s-1-(combination) and Stomatitis

We performed a meta-analysis of the risk of oral and gastrointestinal (GI) mucosal injury associated with S-1-based regimens.. Randomized phase II and III trials of patients with solid tumors on S-1; describing events of all-grade and high-grade stomatitis and diarrhea constituted the eligible studies.. After exclusion of ineligible studies, a total of 26 clinical trials were considered eligible for the meta-analysis. The odds ratio (OR) of all-grade and high-grade stomatitis for S-1 vs. non-fluoropyrimidine controls was 4.39 [95% CI: 1.05, 18.37; p = 0.04] and 5.64 [95% CI: 1.46, 21.77; p = 0.01], respectively; while the OR of all-grade and high-grade stomatitis for S-1 vs. infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) control was -1.01 [95% CI: 0.22, 4.63; p = 0.99] and 0.32 [95% CI: 0.20, 0.49; p < 0.00001], respectively. The OR of all-grade and high-grade diarrhea for S-1 vs. non-fluoropyrimidine controls was 2.48 [95% CI: 2.12, 2.90; p < 0.00001] and 1.95 [95% CI: 1.29, 2.96; p = 0.002], respectively; while the OR of all-grade and high-grade diarrhea for S-1 vs. infusional 5-FU control was -1.03 [95% CI: 0.87, 1.22; p = 0.76] and 2.52 [95% CI: 1.80, 3.52; p < 0.00001], respectively.. Compared to non-fluoropyrimidine control, patients treated with S-1-based regimens have an increased risk of all-grade and high-grade stomatitis and diarrhea; while on the other hand, patients treated with infusional 5-FU have a greater risk of high-grade stomatitis and diarrhea compared to patients treated with S-1-based regimens.

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Diarrhea; Drug Combinations; Fluorouracil; Humans; Intestinal Mucosa; Mouth Mucosa; Neoplasms; Oxonic Acid; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stomatitis; Tegafur

Two pivotal phase II studies of S-1 in advanced gastric cancer showed response rates of 44% and 49%, and the overall survival time was 207 and 250 days, respectively. The response rate of S-1 exceeded the response rates of other approved drugs, and was comparable to that of combination chemotherapies such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus cisplatin (CDDP). These data suggested that S-1 could be used as a first-line drug for gastric cancer with a great advantage in quality of life (QOL), because it is an oral drug and can be used at an outpatient clinic. The overall incidences of adverse reactions in the phase II studies were 74.3%, and that of grade 3 or worse were 14.9%. The main adverse reactions were myelosuppression and GI toxicities. As hematological toxicity was more common than other oral fluoropyrimidine derivatives such as UFT, a careful hematological monitoring is necessary. To confirm the survival benefit of S-1 in advanced gastric cancer, a phase III trial of S-1 vs 5-FU vs CDDP plus irinotecan (CPT-11) has been conducted by the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG), and these results have been awaited. Furthermore, the combination of S-1 with CDDP, CPT-11 or taxane for the treatment of gastric cancer is feasible and active, and phase III studies of S-1 vs several combination therapies including S-1 are also in progress. The effect of S-1 in adjuvant setting is also promising. Currently, a phase III study of surgery alone vs S-1 in patients with a curative resection of gastric cancer has been developed. Further therapeutic benefits are also expected by combining S-1 with other chemotherapeutic agents such as molecular targeted agents.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anemia; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Camptothecin; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Cisplatin; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Humans; Irinotecan; Leukopenia; Neutropenia; Oxonic Acid; Quality of Life; Stomach Neoplasms; Stomatitis; Tegafur

The S-1 +biweekly docetaxel (DOC) combination therapy was evaluated for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer patients. This combination therapy was evaluated in vitro using the nude rat-gastric cancer xenograft system. S-1 alone or DOC alone showed antitumor activity, and the antitumor activity was synergistic when two drugs were combined. In clinical settings, the schedule was S-1 80 mg/m2 (day 1-14, orally) and DOC (day 1 and day 15, intravenously) followed by a 2-week rest. In phase I study, the dose of DOC was evaluated, and a recommended dose for phase II was determined as 35 mg/m2. The entry for phase II study was completed, and the preliminary results of 33 patients showed the response rate of 21.2%. The incidence of more than grade 3 adverse effects was 29%(neutropenia, leukocytopenia, anorexia and mucositis). The S-1 +biweekly DOC combination therapy can be a candidate for outpatient chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer.

