Page last updated: 2024-11-04

ropinirole and Parkinson Disease

ropinirole has been researched along with Parkinson Disease in 260 studies

Parkinson Disease: A progressive, degenerative neurologic disease characterized by a TREMOR that is maximal at rest, retropulsion (i.e. a tendency to fall backwards), rigidity, stooped posture, slowness of voluntary movements, and a masklike facial expression. Pathologic features include loss of melanin containing neurons in the substantia nigra and other pigmented nuclei of the brainstem. LEWY BODIES are present in the substantia nigra and locus coeruleus but may also be found in a related condition (LEWY BODY DISEASE, DIFFUSE) characterized by dementia in combination with varying degrees of parkinsonism. (Adams et al., Principles of Neurology, 6th ed, p1059, pp1067-75)

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"It is necessary to conduct a meta-analysis of the clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on ropinirole in the treatment of Parkinson disease (PD), to explore the effects and safety of ropinirole, and to provide a theoretical basis for clinically safe and rational drug use."9.12The effect and safety of ropinirole in the treatment of Parkinson disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. ( Chen, M; Zhu, J, 2021)
"To evaluate the efficacy of ropinirole 24-hour prolonged release (ropinirole 24-hour) as an adjunct to levodopa in patients with Parkinson disease (PD) and motor fluctuations."9.12Ropinirole 24-hour prolonged release: randomized, controlled study in advanced Parkinson disease. ( Earl, NL; Elmer, LW; Factor, SA; Hersh, BP; Lyons, KE; Pahwa, R; Stacy, MA; Stocchi, F; Truong, DD, 2007)
"The effect of Ropinirole on tremor in early Parkinson's disease (PD) was assessed."9.10Ropinirole for the treatment of tremor in early Parkinson's disease. ( Keens, J; Schrag, A; Warner, J, 2002)
"To evaluate ropinirole hydrochloride as dopaminergic monotherapy in patients with early Parkinson disease."9.08Ropinirole for the treatment of early Parkinson disease: a 12-month experience. Ropinirole Study Group. ( Adler, CH; Bertoni, JM; Davis, TL; Hammerstad, JP; Hauser, RA; O'Brien, CF; Sanchez-Ramos, J; Sethi, KD; Taylor, RL, 1998)
"This study evaluated the effects of ropinirole prolonged-release (RPR) in comparison with ropinirole immediate-release (RIR) on sleep-related disorders in Parkinson disease (PD)."7.76Effects of ropinirole prolonged-release on sleep disturbances and daytime sleepiness in Parkinson disease. ( Busková, J; Dusek, P; Jech, R; Majerová, V; Roth, J; Růzicka, E; Sonka, K; Srp, A, 2010)
"To determine if cardiac valve regurgitation occurs more commonly in patients with Parkinson disease (PD) treated with pergolide than in those treated with nonergot agonists at a comparable dose."7.74Cardiac valve regurgitation with pergolide compared with nonergot agonists in Parkinson disease. ( Dewey, RB; O'Suilleabhain, PE; Reimold, SC, 2007)
"Data from the ropinirole versus levodopa studies 056 and REAL-PET in early Parkinson's disease were pooled and manipulated to calculate levodopa dose per kilogram body weight."7.74Relationship between weight, levodopa and dyskinesia: the significance of levodopa dose per kilogram body weight. ( Brooks, D; Rascol, O; Ross, IN; Sharma, JC, 2008)
"Pergolide is a dopaminergic agonist used to treat Parkinson's disease but is associated with the development of retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF)."7.70Treatment of Parkinson's disease with ropinirole after pergolide-induced retroperitoneal fibrosis. ( Lund, BC; Neiman, RF; Perry, PJ, 1999)
" Switching treatment from oral ropinirole to transdermal rotigotine was carried out overnight, with a dosage ratio of 1."6.76Overnight switch from ropinirole to transdermal rotigotine patch in patients with Parkinson disease. ( Ahn, TB; Boroojerdi, B; Cho, J; Chung, SJ; Grieger, F; Jeon, BS; Kim, HJ; Kim, JM; Kim, JW; Lee, MC; Lee, WY; Whitesides, J, 2011)
" Data were collected in a retrospective manner from 95 patients who were tracked over the course of their therapy to determine whether psychosis or associated behavioral symptoms developed as a result and whether an intervention was needed to adjust ropinirole dosing or if additional medications had to be added to control features associated with psychosis."5.35An exploratory retrospective evaluation of ropinirole-associated psychotic symptoms in an outpatient population treated for restless legs syndrome or Parkinson's disease. ( Carver, LJ; Dahmen, MM; Lea, JW; Makos, M; Rasu, RS; Stoner, SC, 2009)
" We observed a negative correlation between the severity of daytime sleepiness and renal function in patients treated with pramipexole alone (r(s) = -0."5.15Effect of chronic kidney disease on excessive daytime sleepiness in Parkinson disease. ( Abe, H; Baba, Y; Fukuyama, K; Higuchi, MA; Inoue, T; Uehara, Y; Yamada, T, 2011)
"It is necessary to conduct a meta-analysis of the clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on ropinirole in the treatment of Parkinson disease (PD), to explore the effects and safety of ropinirole, and to provide a theoretical basis for clinically safe and rational drug use."5.12The effect and safety of ropinirole in the treatment of Parkinson disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. ( Chen, M; Zhu, J, 2021)
"To evaluate the efficacy of ropinirole 24-hour prolonged release (ropinirole 24-hour) as an adjunct to levodopa in patients with Parkinson disease (PD) and motor fluctuations."5.12Ropinirole 24-hour prolonged release: randomized, controlled study in advanced Parkinson disease. ( Earl, NL; Elmer, LW; Factor, SA; Hersh, BP; Lyons, KE; Pahwa, R; Stacy, MA; Stocchi, F; Truong, DD, 2007)
"The effect of Ropinirole on tremor in early Parkinson's disease (PD) was assessed."5.10Ropinirole for the treatment of tremor in early Parkinson's disease. ( Keens, J; Schrag, A; Warner, J, 2002)
"To evaluate ropinirole hydrochloride as dopaminergic monotherapy in patients with early Parkinson disease."5.08Ropinirole for the treatment of early Parkinson disease: a 12-month experience. Ropinirole Study Group. ( Adler, CH; Bertoni, JM; Davis, TL; Hammerstad, JP; Hauser, RA; O'Brien, CF; Sanchez-Ramos, J; Sethi, KD; Taylor, RL, 1998)
"Levodopa should generally be avoided early in the course of Parkinson disease; dopamine agonists, particularly second-generation agents such as ropinirole (Requip) and pramipexole (Mirapex), carry a smaller long-term risk of dyskinesia and should be used instead."4.81Two advances in the management of Parkinson disease. ( Montgomery, EB, 2002)
"This study evaluated the effects of ropinirole prolonged-release (RPR) in comparison with ropinirole immediate-release (RIR) on sleep-related disorders in Parkinson disease (PD)."3.76Effects of ropinirole prolonged-release on sleep disturbances and daytime sleepiness in Parkinson disease. ( Busková, J; Dusek, P; Jech, R; Majerová, V; Roth, J; Růzicka, E; Sonka, K; Srp, A, 2010)
"To determine if cardiac valve regurgitation occurs more commonly in patients with Parkinson disease (PD) treated with pergolide than in those treated with nonergot agonists at a comparable dose."3.74Cardiac valve regurgitation with pergolide compared with nonergot agonists in Parkinson disease. ( Dewey, RB; O'Suilleabhain, PE; Reimold, SC, 2007)
"To evaluate the effects of the dopamine D2-D3 agonist ropinirole in patients who developed apathy after complete withdrawal from dopaminergic medication following successful subthalamic nucleus (STN) stimulation for advanced Parkinson disease (PD)."3.74Apathy following subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson disease: a dopamine responsive symptom. ( Agid, Y; Bardinet, E; Czernecki, V; Dubois, B; Lévy, R; Schüpbach, M; Yaici, S; Yelnik, J, 2008)
"Data from the ropinirole versus levodopa studies 056 and REAL-PET in early Parkinson's disease were pooled and manipulated to calculate levodopa dose per kilogram body weight."3.74Relationship between weight, levodopa and dyskinesia: the significance of levodopa dose per kilogram body weight. ( Brooks, D; Rascol, O; Ross, IN; Sharma, JC, 2008)
"Patients with Parkinson disease (PD) treated with the nonergot dopamine agonists pramipexole dihydrochloride and ropinirole hydrochloride have been reported to have sleep attacks without warning."3.72Predictors of impaired daytime sleep and wakefulness in patients with Parkinson disease treated with older (ergot) vs newer (nonergot) dopamine agonists. ( Lang, AE; Razmy, A; Shapiro, CM, 2004)
"Pergolide is a dopaminergic agonist used to treat Parkinson's disease but is associated with the development of retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF)."3.70Treatment of Parkinson's disease with ropinirole after pergolide-induced retroperitoneal fibrosis. ( Lund, BC; Neiman, RF; Perry, PJ, 1999)
" Dopamine receptor agonists provide sustained dopamin-ergic stimulation and have been found to delay the initiation of levodopa treatment and reduce the frequency of various motor complications due to the long-term use of levodopa."3.11Comparison of pramipexole versus ropinirole in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. ( Gencler, OS; Oztekin, MF; Oztekin, N, 2022)
"This Phase IV, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study characterized the dose-response and tolerability of fixed doses of ropinirole prolonged release (PR)."2.84A fixed-dose, dose-response study of ropinirole prolonged release in early stage Parkinson's disease. ( Chriscoe, S; Jimenez, T; Upward, J; VanMeter, S; Zesiewicz, TA, 2017)
"This Phase IV, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study characterized the dose-response and tolerability of fixed doses of ropinirole prolonged release (PR) in subjects with advanced Parkinson's disease."2.84A randomized, fixed-dose, dose-response study of ropinirole prolonged release in advanced Parkinson's disease. ( Chriscoe, S; Davy, M; Jimenez, T; Upward, J; VanMeter, S; Zesiewicz, TA, 2017)
"Ropinirole XL/PR was titrated/continued, and adjusted as appropriate during the maintenance phase (maximum 24 mg/d)."2.82Long-term, open-label, safety study of once-daily ropinirole extended/prolonged release in early and advanced Parkinson's disease. ( Asgharian, A; Ellis, J; Jimenez, T; Makumi, CW; Shaikh, S; VanMeter, S, 2016)
" Dosage of levodopa and oral DA (pramipexole ≤1."2.80Rotigotine transdermal system as add-on to oral dopamine agonist in advanced Parkinson's disease: an open-label study. ( Bauer, L; Chung, SJ; Ikeda, J; Jeon, BS; Kim, JM; Kim, JW; Singh, P; Thierfelder, S, 2015)
" Safety assessments included monitoring adverse events (AEs), neurological examination, Gambling Symptom Assessment Scale questionnaire, liver chemistry, and laboratory tests."2.80An open-label extension study to evaluate the safety of ropinirole prolonged release in Chinese patients with advanced Parkinson's disease. ( Cai, M; Chen, S; Cheng, Y; Hu, J; Li, J; Liu, C; Qu, Q; Wang, J; Wang, Z; Zhang, B; Zhang, X; Zhang, Z; Zhu, R, 2015)
"Pramipexole/ropinirole was switched to equivalent dose rotigotine overnight or in two stages."2.80Switch from oral pramipexole or ropinirole to rotigotine transdermal system in advanced Parkinson's disease: an open-label study. ( Bauer, L; Chung, SJ; Ikeda, J; Jeon, BS; Kim, JM; Kim, JW; Singh, P; Thierfelder, S, 2015)
" However, there may be individual pharmacokinetic differences so that multiple dosing may be preferred in some individuals."2.78Comparison of once-daily versus twice-daily combination of ropinirole prolonged release in Parkinson's disease. ( Jeon, BS; Kim, HJ; Kim, JM; Kim, JS; Kim, YE; Lee, JY; Yun, JY, 2013)
" The most frequent adverse event experienced in the ropinirole PR group was dyskinesia."2.78The efficacy and safety of ropinirole prolonged release tablets as adjunctive therapy in Chinese subjects with advanced Parkinson's disease: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. ( Cai, M; Cao, H; Chen, S; Cheng, Y; Li, J; Liu, C; Qu, Q; Wang, J; Wang, Z; Zhang, B; Zhang, X; Zhang, Z; Zhu, R, 2013)
" The safety was assessed on the basis of adverse events, blood pressure, pulse, laboratory measurement and electrocardiographic recordings."2.78[Efficacy and safety of ropinirole in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: a multi-center, randomized, double-blind and bromocriptine-controlled trial]. ( Chen, HB; Li, SH; Ma, J; Sun, XR; Tang, RH; Wang, ZF; Yang, JS; Zhang, XY; Zhao, WQ, 2013)
"Ropinirole was initiated at 0."2.77Ropinirole does not affect plasma arginine vasopressin levels in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease. ( Arai, M, 2012)
" Switching treatment from oral ropinirole to transdermal rotigotine was carried out overnight, with a dosage ratio of 1."2.76Overnight switch from ropinirole to transdermal rotigotine patch in patients with Parkinson disease. ( Ahn, TB; Boroojerdi, B; Cho, J; Chung, SJ; Grieger, F; Jeon, BS; Kim, HJ; Kim, JM; Kim, JW; Lee, MC; Lee, WY; Whitesides, J, 2011)
" Despite dosing differences, the PR titration regimen was generally well tolerated, with an AE profile similar to that of IR."2.76PREPARED: Comparison of prolonged and immediate release ropinirole in advanced Parkinson's disease. ( Giorgi, L; Hunter, B; Schapira, AH; Stocchi, F, 2011)
"Ropinirole PR was titrated/continued, and adjusted as appropriate during the maintenance phase (maximum 24 mg/day)."2.76Long-term, open-label study of once-daily ropinirole prolonged release in early Parkinson's disease. ( Asgharian, A; Hauser, RA; Lew, M; Makumi, C; Reichmann, H; Shulman, KJ, 2011)
" Intensive pharmacokinetic blood sampling was performed over 24 hours."2.73Steady-state pharmacokinetic properties of a 24-hour prolonged-release formulation of ropinirole: results of two randomized studies in patients with Parkinson's disease. ( Tompson, DJ; Vearer, D, 2007)
"Ropinirole is a non-ergot-selective D2 dopamine agonist."2.71[Practical experience on improving activities of daily living competence in Parkinson's patients treated with ropinirole. Results of a applied study]. ( Angersbach, D; Buchwald, B; Reichmann, H, 2005)
"Ropinirole was found to be safe and well-tolerated."2.71Ropinirole as an adjunct to levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: a 16-week bromocriptine controlled study. ( Cho, IS; Ha, JH; Im, JH; Lee, MC, 2003)
" In the group of patients with prior dopamine-agonist therapy, more patients reported adverse events in the ropinirole group (90% versus 79%, p < 0."2.70A six-month multicentre, double-blind, bromocriptine-controlled study of the safety and efficacy of ropinirole in the treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease not optimally controlled by L-dopa. ( Brooks, DJ; Brunt, ER; Korczyn, AD; Montastruc, JL; Stocchi, F, 2002)
"Ropinirole is a specific non-ergoline dopamine D2-receptor agonist with antiparkinsonian properties."2.69Effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of ropinirole in parkinsonian patients. ( Brefel, C; Bullman, S; Citerone, DR; Fitzpatrick, K; Lopez-Gil, A; Montastruc, JL; Rascol, O; Rayet, S; Taylor, AC; Thalamas, C, 1998)
"Thirty patients with Parkinson's disease not previously treated with dopamine agonists, of whom 28 produced evaluable pharmacokinetic data for ropinirole and 23 for L-dopa."2.69Lack of a pharmacokinetic interaction at steady state between ropinirole and L-dopa in patients with Parkinson's disease. ( Beerahee, A; Burns, E; Citerone, DR; Cyronak, MJ; Fitzpatrick, KL; Leigh, TJ; Lennox, G; Lopez-Gil, A; Taylor, AC; Vakil, SD, 1999)
"theophylline were compared before and after a 4-week period of oral treatment with ropinirole (2 mg t."2.69Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between ropinirole and theophylline in patients with Parkinson's disease. ( Brefel-Courbon, C; Eagle, S; Fitzpatrick, K; Rascol, O; Taylor, A; Thalamas, C, 1999)
"Early Parkinson's disease can be managed successfully for up to five years with a reduced risk of dyskinesia by initiating treatment with ropinirole alone and supplementing it with levodopa if necessary."2.69A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson's disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa. ( Brooks, DJ; Clarke, CE; De Deyn, PP; Korczyn, AD; Lang, AE; Rascol, O, 2000)
"The proportion of "responders" (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale improvement of at least 30%) did not differ between groups (levodopa, 58%; ropinirole, 48%)."2.69Ropinirole in the treatment of early Parkinson's disease: a 6-month interim report of a 5-year levodopa-controlled study. 056 Study Group. ( Brooks, DJ; Brunt, ER; Korczyn, AD; Poewe, WH; Rascol, O; Stocchi, F, 1998)
"The mean Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) total motor examination scores (Part III) at baseline were similar in the four strata."2.69Ropinirole versus bromocriptine in the treatment of early Parkinson's disease: a 6-month interim report of a 3-year study. 053 Study Group. ( Brooks, DJ; Brunt, ER; Korczyn, AD; Poewe, WH; Rascol, O; Stocchi, F, 1998)
"Ropinirole-treated patients had a significantly greater percentage improvement in UPDRS motor score than patients who received placebo (+24% vs -3%; p < 0."2.68Ropinirole for the treatment of early Parkinson's disease. The Ropinirole Study Group. ( Adler, CH; Bertoni, J; Davis, TL; Hammerstad, JP; Hauser, RA; O'Brien, CF; Sanchez-Ramos, J; Sethi, KD; Taylor, RL, 1997)
"Ropinirole has beneficial adjuvant effects in parkinsonian patients with moderate motor disability and motor fluctuations."2.68Ropinirole in the treatment of levodopa-induced motor fluctuations in patients with Parkinson's disease. ( Fuell, D; Lees, AJ; Montastruc, JL; Pirtosek, Z; Rascol, O; Senard, JM, 1996)
"Ropinirole-SR adjunctive treatment showed a tendency towards more improvement in UPDRS-ADL score (MD 1."2.61Indirect Comparison of Ropinirole and Pramipexole as Levodopa Adjunctive Therapy in Advanced Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. ( Cooper, J; Ni, X; Ning, Y; Parks, D; Refoios Camejo, R; Yi, B; Zhao, H, 2019)
"Selegiline was more tolerable than bromocriptine (OR = 0."2.55Comparison for Efficacy and Tolerability among Ten Drugs for Treatment of Parkinson's Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis. ( Ji, F; Jiang, R; Su, Z; Xue, R; Zhou, Y; Zhu, X; Zhuo, C, 2017)
"Medical literature on the use of RPR in Parkinson's disease was identified using MEDLINE and the reference lists of published articles."2.50Drug safety evaluation of ropinirole prolonged release. ( Radicati, FG; Stocchi, F; Torti, M, 2014)
" However, long-acting NEDA were also associated with a higher incidence of adverse events, especially in early PD patients, compared with placebo."2.50Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of long-acting non-ergot dopamine agonists in Parkinson's disease. ( Peng, GG; Wang, M; Zhang, JW; Zhou, CQ, 2014)
" The objective of this study was to perform an indirect comparison of Adverse Events (AEs) and Dropout Rates (DRs) among clinical trials of pramipexole, ropinirole, and rasagiline."2.48Indirect comparisons of adverse events and dropout rates in early Parkinson's disease trials of pramipexole, ropinirole, and rasagiline. ( Tarrants, ML; Zagmutt, FJ, 2012)
" The Cochrane Collaboration guidelines were followed and the following data were extracted from each study: identifier (title and bibliographical reference), classification of the quality of the evidence (Jadad criteria), type and design of the study, number of patients, patient demographics (average age, sex), Parkinson's disease stage (Hoehn and Yahr Scale), treatment (monotherapy or adjuvant to levodopa), drugs used (including dosage and duration), study objective (safety or tolerability), method of evaluation of results, randomization and blinding, and description of all the adverse events in all treatment groups."2.46Tolerability and safety of ropinirole versus other dopamine agonists and levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. ( Kulisevsky, J; Pagonabarraga, J, 2010)
"Ropinirole is a non-ergoline dopamine agonist with medium elimination half time, which has been licensed for the therapy of idiopathic Parkinson syndrome in mono- and add-on therapy for more than 10 years."2.46[Clinical data of the prolonged-release formulation of ropinirole]. ( Bergmann, L; Jost, WH, 2010)
" Several potential advantages of ropinirole prolonged release compared to the immediate release formulation include maintaining more consistent dopaminergic activity with steadier plasma levels, increased tolerability, greater compliance from a simpler once-daily dosing regimen and ease in dose titration."2.45A review of ropinirole prolonged release in Parkinson's disease. ( Lyons, KE; Nashatizadeh, MM; Pahwa, R, 2009)
"Ropinirole is a non-ergolinic dopamine agonist, which has been used for over 10 years for the treatment of Parkinson's disease."2.44Initial experience with ropinirole PR (prolonged release). ( Buhmann, C; Fuchs, G; Greulich, W; Hummel, S; Jost, WH; Korchounov, A; Müngersdorf, M; Schwarz, M; Spiegel-Meixensberger, M, 2008)
"Ropinirole is a non-ergoline dopamine agonist, highly selective for the D2 receptor subtype D3."2.44[Systemic review and meta-analysis of tolerability and safety between different titration regimes of ropinirol dose in the treatment of Parkinson's disease]. ( Chacon, J, 2007)
"Selegiline was reassigned as Non-efficacious for the prevention of dyskinesias."2.43Evidence-based medical review update: pharmacological and surgical treatments of Parkinson's disease: 2001 to 2004. ( Goetz, CG; Poewe, W; Rascol, O; Sampaio, C, 2005)
"When used as monotherapy in early Parkinson's disease, ropinirole improves signs and symptoms of the disorder."2.42Ropinirole therapy for Parkinson's disease. ( Hauser, RA; Lyons, KE; Pahwa, R, 2004)
"Ropinirole is a modern, non-ergoline dopamine agonist which has been shown to be effective as monotherapy as well as combination therapy against idiopathic Parkinson's disease."2.42Ropinirole: current status of the studies. ( Jost, WH, 2004)
" There is, however, uncertainty regarding differences in the adverse event profiles associated with each drug."2.42Comparison of the risk of adverse events with pramipexole and ropinirole in patients with Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis. ( Etminan, M; Gill, S; Samii, A, 2003)
"Patients with Parkinson's disease using pramipexole or ropinirole are at higher risk of experiencing somnolence relative to patients taking placebo."2.41Increased risk of somnolence with the new dopamine agonists in patients with Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. ( Etminan, M; Rochon, PA; Samii, A; Takkouche, B, 2001)
"Ropinirole is a selective non-ergoline dopamine D2 receptor agonist indicated for use in treating Parkinson's disease."2.41Clinical pharmacokinetics of ropinirole. ( Kaye, CM; Nicholls, B, 2000)
"Ropinirole and levodopa treatments were similar in efficacy as measured by UPDRS ADL scores, although ropinirole recipients showed significantly less improvement on UPDRS motor scores at the 5-year study end-point in a multicentre, randomised double-blind trial."2.41Ropinirole: a review of its use in the management of Parkinson's disease. ( Matheson, AJ; Spencer, CM, 2000)
"Long-term levodopa therapy for Parkinson's disease is complicated by the development of motor fluctuations and abnormal involuntary movements."2.41Ropinirole versus bromocriptine for levodopa-induced complications in Parkinson's disease. ( Clarke, CE; Deane, KH, 2000)
"Long-term levodopa therapy for Parkinson's disease is complicated by the development of motor fluctuations and abnormal involuntary movements."2.41Ropinirole for levodopa-induced complications in Parkinson's disease. ( Clarke, CE; Deane, KH, 2000)
" Also, when given as adjunctive therapy with levodopa, they can allow the levodopa maintenance dosage to be reduced without loss of symptom control."2.41Clinical pharmacology of dopamine agonists. ( Lam, YW, 2000)
"Ropinirole is a nonergoline dopamine agonist that binds to dopamine D2-receptors; the drug is indicated for use in the symptomatic treatment of early and late Parkinson's disease (PD)."2.40Ropinirole: a dopamine agonist for the treatment of Parkinson's disease. ( Kuzel, MD, 1999)
" Monotherapy with dopamine agonists in early Parkinson's disease has been advocated in order to delay the occurrence of complications associated with long term administration of levodopa."2.40Clinical pharmacology of dopamine agonists in Parkinson's disease. ( Lange, KW, 1998)
"Tolcapone has also demonstrated efficacy in patients with motor fluctuations."2.40New pharmacotherapy for Parkinson's disease. ( Alldredge, BK; Aminoff, MJ; Bainbridge, JL; Dowling, GA; Gottwald, MD, 1997)
"Ropinirole is a new nonergoline dopamine agonist that binds specifically to D2-like receptors with a selectivity similar to that of dopamine (D3 > D2 > D4)."2.40Pharmacologic profile of ropinirole: a nonergoline dopamine agonist. ( Tulloch, IF, 1997)
"Ropinirole is a novel, non-ergoline dopamine agonist chemical name with a very high specificity for dopamine D2-like receptors, currently being investigated for the symptomatic treatment of Parkinson's disease."2.39Ropinirole in the symptomatic treatment of Parkinson's disease. ( Brooks, DJ; Burn, DJ; Torjanski, N, 1995)
"This article selects Parkinson's disease patients from the provincial hospital to conduct investigations and group experiments on these people to test the effects of different levels of ropinirole hydrochloride in the treatment of Parkinson's disease."1.72Clinical Observation of Ropinirole Hydrochloride in the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease. ( Chen, Y; Gao, X; Kong, Q; Zhang, J, 2022)
"75]) taking one of three types of non-ergot extended-release DAs (rotigotine 32; pramipexole 44; ropinirole 36) with or without L-dopa (median daily total dosage of antiparkinsonian drugs 525."1.62Antiparkinsonian drugs as potent contributors to nocturnal sleep in patients with Parkinson's disease. ( Ando, H; Doyu, M; Fujikake, A; Fukuoka, T; Hayashi, M; Ito, C; Izumi, M; Kawagashira, Y; Koide, H; Nakashima, K; Niwa, JI; Ogawa, K; Oiwa, H; Okada, Y; Taguchi, S; Tokui, K; Tsunoda, Y; Yasumoto, A; Yuasa, T, 2021)
"Ropinirole is a very important treatment option for Parkinson's disease (PD), a major threat to the aging population."1.48Orally-dissolving film for sublingual and buccal delivery of ropinirole. ( Chow, SF; Fang, Y; Han, H; Lai, KL; Lam, TN; Lee, WYT; Li, HY; Li, Q; Zhang, S, 2018)
"A rat model of Parkinson's disease was created by unilaterally infusing 6-hydroxydopamine, a dopamine neurotoxin, into the medial forebrain bundle."1.46D-512, a novel dopamine D ( Bishop, C; Conti, MM; Das, B; Dutta, AK; Lindenbach, D; Meadows, SM, 2017)
"Impulse control disorders (ICDs) in Parkinson's disease (PD) are associated primarily with dopamine agonist (DA) use."1.43A European multicentre survey of impulse control behaviours in Parkinson's disease patients treated with short- and long-acting dopamine agonists. ( Antonini, A; Chaudhuri, KR; Durner, G; Falup-Pecurariu, C; Grilo, M; Henriksen, T; Kessel, B; Martinez-Martin, P; Odin, P; Rizos, A; Røkenes Karlsen, K; Sauerbier, A; Silverdale, M; Weintraub, D, 2016)
"Parkinson's disease is characterised by three main symptoms: slowness and paucity of movements, rigidity, and resting tremor."1.42Parkinson's disease: initial treatment of motor disorders. ( , 2015)
" Pharmacokinetic results of CSNE(ROP) in Wistar rat brain and plasma showed a significantly high (p** < 0."1.42Nano-ropinirole for the management of Parkinsonism: blood-brain pharmacokinetics and carrier localization. ( Ahuja, A; Al Rohaimi, AH; Ali, J; Baboota, S; Hassan, AA; Muslim, S; Mustafa, G, 2015)
"These agents are used to treat Parkinson disease, restless leg syndrome, and hyperprolactinemia."1.40Reports of pathological gambling, hypersexuality, and compulsive shopping associated with dopamine receptor agonist drugs. ( Glenmullen, J; Mattison, DR; Moore, TJ, 2014)
" However, orally it undergoes degradation in gastrointestinal tract and extensive first pass metabolism, resulting in its poor and variable bioavailability of the commercially available oral tablets."1.40Colloidal soft nanocarrier for transdermal delivery of dopamine agonist: ex vivo and in vivo evaluation. ( Kalaria, DR; Kalia, YN; More, S; Patel, P; Patravale, VB; Pol, A, 2014)
"Ropinirole treatment yielded a significant clinical improvement (mean UPDRS score subitem III 13."1.39fMRI changes in cortical activation during task performance with the unaffected hand partially reverse after ropinirole treatment in de novo Parkinson's disease. ( Baldacci, F; Bonuccelli, U; Cecchi, P; Diciotti, S; Giannelli, M; Lucetti, C; Mascalchi, M; Tessa, C, 2013)
"Methods are illustrated using a Parkinson's disease trial."1.39Some consequences of assuming simple patterns for the treatment effect over time in a linear mixed model. ( Bamia, C; Kenward, MG; White, IR, 2013)
"Impulse control disorders were more common in patients treated with a dopamine agonist than in patients not taking a dopamine agonist (17."1.36Impulse control disorders in Parkinson disease: a cross-sectional study of 3090 patients. ( Koester, J; Lang, AE; Potenza, MN; Siderowf, AD; Stacy, M; Voon, V; Weintraub, D; Whetteckey, J; Wunderlich, GR, 2010)
"Psychotic features in patients with Parkinson's Disease usually present as visual hallucinations against a background of cognitive deterioration and dopaminomimetic therapy."1.36Isolated delusional syndrome in Parkinson's Disease. ( Bozi, M; Christodoulou, C; Douzenis, A; Gasparinatos, G; Stamboulis, E; Stefanis, C; Stefanis, L; Stefanis, N, 2010)
"The role of iron in the pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease (PD) has been implicated strongly because of generation of oxidative stress leading to dopamine cell death."1.36Discovery of 4-(4-(2-((5-Hydroxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalen-2-yl)(propyl)amino)ethyl)piperazin-1-yl)quinolin-8-ol and its analogues as highly potent dopamine D2/D3 agonists and as iron chelator: in vivo activity indicates potential application in sympto ( Antonio, T; Dutta, AK; Ghosh, B; Reith, ME, 2010)
" Data were collected in a retrospective manner from 95 patients who were tracked over the course of their therapy to determine whether psychosis or associated behavioral symptoms developed as a result and whether an intervention was needed to adjust ropinirole dosing or if additional medications had to be added to control features associated with psychosis."1.35An exploratory retrospective evaluation of ropinirole-associated psychotic symptoms in an outpatient population treated for restless legs syndrome or Parkinson's disease. ( Carver, LJ; Dahmen, MM; Lea, JW; Makos, M; Rasu, RS; Stoner, SC, 2009)
"Parkinson's disease is characterized by the degeneration of dopaminergic pathways projecting to the striatum."1.35Reward-learning and the novelty-seeking personality: a between- and within-subjects study of the effects of dopamine agonists on young Parkinson's patients. ( Bereczki, D; Bódi, N; Daw, N; Dibó, G; Gluck, MA; Kéri, S; Moustafa, A; Myers, CE; Nagy, H; Takáts, A, 2009)
"Results achieved in treating the Parkinson's disease (PD) by the dopamine receptor agonist, ropinirole, have been hampered by its side effects."1.35Side effects of ropinirole in patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease. ( Dikanovic, M; Jukic, I; Lusic, I; Titlic, M; Tonkic, A, 2008)
"Ropinirole, which is a non-ergot dopamine agonist derivative, exerts therapeutic benefits in Parkinson's disease (PD)."1.34Overexpression of D2/D3 receptors increases efficacy of ropinirole in chronically 6-OHDA-lesioned Parkinsonian rats. ( Borlongan, CV; Hara, K; Kim, KM; Maki, M; Matsukawa, N; Morgan, JC; Sethi, KD; Xu, L; Yasuhara, T; Yu, G, 2007)
"Ropinirole is a non-ergoline selective D2 dopamine agonist."1.34[Improvements in motor and non-motor symptoms in parkinson patients under ropinirole therapy]. ( Angersbach, D; Buchwald, B; Jost, WH, 2007)
"Ropinirole is a modern dopamine agonist with a half-life of medium extent that is highly selective for D(2)-receptors."1.33Clinical studies with ropinirole in Parkinson's disease and RLS. ( Angersbach, D; Jost, WH; Rascol, O, 2006)
"The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) is the main outcome measure in clinical trials of Parkinson's disease (PD)."1.33Minimal clinically important change on the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale. ( Counsell, N; Poewe, W; Sampaio, C; Schrag, A, 2006)
"Not all patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) respond to levodopa and others develop dyskinesias."1.32Cost analysis of ropinirole versus levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. ( Einarson, TR; Iskedjian, M, 2003)
"Two patients with Parkinson's disease received treatment with ropinirole and/or pramipexole, during which both experienced sleep attacks."1.31Non-ergot dopamine agonist-induced sleep attacks. ( Ryan, M; Slevin, JT; Wells, A, 2000)
"Ropinirole was added to his current therapy for Parkinson disease, with a corresponding decrease in the dose of levodopa/carbidopa to allow levodopa sparing."1.31Warfarin and ropinirole interaction. ( Bair, JD; Oppelt, TF, 2001)
"Orthostatic hypotension was defined as a drop in either systolic blood pressure of more than 25 mm Hg or diastolic pressure of more than 10 mm Hg."1.31Acute orthostatic hypotension when starting dopamine agonists in Parkinson's disease. ( Blasucci, L; Goetz, CG; Kujawa, K; Leurgans, S; Raman, R, 2000)
"Patients with Parkinson's disease (n = 68) switched from pergolide or bromocriptine to ropinirole overnight (dose equivalence ratios 1:6 and 10:6, respectively)."1.30An overnight switch to ropinirole therapy in patients with Parkinson's disease. Short communication. ( Antonini, A; Barichella, M; Canesi, M; Mariani, CB; Pezzoli, G; Tesei, S; Zecchinelli, AL, 1999)

