rutin and Hypertension

A range of surgical, endovenous, physical and medical treatments are available for patients with chronic venous disease. The aim of this review was to evaluate the evidence for pharmacological agents used for the treatment of chronic venous disease.. A literature search was performed using Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane and Google Scholar databases. The initial search terms 'varicose vein', 'venous ulcer', 'venous disease' and 'lipodermatosclerosis' were used to identify relevant clinical studies of pharmacotherapy in patients with chronic venous disease (C4-C6).. A huge range of naturally occurring and synthetic drugs have been studied in patients with chronic venous disease. For patients with C4 venous disease, micronized purified flavonoid fraction (MPFF), oxerutin, rutosides and calcium dobesilate may reduce venous symptoms and oedema. MPFF and pentoxifylline have been shown to improve venous ulcer healing when used in addition to multilayer compression bandaging. The clinical benefits of other medications remain unproven. Reliability of meta-analyses was limited by study heterogeneity, small sample sizes and lack of long-term follow-up.. In prospective randomized studies, MPFF (Daflon(®)), other flavonoid derivatives and pentoxifylline have demonstrated clinical benefits in patients with C4-C6 venous disease. Pharmacotherapy should be part of a range of treatment options in the modern management of patients with chronic venous disorders.

Topics: Calcium Dobesilate; Cardiology; Chronic Disease; Compression Bandages; Drug Therapy; Flavonoids; Humans; Hydroxyethylrutoside; Hypertension; Pentoxifylline; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rutin; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Diseases; Venous Insufficiency

The aim of this study was the evaluation of the effects of Venoruton (HR) on the prevention and control of flight microangiopathy and edema in subjects with varicose veins flying for more than 7 hours. A group of 80 patients with varicose veins, edema, and initial skin alterations due to chronic venous hypertension were included. Measurements of skin laser Doppler (LDF) resting flux (RF), PO2 and rate of ankle swelling (RAS), were made before and after the flights (within 2 hours before the flights and within 2 hours after the flights). The length of the flights was between 7 and 9 hours; all seats were in coach class. The two groups (treatment and control) were comparable for age and sex distribution. The variation (decrease) in PO2 was significant in both groups. In subjects treated with HR the decrease in PO2 was smaller (p < 0.05). The decrease in LDF-RF was significant in both groups with a higher flux at the end of the flight in the treated subjects (p < 0.05). The venoarteriolar response was decreased at the end of the flights. The decrease was less evident in the treatment group (p < 0.05). The increase in RAS was significant in the control group while it was limited in the HR group. In conclusion, HR is useful for reducing the increased capillary filtration and in controlling edema in patients with chronic venous disease in long-haul flights. HR is effective to control flight microangiopathy associated with edema.

Topics: Adult; Aerospace Medicine; Ankle; Edema; Female; Humans; Hydroxyethylrutoside; Hypertension; Male; Microcirculation; Oxygen; Partial Pressure; Skin; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography; Varicose Veins; Vasoconstrictor Agents; Venous Insufficiency

The aim of this study was to demonstrate whether and how HR (Venoruton(1000), Paroven, 0-[beta-hydroxyethyl]-rutosides) and Daflon (diosmin, 500 mg) were comparatively effective in improving the microcirculation in venous hypertension and microangiopathy.. A group of 90 patients with severe venous hypertension due to chronic venous insufficiency, ankle swelling, and lipodermatosclerosis were included. After informed consent, patients were randomized into a Venoruton and a Daflon (DF) group: patients in the Venoruton group received oral HR (2 g/day for 8 weeks); those in the Daflon group received three 500-mg tablets daily every 8 hours. The two groups were comparable for age and sex distribution. The mean age was 41 years (SD +/- 11) in the Venoruton group (46 patients) and 41.3 (SD +/- 12) in the DF group (44 patients).. There were no differences in microcirculatory parameters between the Venoruton and DF treatment groups at inclusion. There was no significant change between inclusion and measurements at 8 weeks in the DF group. In comparison, a significant decrease (P < .05) in RF (resting skin flux) and RAS (rate of ankle swelling) was observed in the Venoruton group (P < .001). The decrease in capillary filtration was associated with improvement in signs and symptoms (measured by an analogue scale line) (P < .05). Symptomatic improvement was clinically and statistically significant and important only in the Venoruton group. No side effects and no drop-outs were observed.. Venous microangiopathy was improved by the treatment with Venoruton. The comparison with Daflon indicates that HR is comparatively more effective both on microcirculatory parameters and on signs and symptoms.

