rivaroxaban and Stroke

Dental procedures can pose a risk of bleeding, and it is not uncommon for dentists to consult prescribing physicians regarding a mutual patient's antiplatelet and anticoagulant medication to prevent excessive bleeding during or after an upcoming procedure. However, there has been a growing controversy in the dental community surrounding the stoppage of these medications prior to dental procedures. Some believe that stopping these medications prior to dental procedures is necessary to reduce the risk of bleeding complications, while others argue that stopping them can increase the risk of stroke or other thromboembolic events. The debate has left many dentists and specialists unsure about the best course of action when it comes to managing bleeding risk during dental procedures.In this article, we will review the antithrombotic medications, indications, mechanism of action, and its effects on the coagulation pathway, laboratory testing and reversal agents. Also, we will explore the controversy surrounding the stoppage of novel anitplatelets (eg,: prasurgrel and ticagrelor), dual-antiplatelets, triple-antiplatelet, vitamin K antagonists (eg,: wafarin, coumadin), and direct oral anticoagulants (eg,: dabigatran, rivaroxaban, xarelto and endoxaban) in dentistry and examine the current evidence and guidelines for managing dental patients undergoing oral surgery.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Humans; Oral Surgical Procedures; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Heart failure (HF) is a major public health issue associated with significantly increased risk of stroke. It remains uncertain whether oral anticoagulation (OAC) in patients with heart failure and sinus rhythm (HF-SR) could improve prognosis.. We performed a systematic search of PubMed and Embase databases for randomized controlled clinical trials assessing oral anticoagulants versus antiplatelets or placebo in patients with HF or ventricular dysfunction/cardiomyopathy without clinical HF and SR. The outcomes assessed were stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding, myocardial infarction, all-cause mortality, and HF hospitalization.. Seven trials of 15,794 patients were eligible for our analyses. The overall follow-up duration was 32,367 patient-years corresponding to a mean follow-up of 2.05 years per patient. Four trials included patients treated with warfarin and three included patients treated with rivaroxaban. OAC was associated with reduced rate of stroke or systemic embolism compared to control (odds ratio (OR): 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.44, 0.73, number needed to treat (NNT): 71.9) but higher rate of major bleeding (OR: 1.92, 95% CI: 1.47, 2.50, number needed to harm (NNH): 57.1). In the subgroup analysis according to the type of OAC, rivaroxaban was associated with significantly reduced rate of stroke or systemic embolism (1.24 vs 1.97 events per 100 patient-years, respectively, OR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.45, 0.88, NNT: 82) and higher risk of major bleeding (OR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.26, 2.20) compared to antiplatelets or placebo. There was no significant differences between groups for the outcomes of myocardial infarction, all-cause mortality, and HF hospitalization.. This analysis shows that any benefit of OAC for stroke prevention may be offset by an increased risk of major bleeding in HF-SR patients. A well-designed randomized controlled trial of newer safer OACs is needed in this population.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Fibrinolytic Agents; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamins

The fracture risks of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Clinical Trials.gov databases for RCTs, and cohort studies were systematically searched from inception to 10 June 2021.. NOACs were associated with a significantly lower risk of any fracture and osteoporotic fracture compared to warfarin. This benefit was also observed in specific NOACs types of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. However, whether NOACs had a less fracture risk than warfarin on the other risk of fractures was still uncertain.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Osteoporotic Fractures; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) are highly prevalent conditions with a significant healthcare burden, and represent the main indications for anticoagulation. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are the first choice treatment of AF/VTE, and have become the most prescribed class of anticoagulants globally, overtaking vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Compared to VKAs, DOACs have a similar or better efficacy/safety profile, with reduced risk of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), while the risk of major bleeding and other bleeding harms may vary depending on the type of DOAC. We have critically reviewed available evidence from randomized controlled trials and observational studies regarding the risk of bleeding complications of DOACs compared to VKAs in patients with AF and VTE. Special patient populations (e.g., elderly, extreme body weights, chronic kidney disease) have specifically been addressed. Management of bleeding complications and possible resumption of anticoagulation, in particular after ICH and gastrointestinal bleeding, are also discussed. Finally, some suggestions are provided to choose the optimal DOAC to minimize adverse events according to individual patient characteristics and bleeding risk.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Venous Thromboembolism

Several studies have evaluated the economic evaluation of a group of medications known as novel oral anticoagulant drugs (NOACs) in recent years. The aim of this study is to review and systematically analyze the cost-utility studies results of warfarin compared with other NOAC drugs in atrial fibrillation patients.. A systematic review was performed to identify all studies evaluating the NOAC medications in comparison with warfarin. For this purpose, PubMed, Cochrane Library, ISI Web of Science, and Scopus were searched from 2013 to 2022. Articles were independently screened with inclusion criteria, and full texts were reviewed. First, the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards checklist was used to evaluate the quality of the articles. Then, the costs and outcomes of the studies were analyzed, and findings were appraised critically.. A total of 84 costs-per-quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) cases were extracted from the studies in which the share of rivaroxaban, edoxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran were 31%, 13%, 29%, and 27%, respectively. The median cost per QALY of rivaroxaban, edoxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran was 21 910$/QALY, 22 096$/QALY, 17 765$/QALY, and 24 161$/QALY, respectively. Subgroup analysis based on perspective showed that dabigatran had the highest incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and edoxaban had the lowest ICER value. Edoxaban and apixaban had the highest and the lowest cost per QALY from an insurance perspective, respectively.. Despite the differences and variations in the economic evaluation studies of NOAC drugs, these drugs have shown acceptable cost-effectiveness in developed and developing countries. Among NOAC drugs, apixaban has the lowest ICER and the highest cost-effectiveness.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants have been an increasingly used class of drugs in the setting of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, defying vitamin K antagonists' monopoly when it comes to anticoagulation due to its several limitations. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have entered the market as a noninferior and safer option in comparison with vitamin K antagonists, as their respective phase III clinical trials proved. The aim of this article was to update and summarize data on their clinical pharmacology and to review real-world data to know their comparative effectiveness and safety. We performed a systematic review using PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, and Web of Science as search engines. Regarding pharmacodynamics, there were no substantial changes reported from their original profile. There were many advances in the knowledge about clinical pharmacokinetics of DOACs that have had a direct impact on their clinical use, mainly related to drug-drug interactions. In a real-world setting, DOACs have shown to be noninferior in preventing thromboembolic events compared to vitamin K antagonists. In regards to safety, DOACs have shown a lower bleeding risk relative to warfarin. Comparison between DOACs has demonstrated rivaroxaban to have the highest bleeding risk. Overall, the evidence gathered showed few changes from the original data presented in phase III clinical trials, concluding that their real-world use coincides greatly with them.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Pharmacology, Clinical; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K

There are limited data about the frequency of urgent surgical emergencies among patients receiving oral anticoagulants (OACs). We conducted a systematic literature review of Medline and EMBASE for published English-language articles of adult patients receiving oral anticoagulant treatment (vitamin K antagonists, apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, rivaroxaban) that reported on patients experiencing unplanned emergent or urgent surgery/procedure or trauma. Randomized trials, observational studies, and case series (50-100 cases) were included. The primary outcome was the frequency of unplanned urgent surgery or invasive procedures among OAC-treated patients with a focus on those not precipitated by the presence of major bleeding. The protocol was not registered. Funding was provided by Covis Pharmaceuticals. The search yielded 1367 potential studies of which 34 were included in the final review. One study reported the rate of urgent surgery/procedures among a large cohort of patients treated with dabigatran or warfarin for atrial fibrillation (~ 1% per year). Another study reported the rate of bleeding or urgent surgery among OAC-treated patients experiencing a fracture or trauma (0.489% per patient-year). The remaining 32 studies were cohorts of OAC-treated patients who received reversal or hemostatic therapies for major bleeding or urgent surgery. A median of 28.8% of these patients underwent surgery or invasive procedure. Urgent surgery appears to be a common, yet understudied complication during OAC treatment potentially associated with high rates of adverse outcomes. With increased eligibility for OACs, future studies evaluating the management and outcomes in this setting are needed.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

The administration of an anticoagulant in patients with liver disease (nonalcoholic steatohepatitis-NASH, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-NAFLD, chronic hepatitis, or cirrhosis) who have an indication (atrial fibrillation, venous thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism) is challenging because there is an imbalance between thrombosis and bleeding. There is a need to focus our attention on preventing risk factors because diabetes, obesity, dyslipidemia, smoking, and sedentary behavior are risk factors for both NASH/NAFLD and AF, and these patients require anticoagulant treatment. Patients with advanced liver disease (Child-Pugh C) were excluded from studies, so vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) are still recommended. Currently, VKAs are recommended for other conditions (antiphospholipid syndrome, mitral valve stenosis, and mechanical valve prosthesis). Amongst the patients under chronic anticoagulant treatment, especially for the elderly, bleeding as a result of the improper use of warfarin is one of the important causes of emergency admissions due to adverse reactions. DOACs are considered to be efficient and safe, with apixaban offering superior protection against stroke and a good safety profile as far as major bleeding is concerned compared to warfarin. DOACs are safe in the Child-Pugh A and B classes (except rivaroxaban), and in the Child-Pugh C class are contraindicated. Given that there are certain and reliable data for chronic kidney disease regarding the recommendations, in liver function impairment more randomized studies must be carried out, as the current data are still uncertain. In particular, DOACs have a simple administration, minimal medication interactions, a high safety and effectiveness profile, and now a reversal agent is available (for dabigatran and idarucizumab). Patients are also statistically more compliant and do not require INR monitoring.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of antithrombotic regimens and their combinations in preventing thrombotic incidents in patients with stable atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (S-ASCVD).. A systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases. The primary comprehensive endpoint was a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) composite of cardiovascular death, stroke, or myocardial infarction, while the secondary endpoints were cardiovascular death, all-cause stroke, ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause death. The safety endpoint was major bleeding. Bayesian network meta-regression analysis in R software was used to calculate the final effect size and to correct for the effect of follow-up time on the outcome effect size.. Twelve studies reporting 122,190 patients with eight antithrombotic regimens were included in this systematic review. For the primary composite endpoint, low-dose aspirin plus clopidogrel 75 mg (hazard ratio [HR] 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33-0.87) and low-dose aspirin plus rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.34-0.82) showed significantly better efficacy than clopidogrel monotherapy, and the efficacy was comparable among the first two regimens. Unfortunately, none of the active regimens significantly decreased all-cause death, cardiovascular death branch, and all-cause stroke as part of the secondary endpoints. Low-dose aspirin plus ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.69-0.94) and low-dose aspirin plus ticagrelor 60 mg twice daily (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74-0.95) had a significant advantage in myocardial infarction compared with low-dose aspirin monotherapy, while low-dose aspirin plus 2.5 mg rivaroxaban twice daily (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.41-0.94) was better than low-dose aspirin in the treatment of ischemic stroke. In the major bleeding branch, low-dose aspirin plus ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily (HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.70-2.90), low-dose aspirin plus ticagrelor 60 mg twice daily (HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.70-2.60), low-dose aspirin plus rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.30-2.00), and rivaroxaban 5 mg twice daily (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.20-1.90) showed higher major bleeding risk compared with low-dose aspirin.. Considering MACEs, myocardial infarction, all kinds of stroke, ischemic stroke, and major bleeding, low-dose aspirin plus rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily should be considered the preferred regimen for S-ASCVD patients with low bleeding risk.

Topics: Aspirin; Atherosclerosis; Bayes Theorem; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Myocardial Infarction; Network Meta-Analysis; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Regression Analysis; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Ticagrelor

Large-scaled post-marketing surveillance studies (PMSSs) of 4 direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) were conducted since 2011 in Japan, and the results of the last one have recently been published. Each reported a more than acceptable ischemic stroke prevention. The major bleeding rates were also acceptably low and comparable to each other in the PMSSs of dabigatran (J-dabigatran), rivaroxaban (XAPASS), and edoxaban (ETNA-AF-Japan). However, the incidence in PMSS of apixaban (STANDARD) was more than double the others. This finding appeared to contradict the globally accepted theory that apixaban is less likely than other DOACs to cause bleeding events. Possible responsible mechanisms included (1) the age and kidney function, (2) concomitant antiplatelet therapy, (3) drug actions, (4) follow-up duration, and (5) dose reduction criteria. Similarities in the clinical background shared by the 4 different PMSSs' participants and knowledge from previous studies did not support a dominant contribution of any of those former 4 factors to the increased major bleeding incidence in STANDARD. A possibility of the 5th factor was then examined. An estimated calculation we created showed that apixaban's dose reduction criteria was strict enough to considerably reduce the opportunity for participants to take its reduced rather than standard dose. We then successfully simulated how the "strict" dose reduction criteria would have increased the bleeding event rates under DOAC therapy. The discussion in this review may therefore raise a question about the validity of the current dose reduction criteria of apixaban for Japanese AF patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Japan; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become the cornerstone for prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation and patients with a history of venous thromboembolism. However, studies show that DOAC prescriptions are commonly inconsistent with guideline recommendations. DOAC dosing in the acutely ill patient could impose an even greater challenge. In this review, we describe the prevalence of inappropriate inpatient prescribing of DOACs and the associated rationales, predictors and clinical consequences. With the aim of promoting appropriate prescriptions of DOACs to hospitalized patients, we further outline DOAC dose reduction criteria justified by various guidelines, illustrating the complexities of appropriate dosing, especially in acutely ill patients. Moreover, we will discuss the impact of anticoagulant stewardship programs and the vital role that pharmacists may play in optimizing inpatient DOAC treatment.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Inappropriate Prescribing; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Venous Thromboembolism

Oral anticoagulants (OACs) prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Several factors may cause OAC switching.. To examine the phenomenon of OAC switching in patients with AF, including all available evidence; frequency and patterns of switch, clinical outcomes, adherence, patient-reported outcomes, reasons for switch, factors associated with switch and evidence gaps.. Scoping review.. MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science, up to January 2022.. Of the 116 included studies, 2/3 examined vitamin K antagonist (VKA) to direct-acting OAC (DOAC) switching. Overall, OAC switching was common and the definition of an OAC switch varied across. Switching from VKA to dabigatran was the most prevalent switch type, but VKA to apixaban has increased in recent years. Patients on DOAC switched more to warfarin than to other DOACs. OAC doses involved in the switches were hardly reported and patients were often censored after the first switch. Switching back to a previously taken OAC (frequently warfarin) occurred in 5%-21% of switchers.The risk of ischaemic stroke and gastrointestinal bleeding in VKA to DOAC switchers compared with non-switchers was conflicting, while there was no difference in the risk of other types of bleeding. The risk of ischaemic stroke in switchers from DOAC versus non-switchers was conflicting. Studies evaluating adherence found no significant changes in adherence after switching from VKA to DOAC, however, an increase in satisfaction with therapy were reported. Reasons for OAC switch, and factors associated with OAC switch were mostly risk factors for stroke and bleeding. Clinical outcomes, adherence and patient-reported outcomes were sparse for switches from DOACs.. OAC switching is common in patients with AF and patients often switch back to an OAC they have previously been on. There are aspects of OAC switching that have received little study, especially in switches from DOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are associated with bleeding. Patients often stop taking DOACs due to non-major bleeding, which may lead to stroke recurrence. We aimed to determine the risk of non-major bleeding using different DOACs to prevent strokes in atrial fibrillation (AF).. A systematic search of four databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting non-major bleeding events in patients taking DOACs or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). In this frequency-based network meta-analysis, odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were used for reporting. Based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA), the relative ranking probability of each group was generated.. Nineteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (involving 85,826 patients) were included. For clinically relevant non-major bleeding, the risk for bleeding was lowest for apixaban (SUCRA, 93.9), followed by that for VKAs (SUCRA, 47.7), dabigatran (SUCRA, 40.3), rivaroxaban (SUCRA, 35.9), and edoxaban (SUCRA, 32.2). The minor bleeding safety of DOACs was ranked from highest to lowest as follows: apixaban (SUCRA, 78.1), edoxaban (SUCRA, 69.4), dabigatran (SUCRA, 48.8), and VKAs (SUCRA, 3.7).. Based on current evidence, for stroke prevention in patients with AF, the safest DOAC is apixaban in terms of non-major bleeding. This suggests that apixaban may have a lower risk of non-major bleeding than other anticoagulants and may help provide some clinical reference for choosing a more appropriate drug for the patient.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulants for older adult patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).. Pairwise and network meta-analyses.. Patients with AF aged ≥75 years.. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library were searched for published randomized controlled trials and adjusted observational studies evaluating the use of a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), vitamin K antagonist, or antiplatelet drug for the prevention of stroke. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were the composite of stroke and systemic embolism (SSE) and major bleedings.. This study included 38 studies enrolling 1,022,908 older adult patients with AF. Results from pairwise meta-analyses showed that NOACs were superior to warfarin for all outcomes, except that dabigatran increased the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleedings. Aspirin was associated with a higher risk of SSE and ischemic stroke than warfarin or NOACs. Results of network meta-analyses indicated that apixaban significantly reduced the risk of SSE, major bleedings, and GI bleedings than warfarin, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran. Apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran reduced the risk of ischemic stroke and intracranial bleeding compared to warfarin. Dabigatran showed lower risk of all-cause mortality than warfarin and of intracranial bleeding than rivaroxaban.. NOACs are of at least equal efficacy, or even superior to warfarin. The safety profile of individual NOAC agents was significantly different, as apixaban performs better than the other oral anticoagulants in reducing major bleeding and GI bleeding, whereas dabigatran increased the risk of GI bleeding.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Network Meta-Analysis; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Although guidelines give preference to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for stroke prevention in most patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), DOACs are not recommended in those with rheumatic heart disease or mechanical heart valves. The results of the INVICTUS trial (Investigation of Rheumatic AF Treatment Using Vitamin K Antagonists, Rivaroxaban or Aspirin Studies), which compared rivaroxaban with a VKA in patients with rheumatic heart disease-associated AF, and the PROACT Xa trial (A Trial to Determine if Participants with an On-X Aortic Valve Can be Maintained Safely on Apixaban), which compared apixaban with warfarin in patients with an On-X valve in the aortic position, support the use of VKAs for these indications. In this paper, we review the results of these trials, provide perspective on why VKAs were superior to DOACs, and discuss future directions for anticoagulation in these disorders.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Pyridones; Rheumatic Heart Disease; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Altered direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) plasma levels can lead either to spontaneous hemorrhagic or thrombotic complications. We describe a case of suspected altered apixaban disposition in a patient with an upper gastrointestinal cancer resection treated with apixaban for non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Diagnosis of ischemic stroke for left hemiparesis was confirmed due to recent emergence of a hypodense area in the posterior capsular nucleus of ischemic reference in a context of binuclear capsular lacunar lesions. Thus, apixaban underexposure was suspected from anamnestic data and oral anticoagulation was switched to parenteral at the next scheduled dose for stroke recurrence. Before switching apixaban pharmacokinetic analysis was performed and unexpectedly showed apixaban plasma overexposure. After 3 days from the switch, the patient experienced spontaneous bleeding complications, for which the risk-benefit profile of continuing anticoagulant treatment for stroke recurrences warranted treatment discontinuation. Unexpected DOAC plasma exposure may present in special patient populations with thrombotic and bleeding complications. Though universally recognized therapeutic ranges have yet to be established for DOACs, periodic drug monitoring may aid in guiding optimization of DOAC therapy and reduce the risk of adverse events in special patient populations.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Tract; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Advancing age is a risk factor for developing non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) or acute venous thromboembolism (VTE). We assessed the comparative effectiveness, safety, costs, and healthcare utilization associated with rivaroxaban versus warfarin in patients of advanced age managed in the United States (US).. We conducted a systematic review of Medline and Embase through April 2023 to identify real-world evidence (RWE) studies of older adults (at least 65+ years of age) with either NVAF or VTE who received either rivaroxaban or warfarin in the US and reported an outcome of stroke or systemic embolism (SSE), ischemic stroke (IS), recurrent VTE, major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, costs, or healthcare resource utilization. We classified each outcome of interest per study as "positive" (lower risk), "negative" (higher risk), or "neutral" based upon the summary effect size of rivaroxaban versus warfarin.. Twenty-nine RWE studies met inclusion criteria, mostly (83%) in NVAF populations. For SSE with rivaroxaban versus warfarin, 68.8% of studies showed positive effects and 31.2% showed neutral outcome. For major bleeding, 57.7% showed neutral effects, 38.5% showed negative effects, and 3.8% of studies showed positive effects with rivaroxaban versus warfarin. Of the two studies reporting cost data, both were positive, showing lower costs for SSE for rivaroxaban versus warfarin and neutral cost for major bleeding costs.. This systematic review supports findings from subgroup analyses of randomized controlled trials that, compared with warfarin, rivaroxaban is associated with generally neutral or positive effects on thrombosis and a mixed picture on bleeding outcomes in older adults with either NVAF or VTE treated in the United States.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

The conjunction of atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) is common in clinical practice. Over the last 2 decades, a significant number of articles (2500) have been published about AF and VTE. To effectively analyze and present these vast amounts of information, this study uses bibliometric research methods to categorize and consolidate these publications. The number of publications has increased yearly, especially since 2012. The United States was the most prolific country, with 1054 studies published. The most productive institution was McMaster University. Gregory Y.H. Lip was the most prolific author. The keyword analysis identified that the research focuses from 2003 to 2014 were factor Xa inhibitor, dabigatran etexilate, direct thrombin inhibitor, double-blind, deep vein thrombosis, molecular weight heparin, stroke prevention, etc. From 2015 to 2016, research mainly focused on venous thromboembolism, antithrombotic therapy, anticoagulant, warfarin, atrial fibrillation, stroke, and pulmonary embolism. Studies during 2017 to 2022 focused on apixaban, direct oral anticoagulant, rivaroxaban, dabigatran, hemorrhage, edoxaban, medicine efficacy and safety, risk factors, clinical management, and vitamin K antagonists. Since 2018, novel oral anticoagulants have been the most commonly used keywords. On the whole, most studies of AF and VTE focus on pathogenesis and therapeutic drugs. The causal relationship between AF and VTE, the effectiveness and safety of novel oral anticoagulants in the treatments, the anticoagulant regimen of AF and VTE co-disease, and the treatment regimen for vulnerable populations such as the elderly or obese people were the focus of current research and will continue to be the central point of future research.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Limited real-world data show that rivaroxaban following dosage criteria from either ROCKET AF [20 mg/day or 15 mg/day if creatinine clearance (CrCl) < 50 mL/min] or J-ROCKET AF (15 mg/day or 10 mg/day if CrCl < 50 mL/min) is associated with comparable risks of thromboembolism and bleeding with each other in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). We are aimed to study whether these observations differ between Asian and non-Asian subjects.. A systematic review and meta-analysis with random effects was conducted to estimate the aggregate hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) using PubMed and MEDLINE databases from 8 September 2011 to 31 December 2022 searched for adjusted observational studies that reported relevant clinical outcomes of NVAF patients receiving rivaroxaban 10 mg/day if CrCl > 50 mL/min, on-label dose rivaroxaban eligible for ROCKET AF or J-ROCKET AF, and rivaroxaban 20 mg/day if CrCl < 50 mL/min. Effectiveness and safety endpoints were compared between ROCKET AF and J-ROCKET AF dosing regimen in Asian and non-Asian subjects, separately. Also, risks of events of rivaroxaban 10 mg/day despite of CrCl > 50 mL/min and rivaroxaban 20 mg/day despite of CrCl < 50 mL/min were compared to that of 'ROCKET AF/J-ROCKET AF dosing'. Sensitivity analyses were performed by sequential elimination of each study from the pool. The meta-regression analysis was performed to explore the influence of potential factors on the effectiveness and safety outcomes. Eighteen studies involving 67 571 Asian and 54 882 non-Asian patients were included. Rivaroxaban following J-ROCKET AF criteria was associated with comparable risks of thromboembolism in the Asian subgroup, whereas rivaroxaban following J-ROCKET AF criteria was associated with higher risks of all-cause mortality (HR:1.30; 95% CI:1.05-1.60) compared with that of ROCKET AF criteria in the non-Asian population. There were no differences in risks of major bleeding between rivaroxaban following J-ROCKET AF vs. ROCKET AF criteria either in the Asian or non-Asian population. The use of rivaroxaban 10 mg despite of CrCl > 50 mL/min was associated with a higher risk of thromboembolism (HR:1.64; 95% CI:1.28-2.11) but lower risk of major bleeding (HR:0.72; 95% CI:0.57-0.90) compared with eligible dosage criteria. The use of rivaroxaban 20 mg despite of CrCl < 50 mL/min was associated with worse clinical outcomes in the risks of thromboembolism (HR:1.32; 95% CI:1.09-1.59), mortality (HR:1.33; 95% CI:1.10-1.59), and major bleeding (HR:1.26; 95% CI:1.03-1.53) compared with eligible dosage criteria. The pooled results were generally in line with the primary effectiveness and safety outcomes by removing a single study at one time. Meta-regression analyses failed to detect the bias in most potential patient characteristics associated with the clinical outcomes.. Rivaroxaban dosing regimen following J-ROCKET criteria may serve as an alternative to ROCKET AF criteria for the Asian population with NVAF, whereas the dosing regimen following ROCKET AF criteria was more favourable for the non-Asian population. The use of rivaroxaban 10 mg despite of CrCl > 50 mL/min was associated with a higher risk of thromboembolism but a lower risk of major bleeding, while use of rivaroxaban 20 mg despite of CrCl < 50 mL/min was associated with worse outcome in most clinical events.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Observational Studies as Topic; Off-Label Use; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Although older patients with atrial fibrillation are at heightened risk of thromboembolic and bleeding events, their optimal treatment choice remains uncertain.. This meta-analysis was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials that compared thromboembolic or bleeding outcomes between a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) and a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and reported outcomes for patients aged ≥75 years with atrial fibrillation. The efficacy outcome was the composite of stroke and systemic embolism. Safety outcomes included major bleeding, any clinically relevant bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage. Each DOAC and VKA was compared pairwise in a network meta-analysis. High- and low-dose regimens and factor IIa and Xa inhibitors were also compared. Seven randomized controlled trials were included in the analysis. Stroke and systemic embolism risks did not differ significantly among DOACs. There were no significant differences in major bleeding between each DOAC and VKA. Intracranial hemorrhage risk was significantly lower with dabigatran, apixaban, and edoxaban than with VKA and rivaroxaban, which had similar risks. High-dose regimens led to lower risks of stroke or systemic embolism compared with VKA and low-dose regimens, with both doses having similar bleeding risks.. In patients aged ≥75 years with atrial fibrillation, DOACs were associated with fewer thromboembolic events compared with VKA, whereas dabigatran, apixaban, and edoxaban were associated with lower risks of intracranial hemorrhage compared with VKA and rivaroxaban.. URL: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/. Unique identifier: CRD42022329557.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Network Meta-Analysis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

We aimed to determine the safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for stroke prevention and treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).. A systematic search of four databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting severe bleeding events in patients taking DOACs or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). In this frequency-based network meta-analysis, odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were used for reporting. Based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA), the relative ranking probability of each group was generated.. Twenty-three RCTs met the inclusion criteria, and a total of 87,616 patients were enrolled. The bleeding safety of DOACs for stroke prevention and treatment in patients with AF was ranked from highest to lowest as follows: fatal bleeding: edoxaban (SUCRA,80.2), rivaroxaban (SUCRA,68.3), apixaban (SUCRA,48.5), dabigatran (SUCRA,40.0), VKAs (SUCRA,12.9); major bleeding: dabigatran (SUCRA,74.0), apixaban (SUCRA,71.5), edoxaban (SUCRA,66.5), rivaroxaban (SUCRA,22.7), VKAs (SUCRA,15.4); gastrointestinal bleeding: apixaban (SUCRA,55.9), VKAs (SUCRA,53.7), edoxaban (SUCRA,50.5), rivaroxaban (SUCRA,50.4), dabigatran (SUCRA,39.5); intracranial hemorrhage: dabigatran (SUCRA,84.6), edoxaban (SUCRA,74.1), apixaban (SUCRA,65.8), rivaroxaban (SUCRA,24.4), VKAs (SUCRA,1.1).. Based on current evidence, for stroke prevention and treatment in patients with AF, the most safe DOAC is edoxaban in terms of fatal bleeding; dabigatran in terms of major bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage and apixaban in terms of gastrointestinal bleeding. However, given the nature of indirect comparisons, more high-quality evidence from head-to-head comparisons is still needed to confirm them.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Network Meta-Analysis; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K

Low-dose rivaroxaban is often given to patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) around the world, but the rationale for its use remains unclear. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of standard- or low-dose rivaroxaban in patients with AF through systematic review of literature with meta-analysis.. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Clinical Trials.gov, the Cochrane Library, and Bayer trial website from inception of each database until June 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies were included in the meta-analysis. A random-effects model was employed to calculate the pooled effect estimates.. Two RCTs and 17 cohort studies were included in the qualitative analysis. Indirect comparison of RCTs showed no significant difference between the two rivaroxaban dosages in risk of efficacy or safety outcomes (p > 0.05). Indirect comparison of cohort studies showed a lower risk of MACE among Caucasians in standard-dose group (HR 0.779; 95% CI 0.687-0.884; p < 0.001). Bleeding outcomes did not differ significantly between the two dosage regimens in Asian or Caucasian populations, except that the standard dose was associated with higher risk of major bleeding among elderly Caucasian patients (HR 1.329; 95% CI 1.141-1.547; p < 0.001). The quality of evidence was rated ranging from very low to low for all the efficacy and safety outcomes.. In Caucasians with AF, standard-dose rivaroxaban may prevent MACE significantly better than low-dose treatment. Further studies in Asians are needed to verify the advantages of the standard dose.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Hemorrhage; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; White People

Patients with heart failure (HF) in sinus rhythm (SR) experience an increased incidence of thromboembolic events including stroke. Among patients with HF, high-quality evidence supports the use of oral anticoagulation when atrial fibrillation is present, but the benefit of anticoagulation in SR in the absence of other known indications for anticoagulation is unclear. In four randomized controlled trials (RCTs), warfarin did not improve a composite of clinical outcomes compared with aspirin or placebo in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and SR. A recent RCT assessed the efficacy of the direct oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban versus placebo in patients with HFrEF (including mildly reduced ejection fraction), SR, and coronary artery disease. While rivaroxaban had a neutral effect on the primary composite outcome of myocardial infarction, stroke, or all-cause mortality, exploratory analyses revealed a significant reduction in strokes. It is thus possible that a subgroup of patients with HFrEF who are at high risk of stroke may benefit from anticoagulation. The challenge is to adequately identify this subgroup and to balance the potential benefit of anticoagulation with the risk of major bleeding. There is also an unmet need for evidence around anticoagulation in HF with preserved ejection fraction and SR. This review explores the current evidence around anticoagulation in patients with HF and SR, identifies challenges regarding outcome definitions and patient selection, and offers suggestions for future research.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Heart Failure; Humans; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) are emerging treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, data on the safety, efficacy, and medications for LAAC devices in patients with AF are lacking. We aimed to investigate the incidence of all-cause mortality, stroke, and major bleeding in AF patients with LAAC devices and DOACs. Moreover, we aimed to investigate the incidence rate of device-related thrombus (DRT) and the medications used in the management of AF patients with LAAC devices to gain insights into achieving better outcome. Based on a literature search using PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases between January 2015 and December 2020, eight LAAC device studies that used WATCHMAN and Amulet, and three DOAC studies that used rivaroxaban, with a total of 24,055 AF patients (LAAC devices, n = 2855; DOAC, n = 21,200), were included. A random-effects model was used to incorporate heterogeneity among studies. The pooled incidence of events per person-years were as follows: all-cause mortality, 0.06 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02-0.10) for WATCHMAN, 0.04 (95% CI 0.00-0.14) for Amulet, and 0.03 (95% CI 0.01-0.04) for rivaroxaban; stroke; 0.02 (95% CI 0.00-0.04) for WATCHMAN, 0 for Amulet, and 0.01 (95% CI 0.01-0.02) for rivaroxaban; major bleeding, 0.04 (95% CI 0.02-0.06) for WATCHMAN, 0.02 (95% CI 0.00-0.06) for Amulet, and 0.02 (95% CI 0.01-0.03) for rivaroxaban. The incidence rate of DRT was 2.3%, and complications were reported in 9%. The incidence of all-cause mortality, stroke, and major bleeding were similar between LAAC devices and DOACs. The rate of complications was acceptable, and those of DRT were lower than the average incidence reported in previous studies. However, further follow-up is needed. Concomitant anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies should be further evaluated to find the optimal regimen for AF patients with LAAC devices.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

The objective of present study was to compare the safety and efficacy of resuming direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and prior gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB).. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched from their inception until 2 June 2021 for observational cohort studies in patients with AF, who resumed VKAs or DOACs after a history of GIB. Studies that reported data on clinical outcomes including risk of recurrent GIB, thromboembolic events, or all-cause mortality were included. A network meta-analysis was performed to calculate the pooled hazard ratio (HR) and associated 95% credible intervals (CIs), using a random effects model in a Bayesian framework.. A total of 10 studies were included in the final analysis, including 59,244 AF patients with prior GIB, of whom 27,793 resumed DOACs, 24,635 resumed warfarin, and 6816 did not resume anticoagulation. Compared with no resumption of anticoagulation, resumption of warfarin was associated with an increased risk of recurrent GIB (HR 1.33, 95% CI: 1.06-1.70), but no increased risk of recurrent GIB was found with resumption of DOACs (HR 1.22, 95% CI: 0.88-1.71); among individual DOACs, only rivaroxaban was associated with an increased risk of recurrent GIB (HR 1.67, 95% CI: 1.16-2.65). Compared with no resumption of anticoagulation, resumption of DOACs and warfarin was associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality (HR 0.57, 95% CI: 0.40-0.84; HR 0.58, 95% CI: 0.44-0.79), but no statistically significant reduction in thromboembolic events (HR 0.69, 95% CI: 0.4-1.2; HR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.55-1.29).. In AF patients with prior GIB, resumption of DOACs may be safer, except for rivaroxaban.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Bayes Theorem; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

A Markov model was adapted to assess the real-world cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban. Each of these non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants was compared with vitamin K antagonist for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in Spain.. All inputs were derived from real-world studies: baseline patient characteristics, clinical event rates, as well as persistence rates for the vitamin K antagonist treatment option. A meta-analysis of real-world studies provided treatment effect and persistence data for rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban, each compared with vitamin K antagonist therapy. The model considered 3-month cycles over a lifetime horizon. The model outcomes included different costs, quality-adjusted life years and life-years gained. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the model.. When compared with vitamin K antagonist, rivaroxaban incurred incremental costs of €77 and resulted in incremental quality-adjusted life years of 0.08. The incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year was €952. For the same comparison, the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year for dabigatran was €4,612. Finally, compared with vitamin K antagonist, the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year for apixaban was €32,015. The sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the base case results. The probabilities to be cost-effective versus vitamin K antagonist were 94%, 86% and 35%, respectively, for rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban, considering a willingness-to-pay threshold of €22,000 per quality-adjusted life year gained, based on a cost-effectiveness study of the Spanish National Health System.. These results suggest that rivaroxaban and dabigatran are cost-effective versus vitamin K antagonist for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation, from the Spanish National Health System perspective.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Spain; Stroke; Vitamin K

To assess the validity of the belief that anticoagulation is not beneficial in patients with embolic stroke of unknown source (ESUS), and to asssess the benefits and safety of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs).. The failure of randomized trials to show benefit of anticoagulation in ESUS is probably due to misclassification of large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) as ESUS, as defined by a stenosis ≥ 50%. There are important differences among DOACs. There are a number of problems with dabigatran, and rivaroxaban and edoxaban are not suitable for once-daily dosing. Recent evidence from real-world practice indicates that apixaban is more effective and safer than rivaroxaban. Plaque burden should be included in the definition of LAA. Patients in whom a cardioembolic source is strongly suspected should be anticoagulated; antiplatelet agents are not significantly safer than DOACs, and are not effective in cardioembolic stroke.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Reasoning; Embolic Stroke; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Available data have shown an association between direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) plasma concentration and clinical, particularly bleeding, events. Factors that may influence DOAC plasma concentration are therefore the focus of particular attention. Population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) analyses can help in identifying such factors while providing predictive models. The main aim of the present study was to identify all the PopPK models to date for the four most frequently used DOACs (dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban). The secondary aim was to use these models to simulate different DOAC plasma concentration-time profiles in relevant clinical scenarios. The results of our model-based simulations confirm the clinical relevance of the known major factors influencing DOAC exposure and support the current approved dose adaptation, at least for atrial fibrillation. They also highlight how the accumulation of covariates, not currently considered for dose adaptation due to their seemingly minor influence on DOAC exposure, lead to supratherapeutic blood concentrations and could thus enhance the risk of major bleeding. The present results therefore question DOAC dose adaptation in the presence of these covariates, such as drug-drug interaction or genotypes, alongside the known existing covariates. As the overall effect of accumulation of several covariates could be difficult to apprehend for the clinicians, PopPK modeling could represent an interesting approach for informed precision dosing and to improve personalized prescription of DOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are used for prevention of thromboembolic events, but their use in dialysis patients is debatable. This study investigated the available evidence for the use of NOACs in dialysis patients. Online databases were systematically searched for eligible studies including pharmacokinetic (PK) studies, cohort studies, and randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing NOAC with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) or no anticoagulant treatment. Newcastle Ottawa Scale and Cochrane Risk of bias tool were used for quality assessment. Twenty studies were identified (nine PK studies, two RCTs, and nine cohort studies). Most of the studies investigated apixaban or rivaroxaban. In dialysis patients, less accumulation was reported with apixaban and rivaroxaban compared to dabigatran and edoxaban. PK studies indicate that high dose apixaban or rivaroxaban should be avoided. The two RCTs (rivaroxaban/apixaban vs. VKA) were small and underpowered regarding stroke and bleeding outcomes. Most cohort studies found apixaban superior to VKA, whereas comparison of rivaroxaban with VKA yielded conflicting results. Cohort studies comparing apixaban high dose (5 mg) with low dose (2.5 mg) twice daily suggest a lower risk of stroke with high dose but also a higher risk of bleeding with high dose. Apixaban versus no anticoagulation was compared in one cohort study and did not lower the risk of stroke compared with non-treated regardless of apixaban dosage. Widespread use of NOACs in dialysis patients is limited by adequately sized RCTs. Available evidence suggests a potential for use of apixaban and rivaroxaban in reduced dose.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Renal Dialysis; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K

Although several meta-analyses have examined the effects of off-label underdosing of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) compared with their recommended doses in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), they combined different kinds of NOACs in their primary analyses. Herein, we first conducted a meta-analysis to separately assess the effects of off-label underdosing versus on-label dosing of four individual NOACs on adverse outcomes in the AF population.. The PubMed and Embase database were systemically searched until November 2021 to identify the relevant studies. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled by utilizing a random-effects model.. A total of nine studies with 144,797 patients taking NOACs were included in the meta-analysis. In the pooled analysis, off-label underdosing of rivaroxaban was related to an increased risk of stroke or systemic embolism (HR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.05-1.63; p = .02), whereas off-label underdosing of apixaban was associated with a higher risk of all-cause death (HR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.05-1.40; p = .01). When comparing off-label underdosing versus on-label dosing of dabigatran or edoxaban, no differences were found in the primary and secondary clinical outcomes.. Off-label underdosing of rivaroxaban may increase the risk of stroke or systematic embolism, whereas off-label underdosing of apixaban may heighten the incidence of all-cause death.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Humans; Off-Label Use; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Dose-reduced regimens of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may be used for 2 main purposes: dose-adjusted treatment intended as full-intensity anticoagulation (eg, for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation [AF] in patients requiring dose reduction) or low-intensity treatment (eg, extended-duration treatment of venous thromboembolism [VTE]). We reviewed randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to understand the scenarios in which dose-adjusted or low-intensity DOACs were tested and reviewed the labeled indications by regulatory authorities, using data from large registries to assess whether the use of dose-reduced DOACs in routine practice aligned with the findings of RCTs.. Among 4191 screened publications, 35 RCTs that used dose-adjusted DOACs were identified for dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban. Of these 35 RCTs, 29 were related to stroke prevention in AF. Efficacy and safety results for dose-adjusted DOACs in large RCTs of AF were similar to those found for full-dose DOACs. To our knowledge, dabigatran, apixaban, and rivaroxaban have not been studied as dose-adjusted therapy for acute VTE treatment. Low-intensity DOACs were identified in 37 RCTs. Low-intensity DOACs may be used for extended-duration treatment of VTE (apixaban and rivaroxaban), primary prevention in orthopedic surgeries (dabigatran, apixaban, and rivaroxaban), primary prevention in ambulatory high-risk cancer patients (apixaban and rivaroxaban) or (postdischarge) high-risk medical patients (rivaroxaban), in stable atherosclerotic vascular disease, or after a recent revascularization for peripheral artery disease in conjunction with aspirin (rivaroxaban). Minor variations exist between regulatory authorities in different regions regarding criteria for dose adjustment of DOACs. Data from large registries indicated that dose-reduced DOACs were used occasionally with doses or for clinical scenarios different from those studied in RCTs or recommended by regulatory authorities.. Dose adjustment and low-intensity treatment are 2 different forms of dose-reduced DOACs. Dose adjustment is mostly relevant for AF and should be done based on the approved criteria. Dose adjustment of DOACs should not be used for acute VTE treatment in most cases. In contrast, low-intensity DOACs may be used for primary or secondary VTE prevention for studied and approved indications. Attention should be given to routine practice patterns to align the daily clinical practice with existing evidence of safety and efficacy.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Venous Thromboembolism