Research

Studies (260)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19901 (0.38)18.7374
1990's40 (15.38)18.2507
2000's122 (46.92)29.6817
2010's88 (33.85)24.3611
2020's9 (3.46)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Ghosh, B2
Antonio, T3
Zhen, J1
Kharkar, P1
Reith, ME2
Dutta, AK3
Modi, G1
Reith, M1
Dutta, A1
Zhu, J1
Chen, M1
Gencler, OS1
Oztekin, N1
Oztekin, MF1
Zhang, J1
Gao, X1
Chen, Y1
Kong, Q1
Jeon, N1
Bortolato, M1
Gungabissoon, U1
Kirichek, O1
El Baou, C1
Galwey, N1
Hattori, N4
Mochizuki, H1
Hasegawa, K5
Nomoto, M2
Uchida, E1
Terahara, T1
Okawa, K1
Fukuta, H1
Nehal, N1
Nabi, B1
Rehman, S1
Pathak, A1
Iqubal, A1
Khan, SA1
Yar, MS1
Parvez, S1
Baboota, S3
Ali, J3
Chen, C1
Jönsson, S1
Yang, S1
Plan, EL1
Karlsson, MO1
Taguchi, S1
Koide, H1
Oiwa, H1
Hayashi, M1
Ogawa, K1
Ito, C1
Nakashima, K1
Yuasa, T1
Yasumoto, A1
Ando, H1
Fujikake, A1
Fukuoka, T1
Tokui, K1
Izumi, M1
Tsunoda, Y1
Kawagashira, Y1
Okada, Y1
Niwa, JI1
Doyu, M1
Zhuo, C1
Zhu, X1
Jiang, R1
Ji, F1
Su, Z1
Xue, R1
Zhou, Y1
Sato, K1
Mitsuyama, E1
Numachi, Y1
Lindenbach, D1
Das, B1
Conti, MM1
Meadows, SM1
Bishop, C1
Barcia, E1
Boeva, L1
García-García, L1
Slowing, K1
Fernández-Carballido, A1
Casanova, Y1
Negro, S1
Foley, JA1
Warner, TT1
Cipolotti, L1
Lai, KL1
Fang, Y1
Han, H1
Li, Q1
Zhang, S1
Li, HY1
Chow, SF1
Lam, TN1
Lee, WYT1
Castro-Martínez, XH1
García-Ruiz, PJ2
Martínez-García, C1
Martínez-Castrillo, JC1
Vela, L2
Mata, M2
Martínez-Torres, I1
Feliz-Feliz, C1
Palau, F1
Hoenicka, J1
Lanteri, PF1
Leguia, A1
Doladé, NG1
García, GC1
Figueras, A1
Lee, JY2
Jeon, B1
Koh, SB1
Yoon, WT1
Lee, HW1
Kwon, OD1
Kim, JW4
Kim, JM5
Ma, HI1
Kim, HT1
Baik, JS1
Cho, J2
Contin, M2
Lopane, G1
Mohamed, S2
Calandra-Buonaura, G1
Capellari, S1
De Massis, P1
Nassetti, S1
Perrone, A1
Riva, R2
Sambati, L1
Scaglione, C1
Cortelli, P1
Fowler, E1
Maderal, A1
Yosipovitch, G1
Mancera, N1
Wadia, HP1
Zhao, H1
Ning, Y1
Cooper, J2
Refoios Camejo, R1
Ni, X1
Yi, B1
Parks, D1
Jackowiak, E1
Patil, PG1
Chou, KL1
Frampton, JE1
Plate, A1
Benninghoff, J1
Jansen, GH1
Wlasich, E1
Eigenbrod, S1
Drzezga, A1
Jansen, NL1
Kretzschmar, HA1
Bötzel, K1
Rujescu, D1
Danek, A1
Wilson, L1
Sheehan, J1
Thorpe, M1
Agúndez, JA1
García-Martín, E1
Alonso-Navarro, H1
Jiménez-Jiménez, FJ1
Shepherd, TA1
Edelstyn, NM1
Mayes, AR1
Ellis, SJ1
Zhang, Z2
Wang, J2
Zhang, X2
Chen, S2
Wang, Z2
Zhang, B2
Liu, C2
Qu, Q2
Cheng, Y2
Li, J2
Cao, H1
Cai, M2
Zhu, R2
Yun, JY1
Kim, HJ3
Kim, YE1
Kim, JS1
Jeon, BS5
El Otmani, H1
Raji, L1
El Moutaouakil, B1
Rafai, MA1
Slassi, I1
Li, SH1
Chen, HB1
Wang, ZF1
Tang, RH1
Zhang, XY1
Yang, JS1
Zhao, WQ1
Sun, XR1
Ma, J1
Lamichhane, D1
Narayanan, NS1
Gonzalez-Alegre, P1
Arora, A1
Fletcher, P1
Pagonabarraga, J3
Kulisevsky, J3
van Boven, JF1
Novak, A1
Driessen, MT1
Boersma, C1
Boomsma, MM1
Postma, MJ1
Martinez Castrillo, JC1
Alonso-Canovas, A1
Herranz Barcenas, A1
Sanchez Alonso, P1
Olmedilla Gonzalez, N1
Mahillo Fernandez, I1
Stocchi, F12
Radicati, FG1
Torti, M1
Tomasiuk, R1
Szlufik, S1
Friedman, A1
Koziorowski, D1
Zhou, CQ1
Zhang, JW1
Wang, M1
Peng, GG1
Moore, TJ1
Glenmullen, J1
Mattison, DR1
Rossi, M1
Merello, M1
Mizuno, Y2
Kondo, T2
Murata, M1
Takeuchi, M1
Takahashi, M1
Tomida, T1
Makumi, CW1
Asgharian, A2
Ellis, J1
Shaikh, S1
Jimenez, T3
VanMeter, S3
Jafarieh, O1
Md, S1
Ali, M1
Sahni, JK1
Kumari, B1
Bhatnagar, A1
Hu, J1
Chung, SJ3
Singh, P2
Thierfelder, S2
Ikeda, J2
Bauer, L2
Pérez-Pérez, J1
Martínez-Horta, S1
Fernández-Bobadilla, R1
Sierra, S1
Pascual-Sedano, B1
Gironell, A1
Mustafa, G1
Ahuja, A1
Al Rohaimi, AH1
Muslim, S1
Hassan, AA1
Patel, P1
Pol, A1
More, S1
Kalaria, DR1
Kalia, YN1
Patravale, VB1
Ciurleo, R1
Bonanno, L1
Di Lorenzo, G1
Bramanti, P1
Marino, S1
Sasaki-Saito, N1
Sawada, Y1
Ohmori, S1
Omoto, D1
Haruyama, S1
Yoshioka, M1
Nishio, D1
Nakamura, M1
Matute, MS1
Matute, R1
Merino, P1
Rizos, A1
Sauerbier, A1
Antonini, A2
Weintraub, D3
Martinez-Martin, P2
Kessel, B1
Henriksen, T1
Falup-Pecurariu, C1
Silverdale, M1
Durner, G1
Røkenes Karlsen, K1
Grilo, M1
Odin, P2
Chaudhuri, KR1
Tremblay, M1
Silveira, MM1
Kaur, S1
Hosking, JG1
Adams, WK1
Baunez, C1
Winstanley, CA1
Zesiewicz, TA2
Chriscoe, S2
Upward, J2
Davy, M2
Arbouw, ME2
Movig, KL2
Guchelaar, HJ2
Poels, PJ2
van Vugt, JP2
Neef, C2
Egberts, TC2
Titlic, M1
Tonkic, A1
Jukic, I1
Lusic, I1
Dikanovic, M1
Bares, M1
Rektorová, I1
Krajcovicová, L1
Rektor, I1
Hersh, BP3
Scott, BL1
Nausieda, PA1
Giorgi, L3
Jost, WH5
Buhmann, C1
Fuchs, G1
Greulich, W1
Hummel, S1
Korchounov, A1
Müngersdorf, M2
Schwarz, M1
Spiegel-Meixensberger, M1
Knobel, D1
Aybek, S1
Pollo, C1
Vingerhoets, FJ1
Berney, A1
Weber, J1
Keating, GM1
Kuzuhara, S1
Weber, WE1
Nijssen, PC1
Bostwick, JM1
Hecksel, KA1
Stevens, SR1
Bower, JH3
Ahlskog, JE4
Bódi, N1
Kéri, S1
Nagy, H1
Moustafa, A1
Myers, CE1
Daw, N1
Dibó, G1
Takáts, A1
Bereczki, D1
Gluck, MA1
Nashatizadeh, MM1
Lyons, KE5
Pahwa, R5
Montgomery, EB2
Wessels, JA1
van der Straaten, RJ1
Stoner, SC1
Dahmen, MM1
Makos, M1
Lea, JW1
Carver, LJ1
Rasu, RS1
Park, SY1
Cho, YJ1
Hong, KS1
Cho, JY1
Seo, SY1
Lee, DH1
Valldeoriola, F1
Cobaleda, S1
Lahuerta, J1
Onofrj, M2
Bonanni, L2
De Angelis, MV1
Anzellotti, F2
Ciccocioppo, F1
Thomas, A3
Bienfait, KL1
Menza, M1
Mark, MH1
Dobkin, RD1
Bergmann, L1
Koester, J1
Potenza, MN2
Siderowf, AD2
Stacy, M2
Voon, V1
Whetteckey, J1
Wunderlich, GR1
Lang, AE7
Watts, RL3
Sethi, K2
Stern, M1
Hauser, RA8
Olanow, W1
Gray, AM1
Adams, B1
Earl, NL3
Stefanis, N1
Bozi, M1
Christodoulou, C1
Douzenis, A1
Gasparinatos, G1
Stamboulis, E1
Stefanis, C1
Stefanis, L1
Di Giacopo, R1
Fasano, A1
Fenici, R1
Loria, G1
Bentivoglio, AR1
Dusek, P1
Busková, J1
Růzicka, E1
Majerová, V1
Srp, A1
Jech, R1
Roth, J1
Sonka, K1
Fisone, G1
Senn, S1
Rolfe, K1
Julious, SA1
Reichmann, H7
Lew, M1
Makumi, C1
Shulman, KJ1
Maguire, M1
Cowen, Z1
Hassan, A1
Kumar, N1
Matsumoto, JY2
Fealey, RD1
Josephs, KA2
Baba, Y1
Higuchi, MA1
Fukuyama, K1
Abe, H1
Uehara, Y1
Inoue, T1
Yamada, T1
Hunter, B1
Schapira, AH5
Grossac, J1
Ruiz, S1
Bondon-Guitton, E1
Roux, FE1
Fourcade, O1
Montastruc, JL6
Geeraerts, T1
Ray Chaudhuri, K1
Rolfe, KA1
Rockett, CB1
Ondo, WG1
Lee, WY1
Lee, MC2
Ahn, TB1
Grieger, F1
Whitesides, J1
Boroojerdi, B2
Fanciulli, A1
Misasi, R1
Campanelli, D1
Buttarelli, FR1
Pontieri, FR1
Zagmutt, FJ1
Tarrants, ML1
Jain, L1
Benko, R1
Safranek, S1
Marusiak, J1
Jaskólska, A1
Koszewicz, M1
Budrewicz, S1
Jaskólski, A1
Sakamoto, T1
De Caro, V1
Giandalia, G1
Siragusa, MG1
Sutera, FM1
Giannola, LI1
Shin, E1
Garcia, J1
Winkler, C1
Björklund, A1
Carta, M1
Tessa, C1
Diciotti, S1
Lucetti, C1
Baldacci, F1
Cecchi, P1
Giannelli, M1
Bonuccelli, U2
Mascalchi, M1
Kaut, O1
Asmus, F1
Paus, S1
Nissen, T1
Newman, EJ1
Grosset, KA1
Daghem, M1
Pal, G1
Stewart, M1
Macphee, GJ1
Grosset, DG1
van Vugt, FT1
Schüpbach, M2
Altenmüller, E1
Bardinet, E2
Yelnik, J2
Hälbig, TD1
Bamia, C1
White, IR2
Kenward, MG1
Batla, A1
Stamelou, M1
Mencacci, N1
Bhatia, KP1
Arai, M1
Korczyn, AD10
Thalamas, C3
Adler, CH3
Gekht, AB1
Homann, CN1
Wenzel, K1
Suppan, K1
Ivanic, G1
Crevenna, R1
Ott, E1
Marek, K1
Jennings, D1
Seibyl, J1
Clarke, CE6
Guttman, M1
Rakshi, JS1
Pavese, N2
Uema, T1
Ito, K1
Morrish, PK2
Bailey, DL2
Brooks, DJ9
Iskedjian, M1
Einarson, TR1
Riederer, P1
Gille, G1
Müller, T1
Przuntek, H1
Riess, O1
Schwartz, A1
Schwarz, J1
Vogt, T1
Im, JH1
Ha, JH1
Cho, IS1
Quinn, NP1
Berardelli, A1
Vacca, L2
De Pandis, MF1
Modugno, N1
Valente, M1
Ruggieri, S3
Etminan, M2
Gill, S1
Samii, A2
Berger, Ch1
Mehrhoff, FW1
Beier, KM1
Meinck, HM1
MacMahon, DG1
Whone, AL2
Stoessl, AJ1
Davis, M1
Reske, S1
Nahmias, C1
Rascol, O14
Ribeiro, MJ1
Remy, P2
Poewe, WH4
Inzelberg, R1
Schechtman, E1
Nisipeanu, P2
Jähnel, M1
O'Suilleabhain, P1
Giller, C1
Razmy, A1
Shapiro, CM1
Pan, T1
Le, W1
Jankovic, J2
Morgan, JC2
Sethi, KD4
Grosset, K1
Needleman, F1
Macphee, G1
Grosset, D1
Körner, Y1
Meindorfner, C1
Möller, JC2
Stiasny-Kolster, K1
Haja, D1
Cassel, W2
Oertel, WH2
Krüger, HP2
Bara-Jimenez, W1
Dimitrova, T1
Sherzai, A1
Favit, A1
Mouradian, MM1
Chase, TN1
Plowman, BK1
Boggie, DT1
Morreale, AP1
Schaefer, MG1
Delattre, ML1
Chan, H1
Kurlan, R1
Singh, A1
Althoff, R1
Martineau, RJ1
Jacobson, J1
Goetz, CG2
Poewe, W3
Sampaio, C2
Angersbach, D3
Buchwald, B2
Klos, KJ1
Walker, RH1
Warwick, R1
Cercy, SP1
Badarny, S1
Stern, A1
Susel, Z1
Honigman, S1
Hocherman, S1
Schrag, A2
Counsell, N1
Deleu, D1
Hanssens, Y1
Goveas, J1
Morales, KH1
Duda, JE1
Moberg, PJ1
Stern, MB1
De Deyn, PP3
Abdalla, M1
Junghanns, S1
Fuhrmann, JT1
Simonis, G1
Oelwein, C1
Koch, R1
Strasser, RH1
Storch, A1
Barone, P1
Lamb, J2
Ellis, A2
Clarke, Z1
Di Iorio, A1
Varanese, S1
D'Andreagiovanni, A1
Miwa, H1
Singer, C1
Layton, G1
Dewey, RB1
Reimold, SC1
O'Suilleabhain, PE1
Stacy, MA1
Factor, SA3
Elmer, LW1
Truong, DD1
Onal, A1
Cağlar, S1
Matsukawa, N1
Maki, M1
Yasuhara, T1
Hara, K1
Yu, G1
Xu, L1
Kim, KM1
Borlongan, CV1
Chacon, J1
Abe, T1
Kuno, S1
Yamamoto, M1
Nakashima, M1
Kanazawa, I1
Jon Stoessl, A1
Giladi, N1
Burn, DJ2
Arai, H1
Minami, J1
Tompson, DJ1
Vearer, D1
Sharma, JC1
Ross, IN1
Brooks, D1
Czernecki, V1
Yaici, S1
Lévy, R1
Dubois, B2
Agid, Y2
Lees, AJ4
Senard, JM3
Pirtosek, Z3
Brefel, C2
Fuell, D2
Rabey, JM1
Torjanski, N1
Tulloch, IF1
Heins, JR1
Davis, TL2
Hammerstad, JP2
Bertoni, J1
Taylor, RL2
Sanchez-Ramos, J2
O'Brien, CF2
Barbato, L1
Monge, A1
Nordera, G1
Marsden, CD1
Gottwald, MD1
Bainbridge, JL1
Dowling, GA1
Aminoff, MJ1
Alldredge, BK1
LeWitt, PA2
Brunt, ER4
Giménez-Roldán, S1
Rayet, S1
Lopez-Gil, A3
Fitzpatrick, K3
Bullman, S1
Citerone, DR3
Taylor, AC3
Fernandez, HH1
Friedman, JH1
Bertoni, JM1
Lieberman, A1
Olanow, CW2
Swanson, P1
Waters, CH1
Fahn, S2
Hurtig, H1
Yahr, M1
Lange, KW1
Kuzel, MD1
Beerahee, A2
Cyronak, MJ1
Leigh, TJ1
Fitzpatrick, KL1
Vakil, SD1
Burns, E1
Lennox, G1
Taylor, A2
Citerone, D1
Frucht, S2
Rogers, JD1
Greene, PE1
Gordon, MF1
Brefel-Courbon, C1
Eagle, S1
Larsen, JP1
Nagy, Z1
Fine, J1
Iida, M1
Miyazaki, I1
Tanaka, K1
Kabuto, H1
Iwata-Ichikawa, E1
Ogawa, N1
Jeret, JS1
Hobson, DE1
Pourcher, E1
Martin, WR1
Phillips, P1
Weiner, WJ2
Canesi, M1
Mariani, CB1
Tesei, S1
Zecchinelli, AL1
Barichella, M1
Pezzoli, G1
Lund, BC1
Neiman, RF1
Perry, PJ1
Lam, YW1
Roth, T1
Ryan, M1
Slevin, JT1
Wells, A1
Hubble, J1
Koller, WC1
Atchison, P1
Zussman, BD1
Friedman, CJ1
Hawker, N1
Marsh, L1
Dawson, TM1
Deane, KH2
Matheson, AJ1
Spencer, CM1
Pirker, W1
Happe, S1
Stiasny, K1
Peter, JH1
Hiner, BC1
Earnhart, M1
Yamamoto, T1
Kujawa, K1
Leurgans, S1
Raman, R1
Blasucci, L1
Kaye, CM1
Nicholls, B1
Lachenmayer, L1
Supiot, F1
Sternon, J1
Zegers de Beyl, D1
Ponsford, JR1
Masson, C1
Moller, H1
Johnels, B1
Ingvarsson, PE1
Steg, G1
Olsson, T1
Le, WD1
Zenzola, A1
Diroma, C1
Fraddosio, A1
Lamberti, S1
Moramarco, A1
Palagano, G1
Iliceto, G1
Bamias, C1
Hardy, P1
Pocock, S1
Warner, J2
Takkouche, B1
Rochon, PA1
Bair, JD1
Oppelt, TF1
Sommer, U1
Sommer, M1
Tabamo, RE1
Di Rocco, A1
Mazzoni, P1
Morrish, P1
Keens, J1
Kleedorfer, B1
Stern, GM2
Bottomley, JM2
Sree-Haran, N1
Vidailhet, MJ1
Bonnet, AM1
Belal, S1
Marle, C1
Boothman, BR1
Spokes, EG1
Kapoon, R1
Frankel, JP1
Haran, NS1

