ropinirole has been researched along with Parkinson Disease in 260 studies
Parkinson Disease: A progressive, degenerative neurologic disease characterized by a TREMOR that is maximal at rest, retropulsion (i.e. a tendency to fall backwards), rigidity, stooped posture, slowness of voluntary movements, and a masklike facial expression. Pathologic features include loss of melanin containing neurons in the substantia nigra and other pigmented nuclei of the brainstem. LEWY BODIES are present in the substantia nigra and locus coeruleus but may also be found in a related condition (LEWY BODY DISEASE, DIFFUSE) characterized by dementia in combination with varying degrees of parkinsonism. (Adams et al., Principles of Neurology, 6th ed, p1059, pp1067-75)
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"It is necessary to conduct a meta-analysis of the clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on ropinirole in the treatment of Parkinson disease (PD), to explore the effects and safety of ropinirole, and to provide a theoretical basis for clinically safe and rational drug use." | 9.12 | The effect and safety of ropinirole in the treatment of Parkinson disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. ( Chen, M; Zhu, J, 2021) |
"To evaluate the efficacy of ropinirole 24-hour prolonged release (ropinirole 24-hour) as an adjunct to levodopa in patients with Parkinson disease (PD) and motor fluctuations." | 9.12 | Ropinirole 24-hour prolonged release: randomized, controlled study in advanced Parkinson disease. ( Earl, NL; Elmer, LW; Factor, SA; Hersh, BP; Lyons, KE; Pahwa, R; Stacy, MA; Stocchi, F; Truong, DD, 2007) |
"The effect of Ropinirole on tremor in early Parkinson's disease (PD) was assessed." | 9.10 | Ropinirole for the treatment of tremor in early Parkinson's disease. ( Keens, J; Schrag, A; Warner, J, 2002) |
"To evaluate ropinirole hydrochloride as dopaminergic monotherapy in patients with early Parkinson disease." | 9.08 | Ropinirole for the treatment of early Parkinson disease: a 12-month experience. Ropinirole Study Group. ( Adler, CH; Bertoni, JM; Davis, TL; Hammerstad, JP; Hauser, RA; O'Brien, CF; Sanchez-Ramos, J; Sethi, KD; Taylor, RL, 1998) |
"This study evaluated the effects of ropinirole prolonged-release (RPR) in comparison with ropinirole immediate-release (RIR) on sleep-related disorders in Parkinson disease (PD)." | 7.76 | Effects of ropinirole prolonged-release on sleep disturbances and daytime sleepiness in Parkinson disease. ( Busková, J; Dusek, P; Jech, R; Majerová, V; Roth, J; Růzicka, E; Sonka, K; Srp, A, 2010) |
"To determine if cardiac valve regurgitation occurs more commonly in patients with Parkinson disease (PD) treated with pergolide than in those treated with nonergot agonists at a comparable dose." | 7.74 | Cardiac valve regurgitation with pergolide compared with nonergot agonists in Parkinson disease. ( Dewey, RB; O'Suilleabhain, PE; Reimold, SC, 2007) |
"Data from the ropinirole versus levodopa studies 056 and REAL-PET in early Parkinson's disease were pooled and manipulated to calculate levodopa dose per kilogram body weight." | 7.74 | Relationship between weight, levodopa and dyskinesia: the significance of levodopa dose per kilogram body weight. ( Brooks, D; Rascol, O; Ross, IN; Sharma, JC, 2008) |
"Pergolide is a dopaminergic agonist used to treat Parkinson's disease but is associated with the development of retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF)." | 7.70 | Treatment of Parkinson's disease with ropinirole after pergolide-induced retroperitoneal fibrosis. ( Lund, BC; Neiman, RF; Perry, PJ, 1999) |
" Switching treatment from oral ropinirole to transdermal rotigotine was carried out overnight, with a dosage ratio of 1." | 6.76 | Overnight switch from ropinirole to transdermal rotigotine patch in patients with Parkinson disease. ( Ahn, TB; Boroojerdi, B; Cho, J; Chung, SJ; Grieger, F; Jeon, BS; Kim, HJ; Kim, JM; Kim, JW; Lee, MC; Lee, WY; Whitesides, J, 2011) |
" Data were collected in a retrospective manner from 95 patients who were tracked over the course of their therapy to determine whether psychosis or associated behavioral symptoms developed as a result and whether an intervention was needed to adjust ropinirole dosing or if additional medications had to be added to control features associated with psychosis." | 5.35 | An exploratory retrospective evaluation of ropinirole-associated psychotic symptoms in an outpatient population treated for restless legs syndrome or Parkinson's disease. ( Carver, LJ; Dahmen, MM; Lea, JW; Makos, M; Rasu, RS; Stoner, SC, 2009) |
" We observed a negative correlation between the severity of daytime sleepiness and renal function in patients treated with pramipexole alone (r(s) = -0." | 5.15 | Effect of chronic kidney disease on excessive daytime sleepiness in Parkinson disease. ( Abe, H; Baba, Y; Fukuyama, K; Higuchi, MA; Inoue, T; Uehara, Y; Yamada, T, 2011) |
"It is necessary to conduct a meta-analysis of the clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on ropinirole in the treatment of Parkinson disease (PD), to explore the effects and safety of ropinirole, and to provide a theoretical basis for clinically safe and rational drug use." | 5.12 | The effect and safety of ropinirole in the treatment of Parkinson disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. ( Chen, M; Zhu, J, 2021) |
"To evaluate the efficacy of ropinirole 24-hour prolonged release (ropinirole 24-hour) as an adjunct to levodopa in patients with Parkinson disease (PD) and motor fluctuations." | 5.12 | Ropinirole 24-hour prolonged release: randomized, controlled study in advanced Parkinson disease. ( Earl, NL; Elmer, LW; Factor, SA; Hersh, BP; Lyons, KE; Pahwa, R; Stacy, MA; Stocchi, F; Truong, DD, 2007) |
"The effect of Ropinirole on tremor in early Parkinson's disease (PD) was assessed." | 5.10 | Ropinirole for the treatment of tremor in early Parkinson's disease. ( Keens, J; Schrag, A; Warner, J, 2002) |
"To evaluate ropinirole hydrochloride as dopaminergic monotherapy in patients with early Parkinson disease." | 5.08 | Ropinirole for the treatment of early Parkinson disease: a 12-month experience. Ropinirole Study Group. ( Adler, CH; Bertoni, JM; Davis, TL; Hammerstad, JP; Hauser, RA; O'Brien, CF; Sanchez-Ramos, J; Sethi, KD; Taylor, RL, 1998) |
"Levodopa should generally be avoided early in the course of Parkinson disease; dopamine agonists, particularly second-generation agents such as ropinirole (Requip) and pramipexole (Mirapex), carry a smaller long-term risk of dyskinesia and should be used instead." | 4.81 | Two advances in the management of Parkinson disease. ( Montgomery, EB, 2002) |
"This study evaluated the effects of ropinirole prolonged-release (RPR) in comparison with ropinirole immediate-release (RIR) on sleep-related disorders in Parkinson disease (PD)." | 3.76 | Effects of ropinirole prolonged-release on sleep disturbances and daytime sleepiness in Parkinson disease. ( Busková, J; Dusek, P; Jech, R; Majerová, V; Roth, J; Růzicka, E; Sonka, K; Srp, A, 2010) |
"To determine if cardiac valve regurgitation occurs more commonly in patients with Parkinson disease (PD) treated with pergolide than in those treated with nonergot agonists at a comparable dose." | 3.74 | Cardiac valve regurgitation with pergolide compared with nonergot agonists in Parkinson disease. ( Dewey, RB; O'Suilleabhain, PE; Reimold, SC, 2007) |
"To evaluate the effects of the dopamine D2-D3 agonist ropinirole in patients who developed apathy after complete withdrawal from dopaminergic medication following successful subthalamic nucleus (STN) stimulation for advanced Parkinson disease (PD)." | 3.74 | Apathy following subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson disease: a dopamine responsive symptom. ( Agid, Y; Bardinet, E; Czernecki, V; Dubois, B; Lévy, R; Schüpbach, M; Yaici, S; Yelnik, J, 2008) |
"Data from the ropinirole versus levodopa studies 056 and REAL-PET in early Parkinson's disease were pooled and manipulated to calculate levodopa dose per kilogram body weight." | 3.74 | Relationship between weight, levodopa and dyskinesia: the significance of levodopa dose per kilogram body weight. ( Brooks, D; Rascol, O; Ross, IN; Sharma, JC, 2008) |
"Patients with Parkinson disease (PD) treated with the nonergot dopamine agonists pramipexole dihydrochloride and ropinirole hydrochloride have been reported to have sleep attacks without warning." | 3.72 | Predictors of impaired daytime sleep and wakefulness in patients with Parkinson disease treated with older (ergot) vs newer (nonergot) dopamine agonists. ( Lang, AE; Razmy, A; Shapiro, CM, 2004) |
"Pergolide is a dopaminergic agonist used to treat Parkinson's disease but is associated with the development of retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF)." | 3.70 | Treatment of Parkinson's disease with ropinirole after pergolide-induced retroperitoneal fibrosis. ( Lund, BC; Neiman, RF; Perry, PJ, 1999) |
" Dopamine receptor agonists provide sustained dopamin-ergic stimulation and have been found to delay the initiation of levodopa treatment and reduce the frequency of various motor complications due to the long-term use of levodopa." | 3.11 | Comparison of pramipexole versus ropinirole in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. ( Gencler, OS; Oztekin, MF; Oztekin, N, 2022) |
"This Phase IV, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study characterized the dose-response and tolerability of fixed doses of ropinirole prolonged release (PR)." | 2.84 | A fixed-dose, dose-response study of ropinirole prolonged release in early stage Parkinson's disease. ( Chriscoe, S; Jimenez, T; Upward, J; VanMeter, S; Zesiewicz, TA, 2017) |
"This Phase IV, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study characterized the dose-response and tolerability of fixed doses of ropinirole prolonged release (PR) in subjects with advanced Parkinson's disease." | 2.84 | A randomized, fixed-dose, dose-response study of ropinirole prolonged release in advanced Parkinson's disease. ( Chriscoe, S; Davy, M; Jimenez, T; Upward, J; VanMeter, S; Zesiewicz, TA, 2017) |
"Ropinirole XL/PR was titrated/continued, and adjusted as appropriate during the maintenance phase (maximum 24 mg/d)." | 2.82 | Long-term, open-label, safety study of once-daily ropinirole extended/prolonged release in early and advanced Parkinson's disease. ( Asgharian, A; Ellis, J; Jimenez, T; Makumi, CW; Shaikh, S; VanMeter, S, 2016) |
" Dosage of levodopa and oral DA (pramipexole ≤1." | 2.80 | Rotigotine transdermal system as add-on to oral dopamine agonist in advanced Parkinson's disease: an open-label study. ( Bauer, L; Chung, SJ; Ikeda, J; Jeon, BS; Kim, JM; Kim, JW; Singh, P; Thierfelder, S, 2015) |
" Safety assessments included monitoring adverse events (AEs), neurological examination, Gambling Symptom Assessment Scale questionnaire, liver chemistry, and laboratory tests." | 2.80 | An open-label extension study to evaluate the safety of ropinirole prolonged release in Chinese patients with advanced Parkinson's disease. ( Cai, M; Chen, S; Cheng, Y; Hu, J; Li, J; Liu, C; Qu, Q; Wang, J; Wang, Z; Zhang, B; Zhang, X; Zhang, Z; Zhu, R, 2015) |
"Pramipexole/ropinirole was switched to equivalent dose rotigotine overnight or in two stages." | 2.80 | Switch from oral pramipexole or ropinirole to rotigotine transdermal system in advanced Parkinson's disease: an open-label study. ( Bauer, L; Chung, SJ; Ikeda, J; Jeon, BS; Kim, JM; Kim, JW; Singh, P; Thierfelder, S, 2015) |
" However, there may be individual pharmacokinetic differences so that multiple dosing may be preferred in some individuals." | 2.78 | Comparison of once-daily versus twice-daily combination of ropinirole prolonged release in Parkinson's disease. ( Jeon, BS; Kim, HJ; Kim, JM; Kim, JS; Kim, YE; Lee, JY; Yun, JY, 2013) |
" The most frequent adverse event experienced in the ropinirole PR group was dyskinesia." | 2.78 | The efficacy and safety of ropinirole prolonged release tablets as adjunctive therapy in Chinese subjects with advanced Parkinson's disease: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. ( Cai, M; Cao, H; Chen, S; Cheng, Y; Li, J; Liu, C; Qu, Q; Wang, J; Wang, Z; Zhang, B; Zhang, X; Zhang, Z; Zhu, R, 2013) |
" The safety was assessed on the basis of adverse events, blood pressure, pulse, laboratory measurement and electrocardiographic recordings." | 2.78 | [Efficacy and safety of ropinirole in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: a multi-center, randomized, double-blind and bromocriptine-controlled trial]. ( Chen, HB; Li, SH; Ma, J; Sun, XR; Tang, RH; Wang, ZF; Yang, JS; Zhang, XY; Zhao, WQ, 2013) |
"Ropinirole was initiated at 0." | 2.77 | Ropinirole does not affect plasma arginine vasopressin levels in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease. ( Arai, M, 2012) |
" Switching treatment from oral ropinirole to transdermal rotigotine was carried out overnight, with a dosage ratio of 1." | 2.76 | Overnight switch from ropinirole to transdermal rotigotine patch in patients with Parkinson disease. ( Ahn, TB; Boroojerdi, B; Cho, J; Chung, SJ; Grieger, F; Jeon, BS; Kim, HJ; Kim, JM; Kim, JW; Lee, MC; Lee, WY; Whitesides, J, 2011) |
" Despite dosing differences, the PR titration regimen was generally well tolerated, with an AE profile similar to that of IR." | 2.76 | PREPARED: Comparison of prolonged and immediate release ropinirole in advanced Parkinson's disease. ( Giorgi, L; Hunter, B; Schapira, AH; Stocchi, F, 2011) |
"Ropinirole PR was titrated/continued, and adjusted as appropriate during the maintenance phase (maximum 24 mg/day)." | 2.76 | Long-term, open-label study of once-daily ropinirole prolonged release in early Parkinson's disease. ( Asgharian, A; Hauser, RA; Lew, M; Makumi, C; Reichmann, H; Shulman, KJ, 2011) |
" Intensive pharmacokinetic blood sampling was performed over 24 hours." | 2.73 | Steady-state pharmacokinetic properties of a 24-hour prolonged-release formulation of ropinirole: results of two randomized studies in patients with Parkinson's disease. ( Tompson, DJ; Vearer, D, 2007) |
"Ropinirole is a non-ergot-selective D2 dopamine agonist." | 2.71 | [Practical experience on improving activities of daily living competence in Parkinson's patients treated with ropinirole. Results of a applied study]. ( Angersbach, D; Buchwald, B; Reichmann, H, 2005) |
"Ropinirole was found to be safe and well-tolerated." | 2.71 | Ropinirole as an adjunct to levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: a 16-week bromocriptine controlled study. ( Cho, IS; Ha, JH; Im, JH; Lee, MC, 2003) |
" In the group of patients with prior dopamine-agonist therapy, more patients reported adverse events in the ropinirole group (90% versus 79%, p < 0." | 2.70 | A six-month multicentre, double-blind, bromocriptine-controlled study of the safety and efficacy of ropinirole in the treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease not optimally controlled by L-dopa. ( Brooks, DJ; Brunt, ER; Korczyn, AD; Montastruc, JL; Stocchi, F, 2002) |
"Ropinirole is a specific non-ergoline dopamine D2-receptor agonist with antiparkinsonian properties." | 2.69 | Effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of ropinirole in parkinsonian patients. ( Brefel, C; Bullman, S; Citerone, DR; Fitzpatrick, K; Lopez-Gil, A; Montastruc, JL; Rascol, O; Rayet, S; Taylor, AC; Thalamas, C, 1998) |
"Thirty patients with Parkinson's disease not previously treated with dopamine agonists, of whom 28 produced evaluable pharmacokinetic data for ropinirole and 23 for L-dopa." | 2.69 | Lack of a pharmacokinetic interaction at steady state between ropinirole and L-dopa in patients with Parkinson's disease. ( Beerahee, A; Burns, E; Citerone, DR; Cyronak, MJ; Fitzpatrick, KL; Leigh, TJ; Lennox, G; Lopez-Gil, A; Taylor, AC; Vakil, SD, 1999) |
"theophylline were compared before and after a 4-week period of oral treatment with ropinirole (2 mg t." | 2.69 | Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between ropinirole and theophylline in patients with Parkinson's disease. ( Brefel-Courbon, C; Eagle, S; Fitzpatrick, K; Rascol, O; Taylor, A; Thalamas, C, 1999) |
"Early Parkinson's disease can be managed successfully for up to five years with a reduced risk of dyskinesia by initiating treatment with ropinirole alone and supplementing it with levodopa if necessary." | 2.69 | A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson's disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa. ( Brooks, DJ; Clarke, CE; De Deyn, PP; Korczyn, AD; Lang, AE; Rascol, O, 2000) |
"The proportion of "responders" (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale improvement of at least 30%) did not differ between groups (levodopa, 58%; ropinirole, 48%)." | 2.69 | Ropinirole in the treatment of early Parkinson's disease: a 6-month interim report of a 5-year levodopa-controlled study. 056 Study Group. ( Brooks, DJ; Brunt, ER; Korczyn, AD; Poewe, WH; Rascol, O; Stocchi, F, 1998) |
"The mean Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) total motor examination scores (Part III) at baseline were similar in the four strata." | 2.69 | Ropinirole versus bromocriptine in the treatment of early Parkinson's disease: a 6-month interim report of a 3-year study. 053 Study Group. ( Brooks, DJ; Brunt, ER; Korczyn, AD; Poewe, WH; Rascol, O; Stocchi, F, 1998) |
"Ropinirole-treated patients had a significantly greater percentage improvement in UPDRS motor score than patients who received placebo (+24% vs -3%; p < 0." | 2.68 | Ropinirole for the treatment of early Parkinson's disease. The Ropinirole Study Group. ( Adler, CH; Bertoni, J; Davis, TL; Hammerstad, JP; Hauser, RA; O'Brien, CF; Sanchez-Ramos, J; Sethi, KD; Taylor, RL, 1997) |
"Ropinirole has beneficial adjuvant effects in parkinsonian patients with moderate motor disability and motor fluctuations." | 2.68 | Ropinirole in the treatment of levodopa-induced motor fluctuations in patients with Parkinson's disease. ( Fuell, D; Lees, AJ; Montastruc, JL; Pirtosek, Z; Rascol, O; Senard, JM, 1996) |
"Ropinirole-SR adjunctive treatment showed a tendency towards more improvement in UPDRS-ADL score (MD 1." | 2.61 | Indirect Comparison of Ropinirole and Pramipexole as Levodopa Adjunctive Therapy in Advanced Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. ( Cooper, J; Ni, X; Ning, Y; Parks, D; Refoios Camejo, R; Yi, B; Zhao, H, 2019) |
"Selegiline was more tolerable than bromocriptine (OR = 0." | 2.55 | Comparison for Efficacy and Tolerability among Ten Drugs for Treatment of Parkinson's Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis. ( Ji, F; Jiang, R; Su, Z; Xue, R; Zhou, Y; Zhu, X; Zhuo, C, 2017) |
"Medical literature on the use of RPR in Parkinson's disease was identified using MEDLINE and the reference lists of published articles." | 2.50 | Drug safety evaluation of ropinirole prolonged release. ( Radicati, FG; Stocchi, F; Torti, M, 2014) |
" However, long-acting NEDA were also associated with a higher incidence of adverse events, especially in early PD patients, compared with placebo." | 2.50 | Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of long-acting non-ergot dopamine agonists in Parkinson's disease. ( Peng, GG; Wang, M; Zhang, JW; Zhou, CQ, 2014) |
" The objective of this study was to perform an indirect comparison of Adverse Events (AEs) and Dropout Rates (DRs) among clinical trials of pramipexole, ropinirole, and rasagiline." | 2.48 | Indirect comparisons of adverse events and dropout rates in early Parkinson's disease trials of pramipexole, ropinirole, and rasagiline. ( Tarrants, ML; Zagmutt, FJ, 2012) |
" The Cochrane Collaboration guidelines were followed and the following data were extracted from each study: identifier (title and bibliographical reference), classification of the quality of the evidence (Jadad criteria), type and design of the study, number of patients, patient demographics (average age, sex), Parkinson's disease stage (Hoehn and Yahr Scale), treatment (monotherapy or adjuvant to levodopa), drugs used (including dosage and duration), study objective (safety or tolerability), method of evaluation of results, randomization and blinding, and description of all the adverse events in all treatment groups." | 2.46 | Tolerability and safety of ropinirole versus other dopamine agonists and levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. ( Kulisevsky, J; Pagonabarraga, J, 2010) |
"Ropinirole is a non-ergoline dopamine agonist with medium elimination half time, which has been licensed for the therapy of idiopathic Parkinson syndrome in mono- and add-on therapy for more than 10 years." | 2.46 | [Clinical data of the prolonged-release formulation of ropinirole]. ( Bergmann, L; Jost, WH, 2010) |
" Several potential advantages of ropinirole prolonged release compared to the immediate release formulation include maintaining more consistent dopaminergic activity with steadier plasma levels, increased tolerability, greater compliance from a simpler once-daily dosing regimen and ease in dose titration." | 2.45 | A review of ropinirole prolonged release in Parkinson's disease. ( Lyons, KE; Nashatizadeh, MM; Pahwa, R, 2009) |
"Ropinirole is a non-ergolinic dopamine agonist, which has been used for over 10 years for the treatment of Parkinson's disease." | 2.44 | Initial experience with ropinirole PR (prolonged release). ( Buhmann, C; Fuchs, G; Greulich, W; Hummel, S; Jost, WH; Korchounov, A; Müngersdorf, M; Schwarz, M; Spiegel-Meixensberger, M, 2008) |
"Ropinirole is a non-ergoline dopamine agonist, highly selective for the D2 receptor subtype D3." | 2.44 | [Systemic review and meta-analysis of tolerability and safety between different titration regimes of ropinirol dose in the treatment of Parkinson's disease]. ( Chacon, J, 2007) |
"Selegiline was reassigned as Non-efficacious for the prevention of dyskinesias." | 2.43 | Evidence-based medical review update: pharmacological and surgical treatments of Parkinson's disease: 2001 to 2004. ( Goetz, CG; Poewe, W; Rascol, O; Sampaio, C, 2005) |
"When used as monotherapy in early Parkinson's disease, ropinirole improves signs and symptoms of the disorder." | 2.42 | Ropinirole therapy for Parkinson's disease. ( Hauser, RA; Lyons, KE; Pahwa, R, 2004) |
"Ropinirole is a modern, non-ergoline dopamine agonist which has been shown to be effective as monotherapy as well as combination therapy against idiopathic Parkinson's disease." | 2.42 | Ropinirole: current status of the studies. ( Jost, WH, 2004) |
" There is, however, uncertainty regarding differences in the adverse event profiles associated with each drug." | 2.42 | Comparison of the risk of adverse events with pramipexole and ropinirole in patients with Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis. ( Etminan, M; Gill, S; Samii, A, 2003) |
"Patients with Parkinson's disease using pramipexole or ropinirole are at higher risk of experiencing somnolence relative to patients taking placebo." | 2.41 | Increased risk of somnolence with the new dopamine agonists in patients with Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. ( Etminan, M; Rochon, PA; Samii, A; Takkouche, B, 2001) |
"Ropinirole is a selective non-ergoline dopamine D2 receptor agonist indicated for use in treating Parkinson's disease." | 2.41 | Clinical pharmacokinetics of ropinirole. ( Kaye, CM; Nicholls, B, 2000) |
"Ropinirole and levodopa treatments were similar in efficacy as measured by UPDRS ADL scores, although ropinirole recipients showed significantly less improvement on UPDRS motor scores at the 5-year study end-point in a multicentre, randomised double-blind trial." | 2.41 | Ropinirole: a review of its use in the management of Parkinson's disease. ( Matheson, AJ; Spencer, CM, 2000) |
"Long-term levodopa therapy for Parkinson's disease is complicated by the development of motor fluctuations and abnormal involuntary movements." | 2.41 | Ropinirole versus bromocriptine for levodopa-induced complications in Parkinson's disease. ( Clarke, CE; Deane, KH, 2000) |
"Long-term levodopa therapy for Parkinson's disease is complicated by the development of motor fluctuations and abnormal involuntary movements." | 2.41 | Ropinirole for levodopa-induced complications in Parkinson's disease. ( Clarke, CE; Deane, KH, 2000) |
" Also, when given as adjunctive therapy with levodopa, they can allow the levodopa maintenance dosage to be reduced without loss of symptom control." | 2.41 | Clinical pharmacology of dopamine agonists. ( Lam, YW, 2000) |
"Ropinirole is a nonergoline dopamine agonist that binds to dopamine D2-receptors; the drug is indicated for use in the symptomatic treatment of early and late Parkinson's disease (PD)." | 2.40 | Ropinirole: a dopamine agonist for the treatment of Parkinson's disease. ( Kuzel, MD, 1999) |
" Monotherapy with dopamine agonists in early Parkinson's disease has been advocated in order to delay the occurrence of complications associated with long term administration of levodopa." | 2.40 | Clinical pharmacology of dopamine agonists in Parkinson's disease. ( Lange, KW, 1998) |
"Tolcapone has also demonstrated efficacy in patients with motor fluctuations." | 2.40 | New pharmacotherapy for Parkinson's disease. ( Alldredge, BK; Aminoff, MJ; Bainbridge, JL; Dowling, GA; Gottwald, MD, 1997) |
"Ropinirole is a new nonergoline dopamine agonist that binds specifically to D2-like receptors with a selectivity similar to that of dopamine (D3 > D2 > D4)." | 2.40 | Pharmacologic profile of ropinirole: a nonergoline dopamine agonist. ( Tulloch, IF, 1997) |
"Ropinirole is a novel, non-ergoline dopamine agonist chemical name with a very high specificity for dopamine D2-like receptors, currently being investigated for the symptomatic treatment of Parkinson's disease." | 2.39 | Ropinirole in the symptomatic treatment of Parkinson's disease. ( Brooks, DJ; Burn, DJ; Torjanski, N, 1995) |
"This article selects Parkinson's disease patients from the provincial hospital to conduct investigations and group experiments on these people to test the effects of different levels of ropinirole hydrochloride in the treatment of Parkinson's disease." | 1.72 | Clinical Observation of Ropinirole Hydrochloride in the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease. ( Chen, Y; Gao, X; Kong, Q; Zhang, J, 2022) |