Observational studies have investigated the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) used in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the risk of ischaemic stroke, thromboembolism (TE) and intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) associated with the use of DOACs and VKAs.. Medline and Embase were systematically searched until April 2021. Observational studies were gathered and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were extracted. Subgroup analyses based on DOAC doses, history of chronic kidney disease, stroke, exposure to VKA, age and sex were performed. A random-effects model was used.. We included 92 studies and performed 107 comparisons. Apixaban was associated with lower risk of stroke (HR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.68-0.99) compared to dabigatran. Rivaroxaban was associated with lower risk of stroke (HR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.83-0.98) compared to VKA. Dabigatran (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.80-0.91), rivaroxaban (HR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.77-0.89) and apixaban (HR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.65-0.86) were associated with lower risk for TE/stroke compared to VKA. Apixaban (HR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.03-1.68) and rivaroxaban (HR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.31-1.89) were associated with higher risk of ICH compared to dabigatran. Dabigatran (HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.44-0.52), apixaban (HR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.49-0.73) and rivaroxaban (HR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.65-0.81) were associated with lower risk of ICH compared to VKA.. Our study demonstrated significant differences in the risk of ischaemic stroke, TE/stroke and ICH associated with individual DOACs compared to both other DOACs and VKA.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Dabigatran; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Ischemic Stroke; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

For a long time, vitamin K antagonists (VKA) were the only oral anticoagulation therapy available to reduce adverse events in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are at least as effective and safe as VKA with few drug interactions, rapid onset, and short half-life. Four DOACs, dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban, have demonstrated efficacy and safety for treatment in AF patients.. The purpose of this review article is to analyze the current evidence in clinical trials and in real-world populations and performed a new analysis with the estimated effect of those DOACs over the VKA population from the FANTASIIA registry.. In the absence of randomized, controlled head-to-head comparisons between DOACs, high-quality observational data can provide useful information on the comparative effectiveness of DOACs. Current clinical guidelines recommend the management of oral anticoagulation in AF patients with DOACs over VKA for stroke prevention; however, many guidelines generally do not suggest a specific DOAC choice in clinical practice. The revised evidence in this manuscript and our real experience reflects that apixaban and dabigatran show the best efficacy and safety profile.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyridones; Registries; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K

Obesity is an epidemic with rising prevalence, and obese patients are predisposed to comorbid conditions that increase risk for thromboembolic events. It is critical to identify safe and effective anticoagulation therapy for use in this population. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are a preferred option for anticoagulation in patients of normal weight due to many benefits and equivalent safety and efficacy to their vitamin K antagonist counterparts. However, the safety and efficacy of DOACs in obese patients is not well understood. This review describes recent studies on the pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy, and clinical outcomes of the DOACs apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban and dabigatran in obese patient populations. DOACs may be a beneficial alternative to vitamin K antagonist therapy in obese patient populations.. The incidence of obesity within the USA is on the rise, as is that of the medical conditions that often accompany it. These include conditions that can predispose individuals to forming clots in the blood, such as atrial fibrillation, which is a form of an abnormal heartbeat, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, which is caused by fat buildup around the liver. Therefore, it is important that we have effective medicines that can prevent clotting in an obese patient population. Direct oral anticoagulants are a new, preferred medication option for this, but it is unclear how safe or effective they are in obese people; there is some concern that because of increased body weight, individuals may not get enough medicine to effectively prevent clots from forming, which would ultimately put them at risk for clotting and serious adverse health outcomes such as stroke. This review describes recent studies on the use of the direct oral anticoagulants apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban and dabigatran in obese patients, and whether they are a safe and effective form of anticoagulation in this population.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Obesity; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Dabigatran; Humans; Medicare; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States

The most frequent arrhythmia treated is atrial fibrillation (AF), which necessitates the use of oral anticoagulants (OACs) to reduce the risk of thromboembolism and stroke. Patients with chronic kidney disease are more likely to develop AF, with a 10% frequency among those on chronic dialysis. Warfarin is the most widely prescribed OAC for individuals with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). On the other hand, direct OACs (DOACs) are generally safer than warfarin, with fewer fatal bleeding events and a fixed dose that does not require close international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring. For those patients, warfarin and apixaban appear to be FDA-approved, whereas dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban are not recommended yet. Due to a lack of large randomized studies, data from major trials cannot be extended to dialysis patients. In this review, we summarize the available data and literature referring to patients on chronic hemodialysis with concomitant AF. Due to the scarcity of data, we try to assist clinicians in selecting the appropriate therapy according to the specific characteristics of each patient. Finally, future directions are provided in two key areas of focus: left atrial appendage closure therapies and genetic research.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Renal Dialysis; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is the most common type of bleeding occurring in patients on oral anticoagulation. A meta-analysis of the landmark randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for patients with atrial fibrillation demonstrated that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were associated with higher GIB rates compared to warfarin. However, significant heterogeneity existed between studies. While rivaroxaban, high-dose dabigatran, and high-dose edoxaban were associated with higher GIB rates than warfarin, GIB rates were similar between warfarin users and both apixaban and low-dose dabigatran users. Additionally, previous observational studies have yielded conflicting reports on whether GIB rates differ between warfarin and DOACs. Meta-analyses of observational studies demonstrated that warfarin is associated with lower rates of GIB compared to rivaroxaban, similar or lower rates compared to dabigatran, and higher rates compared to apixaban. Importantly, no RCT has compared individual DOACs directly and due to the different selection criteria of the initial RCTs, indirect comparisons between DOACs using these studies are unreliable. The best available information of comparisons between individual DOACs is therefore limited to observational studies. There is mounting evidence that suggests that rivaroxaban is associated with a higher risk of GIB compared to other DOACs. Finally, GIB induced by oral anticoagulation may have some positive aspects. Interestingly, there are studies that indicate oral anticoagulation facilitates colorectal cancer detection. Furthermore, results from RCTs and observational studies suggest that warfarin may even decrease the incidence of cancer.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Chronic kidney disease is common in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and is associated with heightened risks of stroke/systemic embolisation and bleeding. In this review we outline the evidence for AF stroke prevention in kidney disease, identify current knowledge gaps, and give recommendations for anticoagulation at various stages of chronic kidney disease. Overall, anticoagulation is underused. Warfarin use becomes increasingly difficult with advancing kidney disease, with difficulty maintaining international normalised ratio (INR) in therapeutic range, increased risk of intracranial and fatal bleeding compared to non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs), and high rates of discontinuation. Similarly, the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran is not recommended as it is predominantly renally excreted with consequent increased plasma levels and bleeding risk with advanced kidney disease. The Factor Xa inhibitors apixaban and rivaroxaban have less renal excretion (25-35%), modest increases in plasma levels with advancing kidney disease, and are the preferred first line choice for anticoagulation in moderate kidney disease based on strong evidence from randomised clinical trials (RCTs). In severe kidney disease there is a paucity of RCT data, but extrapolation of the pharmacokinetic and RCT data for moderate kidney disease, and observational studies, support the considered use of dose-adjusted Factor Xa inhibitors unless the bleeding risk is prohibitive. In Australia, apixaban is approved for creatinine clearance down to 25 mL/min, and rivaroxaban down to 15 mL/min. For end-stage kidney disease warfarin is the only agent approved, but we recommend against anticoagulation (except in selected cases) due to high bleeding risk, multiple co-morbidities, and questionable benefit.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Australia; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Low-dose (LD) direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in adjunct to antiplatelet therapy, known as dual-pathway inhibition (DPI), have been tested to prevent ischaemic events in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the overall safety and efficacy of LD DOACs vs placebo on a background of antiplatelet therapy.. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing LD DOAC (defined as a dosage below the lowest approved for stroke prevention) vs placebo among patients with CVD receiving single or dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in at least 50% of the population and followed for at least 6 months, were included. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to overcome different follow-up durations across trials. The primary efficacy endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and the primary safety endpoint major bleeding. A pre-specified subgroup analysis was performed for different DOAC-dose regimens. A total of 49 802 patients from 7 RCTs were included. Low-dose DOACs vs placebo were associated with significant reductions in MACE (IRR 0.85, 95% CI 0.78-0.91, number needed to treat, NNT, 86) and myocardial infarction (IRR 0.86, 95% CI 0.78-0.95, NNT 355) and significant increases of major (IRR 2.05, 95% CI 1.50-2.80, number needed to harm, NNH, 89) or all bleeding (IRR 1.82, 95% CI 1.49-2.22, NNH 23). Cardiovascular death (IRR 0.90, 95% CI 0.79-1.03, NNT 784), intracranial (IRR 1.18, 95% CI 0.71-1.96, NNH 1810), and fatal bleeding (IRR 1.13, 95% CI 0.76-1.69, NNH 3170) did not differ significantly between strategies. Non-significant reductions of all-cause death (IRR 0.90, 95% CI 0.80-1.01, NNT 821) and stroke (IRR 0.73, 95% CI 0.53-1.01, NNT 315) favoured LD DOACs. Meta-regression analyses showed a significant interaction between percentage of DAPT use and increased risk of major bleeding (P = 0.04), intracranial haemorrhage (P = 0.035), and stroke (P = 0.0003). Subgroup analysis of very LD DOAC, defined as ≤1/3 of the lowest approved dose for stroke prevention (i.e. rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily) seemed to mitigate the risk of bleeding without any trade-off in efficacy compared to other LD DOAC regimens.. In patients with CVD, LD DOAC vs placebo on a background of antiplatelet therapy, reduced ischaemic events at the expense of increased major and all bleeding, but without significantly increasing intracranial or fatal bleeds, while the reduction of cardiovascular or total mortality and stroke was not statistically significant. A DPI with very LD DOAC (i.e. rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily) appeared particularly advantageous, especially when combined with a single antiplatelet agent and used among patients at high ischaemic and low bleeding risk.. This study is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021232744).

Topics: Anticoagulants; Cardiovascular Diseases; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Current guidelines give class I recommendations for uninterrupted use of dabigatran rivaroxaban as an alternative to vitamin K antagonist (VKA) in patients of atrial fibrillation (AF) who are undergoing catheter ablation. The recent randomized controlled trials have shown similar efficacy of novel oral anticoagulants when compared to VKA in these patients. We sought to perform a meta-analysis with a focus on subgroup analysis of novel oral anticoagulants.. We searched PubMed, Clinical trials registry and the Cochrane Center Register of Controlled Trials were searched through August 2020. Six RCTs studies (n = 2260) comparing the use of NOACs versus VKA in patients with AF undergoing catheter ablation were included. The odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval was computed and P < 0.05 was considered as a level of significance. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were considered as a primary endpoint.. Our results showed a significant difference in MACE between NOACs and VKA [OR 0.57 (0.37-0.88); P = 0.01] and in major bleeding events [OR 0.55 (0.35-0.86); P = 0.009], which is mainly derived from the use of dabigatran. No significant difference in MACE or major bleeding events was found on the subgroup analysis of rivaroxaban and apixaban over VKA therapy.. Uninterrupted use of NOACs is safe and effective alternative for the prevention of cerebral thromboembolism and reducing the risk of major bleeding in patients undergoing catheter ablation of AF. However, the individual subgroup analysis showed that only dabigatran is superior to VKA in terms of reducing MACE through a reduction in major bleeding. The rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban are non-inferior to VKA therapy based on these results. Further studies are needed to generalize these recommendations in morbidly obese patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Humans; Obesity, Morbid; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been increasingly preferred over warfarin; however, The International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis recommended avoiding the use of DOACs in morbidly obese patients (body mass index >40 or weight >120 kg) because of limited clinical data.. Are DOACs effective and safe in morbidly obese patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).. We performed a comprehensive search for published studies indexed in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials that evaluated the efficacy and safety of DOACs in morbidly obese patients with NVAF.. Information on patient characteristics, comorbidities, primary anticoagulation indications, pharmacologic treatment, and outcomes were collected. The primary outcome of interest was stroke or systemic embolism (SSE) rate. The secondary outcome was major bleeding (MB).. A total of 10 studies including, 89,494 morbidly obese patients with NVAF on oral anticoagulation therapy (45,427 on DOACs vs. 44,067 on warfarin) were included in the final analysis. The SSE rate was significantly lower in DOACs group compared with warfarin group [odds ratio: 0.71; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.62-0.81; P < 0.0001; I2 = 0%]. MB rate was also significantly lower in DOACs group compared with the warfarin group (odds ratio: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.46-0.78; P < 0.0001; I2 = 86%). On subgroup analysis, SSE and MB event rates were significantly lower in rivaroxaban and apixaban than warfarin; however, dabigatran showed noninferiority to warfarin in SSE rate but superiority in the safety outcome.. Our meta-analysis demonstrated that DOACs are effective and safe with statistical superiority when compared with warfarin in morbidly obese patients. Large-scale randomized clinical trials are needed to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of DOACs in this cohort of patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Obesity, Morbid; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Real-life data about the use of dabigatran in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation are warranted. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness and safety of dabigatran, globally and stratified by dose (110/150 mg twice daily), vs vitamin K antagonists in non-Asian patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation from "real-world" studies.. A systematic review was performed according to Cochrane methodological standards. The results were reported according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Statement) statement. The ROBINS-I tool was used to assess bias risk. MEDLINE and EMBASE, from inception up to May 2021, using appropriate controlled vocabulary and free search terms, were searched.  RESULTS: A total of 34 studies, corresponding to 37 articles involving 1,600,722 participants (1,154,283 exposed to vitamin K antagonists and 446,439 to dabigatran) were eligible for this review. Dabigatran 150 mg reduced the risk of ischemic stroke compared with vitamin K antagonists, with a 14% risk reduction (hazard ratio [HR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-0.98). Globally, dabigatran reduced the risk of all-cause mortality compared with vitamin K antagonists (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.69-0.84), with a greater effect observed with dabigatran 150 mg (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.58-0.73). There was a trend towards a lower risk of myocardial infarction with dabigatran 150 mg (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.71-1.04). Regarding the primary safety outcomes, dabigatran (either at a dose of 150 mg or 110 mg) reduced the risk of major bleeding compared with vitamin K antagonists (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.70-0.83), as well as the risk of intracranial bleeding (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.39-0.50) and fatal bleeding (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.60-0.95), but with a slight increase in gastrointestinal bleeding risk (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.08-1.26).. Dabigatran has a favorable impact on effectiveness and safety outcomes compared with vitamin K antagonists in real-world populations.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K

This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and diabetes mellitus.. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched from the establishment of databases up to 15 October 2019. Studies on efficacy and safety outcomes of rivaroxaban and warfarin were included. Efficacy and safety outcomes, including stroke, ischemic stroke, stroke or systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, major adverse cardiac events, major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and major gastrointestinal bleeding were collected for meta-analysis.. Compared with warfarin, rivaroxaban could significantly reduce stroke (risk ratio [RR] 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-0.95; P = 0.01), ischemic stroke (RR 0.74; 95% CI 0.63-0.87; P = 0.0004), stroke or systemic embolism (RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.60-0.89; P = 0.002), myocardial infarction (RR 0.68; 95% CI 0.56-0.82; P < 0.0001), and major adverse cardiac events (RR 0.71; 95% CI 0.53-0.94; P = 0.02) in patients with AF and diabetes. Moreover, rivaroxaban was associated with a lower risk of major bleeding (RR 0.79; 95% CI 0.65-0.96; P = 0.02), intracranial hemorrhage (RR 0.52; 95% CI 0.39-0.69; P < 0.00001), and major gastrointestinal bleeding (RR 0.74; 95% CI 0.56-0.98; P = 0.04). Similar results were obtained in stratified meta-analysis of cohort studies.. Our study suggests a favorable risk-benefit profile of rivaroxaban, with superior efficacy and safety over warfarin in patients with AF and diabetes.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of death in the USA. Several risk factors have been identified, and obesity has become one of prominent concern. Excessive weight is considered a risk factor for CVD based on evidence linking it to a hypercoagulable state. Considering the prevalence of CVD and obesity in the USA, along with the increased risk for thrombus-related events, anticoagulation plays a significant role in prevention and treatment. Direct oral anticoagulants have taken the place of many traditional anticoagulants. Considering the recently approved indications and continued postmarketing studies conducted with rivaroxaban, this updated review provides data on the overall impact of obesity on this compound. This includes data obtained from both healthy obese volunteers and obese patients with various CVD conditions enrolled in rivaroxaban clinical trials, along with data obtained from postmarketing real-world evidence studies. Assessment of the clinical pharmacology and population pharmacokinetics in obese individuals revealed no clinically relevant effects of increased weight. Additionally, subgroup analyses from each of the pivotal phase III trials supporting the current approved labeling also demonstrated consistent efficacy and safety results in obese patients. Lastly, these findings are further supported by several recent real-world evidence studies assessing the continued effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban. In conclusion, rivaroxaban's overall pharmacological and clinical profile remained consistent in obese adults when assessed in both drug development and postmarketing studies, supporting the premise that higher weight does not necessitate adjustment in either dose strength or regimen.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Area Under Curve; Body Weight; Cardiovascular Diseases; Humans; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Obesity; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Venous Thrombosis

Comparative fracture risk for non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remains unclear. This study aimed to provide summary relative risk (RR) estimates for associations between NOACs vs. VKAs and fracture risk.. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched from 2010 to 26 May 2020. Observational studies investigating the association between NOACs vs. VKAs and fracture risk in patients with AF were included. The adjusted effect estimates were pooled using the DerSimonian-Laird random effects models. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) and the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiological (MOOSE) guidelines were followed. Five observational studies comprising 269 922 patients and 4289 fractures were included. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants use was associated with a lower risk of any fractures compared to VKAs use, with moderate heterogeneity [pooled RR = 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.75-0.92, P < 0.001, I2 = 73.0%]. When comparing individual NOAC to VKAs, a statistically significant lower risk of any fractures was found for rivaroxaban (pooled RR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.71-0.88, P < 0.001, I2 = 55.2%) and apixaban (pooled RR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.60-0.92, P = 0.007, I2 = 54.5%), but not dabigatran (pooled RR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.74-1.01, P = 0.061, I2 = 74.6%). No differences were observed in all head-to-head comparisons between NOACs.. This large meta-analysis suggests that NOACs use was associated with a lower risk of fractures compared with VKAs. Fracture risks were similar between NOACs. These findings may help inform the optimal anticoagulant choice for patients with AF at high risk of fracture.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K

The direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) have similar half-lives, but the dosing regimen varies between once daily (QD) or twice daily (BID). For some prescribers, the QD regimen improves compliance. Others prefer BID regimens to promote better stability of plasma concentrations, particularly in the event of missed doses. Limited level of evidence provides guidance about the best treatment strategy. The purpose of this study was to compare the treatment effect of QD vs. BID administration of DOACs in major orthopedic surgery (MOS), non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), venous thromboembolism (VTE), and acute coronary syndrome (ACS).. We conducted a systematic review up to April 2020. We included phase II clinical trials comparing DOAC QD vs BID with same daily dose. We extracted data for the occurrence of major thrombosis (proximal deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke) and major hemorrhage (ISTH criteria and recommendations of the European Medicines Agency for surgical patients). Relative risks (RR) were combined using a fixed and random effects weighted meta-analysis.. Our study does not support a global difference in term of efficacy and safety of the BID and QD regimens of DOAC in MOS, NVAF, VTE and ACS.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

There are conflicting signals in the literature about comparative safety and effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).. We conducted multicentre matched cohort studies with secondary meta-analysis to assess safety and effectiveness of dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban across 9 administrative healthcare databases. We included adults with NVAF initiating anticoagulation therapy (dabigatran, rivaroxaban or apixaban), and constructed 3 cohorts to compare DOACs pairwise. The primary outcome was pooled hazard ratio (pHR) of ischaemic stroke or systemic thromboembolism. Secondary outcomes included pHR of major bleeding, and a composite of stroke, major bleeding, or all-cause mortality. We used proportional hazard Cox regressions models, and pooled estimates were obtained with random effect meta-analyses.. The cohorts included 73 414 new users of dabigatran, 92 881 of rivaroxaban, and 61 284 of apixaban. After matching, the pHRs (95% confidence intervals) comparing rivaroxaban initiation to dabigatran were: 1.11 (0.93, 1.32) for ischaemic stroke or systemic thromboembolism, 1.26 (1.09, 1.46) for major bleeding, and 1.17 (1.05, 1.30) for the composite endpoint. For apixaban vs dabigatran, they were: 0.91 (0.74, 1.12) for ischaemic stroke or systemic thromboembolism, 0.89 (0.75, 1.05) for major bleeding, and 0.94 (0.78 to 1.14) for the composite endpoint. For apixaban vs rivaroxaban, they were: 0.85 (0.74, 0.99) for ischaemic stroke or systemic thromboembolism, 0.61 (0.53, 0.70) for major bleeding, and 0.82 (0.76, 0.88) for the composite endpoint.. We found that apixaban use is associated with lower risks of stroke and bleeding compared with rivaroxaban, and similar risks compared with dabigatran.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

We present a case of a fatal cerebral haemorrhage in an 82-year-old male patient with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), who was taking prophylactic oral anticoagulation because of atrial fibrillation (rivaroxaban 20 mg q.d. for two years). On admission, the patient was deeply comatose, mechanically ventilated, with tachycardia up to 150 bpm, high blood pressure >210/120 mmHg and a body temperature >39°C. A computed tomography scan of the head showed a large intracerebral haemorrhage located in the deep structures of the right hemisphere, with a mass effect and bleeding to the ventricles. Rivaroxaban was discontinued at admission. The patient tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), but he did not have typical symptoms of pneumonia. In the following days, the patient's neurological condition did not improve, and a fever of up to 40°C and abnormal coagulation parameters remained resistant to pharmacotherapy. The patient developed multi-system organ failure and died on day 8. Here, we review the recent literature and discuss the possible association of SARS-CoV-2-mediated endothelial injury and cardiovascular disorders with cerebrovascular complications. We postulate that anti-inflammatory treatment in COVID-19 and the stabilisation of endothelium functions can be particularly important in patients with pre-existing cardiovascular conditions.

Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Cerebral Hemorrhage; COVID-19; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fatal Outcome; Humans; Hypertension; Hypotension; Male; Multiple Organ Failure; Respiratory Insufficiency; Rivaroxaban; SARS-CoV-2; Stroke; Tachycardia

Crossover between direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has been underinvestigated, but happens frequently in clinical practice. It is still unknown whether DOACs have similar rates of switch, or whether some DOACs are more prone to be switched over time. We reviewed studies comparing DOAC-to-DOAC switch prevalence, and compared risk of switch depending on index DOAC through meta-analysis. Systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines and deposited protocol (PROSPERO#CRD42020152405). MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane-CENTRAL were searched up to 1/3/2020 for studies reporting on DOAC-to-DOAC switch. We determined by meta-analysis the pooled odds ratio (OR) for switch depending on index DOAC prescribed. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used for bias assessment. Among 221 results retrieved, 5 large studies (n = 259,308, mean age ranging 61.2-79.3) provided data on DOAC-to-DOAC switch. Studies were all large retrospective, observational and claims registry-based, with similar ascertainment of exposure and switch. Bias assessment revealed fair to high quality. Among DOACs, apixaban had consistently lower risk of DOAC-to-DOAC switch compared to dabigatran (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.25-0.34) or rivaroxaban (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.50-0.67), the former carrying a higher risk than the latter (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.93-2.86). Results were robustly confirmed by sensitivity analysis. Apixaban might carry a lower risk of DOAC-to-DOAC switch compared to dabigatran and rivaroxaban. Further studies are needed to confirm long-term safety and effectiveness of switching paradigm.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

The relative risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) among different direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is debatable. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing DOACs with each other are lacking. We performed network meta-analysis to assess whether the risk of major GIB differs based on type and dose of DOAC. Literature search of PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases from inception to August 2019, limited to English publications, was conducted to identify RCTs comparing DOACs with warfarin or enoxaparin for any indication. Primary outcome of interest was major GIB risk. We used frequentist network meta-analysis through the random-effects model to compare DOACs with each other and DOACs by dose to isolate the impact on major GIB. Twenty-eight RCTs, including 139 587 patients receiving six anticoagulants, were selected. The risk of major GIB for DOACs was equal to warfarin. Comparison of DOACs with each other did not show risk differences. After accounting for dose, rivaroxaban 20 mg, dabigatran 300 mg and edoxaban 60 mg daily had 47, 40 and 22% higher rates of major GIB versus warfarin, respectively. Apixaban 5 mg twice daily had lower major GIB compared to dabigatran 300 mg (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.44-0.88) and rivaroxaban 20 mg (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.43-0.83) daily. Heterogeneity was low, and the model was consistent without publication bias (Egger's test: P = 0.079). All RCTs were high-quality with low risk of bias. DOACs at standard dose, except apixaban, had a higher risk of major GIB compared to warfarin. Apixaban had a lower rate of major GIB compared to dabigatran and rivaroxaban.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

This article presents current opinions on the role of antithrombotic therapy in secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) in patients after noncardioembolic stroke or a transient ischemic attack on the background of sinus rhythm. This review analytically analyses evidence-based data on antithrombotic drugs used for this secondary prevention. Despite the fact that acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) is still a "gold standard" for prevention of noncardioembolic stroke, the search for rational combinations of antithrombotic drugs to increase the effectiveness of preventive treatment is relevant. The question whether the rivaroxaban treatment as monotherapy or in combination with ASA is more effective than the ASA monotherapy for secondary prevention of cardiovascular complications (CVC) was addressed in the COMPASS study. In that study, three regimens of antithrombotic therapy were compared in patients with stable atherosclerotic CVD: rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice a day) in combination with ASA (100 mg/day); rivaroxaban (5 mg twice a day); and ASA (100 mg/day). Risk for development of major CVC (death, stroke, myocardial infarction (IM)) was lower (p<0.001) in the rivaroxaban+ASA combination treatment group than in the ASA monotherapy group; however, the risk of major bleedings was somewhat higher. Total risk based on the definition of "pure clinical benefit" was lower for the rivaroxaban+ASA combination treatment than for the ASA monotherapy. The rivaroxaban monotherapy did not result in a significant decrease in the risk of major CVC compared to the ASA monotherapy but significantly increased the risk of major bleedings. Incidence of repeated ischemic stroke for a year was 1.1% for the combination therapy, 2.6% for the rivaroxaban therapy, and 3.4% for the ASA monotherapy with significant differences between the combination treatment group and the ASA monotherapy group (p<0.01). Relative risk of repeated stroke was 67% lower for the combination therapy group compared to the ASA monotherapy group. The combination of rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice a day) and ASA (100 mg) opens a new epoch of antithrombotic treatment for primary and secondary prevention of stroke in patients with a stable atherosclerotic CVD and sinus rhythm.

Topics: Aspirin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke

Anticoagulant treatment in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) or on dialysis remains a matter of debate. The object of this study was to quantify the benefit-risk profiles of rivaroxaban or apixaban versus warfarin in AF patients with stage 4-5 CKD or on dialysis.. A comprehensive search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Ovid, and Google Scholar databases was performed for eligible studies that comparing the effect and safety of rivaroxaban or apixaban versus warfarin in AF patients with stage 4-5 CKD or on dialysis. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were abstracted, and then pooled using a random-effects model.. A total of seven studies, one post hoc analysis of RCT and six observational cohorts, were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with warfarin use, the use of rivaroxaban or apixaban was significantly associated with reduced risks of all-cause death (HR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.72-0.93) and gastrointestinal bleeding (HR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.80-0.95). There were no significant differences in the risks of stroke or systemic embolism (rivaroxaban, HR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.43-1.19; apixaban, HR = 0.86, 95%CI 0.68-1.09) and major bleeding (rivaroxaban, HR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.64-1.45; apixaban, HR = 0.56, 95%CI 0.28-1.12).. Current evidence suggests that rivaroxaban or apixaban are safe and at least as effective as warfarin in patients with AF and stage 4-5 CKD or on dialysis.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Patient Acuity; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

The increasing availability of real-world evidence (RWE) about safety and effectiveness of direct non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for the management of atrial fibrillation (AF) offers the opportunity to better understand the clinical and economic implications of DOACs versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). The objective of this study was to compare the economic implications of DOACs and VKAs using data from real-world evidence in patients with AF.. A Markov model simulating the lifetime course of patients diagnosed with non-valvular AF was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of DOACs (i.e., rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban) versus VKAs from the Italian National Health System (INHS) perspective. The model was made up of data from the literature and a meta-analysis of RWE on the incidence of stroke/systemic embolism (SE), major bleeding (MB), intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) and all-cause mortality (ACM); direct costs included drug costs, costs for drug monitoring, and management of events from official national lists. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were used to assess the robustness of the results.. Results from the meta-analysis showed that apixaban had a high probability of being the most effective for stroke/SE, MB and ACM. Despite their higher acquisition costs, the cost-effectiveness analysis showed all DOACs involved a saving when compared with VKAs, with per-patient savings ranging between €4647 (rivaroxaban) to €6086 (apixaban). Moreover, all DOACs indicated a gain both in quality-adjusted life-years and life-years. According to PSA, findings related to apixaban were consistent, while for dabigatran and rivaroxaban PSA revealed a higher degree of uncertainty.. The beneficial effect of DOACs on containing events showed in RWE had the potential to offset drug-related costs, thus improving the sustainability of treatment for non-valvular AF in daily clinical practice.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Italy; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K

Several observational studies have compared the effect of the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants to each other in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, confounding by indication is a major problem when comparing non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant treatments in some of these studies. This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the effectiveness and safety between non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant by only including the propensity score matching studies.. We systematically searched the PubMed and Ovid databases until May 2020 to identify relevant observational studies. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs of the reported outcomes were collected and then pooled by a random-effects model complemented with an inverse variance heterogeneity or quality effects model.. A total of 17 retrospective cohort studies were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with dabigatran use, the use of rivaroxaban was significantly associated with increased risks of stroke or systemic embolism (HR, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.05-1.29]) and major bleeding (HR, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.24-1.41]), whereas the use of apixaban was associated with a reduced risk of major bleeding (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.67-0.90]) but not stroke or systemic embolism (HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.56-1.28]). Compared with rivaroxaban use, the use of apixaban was associated with a decreased risk of major bleeding (HR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.54-0.73]) but not stroke or systemic embolism (HR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.67-1.04]). Reanalyses with the inverse variance heterogeneity or quality effects model produced similar results as the random-effects model.. Current observational comparisons with propensity score matching methods suggest that apixaban might be a better choice compared with dabigatran or rivaroxaban for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Observational Studies as Topic; Propensity Score; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism

Rivaroxaban is a factor Xa inhibitor oral anticoagulant first approved for use in the United States in 2011. Under the drug class commonly termed direct oral anticoagulants, rivaroxaban is approved for the most indications within its class, 7 indications, which are: (1) reduction of risk of stroke and systemic embolism (SE) in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, (2) treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), (3) treatment of pulmonary embolism (PE), (4) reduction in the risk of recurrence of DVT and/or PE, (5) prophylaxis of DVT following hip or knee replacement surgery, (6) prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients at risk for thromboembolic complications not at high risk of bleeding, and (7) reduction of risk of major cardiovascular events in patients with chronic coronary artery disease or peripheral artery disease. Considering the relationship between cardiovascular disease, renal impairment, and the use of oral anticoagulants, the following targeted review was created. This review reports the results of the primary pharmacology, pharmacokinetic modeling, clinical safety and efficacy, and real-world postmarketing effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with various degrees of renal impairment. Based on these data, rivaroxaban is a viable option for when anticoagulation is needed in patients who have both cardiovascular disease and renal impairment. However, as with any therapy, the benefits and risks of intervention should be carefully assessed and balanced. Patients treated with rivaroxaban for several of its approved indications should have their kidney function assessed prior to and during continued therapy to ensure consistency with the drug label.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Area Under Curve; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Patient Acuity; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Renal Insufficiency; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thrombosis

To conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis of real-world evidence comparing adherence, persistence, cost, and utilization between oral anticoagulant (OAC) in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients.. A systematic search of MEDLINE and Embase (inception-July 2019) was conducted for published observational cohort studies comparing outcomes between ≥2 OACs. A network meta-analysis was performed to estimate odds ratios for non-persistence using a random-effects model.. There were 80 studies evaluating the outcomes of interest. However, due to a paucity in adherence studies and heterogeneity in adherence, cost, and utilization definitions, persistence was the focus of this network meta-analysis. There were 36 studies evaluating non-persistence in 395,593 participants, 24 of which used 3 gap definitions (30-, 60-, and 90-days); 18 unique studies evaluating non-persistence at 12 months were included in the network meta-analysis. Using 30- and 90-day gaps, all NOACs, when compared with VKAs, had lower odds of non-persistence (30-day OR (95%CI): apixaban: 0.63 (0.58, 0.69); rivaroxaban: 0.69 (0.62, 0.76); dabigatran: 0.89 (0.82, 0.97); 90-day OR (95%CI): apixaban: 0.33 (0.22, 0.47); rivaroxaban: 0.47 (0.36, 0.61); dabigatran 0.61 (0.44, 0.85)). When using a 60-day gap, dabigatran had higher odds of non-persistence vs VKAs (OR: 1.35; 95%CI: 1.12, 1.61), but there were no significant differences for apixaban and rivaroxaban. Apixaban had the lowest probability of non-persistence across the 3-gap definitions (95.7% with 30-day gap, 76.9% with 60-day gap, 98.4% with 90-day gap).. The current findings, despite multiple limitations, can raise awareness and understanding of real-world persistence associated with OAC therapy in NVAF patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been widely used for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) and the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism. There is an issue with safety, especially in clinically relevant bleeding. We performed a network meta-analysis to evaluate the risk of major gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding associated with NOACs.. Interventions were warfarin, enoxaparin, apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban. The primary outcome was the incidence of major GI bleeding. A subgroup analysis was performed according to the following indications: AF, deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, and postsurgical prophylaxis.. A total of 29 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 4 large observation population studies were included. Compared with warfarin, apixaban showed a decreased the risk of major GI bleeding (relative risk [RR] 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-0.76), and rivaroxaban tended to increase this risk (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.06-1.85). Dabigatran (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.98-1.60), edoxaban (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.69-1.65), and enoxaparin (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.63-2.43) did not significantly increase the risk of GI bleeding than did warfarin. In the subgroup analysis, according to indications, apixaban showed a decreased risk of major GI bleeding (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.34-0.74) than did warfarin in AF studies. Dabigatran (RR 2.36, 95% CI 1.55-3.60, and rivaroxaban (RR 1.75, 95% CI 1.10-6.41) increased the risk of major GI bleeding than did apixaban. An analysis of studies on venous thromboembolism or pulmonary embolism showed that no individual NOAC or enoxaparin was associated with an increased risk of major GI bleeding compared to warfarin.. Individual NOACs had varying profiles of GI bleeding risk. Results of analyses including only RCTs and those including both RCTs and population studies showed similar trends, but also showed several differences.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Enoxaparin; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Network Meta-Analysis; Observational Studies as Topic; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

People with chronic heart failure (HF) are at risk of thromboembolic events, including stroke, pulmonary embolism, and peripheral arterial embolism; coronary ischaemic events also contribute to the progression of HF. The use of long-term oral anticoagulation is established in certain populations, including people with HF and atrial fibrillation (AF), but there is wide variation in the indications and use of oral anticoagulation in the broader HF population.. To determine whether long-term oral anticoagulation reduces total deaths and stroke in people with heart failure in sinus rhythm.. We updated the searches in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase in March 2020. We screened reference lists of papers and abstracts from national and international cardiovascular meetings to identify unpublished studies. We contacted relevant authors to obtain further data. We did not apply any language restrictions.. Randomised controlled trials (RCT) comparing oral anticoagulants with placebo or no treatment in adults with HF, with treatment duration of at least one month. We made inclusion decisions in duplicate, and resolved any disagreements between review authors by discussion, or a third party.. Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion, and assessed the risks and benefits of antithrombotic therapy by calculating odds ratio (OR), accompanied by the 95% confidence intervals (CI).. We identified three RCTs (5498 participants). One RCT compared warfarin, aspirin, and no antithrombotic therapy, the second compared warfarin with placebo in participants with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, and the third compared rivaroxaban with placebo in participants with HF and coronary artery disease. We pooled data from the studies that compared warfarin with a placebo or no treatment. We are uncertain if there is an effect on all-cause death (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.18; 2 studies, 324 participants; low-certainty evidence); warfarin may increase the risk of major bleeding events (OR 5.98, 95% CI 1.71 to 20.93, NNTH 17). 2 studies, 324 participants; low-certainty evidence). None of the studies reported stroke as an individual outcome. Rivaroxaban makes little to no difference to all-cause death compared with placebo (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.13; 1 study, 5022 participants; high-certainty evidence). Rivaroxaban probably reduces the risk of stroke compared to placebo (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.95; NNTB 101; 1 study, 5022 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and probably increases the risk of major bleeding events (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.33; NNTH 79; 1 study, 5008 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).. Based on the three RCTs, there is no evidence that oral anticoagulant therapy modifies mortality in people with HF in sinus rhythm. The evidence is uncertain if warfarin has any effect on all-cause death compared to placebo or no treatment, but it may increase the risk of major bleeding events. There is no evidence of a difference in the effect of rivaroxaban on all-cause death compared to placebo. It probably reduces the risk of stroke, but probably increases the risk of major bleedings. The available evidence does not support the routine use of anticoagulation in people with HF who remain in sinus rhythm.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Cardiomyopathy, Dilated; Chronic Disease; Heart Failure; Heart Rate; Hemorrhage; Humans; Placebo Effect; Placebos; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

To assess the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) after the use of rivaroxaban or warfarin. To investigate the effects of rivaroxaban and warfarin on gastrointestinal and intracranial hemorrhage in patients with AF, we searched PubMed, Embase, and Medline from the establishment of databases up to 2020. We finally included 38 observational studies involving 1 312 609 patients for the assessment of intracranial hemorrhage, and 33 observational studies involving 1 332 956 patients for the assessment of gastrointestinal bleeding. The rates of intracranial hemorrhage were 0.55% in the rivaroxaban group versus 0.91% in the warfarin group (OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.53-0.66; p < .00001, I2 = 78%). The rates of gastrointestinal bleeding were 2.63% in patients with rivaroxaban versus 2.48% in those with warfarin (OR 1.06; 95% CI 0.96-1.17; p < .00001, I2 = 94%). Rivaroxaban could significantly reduce the risk of intracranial hemorrhage in patients with AF than warfarin, but the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding remained controversy due to no statistical significant difference. Notably, a subgroup analysis demonstrated that patients in rivaroxaban group with severe chronic renal diseases or undergoing hemodialysis exposed to less gastrointestinal hemorrhage risk than the group from warfarin.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

