s-1-(combination) and Nausea

Cytotoxic agents such as anthracycline or taxanes have provided a good clinical response for breast cancer patients, although they have failed to prolong the survival rate and to improve the quality of life (QOL) of these patients. On the other hand, cytostatic agents such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) have to be focused to accommodate a long term progression with respect to efficacy and the patients' QOL improvement. S-1 was a newly developed and orally administered fluorinated pyrimidine containing 1 M tegafur (FT) and two classes of a modulator, 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyrimidine (CDHP) and potassium oxonate (Oxo) at a molar ratio of FT : CDHP : Oxo= 1 : 0.4 : 1. Specific dose limiting factors such as neutropenia, diarrhea and stomatitis have been observed in a previous phase I study. Two phase II studies of 4 weeks treatment of S-1 (1 M tegafur-0.4 M gimestat-1 M otastat potassium) for the advanced or metastatic breast cancer patients were carried out in Japan. Among 108 evaluable patients for response, there were 10 complete response (CR) and 35 partial response (PR) with an overall response rate of 41.7% (95% confidence interval, 32.3-51.5%). The incidence of toxicity (> or = grade 3) was as followed: neutropenia 9.3%, anemia 0.9%, stomatitis 1.9% and nausea/vomiting 0.9%. The median follow-up period for patients was 802 days. S-1 will be the new promising oral agent like a capecitabine which has been widely used as a third-line chemotherapy for the heavily treated breast cancer patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anemia; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Breast Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Combined Modality Therapy; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Mastectomy, Segmental; Nausea; Neutropenia; Oxonic Acid; Quality of Life; Stomatitis; Survival Rate; Tegafur

Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) is the standard treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC); however, it causes nausea, vomiting, and anorexia, and requires hydration. Gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) reportedly has equal to, or better, efficacy and an acceptable toxicity profile. We aimed to confirm the non-inferiority of GS to GC for patients with advanced/recurrent BTC in terms of overall survival (OS).. We undertook a phase III randomized trial in 33 institutions in Japan. Eligibility criteria included chemotherapy-naïve patients with recurrent or unresectable BTC, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0 - 1, and adequate organ function. The calculated sample size was 350 with a one-sided α of 5%, a power of 80%, and non-inferiority margin hazard ratio (HR) of 1.155. The primary end point was OS, while the secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), adverse events (AEs), and clinically significant AEs defined as grade ≥2 fatigue, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, oral mucositis, or diarrhea.. Between May 2013 and March 2016, 354 patients were enrolled. GS was found to be non-inferior to GC [median OS: 13.4 months with GC and 15.1 months with GS, HR, 0.945; 90% confidence interval (CI), 0.78-1.15; P = 0.046 for non-inferiority]. The median PFS was 5.8 months with GC and 6.8 months with GS (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.70-1.07). The RR was 32.4% with GC and 29.8% with GS. Both treatments were generally well-tolerated. Clinically significant AEs were observed in 35.1% of patients in the GC arm and 29.9% in the GS arm.. GS, which does not require hydration, should be considered a new, convenient standard of care option for patients with advanced/recurrent BTC.. This trial has been registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm), number UMIN000010667.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biliary Tract Neoplasms; Cisplatin; Deoxycytidine; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Combinations; Female; Gemcitabine; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Oxonic Acid; Tegafur; Vomiting

Previous studies have shown sex-related differences in the incidence of adverse events following treatment with fluoropyrimidines, however the mechanism of this difference is unknown. We examined sex-related differences in the safety of S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) and S-1 plus cisplatin (CS) in 663 metastatic gastric cancer patients taking part in a phase III study. The incidences of leukopenia (odds ratio [OR] 1.9; P = .015), neutropenia (OR 2.2; P = .002), nausea (OR 2.0; P = .009), and vomiting (OR 2.8; P < .001) were increased in women versus men treated with SOX, while vomiting (OR 2.9; P < .001) and stomatitis (OR 1.8; P = .043) were increased in women versus men treated with CS. In contrast, male patients treated with CS experienced thrombocytopenia more often (OR 0.51; P = .009). The mean relative dose intensity of S-1 in SOX was 75.4% in women and 81.4% in men (P = .032). No difference in efficacy was observed between women and men undergoing either regimen. Sex-related differences in adverse reactions during SOX and CS treatment were confirmed in this phase III study. Further translational research studies are warranted to pursue the cause of this difference.

Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cisplatin; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neutropenia; Oxaliplatin; Oxonic Acid; Sex Factors; Stomach Neoplasms; Stomatitis; Tegafur; Thrombocytopenia; Vomiting

This study compared the efficiency and safety of definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) using Paclitaxel plus Cisplatin (TP) versus S-1 plus Cisplatin (CS) in unresectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LAESCC). Between January 2009 and December 2013, 203 LAESCC patients were retrospectively reviewed. We performed a propensity score matching analysis; 41 patients treated with the CS regimen were matched 1:1 to patients who received the TP regimen. Patient- and disease-related characteristics were well-balanced between the two groups. The CS group showed significantly better treatment compliance (90.2% vs. 70.7%, P = 0.026) and less hospital stay (48 days vs 49 days, P = 0.025) over the TP group during the CCRT course. The complete response rate was comparable between the two groups (51.2% vs. 48.8%, P = 0.825). The 1- and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates in the TP group were 63.4% and 32.4% compared to 62.8% and 32.1% in the CS group, respectively (P = 0.796). The 1- and 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates in the TP group were 51.2% and 24.9%, compared to 53.6% and 18.9% in the CS group, respectively (P = 0.630). The incidence of severe and total neutropenia in the TP group was significantly higher compared to the CS group (P = 0.011 and 0.046, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that T stage and the complete response rate were strong prognostic factors associated with OS and PFS. In conclusion, both treatment regimens yielded satisfactory survival outcomes, but the CS regimen could significantly improve treatment compliance, reduce hematological toxicities and lengths of hospital stay. Future prospective studies in large cohorts are highly warranted to confirm the findings in our report.

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Chemoradiotherapy; Cisplatin; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Combinations; Esophageal Neoplasms; Female; Fluorouracil; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neutropenia; Oxonic Acid; Paclitaxel; Remission Induction; Retrospective Studies; Tegafur; Vomiting

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cisplatin; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Combinations; Drugs, Chinese Herbal; Esophageal Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Karnofsky Performance Status; Leukopenia; Male; Nausea; Neutropenia; Oxonic Acid; Tegafur; Vomiting

Gemcitabine (GEM) plus cisplatin (CDDP) chemotherapy has been used worldwide as the standard first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). A phase II trial has also suggested promising activity of GEM plus S-1 chemotherapy against advanced BTC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of GEM plus S-1 chemotherapy in patients with advanced BTC.. A total of 38 patients were enrolled between August 2008 and November 2011. There were 19 men and 19 women, with a median age of 66 years (range=44-81 years). Seven patients had a previous history of first-line or adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. The PS was 0 and 1 in 30 and 7 patients, respectively. The treatment response was classified as partial response in 6 patients (15.8%) and as stable disease in 18 patients (47.4%). The median PFS and OS were 5.8 and 15.9 months, respectively. The toxicity was generally mild, and the most common grade 3/4 toxicities were leukopenia (31.6%), neutropenia (36.8%), nausea/vomiting (2.6%), and diarrhea (2.6%). There was one treatment-related death due to interstitial pneumonia.. Our study revealed that gemcitabine plus S-1 chemotherapy was well-tolerated and exhibited favorable antitumor activity in patients with advanced BTC.

Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biliary Tract Neoplasms; Deoxycytidine; Diarrhea; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Gemcitabine; Humans; Leukopenia; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neutropenia; Oxonic Acid; Tegafur; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting

S-1, a novel oral fluoropyrimidine, is active in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, data on S-1 for elderly patients with NSCLC are insufficient.. Eligibility criteria were no prior chemotherapy, stage IIIB or IV NSCLC, performance status 0-1, age >70 years, and adequate hematological, hepatic, and renal functions. Patients received S-1 (40 mg/m(2) twice a day) for 28 consecutive days. This schedule was repeated every 6 weeks. The primary end point was the tumor response rate.. Thirty-two patients were enrolled and 31 patients were evaluable for response. The patients' median age was 80 years (range: 71-88). The response rate was 22.6% (95% CI: 11-38). Neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, febrile neutropenia, and diarrhea of grade ≥ 3 occurred in 6, 6, 10, 3, and 3%, respectively.. In elderly patients with previously untreated advanced NSCLC, S-1 appears to be well tolerated and demonstrates encouraging activity.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anemia; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Nausea; Neutropenia; Oxonic Acid; Tegafur; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting

For patients with advanced non-small cell lung adenocarcinoma that fail to respond to first-line chemotherapy and that do not involve epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, previous empirical analysis showed that a single second-line chemotherapy agent may be inadequate for the control of further tumor development. This study examines the combination of S-1 drugs and nedaplatin that has no cross-resistance to first-line treatments; 179 cases of IIIb-IV stage non-small-cell lung adenocarcinoma that failed to respond to first-line chemotherapy were included, and these subjects did not have mutated EGFRs. In the present study, S-1 plus nedaplatin chemotherapy was better than standard second-line chemotherapy options in the treatment of advanced lung adenocarcinoma that did not involve EGFR mutations and that failed to respond to first-line chemotherapy. Additionally, the combination of S-1 and nedaplatin seemed to be well tolerated, making this chemotherapy technique a potentially strong candidate for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung adenocarcinoma.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Anemia; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy; ErbB Receptors; Female; Humans; Logistic Models; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Mutation; Nausea; Neoplasm Staging; Organoplatinum Compounds; Oxonic Acid; Tegafur; Treatment Failure; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting

The present study evaluated the efficacy of lafutidine, a histamine H2 receptor antagonist, for reducing gastrointestinal toxicities during adjuvant chemotherapy using oral fluorouracil anticancer drugs for gastric cancer.. Patients with stage II (T1 cases excluded) or stage III gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy achieving R0 resection from 2011 to 2013 were prospectively enrolled in the study. Patients were randomly assigned to either S-1 treatment or S-1 plus lafutidine treatment. Quality of life and gastrointestinal toxicity were evaluated before chemotherapy and at 2, 4, and 6 weeks after the beginning of treatment.. The incidence of diarrhea during chemotherapy was significantly lower in the S-1 plus lafutidine group than in the group treated with S-1 alone (10% vs. 83%, respectively; p=0.002). The grades of diarrhea and nausea during chemotherapy were also significantly lower compared to those before chemotherapy in patients receiving S-1 plus lafutidine than in those administered S-1 alone. The rate of patients requiring a dose reduction or interruption of S-1 was significantly lower in the S-1 plus lafutidine group than in the group treated with S-1 alone (30% vs. 83%, respectively; p=0.027).. Lafutidine might be useful not only for preventing gastrointestinal toxicities during adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer, but also for improving compliance with taking oral fluorouracil anticancer drugs. However, this indication needs to be confirmed in a larger, prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Topics: Acetamides; Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Diarrhea; Drug Combinations; Female; Fluorouracil; Gastrectomy; Gastrointestinal Tract; Histamine H2 Antagonists; Humans; Lymph Node Excision; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Oxonic Acid; Piperidines; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Quality of Life; Stomach Neoplasms; Tegafur

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and toxicity of weekly paclitaxel plus S-1 with weekly paclitaxel plus 5-fluorouracil in treating advanced gastric cancer as first line regimen. The primary end-point was disease control rate (DCR).. Patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer were randomly assigned to an experimental arm or a control arm. The experimental arm's dosage schedule was paclitaxel 60 mg/m2 (intravenous infusion) on days 1, 8 and 15 and S-1 80-120 mg/d (oral administration) on days 1-14. Control arm patients were given the same paclitaxel, combined with 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m2 (continuous intravenous infusion) on days 1-5; and leucovorin 20 mg/m2 (intravenous infusion) on days 1-5. All schedules were repeated every 28 d.. A total of 240 patients were enrolled and equally randomised into two arms. The overall response rate and DCR of the experimental arm was non-inferior to that of the control arm both in the per-protocol set and the full analysis set. The secondary end-point median progression-free survival (PFS) of the experimental and control arms was 153 and 129 d, with the hazard ratio of 0.641 (95% CI: 0.473-0.868, P = 0.004). The hazard ratio of the time to treatment failure of the two arms was 1.449 (95% CI: 0.705-2.980, P = 0.229). The six-month PFS rates of both arms were similar (31.3% versus 31.8%, P = 0.94). Cox regression analysis indicated that only treatment regimen and age were independent predictive factors for PFS. The most common adverse events were haematological and gastrointestinal. The rates of grade 3-4 adverse events were not significantly different between the two study arms and were mostly lower than 5%.. Weekly paclitaxel combined with S-1 is an active and well-tolerated regimen, supporting the view that S-1 can be an alternative for infusional 5-fluorouracil for advanced gastric cancer.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anorexia; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Fluorouracil; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Leucovorin; Leukopenia; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Nausea; Oxonic Acid; Paclitaxel; Stomach Neoplasms; Tegafur; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

To perform a Phase I study of preoperative chemoradiation (CRT) with S-1, a novel oral fluoropyrimidine, plus oxaliplatin in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, to determine the maximum tolerated dose and the recommended dose.. Radiotherapy was delivered to a total of 45 Gy in 25 fractions and followed by a coned-down boost of 5.4 Gy in 3 fractions. Concurrent chemotherapy consisted of a fixed dose of oxaliplatin (50 mg/m2/week) on Days 1, 8, 22, and 29 and escalated doses of S-1 on Days 1-14 and 22-35. The initial dose of S-1 was 50 mg/m2/day, gradually increasing to 60, 70, and 80 mg/m2/day. Surgery was performed within 6±2 weeks.. Twelve patients were enrolled and tolerated up to Dose Level 4 (3 patients at each dose level) without dose-limiting toxicity. An additional 3 patients were enrolled at Dose Level 4, with 1 experiencing a dose-limiting toxicity of Grade 3 diarrhea. Although maximum tolerated dose was not attained, Dose Level 4 (S-1 80 mg/m2/day) was chosen as the recommended dose for further Phase II studies. No Grade 4 toxicity was observed, and Grade 3 toxicities of leukopenia and diarrhea occurred in the same patient (1 of 15, 6.7%). Pathologic complete responses were observed in 2 of 15 patients (13.3%).. The recommended dose of S-1 was determined to be 80 mg/m2/day when combined with oxaliplatin in preoperative CRT, and a Phase II trial is now ongoing.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Combined Modality Therapy; Diarrhea; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neutropenia; Organoplatinum Compounds; Oxaliplatin; Oxonic Acid; Preoperative Care; Radiotherapy Dosage; Rectal Neoplasms; Tegafur; Thrombocytopenia; Vomiting