Topics: Animals; Anorexia; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Docetaxel; Drug Combinations; Humans; Leukopenia; Neoplasm Transplantation; Neutropenia; Oxonic Acid; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rats; Rats, Nude; Stomach Neoplasms; Stomatitis; Taxoids; Tegafur

Cytotoxic agents such as anthracycline or taxanes have provided a good clinical response for breast cancer patients, although they have failed to prolong the survival rate and to improve the quality of life (QOL) of these patients. On the other hand, cytostatic agents such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) have to be focused to accommodate a long term progression with respect to efficacy and the patients' QOL improvement. S-1 was a newly developed and orally administered fluorinated pyrimidine containing 1 M tegafur (FT) and two classes of a modulator, 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyrimidine (CDHP) and potassium oxonate (Oxo) at a molar ratio of FT : CDHP : Oxo= 1 : 0.4 : 1. Specific dose limiting factors such as neutropenia, diarrhea and stomatitis have been observed in a previous phase I study. Two phase II studies of 4 weeks treatment of S-1 (1 M tegafur-0.4 M gimestat-1 M otastat potassium) for the advanced or metastatic breast cancer patients were carried out in Japan. Among 108 evaluable patients for response, there were 10 complete response (CR) and 35 partial response (PR) with an overall response rate of 41.7% (95% confidence interval, 32.3-51.5%). The incidence of toxicity (> or = grade 3) was as followed: neutropenia 9.3%, anemia 0.9%, stomatitis 1.9% and nausea/vomiting 0.9%. The median follow-up period for patients was 802 days. S-1 will be the new promising oral agent like a capecitabine which has been widely used as a third-line chemotherapy for the heavily treated breast cancer patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anemia; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Breast Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Combined Modality Therapy; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Mastectomy, Segmental; Nausea; Neutropenia; Oxonic Acid; Quality of Life; Stomatitis; Survival Rate; Tegafur

Oral mucositis is one of the most common reasons for discontinuation of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy after radical gastrectomy. Some studies suggest that nutritional support with amino acids may improve oral mucositis. We conducted a prospective, randomized clinical trial of patients who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer to examine whether an oral elemental diet prevents chemotherapy associated oral mucositis and body weight loss.. Patients were randomly assigned to a group consuming Elental. The incidence of oral mucositis was significantly lower in the treatment group (9.1%) than in the control group (27.3%). The median body weight loss in the treatment group was significantly smaller than that in the control group (P = .015). According to Kaplan-Meier estimates the treatment group was significantly associated with high cumulative S-1 continuation rates (log-rank P = .047).. We conclude that the amino-acid-rich elemental diet Elental

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Case-Control Studies; Diarrhea; Drug Combinations; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Food, Formulated; Humans; Incidence; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Nutritional Support; Oxonic Acid; Pilot Projects; Prognosis; Prospective Studies; Stomach Neoplasms; Stomatitis; Tegafur; Young Adult

Previous studies have shown sex-related differences in the incidence of adverse events following treatment with fluoropyrimidines, however the mechanism of this difference is unknown. We examined sex-related differences in the safety of S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) and S-1 plus cisplatin (CS) in 663 metastatic gastric cancer patients taking part in a phase III study. The incidences of leukopenia (odds ratio [OR] 1.9; P = .015), neutropenia (OR 2.2; P = .002), nausea (OR 2.0; P = .009), and vomiting (OR 2.8; P < .001) were increased in women versus men treated with SOX, while vomiting (OR 2.9; P < .001) and stomatitis (OR 1.8; P = .043) were increased in women versus men treated with CS. In contrast, male patients treated with CS experienced thrombocytopenia more often (OR 0.51; P = .009). The mean relative dose intensity of S-1 in SOX was 75.4% in women and 81.4% in men (P = .032). No difference in efficacy was observed between women and men undergoing either regimen. Sex-related differences in adverse reactions during SOX and CS treatment were confirmed in this phase III study. Further translational research studies are warranted to pursue the cause of this difference.

Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cisplatin; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neutropenia; Oxaliplatin; Oxonic Acid; Sex Factors; Stomach Neoplasms; Stomatitis; Tegafur; Thrombocytopenia; Vomiting

A phase II study of S-1 plus leucovorin (LV) given in a 4-week schedule (2 weeks' administration followed by 2 weeks' rest) for patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) showed that the combination was effective, but grade 3 toxicities (diarrhea, stomatitis and anorexia) occurred at a relatively high rate. In this phase II study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of a 2-week schedule of S-1 plus LV. Patients with mCRC received oral S-1 (40-60 mg) and LV (25 mg) twice daily for 1 week, followed by 1 week's rest. Treatment was repeated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was response rate. The pharmacokinetics of S-1 and LV in Chinese patients were evaluated on day 1 of the first cycle. Seventy-three patients were enrolled in Japan and China. Of 71 eligible patients, the response rate was 53.5%, and the disease control rate was 83.1%. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 6.5 and 24.3 months, respectively. The incidences of grade 3 toxicities were diarrhea 8.3%, stomatitis 8.3%, anorexia 2.8% and neutropenia 9.7%. There were no treatment-related deaths. The pharmacokinetics profiles of S-1 plus LV in Chinese patients were similar to those in Japanese patients. This 2-week schedule of S-1 plus LV showed good efficacy and better tolerability than the 4-week schedule. This therapy will be the base regimen for mCRC to be added by other cytotoxic or molecular-targeted drugs. The optimized treatment schedule for S-1 plus LV was 1 week on and 1 week off.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anorexia; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; China; Colorectal Neoplasms; Diarrhea; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Japan; Leucovorin; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neutropenia; Oxonic Acid; Stomatitis; Survival Analysis; Tegafur; Treatment Outcome

In our previous randomized controlled trial, the addition of S-1 to gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer did not prolong overall survival (OS) significantly, despite its higher response rate and longer progression-free survival (PFS). Leucovorin is known to enhance efficacy of S-1, and we conducted this phase I trial of combination therapy of gemcitabine, S-1 and leucovorin (GSL).. Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who had received no prior chemotherapy were eligible for this study. Gemcitabine was administered at an escalating dose of 600, 800 and 1,000 mg/m(2) over 30 min on day 1, and oral S-1 at a dose of 40 mg/m(2) twice daily and oral leucovorin at a dose of 25 mg twice daily on days 1-7, every 2 weeks. A standard "3 + 3" phase I dose escalation design was utilized.. Fifteen patients were enrolled across three dose levels. Three patients developed DLTs: two patients in level 1 (grade 3 anorexia in 1 and grade 3 anorexia, stomatitis and diarrhea in 1) and one patient in level 2 (grade 3 deep vein thrombosis). No DLT was observed in level 3. Response rate and the disease control rate were 33 and 93 %, respectively. The median PFS and OS were 5.4 and 16.6 months. Ten of 12 patients (83 %) with elevated CA19-9 at baseline had a ≥ 50 % decline.. RD of gemcitabine in GSL was determined as 1,000 mg/m(2). GSL was well tolerable and showed promising results in advanced pancreatic cancer.