The use of warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has been implicated with efficacy and safety concerns. Evidence on the role of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in this population is limited.. Electronic databases were searched and articles comparing the safety and efficacy of warfarin with apixaban or rivaroxaban were identified. Pooled hazard ratios (HR) were computed using a random-effects model.. A total of eight articles consisting of 30,806 patients; (rivaroxaban 2196, apixaban 2745 and warfarin 25,865) were identified. The pooled HR for major bleeding events favored apixaban over warfarin (0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33-0.84, p = 0.008). Apixaban was similar to warfarin in terms of clinically relevant non-major bleeding (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.64-1.84, p = 0.77) and stroke events (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.85, 1.39, p = 0.99). There was no significant difference in the risk of major bleeding events (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.50-1.81, p = 0.88) and stroke between rivaroxaban (HR 1.39, 95% CI, 0.59-3.29, p = 0.09) and warfarin. The combined results of major bleeding in the apixaban group were not affected by the sensitivity analysis.. Apixaban may have a lower risk of major bleeding and comparable risk of stroke when compared with warfarin in AF patients with ESRD.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

The optimal antithrombotic strategy for patients with a long-term indication for anticoagulation and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains controversial. This meta-analysis aims to compare randomised trials' outcomes of these patients, focussing on dual versus triple antithrombotic and non vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus vitamin K oral anticoagulants regimens.. Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched from January 1980 to March 2019 yielding 309 articles, and after careful screening, five randomized trials totalling 10 643 patients were included for analysis.. Dual antithrombotic regimens were associated with significantly less thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) major and minor bleeding [odds ratio (OR) 0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40-0.71], with no significant difference in major adverse cardiovascular events (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.72-1.22) or all-cause mortality (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.61-1.19). NOAC regimens had significantly lower TIMI major and minor bleeding (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.43-0.78) and intracranial bleeding (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.16-0.66), with similar rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.86-1.16) and all-cause mortality (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.81-1.26).. Dual antithrombotic and NOAC regimens have reduced bleeding without compromising the risk of cardiovascular events or mortality, and should be preferred for patients with ACS or PCI also needing long-term anticoagulation.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Clopidogrel; Dabigatran; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Warfarin

Major bleeding (especially intracranial hemorrhage) is the most feared adverse event observed in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving oral anticoagulation. Clinical risk factor-based scores have modest ability to predict major or clinically relevant bleeds, and blood biomarkers are increasingly implemented to improve bleeding prognostication in patients with AF on life‑long anticoagulation. To improve the safety of anticoagulation in the era of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs, or direct oral anticoagulants [DOACs], including dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban), specific demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables should be considered. The current review summarizes practical challenges in the management of oral anticoagulation with emphasis on the risk assessment tools, elderly or underweight patients, cancer patients, impact of chronic kidney disease, liver cirrhosis, and thrombocytopenia in the context of bleeding risk in patients with AF.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have a high prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF). Stroke in patients with CKD and AF is frequent, and is usually more severe than in the absence of CKD. Current European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend oral anticoagulant therapy in order to reduce thromboembolic risk in AF patients in general, and also in the presence of CKD, excluding however stage 4 and dialysis (stage 5) patients. Warfarin and other vitamin K antagonists are still the most frequently used drugs in these settings, despite the high bleeding risk. In the United States, the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants, especially apixaban, are here used off-label, despite the absence of strong evidences of efficacy and safety. Several clinical trials are ongoing, and further evidence is needed before non-vitamin K antagonists can be recommended in these patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Diabetes Complications; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Middle Aged; Off-Label Use; Prevalence; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Sex Factors; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism

The objective was to assess the real-world cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban, versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) from a French national health insurance perspective.. A Markov model was developed with a lifetime horizon and cycle length of 3 months. All inputs were drawn from real-world evidence (RWE) studies: data on baseline patient characteristics at model entry were obtained from a French RWE study, clinical event rates as well as persistence rates for the VKA treatment arm were estimated from a variety of RWE studies, and a meta-analysis provided comparative effectiveness for rivaroxaban compared to VKA. Model outcomes included costs (drug costs, clinical event costs, and VKA monitoring costs), quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) and life-years (LY) gained, incremental cost per QALY, and incremental cost per LY. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the model and to better understand the results drivers.. In the base-case analysis, the incremental total cost was €714 and the total incremental QALYs and LYs were 0.12 and 0.16, respectively. The resulting incremental cost/QALY and incremental cost/LY were €6,006 and €4,586, respectively. The results were more sensitive to the inclusion of treatment-specific utility decrements and clinical event rates.. Although there is no official willingness-to-pay threshold in France, these results suggest that rivaroxaban is likely to be cost-effective compared to VKA in French patients with AF from a national insurance perspective.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Female; France; Humans; Male; Markov Chains; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Major bleeding (especially intracranial hemorrhage) is the most feared adverse event observed in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving oral anticoagulation. Clinical risk factor-based scores have modest ability to predict major or clinically relevant bleeds, and blood biomarkers are increasingly implemented to improve bleeding prognostication in patients with AF on life‑long anticoagulation. To improve the safety of anticoagulation in the era of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs, or direct oral anticoagulants [DOACs], including dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban), specific demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables should be considered. The current review summarizes practical challenges in the management of oral anticoagulation with emphasis on the risk assessment tools, elderly or underweight patients, cancer patients, impact of chronic kidney disease, liver cirrhosis, and thrombocytopenia in the context of bleeding risk in patients with AF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in secondary stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients.. PubMed and Embase electronic databases were systematically searched from January 2009 to July 2019 for relevant randomized clinical trials and observational studies. A random-effects model was applied in the pooled analysis.. A total of 14 studies (4 randomized clinical trials and 10 observational studies) were included. Based on the randomized clinical trials, compared with VKA use, the use of NOACs was associated with decreased risk of stroke and systemic embolism, major bleeding, and intracranial bleeding. Based on the observational studies, compared with VKAs, the subgroup analysis showed that dabigatran and rivaroxaban were associated with a reduced risk of stroke or systemic embolism, whereas dabigatran and apixaban were associated with a decreased risk of major bleeding.. Based on current data, the use of NOACs is at least non-inferior to the use of VKAs in AF patients for secondary stroke prevention irrespective of NOAC type.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Observational Studies as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Ischaemic stroke and systemic embolism are the major potentially preventable complications of atrial fibrillation (AF) leading to severe morbidity and mortality. Anticoagulation using vitamin K antagonists (VKA) or non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) is mandatory for stroke prevention in AF. Following approval of the four NOACs dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, the use of VKA is declining steadily. Increasing age with thresholds of 65 and 75 years is a strong risk factor when determining annual stroke risk in AF patients. Current recommendations such as the "2016 Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation" of the European Society of Cardiology and the "2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update" by the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, and the Heart Rhythm Society strengthen the importance of anticoagulation and detection of bleeding risks, of which older age is an important one. While patients aged ≥ 75 years are usually underrepresented in randomised clinical trials, they represent almost 40% of the trial populations in the large NOAC approval studies. Therefore, a sufficient amount of data is available to assess the efficacy and safety for this patient cohort in that specific indication. In this article, the evidence for stroke prevention in AF using either VKA or NOACs is summarised with a special focus on efficacy compared to bleeding risk in patients aged ≥ 75 years. Specifically, we used a model of increased weighing of intracranial bleeding to illustrate the potential benefit of NOACs over VKA in the elderly population. In brief, there are at least two tested strategies with apixaban and edoxaban which even confer an additional clinical net benefit compared with VKA. Furthermore, elderly subgroups of trials for combined antithrombotic treatment following percutaneous coronary interventions in anticoagulated patients are analysed.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

This meta-analysis was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for perioperative anticoagulation of atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation (CA) in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for articles published up to June 30, 2019. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.. Nineteen studies with a total of 6827 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The experimental group received dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban; the control group received warfarin. The safety endpoints were bleeding complications; the efficacy endpoints were thromboembolic complications. Results were as follows: Patients with NOACs had a lower risk of overall bleeding complications (OR = 0.69, 95% CI (0.54, 0.87), P = 0.002), including major bleeding complications (OR = 0.52, 95% CI (0.32, 0.84), P = 0.007) and minor bleeding complications (OR = 0.73, 95% CI (0.56, 0.94), P = 0.02). There was no significant difference in thromboembolic complications between NOACs and warfarin after CA (OR = 0.39, 95% CI (0.14, 1.10), P = 0.08).. In Japanese NVAF patients undergoing CA, NOACs have similar effects to warfarin in the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism. Moreover, NOACs were associated with a lower incidence of bleeding complications.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Dabigatran; Humans; Japan; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Decisions surrounding periprocedural anticoagulation management must balance thromboembolic and procedural bleed risk. The interruption of both warfarin and DOACs requires consideration of anticoagulant pharmacokinetics, procedural bleed risk and patient characteristics. There is a diminishing role for periprocedural bridging LMWH overall and no role for bridging LMWH for the procedural interruption of DOACs. A clinical approach to perioperative DOAC management based on operative bleeding risk and renal function is safe and effective, and at present, is preferred over preprocedural DOAC levels testing. Clear communication of the anticoagulation interruption plan to both the patient and the patient's care team is essential.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Perioperative Care; Postoperative Complications; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Warfarin

Given the huge burden of atrial fibrillation (AF) and AF-related stroke in Asia, stroke prevention represents an urgent issue in this region. We herein performed a network meta-analysis to examine the role of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in Asian patients with AF.. A systematic search of the publications was conducted in PubMed and Embase databases for eligible studies until July 2019. The odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were regarded as the effect estimates. The surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA) for the ranking probabilities was calculated.. A total of 17 studies were included. For comparisons of NOACs vs warfarin, dabigatran (OR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.68-0.86), rivaroxaban (OR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.65-0.81), apixaban (OR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.49-0.65), but not edoxaban reduced the risk of stroke or systemic embolism, wheres dabigatran (OR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.41-0.76), rivaroxaban (OR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.50-0.86), apixaban (OR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.36-0.66), and edoxaban (OR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.24-0.49) decreased the risk of major bleeding. In reducing the risk of stroke or systemic embolism, apixaban and rivaroxaban ranked the best and second best (SUCRA 0.2% and 31.4%, respectively), followed by dabigatran (50.2%), edoxaban (75.2%), and warfarin (93.0%). In reducing the risk of major bleeding, edoxaban, and apixaban ranked the best and second best (1.5% and 30.8%, respectively), followed by dabigatran (48.4%), rivaroxaban (69.2%), and warfarin (100%).. NOACs were at least as effective as warfarin, but more safer in Asians with AF. Apixaban was superior to other NOACs for reducing stroke or systemic embolism, while edoxaban showed a better safety profile than other NOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Asia; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost of Illness; Dabigatran; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Network Meta-Analysis; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Safety; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

This review assessed global health technology assessment (HTA) reports and recommendations of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).. NHTA agency websites were searched for HTA reports evaluating NOACs versus NOACs or vitamin K antagonists. HTA methods and information on patient involvement/access were collected and empirically analyzed.. The review identified 38 unique HTA reports published between 2012 and 2017 in 16 countries including 11 in Europe. NOACs that were cost-effective per local willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds were positively recommended for the treatment of NVAF. WTP thresholds ranged from €20,000 to 69,000. Apixaban was recommended in 10/12 (83%) countries, dabigatran in 9/13 (69%) countries, and rivaroxaban in 10/13 (76%) over warfarin. Edoxaban was recommended in 5/7 (71%) countries. Economic evaluations and recommendations comparing NOACs were sparse (two or three countries per NOAC) and generally favored apixaban and edoxaban, followed by dabigatran. Eleven HTA reports from four countries considered the patient voice (Canada [n = 3], Scotland [n = 3], England [n = 4], Brazil [n = 1]); however, only 2/11 (18%) developed recommendations based on this. Among the reports with a positive recommendation, 26/30 (87%) featured a decision that aligned with the approved regulatory label.. Most agencies recommended NOACs over warfarin for patients with NVAF. Few countries made statements recommending one NOAC over another. Given different WTP thresholds, a drug that is cost-effective in one market may not be in another. Therefore, the various NOAC recommendations from HTA agencies cannot be generalized across different countries.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Technology Assessment, Biomedical

Even with currently available therapies and lifestyle modifications following an ischemic stroke, there remains a substantial residual lifetime risk of stroke recurrence and cardiovascular morbidity. This review summarizes emerging novel therapeutic approaches that have demonstrated signals of efficacy for prevention of noncardioembolic stroke from phase II and phase III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and provides an overview of drug regimens that have had promising results in primary stroke prevention and could be considered for further evaluation.. After a minor acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack, patients bear a high cardiovascular risk that is insufficiently addressed by long-term antiplatelet treatment. The potent combination of low-dose rivaroxaban with aspirin as an antithrombotic option for the secondary prevention in patients with clinical atherosclerosis and a history of previous stroke warrants further study. Two international RCTs are currently evaluating the utility of oral factor XI inhibitors combined with antiplatelets for secondary, noncardioembolic ischemic stroke prevention. Aggressive lipid management with statins has been shown to ameliorate ischemic stroke recurrence and total cardiovascular risk. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors are drug regimens that researchers have suggested confer additional protection against stroke recurrence, while antisense oligonucleotide therapies targeting lipoprotein(a) have been reported to hold great promise as a future therapeutic strategy to decrease the residual cardiovascular risk mediated through lipoprotein(a). Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists are newer antidiabetic medications, recently highlighted because of their consistently greater benefit on stroke reduction compared with other cardiovascular outcomes.. There are currently several exciting emerging opportunities in secondary stroke prevention, with RCTs investigating novel antithrombotic, hypolipidemic, anti-inflammatory, and antidiabetic agents with novel mechanisms that are likely to reduce the future burden of recurrent stroke.

Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Aspirin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Hypolipidemic Agents; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke

To recommend the proper anticoagulant drug and its dose for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF), we conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to make the comparisons among non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and warfarin with regard to efficacy (stroke or systemic embolism) and safety (major bleeding).. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library with the items: "dabigatran, edoxaban, apixaban, rivaroxaban, warfarin, atrial fibrillation and heart failure" through April 14, 2020, focusing on the RCTs comparing the effect of NOACs to warfarin in patients with AF and HF. The NMA was performed based on R (version3.5.1) recalling JAGS (version4.3.0) with gemtc package. Moreover, NetMetaXL (version1.6.1) and winBUGS (version1.4.3) were employed to obtain the cumulative ranking curve area (SUCRA) of the anticoagulants.. There was a high probability that dabigatran150 (SUCRA 0.82) ranked the first for the most effective drug, followed by apixaban (SUCRA 0.81), edoxaban60 (SUCRA 0.57) and rivaroxaban (SUCRA 0.52). However, with respect to safety for preventing major bleeding, edoxaban30 (SUCRA 0.99) ranked as the safest drug, followed by apixaban (SUCRA 0.71), edoxaban 60 (SUCRA 0.59) and dabigatran150 (SUCRA 0.55).. Apixaban, edoxaban60 and dabigatran150 were more likely to become the choice for preventing stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding in patients with AF and HF. Nevertheless, more trials need to be performed to focus on the effect of NOACs on the efficacy outcome due to the sparse data. In addition, caution should be excised over selecting the NOAC and its dose on account of the lacking head-to-head comparisons.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Heart Failure; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Obesity, Morbid; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by arterial or venous thrombosis (or both), and/or pregnancy morbidity in association with the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies. The prevalence of APS is estimated at 40 to 50 cases per 100,000 people. The most common sites of thrombosis are cerebral arteries and deep veins of the lower limbs. People with a definite APS diagnosis have an increased lifetime risk of recurrent thrombotic events.. To assess the effects of antiplatelet (AP) or anticoagulant agents, or both, for the secondary prevention of recurrent thrombosis, particularly ischemic stroke, in people with APS.. We last searched the MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register, and ongoing trials registers on 22 November 2019. We checked reference lists of included studies, systematic reviews, and practice guidelines. We also contacted experts in the field.. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated any anticoagulant or AP agent, or both, in the secondary prevention of thrombosis in people with APS, according to the criteria valid when the study took place. We did not include studies specifically addressing women with obstetrical APS.. Pairs of review authors independently worked on each step of the review, following Cochrane methods. We summarized the evidence using the GRADE approach.. We identified eight studies including 811 participants that compared different AP or anticoagulant agents. NOAC (non-VKA oral anticoagulant: rivaroxaban 15 or 20 mg/d) versus standard-dose VKA (vitamin K antagonist: warfarin at moderate International Normalized Ratio [INR] - 2.5) or adjusted [INR 2.0-3.0] dose): In three studies there were no differences in any thromboembolic event (including death) and major bleeding (moderate-certainty evidence), but an increased risk of stroke (risk ratio [RR] 14.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.87 to 106.8; moderate-certainty evidence). One of the studies reported a small benefit of rivaroxaban in terms of quality of life at 180 days measured as health state on Visual Analogue Scale (mean difference [MD] 7 mm, 95% CI 2.01 to 11.99; low-certainty evidence), but not measured as health utility on a scale from 0 to 1 (MD 0.04, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.10; low-certainty evidence). High-dose VKA (warfarin with a target INR of 3.1 to 4.0 [mean 3.3] or 3.5 [mean 3.2]) versus standard-dose VKA (warfarin with a target INR of 2.0 to 3.0 [mean 2.3] or 2.5 [mean 2.5]): In two studies there were no differences in the rates of thrombotic events and major bleeding (RR 2.22, 95% CI 0.79 to 6.23, low-certainty evidence), but an increased risk of minor bleeding in one study during a mean of 3.4 years (standard deviation [SD] 1.2) of follow-up (RR 2.55, 95% CI 1.07 to 6.07). In both trials there was evidence of a higher risk of any bleeding (hazard ratio [HR] 2.03 95% CI 1.12 to 3.68; low-certainty evidence) in the high-dose VKA group, and for this outcome (any bleeding) the incidence is not different, only the time to event is showing an effect. Standard-dose VKA plus a single AP agent (warfarin at a target INR of 2.0 to 3.0 plus aspirin 100 mg/d) versus standard-dose VKA (warfarin at a target INR of 2.0 to 3.0): One high-risk-of-bias study showed an increased risk of any thromboembolic event with combined treatment (RR 2.14, 95% CI 1.04 to 4.43; low-certainty evidence) and reported on major bleeding with five cases in the combined treatment group and one case in the standard-dose VKA treatment group, resulting in RR 7.42 (95% CI 0.91 to 60.7; low-certainty evidence) and no differences for secondary outcomes (very low- to low-certainty evidence). Single/dual AP agent and standard-dose VKA (pooled results): Two high-risk-of-bias studies compared a combination of AP and VKA (aspirin 100 mg/d plus warfarin or unspecified VKA at a target INR of. The evidence identified indicates that NOACs compared with standard-dose VKAs may increase the risk of stroke and do not appear to alter the risk of other outcomes (moderate-certainty evidence). Using high-dose VKA versus standard-dose VKA did not alter the risk of any thromboembolic event or major bleeding but may increase the risk of any form of bleeding (low-certainty evidence). Standard-dose VKA combined with an AP agent compared with standard-dose VKA alone may increase the risk of any thromboembolic event and does not appear to alter the risk of major bleeding or other outcomes (low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the benefit or harm of using standard-dose VKA plus AP agents versus single or dual AP therapy, or dual versus single AP therapy, for the secondary prevention of recurrent thrombosis in people with APS (very low-certainty evidence).

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Cause of Death; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation is one of the most common concomitant diseases in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Meta-analyses of multiple studies have shown that the risk of AF is higher for diabetic patients with impaired glucose homeostasis than for patients without DM. Patients with AF and DM were younger, more frequently had arterial hypertension, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, and ischemic heart disease, and stroke and were characterized with a more severe course of AF. The article discusses possible mechanisms of the mutually aggravating effects of DM and AF, scales for evaluating the risk of bleeding (CHADS2, CHA2DS2‑VASc, HAS-BLED), and the role of anticoagulants. A meta-analysis of 16 randomized clinical studies, including 9 874 patients, has demonstrated the efficacy of oral anticoagulants in prevention of stroke with an overall decrease in the relative risk by 62 % compared to placebo (95% confidence interval, from 48 to 72 ). For prevention of complications in patients with AF and DM, current antithrombotic therapies can be used, specifically the oral factor Xa inhibitor, rivaroxaban, which is the best studied in patients with AF and DM and represents a possible alternative to warfarin in such patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Diabetes Mellitus; Humans; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are currently recommended for oral anticoagulation in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. In the setting, NOACs effectively prevent from stroke and systemic embolic events. In spite of the favorable safety profile of NOACs when compared with vitamin K antagonists, the use of any kind of anticoagulation is associated with an increased risk of bleeding. However, there is still a lack of direct comparisons of effectiveness and safety among NOACs. The results of indirect comparisons and meta-analyses suggest that the risk of various types of hemorrhagic complications differ among the particular NOACs. Management of bleeding in patients under NOAC therapy can be challenging because of limited availability of antidotes and the lack of routine laboratory test monitoring the NOAC anticoagulant effect. In case of life-threatening or critical site bleeding, reversal of NOAC anticoagulant activity is essential together with immediate implementation of causative treatment. Moreover, some patients on chronic NOAC therapy may require urgent surgery or invasive procedures. Specific reversal agents for NOACs have been developed, i.e. more widely available idarucizumab for the factor IIa inhibitor (dabigatran) and andexanet alfa for the factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) with limited availability. This review summarizes the occurrence and management of NOAC-related bleeding complications with a particular emphasis on hematuria.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hematuria; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

There is controversy over whether use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) associates with increased risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) compared with conventional therapies (such as vitamin K antagonists or anti-platelet agents). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of data from randomized controlled trials and high-quality real-world studies.. We performed a systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov Website databases (through Oct 12, 2018) for randomized controlled trials and high-quality real-world studies that reported major GIB events in patients given NOACs or conventional therapy. Relative risks (RRs) for randomized controlled trials and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for real-world studies were calculated separately using random-effects models.. We analyzed data from 43 randomized controlled trials (183,752 patients) and 41 real-world studies (1,879,428 patients). The pooled major rates of GIB for patients on NOACs (1.19%) vs conventional treatment (0.92%) did not differ significantly (RR from randomized controlled trials, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.91-1.31 and aHR from real-world studies, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.94-1.10; P. In a systematic review and meta-analysis of data from randomized controlled trials and real-world studies, we confirmed that there is no significant difference in risk of major GIB between patients receiving NOACs vs conventional treatment. Rivaroxaban users had a 39% increase in risk for major GIB.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Fibrinolytic Agents; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Data on possibilities of personalized approach for direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) choice in patients with atrial fibrillation are presented in the article. We also review clinical and fundamental studies and future perspectives on pharmacogenetic and pharmacokinetic tests to predict the efficacy and safety of DOAC.. В статье представлены данные о возможностях персонализированного подхода к назначению прямых оральных антикоагулянтов (ПОАК) у пациентов с фибрилляцией предсердий. Подробно обсуждается обзор клинических и научных исследований по возможностям и перспективам фармакогенетического и фармакокинетического тестирования для прогнозирования эффективного и безопасного применения ПОАК.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Precision Medicine; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

There is a lack of clear benefit and a potential risk of bleeding with direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and dialysis patients with atrial fibrillation. The objective of this study was to evaluate how treatment with DOACs affects stroke and bleeding outcomes compared with warfarin or aspirin.. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials, cohort studies and case series, and searched electronic databases from 1946 to 2017. Studies evaluating stroke and bleeding outcomes with DOAC use in CKD and dialysis patients were included.. From 8008 studies, 10 met the inclusion criteria. For moderate CKD patients (estimated glomerular filtration rate  <60 mL/min/1.73 m2), there was no difference in stroke outcomes between dabigatran 110 mg [hazard ratio (HR) 0.78, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.51-1.21], rivaroxaban (HR 0.82-0.84, 95% CI 0.25-2.69) and edoxaban (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.65-1.18) versus warfarin. Dabigatran (150 mg twice daily) and apixaban reduced risk of stroke or systemic embolism significantly more than warfarin for moderate CKD patients (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.34-0.89 and HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.94, respectively). Edoxaban and apixaban were associated with reduced major bleeding events (HR 0.50-0.76) compared with warfarin. Rivaroxaban and dabigatran 110 mg and 150 mg showed no significant difference in major bleeding versus warfarin. In hemodialysis (HD) patients, there was no difference in stroke outcomes between apixaban, dabigatran [relative risk (RR) 1.71, 95% CI 0.97-2.99] or rivaroxaban (RR 1.8, 95% CI 0.89-3.64) versus warfarin. In HD patients, rivaroxaban and dabigatran were associated with an increased major bleeding risk (RR 1.45-1.76), whereas there was no major bleeding difference with apixaban compared to warfarin.. The heterogeneity of major bleeding and stroke definitions of the 10 included studies.. Clinicians should continue to weigh the risk of stroke versus bleeding before prescribing DOACs in the CKD and dialysis population.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

To assess the effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants vs vitamin K antagonists in real-life patients with atrial fibrillation.. A systematic review was performed according to Cochrane methodological standards. The results were reported according to the PRISMA statement. The ROBINS-I tool was used to assess risk of bias.. A total of 27 different studies publishing data in 30 publications were included. In the studies with a follow-up up to 1 year, apixaban (HR, 0.93; 95%CI, 0.71-1.20) and dabigatran (HR, 0.95; 95%CI, 0.80-1.13) did not significantly reduce the risk of ischemic stroke vs warfarin, whereas rivaroxaban significantly reduced this risk (HR, 0.83; 95%CI, 0.73-0.94). Apixaban (HR, 0.66; 95%CI, 0.55-0.80) and dabigatran (HR, 0.83; 95%CI, 0.70-0.97) significantly reduced the major bleeding risk vs warfarin, but not rivaroxaban (HR, 1.02; 95%CI, 0.95-1.10), although with a high statistical heterogeneity among studies. Apixaban (HR, 0.56; 95%CI, 0.42-0.73), dabigatran (HR, 0.45; 95%CI, 0.39-0.51), and rivaroxaban (HR, 0.66; 95%CI, 0.49-0.88) significantly reduced the risk of intracranial bleeding vs warfarin. Reduced doses of direct oral anticoagulants were associated with a slightly better safety profile, but with a marked reduction in stroke prevention effectiveness.. Data from this meta-analysis suggest that, vs warfarin, the stroke prevention effectiveness and bleeding risk of direct oral anticoagulants may differ in real-life patients with atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Case-Control Studies; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Observational Studies as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

The non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been increasingly prescribed in clinical practice for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Direct comparisons between NOACs in trials are lacking, leaving an important clinical decision-making gap. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the evidence of observational studies for direct comparative effectiveness and safety amongst NOACs in patients with AF. Conference proceedings and electronic databases including MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE and PUBMED were systematically searched. We included observational studies directly comparing individual NOACs in patients with nonvalvular AF who were aged ≥ 18 years for stroke prevention. Primary outcome included effectiveness outcome (stroke or systemic embolism) and safety outcome (major bleeding). Data were extracted in duplicated by two reviewers independently. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to synthesize the data from included observational studies. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) to rate the overall quality of evidence for each outcome. Fifteen studies were included for qualitative synthesis, twelve studies for meta-analyses. It was found that rivaroxaban and dabigatran were similar with regard to risk of stroke or systemic embolism (Hazard ratio [HR] = 1.00, 95% CI 0.91-1.10; evidence quality: low), but rivaroxaban was associated with higher risk of major bleeding (HR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.28-1.50; evidence quality: moderate). Compared with apixaban, a significantly higher risk of major bleeding was observed with rivaroxaban (HR = 1.71, 95% CI 1.51-1.94; evidence quality: low). Apixaban was associated with lower risk of major bleeding, in comparison with dabigatran (HR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.68-0.95; evidence quality: low). No differences in risk of stroke or systemic embolism was observed between rivaroxaban versus apixaban, and apixaban versus dabigatran. In this study, apixaban was found to have the most favorable safety profile amongst the three NOACs. No significant difference was observed in risk of stroke or systemic embolism between the NOACs. Such findings may provide some decision-making support for physicians regarding their choices amongst NOACs in patients with AF.Registration PROSPERO (identifier: CRD42016052908).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Observational Studies as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Four non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been evaluated in clinical trials for the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Although each of the NOACs have been shown to be at least non-inferior to warfarin for efficacy and safety outcomes, controversy remains over the relative safety of each NOAC inpatient subgroups. This narrative review provides an overview of phase III data on NOAC trials for the prevention of stroke in AF, with a focus on reporting the safety of each agent in key patient subgroups based on age, gender, accumulated risk factors, and primary or secondary prevention of stroke.. A comprehensive literature search was completed and, where data permit, analyses of phase III trials of the NOACs are presented for each patient subgroup.. Analyses of key safety outcomes from NOAC trials were completed using primary trial data, including major bleeding and all-cause mortality. The safety of NOACs was generally consistent and favourable compared with warfarin according to patient age, gender, previous history of stroke, and the presence of risk factors for stroke.. The safety of the NOACs compared with warfarin was generally favourable across different patient subgroups, including those perceived to be at "high risk" for adverse outcomes. However, certain NOACs may be preferable to warfarin in some subgroups, based on indirect analyses.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) increases a patient's stroke risk four- to five-fold. Anticoagulation with the vitamin K antagonist (VKA) warfarin reduces the risk of stroke by 67%, but warfarin carries a significant risk of major bleeding and has unpredictable pharmacodynamics with a narrow therapeutic window, necessitating frequent monitoring of its anticoagulant effect. The non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban provide more predictable anticoagulant activity than warfarin with a lower risk of major bleeding, and each is noninferior to warfarin for the prevention of stroke. All have earned regulatory approval in the past eight years. At least one of the NOACs is approved for use in all patients with AF, except those with mechanical valves and rheumatic mitral valve disease, for whom warfarin remains the only option. Recent clinical trials have shown that antithrombotic regimens including NOACs are safe and effective in patients with AF who need potent antiplatelet therapy.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Novel oral anticoagulants are the cornerstone of therapy for non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients to lower the risk of ischaemic stroke. Given the lack of head-to-head comparisons among oral anticoagulants, a Bayesian analysis was used to evaluate their safety and efficacy based on studies from real-world practice.. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant studies. Bayesian analyses were conducted to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% credible intervals (CrI) for the safety and efficacy of oral anticoagulants.. In the 22 studies included in our analysis, novel oral anticoagulants exhibited a clear advantage over warfarin in preventing ischaemic stroke, haemorrhagic stroke and, especially, intracranial haemorrhage. Incidence of major bleeding was lowest for apixaban, followed by dabigatran, warfarin and rivaroxaban. Gastrointestinal bleeding risk was lowest for apixaban, followed by warfarin, and was slightly lower for dabigatran than for rivaroxaban with no statistical difference (HR 1.05, 95% CrI 0.99-1.11). Ischaemic stroke risk was lowest for rivaroxaban, followed by apixaban, dabigatran and warfarin (HR 1.13, 95% CrI 1.07-1.20).. In real-world practice, apixaban may represent the optimal treatment in terms of safety and efficacy for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. For patients with high risk of ischaemic events but low bleeding risk, rivaroxaban may be preferable.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Bayes Theorem; Dabigatran; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) require dose reductions according to patient or clinical factors for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). In this meta-analysis, we aimed to assess outcomes with reduced-dose NOACs when given as pre-specified in pivotal trials.. Aggregated data abstracted from Phase III trials comparing NOACs with warfarin in patients with AF were assessed by treatment using risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) stratified by patient eligibility for NOAC dose reduction. Irrespective of treatments, annualized rates of stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding were higher in patients eligible for reduced-dose NOACs than in those eligible for full-dose NOACs (2.70% vs. 1.60% and 4.35% vs. 2.87%, respectively). Effects of reduced-dose NOACs compared with warfarin in patients eligible for reduced-dose NOACs on stroke or systemic embolism [RR 0.84 (95% CI 0.69-1.03)] and on major bleeding [RR 0.70 (95% CI 0.50-0.97)] were consistent with those of full-dose NOACs relative to warfarin in those eligible for full-dose NOACs [RR 0.86 (95% CI 0.77-0.96) for stroke or systemic embolism and RR 0.87 (95% CI 0.70-1.08) for major bleeding; interaction P, 0.89 and 0.26, respectively]. In addition, NOACs were associated with reduced risks of haemorrhagic stroke, intracranial haemorrhage, fatal bleeding, and death regardless of patient eligibility for NOAC dose reduction (interaction P > 0.05 for each).. Patients eligible for reduced-dose NOACs were at elevated risk of thromboembolic and haemorrhagic complications when treated with anticoagulants. NOACs, when appropriately dose-adjusted, had an improved benefit-harm profile compared with warfarin. Our findings highlight the importance of prescribing reduced-dose NOACs for indicated patient populations.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) include dabigatran, which inhibits thrombin, and apixaban, betrixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban, which inhibit factor Xa. In large clinical trials comparing the NOACs with the vitamin K antagonist (VKA) warfarin, dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban and edoxaban were at least as effective for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and for treatment of venous thromboembolism, but were associated with less intracranial bleeding. In addition, the NOACs are more convenient to administer than VKAs because they can be given in fixed doses without routine coagulation monitoring. Consequently, the NOACs are now replacing VKAs for these indications, and their use is increasing. Although, as a class, the NOACs have a favourable benefit-risk profile compared with VKAs, choosing among them is complicated because they have not been compared in head-to-head trials. Therefore, selection depends on the results of the individual trials, renal function, the potential for drug-drug interactions and preference for once- or twice-daily dosing. In addition, several 'special situations' were not adequately studied in the dedicated clinical trials. For these situations, knowledge of the unique pharmacological features of the various NOACs and judicious cross-trial comparison can help inform prescription choices. The purpose of this position article is therefore to help clinicians choose the right anticoagulant for the right patient at the right dose by reviewing a variety of special situations not widely studied in clinical trials.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Anticoagulants; Arginine; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzamides; Biomarkers; Blood Coagulation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa; Heart Diseases; Humans; Piperazines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thrombin; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

As the management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) continues to evolve, many old practices proved to be of a little benefit and other approaches established the new pillars of modern medicine. Treating ACS patients with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for a year by combining aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor (clopidogrel, ticagrelor, or prasugrel) has resulted in better outcomes and is currently the standard of therapy. However, owing to the persistent activation of the coagulation cascade, patients may continue to experience recurrent ischemia and high mortality rates despite compliance with the dual antiplatelet therapy. Research is underway to establish new treatment modalities for secondary prevention post-ACS, including the use of the novel direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).. Multiple trials have been conducted to evaluate the use of DOACs for the secondary prevention after ACS. Recent emerging data showed that the addition of rivaroxaban in a very low dose of 2.5 mg twice daily to the regular DAPT regimen after ACS is beneficial in the reduction of major cardiovascular events, including recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) and strokes. On the other hand, other DOACs, including apixaban, did not show similar efficacy and did not improve the cardiovascular outcomes. Patients who experience an ACS continue to suffer long-term consequences and thromboembolic complications. Many studies have shown that after the initial ACS event, patients remain in a hypercoagulable state and are more prone to recurrent ischemic attacks including stroke, recurrent MI, or unstable angina (UA). With the objective of seeking better outcomes, it is imperative to explore more aggressive anticoagulation strategies in ACS patients. In this article, we discuss the progress that was made and the limitations we face regarding the role of different anticoagulants in this setting.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke

The purpose of this article is to educate staff nurses and advanced practice nurses the importance of identifying, diagnosing, and making appropriate clinical decisions when treating patients with atrial fibrillation. Atrial fibrillation is a supraventricular arrhythmia characterized by uncoordinated, chaotic electrical activity and deterioration of proper atrial mechanical function, with an irregular ventricular response. Poorly controlled or undiagnosed atrial fibrillation increases the risk of mortality and may decrease quality of life. Identifying and staying abreast of cardiovascular care and current updates in treatment is strongly encouraged as guidelines are revised and updated as new treatments evolve.

Topics: Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Critical Care Nursing; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Antithrombotic treatment is a key component of secondary prevention following acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Although dual antiplatelet therapy is standard therapy post-ACS, duration of treatment is the subject of ongoing debate. Prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy in high-risk patients with history of myocardial infarction reduced the risk of recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke or cardiovascular death. Similarly, in patients with stable coronary artery disease, two-thirds of whom had a history of myocardial infarction, dual antithrombotic therapy with very-low-dose rivaroxaban and aspirin also resulted in improved ischaemic outcomes. In the absence of head-to-head comparison, choosing the most appropriate treatment strategy can be challenging, particularly when it comes to balancing the risks of ischaemia and bleeding. We aim to review the evidence for currently available antithrombotic treatments and provide a practical algorithm to aid the decision-making process.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Algorithms; Aspirin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Coronary Artery Disease; Decision Making; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Ischemia; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Ticagrelor

Background Several studies have investigated the effect of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with cancer, but the results remain controversial. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of NOACs versus warfarin in this population. Methods and Results We systematically searched the PubMed and Embase databases until February 16, 2019 for studies comparing the effect of NOACs with warfarin in AF patients with cancer. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were extracted and pooled by a random-effects model. Five studies involving 8908 NOACs and 12 440 warfarin users were included. There were no significant associations between cancer status and risks of stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, or death in AF patients. Compared with warfarin, NOACs were associated with decreased risks of stroke or systemic embolism (RR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.28-0.99), venous thromboembolism (RR, 0.37, 95% CI, 0.22-0.63), and intracranial or gastrointestinal bleeding (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.42-0.98) and with borderline significant reductions in ischemic stroke (RR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.40-1.00) and major bleeding (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.53-1.00). In addition, risks of efficacy and safety outcomes of NOACs versus warfarin were similar between AF patients with and without cancer. Conclusions In patients with AF and cancer, compared with warfarin, NOACs had lower or similar rates of thromboembolic and bleeding events and posed a reduced risk of venous thromboembolism.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The use of oral anticoagulant therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation has been transformed by the availability of the nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants. Real-world studies on the use of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants would help elucidate their effectiveness and safety in daily clinical practice. Apixaban was the third nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants introduced to clinical practice, and increasing real-world studies have been published. Our aim was to summarize current evidence about real-world studies on apixaban for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all observational real-world studies comparing apixaban with other available oral anticoagulant drugs.. From the original 9680 results retrieved, 16 studies have been included in the final meta-analysis. Compared with warfarin, apixaban regular dose was more effective in reducing any thromboembolic event (odds ratio: 0.77; 95% confidence interval: 0.64-0.93), but no significant difference was found for stroke risk. Apixaban was as effective as dabigatran and rivaroxaban in reducing thromboembolic events and stroke. The risk of major bleeding was significantly lower for apixaban compared with warfarin, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban (relative risk reduction, 38%, 35%, and 46%, respectively). Similarly, the risk for intracranial hemorrhage was significantly lower for apixaban than warfarin and rivaroxaban (46% and 54%, respectively) but not dabigatran. The risk of gastrointestinal bleeding was lower with apixaban when compared with all oral anticoagulant agents (. Use of apixaban in real-life is associated with an overall similar effectiveness in reducing stroke and any thromboembolic events when compared with warfarin. A better safety profile was found with apixaban compared with warfarin, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Female; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Polymers; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Saliva, Artificial; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Vitamin K antagonists were the only choice for chronic oral anticoagulation for more than half a century. Over the past few years, direct oral anticoagulants have emerged, including one direct thrombin inhibitor (dabigatran etexilate) and three factor Xa inhibitors (apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban). In randomised controlled trials comparing direct oral anticoagulants with traditional vitamin K antagonists, the direct oral anticoagulants all showed a favourable benefit-risk balance in their safety and efficacy profile, in prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation and in the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism and acute coronary syndrome. In 2008, dabigatran was the first direct oral anticoagulant approved by the European Medicine Agency. Subsequently, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban were also authorised. This article reviews the evidence related to the use of these drugs.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Postoperative Complications; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Withholding Treatment

Because atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major risk for thrombotic disease, many patients with AF are managed with anticoagulation for primary or secondary prevention of these events. The emergence of novel oral anticoagulants offers patients and providers options to consider beyond warfarin. Decision making should address safety, tolerability, efficacy, price, and simplicity of use; and decisions should be individualized for each patient.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thrombosis

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, and it leads to significant morbidity and mortality, predominantly from ischemic stroke. Vitamin K antagonists, mainly warfarin, have been used for decades to prevent ischemic stroke in AF, but their use is limited due to interactions with food and other drugs, as well as the requirement for regular monitoring of the international normalized ratio. Rivaroxaban, a direct factor Xa inhibitor and the most commonly used non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant, avoids many of these challenges and is being prescribed with increasing frequency for stroke prevention in non-valvular AF. Randomized controlled trial (RCT) data from the ROCKET-AF(Rivaroxaban once daily oral direct Factor Xa inhibition compared with vitamin K antagonism for prevention of stroke and embolism trial in atrial fibrillation) trial have shown rivaroxaban to be non-inferior to warfarin in preventing ischemic stroke and systemic embolism and to have comparable overall bleeding rates. Applicability of the RCT data to real-world practice can sometimes be limited by complex clinical scenarios or multiple comorbidities not adequately represented in the trials. Available real-world evidence in non-valvular AF patients with comorbidities - including renal impairment, acute coronary syndrome, diabetes mellitus, malignancy, or old age - supports the use of rivaroxaban as safe and effective in preventing ischemic stroke in these subgroups, though with some important considerations required to reduce bleeding risk. Patient perspectives on rivaroxaban use are also considered. Real-world evidence indicates superior rates of drug adherence with rivaroxaban when compared with vitamin K antagonists and with alternative non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants - perhaps, in part, due to its once-daily dosing regimen. Furthermore, self-reported quality of life scores are highest among patients compliant with rivaroxaban therapy. The generally high levels of patient satisfaction with rivaroxaban therapy contribute to overall favorable clinical outcomes.