"75]) taking one of three types of non-ergot extended-release DAs (rotigotine 32; pramipexole 44; ropinirole 36) with or without L-dopa (median daily total dosage of antiparkinsonian drugs 525." | 1.62 | Antiparkinsonian drugs as potent contributors to nocturnal sleep in patients with Parkinson's disease. ( Ando, H; Doyu, M; Fujikake, A; Fukuoka, T; Hayashi, M; Ito, C; Izumi, M; Kawagashira, Y; Koide, H; Nakashima, K; Niwa, JI; Ogawa, K; Oiwa, H; Okada, Y; Taguchi, S; Tokui, K; Tsunoda, Y; Yasumoto, A; Yuasa, T, 2021) |
"Ropinirole is a very important treatment option for Parkinson's disease (PD), a major threat to the aging population." | 1.48 | Orally-dissolving film for sublingual and buccal delivery of ropinirole. ( Chow, SF; Fang, Y; Han, H; Lai, KL; Lam, TN; Lee, WYT; Li, HY; Li, Q; Zhang, S, 2018) |
"A rat model of Parkinson's disease was created by unilaterally infusing 6-hydroxydopamine, a dopamine neurotoxin, into the medial forebrain bundle." | 1.46 | D-512, a novel dopamine D ( Bishop, C; Conti, MM; Das, B; Dutta, AK; Lindenbach, D; Meadows, SM, 2017) |
"Impulse control disorders (ICDs) in Parkinson's disease (PD) are associated primarily with dopamine agonist (DA) use." | 1.43 | A European multicentre survey of impulse control behaviours in Parkinson's disease patients treated with short- and long-acting dopamine agonists. ( Antonini, A; Chaudhuri, KR; Durner, G; Falup-Pecurariu, C; Grilo, M; Henriksen, T; Kessel, B; Martinez-Martin, P; Odin, P; Rizos, A; Røkenes Karlsen, K; Sauerbier, A; Silverdale, M; Weintraub, D, 2016) |
"Parkinson's disease is characterised by three main symptoms: slowness and paucity of movements, rigidity, and resting tremor." | 1.42 | Parkinson's disease: initial treatment of motor disorders. ( , 2015) |
" Pharmacokinetic results of CSNE(ROP) in Wistar rat brain and plasma showed a significantly high (p** < 0." | 1.42 | Nano-ropinirole for the management of Parkinsonism: blood-brain pharmacokinetics and carrier localization. ( Ahuja, A; Al Rohaimi, AH; Ali, J; Baboota, S; Hassan, AA; Muslim, S; Mustafa, G, 2015) |
"These agents are used to treat Parkinson disease, restless leg syndrome, and hyperprolactinemia." | 1.40 | Reports of pathological gambling, hypersexuality, and compulsive shopping associated with dopamine receptor agonist drugs. ( Glenmullen, J; Mattison, DR; Moore, TJ, 2014) |
" However, orally it undergoes degradation in gastrointestinal tract and extensive first pass metabolism, resulting in its poor and variable bioavailability of the commercially available oral tablets." | 1.40 | Colloidal soft nanocarrier for transdermal delivery of dopamine agonist: ex vivo and in vivo evaluation. ( Kalaria, DR; Kalia, YN; More, S; Patel, P; Patravale, VB; Pol, A, 2014) |
"Ropinirole treatment yielded a significant clinical improvement (mean UPDRS score subitem III 13." | 1.39 | fMRI changes in cortical activation during task performance with the unaffected hand partially reverse after ropinirole treatment in de novo Parkinson's disease. ( Baldacci, F; Bonuccelli, U; Cecchi, P; Diciotti, S; Giannelli, M; Lucetti, C; Mascalchi, M; Tessa, C, 2013) |
"Methods are illustrated using a Parkinson's disease trial." | 1.39 | Some consequences of assuming simple patterns for the treatment effect over time in a linear mixed model. ( Bamia, C; Kenward, MG; White, IR, 2013) |
"Impulse control disorders were more common in patients treated with a dopamine agonist than in patients not taking a dopamine agonist (17." | 1.36 | Impulse control disorders in Parkinson disease: a cross-sectional study of 3090 patients. ( Koester, J; Lang, AE; Potenza, MN; Siderowf, AD; Stacy, M; Voon, V; Weintraub, D; Whetteckey, J; Wunderlich, GR, 2010) |
"Psychotic features in patients with Parkinson's Disease usually present as visual hallucinations against a background of cognitive deterioration and dopaminomimetic therapy." | 1.36 | Isolated delusional syndrome in Parkinson's Disease. ( Bozi, M; Christodoulou, C; Douzenis, A; Gasparinatos, G; Stamboulis, E; Stefanis, C; Stefanis, L; Stefanis, N, 2010) |
"The role of iron in the pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease (PD) has been implicated strongly because of generation of oxidative stress leading to dopamine cell death." | 1.36 | Discovery of 4-(4-(2-((5-Hydroxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalen-2-yl)(propyl)amino)ethyl)piperazin-1-yl)quinolin-8-ol and its analogues as highly potent dopamine D2/D3 agonists and as iron chelator: in vivo activity indicates potential application in sympto ( Antonio, T; Dutta, AK; Ghosh, B; Reith, ME, 2010) |
" Data were collected in a retrospective manner from 95 patients who were tracked over the course of their therapy to determine whether psychosis or associated behavioral symptoms developed as a result and whether an intervention was needed to adjust ropinirole dosing or if additional medications had to be added to control features associated with psychosis." | 1.35 | An exploratory retrospective evaluation of ropinirole-associated psychotic symptoms in an outpatient population treated for restless legs syndrome or Parkinson's disease. ( Carver, LJ; Dahmen, MM; Lea, JW; Makos, M; Rasu, RS; Stoner, SC, 2009) |
"Parkinson's disease is characterized by the degeneration of dopaminergic pathways projecting to the striatum." | 1.35 | Reward-learning and the novelty-seeking personality: a between- and within-subjects study of the effects of dopamine agonists on young Parkinson's patients. ( Bereczki, D; Bódi, N; Daw, N; Dibó, G; Gluck, MA; Kéri, S; Moustafa, A; Myers, CE; Nagy, H; Takáts, A, 2009) |
"Results achieved in treating the Parkinson's disease (PD) by the dopamine receptor agonist, ropinirole, have been hampered by its side effects." | 1.35 | Side effects of ropinirole in patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease. ( Dikanovic, M; Jukic, I; Lusic, I; Titlic, M; Tonkic, A, 2008) |
"Ropinirole, which is a non-ergot dopamine agonist derivative, exerts therapeutic benefits in Parkinson's disease (PD)." | 1.34 | Overexpression of D2/D3 receptors increases efficacy of ropinirole in chronically 6-OHDA-lesioned Parkinsonian rats. ( Borlongan, CV; Hara, K; Kim, KM; Maki, M; Matsukawa, N; Morgan, JC; Sethi, KD; Xu, L; Yasuhara, T; Yu, G, 2007) |
"Ropinirole is a non-ergoline selective D2 dopamine agonist." | 1.34 | [Improvements in motor and non-motor symptoms in parkinson patients under ropinirole therapy]. ( Angersbach, D; Buchwald, B; Jost, WH, 2007) |
"Ropinirole is a modern dopamine agonist with a half-life of medium extent that is highly selective for D(2)-receptors." | 1.33 | Clinical studies with ropinirole in Parkinson's disease and RLS. ( Angersbach, D; Jost, WH; Rascol, O, 2006) |
"The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) is the main outcome measure in clinical trials of Parkinson's disease (PD)." | 1.33 | Minimal clinically important change on the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale. ( Counsell, N; Poewe, W; Sampaio, C; Schrag, A, 2006) |
"Not all patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) respond to levodopa and others develop dyskinesias." | 1.32 | Cost analysis of ropinirole versus levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. ( Einarson, TR; Iskedjian, M, 2003) |
"Two patients with Parkinson's disease received treatment with ropinirole and/or pramipexole, during which both experienced sleep attacks." | 1.31 | Non-ergot dopamine agonist-induced sleep attacks. ( Ryan, M; Slevin, JT; Wells, A, 2000) |
"Ropinirole was added to his current therapy for Parkinson disease, with a corresponding decrease in the dose of levodopa/carbidopa to allow levodopa sparing." | 1.31 | Warfarin and ropinirole interaction. ( Bair, JD; Oppelt, TF, 2001) |
"Orthostatic hypotension was defined as a drop in either systolic blood pressure of more than 25 mm Hg or diastolic pressure of more than 10 mm Hg." | 1.31 | Acute orthostatic hypotension when starting dopamine agonists in Parkinson's disease. ( Blasucci, L; Goetz, CG; Kujawa, K; Leurgans, S; Raman, R, 2000) |
"Patients with Parkinson's disease (n = 68) switched from pergolide or bromocriptine to ropinirole overnight (dose equivalence ratios 1:6 and 10:6, respectively)." | 1.30 | An overnight switch to ropinirole therapy in patients with Parkinson's disease. Short communication. ( Antonini, A; Barichella, M; Canesi, M; Mariani, CB; Pezzoli, G; Tesei, S; Zecchinelli, AL, 1999) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 1 (0.38) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 40 (15.38) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 122 (46.92) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 88 (33.85) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 9 (3.46) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Ghosh, B | 2 |
Antonio, T | 3 |
Zhen, J | 1 |
Kharkar, P | 1 |
Reith, ME | 2 |
Dutta, AK | 3 |
Modi, G | 1 |
Reith, M | 1 |
Dutta, A | 1 |
Zhu, J | 1 |
Chen, M | 1 |
Gencler, OS | 1 |
Oztekin, N | 1 |
Oztekin, MF | 1 |
Zhang, J | 1 |
Gao, X | 1 |
Chen, Y | 1 |
Kong, Q | 1 |
Jeon, N | 1 |
Bortolato, M | 1 |
Gungabissoon, U | 1 |
Kirichek, O | 1 |
El Baou, C | 1 |
Galwey, N | 1 |
Hattori, N | 4 |
Mochizuki, H | 1 |
Hasegawa, K | 5 |
Nomoto, M | 2 |
Uchida, E | 1 |
Terahara, T | 1 |
Okawa, K | 1 |
Fukuta, H | 1 |
Nehal, N | 1 |
Nabi, B | 1 |
Rehman, S | 1 |
Pathak, A | 1 |
Iqubal, A | 1 |
Khan, SA | 1 |
Yar, MS | 1 |
Parvez, S | 1 |
Baboota, S | 3 |
Ali, J | 3 |
Chen, C | 1 |
Jönsson, S | 1 |
Yang, S | 1 |
Plan, EL | 1 |
Karlsson, MO | 1 |
Taguchi, S | 1 |
Koide, H | 1 |
Oiwa, H | 1 |
Hayashi, M | 1 |
Ogawa, K | 1 |
Ito, C | 1 |
Nakashima, K | 1 |
Yuasa, T | 1 |
Yasumoto, A | 1 |
Ando, H | 1 |
Fujikake, A | 1 |
Fukuoka, T | 1 |
Tokui, K | 1 |
Izumi, M | 1 |
Tsunoda, Y | 1 |
Kawagashira, Y | 1 |
Okada, Y | 1 |
Niwa, JI | 1 |
Doyu, M | 1 |
Zhuo, C | 1 |
Zhu, X | 1 |
Jiang, R | 1 |
Ji, F | 1 |
Su, Z | 1 |
Xue, R | 1 |
Zhou, Y | 1 |
Sato, K | 1 |
Mitsuyama, E | 1 |
Numachi, Y | 1 |
Lindenbach, D | 1 |
Das, B | 1 |
Conti, MM | 1 |
Meadows, SM | 1 |
Bishop, C | 1 |
Barcia, E | 1 |
Boeva, L | 1 |
García-García, L | 1 |
Slowing, K | 1 |
Fernández-Carballido, A | 1 |
Casanova, Y | 1 |
Negro, S | 1 |
Foley, JA | 1 |
Warner, TT | 1 |
Cipolotti, L | 1 |
Lai, KL | 1 |
Fang, Y | 1 |
Han, H | 1 |
Li, Q | 1 |
Zhang, S | 1 |
Li, HY | 1 |
Chow, SF | 1 |
Lam, TN | 1 |
Lee, WYT | 1 |
Castro-Martínez, XH | 1 |
García-Ruiz, PJ | 2 |
Martínez-García, C | 1 |
Martínez-Castrillo, JC | 1 |
Vela, L | 2 |
Mata, M | 2 |
Martínez-Torres, I | 1 |
Feliz-Feliz, C | 1 |
Palau, F | 1 |
Hoenicka, J | 1 |
Lanteri, PF | 1 |
Leguia, A | 1 |
Doladé, NG | 1 |
García, GC | 1 |
Figueras, A | 1 |
Lee, JY | 2 |
Jeon, B | 1 |
Koh, SB | 1 |
Yoon, WT | 1 |
Lee, HW | 1 |
Kwon, OD | 1 |
Kim, JW | 4 |
Kim, JM | 5 |
Ma, HI | 1 |
Kim, HT | 1 |
Baik, JS | 1 |
Cho, J | 2 |
Contin, M | 2 |
Lopane, G | 1 |
Mohamed, S | 2 |
Calandra-Buonaura, G | 1 |
Capellari, S | 1 |
De Massis, P | 1 |
Nassetti, S | 1 |
Perrone, A | 1 |
Riva, R | 2 |
Sambati, L | 1 |
Scaglione, C | 1 |
Cortelli, P | 1 |
Fowler, E | 1 |
Maderal, A | 1 |
Yosipovitch, G | 1 |
Mancera, N | 1 |
Wadia, HP | 1 |
Zhao, H | 1 |
Ning, Y | 1 |
Cooper, J | 2 |
Refoios Camejo, R | 1 |
Ni, X | 1 |
Yi, B | 1 |
Parks, D | 1 |
Jackowiak, E | 1 |
Patil, PG | 1 |
Chou, KL | 1 |
Frampton, JE | 1 |
Plate, A | 1 |
Benninghoff, J | 1 |
Jansen, GH | 1 |
Wlasich, E | 1 |
Eigenbrod, S | 1 |
Drzezga, A | 1 |
Jansen, NL | 1 |
Kretzschmar, HA | 1 |
Bötzel, K | 1 |
Rujescu, D | 1 |
Danek, A | 1 |
Wilson, L | 1 |
Sheehan, J | 1 |
Thorpe, M | 1 |
Agúndez, JA | 1 |
García-Martín, E | 1 |
Alonso-Navarro, H | 1 |
Jiménez-Jiménez, FJ | 1 |
Shepherd, TA | 1 |
Edelstyn, NM | 1 |
Mayes, AR | 1 |
Ellis, SJ | 1 |
Zhang, Z | 2 |
Wang, J | 2 |
Zhang, X | 2 |
Chen, S | 2 |
Wang, Z | 2 |
Zhang, B | 2 |
Liu, C | 2 |
Qu, Q | 2 |
Cheng, Y | 2 |
Li, J | 2 |
Cao, H | 1 |
Cai, M | 2 |
Zhu, R | 2 |
Yun, JY | 1 |
Kim, HJ | 3 |
Kim, YE | 1 |
Kim, JS | 1 |
Jeon, BS | 5 |
El Otmani, H | 1 |
Raji, L | 1 |
El Moutaouakil, B | 1 |
Rafai, MA | 1 |
Slassi, I | 1 |
Li, SH | 1 |
Chen, HB | 1 |
Wang, ZF | 1 |
Tang, RH | 1 |
Zhang, XY | 1 |
Yang, JS | 1 |
Zhao, WQ | 1 |
Sun, XR | 1 |
Ma, J | 1 |
Lamichhane, D | 1 |
Narayanan, NS | 1 |
Gonzalez-Alegre, P | 1 |
Arora, A | 1 |
Fletcher, P | 1 |
Pagonabarraga, J | 3 |
Kulisevsky, J | 3 |
van Boven, JF | 1 |
Novak, A | 1 |
Driessen, MT | 1 |
Boersma, C | 1 |
Boomsma, MM | 1 |
Postma, MJ | 1 |
Martinez Castrillo, JC | 1 |
Alonso-Canovas, A | 1 |
Herranz Barcenas, A | 1 |
Sanchez Alonso, P | 1 |
Olmedilla Gonzalez, N | 1 |
Mahillo Fernandez, I | 1 |
Stocchi, F | 12 |
Radicati, FG | 1 |
Torti, M | 1 |
Tomasiuk, R | 1 |
Szlufik, S | 1 |
Friedman, A | 1 |
Koziorowski, D | 1 |
Zhou, CQ | 1 |
Zhang, JW | 1 |
Wang, M | 1 |
Peng, GG | 1 |
Moore, TJ | 1 |
Glenmullen, J | 1 |
Mattison, DR | 1 |
Rossi, M | 1 |
Merello, M | 1 |
Mizuno, Y | 2 |
Kondo, T | 2 |
Murata, M | 1 |
Takeuchi, M | 1 |
Takahashi, M | 1 |
Tomida, T | 1 |
Makumi, CW | 1 |
Asgharian, A | 2 |
Ellis, J | 1 |
Shaikh, S | 1 |
Jimenez, T | 3 |
VanMeter, S | 3 |
Jafarieh, O | 1 |
Md, S | 1 |
Ali, M | 1 |
Sahni, JK | 1 |
Kumari, B | 1 |
Bhatnagar, A | 1 |
Hu, J | 1 |
Chung, SJ | 3 |
Singh, P | 2 |
Thierfelder, S | 2 |
Ikeda, J | 2 |
Bauer, L | 2 |
Pérez-Pérez, J | 1 |
Martínez-Horta, S | 1 |
Fernández-Bobadilla, R | 1 |
Sierra, S | 1 |
Pascual-Sedano, B | 1 |
Gironell, A | 1 |
Mustafa, G | 1 |
Ahuja, A | 1 |
Al Rohaimi, AH | 1 |
Muslim, S | 1 |
Hassan, AA | 1 |
Patel, P | 1 |
Pol, A | 1 |
More, S | 1 |
Kalaria, DR | 1 |
Kalia, YN | 1 |
Patravale, VB | 1 |
Ciurleo, R | 1 |
Bonanno, L | 1 |
Di Lorenzo, G | 1 |
Bramanti, P | 1 |
Marino, S | 1 |
Sasaki-Saito, N | 1 |
Sawada, Y | 1 |
Ohmori, S | 1 |
Omoto, D | 1 |
Haruyama, S | 1 |
Yoshioka, M | 1 |
Nishio, D | 1 |
Nakamura, M | 1 |
Matute, MS | 1 |
Matute, R | 1 |
Merino, P | 1 |
Rizos, A | 1 |
Sauerbier, A | 1 |
Antonini, A | 2 |
Weintraub, D | 3 |
Martinez-Martin, P | 2 |
Kessel, B | 1 |
Henriksen, T | 1 |
Falup-Pecurariu, C | 1 |
Silverdale, M | 1 |
Durner, G | 1 |
Røkenes Karlsen, K | 1 |
Grilo, M | 1 |
Odin, P | 2 |
Chaudhuri, KR | 1 |
Tremblay, M | 1 |
Silveira, MM | 1 |
Kaur, S | 1 |
Hosking, JG | 1 |
Adams, WK | 1 |
Baunez, C | 1 |
Winstanley, CA | 1 |
Zesiewicz, TA | 2 |
Chriscoe, S | 2 |
Upward, J | 2 |
Davy, M | 2 |
Arbouw, ME | 2 |
Movig, KL | 2 |
Guchelaar, HJ | 2 |
Poels, PJ | 2 |
van Vugt, JP | 2 |
Neef, C | 2 |
Egberts, TC | 2 |
Titlic, M | 1 |
Tonkic, A | 1 |
Jukic, I | 1 |
Lusic, I | 1 |
Dikanovic, M | 1 |
Bares, M | 1 |
Rektorová, I | 1 |
Krajcovicová, L | 1 |
Rektor, I | 1 |
Hersh, BP | 3 |
Scott, BL | 1 |
Nausieda, PA | 1 |
Giorgi, L | 3 |
Jost, WH | 5 |
Buhmann, C | 1 |
Fuchs, G | 1 |
Greulich, W | 1 |
Hummel, S | 1 |
Korchounov, A | 1 |
Müngersdorf, M | 2 |
Schwarz, M | 1 |
Spiegel-Meixensberger, M | 1 |
Knobel, D | 1 |
Aybek, S | 1 |
Pollo, C | 1 |
Vingerhoets, FJ | 1 |
Berney, A | 1 |
Weber, J | 1 |
Keating, GM | 1 |
Kuzuhara, S | 1 |
Weber, WE | 1 |
Nijssen, PC | 1 |
Bostwick, JM | 1 |
Hecksel, KA | 1 |
Stevens, SR | 1 |
Bower, JH | 3 |
Ahlskog, JE | 4 |
Bódi, N | 1 |
Kéri, S | 1 |
Nagy, H | 1 |
Moustafa, A | 1 |
Myers, CE | 1 |
Daw, N | 1 |
Dibó, G | 1 |
Takáts, A | 1 |
Bereczki, D | 1 |
Gluck, MA | 1 |
Nashatizadeh, MM | 1 |
Lyons, KE | 5 |
Pahwa, R | 5 |
Montgomery, EB | 2 |
Wessels, JA | 1 |
van der Straaten, RJ | 1 |
Stoner, SC | 1 |
Dahmen, MM | 1 |
Makos, M | 1 |
Lea, JW | 1 |
Carver, LJ | 1 |
Rasu, RS | 1 |
Park, SY | 1 |
Cho, YJ | 1 |
Hong, KS | 1 |
Cho, JY | 1 |
Seo, SY | 1 |
Lee, DH | 1 |
Valldeoriola, F | 1 |
Cobaleda, S | 1 |
Lahuerta, J | 1 |
Onofrj, M | 2 |
Bonanni, L | 2 |
De Angelis, MV | 1 |
Anzellotti, F | 2 |
Ciccocioppo, F | 1 |
Thomas, A | 3 |
Bienfait, KL | 1 |
Menza, M | 1 |
Mark, MH | 1 |
Dobkin, RD | 1 |
Bergmann, L | 1 |
Koester, J | 1 |
Potenza, MN | 2 |
Siderowf, AD | 2 |
Stacy, M | 2 |
Voon, V | 1 |
Whetteckey, J | 1 |
Wunderlich, GR | 1 |
Lang, AE | 7 |
Watts, RL | 3 |
Sethi, K | 2 |
Stern, M | 1 |
Hauser, RA | 8 |
Olanow, W | 1 |
Gray, AM | 1 |
Adams, B | 1 |
Earl, NL | 3 |
Stefanis, N | 1 |
Bozi, M | 1 |
Christodoulou, C | 1 |
Douzenis, A | 1 |
Gasparinatos, G | 1 |
Stamboulis, E | 1 |
Stefanis, C | 1 |
Stefanis, L | 1 |
Di Giacopo, R | 1 |
Fasano, A | 1 |
Fenici, R | 1 |
Loria, G | 1 |
Bentivoglio, AR | 1 |
Dusek, P | 1 |
Busková, J | 1 |
Růzicka, E | 1 |
Majerová, V | 1 |
Srp, A | 1 |
Jech, R | 1 |
Roth, J | 1 |
Sonka, K | 1 |
Fisone, G | 1 |
Senn, S | 1 |
Rolfe, K | 1 |
Julious, SA | 1 |
Reichmann, H | 7 |
Lew, M | 1 |
Makumi, C | 1 |
Shulman, KJ | 1 |
Maguire, M | 1 |
Cowen, Z | 1 |
Hassan, A | 1 |
Kumar, N | 1 |
Matsumoto, JY | 2 |
Fealey, RD | 1 |
Josephs, KA | 2 |
Baba, Y | 1 |
Higuchi, MA | 1 |
Fukuyama, K | 1 |
Abe, H | 1 |
Uehara, Y | 1 |
Inoue, T | 1 |
Yamada, T | 1 |
Hunter, B | 1 |
Schapira, AH | 5 |
Grossac, J | 1 |
Ruiz, S | 1 |
Bondon-Guitton, E | 1 |
Roux, FE | 1 |
Fourcade, O | 1 |
Montastruc, JL | 6 |
Geeraerts, T | 1 |
Ray Chaudhuri, K | 1 |
Rolfe, KA | 1 |
Rockett, CB | 1 |
Ondo, WG | 1 |
Lee, WY | 1 |
Lee, MC | 2 |
Ahn, TB | 1 |
Grieger, F | 1 |
Whitesides, J | 1 |
Boroojerdi, B | 2 |
Fanciulli, A | 1 |
Misasi, R | 1 |
Campanelli, D | 1 |
Buttarelli, FR | 1 |
Pontieri, FR | 1 |
Zagmutt, FJ | 1 |
Tarrants, ML | 1 |
Jain, L | 1 |
Benko, R | 1 |
Safranek, S | 1 |
Marusiak, J | 1 |
Jaskólska, A | 1 |
Koszewicz, M | 1 |
Budrewicz, S | 1 |
Jaskólski, A | 1 |
Sakamoto, T | 1 |
De Caro, V | 1 |
Giandalia, G | 1 |
Siragusa, MG | 1 |
Sutera, FM | 1 |
Giannola, LI | 1 |
Shin, E | 1 |
Garcia, J | 1 |
Winkler, C | 1 |
Björklund, A | 1 |
Carta, M | 1 |
Tessa, C | 1 |
Diciotti, S | 1 |
Lucetti, C | 1 |
Baldacci, F | 1 |
Cecchi, P | 1 |
Giannelli, M | 1 |
Bonuccelli, U | 2 |
Mascalchi, M | 1 |
Kaut, O | 1 |
Asmus, F | 1 |
Paus, S | 1 |
Nissen, T | 1 |
Newman, EJ | 1 |
Grosset, KA | 1 |
Daghem, M | 1 |
Pal, G | 1 |
Stewart, M | 1 |
Macphee, GJ | 1 |
Grosset, DG | 1 |
van Vugt, FT | 1 |
Schüpbach, M | 2 |
Altenmüller, E | 1 |
Bardinet, E | 2 |
Yelnik, J | 2 |
Hälbig, TD | 1 |
Bamia, C | 1 |
White, IR | 2 |
Kenward, MG | 1 |
Batla, A | 1 |
Stamelou, M | 1 |
Mencacci, N | 1 |
Bhatia, KP | 1 |
Arai, M | 1 |
Korczyn, AD | 10 |
Thalamas, C | 3 |
Adler, CH | 3 |
Gekht, AB | 1 |
Homann, CN | 1 |
Wenzel, K | 1 |
Suppan, K | 1 |
Ivanic, G | 1 |
Crevenna, R | 1 |
Ott, E | 1 |
Marek, K | 1 |
Jennings, D | 1 |
Seibyl, J | 1 |
Clarke, CE | 6 |
Guttman, M | 1 |
Rakshi, JS | 1 |
Pavese, N | 2 |
Uema, T | 1 |
Ito, K | 1 |
Morrish, PK | 2 |
Bailey, DL | 2 |
Brooks, DJ | 9 |
Iskedjian, M | 1 |
Einarson, TR | 1 |
Riederer, P | 1 |
Gille, G | 1 |
Müller, T | 1 |
Przuntek, H | 1 |
Riess, O | 1 |
Schwartz, A | 1 |
Schwarz, J | 1 |
Vogt, T | 1 |
Im, JH | 1 |
Ha, JH | 1 |
Cho, IS | 1 |
Quinn, NP | 1 |
Berardelli, A | 1 |
Vacca, L | 2 |
De Pandis, MF | 1 |
Modugno, N | 1 |
Valente, M | 1 |
Ruggieri, S | 3 |
Etminan, M | 2 |
Gill, S | 1 |
Samii, A | 2 |
Berger, Ch | 1 |
Mehrhoff, FW | 1 |
Beier, KM | 1 |
Meinck, HM | 1 |
MacMahon, DG | 1 |
Whone, AL | 2 |
Stoessl, AJ | 1 |
Davis, M | 1 |
Reske, S | 1 |
Nahmias, C | 1 |
Rascol, O | 14 |
Ribeiro, MJ | 1 |
Remy, P | 2 |
Poewe, WH | 4 |
Inzelberg, R | 1 |
Schechtman, E | 1 |
Nisipeanu, P | 2 |
Jähnel, M | 1 |
O'Suilleabhain, P | 1 |
Giller, C | 1 |
Razmy, A | 1 |
Shapiro, CM | 1 |
Pan, T | 1 |
Le, W | 1 |
Jankovic, J | 2 |
Morgan, JC | 2 |
Sethi, KD | 4 |
Grosset, K | 1 |
Needleman, F | 1 |
Macphee, G | 1 |
Grosset, D | 1 |
Körner, Y | 1 |
Meindorfner, C | 1 |
Möller, JC | 2 |
Stiasny-Kolster, K | 1 |
Haja, D | 1 |
Cassel, W | 2 |
Oertel, WH | 2 |
Krüger, HP | 2 |
Bara-Jimenez, W | 1 |
Dimitrova, T | 1 |
Sherzai, A | 1 |
Favit, A | 1 |
Mouradian, MM | 1 |
Chase, TN | 1 |
Plowman, BK | 1 |
Boggie, DT | 1 |
Morreale, AP | 1 |
Schaefer, MG | 1 |
Delattre, ML | 1 |
Chan, H | 1 |
Kurlan, R | 1 |
Singh, A | 1 |
Althoff, R | 1 |
Martineau, RJ | 1 |
Jacobson, J | 1 |
Goetz, CG | 2 |
Poewe, W | 3 |
Sampaio, C | 2 |
Angersbach, D | 3 |
Buchwald, B | 2 |
Klos, KJ | 1 |
Walker, RH | 1 |
Warwick, R | 1 |
Cercy, SP | 1 |
Badarny, S | 1 |
Stern, A | 1 |
Susel, Z | 1 |
Honigman, S | 1 |
Hocherman, S | 1 |
Schrag, A | 2 |
Counsell, N | 1 |
Deleu, D | 1 |
Hanssens, Y | 1 |
Goveas, J | 1 |
Morales, KH | 1 |
Duda, JE | 1 |
Moberg, PJ | 1 |
Stern, MB | 1 |
De Deyn, PP | 3 |
Abdalla, M | 1 |
Junghanns, S | 1 |
Fuhrmann, JT | 1 |
Simonis, G | 1 |
Oelwein, C | 1 |
Koch, R | 1 |
Strasser, RH | 1 |
Storch, A | 1 |
Barone, P | 1 |
Lamb, J | 2 |
Ellis, A | 2 |
Clarke, Z | 1 |
Di Iorio, A | 1 |
Varanese, S | 1 |
D'Andreagiovanni, A | 1 |
Miwa, H | 1 |
Singer, C | 1 |
Layton, G | 1 |
Dewey, RB | 1 |
Reimold, SC | 1 |
O'Suilleabhain, PE | 1 |
Stacy, MA | 1 |
Factor, SA | 3 |
Elmer, LW | 1 |
Truong, DD | 1 |
Onal, A | 1 |
Cağlar, S | 1 |
Matsukawa, N | 1 |
Maki, M | 1 |
Yasuhara, T | 1 |
Hara, K | 1 |
Yu, G | 1 |
Xu, L | 1 |
Kim, KM | 1 |
Borlongan, CV | 1 |
Chacon, J | 1 |
Abe, T | 1 |
Kuno, S | 1 |
Yamamoto, M | 1 |
Nakashima, M | 1 |
Kanazawa, I | 1 |
Jon Stoessl, A | 1 |
Giladi, N | 1 |
Burn, DJ | 2 |
Arai, H | 1 |
Minami, J | 1 |
Tompson, DJ | 1 |
Vearer, D | 1 |
Sharma, JC | 1 |
Ross, IN | 1 |
Brooks, D | 1 |
Czernecki, V | 1 |
Yaici, S | 1 |
Lévy, R | 1 |
Dubois, B | 2 |
Agid, Y | 2 |
Lees, AJ | 4 |
Senard, JM | 3 |
Pirtosek, Z | 3 |
Brefel, C | 2 |
Fuell, D | 2 |
Rabey, JM | 1 |
Torjanski, N | 1 |
Tulloch, IF | 1 |
Heins, JR | 1 |
Davis, TL | 2 |
Hammerstad, JP | 2 |
Bertoni, J | 1 |
Taylor, RL | 2 |
Sanchez-Ramos, J | 2 |
O'Brien, CF | 2 |
Barbato, L | 1 |
Monge, A | 1 |
Nordera, G | 1 |
Marsden, CD | 1 |
Gottwald, MD | 1 |
Bainbridge, JL | 1 |
Dowling, GA | 1 |
Aminoff, MJ | 1 |
Alldredge, BK | 1 |
LeWitt, PA | 2 |
Brunt, ER | 4 |
Giménez-Roldán, S | 1 |
Rayet, S | 1 |
Lopez-Gil, A | 3 |
Fitzpatrick, K | 3 |
Bullman, S | 1 |
Citerone, DR | 3 |
Taylor, AC | 3 |
Fernandez, HH | 1 |
Friedman, JH | 1 |
Bertoni, JM | 1 |
Lieberman, A | 1 |
Olanow, CW | 2 |
Swanson, P | 1 |
Waters, CH | 1 |
Fahn, S | 2 |
Hurtig, H | 1 |
Yahr, M | 1 |
Lange, KW | 1 |
Kuzel, MD | 1 |
Beerahee, A | 2 |
Cyronak, MJ | 1 |
Leigh, TJ | 1 |
Fitzpatrick, KL | 1 |
Vakil, SD | 1 |
Burns, E | 1 |
Lennox, G | 1 |
Taylor, A | 2 |
Citerone, D | 1 |
Frucht, S | 2 |
Rogers, JD | 1 |
Greene, PE | 1 |
Gordon, MF | 1 |
Brefel-Courbon, C | 1 |
Eagle, S | 1 |
Larsen, JP | 1 |
Nagy, Z | 1 |
Fine, J | 1 |
Iida, M | 1 |
Miyazaki, I | 1 |
Tanaka, K | 1 |
Kabuto, H | 1 |
Iwata-Ichikawa, E | 1 |
Ogawa, N | 1 |
Jeret, JS | 1 |
Hobson, DE | 1 |
Pourcher, E | 1 |
Martin, WR | 1 |
Phillips, P | 1 |
Weiner, WJ | 2 |
Canesi, M | 1 |
Mariani, CB | 1 |
Tesei, S | 1 |
Zecchinelli, AL | 1 |
Barichella, M | 1 |
Pezzoli, G | 1 |
Lund, BC | 1 |
Neiman, RF | 1 |
Perry, PJ | 1 |
Lam, YW | 1 |
Roth, T | 1 |
Ryan, M | 1 |
Slevin, JT | 1 |
Wells, A | 1 |
Hubble, J | 1 |
Koller, WC | 1 |
Atchison, P | 1 |
Zussman, BD | 1 |
Friedman, CJ | 1 |
Hawker, N | 1 |
Marsh, L | 1 |
Dawson, TM | 1 |
Deane, KH | 2 |
Matheson, AJ | 1 |
Spencer, CM | 1 |
Pirker, W | 1 |
Happe, S | 1 |
Stiasny, K | 1 |
Peter, JH | 1 |
Hiner, BC | 1 |
Earnhart, M | 1 |
Yamamoto, T | 1 |
Kujawa, K | 1 |
Leurgans, S | 1 |
Raman, R | 1 |
Blasucci, L | 1 |
Kaye, CM | 1 |
Nicholls, B | 1 |
Lachenmayer, L | 1 |
Supiot, F | 1 |
Sternon, J | 1 |
Zegers de Beyl, D | 1 |
Ponsford, JR | 1 |
Masson, C | 1 |
Moller, H | 1 |
Johnels, B | 1 |
Ingvarsson, PE | 1 |
Steg, G | 1 |
Olsson, T | 1 |
Le, WD | 1 |
Zenzola, A | 1 |
Diroma, C | 1 |
Fraddosio, A | 1 |
Lamberti, S | 1 |
Moramarco, A | 1 |
Palagano, G | 1 |
Iliceto, G | 1 |
Bamias, C | 1 |
Hardy, P | 1 |
Pocock, S | 1 |
Warner, J | 2 |
Takkouche, B | 1 |
Rochon, PA | 1 |
Bair, JD | 1 |
Oppelt, TF | 1 |
Sommer, U | 1 |
Sommer, M | 1 |
Tabamo, RE | 1 |
Di Rocco, A | 1 |
Mazzoni, P | 1 |
Morrish, P | 1 |
Keens, J | 1 |
Kleedorfer, B | 1 |
Stern, GM | 2 |
Bottomley, JM | 2 |
Sree-Haran, N | 1 |
Vidailhet, MJ | 1 |
Bonnet, AM | 1 |
Belal, S | 1 |
Marle, C | 1 |
Boothman, BR | 1 |
Spokes, EG | 1 |
Kapoon, R | 1 |
Frankel, JP | 1 |
Haran, NS | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A Study ROP116991, Clinical Evaluation of 18 to 24mg/Day Ropinirole CR for Parkinson's Disease.[NCT01929317] | Phase 3 | 81 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2013-08-28 | Terminated | ||
The REmission of the Impulse Control Disorder and the Changes of the Neuropsychiatric Characteristics After Switching Into Levodopa/Carbidopa in Patients With Parkinson's Disease Who Have Developed Impulse Control Disorders Due to the Dopamine Replacement[NCT01683253] | Phase 4 | 150 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2012-11-30 | Completed | ||
An Open-label, Multi-center, Crossover Study to Compare the Effect of Once-daily Ropinirole PR and Twice-daily Ropinirole PR in Patients With Parkinson Disease[NCT00986245] | Phase 4 | 82 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2009-09-30 | Completed | ||
An Open-Label Extension Study With REQUIP (Ropinirole) CR for Subjects From Studies 101468/165, 101468/168 and 101468/169[NCT00632736] | Phase 3 | 419 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2004-02-29 | Completed | ||
An Open Label Extension Study With REQUIP PR for Subjects From Study ROP111528[NCT01536574] | Phase 3 | 295 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2010-09-02 | Completed | ||
An Open-Label, Multicenter, Multinational Study to Assess the Feasibility of Switching Therapy From Pramipexole or Ropinirole to the Rotigotine Transdermal System and Its Effect on Motor and Non-Motor Symptoms in Subjects With Advanced Idiopathic Parkinso[NCT01711866] | Phase 4 | 87 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2012-09-30 | Completed | ||
An Open-Label Study to Investigate the Safety and Efficacy of Rotigotine Add-On Therapy With Low Doses of Pramipexole or Ropinirole in Patients With Advanced Parkinson's Disease Phase 3B[NCT01723904] | Phase 3 | 90 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2012-10-31 | Completed | ||
A Cross-sectional, Retrospective Screening and Case-control Study Examining the Frequency of, and Risk Factors Associated With, Impulse Control Disorders in Parkinson's Disease Patients Treated With MIRAPEX® (Pramipexole) and Other Anti-parkinson Agents ([NCT00617019] | 3,234 participants (Actual) | Observational | 2006-09-30 | Completed | |||