S-1 is an oral fluoropyrimidine derivative that has demonstrated favorable antitumor activity in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of S-1 and concurrent radiotherapy in patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer.. Patients with histopathologically proven, unresectable, locally advanced pancreatic cancer were eligible. Radiotherapy was delivered in 1.8 Gy daily fractions to a total dose of 50.4 Gy over 5.5 weeks. S-1 was administered orally twice a day at a dose of 80 mg/m(2)/day from day 1 to 14 and 22 to 35. Two weeks after the completion of chemoradiotherapy, maintenance chemotherapy with S-1 was administered for 28 days every 6 weeks until progression.. Thirty-four patients were enrolled in this study. The most common Grade 3 toxicities during chemoradiotherapy were anorexia (24%) and nausea (12%). The overall response rate was 41% (95% confidence interval, 25%-58%) and overall disease control rate (partial response plus stable disease) was 97%. More than 50% decrease in serum CA 19-9 was seen in 27 of 29 evaluable patients (93%). The median progression-free survival was 8.7 months. The median overall survival and 1-year survival rate were 16.8 months and 70.6%, respectively.. Oral S-1 and concurrent radiotherapy exerted a promising antitumor activity with acceptable toxicity in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. This combination therapy seems to be an attractive alternative to conventional chemoradiotherapy using 5-fluorouracil infusion.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anorexia; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; CA-19-9 Antigen; Combined Modality Therapy; Deoxycytidine; Disease Progression; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Gemcitabine; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Oxonic Acid; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Prospective Studies; Radiotherapy Dosage; Tegafur

We aimed to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of S-1 when given with oxaliplatin, to evaluate S-1 pharmacokinetics, and to determine the efficacy and safety of this regimen as a first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (AGC).. Oxaliplatin was fixed at a dose of 130 mg/m2 on day 1 (D1). S-1 was administered from D1 to D14 of a 3-week cycle, and escalated by 10 mg/m2 per day from 70 mg/m2 per day up to 100 mg/m2 per day. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed following a single dose of S-1 on D-5 and D1 of the first cycle.. In phase I (n=18), MTD was not defined. In phase II (n=47) with the planned maximum dose, partial response was achieved in 26 patients (55.3%) and stable disease in 14 patients (29.8%). The median time to progression was 6.6 months (95% CI 4.0-9.2 months) and the median overall survival was 12.5 months (95% CI 9.2-15.9 months). Frequent grade 3/4 toxicities included thrombocytopenia (39%), neutropenia (28%), anemia (17%), and leukopenia (13%). There was one grade 5 febrile neutropenia during the first cycle.. The pharmacokinetics of S-1 was not influenced by oxaliplatin. S-1/Oxaliplatin combination therapy is highly active against AGC and has a favorable toxicity profile.

Topics: Adult; Anemia; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Area Under Curve; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Leukopenia; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neutropenia; Organoplatinum Compounds; Oxaliplatin; Oxonic Acid; Stomach Neoplasms; Survival Analysis; Tegafur; Thrombocytopenia; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting

To confirm the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine and S-1 combination chemotherapy when used as a first-line therapy in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.. Patients with locally advanced or metastatic or recurrent pancreatic adenocarcinoma, which was histologically or cytologically proven, with at least one measurable lesion were eligible for the study. Gemcitabine at a dose of 1,000 mg/m2 was intravenously given over 30 min on days 1 and 8, while S-1 at a dose of 40 mg/m2 was orally given twice daily from day 1 to 14, and the cycle was repeated every 3 weeks. The objective response rate, which was assessed according to RECIST criteria, was the primary end point.. A total of 38 patients were enrolled between June 2006 and June 2007. The median number of treatment courses was 5.5 (range 1-22). Thirty-four patients were evaluable for response. Although no complete response was seen, partial responses were achieved in 11 patients, resulting in an overall response rate of 32% [95% confidence interval (CI) 17-48%]. The median response duration was 6.0 months (95% CI 4.6-8.3 months), the median time-to-progression was 5.4 months (95% CI 2.9-8.0 months), and the median overall survival was 8.4 months (95% CI 5.7-11.1 months). The major grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities were neutropenia (39.5%), leukopenia (15.8%), thrombocytopenia (2.6%), and anemia (7.9%). The major grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities included anorexia (10.5%), stomatitis (2.6%), rash (7.9%), fatigue (7.9%) and hyperbilirubinemia (5.3%).. Gemcitabine and S-1 combination chemotherapy was effective and tolerable in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Deoxycytidine; Drug Combinations; Fatigue; Female; Gemcitabine; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Leukopenia; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neutropenia; Oxonic Acid; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Tegafur; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine and S-1 combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.. Patients with a measurable lesion and no previous history of chemotherapy or radiotherapy were enrolled. Gemcitabine was administered intravenously at a dose of 1,000 mg/m(2) over 30 min on day 1 and 15, repeated every 4 weeks. S-1 was administered orally at a dose of 40 mg/m(2) b.i.d. on days 1-14. Tumor response was assessed every two cycles using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria.. As much as 35 patients were enrolled between December 2006 and July 2008; 14 patients (40%) with gallbladder cancer and 14 (40%) with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma were included and 7 patients (20%) had received previous surgical resection. The overall response rate was 34.3% and the overall disease control rate was 82.9%. The median overall survival time was 11.6 months (95% CI, 7.3-15.6 months), and the median time to progression was 5.9 months (95% CI, 4.0-7.7 months). The grade 3/4 toxicities were leucopenia (23%), neutropenia (34%), anemia (20%), thrombocytopenia (6%) and anorexia (3%).. Gemcitabine and S-1 combination chemotherapy has promising efficacy and good tolerability in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biliary Tract Neoplasms; Deoxycytidine; Drug Combinations; Female; Gemcitabine; Humans; Leukopenia; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neutropenia; Oxonic Acid; Survival Analysis; Tegafur; Treatment Outcome

A Phase I/II study of S-1 combined radiation therapy was conducted in patients with Stage II (T2N0) glottic cancer. The purpose of the Phase I study was to identify the maximum tolerated dose, the recommended dose and the dose limiting toxicity. The objectives in the phase II study were to estimate the local control and the overall survival, and the incidence of adverse events.. In Phase I, S-1 was administered orally in a split-course fashion as two doses of 40 mg/m(2), for a total daily dose of 80 mg/m(2). The course involved a 2-week rest after a 2-week administration (Level 1) and a 1-week rest after a 3-week administration (Level 2). Radiation therapy was administered in 2-Gy daily (total 60-Gy) standard fractionation.. Seven patients were enrolled in the Phase I, and 19 in the Phase II study. Mucositis was the most common toxicity encountered. All 26 patients completed radiation therapy without delay. The overall response rate was 100% (26/26) with all patients showing a complete response. One patient developed a local recurrence 28 months after the treatment. The 3-year local control and overall survival rates were 94.7 and 85.4%, respectively (limited to 22 patients from Level 2).. The use of S-1 at 80 mg/m(2) per day in a split-course with 1-week rest during the course of radiation therapy was safe and effective for Stage II glottic cancer. The treatment strategy employing orally available S-1 proved to be beneficial over the conventional injection of antitumor agents for maintaining the patients' quality of life.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anemia; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Combined Modality Therapy; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glottis; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Laryngeal Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neutropenia; Oxonic Acid; Radiotherapy; Tegafur; Treatment Outcome

