rome has been researched along with Aortic-Aneurysm--Abdominal* in 10 studies
10 other study(ies) available for rome and Aortic-Aneurysm--Abdominal
Article | Year |
---|---|
Comparison of Outcomes Following EVAR Based on Aneurysm Diameter and Volume and Their Postoperative Variations.
to evaluate the impact of bi- and 3-dimensional preoperative aortic morphological features and their immediate postoperative variations on the outcome of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) treated by endovascular exclusion with standard devices (EVAR).. Double centre retrospective analysis of prospectively collected registry data of EVAR patients. For all patients, preoperative and 30-day computed tomographic angiography images (CTA) were reviewed. Preoperative maximum AAA diameter >59 mm and volume >159 cm. Three hundred and thrity-three patients were enrolled. Mean preoperative and 30-day AAA diameter and volume were 50.4 mm ± 11.8 vs. 49.1 mm ± 12.1, and 112.9 cm3 ± 79.5 vs. 112.1 cm3 ± 80.5, respectively. Primary technical success was achieved in all cases. At 34.9 months follow-up, cumulative reintervention rate was 12.0%, mortality rates 7.2%, without AAA-related deaths. Endoleak-related reintervention rate was 7.5%. At uni- and multi-variate analysis, preoperative AAA diameter >59 mm, and AAA volume >159 cm. Patients with larger baseline AAA size and volume as well as unfavourable early remodelling of the sac are associated to worse long-term EVAR outcome. Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Aortography; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Computed Tomography Angiography; Endovascular Procedures; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Registries; Retreatment; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rome; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome | 2021 |
Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Endovascular Treatment: Long-term Results From a Single-Center Experience in an Unselected Patient Population.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate early-, mid-, and long-term outcomes in an unselected population of patients treated for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) by endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with different commercially available off-the-shelf devices.. A retrospective study was conducted on a prospectively compiled computerized database on patients presenting an infrarenal AAA treated between January 2008 and December 2015 in a high-volume Italian tertiary referral Center. Demographic, clinical, and specific morphological features were considered as potentially influencing the outcomes and the type of the implanted device. Outcome measures were procedure-related reintervention, AAA-related, and all-cause mortality rates at 30-day, 12-month, and long-term follow-up. Reinterventions considered for the analysis were AAA rupture, graft infection, type I or III endoleaks, type II endoleaks with sac enlargement > 5 mm, graft stenosis or occlusions, procedures related to renal or visceral ischemia, and reintervention for access vessel injury.. Of 498 EVAR procedures performed for elective infrarenal AAA treatment during the entire study period, 479 patients were enrolled, the mean age was 73.5 ± 7.34 years (range 51-91), and 416 (86.84%) were men. The mean maximum AAA diameter was 52.02 ± 8.04 mm (range 39-90.2), a maximum AAA diameter ≥59 mm was recorded in 107 patients (22.33%), and an aortic neck length was <10 mm in 137 (28.60%). Technical success was achieved in all patients. At a mean follow-up of 52.97 ± 26.16 months (range 1-120), overall reintervention and death rates were 8.14% and 20.04%, respectively, without AAA-related deaths. At univariate analysis, hypertension was the only demographical variable found to be associated with higher risk of reintervention, P = 0.04 (OR: 2.34; CI 95%: 1.00-5.42). Furthermore, male sex (P = 0.02; OR: 2.62; CI 95%: 1.09-6.27) and chronic renal insufficiency (P = 0.003; OR: 2.08; CI 95%: 1.27-3.42) were associated with higher mortality rates. AAA diameter ≥59 mm was statistically associated with a higher rate of both reintervention and mortality: P < 0.001 (OR: 9.05; CI 95%: 4.52-18.11) and <0.001 (4.00; 2.46-6.49), respectively.. Our experience seems to suggest that EVAR could be safely and effectively performed in an unselected patients' population, with encouraging results up to a ten-year follow-up. Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Blood Vessel Prosthesis; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Databases, Factual; Endovascular Procedures; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Prosthesis Design; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rome; Stents; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome | 2020 |
The Safety of EVAS Surgical Conversion in a Comparative Monocentric Analysis.
Endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) was a widespread technology to treat abdominal aortic aneurysm. However, the particular morphology and structure of this endoprosthesis predisposed to proximal sealing defects with a high rate of reintervention or conversion to open surgery treatments. The purpose of this article is to report our experience on late open conversion of Nellix device, compared with the previous reported experience.. Between September 2013 and February 2020, eight late open surgical conversions for endoleak (EL) were performed in our center: four of these were for EVAR. Four of these were EVAS devices required explantation and were included in the study. All excisions of infected abdominal aortic endograft were excluded.. All patients were treated within the original instructions for use. Aorto-bi-iliac reconstruction was performed with a bifurcated Dacron graft in all the four cases. At 12 months Doppler ultrasonography follow-up, good results at short term with preserved primary patency and freedom of re-intervention in three cases were reported. Only one patient died 16 days after the procedure. Nevertheless, the endoprosthetic structure allows in three of our cases to clamp down the renal level, with a decrease of the time of lower limbs ischemia and greater safety of the open surgery repair procedure.. The EVAS conversion is common, and a closer follow-up is required. The most recurrent open surgery indication is its migration and the EL type 1. The procedure is influenced by multiple comorbidities; emergency graft excision appears to increase morbidity and mortality, compared with elective surgical setting. Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Blood Vessel Prosthesis; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Conversion to Open Surgery; Device Removal; Endoleak; Endovascular Procedures; Foreign-Body Migration; Humans; Male; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rome; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome | 2020 |
One-Year Outcomes after Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Repair: Is Endovascular Aortic Repair the Best Choice? A Single-Center Experience.
Treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs) is still burdened by high morbidity and mortality. Although endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) offers encouraging results in elective setting, its role as first-line strategy to treat rAAA is still debated. Our aim was to compare early and late outcomes in patients undergoing open surgical repair (OSR) versus EVAR for rAAAs.. A retrospective review of data extracted from medical records identified 105 consecutive patients with rAAA who were submitted to open or endovascular repairs from 2008 to 2016. The primary end point was to assess the rAAA-related mortality in the immediate postoperative period, within 1 month and 1 year after OSR, and EVAR; secondary endpoints included the following: length of stay, AAA-related postoperative complications such as acute limb ischemia, myocardial infarction, renal and respiratory failure, and rAAA-related re-interventions. Statistical analysis was performed using the Fisher exact test, χ. Of the 105 patients with rAAA, 70.48% underwent OSR including 41.89% which was hemodynamically (Hd) unstable and the remaining 29.52% was submitted to rEVAR. (all Hd stable). Compared with EVAR group, the OSR group had a higher rAAA-related mortality rate for both Hd stable and Hd unstable patients: 18.92% vs. 6.45% at 24 hr; (P = 0.185) 39.19% vs. 19.35% at 30 days (P = 0.082); 44.59% vs. 38.71% at 1 year (P = 0.734) If only Hd stable patients were considered, mortality following OSR and EVAR was as follows: 6.98% vs. 6.45% at 24 hr (P = 0.703); 27.91% vs. 19.35% at 30 days (P = 0.567); 32.56% vs. 38.71% at 1 year (P = 0.764). Mean length of stay for patients was 15 days after OSR and 10 days after rEVAR (P = 0.002). At 1-year follow-up, the overall rAAA-related complications incidence was higher in the rEVAR group than that in the OSR group (47.85% vs. 18.33%; P = 0.008); re-interventions were 18.33% in OSR group vs. 21.82% in EVAR group (P = 0.917). Cox model showed that instability and coronary artery disease were predictors of overall mortality of rAAAs.. EVAR does not independently reduce 1-year mortality in comparison with OSR in Hd stable patients. Urgent EVAR for rAAAs in unstable patients can be limited by logistical problems. It follows that patients selected for OSR have a more complex aortic anatomy and worse Hd status than those submitted to rEVAR. rEVAR burdened by a higher incidence of procedure-related complications than OSR. Reconfiguration of acute aortic services and establishment of standardized institutional protocols might be advisable for improvements in the management of ruptured AAA. A careful evaluation of whether the benefits of an endovascular strategy translate into long term benefit is needed before definitive conclusions can be drawn about the advantages of EVAR as first-line strategy for ruptured aneurysms. Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Aortic Rupture; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Clinical Decision-Making; Endovascular Procedures; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Selection; Postoperative Complications; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rome; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome | 2018 |
Initial single-site experience with the Ovation abdominal stent-graft system in patients with challenging aortoiliac anatomy.