A Replicated Crossover Study to Explore Individual Variability of Appetite Responses to a Standardised Meal and Any Moderating Influence of the FTO Gene[NCT03771690] | 18 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2018-01-11 | Completed | |||
A Replicated Crossover Study Exploring Individual Variability of Postprandial Coronary Heart Disease Risk Markers and Sleep Quality in Response to Acute Exercise in Healthy Young Men[NCT05022498] | 20 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2019-10-01 | Completed | |||
101648/196: A Long-Term, Open-Label Continuation Study of Once Daily Administration of Ropinirole CR Tablets to Patients With Parkinson's Disease Who Completed the Previous Ropinirole CR Studies 167 or 164[NCT00650104] | Phase 3 | 76 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2002-05-31 | Completed | ||
A Phase III, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Study of Six Months Treatment With Ropinirole CR as Adjunctive Therapy in Patients With Parkinson's Disease Who Are Not Optimally Controlled on L-dopa[NCT00381472] | Phase 3 | 393 participants | Interventional | 2003-06-30 | Completed | ||
A Phase 3b, Open-Label, Multicenter Trial to Assess the Safety and Tolerability of Switching Korean Subjects From Ropinirole to the Rotigotine Transdermal System and Its Effect on Symptoms in Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease[NCT00593606] | Phase 3 | 124 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2007-07-31 | Completed | ||
Effects of Myofascial Trigger Points Therapy in Migraine.[NCT05646160] | 100 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2018-01-15 | Recruiting | |||
A Single-blinded Assessment of the Short-term Effects of Cabergoline vs. Carbidopa/Levodopa on SPECT Dopamine Transporter Density in Out-patient Subjects With Parkinson's Disease[NCT00129181] | 30 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2005-01-31 | Completed | |||
Investigating Effects of Short-term Treatment With Pramipexole or Levodopa on [123I]B-CIT and SPECT Imaging in Early Parkinson's[NCT00096720] | Phase 2 | 112 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2004-02-29 | Completed | ||
A Pilot Phase II Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Tolerability and Dosage Finding Study of Isradipine CR as a Disease Modifying Agent in Patients With Early Parkinson Disease[NCT00909545] | Phase 2 | 99 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2009-07-31 | Completed | ||
A 2-Part, Open Label, Adaptive, Single and/or Multiple Oral Dose, Safety, Tolerability, and Food Effect Trial of CVL-751 in Subjects With Parkinson's Disease[NCT04295642] | Phase 1 | 24 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2020-01-08 | Completed | ||
A 10-year Observational Study of the Incidence of Dyskinesia in Patients With Early Parkinson's Disease Who Were Treated With Amantadine or Dopamine Agonist[NCT01338662] | 500 participants (Anticipated) | Observational | 2011-05-31 | Recruiting | |||
Determining the Natural History of Levodopa-Induced Dyskinesia (LID)[NCT01003002] | 0 participants (Actual) | Observational | 2010-12-31 | Withdrawn (stopped due to Funding not secured.) | |||
Reducing Dyskinesia in Parkinson Disease With Omega-3 Fatty Acids[NCT01563913] | Phase 1 | 33 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2012-10-31 | Completed | ||
The Effects of Supplementing Tyrosine on Blood Pressure in Parkinson's Disease[NCT01676103] | Phase 1/Phase 2 | 40 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2012-09-30 | Completed | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
The Japanese Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) assesses the status of Parkinson's Disease (PD) participants objectively. Part III assessed motor examination on 27 items. Participants received a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 108 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 0. Mean change from Baseline was calculated as the total score at Week 12 minus the total score at Baseline. The analyses for the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was performed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at a planned visit. The imputation was conducted using the data within only the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase; therefore, the value observed in the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was not used to impute a missing data in the Long-term Phase. (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group | -4.8 |
(NCT01929317)
Timeframe: From the start of the study medication (Week 0) until Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group | 25 |
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group | 14 |
The CGI global improvement scale allows the investigator to rate the participant's total improvement since the beginning of treatment (Baseline). Scores on the scale range from 1 to 7 (1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=no change, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse, and 7=very much worse). Participants with a CGI global improvement score of <=2 (representing much improved or very much improved) were considered to be moderate improvement (responder). The analyses performed using the OC data. In the OC data, no imputation was carried for any missing data. (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Week 12
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group | 19 |
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group | 6 |
"On state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Participants were asked to record the duration of their off periods and asleep in diary cards every day. Change from Baseline in awake time spent On(actual hours) is calculated as awake time spent On (hours) at the week 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52 value minus awake time spent On (hours) at Baseline. Baseline is defined as the value at Week 13. If the value evaluated at week 13 was missing then first observed value post week 13 was used as a Baseline. The analyses for Long term phase was performed using the OC data. The OC (observed Case) dataset was defined as the dataset consisting of observed data without any missing data imputation." (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52
Intervention | hours (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 17, n=36, 15 | Week 21, n=34, 14 | Week 25, n=34, 15 | Week 37, n=29, 15 | Week 49, n=26, 12 | Week 52, n=23, 12 | |
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group: Long Term Phase | 0.56 | 0.43 | -0.04 | 0.26 | -0.19 | 0.36 |
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group: Long Term Phase | 0.57 | 0.73 | 0.23 | 0.37 | -0.56 | -0.56 |
"On state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Participants were asked to record the duration of their off periods and asleep in diary cards every day. Change from Baseline in awake time spent On(actual hours) is calculated as awake time spent On (hours) at the indicated visit minus awake time spent On (hours) at Baseline. Baseline is defined as the value at Week 0. The analyses for Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was performed using the LOCF data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at a planned visit." (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Intervention | hours (Mean) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 2, n=53, 17 | Week 4, n=53, 18 | Week 6, n=53, 18 | Week 8, n=53, 18 | Week 12, n=53, 18 | |
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group | -0.39 | -0.12 | -0.01 | -0.11 | 0.07 |
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group | -0.46 | -0.60 | -0.61 | -0.96 | -0.79 |
"On state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Participants were asked to record the duration of their on periods and asleep in diary cards every day. Change from Baseline in awake time spent On without troublesome dyskinesias (actual hours) is calculated as [awake time spent On minus awake time spent On with troublesome dyskinesias] (hours) at visit minus [awake time spent On minus awake time spent On with troublesome dyskinesias] (hours) at Baseline. Baseline is defined as the value at Week 13. If the value evaluated at week 13 was missing then first observed value post week 13 was used as a Baseline. The analyses for Long term phase was performed using the OC data. In the OC data, no imputation was carried for any missing data" (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52
Intervention | hours (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 17, n=36, 15 | Week 21, n=34, 14 | Week 25, n=34, 15 | Week 37, n=29, 15 | Week 49, n=26, 12 | Week 52, n=23, 12 | |
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group: Long Term Phase | 0.24 | 0.21 | -0.15 | -0.09 | -0.50 | 0.08 |
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group: Long Term Phase | 0.60 | 1.23 | 0.25 | 1.02 | 0.04 | -0.21 |
"On state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Participants were asked to record the duration of their off periods and asleep in diary cards every day. Change from Baseline in awake time spent On without troublesome dyskinesias (actual hours) is calculated as [awake time spent On minus awake time spent On with troublesome dyskinesias] (hours) at visit minus [awake time spent On minus awake time spent On with troublesome dyskinesias] (hours) at Baseline. Baseline is defined as the value at Week 0. The analyses for Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was performed using the LOCF data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at a planned visit." (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Intervention | hours (Mean) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 2, n=53, 17 | Week 4, n=53, 18 | Week 6, n=53, 18 | Week 8, n=53, 18 | Week 12, n=53, 18 | |
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group | -0.40 | -0.14 | -0.06 | -0.05 | 0.11 |
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group | -0.59 | -0.71 | -0.63 | -1.01 | -0.74 |
"On state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Participants were asked to record the duration of their on periods and asleep in diary cards every day. Percentage of awake time spent on is defined as sum of two days on time (hours) divided by sum of two days awake time (hours) and multiplified by 100. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value (percentage of awake time spent on) from week 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52 value (percentage of awake time spent on). Baseline is defined as the value at Week 13. If the value evaluated at week 13 was missing the first observed value post week 13 was used as a Baseline.The analyses for Long term phase was performed using the OC data. In the OC data, no imputation was carried for any missing data." (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52
Intervention | percentage of awake time spent on (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 17, n=36, 15 | Week 21, n=34, 14 | Week 25, n=34, 15 | Week 37, n=29, 15 | Week 49, n=26, 12 | Week 52, n=23, 12 | |
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group: Long Term Phase | 2.81 | 1.20 | -1.02 | 0.13 | -0.23 | 1.80 |
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group: Long Term Phase | 3.82 | 4.62 | 3.42 | 3.27 | -2.68 | -1.14 |
"On state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Par. were asked to record the duration of their on periods and asleep in diary cards every day. Percentage of awake time spent On without troublesome dyskinesias is defined as sum of two days on time without troublesome dyskinesias [On time minus On time with troublesome dyskinesias] (hours) divided by sum of two days awake time (hours) and multiplified by 100. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value (percentage of awake time spent On without troublesome dyskinesias) from week 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52 value (percentage of awake time spent On without troublesome dyskinesias). Baseline is defined as the value at Week 13. If the value evaluated at week 13 was missing the first observed value post week 13 was used as a Baseline.The analyses for Long term phase was performed using the OC data. In the OC data, no imputation was carried for any missing data." (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52
Intervention | percentage of awake time spent on (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 17, n=36, 15 | Week 21, n=34, 14 | Week 25, n=34, 15 | Week 37, n=29, 15 | Week 49, n=26, 12 | Week 52, n=23, 12 | |
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group: Long Term Phase | 0.70 | -0.16 | -1.70 | -1.71 | -2.00 | -0.05 |
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group: Long Term Phase | 4.04 | 7.31 | 3.10 | 6.93 | 0.45 | 0.53 |
"Off state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. Participants were asked to record the duration of their off periods and asleep in diary cards every day. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value (actual hours of awake time spent off) from the week 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52 value (proportion of awake time spent off). Baseline is defined as the value at Week 13. If the value evaluated at week 13 was missing then first observed value post week 13 was used as a Baseline.The analyses for long term phase was performed using the OC data. In the OC data, no imputation was carried for any missing data" (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52
Intervention | hours (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 17, n=26, 13 | Week 21, n=24, 12 | Week 25, n=24, 13 | Week 37, n=20, 13 | Week 49, n=18, 11 | Week 52, n=15, 11 | |
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group: Long Term Phase | -0.63 | -0.40 | 0.04 | 0.01 | -0.24 | -0.62 |
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group: Long Term Phase | -0.50 | -0.65 | -0.52 | -0.46 | 0.91 | 0.45 |
"Off state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. Participants were asked to record the duration of their off periods and asleep in diary cards every day. Change from Baseline in awake time spent Off(actual hours) is calculated as awake time spent Off (hours) at the indicated visit minus awake time spent Off (hours) at Baseline. Baseline is defined as the value at Week 0. The analyses for Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was performed using the LOCF data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at a planned visit." (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Intervention | hours (Mean) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 2 | Week 4 | Week 6 | Week 8 | Week 12 | |
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group | 0.14 | 0.09 | 0.01 | -0.08 | -0.27 |
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group | 0.44 | 0.04 | 0.37 | 0.77 | 0.81 |
"Off state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. Participants were asked to record the duration of their off periods and asleep in diary cards every day. Percentage of awake time spent off is defined as sum of two days off time (hours) divided by sum of two days awake time (hours) and multiplied by 100. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value (percentage of awake time spent off) from week 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52 value (percentage of awake time spent off). Baseline is defined as the value at Week 13, If the value evaluated at week 13 was missing then first observed value post week 13 was used as a Baseline. The analyses for Long term phase was performed using the OC data. In the OC data, no imputation was carried for any missing data." (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52
Intervention | percentage of awake time spent off (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 17, n=26, 13 | Week 21, n=24, 12 | Week 25, n=24, 13 | Week 37, n=20, 13 | Week 49, n=18, 11 | Week 52, n=15, 11 | |
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group: Long Term Phase | -4.16 | -2.59 | 0.49 | -0.99 | -1.33 | -3.62 |
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group: Long Term Phase | -4.41 | -5.39 | -3.95 | -4.56 | 2.93 | 1.24 |
"Off state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. Participants were asked to record the duration of their off periods and asleep in diary cards every day. Percentage of awake time spent off is defined as sum of two days off time (hours) divided by sum of two days awake time (hours) and multiplied by 100. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value (percentage of awake time spent off) from the post Baseline value (percentage of awake time spent off). Baseline is defined as the value at Week 0. The analyses for Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was performed using the LOCF data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at a planned visit." (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Intervention | percentage of awake time spent off (Mean) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 2 | Week 4 | Week 6 | Week 8 | Week 12 | |
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group | 1.36 | 0.62 | -0.09 | 0.19 | -1.24 |
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group | 2.39 | 0.48 | 2.70 | 4.65 | 4.74 |
The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD participants objectively. Part I evaluated mentation, behavior, and mood on 4 items, response for each item were scored numerically from 0-4. The total score for the 4 items ranged from 0 to 16. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post Baseline value. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 0. The analyses for the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was performed using the LOCF data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at the planned visit. (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Mean) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 2 | Week 4 | Week 6 | Week 8 | Week 12 | |
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group | -0.0 | -0.1 | -0.1 | -0.1 | 0.1 |
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group | -0.1 | -0.2 | -0.1 | -0.1 | -0.1 |
The Japanese UPDRS assessed the status of PD participants objectively. Part I evaluated mentation, behavior, and mood on 4 items, response for each item were scored numerically from 0-4. The total score for the 4 items ranged from 0 to 16. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms.Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post Baseline value. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 13. If the value evaluated at Week 13 was missing, then first observed value post Week 13 was used as Baseline. The analyses performed using the OC data. In the OC data, no imputation was carried for any missing data. Full Analysis Set 2 (FAS2) Population comprised of all participants in the FAS1 and shifted to Long-term Phase, excluding those participants who received no dose of study medication and participants without UPDRS part III total score data after supply of the investigational product. (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 17; n=42,17 | Week 21; n=40, 16 | Week 25; n=40, 17 | Week 37; n=33, 17 | Week 49; n=26, 14 | Week 52; n=25, 14 | |
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group: Long Term Phase | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Group: Long Term Phase | 0.1 | -0.2 | -0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 |
"The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD participants objectively. Part 2 evaluated activities of daily living on 13 items, response for each item were scored numerically from 0-4. The total score for the 4 items ranged from 0 to 52. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post Baseline value. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 0. The analyses for the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was performed using the LOCF data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at a planned visit. Off state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. On state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. The score of UPDRS part 2 in off status is rated as '0' (Normal/None), if L-dopa adjunct participants do not have diurnal fluctuations." (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Mean) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 2, On status, n=61, 20 | Week 4, On status, n=61, 20 | Week 6, On status, n=61, 20 | Week 8, On status, n=61, 20 | Week 12, On status, n=61, 20 | Week 2, Off status, n=53, 18 | Week 4, Off status, n=53, 18 | Week 6, Off status, n=53, 18 | Week 8, Off status, n=53, 18 | Week 12, Off status, n=53, 18 | |
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group | -1.0 | -1.4 | -1.6 | -1.4 | -1.1 | -1.0 | -1.3 | -1.7 | -1.4 | -1.4 |
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group | -0.2 | -0.3 | -0.5 | -0.2 | -0.2 | -0.3 | -0.4 | -0.8 | -1.3 | -1.3 |
"The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD participants objectively. Part 2 evaluates activities of daily living on 13 items, response for each item were scored numerically from 0-4. The total score for the 4 items ranged from 0 to 52. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms.Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post Baseline value. Baseline is defined as the value at Week 13. If the value at Week 13 was missing, then first observed value post Week 13 was used as Baseline. The analyses performed using the OC data. In the OC data, no imputation was carried for any missing data.Off state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. On state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. The score of UPDRS part 2 in off status is rated as '0' (Normal/None), if L-dopa adjunct participants do not have diurnal fluctuations." (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Mean) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 17, On status, n=42, 17 | Week 21, On status, n=40, 16 | Week 25, On status, n=40, 17 | Week 37, On status, n=33, 17 | Week 49, On status, n=26, 14 | Week 52, On status, n=25, 14 | Week 17, Off status, n=36, 15 | Week 21, Off status, n=34, 14 | Week 25, Off status, n=34, 15 | Week 37, Off status, n=29, 15 | Week 49, Off status, n=24, 12 | Week 52, Off status, n=23, 12 | |
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group: Long Term Phase | -0.1 | -0.4 | -0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -0.2 | -0.4 | -0.4 | -0.2 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Group: Long Term Phase | 0.1 | 0.0 | -0.1 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.1 | -0.5 | -0.7 | -1.5 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
"The Japanese UPDRS assessed the status of PD participants objectively. Part 4 evaluated complications on 11 items, response for 4 items were scored numerically from 0-4 and response for other 7 items were Yes/No questions and responses are numerically scored as 0 for No and 1 for Yes. The total score for the 11 items ranged from 0 to 23. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post Baseline value. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 0. The analyses for the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was performed using the LOCF data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at a planned visit." (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Mean) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 2 | Week 4 | Week 6 | Week 8 | Week 12 | |
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group | -0.3 | -0.2 | -0.2 | 0.0 | -0.1 |
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group | -0.2 | -0.2 | -0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
"The Japanese UPDRS assessed the status of PD participants objectively. Part 4 evaluated complications on 11 items, response for 4 items were scored numerically from 0-4 and response for other 7 items were Yes/No questions and responses are numerically scored as 0 for No and 1 for Yes. The total score for the 11 items ranged from 0 to 23. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms.Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post Baseline value. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 13. If the value evaluated at Week 13 was missing, then first observed value post Week 13 was used as Baseline. The analyses performed using the OC data. In the OC data, no imputation was carried for any missing data." (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 17, n=42, 17 | Week 21, n=40, 16 | Week 25, n=40, 17 | Week 37; n=33;17 | Week 49; n=26,14 | Week 52; n=25, 14 | |
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group: Long Term Phase | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.6 |
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Group: Long Term Phase | -0.1 | -0.1 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 0.8 |
The Japanese Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) assesses the status of Parkinson's Disease (PD) participants objectively. Part III assessed motor examination on 27 items. Participants received a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 108 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 0. Mean change from Baseline was calculated as the total score at Week 12 minus the total score at Baseline. The analyses for the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was performed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at a planned visit. The imputation was conducted using the data within only the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase; therefore, the value observed in the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was not used to impute a missing data in the Long-term Phase. (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Mean) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 2 | Week 4 | Week 6 | Week 8 | Week 12 | |
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group | -2.9 | -3.8 | -4.6 | -5.2 | -4.8 |
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group | -2.7 | -4.4 | -5.0 | -4.5 | -5.7 |
