rome and Chest-Pain

The aim of the Chest Pain Unit at Policlinico Umberto I in Rome was to implement simple diagnostic flow-charts in subjects with non-traumatic chest pain for an early identification of patients at high, intermediate and low risk of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). A total of 4.74% of all patients admitted to the Emergency Department were hospitalized in the Chest Pain Unit. 15.72% of them received a diagnosis of atypical chest pain with low risk of ACS; 26,42% were diagnosed of stable angina pectoris; 11.37% were affected by chronic coronary heart disease with medium risk of ACS and 12.83% were at high risk of acute coronary syndrome.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Angina Pectoris; Chest Pain; Coronary Care Units; Coronary Disease; Diagnosis, Differential; Electronic Health Records; Female; Hospitals, Teaching; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Admission; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rome

In Italy one of the most common cause of access to the Emergency Departments is not traumatic chest pain, representing from the 6% to 10% of all the diagnoses. Admissions to the Emergency Department (DEA) of Policlinico Umberto I of Rome for non-traumatic chest pain, occurred between 2000 and 2008, were analyzed in this study. Out of 26,8910 admissions to the medical emergency room (PS), 21,088 (7.84%) were due to non-traumatic or precordial chest pain. Of these, 2881 (14%) patients had a diagnosis of myocardial infarction STEMI, NSTEMI and IA and 18,207 (86%) had a diagnosis of atypical chest pain, representing respectively 1.07% and 6.77% of all admissions to PS. About 27.62% of patients with atypical chest pain were discharged from the PS, 33.27% were hospitalized, 36.73% refused hospitalization, 1.68% were transferred elsewhere, and 0.7% did not uptake the visit. 85% of patients with myocardial infarction STEMI, NSTEMI and IA were hospitalized, 3.75% refused hospitalization, 8.82% were transferred elsewhere, and 1.71% died in the PS. Hospitalizations resulted often in unjustified and protracted length of hospital stays for clinical investigations, with negative repercussions for patients and costs. In the last years, the number of inappropriate hospitalizations progressively increased, partly as consequence of recourse to the court aiming at defining legal responsibility of the health board.Since avoiding inappropriate hospital admissions is an essential requirement for containing healthcare costs and improving the health service, Chest Pain Unit has been established. Its responsibility is to recognize and promptly treat patients with chest pain and acute coronary syndrome. As well, it is responsible to quickly discharge patients with chest pain at low and intermediate risk of acute coronary insufficiency, after careful clinical assessment lasting 24-36 hours.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Chest Pain; Emergency Service, Hospital; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Theoretical; Myocardial Infarction; Patient Admission; Rome

Penetrating ulcer of the aorta has been recognized as a distinct aortic disorder, defined by the ulceration of an atherosclerotic plaque. The lesion has the potential to evolve acutely into aortic rupture, but chronic pictures are possible. Late evolution into rupture, frank aortic dissection and progressive aortic enlargement have been documented. We discuss different modalities of presentation on the basis of recent clinical cases. As the optimal treatment, either surgical (open or endovascular) or medical, is based on a correct diagnosis, we highlight the importance of including aortic ulcers in the differential diagnosis of chest pain. Although endovascular treatment can be advisable in cases with favorable anatomic condition and in patients with multiple comorbidities, the open surgical option should be available given the heterogeneous location and clinical scenarios of these lesions.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aortic Aneurysm; Aortic Diseases; Aortic Dissection; Aortic Rupture; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Chest Pain; Diagnosis, Differential; Endovascular Procedures; Hemodynamics; Humans; Male; Predictive Value of Tests; Rome; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Treatment Outcome; Ulcer

Identification and treatment of patients with acute chest pain due to acute coronary syndrome is a common and difficult challenge for emergency physicians. The aim of this study was to establish: a) the reliability of diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction met in the emergency ward, b) the length of the patient's hospital stay with acute myocardial infarction discovered and treated in the emergency ward either with primary angioplasty or with thrombolysis.. We analyzed the data collected in the emergency ward of the San Camillo Hospital in Rome from January 1 to June 30, 2000, with patients suffering from chest pain and diagnosis after hospitalization. The reliability of diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction was calculated from the comparison of the diagnosis in the emergency ward and the diagnosis at hospital discharge.. From January 1 to June 30, 2000, 45,810 patients have asked for help at the emergency ward; 2334 (5.1%) of these were suffering from chest pain. The diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction was done in the emergency ward in 147 cases (141 hospitalized, 4 deceased, and 2 transferred to other hospitals), equal to 65% of all those discharged with the same diagnosis in the period under examination. In 66 out of the 141 cases hospitalized (46.8%) primary angioplasty was successfully performed; in 14 (9.9%) only coronary angiography was performed (primary angioplasty unfeasible); in 22 (15.6%) thrombolysis was administered whereas in 38 cases (27.0%) other treatments were used. The average stay for the different groups turned out to be 9.8 +/- 4 days for primary angioplasty and 12.9 +/- 4 days for thrombolysis: the difference was relevant.. The accuracy value of the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction made in the emergency ward of our Hospital is the same as that published in the international literature and demonstrates the high level of treatment of chest pain. Furthermore, the shorter hospital stay obtained by primary angioplasty in comparison with thrombolysis seems to strengthen the already favorable cost-benefit ratio of primary angioplasty in comparison with thrombolysis.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Chest Pain; Emergencies; Female; Hospitals; Humans; Length of Stay; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Reproducibility of Results; Rome