s-1-(combination) and Diarrhea

We performed a meta-analysis of the risk of oral and gastrointestinal (GI) mucosal injury associated with S-1-based regimens.. Randomized phase II and III trials of patients with solid tumors on S-1; describing events of all-grade and high-grade stomatitis and diarrhea constituted the eligible studies.. After exclusion of ineligible studies, a total of 26 clinical trials were considered eligible for the meta-analysis. The odds ratio (OR) of all-grade and high-grade stomatitis for S-1 vs. non-fluoropyrimidine controls was 4.39 [95% CI: 1.05, 18.37; p = 0.04] and 5.64 [95% CI: 1.46, 21.77; p = 0.01], respectively; while the OR of all-grade and high-grade stomatitis for S-1 vs. infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) control was -1.01 [95% CI: 0.22, 4.63; p = 0.99] and 0.32 [95% CI: 0.20, 0.49; p < 0.00001], respectively. The OR of all-grade and high-grade diarrhea for S-1 vs. non-fluoropyrimidine controls was 2.48 [95% CI: 2.12, 2.90; p < 0.00001] and 1.95 [95% CI: 1.29, 2.96; p = 0.002], respectively; while the OR of all-grade and high-grade diarrhea for S-1 vs. infusional 5-FU control was -1.03 [95% CI: 0.87, 1.22; p = 0.76] and 2.52 [95% CI: 1.80, 3.52; p < 0.00001], respectively.. Compared to non-fluoropyrimidine control, patients treated with S-1-based regimens have an increased risk of all-grade and high-grade stomatitis and diarrhea; while on the other hand, patients treated with infusional 5-FU have a greater risk of high-grade stomatitis and diarrhea compared to patients treated with S-1-based regimens.

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Diarrhea; Drug Combinations; Fluorouracil; Humans; Intestinal Mucosa; Mouth Mucosa; Neoplasms; Oxonic Acid; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stomatitis; Tegafur

A new oral type of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) derivative possessed of both potent antitumor activity and less gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity was investigated and developed in the form of a combination of tegafur (FT), a masked form of 5-FU, and its two peculiar biochemical modulators. One is 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (CDHP), a new potent inhibitor of 5-FU degradation in vivo, and another is potassium oxonate (Oxo), a characteristic inhibitor of 5-FU phosphorylation, which distributes much higher in GI tract after p.o. administration. 5-FU levels in blood of rats following administration of FT, were markedly elevated and persisted for a long-time by co-oral CDHP corresponding to over 0.4 molar ratio to FT, like the case in continuous infusion of 5-FU, which resulted in an augmentation of antitumor efficacy in Yoshida sarcoma-bearing rats, although severe GI toxicity simultaneously occurred. To reduce 5-FU-induced toxicities such as diarrhea and body weight loss and to maintain the augmented antitumor activity, 0.5 to 2 molar Oxo was orally given to rats with one molar FT plus 0.4 molar CDHP. As a result, both severe GI injury and body weight loss were markedly inhibited by coadministration of 0.5 to 1.0 molar Oxo while high antitumor efficacy (about 90% inhibition of tumor growth) was maintained. However, such almost complete antitumor effect was reduced to about 50% inhibition of tumor growth by over 2 molar Oxo combined with one molar FT plus 0.4 molar CDHP. Based on these results, a novel 5-FU derivative, named S-1, was composed of one molar FT, 0.4 molar CDHP and one molar Oxo. S-1 showed an antitumor activity over 3-fold stronger than UFT (one molar FT plus 4 molar uracil) against Yoshida sarcoma and Sato lung carcinoma in rats and human colon carcinoma (KM12C) xenografted in nude rats when its minimum toxic dose was administered. Co-oral Oxo also significantly reduced the incidence of diarrhea and stomatitis induced by administration of FT-CDHP in beagle dogs. These results suggest that high antitumor activity and less GI toxicity of S-1 was brought about by the elevation in blood and tumor tissues and by selective decrease of 5-fluoronucleotides, an active metabolite of 5-FU, in GI tract.

Topics: Animals; Anorexia; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Diarrhea; Dogs; Drug Combinations; Female; Fluorouracil; Immunologic Factors; Male; Mice; Mice, Nude; Oxonic Acid; Pyridines; Rats; Sarcoma, Yoshida; Tegafur; Vomiting

Oral mucositis is one of the most common reasons for discontinuation of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy after radical gastrectomy. Some studies suggest that nutritional support with amino acids may improve oral mucositis. We conducted a prospective, randomized clinical trial of patients who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer to examine whether an oral elemental diet prevents chemotherapy associated oral mucositis and body weight loss.. Patients were randomly assigned to a group consuming Elental. The incidence of oral mucositis was significantly lower in the treatment group (9.1%) than in the control group (27.3%). The median body weight loss in the treatment group was significantly smaller than that in the control group (P = .015). According to Kaplan-Meier estimates the treatment group was significantly associated with high cumulative S-1 continuation rates (log-rank P = .047).. We conclude that the amino-acid-rich elemental diet Elental

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Case-Control Studies; Diarrhea; Drug Combinations; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Food, Formulated; Humans; Incidence; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Nutritional Support; Oxonic Acid; Pilot Projects; Prognosis; Prospective Studies; Stomach Neoplasms; Stomatitis; Tegafur; Young Adult

The aim of this single-arm phase II clinical trial was to evaluate whether the alternate-day administration of S-1 plus irinotecan would reduce the incidence of severe diarrhea in comparison to consecutive-day S-1 administration (standard IRIS regimen) in second-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.. A total of 51 patients were enrolled. The incidence of grade ≥ 3 diarrhea was 15.7% (8/51). Other common grade ≥ 3 adverse events were neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia and fatigue were 13.7% (7/51), 5.9% (3/51), 2.0% (1/51) and 5.9% (3/51), respectively. The relative dose intensities of irinotecan, bevacizumab, and S-1 were 80.0, 86.8, and 77.7%, respectively. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 8.4 months (5.8-9.8) and 17.1 months (11.8-22.3).. The alternate-day S-1 administration does not have significant effectiveness to reduce diarrhea in patients who received second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Colorectal Neoplasms; Diarrhea; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Irinotecan; Male; Neoplasm Metastasis; Oxonic Acid; Survival Rate; Tegafur

Unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma is a heterogeneous disease, for which sorafenib is the first targeted agent approved for first-line therapy, and treatment options for patients with sorafenib-refractory advanced hepatocellular carcinoma are limited. We assessed the efficacy and safety of S-1, a chemotherapeutic agent based on fluorouracil, in patients with sorafenib-refractory advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.. We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study done at 57 sites in Japan. Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who were ineligible for surgical or local-regional therapy and judged refractory to sorafenib (ie, had progressed on sorafenib or had discontinued sorafenib because of adverse events) were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive oral S-1 (weight-banded 80 mg/m. Between Oct 26, 2009, and Aug 22, 2012, we screened 399 patients. 65 patients were excluded due to not meeting criteria (n=61), declining to participate (n=3), or other reasons (n=1). 334 patients were randomly assigned to receive either S-1 (n=223) or placebo (n=111). One patient in the S-1 group did not receive treatment, and was thus excluded from analyses. At data cutoff, median follow-up was 32·4 months (IQR 24·0-34·7) in the S-1 group and 32·9 months (23·7-39·5) in the placebo group. Median overall survival was 11·1 months (95% CI 9·7-13·1) in the S-1 group and 11·2 months (9·2-12·8) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·86, 95% CI 0·67-1·10; p=0·220). The most frequently reported adverse events were skin hyperpigmentation (123 [55%] of 222 patients in the S-1 group vs nine [8%] of 111 patients in the placebo group), decreased appetite (104 [47%] vs 21 [19%]), fatigue (102 [46%] vs 20 [18%]), diarrhoea (77 [35%] vs 14 [13%]), and increased blood bilirubin (77 [35%] vs 14 [13%]). Serious adverse events were reported in 90 (41%) of 222 patients in the S-1 group and 24 (22%) of 111 patients in the placebo group. Five treatment-related deaths were reported in the S-1 group.. S-1 did not prolong overall survival in patients with sorafenib-refractory advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Further research is needed to identify subgroups of patients who might benefit from S-1.. Taiho Pharmaceuticals.

Topics: Aged; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Diarrhea; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Fatigue; Feeding and Eating Disorders; Female; Humans; Hyperbilirubinemia; Hyperpigmentation; Liver Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Oxonic Acid; Survival Analysis; Tegafur

A phase II study of S-1 plus leucovorin (LV) given in a 4-week schedule (2 weeks' administration followed by 2 weeks' rest) for patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) showed that the combination was effective, but grade 3 toxicities (diarrhea, stomatitis and anorexia) occurred at a relatively high rate. In this phase II study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of a 2-week schedule of S-1 plus LV. Patients with mCRC received oral S-1 (40-60 mg) and LV (25 mg) twice daily for 1 week, followed by 1 week's rest. Treatment was repeated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was response rate. The pharmacokinetics of S-1 and LV in Chinese patients were evaluated on day 1 of the first cycle. Seventy-three patients were enrolled in Japan and China. Of 71 eligible patients, the response rate was 53.5%, and the disease control rate was 83.1%. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 6.5 and 24.3 months, respectively. The incidences of grade 3 toxicities were diarrhea 8.3%, stomatitis 8.3%, anorexia 2.8% and neutropenia 9.7%. There were no treatment-related deaths. The pharmacokinetics profiles of S-1 plus LV in Chinese patients were similar to those in Japanese patients. This 2-week schedule of S-1 plus LV showed good efficacy and better tolerability than the 4-week schedule. This therapy will be the base regimen for mCRC to be added by other cytotoxic or molecular-targeted drugs. The optimized treatment schedule for S-1 plus LV was 1 week on and 1 week off.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anorexia; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; China; Colorectal Neoplasms; Diarrhea; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Japan; Leucovorin; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neutropenia; Oxonic Acid; Stomatitis; Survival Analysis; Tegafur; Treatment Outcome

Gemcitabine (GEM) plus cisplatin (CDDP) chemotherapy has been used worldwide as the standard first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). A phase II trial has also suggested promising activity of GEM plus S-1 chemotherapy against advanced BTC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of GEM plus S-1 chemotherapy in patients with advanced BTC.. A total of 38 patients were enrolled between August 2008 and November 2011. There were 19 men and 19 women, with a median age of 66 years (range=44-81 years). Seven patients had a previous history of first-line or adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. The PS was 0 and 1 in 30 and 7 patients, respectively. The treatment response was classified as partial response in 6 patients (15.8%) and as stable disease in 18 patients (47.4%). The median PFS and OS were 5.8 and 15.9 months, respectively. The toxicity was generally mild, and the most common grade 3/4 toxicities were leukopenia (31.6%), neutropenia (36.8%), nausea/vomiting (2.6%), and diarrhea (2.6%). There was one treatment-related death due to interstitial pneumonia.. Our study revealed that gemcitabine plus S-1 chemotherapy was well-tolerated and exhibited favorable antitumor activity in patients with advanced BTC.

Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biliary Tract Neoplasms; Deoxycytidine; Diarrhea; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Gemcitabine; Humans; Leukopenia; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neutropenia; Oxonic Acid; Tegafur; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting

An aging population will increase the number of older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, there is limited knowledge about treatment in older patients as they are under-represented in clinical trials. The oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 is associated with a lower rate of adverse events than capecitabine and may therefore be a suitable drug for elderly. However, data on the use of S-1 in Caucasian mCRC patients are lacking/scarce.. In the present study we evaluated safety and the efficacy of S-1 alone or in combination with oxaliplatin (SOx) or irinotecan (IRIS) in older mCRC patients. Patients who received at least one cycle of S-1 (first-line therapy), SOx (mainly first-line therapy) or IRIS (second-line therapy) were included.. From June 2012 to December 2014, 71 older patients received ≥1 cycle of either S-1 (n = 9), SOx (n = 44) or IRIS (n = 18) for mCRC. Median age was 76 years and most patients had a WHO performance status of 0 (32%) or 1 (56%). All patients were evaluable for response and safety. In the SOx group, 18 (41%) and 20 patients (45%) had partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD), respectively (disease control rate 86%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.5 months and median overall survival (OS) was 18.5 months. In the S-1 group (median age 82 years), PR was 22%, median PFS 6.4 months and median OS 15.8 months. In the IRIS group, PR was 28%, median PFS 7.8 months and the median OS 16.5 months. In general, therapy was well tolerated; main non-hematological toxicities were fatigue and diarrhea.. S-1 monotherapy, SOx and IRIS were well tolerated for older patients with mCRC and could become alternative regimens in older mCRC patients. These regimens are now further evaluated in the randomized ongoing NORDIC9 trial.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Camptothecin; Colorectal Neoplasms; Diarrhea; Drug Combinations; Fatigue; Female; Humans; Irinotecan; Male; Organoplatinum Compounds; Oxaliplatin; Oxonic Acid; Tegafur; Treatment Outcome

Preoperative 5-fluorouracil-based chemoradiotherapy is a standard treatment for locally advanced lower rectal cancer (LALRC). We performed a phase I study to develop a new regimen combining irinotecan and S-1.. Patients with LALRC (T3-4, N0-2) were studied. The radiation dose was 45Gy in 25 fractions. S-1 (80mg/m(2)/day) was administered on days 1-5, 8-12, 22-26, and 29-33. Irinotecan was administered on days 1, 8, 22, and 29. The dose of irinotecan was initially 60mg/m(2) (level 1). Surgery was performed 6-10weeks after the chemoradiotherapy.. Twenty patients were enrolled, of whom 18 patients were analyzed. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) did not occur in the first 3 patients treated with irinotecan at 80mg/m(2) (level 2), but developed in 3 of the 6 patients who received irinotecan at 90mg/m(2) (level 3). Then DLT occurred in 3 other patients at level 2. At level 2 or 3, DLT comprised neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and diarrhea. Level 2 was designated as the maximum tolerated dose, and level 1 as a recommended dose (RD). The pathological complete response rate was 28%, and the down-staging rate was 56%.. Our results suggested that the RD of irinotecan when combined with preoperative S-1 and pelvic radiation was 60mg/m(2).