Clinical Trials (22)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Study ROP116991, Clinical Evaluation of 18 to 24mg/Day Ropinirole CR for Parkinson's Disease.[NCT01929317]Phase 381 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-28Terminated
The REmission of the Impulse Control Disorder and the Changes of the Neuropsychiatric Characteristics After Switching Into Levodopa/Carbidopa in Patients With Parkinson's Disease Who Have Developed Impulse Control Disorders Due to the Dopamine Replacement[NCT01683253]Phase 4150 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-30Completed
An Open-label, Multi-center, Crossover Study to Compare the Effect of Once-daily Ropinirole PR and Twice-daily Ropinirole PR in Patients With Parkinson Disease[NCT00986245]Phase 482 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
An Open-Label Extension Study With REQUIP (Ropinirole) CR for Subjects From Studies 101468/165, 101468/168 and 101468/169[NCT00632736]Phase 3419 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-02-29Completed
An Open Label Extension Study With REQUIP PR for Subjects From Study ROP111528[NCT01536574]Phase 3295 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-02Completed
An Open-Label, Multicenter, Multinational Study to Assess the Feasibility of Switching Therapy From Pramipexole or Ropinirole to the Rotigotine Transdermal System and Its Effect on Motor and Non-Motor Symptoms in Subjects With Advanced Idiopathic Parkinso[NCT01711866]Phase 487 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Completed
An Open-Label Study to Investigate the Safety and Efficacy of Rotigotine Add-On Therapy With Low Doses of Pramipexole or Ropinirole in Patients With Advanced Parkinson's Disease Phase 3B[NCT01723904]Phase 390 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
A Cross-sectional, Retrospective Screening and Case-control Study Examining the Frequency of, and Risk Factors Associated With, Impulse Control Disorders in Parkinson's Disease Patients Treated With MIRAPEX® (Pramipexole) and Other Anti-parkinson Agents ([NCT00617019]3,234 participants (Actual)Observational2006-09-30Completed
A Replicated Crossover Study to Explore Individual Variability of Appetite Responses to a Standardised Meal and Any Moderating Influence of the FTO Gene[NCT03771690]18 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-11Completed
A Replicated Crossover Study Exploring Individual Variability of Postprandial Coronary Heart Disease Risk Markers and Sleep Quality in Response to Acute Exercise in Healthy Young Men[NCT05022498]20 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-10-01Completed
101648/196: A Long-Term, Open-Label Continuation Study of Once Daily Administration of Ropinirole CR Tablets to Patients With Parkinson's Disease Who Completed the Previous Ropinirole CR Studies 167 or 164[NCT00650104]Phase 376 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-05-31Completed
A Phase III, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Study of Six Months Treatment With Ropinirole CR as Adjunctive Therapy in Patients With Parkinson's Disease Who Are Not Optimally Controlled on L-dopa[NCT00381472]Phase 3393 participants Interventional2003-06-30Completed
A Phase 3b, Open-Label, Multicenter Trial to Assess the Safety and Tolerability of Switching Korean Subjects From Ropinirole to the Rotigotine Transdermal System and Its Effect on Symptoms in Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease[NCT00593606]Phase 3124 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Completed
Effects of Myofascial Trigger Points Therapy in Migraine.[NCT05646160]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-01-15Recruiting
A Single-blinded Assessment of the Short-term Effects of Cabergoline vs. Carbidopa/Levodopa on SPECT Dopamine Transporter Density in Out-patient Subjects With Parkinson's Disease[NCT00129181]30 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-31Completed
Investigating Effects of Short-term Treatment With Pramipexole or Levodopa on [123I]B-CIT and SPECT Imaging in Early Parkinson's[NCT00096720]Phase 2112 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-02-29Completed
A Pilot Phase II Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Tolerability and Dosage Finding Study of Isradipine CR as a Disease Modifying Agent in Patients With Early Parkinson Disease[NCT00909545]Phase 299 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
A 2-Part, Open Label, Adaptive, Single and/or Multiple Oral Dose, Safety, Tolerability, and Food Effect Trial of CVL-751 in Subjects With Parkinson's Disease[NCT04295642]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-01-08Completed
A 10-year Observational Study of the Incidence of Dyskinesia in Patients With Early Parkinson's Disease Who Were Treated With Amantadine or Dopamine Agonist[NCT01338662]500 participants (Anticipated)Observational2011-05-31Recruiting
Determining the Natural History of Levodopa-Induced Dyskinesia (LID)[NCT01003002]0 participants (Actual)Observational2010-12-31Withdrawn (stopped due to Funding not secured.)
Reducing Dyskinesia in Parkinson Disease With Omega-3 Fatty Acids[NCT01563913]Phase 133 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
The Effects of Supplementing Tyrosine on Blood Pressure in Parkinson's Disease[NCT01676103]Phase 1/Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Mean Change From Baseline (Week 0) in UPDRS Part III Total Score at Week 12 in the CR High-dose Group

The Japanese Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) assesses the status of Parkinson's Disease (PD) participants objectively. Part III assessed motor examination on 27 items. Participants received a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 108 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 0. Mean change from Baseline was calculated as the total score at Week 12 minus the total score at Baseline. The analyses for the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was performed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at a planned visit. The imputation was conducted using the data within only the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase; therefore, the value observed in the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was not used to impute a missing data in the Long-term Phase. (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group-4.8

Number of Participants Remaining in the Study

(NCT01929317)
Timeframe: From the start of the study medication (Week 0) until Week 52

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group25
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group14

Number of Participants With an Improvement (Responder) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Global Improvement Scale at Week 12

The CGI global improvement scale allows the investigator to rate the participant's total improvement since the beginning of treatment (Baseline). Scores on the scale range from 1 to 7 (1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=no change, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse, and 7=very much worse). Participants with a CGI global improvement score of <=2 (representing much improved or very much improved) were considered to be moderate improvement (responder). The analyses performed using the OC data. In the OC data, no imputation was carried for any missing data. (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group19
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group6

"Change From Baseline in Actual Hours of Awake Time Spent On at the Indicated Visits Only in Participants Who Received L-dopa Adjunct in Long Term Phase"

"On state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Participants were asked to record the duration of their off periods and asleep in diary cards every day. Change from Baseline in awake time spent On(actual hours) is calculated as awake time spent On (hours) at the week 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52 value minus awake time spent On (hours) at Baseline. Baseline is defined as the value at Week 13. If the value evaluated at week 13 was missing then first observed value post week 13 was used as a Baseline. The analyses for Long term phase was performed using the OC data. The OC (observed Case) dataset was defined as the dataset consisting of observed data without any missing data imputation." (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52

,
Interventionhours (Mean)
Week 17, n=36, 15Week 21, n=34, 14Week 25, n=34, 15Week 37, n=29, 15Week 49, n=26, 12Week 52, n=23, 12
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group: Long Term Phase0.560.43-0.040.26-0.190.36
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group: Long Term Phase0.570.730.230.37-0.56-0.56

"Change From Baseline in Actual Hours of Awake Time Spent On at the Indicated Visits Only in Participants Who Received L-dopa Adjunct"

"On state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Participants were asked to record the duration of their off periods and asleep in diary cards every day. Change from Baseline in awake time spent On(actual hours) is calculated as awake time spent On (hours) at the indicated visit minus awake time spent On (hours) at Baseline. Baseline is defined as the value at Week 0. The analyses for Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was performed using the LOCF data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at a planned visit." (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12

,
Interventionhours (Mean)
Week 2, n=53, 17Week 4, n=53, 18Week 6, n=53, 18Week 8, n=53, 18Week 12, n=53, 18
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group-0.39-0.12-0.01-0.110.07
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group-0.46-0.60-0.61-0.96-0.79

"Change From Baseline in Actual Hours of Awake Time Spent On Without Troublesome Dyskinesias at the Indicated Visits Only in Participants Who Received L-dopa Adjunct in Long Term Phase"

"On state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Participants were asked to record the duration of their on periods and asleep in diary cards every day. Change from Baseline in awake time spent On without troublesome dyskinesias (actual hours) is calculated as [awake time spent On minus awake time spent On with troublesome dyskinesias] (hours) at visit minus [awake time spent On minus awake time spent On with troublesome dyskinesias] (hours) at Baseline. Baseline is defined as the value at Week 13. If the value evaluated at week 13 was missing then first observed value post week 13 was used as a Baseline. The analyses for Long term phase was performed using the OC data. In the OC data, no imputation was carried for any missing data" (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52

,
Interventionhours (Mean)
Week 17, n=36, 15Week 21, n=34, 14Week 25, n=34, 15Week 37, n=29, 15Week 49, n=26, 12Week 52, n=23, 12
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group: Long Term Phase0.240.21-0.15-0.09-0.500.08
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group: Long Term Phase0.601.230.251.020.04-0.21

"Change From Baseline in Actual Hours of Awake Time Spent OnWithout Troublesome Dyskinesias at the Indicated Visits Only in Participants Who Received L-dopa Adjunct"

"On state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Participants were asked to record the duration of their off periods and asleep in diary cards every day. Change from Baseline in awake time spent On without troublesome dyskinesias (actual hours) is calculated as [awake time spent On minus awake time spent On with troublesome dyskinesias] (hours) at visit minus [awake time spent On minus awake time spent On with troublesome dyskinesias] (hours) at Baseline. Baseline is defined as the value at Week 0. The analyses for Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was performed using the LOCF data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at a planned visit." (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12

,
Interventionhours (Mean)
Week 2, n=53, 17Week 4, n=53, 18Week 6, n=53, 18Week 8, n=53, 18Week 12, n=53, 18
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group-0.40-0.14-0.06-0.050.11
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group-0.59-0.71-0.63-1.01-0.74

"Change From Baseline in Percentage of Awake Time Spent On at the Indicated Visits Only in Participants Who Received L-dopa Adjunct in Long Term Phase"

"On state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Participants were asked to record the duration of their on periods and asleep in diary cards every day. Percentage of awake time spent on is defined as sum of two days on time (hours) divided by sum of two days awake time (hours) and multiplified by 100. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value (percentage of awake time spent on) from week 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52 value (percentage of awake time spent on). Baseline is defined as the value at Week 13. If the value evaluated at week 13 was missing the first observed value post week 13 was used as a Baseline.The analyses for Long term phase was performed using the OC data. In the OC data, no imputation was carried for any missing data." (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52

,
Interventionpercentage of awake time spent on (Mean)
Week 17, n=36, 15Week 21, n=34, 14Week 25, n=34, 15Week 37, n=29, 15Week 49, n=26, 12Week 52, n=23, 12
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group: Long Term Phase2.811.20-1.020.13-0.231.80
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group: Long Term Phase3.824.623.423.27-2.68-1.14

"Change From Baseline in Percentage of Awake Time Spent On Without Troublesome Dyskinesias at the Indicated Visits Only in Participants Who Received L-dopa Adjunct in Long Term Phase"

"On state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Par. were asked to record the duration of their on periods and asleep in diary cards every day. Percentage of awake time spent On without troublesome dyskinesias is defined as sum of two days on time without troublesome dyskinesias [On time minus On time with troublesome dyskinesias] (hours) divided by sum of two days awake time (hours) and multiplified by 100. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value (percentage of awake time spent On without troublesome dyskinesias) from week 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52 value (percentage of awake time spent On without troublesome dyskinesias). Baseline is defined as the value at Week 13. If the value evaluated at week 13 was missing the first observed value post week 13 was used as a Baseline.The analyses for Long term phase was performed using the OC data. In the OC data, no imputation was carried for any missing data." (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52

,
Interventionpercentage of awake time spent on (Mean)
Week 17, n=36, 15Week 21, n=34, 14Week 25, n=34, 15Week 37, n=29, 15Week 49, n=26, 12Week 52, n=23, 12
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group: Long Term Phase0.70-0.16-1.70-1.71-2.00-0.05
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group: Long Term Phase4.047.313.106.930.450.53

"Change From Baseline in the Actual Hours of Awake Time Spent Off at the Indicated Visits Only in Participants Who Received L-dopa Adjunct in Long Term Phase"

"Off state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. Participants were asked to record the duration of their off periods and asleep in diary cards every day. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value (actual hours of awake time spent off) from the week 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52 value (proportion of awake time spent off). Baseline is defined as the value at Week 13. If the value evaluated at week 13 was missing then first observed value post week 13 was used as a Baseline.The analyses for long term phase was performed using the OC data. In the OC data, no imputation was carried for any missing data" (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52

,
Interventionhours (Mean)
Week 17, n=26, 13Week 21, n=24, 12Week 25, n=24, 13Week 37, n=20, 13Week 49, n=18, 11Week 52, n=15, 11
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group: Long Term Phase-0.63-0.400.040.01-0.24-0.62
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group: Long Term Phase-0.50-0.65-0.52-0.460.910.45

"Change From Baseline in the Actual Hours of Awake Time Spent Off at the Indicated Visits Only in Participants Who Received L-dopa Adjunct"

"Off state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. Participants were asked to record the duration of their off periods and asleep in diary cards every day. Change from Baseline in awake time spent Off(actual hours) is calculated as awake time spent Off (hours) at the indicated visit minus awake time spent Off (hours) at Baseline. Baseline is defined as the value at Week 0. The analyses for Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was performed using the LOCF data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at a planned visit." (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12

,
Interventionhours (Mean)
Week 2Week 4Week 6Week 8Week 12
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group0.140.090.01-0.08-0.27
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group0.440.040.370.770.81

"Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Awake Time Spent Off at the Indicated Visits Only in Participants Who Received L-dopa Adjunct in Long Term Phase"

"Off state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. Participants were asked to record the duration of their off periods and asleep in diary cards every day. Percentage of awake time spent off is defined as sum of two days off time (hours) divided by sum of two days awake time (hours) and multiplied by 100. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value (percentage of awake time spent off) from week 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52 value (percentage of awake time spent off). Baseline is defined as the value at Week 13, If the value evaluated at week 13 was missing then first observed value post week 13 was used as a Baseline. The analyses for Long term phase was performed using the OC data. In the OC data, no imputation was carried for any missing data." (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52

,
Interventionpercentage of awake time spent off (Mean)
Week 17, n=26, 13Week 21, n=24, 12Week 25, n=24, 13Week 37, n=20, 13Week 49, n=18, 11Week 52, n=15, 11
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group: Long Term Phase-4.16-2.590.49-0.99-1.33-3.62
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group: Long Term Phase-4.41-5.39-3.95-4.562.931.24

"Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Awake Time Spent Off at the Indicated Visits Only in Participants Who Received L-dopa Adjunct"

"Off state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. Participants were asked to record the duration of their off periods and asleep in diary cards every day. Percentage of awake time spent off is defined as sum of two days off time (hours) divided by sum of two days awake time (hours) and multiplied by 100. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value (percentage of awake time spent off) from the post Baseline value (percentage of awake time spent off). Baseline is defined as the value at Week 0. The analyses for Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was performed using the LOCF data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at a planned visit." (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12

,
Interventionpercentage of awake time spent off (Mean)
Week 2Week 4Week 6Week 8Week 12
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group1.360.62-0.090.19-1.24
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group2.390.482.704.654.74

Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part 1 Total Score at the Indicated Visits in the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase

The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD participants objectively. Part I evaluated mentation, behavior, and mood on 4 items, response for each item were scored numerically from 0-4. The total score for the 4 items ranged from 0 to 16. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post Baseline value. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 0. The analyses for the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was performed using the LOCF data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at the planned visit. (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Week 2Week 4Week 6Week 8Week 12
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group-0.0-0.1-0.1-0.10.1
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group-0.1-0.2-0.1-0.1-0.1

Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part 1 Total Score at the Indicated Visits in the Long-term Phase

The Japanese UPDRS assessed the status of PD participants objectively. Part I evaluated mentation, behavior, and mood on 4 items, response for each item were scored numerically from 0-4. The total score for the 4 items ranged from 0 to 16. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms.Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post Baseline value. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 13. If the value evaluated at Week 13 was missing, then first observed value post Week 13 was used as Baseline. The analyses performed using the OC data. In the OC data, no imputation was carried for any missing data. Full Analysis Set 2 (FAS2) Population comprised of all participants in the FAS1 and shifted to Long-term Phase, excluding those participants who received no dose of study medication and participants without UPDRS part III total score data after supply of the investigational product. (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Week 17; n=42,17Week 21; n=40, 16Week 25; n=40, 17Week 37; n=33, 17Week 49; n=26, 14Week 52; n=25, 14
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group: Long Term Phase0.10.20.20.20.20.2
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Group: Long Term Phase0.1-0.2-0.10.10.10.2

Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part 2 Total Score at the Indicated Visits by the on/Off Status in the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase

"The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD participants objectively. Part 2 evaluated activities of daily living on 13 items, response for each item were scored numerically from 0-4. The total score for the 4 items ranged from 0 to 52. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post Baseline value. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 0. The analyses for the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was performed using the LOCF data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at a planned visit. Off state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. On state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. The score of UPDRS part 2 in off status is rated as '0' (Normal/None), if L-dopa adjunct participants do not have diurnal fluctuations." (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Week 2, On status, n=61, 20Week 4, On status, n=61, 20Week 6, On status, n=61, 20Week 8, On status, n=61, 20Week 12, On status, n=61, 20Week 2, Off status, n=53, 18Week 4, Off status, n=53, 18Week 6, Off status, n=53, 18Week 8, Off status, n=53, 18Week 12, Off status, n=53, 18
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group-1.0-1.4-1.6-1.4-1.1-1.0-1.3-1.7-1.4-1.4
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group-0.2-0.3-0.5-0.2-0.2-0.3-0.4-0.8-1.3-1.3

Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part 2 Total Score at the Indicated Visits by the on/Off Status in the Long Term Phase

"The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD participants objectively. Part 2 evaluates activities of daily living on 13 items, response for each item were scored numerically from 0-4. The total score for the 4 items ranged from 0 to 52. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms.Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post Baseline value. Baseline is defined as the value at Week 13. If the value at Week 13 was missing, then first observed value post Week 13 was used as Baseline. The analyses performed using the OC data. In the OC data, no imputation was carried for any missing data.Off state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. On state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. The score of UPDRS part 2 in off status is rated as '0' (Normal/None), if L-dopa adjunct participants do not have diurnal fluctuations." (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Week 17, On status, n=42, 17Week 21, On status, n=40, 16Week 25, On status, n=40, 17Week 37, On status, n=33, 17Week 49, On status, n=26, 14Week 52, On status, n=25, 14Week 17, Off status, n=36, 15Week 21, Off status, n=34, 14Week 25, Off status, n=34, 15Week 37, Off status, n=29, 15Week 49, Off status, n=24, 12Week 52, Off status, n=23, 12
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group: Long Term Phase-0.1-0.4-0.20.00.0-0.2-0.4-0.4-0.20.90.40.4
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Group: Long Term Phase0.10.0-0.10.20.60.1-0.5-0.7-1.50.00.80.8

Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part 4 Total Score at the Indicated Visits in the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase

"The Japanese UPDRS assessed the status of PD participants objectively. Part 4 evaluated complications on 11 items, response for 4 items were scored numerically from 0-4 and response for other 7 items were Yes/No questions and responses are numerically scored as 0 for No and 1 for Yes. The total score for the 11 items ranged from 0 to 23. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post Baseline value. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 0. The analyses for the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was performed using the LOCF data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at a planned visit." (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Week 2Week 4Week 6Week 8Week 12
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group-0.3-0.2-0.20.0-0.1
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group-0.2-0.2-0.30.10.1

Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part 4 Total Score at the Indicated Visits in the Long Term Phase

"The Japanese UPDRS assessed the status of PD participants objectively. Part 4 evaluated complications on 11 items, response for 4 items were scored numerically from 0-4 and response for other 7 items were Yes/No questions and responses are numerically scored as 0 for No and 1 for Yes. The total score for the 11 items ranged from 0 to 23. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms.Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post Baseline value. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 13. If the value evaluated at Week 13 was missing, then first observed value post Week 13 was used as Baseline. The analyses performed using the OC data. In the OC data, no imputation was carried for any missing data." (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Week 17, n=42, 17Week 21, n=40, 16Week 25, n=40, 17Week 37; n=33;17Week 49; n=26,14Week 52; n=25, 14
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group: Long Term Phase0.10.30.40.50.90.6
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Group: Long Term Phase-0.1-0.10.21.11.20.8

Mean Change From Baseline (Week 0) in UPDRS Part III Total Score at the Indicated Visits

The Japanese Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) assesses the status of Parkinson's Disease (PD) participants objectively. Part III assessed motor examination on 27 items. Participants received a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 108 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 0. Mean change from Baseline was calculated as the total score at Week 12 minus the total score at Baseline. The analyses for the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was performed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at a planned visit. The imputation was conducted using the data within only the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase; therefore, the value observed in the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was not used to impute a missing data in the Long-term Phase. (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Week 2Week 4Week 6Week 8Week 12
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group-2.9-3.8-4.6-5.2-4.8
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group-2.7-4.4-5.0-4.5-5.7

Mean Change From Baseline in UPDRS Part 3 Total Score at the Indicated Visits for Long Term Phase

The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD participants objectively. Part 3 evaluates motor examination on 27 items, response for each items were scored numerically from 0-4. The total score for the 27 items ranged from 0 to 108. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post Baseline value. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 13. If the value evaluated at Week 13 was missing, then first observed value post Week 13 was used as Baseline. The analyses performed using the OC data. In the OC data, no imputation was carried for any missing data. (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49, 52

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Week 17; n=41, 16Week 21, n=39, 16Week 25, n=40, 17Week 37; n=33, 17Week 49; n=26, 14Week 52; n=25, 14
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group: Long Term Phase-1.2-2.5-2.1-1.9-2.2-1.9
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Group: Long Term Phase-0.7-1.9-0.61.40.6-0.6

Number of Participants Achieving a 30% and 20% Reduction From Baseline in the UPDRS Total Part 3 Score at the Indicated Visits in Long Term Phase.