The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD participants objectively. Part 3 evaluates motor examination on 27 items, response for each items were scored numerically from 0-4. The total score for the 27 items ranged from 0 to 108. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post Baseline value. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 13. If the value evaluated at Week 13 was missing, then first observed value post Week 13 was used as Baseline. The analyses performed using the OC data. In the OC data, no imputation was carried for any missing data. (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49, 52
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 17; n=41, 16 | Week 21, n=39, 16 | Week 25, n=40, 17 | Week 37; n=33, 17 | Week 49; n=26, 14 | Week 52; n=25, 14 | |
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group: Long Term Phase | -1.2 | -2.5 | -2.1 | -1.9 | -2.2 | -1.9 |
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Group: Long Term Phase | -0.7 | -1.9 | -0.6 | 1.4 | 0.6 | -0.6 |
The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of Parkinson's Disease (PD) participants objectively. Part III assessed motor examination on 27 items. Participants received a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 108 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Number of participants achieving a 30% or greater and 20% or greater reduction from Baseline in UPDRS total part III score at Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52,are presented using OC data. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post Baseline value. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 13. If the value evaluated at Week 13 was missing, then first observed value post Week 13 was used as Baseline. The OC (observed Case) dataset was defined as the dataset consisting of observed data without any missing data imputation. (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49, 52
Intervention | Participants (Number) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 17, >=30% reduction from Baseline; n=41,16 | Week 21, >=30% reduction from Baseline; n=39,16 | Week 25, >=30% reduction from Baseline; n=40, 17 | Week 37, >=30% reduction from Baseline; n=33,17 | Week 49, >=30% reduction from Baseline; n=26, 14 | Week 52, >=30% reduction from Baseline; n=25, 14 | Week 17, >=20% reduction from Baseline; n=41,16 | Week 21, >=20% reduction from Baseline; n=39,16 | Week 25, >=20% reduction from Baseline; n=40, 17 | Week 37, >=20% reduction from Baseline; n=33,17 | Week 49, >=20% reduction from Baseline; n=26, 14 | Week 52, >=20% reduction from Baseline; n=25, 14 | |
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group: Long Term Phase | 5 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 6 | 8 | 15 | 16 | 14 | 13 | 12 |
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Group: Long Term Phase | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of Parkinson's Disease (PD) participants objectively. Part III assessed motor examination on 27 items. Participants received a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 108 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Number of participants achieving a 30% or greater and 20% or greater reduction from Baseline in UPDRS total part III score at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 are presented using LOCF data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at a planned visit. The imputation was conducted using the data within only the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase; therefore, the value observed in the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was not used to impute a missing data in the Long-term Phase. (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Intervention | Participants (Number) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 2, 30% or greater reduction from Baseline | Week 4, 30% or greater reduction from Baseline | Week 6, 30% or greater reduction from Baseline | Week 8, 30% or greater reduction from Baseline | Week 12, 30% or greater reduction from Baseline | Week 2, 20% or greater reduction from Baseline | Week 4, 20% or greater reduction from Baseline | Week 6, 20% or greater reduction from Baseline | Week 8, 20% or greater reduction from Baseline | Week 12, 20% or greater reduction from Baseline | |
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group | 10 | 17 | 21 | 30 | 27 | 16 | 26 | 30 | 35 | 31 |
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 11 | 10 | 11 | 13 |
The Japanese UPDRS assessed the status of PD participants objectively. Part I evaluated mentation, behavior, and mood on 4 items, response for each item were scored numerically from 0-4. The total score for the 4 items ranged from 0 to 16. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as Post baseline value minus Baseline value, divided by Baseline value and multiplied by 100. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 0. The analyses for Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was performed using the LOCF data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at a planned visit. (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Intervention | Percent change (Mean) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 2 | Week 4 | Week 6 | Week 8 | Week 12 | |
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group | -6.2 | -14.5 | -15.2 | -16.4 | -7.4 |
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group | -16.7 | -41.7 | -29.2 | -29.2 | -29.2 |
The Japanese UPDRS assessed the status of PD participants objectively. Part I evaluated mentation, behavior, and mood on 4 items, response for each item were scored numerically from 0-4. The total score for the 4 items ranged from 0 to 16. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as Post baseline value minus Baseline value, divided by Baseline value and multiplied by 100. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 13. If the value evaluated at Week 13 was missing, then first observed value post Week 13 was used as Baseline. The analyses performed using the OC data. In the OC data, no imputation was carried for any missing data. (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52
Intervention | Percent change (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 17, n=15, 7 | Week 21, n=14, 7 | Week 25, n=14, 7 | Week 37; n=9, 7 | Week 49; n=6, 5 | Week 52; n=6, 5 | |
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group: Long Term Phase | 13.3 | -7.1 | 3.6 | 0.0 | 20.8 | 12.5 |
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Group: Long Term Phase | -9.5 | -31.0 | -26.2 | -11.9 | 15.0 | 5.0 |
"The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD participants objectively. Part 2 evaluates activities of daily living on 13 items, response for each item were scored numerically from 0-4. The total score for the 4 items ranged from 0 to 52. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as Post baseline value minus Baseline value, divided by Baseline value and multiplied by 100. Baseline is defined as the value at Week 0. The analyses for Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was performed using the LOCF data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at a planned visit. Off state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. On state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. The score of UPDRS part 2 in off status is rated as '0' (Normal/None), if L-dopa adjunct participants do not have diurnal fluctuations." (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Intervention | Percent change (Mean) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 2, On status, n=55, 16 | Week 4, On status, n=55, 16 | Week 6, On status, n=55, 16 | Week 8, On status, n=55, 16 | Week 12, On status, n=55, 16 | Week 2, Off status, n=48, 15 | Week 4, Off status, n=48, 15 | Week 6, Off status, n=48, 15 | Week 8, Off status, n=48, 15 | Week 12, Off status, n=48, 15 | |
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group | -22.3 | -21.9 | -21.4 | -14.3 | -4.7 | -11.7 | -15.0 | -17.0 | -14.7 | -15.2 |
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group | -4.6 | -13.0 | -12.9 | -9.0 | -9.3 | -4.2 | -4.4 | -9.7 | -10.9 | -10.1 |
"The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD participants objectively. Part 2 evaluates activities of daily living on 13 items, response for each item were scored numerically from 0-4. The total score for the 4 items ranged from 0 to 52. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as Post baseline value minus Baseline value, divided by Baseline value and multiplied by 100. Baseline is defined as the value at Week 13. If the value at Week 13 was missing, then first observed value post Week 13 was used as Baseline. The analyses performed using the OC data. In the OC data, no imputation was carried for any missing data.Off state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. On state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. The score of UPDRS part 2 in off status is rated as '0' (Normal/None), if L-dopa adjunct participants do not have diurnal fluctuations." (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52
Intervention | Percent change (Mean) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 17, On status, n=35, 12 | Week 21, On status, n=33, 11 | Week 25, On status, n=33, 12 | Week 37, On status, n=26, 12 | Week 49, On status, n=20, 9 | Week 52, On status, n=19, 9 | Week 17, Off status, n=26, 13 | Week 21, Off status, n=24, 12 | Week 25, Off status, n=24, 13 | Week 37, Off status, n=20, 13 | Week 49, Off status, n=16, 11 | Week 52, Off status, n=15, 11 | |
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group: Long Term Phase | 2.3 | -0.1 | -1.7 | 8.0 | 27.8 | 7.5 | -1.4 | -4.4 | 1.4 | 6.1 | 1.9 | 7.1 |
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Group: Long Term Phase | -5.8 | -7.1 | -0.7 | -8.6 | 1.8 | 0.7 | -3.6 | -6.0 | -5.2 | 6.3 | 44.5 | 26.2 |
The Japanese UPDRS assessed the status of PD participants objectively. Part 3 evaluated motor examination on 27 items, response for each items were scored numerically from 0-4. The total score for the 27 items ranged from 0 to 108. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as Post baseline value minus Baseline value, divided by Baseline value and multiplied by 100. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 0. The analyses for Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was performed using the LOCF data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at a planned visit. (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Intervention | Percent change (Mean) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 2 | Week 4 | Week 6 | Week 8 | Week 12 | |
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group | -12.0 | -17.4 | -21.6 | -25.5 | -23.1 |
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group | -11.8 | -21.9 | -22.9 | -22.9 | -27.6 |
The Japanese UPDRS assessed the status of PD participants objectively. Part 3 evaluated motor examination on 27 items, response for each items were scored numerically from 0-4. The total score for the 27 items ranged from 0 to 108. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as Post baseline value minus Baseline value, divided by Baseline value and multiplied by 100. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 13. If the value evaluated at Week 13 was missing, then first observed value post Week 13 was used as Baseline. The analyses performed using the OC data. In the OC data, no imputation was carried for any missing data. (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52
Intervention | Percent change (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 17, n=41, 16 | Week 21, n=39, 16 | Week 25, n=40, 17 | Week 37; n=33, 17 | Week 49; n=26, 14 | Week 52; n=25, 14 | |
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group: Long Term Phase | -5.4 | -10.5 | -10.3 | -6.4 | -3.4 | -4.1 |
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Group: Long Term Phase | 6.2 | -6.0 | 2.6 | 50.2 | 43.2 | 16.2 |
"The Japanese UPDRS assessed the status of PD participants objectively. Part 4 evaluated complications on 11 items, response for 4 items were scored numerically from 0-4 and response for other 7 items were Yes/No questions and responses are numerically scored as 0 for No and 1 for Yes. The total score for the 11 items ranged from 0 to 23. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as Post baseline value minus Baseline value, divided by Baseline value and multiplied by 100. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 0. The analyses for Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was performed using the LOCF data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at a planned visit." (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Intervention | Percent change (Mean) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 2 | Week 4 | Week 6 | Week 8 | Week 12 | |
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group | -7.9 | -4.1 | -7.2 | 1.4 | -6.6 |
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group | -1.9 | -6.5 | -4.9 | 3.5 | 9.5 |
"The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD participants objectively. Part 4 evaluates complications on 11 items, response for 4 items were scored numerically from 0-4 and response for other 7 items were Yes/No questions and responses are numerically scored as 0 for No and 1 for Yes. The total score for the 11 items ranged from 0 to 23. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as Post baseline value minus Baseline value, divided by Baseline value and multiplied by 100. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 13. If the value evaluated at Week 13 was missing, then first observed value post Week 13 was used as Baseline. The analyses performed using the OC data. In the OC data, no imputation was carried for any missing data." (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52
Intervention | Percent change (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 17, n=30, 15 | Week 21, n=28, 14 | Week 25, n=28, 15 | Week 37, n=23, 15 | Week 49, n=18, 13 | Week 52, n=17, 13 | |
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group: Long Term Phase | 13.1 | 11.3 | 16.4 | 11.3 | 27.5 | 23.7 |
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group: Long Term Phase | 7.1 | 6.8 | 18.7 | 49.5 | 40.0 | 35.4 |
Patients who have adverse events (NCT00986245)
Timeframe: After 8 weeks in each arm or at last visit for early completion
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Once-daily of Ropinirole PR | 33 |
Twice-daily of Ropinirole PR | 28 |
Compliances after 8 weeks in each arm or at last visit for early completion. Compliance was calcuated by the percentage of used medication. (NCT00986245)
Timeframe: 8 weeks for each arm or at last visit
Intervention | percentage of used medication (Mean) |
---|---|
Once-daily of Ropinirole PR | 98.4 |
Twice-daily of Ropinirole PR | 97.6 |
"Sleep questionnaire 3 for early morning off symptoms Visual analogue scale: 0~10 Higher values represent worse early morning off symptoms." (NCT00986245)
Timeframe: 8 weeks for each arm or at last visit
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Once-daily of Ropinirole PR | 2.5 |
Twice-daily of Ropinirole PR | 2.9 |
"Epworth sleep scale after 8 weeks in each arm or at last visit for early completion.~Range: 0~24 Higher values represent worse daytime-sleepiness." (NCT00986245)
Timeframe: 8 weeks in each arm or at last visit for early completion
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Once-daily of Ropinirole PR | 6.3 |
Twice-daily of Ropinirole PR | 6.4 |
Hoehn and Yahr(HY) stage for parkinsonism after 8 weeks in each arm or at last visit for early completion Range: 0~5 Higher values represent more severe parkinsonism (NCT00986245)
Timeframe: 8 weeks for each arm or at last visit
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Once-daily of Ropinirole PR | 2.1 |
Twice-daily of Ropinirole PR | 2.1 |
"Sleep questionnaire 2 for Nocturnal off-symptoms Visual analogue scale: 0~10 Higher values represent worse nocturnal off-symptoms." (NCT00986245)
Timeframe: 8 weeks for each arm or at last visit
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Once-daily of Ropinirole PR | 2.9 |
Twice-daily of Ropinirole PR | 3.1 |
"Sleep questionnaire 1 for Overall quality of sleep Visual analogue scale: 0~10 Higher values represent worse overall sleep quality." (NCT00986245)
Timeframe: 8 weeks for each arm or at last visit
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Once-daily of Ropinirole PR | 2.9 |
Twice-daily of Ropinirole PR | 3.2 |
Patient preference between once-daily and twice-daily regimen (NCT00986245)
Timeframe: After 16 weeks or at last visit for early completion
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Once-daily | 17 |
Twice-daily | 31 |
No Preference | 13 |
Patients who have global impression for improvement for each dosing. (NCT00986245)
Timeframe: After 8 weeks in each arm or at last visit for early completion
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Once-daily of Ropinirole PR | 32 |
Twice-daily of Ropinirole PR | 42 |
Patients who have global impression for improvement to duration of dyskinesia compared (NCT00986245)
Timeframe: After 8 weeks in each arm or at last visit for early completion
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Once-daily of Ropinirole PR | 13 |
Twice-daily of Ropinirole PR | 16 |
Patients who have global impression for improvement to duration of motor fluctuation (NCT00986245)
Timeframe: After 8 weeks in each arm or at last visit for early completion
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Once-daily of Ropinirole PR | 27 |
Twice-daily of Ropinirole PR | 38 |
Patients who have Global Impression for Improvement to Severity of Dyskinesia compared (NCT00986245)
Timeframe: After 8 weeks in each arm or at last visit for early completion
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Once-daily of Ropinirole PR | 16 |
Twice-daily of Ropinirole PR | 15 |
Patients who have global impression for improvement to severity of motor fluctuation compared (NCT00986245)
Timeframe: After 8 weeks in each arm or at last visit for early completion
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Once-daily of Ropinirole PR | 28 |
Twice-daily of Ropinirole PR | 34 |
"Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS) motor scale after 8 weeks in each arm or at last visit for early completion.~UPDRS part 3 is motor scale for parkinson's disease. Range: 0~108 Higher values represent more severe motor symptoms of parkinsonism." (NCT00986245)
Timeframe: 8 weeks for each arm or at last visit
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Once-daily of Ropinirole PR | 17.5 |
Twice-daily of Ropinirole PR | 17.1 |
AEs, defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, were collected to obtain data on the safety, tolerability, and benefit of ropinirole XL. SAEs, defined as AEs that are fatal, life threatening, disabling/incapacitating, resulting in hospitalization or prolongation of a hospital stay, a congenital abnormality/birth defect, or any important medical occurrence that the investigator regards as serious based on medical judgment, were also collected. st. med., study medication. (NCT00632736)
Timeframe: 13 February 2004 through 31 March 2010
Intervention | participants (Number) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Participants (Par.) reporting at least one AE | Par. reporting at least one SAE | Par. with drug-related AEs | Par. with AEs leading to withdrawal | |
Ropinirole XL | 365 | 109 | 213 | 106 |
"The patient preference question assessed the participant's preference for either dosing regimen of study drug, once a day versus three times a day. Participants were asked to respond to the following question to assess preference: Please indicate whether you preferred taking your Parkinson's tablets 3 times a day or once a day. Wk, Week." (NCT00632736)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 26
Intervention | participants (Number) | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Very much preferred three times a day, Wk 4, n=74 | Much preferred three times a day, Week 4, n=74 | Preferred three times a day, Week 4, n=74 | Both regimens are about the same, Week 4, n=74 | Preferred once a day, Week 4, n=74 | Much preferred once a day, Week 4, n=74 | Very much preferred once a day, Week 4, n=74 | Very much preferred three times a day, Wk 26, n=87 | Much preferred three times a day, Week 26, n=87 | Preferred three times a day, Week 26, n=87 | Both regimens are about the same, Week 26, n=87 | Preferred once a day, Week 26, n=87 | Much preferred once a day, Week 26, n=87 | Very much preferred once a day, Week 26, n=87 | |
Ropinirole XL | 2 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 17 | 18 | 28 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 14 | 20 | 42 |
The G-SAS is a reliable and valid self-reported measure of gambling symptoms. It is comprised of twelve questions aimed at evaluating gambling symptoms; each item is scored on a 5-point scale from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (extreme symptoms). The total score ranges from 0 to 48, where 0=least severe and 48=most severe. Change from Baseline is calculated as the value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. (NCT01536574)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Ropinirole PR in Parent DB Study, Ropinirole PR in OL Study | -0.1 |
Placebo in Parent DB Study, Ropinirole PR in OL Study | -0.3 |
The G-SAS is a reliable and valid self-reported measure of gambling symptoms. It is comprised of twelve questions aimed at evaluating gambling symptoms; each item is scored on a 5-point scale from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (extreme symptoms). The total score ranges from 0 to 48, where 0=least severe and 48=most severe. (NCT01536574)
Timeframe: Week 24
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Ropinirole PR in Parent DB Study, Ropinirole PR in OL Study | 0.9 |
Placebo in Parent DB Study, Ropinirole PR in OL Study | 1.3 |
AE=any untoward medical occurrence (UMO), temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product (MP), whether or not considered related to the MP. SAE=any UMO that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization/prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomoly/birth defect. The Investigator determined if an AE/SAE was related to investigational product. Medical/scientific judgment was used to determine whether SAE reporting was appropriate in situations in which an event may not have met the SAE definition. (NCT01536574)
Timeframe: 4- to 14-day Follow-up Phase, beginning after the date of the last dose of down-titration medication (up to and during Study Weeks 26 and 27)
Intervention | Participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Any AE | AE related to IP | Any SAE | |
Placebo in Parent DB Study, Ropinirole PR in OL Study | 3 | 2 | 0 |
Ropinirole PR in Parent DB Study, Ropinirole PR in OL Study | 2 | 1 | 0 |
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. In addition to the data recorded at the follow-up visit, SAEs occurring up to and including 2 days after the last dose of down-titration medication are included in the Follow-up Phase. (NCT01536574)
Timeframe: 4- to 14-day Follow-up Phase, beginning after the date of the last dose of down-titration medication (up to and during Study Weeks 26 and 27)
Intervention | Participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Facial palsy | Parkinsonian rest tremor | Lymphopenia | Hallucination | Choking sensation | |
Placebo in Parent DB Study, Ropinirole PR in OL Study | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Ropinirole PR in Parent DB Study, Ropinirole PR in OL Study | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. The Investigator determined if an AE/SAE was related to investigational product. In addition to the data recorded at the follow-up visit, SAEs occurring up to and including 2 days after the last dose of down-titration medication are included in the Follow-up Phase. (NCT01536574)
Timeframe: 4- to 14-day Follow-up Phase, beginning after the date of the last dose of down-titration medication (up to and during Study Weeks 26 and 27)
Intervention | Participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Lymphopenia | Parkinsonian rest tremor | Hallucination | |
Placebo in Parent DB Study, Ropinirole PR in OL Study | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Ropinirole PR in Parent DB Study, Ropinirole PR in OL Study | 1 | 0 | 0 |
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. The Investigator determined if an AE/SAE was related to investigational product. The On-Treatment Phase is comprised of the Open-label Treatment Phase and the Down-titration Phase. (NCT01536574)
Timeframe: From the start of treatment (Baseline) up to Week 25
Intervention | Participants (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dyskinesia | Dizziness | Somnolence | Akathisia | Akinesia | Cerebral infarction | Headache | Lethargy | Syncope | Nausea | Constipation | Abdominal distension | Abdominal pain upper | Epigastric discomfort | Flatulence | Vomiting | Hallucination | Insomnia | Hallucination, auditory | Impulse-control disorder | Oedema peripheral | Gait disturbance | Medication residue | Orthostatic hypotension | Hypotension | Lymphopenia | Arrhythmia | Blood uric acid increased | Weight decreased | Muscle spasms | Musculoskeletal stiffness | Vertigo | Decreased appetite | Asphyxia | Pruritus | |
Placebo in Parent DB Study, Ropinirole PR in OL Study | 10 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Ropinirole PR in Parent DB Study, Ropinirole PR in OL Study | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
AE=any untoward medical occurrence (UMO), temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product (MP), whether or not considered related to the MP. SAE=any UMO that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization/prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomoly/birth defect. The Investigator determined if an AE/SAE was related to investigational product. Medical/scientific judgment was used to determine whether SAE reporting was appropriate in situations in which an event may not have met the SAE definition. (NCT01536574)