Although S-1 is effective against advanced gastric cancer (AGC), its efficacy in elderly patients has not yet been investigated sufficiently. We assessed the efficacy and safety of S-1 monotherapy in elderly patients with AGC.. We conducted a retrospective review of the data of 153 patients with unresectable/recurrent gastric adenocarcinoma who received S-1 monotherapy as first-line chemotherapy at our institution. S-1 was administered orally twice daily at the dose of 40 mg/m², on days 1-28, every 6 weeks. We categorized the patients into three groups, the young (≤65 years old), the middle-aged (66-75 years old), and the elderly (≥76 years old); and the drug toxicity, objective responses, progression-free survivals, and overall survivals were compared among the three groups.. The incidence of leukopenia of grade 3 or greater in the three groups was 7%, 5%, and 13%, and that of anemia was 9%, 18%, and 27%, respectively. In regard to nonhematological toxicities, the incidence of nausea of grade 3 or greater was 3%, 5%, and 13%; that of fatigue was 5%, 11%, and 20%; and that of anorexia was 5%, 6%, and 27%, respectively. As for the treatment efficacy, the objective response rates, median progressionfree survivals, and overall survivals in the young, middle-aged, and elderly groups were 53%, 46%, and 33%; 7.8, 5.6, and 3.9 months; and 16.9, 17.1; and 7.7 months, respectively.. Although S-1 monotherapy showed moderate efficacy in elderly (≥76 years) patients with AGC, patients in this age group showed higher incidences of severe toxicities than the younger patients.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anemia; Anorexia; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Fatigue; Female; Humans; Leukopenia; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Oxonic Acid; Retrospective Studies; Stomach Neoplasms; Survival Analysis; Tegafur; Treatment Outcome

We reported the results of phase I study with CPT-11 and S-1 (IRIS) in advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients at ASCO 2002. Now I present an outline of this phase I/II trial. A combined treatment of IRIS (CPT-11 + S-1) was given to the AGC patients who had not received prior chemotherapy. S-1 was orally administered twice a day for 14 days, and CPT-11 was administered as a 90-minute intravenous infusion on days 1 and 15. This schedule was repeated every 4 weeks. Fifteen patients were registered in this phase I study and 9 patients were added in this phase II study. Non-hematological toxicities were almost classified as grade 2 or lower, except for grade 3 nausea and grade 3 dermatitis of level 2. These adverse events were manageable by administering anti-emetic drugs and a drug rest. As for hematological toxicities, grade 4 neutropenia occurred with one patient at level 1 and level 2 in phase I. And grade 4 neutropenia occurred with four patients at level 2 in phase II. However, they recovered after the drug rest, and we could continue the administration based on the standard dose modifications. These side effects were tolerable, and the overall response rate was 54.2%. MST of this regimen is 581 days. The IRIS treatment is effective and tolerable for outpatient treatments.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Camptothecin; Capsules; Diarrhea; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Irinotecan; Middle Aged; Nausea; Oxonic Acid; Quality of Life; Stomach Neoplasms; Survival Rate; Tegafur

We planned to conduct a phase II clinical study of combination therapy with CPT-11 and S-1. The antitumor effect was the primary endpoint, while the safety, progression-free survival time, and median survival time were the secondary endpoints. The subjects were untreated patients with inoperable advanced colorectal cancer aged 20-75 years. Based on the results of our previous phase I/II study in patients with gastric cancer, the dosage was established in consideration of safety for outpatient therapy. CPT-11 was administered at a dose of 100 mg/m2 (on days 1 and 15) as an intravenous infusion over 90 minutes, and oral S-1 (40 mg/m2) was administered after breakfast and dinner and then withdrawn for 2 weeks. No other serious adverse reactions occurred (either hematological or non-hematological), and all patients could receive therapy safely on an outpatient basis. Interim analysis suggested excellent results, with a response rate of 50%. Combination therapy with CPT-11 and S-1 achieved a high response rate and could be given safely. These findings suggest that the therapy has potential as first-line treatment for inoperable advanced recurrent colorectal cancer.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Alopecia; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Camptothecin; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Irinotecan; Leukopenia; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neutropenia; Oxonic Acid; Remission Induction; Tegafur

S-1 is a novel oral fluoropyrimidine inhibitory for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). In the present study, we have examined the appropriate dose of S-1 in the combination with radiation and the safety and clinical efficacy. Radiation was given (2 Gy/day; 5 days/week) for a total of 60 Gy. S-1 was given orally every day for 2 weeks and then S-1 was stopped for 1 week. The levels were divided accordingly to the S-1 application as follows; level 0, 50 mg/m2/day; level 1, 65 mg/m2/day; level 2, 80 mg/m2/day. grade 3 toxicity of anorexia and the grade 3 toxicity increase in bilirubin level were observed in 2 cases of level 2. We decided that level 1 (65 mg/m2/day) was the recommended dose of the S-1 application as observed in compliance and efficacy. This therapy is a useful concurrent chemo-radiotherapy which may improve the response rate and quality of life (QOL) of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Combined Modality Therapy; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Mouth Neoplasms; Nausea; Oxonic Acid; Quality of Life; Radiotherapy Dosage; Stomatitis; Tegafur

We investigated preoperative chemotherapy with S-1 and low-dose cisplatin for the untreated stage II-IV oral squamous cell carcinoma patients. The chemotherapy consisted of S-1 80 mg/m2/day (day 1-14) and CDDP 5 mg/m2/day (day 1-5 and day 8-12) intravenous drip (less than 1 hour). In the second phase clinical trial of 44 patients, the clinical response rate was 63.7% and the histological response rate by the Oboshi-Shimosato's evaluation was 61.4%. The main adverse events were myelosuppression and gastrointestinal disturbance such as nausea 36.4%, anorexia 27.3%, neutropenia 25% and leukopenia 25%. Grade 3 and 4 adverse events were neutropenia 11.4%, leukopenia 9.1%, thrombocytopenia 4.5% and oligochromemia 4.5%. The two-year overall survival rate was 92.6%. The advantages of this chemotherapy are high response rate, low adverse effects and not to prevent planned therapies such as surgery and radiation. These facts suggest that this chemotherapy is suitable for preoperative chemotherapy.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anorexia; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Cisplatin; Combined Modality Therapy; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Leukopenia; Male; Middle Aged; Mouth Neoplasms; Nausea; Neutropenia; Oxonic Acid; Preoperative Care; Survival Rate; Tegafur

Early and late phase II studies of S-1 were conducted for the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer. In both trials, S-1 was administered at a dose of 80 mg/m2/day. One course consisted of consecutive administration of S-1 for 28 days, followed by 14 days of rest. This regimen was repeated every 6 weeks until the occurrence of progressive disease or unacceptable toxicities. The early phase II study demonstrated a response rate of 21.1% with a median survival time of 5.6 months in 19 patients. The major drug-related adverse events were gastrointestinal toxicities like nausea, and anorexia, though most of them were tolerable and reversible. Other treatment-related adverse events, like ileus, colitis, and abdominal distension, were less frequent. The late phase II study confirmed favorable responces with a mild toxicity profile in 40 evaluable patients. S-1 is active and well tolerated in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Randomized trials are warranted to determine the effectiveness of S-1 for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anorexia; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Lung Neoplasms; Lymph Nodes; Lymphatic Metastasis; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Oxonic Acid; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Tegafur