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Brain Ischemia; Comorbidity; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Patient Safety; Patient Satisfaction; Quality of Life; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk of atrial fibrillation, stroke, and bleeding posing unique clinical challenges. Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) including dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban have become recognized as alternative therapy to Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) regarding the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and reduce the risk of stroke in atrial fibrillation. However, the understanding of NOACs in CKD is still underdeveloped. This review summarizes recent literature on the efficacy and safety of NOACs in patients with CKD.. Studies focusing on patients with moderate kidney disease were drawn from post hoc analyses from three major NOAC trials, meta-analyses, and postmarketing surveillance studies. Cumulatively, these studies continue to demonstrate NOACs as equivalent if not superior therapies to VKAs in regards to both efficacy and safety. These studies are limited by small sample sizes as well as a lack of direct comparison between NOACs.. The role of NOACs in managing VTE and atrial fibrillation is increasing. Current research suggests that NOACs are at least as efficacious and well tolerated as VKAs. More research is required to elucidate which NOAC is preferable in the clinical setting.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Venous Thromboembolism

Four non-vitamin-K-antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been approved for use in various cardiovascular indications. The direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and the direct factor Xa inhibitors apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban are now increasingly used in clinical practice. For some of these agents, available data from real-world studies support the efficacy and safety data in phase III clinical trials.. This review aims to summarize the current status of trials and observational studies of oral anticoagulant use over the spectrum of cardiovascular disorders (excluding venous thrombosis), provide a reference source beyond stroke prevention for atrial fibrillation (AF) and examine the potential for novel applications in the cardiovascular field.. We searched the recent literature for data on completed and upcoming trials of oral anticoagulants with a particular focus on rivaroxaban.. Recent data in specific patient subgroups, such as patients with AF undergoing catheter ablation or cardioversion, have led to an extended approval for rivaroxaban, whereas the other NOACs have ongoing or recently completed trials in this setting. However, there are unmet medical needs for several arterial thromboembolic-related conditions, including patients with: AF and acute coronary syndrome, AF and coronary artery disease undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery disease and peripheral artery disease, implanted cardiac devices, and embolic stroke of unknown source.. NOACs may provide alternative treatment options in areas of unmet need, and numerous studies are underway to assess their benefit-risk profiles in these settings.

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiovascular Diseases; Drug Repositioning; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Atrial fibrillation (AF) occurs approximately in 3% of general population, with greater prevalence in elderly. Non-vitamin K-dependent oral anticoagulant agents (NOACs) according to the current European guidelines are recommended for patients with AF at high risk for stroke as a first-choice treatment. NOACs are not inferior to warfarin or some of them are better than warfarin in reducing the rate of ischemic stroke. Moreover, they significantly reduce the rate of intracranial hemorrhages, major bleedings, and mortality compared with warfarin. Nevertheless according to ESC guidelines, NOACs are not recommended in patients with creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min. Observational studies provide contradictive data. Only few new trials are ongoing. Therefore, it is not clear if NOACs should be in the future prescribed to patients with advanced CKD and those on dialysis. Moreover, the risk of stroke and bleeding is much higher in such population than in patients without end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The authors provide data on pros and cons of use of NOACs in ESRD patients with AF.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Dabigatran; Humans; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles

Until recently, vitamin K antagonists (VKA) were the only drugs available for long-term anticoagulation. The use of these drugs is laborious due to their variable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. The advent of direct oral anticoagulants has produced a paradigm shift due to their low incidence of drug interactions, their stable plasma levels, and their lack of monitoring. Rivaroxaban, a factor Xa inhibitor, has been tested in different clinical scenarios and has proved to be effective and safe, even increasing the scope of the old VKA. Areas covered: A non-systematic review of the literature was conducted using the PubMed and Cochrane databases, focusing on randomized clinical trials and real-world observational studies that evaluated rivaroxaban in patients with atrial fibrillation, venous thromboembolism, and atherosclerotic coronary and peripheral vascular disease. Expert commentary: The role of rivaroxaban keeps expanding into areas that were unimaginable few years ago, in the light of solid evidence that has eliminated old strict paradigms. Nonetheless, it will be necessary to adjust costs and better understand the perceived barriers to its widespread implementation, to get fully acceptation of rivaroxaban for the different clinical conditions that have been suggested.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Venous Thromboembolism

Atrial fibrillation, peripheral and coronary artery disease, and venous thromboembolism are major risk factors for stroke, disability, and death in the rapidly growing older (≥ 65 years.) population. In the absence of clear guidelines on the appropriate use of the newer non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in this population, this study specifically reviews the available literature for rivaroxaban and the impact of age that may affect the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and safety of this anticoagulant.. This review includes a summary of data obtained from the available literature concerning both older healthy subjects and older patients with various aspects of cardiovascular disease enrolled in rivaroxaban clinical trials and data from real world evidence studies.. Evaluation of the clinical pharmacology in healthy, older adults reveal no clinically relevant effect of age on rivaroxaban pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Population pharmacokinetic studies in older patients with thromboembolic diseases suggest a moderate effect of increasing age on rivaroxaban clearance, albeit not clinically significant. Additionally, sub-group analyses from large, phase 3 clinical trials demonstrate consistent efficacy and safety in the older patient population vs the overall population. These findings are further supported by real-world evidence studies.. A favorable clinical profile with rivaroxaban was observed across age sub-groups, supporting the premise that dosing in older adults does not necessitate adjustment. However, it is prudent that a cautious and individualized approach is taken for treatment with any anticoagulant in older adults.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Venous Thromboembolism

Residual cardiovascular risk remains high in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease despite current antithrombotic therapy. On the other hand, patients with atrial fibrillation have an increased risk of myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death. As a result, a new antithrombotic approach appears necessary to reduce this risk. Areas covered: In this article, the role of rivaroxaban on vascular protection in patients with cardiovascular disease and/or atrial fibrillation was reviewed, with a particular focus, but not limited, on clinical trials. Expert commentary: Previous data have shown that factor Xa plays a key role in the etiopathogenesis of atherothrombosis. Experimental data suggest that rivaroxaban exhibits antiinflammatory and antioxidative stress properties, and may improve endothelial dysfunction. The COMPASS trial showed that among patients with stable atherosclerotic vascular disease, the addition of rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily (vascular dose) to aspirin provided a higher cardiovascular protection than aspirin alone. In ROCKET-AF trial, compared with warfarin, rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily (15 mg if moderate renal dysfunction) (anticoagulant dose) was, at least, as effective as warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, with a trend toward a reduction in the risk of cardiovascular outcomes. All these data suggest that rivaroxaban might have a vascular protective effect beyond its stroke/systemic embolism preventive activity.

Topics: Atherosclerosis; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiovascular Diseases; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Mortality; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Complications; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stents; Stroke; Thrombophilia; Ticlopidine

Background and Purpose- Although there are no trials or large cohorts to inform clinical care, current guidelines caution against giving intravenous tPA (tissue-type plasminogen activator) to patients with acute ischemic stroke who are taking non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). We performed a literature review of intravenous tPA in patients treated with NOACs preceding stroke. Methods- A literature search of PubMed was performed encompassing January 2010 to March 2018. Patient characteristics, timing of last medication intake, laboratory testing, use of reversal, and outcomes ≤3 months after discharge were summarized. Results- We identified 55 studies with 492 NOAC patients receiving tPA (dabigatran, 181; rivaroxaban, 215; apixaban, 40; and unspecified NOAC, 56). Among patients with complete data, the median time from the last NOAC intake to symptom onset was 8 hours (interquartile range, 2.5-14.5), with 55.2% (80/145) within 12 hours. Few patients underwent sensitive laboratory tests, such as thrombin time, diluted thrombin time, or anti-Xa assays before tPA administration. The overall observed rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, mortality, and favorable outcomes (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, ≤1; modified Rankin Scale score, 0-2; or neurological improvement in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, ≥8 points) were 4.3% (20/462), 11.3% (48/423), and 43.7% (164/375), respectively. Among dabigatran-treated patients, reversal with idarucizumab was associated with fewer symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (4.5% [2/44] versus 7.4% [8/108]; unadjusted odds ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.12-2.92), death (4.5% [2/44] versus 12.0% [13/108]; unadjusted odds ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.08-1.61), and more favorable outcomes (79.1% [34/43] versus 39.2% [29/74]; unadjusted odds ratio, 5.86; 95% CI, 2.45-14.00), although the differences were not statistically significant for symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and death. Conclusions- These preliminary observations suggest that tPA may be reasonably well tolerated without prohibitive risks of bleeding complications in selected patients on NOACs. Reversal of anticoagulant effects by idarucizumab for dabigatran-treated patients before tPA is an emerging strategy that was associated with more favorable outcomes.

Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Administration, Oral; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Anticoagulants; Antidotes; Antithrombins; Brain Ischemia; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Odds Ratio; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Tissue Plasminogen Activator

The introduction of NOACs has put a focus on stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). The number of patients in Stockholm diagnosed with non-valvular AF increased from 41 008 in 2011 to 51 266 in 2017 and their treatment has been markedly improved. Between 2011 and 2017 total oral anticoagulant treatment increased from 51.6% (warfarin) to 77.3% (31% warfarin, 46.3% NOACs) and aspirin decreased from 31.6% to 7.2%. Treatment was especially improved among patients with CHA2DS2-VASc scores ≥2 and elderly high risk patients. We found an excellent persistence with OAC treatment (88% at 1 year and 83% at 2 years). A comparative effectiveness study showed that NOACs were at least as effective and safe as warfarin even among patients ≥80 years or with previous serious bleeds. After a gradual introduction of NOACs with many educational activities apixaban is now the first-line choice for stroke prevention in AF in Stockholm. Swedish guideline goals are fulfilled and outcomes are improved.

Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Observational Studies as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Sweden; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Registries and non-interventional studies offer relevant and complementary information to clinical trials, since they have a high external validity. Areas covered: The information regarding the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin, or rivaroxaban alone in clinical practice was reviewed in this manuscript. For this purpose, a search on MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was performed. The MEDLINE and EMBASE search included both medical subject headings (MeSH) and keywords including: atrial fibrillation (AF) OR warfarin OR clinical practice OR ROCKET AF AND rivaroxaban. Case reports were not considered. Expert commentary: In ROCKET AF, rivaroxaban was at least as effective as warfarin for the prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular AF at high risk of stroke, but, importantly, with a lesser risk of intracranial, critical and fatal bleedings. A number of observational comparative and non-comparative studies, with more than 60,000 patients included treated with rivaroxaban, have analyzed the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in real-life patients with AF in different clinical settings. These studies have shown that in clinical practice, rates of stroke and major bleeding were consistently lower than those reported in ROCKET AF, likely due to the lower thromboembolic and bleeding risk observed in these patients.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

The non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban are administered in fixed doses without anticoagulant monitoring. Randomized trials show that unmonitored NOAC therapy is at least as effective as and safer than dose-adjusted warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Subgroup analyses indicate that plasma drug levels or anticoagulant activity of the NOACs predict stroke and bleeding. This review examines the historical basis for anticoagulant monitoring, discusses methods to measure and interpret drug levels, and critically assesses the role of routine laboratory monitoring in the management of NOAC therapy.. The predictable anticoagulant response of NOACs has provided the pharmacological basis for their administration in fixed doses without routine coagulation monitoring. Although it is possible to accurately measure NOAC drug levels, within-patient variability complicates interpretation of these results. Furthermore, patient characteristics, such as age and renal function, confound the association between NOAC drug levels and clinical outcomes. Information is lacking on the optimal drug level in particular patient groups (eg, elderly, the renally impaired, and those with high bleeding risk), the appropriate dose adjustment to achieve expected levels, and whether routine laboratory monitoring and dose adjustment will improve clinical outcomes. A benefit of a management strategy that incorporates routine therapeutic drug monitoring and dose adjustment over current standard-of-care metrics without such monitoring remains unproven.. Robust evidence from patients with atrial fibrillation randomized to NOACs or warfarin demonstrates that unmonitored NOAC therapy is at least as effective and safe as monitored warfarin, with lower rates of intracranial hemorrhage and reduced mortality. Further research is required to determine whether routine laboratory monitoring might provide a net benefit for patients. Until such data are available, clinicians should continue to prescribe NOACs in fixed doses without routine monitoring.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Partial Thromboplastin Time; Prothrombin Time; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; Thiazoles; Thrombin Time; Warfarin

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are convenient and effective in the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism and the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, these drugs have been associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the risk of GI bleeding in patients receiving these drugs.. We searched the EMBASE, Medline, Cochrane, and ISI Web of knowledge databases through January 2016 for randomized trials that compared NOACs with conventional anticoagulants for approved indications. We conducted a meta-analysis, reporting odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The primary outcome was major GI bleeding. Secondary outcomes included clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding and upper and lower GI bleeding. We performed a priori subgroup analyses by individual drug.. Our analysis included a total of 43 randomized trials, comprising 166,289 patients. There was no difference between NOACs and conventional anticoagulants in the risk of major bleeding (1.5% vs 1.3%, respectively; OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.80-1.21), clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (0.6% vs 0.6%, respectively; OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.64-1.36), upper GI bleeding (1.5% vs 1.6%, respectively; OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.77-1.20), or lower GI bleeding (1.0% vs 1.0%, respectively; OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.67-1.15). Dabigatran (2.0% vs 1.4%, respectively; OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.04-1.55) and rivaroxaban (1.7% vs 1.3%, respectively; OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.15-1.70) were associated with increased odds of major GI bleeding compared with conventional anticoagulation, whereas no difference was found for apixaban (0.6% vs 0.7%, respectively; OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.64-1.02) or edoxaban (1.9% vs 1.6%, respectively; OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.78-1.11). These subgroup findings were not observed in other sensitivity analyses.. In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we found risk of major GI bleeding to be similar between NOACs and conventional anticoagulation. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban, however, may be associated with increased odds of major GI bleeding. Further high-quality studies are needed to characterize GI bleeding risk among NOACs.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism

Atrial fibrillation (AF) represents the most common arrhythmia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). As in the general population, in CKD patients AF is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolism and stroke. However, CKD patients, especially those on renal replacement therapy (RRT), also exhibit an increased risk of bleeding, especially from the gastrointestinal tract. Oral anticoagulation is the most effective form of thromboprophylaxis in patients with AF presenting increased risk of stroke. Limited evidence on efficacy, the increased risk of bleeding as well as some concern regarding the use of warfarin in CKD, has often resulted in the underuse of anticoagulation CKD patients. A large body of evidence suggests that non-vitamin K-dependent oral anticoagulant agents (NOACs) significantly reduce the risk of stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality, with lower to similar major bleeding rates compared with vitamin K antagonist such as warfarin in normal renal function subjects. Hence, they are currently recommended for patients with atrial fibrillation at risk for stroke. However, NOACs metabolism is largely dependent on the kidneys for elimination and little is known in patients with creatinine clearance <25ml/min who were excluded from all pivotal phase 3 NOACs trials. This review focuses on the current pharmacokinetic, observational, and prospective data on NOACs in patients with moderate to advanced chronic kidney disease (creatinine clearance 15-49ml/min) and those on dialysis.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Renal impairment increases risk of stroke and systemic embolic events and bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have varied dependence on renal elimination, magnifying the importance of appropriate patient selection, dosing, and periodic kidney function monitoring. In randomized controlled trials of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, DOACs were at least as effective and associated with less bleeding compared with warfarin. Each direct oral anticoagulant was associated with reduced risk of stroke and systemic embolic events and major bleeding compared with warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients with mild or moderate renal impairment. Renal function decrease appears less impacted by DOACs, which are associated with a better risk-benefit profile than warfarin in patients with decreasing renal function over time. Limited data address the risk-benefit profile of DOACs in patients with severe impairment or on dialysis.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pharmaceutical Research; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Therapeutic Equivalency; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Anticoagulation, reducing the risk of thromboembolic events in patients undergoing cardioversion, is a cornerstone of peri-cardioversion management in patients with atrial fibrillation. We aimed to analyse published data on the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients undergoing cardioversion. We performed a systematic review of randomized prospective clinical trials (RCTs) comparing DOACs with warfarin and reporting data on post-cardioversion outcomes of interest. Outcomes of interest were stroke, systemic thromboembolic events and major bleeding. We reviewed a total of six RCTs including 3900 cardioversions performed using a DOAC for thromboembolic prophylaxis. These studies reported a low incidence overall of adverse outcomes associated with the use of DOACs (around 1% in all studies, except the ROCKET post-hoc study which included ablation procedures). The incidence rate of adverse events during DOAC treatment was found to be very similar to that observed with warfarin anticoagulation. In RCTs DOAC treatment in patients undergoing cardioversion appears to be effective and safe. However, because evidence in this clinical setting is still weak, observational reports could be useful in providing further data about peri-procedural outcomes.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Electric Countershock; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are indicated for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism. As any anticoagulant, they are associated with a bleeding risk. Management of DOAC-induced bleeding is challenging. Idarucizumab, antidote for dabigatran, is currently available and is part of the therapeutic strategy, whereas antidotes for anti-Xa agents are under development. Activated or non-activated prothrombin concentrates are proposed, although their efficacy to reverse DOAC is uncertain. We propose an update on DOAC-associated bleeding management, integrating the availability of idarucizumab and the critical place of DOAC concentration measurements.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antidotes; Antithrombins; Arginine; Blood Coagulation Factors; Blood Transfusion; Dabigatran; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Hemostatics; Humans; Piperazines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thrombophilia

Evidence from the real-world setting complements evidence coming from randomized controlled trials. We aimed to summarize all available evidence from high-quality real-world observational studies about efficacy and safety of nonvitamin-K oral anticoagulants compared with vitamin-K antagonists in patients with atrial fibrillation.. We searched PubMed and Web of Science until January 7, 2017 for observational nationwide or health insurance databases reporting matched or adjusted results comparing nonvitamin-K oral anticoagulants versus vitamin-K antagonists in patients with atrial fibrillation. Outcomes assessed included ischemic stroke, ischemic stroke or systemic embolism, any stroke or systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, intracranial hemorrhage, major hemorrhage, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and death.. In 28 included studies of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban compared with vitamin-K antagonists, all 3 nonvitamin-K oral anticoagulants were associated with a large reduction of intracranial hemorrhage (apixaban hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-0.63; dabigatran HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.37-0.49; rivaroxaban HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.47-0.86); similar rates of ischemic stroke and ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (apixaban HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.75-1.19 and HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.95-1.22 / dabigatran HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.80-1.16 and HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.92-1.50 / rivaroxaban HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.76-1.04 and HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.52-1.04, respectively); apixaban and dabigatran with lower mortality (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.56-0.75 and HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.53-0.75, respectively); apixaban with fewer gastrointestinal (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.42-0.95) and major hemorrhages (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.48-0.63); dabigatran and rivaroxaban with more gastrointestinal hemorrhages (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.06-1.36 and HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.08-1.41, respectively); dabigatran and rivaroxaban with similar rate of myocardial infarction (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.77-1.21 and HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.54-1.89, respectively).. This meta-analysis confirms the main findings of the randomized controlled trials of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban in the real-world setting and, hence, strengthens their validity.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Rivaroxaban is a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) approved for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, a common arrhythmia. In this review, we summarize the effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus warfarin and the DOACs dabigatran, apixaban and edoxaban. The primary focus is on primary evidence from clinical trials, indirect comparison studies and real-world studies. While there are gaps in the literature, the evidence thus far indicates that rivaroxaban is superior to warfarin and similar to dabigatran, apixaban and edoxaban for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, although rivaroxaban may be associated with an elevated bleeding risk compared with other DOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Epidemiologic Methods; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Four direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are available for the prevention of stroke in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF): dabigatran (a direct thrombin inhibitor); and rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban (factor Xa inhibitors). This article summarizes the safety and efficacy of DOACs for the prevention of stroke in elderly NVAF patients.. PubMed was searched to identify published results of randomized, controlled trials evaluating DOACs for stroke prevention in elderly NVAF patients. Pharmacologic and dose recommendations were obtained from the package inserts.. DOACs are at least as effective as warfarin for stroke prevention in elderly patients with NVAF. Compared with warfarin, DOACs were associated with reduced risk of intracranial hemorrhage, while some DOACs demonstrated an increase in other bleeding events (e.g., gastrointestinal). The faster onset and offset of action and fewer food and drug interactions of DOACs may be an advantage over warfarin for some patients.. DOACs are an alternative to warfarin with overall equivalent safety and efficacy in elderly patients with NVAF, and may be preferable for some. Stroke risk must always be balanced against potential bleeding risk when determining an optimal anticoagulation treatment plan. Patients' needs and preferences will also impact this decision.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by arterial or venous thrombosis (or both) and/or pregnancy morbidity in association with the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies. The prevalence is estimated at 40 to 50 cases per 100,000 people. The most common sites of thrombosis are cerebral arteries and deep veins of the lower limbs. People with a definite APS diagnosis have an increased lifetime risk of recurrent thrombotic events.. To assess the effects of antiplatelet or anticoagulant agents, or both, for the secondary prevention of recurrent thrombosis, particularly ischemic stroke, in people with antiphospholipid syndrome.. We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (February 2017), CENTRAL (last search February 2017), MEDLINE (from 1948 to February 2017), Embase (from 1980 to February 2017), and several ongoing trials registers. We also checked the reference lists of included studies, systematic reviews, and practice guidelines, and we contacted experts in the field.. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated any anticoagulant or antiplatelet agent, or both, in the secondary prevention of thrombosis in people diagnosed with APS according to the criteria valid when the study took place. We did not include studies specifically addressing women with obstetrical APS.. Pairs of review authors independently selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias for the included studies. We resolved any discrepancies through discussion or by consulting a third review author and, in addition, one review author checked all the extracted data.. We included five studies involving 419 randomized participants with APS. Only one study was at low risk of bias in all domains. One study was at low risk of bias in all domains for objective outcomes but not for quality of life (measured using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire). We judged the other three studies to be at unclear or high risk of bias in three or more domains.The duration of intervention ranged from 180 days to a mean of 3.9 years. One study compared rivaroxaban (a novel oral anticoagulant: NOAC) with standard warfarin treatment and reported no thrombotic or major bleeding events, but it was not powered to detect such differences (low-quality evidence). Investigators reported similar rates of clinically relevant non-major bleeding (risk ratio (RR) 1.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25 to 8.33; moderate-quality evidence) and minor bleeding (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.51 to 2.83) for participants receiving rivaroxaban and the standard vitamin K antagonists (VKA). This study also reported some small benefit with rivaroxaban over the standard VKA treatment in terms of quality of life health state measured at 180 days with the EQ-5D-5L 100 mm visual analogue scale (mean difference (MD) 7 mm, 95% CI 2.01 to 11.99; low-quality evidence) but not measured as health utility (MD 0.04, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.10 [on a scale from 0 to 1]).Two studies compared high dose VKA (warfarin) with moderate/standard intensity VKA and found no differences in the rates of any thrombotic events (RR 2.22, 95% CI 0.79 to 6.23) or major bleeding (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.24 to 2.25) between the groups (low-quality evidence). Minor bleeding analyzed using the RR and any bleeding using the hazard ratio (HR) were more frequent in participants receiving high-intensity warfarin treatment compared to the standard-intensity therapy (RR 2.55, 95% CI 1.07 to 6.07; and HR 2.03, 95% CI 1.12 to 3.68; low-quality evidence).In one study, it was not possible to estimate the RR for stroke with a combination of VKA plus antiplatelet agent compared to a single antiplatelet agent, while for major bleeding, a single event occurred in the single antiplatelet agent group. In one study, comparing combined VKA plus antiplatelet agent with dual antiplatelet therapy, the RR of the risk of stroke over three years of observation was 5.00 (95% CI 0.26 to 98.0). In a single small study, the RR for stroke during one year of observation with a dual antiplatelet therapy compared to single antiplatelet drug was 0.14 (95% CI 0.01. There is not enough evidence for or against NOACs or for high-intensity VKA compared to the standard VKA therapy in the secondary prevention of thrombosis in people with APS. There is some evidence of harm for high-intensity VKA regarding minor and any bleeding. The evidence was also not sufficient to show benefit or harm for VKA plus antiplatelet agent or dual antiplatelet therapy compared to a single antiplatelet drug. Future studies should be adequately powered, with proper adherence to treatment, in order to evaluate the effects of anticoagulants, antiplatelets, or both, for secondary thrombosis prevention in APS. We have identified five ongoing trials mainly using NOACs in APS, so increasing experimental efforts are likely to yield additional evidence of clinical relevance in the near future.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Warfarin

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an independent risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF), which is more prevalent among CKD patients than the general population. AF causes stroke or systemic embolism, leading to increased mortality. The conventional antithrombotic prophylaxis agent warfarin is often prescribed for the prevention of stroke, but risk of bleeding necessitates regular therapeutic monitoring. Recently developed direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are expected to be useful as alternatives to warfarin.. To assess the efficacy and safety of DOAC including apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban versus warfarin among AF patients with CKD.. We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Specialised Register (up to 1 August 2017) through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Specialised Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov.. We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which directly compared the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (direct thrombin inhibitors or factor Xa inhibitors) with dose-adjusted warfarin for preventing stroke and systemic embolic events in non-valvular AF patients with CKD, defined as creatinine clearance (CrCl) or eGFR between 15 and 60 mL/min (CKD stage G3 and G4).. Two review authors independently selected studies, assessed quality, and extracted data. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for the association between anticoagulant therapy and all strokes and systemic embolic events as the primary efficacy outcome and major bleeding events as the primary safety outcome. Confidence in the evidence was assessing using GRADE.. Our review included 12,545 AF participants with CKD from five studies. All participants were randomised to either DOAC (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban) or dose-adjusted warfarin. Four studies used a central, interactive, automated response system for allocation concealment while the other did not specify concealment methods. Four studies were blinded while the other was partially open-label. However, given that all studies involved blinded evaluation of outcome events, we considered the risk of bias to be low. We were unable to create funnel plots due to the small number of studies, thwarting assessment of publication bias. Study duration ranged from 1.8 to 2.8 years. The large majority of participants included in this study were CKD stage G3 (12,155), and a small number were stage G4 (390). Of 12,545 participants from five studies, a total of 321 cases (2.56%) of the primary efficacy outcome occurred per year. Further, of 12,521 participants from five studies, a total of 617 cases (4.93%) of the primary safety outcome occurred per year. DOAC appeared to probably reduce the incidence of stroke and systemic embolism events (5 studies, 12,545 participants: RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.00; moderate certainty evidence) and to slightly reduce the incidence of major bleeding events (5 studies, 12,521 participants: RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.04; low certainty evidence) in comparison with warfarin.. Our findings indicate that DOAC are as likely as warfarin to prevent all strokes and systemic embolic events without increasing risk of major bleeding events among AF patients with kidney impairment. These findings should encourage physicians to prescribe DOAC in AF patients with CKD without fear of bleeding. The major limitation is that the results of this study chiefly reflect CKD stage G3. Application of the results to CKD stage G4 patients requires additional investigation. Furthermore, we could not assess CKD stage G5 patients. Future reviews should assess participants at more advanced CKD stages. Additionally, we could not conduct detailed analyses of subgroups and sensitivity analyses due to lack of data.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Currently, little evidence is available on the length and type of anticoagulation used for extended treatment for prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with unprovoked VTE who have completed initial oral anticoagulation therapy.. To compare the efficacy and safety of available oral therapeutic options (aspirin, warfarin, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)) for extended thromboprophylaxis in adults with a first unprovoked VTE, to prevent VTE recurrence after completion of an acceptable initial oral anticoagulant treatment period, as defined in individual studies.. For this review, the Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist (CIS) searched the Specialised Register (March 2017) as well as the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2017, Issue 2). We also searched trials registries (March 2017) and reference lists of relevant articles.. We included randomised controlled trials in which patients with a first, symptomatic, objectively confirmed, unprovoked VTE, who had been initially treated with anticoagulants, were randomised to extended prophylaxis (vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), antiplatelet agents, or DOACs) versus no prophylaxis or placebo. We also included trials that compared one type of extended prophylaxis versus another type of extended prophylaxis.. Two review authors independently selected studies, assessed quality, and extracted data. We resolved disagreements by discussion.. Six studies with a combined total of 3436 participants met the inclusion criteria. Five studies compared extended prophylaxis versus placebo: three compared warfarin versus placebo, and two compared aspirin versus placebo. One study compared one type of extended prophylaxis (rivaroxaban) versus another type of extended prophylaxis (aspirin). For extended prophylaxis versus placebo, we downgraded the quality of the evidence for recurrent VTE and all-cause mortality to moderate owing to concerns arising from risks of selection and performance bias in individual studies. For all other outcomes in this review, we downgraded the quality of the evidence to low owing to concerns arising from risk of bias for the studies stated above, combined with concerns over imprecision. For extended prophylaxis versus other extended prophylaxis, we downgraded the quality of the evidence for recurrent VTE and major bleeding to moderate owing to concerns over imprecision. Risk of bias in the individual study was low.Meta-analysis showed that extended prophylaxis was no more effective than placebo in preventing VTE-related mortality (odds ratio (OR) 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14 to 6.98; 1862 participants; 4 studies; P = 0.98; low-quality evidence), recurrent VTE (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.03; 2043 participants; 5 studies; P = 0.07; moderate-quality evidence), major bleeding (OR 1.84, 95% CI 0.87 to 3.85; 2043 participants; 5 studies; P = 0.86; low-quality evidence), all-cause mortality (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.57; 2043 participants; 5 studies; P = 0.99; moderate-quality evidence), clinically relevant non-major bleeding (OR 1.78, 95% CI 0.59 to 5.33; 1672 participants; 4 studies; P = 0.30; low-quality evidence), stroke (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.39 to 3.46; 1224 participants; 2 studies; P = 0.80; low-quality evidence), or myocardial infarction (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.35 to 2.87; 1495 participants; 3 studies; P = 1.00; low-quality evidence).One study showed that the novel oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban was associated with fewer recurrent VTEs than aspirin (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.54; 1389 participants; P = 0.0001; moderate-quality evidence). Data show no clear differences in the incidence of major bleeding between rivaroxaban and aspirin (OR 3.06, 95% CI 0.37 to 25.51; 1389 participants; P = 0.30; moderate-quality evidence) nor in the incidence of clinically relevant non-major bleeding (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.94; 1389 participants; 1 study; P = 0.69; moderate-quality evidenc. Evidence is currently insufficient to permit definitive conclusions concerning the effectiveness and safety of extended thromboprophylaxis in prevention of recurrent VTE after initial oral anticoagulation therapy among participants with unprovoked VTE. Additional good-quality large-scale randomised controlled trials are required before firm conclusions can be reached.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

In this review we present comparison of pharmacokinetics of novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC) dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, principles of selection of a regimen of their dosing for phase III clinical trials in patients with atrial fibrillation. Multiplicity of administration of NOAC depends on required level of anticoagulation, ability to maintain anticoagulation for 24 hours, relationship between minimal and maximal levels of equilibrium concentrations, efficacy and safety. Once a day administration of some drugs of this group is reasonable from positions of clinical pharmacology. It can provide not only better adherence to treatment but greater safety relative to development of bleeding.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Despite the information provided by clinical trials is important, there are relevant clinical differences between those patients included in clinical trials and data of daily outpatient clinics. As a result, in some cases, the results of randomized clinical trials could not be directly applied to clinical practice. In this context, to perform «real-life» registries is mandatory. In the ROCKET-AF study, rivaroxaban, a once-daily direct oral anticoagulant, was at least as effective as warfarin for preventing stroke or systemic embolism, with similar rates of major bleeding, but with a lesser risk of intracranial, critical and fatal bleedings. In the last years, different large registries have confirmed that rivaroxaban is effective and even safer in real-life patients than in ROCKET-AF. The aim of this review is to update the current evidence about the efficacy, effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in real-life patients.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

The safety and efficacy of the oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban were studied in the Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET AF trial). A number of subanalyses of the ROCKET AF trial have subsequently analyzed the use of rivaroxaban in special patient populations.. The outcomes of the ROCKET AF trial were reviewed. The use of rivaroxaban in higher risk populations, as determined by the presence of co-morbidities included in the CHADS2 criteria, was analyzed. Requirements for dose adjustment in patients with renal impairment and in East Asian patients were described. Finally, clinical management challenges, including interruptions in therapy, drug discontinuation, management of bleeding events, drug interactions, and management of patients requiring cardioversion/ablation were reviewed.. Rivaroxaban is efficacious in high-risk populations, including elderly patients, patients with diabetes, heart failure, history of stroke, prior myocardial infarction, or peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Patients with PAD have a higher risk of bleeding with rivaroxaban compared with warfarin. East Asian populations do not require a dose adjustment for rivaroxaban, while a reduced dose of 15 mg daily is required for patients with moderate renal impairment. Rivaroxaban remains effective with temporary interruptions in therapy and in patients requiring cardioversion/ablation. Rates of major bleeding and subsequent outcomes were similar in patients on warfarin and rivaroxaban, although rates of gastrointestinal bleeding were higher with rivaroxaban. Concurrent use of antiarrhythmic therapy was not associated with adverse outcomes.. Rivaroxaban represents an efficacious alternative to warfarin in high-risk patients with AF. Dose adjustment is required for patients with moderate renal impairment. Rivaroxaban can be used safely in a number of challenging clinical management scenarios although the concurrent use of amiodarone requires more study.

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Despite direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have overcome the most relevant limitations of vitamin K antagonists, many patients with atrial fibrillation are not receiving the appropriate anticoagulant therapy. In addition, when patients are anticoagulated with DOACs, some of them are not taking the dose recommended in the summary of product characteristics. This may be related, at least in part, to the concern about the applicability of findings from randomized clinical trials to real-life patients. In this context, performing studies in daily clinical practice to assess the efficacy and safety of DOACs in real-world setting is mandatory. The aim of this review is to update the current evidence regarding safety of rivaroxaban in clinical practice. The Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET-AF) showed that rivaroxaban was at least as effective as warfarin for preventing stroke or systemic embolism, with similar rates of major bleeding but with lesser risk of intracranial and fatal bleedings. Data from noninterventional studies and registries have confirmed the good results of ROCKET-AF. Even more, rates of bleeding may be inferior in real-life patients, since they have a lower risk profile than those included in ROCKET-AF.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

The majority of patients with atrial fibrillation should receive oral anticoagulation to reduce the risk of stroke. The limitations of vitamin K antagonists have led to an underuse of anticoagulants in clinical practice which has been associated with a higher risk of stroke, hospitalizations and healthcare costs. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) overcome some of the limitations of vitamin K antagonists and may therefore increase the use of oral anticoagulants in clinical practice. Since no head-to-head trials have been performed, only indirect comparisons can be made among them. In this review, the results of the Phase III randomized controlled trials with DOACs were analyzed, trying to determine whether one or more DOACs could be especially recommended according to different clinical conditions.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles

Atrial fibrillation (AF) ranks the most prevailing type of cardiac rhythm disorder and AF patients are associated with a significantly increased risk of stroke compared to others. This study is designed to assess the relative efficacy of several clinical events prevention anticoagulants in patients with AF. Conventional pairwise meta-analysis was performed with fixed-effect model initially, then network meta-analysis was performed with random-effects model within results illustrated by cumulative odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% credible interval (CrI). The rank probabilities of each treatment outcomes were summarized by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). We conducted a systematic review and collected key clinical data from 37 studies with respect to 5 anticoagulant treatments for AF. Patients treated with rivaroxaban and apixaban are associated with a reduced risk of stroke compared to those treated with warfarin (OR 0.72, 95% CrI 0.53 to 0.88; OR 0.68, 95% CrI 0.48 to 0.91). Rivaroxaban (SUCRA = 0.712) appears to be the most preferable one with respect to vascular events, and both apixaban (SUCRA = 0.720) and rivaroxaban (SUCRA = 0.678) are preferable to others with respect to stroke. Dabigatran outperforms others with respect to the outcome of mortality (SUCRA = 0.695), hemorrhage events (SUCRA = 0.747), and myocardial infarction (SUCRA = 0.620). In conclusion, dabigatran has a noticeable and comprehensive advantage compared to others with respect to preventing several complications including hemorrhage events, myocardial infarction, and mortality. In addition, apixaban may be the best choice of preventing stroke, and rivaroxaban is more preferable to others with respect to preventing vascular events.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Mortality; Myocardial Infarction; Network Meta-Analysis; Odds Ratio; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Warfarin is commonly used as a secondary prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, limitations have been observed even with the use of this medication. Recently, several newer direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been approved for use by the food and drug administrations. Unfortunately, these newer drugs have seldom been compared directly with each other. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the bleeding events associated with rivaroxaban and dabigatran in patients treated for non-valvular AF.. EMBASE, Medline (National Library of Medicine) and the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials were searched for studies comparing rivaroxaban with dabigatran using the terms 'rivaroxaban, dabigatran and atrial fibrillation'. Primary endpoints were: any bleeding outcomes, intracranial bleeding and gastro-intestinal (GI) bleeding. Secondary outcomes included stroke/systemic embolism (SE)/transient ischemic attack (TIA), venous thromboembolism and mortality. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The pooled analyses were carried out with RevMan 5.3 software. All the authors had full access to the data and approved the manuscript as written.. A total number of 4895 patients were included. This analysis showed that rivaroxaban was not associated with a significantly higher bleeding event when compared to dabigatran (OR: 1.28, 95% CI: 0.95-1.72; P = 0.11). GI bleeding was similarly manifested between these two DOACs (OR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.43-2.25; P = 0.97). Even if intracranial bleeding was higher with the use of rivaroxaban, (OR: 2.18, 95% CI: 0.51-9.25; P = 0.29), the result was not statistically significant. Moreover, stroke/SE/TIA and venous thromboembolism were also not significantly different (OR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.53-1.23; P = 0.32) and (OR: 2.06, 95% CI: 0.73-5.82; P = 0.17) respectively. However, even if mortality favored dabigatran (OR: 1.42, 95% CI: 0.99-2.06; P = 0.06), this result only approached statistical significance.. Head to head comparison showed that rivaroxaban was not associated with significantly higher bleeding events compared to dabigatran. Intracranial bleeding, GI bleeding, stroke/SE/TIA, venous thromboembolism and mortality were also not significantly different between these two DOACs. However, due to the limited number of patients analyzed, and which were mainly obtained from observational studies, this hypothesis might only be confirmed in future randomized trials. Furthermore, the CHADS

Topics: Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Global Health; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke

The non-vitamin K antagonists (NOAC) are an integral component of our antithrombotic prevention and therapy. For four of the NOAC, their non-inferiority or even superiority versus vitamin K antagonists (VKA) has been proven. Thus, the management of special patient cohorts or the management of active bleeding complications is a focus of current discussion.In addition to prospective trials, numerous retrospective analyses of health insurers or public health provider data have been analyzed and published as "real life" or "real-world evidence" data. In almost all data sets the results of the NOAC approval trials were confirmed, demonstrating their non-inferiority or even superiority versus VKA. Attempts to compare the various NOAC with each other must be viewed critically since the real-world evidence (RWE) analysis provides very divergent results depending on the cohorts analyzed. Thus, a substantial prescriber-bias must be taken into account and never be excluded.In order to improve the management of bleeding complications, NOAC antidotes were developed. While the factors Xa antidote, andexanet alpha, a modified coagulation factor deleted of an intrinsic activity, will not be available before 2018, the dabigatran antidote idarucizumab is already in clinical use. Idarucizumab, a monoclonal antibody fragment directed against dabigatran, is able to completely antagonize the effect of dabigatran within minutes. Therefore, the drug has the potential to terminate life-threatening bleeding complications earlier and make emergency surgical or interventional procedures possible without an elevated bleeding risk.

