s-1-(combination) and Vomiting

A new oral type of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) derivative possessed of both potent antitumor activity and less gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity was investigated and developed in the form of a combination of tegafur (FT), a masked form of 5-FU, and its two peculiar biochemical modulators. One is 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (CDHP), a new potent inhibitor of 5-FU degradation in vivo, and another is potassium oxonate (Oxo), a characteristic inhibitor of 5-FU phosphorylation, which distributes much higher in GI tract after p.o. administration. 5-FU levels in blood of rats following administration of FT, were markedly elevated and persisted for a long-time by co-oral CDHP corresponding to over 0.4 molar ratio to FT, like the case in continuous infusion of 5-FU, which resulted in an augmentation of antitumor efficacy in Yoshida sarcoma-bearing rats, although severe GI toxicity simultaneously occurred. To reduce 5-FU-induced toxicities such as diarrhea and body weight loss and to maintain the augmented antitumor activity, 0.5 to 2 molar Oxo was orally given to rats with one molar FT plus 0.4 molar CDHP. As a result, both severe GI injury and body weight loss were markedly inhibited by coadministration of 0.5 to 1.0 molar Oxo while high antitumor efficacy (about 90% inhibition of tumor growth) was maintained. However, such almost complete antitumor effect was reduced to about 50% inhibition of tumor growth by over 2 molar Oxo combined with one molar FT plus 0.4 molar CDHP. Based on these results, a novel 5-FU derivative, named S-1, was composed of one molar FT, 0.4 molar CDHP and one molar Oxo. S-1 showed an antitumor activity over 3-fold stronger than UFT (one molar FT plus 4 molar uracil) against Yoshida sarcoma and Sato lung carcinoma in rats and human colon carcinoma (KM12C) xenografted in nude rats when its minimum toxic dose was administered. Co-oral Oxo also significantly reduced the incidence of diarrhea and stomatitis induced by administration of FT-CDHP in beagle dogs. These results suggest that high antitumor activity and less GI toxicity of S-1 was brought about by the elevation in blood and tumor tissues and by selective decrease of 5-fluoronucleotides, an active metabolite of 5-FU, in GI tract.

Topics: Animals; Anorexia; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Diarrhea; Dogs; Drug Combinations; Female; Fluorouracil; Immunologic Factors; Male; Mice; Mice, Nude; Oxonic Acid; Pyridines; Rats; Sarcoma, Yoshida; Tegafur; Vomiting

Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) is the standard treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC); however, it causes nausea, vomiting, and anorexia, and requires hydration. Gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) reportedly has equal to, or better, efficacy and an acceptable toxicity profile. We aimed to confirm the non-inferiority of GS to GC for patients with advanced/recurrent BTC in terms of overall survival (OS).. We undertook a phase III randomized trial in 33 institutions in Japan. Eligibility criteria included chemotherapy-naïve patients with recurrent or unresectable BTC, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0 - 1, and adequate organ function. The calculated sample size was 350 with a one-sided α of 5%, a power of 80%, and non-inferiority margin hazard ratio (HR) of 1.155. The primary end point was OS, while the secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), adverse events (AEs), and clinically significant AEs defined as grade ≥2 fatigue, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, oral mucositis, or diarrhea.. Between May 2013 and March 2016, 354 patients were enrolled. GS was found to be non-inferior to GC [median OS: 13.4 months with GC and 15.1 months with GS, HR, 0.945; 90% confidence interval (CI), 0.78-1.15; P = 0.046 for non-inferiority]. The median PFS was 5.8 months with GC and 6.8 months with GS (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.70-1.07). The RR was 32.4% with GC and 29.8% with GS. Both treatments were generally well-tolerated. Clinically significant AEs were observed in 35.1% of patients in the GC arm and 29.9% in the GS arm.. GS, which does not require hydration, should be considered a new, convenient standard of care option for patients with advanced/recurrent BTC.. This trial has been registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm), number UMIN000010667.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biliary Tract Neoplasms; Cisplatin; Deoxycytidine; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Combinations; Female; Gemcitabine; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Oxonic Acid; Tegafur; Vomiting