The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of Parkinson's Disease (PD) participants objectively. Part III assessed motor examination on 27 items. Participants received a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 108 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Number of participants achieving a 30% or greater and 20% or greater reduction from Baseline in UPDRS total part III score at Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52,are presented using OC data. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post Baseline value. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 13. If the value evaluated at Week 13 was missing, then first observed value post Week 13 was used as Baseline. The OC (observed Case) dataset was defined as the dataset consisting of observed data without any missing data imputation. (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49, 52

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Week 17, >=30% reduction from Baseline; n=41,16Week 21, >=30% reduction from Baseline; n=39,16Week 25, >=30% reduction from Baseline; n=40, 17Week 37, >=30% reduction from Baseline; n=33,17Week 49, >=30% reduction from Baseline; n=26, 14Week 52, >=30% reduction from Baseline; n=25, 14Week 17, >=20% reduction from Baseline; n=41,16Week 21, >=20% reduction from Baseline; n=39,16Week 25, >=20% reduction from Baseline; n=40, 17Week 37, >=20% reduction from Baseline; n=33,17Week 49, >=20% reduction from Baseline; n=26, 14Week 52, >=20% reduction from Baseline; n=25, 14
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group: Long Term Phase58989681516141312
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Group: Long Term Phase233312233334

Number of Participants Achieving a 30% and 20% Reduction From Baseline in the UPDRS Total Part 3 Score at the Indicated Visits in the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase

The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of Parkinson's Disease (PD) participants objectively. Part III assessed motor examination on 27 items. Participants received a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 108 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Number of participants achieving a 30% or greater and 20% or greater reduction from Baseline in UPDRS total part III score at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 are presented using LOCF data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at a planned visit. The imputation was conducted using the data within only the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase; therefore, the value observed in the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was not used to impute a missing data in the Long-term Phase. (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Week 2, 30% or greater reduction from BaselineWeek 4, 30% or greater reduction from BaselineWeek 6, 30% or greater reduction from BaselineWeek 8, 30% or greater reduction from BaselineWeek 12, 30% or greater reduction from BaselineWeek 2, 20% or greater reduction from BaselineWeek 4, 20% or greater reduction from BaselineWeek 6, 20% or greater reduction from BaselineWeek 8, 20% or greater reduction from BaselineWeek 12, 20% or greater reduction from Baseline
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group10172130271626303531
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group45677511101113

Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part 1 Total Score at the Indicated Visits in the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase

The Japanese UPDRS assessed the status of PD participants objectively. Part I evaluated mentation, behavior, and mood on 4 items, response for each item were scored numerically from 0-4. The total score for the 4 items ranged from 0 to 16. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as Post baseline value minus Baseline value, divided by Baseline value and multiplied by 100. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 0. The analyses for Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was performed using the LOCF data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at a planned visit. (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12

,
InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Week 2Week 4Week 6Week 8Week 12
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group-6.2-14.5-15.2-16.4-7.4
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group-16.7-41.7-29.2-29.2-29.2

Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part 1 Total Score at the Indicated Visits in the Long Term Phase

The Japanese UPDRS assessed the status of PD participants objectively. Part I evaluated mentation, behavior, and mood on 4 items, response for each item were scored numerically from 0-4. The total score for the 4 items ranged from 0 to 16. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as Post baseline value minus Baseline value, divided by Baseline value and multiplied by 100. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 13. If the value evaluated at Week 13 was missing, then first observed value post Week 13 was used as Baseline. The analyses performed using the OC data. In the OC data, no imputation was carried for any missing data. (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52

,
InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Week 17, n=15, 7Week 21, n=14, 7Week 25, n=14, 7Week 37; n=9, 7Week 49; n=6, 5Week 52; n=6, 5
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group: Long Term Phase13.3-7.13.60.020.812.5
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Group: Long Term Phase-9.5-31.0-26.2-11.915.05.0

Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part 2 Total Score at the Indicated Visits by the on/Off Status in the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase

"The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD participants objectively. Part 2 evaluates activities of daily living on 13 items, response for each item were scored numerically from 0-4. The total score for the 4 items ranged from 0 to 52. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as Post baseline value minus Baseline value, divided by Baseline value and multiplied by 100. Baseline is defined as the value at Week 0. The analyses for Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was performed using the LOCF data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at a planned visit. Off state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. On state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. The score of UPDRS part 2 in off status is rated as '0' (Normal/None), if L-dopa adjunct participants do not have diurnal fluctuations." (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12

,
InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Week 2, On status, n=55, 16Week 4, On status, n=55, 16Week 6, On status, n=55, 16Week 8, On status, n=55, 16Week 12, On status, n=55, 16Week 2, Off status, n=48, 15Week 4, Off status, n=48, 15Week 6, Off status, n=48, 15Week 8, Off status, n=48, 15Week 12, Off status, n=48, 15
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group-22.3-21.9-21.4-14.3-4.7-11.7-15.0-17.0-14.7-15.2
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group-4.6-13.0-12.9-9.0-9.3-4.2-4.4-9.7-10.9-10.1

Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part 2 Total Score at the Indicated Visits by the on/Off Status in the Long-term Phase

"The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD participants objectively. Part 2 evaluates activities of daily living on 13 items, response for each item were scored numerically from 0-4. The total score for the 4 items ranged from 0 to 52. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as Post baseline value minus Baseline value, divided by Baseline value and multiplied by 100. Baseline is defined as the value at Week 13. If the value at Week 13 was missing, then first observed value post Week 13 was used as Baseline. The analyses performed using the OC data. In the OC data, no imputation was carried for any missing data.Off state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. On state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. The score of UPDRS part 2 in off status is rated as '0' (Normal/None), if L-dopa adjunct participants do not have diurnal fluctuations." (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52

,
InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Week 17, On status, n=35, 12Week 21, On status, n=33, 11Week 25, On status, n=33, 12Week 37, On status, n=26, 12Week 49, On status, n=20, 9Week 52, On status, n=19, 9Week 17, Off status, n=26, 13Week 21, Off status, n=24, 12Week 25, Off status, n=24, 13Week 37, Off status, n=20, 13Week 49, Off status, n=16, 11Week 52, Off status, n=15, 11
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group: Long Term Phase2.3-0.1-1.78.027.87.5-1.4-4.41.46.11.97.1
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Group: Long Term Phase-5.8-7.1-0.7-8.61.80.7-3.6-6.0-5.26.344.526.2

Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part 3 Total Score at the Indicated Visits in the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase

The Japanese UPDRS assessed the status of PD participants objectively. Part 3 evaluated motor examination on 27 items, response for each items were scored numerically from 0-4. The total score for the 27 items ranged from 0 to 108. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as Post baseline value minus Baseline value, divided by Baseline value and multiplied by 100. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 0. The analyses for Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was performed using the LOCF data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at a planned visit. (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12

,
InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Week 2Week 4Week 6Week 8Week 12
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group-12.0-17.4-21.6-25.5-23.1
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group-11.8-21.9-22.9-22.9-27.6

Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part 3 Total Score at the Indicated Visits in the Long Term Phase

The Japanese UPDRS assessed the status of PD participants objectively. Part 3 evaluated motor examination on 27 items, response for each items were scored numerically from 0-4. The total score for the 27 items ranged from 0 to 108. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as Post baseline value minus Baseline value, divided by Baseline value and multiplied by 100. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 13. If the value evaluated at Week 13 was missing, then first observed value post Week 13 was used as Baseline. The analyses performed using the OC data. In the OC data, no imputation was carried for any missing data. (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52

,
InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Week 17, n=41, 16Week 21, n=39, 16Week 25, n=40, 17Week 37; n=33, 17Week 49; n=26, 14Week 52; n=25, 14
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group: Long Term Phase-5.4-10.5-10.3-6.4-3.4-4.1
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Group: Long Term Phase6.2-6.02.650.243.216.2

Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part 4 Total Score at the Indicated Visits in the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase

"The Japanese UPDRS assessed the status of PD participants objectively. Part 4 evaluated complications on 11 items, response for 4 items were scored numerically from 0-4 and response for other 7 items were Yes/No questions and responses are numerically scored as 0 for No and 1 for Yes. The total score for the 11 items ranged from 0 to 23. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as Post baseline value minus Baseline value, divided by Baseline value and multiplied by 100. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 0. The analyses for Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was performed using the LOCF data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at a planned visit." (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12

,
InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Week 2Week 4Week 6Week 8Week 12
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group-7.9-4.1-7.21.4-6.6
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group-1.9-6.5-4.93.59.5

Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part 4 Total Score at the Indicated Visits in the Long-term Phase

"The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD participants objectively. Part 4 evaluates complications on 11 items, response for 4 items were scored numerically from 0-4 and response for other 7 items were Yes/No questions and responses are numerically scored as 0 for No and 1 for Yes. The total score for the 11 items ranged from 0 to 23. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as Post baseline value minus Baseline value, divided by Baseline value and multiplied by 100. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 13. If the value evaluated at Week 13 was missing, then first observed value post Week 13 was used as Baseline. The analyses performed using the OC data. In the OC data, no imputation was carried for any missing data." (NCT01929317)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52

,
InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Week 17, n=30, 15Week 21, n=28, 14Week 25, n=28, 15Week 37, n=23, 15Week 49, n=18, 13Week 52, n=17, 13
Ropinirole CR - High Dose Group: Long Term Phase13.111.316.411.327.523.7
Ropinirole CR - Maintenance Dose Group: Long Term Phase7.16.818.749.540.035.4

Adverse Events

Patients who have adverse events (NCT00986245)
Timeframe: After 8 weeks in each arm or at last visit for early completion

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Once-daily of Ropinirole PR33
Twice-daily of Ropinirole PR28

Compliance

Compliances after 8 weeks in each arm or at last visit for early completion. Compliance was calcuated by the percentage of used medication. (NCT00986245)
Timeframe: 8 weeks for each arm or at last visit

Interventionpercentage of used medication (Mean)
Once-daily of Ropinirole PR98.4
Twice-daily of Ropinirole PR97.6

Early Morning Off Symptoms

"Sleep questionnaire 3 for early morning off symptoms Visual analogue scale: 0~10 Higher values represent worse early morning off symptoms." (NCT00986245)
Timeframe: 8 weeks for each arm or at last visit

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Once-daily of Ropinirole PR2.5
Twice-daily of Ropinirole PR2.9

Epworth Sleep Scale

"Epworth sleep scale after 8 weeks in each arm or at last visit for early completion.~Range: 0~24 Higher values represent worse daytime-sleepiness." (NCT00986245)
Timeframe: 8 weeks in each arm or at last visit for early completion

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Once-daily of Ropinirole PR6.3
Twice-daily of Ropinirole PR6.4

Hoehn and Yahr Stage

Hoehn and Yahr(HY) stage for parkinsonism after 8 weeks in each arm or at last visit for early completion Range: 0~5 Higher values represent more severe parkinsonism (NCT00986245)
Timeframe: 8 weeks for each arm or at last visit

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Once-daily of Ropinirole PR2.1
Twice-daily of Ropinirole PR2.1

Nocturnal Off-symptoms

"Sleep questionnaire 2 for Nocturnal off-symptoms Visual analogue scale: 0~10 Higher values represent worse nocturnal off-symptoms." (NCT00986245)
Timeframe: 8 weeks for each arm or at last visit

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Once-daily of Ropinirole PR2.9
Twice-daily of Ropinirole PR3.1

Overall Quality of Sleep

"Sleep questionnaire 1 for Overall quality of sleep Visual analogue scale: 0~10 Higher values represent worse overall sleep quality." (NCT00986245)
Timeframe: 8 weeks for each arm or at last visit

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Once-daily of Ropinirole PR2.9
Twice-daily of Ropinirole PR3.2

Patient Preference

Patient preference between once-daily and twice-daily regimen (NCT00986245)
Timeframe: After 16 weeks or at last visit for early completion

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Once-daily17
Twice-daily31
No Preference13

Patients Who Have Global Impression for Improvement

Patients who have global impression for improvement for each dosing. (NCT00986245)
Timeframe: After 8 weeks in each arm or at last visit for early completion

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Once-daily of Ropinirole PR32
Twice-daily of Ropinirole PR42

Patients Who Have Global Impression for Improvement to Duration of Dyskinesia

Patients who have global impression for improvement to duration of dyskinesia compared (NCT00986245)
Timeframe: After 8 weeks in each arm or at last visit for early completion

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Once-daily of Ropinirole PR13
Twice-daily of Ropinirole PR16

Patients Who Have Global Impression for Improvement to Duration of Motor Fluctuation

Patients who have global impression for improvement to duration of motor fluctuation (NCT00986245)
Timeframe: After 8 weeks in each arm or at last visit for early completion

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Once-daily of Ropinirole PR27
Twice-daily of Ropinirole PR38

Patients Who Have Global Impression for Improvement to Severity of Dyskinesia

Patients who have Global Impression for Improvement to Severity of Dyskinesia compared (NCT00986245)
Timeframe: After 8 weeks in each arm or at last visit for early completion

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Once-daily of Ropinirole PR16
Twice-daily of Ropinirole PR15

Patients Who Have Global Impression for Improvement to Severity of Motor Fluctuation

Patients who have global impression for improvement to severity of motor fluctuation compared (NCT00986245)
Timeframe: After 8 weeks in each arm or at last visit for early completion

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Once-daily of Ropinirole PR28
Twice-daily of Ropinirole PR34

Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, Part 3

"Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS) motor scale after 8 weeks in each arm or at last visit for early completion.~UPDRS part 3 is motor scale for parkinson's disease. Range: 0~108 Higher values represent more severe motor symptoms of parkinsonism." (NCT00986245)
Timeframe: 8 weeks for each arm or at last visit

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Once-daily of Ropinirole PR17.5
Twice-daily of Ropinirole PR17.1

Number of Participants With the Indicated Number of Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

AEs, defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, were collected to obtain data on the safety, tolerability, and benefit of ropinirole XL. SAEs, defined as AEs that are fatal, life threatening, disabling/incapacitating, resulting in hospitalization or prolongation of a hospital stay, a congenital abnormality/birth defect, or any important medical occurrence that the investigator regards as serious based on medical judgment, were also collected. st. med., study medication. (NCT00632736)
Timeframe: 13 February 2004 through 31 March 2010

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Participants (Par.) reporting at least one AEPar. reporting at least one SAEPar. with drug-related AEsPar. with AEs leading to withdrawal
Ropinirole XL365109213106

Number of Participants With the Indicated Response to the Patient Preference Question at Week 4 and Week 26

"The patient preference question assessed the participant's preference for either dosing regimen of study drug, once a day versus three times a day. Participants were asked to respond to the following question to assess preference: Please indicate whether you preferred taking your Parkinson's tablets 3 times a day or once a day. Wk, Week." (NCT00632736)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 26

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very much preferred three times a day, Wk 4, n=74Much preferred three times a day, Week 4, n=74Preferred three times a day, Week 4, n=74Both regimens are about the same, Week 4, n=74Preferred once a day, Week 4, n=74Much preferred once a day, Week 4, n=74Very much preferred once a day, Week 4, n=74Very much preferred three times a day, Wk 26, n=87Much preferred three times a day, Week 26, n=87Preferred three times a day, Week 26, n=87Both regimens are about the same, Week 26, n=87Preferred once a day, Week 26, n=87Much preferred once a day, Week 26, n=87Very much preferred once a day, Week 26, n=87
Ropinirole XL20451718284124142042

Mean Change From Baseline in the Gambling Symptom Assessment Scale (G-SAS) Score at Week 24

The G-SAS is a reliable and valid self-reported measure of gambling symptoms. It is comprised of twelve questions aimed at evaluating gambling symptoms; each item is scored on a 5-point scale from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (extreme symptoms). The total score ranges from 0 to 48, where 0=least severe and 48=most severe. Change from Baseline is calculated as the value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. (NCT01536574)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Ropinirole PR in Parent DB Study, Ropinirole PR in OL Study-0.1
Placebo in Parent DB Study, Ropinirole PR in OL Study-0.3

Mean Gambling Symptom Assessment Scale (G-SAS) Score at Week 24

The G-SAS is a reliable and valid self-reported measure of gambling symptoms. It is comprised of twelve questions aimed at evaluating gambling symptoms; each item is scored on a 5-point scale from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (extreme symptoms). The total score ranges from 0 to 48, where 0=least severe and 48=most severe. (NCT01536574)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Ropinirole PR in Parent DB Study, Ropinirole PR in OL Study0.9
Placebo in Parent DB Study, Ropinirole PR in OL Study1.3

Number of Participants With an Adverse Event During the Follow-up Phase

AE=any untoward medical occurrence (UMO), temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product (MP), whether or not considered related to the MP. SAE=any UMO that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization/prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomoly/birth defect. The Investigator determined if an AE/SAE was related to investigational product. Medical/scientific judgment was used to determine whether SAE reporting was appropriate in situations in which an event may not have met the SAE definition. (NCT01536574)
Timeframe: 4- to 14-day Follow-up Phase, beginning after the date of the last dose of down-titration medication (up to and during Study Weeks 26 and 27)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Any AEAE related to IPAny SAE
Placebo in Parent DB Study, Ropinirole PR in OL Study320
Ropinirole PR in Parent DB Study, Ropinirole PR in OL Study210

Number of Participants With the Indicated Adverse Events During the Follow-up Phase

An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. In addition to the data recorded at the follow-up visit, SAEs occurring up to and including 2 days after the last dose of down-titration medication are included in the Follow-up Phase. (NCT01536574)
Timeframe: 4- to 14-day Follow-up Phase, beginning after the date of the last dose of down-titration medication (up to and during Study Weeks 26 and 27)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Facial palsyParkinsonian rest tremorLymphopeniaHallucinationChoking sensation
Placebo in Parent DB Study, Ropinirole PR in OL Study11010
Ropinirole PR in Parent DB Study, Ropinirole PR in OL Study00101

Number of Participants With the Indicated Adverse Events Related to Investigational Product During the Follow-up Phase

An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. The Investigator determined if an AE/SAE was related to investigational product. In addition to the data recorded at the follow-up visit, SAEs occurring up to and including 2 days after the last dose of down-titration medication are included in the Follow-up Phase. (NCT01536574)
Timeframe: 4- to 14-day Follow-up Phase, beginning after the date of the last dose of down-titration medication (up to and during Study Weeks 26 and 27)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
LymphopeniaParkinsonian rest tremorHallucination
Placebo in Parent DB Study, Ropinirole PR in OL Study011
Ropinirole PR in Parent DB Study, Ropinirole PR in OL Study100

Number of Participants With the Indicated Adverse Events Related to Investigational Product During the On-treatment Phase

An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. The Investigator determined if an AE/SAE was related to investigational product. The On-Treatment Phase is comprised of the Open-label Treatment Phase and the Down-titration Phase. (NCT01536574)
Timeframe: From the start of treatment (Baseline) up to Week 25

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
DyskinesiaDizzinessSomnolenceAkathisiaAkinesiaCerebral infarctionHeadacheLethargySyncopeNauseaConstipationAbdominal distensionAbdominal pain upperEpigastric discomfortFlatulenceVomitingHallucinationInsomniaHallucination, auditoryImpulse-control disorderOedema peripheralGait disturbanceMedication residueOrthostatic hypotensionHypotensionLymphopeniaArrhythmiaBlood uric acid increasedWeight decreasedMuscle spasmsMusculoskeletal stiffnessVertigoDecreased appetiteAsphyxiaPruritus
Placebo in Parent DB Study, Ropinirole PR in OL Study103610011161110115100100102100000101
Ropinirole PR in Parent DB Study, Ropinirole PR in OL Study65001100041001005111111210111111010

Number of Participants With the Indicated Types of Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-Treatment Phase (Comprised of the Open-label Treatment Phase and the Down-titration Phase)

AE=any untoward medical occurrence (UMO), temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product (MP), whether or not considered related to the MP. SAE=any UMO that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization/prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomoly/birth defect. The Investigator determined if an AE/SAE was related to investigational product. Medical/scientific judgment was used to determine whether SAE reporting was appropriate in situations in which an event may not have met the SAE definition. (NCT01536574)
Timeframe: From the start of treatment (Baseline) up to Week 25

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Any AEAE Related to Investigational Product (IP)Any SAESAE Related to Investigational Product (IP)AE Leading to DeathAE Leading to Withdrawal
Placebo in Parent DB Study, Ropinirole PR in OL Study56354104
Ropinirole PR in Parent DB Study, Ropinirole PR in OL Study58332004

Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Item 4 (Side Effects) at the End of the Treatment Period or Early Withdrawal Visit

"The CGI Item 4 was used to assess side effects. It ranges from 0 to 4 as follows:~0 = Side effects not assessable~1 = No side effects~2 = Side effects do not significantly interfere with subject's functioning~3 = Side effects significantly interfere with the subject's functioning~4 = Side effects outweigh therapeutic efficacy." (NCT01711866)
Timeframe: Day 28 (Visit 5) of the 28 days Treatment Period or Early Withdrawal Visit

Interventionparticipants (Number)
CGI Item 4 score of 1CGI Item 4 score of 2CGI Item 4 score of 3CGI Item 4 score of 4CGI Item 4 score of 3 or 4
Rotigotine5826303

Patients Global Impressions of Change (PGIC) at the End of the Treatment Period or Early Withdrawal Visit

"The PGIC is a 7-point categorical rating scale in which the subject rates the changes in functioning over time as follows:~1 = Very much improved~2 = Much improved~3 = Minimally improved~4 = No change~5 = Minimally worse~6 = Much worse~7 = Very much worse." (NCT01711866)
Timeframe: Day 28 (Visit 5) of the 28 days Treatment Period or Early Withdrawal Visit

Interventionparticipants (Number)
PGIC category 1PGIC category 2PGIC category 3PGIC category 4PGIC category 5PGIC category 6PGIC category 7PGIC category ≥ 5PGIC category ≥ 6
Rotigotine51730181031144

"Change From Baseline to the End of the Treatment Period in Absolute Time Spent Off"

"Absolute time spent off is measured in hours per day. A negative value in Change from Baseline to Week 8 indicates that the time spent off decreased from Baseline and therefore indicates an improvement from Baseline.~Only subjects with time spent off at Baseline (subset of the Full Analysis Set (FAS)) are included in the analysis of this outcome measure." (NCT01723904)
Timeframe: From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 8 (Visit 8) of the 8 weeks Treatment Period (Titration and Maintenance Period)

Interventionhours/day (Mean)
Rotigotine-2.1

"Change From Baseline to the End of the Treatment Period in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part II (Average of on and Off State) Total Score"

"UPDRS Part II measures 'Activities in Daily Living'. The total score ranges from 0 (Best score possible) to 52 (Worst score possible).~UPDRS Part II total score (average of on and off state) is the average of UPDRS Part II total score (on state) and Part II total score (off state).~A negative value in Change from Baseline to Week 8 indicates an improvement in activities in daily living from Baseline." (NCT01723904)
Timeframe: From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 8 (Visit 8) of the 8 weeks Treatment Period (Titration and Maintenance Period)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Rotigotine-1.5

"Change From Baseline to the End of the Treatment Period in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III (on State) Total Score"

"The Unified Parkinson´s Disease Rating Scale Part III is an accepted and validated scale for the assessment of motor function in Parkinson´s disease. Each of the 27 sub-items in the UPDRS III is measured on a scale of 0 to 4, where 0 is normal and 4 represents severe abnormalities. The total scores therefore ranges from 0 to 108.~A negative value in Change from Baseline to Week 8 indicates an improvement in motor functions from Baseline." (NCT01723904)
Timeframe: From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 8 (Visit 8) of the 8 weeks Treatment Period (Titration and Maintenance Period)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Rotigotine-5.3

"Change From Baseline to the End of the Treatment Period in Time Spent on Without Troublesome Dyskinesia"

"Absolute time spent on without troublesome dyskinesia is measured in hours per day. A positive value in Change from Baseline to Week 8 indicates that the time spent on without troublesome dyskinesia increased from Baseline and therefore indicates an improvement from Baseline." (NCT01723904)
Timeframe: From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 8 (Visit 8) of the 8 weeks Treatment Period (Titration and Maintenance Period)

Interventionhours/day (Mean)
Rotigotine1.9

Change From Baseline to the End of Treatment Period in Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale 2 (PDSS-2) Total Score

"The Parkinson´s Disease Sleep Scale (PDSS) is a questionnaire with 15 questions to assess sleep disturbance and nocturnal disability in Parkinson´s disease. The item- scores can range between 0= never and 4= very often. The PDSS score is a sum score of all 15 questions.~A negative value in Change from Baseline to Week 8 indicates an improvement from Baseline." (NCT01723904)
Timeframe: From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 8 (Visit 8) of the 8 weeks Treatment Period (Titration and Maintenance Period)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Rotigotine-3.2