Timeframe: From the start of treatment (Baseline) up to Week 25
Intervention | Participants (Number) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Any AE | AE Related to Investigational Product (IP) | Any SAE | SAE Related to Investigational Product (IP) | AE Leading to Death | AE Leading to Withdrawal | |
Placebo in Parent DB Study, Ropinirole PR in OL Study | 56 | 35 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
Ropinirole PR in Parent DB Study, Ropinirole PR in OL Study | 58 | 33 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
"The CGI Item 4 was used to assess side effects. It ranges from 0 to 4 as follows:~0 = Side effects not assessable~1 = No side effects~2 = Side effects do not significantly interfere with subject's functioning~3 = Side effects significantly interfere with the subject's functioning~4 = Side effects outweigh therapeutic efficacy." (NCT01711866)
Timeframe: Day 28 (Visit 5) of the 28 days Treatment Period or Early Withdrawal Visit
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGI Item 4 score of 1 | CGI Item 4 score of 2 | CGI Item 4 score of 3 | CGI Item 4 score of 4 | CGI Item 4 score of 3 or 4 | |
Rotigotine | 58 | 26 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
"The PGIC is a 7-point categorical rating scale in which the subject rates the changes in functioning over time as follows:~1 = Very much improved~2 = Much improved~3 = Minimally improved~4 = No change~5 = Minimally worse~6 = Much worse~7 = Very much worse." (NCT01711866)
Timeframe: Day 28 (Visit 5) of the 28 days Treatment Period or Early Withdrawal Visit
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGIC category 1 | PGIC category 2 | PGIC category 3 | PGIC category 4 | PGIC category 5 | PGIC category 6 | PGIC category 7 | PGIC category ≥ 5 | PGIC category ≥ 6 | |
Rotigotine | 5 | 17 | 30 | 18 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 14 | 4 |
"Absolute time spent off is measured in hours per day. A negative value in Change from Baseline to Week 8 indicates that the time spent off decreased from Baseline and therefore indicates an improvement from Baseline.~Only subjects with time spent off at Baseline (subset of the Full Analysis Set (FAS)) are included in the analysis of this outcome measure." (NCT01723904)
Timeframe: From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 8 (Visit 8) of the 8 weeks Treatment Period (Titration and Maintenance Period)
Intervention | hours/day (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | -2.1 |
"UPDRS Part II measures 'Activities in Daily Living'. The total score ranges from 0 (Best score possible) to 52 (Worst score possible).~UPDRS Part II total score (average of on and off state) is the average of UPDRS Part II total score (on state) and Part II total score (off state).~A negative value in Change from Baseline to Week 8 indicates an improvement in activities in daily living from Baseline." (NCT01723904)
Timeframe: From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 8 (Visit 8) of the 8 weeks Treatment Period (Titration and Maintenance Period)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | -1.5 |
"The Unified Parkinson´s Disease Rating Scale Part III is an accepted and validated scale for the assessment of motor function in Parkinson´s disease. Each of the 27 sub-items in the UPDRS III is measured on a scale of 0 to 4, where 0 is normal and 4 represents severe abnormalities. The total scores therefore ranges from 0 to 108.~A negative value in Change from Baseline to Week 8 indicates an improvement in motor functions from Baseline." (NCT01723904)
Timeframe: From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 8 (Visit 8) of the 8 weeks Treatment Period (Titration and Maintenance Period)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | -5.3 |
"Absolute time spent on without troublesome dyskinesia is measured in hours per day. A positive value in Change from Baseline to Week 8 indicates that the time spent on without troublesome dyskinesia increased from Baseline and therefore indicates an improvement from Baseline." (NCT01723904)
Timeframe: From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 8 (Visit 8) of the 8 weeks Treatment Period (Titration and Maintenance Period)
Intervention | hours/day (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 1.9 |
"The Parkinson´s Disease Sleep Scale (PDSS) is a questionnaire with 15 questions to assess sleep disturbance and nocturnal disability in Parkinson´s disease. The item- scores can range between 0= never and 4= very often. The PDSS score is a sum score of all 15 questions.~A negative value in Change from Baseline to Week 8 indicates an improvement from Baseline." (NCT01723904)
Timeframe: From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 8 (Visit 8) of the 8 weeks Treatment Period (Titration and Maintenance Period)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | -3.2 |
"The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a questionnaire with 18 questions to assess sleep quality. The 18 questions are distributed to 7 elements with each element ranging from 0-3. The global score is the sum score of all 7 elements and ranges from 0-21 with higher values indicating worse sleep quality.~A negative value in Change from Baseline to Week 8 indicates an improvement in sleep quality from Baseline." (NCT01723904)
Timeframe: From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 8 (Visit 8) of the 8 weeks Treatment Period (Titration and Maintenance Period)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | -0.7 |
"The CGI Item 4 was used to assess side effects. It ranges from 0 to 4 as follows: 0 = Side effects not assessable~= No side effects~= Side effects do not significantly interfere with subject's functioning~= Side effects significantly interfere with the subject's functioning~= Side effects outweigh therapeutic efficacy." (NCT01723904)
Timeframe: Week 8 (Visit 8) of the 8 weeks Treatment Period (Titration and Maintenance Period)
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGI Item 4 score of 1 | CGI Item 4 score of 2 | CGI Item 4 score of 3 | CGI Item 4 score of 4 | CGI Item 4 score of 3 or 4 | |
Rotigotine | 61 | 22 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
AEs, defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, were collected to obtain data on the safety, tolerability, and benefit of ropinirole XL. Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), defined as AEs that are either fatal, life threatening, disabling/incapacitating, resulting in hospitalization or prolongation of a hospital stay, a congenital abnormality/birth defect, or any important medical occurrence that the investigator regards as serious based on medical judgment, were also collected. st. med., study medication. (NCT00650104)
Timeframe: Every study visit from baseline to market availability (Month 78)
Intervention | participants (Number) | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Participants (Par.) with at least one event | Par. with 0 events | Par. with 1 event | Par. with 2 events | Par. with ≥3 events | Par. with mild AEs (by maximum intensity) | Par. with moderate AEs (by maximum intensity) | Par. with severe AEs (by maximum intensity) | Par. with AEs not related to st. med. | Par. with AEs not likely related to st. med. | Par. with AEs suspected to be related to st. med. | Par. with AEs probably related to st. med. | Par. who withdrew study due to AEs | Par. reporting SAEs | |
Ropinirole XL | 81 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 80 | 3 | 38 | 40 | 6 | 6 | 36 | 33 | 20 | 35 |
The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale comprises the following three components (CGI-Severity, CGI-Improvement, Index); where only the CGI-S and CGI-I were assessed in this study. CGI-I is a global improvement scale that scores the clinician's view of the participant's global functioning prior to and after initiating a study medication from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse. (NCT00650104)
Timeframe: Week 2, Month 12, Month 78
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 2 - Very Much Improved, n=70 | Week 2 - Much Improved, n=70 | Week 2 - Minimally Improved, n=70 | Week 2 - No Change, n=70 | Week 2 - Minimally Worse, n=70 | Week 2 - Much Worse, n=70 | Week 2 - Very Much Worse, n=70 | Month 12 - Very Much Improved, n=69 | Month 12 - Much Improved, n=69 | Month 12 - Minimally Improved, n=69 | Month 12 - No Change, n=69 | Month 12 - Minimally Worse, n=69 | Month 12 - Much Worse, n=69 | Month 12 - Very Much Worse, n=69 | Month 78 -Very Much Improved, n=13 | Month 78 - Much Improved, n=13 | Month 78 - Minimally Improved, n=13 | Month 78 - No Change, n=13 | Month 78 - Minimally Worse, n=13 | Month 78 - Much Worse, n=13 | Month 78 - Very Much Worse, n=13 | |
Ropinirole XL | 0 | 2 | 20 | 43 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 25 | 20 | 7 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale comprises the following three components (CGI-Severity, CGI-Improvement, Index); where only the CGI-S and CGI-I were assessed in this study. CGI-I is a global improvement scale that scores the clinician's view of the participant's global functioning prior to and after initiating a study medication from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse. (NCT00650104)
Timeframe: Week 2, Month 12, Month 78
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 2 - Very Much Improved, n=37 | Week 2 - Much Improved, n=37 | Week 2 - Minimally Improved, n=37 | Week 2 - No Change, n=37 | Week 2 - Minimally Worse, n=37 | Week 2 - Much Worse, n=37 | Week 2 - Very Much Worse, n=37 | Month 12 - Very Much Improved, n=46 | Month 12 - Much Improved, n=46 | Month 12 - Minimally Improved, n=46 | Month 12 - No Change, n=46 | Month 12 - Minimally Worse, n=46 | Month 12 - Much Worse, n=46 | Month 12 - Very Much Worse, n=46 | Month 78 - Very Much Improved, n=13 | Month 78 - Much Improved, n=13 | Month 78 - Minimally Improved, n=13 | Month 78 - No Change, n=13 | Month 78 - Minimally Worse, n=13 | Month 78 - Much Worse, n=13 | Month 78 - Very Much Worse, n=13 | |
Ropinirole XL | 0 | 2 | 12 | 20 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 23 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale comprises the following three components (CGI-Severity, CGI-Improvement, Index); where only the CGI-S and CGI-I were assessed in this study. CGI-I is a global improvement scale that scores the clinician's view of the participant's global functioning prior to and after initiating a study medication from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse. (NCT00650104)
Timeframe: Week 2, Month 12, Month 78
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 2 - Very Much Improved, n=49 | Week 2 - Much Improved, n=49 | Week 2 - Minimally Improved, n=49 | Week 2 - No Change, n=49 | Week 2 - Minimally Worse, n=49 | Week 2 - Much Worse, n=49 | Week 2 - Very Much Worse, n=49 | Month 12 - Very Much Improved, n=56 | Month 12 - Much Improved, n=56 | Month 12 - Minimally Improved, n=56 | Month 12 - No Change, n=56 | Month 12 - Minimally Worse, n=56 | Month 12 - Much Worse, n=56 | Month 12 - Very Much Worse, n=56 | Month 78 - Very Much Improved, n=13 | Month 78 - Much Improved, n=13 | Month 78 - Minimally Improved, n=13 | Month 78 - No Change, n=13 | Month 78 - Minimally Worse, n=13 | Month 78 - Much Worse, n=13 | Month 78 - Very Much Worse, n=13 | |
Ropinirole XL | 0 | 2 | 17 | 27 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 25 | 12 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
The UPDRS is a clinician-based scale used to assess the longitudinal course of PD. Two of the six sections were assessed (Part II, Activities of Daily Living (ADL); Part III, Motor Examination). Both consist of a number of items (ADL, 13 items; Motor Exam., 17 items), and each item has a choice of 5 responses that are numerically scored 0-4, with 0 as the least severe response and 4 as the most severe response. ADL final score is a sum of the 13 items and may have a value between 0 (no impairment of overall activities) and 52 (severe impairment of overall activities). LTT, long-term treatment. (NCT00650104)
Timeframe: Screening; Week 4; Months 3, 9, 15, 21, 27, 33, 39, 45, 51, 57, 63, 69, 75, and 78
Intervention | points on a scale (Mean) | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screening, n=83 | Up-titration (Week 4), n=64 | LTT, Month 3, n=76 | LTT, Month 9, n=72 | LTT, Month 15, n=67 | LTT, Month 21, n=63 | LTT, Month 27, n=58 | LTT, Month 33, n=53 | LTT, Month 39, n=19 | LTT, Month 45, n=18 | LTT, Month 51, n=19 | LTT, Month 57, n=20 | LTT, Month 63, n=19 | LTT, Month 69, n=20 | LTT, Month 75, n=16 | LTT, Month 78, n=13 | |
Ropinirole XL | 9.4 | 8.9 | 8.2 | 8.1 | 9.0 | 8.6 | 9.3 | 10.3 | 10.5 | 9.3 | 10.1 | 10.4 | 11.9 | 10.8 | 12.6 | 11.5 |
Two of the six UPDRS sections (Part II, Activities of Daily Living (ADL); Part III, Motor Examination) were assessed in this study. The Motor Exam has 17 items, some of which are assessed in both the left and right extremities. Each item has a choice of 5 responses that are numerically scored 0-4 (0 as the least severe, 4 as the most severe). The final score is a sum of the 17 items, with some sections requiring multiple grades assigned to each extremity, and has a value ranging from 0 (no motor impairment) to 108 (severe motor impairment). (NCT00650104)
Timeframe: Screening and Month 78
Intervention | points on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Screening, n=83 | Month 78, n=13 | |
Ropinirole XL | 22.0 | 20.7 |
Two of the six UPDRS sections (Part II, Activities of Daily Living (ADL); Part III, Motor Examination) were assessed in this study. The Motor Exam has 17 items, some of which are assessed in both the left and right extremities. Each item has a choice of 5 responses that are numerically scored 0-4 (0 as the least severe, 4 as the most severe). The final score is a sum of the 17 items, with some sections requiring multiple grades assigned to each extremity, and has a value ranging from 0 (no motor impairment) to 108 (severe motor impairment). (NCT00650104)
Timeframe: Screening and Month 78
Intervention | points on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Screening, n=47 | Month 78, n=13 | |
Ropinirole XL | 22.2 | 20.7 |
Two of the six UPDRS sections (Part II, Activities of Daily Living (ADL); Part III, Motor Examination) were assessed in this study. The Motor Exam has 17 items, some of which are assessed in both the left and right extremities. Each item has a choice of 5 responses that are numerically scored 0-4 (0 as the least severe, 4 as the most severe). The final score is a sum of the 17 items, with some sections requiring multiple grades assigned to each extremity, and has a value ranging from 0 (no motor impairment) to 108 (severe motor impairment). (NCT00650104)
Timeframe: Screening and Month 78
Intervention | points on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Screening, n=60 | Month 78, n=13 | |
Ropinirole XL | 21.7 | 20.7 |
The UPDRS is a clinician-based scale used to assess the longitudinal course of PD. Two of the six sections were assessed (Part II, Activities of Daily Living (ADL); Part III, Motor Examination). Both consist of a number of items (ADL, 13 items; Motor Exam., 17 items), and each item has a choice of 5 responses that are numerically scored 0-4, with 0 as the least severe response and 4 as the most severe response. ADL final score is a sum of the 13 items and may have a value between 0 (no impairment of overall activities) and 52 (severe impairment of overall activities). LTT, long-term treatment. (NCT00650104)
Timeframe: Screening; Months 3, 9, 15, 27, and 78
Intervention | points on a scale (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screening, n=60 | LTT, Month 3, n=59 | LTT, Month 9, n=58 | LTT, Month 15, n=55 | LTT, Month 27, n=47 | LTT, Month 78, n=13 | |
Ropinirole XL | 9.1 | 8.0 | 7.8 | 8.7 | 8.8 | 11.5 |
The UPDRS is a clinician-based scale used to assess the longitudinal course of PD. Two of the six sections were assessed (Part II, Activities of Daily Living (ADL); Part III, Motor Examination). Both consist of a number of items (ADL, 13 items; Motor Exam., 17 items), and each item has a choice of 5 responses that are numerically scored 0-4, with 0 as the least severe response and 4 as the most severe response. ADL final score is a sum of the 13 items and may have a value between 0 (no impairment of overall activities) and 52 (severe impairment of overall activities). LTT, long-term treatment. (NCT00650104)
Timeframe: Screening; Months 3, 9, 15, 27, and 78
Intervention | points on a scale (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screening, n=47 | LTT, Month 3, n=46 | LTT, Month 9, n= 46 | LTT, Month 15, n=44 | LTT, Month 27, n=37 | LTT, Month 78, n=13 | |
Ropinirole XL | 9.0 | 7.7 | 7.7 | 8.6 | 8.4 | 11.5 |
Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | g/l (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | -0.5 |
Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | Units/l (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | -1.4 |
Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | mmol/l (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | -0.24 |
Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | mg/dl (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | -0.05 |
Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | mmol/l (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | -0.4 |
"The CGI is a set of ratings made by a clinician in order to assess the overall severity of an individual's symptoms as well as changes in his/her functioning over time.~Item 1 measures 'Severity of Parkinson's Disease'. Range: 1 (Normal, not ill at all) to 7 (Among the most extremely ill patients) Change = 28 day value minus baseline value." (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | score on scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | -0.0 |
Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | mg/dl (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | -0.004 |
Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | mmHg (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 0.8 |
Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | mmHg (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 0.8 |
Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | mmHg (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 1.7 |
Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | mmHg (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 0.6 |
The ESS is a self-administered questionnaire in which the subject rates the probability of his/her dozing during 8 situations that are differently conductive to sleep Range: 0 (Best score possible) to 24 (Worst score possible) Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | score on scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | -0.2 |
Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | Units/l (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | -0.1 |
Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | mg/dl (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | -0.2 |
Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | Units/l (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | -0.2 |
Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | beats per minute (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 0.5 |
Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | l/l*100 (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 0.09 |
Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | g/l (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 0.8 |
Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | mg/dl (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | -0.03 |
The PDNMS is a rating by the clinician to assess the severity and frequency of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease patients Range: 0 (Best score possible) to 384 (Worst score possible) Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | score on scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | -7.9 |
"The PDSS is a scale to assess sleep and nocturnal disability in Parkinson's disease.~Range: 0 (Best score possible) to 60 (Worst score possible) Change = 28 day value minus baseline value." (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | score on scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | -0.8 |
Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | Percentage of white blood cell count (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 0.01 |
Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | Percentage of white blood cell count (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | -0.11 |
Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | Percentage of white blood cell count (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 0.73 |
Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | Percentage of white blood cell count (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 0.96 |
Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | Percentage of white blood cell count (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | -0.40 |
Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | Giga/l (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 2.6 |
Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | mmol/l (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 0.08 |
"The PR interval is defined as the period that extends from the onset of atrial depolarization (beginning of the P wave) until the onset of ventricular depolarization (beginning of the QRS complex).~Change = 28 day value minus baseline value." (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | msec (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | -0.0 |
Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | beats per minute (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 1.7 |
Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | beats per minute (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 0.8 |
Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | beats per minute (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 2.0 |
Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | beats per minute (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 1.8 |
"The QRS duration represents the time it takes for ventricular depolarization to occur.~Change = 28 day value minus baseline value." (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | msec (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | -1.2 |
"The QT interval is the period that extends from the beginning of ventricular depolarization until the end of ventricular repolarization.~Change = 28 day value minus baseline value." (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | msec (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | -1.7 |
"The QT interval is the period that extends from the beginning of ventricular depolarization until the end of ventricular repolarization.~Change = 28 day value minus baseline value." (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | msec (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 0.5 |
Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | Tera/l (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 0.023 |
Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | Units/l (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | -0.1 |
"The PDQ-8 is a self-administered 8-item questionnaire that assesses issues associated with Parkinson's disease.~Range: 0 (good health) to 100 (poor health) Change = 28 day value minus baseline value." (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | score on scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | -3.9 |
Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | mmol/l (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | -0.6 |
Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | mmHg (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | -0.2 |
Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | mmHg (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 2.0 |
Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | mmHg (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 5.7 |
Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 Days
Intervention | mmHg (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 2.6 |
Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | mg/dl (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 0.079 |
Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | g/dl (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | -0.09 |
The UPDRS is a scale for the assessment of function in Parkinson's disease UPDRS Part I measures 'Mentation, Behavior and Mood'. Range: 0 (Best score possible) to 16 (Worst score possible) Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | score on scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | -0.5 |
The UPDRS is a scale for the assessment of function in Parkinson's disease UPDRS Part II measures 'Activities in Daily Living'. Range: 0 (Best score possible) to 52 (Worst score possible) Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | score on scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | -0.9 |
The UPDRS is a scale for the assessment of function in Parkinson's disease UPDRS Part III measures 'Motor Examination'. Range: 0 (Best score possible) to 56 (Worst score possible) Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | score on scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | -1.9 |
The UPDRS is a scale for the assessment of function in Parkinson's disease UPDRS Part IV measures 'Complications of Therapy'. Range: 0 (Best score possible) to 23 (Worst score possible) Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | score on scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | -0.4 |
Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | µmol/l (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | -3.80 |
Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | Giga/l (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | -0.045 |
"The CGI is a set of ratings made by a clinician in order to assess the overall severity of an individual's symptoms as well as changes in his/her functioning over time.~Item 2 measures 'Global Improvement'. Range 1 (Very much improved) to 7 (Very much worse)" (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | score on scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 3.6 |
(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 99 |
(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 88 |
(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 56 days
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 1 |
(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 2 days
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 1 |
(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 56 days
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 9 |
(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 2 days
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 0 |
(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 0 |
(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 0 |
(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 0 |
(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 1 |
(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 1 |
(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 0 |
(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 0 |
(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 0 |
(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 0 |
(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 0 |
(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 0 |
(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 1 |
(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 0 |
(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 0 |
(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 0 |
(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 0 |
(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 1 |
(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 0 |
(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 0 |
(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 0 |
(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 0 |
(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 0 |
"The PGI is a set of ratings made by the patient in order to assess the overall severity of an individual's symptoms as well as changes in his/her functioning over time.~Item 1 measures 'Global Improvement'. Range: 1 (Very much improved) to 7 (Very much worse)" (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | score on scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Rotigotine | 3.6 |
"The CGI is a set of ratings made by a clinician in order to assess the overall severity of an individual's symptoms as well as changes in his/her functioning over time.~Item 3.1 measures 'Therapeutic Effect'. Range: 1 (Marked - Vast improvement. Complete or nearly complete remission of all symptoms.) to 4 (Unchanged or worse)" (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Marked | Moderate | Minimal | Unchanged or Worse | Not Assessed | |
Rotigotine | 3 | 20 | 36 | 54 | 1 |
"The CGI is a set of ratings made by a clinician in order to assess the overall severity of an individual's symptoms as well as changes in his/her functioning over time.~Item 3.2 measures 'Therapeutic Side Effects'. Range: 1 (None) to 4 (Outweigh the therapeutic effect)" (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
None | No Significant Interference with Subj. Functioning | Significant Interference with Subj. Functioning | Outweigh the Theraputic Effect | Not Assessed | |
Rotigotine | 88 | 18 | 5 | 2 | 1 |
"The PGI is a set of ratings made by the patient in order to assess the overall severity of an individual's symptoms as well as changes in his/her functioning over time.~Item 2 measures 'Therapeutic Effect'. Range: 1 (Marked - Vast improvement. Complete or nearly complete remission of all symptoms) to 4 (Unchanged or worse)" (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Marked | Moderate | Minimal | Unchanged or Worse | Missing / Not Done | |
Rotigotine | 5 | 25 | 38 | 44 | 2 |
"The PGI is a set of ratings made by the patient in order to assess the overall severity of an individual's symptoms as well as changes in his/her functioning over time.~Item 3 measures 'Side Effects'. Range: 1 (I have no side effects) to 4 (They outweigh the therapeutic effect of the trial medication)" (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
No Side Effects | No Significant Interference with Functioning | Significant Interference with Functioning | Outweighing Therapeutic Effect of Trial Medication | Missing / Not Done | |
Rotigotine | 77 | 24 | 6 | 5 | 2 |
Have you used pharmaceutical treatments for your Parkinson's disease before the study? (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
yes | no | |
Rotigotine | 114 | 0 |
Why did you decide to enter this study? (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | participants (Number) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Side effects with oral medicine | Oral medicine not effective in controlling sympt. | Taking med. several times a day was not convenient | Other | |
Rotigotine | 14 | 21 | 71 | 40 |
In comparing the patch and previous oral treatments for Parkinson's disease, how satisfied have you been with oral medication / patch? (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | participants (Number) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Very Dissatisfied with Oral Medication | Dissatisfied with Oral Medication | Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied with Oral Med. | Satisfied with Oral Medication | Very Satisfied with Oral Medication | Assessment for Oral Medication Missing / Not Done | Very Dissatisfied with Patch | Dissatisfied with Patch | Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied with Patch | Satisfied with Patch | Very Satisfied with Patch | Assessment for Patch Missing / Not Done | |
Rotigotine | 3 | 11 | 49 | 43 | 6 | 2 | 9 | 28 | 34 | 32 | 9 | 2 |
I would prefer using a patch over taking a pill or capsule for treatment of my Parkinson's disease. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | participants (Number) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Strongly Agree | Agree | Neither Agree nor Disagree | Disagree | Strongly Disagree | Not Done / Missing | |
Rotigotine | 18 | 34 | 29 | 28 | 3 | 2 |
I would prefer applying one 40cm**2 patch over applying two 20cm**2 patches for treatment of my Parkinson's disease. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | participants (Number) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Strongly Agree | Agree | Neither Agree nor Disagree | Disagree | Strongly Disagree | Not Done / Missing | |
Rotigotine | 17 | 68 | 10 | 13 | 4 | 2 |
What aspects do you like the most about the patch? (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Applying the patch once a day | Comfortable to wear | Does not interfere with my normal activities | Do not have to take medicine in public | Provides symptom relief all day | Convenient | Easy to apply | Do not have to remember to take med. during day | Missing / Not Done | |
Rotigotine | 81 | 28 | 61 | 56 | 46 | 53 | 50 | 60 | 2 |
What aspects do you like the least about the patch? Check all that apply. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | participants (Number) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hard to apply | Hard to remove | Hard to remove the patch from its pouch | Did not stay on for the entire day | Uncomfortable to wear | Not always covered by clothing | Symptom relief did not last all day | Not Done / Missing | |
Rotigotine | 11 | 3 | 1 | 80 | 27 | 8 | 29 | 2 |
Musculoskeletal and Connective Tissue Disorders. Common adverse experience/event is defined as AE occurs to 5(about 5%) or more subjects. They will also be tabulated by treatment groups. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 1 |
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day | 0 |
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day | 2 |
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day | 3 |
Gastrointestinal Disorders. Common adverse experience/event is defined as AE occurs to 5(about 5%) or more subjects. They will also be tabulated by treatment groups. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 3 |
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day | 2 |
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day | 3 |
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day | 4 |
Psychiatric Disorders. Common adverse experience/event is defined as AE occurs to 5(about 5%) or more subjects. They will also be tabulated by treatment groups. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 2 |
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day | 3 |
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day | 1 |
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day | 1 |
Gastrointestinal Disorders. Common adverse experience/event is defined as AE occurs to 5(about 5%) or more subjects. They will also be tabulated by treatment groups. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 2 |
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day | 1 |
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day | 2 |
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day | 1 |
Nervous system disorders. Common adverse experience/event is defined as AE occurs to 5(about 5%) or more subjects. They will also be tabulated by treatment groups. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 7 |
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day | 5 |
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day | 6 |
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day | 6 |
Gastrointestinal Disorders. Common adverse experience/event is defined as AE occurs to 5(about 5%) or more subjects. They will also be tabulated by treatment groups. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 3 |
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day | 1 |
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day | 1 |
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day | 1 |
General Disorders and Administration Site Conditions. Common adverse experience/event is defined as AE occurs to 5(about 5%) or more subjects. They will also be tabulated by treatment groups. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 2 |
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day | 1 |
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day | 3 |
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day | 3 |
Nervous System disorders. Common adverse experience/event is defined as AE occurs to 5(about 5%) or more subjects. They will also be tabulated by treatment groups. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 3 |
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day | 3 |
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day | 6 |
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day | 4 |
Vascular Disorders. Common adverse experience/event is defined as AE occurs to 5(about 5%) or more subjects. They will also be tabulated by treatment groups. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 1 |
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day | 1 |
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day | 2 |
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day | 2 |
Psychiatric Disorders. Common adverse experience/event is defined as AE occurs to 5(about 5%) or more subjects. They will also be tabulated by treatment groups. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 2 |
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day | 3 |
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day | 1 |
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day | 1 |
Infections and infestations. Common adverse experience/event is defined as AE occurs to 5(about 5%) or more subjects. They will also be tabulated by treatment groups. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 2 |
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day | 4 |
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day | 7 |
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day | 4 |
Gastrointestinal Disorders. Common adverse experience/event is defined as AE occurs to 5(about 5%) or more subjects. They will also be tabulated by treatment groups. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 3 |
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day | 2 |
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day | 1 |
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day | 2 |
General disorders and administration site conditions. Common adverse experience/event is defined as AE occurs to 5(about 5%) or more subjects. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 1 |
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day | 4 |
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day | 10 |
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day | 16 |
Infections and Infestations. Common adverse experience/event is defined as AE occurs to 5(about 5%) or more subjects. They will also be tabulated by treatment groups. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 3 |
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day | 2 |
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day | 1 |
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day | 0 |
Nervous System Disorders. Common adverse experience/event is defined as AE occurs to 5(about 5%) or more subjects. They will also be tabulated by treatment groups. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 2 |
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day | 3 |
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day | 2 |
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day | 0 |
Infections and Infestations. Common adverse experience/event is defined as AE occurs to 5(about 5%) or more subjects. They will also be tabulated by treatment groups. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 1 |
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day | 2 |
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day | 5 |
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day | 0 |
The outcome is defined as change in ADL subscale of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale(UPDRS Part II) between the baseline visit and month 12 or the time of sufficient disability to require dopaminergic therapy. UPDRS Part II: Activities of Daily Living in the week prior to the designated visit, consisting of 13 questions answered on a 0-4 point scale where 0 represents the absence of impairment and 4 represents the highest degree of impairment. Total Part II score represents the sum of these 13 questions. A greater increase in score indicates a greater increase in disability. A total of 52 points are possible. 52 represents the worst (total) disability), 0--no disability (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 2.60 |
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day | 3.20 |
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day | 2.09 |
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day | 1.86 |
The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is a validated self-reported 21-item depression scale that was tested and validated as a reliable instrument for screening for depression in PD. The outcome is defined as change in BDI-II between the baseline visit and month 12 or the time of sufficient disability to require dopaminergic therapy. Total BDI score represents the sum of these 21-items. A higher change in score indicates a greater increase in disability. Total score of 0-13 is considered minimal, 14-19 is mild, 20-28 is moderate, and 29-63 is severe. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -0.52 |
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day | 1.99 |
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day | 0.11 |
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day | 1.50 |
The outcome is defined as change in Mental subscale of Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale(UPDRS Part I) between the baseline visit and month 12 or the time of sufficient disability to require dopaminergic therapy. UPDRS Part I: Mentation, behavior and mood, consisting of 4 questions answered on a 0-4 point scale where 0 represents the absence of impairment and 4 represents the highest degree of impairment. Total score represents the sum of these 4 questions. A greater increase in score indicates a greater increase in disability. A total of 16 points are possible. 16 represents the worst (total) disability), 0--no disability. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 0.30 |
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day | 0.76 |
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day | 0.30 |
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day | 0.03 |
The Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale is an 8-level Parkinson's disease staging instrument. The outcome is defined as change in Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale between the baseline visit and month 12 or the time of sufficient disability to require dopaminergic therapy. A greater increase in stage indicates a greater increase in disability. Stage ranges from 0-5 (also including 1.5 and 2.5) with 0 indicating no disability and 5 indicating maximum disability. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 0.27 |
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day | 0.22 |
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day | 0.12 |
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day | 0.11 |
The Schwab & England scale is an investigator and subject assessment of the subject's level of independence at all scheduled study visits. The subject will be scored on a percentage scale reflective of his/her ability to perform acts of daily living in relation to what he/she did before Parkinson's disease appeared. The outcome is defined as change in Schwab & England Independence Scale between the baseline visit and month 12 or the time of sufficient disability to require dopaminergic therapy. Higher decrease in score indicates higher disability. Score ranges from 100% (complete independence) to 0% (total disability). (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -5.04 |
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day | -5.56 |
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day | -3.69 |
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day | -3.76 |
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment(MoCA) is a brief 30-point screening instrument that was developed and validated to identify subjects with mild cognitive impairment. The outcome is defined as change in MoCA between the baseline visit and month 12 or the time of sufficient disability to require dopaminergic therapy. Total MoCA score represents the sum of these 30-points, with a lower score indicating greater cognitive impairment. 30 is the maximum score, with a score of 26 or higher considered normal and below 26 indicative of Mild Cognitive Impairment. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 0.58 |
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day | 0.06 |
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day | 0.11 |
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day | 0.36 |
The outcome is defined as change in Motor subscale of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale(UPDRS Part III) between the baseline visit and month 12 or the time of sufficient disability to require dopaminergic therapy. UPDRS Part III: motor abilities at the time of the visit, consisting of 27 items (including 13 general questions and 14 sub-questions) each answered on a 0-4 point scale where 0 represents the absence of impairment and 4 represents the highest degree of impairment. Total Part III score represents the sum of these 27 items. A total of 108 points are possible. 108 represents the worst (total) disability), 0--no disability. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 4.32 |
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day | 3.49 |
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day | 3.91 |
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day | 3.69 |
The PD Quality of Life Scale(PDQ-39) asks the subject to evaluate how Parkinson disease has affected their health and overall quality of life at that point in time. The total quality of life scale includes subscales relating to social role, self-image/sexuality, sleep, outlook, physical function and urinary function. The outcome is defined as change in PDQ-39 between the baseline visit and month 12 or the time of sufficient disability to require dopaminergic therapy. It is scored on a scale of zero to 100, with lower scores indicating better health and higher scores more severe disability. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 1.28 |
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day | 3.47 |
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day | 3.00 |
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day | 3.35 |
Outcome is defined as change in total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) between the baseline visit and month 12 or the time to require dopaminergic therapy (last visit before subject goes on dopaminergic therapy), whichever occurs first. The UPDRS score has 4 components. Part I assesses mentation; Part II assesses activities of daily living; Part III assesses motor abilities; Part IV assesses complications of therapy. A total of 44 items are included in Parts I-III. Each item will receive a score ranging from 0 to 4 where 0 represents the absence of impairment and 4 represents the highest degree of impairment. Part IV contains 11 items, 4 of these items are scored 0-4 in the same manner, and 7 are scored 0-1, with 0 indicating the absence of impairment and 1 indicating the presence of impairment. Total UPDRS score represents the sum of these items in Parts I-IV. A total of 199 points are possible. 199 represents the worst (total) disability), 0--no disability. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 7.40 |
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day | 7.44 |
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day | 6.30 |
Isradipine CR 15-20mg/Day | 5.40 |
Tolerability will be judged by the proportion of subjects enrolled in a dosage group able to complete the 12 month study or to the time of initiation of dopaminergic therapy on their original assigned dosage. Tolerability of each active arm will be compared to placebo group. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 25 |
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day | 19 |
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day | 19 |
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day | 9 |
(NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy
Intervention | mm Hg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -0.38 |
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day | -4.20 |
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day | -5.14 |
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day | -4.34 |
(NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy
Intervention | mm Hg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 0.09 |
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day | -2.79 |
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day | -4.54 |
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day | -3.63 |
(NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy
Intervention | beats per minute (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -0.08 |
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day | -2.98 |
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day | -2.29 |
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day | -1.21 |
(NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy
Intervention | beats per minute (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -0.42 |
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day | -0.71 |
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day | -0.52 |
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day | 0.18 |
(NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy
Intervention | mm Hg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -4.77 |
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day | -9.85 |
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day | -7.75 |
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day | -6.30 |
(NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy
Intervention | mm Hg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -2.45 |
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day | -8.59 |
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day | -6.45 |
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day | -7.01 |
Therapeutic level monitoring will be accomplished by analyzing blood levels for DHA. (NCT01563913)
Timeframe: baseline and 1.5 years
Intervention | ng/dL - Blood (Mean) |
---|---|
Docosahexaenoic Acid | 102.18 |
Placebo: | -13.20 |
This study is seeking to determine the safety/efficacy of DHA in Parkinson's disease patients. The safety/efficacy of DHA will be determined using periodic safety lab information. Safety labs for complete blood count (CBC) were performed at each inpatient visit, reviewed by the PI, and marked as normal or abnormal. (NCT01563913)
Timeframe: Year 1
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Docosahexaenoic Acid | 0 |
Placebo: | 0 |
62 reviews available for ropinirole and Parkinson Disease
Article | Year |
---|---|
The effect and safety of ropinirole in the treatment of Parkinson disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Headache; Humans; Indoles; Nausea; Parkinson Disease; Randomized Controlled Tr | 2021 |
Comparison for Efficacy and Tolerability among Ten Drugs for Treatment of Parkinson's Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis.