The incidence and mortality of pancreatic cancer has increased very rapidly in Japan. The five-year survival rate is still poor at less than 10%, because it is commonly considered to be linked to a high incidence of distant metastasis even at the initial diagnosis as well as to the tumor's resistance to anticancer agents. Although gemcitabine has been the most widely used chemotherapeutic agent in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC), gemcitabine monotherapy has obvious limitations. Therefore, various combinations with other agents have been investigated to improving the survival of patients with APC. Under these circumstances, we conducted a phase I /II trial of gemcitabine with S-1, an oral fluorouracil derivative, to determine the maximum tolerated dose and to evaluate the activity and toxicity of such a combination in patients with APC. S-1 was administered orally twice daily each day for 14 days and gemcitabine on days 8 and 15 of each cycle, and this cycle was repeated every 21 days. As a result, S-1 30 mg/m2 orally twice daily and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 were selected as the recommended dose. The toxicities observed were mainly hematological ones with mild non-hematological toxicities. An encouragingly high response rate was observed. This result is very promising, but the survival benefit in comparison with gemcitabine monotherapy needs to be confirmed in a future randomized clinical trial.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Anorexia; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Deoxycytidine; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Gemcitabine; Humans; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Nausea; Oxonic Acid; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Survival Rate; Tegafur; Thrombocytopenia

This is a phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicity of a combination of TS-1 and weekly cisplatin (CDDP) in advanced gastric cancer patients. TS-1 was administered orally twice daily after meals, at a standard dose of 80 mg/m2. One course consisted of 21 days' consecutive administration followed by 14 days' rest. Cisplatin (CDDP) was injected intravenously on days 8, 15 and 22 using the following dose levels: dose level 1 20 mg/m2, dose level 2 25 mg/m2, and dose level 3 30 mg/m2. Twelve patients were entered in this trial. One of the 6 patients at dose level 3 had neutropenia NCI-CTC grade 3, while another patient at dose level 3 suffered from DLT (liver function grade 3. The maximal tolerable dose (MTD) was not reached using dose level 3. Partial responses were seen in 5 (62.5%) of 8 patients with evaluable lesions. At level 2 (25 mg/m2), the response rate was 100%. We recommended dose level 2 for phase II trials from the standpoint of toxicity and response rate.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cisplatin; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Humans; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Nausea; Oxonic Acid; Pyridines; Stomach Neoplasms; Tegafur

The safety of chemotherapy combining TS-1 and pirarubicin (THP) for treatment of recurrent or locally advanced gastric cancer was evaluated. THP was administered by intravenous drip infusion at a dose of 14 mg/m2 every other week. TS-1 was administered orally at a dose of 40 mg/m2 twice a day for 2 weeks followed by 2 weeks of rest (level 1), for 3 weeks followed by 2 weeks of rest (level 2), and for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks of rest (level 3). Three patients were treated with the level 1 schedule. One patient with peritoneal dissemination received 22 courses of the treatment, and benefited from a long-term NC. However the remaining 2 cases were diagnosed as PD after 4 courses and were withdrawn from further treatment. Two patients in this group suffered from grade 2 adverse events according to the NCI-CTC. Only 1 patient who had liver metastasis was treated at level 2. Fourteen courses were administered, and a PR was achieved while grade 2 adverse events were observed. One of 3 patients who were treated with level 3 had grade 3 adverse events. Consequently, 3 more cases were added to this dose level, and no additional grade 3 adverse events were observed, while grade 2 adverse events were seen in 4 cases. Urinary urgency had completely disappeared in 1 patient with peritoneal recurrence. Myelosuppression, which was the main observed adverse event, was well controlled and of brief duration. The response, including alleviation of clinical symptoms, was confirmed in 3 of 5 chemo-naive patients.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anemia; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Doxorubicin; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Leukopenia; Liver; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Oxonic Acid; Pyridines; Stomach Neoplasms; Tegafur; Vomiting, Anticipatory

A late phase II clinical study of S-1 against advanced or refractory breast cancer was done by 37 institutes in Japan. S-1 was administered twice daily at 80, 100 or 120 mg/body/day consecutively for 28 days followed by 14 days of rest (1 course). Eighty-three patients were enrolled and 81 were eligible for the study. The response ratio was 42.0% with 6 CR and 28 PR and its 95% confidence interval for the response was 31.1 to 53.5%. The median survival period was 910 days (95% confidence interval was 493-1, 083 days). The observed major adverse reactions (> or = grade 2) were as follows: hematological toxicities: leukopenia 21.0% (17/81), neutropenia 28.4% (23/81), erythropenia 4.9% (4/81); gastrointestinal toxicities: anorexia 9.9% (8/81), nausea and vomiting 12.3% (10/81), diarrhea 8.6% (7/81), stomatitis 1.2% (1/81), and fatigue 8.6% (7/81). The severe adverse reactions (> or = grade 3) were as follows; hematological toxicities: neutropenia 8.6% (7/81), anorexia 4.9% (4/81), fatigue 3.7% (3/81), nausea and vomiting 1.2% (1/81), diarrhea 1.2% (1/81), stomatitis 1.2% (1/81). Grade 4 adverse reactions (neutropenia and fatigue) were observed only in 1 patient. The ratio without hospitalization was 87.7%. These results strongly suggest the superior efficacy and safety of S-1 against patients suffering from advanced, refractory breast cancer. Therefore, S-1 may be a new therapeutic agent to prolong the survival period of breast cancer patients due to its high antitumor activity and low toxicity.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anorexia; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Breast Neoplasms; Diarrhea; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Leukopenia; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neutropenia; Oxonic Acid; Pyridines; Tegafur; Vomiting, Anticipatory

S-1 monotherapy with concurrent radiotherapy (RT) is a standard of care for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Although renal dysfunction increases S-1 monotherapy toxicity, its effect in S-1 with concurrent RT remains unknown. We evaluated the effect of renal function on the safety of S-1 with RT for LAPC.. We performed an integrated exploratory post hoc analysis of data from 2 prospective studies (JCOG1106 and LAPC-S1RT), where patients with LAPC received RT (50.4 Gy/28 fraction for 5.5 weeks) and concurrent S-1 (40 mg/m2 per dose, twice daily on the day of irradiation). We split the patients into high creatinine clearance (CCr; ≥80 mL/min) and low CCr (<80 mL/min) groups and compared the findings to determine treatment safety.. The high and low CCr groups showed a median of 97.5 (range, 80.0-194.6) and 64.4 (range, 50.0-78.3) mL/min, respectively. The low CCr group presented more adverse reactions (ARs) of grade 3 or higher and gastrointestinal ARs of grade 2 or higher than the high CCr group (30.8% vs 15.8% and 51.9% vs 36.8%).. The incidence of ARs associated with concurrent S-1 and RT increases in patients with low CCr; therefore, ARs should be duly considered in such patients.