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Camptothecin; Chemoradiotherapy; Diarrhea; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Irinotecan; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Oxonic Acid; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted; Rectal Neoplasms; Tegafur; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

The purpose of this phase I study of the dose escalation of oxaliplatin in combination with oral S-1 and pelvic radiation preoperatively for poor-risk lower rectal cancer was to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and recommended dose of oxaliplatin.. Patients with cT4 and lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis, and without distant metastasis (cM0), were treated with weekly oxaliplatin, oral S-1 40 mg/m(2) twice daily for 5 days a week, and radiation. A total of 5 weekly doses of oxaliplatin were planned. RT was administered to a total dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions.. We enrolled 11 patients between December 2009 and January 2012. DLTs were observed at dose level 1 (50 mg/m(2)) in two patients, one of whom experienced grade 3 aspartate aminotransferase elevation and a grade 3 alanine aminotransferase increase, and the other developed grade 4 hypokalemia and a grade 3 alanine aminotransferase increase. Five patients at dose level 2 (60 mg/m(2)) showed no DLTs. The hematological toxicities in all patients were mild and reversible. One patient showed distant metastasis after chemoradiation. Ten of the 11 patients achieved R0 resection by mesorectal resection and lateral lymph node dissection; three of the 10 underwent combined resection of the other organs.. This phase I trial of preoperative S-1 in combination with oxaliplatin and radiation for lower rectal cancer with T4 and lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis revealed that the recommended dose of oxaliplatin was 60 mg/m(2) weekly.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Alanine Transaminase; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aspartate Aminotransferases; Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant; Diarrhea; Dose Fractionation, Radiation; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Lymph Node Excision; Lymphatic Metastasis; Male; Middle Aged; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Neoplasm Staging; Neutropenia; Organoplatinum Compounds; Oxaliplatin; Oxonic Acid; Pelvis; Preoperative Care; Rectal Neoplasms; Tegafur; Vomiting

To assess the long-term outcomes of patients with rectal cancer who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (NCRT) with concurrent S-1 and irinotecan (S-1/irinotecan) therapy.. The study group consisted of 115 patients with clinical stage T3 or T4 rectal cancer. Patients received pelvic radiation therapy (45 Gy) plus concurrent oral S-1/irinotecan. The median follow-up was 60 months.. Grade 3 adverse effects occurred in 7 patients (6%), and the completion rate of NCRT was 87%. All 115 patients (100%) were able to undergo R0 surgical resection. Twenty-eight patients (24%) had a pathological complete response (ypCR). At 60 months, the local recurrence-free survival was 93%, disease-free survival (DFS) was 79%, and overall survival (OS) was 80%. On multivariate analysis with a proportional hazards model, ypN2 was the only independent prognostic factor for DFS (P=.0019) and OS (P=.0064) in the study group as a whole. Multivariate analysis was additionally performed for the subgroup of 106 patients with ypN0/1 disease, who had a DFS rate of 85.3%. Both ypT (P=.0065) and tumor location (P=.003) were independent predictors of DFS. A combination of these factors was very strongly related to high risk of recurrence (P<.0001), which occurred most commonly in the lung.. NCRT with concurrent S-1/irinotecan produced high response rates and excellent long-term survival, with acceptable adverse effects in patients with rectal cancer. ypN2 is a strong predictor of dismal outcomes, and a combination of ypT and tumor location can identify high-risk patients among those with ypN0/1 disease.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Agranulocytosis; Analysis of Variance; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Camptothecin; Chemoradiotherapy; Diarrhea; Disease-Free Survival; Dose Fractionation, Radiation; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Fluorouracil; Humans; Irinotecan; Leucovorin; Leukopenia; Male; Middle Aged; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Neoplasm Staging; Organoplatinum Compounds; Oxonic Acid; Rectal Neoplasms; Tegafur; Treatment Outcome

In our previous randomized controlled trial, the addition of S-1 to gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer did not prolong overall survival (OS) significantly, despite its higher response rate and longer progression-free survival (PFS). Leucovorin is known to enhance efficacy of S-1, and we conducted this phase I trial of combination therapy of gemcitabine, S-1 and leucovorin (GSL).. Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who had received no prior chemotherapy were eligible for this study. Gemcitabine was administered at an escalating dose of 600, 800 and 1,000 mg/m(2) over 30 min on day 1, and oral S-1 at a dose of 40 mg/m(2) twice daily and oral leucovorin at a dose of 25 mg twice daily on days 1-7, every 2 weeks. A standard "3 + 3" phase I dose escalation design was utilized.. Fifteen patients were enrolled across three dose levels. Three patients developed DLTs: two patients in level 1 (grade 3 anorexia in 1 and grade 3 anorexia, stomatitis and diarrhea in 1) and one patient in level 2 (grade 3 deep vein thrombosis). No DLT was observed in level 3. Response rate and the disease control rate were 33 and 93 %, respectively. The median PFS and OS were 5.4 and 16.6 months. Ten of 12 patients (83 %) with elevated CA19-9 at baseline had a ≥ 50 % decline.. RD of gemcitabine in GSL was determined as 1,000 mg/m(2). GSL was well tolerable and showed promising results in advanced pancreatic cancer.

Topics: Aged; Anorexia; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Deoxycytidine; Diarrhea; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Gemcitabine; Humans; Leucovorin; Male; Middle Aged; Oxonic Acid; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Stomatitis; Survival Analysis; Tegafur; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thrombosis

The present study evaluated the efficacy of lafutidine, a histamine H2 receptor antagonist, for reducing gastrointestinal toxicities during adjuvant chemotherapy using oral fluorouracil anticancer drugs for gastric cancer.. Patients with stage II (T1 cases excluded) or stage III gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy achieving R0 resection from 2011 to 2013 were prospectively enrolled in the study. Patients were randomly assigned to either S-1 treatment or S-1 plus lafutidine treatment. Quality of life and gastrointestinal toxicity were evaluated before chemotherapy and at 2, 4, and 6 weeks after the beginning of treatment.. The incidence of diarrhea during chemotherapy was significantly lower in the S-1 plus lafutidine group than in the group treated with S-1 alone (10% vs. 83%, respectively; p=0.002). The grades of diarrhea and nausea during chemotherapy were also significantly lower compared to those before chemotherapy in patients receiving S-1 plus lafutidine than in those administered S-1 alone. The rate of patients requiring a dose reduction or interruption of S-1 was significantly lower in the S-1 plus lafutidine group than in the group treated with S-1 alone (30% vs. 83%, respectively; p=0.027).. Lafutidine might be useful not only for preventing gastrointestinal toxicities during adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer, but also for improving compliance with taking oral fluorouracil anticancer drugs. However, this indication needs to be confirmed in a larger, prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Topics: Acetamides; Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Diarrhea; Drug Combinations; Female; Fluorouracil; Gastrectomy; Gastrointestinal Tract; Histamine H2 Antagonists; Humans; Lymph Node Excision; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Oxonic Acid; Piperidines; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Quality of Life; Stomach Neoplasms; Tegafur