Topics: Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Anticoagulants; Antidotes; Dabigatran; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used for prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism and for prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. In phase III clinical trials that included more than 100,000 patients, the DOACs were at least as effective as vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and were associated with less serious bleeding, particularly less intracranial bleeding. Real-world evidence supports these outcomes. Despite this, some physicians and patients are concerned about serious bleeding or emergencies unless specific reversal agents for the DOACs are available. However, in clinical trials performed without reversal agents, the outcome of major bleeds was similar or better in patients receiving DOACs than in those taking VKAs. Because of their short half-lives, supportive measures are sufficient to manage most bleeds in patients receiving DOACs. Anticoagulant reversal should only be considered with life-threatening bleeds, with bleeds that fail to respond to usual measures and in patients requiring urgent surgery. Idarucizumab is licensed for dabigatran reversal and andexanet alfa is likely to be soon licensed for reversal of rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban. To ensure responsible use of these agents, every hospital needs a bleeding management algorithm that identifies patients eligible for reversal and outlines appropriate dosing regimens.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Factor Xa; Forecasting; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

This study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in real-world practice compared with effectiveness and safety of dabigatran or warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation through meta-analyzing observational studies.. Seventeen studies were included after searching in PubMed for studies reporting the comparative effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus dabigatran (n=3), rivaroxaban versus Warfarin (n=11), or both (n=3) for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.. Overall, the risks of stroke/systematic thromboembolism with rivaroxaban were similar when compared with those with dabigatran (stroke/thromboembolism: hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.91-1.13; I. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, rivaroxaban was as effective as dabigatran, but was more effective than warfarin for the prevention of stroke/thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation patients. Major bleeding risk was significantly higher with rivaroxaban than with dabigatran, as was all-cause mortality and gastrointestinal bleeding. Rivaroxaban was comparable to warfarin for major bleeding, with an increased risk in gastrointestinal bleeding and decreased risk of intracranial hemorrhage.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Intracranial Embolism; Intracranial Thrombosis; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Current evidence indicates that heart failure (HF) confers a hyper-coagulable state that is associated with adverse events including stroke, systemic embolism, and mortality. This may be due to the elevated levels of pro-thrombotic and pro-inflammatory cytokines that are seen in patients with acute and chronic HF. Left ventricular wall motion abnormalities in patients with systolic dysfunction predispose to local thrombosis due to blood stasis as does atrial fibrillation (AF) which leads to blood stasis in regions of the atria. The high risk of thromboemboli in HF patients with AF has resulted in the use anticoagulation therapy to prevent the occurrence of catastrophic events. There is evidence, however, that the pro-inflammatory, pro-thrombotic state that exists in HF puts patients who are in sinus rhythm at risk. The novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been shown in RCT to have at least equivalent efficacy in reducing stroke as warfarin while exposing patients to a lower risk of bleeding. The fact that the NOACs don't require routine monitoring to assure that patients remain within the therapeutic range and have relatively simple dosing requirements and a safer risk profile makes them attractive substitutes to warfarin in HF patients with atrial fibrillation and other conditions (e.g. deep venous thrombosis). Post hoc analyses from a subset of HF patients from the RCTs in AF patients have demonstrated similar findings as were reported in the entire populations that were included in the trials. As a result, NOACS are commonly used now in HF patients with AF. For HF patients with reduced ejection fraction in sinus rhythm, the use of warfarin in randomized clinical trials (RCT) to reduce stroke has been disappointing and associated with increase bleeding risk when compared to aspirin. The advantages of the NOACs over warfarin, however, raise the question of whether they might improve outcomes in HF patients who are in sinus rhythm. The currently ongoing COMMANDER-HF trial has been designed to address this issue. In this chapter we review evidence of existence of a prothombotic state in HF, the pharmacodynamics and clinical trials of the NOACs and the outcomes from NOAC substudies in the HF subgroup. We also discuss the rationale for using anticoagulation in HF independent of arrhythmia burden.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Rivaroxaban, an inhibitor of Factor Xa, is a direct oral anti-coagulant that has been found to be non-inferior to warfarin in preventing cerebral ischemia in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and in the subgroup of patients with a history of the previous stroke or transient ischemic attack. Vascular neurologists in daily clinical practice may encounter patients taking rivaroxaban or patients who may benefit from its use. In this paper, we review the current clinical indications, contraindications, and clinical management guidelines for rivaroxaban while providing a special focus on neurological aspects and expert opinions on rivaroxaban therapy management in various situations that a neurologist may encounter when treating patients with an ischemic stroke (including those requiring intravenous or intra-arterial reperfusion therapy) and patients with an intracerebral hemorrhage. Since data from clinical trials and real-life data are missing in some clinical situations, strong recommendations are not always available. Nevertheless, practical guidelines should be adopted to maximize benefits from this oral anti-coagulant.

Topics: Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

The non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are replacing warfarin for stroke prevention in many patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Edoxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, is the newest entrant in this class. Results of the Effective Anticoagulation with Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation (ENGAGE AF) study demonstrate that edoxaban is noninferior to warfarin for prevention of stroke and systemic embolic events, and is associated with significantly less major bleeding, including intracranial bleeding, and reduced cardiovascular mortality. With a net clinical benefit over warfarin, edoxaban is well positioned as a choice among the NOACs, which include dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. But how will clinicians choose amongst them? The purpose of this paper is to (a) place the ENGAGE AF trial results into context with results of the studies with the other NOACs, and (b) aid clinicians in selection of the right anticoagulant for the right atrial fibrillation patient.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Research Design; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Benefits and/or harms (including costs) of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus warfarin therapy need appreciation in relative and absolute terms.. Accordingly, we derived clinically relevant relative and absolute benefit/harm parameters for NOACs (apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, edoxaban) compared to warfarin from four clinical trials involving atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. For each trial, we tabulated patient numbers enduring four important outcomes and calculated unadjusted relative risk reduction (RRR) and number needed to treat (NNT)/year values (and 95% confidence intervals) for the NAOC compared to warfarin. These outcomes were as follows: stroke/systemic embolism (primary endpoint), hemorrhagic stroke, major bleeds, and death. We also addressed drug acquisition costs.. Each NOAC was noninferior to warfarin for primary-outcome prevention; RRRs were 12-33% and NNT/year values were 182-481, and all but one indicated statistically significant superiority. All the NOACs yielded statistically significant reductions in hemorrhagic stroke risk; RRRs were 42-74% and NNT/year values were 364-528. Major bleeding risk was comparable in both groups. Apixaban yielded a lower NNT/year for preventing death than for primary-outcome prevention. Compared to warfarin, NOAC acquisition costs were 70- to 140-fold greater.. For the primary outcome, the absolute benefits of NOACs were modest (NNT/year values being large). Reduced hemorrhagic stroke rates with NOACs could be due to superior embolic infarct prevention and fewer consequential hemorrhagic transformations. Among apixaban recipients, the absolute mortality benefit exceeded that for the primary outcome, indicating prevention of additional unrelated deaths. The substantially greater NOAC acquisition costs need viewing against probable greater safety and the avoidance of monitoring bleeding risks.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Rivaroxaban is increasingly used in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). In the absence of large controlled trials, a comprehensive meta-analysis of the literature appears to be the best way to obtain reliable evidence on rare peri-procedural outcomes such as thromboembolic or bleeding events. We aimed to provide a detailed analysis of currently available data on safety and efficacy of peri-procedural rivaroxaban in patients undergoing AF ablation. We performed a systematic search of the English language literature for studies comparing peri-procedural rivaroxaban therapy with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and reporting detailed data on bleeding and/or thromboembolic complications. The Peto odds ratio (POR) was used to pool data into a fixed-effect meta-analysis. A total of 7400 patients undergoing catheter ablation were included in 15 observational and 1 randomized studies of which 1994 were receiving rivaroxaban and 5406 VKA. The risk of thromboembolism trended to be lower in the rivaroxaban group [4/1954 vs. 19/5219, POR 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.16-1.01, P = 0.052]. Major bleeding events occurred in 23 of 1994 cases (1.15%) in the rivaroxaban and 90 of 5406 (1.66%) in the VKA group (POR 0.74, 95% CI, 0.46-1.21, P = 0.23). A total of 87 minor bleeding events were reported in 1753 patients (4.96%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 165 of 4009 patients (4.12%) in the VKA group (POR 0.84, 95% CI 0.63-1.11, p = 0.22). In patients undergoing AF ablation, rivaroxaban appears to be an effective and safe alternative to VKA.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Catheter Ablation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Anticoagulation in catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) is of paramount importance for prevention of thromboembolic events, and recent studies favor uninterrupted vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) to uninterrupted VKAs for anticoagulation in CA by performing a meta-analysis. PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases were searched for studies comparing NOACs with uninterrupted VKAs in patients who underwent CA for AF from January 1, 2000, to August 31, 2015. Odds ratio (OR) and Peto's OR (POR) were used to report for event rates >1% and <1%, respectively. A total of 11,686 patients with AF who underwent CA in 25 studies were included in this analysis. There was no significant difference between NOACs and uninterrupted VKAs in occurrence of stroke or transient ischemic attacks (POR 1.35, 95% CI 0.62 to 2.94) and major bleeding (POR 0.87, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.31), which were consistent in subgroup analysis of interrupted and uninterrupted NOACs. A lower risk of minor bleeding was observed with NOACs (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.00), and no major differences were observed for the risk of thromboembolic events, cardiac tamponade or pericardial effusion requiring drainage, and groin hematoma. NOACs, whether interrupted preprocedure or not, were associated with equal rates of stroke or TIA and major bleeding complications and less risk of minor bleeding compared with uninterrupted VKAs in CA for AF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Observational Studies as Topic; Prothrombin; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and the associated risk of stroke are emerging epidemics throughout the world. Suboptimal use of oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention has been widely reported from observational studies. In recent years, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been introduced for thromboprophylaxis. We conducted a systematic literature review to evaluate current practices of anticoagulation in AF, pharmacologic features and adoption patterns of DOACs, their impacts on proportion of eligible patients with AF who receive oral anticoagulants, persisting challenges and future prospects for optimal anticoagulation.. In conducting this review, we considered the results of relevant prospective and retrospective observational studies from real-world practice settings. PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus (RIS), Google Scholar, EMBASE and Web of Science were used to source relevant literature. There were no date limitations, while language was limited to English. Selection was limited to articles from peer reviewed journals and related to our topic.. Most studies identified in this review indicated suboptimal use of anticoagulants is a persisting challenge despite the availability of DOACs. Underuse of oral anticoagulants is apparent particularly in patients with a high risk of stroke. DOAC adoption trends are quite variable, with slow integration into clinical practice reported in most countries; there has been limited impact to date on prescribing practice.. Available data from clinical practice suggest that suboptimal oral anticoagulant use in patients with AF and poor compliance with guidelines still remain commonplace despite transition to a new era of anticoagulation featuring DOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation Factors; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Evidence-Based Medicine; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Medication Errors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with an increased risk of stroke. AF-related strokes cause greater disability and mortality than those in patients without AF, and are associated with a significant clinical and economic burden in Mexico. Antithrombotic therapy reduces stroke risk in patients with AF and is recommended for all patients except those classified as having a low stroke risk. However, its use is suboptimal all around the world; one study showed that only 4 % of Mexican patients with AF who presented with ischemic stroke were in the therapeutic range for anticoagulation. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) such as warfarin or acenocoumarin have long been the only oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in AF. Although effective, VKAs have disadvantages, including the need for regular coagulation monitoring and dose adjustment. Interactions with numerous common medications and foods contribute to the risk of serious bleeding and thrombotic events in VKA-treated patients. Thus novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), more properly called direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), such as dabigatran etexilate, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban (not available in Mexico), have been developed. These offer the convenience of fixed-dose treatment without the need for monitoring, and have few drug or food interactions. Pivotal phase III trials have demonstrated that these agents are at least as effective as warfarin in preventing stroke and are associated with a reduced risk of intracranial hemorrhage. With apixaban approved in Mexico in April 2013, clinicians now have the choice of three novel DOACs as alternatives to warfarin. However, it is yet to be established which of these agents should be the first choice, and treatment decisions are likely to depend on the individual patient's characteristics.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Drugs, Investigational; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Mexico; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Precision Medicine; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Vitamin K

Numerous real-world studies estimating major bleeding rates in rivaroxaban patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation have been published. We performed a meta-analysis to better quantify the rates of different types of major bleeding seen with rivaroxaban in observational studies. The pooled rates of major bleeding with rivaroxaban were generally low and consistent with those reported in its pivotal randomized controlled trial.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Direct oral anticoagulants are being presented as alternatives to warfarin for preventing stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Yet direct comparative trials between these agents in prevention of acute limb ischemia (ALI) are unavailable so far.. To conduct an adjusted indirect comparison meta-analysis between direct oral agents for prevention of acute limb ischemia in atrial fibrillation.. We conducted a systematic literature review searching electronic databases (MEDLINE and Embase) and the Cochrane Library from January 1990 through November 2014. Two blinded investigators reviewed all potentially relevant articles in a parallel manner by using a priori defined criteria. To assess the long-term efficacy and safety of these agents, only randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with follow-up durations of >1 year were included. The primary efficacy outcome was the end point of acute limb ischemia and/or extremity embolism.. A total of 44,563 patients from three RCTs met criteria for inclusion. Patients randomized to direct oral anticoagulants had a non-significant decreased risk for acute limb ischemia (risk ratio [RR]: 0.57, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26-1.2). In the analysis between agents, however, rivaroxaban significantly lowered the risk of ALI compared to warfarin (RR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.064-0.82), apixaban (RR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.081-0.83), and dabigatran (RR: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.077-0.83).. Significant differences in prevention of acute limb ischemia may exist between oral anticoagulant agents in patients with atrial fibrillation. Rivaroxaban lowers the risk of limb embolism versus warfarin, apixaban and dabigatran.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Humans; Ischemia; Leg; Odds Ratio; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

In recent years, small oral compounds that specifically block activated coagulation factor X (FXa) or thrombin (FIIa) have become alternatives to the anticoagulants that had been used for several decades. As of today, these direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) include dabigatran etexilate (thrombin inhibitor) and apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban (inhibitors of FXa). While there is no doubt that DOACs represent a major step forward in the management of patients with venous thromboembolic disease and atrial fibrillation, new challenges have arisen. They need to be addressed with the necessary pragmatism on the basis of evidence. Indeed, a better understanding of the management of these last-generation antithrombotics will favour safer use and increase confidence of the practitioner for the prescription of these drugs. The aim of this article is to present practical suggestions for the prescription and use of these drugs in everyday clinical practice, based on clinical experience and recently updated recommendations of the European Heart Rhythm Association and the American College of Chest Physicians among other scientific organisations. We address issues such as pharmacokinetics, dosing, side effects, limitations of use, drug interactions, switching from and to other anticoagulants, renal function, concomitant administration of antiplatelet agents and perioperative use. We also address the issue of monitoring and reversal, taking advantage of the most recent development in this latter area. Rather than being one additional set of recommendations, our narrative review aims at assisting the practicing physician in his or her daily handling of these novel anticoagulant compounds, based on frequently asked questions to the authors, a group of experienced specialists in the field who have, however, no commitment to issue guidelines.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban have gained a lot of popularity as alternatives to warfarin for anticoagulation in various clinical settings. However, there is conflicting opinion regarding the absolute benefit of NOAC use in elderly patients. Low body mass, altered body composition of fat and muscle, renal impairment and concurrent presence of multiple comorbidities predispose elderly patients to many adverse effects with NOACs that are typically not seen in younger patients. There have been reports that NOAC use, in particular dabigatran, is associated with a higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in the elderly. Diagnosis and management of NOAC-associated bleeding in the elderly is difficult due to the absence of commonly available drug-specific antidotes that can rapidly reverse the anticoagulant effects. Moreover, in elderly patients, a number of factors such as the presence of other comorbid medical conditions, renal insufficiency, drug interactions from polypharmacy, risk of falls and dementia need to be considered before prescribing anticoagulation therapy. Elderly patients frequently have compromised renal function, and therefore dose adjustments according to creatinine clearance for NOACs need to be made. As each NOAC comes with its own unique advantages and safety profile, an individualized case by case approach should be adopted to decide on the appropriate anticoagulation regimen for elderly patients after weighing the overall risks and benefits of therapy.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Precision Medicine; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

The most common cardiogenic cause of ischaemic stroke is atrial fibrillation which increases the probability of stroke five-fold and doubles case fatality. Based on international data the incidence of atrial fibrillation is approx. 2% however this rapidly increases with age. The necessity of using oral anticoagulants in the prevention of non-valvular atrial fibrillation related stroke is decided based on estimated stroke risk. The CHADS2 and the more predictive CHA2DS2-VASc scales are used for this purpose while the bleeding risk of patients treated with anticoagulant may be estimated by the HAS-BLED scoring scale. For decades oral anticoagulation meant using vitamin-K antagonists. Based on international data we can see that rate of anticoagulation is unacceptably low, furthermore most of the anticoagulated patients aren't within the therapeutic range of INR (INR: 2-3). A lot of disadvantages of vitamin-K antagonists are known (e.g. food-drug interaction, need for regular coagulation monitoring, increased risk of bleeding), therefore compounds with new therapeutic target have been developed. The novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC) can be divided in two major subgroups: direct thrombin inhibitors (dabigatran etexilate) and Xa-factor inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban). These products are administered in fix doses, they less frequently interact with other medications or food, and regular coagulation monitoring is not needed when using these drugs. Moreover several studies have shown that they are at least as effective in the prevention of ischaemic stroke than the vitamin-K antagonists, with no more haemorrhagic complications.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Prevalence; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles

The goal of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of individual antiembolic interventions in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF): novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban); vitamin K antagonists (VKA); aspirin; and the Watchman device.. A network meta-analysis of randomized, clinical trials (RCTs) was performed. RCTs that included patients with prosthetic cardiac valves or mitral stenosis, mean or median follow-up <6 months, <200 participants, without published report in English language, and NOAC phase II studies were excluded. The placebo/control arm received either placebo or no treatment. The primary efficacy outcome was the combination of stroke (of any type) and systemic embolism. All-cause mortality served as a secondary efficacy outcome. The primary safety outcome was the combination of major extracranial bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage. A total of 21 RCTs (96 017 nonvalvular AF patients; median age, 72 years; 65% males; median follow-up, 1.7 years) were included. In comparison to placebo/control, use of aspirin (odds ratio [OR], 0.75 [95% CI, 0.60-0.95]), VKA (0.38 [0.29-0.49]), apixaban (0.31 [0.22-0.45]), dabigatran (0.29 [0.20-0.43]), edoxaban (0.38 [0.26-0.54]), rivaroxaban (0.27 [0.18-0.42]), and the Watchman device (0.36 [0.16-0.80]) significantly reduced the risk of any stroke or systemic embolism in nonvalvular AF patients, as well as all-cause mortality (aspirin: OR, 0.82 [0.68-0.99]; VKA: 0.69 [0.57-0.85]; apixaban: 0.62 [0.50-0.78]; dabigatran: 0.62 [0.50-0.78]; edoxaban: 0.62 [0.50-0.77]; rivaroxaban: 0.58 [0.44-0.77]; and the Watchman device: 0.47 [0.25-0.88]). Apixaban (0.89 [0.80-0.99]), dabigatran (0.90 [0.82-0.99]), and edoxaban (0.89 [0.82-0.96]) reduced risk of all-cause death as compared to VKA.. The entire spectrum of therapy to prevent thromboembolism in nonvalvular AF significantly reduced stroke/systemic embolism events and mortality.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Network Meta-Analysis; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are proven alternatives to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for the prevention of thromboembolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. However, there are few data on the efficacy and safety of NOAC therapy after cardioversion, where the risk of thromboembolic events is heightened.. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis of patients who underwent both electrical and pharmacologic cardioversion for atrial fibrillation in the RE-LY, ROCKET-AF, ARISTOTLE, ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48, and X-VeRT trials. We assessed Mantel-Haenszel pooled estimates of risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding at ≤42 days of follow-up.. The analysis pooled 3949 patients in whom a total of 4900 cardioversions for atrial fibrillation were performed. Compared with VKAs, NOAC therapy was associated with a similar risk of stroke/systemic embolism (RR 0.84; 95% CI, 0.34-2.04) and major bleeding (RR 1.12; 95% CI, 0.52-2.42); no significant statistical heterogeneity was found among studies (Cochrane Q P = .59, I(2) = 0% for stroke/systemic embolism; P = .47; I(2) = 0% for major bleeding).. The short-term incidences of thromboembolic and major hemorrhagic events after cardioversion on NOACs were low and comparable to those observed on dose-adjusted VKA therapy. Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants are a reasonable alternative to VKAs in patients undergoing cardioversion.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Electric Countershock; Hemorrhage; Humans; Odds Ratio; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Four non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban) have been approved in the United States for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolic disease. They have been as or more effective than the prior standards of care, with less fatal or intracranial bleeding, fewer drug and dietary interactions, and greater patient convenience. Nonetheless, the absence of the ability for clinicians to assess compliance or washout with a simple laboratory test (or to adjust dosing with a similar assessment) and the absence of an antidote to rapidly stop major hemorrhage or to enhance safety in the setting of emergent or urgent surgery/procedures have been limitations to greater non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant usage and better thromboembolic prevention. Accordingly, a Cardiac Research Safety Consortium "think tank" meeting was held in February 2015 to address these concerns. This manuscript reports on the discussions held and the conclusions reached at that meeting.

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antidotes; Antithrombins; Arginine; Atrial Fibrillation; Congresses as Topic; Dabigatran; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Partial Thromboplastin Time; Piperazines; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thrombin Time; Venous Thromboembolism

Nonvitamin K-dependent oral anticoagulant agents (NOACs) are currently recommended for patients with atrial fibrillation at risk for stroke. As a group, NOACs significantly reduce stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality, with lower to similar major bleeding rates compared with warfarin. All NOACs are dependent on the kidney for elimination, such that patients with creatinine clearance <25 ml/min were excluded from all the pivotal phase 3 NOAC trials. It therefore remains unclear how or if NOACs should be prescribed to patients with advanced chronic kidney disease and those on dialysis. The authors review the current pharmacokinetic, observational, and prospective data on NOACs in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (creatinine clearance <30 ml/min) and those on dialysis. The authors frame the evidence in terms of risk versus benefit to bring greater clarity to NOAC-related major bleeding and efficacy at preventing stroke specifically in patients with creatinine clearance <30 ml/min.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Creatinine; Dabigatran; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is the most common cardiac source of emboli in cardioembolic stroke which occupies from 1/4 to 1/3 of acute brain infarction in Japan. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) have been used widely because they are easy to use, their effect in preventing ischemic stroke is higher than or as high as warfarin, their incidence of major hemorrhage is lower than or as low as warfarin, and their incidence of intracranial hemorrhage is much lower than warfarin. However, there seem several issues to address regarding NOAC treatment, such as reversal of anticoagulation, antidotes, monitoring of anticoagulation, rt-PA treatment for acute stroke patients treated with NOACs. In this review, current strategies and issues of anticoagulation for prevention of stroke in NVAF are discussed.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thrombolytic Therapy; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are a relatively recent addition to the oral anticoagulant armamentarium, and provide an alternative to the use of vitamin K antagonists such as warfarin. Regardless of the type of agent used, bleeding is the major complication of anticoagulant therapy. The decision to restart oral anticoagulation following a major hemorrhage in a previously anticoagulated patient is supported largely by retrospective studies rather than randomized clinical trials (mostly with vitamin K antagonists), and remains an issue of individualized clinical assessment: the patient's risk of thromboembolism must be balanced with the risk of recurrent major bleeding. This review provides guidance for clinicians regarding if and when a patient should be re-initiated on DOAC therapy following a major hemorrhage, based on the existing evidence.

Topics: Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recurrence; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been marketed in the United States since 2010. While numerous large-scale prospective phase 3 outcomes studies have documented the effectiveness of DOACs for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, the primary safety concern with all of these drugs-as it is with the more established oral anticoagulant warfarin-is the risk of major bleeding. Postmarketing surveillance studies (PMSS) provide the opportunity to evaluate the safety of these recently approved drugs across a spectrum of patients that may be broader than those included in randomized controlled trials. This review will summarize the safety findings of numerous recently performed, large-scale PMSS evaluations, and consider the currently available evidence regarding the risks for bleeding in patients treated with DOACs, in order to give providers and patients additional evidence regarding the safety of DOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism

Oral Factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors, a growing class of direct-acting anticoagulants, are frequently used to prevent stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation and to prevent and treat venous thromboembolism. These drugs reduce the risk of clotting at the expense of increasing the risk of bleeding, and currently they have no specific reversal agent. However, andexanet alfa, a recombinant modified FXa decoy molecule, is in a late-phase clinical trial in bleeding patients, and ciraparantag, a small molecule that appears to reverse many anticoagulants including the FXa inhibitors, is in development. This review summarizes the published data to date on both drugs, which have the potential to change the management approach to patients with FXa inhibitor-associated major hemorrhage.

Topics: Animals; Antidotes; Arginine; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Piperazines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism

The risk of bleeding in the setting of anticoagulant therapy continues to be re-evaluated following the introduction of a new generation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Interruption of DOAC therapy and supportive care may be sufficient for the management of patients who present with mild or moderate bleeding, but in those with life-threatening bleeding, a specific reversal agent is desirable. We review the phase 3 clinical studies of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, in the context of bleeding risk and management.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antidotes; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

This study investigated the efficacy and safety of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) by a meta-analysis.. AF is quite prevalent in patients with HF.. Four phase III clinical trials comparing NOACs to warfarin in patients with AF were included. Each patient was defined as affected by HF according to the criteria of the trial in which the patient was enrolled. Pre-specified outcomes were the composite of stroke/systemic embolism (SSE); major, intracranial, and any bleeding; and cardiovascular (CV) and all-cause death.. A total of 55,011 patients were enrolled, 26,384 (48%) with HF, and 28,627 (52%) without HF; 27,518 receiving NOACs and 27,493 receiving warfarin (median, 70 years of age; 36% females; follow-up: 1.5 to 2.8 years). Rates of SSE (relative risk [RR]: 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90 to 1.07]; p = 0.68) and major bleeding (RR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.88 to 1.03; p = 0.21) were comparable in patients with and without HF. HF patients had reduced rates of any (RR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.81 to 0.91; p < 0.01) and intracranial (RR: 0.74 95% CI: 0.63 to 0.88; p < 0.01) bleeding but increased rates of all-cause (RR: 1.70 95% CI: 1.31 to 2.19; p < 0.01) and CV death (RR: 2.05 95% CI: 1.66 to 2.55; p < 0.01). NOACs, compared with warfarin significantly reduced SSE and major, intracranial, and any bleeding, regardless of the presence or absence of HF (p. Patients with AF and HF had increased mortality but reduced rates of intracranial and any bleeding compared with the no-HF patients, with no differences in rates of SSE and major bleeding. NOACs significantly reduced SSE, major bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage in HF patients. No interactions in efficacy and safety of NOACs were observed between AF patients with and without HF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cause of Death; Dabigatran; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Mortality; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Among patients with atrial fibrillation, prophylaxis for stroke prevention with the use of anticoagulation is well established in the general population. A number of randomized controlled trials and evidence-based risk prediction tools clearly delineate the benefit and risks of therapy. Despite the high incidence of atrial fibrillation in the late stage CKD and ESRD populations, little high quality evidence exists in these populations. Is it appropriate then to extrapolate findings from the general population to those with CKD/ESRD? In our view, too much uncertainty exists regarding proof of efficacy with clear signals of harm. Routine anticoagulation for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation is not recommended for the majority of CKD and ESRD patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

The article presents an analytical review of the results of post-registration clinical studies on the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) to prevent stroke and other systemic thromboembolic complications. The main purpose of the first large prospective international observational study of rivaroxaban for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular AF patients XANTUS was the analysis of efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in clinical practice. Results of one year of observation of 6784 patients confirmed that rivaroxaban is effective and safe in real unselected population of patients with non-valvular AF and various stroke risk. The first Russian multicenter observational study Neuro-Xar dedicated to secondary prevention of stroke and systemic embolism, demonstrated the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in routine clinical practice. Lower risk of fatal intracranial and gastrointestinal bleeding was found in retrospective post-marketing studies, of rivaroxaban in the US, such as the PMSS and REVISIT-US. Rivaroxaban therapy was associated with reduced risk of the combined endpoint (ischemic stroke and intracranial hemorrhage).

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Russia; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thromboembolism

Atrial fibrillation is a common finding in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), which increases markedly the embolism risk. The CHADS2 and HAS-BLED scales, used in the general population to assess the risk/benefit of oral anticoagulation (OAC), underestimate respectively the risk of embolism and haemorrhage in CKD, making it difficult to decide whether to use OAC or not. Based on the available evidence, it seems indicated to use OAC in stage 3 CKD, while it is controversial in advanced stages. New OAC such as dabigatran and rivaroxaban have been approved in stage 3 CKD but their role is still somewhat uncertain.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

In studying the comparative effectiveness of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in orthopedic surgery and in non-valvular atrial fibrillation, previous meta-analyses have found no proof of difference in head-to-head indirect comparisons between individual agents. However, the question of their therapeutic equivalence remains unanswered.. The objective of this analysis was to test the equivalence of three NOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban) in orthopedic surgery and four NOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban) in non-valvular atrial fibrillation.. Standard pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis for indirect comparisons were combined with equivalence testing. The endpoint was venous thromboembolism in orthopedic surgery and a composite of stroke or systemic embolism in atrial fibrillation. Comparisons were expressed as risk difference (RD). Margins for equivalence testing were derived from the original trials.. Our results indicate that rivaroxaban and apixaban (but not dabigatran) are equivalent for thromboprophylaxis in orthopedic surgery. In atrial fibrillation, all the four NOACs we tested were found to meet the criterion of therapeutic equivalence. Some concern, however, is raised by some findings focused on adverse events of these agents, in which the equivalence was not proven in all analyses.. Regardless of clinical implications, our results can be the basis to develop local acquisition tenderings on NOACS. In Italy, a new law has been issued according to which equivalence analyses have become a mandatory prerequisite for local tenderings.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Blood Coagulation; Dabigatran; Humans; Morpholines; Orthopedic Procedures; Patient Safety; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Therapeutic Equivalency; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

As a class, the target-specific oral anticoagulants (TSOACs) are at least as effective as warfarin, often with superior safety for the prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) and prevention of recurrent VTE. Currently, dabigatran, the direct thrombin inhibitor, along with rivaroxaban and apixaban, direct factor Xa inhibitors, has been approved in multiple countries for these indications. Edoxaban, which has received approval for the abovementioned indications in Japan, has demonstrated efficacy and safety comparable to or better than warfarin in Phase III clinical trials and is under further regulatory consideration. It is anticipated that the use of TSOACs will increase as practitioners and healthcare systems gain familiarity with these drugs and adopt their use into clinical practice. This review will provide a brief overview of the TSOAC Phase III clinical trials for prevention of stroke and systemic embolic events in patients with AF and the Phase III clinical trials for the prevention of recurrent VTE, discuss current treatment guidelines, address how TSOACs may help meet national safety goals, and provide clinical decision-making guidance regarding the use of TSOACs for hospitalists.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hospitalists; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

The target-specific oral anticoagulants are a class of agents that inhibit factor Xa or thrombin. They are effective and safe compared to warfarin for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation and for the treatment of venous thromboembolism, and they are comparable to low-molecular-weight heparin for thromboprophylaxis after hip or knee arthroplasty. For other indications, however, such as the prevention of stroke in patients with mechanical heart valves, initial studies have been unfavorable for the newer agents, leaving warfarin the anticoagulant of choice. Further studies are needed before the target-specific anticoagulants can be recommended for patients with cancer-associated thrombosis or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Concerns also persist about difficulties with the laboratory assessment of anticoagulant effect and the lack of a specific reversal agent. For these reasons, we anticipate that the vitamin K antagonists will continue to be important anticoagulants for years to come.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The new oral anticoagulants (NOAC) dabigatran etexilate, rivaroxaban, and apixaban show similar efficacy for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) as the vitamin K antagonist warfarin. Absorption of NOACs is dependent on the intestinal P-glycoprotein (P-gp) system and P-gp activity is modulated by a variety of drugs and food components.. The aim of this review is to give an overview of P-gp-associated drug-drug and drug-food interactions with NOACs in AF patients.. A literature search was carried out by screening MEDLINE for the terms dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, P-glycoprotein, and atrial fibrillation from 1998 to 2013. Randomized clinical trials, longitudinal studies, case series, and case reports were included.. Concomitant medication with proton pump inhibitors, amiodarone, clarithromycin, and verapamil increased bioavailability whereas rifampicin decreased the bioavailability of dabigatran. Coadministration of erythromycin, clarithromycin, fluconazole, ketoconazole, and ritonavir increased rivaroxaban plasma concentrations. No data were found on apixaban and P-gp-modulating drugs or on NOACs and food components modulating P-gp. The clinical relevance of interactions between NOACs and P-gp-modulating drugs or food components is largely unknown as bleeding complications under NOACs and P-gp-inhibiting drugs are mainly reported from patients with concomitant renal failure.. There is an urgent need to investigate the role of P-gp-modulating substances as potential sources of drug-drug and drug-food interactions. A thorough analysis of the data accumulated in the three large NOAC trials regarding the role of P-gp-modulating drugs in bleeding and embolic events is desirable. Pharmacological studies should investigate the influence of P-gp-modulating drugs and food on NOAC plasma concentrations and coagulation parameters. When prescribing NOACs, patients should be informed about the potential interactions with drugs and herbal drugs. Patients who develop bleeding or embolic events under treatment with NOACs should be investigated for co-medications as well as for over-the-counter drugs and dietary habits. In post-marketing surveillance of NOACs, the association with drug or food intake with complications, bleeding, and embolic events should be registered.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antithrombins; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Drug Interactions; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Novel oral anticoagulants are emerging options for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic diseases. They are increasingly used in clinical practice due to their simplicity of use and clinical benefits, but an important step is to evaluate their cost-effectiveness. The aim of the AFFORD study (A Review of Cost EFFectiveness of Novel ORal Anticoagulant Drugs) was to perform a systematic review of cost-effectiveness studies of novel oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF).. A systematic review of the literature was conducted by searching the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane and Web of Knowledge databases to identify all cost-effectiveness studies of novel oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in AF.. The search identified 27 studies, 18 with dabigatran, three with apixaban, two with rivaroxaban and four with at least two of these drugs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were 30 405 ± 16 101 euros per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) for dabigatran 110 mg, 17 566 ± 16 902 euros/QALY for dabigatran 150 mg, 8102 ± 3252 euros/QALY for age-adjusted dabigatran, 11 897 ± 3341 euros/QALY for apixaban and 17 960 ± 12 005 euros/QALY for rivaroxaban.. The present systematic review demonstrates that novel oral anticoagulants are cost-effective for stroke prevention in AF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

The non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are replacing warfarin for many indications. These agents include dabigatran, which inhibits thrombin, and rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, which inhibit factor Xa. All 4 agents are licensed in the United States for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and for treatment of venous thromboembolism and rivaroxaban and apixaban are approved for thromboprophylaxis after elective hip or knee arthroplasty. The NOACs are at least as effective as warfarin, but are not only more convenient to administer because they can be given in fixed doses without routine coagulation monitoring but also are safer because they are associated with less intracranial bleeding. As part of a theme series on the NOACs, this article (1) compares the pharmacological profiles of the NOACs with that of warfarin, (2) identifies the doses of the NOACs for each approved indication, (3) provides an overview of the completed phase III trials with the NOACs, (4) briefly discusses the ongoing studies with the NOACs for new indications, (5) reviews the emerging real-world data with the NOACs, and (6) highlights the potential opportunities for the NOACs and identifies the remaining challenges.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Sensitivity and Specificity; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Rivaroxaban is a once-daily oral anticoagulant currently marketed for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. This indication is largely based on the results of the ROCKET-AF trial. Although these results are robust, studies performed in clinical practice are necessary to confirm these data in real-life patients. These studies have shown rates of stroke and bleeding similar to that found in ROCKET-AF. As an anticoagulant, attention should be paid to making a correct prescription of rivaroxaban, particularly in fragile patients, to reduce the risk of bleeding. In addition, a number of studies have shown that rivaroxaban is cost-effective in clinical practice. Moreover, rivaroxaban is a good alternative to warfarin in patients undergoing elective cardioversion or atrial fibrillation ablation.

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Electric Countershock; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Contraindications; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Interactions; Endovascular Procedures; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Kidney Function Tests; Male; Middle Aged; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thrombectomy; Thrombolytic Therapy; Tissue Plasminogen Activator

Anticoagulation in cardioversion and ablation of atrial fibrillation is imperative for reducing thrombo-embolic events. Ample information is available about the use of warfarin and vitamin K antagonists (VKA) but few trials examine safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban in these procedures. We aim to explore the hypothesis that rivaroxaban causes equal thrombo-embolic and bleeding events when used in atrial fibrillation patients undergoing ablation or cardioversion compared to VKA.. We searched the online databases as well as conference abstracts till December 2014 for studies comparing rivaroxaban with VKA in atrial fibrillation patients undergoing catheter ablation or cardioversion. We report events as Odds ratio using random effects model except when event rates were less than 1% we used Peto Odds Ratio.. A total of 8872 atrial fibrillation patients in 15 studies undergoing either catheter ablation or cardioversion were included in this analysis. There were significantly lower stroke events with rivaroxaban compared with VKA (Peto Odds Ratio (POR) 0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.11, 0.95]; P=0.04), and significantly less thrombo-embolic events with rivaroxaban compared with VKA (POR 0.46, 95% CI [0.21, 0.97]; P=0.04). Major and minor bleeding were equal with rivaroxaban versus VKA (Odds Ratio (OR) 0.92, 95% CI [0.62, 1.36]; P=0.68) and (OR 0.81,95% CI [0.58, 1.11]; P=0.19) respectively.. The use of rivaroxaban in ablation and cardioversion of atrial fibrillation may be associated with decreased risk of stroke and thromboembolism with equal bleeding risk compared to VKA.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Electric Countershock; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common cardiac arrhythmia, is a major risk factor for stroke. Rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, is approved for the prevention of stroke in patients with non-valvular AF. In the pivotal phase III trial ROCKET AF, rivaroxaban demonstrated non-inferiority compared with warfarin for reducing the risk of stroke or systemic embolism (SE) in patients with AF (intention-to-treat analysis), without an increased risk of major bleeding. Superior efficacy vs. warfarin was achieved while patients were on study medication. Other direct oral factor Xa inhibitors have completed phase III clinical trials in this indication. Compared with warfarin, apixaban (in the ARISTOTLE trial) and edoxaban (in the ENGAGE-AF trial) were shown to be superior or non-inferior, respectively, for reduction in stroke or SE risk in patients with AF. Baseline stroke risk, as indicated by CHADS2 scores, was lower in patients in the ARISTOTLE and ENGAGE-AF trials than in ROCKET AF.. This review discusses the main findings from ROCKET AF, specifically examining recent subgroup analyses investigating rivaroxaban use across various patient types at high risk for adverse outcomes, including those with prior stroke or transient ischaemic attack, reduced renal function, prior myocardial infarction, peripheral artery disease, heart failure or patients aged ≥ 75 years and those resident in East Asia.. These subgroup analyses demonstrate that the treatment effect for rivaroxaban vs. warfarin is broadly consistent across a wide range of patient groups, with respect to both efficacy and safety.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Population Surveillance; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an increasingly common cause of stroke and systemic embolism. While warfarin has been the mainstay of stroke prevention in patients with AF, newer novel oral anticoagulant medications are now available. Rivaroxaban, a direct factor Xa inhibitor with a rapid onset and offset after oral administration, offers potential advantages over warfarin, predominantly due to its predictable pharmacokinetics across wide patient populations. It requires no coagulation monitoring, and only two different doses are needed (20 mg daily for patients with normal renal function and 15 mg daily in those with reduced renal function). A large randomized trial (ROCKET AF) has shown non-inferiority to warfarin for preventing stroke or systemic embolism in the per-protocol population and superiority to warfarin in the on-treatment safety population. Several subanalyses confirm that the treatment effect of rivaroxaban is consistent across different patient subgroups, including those with reduced renal function. The tolerability of rivaroxaban appears similar to that of warfarin, with comparable overall bleeding rates in clinical trials. In ROCKET AF, significantly lower rates of fatal and intracranial bleeding were seen with rivaroxaban, while lower rates of gastrointestinal bleeding were seen with warfarin. Important contraindications to rivaroxaban include valvular AF, the presence of a prosthetic valve (mechanical or bioprosthetic) or valve repair, the need for concurrent dual antiplatelet therapy, and creatinine clearance <30 ml/min. Once-daily dosing and the lack of coagulation monitoring may increase utilization and adherence compared with warfarin, potentially decreasing the large burden of care associated with stroke secondary to AF. Overall, rivaroxaban offers a useful alternative to warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with AF.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Creatinine; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Renal Insufficiency; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Recently, novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been approved for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Although these agents overcome some disadvantages of warfarin, they are associated with increased costs. In this review, we will provide an overview of the cost-effectiveness of NOACs for stroke prevention in AF. Our comments and conclusions are limited to studies directly comparing all available NOACs within the same framework. The available cost-effectiveness analyses suggest that NOACs are cost-effective compared to warfarin, with apixaban likely being most favorable. However, significant limitations in these models are present and should be appreciated when interpreting their results.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Rivaroxaban has proven efficacious in a variety of conditions. In fact, rivaroxaban has been approved for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after elective hip or knee replacement surgery, for the prevention and treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, for the prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and for the prevention of atherothrombotic events after acute coronary syndrome with elevated cardiac biomarkers. However, clinical development of rivaroxaban is ongoing. Considering published and on-going randomized clinical trials, noninterventional studies and registries, over 275,000 patients are being analyzed. The aim of this review was to update the clinical development of rivaroxaban, including completed and ongoing studies not only randomized clinical trials, but also clinical practice studies.