Topics: Bromocriptine; Cluster Analysis; Dopamine Agonists; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Indoles; Levo | 2017 |
Indirect Comparison of Ropinirole and Pramipexole as Levodopa Adjunctive Therapy in Advanced Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Combined Modality Therapy; Female; Humans; Ind | 2019 |
Rotigotine Transdermal Patch: A Review in Parkinson's Disease.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Dopamine Agonists; Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Disease; Pramipexole; Quali | 2019 |
Anti-Parkinson's disease drugs and pharmacogenetic considerations.
Topics: Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylases; Benzothiazoles; Benztropine; Bromocriptine; Cabergoline; Catechols; C | 2013 |
[Dopaminergic treatment in Parkinson's disease: what has each therapeutic family got to offer?].
Topics: Amantadine; Antiparkinson Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Catechol O-Methyltransferase; Catechol O- | 2014 |
Drug safety evaluation of ropinirole prolonged release.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dopamine Agonists; Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Dis | 2014 |
Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of long-acting non-ergot dopamine agonists in Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Dopamine Agonists; Drug Delivery Systems; Humans; Indoles; Par | 2014 |
Design and Synthesis of Dopaminergic Agonists.
Topics: Apomorphine; Dopamine Agonists; Drug Design; Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Disease; Phenanthridines; Qu | 2016 |
Initial experience with ropinirole PR (prolonged release).
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Indoles; Park | 2008 |
Ropinirole prolonged release: in advanced Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Animals; Antiparkinson Agents; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Delivery Systems; Humans; Indo | 2009 |
[Treatment of Parkinson's disease at present and in the future].
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Aromatic-L-Amino-Acid Decarboxylases; Catechol O-Methyltransferase Inhibitors; | 2008 |
A review of ropinirole prolonged release in Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Delayed-Action Preparations; Dopamine Agonists; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Indoles; P | 2009 |
Tolerability and safety of ropinirole versus other dopamine agonists and levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Dopamine Agonists; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; Parki | 2010 |
Long half-life and prolonged-release dopamine receptor agonists: a review of ropinirole prolonged-release studies.
Topics: Animals; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dopamine Agonists; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dyskinesia, Drug | 2009 |
[Clinical data of the prolonged-release formulation of ropinirole].
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Delayed-Action Preparations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans | 2010 |
Pathological behaviors provoked by dopamine agonist therapy of Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders; Dopamine A | 2011 |
Indirect comparisons of adverse events and dropout rates in early Parkinson's disease trials of pramipexole, ropinirole, and rasagiline.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Cognition Disorders; Cross-Sectional Studies; Databases, Bibli | 2012 |
Clinical inquiry. Which drugs work best for early Parkinson's disease?
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Carbidopa; Drug Combinations; Family Practice; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; Moto | 2012 |
Two advances in the management of Parkinson disease.
Topics: Age Factors; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Carbidopa; Dyskinesias; Electric Stimulation Ther | 2002 |
DA agonists -- non-ergot derivatives: ropinirole: management of Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Dopamine Agonists; Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Disease; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic | 2002 |
[Use of dopamine agonists in the treatment of Parkinson's disease].
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Bromocriptine; Cabergoline; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topi | 2002 |
Sleep attacks--facts and fiction: a critical review.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Disorders of Excessive Somn | 2003 |
Do dopamine agonists or levodopa modify Parkinson's disease progression?
Topics: Animals; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Carrier Proteins; Dihydroxyphenylalanine; Disease Pro | 2002 |
Dopamine agonist monotherapy in Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Benzothiazoles; Cabergoline; Dopamine Agonists; Ergolines; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; Middle Aged; P | 2002 |
Neuroprotection in idiopathic Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Cell Death; Dopamine Agonists; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; Neur | 2002 |
Practical importance of neuroprotection in Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Amantadine; Antiparkinson Agents; Dopamine Agonists; Humans; Indoles; Neuroprotective Agents; Parkin | 2002 |
Comparison of the risk of adverse events with pramipexole and ropinirole in patients with Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis.
Topics: Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Benzothiazoles; Dopamine Agonists; Humans; Indoles; Parkins | 2003 |
Cabergoline, pramipexole and ropinirole used as monotherapy in early Parkinson's disease: an evidence-based comparison.
Topics: Age of Onset; Benzothiazoles; Cabergoline; Dopamine Agonists; Double-Blind Method; Ergolines; Eviden | 2003 |
Comparing dopamine agonists in Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Dopamine Agonists; Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Disease; Pergolide; Randomized C | 2003 |
Ropinirole: current status of the studies.
Topics: Bromocriptine; Dopamine Agonists; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Human | 2004 |
Sleep attacks in patients receiving dopamine-receptor agonists.
Topics: Aged; Benzothiazoles; Dopamine Agonists; Female; Humans; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; Narcolepsy; Par | 2005 |
Evidence-based medical review update: pharmacological and surgical treatments of Parkinson's disease: 2001 to 2004.
Topics: Amantadine; Antiparkinson Agents; Apomorphine; Benzophenones; Benzothiazoles; Bromocriptine; Cabergo | 2005 |
Ropinirole therapy for Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Dopamine Agonists; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; Parki | 2004 |
Present and future drug treatment for Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Benzothiazoles; Corpus Striatum; Disease Progression; Dopamine Agonists; Drug Therapy, Combination; | 2005 |
[Placebo effect in Parkinson's disease].
Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Conditioning, Psychological; Corpus Striatum; Deep Brain Stimulation; Dopa | 2007 |
[Systemic review and meta-analysis of tolerability and safety between different titration regimes of ropinirol dose in the treatment of Parkinson's disease].
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Disease | 2007 |
[Pharmacological profiles and clinical effects of ropinirole hydrochloride (ReQuip)].
Topics: Animals; Antiparkinson Agents; Catalase; Cell Proliferation; Cerebral Ventricles; Clinical Trials as | 2007 |
Second generation of dopamine agonists: pros and cons.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Cabergoline; Dopamine Agonists; Drugs, Investigational; Ergoli | 1995 |
Ropinirole in the symptomatic treatment of Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Dopamine Agonists; Drug Therapy, Combinati | 1995 |
Newer therapies for Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Bromocriptine; Cabergoline; Dopamine Agonists; Ergolines; Humans; Indoles; Par | 1996 |
Pharmacologic profile of ropinirole: a nonergoline dopamine agonist.
Topics: Animals; Antiparkinson Agents; Dopamine Agonists; Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Disease | 1997 |
New pharmacotherapy for Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Benzophenones; Benzothiazoles; Cabergoline; Catechol O-Methyltransferase Inhibitors; Catechols; Dopa | 1997 |
New options for treatment of Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzophenones; Benzothiazoles; Cabergoline; Catechol O-Methyltransferase; Cate | 1997 |
[Ropinirol: a new dopamine agonist in the treatment of Parkinson's disease].
Topics: Dopamine Agonists; Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Disease | 1997 |
Clinical pharmacology of dopamine agonists in Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Animals; Antiparkinson Agents; Apomorphine; Benzothiazoles; Cabergoline; Dopamine Agonists; Ergoline | 1998 |
Ropinirole: a dopamine agonist for the treatment of Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Dopamine Agonists; Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Disease; Randomized Controlled T | 1999 |
Dopamine agonists.
Topics: Apomorphine; Benzothiazoles; Bromocriptine; Dopamine Agonists; Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Disease; P | 1999 |
Ropinirole and pramipexole, the new agonists.
Topics: Animals; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Binding, Competitive; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dopam | 1999 |
The initial treatment of Parkinson's disease should begin with levodopa.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Bromocriptine; Drug Therapy, Combination; Essential Trem | 1999 |
Treatment of Parkinson's disease should begin with a dopamine agonist.
Topics: Benzothiazoles; Bromocriptine; Cabergoline; Dopamine Agonists; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Dru | 1999 |
Clinical pharmacology of dopamine agonists.
Topics: Benzothiazoles; Cabergoline; Dopamine Agonists; Drug Interactions; Ergolines; Humans; Indoles; Parki | 2000 |
New drugs for the treatment of Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzophenones; Benzothiazoles; Cabergoline; Catechol O-Methyltransferase Inhib | 2000 |
Waking up to sleep episodes in Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Automobile Driving; Benzothiazoles; Dopamine Agents; Humans; Indoles; Narcolep | 2000 |
Ropinirole for levodopa-induced complications in Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dopam | 2000 |
Ropinirole versus bromocriptine for levodopa-induced complications in Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Bromocriptine; Dopamine Agonists; Dyskinesias; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; Park | 2000 |
Ropinirole: a review of its use in the management of Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Disease | 2000 |
["Sleep attacks" in Parkinson patients. A side effect of nonergoline dopamine agonists or a class effect of dopamine agonists?].
Topics: Accidents, Traffic; Automobile Driving; Benzothiazoles; Contraindications; Dopamine Agents; Dopamine | 2000 |
Clinical pharmacokinetics of ropinirole.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Distribution; Aged; Area Under Curve; Dopamine Agonists; Drug Interactions | 2000 |
[Parkinson disease: diagnostic and therapeutic criteria].
Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Adult; Aged; Amantadine; Antiparkinson Agents; Bromocriptine; Diagnosis, | 2001 |
Are dopamine receptor agonists neuroprotective in Parkinson's disease?
Topics: Animals; Antiparkinson Agents; Apomorphine; Benzothiazoles; Bromocriptine; Cell Culture Techniques; | 2001 |
Increased risk of somnolence with the new dopamine agonists in patients with Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Dopamine Agonists; Drug The | 2001 |
68 trials available for ropinirole and Parkinson Disease
Article | Year |
---|---|
Comparison of pramipexole versus ropinirole in the treatment of Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Humans; Indoles; Middle Aged; Neurodegenerative Diseases; Parkinson | 2022 |
Ropinirole Patch Versus Placebo, Ropinirole Extended-Release Tablet in Advanced Parkinson's Disease.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; Parkinson Disease; Tablets | 2020 |
Detecting placebo and drug effects on Parkinson's disease symptoms by longitudinal item-score models.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Case-Control Studies; Cross-Over Studies; Dopamine Agonists; Drug De | 2021 |
Clinical evaluation of ropinirole controlled-release formulation at 18-24 mg/day in Japanese patients with Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Asian People; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dou | 2017 |
Behavioural and trait changes in parkinsonian patients with impulse control disorder after switching from dopamine agonist to levodopa therapy: results of REIN-PD trial.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Carbidopa; Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Co | 2019 |
The efficacy and safety of ropinirole prolonged release tablets as adjunctive therapy in Chinese subjects with advanced Parkinson's disease: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Asian People; Delayed-Action Preparations; Double-Blind Method; Drug The | 2013 |
Comparison of once-daily versus twice-daily combination of ropinirole prolonged release in Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Cross-Over Studies; Drug Admin | 2013 |
[Efficacy and safety of ropinirole in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: a multi-center, randomized, double-blind and bromocriptine-controlled trial].
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bromocriptine; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Indoles; Male; M | 2013 |
Rotigotine vs ropinirole in advanced stage Parkinson's disease: a double-blind study.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Analysis of Variance; Antiparkinson Agents; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Indole | 2014 |
Long-term, open-label, safety study of once-daily ropinirole extended/prolonged release in early and advanced Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Back Pain; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dopami | 2016 |
An open-label extension study to evaluate the safety of ropinirole prolonged release in Chinese patients with advanced Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Asian People; Delayed-Action Preparations; Drug Liber | 2015 |
Switch from oral pramipexole or ropinirole to rotigotine transdermal system in advanced Parkinson's disease: an open-label study.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Dru | 2015 |
Rotigotine transdermal system as add-on to oral dopamine agonist in advanced Parkinson's disease: an open-label study.
Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Administration, Cutaneous; Aged; Benzothiazoles; Dopamine Agonists; Fema | 2015 |
A fixed-dose, dose-response study of ropinirole prolonged release in early stage Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Me | 2017 |
A randomized, fixed-dose, dose-response study of ropinirole prolonged release in advanced Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Adult; Antiparkinson Agents; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; | 2017 |
Ropinirole 24-hour prolonged release and ropinirole immediate release in early Parkinson's disease: a randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority crossover study.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Cross-Over Studies; Delayed-Action Preparation | 2008 |
A multicentre retrospective study of the clinical use of ropinirole in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: the ROPI-PARK study.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; P | 2009 |
An open-label conversion study of pramipexole to ropinirole prolonged release in Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Accidental Falls; Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Cohort Studies; Dopamine Agonists; Dos | 2009 |
Onset of dyskinesia with adjunct ropinirole prolonged-release or additional levodopa in early Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Adult; Age of Onset; Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Delayed-Action Preparations; Disability Evaluation; | 2010 |
Early treatment benefits of ropinirole prolonged release in Parkinson's disease patients with motor fluctuations.
Topics: Aged; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dopamine Agonists; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Indoles; | 2010 |
Long-term, open-label study of once-daily ropinirole prolonged release in early Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cross-Over Studies; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dopamine Agonists; | 2011 |
Effect of chronic kidney disease on excessive daytime sleepiness in Parkinson disease.
Topics: Aged; Benzothiazoles; Comorbidity; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Dopamine Agonists; Female; Hum | 2011 |
PREPARED: Comparison of prolonged and immediate release ropinirole in advanced Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Delayed-Action Preparations; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, | 2011 |
Improvements in nocturnal symptoms with ropinirole prolonged release in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Delayed-Action Preparations; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Indole | 2012 |
Overnight switch from ropinirole to transdermal rotigotine patch in patients with Parkinson disease.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Administration, Oral; Antiparkinson Agents; Drug Administration Schedule; | 2011 |
Dopaminergic drug-induced modulation of the expression of the dopamine transporter in peripheral blood lymphocytes in Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Carbidopa; Dopamine Agonists; Dopamine Plasma Membrane T | 2011 |
Pharmacokinetics and effect of food after oral administration of prolonged-release tablets of ropinirole hydrochloride in Japanese patients with Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Asian People; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dopamine Agonists; Female; Fo | 2012 |
Ropinirole does not affect plasma arginine vasopressin levels in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Aged; Arginine Vasopressin; Carbidopa; Catechols; Dopamine Agonists; Dose-Response Relationship, Dru | 2012 |
A comparison of the progression of early Parkinson's disease in patients started on ropinirole or L-dopa: an 18F-dopa PET study.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Dihydroxyphenylalanine; Disease Progression; Fluorine Radioisotopes; Fol | 2002 |
Ropinirole as an adjunct to levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: a 16-week bromocriptine controlled study.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Bromocriptine; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Female; Hu | 2003 |
Combination of two different dopamine agonists in the management of Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Cabergoline; Dopamine Agonists; Drug Therapy, Combinatio | 2002 |
Slower progression of Parkinson's disease with ropinirole versus levodopa: The REAL-PET study.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Brain; Caudate Nucleus; Corpus Striatum; Disease Progression; Dopamine; Dopamine Agonis | 2003 |
Slower progression of Parkinson's disease with ropinirole versus levodopa: The REAL-PET study.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Brain; Caudate Nucleus; Corpus Striatum; Disease Progression; Dopamine; Dopamine Agonis | 2003 |
Slower progression of Parkinson's disease with ropinirole versus levodopa: The REAL-PET study.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Brain; Caudate Nucleus; Corpus Striatum; Disease Progression; Dopamine; Dopamine Agonis | 2003 |
Slower progression of Parkinson's disease with ropinirole versus levodopa: The REAL-PET study.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Brain; Caudate Nucleus; Corpus Striatum; Disease Progression; Dopamine; Dopamine Agonis | 2003 |
Slower progression of Parkinson's disease with ropinirole versus levodopa: The REAL-PET study.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Brain; Caudate Nucleus; Corpus Striatum; Disease Progression; Dopamine; Dopamine Agonis | 2003 |
Slower progression of Parkinson's disease with ropinirole versus levodopa: The REAL-PET study.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Brain; Caudate Nucleus; Corpus Striatum; Disease Progression; Dopamine; Dopamine Agonis | 2003 |
Slower progression of Parkinson's disease with ropinirole versus levodopa: The REAL-PET study.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Brain; Caudate Nucleus; Corpus Striatum; Disease Progression; Dopamine; Dopamine Agonis | 2003 |
Slower progression of Parkinson's disease with ropinirole versus levodopa: The REAL-PET study.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Brain; Caudate Nucleus; Corpus Striatum; Disease Progression; Dopamine; Dopamine Agonis | 2003 |
Slower progression of Parkinson's disease with ropinirole versus levodopa: The REAL-PET study.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Brain; Caudate Nucleus; Corpus Striatum; Disease Progression; Dopamine; Dopamine Agonis | 2003 |
Cabergoline, pramipexole and ropinirole used as monotherapy in early Parkinson's disease: an evidence-based comparison.
Topics: Age of Onset; Benzothiazoles; Cabergoline; Dopamine Agonists; Double-Blind Method; Ergolines; Eviden | 2003 |
Ropinirole versus levodopa in Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Indoles; Internationality; Levodopa; Middle Aged; Parkinso | 2004 |
A technique for standardized central analysis of 6-(18)F-fluoro-L-DOPA PET data from a multicenter study.
Topics: Algorithms; Antiparkinson Agents; Canada; Dihydroxyphenylalanine; Dopamine Agents; France; Germany; | 2004 |
Effect of monoamine reuptake inhibitor NS 2330 in advanced Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Carbidopa; Dopamine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins; | 2004 |
[Practical experience on improving activities of daily living competence in Parkinson's patients treated with ropinirole. Results of a applied study].
Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Dose-Response Rela | 2005 |
Effect of ropinirole on visuo-motor test in newly diagnosed Parkinson's disease patients.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Disability Evaluation; Dose-Response Relations | 2006 |
Development of dyskinesias in a 5-year trial of ropinirole and L-dopa.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Confidence Intervals; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Hum | 2006 |
Valvular heart disease in Parkinson's disease patients treated with dopamine agonists: a reader-blinded monocenter echocardiography study.
Topics: Benzothiazoles; Cabergoline; Dopamine Agonists; Double-Blind Method; Echocardiography; Ergolines; Fe | 2007 |
Sumanirole versus placebo or ropinirole for the adjunctive treatment of patients with advanced Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Adult; Benzimidazoles; Dopamine Agonists; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hu | 2007 |
End-of-dose deterioration in non ergolinic dopamine agonist monotherapy of Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Benzothiazoles; Dopamine Agonists; Double-Blind Method; Endpoint Determination; Female; Humans; Indo | 2006 |
A comparison of sumanirole versus placebo or ropinirole for the treatment of patients with early Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Adult; Benzimidazoles; Demography; Dopamine Agonists; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Sched | 2007 |
Ropinirole 24-hour prolonged release: randomized, controlled study in advanced Parkinson disease.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Double-Blind Method; Drug Delivery Systems; Female; Humans; Indoles; Int | 2007 |
Ropinirole is effective on motor function when used as an adjunct to levodopa in Parkinson's disease: STRONG study.
Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Case-Control Studies; Dose-Response Relation | 2007 |
Ten-year follow-up of Parkinson's disease patients randomized to initial therapy with ropinirole or levodopa.
Topics: Aged; Amantadine; Antiparkinson Agents; Disability Evaluation; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Met | 2007 |
Rotigotine transdermal patch in early Parkinson's disease: a randomized, double-blind, controlled study versus placebo and ropinirole.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Antiparkinson Agents; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Meth | 2007 |
Steady-state pharmacokinetic properties of a 24-hour prolonged-release formulation of ropinirole: results of two randomized studies in patients with Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Biological Availability; Cross-Over Studies; D | 2007 |
A placebo-controlled study of ropinirole, a new D2 agonist, in the treatment of motor fluctuations of L-DOPA-treated parkinsonian patients.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Dopamine Agonists; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; Movem | 1996 |
Ropinirole in the treatment of levodopa-induced motor fluctuations in patients with Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Dopamine Agonists; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination | 1996 |
Ropinirole for the treatment of early Parkinson's disease. The Ropinirole Study Group.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Dopamine Agonists; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Indoles; Male; M | 1997 |
Ropinirole in the treatment of early Parkinson's disease: a 6-month interim report of a 5-year levodopa-controlled study. 056 Study Group.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Analysis of Variance; Antiparkinson Agents; Confidence Intervals; Disease Progression; | 1998 |
Ropinirole versus bromocriptine in the treatment of early Parkinson's disease: a 6-month interim report of a 3-year study. 053 Study Group.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Bromocriptine; Confidence Intervals; Disease Progression; Dopamin | 1998 |
Effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of ropinirole in parkinsonian patients.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Area Under Curve; Female; Food-Drug Interactions; Half-Life; Humans; Ind | 1998 |
Ropinirole for the treatment of early Parkinson disease: a 12-month experience. Ropinirole Study Group.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Ambulatory Care; Antiparkinson Agents; Double-Blind Method; Female; | 1998 |
A multicenter trial of ropinirole as adjunct treatment for Parkinson's disease. Ropinirole Study Group.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Dopamine Agonists; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; | 1998 |
Lack of a pharmacokinetic interaction at steady state between ropinirole and L-dopa in patients with Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Area Under Curve; Carbidopa; Dopamine Agonists; Drug Therapy, Combinatio | 1999 |
The effect of steady-state ropinirole on plasma concentrations of digoxin in patients with Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Aged; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Antiparkinson Agents; Digoxin; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Inte | 1999 |
Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between ropinirole and theophylline in patients with Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Cytochrome P-450 CYP1A2; Dopamine Agonists; Drug I | 1999 |
A 3-year randomized trial of ropinirole and bromocriptine in early Parkinson's disease. The 053 Study Group.
Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Bromocriptine; Double-Blind Method; Female; | 1999 |
A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson's disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; D | 2000 |
A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson's disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; D | 2000 |
A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson's disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; D | 2000 |
A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson's disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; D | 2000 |
A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson's disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; D | 2000 |
A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson's disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; D | 2000 |
A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson's disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; D | 2000 |
A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson's disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; D | 2000 |
A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson's disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; D | 2000 |
A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson's disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; D | 2000 |
A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson's disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; D | 2000 |
A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson's disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; D | 2000 |
A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson's disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; D | 2000 |
A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson's disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; D | 2000 |
A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson's disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; D | 2000 |
A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson's disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; D | 2000 |
[1st long-term double-blind study of effectiveness and dyskinesia prevention of ropinirol].