Change From Baseline to the End of Treatment Period in the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Global Score

"The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a questionnaire with 18 questions to assess sleep quality. The 18 questions are distributed to 7 elements with each element ranging from 0-3. The global score is the sum score of all 7 elements and ranges from 0-21 with higher values indicating worse sleep quality.~A negative value in Change from Baseline to Week 8 indicates an improvement in sleep quality from Baseline." (NCT01723904)
Timeframe: From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 8 (Visit 8) of the 8 weeks Treatment Period (Titration and Maintenance Period)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Rotigotine-0.7

Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Item 4 (Side Effects) at the End of the Treatment Period

"The CGI Item 4 was used to assess side effects. It ranges from 0 to 4 as follows: 0 = Side effects not assessable~= No side effects~= Side effects do not significantly interfere with subject's functioning~= Side effects significantly interfere with the subject's functioning~= Side effects outweigh therapeutic efficacy." (NCT01723904)
Timeframe: Week 8 (Visit 8) of the 8 weeks Treatment Period (Titration and Maintenance Period)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
CGI Item 4 score of 1CGI Item 4 score of 2CGI Item 4 score of 3CGI Item 4 score of 4CGI Item 4 score of 3 or 4
Rotigotine6122336

Number of Participants With the Indicated Number of Adverse Events (AEs)

AEs, defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, were collected to obtain data on the safety, tolerability, and benefit of ropinirole XL. Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), defined as AEs that are either fatal, life threatening, disabling/incapacitating, resulting in hospitalization or prolongation of a hospital stay, a congenital abnormality/birth defect, or any important medical occurrence that the investigator regards as serious based on medical judgment, were also collected. st. med., study medication. (NCT00650104)
Timeframe: Every study visit from baseline to market availability (Month 78)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Participants (Par.) with at least one eventPar. with 0 eventsPar. with 1 eventPar. with 2 eventsPar. with ≥3 eventsPar. with mild AEs (by maximum intensity)Par. with moderate AEs (by maximum intensity)Par. with severe AEs (by maximum intensity)Par. with AEs not related to st. med.Par. with AEs not likely related to st. med.Par. with AEs suspected to be related to st. med.Par. with AEs probably related to st. med.Par. who withdrew study due to AEsPar. reporting SAEs
Ropinirole XL8121080338406636332035

Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses for CGI Global Impression (CGI-I) (ITT Population)

The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale comprises the following three components (CGI-Severity, CGI-Improvement, Index); where only the CGI-S and CGI-I were assessed in this study. CGI-I is a global improvement scale that scores the clinician's view of the participant's global functioning prior to and after initiating a study medication from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse. (NCT00650104)
Timeframe: Week 2, Month 12, Month 78

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Week 2 - Very Much Improved, n=70Week 2 - Much Improved, n=70Week 2 - Minimally Improved, n=70Week 2 - No Change, n=70Week 2 - Minimally Worse, n=70Week 2 - Much Worse, n=70Week 2 - Very Much Worse, n=70Month 12 - Very Much Improved, n=69Month 12 - Much Improved, n=69Month 12 - Minimally Improved, n=69Month 12 - No Change, n=69Month 12 - Minimally Worse, n=69Month 12 - Much Worse, n=69Month 12 - Very Much Worse, n=69Month 78 -Very Much Improved, n=13Month 78 - Much Improved, n=13Month 78 - Minimally Improved, n=13Month 78 - No Change, n=13Month 78 - Minimally Worse, n=13Month 78 - Much Worse, n=13Month 78 - Very Much Worse, n=13
Ropinirole XL0220434107252078101811100

Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses for CGI Global Impression (CGI-I) (Maintained Responder Population)

The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale comprises the following three components (CGI-Severity, CGI-Improvement, Index); where only the CGI-S and CGI-I were assessed in this study. CGI-I is a global improvement scale that scores the clinician's view of the participant's global functioning prior to and after initiating a study medication from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse. (NCT00650104)
Timeframe: Week 2, Month 12, Month 78

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Week 2 - Very Much Improved, n=37Week 2 - Much Improved, n=37Week 2 - Minimally Improved, n=37Week 2 - No Change, n=37Week 2 - Minimally Worse, n=37Week 2 - Much Worse, n=37Week 2 - Very Much Worse, n=37Month 12 - Very Much Improved, n=46Month 12 - Much Improved, n=46Month 12 - Minimally Improved, n=46Month 12 - No Change, n=46Month 12 - Minimally Worse, n=46Month 12 - Much Worse, n=46Month 12 - Very Much Worse, n=46Month 78 - Very Much Improved, n=13Month 78 - Much Improved, n=13Month 78 - Minimally Improved, n=13Month 78 - No Change, n=13Month 78 - Minimally Worse, n=13Month 78 - Much Worse, n=13Month 78 - Very Much Worse, n=13
Ropinirole XL021220210623744101811100

Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses for CGI Global Impression (CGI-I) (Responder Population)

The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale comprises the following three components (CGI-Severity, CGI-Improvement, Index); where only the CGI-S and CGI-I were assessed in this study. CGI-I is a global improvement scale that scores the clinician's view of the participant's global functioning prior to and after initiating a study medication from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse. (NCT00650104)
Timeframe: Week 2, Month 12, Month 78

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Week 2 - Very Much Improved, n=49Week 2 - Much Improved, n=49Week 2 - Minimally Improved, n=49Week 2 - No Change, n=49Week 2 - Minimally Worse, n=49Week 2 - Much Worse, n=49Week 2 - Very Much Worse, n=49Month 12 - Very Much Improved, n=56Month 12 - Much Improved, n=56Month 12 - Minimally Improved, n=56Month 12 - No Change, n=56Month 12 - Minimally Worse, n=56Month 12 - Much Worse, n=56Month 12 - Very Much Worse, n=56Month 78 - Very Much Improved, n=13Month 78 - Much Improved, n=13Month 78 - Minimally Improved, n=13Month 78 - No Change, n=13Month 78 - Minimally Worse, n=13Month 78 - Much Worse, n=13Month 78 - Very Much Worse, n=13
Ropinirole XL0217272107251255101811100

Unified Parkinson's Disease (PD) Rating Scale (UPDRS) Total Activities of Daily Living Scores (Intent-to-Treat Population)

The UPDRS is a clinician-based scale used to assess the longitudinal course of PD. Two of the six sections were assessed (Part II, Activities of Daily Living (ADL); Part III, Motor Examination). Both consist of a number of items (ADL, 13 items; Motor Exam., 17 items), and each item has a choice of 5 responses that are numerically scored 0-4, with 0 as the least severe response and 4 as the most severe response. ADL final score is a sum of the 13 items and may have a value between 0 (no impairment of overall activities) and 52 (severe impairment of overall activities). LTT, long-term treatment. (NCT00650104)
Timeframe: Screening; Week 4; Months 3, 9, 15, 21, 27, 33, 39, 45, 51, 57, 63, 69, 75, and 78

Interventionpoints on a scale (Mean)
Screening, n=83Up-titration (Week 4), n=64LTT, Month 3, n=76LTT, Month 9, n=72LTT, Month 15, n=67LTT, Month 21, n=63LTT, Month 27, n=58LTT, Month 33, n=53LTT, Month 39, n=19LTT, Month 45, n=18LTT, Month 51, n=19LTT, Month 57, n=20LTT, Month 63, n=19LTT, Month 69, n=20LTT, Month 75, n=16LTT, Month 78, n=13
Ropinirole XL9.48.98.28.19.08.69.310.310.59.310.110.411.910.812.611.5

Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Motor Examination Score (ITT Population)

Two of the six UPDRS sections (Part II, Activities of Daily Living (ADL); Part III, Motor Examination) were assessed in this study. The Motor Exam has 17 items, some of which are assessed in both the left and right extremities. Each item has a choice of 5 responses that are numerically scored 0-4 (0 as the least severe, 4 as the most severe). The final score is a sum of the 17 items, with some sections requiring multiple grades assigned to each extremity, and has a value ranging from 0 (no motor impairment) to 108 (severe motor impairment). (NCT00650104)
Timeframe: Screening and Month 78

Interventionpoints on a scale (Mean)
Screening, n=83Month 78, n=13
Ropinirole XL22.020.7

Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Motor Examination Score (Maintained Responder Population)

Two of the six UPDRS sections (Part II, Activities of Daily Living (ADL); Part III, Motor Examination) were assessed in this study. The Motor Exam has 17 items, some of which are assessed in both the left and right extremities. Each item has a choice of 5 responses that are numerically scored 0-4 (0 as the least severe, 4 as the most severe). The final score is a sum of the 17 items, with some sections requiring multiple grades assigned to each extremity, and has a value ranging from 0 (no motor impairment) to 108 (severe motor impairment). (NCT00650104)
Timeframe: Screening and Month 78

Interventionpoints on a scale (Mean)
Screening, n=47Month 78, n=13
Ropinirole XL22.220.7

Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Motor Examination Score (Reponder Population)

Two of the six UPDRS sections (Part II, Activities of Daily Living (ADL); Part III, Motor Examination) were assessed in this study. The Motor Exam has 17 items, some of which are assessed in both the left and right extremities. Each item has a choice of 5 responses that are numerically scored 0-4 (0 as the least severe, 4 as the most severe). The final score is a sum of the 17 items, with some sections requiring multiple grades assigned to each extremity, and has a value ranging from 0 (no motor impairment) to 108 (severe motor impairment). (NCT00650104)
Timeframe: Screening and Month 78

Interventionpoints on a scale (Mean)
Screening, n=60Month 78, n=13
Ropinirole XL21.720.7

Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Total Activities of Daily Living Score (Responder Population)

The UPDRS is a clinician-based scale used to assess the longitudinal course of PD. Two of the six sections were assessed (Part II, Activities of Daily Living (ADL); Part III, Motor Examination). Both consist of a number of items (ADL, 13 items; Motor Exam., 17 items), and each item has a choice of 5 responses that are numerically scored 0-4, with 0 as the least severe response and 4 as the most severe response. ADL final score is a sum of the 13 items and may have a value between 0 (no impairment of overall activities) and 52 (severe impairment of overall activities). LTT, long-term treatment. (NCT00650104)
Timeframe: Screening; Months 3, 9, 15, 27, and 78

Interventionpoints on a scale (Mean)
Screening, n=60LTT, Month 3, n=59LTT, Month 9, n=58LTT, Month 15, n=55LTT, Month 27, n=47LTT, Month 78, n=13
Ropinirole XL9.18.07.88.78.811.5

Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Total Activities of Daily Living Scores (Maintained Responder Population)

The UPDRS is a clinician-based scale used to assess the longitudinal course of PD. Two of the six sections were assessed (Part II, Activities of Daily Living (ADL); Part III, Motor Examination). Both consist of a number of items (ADL, 13 items; Motor Exam., 17 items), and each item has a choice of 5 responses that are numerically scored 0-4, with 0 as the least severe response and 4 as the most severe response. ADL final score is a sum of the 13 items and may have a value between 0 (no impairment of overall activities) and 52 (severe impairment of overall activities). LTT, long-term treatment. (NCT00650104)
Timeframe: Screening; Months 3, 9, 15, 27, and 78

Interventionpoints on a scale (Mean)
Screening, n=47LTT, Month 3, n=46LTT, Month 9, n= 46LTT, Month 15, n=44LTT, Month 27, n=37LTT, Month 78, n=13
Ropinirole XL9.07.77.78.68.411.5

Change in Albumin

Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

Interventiong/l (Mean)
Rotigotine-0.5

Change in Alkaline Phosphatase

Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

InterventionUnits/l (Mean)
Rotigotine-1.4

Change in Blood Urea Nitrogen

Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

Interventionmmol/l (Mean)
Rotigotine-0.24

Change in Calcium

Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Rotigotine-0.05

Change in Chloride

Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

Interventionmmol/l (Mean)
Rotigotine-0.4

Change in Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Item 1 Score From Baseline to End of Treatment

"The CGI is a set of ratings made by a clinician in order to assess the overall severity of an individual's symptoms as well as changes in his/her functioning over time.~Item 1 measures 'Severity of Parkinson's Disease'. Range: 1 (Normal, not ill at all) to 7 (Among the most extremely ill patients) Change = 28 day value minus baseline value." (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

Interventionscore on scale (Mean)
Rotigotine-0.0

Change in Creatinine

Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Rotigotine-0.004

Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure (Standing, After 1 Minute)

Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Rotigotine0.8

Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure (Standing, After 3 Minutes)

Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Rotigotine0.8

Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure (Supine, After 1 Minute)

Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Rotigotine1.7

Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure (Supine, After 5 Minutes)

Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Rotigotine0.6

Change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Sum Score From Baseline to End of Treatment

The ESS is a self-administered questionnaire in which the subject rates the probability of his/her dozing during 8 situations that are differently conductive to sleep Range: 0 (Best score possible) to 24 (Worst score possible) Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

Interventionscore on scale (Mean)
Rotigotine-0.2

Change in Gamma-Glutamyltransferase

Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

InterventionUnits/l (Mean)
Rotigotine-0.1

Change in Glucose

Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Rotigotine-0.2

Change in Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase

Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

InterventionUnits/l (Mean)
Rotigotine-0.2

Change in Heart Rate

Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

Interventionbeats per minute (Mean)
Rotigotine0.5

Change in Hematocrit

Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

Interventionl/l*100 (Mean)
Rotigotine0.09

Change in Hemoglobin

Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

Interventiong/l (Mean)
Rotigotine0.8

Change in Inorganic Phosphate

Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Rotigotine-0.03

Change in Parkinson's Disease Non-Motor Symptom Assessment Scale (PDNMS) Total Sum Score From Baseline to End of Treatment

The PDNMS is a rating by the clinician to assess the severity and frequency of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease patients Range: 0 (Best score possible) to 384 (Worst score possible) Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

Interventionscore on scale (Mean)
Rotigotine-7.9

Change in Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale (PDSS) Sum Score From Baseline to End of Treatment

"The PDSS is a scale to assess sleep and nocturnal disability in Parkinson's disease.~Range: 0 (Best score possible) to 60 (Worst score possible) Change = 28 day value minus baseline value." (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

Interventionscore on scale (Mean)
Rotigotine-0.8

Change in Percentage of Basophilic Granulocytes in White Blood Cell Count

Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

InterventionPercentage of white blood cell count (Mean)
Rotigotine0.01

Change in Percentage of Eosinophilic Granulocytes in White Blood Cell Count

Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

InterventionPercentage of white blood cell count (Mean)
Rotigotine-0.11

Change in Percentage of Lymphocytes in White Blood Cell Count

Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

InterventionPercentage of white blood cell count (Mean)
Rotigotine0.73

Change in Percentage of Monocytes in White Blood Cell Count

Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

InterventionPercentage of white blood cell count (Mean)
Rotigotine0.96

Change in Percentage of Neutrophilic Granulocytes Segmented in White Blood Cell Count

Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

InterventionPercentage of white blood cell count (Mean)
Rotigotine-0.40

Change in Platelet Count

Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

InterventionGiga/l (Mean)
Rotigotine2.6

Change in Potassium

Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

Interventionmmol/l (Mean)
Rotigotine0.08

Change in PR Interval

"The PR interval is defined as the period that extends from the onset of atrial depolarization (beginning of the P wave) until the onset of ventricular depolarization (beginning of the QRS complex).~Change = 28 day value minus baseline value." (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

Interventionmsec (Mean)
Rotigotine-0.0

Change in Pulse Rate (Standing, After 1 Minute)

Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

Interventionbeats per minute (Mean)
Rotigotine1.7

Change in Pulse Rate (Standing, After 3 Minutes)

Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

Interventionbeats per minute (Mean)
Rotigotine0.8

Change in Pulse Rate (Supine, After 1 Minute)

Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

Interventionbeats per minute (Mean)
Rotigotine2.0

Change in Pulse Rate (Supine, After 5 Minutes)

Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

Interventionbeats per minute (Mean)
Rotigotine1.8

Change in QRS Duration

"The QRS duration represents the time it takes for ventricular depolarization to occur.~Change = 28 day value minus baseline value." (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

Interventionmsec (Mean)
Rotigotine-1.2

Change in QT Interval

"The QT interval is the period that extends from the beginning of ventricular depolarization until the end of ventricular repolarization.~Change = 28 day value minus baseline value." (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

Interventionmsec (Mean)
Rotigotine-1.7

Change in QT Interval Corrected for Heart Rate According to Bazett's Formula (QTcB)

"The QT interval is the period that extends from the beginning of ventricular depolarization until the end of ventricular repolarization.~Change = 28 day value minus baseline value." (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

Interventionmsec (Mean)
Rotigotine0.5

Change in Red Blood Cell Count

Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

InterventionTera/l (Mean)
Rotigotine0.023

Change in Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase

Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

InterventionUnits/l (Mean)
Rotigotine-0.1

Change in Short-form Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8) Single Index Score From Baseline to End of Treatment

"The PDQ-8 is a self-administered 8-item questionnaire that assesses issues associated with Parkinson's disease.~Range: 0 (good health) to 100 (poor health) Change = 28 day value minus baseline value." (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

Interventionscore on scale (Mean)
Rotigotine-3.9

Change in Sodium

Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

Interventionmmol/l (Mean)
Rotigotine-0.6

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (Standing, After 1 Minute)

Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Rotigotine-0.2

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (Standing, After 3 Minutes)

Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Rotigotine2.0

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (Supine, After 1 Minute)

Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Rotigotine5.7

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (Supine, After 5 Minutes)

Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 Days

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Rotigotine2.6

Change in Total Bilirubin

Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Rotigotine0.079

Change in Total Protein

Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

Interventiong/dl (Mean)
Rotigotine-0.09

Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part I Score From Baseline to End of Treatment

The UPDRS is a scale for the assessment of function in Parkinson's disease UPDRS Part I measures 'Mentation, Behavior and Mood'. Range: 0 (Best score possible) to 16 (Worst score possible) Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

Interventionscore on scale (Mean)
Rotigotine-0.5

Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part II Score From Baseline to End of Treatment

The UPDRS is a scale for the assessment of function in Parkinson's disease UPDRS Part II measures 'Activities in Daily Living'. Range: 0 (Best score possible) to 52 (Worst score possible) Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

Interventionscore on scale (Mean)
Rotigotine-0.9

Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Score From Baseline to End of Treatment

The UPDRS is a scale for the assessment of function in Parkinson's disease UPDRS Part III measures 'Motor Examination'. Range: 0 (Best score possible) to 56 (Worst score possible) Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

Interventionscore on scale (Mean)
Rotigotine-1.9

Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part IV Score From Baseline to End of Treatment

The UPDRS is a scale for the assessment of function in Parkinson's disease UPDRS Part IV measures 'Complications of Therapy'. Range: 0 (Best score possible) to 23 (Worst score possible) Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

Interventionscore on scale (Mean)
Rotigotine-0.4

Change in Uric Acid

Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

Interventionµmol/l (Mean)
Rotigotine-3.80

Change in White Blood Cell Count

Change = 28 day value minus baseline value. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

InterventionGiga/l (Mean)
Rotigotine-0.045

Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Item 2 Score

"The CGI is a set of ratings made by a clinician in order to assess the overall severity of an individual's symptoms as well as changes in his/her functioning over time.~Item 2 measures 'Global Improvement'. Range 1 (Very much improved) to 7 (Very much worse)" (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionscore on scale (Mean)
Rotigotine3.6

Completion of Trial From Baseline to End of Treatment

(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rotigotine99

Completion of Trial on the Original Treatment Assignment From Baseline to End of Treatment

(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rotigotine88

Dose Reduction Due to Adverse Events (AEs) With Onset During the 5 Half-life Overlap Period

(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 56 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rotigotine1

Dose Reduction During the 5 Half-life Overlap Period Due to Adverse Events (AEs)

(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 2 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rotigotine1

Drop-out Due to Adverse Events (AEs) With Onset During the 5 Half-life Overlap Period

(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 56 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rotigotine9

Drop-out During the 5 Half-life Overlap Period Due to Adverse Events (AEs)

(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: Baseline, 2 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rotigotine0

Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Neurological Examination for 'Coordination/Balance'

(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rotigotine0

Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Neurological Examination for 'Cranial Nerve Function'

(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rotigotine0

Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Neurological Examination for 'Deep Tendon Reflexes'

(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rotigotine0

Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Neurological Examination for 'Gait'

(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rotigotine1

Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Neurological Examination for 'Involuntary Movements'

(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rotigotine1

Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Neurological Examination for 'Mental Status'

(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rotigotine0

Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Neurological Examination for 'Muscle Strength'

(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rotigotine0

Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Neurological Examination for 'Other'

(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rotigotine0

Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Neurological Examination for 'Plantar Reflex'

(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rotigotine0

Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Neurological Examination for 'Sensory Perception'

(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rotigotine0

Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for 'Cardiovascular'

(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rotigotine0

Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for 'Dermatological'

(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rotigotine1

Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for 'Ears, Eyes, Nose, Mouth, Throat'

(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rotigotine0

Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for 'Hematological/Lymphatic Nodes'

(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rotigotine0

Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for 'Hepato-/Gastrointestinal'

(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rotigotine0

Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for 'Metabolic/Endocrine'

(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rotigotine0

Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for 'Musculoskeletal'

(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rotigotine1

Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for 'Other'

(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rotigotine0

Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for 'Peripheral Vascular'

(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rotigotine0

Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for 'Psychiatric'

(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rotigotine0

Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for 'Pulmonary'

(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rotigotine0

Occurrence of Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Events in Physical Examination for 'Renal/Genitourological'

(NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rotigotine0

Patient Global Impression (PGI) Item 1 Score

"The PGI is a set of ratings made by the patient in order to assess the overall severity of an individual's symptoms as well as changes in his/her functioning over time.~Item 1 measures 'Global Improvement'. Range: 1 (Very much improved) to 7 (Very much worse)" (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionscore on scale (Mean)
Rotigotine3.6

Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Item 3.1

"The CGI is a set of ratings made by a clinician in order to assess the overall severity of an individual's symptoms as well as changes in his/her functioning over time.~Item 3.1 measures 'Therapeutic Effect'. Range: 1 (Marked - Vast improvement. Complete or nearly complete remission of all symptoms.) to 4 (Unchanged or worse)" (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
MarkedModerateMinimalUnchanged or WorseNot Assessed
Rotigotine32036541

Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Item 3.2

"The CGI is a set of ratings made by a clinician in order to assess the overall severity of an individual's symptoms as well as changes in his/her functioning over time.~Item 3.2 measures 'Therapeutic Side Effects'. Range: 1 (None) to 4 (Outweigh the therapeutic effect)" (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
NoneNo Significant Interference with Subj. FunctioningSignificant Interference with Subj. FunctioningOutweigh the Theraputic EffectNot Assessed
Rotigotine8818521

Patient Global Impression (PGI) Item 2

"The PGI is a set of ratings made by the patient in order to assess the overall severity of an individual's symptoms as well as changes in his/her functioning over time.~Item 2 measures 'Therapeutic Effect'. Range: 1 (Marked - Vast improvement. Complete or nearly complete remission of all symptoms) to 4 (Unchanged or worse)" (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
MarkedModerateMinimalUnchanged or WorseMissing / Not Done
Rotigotine52538442

Patient Global Impression (PGI) Item 3

"The PGI is a set of ratings made by the patient in order to assess the overall severity of an individual's symptoms as well as changes in his/her functioning over time.~Item 3 measures 'Side Effects'. Range: 1 (I have no side effects) to 4 (They outweigh the therapeutic effect of the trial medication)" (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
No Side EffectsNo Significant Interference with FunctioningSignificant Interference with FunctioningOutweighing Therapeutic Effect of Trial MedicationMissing / Not Done
Rotigotine7724652

Patient Treatment Preference Scale Question 1

Have you used pharmaceutical treatments for your Parkinson's disease before the study? (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
yesno
Rotigotine1140

Patient Treatment Preference Scale Question 2

Why did you decide to enter this study? (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Side effects with oral medicineOral medicine not effective in controlling sympt.Taking med. several times a day was not convenientOther
Rotigotine14217140

Patient Treatment Preference Scale Question 3

In comparing the patch and previous oral treatments for Parkinson's disease, how satisfied have you been with oral medication / patch? (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very Dissatisfied with Oral MedicationDissatisfied with Oral MedicationNeither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied with Oral Med.Satisfied with Oral MedicationVery Satisfied with Oral MedicationAssessment for Oral Medication Missing / Not DoneVery Dissatisfied with PatchDissatisfied with PatchNeither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied with PatchSatisfied with PatchVery Satisfied with PatchAssessment for Patch Missing / Not Done
Rotigotine311494362928343292

Patient Treatment Preference Scale Question 4

I would prefer using a patch over taking a pill or capsule for treatment of my Parkinson's disease. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeither Agree nor DisagreeDisagreeStrongly DisagreeNot Done / Missing
Rotigotine1834292832

Patient Treatment Preference Scale Question 5

I would prefer applying one 40cm**2 patch over applying two 20cm**2 patches for treatment of my Parkinson's disease. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeither Agree nor DisagreeDisagreeStrongly DisagreeNot Done / Missing
Rotigotine1768101342