Topics: Aged; Anorexia; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Chemoradiotherapy; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Kidney; Kidney Function Tests; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Oxonic Acid; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Radiotherapy; Tegafur; Vomiting

S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) is an established treatment for advanced gastric cancer. S-1 adherence is the key to successful SOX treatment. This study focused on S-1 adherence by evaluating real-world adherence to S-1 and investigating factors related to decreased S-1 adherence. This study included cases treated between August 1, 2014 and October 12, 2016 at the Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research. The S-1 adherence rate per cycle was defined as the number of times a patient took S-1/28. In this study, adherence to S-1 was assessed through pill counts and by asking the patient about the reason for non-adherence at a pharmaceutical outpatient clinic. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate factors influencing lower adherence. This analysis included 116 patients evaluated for adherence to S-1 on SOX treatment. The median rate of adherence to S-1 was 92.8% in the first cycle and 90.5% in the seventh cycle. The median relative dose intensity of S-1 was 84.6%. In terms of reasons for nonadherence, patients most commonly cited nausea/vomiting (43.7%), diarrhea (20.8%), missed dose (11.8%), and fever (8.1%). Logistic regression analysis was performed using the most appropriate regression equation, and a significant association was detected with 1 factor, number of combined drugs ≥5 (odds ratio (OR) = 2.50; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.04-6.03, p = 0.04). Eliminating unnecessary concomitant medications helps maintain proper adherence to S-1 in SOX treatment.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Diarrhea; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Motivation; Nausea; Odds Ratio; Oxaliplatin; Oxonic Acid; Polypharmacy; Prescription Drugs; Stomach Neoplasms; Tegafur; Young Adult

The prognosis for locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC) remains unsatisfactory, even with S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy. We investigated the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisting of docetaxel, cisplatin and S-1 (DCS).. We retrospectively reviewed 59 patients who underwent neoadjuvant DCS therapy for clinical stage III tumors or serosa-positive tumors between January 2009 and December 2013 at Niigata Cancer Center Hospital. The patients received S-1 (40 mg/m(2) bid) on days 1-14, and docetaxel (35 mg/m(2)) and cisplatin (35 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 15 every 4 weeks.. Forty-three patients (72.9 %) received two courses of DCS therapy, while 16 patients (27.1 %) received one course of treatment. The clinical response rate of the primary tumor was 74.6 %, and the disease control rate was 100 %. A pathological response, defined as one-third or more of the affected tumor, was observed in 71.2 % of patients. The common grade 3/4 adverse events from chemotherapy were leucopenia (16.9 %), neutropenia (44.1 %), febrile neutropenia (8.5 %), anemia (10.2 %), anorexia (8.5 %) and nausea (6.8 %). Postoperative complications occurred in 11 patients (18.6 %). There was no treatment-related mortality or reoperation. The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 88 and 68.6 %, respectively. Clinical responders had a significantly higher survival rate than non-responders. Multivariate analysis identified clinical response as the only independent prognostic factor.. Neoadjuvant DCS therapy demonstrated a very high clinical and pathological response rate with acceptable toxicities. Therefore, this therapy may improve the prognosis of locally AGC.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anemia; Anorexia; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Cisplatin; Docetaxel; Drug Combinations; Febrile Neutropenia; Female; Gastrectomy; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Neoplasm Staging; Oxonic Acid; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies; Stomach Neoplasms; Survival Rate; Taxoids; Tegafur

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of a new combination antiemetic therapy consisting of palonosetron, aprepitant, and dexamethasone in gastric cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin.. This prospective, multi-institutional observational study assessed patient-reported nausea, vomiting, use of rescue therapy, change of dietary intake, and Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE) questionnaire results. The percentages of patients showing complete response (CR; no emesis and non-use of any rescue antiemetics) and complete protection (CP; no significant nausea and non-use of any rescue antiemetics), change of dietary intake, and impact of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting on daily life during the overall (0-120 h after cisplatin administration), acute (0-24 h), and delayed (24-120 h) phases were examined. These findings were compared with our previous study, which used granisetron, aprepitant, and dexamethasone, to assess the relative effectiveness of palonosetron versus granisetron in combination antiemetic therapy.. Of the 72 included patients, 66 (91.6 %), 70 (97.2 %), and 50 (69.1 %) achieved CR, and 48 (66.7 %), 61 (84.7 %) and 49 (68.1 %) achieved CP during in the overall, acute, and delayed phases of cisplatin administration, respectively. Approximately half of the patients had some degree of anorexia. FLIE results indicated that 78.6 % of patients maintained their quality of life. Palonosetron was not superior to granisetron in combination antiemetic therapy.. Three-drug combination antiemetic therapy with palonosetron, aprepitant, and dexamethasone was tolerable in gastric cancer patients undergoing treatment with S-1 plus cisplatin. The predominance of palonosetron to granisetron was not demonstrated in this study.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aprepitant; Cisplatin; Dexamethasone; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Granisetron; Humans; Isoquinolines; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Nausea; Oxonic Acid; Palonosetron; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Quinuclidines; Stomach Neoplasms; Surveys and Questionnaires; Tegafur; Vomiting

S-1 administration for 28 consecutive days followed by 14 days of rest (6-week cycle) is often chosen as second-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer (PC), but it causes gastrointestinal toxicity. In comparison, in gastric cancer or head and neck cancer, S-1 administration for 14 consecutive days followed by a 7-day rest period (3-week cycle) reduced gastrointestinal toxicity. This study retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of a 3-week S-1 schedule compared to a 6-week schedule in patients with gemcitabine (GEM)-refractory advanced PC. Fifty-seven patients were treated with the 6- week S-1 schedule and 68 patients were treated with the 3-week S-1 schedule. There were no statistical differences in overall survival (p=0.13) and progression-free survival (p=0.190). With regard to adverse events, the rates of nausea (p<0.01) and vomiting (p=0.04) were lower with the 3-week schedule than with the 6-week schedule. Thus, S-1 therapy with a 3- week schedule as second-line chemotherapy in patients with GEM-refractory advanced PC was associated with reduced gastrointestinal toxicity and similar efficacy, when compared to a 6-week schedule.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Deoxycytidine; Drug Combinations; Female; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Gemcitabine; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Oxonic Acid; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Tegafur; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting

S-1 granulated powder has recently been released to the market as an additional format to that of the capsule. Patients who previously found it difficult to swallow the capsules are now able to take S-1 in powder form. This study evaluated the feasibility of S-1 granulated powder as adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer. S-1 was orally administered for 2  weeks, followed by 1  week of rest (one course) for 12  months (16 courses). Twenty-four stage III and IV head and neck cancer patients were enrolled in this study. In total, 10 (47.6%) of the patients follow the planned schedule and dose. Severe adverse events were observed in 22 patients (91.7%), whereas no grade 4 adverse events were observed. S-1 granulated powder should be presented as an additional option for the treatment of head and neck cancer, especially for patients experiencing difficulty in swallowing oral medications.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Drug Combinations; Fatigue; Feasibility Studies; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Hematologic Diseases; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neoplasm Staging; Oxonic Acid; Prognosis; Tegafur; Vomiting

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively examine the effect of concomitant administration of gastric secretion inhibitors or gastrectomy on the frequency of gastrointestinal toxicity caused by 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in gastric cancer patients receiving chemotherapy with S-1. In 62 gastric cancer patients treated with S-1 alone, data relating to the occurrence of gastrointestinal toxicity (diarrhea, vomiting, and nausea) and possible contributing factors were retrospectively collected, and logistic regression analysis was performed. Time-to-event data relating to the occurrence of gastrointestinal toxicity were also collected, and the effect of gastric secretion inhibitors on the time-to-event profiles was examined using a log-rank test. Logistic regression analysis suggested that the frequency of gastrointestinal toxicity was significantly reduced by the administration of gastric secretion inhibitors (p=0.01; odds ratio, 0.197; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.056-0.694) and that gastrointestinal toxicity correlated with the estimated glomerular filtration rate (p=0.04; odds ratio, 0.956; 95% CI, 0.916-0.997). The median time-to-event of gastrointestinal toxicity was 85 d for patients that received gastric secretion inhibitors, which was significantly different from the 42 d for patients that did not receive the inhibitors (p=0.02, log-rank test). No clear effect of gastrectomy was found in the present study. The prophylactic use of gastric secretion inhibitors in gastric cancer patients treated with S-1 may decrease and delay the occurrence of gastrointestinal toxicity.