Aim of the study was to evaluate the initial results of endovascular aneurysm repair with the Ovation abdominal stent-graft system in patients with challenging aortoiliac anatomy.. The Ovation stent-graft is an ultra-low profile, modular endovascular graft characterized by a 14F OD delivery system, active suprarenal fixation, and polymer-filled proximal rings that allow sealing in short (≥7 mm) proximal necks. Between November 2010 and January 2012, 14 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) (male: 100%, mean age: 76 years, mean AAA diameter: 54 mm) and challenging aortoiliac anatomy were treated with the Ovation endograft at a single centre. Mean patient follow-up was 5 months.. All cases were performed under local or epidural anesthesia. No operative deaths or major complications were noted. A type I endoleak was detected on final angiogram in one case, which was successfully treated with additional ballooning and Palmaz stenting of the hooking landing zone. One patient died at 2 months due to myocardial infarction unrelated to the device or procedure. AAA-related mortality was 0%. No AAA rupture, AAA enlargement, type I or III endoleak, stent migration, access site complication, or conversion to open surgery was reported during follow-up. A type II endoleak was successfully treated with a right lumbar artery embolization at 4 months. Occlusion of an iliac axis was successfully managed with local fibrinolysis and implantation of a covered stent in the external iliac artery.. Initial outcomes of this single-center experience suggest that the Ovation abdominal stent-graft system is a promising treatment in AAA patients with challenging aortoiliac anatomy. Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Aortography; Blood Vessel Prosthesis; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Computed Tomography Angiography; Endovascular Procedures; Humans; Iliac Artery; Male; Postoperative Complications; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Rome; Stents; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome | 2016 |
Pushing forward the limits of EVAR: new therapeutic solutions for extremely challenging AAAs using the Ovation® stent-graft.
Extreme complex aortic anatomies still represent the major limit of endovascular aneurysms repair (EVAR) for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Aim of this study was to evaluate results of EVAR with Ovation® stent-graft in extremely complex aortic anatomies.. A single center study was retrospectively conducted on a prospectively compiled computerized database between July 2012 and July 2014. Twenty-one elective patients with atherosclerotic AAA were included. All patients were judged unfit for or refused an open approach. In all of them, extremely complex anatomies features contraindicated EVAR by common endografts. Patients' outcomes were evaluated on the basis of anatomical features: challenging proximal aortic neck (non-cylindrical, short, severely angulated, enlarged, thrombosed) and challenging iliac artery accesses (angulated and narrowed). Technical and clinical successes were defined as the absence of intraoperative surgical conversion and aneurysm related mortality, respectively. Reintervention, morbidity and mortality rates during follow-up were also recorded.. All patients were male; mean age was 75.6±7.2 years. In 14 patients (66.7%) neck length was <10 mm, a non-cylindrical neck was present in 15 patients (71.4%) and a severe neck thrombosis was registered in 13 patients (61.9%). Only 1 patient (4.8%) had no iliac tortuosity, 9 (42.8%) patients had severe tortuosity at least on one iliac access and 7 (33.3%) on both. Technical and clinical successes were achieved in all cases. Neither death nor reinterventions were observed in the present series. At a mean follow-up of 9±5 (3-27) months, only one patient presented an iliac leg occlusion.. Our limited and preliminary experience seems to show that Ovation® stent-graft may widen the range of AAAs suitable for standard EVAR. Early results, even in patients with challenging anatomies, are encouraging but a longer follow-up is mandatory. Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Aortography; Blood Vessel Prosthesis; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Computed Tomography Angiography; Databases, Factual; Endovascular Procedures; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multidetector Computed Tomography; Postoperative Complications; Prosthesis Design; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rome; Stents; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome | 2016 |
Results after elective open repair of pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms.