Patient Treatment Preference Scale Question 6

What aspects do you like the most about the patch? (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Applying the patch once a dayComfortable to wearDoes not interfere with my normal activitiesDo not have to take medicine in publicProvides symptom relief all dayConvenientEasy to applyDo not have to remember to take med. during dayMissing / Not Done
Rotigotine81286156465350602

Patient Treatment Preference Scale Question 7

What aspects do you like the least about the patch? Check all that apply. (NCT00593606)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Hard to applyHard to removeHard to remove the patch from its pouchDid not stay on for the entire dayUncomfortable to wearNot always covered by clothingSymptom relief did not last all dayNot Done / Missing
Rotigotine113180278292

Common Adverse Events: Back Pain

Musculoskeletal and Connective Tissue Disorders. Common adverse experience/event is defined as AE occurs to 5(about 5%) or more subjects. They will also be tabulated by treatment groups. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo1
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day0
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day2
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day3

Common Adverse Events: Constipation

Gastrointestinal Disorders. Common adverse experience/event is defined as AE occurs to 5(about 5%) or more subjects. They will also be tabulated by treatment groups. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo3
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day2
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day3
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day4

Common Adverse Events: Depression

Psychiatric Disorders. Common adverse experience/event is defined as AE occurs to 5(about 5%) or more subjects. They will also be tabulated by treatment groups. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo2
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day3
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day1
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day1

Common Adverse Events: Diarrhoea

Gastrointestinal Disorders. Common adverse experience/event is defined as AE occurs to 5(about 5%) or more subjects. They will also be tabulated by treatment groups. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo2
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day1
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day2
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day1

Common Adverse Events: Dizziness

Nervous system disorders. Common adverse experience/event is defined as AE occurs to 5(about 5%) or more subjects. They will also be tabulated by treatment groups. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo7
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day5
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day6
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day6

Common Adverse Events: Dyspepsia

Gastrointestinal Disorders. Common adverse experience/event is defined as AE occurs to 5(about 5%) or more subjects. They will also be tabulated by treatment groups. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo3
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day1
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day1
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day1

Common Adverse Events: Fatigue

General Disorders and Administration Site Conditions. Common adverse experience/event is defined as AE occurs to 5(about 5%) or more subjects. They will also be tabulated by treatment groups. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo2
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day1
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day3
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day3

Common Adverse Events: Headache

Nervous System disorders. Common adverse experience/event is defined as AE occurs to 5(about 5%) or more subjects. They will also be tabulated by treatment groups. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo3
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day3
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day6
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day4

Common Adverse Events: Hypotension

Vascular Disorders. Common adverse experience/event is defined as AE occurs to 5(about 5%) or more subjects. They will also be tabulated by treatment groups. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo1
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day1
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day2
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day2

Common Adverse Events: Insomnia

Psychiatric Disorders. Common adverse experience/event is defined as AE occurs to 5(about 5%) or more subjects. They will also be tabulated by treatment groups. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo2
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day3
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day1
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day1

Common Adverse Events: Nasopharyngitis

Infections and infestations. Common adverse experience/event is defined as AE occurs to 5(about 5%) or more subjects. They will also be tabulated by treatment groups. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo2
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day4
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day7
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day4

Common Adverse Events: Nausea

Gastrointestinal Disorders. Common adverse experience/event is defined as AE occurs to 5(about 5%) or more subjects. They will also be tabulated by treatment groups. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo3
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day2
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day1
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day2

Common Adverse Events: Oedema Peripheral

General disorders and administration site conditions. Common adverse experience/event is defined as AE occurs to 5(about 5%) or more subjects. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo1
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day4
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day10
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day16

Common Adverse Events: Sinusitis

Infections and Infestations. Common adverse experience/event is defined as AE occurs to 5(about 5%) or more subjects. They will also be tabulated by treatment groups. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo3
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day2
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day1
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day0

Common Adverse Events: Somnolence

Nervous System Disorders. Common adverse experience/event is defined as AE occurs to 5(about 5%) or more subjects. They will also be tabulated by treatment groups. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo2
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day3
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day2
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day0

Common Adverse Events: Upper Respiratory Tract Infection

Infections and Infestations. Common adverse experience/event is defined as AE occurs to 5(about 5%) or more subjects. They will also be tabulated by treatment groups. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo1
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day2
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day5
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day0

Efficacy: Change in Activities of Daily Living(ADL) Subscale of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale

The outcome is defined as change in ADL subscale of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale(UPDRS Part II) between the baseline visit and month 12 or the time of sufficient disability to require dopaminergic therapy. UPDRS Part II: Activities of Daily Living in the week prior to the designated visit, consisting of 13 questions answered on a 0-4 point scale where 0 represents the absence of impairment and 4 represents the highest degree of impairment. Total Part II score represents the sum of these 13 questions. A greater increase in score indicates a greater increase in disability. A total of 52 points are possible. 52 represents the worst (total) disability), 0--no disability (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo2.60
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day3.20
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day2.09
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day1.86

Efficacy: Change in Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II)

The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is a validated self-reported 21-item depression scale that was tested and validated as a reliable instrument for screening for depression in PD. The outcome is defined as change in BDI-II between the baseline visit and month 12 or the time of sufficient disability to require dopaminergic therapy. Total BDI score represents the sum of these 21-items. A higher change in score indicates a greater increase in disability. Total score of 0-13 is considered minimal, 14-19 is mild, 20-28 is moderate, and 29-63 is severe. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.52
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day1.99
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day0.11
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day1.50

Efficacy: Change in Mental Subscales of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale

The outcome is defined as change in Mental subscale of Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale(UPDRS Part I) between the baseline visit and month 12 or the time of sufficient disability to require dopaminergic therapy. UPDRS Part I: Mentation, behavior and mood, consisting of 4 questions answered on a 0-4 point scale where 0 represents the absence of impairment and 4 represents the highest degree of impairment. Total score represents the sum of these 4 questions. A greater increase in score indicates a greater increase in disability. A total of 16 points are possible. 16 represents the worst (total) disability), 0--no disability. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.30
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day0.76
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day0.30
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day0.03

Efficacy: Change in Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale

The Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale is an 8-level Parkinson's disease staging instrument. The outcome is defined as change in Modified Hoehn & Yahr Scale between the baseline visit and month 12 or the time of sufficient disability to require dopaminergic therapy. A greater increase in stage indicates a greater increase in disability. Stage ranges from 0-5 (also including 1.5 and 2.5) with 0 indicating no disability and 5 indicating maximum disability. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.27
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day0.22
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day0.12
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day0.11

Efficacy: Change in Modified Schwab & England Independence Scale

The Schwab & England scale is an investigator and subject assessment of the subject's level of independence at all scheduled study visits. The subject will be scored on a percentage scale reflective of his/her ability to perform acts of daily living in relation to what he/she did before Parkinson's disease appeared. The outcome is defined as change in Schwab & England Independence Scale between the baseline visit and month 12 or the time of sufficient disability to require dopaminergic therapy. Higher decrease in score indicates higher disability. Score ranges from 100% (complete independence) to 0% (total disability). (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-5.04
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day-5.56
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day-3.69
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day-3.76

Efficacy: Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment

The Montreal Cognitive Assessment(MoCA) is a brief 30-point screening instrument that was developed and validated to identify subjects with mild cognitive impairment. The outcome is defined as change in MoCA between the baseline visit and month 12 or the time of sufficient disability to require dopaminergic therapy. Total MoCA score represents the sum of these 30-points, with a lower score indicating greater cognitive impairment. 30 is the maximum score, with a score of 26 or higher considered normal and below 26 indicative of Mild Cognitive Impairment. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.58
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day0.06
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day0.11
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day0.36

Efficacy: Change in Motor Subscale of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale

The outcome is defined as change in Motor subscale of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale(UPDRS Part III) between the baseline visit and month 12 or the time of sufficient disability to require dopaminergic therapy. UPDRS Part III: motor abilities at the time of the visit, consisting of 27 items (including 13 general questions and 14 sub-questions) each answered on a 0-4 point scale where 0 represents the absence of impairment and 4 represents the highest degree of impairment. Total Part III score represents the sum of these 27 items. A total of 108 points are possible. 108 represents the worst (total) disability), 0--no disability. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo4.32
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day3.49
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day3.91
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day3.69

Efficacy: Change in Parkinson Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire-39(PDQ-39)

The PD Quality of Life Scale(PDQ-39) asks the subject to evaluate how Parkinson disease has affected their health and overall quality of life at that point in time. The total quality of life scale includes subscales relating to social role, self-image/sexuality, sleep, outlook, physical function and urinary function. The outcome is defined as change in PDQ-39 between the baseline visit and month 12 or the time of sufficient disability to require dopaminergic therapy. It is scored on a scale of zero to 100, with lower scores indicating better health and higher scores more severe disability. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo1.28
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day3.47
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day3.00
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day3.35

Efficacy: Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)

Outcome is defined as change in total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) between the baseline visit and month 12 or the time to require dopaminergic therapy (last visit before subject goes on dopaminergic therapy), whichever occurs first. The UPDRS score has 4 components. Part I assesses mentation; Part II assesses activities of daily living; Part III assesses motor abilities; Part IV assesses complications of therapy. A total of 44 items are included in Parts I-III. Each item will receive a score ranging from 0 to 4 where 0 represents the absence of impairment and 4 represents the highest degree of impairment. Part IV contains 11 items, 4 of these items are scored 0-4 in the same manner, and 7 are scored 0-1, with 0 indicating the absence of impairment and 1 indicating the presence of impairment. Total UPDRS score represents the sum of these items in Parts I-IV. A total of 199 points are possible. 199 represents the worst (total) disability), 0--no disability. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo7.40
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day7.44
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day6.30
Isradipine CR 15-20mg/Day5.40

Tolerability of the Three Dosages(5mg, 10mg and 20mg) of Isradipine CR.

Tolerability will be judged by the proportion of subjects enrolled in a dosage group able to complete the 12 month study or to the time of initiation of dopaminergic therapy on their original assigned dosage. Tolerability of each active arm will be compared to placebo group. (NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo25
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day19
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day19
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day9

Vital Signs: Change in Diastolic Standing

(NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.38
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day-4.20
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day-5.14
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day-4.34

Vital Signs: Change in Diastolic Supine

(NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.09
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day-2.79
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day-4.54
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day-3.63

Vital Signs: Change in Pulse Standing

(NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy

Interventionbeats per minute (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.08
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day-2.98
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day-2.29
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day-1.21

Vital Signs: Change in Pulse Supine

(NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy

Interventionbeats per minute (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.42
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day-0.71
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day-0.52
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day0.18

Vital Signs: Change in Systolic Standing

(NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-4.77
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day-9.85
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day-7.75
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day-6.30

Vital Signs: Change in Systolic Supine

(NCT00909545)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months or the time to require dopaminergic therapy

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-2.45
Isradipine CR 5mg/Day-8.59
Isradipine CR 10mg/Day-6.45
Isradipine CR 20mg/Day-7.01

Efficacy of DHA - Change in Blood ng/dL Levels

Therapeutic level monitoring will be accomplished by analyzing blood levels for DHA. (NCT01563913)
Timeframe: baseline and 1.5 years

Interventionng/dL - Blood (Mean)
Docosahexaenoic Acid102.18
Placebo:-13.20

Efficacy of DHA - Number of Participants With An Abnormal Safety Lab (CBC)

This study is seeking to determine the safety/efficacy of DHA in Parkinson's disease patients. The safety/efficacy of DHA will be determined using periodic safety lab information. Safety labs for complete blood count (CBC) were performed at each inpatient visit, reviewed by the PI, and marked as normal or abnormal. (NCT01563913)
Timeframe: Year 1

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Docosahexaenoic Acid0
Placebo:0

Reviews

62 reviews available for ropinirole and Parkinson Disease

ArticleYear
The effect and safety of ropinirole in the treatment of Parkinson disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Medicine, 2021, Nov-19, Volume: 100, Issue:46

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Headache; Humans; Indoles; Nausea; Parkinson Disease; Randomized Controlled Tr

2021
Comparison for Efficacy and Tolerability among Ten Drugs for Treatment of Parkinson's Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis.
    Scientific reports, 2017, 04-04, Volume: 8

    Topics: Bromocriptine; Cluster Analysis; Dopamine Agonists; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Indoles; Levo

2017
Indirect Comparison of Ropinirole and Pramipexole as Levodopa Adjunctive Therapy in Advanced Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
    Advances in therapy, 2019, Volume: 36, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Combined Modality Therapy; Female; Humans; Ind

2019
Rotigotine Transdermal Patch: A Review in Parkinson's Disease.
    CNS drugs, 2019, Volume: 33, Issue:7

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Dopamine Agonists; Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Disease; Pramipexole; Quali

2019
Anti-Parkinson's disease drugs and pharmacogenetic considerations.
    Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology, 2013, Volume: 9, Issue:7

    Topics: Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylases; Benzothiazoles; Benztropine; Bromocriptine; Cabergoline; Catechols; C

2013
[Dopaminergic treatment in Parkinson's disease: what has each therapeutic family got to offer?].
    Revista de neurologia, 2014, Jan-01, Volume: 58, Issue:1

    Topics: Amantadine; Antiparkinson Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Catechol O-Methyltransferase; Catechol O-

2014
Drug safety evaluation of ropinirole prolonged release.
    Expert opinion on drug safety, 2014, Volume: 13, Issue:3

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dopamine Agonists; Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Dis

2014
Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of long-acting non-ergot dopamine agonists in Parkinson's disease.
    Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia, 2014, Volume: 21, Issue:7

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Dopamine Agonists; Drug Delivery Systems; Humans; Indoles; Par

2014
Design and Synthesis of Dopaminergic Agonists.
    Current medicinal chemistry, 2016, Volume: 23, Issue:25

    Topics: Apomorphine; Dopamine Agonists; Drug Design; Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Disease; Phenanthridines; Qu

2016
Initial experience with ropinirole PR (prolonged release).
    Journal of neurology, 2008, Volume: 255 Suppl 5

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Indoles; Park

2008
Ropinirole prolonged release: in advanced Parkinson's disease.
    CNS drugs, 2009, Volume: 23, Issue:1

    Topics: Animals; Antiparkinson Agents; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Delivery Systems; Humans; Indo

2009
[Treatment of Parkinson's disease at present and in the future].
    Rinsho shinkeigaku = Clinical neurology, 2008, Volume: 48, Issue:11

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Aromatic-L-Amino-Acid Decarboxylases; Catechol O-Methyltransferase Inhibitors;

2008
A review of ropinirole prolonged release in Parkinson's disease.
    Clinical interventions in aging, 2009, Volume: 4

    Topics: Delayed-Action Preparations; Dopamine Agonists; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Indoles; P

2009
Tolerability and safety of ropinirole versus other dopamine agonists and levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Drug safety, 2010, Feb-01, Volume: 33, Issue:2

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Dopamine Agonists; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; Parki

2010
Long half-life and prolonged-release dopamine receptor agonists: a review of ropinirole prolonged-release studies.
    Parkinsonism & related disorders, 2009, Volume: 15 Suppl 4

    Topics: Animals; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dopamine Agonists; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dyskinesia, Drug

2009
[Clinical data of the prolonged-release formulation of ropinirole].
    Fortschritte der Neurologie-Psychiatrie, 2010, Volume: 78 Suppl 1

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Delayed-Action Preparations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans

2010
Pathological behaviors provoked by dopamine agonist therapy of Parkinson's disease.
    Physiology & behavior, 2011, Jul-25, Volume: 104, Issue:1

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders; Dopamine A

2011
Indirect comparisons of adverse events and dropout rates in early Parkinson's disease trials of pramipexole, ropinirole, and rasagiline.
    The International journal of neuroscience, 2012, Volume: 122, Issue:7

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Cognition Disorders; Cross-Sectional Studies; Databases, Bibli

2012
Clinical inquiry. Which drugs work best for early Parkinson's disease?
    The Journal of family practice, 2012, Volume: 61, Issue:2

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Carbidopa; Drug Combinations; Family Practice; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; Moto

2012
Two advances in the management of Parkinson disease.
    Cleveland Clinic journal of medicine, 2002, Volume: 69, Issue:8

    Topics: Age Factors; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Carbidopa; Dyskinesias; Electric Stimulation Ther

2002
DA agonists -- non-ergot derivatives: ropinirole: management of Parkinson's disease.
    Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2002, Volume: 17 Suppl 4

    Topics: Dopamine Agonists; Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Disease; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

2002
[Use of dopamine agonists in the treatment of Parkinson's disease].
    Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova, 2002, Volume: 102, Issue:9

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Bromocriptine; Cabergoline; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topi

2002
Sleep attacks--facts and fiction: a critical review.
    Advances in neurology, 2003, Volume: 91

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Disorders of Excessive Somn

2003
Do dopamine agonists or levodopa modify Parkinson's disease progression?
    European journal of neurology, 2002, Volume: 9 Suppl 3

    Topics: Animals; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Carrier Proteins; Dihydroxyphenylalanine; Disease Pro

2002
Dopamine agonist monotherapy in Parkinson's disease.
    Lancet (London, England), 2002, Nov-30, Volume: 360, Issue:9347

    Topics: Benzothiazoles; Cabergoline; Dopamine Agonists; Ergolines; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; Middle Aged; P

2002
Neuroprotection in idiopathic Parkinson's disease.
    Journal of neurology, 2002, Volume: 249 Suppl 3

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Cell Death; Dopamine Agonists; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; Neur

2002
Practical importance of neuroprotection in Parkinson's disease.
    Journal of neurology, 2002, Volume: 249 Suppl 3

    Topics: Amantadine; Antiparkinson Agents; Dopamine Agonists; Humans; Indoles; Neuroprotective Agents; Parkin

2002
Comparison of the risk of adverse events with pramipexole and ropinirole in patients with Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis.
    Drug safety, 2003, Volume: 26, Issue:6

    Topics: Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Benzothiazoles; Dopamine Agonists; Humans; Indoles; Parkins

2003
Cabergoline, pramipexole and ropinirole used as monotherapy in early Parkinson's disease: an evidence-based comparison.
    Drugs & aging, 2003, Volume: 20, Issue:11

    Topics: Age of Onset; Benzothiazoles; Cabergoline; Dopamine Agonists; Double-Blind Method; Ergolines; Eviden

2003
Comparing dopamine agonists in Parkinson's disease.
    Current opinion in neurology, 2003, Volume: 16 Suppl 1

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Dopamine Agonists; Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Disease; Pergolide; Randomized C

2003
Ropinirole: current status of the studies.
    Journal of neurology, 2004, Volume: 251 Suppl 6

    Topics: Bromocriptine; Dopamine Agonists; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Human

2004
Sleep attacks in patients receiving dopamine-receptor agonists.
    American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, 2005, Mar-01, Volume: 62, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Benzothiazoles; Dopamine Agonists; Female; Humans; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; Narcolepsy; Par

2005
Evidence-based medical review update: pharmacological and surgical treatments of Parkinson's disease: 2001 to 2004.
    Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2005, Volume: 20, Issue:5

    Topics: Amantadine; Antiparkinson Agents; Apomorphine; Benzophenones; Benzothiazoles; Bromocriptine; Cabergo

2005
Ropinirole therapy for Parkinson's disease.
    Expert review of neurotherapeutics, 2004, Volume: 4, Issue:4

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Dopamine Agonists; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; Parki

2004
Present and future drug treatment for Parkinson's disease.
    Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 2005, Volume: 76, Issue:11

    Topics: Benzothiazoles; Corpus Striatum; Disease Progression; Dopamine Agonists; Drug Therapy, Combination;

2005
[Placebo effect in Parkinson's disease].
    No to shinkei = Brain and nerve, 2007, Volume: 59, Issue:2

    Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Conditioning, Psychological; Corpus Striatum; Deep Brain Stimulation; Dopa

2007
[Systemic review and meta-analysis of tolerability and safety between different titration regimes of ropinirol dose in the treatment of Parkinson's disease].
    Neurologia (Barcelona, Spain), 2007, Volume: 22, Issue:10

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Disease

2007
[Pharmacological profiles and clinical effects of ropinirole hydrochloride (ReQuip)].
    Nihon yakurigaku zasshi. Folia pharmacologica Japonica, 2007, Volume: 130, Issue:4

    Topics: Animals; Antiparkinson Agents; Catalase; Cell Proliferation; Cerebral Ventricles; Clinical Trials as

2007
Second generation of dopamine agonists: pros and cons.
    Journal of neural transmission. Supplementum, 1995, Volume: 45

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Cabergoline; Dopamine Agonists; Drugs, Investigational; Ergoli

1995
Ropinirole in the symptomatic treatment of Parkinson's disease.
    Journal of neural transmission. Supplementum, 1995, Volume: 45

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Dopamine Agonists; Drug Therapy, Combinati

1995
Newer therapies for Parkinson's disease.
    Neurologia i neurochirurgia polska, 1996, Volume: 30 Suppl 2

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Bromocriptine; Cabergoline; Dopamine Agonists; Ergolines; Humans; Indoles; Par

1996
Pharmacologic profile of ropinirole: a nonergoline dopamine agonist.
    Neurology, 1997, Volume: 49, Issue:1 Suppl 1

    Topics: Animals; Antiparkinson Agents; Dopamine Agonists; Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Disease

1997
New pharmacotherapy for Parkinson's disease.
    The Annals of pharmacotherapy, 1997, Volume: 31, Issue:10

    Topics: Benzophenones; Benzothiazoles; Cabergoline; Catechol O-Methyltransferase Inhibitors; Catechols; Dopa

1997
New options for treatment of Parkinson's disease.
    Bailliere's clinical neurology, 1997, Volume: 6, Issue:1

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzophenones; Benzothiazoles; Cabergoline; Catechol O-Methyltransferase; Cate

1997
[Ropinirol: a new dopamine agonist in the treatment of Parkinson's disease].
    Neurologia (Barcelona, Spain), 1997, Volume: 12, Issue:8

    Topics: Dopamine Agonists; Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Disease

1997
Clinical pharmacology of dopamine agonists in Parkinson's disease.
    Drugs & aging, 1998, Volume: 13, Issue:5

    Topics: Animals; Antiparkinson Agents; Apomorphine; Benzothiazoles; Cabergoline; Dopamine Agonists; Ergoline

1998
Ropinirole: a dopamine agonist for the treatment of Parkinson's disease.
    American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, 1999, Feb-01, Volume: 56, Issue:3

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Dopamine Agonists; Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Disease; Randomized Controlled T

1999
Dopamine agonists.
    The Medical clinics of North America, 1999, Volume: 83, Issue:2

    Topics: Apomorphine; Benzothiazoles; Bromocriptine; Dopamine Agonists; Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Disease; P

1999
Ropinirole and pramipexole, the new agonists.
    The Canadian journal of neurological sciences. Le journal canadien des sciences neurologiques, 1999, Volume: 26 Suppl 2

    Topics: Animals; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Binding, Competitive; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dopam

1999
The initial treatment of Parkinson's disease should begin with levodopa.
    Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 1999, Volume: 14, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Bromocriptine; Drug Therapy, Combination; Essential Trem

1999
Treatment of Parkinson's disease should begin with a dopamine agonist.
    Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 1999, Volume: 14, Issue:5

    Topics: Benzothiazoles; Bromocriptine; Cabergoline; Dopamine Agonists; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Dru

1999
Clinical pharmacology of dopamine agonists.
    Pharmacotherapy, 2000, Volume: 20, Issue:1 Pt 2

    Topics: Benzothiazoles; Cabergoline; Dopamine Agonists; Drug Interactions; Ergolines; Humans; Indoles; Parki

2000
New drugs for the treatment of Parkinson's disease.
    Pharmacotherapy, 2000, Volume: 20, Issue:1 Pt 2

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzophenones; Benzothiazoles; Cabergoline; Catechol O-Methyltransferase Inhib

2000
Waking up to sleep episodes in Parkinson's disease.
    Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2000, Volume: 15, Issue:2

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Automobile Driving; Benzothiazoles; Dopamine Agents; Humans; Indoles; Narcolep

2000
Ropinirole for levodopa-induced complications in Parkinson's disease.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000, Issue:3

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dopam

2000
Ropinirole versus bromocriptine for levodopa-induced complications in Parkinson's disease.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000, Issue:3

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Bromocriptine; Dopamine Agonists; Dyskinesias; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; Park

2000
Ropinirole: a review of its use in the management of Parkinson's disease.
    Drugs, 2000, Volume: 60, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Disease

2000
["Sleep attacks" in Parkinson patients. A side effect of nonergoline dopamine agonists or a class effect of dopamine agonists?].
    Der Nervenarzt, 2000, Volume: 71, Issue:8

    Topics: Accidents, Traffic; Automobile Driving; Benzothiazoles; Contraindications; Dopamine Agents; Dopamine

2000
Clinical pharmacokinetics of ropinirole.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2000, Volume: 39, Issue:4

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Distribution; Aged; Area Under Curve; Dopamine Agonists; Drug Interactions

2000
[Parkinson disease: diagnostic and therapeutic criteria].
    Presse medicale (Paris, France : 1983), 2001, Mar-03, Volume: 30, Issue:8

    Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Adult; Aged; Amantadine; Antiparkinson Agents; Bromocriptine; Diagnosis,

2001
Are dopamine receptor agonists neuroprotective in Parkinson's disease?
    Drugs & aging, 2001, Volume: 18, Issue:6

    Topics: Animals; Antiparkinson Agents; Apomorphine; Benzothiazoles; Bromocriptine; Cell Culture Techniques;

2001
Increased risk of somnolence with the new dopamine agonists in patients with Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
    Drug safety, 2001, Volume: 24, Issue:11

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Dopamine Agonists; Drug The

2001

Trials

68 trials available for ropinirole and Parkinson Disease

ArticleYear
Comparison of pramipexole versus ropinirole in the treatment of Parkinson's disease.
    Ideggyogyaszati szemle, 2022, 01-30, Volume: 75, Issue:1-02

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Humans; Indoles; Middle Aged; Neurodegenerative Diseases; Parkinson

2022
Ropinirole Patch Versus Placebo, Ropinirole Extended-Release Tablet in Advanced Parkinson's Disease.
    Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2020, Volume: 35, Issue:9

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; Parkinson Disease; Tablets

2020
Detecting placebo and drug effects on Parkinson's disease symptoms by longitudinal item-score models.
    CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2021, Volume: 10, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Case-Control Studies; Cross-Over Studies; Dopamine Agonists; Drug De

2021
Clinical evaluation of ropinirole controlled-release formulation at 18-24 mg/day in Japanese patients with Parkinson's disease.
    Parkinsonism & related disorders, 2017, Volume: 40

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Asian People; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dou

2017
Behavioural and trait changes in parkinsonian patients with impulse control disorder after switching from dopamine agonist to levodopa therapy: results of REIN-PD trial.
    Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 2019, Volume: 90, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Carbidopa; Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Co

2019
The efficacy and safety of ropinirole prolonged release tablets as adjunctive therapy in Chinese subjects with advanced Parkinson's disease: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.
    Parkinsonism & related disorders, 2013, Volume: 19, Issue:11

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Asian People; Delayed-Action Preparations; Double-Blind Method; Drug The

2013
Comparison of once-daily versus twice-daily combination of ropinirole prolonged release in Parkinson's disease.
    BMC neurology, 2013, Sep-02, Volume: 13

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Cross-Over Studies; Drug Admin

2013
[Efficacy and safety of ropinirole in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: a multi-center, randomized, double-blind and bromocriptine-controlled trial].
    Zhonghua yi xue za zhi, 2013, Jul-02, Volume: 93, Issue:25

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bromocriptine; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Indoles; Male; M

2013
Rotigotine vs ropinirole in advanced stage Parkinson's disease: a double-blind study.
    Parkinsonism & related disorders, 2014, Volume: 20, Issue:12

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Analysis of Variance; Antiparkinson Agents; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Indole

2014
Long-term, open-label, safety study of once-daily ropinirole extended/prolonged release in early and advanced Parkinson's disease.
    The International journal of neuroscience, 2016, Volume: 126, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Back Pain; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dopami

2016
An open-label extension study to evaluate the safety of ropinirole prolonged release in Chinese patients with advanced Parkinson's disease.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2015, Volume: 31, Issue:4

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Asian People; Delayed-Action Preparations; Drug Liber

2015
Switch from oral pramipexole or ropinirole to rotigotine transdermal system in advanced Parkinson's disease: an open-label study.
    Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy, 2015, Volume: 16, Issue:7

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Dru

2015
Rotigotine transdermal system as add-on to oral dopamine agonist in advanced Parkinson's disease: an open-label study.
    BMC neurology, 2015, Feb-28, Volume: 15

    Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Administration, Cutaneous; Aged; Benzothiazoles; Dopamine Agonists; Fema

2015
A fixed-dose, dose-response study of ropinirole prolonged release in early stage Parkinson's disease.
    Neurodegenerative disease management, 2017, Volume: 7, Issue:1

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Me

2017
A randomized, fixed-dose, dose-response study of ropinirole prolonged release in advanced Parkinson's disease.
    Neurodegenerative disease management, 2017, Volume: 7, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Antiparkinson Agents; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans;

2017
Ropinirole 24-hour prolonged release and ropinirole immediate release in early Parkinson's disease: a randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority crossover study.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2008, Volume: 24, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Cross-Over Studies; Delayed-Action Preparation

2008
A multicentre retrospective study of the clinical use of ropinirole in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: the ROPI-PARK study.
    Clinical neurology and neurosurgery, 2009, Volume: 111, Issue:9

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; P

2009
An open-label conversion study of pramipexole to ropinirole prolonged release in Parkinson's disease.
    Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2009, Oct-30, Volume: 24, Issue:14

    Topics: Accidental Falls; Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Cohort Studies; Dopamine Agonists; Dos

2009
Onset of dyskinesia with adjunct ropinirole prolonged-release or additional levodopa in early Parkinson's disease.
    Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2010, May-15, Volume: 25, Issue:7

    Topics: Adult; Age of Onset; Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Delayed-Action Preparations; Disability Evaluation;

2010
Early treatment benefits of ropinirole prolonged release in Parkinson's disease patients with motor fluctuations.
    Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2010, May-15, Volume: 25, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dopamine Agonists; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Indoles;

2010
Long-term, open-label study of once-daily ropinirole prolonged release in early Parkinson's disease.
    The International journal of neuroscience, 2011, Volume: 121, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cross-Over Studies; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dopamine Agonists;

2011
Effect of chronic kidney disease on excessive daytime sleepiness in Parkinson disease.
    European journal of neurology, 2011, Volume: 18, Issue:11

    Topics: Aged; Benzothiazoles; Comorbidity; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Dopamine Agonists; Female; Hum

2011
PREPARED: Comparison of prolonged and immediate release ropinirole in advanced Parkinson's disease.
    Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2011, Volume: 26, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Delayed-Action Preparations; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy,

2011
Improvements in nocturnal symptoms with ropinirole prolonged release in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease.
    European journal of neurology, 2012, Volume: 19, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Delayed-Action Preparations; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Indole

2012
Overnight switch from ropinirole to transdermal rotigotine patch in patients with Parkinson disease.
    BMC neurology, 2011, Aug-10, Volume: 11

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Administration, Oral; Antiparkinson Agents; Drug Administration Schedule;

2011
Dopaminergic drug-induced modulation of the expression of the dopamine transporter in peripheral blood lymphocytes in Parkinson's disease.
    Pharmacological reports : PR, 2011, Volume: 63, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Carbidopa; Dopamine Agonists; Dopamine Plasma Membrane T

2011
Pharmacokinetics and effect of food after oral administration of prolonged-release tablets of ropinirole hydrochloride in Japanese patients with Parkinson's disease.
    Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics, 2012, Volume: 37, Issue:5

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Asian People; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dopamine Agonists; Female; Fo

2012
Ropinirole does not affect plasma arginine vasopressin levels in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease.
    Neuro endocrinology letters, 2012, Volume: 33, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged; Arginine Vasopressin; Carbidopa; Catechols; Dopamine Agonists; Dose-Response Relationship, Dru

2012
A comparison of the progression of early Parkinson's disease in patients started on ropinirole or L-dopa: an 18F-dopa PET study.
    Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2002, Volume: 109, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Dihydroxyphenylalanine; Disease Progression; Fluorine Radioisotopes; Fol

2002
Ropinirole as an adjunct to levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: a 16-week bromocriptine controlled study.
    Journal of neurology, 2003, Volume: 250, Issue:1

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Bromocriptine; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Female; Hu

2003
Combination of two different dopamine agonists in the management of Parkinson's disease.
    Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2002, Volume: 23 Suppl 2

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Cabergoline; Dopamine Agonists; Drug Therapy, Combinatio

2002
Slower progression of Parkinson's disease with ropinirole versus levodopa: The REAL-PET study.
    Annals of neurology, 2003, Volume: 54, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Brain; Caudate Nucleus; Corpus Striatum; Disease Progression; Dopamine; Dopamine Agonis

2003
Slower progression of Parkinson's disease with ropinirole versus levodopa: The REAL-PET study.
    Annals of neurology, 2003, Volume: 54, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Brain; Caudate Nucleus; Corpus Striatum; Disease Progression; Dopamine; Dopamine Agonis

2003
Slower progression of Parkinson's disease with ropinirole versus levodopa: The REAL-PET study.
    Annals of neurology, 2003, Volume: 54, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Brain; Caudate Nucleus; Corpus Striatum; Disease Progression; Dopamine; Dopamine Agonis

2003
Slower progression of Parkinson's disease with ropinirole versus levodopa: The REAL-PET study.
    Annals of neurology, 2003, Volume: 54, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Brain; Caudate Nucleus; Corpus Striatum; Disease Progression; Dopamine; Dopamine Agonis

2003
Slower progression of Parkinson's disease with ropinirole versus levodopa: The REAL-PET study.
    Annals of neurology, 2003, Volume: 54, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Brain; Caudate Nucleus; Corpus Striatum; Disease Progression; Dopamine; Dopamine Agonis

2003
Slower progression of Parkinson's disease with ropinirole versus levodopa: The REAL-PET study.
    Annals of neurology, 2003, Volume: 54, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Brain; Caudate Nucleus; Corpus Striatum; Disease Progression; Dopamine; Dopamine Agonis

2003
Slower progression of Parkinson's disease with ropinirole versus levodopa: The REAL-PET study.
    Annals of neurology, 2003, Volume: 54, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Brain; Caudate Nucleus; Corpus Striatum; Disease Progression; Dopamine; Dopamine Agonis

2003
Slower progression of Parkinson's disease with ropinirole versus levodopa: The REAL-PET study.
    Annals of neurology, 2003, Volume: 54, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Brain; Caudate Nucleus; Corpus Striatum; Disease Progression; Dopamine; Dopamine Agonis

2003
Slower progression of Parkinson's disease with ropinirole versus levodopa: The REAL-PET study.
    Annals of neurology, 2003, Volume: 54, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Brain; Caudate Nucleus; Corpus Striatum; Disease Progression; Dopamine; Dopamine Agonis

2003
Cabergoline, pramipexole and ropinirole used as monotherapy in early Parkinson's disease: an evidence-based comparison.
    Drugs & aging, 2003, Volume: 20, Issue:11

    Topics: Age of Onset; Benzothiazoles; Cabergoline; Dopamine Agonists; Double-Blind Method; Ergolines; Eviden

2003
Ropinirole versus levodopa in Parkinson's disease.
    Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2004, Volume: 4, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Indoles; Internationality; Levodopa; Middle Aged; Parkinso

2004
A technique for standardized central analysis of 6-(18)F-fluoro-L-DOPA PET data from a multicenter study.
    Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2004, Volume: 45, Issue:7

    Topics: Algorithms; Antiparkinson Agents; Canada; Dihydroxyphenylalanine; Dopamine Agents; France; Germany;

2004
Effect of monoamine reuptake inhibitor NS 2330 in advanced Parkinson's disease.
    Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2004, Volume: 19, Issue:10

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Carbidopa; Dopamine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins;

2004
[Practical experience on improving activities of daily living competence in Parkinson's patients treated with ropinirole. Results of a applied study].
    Der Nervenarzt, 2005, Volume: 76, Issue:10

    Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Dose-Response Rela

2005
Effect of ropinirole on visuo-motor test in newly diagnosed Parkinson's disease patients.
    Acta neurologica Scandinavica, 2006, Volume: 113, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Disability Evaluation; Dose-Response Relations

2006
Development of dyskinesias in a 5-year trial of ropinirole and L-dopa.
    Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2006, Volume: 21, Issue:11

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Confidence Intervals; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Hum

2006
Valvular heart disease in Parkinson's disease patients treated with dopamine agonists: a reader-blinded monocenter echocardiography study.
    Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2007, Jan-15, Volume: 22, Issue:2

    Topics: Benzothiazoles; Cabergoline; Dopamine Agonists; Double-Blind Method; Echocardiography; Ergolines; Fe

2007
Sumanirole versus placebo or ropinirole for the adjunctive treatment of patients with advanced Parkinson's disease.
    Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2007, Mar-15, Volume: 22, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Benzimidazoles; Dopamine Agonists; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hu

2007
End-of-dose deterioration in non ergolinic dopamine agonist monotherapy of Parkinson's disease.
    Journal of neurology, 2006, Volume: 253, Issue:12

    Topics: Benzothiazoles; Dopamine Agonists; Double-Blind Method; Endpoint Determination; Female; Humans; Indo

2006
A comparison of sumanirole versus placebo or ropinirole for the treatment of patients with early Parkinson's disease.
    Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2007, Mar-15, Volume: 22, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Benzimidazoles; Demography; Dopamine Agonists; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Sched

2007
Ropinirole 24-hour prolonged release: randomized, controlled study in advanced Parkinson disease.
    Neurology, 2007, Apr-03, Volume: 68, Issue:14

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Double-Blind Method; Drug Delivery Systems; Female; Humans; Indoles; Int

2007
Ropinirole is effective on motor function when used as an adjunct to levodopa in Parkinson's disease: STRONG study.
    Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2007, Oct-15, Volume: 22, Issue:13

    Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Case-Control Studies; Dose-Response Relation

2007
Ten-year follow-up of Parkinson's disease patients randomized to initial therapy with ropinirole or levodopa.
    Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2007, Volume: 22, Issue:16

    Topics: Aged; Amantadine; Antiparkinson Agents; Disability Evaluation; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Met

2007
Rotigotine transdermal patch in early Parkinson's disease: a randomized, double-blind, controlled study versus placebo and ropinirole.
    Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2007, Volume: 22, Issue:16

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Antiparkinson Agents; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Meth

2007
Steady-state pharmacokinetic properties of a 24-hour prolonged-release formulation of ropinirole: results of two randomized studies in patients with Parkinson's disease.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2007, Volume: 29, Issue:12

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Biological Availability; Cross-Over Studies; D

2007
A placebo-controlled study of ropinirole, a new D2 agonist, in the treatment of motor fluctuations of L-DOPA-treated parkinsonian patients.
    Advances in neurology, 1996, Volume: 69

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Dopamine Agonists; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; Movem

1996
Ropinirole in the treatment of levodopa-induced motor fluctuations in patients with Parkinson's disease.
    Clinical neuropharmacology, 1996, Volume: 19, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Dopamine Agonists; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination

1996
Ropinirole for the treatment of early Parkinson's disease. The Ropinirole Study Group.
    Neurology, 1997, Volume: 49, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Dopamine Agonists; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Indoles; Male; M

1997
Ropinirole in the treatment of early Parkinson's disease: a 6-month interim report of a 5-year levodopa-controlled study. 056 Study Group.
    Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 1998, Volume: 13, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Analysis of Variance; Antiparkinson Agents; Confidence Intervals; Disease Progression;

1998
Ropinirole versus bromocriptine in the treatment of early Parkinson's disease: a 6-month interim report of a 3-year study. 053 Study Group.
    Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 1998, Volume: 13, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Bromocriptine; Confidence Intervals; Disease Progression; Dopamin

1998
Effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of ropinirole in parkinsonian patients.
    British journal of clinical pharmacology, 1998, Volume: 45, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Area Under Curve; Female; Food-Drug Interactions; Half-Life; Humans; Ind

1998
Ropinirole for the treatment of early Parkinson disease: a 12-month experience. Ropinirole Study Group.
    Archives of neurology, 1998, Volume: 55, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Ambulatory Care; Antiparkinson Agents; Double-Blind Method; Female;

1998
A multicenter trial of ropinirole as adjunct treatment for Parkinson's disease. Ropinirole Study Group.
    Neurology, 1998, Volume: 51, Issue:4

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Dopamine Agonists; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female;

1998
Lack of a pharmacokinetic interaction at steady state between ropinirole and L-dopa in patients with Parkinson's disease.
    Pharmacotherapy, 1999, Volume: 19, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Area Under Curve; Carbidopa; Dopamine Agonists; Drug Therapy, Combinatio

1999
The effect of steady-state ropinirole on plasma concentrations of digoxin in patients with Parkinson's disease.
    British journal of clinical pharmacology, 1999, Volume: 47, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Antiparkinson Agents; Digoxin; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Inte

1999
Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between ropinirole and theophylline in patients with Parkinson's disease.
    European journal of clinical pharmacology, 1999, Volume: 55, Issue:4

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Cytochrome P-450 CYP1A2; Dopamine Agonists; Drug I

1999
A 3-year randomized trial of ropinirole and bromocriptine in early Parkinson's disease. The 053 Study Group.
    Neurology, 1999, Jul-22, Volume: 53, Issue:2

    Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Bromocriptine; Double-Blind Method; Female;

1999
A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson's disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2000, May-18, Volume: 342, Issue:20

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; D

2000
A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson's disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2000, May-18, Volume: 342, Issue:20

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; D

2000
A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson's disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2000, May-18, Volume: 342, Issue:20

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; D

2000
A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson's disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2000, May-18, Volume: 342, Issue:20

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; D

2000
A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson's disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2000, May-18, Volume: 342, Issue:20

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; D

2000
A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson's disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2000, May-18, Volume: 342, Issue:20

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; D

2000
A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson's disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2000, May-18, Volume: 342, Issue:20

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; D

2000
A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson's disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2000, May-18, Volume: 342, Issue:20

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; D

2000
A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson's disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2000, May-18, Volume: 342, Issue:20

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; D

2000
A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson's disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2000, May-18, Volume: 342, Issue:20

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; D

2000
A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson's disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2000, May-18, Volume: 342, Issue:20

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; D

2000
A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson's disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2000, May-18, Volume: 342, Issue:20

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; D

2000
A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson's disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2000, May-18, Volume: 342, Issue:20

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; D

2000
A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson's disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2000, May-18, Volume: 342, Issue:20

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; D

2000
A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson's disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2000, May-18, Volume: 342, Issue:20

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; D

2000
A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson's disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2000, May-18, Volume: 342, Issue:20

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; D

2000
[1st long-term double-blind study of effectiveness and dyskinesia prevention of ropinirol].
    Der Nervenarzt, 2000, Volume: 71, Issue:12

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Dopamine Agonists; Double-Blind Method; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Female; Follow-Up Stu

2000
The Posturo-Locomotion-Manual Test. A simple method for the characterization of neurological movement disturbances.
    Advances in neurology, 2001, Volume: 87

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Apomorphine; Diagnosis, Differential; Diagnost

2001
High-dose therapy with ropinirole in patients with Parkinson's disease.
    Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2001, Volume: 108, Issue:11

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dyskinesias

2001
A six-month multicentre, double-blind, bromocriptine-controlled study of the safety and efficacy of ropinirole in the treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease not optimally controlled by L-dopa.
    Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2002, Volume: 109, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Bromocriptine; Double-Blind Method; Drug Thera

2002
Ropinirole for the treatment of tremor in early Parkinson's disease.
    European journal of neurology, 2002, Volume: 9, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Bromocriptine; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; M

2002
Pharmacokinetic data for ropinirole.
    Lancet (London, England), 1990, Sep-29, Volume: 336, Issue:8718

    Topics: Dopamine Agents; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Indoles; Male; Middle Ag

1990
Treatment of Parkinson's disease with novel dopamine D2 agonist SK&F 101468.
    Lancet (London, England), 1989, Jun-24, Volume: 1, Issue:8652

    Topics: Dopamine Agents; Drug Evaluation; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; Male

1989

Other Studies

131 other studies available for ropinirole and Parkinson Disease

ArticleYear
Development of (S)-N6-(2-(4-(isoquinolin-1-yl)piperazin-1-yl)ethyl)-N6-propyl-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzo[d]-thiazole-2,6-diamine and its analogue as a D3 receptor preferring agonist: potent in vivo activity in Parkinson's disease animal models.
    Journal of medicinal chemistry, 2010, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3

    Topics: Animals; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; CHO Cells; Cricetinae; Cricetulus; Disease Models, An

2010
Discovery of 4-(4-(2-((5-Hydroxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalen-2-yl)(propyl)amino)ethyl)piperazin-1-yl)quinolin-8-ol and its analogues as highly potent dopamine D2/D3 agonists and as iron chelator: in vivo activity indicates potential application in sympto
    Journal of medicinal chemistry, 2010, Mar-11, Volume: 53, Issue:5

    Topics: Animals; Disease Models, Animal; Guanosine 5'-O-(3-Thiotriphosphate); Humans; Iron Chelating Agents;

2010
Structural modifications of neuroprotective anti-Parkinsonian (-)-N6-(2-(4-(biphenyl-4-yl)piperazin-1-yl)-ethyl)-N6-propyl-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzo[d]thiazole-2,6-diamine (D-264): an effort toward the improvement of in vivo efficacy of the parent molecule.
    Journal of medicinal chemistry, 2014, Feb-27, Volume: 57, Issue:4

    Topics: Animals; Benzothiazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cell Line; Disease Models, Animal; Mice; Neuroprotectiv

2014
Clinical Observation of Ropinirole Hydrochloride in the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease.
    Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022, Volume: 2022

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Indoles; Middle Aged; Parkinson Disea

2022
What drugs modify the risk of iatrogenic impulse-control disorders in Parkinson's disease? A preliminary pharmacoepidemiologic study.
    PloS one, 2020, Volume: 15, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders

2020
Comparison of long-term use of prolonged-release ropinirole and immediate-release dopamine agonists in an observational study in patients with Parkinson's disease.
    Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2020, Volume: 29, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cohort Studies; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dopamine Agonists; Dosa

2020
Chitosan coated synergistically engineered nanoemulsion of Ropinirole and nigella oil in the management of Parkinson's disease: Formulation perspective and In vitro and In vivo assessment.
    International journal of biological macromolecules, 2021, Jan-15, Volume: 167

    Topics: Animals; Benzoquinones; Chitosan; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Stability; Drug Synergism; Emulsions;

2021
Antiparkinsonian drugs as potent contributors to nocturnal sleep in patients with Parkinson's disease.
    PloS one, 2021, Volume: 16, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dopamine Agonists; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; P

2021
D-512, a novel dopamine D
    British journal of pharmacology, 2017, Volume: 174, Issue:18

    Topics: Animals; Antiparkinson Agents; Disease Models, Animal; Dopamine Agonists; Dose-Response Relationship

2017
Nanotechnology-based drug delivery of ropinirole for Parkinson's disease.
    Drug delivery, 2017, Volume: 24, Issue:1

    Topics: Animals; Drug Carriers; Drug Delivery Systems; Indoles; Lactic Acid; Male; Nanoparticles; Parkinson

2017
The neuropsychological profile of Othello syndrome in Parkinson's disease.
    Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 2017, Volume: 96

    Topics: Adult; Antiparkinson Agents; Delusions; Female; Humans; Indoles; Jealousy; Male; Middle Aged; Neurop

2017
Orally-dissolving film for sublingual and buccal delivery of ropinirole.
    Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces, 2018, Mar-01, Volume: 163

    Topics: Administration, Buccal; Administration, Sublingual; Animals; Antiparkinson Agents; Biological Availa

2018
Behavioral addictions in early-onset Parkinson disease are associated with DRD3 variants.
    Parkinsonism & related disorders, 2018, Volume: 49

    Topics: Adult; Age of Onset; Aged; Behavior, Addictive; Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders;

2018
Drug-induced gambling disorder: A not so rare but underreported condition.
    Psychiatry research, 2018, Volume: 269

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Dopamine Agonists; Gambling; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; Male; Middle Aged;

2018
Clinical pharmacokinetics of pramipexole, ropinirole and rotigotine in patients with Parkinson's disease.
    Parkinsonism & related disorders, 2019, Volume: 61

    Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dopamine Agonists; Female;

2019
Treatment-induced Delusions of Infestation Associated with Increased Brain Dopamine Levels.
    Acta dermato-venereologica, 2019, Mar-01, Volume: 99, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain; Deep Brain Stimulation; Delusional Paras

2019
Corneal Edema Associated With Systemic Dopaminergic Agents.
    Cornea, 2019, Volume: 38, Issue:8

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Corneal Edema; Diterpenes; Dopamine; Dop

2019
The Deep Brain Stimulation "Twiddler Syndrome".
    JAMA neurology, 2019, 05-01, Volume: 76, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Deep Brain Stimulation; Female; Humans; Implantable Neurostimulators; In

2019
Atypical parkinsonism due to a D202N Gerstmann-Sträussler-Scheinker prion protein mutation: first in vivo diagnosed case.
    Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2013, Volume: 28, Issue:2

    Topics: 14-3-3 Proteins; Amyloid beta-Peptides; Antiparkinson Agents; Codon; Dopamine Plasma Membrane Transp

2013
Three cases of impulse control disorder in Parkinson's disease patients receiving dopamine replacement therapy.
    Irish medical journal, 2013, Volume: 106, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Amantadine; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Carbidopa; Catechols; Disruptive, Impulse C

2013
Second-generation dopamine agonists and recollection impairments in Parkinson's disease.
    Journal of neuropsychology, 2013, Volume: 7, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Attention; Benzothiazoles; Case-Control Studies; Dopamine Agonists; Female; Humans; Indoles; M

2013
[Severe punding in Parkinson's disease].
    L'Encephale, 2015, Volume: 41, Issue:2