In Japan, a study comparing the effectiveness and safety of irinotecan plus S-1 (IRIS) with those of a combination of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as second-line treatment in patients with advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer demonstrated that IRIS was non-inferior to FOLFIRI. We previously reported that IRIS is also effective as first-line treatment.. Eligibility criteria included inoperable recurrent colorectal cancer with a confirmed diagnosis of adenocarcinoma, age ≥20 years, and no history of prior chemotherapy. S-1 (40-60 mg twice daily) was given orally on Days 1 to 14, and irinotecan (100 mg/m(2)) and bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) were given intravenously on Days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint was safety. The secondary endpoints included overall response (OR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).. A total of 52 eligible patients were enrolled from October 2007 through March 2009. In safety analysis, the incidences of grade 3 or 4 adverse reactions were as follows: neutropenia, 27%; hypertension, 21%; and diarrhea, 17%. The overall response rate was 57.7%. Median progression-free survival was 16.7 months.. IRIS plus bevacizumab is a well-tolerated, highly effective chemotherapeutic regimen that is easy to administer.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Camptothecin; Colorectal Neoplasms; Diarrhea; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Irinotecan; Japan; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Neutropenia; Oxonic Acid; Severity of Illness Index; Tegafur; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of weekly paclitaxel combined with S-1 or fluorouracil in the first line treatment of advanced gastric carcinoma.. Two hundred and forty patients with untreated advanced gastric carcinoma were randomized into two arms, patients in the experimental arm were given paclitaxel and S-1, while those in the control arm received paclitaxel and fluorouracil. The regimen of experimental arm was paclitaxel 60 mg/m(2) by intravenous infusion, day 1, 8, 15; S-1 80 - 120 mg/day given by oral administration, day 1 - 14. The regimen of control arm was fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2) by intravenous infusion continuously, day 1 - 5; CF 20 mg/m(2) by intravenous infusion, day 1 - 5. The regimens in both arms were repeated every 28 days. The efficacy and safety of both arms were assessed.. Two hundred and twenty-eight patients were analyzed in the full analysis set, and 192 patients were analyzed in per-protocol set (experimental arm 100 patients, control arm 92 patients). The overall response rates of experimental and control arms were 50.0% and 28.3% (P = 0.002), and the disease control rates were 82.0% and 70.7% (P = 0.064), respectively. The primary endpoints of experimental arm were non-inferior to that of the control arm. The secondary endpoint of experimental arm in terms of median progression free survival was significantly better than that of control arm (5 months versus 4 months, P = 0.006). The experimental arm had a higher incidence of grade III-IV bone marrow suppression than the control arm, but the incidence of fever in both arms was not significantly different.. Oral administration of S-1 is an alternative option of venous infusional fluorouracil. Weekly paclitaxel combined with S-1 is a safe regimen and has a promising efficacy.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Diarrhea; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Combinations; Female; Fluorouracil; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Leukopenia; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Oxonic Acid; Paclitaxel; Prospective Studies; Remission Induction; Stomach Neoplasms; Survival Rate; Tegafur

To perform a Phase I study of preoperative chemoradiation (CRT) with S-1, a novel oral fluoropyrimidine, plus oxaliplatin in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, to determine the maximum tolerated dose and the recommended dose.. Radiotherapy was delivered to a total of 45 Gy in 25 fractions and followed by a coned-down boost of 5.4 Gy in 3 fractions. Concurrent chemotherapy consisted of a fixed dose of oxaliplatin (50 mg/m2/week) on Days 1, 8, 22, and 29 and escalated doses of S-1 on Days 1-14 and 22-35. The initial dose of S-1 was 50 mg/m2/day, gradually increasing to 60, 70, and 80 mg/m2/day. Surgery was performed within 6±2 weeks.. Twelve patients were enrolled and tolerated up to Dose Level 4 (3 patients at each dose level) without dose-limiting toxicity. An additional 3 patients were enrolled at Dose Level 4, with 1 experiencing a dose-limiting toxicity of Grade 3 diarrhea. Although maximum tolerated dose was not attained, Dose Level 4 (S-1 80 mg/m2/day) was chosen as the recommended dose for further Phase II studies. No Grade 4 toxicity was observed, and Grade 3 toxicities of leukopenia and diarrhea occurred in the same patient (1 of 15, 6.7%). Pathologic complete responses were observed in 2 of 15 patients (13.3%).. The recommended dose of S-1 was determined to be 80 mg/m2/day when combined with oxaliplatin in preoperative CRT, and a Phase II trial is now ongoing.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Combined Modality Therapy; Diarrhea; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neutropenia; Organoplatinum Compounds; Oxaliplatin; Oxonic Acid; Preoperative Care; Radiotherapy Dosage; Rectal Neoplasms; Tegafur; Thrombocytopenia; Vomiting

We aimed to validate our hypothesis that a preoperative chemoradiotherapy regimen with S-1 plus irinotecan is feasible, safe, and active for the management of locally advanced rectal cancer in a single-arm Phase II setting.. Eligible patients had previously untreated, locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma. Radiotherapy was administered in fractions of 1.8 Gy/d for 25 days. S-1 was administered orally in a fixed daily dose of 80 mg/m2 on Days 1 to 5, 8 to 12, 22 to 26, and 29 to 33. Irinotecan (80 mg/m2) was infused on Days 1, 8, 22, and 29. Four or more weeks after the completion of the treatment, total mesorectal excision with lateral lymph node dissection was performed. The primary endpoint was the rate of completing treatment in terms of feasibility. The secondary endpoints were the response rate and safety.. We enrolled 43 men and 24 women in the study. The number of patients who completed treatment was 58 (86.6%). Overall, 46 patients (68.7%) responded to treatment and 24 (34.7%) had a complete histopathologic response. Three patients had Grade 3 leukopenia, and another three patients had Grade 3 neutropenia. Diarrhea was the most common type of nonhematologic toxicity: 3 patients had Grade 3 diarrhea.. A preoperative regimen of S-1, irinotecan, and radiotherapy to the rectum was feasible, and it appeared safe and effective in this nonrandomized Phase II setting. It exhibited a low incidence of adverse events, a high rate of completion of treatment, and an extremely high rate of pathologic complete response.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Camptothecin; Diarrhea; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Feasibility Studies; Female; Humans; Irinotecan; Japan; Leukopenia; Lymph Node Excision; Male; Middle Aged; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Neutropenia; Oxonic Acid; Rectal Neoplasms; Tegafur