Topics: Aged; Diarrhea; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Combinations; Female; Gastric Mucosa; Histamine H2 Antagonists; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Oxonic Acid; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Retrospective Studies; Stomach Neoplasms; Tegafur; Vomiting

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a new combination antiemetic therapy comprising aprepitant, granisetron, and dexamethasone in gastric cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy with cisplatin and S-1.. Gastric cancer patients scheduled to receive their first course of chemotherapy with cisplatin (60 mg/m(2)) and S-1 (80 mg/m(2)) were treated with a new combination antiemetic therapy aprepitant, granisetron, and dexamethasone on day 1; aprepitant and dexamethasone on days 2 and 3; and dexamethasone on day 4. The patients reported vomiting, nausea, use of rescue therapy, and change in the amount of diet intake, and completed the Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE) questionnaire. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR; no emesis and use of no rescue antiemetics) during the overall study phase (0-120 h after cisplatin administration). The secondary endpoints included complete protection (CP; CR plus no significant nausea); change in the amount of diet intake; and the impact of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) on daily life during the overall, acute (0-24 h), and delayed (24-120 h) phases.. Fifty-three patients were included. CR was achieved in 88.7, 98.1, and 88.7% of patients in the overall, acute, and delayed phases, respectively. The corresponding rates of CP were 67.9, 96.2, and 67.9%. Approximately half of the patients had some degree of anorexia. FLIE results indicated that 79.5% of patients reported "minimal or no impact of CINV on daily life".. Addition of aprepitant to standard antiemetic therapy was effective in gastric cancer patients undergoing treatment with cisplatin and S-1.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aprepitant; Cisplatin; Dexamethasone; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Granisetron; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Nausea; Neoplasm Staging; Oxonic Acid; Prospective Studies; Psychometrics; Quality of Life; Stomach Neoplasms; Tegafur; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting

This paper presents a man in his 80's with pancreatic cancer(cStage IV). He suffered from nausea duringS -1 therapy, and therefore, prochlorperazine maleate at a daily dose of 15 mgwas administered. However, refractory nausea was diagnosed because it did not improve, and mirtazapine at a daily dose of 7. 5 mgbefore bedtime was started. Nausea was improved in the next morning, and the patient ate almost all of his breakfast. After that, no nausea appeared, and his food intake was robust. Mirtazapine is a new antidepressant called noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressant(NaSSA)and blocks 5-HT3 receptors to improve nausea. Mirtazapine is usually started at a daily dose of 15 mg, but this dose induces somnolence. Therefore, mirtazapine was administered at a low daily dose of 7. 5 mgin the present case. No somnolence or disturbance of daily life was seen, and administration was safely continued. We conclude that low-dose mirtazapine is one effective option for refractory nausea duringS -1 therapy.

Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Anorexia; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Drug Combinations; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Male; Mianserin; Mirtazapine; Nausea; Neoplasm Staging; Oxonic Acid; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Tegafur

To improve the prognosis of locally advanced gastric cancer, clinical trials of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) are being performed. Although neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) generally achieves superior local tumor control to NAC, its efficacy for locally advanced gastric cancers remains unclear. Therefore, a prospective trial was conducted to explore the feasibility and safety of NACRT with oral S-1 in a series of cases.. Patients who had Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA) cStage IIIB gastric cancer were enrolled onto this study and received oral S-1 (65 mg/m(2)/day) administration and 50-Gy radiotherapy followed by radical surgery. The primary end points were completion of therapy and safety.. Between October 2005 and September 2008, 12 eligible patients were enrolled. Two could not complete the chemotherapy because of grade 3 toxicity. R0 resections were performed in 11 patients (91.7 %) (95 % confidence interval 61.5-99.8). Although operative morbidity was observed in two cases, there were no postoperative deaths. A pathologic response was observed in 10 patients (83.3 %). In five (62.5 %) of eight gastric cancers with invasion to adjacent structures, microscopic tumor deposits were not found in the affected organs. The 3-year survival rate was 58.3 % during a median follow-up period of 36 months.. Although this study is preliminary, the present regimen seems to be feasible and safe as a treatment for locally advanced gastric cancers featuring adjacent tissue invasion or JGCA bulky N2 disease. This treatment approach should now be tested using the new tumor, node, metastasis staging system in a large clinical trial.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anorexia; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant; Dose Fractionation, Radiation; Drug Combinations; Female; Gastrectomy; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Lymph Node Excision; Lymphatic Metastasis; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Neoplasm Grading; Neoplasm Staging; Oxonic Acid; Pilot Projects; Stomach Neoplasms; Tegafur

The combination of oxaliplatin and S-1 is effective in patients with advanced gastric cancer. The purpose of this study was to analyze the safety and compliance of this combination regimen as adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer.. Clinical data of 71 patients with gastric cancer treated with oxaliplatin plus S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy in the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) from Jan 1(st), 2010 to Jan 1(st), 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. The types and incidence rate of adverse events related to chemotherapy and the results of follow up of the patients were analyzed.. Among the 71 cases, 17 were treated with oxaliplatin biweekly, while 54 with oxaliplatin triweekly. The most common adverse events were neutropenia (n = 49, 69.0%), nausea/vomiting (n = 51, 71.8%), and anorexia (n = 49, 69.0%). The most frequent grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (n = 13, 18.3%), thrombocytopenia (n = 10, 14.1%), anorexia (n = 5, 7.0%) and nausea/vomiting (n = 4, 5.6%). Seven (87.5%) of the 8 patients previously treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy experienced thrombocytopenia in the postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, and four (50%) of the 8 patients experienced grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia. The rates of grade 3-4 adverse events in patients aged 65-years or older were similar to that in younger patients.. The combination of oxaliplatin and S-1 used as adjuvant chemotherapy is well tolerated by patients with gastric cancer. Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea/vomiting and anorexia are the major treatment-related adverse events. Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy do not well tolerate this regimen as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. This combination regimen has a manageable tolerability profile in adjuvant setting in patients ≥ 65 years old.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Anorexia; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Drug Combinations; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Neoplasm Staging; Neutropenia; Organoplatinum Compounds; Oxaliplatin; Oxonic Acid; Retrospective Studies; Stomach Neoplasms; Survival Rate; Tegafur; Thrombocytopenia