    Topics: Consanguinity; Diagnosis, Differential; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Substitution; Female;

2015
Two cases of pregnancy in Parkinson's disease.
    Parkinsonism & related disorders, 2014, Volume: 20, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Female; Fetus; Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Disease; Pram

2014
Parkinsonism hyperpyrexia syndrome caused by abrupt withdrawal of ropinirole.
    British journal of hospital medicine (London, England : 2005), 2013, Volume: 74, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Fever; Humans; Indoles; Male; Parkinson Disease; Substance Withdrawal Sy

2013
Economic evaluation of ropinirole prolonged release for treatment of Parkinson's disease in the Netherlands.
    Drugs & aging, 2014, Volume: 31, Issue:3

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced;

2014
Impulse control disorder in patients with Parkinson's disease under dopamine agonist therapy: a multicentre study.
    Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 2014, Volume: 85, Issue:8

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiaz

2014
Ropinirole treatment in Parkinson's disease associated with higher serum level of inflammatory biomarker NT-proCNP.
    Neuroscience letters, 2014, Apr-30, Volume: 566

    Topics: Adult; Antiparkinson Agents; Biomarkers; Case-Control Studies; Dopamine Agonists; Female; Humans; In

2014
Reports of pathological gambling, hypersexuality, and compulsive shopping associated with dopamine receptor agonist drugs.
    JAMA internal medicine, 2014, Volume: 174, Issue:12

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aripiprazole; Benzothiazoles; Compulsive Behavior; Consumer Behavior; Dopamine Agonists

2014
Teaching NeuroImages: Pisa syndrome in Parkinson disease.
    Neurology, 2014, Nov-04, Volume: 83, Issue:19

    Topics: Aged; Carbidopa; Drug Combinations; Dystonia; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; Male; Parkinson Disease; Po

2014
Design, characterization, and evaluation of intranasal delivery of ropinirole-loaded mucoadhesive nanoparticles for brain targeting.
    Drug development and industrial pharmacy, 2015, Volume: 41, Issue:10

    Topics: Adhesiveness; Administration, Intranasal; Animals; Antiparkinson Agents; Brain; Chitosan; Dose-Respo

2015
Head-to-Head Comparison of the Neuropsychiatric Effect of Dopamine Agonists in Parkinson's Disease: A Prospective, Cross-Sectional Study in Non-demented Patients.
    Drugs & aging, 2015, Volume: 32, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Apathy; Benzothiazoles; Cross-Sectional Studie

2015
Nano-ropinirole for the management of Parkinsonism: blood-brain pharmacokinetics and carrier localization.
    Expert review of neurotherapeutics, 2015, Volume: 15, Issue:6

    Topics: Animals; Brain; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Disease Models, Animal; Dopamine; Dopamine Agonists; Dopa

2015
Colloidal soft nanocarrier for transdermal delivery of dopamine agonist: ex vivo and in vivo evaluation.
    Journal of biomedical nanotechnology, 2014, Volume: 10, Issue:11

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Animals; Antiparkinson Agents; Catalepsy; Colloids; Diffusion; Dopamine A

2014
Metabolic changes in de novo Parkinson's disease after dopaminergic therapy: A proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study.
    Neuroscience letters, 2015, Jul-10, Volume: 599

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Aspartic Acid; Case-Control Studies; Choline; Creatine; Dopamine Agonists; Fem

2015
Parkinson's disease: initial treatment of motor disorders.
    Prescrire international, 2015, Volume: 24, Issue:163

    Topics: Age Factors; Antiparkinson Agents; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; Motor Ac

2015
Multiple fixed drug eruption caused by ropinirole in a patient with Parkinson's disease.
    Allergology international : official journal of the Japanese Society of Allergology, 2016, Volume: 65, Issue:2

    Topics: Biopsy; Dopamine Agonists; Drug Eruptions; Female; Humans; Indoles; Middle Aged; Parkinson Disease;

2016
Validated UHPLC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous determination of pramipexole and ropinirole in plasma of patients with Parkinson's disease.
    Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences, 2016, Apr-01, Volume: 1017-1018

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Humans; Indoles; Parkins

2016
A European multicentre survey of impulse control behaviours in Parkinson's disease patients treated with short- and long-acting dopamine agonists.
    European journal of neurology, 2016, Volume: 23, Issue:8

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Benzothiazoles; Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders;

2016
Chronic D
    The European journal of neuroscience, 2017, Volume: 45, Issue:1

    Topics: Animals; Choice Behavior; Corpus Striatum; Dopamine; Dopamine Agonists; Indoles; Male; Neostriatum;

2017
Discontinuation of ropinirole and pramipexole in patients with Parkinson's disease: clinical practice versus clinical trials.
    European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2008, Volume: 64, Issue:10

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Cohort Studies; Female; Follow-Up Stu

2008
Side effects of ropinirole in patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease.
    Bratislavske lekarske listy, 2008, Volume: 109, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Dopamine Agonists; Female; Humans; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; Parkinson

2008
Heart valve abnormalities in Parkinson's disease treated with dopamine agonists.
    Journal of neurology, 2008, Volume: 255, Issue:10

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Dopamine Agonists; Echocardiography; Female; Heart Valve Disea

2008
Rapid resolution of dopamine dysregulation syndrome (DDS) after subthalamic DBS for Parkinson disease (PD): a case report.
    Cognitive and behavioral neurology : official journal of the Society for Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology, 2008, Volume: 21, Issue:3

    Topics: Aggression; Antiparkinson Agents; Deep Brain Stimulation; Dopamine; Humans; Impulsive Behavior; Indo

2008
[Impulse control disorder induced by the use of dopamine agonists].
    Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde, 2009, Jan-17, Volume: 153, Issue:3

    Topics: Benzothiazoles; Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders; Dopamine Agonists; Humans; Indol

2009
Frequency of new-onset pathologic compulsive gambling or hypersexuality after drug treatment of idiopathic Parkinson disease.
    Mayo Clinic proceedings, 2009, Volume: 84, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Carbidopa; Compulsive Behavior; Dopamine Agonists

2009
Reward-learning and the novelty-seeking personality: a between- and within-subjects study of the effects of dopamine agonists on young Parkinson's patients.
    Brain : a journal of neurology, 2009, Volume: 132, Issue:Pt 9

    Topics: Adult; Avoidance Learning; Benzothiazoles; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dopamine Agonists; Exploratory B

2009
Agonist or levodopa for Parkinson disease? Ultimately, it doesn't matter; neither is good enough.
    Neurology, 2009, Jun-16, Volume: 72, Issue:24

    Topics: Bromocriptine; Dopamine Agents; Dopamine Agonists; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Follow-Up Studies; Huma

2009
Clinical and pharmacogenetic determinants for the discontinuation of non-ergoline dopamine agonists in Parkinson's disease.
    European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2009, Volume: 65, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Alleles; Benzothiazoles; Cohort Studies; Contraindications; Dopamine Agonists; Female; Humans;

2009
An exploratory retrospective evaluation of ropinirole-associated psychotic symptoms in an outpatient population treated for restless legs syndrome or Parkinson's disease.
    The Annals of pharmacotherapy, 2009, Volume: 43, Issue:9

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Databases, Factual; Dopamine Agonists; Female; Humans; Indoles; Male; Middl

2009
Nonmotor symptoms in de novo Parkinson disease before and after dopaminergic treatment.
    Journal of the neurological sciences, 2009, Dec-15, Volume: 287, Issue:1-2

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Cognition Disorders; Comorbidity; Disability Evaluation;

2009
Impulsive smoking in a patient with Parkinson's disease treated with dopamine agonists.
    Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia, 2010, Volume: 17, Issue:4

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders; Dopamine A

2010
Impulse control disorders in Parkinson disease: a cross-sectional study of 3090 patients.
    Archives of neurology, 2010, Volume: 67, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Binge-Eating Disorder; Comorbidity; Cross-Sectional Stud

2010
Isolated delusional syndrome in Parkinson's Disease.
    Parkinsonism & related disorders, 2010, Volume: 16, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Amantadine; Antiparkinson Agents; Benserazide; Benzothiazoles; Catechols; Clonazepam; Female;

2010
Rare and serious cardiac side effects during ropinirole titration.
    Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2010, Jul-30, Volume: 25, Issue:10

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Heart Diseases; Humans; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; Parkinson Disease

2010
Effects of ropinirole prolonged-release on sleep disturbances and daytime sleepiness in Parkinson disease.
    Clinical neuropharmacology, 2010, Volume: 33, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dopamine Agonists; Dose-Response Rel

2010
Monitoring dyskinesia with Zif.
    Experimental neurology, 2010, Volume: 226, Issue:1

    Topics: 2,3,4,5-Tetrahydro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepine; Animals; Antiparkinson Agents; Biomarker

2010
Investigating variability in patient response to treatment--a case study from a replicate cross-over study.
    Statistical methods in medical research, 2011, Volume: 20, Issue:6

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cross-Over Studies; Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Disea

2011
Investigating variability in patient response to treatment--a case study from a replicate cross-over study.
    Statistical methods in medical research, 2011, Volume: 20, Issue:6

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cross-Over Studies; Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Disea

2011
Investigating variability in patient response to treatment--a case study from a replicate cross-over study.
    Statistical methods in medical research, 2011, Volume: 20, Issue:6

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cross-Over Studies; Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Disea

2011
Investigating variability in patient response to treatment--a case study from a replicate cross-over study.
    Statistical methods in medical research, 2011, Volume: 20, Issue:6

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cross-Over Studies; Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Disea

2011
Impulsive cross-dressing in Parkinson's disease treated with ropinerole.
    The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2011,Winter, Volume: 23, Issue:1

    Topics: Humans; Impulsive Behavior; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; Parkinson Disease; Transvestism; Treatment O

2011
Dopamine agonist-triggered pathological behaviors: surveillance in the PD clinic reveals high frequencies.
    Parkinsonism & related disorders, 2011, Volume: 17, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Compulsive Behavior; Dopamine

2011
Severe intracranial bleeding related to vitamin K antagonist-ropinirole interaction.
    Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2011, Aug-15, Volume: 26, Issue:10

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Female; Humans; Indoles; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Middle Aged; Parkinson Dise

2011
Myometry revealed medication-induced decrease in resting skeletal muscle stiffness in Parkinson's disease patients.
    Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon), 2012, Volume: 27, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Body Mass Index; Electromyography; Female; Humans; In

2012
New prospective in treatment of Parkinson's disease: studies on permeation of ropinirole through buccal mucosa.
    International journal of pharmaceutics, 2012, Jun-15, Volume: 429, Issue:1-2

    Topics: Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic; Administration, Buccal; Animals; Antiparkinson Agents; Cyclohexenes; Drug D

2012
Serotonergic and dopaminergic mechanisms in graft-induced dyskinesia in a rat model of Parkinson's disease.
    Neurobiology of disease, 2012, Volume: 47, Issue:3

    Topics: 5,6-Dihydroxytryptamine; Adrenergic Agents; Amphetamine; Analysis of Variance; Animals; Antiparkinso

2012
fMRI changes in cortical activation during task performance with the unaffected hand partially reverse after ropinirole treatment in de novo Parkinson's disease.
    Parkinsonism & related disorders, 2013, Volume: 19, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Cerebral Cortex; Female; Functional Laterality; Hand; Humans; Image Inte

2013
Spontaneous unwelcome orgasms due to pramipexole and ropinirole.
    Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2012, Sep-01, Volume: 27, Issue:10

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Female; Humans; Indoles; Middle Aged; Nervous System Diseases;

2012
Duration of L-dopa and dopamine agonist monotherapy in Parkinson's disease.
    Scottish medical journal, 2012, Volume: 57, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Confidence Intervals; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence;

2012
Effects of dopaminergic and subthalamic stimulation on musical performance.
    Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2013, Volume: 120, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Auditory Perceptual Disorders; Deep Brain Stimulation; Dopamine Agents; Humans; Indoles; Levo

2013
Some consequences of assuming simple patterns for the treatment effect over time in a linear mixed model.
    Statistics in medicine, 2013, Jul-10, Volume: 32, Issue:15

    Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Antiparkinson Agents; Biostatistics; Bromocriptine; Clinical Trials as T

2013
Ropinirole monotherapy induced severe reversible dyskinesias in Parkinson's disease.
    Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2013, Volume: 28, Issue:8

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Female; Humans; Indoles; Middle Aged; Parkinson Dise

2013
GSK's Requip slow the loss of dopamine function in Parkinson's disease.
    Aviation, space, and environmental medicine, 2002, Volume: 73, Issue:7

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Disease Progression; Dopamine Agonists; Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Disease; Se

2002
Dosing with ropinirole in a clinical setting.
    Acta neurologica Scandinavica, 2002, Volume: 106, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Data Coll

2002
Cost analysis of ropinirole versus levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson's disease.
    PharmacoEconomics, 2003, Volume: 21, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Antiparkinson Agents; Benserazide; Canada; Caregivers; Cost Savings; Dopamine Agonists; Drug

2003
Ropinirole as an adjunct to levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson's disease A short commentary.
    Journal of neurology, 2003, Volume: 250, Issue:1

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Bromocriptine; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; Parkinson

2003
[Sexual delinquency and Parkinson's disease].
    Der Nervenarzt, 2003, Volume: 74, Issue:4

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Awareness; Bromocriptine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Comb

2003
The initial drug treatment of older patients with Parkinson's disease - consider an agonist, but don't demonise dopa.
    Age and ageing, 2003, Volume: 32, Issue:3

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Catechol O-Methyltransferase; Dopamine Agonists; Dose-Response

2003
REAL and CALM: what have we learned?
    Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2003, Volume: 18, Issue:7

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Clinical Trials as Topic; Corpus Striatum; Disease Progression

2003
[Pseudopheochromocytoma in Parkinson disease and depression].
    Psychiatrische Praxis, 2003, Volume: 30 Suppl 2

    Topics: Adrenal Gland Neoplasms; Antidepressive Agents; Antiparkinson Agents; Catecholamines; Depressive Dis

2003
Rapidly progressive parkinsonism in a self-reported user of ecstasy and other drugs.
    Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2003, Volume: 18, Issue:11

    Topics: Adult; Antiparkinson Agents; Disease Progression; Hallucinogens; Hepatitis C; Humans; Indoles; Male;

2003
Predictors of impaired daytime sleep and wakefulness in patients with Parkinson disease treated with older (ergot) vs newer (nonergot) dopamine agonists.
    Archives of neurology, 2004, Volume: 61, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Benzothiazoles; Bromocriptine; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Dopamine Agonists; Dose-Resp

2004
Slowing Parkinson's disease progression: recent dopamine agonist trials.
    Neurology, 2004, Jan-27, Volume: 62, Issue:2

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Biological Transport; Cell Line, Tumor; Clinical Trials as Top

2004
Switching from ergot to nonergot dopamine agonists in Parkinson's disease: a clinical series and five-drug dose conversion table.
    Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2004, Volume: 19, Issue:11

    Topics: Adult; Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Bromocriptine;

2004
Predictors of sudden onset of sleep in Parkinson's disease.
    Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2004, Volume: 19, Issue:11

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Comorbidity; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dopamine Agonists;

2004
"Levodopa phobia": a new iatrogenic cause of disability in Parkinson disease.
    Neurology, 2005, Mar-08, Volume: 64, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Amantadine; Benzothiazoles; Catechols; Dopamine Agents; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug

2005
Pramipexole, ropinirole, and mania in Parkinson's disease.
    The American journal of psychiatry, 2005, Volume: 162, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Bipolar Disorder; Dopamine Agonists; Drug Therapy, Comb

2005
Pathological hypersexuality predominantly linked to adjuvant dopamine agonist therapy in Parkinson's disease and multiple system atrophy.
    Parkinsonism & related disorders, 2005, Volume: 11, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Catechols; Databases, Factual; Dopamine Agonists;

2005
Pathological gambling in Parkinson's disease.
    The Lancet. Neurology, 2005, Volume: 4, Issue:10

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Brain; Dopamine Agonists; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Ga

2005
Augmentation of artistic productivity in Parkinson's disease.
    Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2006, Volume: 21, Issue:2

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Art; Carbidopa; Creativity; Dopamine Agents; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug;

2006
Minimal clinically important change on the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale.
    Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2006, Volume: 21, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Disability Evaluation; Dopamine Agents; Female; Humans; Indoles; Male; M

2006
Long-term 24-hour duodenal infusion of levodopa: outcome and dose requirements.
    Neurology, 2006, May-23, Volume: 66, Issue:10

    Topics: Animals; Antiparkinson Agents; Cocaine; Dihydroxyphenylalanine; Dopamine Agents; Dose-Response Relat

2006
Association of dopamine agonist use with impulse control disorders in Parkinson disease.
    Archives of neurology, 2006, Volume: 63, Issue:7

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Benzothiazoles; Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders;

2006
Clinical studies with ropinirole in Parkinson's disease and RLS.
    Journal of neurology, 2006, Volume: 253 Suppl 4

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Dopamine Agonists; Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Disease; Randomized Controlled T

2006
Cardiac valve regurgitation with pergolide compared with nonergot agonists in Parkinson disease.
    Archives of neurology, 2007, Volume: 64, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Case-Control Studies; Echocard

2007
Spectrophotometric determination of dopaminergic drugs used for Parkinson's disease, cabergoline and ropinirole, in pharmaceutical preparations.
    Chemical & pharmaceutical bulletin, 2007, Volume: 55, Issue:4

    Topics: Cabergoline; Dopamine Agents; Ergolines; Humans; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; Indoles; Parkinson Dise

2007
[Improvements in motor and non-motor symptoms in parkinson patients under ropinirole therapy].
    Fortschritte der Neurologie-Psychiatrie, 2007, Volume: 75, Issue:4

    Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Depression; Disabi

2007
Overexpression of D2/D3 receptors increases efficacy of ropinirole in chronically 6-OHDA-lesioned Parkinsonian rats.
    Brain research, 2007, Jul-30, Volume: 1160

    Topics: Adrenergic Agents; Animals; Animals, Genetically Modified; Antiparkinson Agents; Behavior, Animal; D

2007
Relationship between weight, levodopa and dyskinesia: the significance of levodopa dose per kilogram body weight.
    European journal of neurology, 2008, Volume: 15, Issue:5

    Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Body Size; Body Weight; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Female; H

2008
Apathy following subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson disease: a dopamine responsive symptom.
    Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2008, May-15, Volume: 23, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged; Deep Brain Stimulation; Dopamine Agonists; Female; Humans; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; Mood Di

2008
New dopamine agonists on the horizon.
    South Dakota journal of medicine, 1997, Volume: 50, Issue:7

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Dopamine Agonists; Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Disease; Pramipe

1997
The long-duration action of levodopa may be due to a postsynaptic effect.
    Clinical neuropharmacology, 1997, Volume: 20, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Antiparkinson Agents; Dopamine Agents; Dopamine Agonists; Female; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa;

1997
Pramipexole and ropinirole for Parkinson's disease.
    The Medical letter on drugs and therapeutics, 1997, Nov-21, Volume: 39, Issue:1014

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dopamine Agonists; Double-Blind Meth

1997
Ropinirole approved for Parkinson's disease.
    American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, 1997, Dec-01, Volume: 54, Issue:23

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Drug Approval; Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Disease; United States; United State

1997
New anti-parkinsonian drugs.
    Medicine and health, Rhode Island, 1998, Volume: 81, Issue:7

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzophenones; Benzothiazoles; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; Nitrophenols; Parkin

1998
Falling asleep at the wheel: motor vehicle mishaps in persons taking pramipexole and ropinirole.
    Neurology, 1999, Jun-10, Volume: 52, Issue:9

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Automobile Driving; Benzothiazoles; Humans; Indoles;

1999
Dose-induced penile erections in response to ropinirole therapy for Parkinson's disease.
    Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 1999, Volume: 14, Issue:4

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Dopamine Agonists; Humans; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; Parkinson Disease; Peni

1999
Dopamine D2 receptor-mediated antioxidant and neuroprotective effects of ropinirole, a dopamine agonist.
    Brain research, 1999, Aug-14, Volume: 838, Issue:1-2

    Topics: Animals; Antioxidants; Corpus Striatum; Dopamine Agonists; Free Radical Scavengers; Indoles; Male; M

1999
A multicenter trial of ropinirole as adjunct treatment for PD.
    Neurology, 1999, Aug-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3

    Topics: Age Factors; Antiparkinson Agents; Humans; Indoles; Middle Aged; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Parki

1999
Several classes of new drugs emerging for Parkinson disease.
    JAMA, 1999, Sep-08, Volume: 282, Issue:10

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Catechol O-Methyltransferase Inhibitors; Catechols; Dopamine A

1999
An overnight switch to ropinirole therapy in patients with Parkinson's disease. Short communication.
    Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 1999, Volume: 106, Issue:9-10

    Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Bromocriptine; Female; Humans; Indoles; Male

1999
Treatment of Parkinson's disease with ropinirole after pergolide-induced retroperitoneal fibrosis.
    Pharmacotherapy, 1999, Volume: 19, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Female; Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Disease; Pergolide

1999
Non-ergot dopamine agonist-induced sleep attacks.
    Pharmacotherapy, 2000, Volume: 20, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Benzothiazoles; Dopamine Agonists; Female; Humans; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; Parkinson Disea

2000
Treatments for Parkinson's disease.
    Health news (Waltham, Mass.), 2000, Volume: 6, Issue:6

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa

2000
Linear pharmacokinetic behavior of ropinirole during multiple dosing in patients with Parkinson's disease.
    Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2000, Volume: 40, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Female; Humans; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; Pa

2000
Treatment of early Parkinson's disease.
    BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2000, Jul-01, Volume: 321, Issue:7252

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Parkinson Disease; Ra

2000
Sleep attacks in Parkinson's disease.
    Lancet (London, England), 2000, Aug-12, Volume: 356, Issue:9229

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Dopamine Agonists; Humans; Indoles; Male; M

2000
Ropinirole as compared with levodopa in Parkinson's disease.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2000, Sep-21, Volume: 343, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced;

2000
Ropinirole as compared with levodopa in Parkinson's disease.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2000, Sep-21, Volume: 343, Issue:12

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; Parkinson Disease; Sleep

2000
Ropinirole as compared with levodopa in Parkinson's disease.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2000, Sep-21, Volume: 343, Issue:12

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Hallucinations; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; Parkinson

2000
Ropinirole as compared with levodopa in Parkinson's disease.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2000, Sep-21, Volume: 343, Issue:12

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; Parkinson Disease; Qualit

2000
Acute orthostatic hypotension when starting dopamine agonists in Parkinson's disease.
    Archives of neurology, 2000, Volume: 57, Issue:10

    Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Benzothiazoles; Dopamine Agonists; Drug Administratio

2000
[Dopaminergic agonists in the treatment of Parkinson's disease].
    Revue medicale de Bruxelles, 2000, Volume: 21, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Apomorphine; Benzothiazoles; Biological Availability; Bromocriptine; Cat

2000
Treatment of early onset Parkinson's disease with ropinirole.
    Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 2001, Volume: 70, Issue:3

    Topics: Humans; Indoles; Parkinson Disease; Time Factors

2001
[Parkinson's disease].
    Presse medicale (Paris, France : 1983), 2001, Mar-03, Volume: 30, Issue:8

    Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Catechols; Depressive Disorder; Diagnosis, Different

2001
Antiparkinsonian drugs and "sleep attacks".
    CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2001, Apr-03, Volume: 164, Issue:7

    Topics: Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Automobile Driving; Benzothiazo

2001
Efficacy and tolerability of dopamine agonists in a parkinsonian population.
    Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2001, Volume: 22, Issue:1

    Topics: Age of Onset; Aged; Aging; Benzothiazoles; Bromocriptine; Dopamine Agonists; Drug Administration Sch

2001
Randomized clinical trials with added rescue medication: some approaches to their analysis and interpretation.
    Statistics in medicine, 2001, Oct-30, Volume: 20, Issue:20

    Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Antiparkinson Agents; Bromocriptine; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; Multicen

2001
Warfarin and ropinirole interaction.
    The Annals of pharmacotherapy, 2001, Volume: 35, Issue:10

    Topics: Anticoagulants; Antiparkinson Agents; Drug Interactions; Humans; Indoles; International Normalized R

2001
Alopecia induced by dopamine agonists.
    Neurology, 2002, Mar-12, Volume: 58, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Alopecia; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzothiazoles; Dopamine Agonists; Female; Humans; Indoles; Pa

2002
Literature alert.
    Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2001, Volume: 1, Issue:4

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Fetal Tissue Transplantation; Humans; Incidence; Ind

2001
Is it time to abandon functional imaging in the study of neuroprotection?
    Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2002, Volume: 17, Issue:2

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Brain; Clinical Trials as Topic; Disease Progression; Humans; Indoles; Levodop

2002
Ropinirole (SK and F 101468) in the treatment of Parkinson's disease.
    Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 1991, Volume: 54, Issue:10

    Topics: Aged; Dopamine Agents; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; Middle Aged; Neu

1991
Ropinirole without levodopa in Parkinson's disease.
    Lancet (London, England), 1990, Aug-04, Volume: 336, Issue:8710

    Topics: Dopamine Agents; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Evaluation; Fe

1990