This phase II trial first describes the combination chemotherapy of biweekly irinotecan plus S-1 (biweekly IRIS) for pretreated advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients.. Patients who had previously been treated with greater than or equal to one regimen were enrolled. They received S-1 35 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14 and irinotecan 150 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 15, every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).. Among the 38 patients enrolled, 18 patients were treated as second line, and the remaining 20 patients were enrolled as third- or fourth line. A total of 208 cycles were administered with the median being four cycles (range 1-16). The median OS was 8.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.5-10.3], and the median progression-free survival was 6.3 months (95% CI 5.3-7.3). Low serum albumin (<3.5 mg/dL) was an independent adverse prognosticator for survival. Overall response rate was 17% (95% CI 4-30%). The major grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (26%) and diarrhea (18%).. Biweekly IRIS showed the moderate activity as salvage treatment in AGC. Considering high neutropenia and gastrointestinal toxicity, patient selection should be warranted; serum albumin may be a predictive factor for treatment decision.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Camptothecin; Diarrhea; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Irinotecan; Male; Middle Aged; Neutropenia; Oxonic Acid; Patient Selection; Salvage Therapy; Serum Albumin; Stomach Neoplasms; Survival; Tegafur; Treatment Outcome

To define the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of S-1, given daily for 2 weeks followed by a 1-week rest, with a fixed dose of cisplatin on the initial day, and to determine the activity and safety of this regimen at the recommended dose (RD) when used as first line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC).. Cisplatin was fixed at a dose of 60 mg/m2 on day 1 (D1) and the starting dose of S-1 was 60 mg/m2/day (30 mg/m2 bid) (level I) on D1 to D14, every 3 weeks. The dose of S-1 was increased by 5 mg/m2 bid up to 100 mg/m2/day (level V) unless the MTD was achieved.. Sixty-two eligible patients were enrolled. MTD was set at level V with two of three patients developing grade 3 diarrhea or febrile neutropenia. The RD was determined at level IV (90 mg/m2/day). After the first 20 patients were enrolled in phase II, the protocol was amended; the S-1 dose was reduced to 80 mg/m2/day (N=23) because of poor bone marrow recovery. The objective response was observed in 20 of 42 evaluable patients (48%). SD was achieved in 15 (36%). The median PFS was 5.3 months (95% CI, 4.6-6.0 months) with a median OS of 10.0 months (95% CI, 5.1-14.8 months). Grade 3-4 toxicities included neutropenia (33%), anemia (31%), and anorexia (24%).. The 3-week combination of cisplatin plus S-1 is active against AGC with favorable toxicitiy profiles. The phase II schedule or doses may need further refinements.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anemia; Anorexia; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cisplatin; Diarrhea; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Fever; Humans; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neutropenia; Oxonic Acid; Stomach Neoplasms; Tegafur

To investigate the efficacy and safety of the combination therapy of irinotecan (CPT-11) plus S-1 in patients with advanced gastric cancer at the dose recommended by a previous phase I study.. A total of 23 patients received 80 mg/m(2) of CPT-11 on days 1 and 15, and S-1 at a dose level set on the basis of the body surface area (BSA): 40 (BSA <1.25 m(2)), 50 (BSA > or =1.25 to <1.5 m(2)) or 60 mg (BSA > or =1.5 m(2)) b.i.d. was given from days 1-21.. The overall response rate was 47.8% (11 of 23, 95% confidence interval, CI: 27.4-68.2%). The median time to progression (TTP) was 210 days (95% CI: 145-322 days) and the median survival time was 394 days (95% CI: 241-484 days). The incidence of grade 3 or 4 hematological and non-hematological toxicity was 17.4 and 8.7%. The most common hematological toxicity was anemia and the most common non-hematological toxicity was diarrhea.. The combination therapy of CPT-11 and S-1 provided prolonged TTP with low toxicity, and the results warrant a further phase III study to define the efficacy in improvement of survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anemia; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Camptothecin; Diarrhea; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Irinotecan; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Oxonic Acid; Stomach Neoplasms; Survival Analysis; Tegafur; Treatment Outcome

A combination of irinotecan with continuous intravenous infusions of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) is often used to treat advanced colorectal cancer. However, recent concerns about safety and convenience have prompted the development of new oral fluoropyrimidine derivatives and improved regimens. This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 plus irinotecan in patients with previously untreated advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer.. Forty eligible patients with histologically confirmed colorectal adenocarcinoma received this treatment. S-1 was administered orally on days 1 to 14 of a 21-day cycle. Patients were assigned on the basis of body surface area (BSA) to receive one of the following oral doses twice daily: 40 mg (BSA < 1.25 m(2)), 50 mg (BSA > or = 1.25 to < 1.50 m(2)), or 60 mg (BSA > or = 1.50 m(2)). Irinotecan (150 mg/m(2)) was administered by intravenous infusion on day 1.. A total of 327 courses of treatment were administered to 40 patients. Five patients had complete responses, and 20 had partial responses. The overall response rate was 62.5% (95% confidential interval, 47.5%-77.5%). Median progression-free survival was 8.0 months (95% confidential interval, 5.2-11.4 months). The rates of grade 3 or 4 toxicity were as follows: neutropenia, 15%; anemia, 7.5%; anorexia, 12.5%; and diarrhea, 7.5%.. Combined treatment with S-1 and irinotecan is an effective, well tolerated, and convenient regimen in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Our findings suggest that combined treatment with S-1 and irinotecan is a promising regimen, offering benefits in terms of safety and survival as compared with conventional regimens in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Anemia; Anorexia; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Camptothecin; Colorectal Neoplasms; Diarrhea; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Irinotecan; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Oxonic Acid; Survivors; Tegafur; Treatment Outcome

We developed a combination chemotherapy, comprising weekly dosing of iv cisplatin (days 1 and 8) combined with a fixed dose (70 mg/m2/day) of S-1 (days 1-14) for patients with metastatic gastric cancer. The treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. Twenty patients were studied. Dose-limiting toxicities of grade 3 diarrhea and stomatitis were observed in one patient at the dose of cisplatin 20 mg/m2. Grade 2 gastrointestinal adverse reactions, such as nausea and anorexia, were seen in approximately half of patients at this dose level within the first two treatment cycles. This was the maximum acceptable level. The overall response rate in 18 patients evaluated was 61%. The median survival was 11 months, despite including 11 pre-treated patients. S-1 given with weekly cisplatin was a feasible and promising combination regimen for an outpatient setting.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Anorexia; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cisplatin; Diarrhea; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Oxonic Acid; Stomach Neoplasms; Stomatitis; Survival Rate; Tegafur