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

This study was designed to compare efficacy and safety among novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), which have not been directly compared in randomized control trials to date.. We performed network meta-analyses of randomized control trials in preventing thromboembolic events and major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for published studies and various registries of clinical trials for unpublished studies were searched for 2002-2013. All phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of NOACs (apixaban, edoxaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban), idraparinux, and ximelagatran were reviewed.. A systematic literature search identified nine phase III RCTs for primary analyses. The efficacy of each NOAC was similar with respect to our primary composite endpoint following adjustment for open label designs [odds ratios (ORs) versus vitamin K antagonists: apixaban 0.79; dabigatran 150mg 0.77; edoxaban 60mg 0.87; rivaroxaban 0.86] except for dabigatran 110mg and edoxaban 30mg. Apixaban and edoxaban 30mg and 60mg had significantly fewer major bleeding events than dabigatran 150mg, ricvaroxaban, and vitamin K antagonists. All NOACs were similar in reducing secondary endpoints with the exception of dabigatran 110mg and 150mg which were associated with a significantly greater incidence of myocardial infarction compared to apixaban, edoxaban 60mg, and rivaroxaban.. Our indirect comparison with adjustment for study design suggests that the efficacy of the examined NOACs is similar across drugs, but that some differences in safety and risk of myocardial infarction exist, and that open label study designs appear to overestimate safety and treatment efficacy. Differences in study design should be taken into account in the interpretation of results from RCTs of NOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Odds Ratio; Oligosaccharides; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), are direct anticoagulants which inhibit specific coagulation factors and function as anticoagulants. Three NOACs are currently licensed in the United Kingdom: dabigatran, a thrombin inhibitor, and rivaroxaban and apixaban, antagonists of factor Xa. They are set to change the anticoagulant landscape, which was previously ruled by warfarin and heparins. Their advantages including oral formulations, rapid onset and offset of action, predictable pharmacokinetics, no requirement for routine blood monitoring or dose adjustment and very few drug interactions. The increasing use of these drugs means the acute medicine physicians are likely to encounter patients who have been taking them. This article reviews some of the challenging clinical situations in which this may arise.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Emergency Medicine; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United Kingdom

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

The decision to prescribe anticoagulant therapy must consider the balance between reducing the risk of thromboembolic events and increasing the risk of bleeding. Although assessments of net clinical outcomes with oral anticoagulants are not new, this article presents an evaluation of benefit-risk by considering only events of substantial and comparable clinical relevance (i.e., events with serious long-term sequelae likely to have irreversible consequences, including death). This is based on the concept of the number of patients who need to be treated to elicit one beneficial [number needed to treat (NNT)] or harmful [number needed to harm (NNH)] event. The approach is illustrated using data from phase III trials of rivaroxaban, selected because it has the broadest range of approved indications of the novel oral anticoagulants. For example, in the ATLAS ACS 2 TIMI 51 trial of rivaroxaban plus standard antiplatelet therapy following an acute coronary syndrome event, the current analysis demonstrates that 63 patients need to be treated (over 24 months) to prevent one all-cause mortality event compared with placebo (NNT = 63). Conversely, 500 patients need to be treated to cause one additional intracranial hemorrhage (NNH = 500). The most relevant and clinically meaningful assessment of benefit-risk may therefore be achieved by focusing only on events of greatest concern to patients and physicians, namely those with (potentially) long-lasting, severe consequences. Although there are clear limitations to this type of analysis, rivaroxaban appears to demonstrate a broadly favorable benefit-risk profile across multiple clinical indications.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Numbers Needed To Treat; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Four new oral anticoagulants have been approved for reducing stroke risk in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Compared with warfarin, these agents offer a more predictable dose response with fewer food and drug interactions and no regular blood monitoring, although some of the drugs have an increased risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding. This article reviews the new drugs.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles

Dabigatran (a direct thrombin inhibitor) and rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban (direct activated factor X inhibitors) are increasingly being used in clinical practice. Compared with vitamin K antagonists, they are more convenient, do not require laboratory monitoring, have limited drug and food interactions, and have fixed dosages suitable for most patients. But the shortcomings of these agents can jeopardize their efficacy and increase the risk of bleeding. Their future role in preventing and treating thromboembolic disease will depend on building clinical experience, but current evidence indicates that they are reasonable alternatives to vitamin K antagonists.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thrombosis

Stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation relies on an assessment of the individual risks for stroke and bleeding. Patients at high risk for stroke are candidates for anticoagulant therapy. Anticoagulants, however, have substantial bleeding risks that must be weighed in the therapeutic decision. Warfarin has been the traditional choice, but the recently introduced novel oral anticoagulants offer similar efficacy with less bleeding risk. Additionally, they do not require monitoring and have fewer drug interactions and dietary restrictions than warfarin. Several devices, which isolate the left atrial appendage, have become available as treatment options for patients with elevated risks of both thromboembolism and bleeding complications.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Equipment and Supplies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ligation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently coexist and share a reciprocal relationship. The presence of AF increases the propensity to HF and can worsen its severity as well as escalating the risk of stroke. Despite the proven efficacy of vitamin K antagonists and warfarin for stroke prevention in AF, their use is beset by numerous problems. These include their slow onset and offset of action, unpredictability of response, the need for frequent coagulant monitoring and serious concerns around the increased risks of intracranial and major bleeding. Three recently approved novel anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban) are already challenging warfarin use in AF. They have a predictable therapeutic response and a wide therapeutic range and do not necessitate coagulation monitoring. In this article, the relationship between HF and AF and the mechanisms for their compounded stroke risk are reviewed. The evidence to support the use of these three NOACs amongst patients with AF and HF is further explored.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Chronic Disease; Dabigatran; Drug Monitoring; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Pharmacogenetics-guided warfarin dosing is an alternative to standard clinical algorithms and new oral anticoagulants for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. However, clinical evidence for pharmacogenetics-guided warfarin dosing is limited to intermediary outcomes, and consequently, there is a lack of information on the cost-effectiveness of anticoagulation treatment options. A clinical trial simulation of S-warfarin was used to predict times within therapeutic range for different dosing algorithms. Relative risks of clinical events, obtained from a meta-analysis of trials linking times within therapeutic range with outcomes, served as inputs to an economic analysis. Neither dabigatran nor rivaroxaban were cost-effective options. Along the cost-effectiveness frontier, in relation to clinically dosed warfarin, pharmacogenetics-guided warfarin and apixaban had incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of £13,226 and £20,671 per quality-adjusted life year gained, respectively. On the basis of our simulations, apixaban appears to be the most cost-effective treatment.

Topics: Algorithms; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Drug Costs; Drug Dosage Calculations; Humans; Morpholines; Pharmacogenetics; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Novel oral anticoagulants provide an effective and convenient alternative to warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, novel anticoagulants also present new challenges for stroke physicians, such as measurement of anticoagulant effect in emergency situations, use of thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke, optimal timing of introduction of novel anticoagulants following acute ischemic stroke, and management of intracerebral hemorrhage. In this review, we propose pragmatic approaches to dealing with challenging management issues that will face stroke physicians who care for patients with acute stroke in the novel oral anticoagulant era.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; Child; Dabigatran; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes

Anticoagulation is important in the management of cardiovascular disorders; however, traditional anticoagulants such as heparins and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) have limitations, including parenteral administration with the former and the need for coagulation monitoring and dose adjustments with the latter. Three non-VKA oral anticoagulants (OACs), dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban, are available for the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and may change clinical practice. This article reviews current knowledge and important unanswered questions on the use of these agents in patients with cardiovascular disease.. A literature search was performed using PubMed and the search terms dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, AF and acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Peer-reviewed, published clinical trials, review articles, relevant treatment guidelines and prescribing information documents were identified and reviewed for relevance.. Dabigatran is an oral direct thrombin inhibitor; rivaroxaban and apixaban are oral direct Factor Xa inhibitors. These agents have a quicker onset and offset of action, more predictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles, and fewer drug-drug interactions than VKAs, allowing use of fixed doses. For the prevention of stroke in patients with AF, the non-VKA OACs were either non-inferior or superior to warfarin with similar or improved bleeding profiles, particularly with respect to reductions in intracranial haemorrhage. In patients with ACS receiving dual antiplatelet therapy, the addition of rivaroxaban significantly reduced the rate of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction or stroke without increasing fatal bleeding, but led to higher rates of major bleeding. Dose reductions with non-VKA OACs are mandated in certain circumstances in patients with AF, such as moderate renal impairment. Contraindications include creatinine clearance <15 mL/min (<30 mL/min for dabigatran in Europe and Canada) and moderate or severe hepatic impairment, but patients can be transitioned to other anticoagulants if appropriate. It is unknown which non-VKA OAC is optimal for stroke prevention in patients with AF, although factors such as co-medications (e.g. dabigatran may be preferred if a patient is taking a co-medication that is a strong cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor) and renal function (rivaroxaban and apixaban depend less on renal clearance than dabigatran) will be important for individual patients. Addition of rivaroxaban to antiplatelet therapy for prevention of recurrent events in patients with recent ACS is approved in Europe for patients at the highest risk (with elevated cardiac biomarkers) and must take into account the increased risk of major bleeding. Although routine coagulation monitoring is not required, an understanding of which assays are appropriate for each non-VKA OAC and how they are affected is important. In a bleeding emergency, non-specific prohaemostatic agents are suggested to reverse the action of the non-VKA OACs, but more clinical data are needed.. Non-VKA OACs provide similar or improved efficacy and, on current evidence, improved safety. They provide greater convenience, compared with traditional anticoagulants for the prevention of stroke in patients with AF. Rivaroxaban may be of benefit to selected high-risk patients with ACS. Selection of the most appropriate non-VKA OAC will depend on individual patient factors.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Cardiovascular Diseases; Dabigatran; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes

In October 2011, DTB reviewed the use of dabigatran, the first new oral anticoagulant licensed for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in adult patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and one or more defined risk factors.1 We noted that the potential advantages of dabigatran for many patients with AF and the continuing need to provide warfarin therapy for others, provided an important challenge for the NHS. The use of dabigatran has increased significantly in the UK and two other drugs have been licensed for this indication (▾apixaban-Eliquis, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer; ▾rivaroxaban-Xarelto, Bayer plc).2-6 In addition, published drug safety alerts have highlighted the risk of serious haemorrhage associated with the use of these drugs.7-9 Here we review the evidence for apixaban and rivaroxaban for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in adult patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes

Although highly effective, warfarin use is complicated by its unpredictable narrow therapeutic window, genetic heterogeneity in pharmacokinetic response, numerous food and drug interactions, and the need for regular international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring. Currently, several novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC) drugs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban) are available on the market as alternatives to warfarin. These agents all feature more predictable pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties than warfarin. Additionally, the NOACs do not require routine monitoring of coagulation parameters, and have a relatively lower potential for interactions with drug, herb, and dietary constituents, which enhances the convenience of management for both patients and health professionals alike. However, there are other considerations regarding the use of NOACs that must be taken into account during management of therapy. In contrast to warfarin, most NOACs need dosage adjustments in renal impairment and are contraindicated in severe liver impairment, and there are no specific antidotes for treating NOAC-related over-anticoagulation. The more frequent dosing needed for NOACs may reduce adherence, especially in elderly patients with polypharmacy. Furthermore, NOACs, especially dabigatran, are not as well tolerated as warfarin in patients with gastrointestinal diseases. Overall, the availability of the NOACs has expanded the treatment armamentarium, but they are not without risk. Given the limited experience with the NOACs, their limited range of indications, and their cost, the characteristics of each anticoagulant must be carefully considered to carefully select the agent that will provide the optimal risk/benefit profile in the individual patient.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aging; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Complementary Therapies; Dabigatran; Drug Interactions; Drug Monitoring; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Kidney Diseases; Liver Diseases; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Sex Factors; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

During the past four years the phase III trials on stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation and on treatment of venous thromboembolism have been completed for four new oral anticoagulants - dabigatran, apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban. The studies have revealed advantages in terms of a reduced risk of bleeding, most importantly of intracranial bleeding. These anticoagulants also have favourable pharmacokinetics, eliminating the need for routine laboratory monitoring and dose adjustments. There are, however, some differences between the drugs in certain subsets of patients, according to patient characteristics or to indication for treatment. These features are reviewed here. The management of patients in association with invasive procedures or major bleeding is also discussed. Finally, a strategy of how to select patients for warfarin or the new anticoagulants and thereafter possibly also among the latter is outlined.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Patient Selection; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The best regimen for the long-term management of patients with atrial fibrillation who present with an acute coronary syndrome or require placement of a coronary stent remains unclear. Clinicians need to understand the risk of stroke, stent thrombosis, and major bleeding associated with treating these patients. Numerous studies and risk assessment schemes provide clinicians with an estimation of the risk of stroke, stent thrombosis, and major bleeding that may be associated with the use or avoidance of dual antiplatelet therapy with concurrent anticoagulation therapy (triple therapy). This review discusses the special antithrombotic needs in patients who have atrial fibrillation and either acute coronary syndrome or a requirement for percutaneous coronary intervention, including the published evidence for non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants, and the unanswered questions in this patient population. In conclusion, until the results of additional ongoing or planned randomized trials are known, clinicians must continue to rely on expert opinion and their own clinical judgment when treating these patients.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Clopidogrel; Comorbidity; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Morpholines; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thrombosis; Ticlopidine

Four recently introduced new oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban) have been shown to be at least as efficacious and safe as warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation in their respective trials. The first three have been approved, while edoxaban is awaiting regulatory approval. Several guidelines have endorsed the approved new oral anticoagulants over warfarin because of their favourable risk-benefit ratio, low propensity for food and drug interactions, and lack of requirement for routine coagulation monitoring. In this invited review, we summarise the results of the four studies and discuss widely held conclusions. We take a step further and discuss how differences in study design, analysis plan, and unexpected events affect the interpretation of the study results. Finally, we take our re-interpretation of study results and discuss how they might impact clinical practice and anticoagulant choice for patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Humans; Morpholines; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Research Design; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome

Dabigatran, a direct thrombin inhibitor and 2 factor Xa inhibitors, rivaroxaban and apixaban, are target-specific oral anticoagulants (TSOACs) approved for prevention of stroke or systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Published data suggest that all 3 agents are at least as efficacious as dose‑adjusted warfarin in stroke prevention. Because of their greater specificity, rapid onset of action, and predictable pharmacokinetics, TSOACs have some advantages over vitamin K antagonists, which facilitates their use in clinical practice. The current review addresses the practical questions relating to the use of TSOACs in AF patients based on the available data and personal experience. We discuss topics such as patient selection, renal impairment, drug interactions, switching between anticoagulants, laboratory monitoring, and the risk of bleeding along with its management. We will focus on the aspects of the optimization of treatment with TSOACs in stroke prevention. The understanding of these practical issues by clinicians and patients is of key importance for the safe and effective use of TSOACs in everyday practice.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Rivaroxaban is a direct factor Xa inhibitor that is widely available to reduce the risk of stroke or systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and one or more risk factors for stroke. Rivaroxaban provides practical advantages compared with warfarin and other vitamin K antagonists, including a rapid onset of action, few drug interactions, no dietary interactions, a predictable anticoagulant effect, and no requirement for routine coagulation monitoring. However, questions have emerged relating to the responsible use of rivaroxaban in day-to-day clinical practice, including patient selection, dosing, treatment of patients with renal impairment, conversion from use of vitamin K antagonists to rivaroxaban and vice versa, coagulation tests, and management of patients requiring invasive procedures or experiencing bleeding or an ischemic event. This article provides practical recommendations relating to the use of rivaroxaban in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, based on clinical trial evidence, relevant guidelines, prescribing information, and the authors' clinical experience.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Interactions; Drug Substitution; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Patient Selection; Perioperative Care; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Preventive Health Services; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome

Heparins and vitamin K antagonists (VKA) used commonly are the standard treatment of venous and arterial thromboses. They are very efficient and safe, but have some limitations: iatrogenicity, laboratory monitoring, parenteral use for heparins and fondaparinux. Nowadays, four new inhibitors of factor Xa are used orally (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, betrixaban), and they are at least as efficient as heparins and vitamin K antagonists. The objective is to substitute these indirect inhibitors of factor Xa (heparins, low molecular weight heparins and fondaparinux) in the prevention of venous and arterial thromboembolic episodes. The new direct inhibitors do not require routine laboratory monitoring of blood coagulation. They inhibit the extrinsic and the intrinsic pathways of blood coagulation. Rivaroxaban and apixaban are efficacious and safe in the prevention of cerebral infarcts in patients with non-valvular fibrillation. Apixaban is another direct inhibitor of factor Xa used orally which is developed in the same indications as rivaroxaban. Edoxaban and betrixaban are also in development. The objective of this work is to study the pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, the efficacy and safety of these four oral direct factor Xa inhibitors.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzamides; Blood Coagulation; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Hemostatics; Humans; Morpholines; Postoperative Complications; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thrombophilia; Thrombosis

Rivaroxaban, a direct factor Xa inhibitor, is a novel oral anticoagulant approved for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and also approved in Europe (but not in the United States) to prevent recurrent ischemic events in patients with recent acute coronary syndromes. Advantages of rivaroxaban over oral anticoagulants such as warfarin are the lack of need for ongoing monitoring, a fixed-dose regimen, and fewer drug and food interactions. Drawbacks include a lack of an antidote and the absence of a widely available method to reliably monitor the anticoagulant effect. In patients at risk of stroke due to atrial fibrillation, rivaroxaban was noninferior compared to warfarin in preventing stroke/systemic embolism in the Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET-AF) trial and was associated with a similar risk of major bleeding; the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage was 33% lower with rivaroxaban. Concerns raised about the trial were the adequacy of warfarin management and the increase in event rate at the end of the trial. The drug acquisition cost of rivaroxaban is higher than that of warfarin although decision-analytic models suggest that it is cost effective in atrial fibrillation. In patients with recent acute coronary syndrome, low-dose rivaroxaban reduced mortality and the composite end point of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction and stroke, but this was accompanied by an increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage and major bleeding in the Rivaroxaban in Combination With Aspirin Alone or With Aspirin and a Thienopyridine in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (ATLAS ACS 2-TIMI) 51 trial. Thus, rivaroxaban appears to be a valuable addition to the therapeutic armamentarium in atrial fibrillation although caution should be exercised, given the limited experience in combination with novel oral antiplatelet agents. The role of rivaroxaban as part of a modern regimen in acute coronary syndrome continues to be evaluated.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Costs; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome

Anticoagulation therapy is one of the most important advances in modern medicine, saving thousands of lives from the complications of atrial fibrillation and mechanical heart valves and preventing recurrent venous thromboembolism. Warfarin and heparins have been the predominant anticoagulants used until the past decade. However, the arrival of newer target-specific anticoagulants has brought us easier and equally effective agents, although no specific antidotes are yet available. Being relatively newer drugs, physicians need to be familiar with the various practical issues that may be encountered with the prescription of these drugs, which are summarised in this review.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation increases the risk of stroke, which is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. The use of oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation at moderate or high risk of stroke, estimated by established criteria, improves outcomes. However, to ensure that the benefits exceed the risks of bleeding, appropriate patient selection is essential. Vitamin K antagonism has been the mainstay of treatment; however, newer drugs with novel mechanisms are also available. These novel oral anticoagulants (direct thrombin inhibitors and factor Xa inhibitors) obviate many of warfarin's shortcomings, and they have demonstrated safety and efficacy in large randomized trials of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. However, the management of patients taking warfarin or novel agents remains a clinical challenge. There are several important considerations when selecting anticoagulant therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation. This review will discuss the rationale for anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation; risk stratification for treatment; available agents; the appropriate implementation of these agents; and additional, specific clinical considerations for treatment.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Medication Adherence; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) confers a 4.5% risk of stroke per year. The risk of stroke increases with various risk factors and until recently, warfarin has been the gold standard of thromboembolism prophylaxis in AF for many years. The dosage of warfarin requires regular adjustment dependent on the INR, to keep within a narrow therapeutic range of 2.0- 3.0. The INR can be altered by concomitant drugs, foods and alcohol and requires inconvenient blood monitoring. Underanticoagulation places patients at risk of stroke, whilst over-anticoagulation confers significant bleeding risk. Consequently approximately half who would benefit from oral anticoagulation do not have it prescribed. Novel oral anticoagulants with predictable pharmacokinetics and improved efficacy and safety profiles are currently being developed for stroke prevention in AF. Three novel oral anticoagulants have just completed Phase III trials for stroke prevention, all with impressive results; the direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran and the oral factor Xa inhibitors, rivaroxaban and apixaban.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Brain Ischemia; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Humans; Morpholines; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Primary Prevention; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes

Anticoagulation for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) is effective. Pivotal trials RE-LY, ROCKET AF, ARISTOTLE, and ENGAGE-AF TIMI 48 tested novel agents against warfarin (W). In RE-LY, an open-label trial, dabigatran 150 mg BID (D150) was superior (35%) and 110 mg BID (D110) was noninferior to W. D150 reduced ischemic strokes by 25% and intracerebral bleeds by 74%, but increased major GI bleeds by 0.5 % per year. In ROCKET AF, a double-blind study, rivaroxaban 20 mg daily, downtitrated to 15 mg daily (if CrCl was <49) was noninferior for efficacy and safety, with an increase in GI bleeds. In ARISTOTLE, a double-blind study, apixaban 5 mg BID (downtitrated to 2.5 mg BID if two of the following were present: age, >80; weight, <60 kg; or serum creatinine, >1.5 mg) was superior for safety (31%), efficacy (21%), and all-cause mortality (11%). In ENGAGE-AF TIMI 48, edoxaban 60 mg once daily (30 mg once daily if CrCl 30-50 ml/min, weight <60 kg, or concomitant verapamil or quinidine) was noninferior to W for efficacy, but reduced major bleeding (20%). To translate clinical trials to practice, understanding the disease and each anticoagulant is essential. For all novel agents, rapid anticoagulation, absence of monitoring, and a short half-life differentiate them from W. Bleed rates were either noninferior or lower than for W, without an antidote. Patient compliance is critical. Knowledge of renal function is essential and maintaining patients on therapy is key.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Translational Research, Biomedical; Treatment Outcome

New oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have emerged as an alternative therapy to warfarin in the treatment of arterial and venous thromboembolism and in stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Three of them, i.e., dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban, have been approved for clinical use in North America and in a number of European countries. In non-valvular AF, their approval was based on large randomized trials showing that they are non-inferior or even, in some instances, superior to warfarin. Dabigatran is a direct thrombin (factor IIa) inhibitor; rivaroxaban and apixaban are direct factor Xa inhibitors. Before using NOACs, it is recommended to become familiar with their pharmacological characteristics and their metabolism. The absence of specific antidotes is often cited as part of the possible weaknesses of NOACs. Antidotes are perceived to be useful in emergency situations such as life-threatening bleeding or non-elective major surgery. NOACs do not require blood monitoring, and therefore, patient compliance to the treatment is essential. For the present time, there are no specific antidotes available for the three NOACs approved for clinical use. However, phase I or phase II research studies in this area are ongoing. For dabigatran, a specific antidote has been tested in a rat model of anticoagulation, and a study in healthy male volunteers has been recently reported. For rivaroxaban, prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) have been found to completely reverse the prolongation of the prothrombin time induced by this NOAC. For apixaban, recombinant factor VII was found in an experimental study using human blood to be superior to activated PCC (aPCC) and PCC. More specific antidotes for rivaroxaban and apixaban are in phases I and II evaluation. The management of patients suffering from a major bleeding or requiring a non-elective major surgery includes non-specific reversal agents and is discussed in the light of a recent position paper and of current literature. Most recommendations are based on expert opinions only as randomized trials using agents for reversal of anticoagulation in case of life-threatening bleeding or of major urgent surgery are not available.

Topics: Animals; Antidotes; Antithrombins; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Blood Coagulation; Dabigatran; Elective Surgical Procedures; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Hemostatics; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism

In the majority of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) anticoagulation is required to reduce the risk of stroke. Although vitamin K antagonists effectively reduce the risk of stroke, they have many disadvantages that limit their use. Rivaroxaban is a new once-daily oral anticoagulant that overcomes some of these limitations (i.e., no monitoring of anticoagulant effect required and fixed doses can be prescribed). In recent AF studies, rivaroxaban was reported to be at least as effective as warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism but with a lesser risk of fatal bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage. More recent data have confirmed the beneficial effects of rivaroxaban, as originally described, and irrespective of the history of previous stroke, heart failure, myocardial infarction, diabetes, moderate renal dysfunction or age. In the present review the authors discuss current evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with non-valvular AF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Vitamin K; Warfarin

To systematically examine discontinuation rates with new US Food and Drug Administration-approved oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients with various indications for long-term anticoagulation.. Poor adherence to medications is considered a potential and frequent cause of treatment failure. We searched the PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, EBSCO, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases for articles published from January 1, 2001, through September 15, 2013. The following Medical Subject Heading terms and/or keywords were used for our database searches: rivaroxaban, dabigatran, apixaban, new oral anticoagulants, oral thrombin inhibitors, and oral factor Xa inhibitors. Articles in English that focused on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing NOACs (apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban) with conventional therapy or placebo were abstracted. Independent extraction of relevant data was performed by 2 authors. The primary end point of interest was discontinuation due to all causes. Other end points of interest were discontinuation due to adverse events, consent withdrawal, and nonadherence.. Eighteen RCTs including a total of 101,801 patients were included for analysis. Total study drug discontinuation rates were not statistically different with NOACs in comparison to pharmacologically active comparators for treatment of venous thromboembolism/pulmonary embolism (risk ratio [RR], 0.91; 95% CI, 0.74-1.13; P=.40) and for NOACs in comparison to warfarin and aspirin for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.87-1.17; P=.92). In contrast, in acute coronary syndromes, total study drug discontinuation with NOACs was significantly higher than with placebo (RR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.07-1.83; P=.01). Overall discontinuations were comparable to those with active comparators.. Study drug discontinuations with NOACs were not significantly different from those with conventional drugs in treatment of venous thromboembolism/pulmonary embolism and prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation but were worse in acute coronary syndromes as noted in evidence from contemporary RCTs.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Humans; Medication Adherence; Morpholines; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism

The introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (OACs) for the treatment and prevention of thromboembolic disease represents a shift from the traditional vitamin K antagonist-based therapies, which have been the mainstay of treatment for almost 60 years. A challenge for hospital formularies will be to manage the use of direct OACs from hospital to outpatient settings. Three direct OACs-apixaban, dabigatran and rivaroxaban-are widely approved across different indications, with rivaroxaban approved across the widest breadth of indications. A fourth direct OAC, edoxaban, has also completed phase III trials. Implementation of these agents by physicians will require an understanding of the efficacy and safety profile of these drugs, as well as an awareness of renal function, comedication use, patient adherence and compliance. Optimal implementation of direct OACs in the hospital setting will provide improved patient outcomes when compared with traditional anticoagulants and will simplify the treatment and prevention of thromboembolic diseases.

Topics: Acute Kidney Injury; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Hemorrhage; Humans; Medication Adherence; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome

Recent reports suggest altered antithrombotic efficacy and higher risk of bleeding with new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients with renal insufficiency. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety with recommended doses of NOAC compared with conventional treatment in patients with renal insufficiency.. PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, EBSCO, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases were searched from January 1, 2001 through March 23, 2014. Randomized controlled trials that compared NOACs (rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran) with comparators (vitamin K antagonist/warfarin, low molecular weight heparin, aspirin, placebo) were selected. We defined moderate renal insufficiency as creatinine clearance (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]) of 30-49 mL/min, and mild renal insufficiency as eGFR 50-79 mL/min.. There were 40,693 patients with renal insufficiency in 10 trials. Compared with other anticoagulants in patients with mild renal insufficiency there was significantly less major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (odds ratio [OR], 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-0.90) and stroke or systemic embolism (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.54-0.92) with NOACs. Using random effects meta-analysis, there was significantly less stroke or systemic embolism (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.57-0.92) and a trend toward less major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.59-1.14) with the NOACs among patients with moderate renal insufficiency, and this became statistically significant when evaluated using a fixed effects model. NOACs showed efficiency comparable with conventional anticoagulants for prevention of venous thromboembolism or related mortality.. In patients with renal insufficiency, recommended doses of novel anticoagulants are noninferior and relatively safe compared with conventional anticoagulants.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Renal Insufficiency; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism

Warfarin, a vitamin K antagonist, is the most widely used oral anticoagulant in the world. It is cheap and effective, but its use is limited in many patients by unpredictable levels of anticoagulation, which increases the risk of thromboembolic or haemorrhagic complications. It also requires regular blood monitoring and dose adjustment. New classes of drugs, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), are now supported as alternatives to warfarin. Three NOACs are licensed: dabigatran, a direct thrombin inhibitor, and rivaroxaban and apixaban, antagonists of factor Xa. NOACs do not require routine blood monitoring or dose adjustment. They have a rapid onset and offset of action and fewer food and drug interactions. Current indications include treatment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism and prevention of cardioembolic disease in non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Effective antidotes are lacking and some caution must be used in severe renal impairment, but favourable trial evidence has led to their widespread adoption. Research is ongoing, and an increase in their use and indications is expected in the coming years.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Evidence-Based Medicine; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Stroke is the most feared complication of atrial fibrillation but for over fifty years there has been no simple, effective preventative alternative to warfarin. The development of new risk algorithms such as CHADSVASC has resulted in more patients being recommended anticoagulation therapy. Fixed dose oral anticoagulation is a landmark in drug development for atrial fibrillation. The differences between the drugs are discussed and the trial data examined. As we enter this new frontier of therapy, there is no doubt that these drugs will transform the delivery of anticoagulation for patients with atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Dabigatran; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes

Warfarin has remained the mainstay of stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation for the past 60 years. Recently, two new groups of novel oral anticoagulants- direct thrombin inhibitors (dabigatran) and factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) have shown promising results in well conducted clinical trials in terms of efficacy, safety and convenience of usage. However, in real world practice these novel agents come with their share of side effects and drawbacks which the prescribing physician must be aware about. In this review we discuss the role of these novel agents in real world clinical practice - their advantages, disadvantages and future directions.

Topics: Animals; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Drug Discovery; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Target-specific oral anticoagulants have become increasingly available as alternatives to traditional agents for the management of a number of thromboembolic disorders. To date, the direct Factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban is the most widely approved of the new agents. The dosing of rivaroxaban varies and adheres to specific schedules in each of the clinical settings in which it has been investigated. These regimens were devised based on the results of phase II dose-finding studies and/or pharmacokinetic modeling, and were demonstrated to be successful in randomized, phase III studies. In most cases, the pharmacodynamic profile of rivaroxaban permits once-daily dosing. A once-daily dose is indicated for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing hip or knee replacement surgery, the long-term prevention of stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, and the long-term secondary prevention of recurrent VTE. Twice-daily dosing is required in the acute phase of treatment in patients with VTE and in the combination of rivaroxaban with standard single or dual antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention after acute coronary syndrome events. This article reviews the empirical and clinical rationale supporting the dose regimens of rivaroxaban in each clinical setting.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hip Joint; Humans; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism

The availability of 4 non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs), that is, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, has changed the landscape of stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. This review article provides an overview of the 4 phase III studies that have compared these NOACs, examining major outcomes of efficacy and safety. A range of practical questions relating to the NOACs have emerged, including topics such as patient selection, treating patients with renal impairment, treating elderly patients, and combining anticoagulant therapy with antiplatelet drugs. We also address the interaction of various patient characteristics with the treatments and suggest the features can assist the physician in the choice of a particular NOAC for a particular patient(s).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Morpholines; Patient Preference; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Research Design; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes

Venous thromboembolism and atrial fibrillation are among the most common cardiovascular disorders in the United States. For over 50 years, the standard of care has been anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists. However, the numerous limitations of vitamin K antagonists led to the development of target-specific oral anticoagulants. Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban have been shown to be as effective as warfarin in the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism and prevention of stroke in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. This article compares the basic pharmacologic properties of these anticoagulants, reviews the data supporting their use, and discusses practical clinical issues including measurement of the anticoagulation effect, reversal strategies, and management of patients prior to surgery.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Drug Interactions; Humans; Medication Adherence; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Until about 4 years ago, warfarin was the only oral anticoagulant approved in the United States, and switching between oral anticoagulants has become an option since the emergence of the novel oral anticoagulants dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. What are the reasons one may switch between the agents and how is this done? Discussed in this article are the 4 agents approved in the United States, their characteristics, reasons one may switch, and methods for conversion. After a thorough search of original trial data and recent expert review articles, we have summarized the most recent recommendations below and briefly discuss upcoming oral anticoagulants that show promise.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; United States; Warfarin

Stroke is becoming a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the developing world while the trend is actually downward in the developed nations. This is mostly because of the better recognition, treatment options and secondary prevention in addition to changes in lifestyles. There have been significant developments in the secondary prevention of ischaemic stroke in the last decade alone. Newer medications like direct thrombin inhibitors and factor Xa inhibitors have come into common practice. These medications are either equally effective or even better than age-old warfarin. Unlike previous belief, we now know that mechanical closure of the patent foramen ovale does not reduce the rate of stroke recurrence. There is a hint that dual anti-platelet therapy may reduce early recurrence of stroke. Even more exciting news is that closure of left atrial appendage might totally eliminate the need for oral anticoagulation in selected patient population.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation; Brain Ischemia; Foramen Ovale, Patent; Humans; Intracranial Embolism; Morpholines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thiophenes; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Non-valvular atrial fibrillation is one of the most important risk factor for embolic cerebral infarcts. Besides vitamin K antagonists, recently developed novel oral anticoagulants are gaining an increasing role in its treatment. Dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban are novel oral anticoagulants available in the routine clinical practice. This review summarizes their use and the corresponding guidelines in the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke, by answering questions raised in relation of a hypothetical case report.. A nem valvularis eredetű pitvarfibrilláció az embóliás agyi infarktusok egyik legfontosabb kockázati tényezője. Kezelésében a K-vitamin-antagonisták mellett az elmúlt években megjelenő új típusú orális antikoagulánsok egyre nagyobb teret kapnak. A dabigatran, a rivaroxaban és az apixaban a klinikai gyakorlatban elérhető új típusú orális antikoagulánsok. Az összefoglaló ezek alkalmazásának irányelveit, tulajdonságaikat tekinti át ischaemiás stroke szekunder prevenciójában, hipotetikus esetismertetés kapcsán felmerülő kérdéseket tárgyalva. Orv. Hetil., 2014, 155(42), 1655–1660.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thiophenes; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) have long been the standard of care for treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE), and thromboprophylaxis in atrial fibrillation (AF). Despite their efficacy, their use requires frequent monitoring and is complicated by drug-drug interactions and the need to maintain a narrow therapeutic window. Since 2009, novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), including the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and the direct factor Xa inhibitors apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban, have become alternative options to VKAs owing to their predictable and safe pharmacological profiles. The overall clinical effect of these drugs, which is a balance between ischaemic benefit and bleeding harm, varies according to the clinical scenario. As adjunctive therapy to dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome, NOACs are associated with incremental bleeding risks and modest benefits. For treatment of VTE, NOACs have a safer profile than VKAs and a similar efficacy. In thromboprophylaxis in AF, NOACs are associated with the greatest benefits by reducing both ischaemic events and haemorrhagic complications and might reduce mortality compared with VKAs. The role of NOACs continues to evolve as these drugs are evaluated in different patient populations, including those with renal impairment or with AF and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Topics: Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemia; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism

To compare key features of the new oral anticoagulants (NOACs)-dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban-and to address questions that arise when comparing the NOACs.. PubMed was searched for recent (January 2008 to week 32 of 2013) clinical studies relating to NOAC use for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) and for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE).. All NOACs are at least as effective as warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular AF, and are at least as safe in terms of bleeding risk according to 3 large trials. Meta-analyses of these trials have shown that, compared with warfarin therapy, NOACs reduced total mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and intracranial bleeding, and there was a trend toward less overall bleeding. Practical advantages of NOACs over warfarin include fixed once- or twice-daily oral dosing without the need for coagulation monitoring, and few known or defined drug or food interactions. Potential drawbacks of NOACs include a risk of bleeding that might be increased in patients older than 75 years, increased major gastrointestinal bleeding with high-dose dabigatran, increased dyspepsia with dabigatran, the lack of a routine laboratory test to reliably measure anticoagulant effect, and the lack of an antidote for reversal. No direct comparisons of NOACs have been made in randomized controlled trials, and the choice of NOAC is influenced by individual patient characteristics, including risk of stroke or VTE, risk of bleeding, and comorbidity (eg, renal dysfunction).. The NOACs represent important alternatives in the management of patients with AF and VTE, especially for patients who have difficulty accessing regular coagulation monitoring. The companion to this article addresses common "what if" questions that arise in the long-term clinical follow-up and management of patients receiving NOACs.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antidotes; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Drug Monitoring; Family Practice; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The majority of patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) will require anticoagulation therapy for reducing the risk of stroke, the most devastating complication of AF. Although traditionally vitamin K antagonists have been used for this purpose, they have important limitations that interfere with their use in clinical practice. Different clinical trials have shown the benefits of new oral anticoagulants over warfarin, but patients included in the ROCKET-AF trial were found to be at a higher risk of AF-related complications. Moreover, rivaroxaban has been proven to be effective and safe in patients with AF and moderate renal dysfunction as well as in those with ischemic heart disease. Rivaroxaban is taken only once daily; this may improve medication adherence and, secondarily, it provides a higher protection and reduction in the risk of stroke. This article provides an extensive review of the available evidence about rivaroxaban, with a special focus on nonvalvular AF.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Medication Adherence; Morpholines; Renal Insufficiency; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Novel oral anticoagulants (OACs), including dabigatran etexilate, rivaroxaban, and apixaban, are available alternative anticoagulant therapy to vitamin K antagonists. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban for the treatment of appropriate patients for specific clinical indications. Therapeutic advantages of prescribing the new OACs are related to their predictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban have all been shown to be noninferior to warfarin treatment for stroke prevention in respective phase 3 clinical trials; dabigatran and apixaban were shown to be superior to warfarin as preventive therapy. Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban are all approved agents for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in the United States and Europe. Among these agents, rivaroxaban is the only FDA-approved drug for the treatment of venous thromboembolism. This article reviews the major clinical trials that investigated the efficacy and safety of the new OACs and the use of these agents in special clinical situations.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Drug Approval; Europe; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Therapeutic Equivalency; Thiophenes; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common clinically significant cardiac arrhythmia occurring in patients in the United States. The primary clinical consequence of AF is an increase in the risk and severity of strokes. Treatment guidelines recommend anticoagulation therapy for most patients with AF. One risk-stratification scheme, the CHADS2 index, is simple and widely used to determine the management of patients with AF in regard to stroke prevention. However, new schemes, such as CHA2DS2-VASc, further refine risk stratification to identify patients who would obtain a net clinical benefit from a particular management strategy, thus improving the quality of management. For patients with AF for whom oral anticoagulation (OAC) is advisable, vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy is well established and effective. However, OAC with VKAs presents challenges to prescribers and patients in maintaining therapeutic efficacy. Novel OACs may offer alternatives to VKAs. Dabigatran etexilate, a direct thrombin inhibitor, was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2010 for reducing the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular AF. The activated factor X (factor Xa) inhibitor rivaroxaban was recently approved by the FDA both for prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis, which may lead to pulmonary embolism in patients undergoing knee or hip arthroplasty, and for reducing the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular AF. Apixaban, another factor Xa inhibitor, was recently shown to be effective for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular AF. This article reviews clinical considerations regarding new agents that may offer alternatives to VKA therapy for the prevention of stroke in patients with AF.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Comorbidity; Dabigatran; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Pyridines; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Sex Factors; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) face an elevated risk of stroke compared with patients who have normal sinus rhythm. Warfarin, an oral vitamin K antagonist, is a highly effective therapeutic agent to reduce stroke risk in patients with AF; however, use of warfarin is complicated by variable patient dose response due to genetic factors and multiple food-drug and drug-drug interactions. Novel oral anticoagulants appear to be a safe, effective alternative to warfarin therapy without the need for routine coagulation monitoring. Dabigatran, a direct thrombin inhibitor, has been commercially available since 2010 for prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular AF. More recently, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved 2 oral activated factor X inhibitors, rivaroxaban and apixaban, for stroke prevention in patients with AF based on clinical trial evidence of their safety and efficacy. In this article, we provide an overview of the 3 novel oral anticoagulants for treating patients with AF and discuss the latest findings from subgroup analyses.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aging; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Comorbidity; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

For > 50 years, vitamin K antagonists were the only available oral drugs for the prevention of thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. Recently, new oral anticoagulants (the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and the direct activated factor X (factor Xa) inhibitors rivaroxaban and apixaban) have completed phase 3 clinical trials for the same indications. The direct factor Xa inhibitor apixaban was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in December 2012. In this article, we provide a comprehensive assessment of the safety and efficacy of the new oral anticoagulants. We focus primarily on the balance between thromboembolic and hemorrhagic risk and the implications of such risks in clinical practice. Bleeding and thromboembolic risk estimation tools and their roles in the correct utilization of new oral anticoagulation are also discussed.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Age Distribution; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

For the last decades vitamin K antagonists have been the most effective anticoagulant treatment of atrial fibrillation. New molecules are being designed, mainly due to the great amount of disadvantages in the management of conventional anticoagulation. Dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban will soon be available as an alternative to warfarin/acenocumarol. All of them have demonstrated to be non-inferior to warfarin in preventing stroke and systemic embolism, with even dabigatran 150 mg bid and apixaban being superior. They have also a lower risk of bleeding, especially regarding severe/fatal and intracranial hemorrhages. This is a real revolution. The advance of these new anticoagulants will be limited only by the higher cost, and will progressively become the protagonists of oral anticoagulation in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzimidazoles; Benzylamines; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Embolism; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Anticoagulant prophylaxis with vitamin K antagonists (such as warfarin) is effective in reducing the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). New oral anticoagulants have emerged as potential alternatives to traditional oral agents. The purpose of this review was to summarise the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban in stroke prevention in patients with AF in phase III trials, evaluate their cost-effectiveness and consider the implications for primary care.. A literature search was performed between 2007 and 2012, selecting all phase III trials (ROCKET AF, RE-LY and ARISTOTLE) of new oral anticoagulants and relevant cost-benefit studies.. Evidence shows that all three agents are at least as effective as warfarin in the prevention of stroke and systemic emboli, with similar safety profiles. Cost-benefit studies of rivaroxaban and dabigatran further confirm their potential use as alternatives to warfarin in clinical practice. These observations may allow stratification of the general practice AF population, to help prioritise which patients may benefit from receiving a new oral anticoagulant.. The clinical and economic benefits of the new oral anticoagulants, along with appropriate risk stratification, may enable a higher number of patients with AF to receive effective and convenient prophylaxis for stroke prevention.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Primary Health Care; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Workload

The first factor Xa inhibitor, rivaroxaban had been released on market, and apixaban and edoxaban are preparing for clinical use in patients with atrial fibrillation. These newer antithrombotic agents are attractive for prevention of thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation because of their favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles that seems to be better than that of direct thrombin inhibitor. The reports of rivaroxaban and apixaban have been showed noninferiority or superiority in their efficacy endpoints and also in safety endpoints even on fixed dose regimen without anticoagulation monitoring. There may be still present an important issue that we have to pay attention to find appropriate doses for the patients with renal impairment, aged or low body weight.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism

Chronic kidney disease and atrial fibrillation (AF) commonly coexist, and data suggest that renal patients have AF rates in excess of double that encountered in the general population. These patients are at increased risk of stroke, regardless of the presence or absence of AF. Furthermore, a lower GFR causes increased thromboembolic risk in patients with AF - independent of other risk factors. The dilemma facing clinicians treating this cohort of patients is that renal insufficiency confers both a thromboembolic and a bleeding risk. Renal disease also commonly coexists with other risk factors for stroke and bleeding such as hypertension and advanced age. Furthermore, bleeding risk tracks stroke risk and many risk factors are common to both thromboembolism and haemorrhage. Patients with severe renal impairment are also actively excluded from the majority of trials for stroke prevention in AF, including those trials which informed the development of stroke risk factor scoring schemes. Therefore, patients with renal disease and AF present a unique management challenge. The available data suggests that the benefit from warfarin in terms of stroke reduction is not as clear as in the general population, and there is an increased risk of bleeding complications and even ectopic vascular calcification. Thus, it is problematic to extrapolate the benefits of warfarin in the general population to a subgroup that has been actively excluded from clinical trials. The new oral anticoagulants have relatively little data in patients with severe renal impairment, and all have an element of renal excretion. There is a need for large randomised control trials in patients with renal insufficiency and on haemodialysis to provide a bank of high-quality scientific data on which clinicians can base their management decisions. Until then, we must adopt a pragmatic approach which involves careful consideration of the relative risk of stroke and bleeding in each individual patient.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Comorbidity; Dabigatran; Disease Management; Embolism; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Hypertension; Intracranial Embolism; Male; Morpholines; Patient Selection; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thrombophilia; Warfarin

Rivaroxaban (Xarelto(®)), a direct factor Xa inhibitor, is approved for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in Canada or those with nonvalvular AF (NVAF) in the EU, US and Japan. It is administered at a fixed oral dose and generally does not require routine monitoring of coagulation parameters. In the ROCKET AF trial in patients with NVAF and a moderate to high risk of stroke, oral rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily (15 mg once daily in patients with moderate renal impairment) was noninferior to oral dose-adjusted warfarin once daily in preventing primary endpoint events (i.e. stroke and systemic embolism) in the per-protocol population (primary noninferiority analysis) and superior in the on-treatment safety population (primary superiority analysis). Several ROCKET AF subgroup analyses indicated that the treatment effect of rivaroxaban was consistent across patient subgroups stratified according to baseline factors, including the presence or absence of previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack. Patients with moderate renal impairment receiving the reduced rivaroxaban dosage (15 mg once daily) showed a treatment effect consistent with that seen with rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily in patients with normal renal function. The tolerability profile of rivaroxaban was generally acceptable in ROCKET AF, with no significant difference between rivaroxaban and warfarin in the incidence of major or nonmajor clinically-relevant bleeding events (primary safety endpoint). In the Japanese ROCKET AF trial, rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily (10 mg once daily in patients with moderate renal impairment) was noninferior to oral dose-adjusted warfarin once daily in the incidence of major or nonmajor clinically-relevant bleeding (primary study outcome). Thus, rivaroxaban is a reasonable alternative to warfarin for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with NVAF.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Interactions; Embolism; Humans; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Endoscopy; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Blood Coagulation Factors; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Monitoring, Physiologic; Morpholines; Prodrugs; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thrombin; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes

Electrical cardioversions are performed to restore sinus rhythm in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation to improve symptoms. It has been known for decades that cardioversion without adequate anticoagulation for 3-4 weeks prior to and for 4 weeks after cardioversion results in thromboembolic complication of about 5%. It is much less known that cardioversion is also associated with a higher risk of thromboembolism (stroke, peripheral embolism) in patients treated with usual anticoagulation. The control arms (warfarin) of the three studies with the new anticoagulants dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban for the prevention of thromboembolism in non-valvular atrial fibrillation report a monthly thromboembolic risk of 0,13-0,2%. The risk for thromboembolic complication in the month following cardioversion is about three to six times higher than without cardioversion in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation treated with usual anticoagulation. Since most cardioversions are performed by DC shock it is not known whether electrical and pharmacological cardioversions carry the same risk for thromboembolism. Although thromboembolic complications do not often occur following cardioversion the increased risk due to this procedure should be acknowledged. Strict anticoagulation (e. g. INR value > 2,5) in the first 10-14 days following cardioversion could possibly minimize the risk of thromboembolism.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Electric Countershock; Enoxaparin; Heparin; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Morpholines; Phenprocoumon; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Patients with atrial fibrillation are at an increased risk for stroke. Anticoagulation therapy has been shown to significantly reduce the risk for stroke in these patients. Warfarin therapy is effective at reducing the risk for thromboembolic events, but requires frequent monitoring of its anticoagulation effect using the international normalized ratio and significantly increases the risk for hemorrhagic events, including intracranial hemorrhage. Novel oral anticoagulants provide simpler, effective stroke prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation. These drugs include dabigatran (a direct thrombin inhibitor) as well as rivaroxaban and apixaban (factor Xa inhibitors). The new anticoagulants have rapid onset of effect; their anticoagulatory effect is stable, predictable, and dose related; and they do not require monitoring of anticoagulation effect using the international normalized ratio. The pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and potential adverse effects of these drugs in patients with atrial fibrillation are reviewed herein.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Dabigatran; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes

Warfarin has been the mainstay oral anticoagulant (OAC) medication prescribed for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. However, warfarin therapy is challenging because of marked interindividual variability in dose and response, requiring frequent monitoring and dose titration. These limitations have prompted the clinical development of new OACs (NOACs) that directly target the coagulation cascade with rapid onset/offset of action, lower risk for drug-drug interactions, and more predictable response. Recently, NOACs dabigatran (direct thrombin inhibitor), and rivaroxaban and apixaban (factor Xa [FXa] inhibitors) have gained regulatory approval as alternative therapies to warfarin. Though the anticoagulation efficacy of these NOACs has been characterized, differences in their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles have become a significant consideration in terms of drug selection and dosing. In this review, we outline key pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic features of each compound and provide guidance on selection and dosing of the 3 NOACs relative to warfarin when considering OAC therapy for AF patients. Importantly, we show that by better understanding the effect of clinical variables such as age, renal function, dosing interval, and drug metabolism (CYP3A4) and transport (P-glycoprotein), we might be able to better predict the risk for sub- and supratherapeutic anticoagulation response and individualize OAC selection and dosing.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Biological Availability; Blood Coagulation; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Drug Monitoring; Humans; Morpholines; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Patient Selection; Polymorphism, Genetic; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

The primary objective was to assess the cost-effectiveness of new oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Secondary objectives related to assessing the cost-effectiveness of new oral anticoagulants stratified by center-specific time in therapeutic range, age, and CHADS2 score.. Cost-effectiveness was assessed by the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Analysis used a Markov cohort model that followed patients from initiation of pharmacotherapy to death. Transition probabilities were obtained from a concurrent network meta-analysis. Utility values and costs were obtained from published data. Numerous deterministic sensitivity analyses and probabilistic analysis were conducted.. The incremental cost per QALY gained for dabigatran 150 mg versus warfarin was $20,797. Apixaban produced equal QALYs at a higher cost. Dabigatran 110 mg and rivaroxaban were dominated by dabigatran 150 mg and apixaban. Results were sensitive to the drug costs of apixaban, the time horizon adopted, and the consequences from major and minor bleeds with dabigatran. Results varied by a center's average time in therapeutic range, a patient's CHADS2 score, and patient age, with either dabigatran 150 mg or apixaban being optimal.. Results were highly sensitive to patient characteristics. Rivaroxaban and dabigatran 110 mg were unlikely to be cost-effective. For different characteristics, apixaban or dabigatran 150 mg were optimal. Thus, the choice between these two options may come down to the price of apixaban and further evidence on the impact of major and minor bleeds with dabigatran.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Drug Costs; Hemorrhage; Humans; Markov Chains; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Time Factors; Warfarin

Stroke is the most feared complication among patients with atrial fibrillation. Oral anticoagulation therapy with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) has been the gold standard for stroke prevention for the past 60 years. However, VKA therapy has many downsides, including risk for bleeding, a narrow therapeutic window, and the need for frequent monitoring, as well as numerous diet and lifestyle considerations that make its use cumbersome. Thus, development of new drugs that can preserve the benefits of VKAs while eliminating the negative aspects of VKA therapy has been enthusiastically sought. This article reviews the anticoagulant agents that are clinically available or under development as alternatives to VKAs for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Given the increasing prevalence of atrial fibrillation, the need for safe and effective stroke prophylaxis will continue to rise. Warfarin has been around for many years and has proven efficacy in preventing stroke, but it has major limitations due to its variable dosing, food and drug interactions, and requirement for regular monitoring. Newer agents which include dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban have recently or will soon be available and may provide an improved efficacy in stroke prevention, an improved safety profile, and improved user-friendliness. Dabigatran was the first of the agents to be widely available, and in the RE-LY study, dabigatran (150 mg dose) showed superiority to warfarin in preventing ischemic stroke and a significant reduction in intracranial bleeding. Rivaroxaban was studied in the ROCKETAF trial, and with once daily dosing, it showed noninferiority to warfarin in preventing stroke with a significant reduction in intracranial bleeding. The ARISTOTLE trial showed apixaban was superior to warfarin for stroke prevention, significantly reduced all major bleeding, and resulted in a significant reduction in all-cause mortality. While all three trials have important limitations, they were very large randomized trials with more than 14,000 patients each and show a clear overall net clinical benefit when compared with warfarin. Key features of the drugs as well as an individual's preferences and stability on warfarin will help guide the ultimate drug choice for any given patient, but these newer anticoagulant agents are likely to usher in a new era in stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Morpholines; Prognosis; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Humans; Morpholines; Pakistan; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Warfarin and aspirin are used to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). There are inherent challenges with both treatments, including variable and inconsistent benefit and increased bleeding risks. The availability of new anticoagulants offers some alternatives.. A mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis to evaluate direct and indirect treatment data including aspirin, warfarin apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban for the prevention of primary or secondary stroke in patients with AF.. A comprehensive, systematic literature search was conducted to identify randomized trials comparing aspirin, warfarin, apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban in patients with AF requiring treatment for stroke prevention. Open-label and blinded designs were included if they evaluated any stroke or any bleeding event. Data on stroke and bleeding events were abstracted, verified, evaluated, scored, and entered into Aggregate Data Drug Information System version 1.16 to generate a mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis. Direct and indirect comparisons were evaluated, and we looked for inconsistency in closed loop structures. Data are reported as rate ratios with 95% credible intervals. In addition, we reviewed variance statistics and explored variance with node-splitting models.. Our literature search yielded 30 articles, 21 of which were included. All treatments except aspirin reduced the risk of any stroke compared with placebo. Warfarin (0.43 [0.33-0.57]), apixaban (0.37 [0.27-0.54]), dabigatran (0.34 [0.21-0.57]), rivaroxaban (0.36 [0.22-0.60]), and aspirin with clopidogrel (0.73 [0.53-0.99]) were more protective than aspirin alone. Warfarin and the new anticoagulants were similar in the reduction of stroke, vascular death, and mortality. There was no difference in major bleeding between any treatment group. There were more nonmajor bleeding events when comparing warfarin and apixaban (1.83 [1.05-4.03]); no other differences between warfarin and the other new anticoagulants were found.. This mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis found similarity between warfarin and the new anticoagulants with the exception of one comparison, in which warfarin was associated with more non-major bleeding than apixaban. Thus, the new anticoagulants are therapeutically comparable when warfarin is inappropriate.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Databases, Bibliographic; Double-Blind Method; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

New oral anticoagulants have been found to be as efficacious as warfarin and safer in terms of intracranial bleeding. All patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation should receive antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention. For those at low risk, antiplatelet therapy is probably sufficient. For those at intermediate or high risk, anticoagulation is superior to antiplatelet therapy. Four oral anticoagulants are currently approved for stroke and systemic embolism prevention in atrial fibrillation: warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. Management of bleeding complications while on the new agents remains an area of concern and management is based on anecdotal experience and observational studies.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes

Until recently, warfarin had been one of the only treatment options for long-term anticoagulation of patients with atrial fibrillation, venous thromboembolism, or other medical conditions that require chronic anticoagulation. A main concern when treating patients with anticoagulants is balancing the benefits of preventing a thromboembolic event with the risks of bleeding events. The US Food and Drug Administration recently approved 2 new oral anticoagulants, dabigatran and rivaroxaban, for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation, and is currently reviewing a drug application for a third new oral anticoagulant, apixaban. These new anticoagulants do not require strict and frequent laboratory monitoring, dosing adjustments, or dietary restrictions, and they incur fewer drug-drug interactions than warfarin. However, these new medications do not have specific reversal agents, may require dosage adjustment based on patient renal function, and lack clinical data regarding their long-term safety and efficacy. The 2012 American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis include recommendations for dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban for certain indications. Each of the 3 novel oral anticoagulants has specific pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties that may make them suitable agents for use in specific patient populations. Knowledge of dosing, drug-drug interactions, monitoring parameters, and clinical considerations for each of these new medications will help clinicians decide for which patients they may be best suited to replace conventional therapy with warfarin.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Morpholines; Postoperative Complications; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Orally active small molecules that selectively and specifically inhibit coagulation serine proteases have been developed for clinical use. For some patients these oral direct inhibitors (ODIs) offer substantial benefits over oral vitamin K antagonists (VKA). However, for the majority of patients with good anticoagulant control with VKAs the advantages of the ODIs are primarily convenience and few drug interactions. The drugs are prescribed at fixed dose without the need for monitoring or dose adjustment in the majority of patients and the rapid onset of anticoagulation and short half-life make initiation and interruption of anticoagulation considerably easier than with VKAs. As yet, specific antidotes to ODIs are not available for clinical use but these are in development as rapid reversal agents. As with all anticoagulants produced so far, there is a correlation between intensity of anticoagulation and bleeding. Consequently, the need to consider the balance of benefit and risk in each individual patient is no less important than with VKA therapy. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban have been chosen for this review as examples of a thrombin inhibitor and an inhibitor of factor Xa respectively. The clinical application of these drugs is the focus of the review.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Drug Interactions; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes

Atrial fibrillation (AF) confers a significant risk of stroke or systemic thromboembolism. Oral anticoagulation is the most effective therapy for AF-related stroke prevention. A decision to advise oral anticoagulation should be based upon the individual absolute risks of stroke and bleeding, and almost all AF patients with ≥1 stroke risk factors have a positive net clinical benefit of oral anticoagulation. The novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban are more convenient, and are at least equally effective and safer (regarding bleeding complications) for stroke prevention compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Availability of NOACs and improved stroke and bleeding risks assessment should increase the number of AF patients who receive adequate thromboprophylaxis. In this review article, we present an overview of the clinical phase III trials with NOACs for stroke prevention and discuss the contemporary principles of thromboprophylaxis in AF patients with various stroke and bleeding risk profiles, as well as practical aspects of NOACs therapy.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism

In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) oral anticoagulation with vitamin-K antagonists (warfarin, phenprocoumon) is effective both for primary and secondary stroke prevention yielding a 60-70% relative reduction in stroke risk compared with placebo, as well as a mortality reduction of 26 percent. Vitamin-K antagonists have a number of well documented shortcomings. Recently the results of randomised trials for three new oral anticoagulants that do not exhibit the limitations of vitamin-K antagonists have been published. These include direct factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban and apixaban) and a direct thrombin inhibitor (dabigatran). The studies (RE-LY, ROCKET-AF, ARISTOTLE, AVERROES) provide promising results for the new agents, including higher efficacy and a significantly lower incidence of intracranial bleeds compared with warfarin or aspirin. The new drugs show similar results in secondary as well as in primary stroke prevention in patients with AF. Apixaban was demonstrated to be clearly superior to aspirin and had the same rate of major bleeding complications. Meta-analyses show that the novel anticoagulants are superior to warfarin for the reduction of stroke, major bleeding and intracranial bleeds. New anticoagulants add to the therapeutic options for patients with AF, and offer a number of advantages over warfarin, for both the clinician and patient, including a favorable bleeding profile and convenience of use. Aspirin is no longer an option in secondary stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. Consideration of these new anticoagulants will improve clinical decision making.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Guidelines as Topic; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) dabigatran etexilate, rivaroxaban, and apixaban have been extensively studied for prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolic disease and for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Elderly patients have the highest incidence of thrombotic complications but also have the highest risk of anticoagulant associated bleeding. In this review we critically examine the balance between risks and benefits of NOACs compared with vitamin K antagonists in elderly patients enrolled in phase 3 randomized controlled trials for the management of venous thrombosis and stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Results show that the favourable balance between risks and benefits of NOACs is preserved in the elderly population.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia and the leading cause of stroke, an event with high human and economic burden. Novel oral anticoagulants have been approved in many markets as alternatives to warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with AF - dabigatran etexilate, apixaban and rivaroxaban. Given the high burden of AF, and given that new treatments can more effectively prevent stroke than warfarin, but at higher drug cost, there has been a need for systematic evaluation of the costs and benefits of these new treatments. In this study, we summarize the findings of a systematic literature review on the cost-effectiveness of the new oral anticoagulants. We find that there is substantial heterogeneity between the studies and their numerical findings, despite using a common set of four trials for their clinical inputs. However, there is broad consensus among them that each of the novel oral anticoagulants is cost-effective versus warfarin or aspirin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Oral anticoagulant therapy, either with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or with novel oral anticoagulants such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban, is the mainstay for thromboprophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Thromboembolic risk factors associated with AF and risk factors for bleeding associated with oral anticoagulant therapy are largely the same, and bleeding risk very rarely outweighs individual benefit of thrombosis prevention, thus resulting in positive net clinical benefit of oral anticoagulant therapy in almost all AF patients. Prevention of AF‑related thromboembolic events most commonly requires long‑term oral anticoagulant therapy. Over time, various clinical situations may occur in a given patient (e.g., a need for an urgent surgery or invasive intervention, acute stroke, etc.), which may require a temporary or permanent modification of anticoagulant therapy regardless of which anticoagulant drug has been used. This may be particularly challenging for physicians because many issues regarding optimal use of oral anticoagulant drugs in specific clinical situations still remain to be solved. In this review article, we discuss the periprocedural management of oral anticoagulant therapy, bridging, transition to another oral anticoagulant, the occurrence of acute stroke in a patient already taking an oral anticoagulant, and decision when it is safe to resume oral anticoagulation therapy after stroke. We summarize the available evidence and current (and future) approaches to oral anticoagulation management in such clinical situations.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Catheter Ablation; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Fibrinolytic Agents; Forecasting; Humans; Morpholines; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Postoperative Care; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Premedication; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The review addresses the primary and secondary prevention of cardioembolic ischemic stroke, in particular, in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Indications and schemes of anticoagulation treatment, advantages in stroke prevention and difficulties in using of the common oral anticoagulant warfarin are discussed. The authors compare the mechanism of action, efficacy and safety of the peroral anticoagulant rivaroxaban with warfarin. Based on the results of large meta-analyses, it has been concluded that the efficacy of rivaroxaban is rather superior to warfarin, this drug has the same safety profile and is more convenient in use. During treatment, no laboratory monitoring of hemostasis indicators is needed. This drug can be recommended for prevention of cardioembolic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation is a commonly encountered problem in the outpatient setting. This article presents an overview of the outpatient management of oral anticoagulation for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in the setting of atrial fibrillation. Results of recent clinical trials demonstrating the efficacy and safety of 3 of the new target-specific oral anticoagulants are reviewed. Discussion includes determining patient candidates for the newer agents and consideration for choice of agent. Advantages and disadvantages to using these newer agents are presented, as are dosing adjustments for renal and hepatic impairment.

Topics: Ambulatory Care; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC) such as the direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran, and oral factor Xa inhibitors, rivaroxaban and apixaban, have recently approved for prevention of stroke in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Phase III trials have compared each of these agents to warfarin. Dabigatran was more efficacious than warfarin in reducing the risk of stroke when given at a dose of 150 mg BID to patients with NVAF. Rivaroxaban 20 mg QD was superior to warfarin in on-treatment analysis. Apixaban 5 mg BID was also found to be superior to warfarin in reducing stroke in NVAF patients. Of note, the rate of hemorrhagic stroke was much smaller in the patients treated with NOAC than those with warfarin. NOAC offer a good therapeutic option for prevention of stroke in NVAF patients.

Topics: Administration, Ophthalmic; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Cerebral Infarction; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Brain Infarction; Dabigatran; Humans; Intracranial Embolism; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Vitamin K

Treatment with vitamin K antagonists are subject to a common iatrogenic mainly characterized by hemorrhagic stroke. Their narrow therapeutic range associated with variability largely explains this phenomenon. New oral anticoagulants (NOAC) are now available. dabigatran (Pradaxa®) is a direct and specific thrombin inhibitor. It is excreted mainly by the kidney and is the only which can be dialyzed. Rivaroxaban (Xarelto®) and apixaban (Eliquis®) are factor X activated direct inhibitors. They are highly bound to plasma proteins and are metabolized mainly by the liver, via CYP3A4. All NOAC are substrates of P-glycoprotein (P-gp). Due to pharmacological changes, some populations at risk were identified: patients with hepatic impairment, renal impairment, elderly patients or low weight. Some pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic drug interactions alter the concentration and the expected impact of NOAC. The NOAC does not require biological monitoring. They interfere with the routine coagulation tests which should be interpreted with caution. Specific tests exist and can be used in case of emergencies. Currently, no antidote is available. The new oral anticoagulant look promising in the elderly. However, certain rules must be followed to reduce the risk of iatrogenic.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Cerebral Infarction; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Drugs, Investigational; Humans; Iatrogenic Disease; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Vitamin K

Atrial fibrillation treatment relies on anticoagulation therapy that reduces the risk of stroke. Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) were the only oral anticoagulant drugs for more than 50 years, but they are difficult to manage especially in the elderly. In France, VKA are the main cause of iatrogenic hospitalizations with about 17,000 hospitalizations per year and around 4,000 to 5,000 deaths per year. Pharmacologic properties of VKA, especially the narrow therapeutic margin explain the complexity of their management. Several studies have shown that patients treated with VKA were on average only 50% of the time with an INR in the therapeutic range. In other words, patients are, half of the time, either-under treated or over-treated. Within this framework, development of new oral anticoagulant drugs appeared necessary, in order to obtain drugs with larger therapeutic margin and a better risk/benefit profile than VKA. Three large randomized clinical trials including almost 50,000 patients with 20,000 subjects over 75 years old and 8,000 over 80 years old, show a better risk/benefit profile of the new oral anticoagulants (NOAC) than VKA, characterized by a 50% reduction of cerebral hemorrhages, 22% reduction of stroke and 12% reduction of total mortality. Meanwhile, their renal elimination and the lack of control of the biological efficacy need to be taken into account for their prescription. Renal failure (estimated glomerular filtration rate according to Cockcroft formula < 30 mL/min) contraindicates their use. Their half-life is shorter than that of VKA and the biological monitoring is not available, thus a good adherence to the treatment is important. Studies specifically conducted among geriatric older population with poly-pathologies and frail are therefore needed to evaluate tolerance of NOAC in real life conditions.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Dabigatran; Drugs, Investigational; Half-Life; Humans; Intracranial Embolism; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Vitamin K

Anticoagulants can complicate the approach to the management of patients undergoing operative interventions. We review new anticoagulants that have been introduced recently to the market or that are undergoing investigations for treatment of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixiban, and edoxaban.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Blood Loss, Surgical; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Three new oral anticoagulant agents were tested versus warfarin in separate, large phase III randomized clinical trials for prevention of any stroke and systemic embolism in atrial fibrillation. Dabigatran, a direct thrombin inhibitor, is at 110 mg bid non-inferior and at 150 mg bid superior to warfarin; rivaroxaban, a factor X inhibitor, is also non-inferior, and apixaban, also a factor X inhibitor, is superior to warfarin on the same efficacy end point. Statistical analysis of subgroups does not suggest, for any of the tested drugs, major differences in relation to different risk levels and history of previous stroke/TIA. This re-appraisal of data was undertaken in search for possible additional information, by considering the absolute differences in efficacy and safety events versus warfarin and the corresponding efficiency and number needed to treat, also with regard to secondary versus primary prevention. By this approach, it appears that for all drugs, equivalence or advantage versus warfarin on the efficacy end point is largely driven by a reduction in hemorrhagic rather than ischemic strokes. Dabigatran shows a balanced effect on ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes, and apixaban is most effective in sparing intracranial bleeding versus warfarin. In secondary prevention, better efficiency is shown by dabigatran 150 and apixaban, versus rivaroxaban, despite the higher proportion of post-stroke/TIA patients (55 %) in the ROCKET AF trial of rivaroxaban seemed to favor better results of this drug in secondary prevention. These and other results of our approach should not be directly translated into clinical practice. They may supply useful suggestions to be subsequently tested in specific trials, although head-to-head comparative studies of the three drugs remain unlikely.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Venous Thrombosis

Effective prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic disorders remain suboptimal in many healthcare systems, partly owing to limitations of traditional anticoagulants. New oral anticoagulants have been developed and among these, rivaroxaban, apixaban and dabigatran etexilate are in the most advanced stage of clinical development.. A literature search using the PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov databases was performed to identify English-language publications. The search was performed up to 31 December 2011 with the terms rivaroxaban OR Xarelto, apixaban OR Eliquis and dabigatran OR Pradaxa. Ongoing, completed and published phase III randomised controlled trials were selected as the primary source of information for the clinical development programme of each drug.. The new oral agents demonstrate several advantages over traditional anticoagulants, including administration at fixed doses and no requirement for routine coagulation monitoring On the basis of phase III clinical trials, rivaroxaban, apixaban and dabigatran etexilate have been approved in many countries for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after hip and knee replacement surgery. Dabigatran etexilate and rivaroxaban have also been approved for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in Europe and the US. In addition, rivaroxaban has been approved in Europe for the treatment of acute deep vein thrombosis and prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism. Approval of these agents and postapproval monitoring of their safety and efficacy will have implications for primary care.. Rivaroxaban, apixaban and dabigatran etexilate offer the possibility of simplified prevention and treatment strategies for thromboembolic disorders in the outpatient setting.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism

Currently available anticoagulants utilized for venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment and prevention and stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have proven effectiveness but are not optimally utilized because of barriers such as the need for subcutaneous administration and requisite routine laboratory monitoring. Rivaroxaban, a novel oral Xa inhibitor, is an alternative to standard therapies utilized for VTE prevention after elective orthopedic surgery, primary and secondary stroke prevention in nonvalvular AF, VTE treatment after an acute VTE event, and secondary prevention after the acute coronary syndromes (ACS).. This article reviews the pharmacology, efficacy, and tolerability of rivaroxaban for VTE prophylaxis in post-orthopedic surgery and medically ill patients, stroke prevention in nonvalvular AF, adjunctive therapy in patients with ACS, and VTE treatment.. International Pharmaceutical Abstracts and EMBASE were searched for English-only clinical trials and reviews published between 1970 and March 15, 2012. PubMed was searched for articles published between 1970 and June 30, 2012. Additional trials and reviews were identified from the citations of published articles.. Eighty-nine publications were identified: 10 clinical trials and 1 meta-analysis were used to obtain efficacy and tolerability data, and 1 analysis of pooled data from the clinical trials was included; 17 pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and drug-drug interaction studies were included; and 5 cost-analyses were reviewed. These data showed rivaroxaban to be noninferior to enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis of VTE after total knee and total hip replacement surgery. It was also shown to be noninferior to vitamin K antagonist therapy for primary and recurrent stroke prevention in nonvalvular AF as well as for the treatment of VTE after an acute deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. It also showed benefit in lowering the risk for major adverse cardiovascular events after ACS. Differences in major bleeding rates were not statistically significant between rivaroxaban and comparators across the various studies, with the exception of ACS, in which there were higher rates of non-coronary artery bypass graft surgery related bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage.. Based on the findings of the studies reported in this review, rivaroxaban is an effective option for the prevention of VTE after orthopedic surgery, stroke prevention for nonvalvular AF, and treatment of VTE. At this time, rivaroxaban cannot be recommended for secondary risk reduction after ACS because of the increased bleeding risk.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Orthopedic Procedures; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Dabigatran and rivaroxaban are novel anticoagulants that have been approved for the prevention of thromboembolic events in atrial fibrillation. These medications are attractive to both patients and clinicians, as, unlike warfarin, they do not require laboratory monitoring or dietary restrictions. However, they carry bleeding risks similar to that of warfarin and are without a reliable reversal agent.. The objectives of this article are to 1) summarize the pivotal trials leading to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approvals of dabigatran (Pradaxa; Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, CT) and rivaroxaban (Xarelto; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Titusville, NJ); 2) present the limited data available regarding the management of bleeding patients on these agents; and 3) provide suggestions to guide emergency providers given the limited data.. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban were approved based on large, non-inferiority trials comparing the new agents to warfarin with stroke or systemic embolism as the primary outcome. Traditional coagulation studies cannot be used to determine the degree of anti-coagulation produced by these agents. Fresh frozen plasma is unlikely to be effective in patients on these drugs who are acutely bleeding. Prothrombin complex concentrate can be considered in patients on rivaroxaban. Dabigatran is renally cleared, so dabigatran could be removed by hemodialysis. Theoretically, DDAVP (Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Bridgewater, NJ), aminocaproic acid, tranexamic acid, or recombinant activated factor VII could also be used in an attempt to control bleeding.. There is a need for assays for the degree of anticoagulation produced by drugs such as dabigatran and rivaroxaban. Additionally, studies are needed to evaluate reversal agents that could be effective in the setting of acute bleeding.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Drug Approval; Emergencies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an important cause of ischemic stroke and is the underlying cause of > 20% of all strokes, with increasing age being a risk factor. Until recently, warfarin was the only available oral anticoagulant used to decrease this risk in patients with AF. However, there are several disadvantages of warfarin use, such as the requirement for monitoring the international normalized ratio, its wide range of drug-food interactions, and its narrow therapeutic index. Thus, there has been a strong impetus for the development of newer oral anticoagulants with predictable pharmacokinetics that obviate the need for monitoring the international normalized ratio. The US Food and Drug Administration has approved a direct thrombin inhibitor (dabigatran) and 2 factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban and apixaban) for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular AF. There are several other new oral anticoagulant agents on the horizon, including the factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban. This review article discusses the pharmacological properties, clinical trial data, and practical issues associated with the use of these novel oral anticoagulants.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequent supraventricular arrhythmia in our environment. The incidence and prevalence of this disease increase with age and with the presence of concomitant cardiovascular disorders; consequently, AF is frequently encountered in the field of internal medicine. Elderly patients have a series of characteristics that lead to a high risk of thromboembolic complications and hemorrhagic events. Internal medicine specialists should be trained in the global management of this disease, in order to correctly evaluate the risk of complications and take unusually difficult decisions. The new oral anticoagulants provide an interesting and promising alternative in the prevention of AF-related stroke, although there are several limitations to consider before prescribing these agents in this group of patients.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Decision Support Techniques; Humans; Internal Medicine; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes

Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is the main cause of cardioembolic stroke. Classically, prevention consists of oral antivitamin-K anticoagulants (AVK), which, despite their demonstrated efficacy, continue to be underused due to their numerous drawbacks. Recently, a new generation of oral anticoagulants has been shown to have a better safety profile and greater efficacy than AVK. The studies that have compared rivoraxaban, dabigatran and apixaban with warfarin have also included a substantial proportion of patients who had previously had a stroke. The results of the substudies performed in this population with a high risk of hemorrhagic and embolic events have been consistent with those in the overall populations in these studies. The new anticoagulants are a feasible alternative to AVK in the secondary prevention of ictus in patients with NVAF. When anticoagulant therapy is contraindicated, percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage could be an alternative.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Contraindications; Dabigatran; Endovascular Procedures; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Spain; Stroke; Thiophenes

The new oral anticoagulants are now a reality and are available to clinicians. Although a large number of patients have been included in the many clinical trials of these drugs, there is one population that is always underrepresented - called special populations - such as those aged more than 75 years old, the obese, and patients with renal impairment. This review aims to analyze differences in the efficacy and safety in these special populations recruited in the various trials.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; Contraindications; Dabigatran; Embolism; Humans; Morpholines; Obesity; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thrombosis

Atrial fibrillation/flutter is the most common cardiac arrhythmia that can potentially result in stroke and death. For many years, aspirin and warfarin have been the cornerstone of stroke prevention among such patients. Although warfarin therapy has been advocated for patients with high likelihood of stroke, it requires close surveillance and monitoring, has a narrow therapeutic window and is quite often affected by medication interactions and diet. Thus, the need for a better and more consistent anticoagulant therapy was necessary and has been under development with various successes for many years. This article will review 3 new antithrombotic medications that may potentially become the mainstay for treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation in the near future.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Morpholines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Stroke is a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality worldwide. Approximately, 795,000 strokes occur in the USA each year, 610,000 of which are first events, and 185,000 of which are recurrent events. Of all strokes, 87% are ischemic strokes. Novel anticoagulants serve as an alternative antithrombotic intervention in patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease. This paper reviews the role of the novel anticoagulants, dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban, in stroke prevention among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes

Warfarin has long been considered the gold standard for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Recently, three major trials comparing the efficacy and safety of new drugs: a thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and two inhibitors of factor Xa - rivaroxaban and apixaban, with that of warfarin, have been published. The aim of this paper is to present the main results of the RE-LY, ROCKET AF and ARISTOTLE trials, compare study populations and outcomes, and discuss clinical implications of their results for the long-term anticoagulation in patients with nonvalvular AF.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Evidence-Based Medicine; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Patient Selection; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

For more than 60 years, vitamin K antagonists have been the only available oral anticoagulants for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in atrial fibrillation (AF). Several new molecules, with a favorable pharmacokinetic profile and avoiding routine monitoring, have been recently developed, opening a new era in anticoagulation. The oral direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran, and the oral activated factor X inhibitors, rivaroxaban and apixaban, are the novel oral anticoagulants with data from large randomized clinical trials showing that these drugs are noninferior to warfarin in the prevention of stroke and thromboembolic complications of AF, with the advantage of less hemorrhagic stroke and intracranial bleeding. While these trial data are extremely encouraging, several practical issues (e.g., lack of specific antidote, safety of long-term treatment or cost-effectiveness in "real-life" clinical practice) still need to be elucidated.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Drugs, Investigational; Factor X; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Venous thromboembolism (including deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) and atrial fibrillation are common conditions in Western countries. The mainstay of treatment and prevention for these diseases is fast-acting anticoagulant drugs such as heparins and vitamin K antagonists. The use of these drugs is, however, complex and demanding for both patients and physicians. Recently, new antithrombotic drugs that act directly by inhibiting activated coagulation factors such as factor X or thrombin have been developed and investigated in phase III clinical trials. The aim of this article is to review: (i) the need to develop new drugs; (ii) their efficacy/safety as demonstrated in clinical trials; (iii) the need for laboratory monitoring and (iv) the direction towards the use of these new drugs in the real-life clinical situation.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Drugs, Investigational; Heparin; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