S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate, is an active and well-tolerated agent against solid cancer. However, the clinical efficacy of S-1 in patients with metastatic breast cancer has not been determined.. We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of S-1 and identified its adverse effects in patients with metastatic breast cancer who had failed to respond to prior chemotherapy regimens. All the patients were treated at the National Cancer Center Hospital and received S-1 twice daily at a dose of 80 mg/m(2) for 4 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest interval.. Between 2003 and 2007, 37 women with metastatic breast cancer received S-1 as a third line or greater chemotherapy regimen. All the patients had been previously treated with both anthracyclines and taxanes prior to S-1 chemotherapy. The median order of S-1 administration was as a fifth-line treatment, and 23 patients (62%) received S-1 as their final anticancer drug. One (3%) partial response and two (5%) stable diseases were observed. The median time to progression (TTP) was 84 days. Grade 2 adverse events, such as diarrhea, stomatitis and neutropenia occurred in 5 (16%), 1 (3%) and 1 (3%) patients, respectively.. S-1 was safety administered to heavily treated metastatic breast cancer patients with limited efficacy. Further evaluation of S-1 is necessary to elucidate its clinical role in breast cancer treatment.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Bone Neoplasms; Breast Neoplasms; Diarrhea; Disease Progression; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Nausea; Oxonic Acid; Retrospective Studies; Tegafur

The present study evaluated the efficacy and safety of nedaplatin-combination therapy (NDP/5-FU [5-FU arm] or NDP/S-1 [S-1 arm] ) for the treatment of oral squamous cell carcinoma.. Previously non-treated oral squamous cell carcinoma patients were eligible. Patients received 5-FU 600 mg/m(2)iv, as a 24-hour infusion (day 1 to 5) followed by NDP 80 to 100 mg/m(2) iv (day 1), or S-1 60 to 80 mg/m(2) orally twice a day (day 1 to 14) followed by NDP 80 mg/m(2) iv (day 8) every 28 days for one or two cycles.. In total, 32 patients (18 in the 5-FU arm, 14 in the S-1 arm) were enrolled. Twenty patients were male and 12 were female. Median age was 57 years (range 20 years to 87 years). Thirty-one patients had a performance status (PS) oF 0, and 1 patient had a PS 1. Three patients were stage I, 12 stage III, and 12 were stage IV. The overall response rate was 69% (5-FU arm,72%;S-1 arm,64%). Two patients achieved a complete response, 20 patients a partial response, and 10 patients had no change. Grade 3 leucopenia, grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia and liver injury occurred in 6% (one in the 5-FU arm, and one in the S-1 arm), 9% (two in the 5-FU arm, and one in the S-1 arm), and 3% (one in the 5-FU arm), respectively. No other severe toxicities were observed.. Response rate and toxicities were similar in both arms. However, the psychosocial stress on patients in the S-1 arm was reduced compared to that in the 5-FU arm, which required hospitalization for a longer period. The outcome in the present study needs further investigation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Fluorouracil; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Leukopenia; Male; Middle Aged; Mouth Neoplasms; Nausea; Organoplatinum Compounds; Oxonic Acid; Tegafur; Thrombocytopenia; Vomiting, Anticipatory

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) is a reducing enzyme for fluoropyrimidine which is a widely-used anti-cancer agent, and its deficiency leads to serious toxicities. We report a rare patient with a DPD deficiency. A 39-year-old man was suspected to have a gastric cancer recurrence from the elevation of CEA. Although TS-1 was administered for five days, it was stopped due to the development of grade 2 anorexia and nausea. Although we administered UFT at his request after a one-month drug rest, grade 1 stomatorrhagia besides the former adverse events developed after five days. Therefore he discontinued it and was admitted to our hospital. After 19 days, he died from multiple brain hemorrhage despite the intensive therapies. We considered that the congenital DPD deficiency caused the development of these adverse events because the DPD value was less than 5 pmol/mg/min in mononuclear cells of peripheral blood.

Topics: Adult; Anorexia; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Bone Neoplasms; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Deficiency; Drug Combinations; Fatal Outcome; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Male; Nausea; Oxonic Acid; Stomach Neoplasms; Tegafur; Uracil

We report a case of non-curatively resected gastric cancer successfully treated with TS-1 and irinotecan (CPT-11) combination therapy, resulting in long-term survival of 17 months. A 56-year-old woman underwent noncurative resection with total gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer with severe lymph node metastasis on June 3, 2004. Postoperatively, She received TS-1 and CPT-11 combination therapy (TS-1 80 mg/m(2) day 1-21, CPT-11 80 mg/m(2) day 1, 15, every 5 weeks). However, due to grade 4 neutropenia, and grade 3 nausea and anorexia in the first course, both doses were reduced. Since then, no grade 3 or severer adverse reactions have been observed. After 5 courses, partial response to lymph node metastasis was obtained, and her quality of life was improved. Thus, TS-1 and CPT-11 combination therapy has been effective for 17 months, suggesting that it is promising for long-term administration and survival to continue it perseveringly.

Topics: Anorexia; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Camptothecin; Combined Modality Therapy; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Gastrectomy; Humans; Irinotecan; Lymph Nodes; Lymphatic Metastasis; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neutropenia; Oxonic Acid; Quality of Life; Stomach Neoplasms; Survivors; Tegafur

A 64-year-old male with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue (T3N0M0) was treated with the novel fluoropyrimidine oral anticancer drug TS-1 and selective intra-arterial infusion of CDDP. His past history revealed pulmonary emphysema as a complication. Since his pulmonary function was reduced and it would have been difficult to perform surgery under general anesthesia, we started administration of TS-1 (100 mg/day) first and added selective arterial infusion of CDDP (5 mg/day) after one week of TS-1. On day 8 of TS-1 administration (day 2 of arterial infusion), the tumor had shrunk considerably, and on day 15 of TS-1 administration (day 9 of arterial infusion) the tumor had almost completely disappeared. Nausea and vomiting developed as adverse effects on day 20 of TS-1 administration (day 14 of arterial infusion), and administration of the anticancer drugs was stopped. Nutrition management and an antiemetic agent were started by intravenous drip infusion, and the adverse effects improved one week after administration was stopped. By the 5th week after the start of treatment, the tumor had disappeared macroscopically, and a CR had been achieved. Interstitial radiotherapy was performed as supplemental therapy, and as of this writing, September 3, 2002, 16 months after the start of treatment, the patient is being followed on an outpatient basis. His course has been favorable and recurrence-free. Although there were some slight adverse reactions, they were relatively mild, and since sufficient efficacy was observed, oral TS-1 plus selective intra-arterial CDDP therapy was concluded to be an effective method of treatment for patients with a past medical history making their general condition unfavorable.

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Cisplatin; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Humans; Infusions, Intra-Arterial; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Oxonic Acid; Pyridines; Remission Induction; Tegafur; Tongue Neoplasms; Vomiting, Anticipatory

Five patients with inoperable advanced gastric cancer were treated with combination chemotherapy of TS-1 and cisplatin (CDDP). TS-1 of 80-120 mg/body/day was orally administered for 3 weeks followed by 2 drug-free weeks, and 60 mg/m2/day of CDDP was venally administered on Day 8. It was possible to evaluate all 5 patients for response and toxicity. Only low grade toxicities (Grade 1 or 2) of leukocytopenia, neutrocytopenia, anemia, nausea, diarrhea and stomatitis were seen. Four of 5 patients achieved a partial response, for a response rate of 80.0%. Stomach, liver, lymph node and peritoneal tumors responded to TS-1/CDDP. TS-1/CDDP therapy produces a high response in cases of gastric cancer, and it is useful as a neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Topics: Aged; Anemia; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cisplatin; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Leukopenia; Lymphatic Metastasis; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Oxonic Acid; Preoperative Care; Pyridines; Stomach Neoplasms; Tegafur