =4 during 24-48 hours. Secondary efficacy variables included the interpolated percentage of time intragastric pH was > or =4 during 0-24, 0-48, and 48-72 hours, the percentage of gastric aspirates collected with pH > or =4 during 0-24, 24-48, 0-48, and 48-72 hours, and time to stable pH > or =4. Safety was assessed based on adverse events (AEs), physical examinations, vital signs, laboratory tests, and electrocardiograms.. Forty-five patients were enrolled (one was excluded because of previous partial gastrectomy). Interpolated mean percentage time pH > or =4 was 88.8%, 80.7%, and 83.5% for 24-48, 0-24, and 0-48 hours, respectively. For 0-72 hours, > or =78% of gastric aspirates had pH > or =4. Median time to stable pH was 1 hour (95% confidence interval: 0.67, 2.00). Treatment was well tolerated, with no evidence of gastrointestinal bleeding. A total of 75 AEs occurred in 34 patients, none considered treatment related.. In this noncontrolled exploratory study, twice-daily IV esomeprazole 40 mg rapidly decreased intragastric acidity and effectively maintained pH >/=4 during 0-72 hours in fasting, critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients at high risk for stress ulcers.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Ulcer Agents; Critical Illness; Esomeprazole; Humans; Treatment Outcome

This study aimed to determine the effect of administration of a single-dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) on gastric intramucosal pH (pHi), gastric juice volume and gastric pH in critically ill patients.. This prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study included 75 patients who were divided into five groups that received the following treatment: group C (n = 15), saline 100 mL; group O (n = 15), omeprazole 20 mg; group P (n = 15), pantoprazole 40 mg; group E (n = 15), esomeprazole 20 mg; and group R (n = 15), rabeprazole 20 mg. All treatments were administered nasogastrically in 100 mL of physiological saline. Measurements of gastric pHi, gastric juice volume and gastric pH were obtained immediately before and 2, 4 and 6 hours after administration of treatments. In addition, gastric content was aspirated and its volume was recorded.. Initial gastric pHi, gastric juice volume and gastric pH values were not statistically significantly different among the groups (p > 0.05). No statistically significant difference in gastric pHi was seen among the groups before or 2, 4 or 6 hours after saline or PPI administration. At hours 2, 4 and 6, gastric pH in the pantoprazole, esomeprazole and rabeprazole groups increased significantly, whereas gastric juice volume decreased significantly, compared with the omeprazole and placebo groups (p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were seen between the pantoprazole, esomeprazole and rabeprazole groups.. This is the first study to show that single-dose pantoprazole, esomeprazole and rabeprazole are associated with greater gastric pH increase and greater gastric juice volume decrease than omeprazole in critically ill patients. Our study also suggests that PPIs do not affect gastric pHi measurements in critically ill patients and can be administered during pH monitoring.

Topics: 2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles; Adult; Aged; Critical Illness; Double-Blind Method; Esomeprazole; Female; Gastric Acidity Determination; Gastric Juice; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Omeprazole; Pantoprazole; Prospective Studies; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Rabeprazole

Critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) are at high risk of developing upper gastrointestinal bleeding due to GI stress ulceration (SU). The major independent risk factors for the development of GI bleeding in the ICUs include mechanical ventilation (MV) and coagulopathy. There is no enough evidence regarding the most appropriate dosing of esomeprazole as stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) in critically ill patients. This is a retrospective cohort study conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City-Riyadh between January and December 2018 to determine the efficacy and safety of two different regimens of esomeprazole (20 vs 40 mg) as SUP in critically ill patients with major risk factors of GI stress ulceration. A total of 1864 patients were reviewed, 387 patients meeting inclusion criteria were enrolled. The propensity score was used to adjust for clinically and statistically relevant variables. We considered a P value of <.05 as statistically significant. 49 patients (12.6%) had received Esomeprazole 20 mg during the study period. Compared with Esomeprazole 20 mg, Esomeprazole 40 mg was not superior in GI bleeding prevention (aOR 2.611, 95% CI 0.343-20.247, P = .356). In addition, neither ICU C. difficle, ICU mortality within 30 days, ICU LOS, hospital LOS, ICU re-admission within 6 months, RBCs transfusion, nor platelets transfusion requirements were significant. On the other hand, Esomeprazole 40 mg was statistically associated with Enterobacteriaceae, Pneumonia, and longer MV duration.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Ulcer Agents; Cohort Studies; Critical Illness; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Esomeprazole; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Length of Stay; Male; Middle Aged; Peptic Ulcer; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors

Topics: Cimetidine; Critical Illness; Double-Blind Method; Esomeprazole; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Histamine; Histamine H2 Antagonists; Humans; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Protons