Topics: Aged; Anorexia; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Deoxycytidine; Diarrhea; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Gemcitabine; Humans; Leucovorin; Male; Middle Aged; Oxonic Acid; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Stomatitis; Survival Analysis; Tegafur; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thrombosis

We developed a combination chemotherapy, comprising weekly dosing of iv cisplatin (days 1 and 8) combined with a fixed dose (70 mg/m2/day) of S-1 (days 1-14) for patients with metastatic gastric cancer. The treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. Twenty patients were studied. Dose-limiting toxicities of grade 3 diarrhea and stomatitis were observed in one patient at the dose of cisplatin 20 mg/m2. Grade 2 gastrointestinal adverse reactions, such as nausea and anorexia, were seen in approximately half of patients at this dose level within the first two treatment cycles. This was the maximum acceptable level. The overall response rate in 18 patients evaluated was 61%. The median survival was 11 months, despite including 11 pre-treated patients. S-1 given with weekly cisplatin was a feasible and promising combination regimen for an outpatient setting.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Anorexia; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cisplatin; Diarrhea; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Oxonic Acid; Stomach Neoplasms; Stomatitis; Survival Rate; Tegafur

We conducted a phase I study to determine a recommended dose (RD) of S-1 for chemo-radiotherapy consisting of S-1+ radiotherapy for T 2 N 0 larynx cancer. The method of administration used to assess the RD was irradiation with 2 Gy/day for 5 days a week until a total dose of 60 Gy, and concomitant administration of S-1 once a day for 2 weeks beginning on the day therapy was started followed by 2 weeks off the drug and 2 weeks on the drug with the dose escalating from S-1 60 mg/body/day (level 1) to 80 mg/body/day (level 2), and then to 100 mg/body/day (level 3). 18 patients were enrolled. 4 patients developed an adverse event of grade 3 radiation dermatitis which became a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at level 3. We then concluded that 100 mg/body/day was the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of S-1 and decided that the RD of S-1 was 80 mg/body/day.

Topics: Aged; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Combined Modality Therapy; Deglutition Disorders; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Glottis; Humans; Laryngeal Neoplasms; Leukopenia; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Oxonic Acid; Radiation Injuries; Radiodermatitis; Radiotherapy Dosage; Stomatitis; Tegafur

S-1 is a novel oral fluoropyrimidine inhibitory for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). In the present study, we have examined the appropriate dose of S-1 in the combination with radiation and the safety and clinical efficacy. Radiation was given (2 Gy/day; 5 days/week) for a total of 60 Gy. S-1 was given orally every day for 2 weeks and then S-1 was stopped for 1 week. The levels were divided accordingly to the S-1 application as follows; level 0, 50 mg/m2/day; level 1, 65 mg/m2/day; level 2, 80 mg/m2/day. grade 3 toxicity of anorexia and the grade 3 toxicity increase in bilirubin level were observed in 2 cases of level 2. We decided that level 1 (65 mg/m2/day) was the recommended dose of the S-1 application as observed in compliance and efficacy. This therapy is a useful concurrent chemo-radiotherapy which may improve the response rate and quality of life (QOL) of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Combined Modality Therapy; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Mouth Neoplasms; Nausea; Oxonic Acid; Quality of Life; Radiotherapy Dosage; Stomatitis; Tegafur

In developing new anticancer agents, the most important thing is the balancing of antitumor activity and toxicity. To achieve high activity and low toxicity, S-1 was designed, in which tegafur, prodrug of 5-FU, was combined with two classes of modulators. CDHP, inhibitor of 5-FU degradation in liver and Oxo, inhibitor of 5-FU phosphoribosylation in digestive tract, respectively. This cooperative study with 15 nation-wide institutes was conducted to evaluate the antitumor activity and toxicity of S-1 in patients with advanced head and neck cancer from Jan. 1994 to March 1996 in Japan. Out of 26 patients, CR was achieved in 1 and PR in 11 with a response rate of 46.2%, while adverse events of grade 3 were as follows: hemoglobinemia (7.7%), leukocytopenia, neutropenia, stomatitis and anorexia (3.8%), each. Neither grade 4 adverse event nor treatment-related deaths were observed. Based on these findings, it was concluded that S-1 is a useful anticancer agent with the low grade toxicities for treatment of the patients with advanced head and neck cancer, and the effects of CDHP and Oxo found in preclinical studies might be also reflected in these results.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Anorexia; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Leukopenia; Lymphatic Metastasis; Male; Middle Aged; Neutropenia; Oxonic Acid; Pyridines; Stomatitis; Tegafur