Topics: Adult; Chi-Square Distribution; Chronic Disease; Diosmin; Female; Humans; Hydroxyethylrutoside; Hypertension; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Statistics, Nonparametric; Venous Insufficiency

The aim of this study was to demonstrate whether HR (Paroven-Venoruton; 0-(beta-hydroxyethyl)-rutosides), was effective in improving the microcirculation in venous hypertension and microangiopathy. Sixty patients with severe venous hypertension due to chronic venous insufficiency, ankle swelling, and lipodermatosclerosis were included. After informed consent, patients were randomized into a treatment group and a placebo group. Patients in the treatment group received oral HR (2 g/day for 8 weeks); those in the placebo group received a comparable placebo.. The two groups were comparable for age and sex distribution. The mean age was 45 years (SD 9) in the treatment group (31 patients) and 45.5 (SD 10) in the placebo group (29 patients). There were no differences between the placebo and treatment groups at inclusion. There was no change between inclusion and measurements at 8 weeks in the placebo group. A significant decrease (P < 0.05) in flux at rest and rate of ankle swelling was observed in the treatment group. The decrease in capillary filtration was associated with improvement in signs and symptoms (P < 0.05). The difference in flux, sign and symptoms, and filtration was clinically important at 8 weeks in the treatment group when compared with the placebo group. No adverse effects were observed.. Venous microangiopathy was improved by HR treatment.

Topics: Adult; Edema; Female; Humans; Hydroxyethylrutoside; Hypertension; Male; Microcirculation; Middle Aged; Placebos; Prospective Studies; Skin Ulcer; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Diseases; Vasoconstrictor Agents; Venous Insufficiency

This study was planned to demonstrate in a prospective, placebo-controlled, randomized study, whether HR (Paroven, Venoruton; 0-(beta-hydroxyethyl)-rutosides), is effective in improving the microcirculation in subjects with diabetic microangiopathy and neuropathy. Patients with severe diabetic microangiopathy, neuropathy and edema, patients with microangiopathy, without neuropathy, and 20 healthy subjects were included. Microangiopathy was defined by laser Doppler flowmetry and capillary filtration (rate of ankle swelling (RAS)). Inclusion criteria were: increase in resting flux (RF) and RAS, a decrease in venoarteriolar response (VAR), and alterations in flux increase with temperature. The 2 groups of patients and the control group were randomized in a treatment sub-group which received HR (1 g, twice daily for 6 months); those in the placebo group received similar treatment.. Groups were comparable; there were no drop-outs. There were no differences in the treatment and placebo groups at inclusion. Treatment was well tolerated; no adverse effects were reported. No variations were observed in healthy subjects at 6 months. In both groups of patients, significant decreases (P < 0.05) in RF and RAS were observed in the active treatment groups. The decrease in RAS was associated with a decrease in edema (P < 0.05) in both treatment groups. The decrease in RF and the increase in VAR were associated with a proportional decrease in RAS (P < 0.05). In patients without neuropathy, the variations in RF, VAR, and RAS were larger (P < 0.05) at 6 months. The variations in healthy subjects were limited and not significant.. The decrease in capillary filtration and edema with HR is associated with symptomatic improvement. The action on edema is beneficial for the evolution of neuropathy. The effects of HR on flux, RAS, and edema are important in early stages of microangiopathy to avoid progression to clinical stages.

Topics: Adult; Diabetic Angiopathies; Diabetic Neuropathies; Edema; Female; Humans; Hydroxyethylrutoside; Hypertension; Laser-Doppler Flowmetry; Male; Microcirculation; Middle Aged; Placebos; Skin Ulcer; Treatment Outcome; Vasoconstrictor Agents

The variation of capillary filtration rate (CFR) and ankle edema (AE) were evaluated in three groups of patients with venous hypertension with ambulatory venous pressure > 42 mmHg and in healthy subjects before and after treatment for four weeks with HR (Paroven, Venoruton; 0-(beta-hydroxyethyl)-rutosides), a venoactive drug acting on the microcirculation and on capillary permeability. Group A (30 patients) was treated with HR 500 mg tid; group B (30 patients) was treated with 1 g tid; group C (30 patients) was treated with placebo; group D (10 healthy subjects) was treated with HR 1 g/day in a randomised study. CFR was assessed by venous occlusion plethysmography. Subjective symptoms of venous hypertension were assessed by an analogue scale line considering four symptoms: swelling sensation, restless lower extremity, pain and cramps, and tiredness.. There were no significant differences for sex and age distribution among the groups; no significant differences were found for ambulatory venous pressure and refilling time and parameters of venous hypertension among groups. There was a significant difference between normal subjects and patients. There were no drop-outs and observed intolerance. In group A, there was a significant decrease of CFR (P < 0.01) after treatment. In group B (2 g/day), the decrease was greater than that in group A (P < 0.05). In group C (placebo) there was no significant difference before or after treatment. The variations in analogue score was higher with the higher dosage. The score of group A fell from 7.8 (SD 1.3) to 4 (1). Group B's score fell from 7.9 (2) to 3.1 (1.2). In group C (placebo) there was no change. The decrease in the score in the groups of patients was correlated with the variation in edema and CFR.. HR is effective in venous edema and hypertension. Its effects are dose-related.