Previous studies have shown sex-related differences in the incidence of adverse events following treatment with fluoropyrimidines, however the mechanism of this difference is unknown. We examined sex-related differences in the safety of S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) and S-1 plus cisplatin (CS) in 663 metastatic gastric cancer patients taking part in a phase III study. The incidences of leukopenia (odds ratio [OR] 1.9; P = .015), neutropenia (OR 2.2; P = .002), nausea (OR 2.0; P = .009), and vomiting (OR 2.8; P < .001) were increased in women versus men treated with SOX, while vomiting (OR 2.9; P < .001) and stomatitis (OR 1.8; P = .043) were increased in women versus men treated with CS. In contrast, male patients treated with CS experienced thrombocytopenia more often (OR 0.51; P = .009). The mean relative dose intensity of S-1 in SOX was 75.4% in women and 81.4% in men (P = .032). No difference in efficacy was observed between women and men undergoing either regimen. Sex-related differences in adverse reactions during SOX and CS treatment were confirmed in this phase III study. Further translational research studies are warranted to pursue the cause of this difference.

Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cisplatin; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neutropenia; Oxaliplatin; Oxonic Acid; Sex Factors; Stomach Neoplasms; Stomatitis; Tegafur; Thrombocytopenia; Vomiting

This study compared the efficiency and safety of definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) using Paclitaxel plus Cisplatin (TP) versus S-1 plus Cisplatin (CS) in unresectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LAESCC). Between January 2009 and December 2013, 203 LAESCC patients were retrospectively reviewed. We performed a propensity score matching analysis; 41 patients treated with the CS regimen were matched 1:1 to patients who received the TP regimen. Patient- and disease-related characteristics were well-balanced between the two groups. The CS group showed significantly better treatment compliance (90.2% vs. 70.7%, P = 0.026) and less hospital stay (48 days vs 49 days, P = 0.025) over the TP group during the CCRT course. The complete response rate was comparable between the two groups (51.2% vs. 48.8%, P = 0.825). The 1- and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates in the TP group were 63.4% and 32.4% compared to 62.8% and 32.1% in the CS group, respectively (P = 0.796). The 1- and 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates in the TP group were 51.2% and 24.9%, compared to 53.6% and 18.9% in the CS group, respectively (P = 0.630). The incidence of severe and total neutropenia in the TP group was significantly higher compared to the CS group (P = 0.011 and 0.046, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that T stage and the complete response rate were strong prognostic factors associated with OS and PFS. In conclusion, both treatment regimens yielded satisfactory survival outcomes, but the CS regimen could significantly improve treatment compliance, reduce hematological toxicities and lengths of hospital stay. Future prospective studies in large cohorts are highly warranted to confirm the findings in our report.

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Chemoradiotherapy; Cisplatin; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Combinations; Esophageal Neoplasms; Female; Fluorouracil; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neutropenia; Oxonic Acid; Paclitaxel; Remission Induction; Retrospective Studies; Tegafur; Vomiting

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cisplatin; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Combinations; Drugs, Chinese Herbal; Esophageal Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Karnofsky Performance Status; Leukopenia; Male; Nausea; Neutropenia; Oxonic Acid; Tegafur; Vomiting

Gemcitabine (GEM) plus cisplatin (CDDP) chemotherapy has been used worldwide as the standard first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). A phase II trial has also suggested promising activity of GEM plus S-1 chemotherapy against advanced BTC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of GEM plus S-1 chemotherapy in patients with advanced BTC.. A total of 38 patients were enrolled between August 2008 and November 2011. There were 19 men and 19 women, with a median age of 66 years (range=44-81 years). Seven patients had a previous history of first-line or adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. The PS was 0 and 1 in 30 and 7 patients, respectively. The treatment response was classified as partial response in 6 patients (15.8%) and as stable disease in 18 patients (47.4%). The median PFS and OS were 5.8 and 15.9 months, respectively. The toxicity was generally mild, and the most common grade 3/4 toxicities were leukopenia (31.6%), neutropenia (36.8%), nausea/vomiting (2.6%), and diarrhea (2.6%). There was one treatment-related death due to interstitial pneumonia.. Our study revealed that gemcitabine plus S-1 chemotherapy was well-tolerated and exhibited favorable antitumor activity in patients with advanced BTC.

Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biliary Tract Neoplasms; Deoxycytidine; Diarrhea; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Gemcitabine; Humans; Leukopenia; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neutropenia; Oxonic Acid; Tegafur; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting

S-1, a novel oral fluoropyrimidine, is active in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, data on S-1 for elderly patients with NSCLC are insufficient.. Eligibility criteria were no prior chemotherapy, stage IIIB or IV NSCLC, performance status 0-1, age >70 years, and adequate hematological, hepatic, and renal functions. Patients received S-1 (40 mg/m(2) twice a day) for 28 consecutive days. This schedule was repeated every 6 weeks. The primary end point was the tumor response rate.. Thirty-two patients were enrolled and 31 patients were evaluable for response. The patients' median age was 80 years (range: 71-88). The response rate was 22.6% (95% CI: 11-38). Neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, febrile neutropenia, and diarrhea of grade ≥ 3 occurred in 6, 6, 10, 3, and 3%, respectively.. In elderly patients with previously untreated advanced NSCLC, S-1 appears to be well tolerated and demonstrates encouraging activity.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anemia; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Nausea; Neutropenia; Oxonic Acid; Tegafur; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting

The purpose of this phase I study of the dose escalation of oxaliplatin in combination with oral S-1 and pelvic radiation preoperatively for poor-risk lower rectal cancer was to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and recommended dose of oxaliplatin.. Patients with cT4 and lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis, and without distant metastasis (cM0), were treated with weekly oxaliplatin, oral S-1 40 mg/m(2) twice daily for 5 days a week, and radiation. A total of 5 weekly doses of oxaliplatin were planned. RT was administered to a total dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions.. We enrolled 11 patients between December 2009 and January 2012. DLTs were observed at dose level 1 (50 mg/m(2)) in two patients, one of whom experienced grade 3 aspartate aminotransferase elevation and a grade 3 alanine aminotransferase increase, and the other developed grade 4 hypokalemia and a grade 3 alanine aminotransferase increase. Five patients at dose level 2 (60 mg/m(2)) showed no DLTs. The hematological toxicities in all patients were mild and reversible. One patient showed distant metastasis after chemoradiation. Ten of the 11 patients achieved R0 resection by mesorectal resection and lateral lymph node dissection; three of the 10 underwent combined resection of the other organs.. This phase I trial of preoperative S-1 in combination with oxaliplatin and radiation for lower rectal cancer with T4 and lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis revealed that the recommended dose of oxaliplatin was 60 mg/m(2) weekly.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Alanine Transaminase; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aspartate Aminotransferases; Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant; Diarrhea; Dose Fractionation, Radiation; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Lymph Node Excision; Lymphatic Metastasis; Male; Middle Aged; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Neoplasm Staging; Neutropenia; Organoplatinum Compounds; Oxaliplatin; Oxonic Acid; Pelvis; Preoperative Care; Rectal Neoplasms; Tegafur; Vomiting

For patients with advanced non-small cell lung adenocarcinoma that fail to respond to first-line chemotherapy and that do not involve epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, previous empirical analysis showed that a single second-line chemotherapy agent may be inadequate for the control of further tumor development. This study examines the combination of S-1 drugs and nedaplatin that has no cross-resistance to first-line treatments; 179 cases of IIIb-IV stage non-small-cell lung adenocarcinoma that failed to respond to first-line chemotherapy were included, and these subjects did not have mutated EGFRs. In the present study, S-1 plus nedaplatin chemotherapy was better than standard second-line chemotherapy options in the treatment of advanced lung adenocarcinoma that did not involve EGFR mutations and that failed to respond to first-line chemotherapy. Additionally, the combination of S-1 and nedaplatin seemed to be well tolerated, making this chemotherapy technique a potentially strong candidate for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung adenocarcinoma.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Anemia; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy; ErbB Receptors; Female; Humans; Logistic Models; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Mutation; Nausea; Neoplasm Staging; Organoplatinum Compounds; Oxonic Acid; Tegafur; Treatment Failure; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting

To perform a Phase I study of preoperative chemoradiation (CRT) with S-1, a novel oral fluoropyrimidine, plus oxaliplatin in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, to determine the maximum tolerated dose and the recommended dose.. Radiotherapy was delivered to a total of 45 Gy in 25 fractions and followed by a coned-down boost of 5.4 Gy in 3 fractions. Concurrent chemotherapy consisted of a fixed dose of oxaliplatin (50 mg/m2/week) on Days 1, 8, 22, and 29 and escalated doses of S-1 on Days 1-14 and 22-35. The initial dose of S-1 was 50 mg/m2/day, gradually increasing to 60, 70, and 80 mg/m2/day. Surgery was performed within 6±2 weeks.. Twelve patients were enrolled and tolerated up to Dose Level 4 (3 patients at each dose level) without dose-limiting toxicity. An additional 3 patients were enrolled at Dose Level 4, with 1 experiencing a dose-limiting toxicity of Grade 3 diarrhea. Although maximum tolerated dose was not attained, Dose Level 4 (S-1 80 mg/m2/day) was chosen as the recommended dose for further Phase II studies. No Grade 4 toxicity was observed, and Grade 3 toxicities of leukopenia and diarrhea occurred in the same patient (1 of 15, 6.7%). Pathologic complete responses were observed in 2 of 15 patients (13.3%).. The recommended dose of S-1 was determined to be 80 mg/m2/day when combined with oxaliplatin in preoperative CRT, and a Phase II trial is now ongoing.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Combined Modality Therapy; Diarrhea; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neutropenia; Organoplatinum Compounds; Oxaliplatin; Oxonic Acid; Preoperative Care; Radiotherapy Dosage; Rectal Neoplasms; Tegafur; Thrombocytopenia; Vomiting

We aimed to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of S-1 when given with oxaliplatin, to evaluate S-1 pharmacokinetics, and to determine the efficacy and safety of this regimen as a first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (AGC).. Oxaliplatin was fixed at a dose of 130 mg/m2 on day 1 (D1). S-1 was administered from D1 to D14 of a 3-week cycle, and escalated by 10 mg/m2 per day from 70 mg/m2 per day up to 100 mg/m2 per day. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed following a single dose of S-1 on D-5 and D1 of the first cycle.. In phase I (n=18), MTD was not defined. In phase II (n=47) with the planned maximum dose, partial response was achieved in 26 patients (55.3%) and stable disease in 14 patients (29.8%). The median time to progression was 6.6 months (95% CI 4.0-9.2 months) and the median overall survival was 12.5 months (95% CI 9.2-15.9 months). Frequent grade 3/4 toxicities included thrombocytopenia (39%), neutropenia (28%), anemia (17%), and leukopenia (13%). There was one grade 5 febrile neutropenia during the first cycle.. The pharmacokinetics of S-1 was not influenced by oxaliplatin. S-1/Oxaliplatin combination therapy is highly active against AGC and has a favorable toxicity profile.

Topics: Adult; Anemia; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Area Under Curve; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Leukopenia; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neutropenia; Organoplatinum Compounds; Oxaliplatin; Oxonic Acid; Stomach Neoplasms; Survival Analysis; Tegafur; Thrombocytopenia; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting

S-1 monotherapy with concurrent radiotherapy (RT) is a standard of care for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Although renal dysfunction increases S-1 monotherapy toxicity, its effect in S-1 with concurrent RT remains unknown. We evaluated the effect of renal function on the safety of S-1 with RT for LAPC.. We performed an integrated exploratory post hoc analysis of data from 2 prospective studies (JCOG1106 and LAPC-S1RT), where patients with LAPC received RT (50.4 Gy/28 fraction for 5.5 weeks) and concurrent S-1 (40 mg/m2 per dose, twice daily on the day of irradiation). We split the patients into high creatinine clearance (CCr; ≥80 mL/min) and low CCr (<80 mL/min) groups and compared the findings to determine treatment safety.. The high and low CCr groups showed a median of 97.5 (range, 80.0-194.6) and 64.4 (range, 50.0-78.3) mL/min, respectively. The low CCr group presented more adverse reactions (ARs) of grade 3 or higher and gastrointestinal ARs of grade 2 or higher than the high CCr group (30.8% vs 15.8% and 51.9% vs 36.8%).. The incidence of ARs associated with concurrent S-1 and RT increases in patients with low CCr; therefore, ARs should be duly considered in such patients.