Radiotherapy (RT) and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is widely accepted as the standard treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC). Oral mucositis (OM) often develops as an adverse reaction in HNC patients that receive RT or CRT involving S-1. However, little is known about the risk factors for OM in HNC patients. We retrospectively evaluated patients' pre-treatment clinical data in order to identify the risk factors for severe OM in HNC patients that are treated with RT or CRT involving S-1. We analyzed the cases of 129 patients who received RT or CRT involving S-1 for HNC. The endpoint of the survey was the occurrence of severe OM (≥grade 2). Risk factors that were significantly related to severe OM were identified using logistic regression analysis. The patients' mean age was 69.3±10.1 years, and 118 (92%) of the patients were male. The primary tumor was located in the oropharynx in 21.7% of cases. Severe OM occurred in 85.0% of cases. In the univariate analysis, the following variables were found to be associated with severe OM: age, the type of radiotherapy, disease stage, and chemotherapy. In the multivariate analysis, the location of the primary tumor and chemotherapy were identified as significant risk factors that contributed independently to the risk of severe OM (p<0.05). Our analysis suggests that cancer of the oropharynx and CRT are important risk factors for severe OM in HNC patients that undergo RT or CRT involving S-1.

Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Chemoradiotherapy; Drug Combinations; Female; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Oropharyngeal Neoplasms; Oxonic Acid; Radiotherapy; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Severity of Illness Index; Stomatitis; Tegafur

Oral mucositis is a frequent adverse event in patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Although the management of oral mucositis is essential to improve treatment completion rates, no detailed studies on the time of oral mucositis appearance have been reported. We conducted a retrospective study on the timing of the appearance of oral mucositis induced by concurrent chemoradiotherapy with S-1 for head and neck cancer. A total of 11 patients with head and neck cancer who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy with S-1 were examined. All patients developed oral mucositis within 13.8 ± 5.6 days after the initiation of radiotherapy (20.4 ± 8.1 Gy). In addition, the effects of pain-associated symptoms caused by oral mucositis on the patients' nutritional status, including reduction in caloric intake (24.4% ± 31.1%), weight loss (5.2% ± 5.2%), and duration of a regular diet (24.5 ± 17.1 days), were observed and lasted until the completion of radiation therapy. The delineation of the timing of oral mucositis appearance has become a key motivator for the patients to perform oral care proactively to limit severity and serves as a necessary index for monitoring oral health and managing pain and nutrition.

Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Chemoradiotherapy; Drug Combinations; Female; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Male; Oxonic Acid; Retrospective Studies; Stomatitis; Tegafur; Time Factors

A 64-year-old female who has undergone D2 total gastrectomy was started on adjuvant treatment with TS-1. Four weeks after initiation of TS-1, the patient developed a rare complication of life-threatening toxic epidermal necrolysis. TS-1 was discontinued and the patient received treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin and supportive care with resolution of toxic epidermal necrolysis. TS-1 has been used for the treatment of gastric cancer, both in the adjuvant and metastatic setting, and is increasingly being used in other malignancies such as colon, pancreatic and non-small cell lung cancer. TS-1 is generally well tolerated. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of toxic epidermal necrolysis associated with the usage of TS-1.