This study presents a retrospective analysis of long-term outcomes and factors influencing early and late results of a 20-year experience with open repair of atherosclerotic pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (PAAAs).. Records of consecutive patients who underwent open repair of PAAA between 1990 and 2010 at a tertiary referral care center were analyzed for demographics, comorbidities, operative variables, complications, and 30-day mortality. Long-term results were also assessed through a local electronic medical database and direct follow-up. Variables influencing early and late results were evaluated by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, stepwise backward elimination, and Cox proportional hazard regression.. The study included 200 patients (94% men; mean age, 69.5 years) who were monitored for a mean of 107.3 months. The aneurysm was juxtarenal in 78% of patients, suprarenal in 19.5%, and type IV thoracoabdominal in 2.5%. Mortality at 30 days was 2.5%. At least one major complication occurred in 51.5%. Postoperative acute renal failure (pARF) occurred in 11% of the patients, 3% had temporary hemodialysis, but only 0.5% required chronic hemodialysis. pARF was significantly related to preoperative renal function (P = .009), visceral ischemia >30 minutes (P = .05), and supraceliac or supramesenteric clamp site (P = .005). Respiratory complications (13.8%) were associated with an increasing stage of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = .020), proximal clamp site (P = .047), and intraoperatively infused crystalloids (P = .014). Cardiac complications (12.8%) were related to previous myocardial infarction (P = .031) and proximal clamp site (P = .003). Late deaths were observed in 21.5%. Mean survival was 50 months, with Kaplan-Meier survival estimates of 78% at 5 years and 60.5% at 10 years. Variables influencing long-term survival included age (hazard ratio [HR], 2.67; P = .01), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease stage 2 (HR, 5.14; P = .01) and stage 3 (HR, 4.54; P = .03), postoperative cardiac complication (HR, 3.93; P ≤ .00), previous myocardial infarction (HR, 1.47; P = .02), peripheral artery disease (HR, 1.97; P = .03), and smoking (HR, 1.17; P = .02). Survival and late-onset renal insufficiency were unaffected by preoperative renal function. Late renal failure was observed in 6.2% of the patients but did not predict mortality.. Conventional surgical repair of PAAAs can be performed with acceptable short-term and long-term mortality. Although pARF is frequent, chronic hemodialysis at discharge is rare. Cardiac and respiratory complications are also common and associated with worse survival. Our data represent a potentially useful benchmark for complex endovascular repairs of this type of aneurysm. Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Chi-Square Distribution; Elective Surgical Procedures; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Odds Ratio; Postoperative Complications; Proportional Hazards Models; Quality Indicators, Health Care; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rome; Tertiary Care Centers; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome | 2016 |
Abdominal aortic endografting beyond the trials: a 15-year single-center experience comparing newer to older generation stent-grafts.
