s-1-(combination) and Hand-Foot-Syndrome

s-1-(combination) has been researched along with Hand-Foot-Syndrome* in 4 studies

Reviews

1 review(s) available for s-1-(combination) and Hand-Foot-Syndrome

ArticleYear
Efficacy of S-1 vs capecitabine for the treatment of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.
    World journal of gastroenterology, 2015, Apr-14, Volume: 21, Issue:14

    To rationally evaluate the effect of S-1 vs capecitabine for the treatment of gastric cancer.. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Google Scholar, and China Journal Full Text Database were accessed to collect clinical randomized controlled trials regarding the effect of S-1 vs capecitabine for the treatment of gastric cancer patients. Statistical analysis was performed by meta-analysis. Four randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria.. Compared with capecitabine regimens, the 1-year survival rate in gastric cancer patients was 0.80 (95%CI: 0.52-1.21, P = 0.29). The overall response rate of S-1 vs capecitabine was 0.94 (95%CI: 0.59-1.51, P = 0.93). Compared with capecitabine regimens, the most frequent hematologic toxicities were neutropenia (OR = 0.99, 95%CI: 0.65-1.49, P = 0.94) and thrombocytopenia (OR = 0.72, 95%CI: 0.31-1.67, P = 0.44). The most frequent non-hematologic toxicities included nausea (OR = 0.85, 95%CI: 0.56-1.28, P = 0.43) and hand-foot syndrome (OR = 0.16, 95%CI: 0.10-0.27, P < 0.00001).. The existing studies suggest that S-1 is not more effective than capecitabine in the treatment of gastric cancer patients, but does exhibit less toxicity with regard to hand-foot syndrome.

    Topics: Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Capecitabine; Chi-Square Distribution; Drug Combinations; Hand-Foot Syndrome; Humans; Odds Ratio; Oxonic Acid; Risk Factors; Stomach Neoplasms; Survival Analysis; Survival Rate; Tegafur; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

2015

Trials

1 trial(s) available for s-1-(combination) and Hand-Foot-Syndrome

ArticleYear
Updated Survival Analysis of the Randomized Phase III Trial of S-1 Versus Capecitabine in the First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer by the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group.
    Clinical colorectal cancer, 2019, Volume: 18, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Capecitabine; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Follow-Up Studies; Hand-Foot Syndrome; Humans; Incidence; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Oxonic Acid; Progression-Free Survival; Tegafur

2019

Other Studies

2 other study(ies) available for s-1-(combination) and Hand-Foot-Syndrome

ArticleYear
A two centers study of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 versus SOX/XELOX regimens for gastric cancer after D2 resection: a cohort study.
    Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2019, Volume: 84, Issue:4

    Currently, radical surgery with D2 lymphadenectomy has become the standard operation mode of patients in East Asian countries who suffer from resectable gastric cancer. Our target is to compare the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 versus SOX/XELOX regimens for gastric cancer after D2 resection.. We selected 186 patients with gastric cancer who underwent D2 resection in Hangzhou First People's Hospital and Hangzhou Cancer Hospital from June 2014 to June 2017. All patients were followed up for more than 3 years. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS), and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and toxicity.. The 3-year DFS of monotherapy group and combined group were, respectively, 50.7% and 64.0%, while the 3-year OS were, respectively, 62.7% and 71.2%. The 3-year DFS and OS of the combined group were higher than the monotherapy group, but the differences had no statistical significance (3-year DFS: P = 0.071; 3-year OS: P = 0.224). Subgroup analysis showed that the DFS of patients with stage III gastric cancer in monotherapy group was significantly lower than the combined group, with the difference that had statistical significance (P = 0.030), while there was no significant difference in OS (P = 0.186). Most toxic and side effects seen in both groups had no significant differences, while the incidence of hand-foot syndrome and peripheral neurotoxicity in combined group was significantly higher than that in the monotherapy group (P < 0.001).. For patients with advanced gastric cancer who underwent D2 resection, compared with S-1 regimen, there is prolonged disease-free survival trend with SOX/XELOX regimen, while there is no significant overall survival benefit.

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Capecitabine; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; China; Cohort Studies; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Combinations; Female; Gastrectomy; Hand-Foot Syndrome; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; Oxaloacetates; Oxonic Acid; Paraneoplastic Polyneuropathy; Stomach Neoplasms; Tegafur

2019
Tolerability of the oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 after hand-foot syndrome-related discontinuation of capecitabine in western cancer patients.
    Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2017, Volume: 56, Issue:7

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Capecitabine; Denmark; Drug Combinations; Drug Substitution; Female; Hand-Foot Syndrome; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Netherlands; Oxonic Acid; Retrospective Studies; Tegafur; Treatment Outcome; Western World

2017