Topics: Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Diagnosis, Differential; Drug Combinations; Female; Gastrectomy; Humans; Immunoglobulins, Intravenous; Middle Aged; Oxonic Acid; Palliative Care; Stevens-Johnson Syndrome; Stomach Neoplasms; Stomatitis; Tegafur

We report a case of advanced gastric cancer that responded well to low-dosage TS-1. A 72-year-old woman was diagnosed as having unresectable advanced gastric cancer with ascites and hydronephrosis in the right kidney. She was treated with chemotherapy using a low-dosage of TS-1 (80 mg/body/day) administered perorally for 4 weeks followed by a drug-free 2 weeks, in six-week cycles. However, she developed weight loss, appetite loss, and stomatitis. We therefore reduced the dosage of TS-1 from 80 mg/body/day to 60 mg/body/day. The ascites and hydronephrosis gradually improved during the following 3 months, whereupon she could undergo total gastrectomy. The postoperative findings showed no ascites and no peritoneal dissemination. The postoperative pathological findings showed that the cancer cells were localized to within the mucosa, and there were no cancer cells in the greater and lesser omentum. Three weeks after the operation, TS-1 was resumed at 60 mg/body/day. However, 3 months later,ascites and metastasis to the abdominal skin developed, and she died 9 months after the operation.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Signet Ring Cell; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Gastrectomy; Humans; Lymph Node Excision; Neoplasm Staging; Neoplasms, Multiple Primary; Oxonic Acid; Stomach Neoplasms; Stomatitis; Tegafur

In two patients with advanced pancreatic cancer with cervical lymph node or liver metastasis and no indication of pancreatic resection and radiotherapy, oral treatment with S-1 (an anti-cancer agent of fluoropyrimidine derivative) exerted high anti-tumor activity on the metastatic lesions. Both cases responded well to this therapy in the late phase II study of S-1 in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer designed to evaluate efficacy and safety. In Case 1 (with cervical lymph node metastasis), the anti-tumor efficacy of this therapy was evaluated as a partial response (PR) after the first four courses of treatment. In Case 2 (with liver metastasis), the efficacy was evaluated as PR for overall response. Thus, the therapy indicated excellent efficacy in both cases. No grade 3 or severe adverse event was noted in either of the two cases. In Case 1, grade 2 anemia, stomatitis, vomiting and fatigue, and some other mild events were noted. When used as a systemic chemotherapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer, oral treatment of S-1 is highly effective, tolerable and convenient in an outpatient clinic. This drug is a promising way to improve and preserve the QOL essential to long-term home care.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Administration, Oral; Aged; Anemia; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Lymph Nodes; Lymphatic Metastasis; Male; Middle Aged; Neck; Oxonic Acid; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Quality of Life; Stomatitis; Tegafur; Vomiting, Anticipatory

We report a case of right maxillary carcinoma with metastases to the cervical lymph nodes (T4N2cM0, Stage IV). A 76-year-old woman was administered preoperative chemoradiotherapy, followed by curative surgery. TS-1 (80 mg/day), CDDP (5 mg/m2/day) and concurrent radiation (total 40 Gy) induced a complete response. Grade 2 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and stomatitis were observed. In the primary tumor and cervical metastatic lymph nodes, no viable carcinoma cells were detected and cancer nests were replaced with marked fibrous tissue.

Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Cisplatin; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Lymph Nodes; Lymphatic Metastasis; Maxillary Neoplasms; Neck; Neutropenia; Oxonic Acid; Pyridines; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant; Stomatitis; Tegafur; Thrombocytopenia

Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a rare adverse reaction to oral fluoropyrimidine TS-1, which contains the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) inhibitor. We treated a recurrent gastric cancer patient with chronic renal failure who developed grade 2 HFS, grade 2 conjunctivitis and grade 3 stomatitis soon after TS-1 administration. Those symptoms improved with the administration of vitamin B6, topical emollient therapy, and so on. We thought that the continuous elevation of serum 5-FU concentration, due to the accumulation of DPD inhibitor from the renal dysfunction, led to the development of HFS, although the participation of 5-FU metabolites such as F-beta-alanine cannot be ruled out.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Conjunctivitis; Drug Combinations; Foot Dermatoses; Hand Dermatoses; Humans; Male; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Oxonic Acid; Prodrugs; Pyridines; Stomach Neoplasms; Stomatitis; Syndrome; Tegafur; Vitamin B 6