To evaluate the late results of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with the endografts currently in use and compare outcomes to older devices.. Clinical, demographic, and imaging data on consecutive patients undergoing elective EVAR from January 1997 to December 2011 at a single center were retrieved from an electronic database and reviewed. Newer stent-grafts (NSG) were defined as those introduced after 2004 (second-generation Excluder and Anaconda) or currently in use without modifications (Zenith, Endurant). Of the 1412 consecutive patients (1290 men; mean age 73 years) who underwent elective EVAR in a tertiary university hospital, 882 were treated with NSGs and 530 with older stent-grafts (OSGs).. In the NSG group, the abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) were larger (55.7 vs. 53.2 mm, p<0.0001) and the patients were older (p<0.0001) and less frequently smokers or had pulmonary disease, while hypertension and diabetes were more frequent (all p<0.0001). Thirty-day mortality was 0.8% in the NSG group vs. 1.1% in the OSG group (p=NS). Follow-up ranged from 1 to 174 months (mean 54.1±42.4); the OSG patients had longer mean follow-up compared to the NSG group (80.2±47.9 vs. 38.4±29.1 months, p<0.0001). All-cause survival rates were comparable in both groups. Freedom from late conversion (96.1% vs. 89.1% at 7 years, p<0.0001) or reintervention (83.6% vs. 74.2% at 7 years, p=0.015) and freedom from AAA diameter growth >5 mm (p=0.022) were higher in the NSG group. In adjusted analyses, the use of a new-generation device was a negative independent predictor of reintervention [hazard ratio (HR) 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49 to 0.93, p=0.015] and aneurysm growth (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.89, p=0.010).. Newer-generation endografts can perform substantially better than the older devices. In the long term, incidences of reintervention, conversion, and AAA growth are decreased in patients treated with devices currently in use. However, the need for continuous surveillance is still imperative for all endografts. Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aorta, Abdominal; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Blood Vessel Prosthesis; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Disease-Free Survival; Endovascular Procedures; Female; Hospitals, University; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Proportional Hazards Models; Prosthesis Design; Reoperation; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rome; Stents; Tertiary Care Centers; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome | 2014 |
Is the chimney graft technique a safe and feasible approach to treat urgent aneurysm and pseudoaneurysm of the abdominal aorta? An analysis of our experience and technical considerations.
The chimney graft (CG) technique, based on the deployment of a covered stent parallel to the aortic endograft, has been proposed to achieve a safe proximal fixation extending the sealing zone. We report our experience with the CG technique in an emergency setting. Between December 2010 and April 2012, 4 patients underwent the CG technique. The mean age was 79 (range 76-82 years) and 3 patients were men. The median aneurysm diameter was 64.7 mm (range 63-68 mm). Indications for CG were painful proximal para-anastomotic aneurysm in 2 cases and symptomatic juxtarenal aneurysm in the other 2. Target vessels were both the renal arteries. Technical success was achieved in 100% and no intraoperative complications occurred. No stent-related complications, or Type I endoleak, were detected. No death occurred during the postoperative course. Creatinine elevation was observed in 2 cases. At follow-up, no endoleaks or rupture occurred. One patient died of myocardial infarction 3 months after the procedure. The primary patency rate of covered stents was 100%. The CG technique seems to be safe and feasible with an excellent patency rate of covered stents and a low incidence of endoleaks. More evidence in the literature is needed to carry out a validation of this technique in an emergency. Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aneurysm, False; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Aortography; Blood Vessel Prosthesis; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Emergencies; Endovascular Procedures; Female; Humans; Male; Rome; Stents; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Treatment Outcome | 2013 |
Seasonal variation in the incidence of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.
In order to determine any possible influence of climatic variables on the incidence of abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture, we reviewed 49,144 autopsies performed in two major hospitals in Rome, Italy, from January 1956 to March 1986. There were 297 subjects who were found to be sufferers of atherosclerotic abdominal aortic aneurysm for a prevalence of 0.6%. The aneurysm was intact in 220 cases (74%) and ruptured in 77 cases (26%). The highest incidence of ruptured aneurysm occurred during the Autumn and in the months May and July. The incidence of ruptured aneurysm was highest in case of significant changes of the atmospheric temperature. There was no correlation between the incidence of ruptured aneurysm and barometric pressure or humidity. Topics: Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Aortic Rupture; Humans; Prevalence; Rome; Seasons; Temperature | 1995 |