Topics: Adult; Aged; Dopamine Agonists; Double-Blind Method; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Female; Follow-Up Stu | 2000 |
The Posturo-Locomotion-Manual Test. A simple method for the characterization of neurological movement disturbances.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Apomorphine; Diagnosis, Differential; Diagnost | 2001 |
High-dose therapy with ropinirole in patients with Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dyskinesias | 2001 |
A six-month multicentre, double-blind, bromocriptine-controlled study of the safety and efficacy of ropinirole in the treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease not optimally controlled by L-dopa.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Bromocriptine; Double-Blind Method; Drug Thera | 2002 |
Ropinirole for the treatment of tremor in early Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Bromocriptine; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; M | 2002 |
Pharmacokinetic data for ropinirole.
Topics: Dopamine Agents; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Indoles; Male; Middle Ag | 1990 |
Treatment of Parkinson's disease with novel dopamine D2 agonist SK&F 101468.
Topics: Dopamine Agents; Drug Evaluation; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; Male | 1989 |
131 other studies available for ropinirole and Parkinson Disease
Article | Year |
---|---|
Development of (S)-N6-(2-(4-(isoquinolin-1-yl)piperazin-1-yl)ethyl)-N6-propyl-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzo[d]-thiazole-2,6-diamine and its analogue as a D3 receptor preferring agonist: potent in vivo activity in Parkinson's disease animal models.
Topics: Animals; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; CHO Cells; Cricetinae; Cricetulus; Disease Models, An | 2010 |
Discovery of 4-(4-(2-((5-Hydroxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalen-2-yl)(propyl)amino)ethyl)piperazin-1-yl)quinolin-8-ol and its analogues as highly potent dopamine D2/D3 agonists and as iron chelator: in vivo activity indicates potential application in sympto
Topics: Animals; Disease Models, Animal; Guanosine 5'-O-(3-Thiotriphosphate); Humans; Iron Chelating Agents; | 2010 |
Structural modifications of neuroprotective anti-Parkinsonian (-)-N6-(2-(4-(biphenyl-4-yl)piperazin-1-yl)-ethyl)-N6-propyl-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzo[d]thiazole-2,6-diamine (D-264): an effort toward the improvement of in vivo efficacy of the parent molecule.
Topics: Animals; Benzothiazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cell Line; Disease Models, Animal; Mice; Neuroprotectiv | 2014 |
Clinical Observation of Ropinirole Hydrochloride in the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Indoles; Middle Aged; Parkinson Disea | 2022 |
What drugs modify the risk of iatrogenic impulse-control disorders in Parkinson's disease? A preliminary pharmacoepidemiologic study.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders | 2020 |
Comparison of long-term use of prolonged-release ropinirole and immediate-release dopamine agonists in an observational study in patients with Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cohort Studies; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dopamine Agonists; Dosa | 2020 |
Chitosan coated synergistically engineered nanoemulsion of Ropinirole and nigella oil in the management of Parkinson's disease: Formulation perspective and In vitro and In vivo assessment.
Topics: Animals; Benzoquinones; Chitosan; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Stability; Drug Synergism; Emulsions; | 2021 |
Antiparkinsonian drugs as potent contributors to nocturnal sleep in patients with Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dopamine Agonists; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; P | 2021 |
D-512, a novel dopamine D
Topics: Animals; Antiparkinson Agents; Disease Models, Animal; Dopamine Agonists; Dose-Response Relationship | 2017 |
Nanotechnology-based drug delivery of ropinirole for Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Animals; Drug Carriers; Drug Delivery Systems; Indoles; Lactic Acid; Male; Nanoparticles; Parkinson | 2017 |
The neuropsychological profile of Othello syndrome in Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Adult; Antiparkinson Agents; Delusions; Female; Humans; Indoles; Jealousy; Male; Middle Aged; Neurop | 2017 |
Orally-dissolving film for sublingual and buccal delivery of ropinirole.
Topics: Administration, Buccal; Administration, Sublingual; Animals; Antiparkinson Agents; Biological Availa | 2018 |
Behavioral addictions in early-onset Parkinson disease are associated with DRD3 variants.
Topics: Adult; Age of Onset; Aged; Behavior, Addictive; Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders; | 2018 |
Drug-induced gambling disorder: A not so rare but underreported condition.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Dopamine Agonists; Gambling; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; Male; Middle Aged; | 2018 |
Clinical pharmacokinetics of pramipexole, ropinirole and rotigotine in patients with Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dopamine Agonists; Female; | 2019 |
Treatment-induced Delusions of Infestation Associated with Increased Brain Dopamine Levels.
Topics: Aged; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain; Deep Brain Stimulation; Delusional Paras | 2019 |
Corneal Edema Associated With Systemic Dopaminergic Agents.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Corneal Edema; Diterpenes; Dopamine; Dop | 2019 |
The Deep Brain Stimulation "Twiddler Syndrome".
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Deep Brain Stimulation; Female; Humans; Implantable Neurostimulators; In | 2019 |
Atypical parkinsonism due to a D202N Gerstmann-Sträussler-Scheinker prion protein mutation: first in vivo diagnosed case.
Topics: 14-3-3 Proteins; Amyloid beta-Peptides; Antiparkinson Agents; Codon; Dopamine Plasma Membrane Transp | 2013 |
Three cases of impulse control disorder in Parkinson's disease patients receiving dopamine replacement therapy.
Topics: Adult; Amantadine; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Carbidopa; Catechols; Disruptive, Impulse C | 2013 |
Second-generation dopamine agonists and recollection impairments in Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Aged; Attention; Benzothiazoles; Case-Control Studies; Dopamine Agonists; Female; Humans; Indoles; M | 2013 |
[Severe punding in Parkinson's disease].
Topics: Consanguinity; Diagnosis, Differential; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Substitution; Female; | 2015 |
Two cases of pregnancy in Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Adult; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Female; Fetus; Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Disease; Pram | 2014 |
Parkinsonism hyperpyrexia syndrome caused by abrupt withdrawal of ropinirole.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Fever; Humans; Indoles; Male; Parkinson Disease; Substance Withdrawal Sy | 2013 |
Economic evaluation of ropinirole prolonged release for treatment of Parkinson's disease in the Netherlands.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; | 2014 |
Impulse control disorder in patients with Parkinson's disease under dopamine agonist therapy: a multicentre study.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiaz | 2014 |
Ropinirole treatment in Parkinson's disease associated with higher serum level of inflammatory biomarker NT-proCNP.
Topics: Adult; Antiparkinson Agents; Biomarkers; Case-Control Studies; Dopamine Agonists; Female; Humans; In | 2014 |
Reports of pathological gambling, hypersexuality, and compulsive shopping associated with dopamine receptor agonist drugs.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aripiprazole; Benzothiazoles; Compulsive Behavior; Consumer Behavior; Dopamine Agonists | 2014 |
Teaching NeuroImages: Pisa syndrome in Parkinson disease.
Topics: Aged; Carbidopa; Drug Combinations; Dystonia; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; Male; Parkinson Disease; Po | 2014 |
Design, characterization, and evaluation of intranasal delivery of ropinirole-loaded mucoadhesive nanoparticles for brain targeting.
Topics: Adhesiveness; Administration, Intranasal; Animals; Antiparkinson Agents; Brain; Chitosan; Dose-Respo | 2015 |
Head-to-Head Comparison of the Neuropsychiatric Effect of Dopamine Agonists in Parkinson's Disease: A Prospective, Cross-Sectional Study in Non-demented Patients.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Apathy; Benzothiazoles; Cross-Sectional Studie | 2015 |
Nano-ropinirole for the management of Parkinsonism: blood-brain pharmacokinetics and carrier localization.
Topics: Animals; Brain; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Disease Models, Animal; Dopamine; Dopamine Agonists; Dopa | 2015 |
Colloidal soft nanocarrier for transdermal delivery of dopamine agonist: ex vivo and in vivo evaluation.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Animals; Antiparkinson Agents; Catalepsy; Colloids; Diffusion; Dopamine A | 2014 |
Metabolic changes in de novo Parkinson's disease after dopaminergic therapy: A proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Aspartic Acid; Case-Control Studies; Choline; Creatine; Dopamine Agonists; Fem | 2015 |
Parkinson's disease: initial treatment of motor disorders.
Topics: Age Factors; Antiparkinson Agents; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; Motor Ac | 2015 |
Multiple fixed drug eruption caused by ropinirole in a patient with Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Biopsy; Dopamine Agonists; Drug Eruptions; Female; Humans; Indoles; Middle Aged; Parkinson Disease; | 2016 |
Validated UHPLC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous determination of pramipexole and ropinirole in plasma of patients with Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Humans; Indoles; Parkins | 2016 |
A European multicentre survey of impulse control behaviours in Parkinson's disease patients treated with short- and long-acting dopamine agonists.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Benzothiazoles; Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders; | 2016 |
Chronic D
Topics: Animals; Choice Behavior; Corpus Striatum; Dopamine; Dopamine Agonists; Indoles; Male; Neostriatum; | 2017 |
Discontinuation of ropinirole and pramipexole in patients with Parkinson's disease: clinical practice versus clinical trials.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Cohort Studies; Female; Follow-Up Stu | 2008 |
Side effects of ropinirole in patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Dopamine Agonists; Female; Humans; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; Parkinson | 2008 |
Heart valve abnormalities in Parkinson's disease treated with dopamine agonists.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Dopamine Agonists; Echocardiography; Female; Heart Valve Disea | 2008 |
Rapid resolution of dopamine dysregulation syndrome (DDS) after subthalamic DBS for Parkinson disease (PD): a case report.
Topics: Aggression; Antiparkinson Agents; Deep Brain Stimulation; Dopamine; Humans; Impulsive Behavior; Indo | 2008 |
[Impulse control disorder induced by the use of dopamine agonists].
Topics: Benzothiazoles; Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders; Dopamine Agonists; Humans; Indol | 2009 |
Frequency of new-onset pathologic compulsive gambling or hypersexuality after drug treatment of idiopathic Parkinson disease.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Carbidopa; Compulsive Behavior; Dopamine Agonists | 2009 |
Reward-learning and the novelty-seeking personality: a between- and within-subjects study of the effects of dopamine agonists on young Parkinson's patients.
Topics: Adult; Avoidance Learning; Benzothiazoles; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dopamine Agonists; Exploratory B | 2009 |
Agonist or levodopa for Parkinson disease? Ultimately, it doesn't matter; neither is good enough.
Topics: Bromocriptine; Dopamine Agents; Dopamine Agonists; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Follow-Up Studies; Huma | 2009 |
Clinical and pharmacogenetic determinants for the discontinuation of non-ergoline dopamine agonists in Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Aged; Alleles; Benzothiazoles; Cohort Studies; Contraindications; Dopamine Agonists; Female; Humans; | 2009 |
An exploratory retrospective evaluation of ropinirole-associated psychotic symptoms in an outpatient population treated for restless legs syndrome or Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Databases, Factual; Dopamine Agonists; Female; Humans; Indoles; Male; Middl | 2009 |
Nonmotor symptoms in de novo Parkinson disease before and after dopaminergic treatment.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Cognition Disorders; Comorbidity; Disability Evaluation; | 2009 |
Impulsive smoking in a patient with Parkinson's disease treated with dopamine agonists.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders; Dopamine A | 2010 |
Impulse control disorders in Parkinson disease: a cross-sectional study of 3090 patients.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Binge-Eating Disorder; Comorbidity; Cross-Sectional Stud | 2010 |
Isolated delusional syndrome in Parkinson's Disease.
Topics: Aged; Amantadine; Antiparkinson Agents; Benserazide; Benzothiazoles; Catechols; Clonazepam; Female; | 2010 |
Rare and serious cardiac side effects during ropinirole titration.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Heart Diseases; Humans; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; Parkinson Disease | 2010 |
Effects of ropinirole prolonged-release on sleep disturbances and daytime sleepiness in Parkinson disease.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dopamine Agonists; Dose-Response Rel | 2010 |
Monitoring dyskinesia with Zif.
Topics: 2,3,4,5-Tetrahydro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepine; Animals; Antiparkinson Agents; Biomarker | 2010 |
Investigating variability in patient response to treatment--a case study from a replicate cross-over study.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cross-Over Studies; Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Disea | 2011 |
Investigating variability in patient response to treatment--a case study from a replicate cross-over study.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cross-Over Studies; Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Disea | 2011 |
Investigating variability in patient response to treatment--a case study from a replicate cross-over study.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cross-Over Studies; Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Disea | 2011 |
Investigating variability in patient response to treatment--a case study from a replicate cross-over study.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cross-Over Studies; Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Disea | 2011 |
Impulsive cross-dressing in Parkinson's disease treated with ropinerole.
Topics: Humans; Impulsive Behavior; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; Parkinson Disease; Transvestism; Treatment O | 2011 |
Dopamine agonist-triggered pathological behaviors: surveillance in the PD clinic reveals high frequencies.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Compulsive Behavior; Dopamine | 2011 |
Severe intracranial bleeding related to vitamin K antagonist-ropinirole interaction.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Female; Humans; Indoles; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Middle Aged; Parkinson Dise | 2011 |
Myometry revealed medication-induced decrease in resting skeletal muscle stiffness in Parkinson's disease patients.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Body Mass Index; Electromyography; Female; Humans; In | 2012 |
New prospective in treatment of Parkinson's disease: studies on permeation of ropinirole through buccal mucosa.
Topics: Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic; Administration, Buccal; Animals; Antiparkinson Agents; Cyclohexenes; Drug D | 2012 |
Serotonergic and dopaminergic mechanisms in graft-induced dyskinesia in a rat model of Parkinson's disease.
Topics: 5,6-Dihydroxytryptamine; Adrenergic Agents; Amphetamine; Analysis of Variance; Animals; Antiparkinso | 2012 |
fMRI changes in cortical activation during task performance with the unaffected hand partially reverse after ropinirole treatment in de novo Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Cerebral Cortex; Female; Functional Laterality; Hand; Humans; Image Inte | 2013 |
Spontaneous unwelcome orgasms due to pramipexole and ropinirole.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Female; Humans; Indoles; Middle Aged; Nervous System Diseases; | 2012 |
Duration of L-dopa and dopamine agonist monotherapy in Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Confidence Intervals; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; | 2012 |
Effects of dopaminergic and subthalamic stimulation on musical performance.
Topics: Adult; Auditory Perceptual Disorders; Deep Brain Stimulation; Dopamine Agents; Humans; Indoles; Levo | 2013 |
Some consequences of assuming simple patterns for the treatment effect over time in a linear mixed model.
Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Antiparkinson Agents; Biostatistics; Bromocriptine; Clinical Trials as T | 2013 |
Ropinirole monotherapy induced severe reversible dyskinesias in Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Female; Humans; Indoles; Middle Aged; Parkinson Dise | 2013 |
GSK's Requip slow the loss of dopamine function in Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Disease Progression; Dopamine Agonists; Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Disease; Se | 2002 |
Dosing with ropinirole in a clinical setting.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Data Coll | 2002 |
Cost analysis of ropinirole versus levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Adult; Antiparkinson Agents; Benserazide; Canada; Caregivers; Cost Savings; Dopamine Agonists; Drug | 2003 |
Ropinirole as an adjunct to levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson's disease A short commentary.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Bromocriptine; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; Parkinson | 2003 |
[Sexual delinquency and Parkinson's disease].
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Awareness; Bromocriptine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Comb | 2003 |
The initial drug treatment of older patients with Parkinson's disease - consider an agonist, but don't demonise dopa.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Catechol O-Methyltransferase; Dopamine Agonists; Dose-Response | 2003 |
REAL and CALM: what have we learned?
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Clinical Trials as Topic; Corpus Striatum; Disease Progression | 2003 |
[Pseudopheochromocytoma in Parkinson disease and depression].
Topics: Adrenal Gland Neoplasms; Antidepressive Agents; Antiparkinson Agents; Catecholamines; Depressive Dis | 2003 |
Rapidly progressive parkinsonism in a self-reported user of ecstasy and other drugs.
Topics: Adult; Antiparkinson Agents; Disease Progression; Hallucinogens; Hepatitis C; Humans; Indoles; Male; | 2003 |
Predictors of impaired daytime sleep and wakefulness in patients with Parkinson disease treated with older (ergot) vs newer (nonergot) dopamine agonists.
Topics: Aged; Benzothiazoles; Bromocriptine; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Dopamine Agonists; Dose-Resp | 2004 |
Slowing Parkinson's disease progression: recent dopamine agonist trials.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Biological Transport; Cell Line, Tumor; Clinical Trials as Top | 2004 |
Switching from ergot to nonergot dopamine agonists in Parkinson's disease: a clinical series and five-drug dose conversion table.
Topics: Adult; Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Bromocriptine; | 2004 |
Predictors of sudden onset of sleep in Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Comorbidity; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dopamine Agonists; | 2004 |
"Levodopa phobia": a new iatrogenic cause of disability in Parkinson disease.
Topics: Aged; Amantadine; Benzothiazoles; Catechols; Dopamine Agents; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug | 2005 |
Pramipexole, ropinirole, and mania in Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Adult; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Bipolar Disorder; Dopamine Agonists; Drug Therapy, Comb | 2005 |
Pathological hypersexuality predominantly linked to adjuvant dopamine agonist therapy in Parkinson's disease and multiple system atrophy.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Catechols; Databases, Factual; Dopamine Agonists; | 2005 |
Pathological gambling in Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Brain; Dopamine Agonists; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Ga | 2005 |
Augmentation of artistic productivity in Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Art; Carbidopa; Creativity; Dopamine Agents; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; | 2006 |
Minimal clinically important change on the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Disability Evaluation; Dopamine Agents; Female; Humans; Indoles; Male; M | 2006 |
Long-term 24-hour duodenal infusion of levodopa: outcome and dose requirements.
Topics: Animals; Antiparkinson Agents; Cocaine; Dihydroxyphenylalanine; Dopamine Agents; Dose-Response Relat | 2006 |
Association of dopamine agonist use with impulse control disorders in Parkinson disease.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Benzothiazoles; Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders; | 2006 |
Clinical studies with ropinirole in Parkinson's disease and RLS.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Dopamine Agonists; Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Disease; Randomized Controlled T | 2006 |
Cardiac valve regurgitation with pergolide compared with nonergot agonists in Parkinson disease.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Case-Control Studies; Echocard | 2007 |
Spectrophotometric determination of dopaminergic drugs used for Parkinson's disease, cabergoline and ropinirole, in pharmaceutical preparations.
Topics: Cabergoline; Dopamine Agents; Ergolines; Humans; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; Indoles; Parkinson Dise | 2007 |
[Improvements in motor and non-motor symptoms in parkinson patients under ropinirole therapy].
Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Depression; Disabi | 2007 |
Overexpression of D2/D3 receptors increases efficacy of ropinirole in chronically 6-OHDA-lesioned Parkinsonian rats.
Topics: Adrenergic Agents; Animals; Animals, Genetically Modified; Antiparkinson Agents; Behavior, Animal; D | 2007 |
Relationship between weight, levodopa and dyskinesia: the significance of levodopa dose per kilogram body weight.
Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Body Size; Body Weight; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Female; H | 2008 |
Apathy following subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson disease: a dopamine responsive symptom.
Topics: Aged; Deep Brain Stimulation; Dopamine Agonists; Female; Humans; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; Mood Di | 2008 |
New dopamine agonists on the horizon.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Dopamine Agonists; Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Disease; Pramipe | 1997 |
The long-duration action of levodopa may be due to a postsynaptic effect.
Topics: Adult; Antiparkinson Agents; Dopamine Agents; Dopamine Agonists; Female; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; | 1997 |
Pramipexole and ropinirole for Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dopamine Agonists; Double-Blind Meth | 1997 |
Ropinirole approved for Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Drug Approval; Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Disease; United States; United State | 1997 |
New anti-parkinsonian drugs.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzophenones; Benzothiazoles; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; Nitrophenols; Parkin | 1998 |
Falling asleep at the wheel: motor vehicle mishaps in persons taking pramipexole and ropinirole.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Automobile Driving; Benzothiazoles; Humans; Indoles; | 1999 |
Dose-induced penile erections in response to ropinirole therapy for Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Dopamine Agonists; Humans; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; Parkinson Disease; Peni | 1999 |
Dopamine D2 receptor-mediated antioxidant and neuroprotective effects of ropinirole, a dopamine agonist.
Topics: Animals; Antioxidants; Corpus Striatum; Dopamine Agonists; Free Radical Scavengers; Indoles; Male; M | 1999 |
A multicenter trial of ropinirole as adjunct treatment for PD.
Topics: Age Factors; Antiparkinson Agents; Humans; Indoles; Middle Aged; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Parki | 1999 |
Several classes of new drugs emerging for Parkinson disease.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Catechol O-Methyltransferase Inhibitors; Catechols; Dopamine A | 1999 |
An overnight switch to ropinirole therapy in patients with Parkinson's disease. Short communication.
Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Bromocriptine; Female; Humans; Indoles; Male | 1999 |
Treatment of Parkinson's disease with ropinirole after pergolide-induced retroperitoneal fibrosis.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Female; Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Disease; Pergolide | 1999 |
Non-ergot dopamine agonist-induced sleep attacks.
Topics: Aged; Benzothiazoles; Dopamine Agonists; Female; Humans; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; Parkinson Disea | 2000 |
Treatments for Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa | 2000 |
Linear pharmacokinetic behavior of ropinirole during multiple dosing in patients with Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Female; Humans; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; Pa | 2000 |
Treatment of early Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Parkinson Disease; Ra | 2000 |
Sleep attacks in Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Dopamine Agonists; Humans; Indoles; Male; M | 2000 |
Ropinirole as compared with levodopa in Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; | 2000 |
Ropinirole as compared with levodopa in Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; Parkinson Disease; Sleep | 2000 |
Ropinirole as compared with levodopa in Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Hallucinations; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; Parkinson | 2000 |
Ropinirole as compared with levodopa in Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; Parkinson Disease; Qualit | 2000 |
Acute orthostatic hypotension when starting dopamine agonists in Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Benzothiazoles; Dopamine Agonists; Drug Administratio | 2000 |
[Dopaminergic agonists in the treatment of Parkinson's disease].
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Apomorphine; Benzothiazoles; Biological Availability; Bromocriptine; Cat | 2000 |
Treatment of early onset Parkinson's disease with ropinirole.
Topics: Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Disease; Time Factors | 2001 |
[Parkinson's disease].
Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Catechols; Depressive Disorder; Diagnosis, Different | 2001 |
Antiparkinsonian drugs and "sleep attacks".
Topics: Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Automobile Driving; Benzothiazo | 2001 |
Efficacy and tolerability of dopamine agonists in a parkinsonian population.
Topics: Age of Onset; Aged; Aging; Benzothiazoles; Bromocriptine; Dopamine Agonists; Drug Administration Sch | 2001 |
Randomized clinical trials with added rescue medication: some approaches to their analysis and interpretation.
Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Antiparkinson Agents; Bromocriptine; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; Multicen | 2001 |
Warfarin and ropinirole interaction.
Topics: Anticoagulants; Antiparkinson Agents; Drug Interactions; Humans; Indoles; International Normalized R | 2001 |
Alopecia induced by dopamine agonists.
Topics: Aged; Alopecia; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Dopamine Agonists; Female; Humans; Indoles; Pa | 2002 |
Literature alert.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Fetal Tissue Transplantation; Humans; Incidence; Ind | 2001 |
Is it time to abandon functional imaging in the study of neuroprotection?
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Brain; Clinical Trials as Topic; Disease Progression; Humans; Indoles; Levodop | 2002 |
Ropinirole (SK and F 101468) in the treatment of Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Aged; Dopamine Agents; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; Middle Aged; Neu | 1991 |
Ropinirole without levodopa in Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Dopamine Agents; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Evaluation; Fe | 1990 |