We reported the results of phase I study with CPT-11 and S-1 (IRIS) in advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients at ASCO 2002. Now I present an outline of this phase I/II trial. A combined treatment of IRIS (CPT-11 + S-1) was given to the AGC patients who had not received prior chemotherapy. S-1 was orally administered twice a day for 14 days, and CPT-11 was administered as a 90-minute intravenous infusion on days 1 and 15. This schedule was repeated every 4 weeks. Fifteen patients were registered in this phase I study and 9 patients were added in this phase II study. Non-hematological toxicities were almost classified as grade 2 or lower, except for grade 3 nausea and grade 3 dermatitis of level 2. These adverse events were manageable by administering anti-emetic drugs and a drug rest. As for hematological toxicities, grade 4 neutropenia occurred with one patient at level 1 and level 2 in phase I. And grade 4 neutropenia occurred with four patients at level 2 in phase II. However, they recovered after the drug rest, and we could continue the administration based on the standard dose modifications. These side effects were tolerable, and the overall response rate was 54.2%. MST of this regimen is 581 days. The IRIS treatment is effective and tolerable for outpatient treatments.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Camptothecin; Capsules; Diarrhea; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Irinotecan; Middle Aged; Nausea; Oxonic Acid; Quality of Life; Stomach Neoplasms; Survival Rate; Tegafur

A late phase II clinical study of S-1 against advanced or refractory breast cancer was done by 37 institutes in Japan. S-1 was administered twice daily at 80, 100 or 120 mg/body/day consecutively for 28 days followed by 14 days of rest (1 course). Eighty-three patients were enrolled and 81 were eligible for the study. The response ratio was 42.0% with 6 CR and 28 PR and its 95% confidence interval for the response was 31.1 to 53.5%. The median survival period was 910 days (95% confidence interval was 493-1, 083 days). The observed major adverse reactions (> or = grade 2) were as follows: hematological toxicities: leukopenia 21.0% (17/81), neutropenia 28.4% (23/81), erythropenia 4.9% (4/81); gastrointestinal toxicities: anorexia 9.9% (8/81), nausea and vomiting 12.3% (10/81), diarrhea 8.6% (7/81), stomatitis 1.2% (1/81), and fatigue 8.6% (7/81). The severe adverse reactions (> or = grade 3) were as follows; hematological toxicities: neutropenia 8.6% (7/81), anorexia 4.9% (4/81), fatigue 3.7% (3/81), nausea and vomiting 1.2% (1/81), diarrhea 1.2% (1/81), stomatitis 1.2% (1/81). Grade 4 adverse reactions (neutropenia and fatigue) were observed only in 1 patient. The ratio without hospitalization was 87.7%. These results strongly suggest the superior efficacy and safety of S-1 against patients suffering from advanced, refractory breast cancer. Therefore, S-1 may be a new therapeutic agent to prolong the survival period of breast cancer patients due to its high antitumor activity and low toxicity.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anorexia; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Breast Neoplasms; Diarrhea; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Leukopenia; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neutropenia; Oxonic Acid; Pyridines; Tegafur; Vomiting, Anticipatory

S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) is an established treatment for advanced gastric cancer. S-1 adherence is the key to successful SOX treatment. This study focused on S-1 adherence by evaluating real-world adherence to S-1 and investigating factors related to decreased S-1 adherence. This study included cases treated between August 1, 2014 and October 12, 2016 at the Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research. The S-1 adherence rate per cycle was defined as the number of times a patient took S-1/28. In this study, adherence to S-1 was assessed through pill counts and by asking the patient about the reason for non-adherence at a pharmaceutical outpatient clinic. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate factors influencing lower adherence. This analysis included 116 patients evaluated for adherence to S-1 on SOX treatment. The median rate of adherence to S-1 was 92.8% in the first cycle and 90.5% in the seventh cycle. The median relative dose intensity of S-1 was 84.6%. In terms of reasons for nonadherence, patients most commonly cited nausea/vomiting (43.7%), diarrhea (20.8%), missed dose (11.8%), and fever (8.1%). Logistic regression analysis was performed using the most appropriate regression equation, and a significant association was detected with 1 factor, number of combined drugs ≥5 (odds ratio (OR) = 2.50; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.04-6.03, p = 0.04). Eliminating unnecessary concomitant medications helps maintain proper adherence to S-1 in SOX treatment.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Diarrhea; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Motivation; Nausea; Odds Ratio; Oxaliplatin; Oxonic Acid; Polypharmacy; Prescription Drugs; Stomach Neoplasms; Tegafur; Young Adult

Although S-1 chemotherapy is used widely as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer, some patients experience diarrhea during treatment. The patient was a 39-year-old woman who underwent distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer and who had started S-1 chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy 1 week before her presentation. She experienced severe diarrhea immediately after starting the course of S-1 tablets. Capsule endoscopy revealed severe S-1-induced enteritis with extensive mucosal injury in the ileum and red intestinal fluid due to the oozing of blood in the ileum. After reducing the dosage of S-1, her diarrhea became milder, and she was able to continue S-1 chemotherapy.

Topics: Adult; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Capsule Endoscopy; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Diarrhea; Drug Combinations; Enteritis; Female; Gastrectomy; Humans; Oxonic Acid; Severity of Illness Index; Stomach Neoplasms; Tegafur

Gemcitabine has been standard of care in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinomas (PC) for almost two decades. Randomized, primarily Japanese, studies have shown promising efficacy when combined with S-1 (GemS-1); however, no data are published in Caucasian patients. We report the first study with a combination of GemS-1 in an unselected cohort of Caucasian PC patients.. In this observational cohort study, we analyzed efficacy and toxicity prospectively.. From July 2012 to July 2014, 64 patients received at least one cycle of GemS-1. 16 patients started therapy with gemcitabine and capecitabine (GemCap) but switched to GemS-1 after median 3 cycles of GemCap due to toxicity (hand-foot syndrome). 48 patients received GemS-1 as initial therapy. For the complete cohort, median age was 68 years (range 44-80); 22 patients (34%) had locally advanced PC; 42 patients (66%) had metastatic disease. Five patients had received prior adjuvant therapy with gemcitabine and 9 pts had received prior first-line therapy. The most common adverse event was fatigue (86%), however, only grade 3 in 3%. Five patients (8%) developed febrile neutropenia. Median PFS was 8.1 (95% CI 6.9-9.0) months and median OS was 11.7 (95% CI 10.7-13.1) months in the whole GemS-1 population. In the 48 patients starting with GemS-1, median PFS was 7.7 (95% CI 6.7-8.9) months and median OS was 11.5 (95% CI 9.7-12.3) months.. The combination of gemcitabine and S-1 is safe and associated with promising efficacy in a Caucasian population; however, this needs to be confirmed in prospective clinical trials.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cohort Studies; Deoxycytidine; Diarrhea; Drug Combinations; Fatigue; Female; Gemcitabine; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Neutropenia; Oxonic Acid; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Tegafur; Treatment Outcome; White People

Three randomised trials (GEST, JACCRO PC-01, and GEMSAP) were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) vs gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (PC). In this pooled analysis, the efficacy and safety of GS vs gemcitabine were evaluated.. Additional follow-up was conducted and survival data were updated in each study. A total of 770 patients (gemcitabine 389; GS 381) were included in the pooled analysis. The efficacy and safety data were analysed according to disease extent: locally advanced PC (LAPC) or metastatic PC (MPC).. There were 738 (95.8%) overall survival events. In patients with LAPC (n=193), the median survival was 11.83 months for gemcitabine and 16.41 months for GS (hazard ratio (HR)=0.708; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.527-0.951; P=0.0220). In patients with MPC (n=577), the median survival was 8.02 months for gemcitabine and 9.43 months for GS (HR=0.872; 95% CI, 0.738-1.032; P=0.1102). The rate of grade 3/4 toxicity (rash and thrombocytopenia in LAPC; rash, diarrhoea, vomiting, and neutropaenia in MPC) was significantly higher for GS than for gemcitabine.. Gemcitabine plus S-1 is a viable treatment alternative to gemcitabine, which is one of the standard treatments in patients with LAPC.

Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Deoxycytidine; Diarrhea; Drug Combinations; Drug Eruptions; Female; Gemcitabine; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neutropenia; Oxonic Acid; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Survival Rate; Tegafur; Thrombocytopenia; Vomiting

Gastric carcinoma is a heterogeneous malignant disease involving genetic factors. To identify predictive markers for gastric cancer treatment in Chinese patients, we evaluated the association between polymorphisms of the gene encoding cytochrome P450 2A6 (CYP2A6) and outcomes of S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) chemotherapy treatment. Clinical data on 60 consecutive gastric cancer patients receiving SOX regimen were collected prospectively. We sequenced all exons of CYP2A6 and a total of 22 different polymorphisms were detected in the present study. Comprehensive analyses of these genetic polymorphisms were performed to determine their association with both safety and efficacy of SOX regimen. Our results showed that polymorphisms of CYP2A6 were associated with the safety and efficacy of SOX treatment. Among them, missense mutations CYP2A6 rs60823196 and rs138978736 could be possible risk factors (P<0.05) for severe diarrhea induced by SOX, whereas CYP2A6 rs138978736 could be a conceivable predictor for overall survival of patients treated with SOX adjuvant chemotherapy. Further large-scale randomized prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Asian People; China; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2A6; Diarrhea; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Genotype; Haplotypes; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Linkage Disequilibrium; Male; Middle Aged; Odds Ratio; Organoplatinum Compounds; Oxaliplatin; Oxonic Acid; Polymorphism, Genetic; Prospective Studies; Severity of Illness Index; Stomach Neoplasms; Tegafur; Treatment Outcome

We compared the clinical outcomes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) resection after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (NACRT) vs. chemotherapy (NAC).. The study population comprised 81 patients with UICC stage T3/4 PDAC, treated initially by NACRT with S-1 in 40 and by NAC with gemcitabine + S-1 in 41. This was followed by pancreatectomy with routine nerve plexus resection in 35 of the patients who had received NACRT and 32 of those who had received NAC. We compared the survival curves and clinical outcomes of these two groups.. The rates of clinical response, surgical resectability, and margin-negative resection were similar. The NACRT group patients had significantly higher rates of Evans stage ≥IIB tumors (29 vs. 0 %, respectively, p = 0.010) and negative lymph nodes (49 vs. 16 %, respectively, p = 0.021) than the NAC group patients. There was no difference in disease-free survival between the groups, but the disease-specific survival of the NAC group patients was better than that of the NACRT group patients (p = 0.034). Patients undergoing pancreatectomy with nerve plexus resection following NACRT had significantly higher rates of intractable diarrhea and ascites but consequently received significantly less adjuvant chemotherapy and therapeutic chemotherapy for relapse.. NACRT followed by pancreatectomy with nerve plexus resection is superior for achieving local control, but postoperative diarrhea and ascites may prohibit continuation of adjuvant chemotherapy or chemotherapy for relapse (UMIN4148).

Topics: Adult; Aged; Ascites; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Combined Modality Therapy; Deoxycytidine; Diarrhea; Drug Combinations; Female; Gemcitabine; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Oxonic Acid; Pancreatectomy; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Postoperative Complications; Tegafur; Treatment Outcome

This study is aimed to assess the efficacy and toxicity of weekly liposome-paclitaxel and S-1 combination therapy as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer.. The chemotherapy regime was 80 mg/m(2) liposome-paclitaxel given on days 1, 8, 15 and 22, combined with S-1 60 mg (body surface area > 1.5) or 50 mg (1.25 < body surface area < 1.5) twice a day on days 1-28, 6 weeks as one cycle. The patients continued to be treated until they received four cycles or until they developed either progressive disease or untolerated toxicity. The response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival and toxicity were evaluated.. A total of 56 patients were enrolled, and the median age was 60 years (range = 38-70 years; 39 males and 17 females). The response rate and disease control rate were 25% (14/56) and 87.5% (49/56), respectively. The median progression-free survival was 6.1 months (95% confidence interval: 5.0-7.2), and the median overall survival was 10.6 months (95% confidence interval: 7.2-14.0). The most frequent hematological toxicities were neutropenia and anemia, which occurred in 22 (48.9%) and 11 (19.6%) patients, respectively.. The weekly administration of a combined regimen of liposome-paclitaxel plus S-1 is effective and has a favorable toxicity profile for advanced gastric cancer.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Diarrhea; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Liposomes; Male; Middle Aged; Neutropenia; Oxonic Acid; Paclitaxel; Stomach Neoplasms; Tegafur; Treatment Outcome

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively examine the effect of concomitant administration of gastric secretion inhibitors or gastrectomy on the frequency of gastrointestinal toxicity caused by 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in gastric cancer patients receiving chemotherapy with S-1. In 62 gastric cancer patients treated with S-1 alone, data relating to the occurrence of gastrointestinal toxicity (diarrhea, vomiting, and nausea) and possible contributing factors were retrospectively collected, and logistic regression analysis was performed. Time-to-event data relating to the occurrence of gastrointestinal toxicity were also collected, and the effect of gastric secretion inhibitors on the time-to-event profiles was examined using a log-rank test. Logistic regression analysis suggested that the frequency of gastrointestinal toxicity was significantly reduced by the administration of gastric secretion inhibitors (p=0.01; odds ratio, 0.197; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.056-0.694) and that gastrointestinal toxicity correlated with the estimated glomerular filtration rate (p=0.04; odds ratio, 0.956; 95% CI, 0.916-0.997). The median time-to-event of gastrointestinal toxicity was 85 d for patients that received gastric secretion inhibitors, which was significantly different from the 42 d for patients that did not receive the inhibitors (p=0.02, log-rank test). No clear effect of gastrectomy was found in the present study. The prophylactic use of gastric secretion inhibitors in gastric cancer patients treated with S-1 may decrease and delay the occurrence of gastrointestinal toxicity.