Topics: Aged; Anorexia; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Chemoradiotherapy; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Kidney; Kidney Function Tests; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Oxonic Acid; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Radiotherapy; Tegafur; Vomiting

Three randomised trials (GEST, JACCRO PC-01, and GEMSAP) were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) vs gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (PC). In this pooled analysis, the efficacy and safety of GS vs gemcitabine were evaluated.. Additional follow-up was conducted and survival data were updated in each study. A total of 770 patients (gemcitabine 389; GS 381) were included in the pooled analysis. The efficacy and safety data were analysed according to disease extent: locally advanced PC (LAPC) or metastatic PC (MPC).. There were 738 (95.8%) overall survival events. In patients with LAPC (n=193), the median survival was 11.83 months for gemcitabine and 16.41 months for GS (hazard ratio (HR)=0.708; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.527-0.951; P=0.0220). In patients with MPC (n=577), the median survival was 8.02 months for gemcitabine and 9.43 months for GS (HR=0.872; 95% CI, 0.738-1.032; P=0.1102). The rate of grade 3/4 toxicity (rash and thrombocytopenia in LAPC; rash, diarrhoea, vomiting, and neutropaenia in MPC) was significantly higher for GS than for gemcitabine.. Gemcitabine plus S-1 is a viable treatment alternative to gemcitabine, which is one of the standard treatments in patients with LAPC.

Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Deoxycytidine; Diarrhea; Drug Combinations; Drug Eruptions; Female; Gemcitabine; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neutropenia; Oxonic Acid; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Survival Rate; Tegafur; Thrombocytopenia; Vomiting

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of a new combination antiemetic therapy consisting of palonosetron, aprepitant, and dexamethasone in gastric cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin.. This prospective, multi-institutional observational study assessed patient-reported nausea, vomiting, use of rescue therapy, change of dietary intake, and Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE) questionnaire results. The percentages of patients showing complete response (CR; no emesis and non-use of any rescue antiemetics) and complete protection (CP; no significant nausea and non-use of any rescue antiemetics), change of dietary intake, and impact of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting on daily life during the overall (0-120 h after cisplatin administration), acute (0-24 h), and delayed (24-120 h) phases were examined. These findings were compared with our previous study, which used granisetron, aprepitant, and dexamethasone, to assess the relative effectiveness of palonosetron versus granisetron in combination antiemetic therapy.. Of the 72 included patients, 66 (91.6 %), 70 (97.2 %), and 50 (69.1 %) achieved CR, and 48 (66.7 %), 61 (84.7 %) and 49 (68.1 %) achieved CP during in the overall, acute, and delayed phases of cisplatin administration, respectively. Approximately half of the patients had some degree of anorexia. FLIE results indicated that 78.6 % of patients maintained their quality of life. Palonosetron was not superior to granisetron in combination antiemetic therapy.. Three-drug combination antiemetic therapy with palonosetron, aprepitant, and dexamethasone was tolerable in gastric cancer patients undergoing treatment with S-1 plus cisplatin. The predominance of palonosetron to granisetron was not demonstrated in this study.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aprepitant; Cisplatin; Dexamethasone; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Granisetron; Humans; Isoquinolines; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Nausea; Oxonic Acid; Palonosetron; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Quinuclidines; Stomach Neoplasms; Surveys and Questionnaires; Tegafur; Vomiting

S-1 administration for 28 consecutive days followed by 14 days of rest (6-week cycle) is often chosen as second-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer (PC), but it causes gastrointestinal toxicity. In comparison, in gastric cancer or head and neck cancer, S-1 administration for 14 consecutive days followed by a 7-day rest period (3-week cycle) reduced gastrointestinal toxicity. This study retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of a 3-week S-1 schedule compared to a 6-week schedule in patients with gemcitabine (GEM)-refractory advanced PC. Fifty-seven patients were treated with the 6- week S-1 schedule and 68 patients were treated with the 3-week S-1 schedule. There were no statistical differences in overall survival (p=0.13) and progression-free survival (p=0.190). With regard to adverse events, the rates of nausea (p<0.01) and vomiting (p=0.04) were lower with the 3-week schedule than with the 6-week schedule. Thus, S-1 therapy with a 3- week schedule as second-line chemotherapy in patients with GEM-refractory advanced PC was associated with reduced gastrointestinal toxicity and similar efficacy, when compared to a 6-week schedule.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Deoxycytidine; Drug Combinations; Female; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Gemcitabine; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Oxonic Acid; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Tegafur; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting

S-1 granulated powder has recently been released to the market as an additional format to that of the capsule. Patients who previously found it difficult to swallow the capsules are now able to take S-1 in powder form. This study evaluated the feasibility of S-1 granulated powder as adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer. S-1 was orally administered for 2  weeks, followed by 1  week of rest (one course) for 12  months (16 courses). Twenty-four stage III and IV head and neck cancer patients were enrolled in this study. In total, 10 (47.6%) of the patients follow the planned schedule and dose. Severe adverse events were observed in 22 patients (91.7%), whereas no grade 4 adverse events were observed. S-1 granulated powder should be presented as an additional option for the treatment of head and neck cancer, especially for patients experiencing difficulty in swallowing oral medications.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Drug Combinations; Fatigue; Feasibility Studies; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Hematologic Diseases; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neoplasm Staging; Oxonic Acid; Prognosis; Tegafur; Vomiting

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively examine the effect of concomitant administration of gastric secretion inhibitors or gastrectomy on the frequency of gastrointestinal toxicity caused by 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in gastric cancer patients receiving chemotherapy with S-1. In 62 gastric cancer patients treated with S-1 alone, data relating to the occurrence of gastrointestinal toxicity (diarrhea, vomiting, and nausea) and possible contributing factors were retrospectively collected, and logistic regression analysis was performed. Time-to-event data relating to the occurrence of gastrointestinal toxicity were also collected, and the effect of gastric secretion inhibitors on the time-to-event profiles was examined using a log-rank test. Logistic regression analysis suggested that the frequency of gastrointestinal toxicity was significantly reduced by the administration of gastric secretion inhibitors (p=0.01; odds ratio, 0.197; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.056-0.694) and that gastrointestinal toxicity correlated with the estimated glomerular filtration rate (p=0.04; odds ratio, 0.956; 95% CI, 0.916-0.997). The median time-to-event of gastrointestinal toxicity was 85 d for patients that received gastric secretion inhibitors, which was significantly different from the 42 d for patients that did not receive the inhibitors (p=0.02, log-rank test). No clear effect of gastrectomy was found in the present study. The prophylactic use of gastric secretion inhibitors in gastric cancer patients treated with S-1 may decrease and delay the occurrence of gastrointestinal toxicity.

Topics: Aged; Diarrhea; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Combinations; Female; Gastric Mucosa; Histamine H2 Antagonists; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Oxonic Acid; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Retrospective Studies; Stomach Neoplasms; Tegafur; Vomiting

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a new combination antiemetic therapy comprising aprepitant, granisetron, and dexamethasone in gastric cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy with cisplatin and S-1.. Gastric cancer patients scheduled to receive their first course of chemotherapy with cisplatin (60 mg/m(2)) and S-1 (80 mg/m(2)) were treated with a new combination antiemetic therapy aprepitant, granisetron, and dexamethasone on day 1; aprepitant and dexamethasone on days 2 and 3; and dexamethasone on day 4. The patients reported vomiting, nausea, use of rescue therapy, and change in the amount of diet intake, and completed the Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE) questionnaire. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR; no emesis and use of no rescue antiemetics) during the overall study phase (0-120 h after cisplatin administration). The secondary endpoints included complete protection (CP; CR plus no significant nausea); change in the amount of diet intake; and the impact of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) on daily life during the overall, acute (0-24 h), and delayed (24-120 h) phases.. Fifty-three patients were included. CR was achieved in 88.7, 98.1, and 88.7% of patients in the overall, acute, and delayed phases, respectively. The corresponding rates of CP were 67.9, 96.2, and 67.9%. Approximately half of the patients had some degree of anorexia. FLIE results indicated that 79.5% of patients reported "minimal or no impact of CINV on daily life".. Addition of aprepitant to standard antiemetic therapy was effective in gastric cancer patients undergoing treatment with cisplatin and S-1.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aprepitant; Cisplatin; Dexamethasone; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Granisetron; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Nausea; Neoplasm Staging; Oxonic Acid; Prospective Studies; Psychometrics; Quality of Life; Stomach Neoplasms; Tegafur; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting