ru-40555 and Mycobacterium-avium-intracellulare-Infection

Several murine models have been used to evaluate the activities of antimicrobial agents against Mycobacterium avium infection. The main model used is the beige mouse model, but beige mice are expensive and not easily available. Thus, we developed a model of infection in wild C57BL/6 mice. The drugs that exhibited some activity in a previous model of early infection were evaluated in a new model of established infection. Sparfloxacin (50 mg/kg of body weight), ethambutol (50 mg/kg), minocycline (25 mg/kg), and the inhibitor of the cortisol receptors RU-40555 (100 mg/kg) were compared with clarithromycin (50 mg/kg). Treatments were started 5 weeks after the inoculation and were continued for 21 days. Sparfloxacin and RU-40555, which exhibited a moderate activity in the model of early infection, were not effective in this model of established infection. Clarithromycin and combinations with clarithromycin kept their activities against M. avium infection, both in the spleen and in lungs. The present model of established infection of normal C57BL/6 mice is more relevant than the model of early infection for a stringent evaluation of drugs.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Clarithromycin; Colony Count, Microbial; Disease Models, Animal; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Lung; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Mifepristone; Mycobacterium avium Complex; Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare Infection; Spleen

We compared the activities of two different biological-response modifiers with that of clarithromycin against Mycobacterium avium complex infection in C57BL/6 mice. Mice were pretreated daily with clarithromycin (50 mg/kg of body weight subcutaneously [s.c.]), RU-40555 (100 mg/kg s.c.), or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) at low dose (15 micrograms/kg intraperitoneally [i.p.]) or high dose (300 micrograms/kg i.p.) 3 days before intravenous challenge with 2.5 x 10(7) CFU of the MO-1 strain of M. avium complex. Mice were treated daily until sacrifice at day 1, 8, 15, or 21 after challenge, and the numbers of CFU were measured per gram of tissue in lung and spleen. Compared at day 21 with control treatment, clarithromycin significantly decreased the level of infection in spleen (P < 0.0001) and lungs (P < 0.0001). Compared with control treatment, G-CSF at low dose had no activity, but G-CSF in combination with clarithromycin was more effective than clarithromycin alone in spleen (P < 0.05) and lungs (P < 0.015). The high dose of G-CSF was as effective as the low dose. RU-40555 alone had no beneficial activity. The RU-40555-clarithromycin combination was more effective than control treatment in spleen (P = 0.0001) and lungs (P < 0.0005) and more effective than clarithromycin alone in spleen (P < 0.009) but not in lungs. Thus, our experiments suggest that clarithromycin alone or in combination with G-CSF should be further evaluated for the prophylaxis of M. avium complex infection.

Topics: Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; Animals; Clarithromycin; Colony Count, Microbial; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucocorticoids; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor; Humans; Immunologic Factors; Lung; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Mifepristone; Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare Infection; Recombinant Proteins; Spleen