Topics: Aged; Diarrhea; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Combinations; Female; Gastric Mucosa; Histamine H2 Antagonists; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Oxonic Acid; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Retrospective Studies; Stomach Neoplasms; Tegafur; Vomiting

S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate, is an active and well-tolerated agent against solid cancer. However, the clinical efficacy of S-1 in patients with metastatic breast cancer has not been determined.. We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of S-1 and identified its adverse effects in patients with metastatic breast cancer who had failed to respond to prior chemotherapy regimens. All the patients were treated at the National Cancer Center Hospital and received S-1 twice daily at a dose of 80 mg/m(2) for 4 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest interval.. Between 2003 and 2007, 37 women with metastatic breast cancer received S-1 as a third line or greater chemotherapy regimen. All the patients had been previously treated with both anthracyclines and taxanes prior to S-1 chemotherapy. The median order of S-1 administration was as a fifth-line treatment, and 23 patients (62%) received S-1 as their final anticancer drug. One (3%) partial response and two (5%) stable diseases were observed. The median time to progression (TTP) was 84 days. Grade 2 adverse events, such as diarrhea, stomatitis and neutropenia occurred in 5 (16%), 1 (3%) and 1 (3%) patients, respectively.. S-1 was safety administered to heavily treated metastatic breast cancer patients with limited efficacy. Further evaluation of S-1 is necessary to elucidate its clinical role in breast cancer treatment.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Bone Neoplasms; Breast Neoplasms; Diarrhea; Disease Progression; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Nausea; Oxonic Acid; Retrospective Studies; Tegafur

A 76-year-old man suffering from advanced gallbladder cancer after hepato-pancreaticoduodenectomy had cholangitis and serum elevation of CA19-9 2 years and 6 months after the operation. A recurrent tumor had been recognized from the hilar to the surrounding inferior vena cava, and stenosis of jejunum utilized for pancreaticocholedoco-jejunostomy. A bypass operation of jejunum was performed. Combination chemotherapy with TS-1 100 mg/day (3 weeks) and CDDP 30 mg/day (day 1, 8 drip infusion) in 1 course was performed, and a partial response (PR) was noted. Diarrhea of grade III and decreased WBC of grade II were recognized, and were improved. Two courses of the same chemotherapeutic regimen were carried out. Among 5 months, recurrent tumor showed preservation of PR. Into 3 course of chemotherapy, radiation therapy was selected for second opinion. But recurrent tumor was enlarged acutely, and radiation therapy was stopped. He died 15 months after the first detection of chemotherapy. The combination chemotherapy of TS-1 and CDDP seems to be beneficial therapy for advanced gallbladder cancer.

Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cisplatin; Combined Modality Therapy; Diarrhea; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Gallbladder Neoplasms; Humans; Male; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Oxonic Acid; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Pancreaticojejunostomy; Pyridines; Tegafur

An important cytotoxic effect of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is the inactivation of thymidylate synthase (TS) (EC 2.1.1.45) activity by the formation of a ternary complex consisting of covalently bound 5-fluorodeoxyuridine 5'-monophosphate (FdUMP), TS and 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate (CH2FH4). The gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity of 5-FU is also caused by its phosphorylation in the GI tract. Potassium oxonate (O(XO)) competitively inhibits pyrimidine phosphoribosyltransferase (EC 2.4.2.10), which converts 5-FU to 5-fluorouridine 5'-monophosphate (FUMP) in vitro. In this study the benefits of combining Oxo and tegafur (FT), which is a masked compound of 5-FU, in reducing the GI toxicity of 5-FU and in protecting the activity of TS in the normal GI tissues were evaluated.. We administered orally a preparation of 1 M FT and 0.4 M 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (CDHP) with or without 1 M O(XO) (called S-1 and FT + CDHP, respectively) or vehicle only (control) to rats for ten consecutive days and compared the toxicity, the histopathological findings and the free TS activity in the GI tissues of the treated rats.. During the experimental periods, the signs of toxicity, such as a decrease in body weight, diarrhea and death, were only observed in the rats treated with FT + CDHP. The histopathological findings in the ileum and colon samples from rats treated consecutively with S-1 on day 1, day 4, day 7 and day 10 were less frequent and more mild than in the samples from rats treated with FT + CDHP. Furthermore, the free TS activities in the ileum samples of rats given S-1 and FT + CDHP were significantly decreased compared with the activity in samples from the control rats throughout the experimental periods. The free TS activities in GI tissues of rats treated with S-1 were higher than the TS activities in tissues from rats treated with FT + CDHP daily from day 4 to day 10, although activities in S-1-treated rat were decreased to almost same low levels as in FT + CDHP-treated rats on day 1.. Our results suggest that repeated simultaneous administration of Oxo and FT can effectively protect the activity of TS by decreasing FdUMP via FUMP from 5-FU in GI tissue, and may lead to a reduction in GI toxicity.

Topics: Animals; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Body Weight; Colon; Diarrhea; Digestive System; Drug Combinations; Drug Interactions; Enzyme Inhibitors; Fluorodeoxyuridylate; Fluorouracil; Ileum; Male; Oxonic Acid; Pyridines; Rats; Tegafur; Thymidylate Synthase

S-1, an antineoplastic formulation of a fluorinated pyrimidine derivative containing tegafur (FT), CDHP, and potassium oxonate (Oxo) in a molar ratio of 1:0.4:1, was recently developed by Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., with the aim of prolonging the effective plasma concentration of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) over that produced by FT alone and reducing its dose-limiting gastrointestinal toxicity. As a part of the S-1 toxicity study, the single-dose toxicity of S-1 as well as that of its components, CDHP and Oxo, was investigated in mice, rats, and dogs. The following results were obtained. 1. In mice and rats, excretion of diarrheal stools, salivation, and alopecia were observed after S-1 administration. In severe cases, the animals subsequently showed emaciation due to weight loss or suppressed weight gain, decreased spontaneous motor activity, an anemic appearance, bradypnea, prone position, and death. In the CDHP and Oxo treatment groups of rats, the only toxic signs were soft or diarrheal stools on the dosing day. 2. In dogs, vomiting and excretion of diarrheal, mucous, or soft stools was observed after S-1 administration. In the CDHP and Oxo treatment groups, excretion of soft and diarrheal stools and vomiting were observed relatively frequently from the dosing day until day 1. 3. In the pathological examination of the animals given S-1, mice and rats showed pulmonary congestion/edema, dark red discoloration of the mesenteric lymph nodes, atrophy of lymphatic tissues such as the thymus and lymph nodes, decreases of lymphocytes in the splenic white pulp and mesenteric lymph nodes, a decrease in bone marrow cells, congestion of the glandular stomach, and aggregates of bacteria in the lung, liver, or spleen. In dogs, abnormal changes were observed mainly in the lymphatic organs such as the thymus and lymph nodes. 4. The LD50 values of S-1 in terms of the amount FT they contained were estimated to be 549 mg/kg for mice(male), 441-551 mg/kg for rats (both sexes) and about 53 mg/kg for dogs (male). The LD50 values of CDHP and Oxo were 2000 mg/kg or higher for both rats (both sexes) and dogs (male). 5. Hematopoietic and lymphatic impairments, immunosuppression associated with respiratory were considered to be the cause of death from S-1. The toxicity of S-1 reflects the toxicity of 5-FU and was not found the different toxicity by the addition of CDHP and Oxo.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Alopecia; Animals; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Body Weight; Diarrhea; Dogs; Drug Combinations; Female; Lethal Dose 50; Lymph Nodes; Male; Mice; Motor Activity; Oxonic Acid; Pyridines; Rats; Salivation; Spleen; Survival Rate; Tegafur; Thymus Gland