Topics: Adult; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Edema; Female; Humans; Hydroxyethylrutoside; Hypertension; Male; Microcirculation; Middle Aged; Placebos; Plethysmography; Treatment Outcome; Vasoconstrictor Agents; Venous Insufficiency

The aim of this study was to demonstrate whether HR (Paroven, Venoruton; 0-(beta-hydroxyethyl)-rutosides), was effective in improving levels of plasma free radicals (PFRs) in patients with chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) and venous microangiopathy. Patients were randomized into the treatment group, which received oral HR (1g sachets, twice daily, for 4 weeks), and a placebo group, which received comparable placebo. Below-knee Sigvaris stockings were used during the study. PFRs were measured with the D-Rom test at the finger and at a vein of the leg in an area of CVI. The mean age of included subjects was 46 years (SD 11) in the treatment group (20 patients; 6 females) and 46.4 (SD 8) in the placebo group (20 patients; 7 females). There were no differences between placebo and treatment groups at inclusion in age and sex distribution and in parameters indicating venous hypertension. The decrease of PFRs levels in the treatment group was significant, both at the finger and in the distal blood taken in areas of CVI. There there were no significant changes in the control group. In areas of venous hypertension, PFRs values were on average higher than at the finger (systemic) level (P < 0.05). In parallel with the progressive decrease in PFRs associated with treatment, the analogue score was significantly decreased at 2 (P < 0.05) and 4 weeks (P < 0.02) in the HR group. No changes were observed in the placebo group. No adverse effects were observed. In conclusion, HR treatment is effective in decreasing both the systemic and local values of PFRs and therefore may have a positive effect on the evolution of CVI.

Topics: Adult; Female; Free Radicals; Humans; Hydroxyethylrutoside; Hypertension; Male; Middle Aged; Placebos; Prospective Studies; Skin Ulcer; Treatment Outcome; Varicose Veins; Vascular Diseases; Venous Insufficiency

The sudden deafness of vascular origin was treated by Venoruton. 4 patients were observed with positive results as improvement of hearing acuity and disappearance of tinnitus.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Clinical Trials as Topic; Female; Hearing Loss, Sudden; Humans; Hydroxyethylrutoside; Hypertension; Male; Middle Aged; Rutin

Aortic wave reflection (augmentation index; AIx) decreases during orthostatic challenges despite increased peripheral resistance, which is thought to be due to venous pooling. The purpose of this study was to examine if the decrease in AIx during an orthostatic challenge is due to venous pooling alone or body position manipulation.. Twenty-three young, healthy adults (11F/12M) participated in 3 separate orthostatic challenges (5 minutes each); 60° head-up tilt (HUT), 60° HUT with bilateral rhythmic blood pressure (BP) cuff inflation on calves (75 mm Hg) to minimize venous pooling, and lower body negative pressure (LBNP; -30 mm Hg) for venous pooling independent of body position. High-fidelity radial artery pressure waveforms using applanation tonometry were recorded at minutes 2:30 and 5:00 during each condition. Aortic BP and wave reflection were analyzed from a synthesized aortic BP waveform.. Compared to resting (baseline) measurements, AIx did not significantly decrease at minutes 2:30 or 5:00 of HUT conditions (HUT 0 ± 2% vs. -3 ± 3%, 0 ± 2%; HUT w/cuffs 0 ± 2% vs. -4 ± 2%, 0 ± 2%). Conversely, LBNP substantially reduced AIx at minutes 2:30 and 5:00 (1 ± 2% vs. -15 ± 2% and -12 ± 2%; P < 0.01). When standardized to heart rate (AIx@75), AIx@75 increased relative to baseline during HUT conditions (P < 0.05).. In contrast to previous studies, AIx did not decrease during passive HUT, yet decreased substantially during LBNP. Despite being well matched for peripheral hemodynamics, it appears that LBNP elicits a greater effect on central hemodynamics, relative to passive HUT. Collectively, changes in body position alone do not explain differences in AIx during orthostatic conditions.

Topics: Adult; Aorta; Arterial Pressure; Electrocardiography; Exercise; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Healthy Volunteers; Heart Rate; Humans; Hydroxyethylrutoside; Hypertension; Lower Body Negative Pressure; Male; Posture; Pulse Wave Analysis; Rest; Vascular Stiffness; Young Adult

Topics: Adult; Blood Viscosity; Humans; Hydroxyethylrutoside; Hypertension; Middle Aged; Rutin