ro13-9904 and Bronchitis--Chronic

In a randomized, open-label, controlled, multicentre study, the clinical and bacteriological efficacy, safety and tolerability of oral gemifloxacin (320 mg once daily, 5 days) was compared with sequential intravenous (i.v.) ceftriaxone (1 g once daily, maximum 3 days) followed by oral cefuroxime axetil (500 mg twice daily, maximum 7 days) in adult hospitalized patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB) (n = 274). The clinical success rates at follow-up (21-28 days post-therapy) in the clinical per-protocol population (the primary endpoint) were 86.8% (105/121) for gemifloxacin vs. 81.3% (91/112) for ceftriaxone/cefuroxime (treatment difference = 5.5,95% CI -3.9,14.9). The corresponding clinical results in the clinical intention-to-treat (ITT) population were 82.6% (114/138) vs. 72.1% (98/136), respectively (treatment difference = 10.5,95% CI 0.7, 20.4).Thus, gemifloxacin had significantly higher clinical success rates than ceftriaxone/cefuroxime. The median time to discharge was 9 days in the gemifloxacin group vs. 11 days in the ceftriaxone/cefuroxime group (P = 0.04, Wilcoxon test). At follow-up, 120/138 (87.0%) gemifloxacin-treated patients had been discharged from hospital, compared with 111/136 (81.6%) ceftriaxone/cefuroxime-treated patients in the clinical ITT population. Both treatments were generally well tolerated and there was no significant difference between the treatment groups in the incidence or type of adverse events reported. A 5-day course of oral gemifloxacin was shown by this study to be at least equivalent to sequential i.v. ceftriaxone/cefuroxime axetil (for up to 10 days) in patients with AECB who require hospital treatment.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-Infective Agents; Bacterial Infections; Bronchitis, Chronic; Ceftriaxone; Cefuroxime; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluoroquinolones; Forced Expiratory Volume; Gemifloxacin; Hospitalization; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Length of Stay; Male; Middle Aged; Naphthyridines; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this multicenter, open, randomized study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of a 5-day treatment course with oral moxifloxacin (MXF) vs a 7-day course with i.m. ceftriaxone (CRO) in 476 patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB), and to conduct a cost minimization analysis of the two treatments from the perspectives of both the Italian National Health Service (INHS) and society. The study was conducted in Italy. Clinical success rates at test-of-cure in the 423 patients of the PP (Per Protocol) population (primary efficacy parameter) were 90.6% and 89.0% for MXF and CRO, respectively. Statistical non-inferiority of MXF vs CRO was confirmed. Similar results were found between study drugs on the secondary efficacy parameters, including success at end-of-treatment (95.3% for MXF vs 92.9% for CRO), success at test-of-cure in bacteriologically-positive patients (94.1% vs 90.7%) and eradication/presumed eradication rates (91.7% vs 93.3%). ITT (Intention-to-Treat) analysis confirmed these data. There was a low incidence of adverse events (10.8% vs 9.1%). During a 6-month follow-up period, relapse rates were lower for MXF vs CRO (23.3% vs 28.3%; p > .05). Compared with CRO, MXF was associated with cost savings per patient ranging from Euro226.57 (INHS perspective) to Euro448.23 (societal perspective), with lower hospitalization rate the major variable contributing to reduced costs. MXF appears to be an ideal candidate for AECB treatment.

Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Anti-Infective Agents; Aza Compounds; Bronchitis, Chronic; Ceftriaxone; Costs and Cost Analysis; Female; Fluoroquinolones; Humans; Italy; Male; Middle Aged; Moxifloxacin; National Health Programs; Quinolines; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Bronchitis, Chronic; Ceftriaxone; Cephalosporin Resistance; Cephalosporins; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pneumonia, Pneumococcal; Streptococcus pneumoniae; Treatment Failure