New oral anticoagulants, including apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban, have been developed as alternatives to warfarin, the standard oral anticoagulation therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants to those of warfarin in patients with AF. The published research was systematically searched for randomized controlled trials of >1 year in duration that compared new oral anticoagulants to warfarin in patients with AF. Random-effects models were used to pool efficacy and safety data across randomized controlled trials. Three studies, including 44,563 patients, were identified. Patients randomized to new oral anticoagulants had a decreased risk for all-cause stroke and systemic embolism (relative risk [RR] 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67 to 0.92), ischemic and unidentified stroke (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.99), hemorrhagic stroke (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.68), all-cause mortality (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.95), and vascular mortality (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.98). Randomization to a new oral anticoagulant was associated with a lower risk for intracranial bleeding (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.66). Data regarding the risks for major bleeding (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.09) and gastrointestinal bleeding (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.72) were inconclusive. In conclusion, the new oral anticoagulants are more efficacious than warfarin for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with AF. With a decreased risk for intracranial bleeding, they appear to have a favorable safety profile, making them promising alternatives to warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Embolism; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have become available for different clinical indications such as the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after major orthopaedic surgery, for the treatment of VTE and stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). One thrombin inhibitor (dabigatran etexilate) and two factor Xa-inhibitors (rivaroxaban and apixaban) are the most advanced NOACs and therefore, up-to-date information on their evidence and use in clinical practice appears timely. In this review we give a concise overview of the pharmacology and clinical evidence derived from phase 3 clinical trials. Then the meaningfulness of laboratory testing is discussed and recommendations are given for clinical scenarios that may necessitate adjustment of their use. We conclude that NOACs are valuable alternatives to heparins or vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in the prevention and treatment of VTE and for the prevention of stroke in patients with AF. Prescribers should however be aware of special situations and patient populations where the manufacturers' instructions need to be carefully followed. In particular, patients with comorbidities and co-medications may require individual decision making in order to prevent bleeding complications.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Blood Coagulation; Blood Coagulation Tests; Dabigatran; Drug Monitoring; Evidence-Based Medicine; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Predictive Value of Tests; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thrombin; Thromboembolism

Arterial and venous thrombotic states, including myocardial infarction (MI), stroke and deep vein thrombosis with subsequent pulmonary embolism, are a significant cause of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. Factor Xa (FXa) plays a pivotal role in thrombus formation. Its inhibition following acute coronary syndromes (ACS) blocks amplification of thrombin generation and subsequent clot formation, resulting in a risk reduction in recurrent MI, stroke and death. For this reason, a predictable form of oral anticoagulation continues to be an ongoing need. Rivaroxaban , the first oral FXa inhibitor, acts by direct inhibition of FXa and does not require an antithrombin cofactor for its activity.. This paper describes the pharmacokinetics (PK) of low-dose rivaroxaban tested in patients with ACS. Age, gender, renal function and body weight have no clinically significant effects on the PK of the drug in treatment of ACS. Caution should be maintained during co-administration of strong CYP3A4 inducers and inhibitors. Among patients with moderate and severe hepatic impairment and in those with associated coagulopathies, rivaroxaban however is contraindicated.. The mortality benefit with low-dose rivaroxaban in ACS patients was first demonstrated in ATLAS ACS2 TIMI-51 trial. With its rapid oral bioavailability, predictable PK, low drug-drug interaction and no need for monitoring, the use of low-dose rivaroxaban in addition to dual antiplatelet therapy offers an appealing new option in improving outcomes following ACS in the modern era of novel oral FXa inhibitors.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Blood Coagulation Tests; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Drug Interactions; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Half-Life; Humans; Morpholines; Myocardial Infarction; Pulmonary Embolism; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thrombin; Thrombosis

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia in clinical practice and is associated with a nearly 5-fold increase in the risk of stroke. Warfarin has been the cornerstone of treatment to reduce stroke risk in AF patients for decades. Although effective in preventing thrombosis, warfarin is difficult to manage and is associated with a 1% to 7% yearly risk of major hemorrhage. Until recently, there were no effective oral alternatives to warfarin. Dabigatran etexilate, a direct thrombin inhibitor, was approved in 2010 for the reduction of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular AF, and the factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban was approved for a similar indication in 2011. Other late-stage orally administered agents that may be approved for this indication include apixaban and edoxaban; others at earlier stages of development will be discussed in this review as well. Nonpharmacological approaches to stroke prevention include left atrial appendage removal, ligation, or occlusion. This review examines advances in the management of stroke risk in AF patients, focusing on recently marketed and late-stage modalities. The advent of alternatives to warfarin for reducing stroke risk in AF patients may improve physicians' ability to offer safe and effective stroke prevention in all AF patients.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombin Proteins; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Chemoprevention; Dabigatran; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Warfarin

As the population ages, the prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) continues to rise. The most feared complication of this common cardiac arrhythmia is cardioembolic stroke. Strokes related to AF are associated with greater morbidity and mortality than ischemic strokes of most other etiologies and impose a substantial economic burden on healthcare systems around the world. Until recently, warfarin was the sole anticoagulant proven effective for stroke prevention patients with AF at elevated risk, but its narrow therapeutic margin and variable dose response limited clinical utility. The emergence of new anticoagulants that offer equal or superior efficacy, greater safety and the convenience of fixed oral dosing may make warfarin the less preferred option. This review provides an update on recent advancements in antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in patients with AF.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clopidogrel; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thrombolytic Therapy; Ticlopidine; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Evidence-Based Medicine; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Guideline Adherence; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Embolism; Morpholines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes

The vitamin K antagonists (VKA) available for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation have many drawbacks due to their difficult clinical use and high risk of bleeding. Currently, several drugs are being developed as possible substitutes for VKA that have many advantages such as the lack of monitoring requirement and scarce pharmacologic and food interactions. The present article provides an update on the new oral anticoagulants that are in a more advanced stage of clinical research, their pharmacologic properties, advantages and disadvantages and their results in recent clinical trials.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Azetidines; Benzimidazoles; Benzylamines; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Drug Monitoring; Drugs, Investigational; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Patient Care Planning; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thrombophilia; Vitamin K

Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) has been challenging over decades, mostly due to a number of difficulties associated with oral vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), which have been the most effective stroke prevention treatment for a long time. The oral direct thrombin inhibitors (e.g., dabigatran) and oral direct inhibitors of factor Xa (e.g., rivaroxaban, apixaban) have emerged recently as an alternative to VKAs for stroke prevention in AF. These drugs act rapidly, and have a predictable and stable dose-related anticoagulant effect with a few clinically relevant drug-drug interactions. The novel oral anticoagulants are used in fixed doses with no need for regular laboratory monitoring of anticoagulation intensity. However, each of these drugs has distinct pharmacological properties that could influence optimal use in clinical practice. The following phase 3 randomized trials with novel oral anticoagulants versus warfarin for stroke prevention in AF have been completed: the Randomized Evaluation of Long-term Anticoagulant therapy (RE-LY) trial with dabigatran, the Rivaroxaban Once daily oral direct Factor Xa inhibition Compared with vitamin K antagonism for prevention of stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET-AF) trial with rivaroxaban, and the Apixaban for Reduction of Stroke and Other Thromboembolism Events in Atrial Fibrillation (ARISTOTLE) trial with apixaban. Moreover, the Apixaban Versus Acetylsalicylic Acid to prevent Strokes (AVERROES) trial included patients with AF who have failed or were unsuitable for warfarin, and compared apixaban versus aspirin for stroke prevention in AF. Overall, apixaban has two large trials for stroke prevention in AF showing benefits not only over warfarin, but also over aspirin among those patients who have failed or refused warfarin. In the ARISTOTLE trial, apixaban was superior to warfarin in the reduction of stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and all-cause mortality, with a similar reduction in the rate of ischemic stroke and better tolerability. When compared with aspirin in the AVERROES trial, apixaban was associated with more effective reduction of stroke, a similar risk of major bleeding, and better tolerability. In this review article, the authors summarize the current knowledge on novel oral anticoagulants and discuss the clinical aspects of their use for stroke prevention in AF, with particular emphasis on apixaban.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

New oral anticoagulant drugs are emerging as alternatives to warfarin for the prevention of stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Two agents are direct factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban and apixaban), and the third is a direct thrombin inhibitor (dabigatran). They have been separately compared to warfarin in large randomised trials. Our objective was to indirectly compare the three agents to each other for major efficacy and safety outcomes. Studies were assessed for comparability and the odds ratios of selected outcomes for each anticoagulant versus one another were estimated indirectly. The three cohorts differed significantly in terms of CHADS(2) score and the number of individuals with a past history of stroke, transient ischemic attack or systemic embolism. The estimated odds ratio of stroke or systemic embolism was 1.35 for rivaroxaban vs dabigatran 150 mg (p=0.04), 0.97 for rivaroxaban versus dabigatran 110 mg (p=0.81), 1.22 for apixaban versus dabigatran 150 mg (p=0.18), 0.88 for apixaban versus dabigatran 110 mg (p=0.34) and 0.90 for apixaban versus rivaroxaban (p=0.43). The estimated odds ratio of major bleeding was 1.10 for rivaroxaban versus dabigatran 150 mg (p=0.36), 1.28 for rivaroxaban versus dabigatran 110 mg (p=0.02), 0.74 for apixaban versus dabigatran 150 mg (p=0.004), 0.87 for apixaban versus dabigatran 110 mg (p=0.17) and 0.68 for apixaban versus rivaroxaban (p<0.001). In conclusion, the available data indicate no significant difference in efficacy between dabigatran 150 mg and apixaban for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. It appears however that apixaban is associated with less major bleeding than dabigatran 150 mg or rivaroxaban and that rivaroxaban is less effective than dabigatran 150 mg in preventing stroke or systemic embolism. Such an indirect comparison should be used only to generate hypotheses which need to be tested in a dedicated randomised trial comparing the three drugs directly.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heart Valve Diseases; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Morpholines; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thrombophilia; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Vit-K antagonists are the therapy of choice to prevent thromboembolic events due to atrial fibrillation since many years. New oral anticoagulants (NOA) showed encouraging results vs. warfarin but there are no data directly comparing different NOA. We performed an adjusted indirect meta-analysis.. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were searched. Efficacy end points were the cumulative rate of thomboembolic stroke (TES) and systemic embolism (SE). Main safety end point was the rate of hemorrhagic stroke (HS).. Three RCTs (50578 patients) were included. Overall, NOA were comparable to warfarin according to the cumulative risk of TES and SE, as well as for TES alone. NOA were associated with a reduced rate of SE [OR 0.64 (0.44, 0.94], P=0.02]. Compared to warfarin, NOA were associated with a significantly reduced risk of HS [OR 0.43 (0.34, 0.55), P<0.001, NNT to avoid a HS 153] and all cause death [OR 0.90 [0.84, 0.96], P=0.03, NNT to save one fatality 43]. Head to head comparison showed that in terms of cumulative rate of TES/SE, as well as of TES, none of the NOA was significantly superior to the others (all Ps>0.05). Rivaroxaban showed superiority in the prevention of SE. Dabigatran 150 mg/twice daily was associated with the largest reduction in the risk of HS vs. warfarin and vs. other NOA. Overall mortality was quite comparable across NOA.. Overall superiority of NOA over warfarin is largely influenced by the reduction of HS. Dabigatran 150 mg/twice daily seems to have the best risk/benefit profile.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Biological Availability; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Dabigatran; Drug Monitoring; Embolism; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; Pharmacovigilance; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Emergency department (ED) clinicians are not typically involved in the long-term management of patients' anticoagulation therapy, but they are responsible for decision making for emergency conditions requiring anticoagulation, such as acute venous thromboembolism (VTE). In addition, emergency physicians are often faced with patients who present first to the ED with conditions that may prompt long-term anticoagulation upon hospital discharge, such as atrial fibrillation (AF), or who have acute or potential bleeding complications from anticoagulation.. In this review, clinical trials of new oral anticoagulants evaluated for treatment of VTE and stroke prophylaxis in AF, as well as practical management aspects, will be discussed. In addition, clinical trials evaluating the adjunctive use of the new oral anticoagulants with antiplatelet therapy in patients who have experienced acute coronary syndrome will be explored.. Both dabigatran etexilate and rivaroxaban have successfully completed phase III trials for acute VTE treatment and are currently approved for the reduction of risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular AF. In a recently completed phase III trial, apixaban also demonstrated promising efficacy and safety in that indication. Rivaroxaban represents the only new anticoagulant to date to have shown promising phase III results as an adjunct to antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome.. Knowledge of the appropriate clinical use and safety concerns of the new anticoagulants is imperative as they become more frequently prescribed, and their potential uses in the ED setting represent an important aspect of continuing education for emergency physicians.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Dabigatran; Emergency Service, Hospital; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism

A network meta-analysis of the three new oral anticoagulants was performed from the three trials comparing dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation.. Data were extracted of the RE-LY study of dabigatran 110 mg bid and dabigatran 150 mg bid, the ROCKET AF trial of rivaroxaban and the ARISTOTLE trial of apixaban for the composite outcome of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism, for major bleeding, intracerebral bleeding, mortality and myocardial infarction.. Dabigatran (150 mg bid) showed superior efficacy in preventing ischemic stroke plus systemic embolism to dabigatran (110 mg bid, P=0.0364) and rivaroxaban (P=0.0388). Apixaban had equivalent efficacy with rivaroxaban and dabigatran (either dose). Apixaban was safer (less major bleeding) than dabigatran (150 mg bid, P=0.036) or rivaroxaban (P=0.0002). Intracerebral hemorrhage occurred with equal frequency for all agents except for rivaroxaban (higher risk than dabigatran 110 mg bid, P=0.0070). Myocardial infarction occurred less frequently with rivaroxaban and apixaban compared to either dose of dabigatran (all P<0.05).. All-cause mortality was not different for any agent or regimen. In the absence of head-to-head comparisons, this network meta-analysis suggests that apixaban and dabigatran 110 mg bid may offer the best benefit-risk balance for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Dabigatran 150 mg bid may be preferred for patients with a high risk for embolism.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Chi-Square Distribution; Dabigatran; Embolism; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Myocardial Infarction; Odds Ratio; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome

In this overview we address the three phase III studies that compared new oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban) with warfarin in the setting of stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Strengths and weaknesses of the studies were examined in detail through indirect comparison. We analyze and comment the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the characteristics of randomized patients, the primary efficacy and safety end points and side effects. All new oral anticoagulants resulted in being non-inferior to vitamin K antagonists in reducing stroke or systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. Dabigatran 150 mg and apixaban were superior to vitamin K antagonists. Importantly, new oral anticoagulants significantly reduced hemorrhagic stroke in all three studies. Major differences among new oral anticoagulants include the way they are eliminated and side effects. Both dabigatran and apixaban were tested in low- to moderate-risk patients (mean CHADS2 [Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age, Diabetes, Stroke] score = 2.1-2.2) whereas rivaroxaban was tested in high-risk patients (mean CHADS2 score = 3.48) and at variance with dabigatran and apixaban was administered once daily. Apixaban significantly reduced mortality from any cause. The choice of a new oral anticoagulant should take into account these and other differences between the new drugs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Evidence-Based Medicine; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Patient Safety; Preventive Health Services; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

New oral anticoagulants for the prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation have been available for a few months, among them the reversible direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and the factor Xa antagonist rivaroxaban. These drugs are considered by some as a superior alternative to vitamin K antagonists. The lack of necessity for regular monitoring is advertised as a major advantage. Although atrial fibrillation is a disease with increasing prevalence with higher age, the suitability of the new drugs has not been extensively studied in multimorbid geriatric patients. Since dabigatran is contraindicated in patients with renal insufficiency, only the lower of the two approved dosages can usually be prescribed in elderly patients. For the lower dosage, however, no superiority in prevention of stroke has been documented but merely a reduction in major bleeding rates, although at a high number needed to treat. The requirement for a twice-daily dosage regimen, the lack of an anticoagulation monitoring option, the relatively short duration of action and the lack of an antidote may even prove to be crucial disadvantages in clinical practice in comparison to vitamin K antagonists. Until more data are available, the new oral anticoagulants should be prescribed with caution in geriatric patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Evidence-Based Medicine; Female; Humans; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes

Atrial fibrillation (AF) increases the risk of stroke. New anticoagulation agents have recently provided alternative and promising approaches. This paper reviews the current state of anticoagulation therapy in AF patients, focusing on various clinical scenarios and on comparisons, where possible, between western and eastern populations.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Cardiology; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) warfarin has been the mainstay therapy for stroke prevention. In recent randomized clinical trials (RCTs) oral direct thrombin inhibitor (Dabigatran) and factor Xa inhibitors (Rivaroxaban and Apixaban) challenged the efficacy and safety benchmarks set by warfarin. These drugs boast a rapid onset of action, shorter half-life and fewer drug and dietary interactions. Moreover, these new anticoagulants do not require monitoring, titration or dose adjustments. These agents have already been approved for prevention of stroke or systemic embolism in patients with AF. Uncertainty regarding suitability, efficacy and safety in certain patient subsets and issues related to the ability effectively monitor the pharmacodynamic effects and reverse the therapeutic effects of these drugs should be addressed as we engage in a widespread use of these agents in various patient subsets.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The occurrence of disabling stroke, the major fatal consequence of atrial fibrillation, can be reduced by almost two-thirds with warfarin oral anticoagulation. Recent estimates on the prevalence of atrial fibrillation in the USA suggest that approximately 3 million people suffer from this common cardiac arrhythmia, therefore, the socioeconomic impact of adequate oral anticoagulation is enormous. Rivaroxaban, a direct orally available factor Xa inhibitor, is the first of a new class of drugs that target a central factor of the coagulation cascade upstream of thrombin. In the ROCKET AF clinical trial, rivaroxaban demonstrated noninferiority compared with warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation, while intracranial and fatal bleeding occurred less frequently with rivaroxaban treatment. Rivaroxban has recently been approved for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation by the US FDA and EMA. Very recently, rivaroxaban in addition to dual antiplatelet therapy, was shown to reduce mortality in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome in the ATLAS ACS 2-TIMI 51 clinical trial. The clinical evaluation of rivaroxaban in cardiovascular disease and the results of the ROCKET AF study, the landmark clinical trial of rivaroxaban for stroke prevention, are discussed along with the unique pharmacological profile of rivaroxaban.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Approval; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Decision Support Techniques; Health Status Indicators; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the commonest cardiac rhythm disorder worldwide, affecting 1% of the general population. It is estimated that up to 16 million people in the US will suffer from the arrhythmia by 2050. AF is an independent stroke risk factor and associated with more severe strokes. For six decades, warfarin has been the only truly effective therapy to protect against stroke for patients with atrial fibrillation. Despite the proven worth of warfarin, its limitations have seen reluctance amongst physicians and patients to utilise this efficacious agent. This has meant that substantial numbers of patients are either unprotected against stroke or suboptimally protected with antiplatelet therapy. Contemporary well-validated stroke risk factor schemes (CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc) now permit rapid but comprehensive evaluation of a patient's risk for thromboembolism, allowing better identification of low-risk patients who do not require antithrombotic therapy, and whilst for those with ≥1 stroke risk factors require formal oral anticoagulation. Aspirin has been proven to be inferior to anticoagulation, and is not free of bleeding risk. We also have simple scores to easily evaluate a patient's risk of haemorrhage (e.g. HAS-BLED). The emergence of new oral anticoagulants should further improve stroke prevention in AF, and they successfully negotiate many of the hurdles to oral anticoagulation generated by warfarin's limitations. Monitoring, reversal, and perioperative management are areas which require further investigation to enhance our ability to safely and effectively utilise the new agents.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Amiodarone; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Dronedarone; Drug Design; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

For many decades Vitamin K antagonists were the standard orally given medication for primary and secondary prevention of thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation and stroke. Three compounds, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban, are now challenging this well established prescription, as they showed similar effect in preventing thromboembolism with a lower bleeding rate in recently published well designed, controlled randomised, non-inferiority trials. Their advantages of each are to have a fixed dosage, no need to monitor coagulation factors, and fewer interactions with food and other drug intake. The therapeutic effect is estimated overall similar between the three compounds. Who is a candidate for one of the new drugs: Patients with atrial fibrillation and the clear indication to get a future oral anticoagulation are potential candidates to receive one of the new drugs. Further this may be patients where the treatment with Vit K antagonists was difficult to optimise, patients who are not willing to have blood controls done regularly or where blood controls are difficult to obtain. This will also be an option in patients who had a stroke due to atrial fibrillation and had no history of cerebral bleeding. Who should not receive the new anticoagulants: patients who present stable blood coagulation values in the treatment range and no complications should not be merged to the new drugs. Patients with severe renal insufficiency or receiving a medication that interacts with the new drugs (e. g. ketoconazole) or with synthetic heart valves will not be candidates to receive the new drugs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Elective Surgical Procedures; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Medical Records; Morpholines; Perioperative Period; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, is a potent risk factor for stroke and transient ischemic attack. Most patients with AF receive antithrombotic stroke prophylaxis, often in the form of a vitamin K antagonist, typically warfarin. Drug treatment with warfarin is associated with significant management issues, such as an unpredictable dose response necessitating dose adjustments, frequent laboratory monitoring, and multiple interactions with other medications, as well as foods. A new generation of novel anticoagulants has emerged that includes dabigatran etexilate, a direct thrombin inhibitor, and rivaroxaban and apixaban, both highly selective factor Xa inhibitors. These newer agents possess a highly predictable pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship, allowing for fixed dosing and no necessity for routine laboratory monitoring; additionally these agents have minimal drug interactions. Dabigatran etexilate and apixaban are both twice-daily medications, whereas rivaroxaban is administered once daily for stroke prophylaxis. The impact of dosing frequency on medication adherence with these agents has not been prospectively evaluated; however, the frequency of dosing intervals has been shown to affect medication adherence, which in turn may influence patient outcomes.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Medication Adherence; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Recent randomized controlled trials have shown that new oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban en apixaban) in patients with atrial fibrillation are equally or more effective in preventing cerebral infarction than vitamin K antagonists (VKA). New oral anticoagulants cause significant less intracranial haemorrhages. These results also apply to patients at high risk for complications such as those with a history of cerebral infarction, and those aged 75 years and over. It is not known whether patients in the acute phase after cerebral infarction and those with blood pressure exceeding 180/110 mmHg benefit as well. Monitoring anticoagulation is no longer needed in patients using these new oral anticoagulants, which makes daily use easier but provides less insight into medication compliance. There is no need to switch medication in patients who respond well to VKA. However, new oral anticoagulants should be considered in patients who have problems with VKA and who have a de novo indication for anticoagulation. Practical issues such as interaction with other drugs, medication compliance, antagonizing, monitoring of the anticoagulation and asymptomatic deteriorating renal function should be studied further.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Dabigatran; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes

A number of novel oral anticoagulants that directly target factor Xa or thrombin have been developed in recent years. Rivaroxaban and apixaban (direct factor Xa inhibitors) and dabigatran etexilate (a direct thrombin inhibitor) have shown considerable promise in large-scale, randomised clinical studies for the management of thromboembolic disorders, and have been approved for clinical use in specific indications. Rivaroxaban is licensed for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing elective hip or knee replacement surgery, the treatment of deep-vein thrombosis and prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism, and for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Based on the clinical trial data for rivaroxaban, feedback on its use in clinical practice and the authors' experience with the use of rivaroxaban, practical guidance for the use of rivaroxaban in special patient populations and specific clinical situations is provided. Although most recommendations are in line with the European summary of product characteristics for the approved indications, additional and, in several areas, different recommendations are given based on review of the literature and the authors' clinical experience.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Blood Loss, Surgical; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pregnancy; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

Orally active direct inhibitors of thrombin and factor Xa have now been approved for treatment or prevention of deep vein thrombosis,and stroke associated with atrial fibrillation. The factor Xa inhibitor, rivaroxaban, has shown promising results in the treatment of acute coronary syndrome but is not yet approved for that indication. These agents share a rapid onset and are cleared with half lives of approximately 10 hours. At present there is no approved antidote for either class of anticoagulant, making the treatment of life-threatening bleeding episodes problematic. These agents have fewer drug interactions than warfarin, have a predictable clearance, and hence do not require monitoring. Patients with renal insufficiency have delayed clearance and hence may have elevated levels of the drug leading to increased risk of bleeding.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Blood Coagulation; Dabigatran; Drug Interactions; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Half-Life; Hemorrhage; Humans; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Venous Thrombosis

The incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation are quickly increasing, mainly due to the ageing of the population. Atrial fibrillation is, to date, a problem of public health. Atrial fibrillation is associated to a five-fold risk of stroke, which may be identified by score risks, such as CHADS(2) score. The classical antithrombotic treatment of atrial fibrillation is based on vitamin K antagonists. Trials made in the 90's have clearly shown that vitamin K antagonists were able to decrease stroke risk by about 60%. New oral anticoagulants are now available on the market to treat patients with atrial fibrillation. These drugs are dabigatran which has demonstrated an interest in the RE-LY trial. Two doses may be prescribed, 110 mg bid and 150 mg bid. Anti Xa have also demonstrated an interest : rivaroxaban in the ROCKET AF trial and apixaban in the AVERROES (versus aspirin) and ARISTOTLE trials. In the future these drugs will have a major place in the armamentarium used to treat patients with atrial fibrillation. In all these trials a decrease in intra cranial haemorrhages has been demonstrated. In the everyday practice it will be necessary to be very cautious in patients with impaired renal function, as all these drugs are eliminated by kidneys.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K

Oral anticoagulation is the mainstay of therapy for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Vitamin K antagonists such as warfarin have many drawbacks that reduce their uptake, safety and effectiveness. The ROCKET AF trial compared rivaroxaban (20 mg/day; 15 mg/day in patients with creatinine clearance 30-49 ml/min) with dose-adjusted warfarin (international normalized ratio 2-3) in 14,264 patients with AF and a prior history of stroke or at least two other additional risk factors for stroke. The ROCKET AF trial demonstrated the noninferiority of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism, with a similar rate of major bleeding and a substantial reduction in intracranial hemorrhage. These results, in conjunction with its convenient once-daily dosing regimen, make rivaroxaban an attractive alternative to warfarin for stroke prevention in AF.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

New oral anticoagulants used as single target inhibitors of coagulation enzymes have been developed and tested in extensive trial programmes. Results of most of these trials showed non-inferior and/or superior efficacy and safety compared to standard treatment with LMWH or VKA. These results led to registration of these agents for the prophylaxis or treatment of thrombosis, as well as stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation. In addition to good efficacy and safety these agents are more convenient in their use and promise advantages in quality of life. Caution is needed, though, since drug-interactions, interferences with coagulation tests and risk of accumulation in case of renal failure should always be taken into consideration when planning a treatment. In the present current-opinion review these advantages and disadvantages are discussed and expressed options are analysed.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Drug Interactions; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Morpholines; Prothrombin; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Electric Countershock; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dabigatran; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; Morpholines; Population Dynamics; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is well established risk factor for cardioembolic stroke. With thromboprophylatic treatment we can reduce the risk of stroke in patients with AF. Oral vitamin K antagonists (VKA) such as warfarin and acenocoumarol are effective for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. VKAs are associated with several limitations including very narrow therapeutic range, several factors (diet, drugs, alcohol consumption) affecting the effect of VKA and excessive bleeding may occur if INR value not controlled successfully. New oral anticoagulant direct Xa factor inhibitor rivaroxaban has a good therapeutic efficacy in prevention (primary and secondary) of stroke in AF patients. Its advantages are including no need for monitoring, fixed oral dose, not affected by meal, age and body weight, all of them can improve patient adherence. In ROCKET AF trial in patients with AF, rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism. There was no significant between-group difference in the risk of major bleeding, although intracranial and fatal bleeding occurred less frequently in the rivaroxaban group.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Morpholines; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome

There is a high prevalence of atrial fibrillation in the United States, particularly in the elderly population. Patients with atrial fibrillation are at an increased risk of stroke and anticoagulant therapy is recommended. However, many eligible patients are not receiving therapy due to limitations and concerns related to the use of the vitamin K antagonist warfarin, such as slow onset of action, variable drug metabolism, risk of bleeding, and requirement for monitoring. Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been developed and may be used as an alternative to warfarin. This review article summarizes the current clinical trial data for warfarin compared with the NOACs dabigatran (direct thrombin inhibitor), and rivaroxaban and apixaban (factor Xa inhibitors). Dabigatran (150 mg twice daily) demonstrated superiority in reducing the stroke or systemic embolism rate compared with warfarin (1.53% vs 1.69%; P < 0.001). The risk of major bleeding was similar for dabigatran and warfarin (3.32% per year vs 3.57% per year; P = 0.32). Rivaroxaban (20 mg once daily) demonstrated noninferiority in reducing the stroke or systemic embolism rate compared with warfarin (2.1% vs 2.4%; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between rivaroxaban and warfarin for the risk of major bleeding and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (14.9% per year vs 14.5% per year; P = 0.44). Apixaban (5 mg twice daily) demonstrated superiority compared with warfarin in preventing stroke or systemic embolism (1.27% vs 1.60%; P = 0.01). Apixaban significantly reduced major bleeding compared with warfarin (2.13% per year vs 3.09% per year; P < 0.001). Compared with warfarin, all-cause mortality was numerically lower for dabigatran (P = 0.051) and similar for rivaroxaban (P = 0.15). Apixaban demonstrated significantly lower mortality rates compared with warfarin (3.52% vs 3.94%; P = 0.047). All 3 NOACS--dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban--significantly reduced intracranial hemorrhage compared with warfarin. Novel oral anticoagulants may be a suitable alternative to warfarin for different patient populations due to minimal drug interactions, lower bleeding risk, and no monitoring requirement.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Humans; Morpholines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

The last decade has seen the evaluation of several new oral anticoagulants that directly target thrombin or activated factor X (FXa). All demonstrate a rapid onset of action, a low potential for food and drug interactions, and a predictable anticoagulant effect that obviates the need for routine coagulation monitoring. Those agents at the most advanced stages of clinical development are a direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran, and direct FXa inhibitors, rivaroxaban and apixaban. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban are approved in more than 70 countries for prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing elective hip or knee arthroplasty, and apixaban is being considered for approval by regulatory agencies for this indication. Dabigatran was shown in a large phase III trial to be more effective and safer than warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation and has recently been approved for this indication. Edoxaban, an oral FXa inhibitor, is also being evaluated in phase III clinical trials. This review summarizes the pharmacology, clinical trial results, and future role of the new oral anticoagulants in clinical practice.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Amidines; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzimidazoles; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thrombin; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K

A number of new oral anticoagulant drugs that selectively and directly inhibit factor Xa (FXa) appear as promising alternatives to the existing anticoagulant agents. These compounds present a convenient route of administration with predictable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics that allow fixed dosing regimens without requiring coagulation monitoring. Rivaroxaban is the first of this new class of drugs that was approved for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after elective total hip replacement or total knee replacement surgery in the EU, Canada and several other countries. Clinical trials with rivaroxaban in patients with acute VTE and in patients with atrial fibrillation have been recently completed. Numerous other compounds are under different developing stages (apixaban, edoxaban, otamixaban, LY517717, PRT-054021, YM150).. This review provides an overview of the two oral anti-FXa drugs at the most advanced stage of development (rivaroxaban and apixaban) and briefly describes and comments on the results of the most important studies.. Undoubtedly, these new drugs will offer several advantages over the previous compounds, but a number of issues still require some attention during the phase of translation from clinical trials into daily clinical practice.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drugs, Investigational; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thrombosis; Venous Thromboembolism

Anticoagulation for the long-term treatment and prevention of thrombo-embolic diseases as well as for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) has been accomplished by vitamin K antagonists for the last half century. Although effective under optimal conditions, the imminent risk of a recurrent event vs. the risk of bleeding due to the narrow therapeutic window, numerous food- and drug interactions, and the need for regular monitoring complicate the long-term use of these drugs and render treatment with these agents complicated. As a result, novel anticoagulants which selectively block key factors in the coagulation cascade are being developed. The efficacy and safety of the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate, as well as of the selective factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban and apixaban, have been demonstrated in Phase III trials for stroke prevention in AF and the treatment and secondary prophylaxis of venous thrombo-embolism. This review summarizes the results from recently published pivotal clinical trials and discusses the opportunities as well as uncertainties in the clinical applications of these novel agents.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Drug Approval; Factor X; Humans; Morpholines; Off-Label Use; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism

For years, prevention and treatment of thromboembolic events have been restricted to the use of heparins and vitamin K antagonists. These treatments, in spite of their unquestioned efficacy, present numerous limits (hemorrhagic risk, need for regular laboratory controls). These limits call for the development of new antithrombotic drugs. This review briefly reports on three new molecules, in very advanced phases of clinical research: dabigatran (Pradaxa®), rivaroxaban (Xarelto®) and apixaban. These molecules represent new oral anticoagulants, which directly inhibit a coagulation factor (thrombin for dabigatran, factor Xa for rivaroxaban and apixaban) and do not need regular anticoagulant monitoring or dose adjustment. The approval is still restricted in France to the prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in orthopaedics. Dabigratran will be soon available in the prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation. With the forthcoming phase III studies to prevent and treat venous thromboembolism, anticoagulant therapy management will be most probably improved in the coming years.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Drug Approval; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Forecasting; France; Humans; Morpholines; Orthopedic Procedures; Postoperative Complications; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thrombin; Thromboembolism; Thrombophilia; Venous Thromboembolism

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Comorbidity; Dabigatran; General Practice; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Medication Adherence; Morpholines; Partial Thromboplastin Time; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes

Anticoagulant therapy, known as warfarin, has been underused despite its marked benefit from embolic prevention. The intricate maintenance has made physicians constrained the use of warfarin for the many decades. Facing the 21(st) century, several new anticoagulants which inhibit single coagulant factor, such as activated factor X (Xa) or activated factor II (thrombin), has been developed. We now have selective thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran, already rolled out in clinical practice around the world. Among these drugs, four new Xa inhibitors are in final developing stage. This article reviewed the current status of new Xa inhibitors. Rivaroxaban leads the other Xa inhibitors in distribution. The phase III clinical study called ROCKET AF study had been completed and recently published. Statistical non-inferiority was clearly established compared to regular warfarin therapy. The Japanese rolled J-ROCKET AF study with 1,000 patients and the usage of reduced dose of rivaroxaban has made a similar outcome and safety end points compared to the initial ROCKET AF study. ARISTOTLE study, a phase III clinical study of apixaban has also been finished this year and will be presented soon. A phase III study of using edoxaban, a Japanese manufactured Xa inhibitor, named ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 will be completed by next year. Darexaban, another Japan-made Xa inhibitor is in its preparation of phase III trial following favorable results of its late phase II study (OPAL-2). Having every trial with its favorable outcome, multiple alternatives of Xa inhibitors will be out in practice in no distant future. In addition, we must be aware to have a deliberate evaluation for each result, even pharmacological profiles of each Xa inhibitors with a 12 hour half-life period shows similarity, the difference in twice-daily dosing with once a day, or the difference in severity of patients' atrial fibrillation risk factor each trial contains might affect the results of phase III trials.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Azepines; Benzamides; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes

Prevention of stroke and systemic emboli is paramount in the management of atrial fibrillation. Although warfarin is the predominant anticoagulant used in patients with atrial fibrillation, it has significant limitations that have impeded appropriate use of stroke prophylaxis in eligible patients with atrial fibrillation. Consequently, much research has been focused on finding an alternative to warfarin. We review the potential alternatives in development and evaluate the current evidence concerning their safety and efficacy.. Oral direct factor Xa inhibitors are potentially well tolerated and effective replacements for warfarin. These agents do not require cofactors and offer selective inhibition at a critical step of amplification in the coagulation cascade. Multiple direct anti-factor Xa agents are currently undergoing evaluation in phase I, II, and III trials. Early results suggest that these novel anticoagulants have favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles with minimal-to-no requirements for therapeutic monitoring. Two direct factor Xa inhibitors are emerging from phase II trials (betrixaban and YM150) and three are being evaluated in phase III trials (apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban) for the prevention of stroke and systemic emboli in patients with atrial fibrillation. The phase III trials of apixaban and rivaroxaban have completed enrollment and are in the follow-up phase.. Given the growing population of patients with atrial fibrillation, there is a great interest in finding new therapies for oral anticoagulation. The direct factor Xa inhibitors may offer several promising alternatives to warfarin therapy.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzamides; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Many years of practical use and intensive scientific research have allowed vitamin K antagonists to become a cornerstone of treatment of internal diseases. Nevertheless, limitations in pharmacokinetics and -dynamics of vitamin K antagonists and the availability of new drugs in regard to a targeted anticoagulation therapy ask for a new review of the situation. Proof of effectiveness for the perioperative prophylaxis of venous thrombosis after hip and knee replacement has already been achieved for the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate as well as for the factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban und apixaban compared to low molecular weight heparins. These new drugs are now also investigated in patients with internal diseases. For the long-term application (6 or 12 months) concerning the treatment of venous thrombosis and/or stroke prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation data is already available for the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate. Depending on its dosage its effectiveness in comparison with vitamin K antagonists is equal or even better without disadvantages in safety. However, vitamin K antagonists will remain the standard oral anticoagulation until open questions regarding e.g. insufficient therapy adherence (with termination rates up to 20%) or problems with drug interactions of the new competitive products have been completely answered.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombin Proteins; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Dabigatran; Humans; Morpholines; Postoperative Complications; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Venous Thrombosis; Vitamin K

The most frequent cardiac arrhythmia and main cause for cardio-embolic stroke is atrial fibrillation. Prophylaxis for thrombembolic events is performed regarding individual risk of patients with either ASS or vitamin-K-antagonists. Efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulation is limited by a narrow therapeutical range as well as by inter- and intraindividual variability of INR-values due to genetic disposition, differences in alimentation, dosage errors, rare control of INR-levels and drug-interactions. New oral anticoagulants with different mechanisms of action may be a promising therapeutic option in future. This review addresses the new anticoagulants Apixaban, Rivaroxban and Dabigatranetexilat with the design and as available the results of the corresponding phase-III-trials in atrial fibrillation (ARISTOTLE, ROCKET-AF, RE-LY).

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzimidazoles; Benzylamines; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism

Anticoagulants are recommended for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE), prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and secondary prevention in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). There is a clinical need for novel anticoagulants offering improvements over current standard of care, such as fixed oral dosing and no need for routine monitoring. Rivaroxaban, an oral, once-daily, direct Factor Xa inhibitor, has recently completed the RECORD phase III programme for the prevention of VTE in patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement (THR or TKR), an indication for which it is approved in Europe and Canada. It is being investigated in large-scale phase III studies for VTE treatment and prevention of stroke in patients with AF, and phase III studies will soon commence for secondary prevention in patients with ACS. Phase I studies demonstrated that no routine anticoagulation monitoring was required, while phase II studies suggested that fixed daily doses had a wide therapeutic window. The four RECORD studies consistently showed that rivaroxaban was significantly more effective than enoxaparin in the prevention of VTE after THR and TKR, with a similar safety profile. This review describes the development of this novel anticoagulant, from bench to bedside.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombin III; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism

Advances in antithrombotic therapy began when traditional anticoagulant agents such as heparin and the vitamin K antagonists like Coumadin became commercially available in the 1940s and 1950s. Inherent limitations of these compounds, including the need for monitoring and multiple food and drug interactions (with coumadin), spurred the development of newer parenteral compounds like low molecular weight heparin, the pentasaccharide fondaparinux, and direct thrombin inhibitors such as hirudin, argatroban and bivalirudin with advantages over traditional compounds. Despite the failure of the first oral anticoagulant in 50 years--the direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran--due to issues with liver toxicity, new oral agents such as the Factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban, YM-150, and DU-176b and oral direct thrombin inhibitors such as dabigatran are in advanced stages of development, with dabigatran and rivaroxaban now approved for use outside of the United States for thromboprophylaxis in the setting of orthopedic surgery. These and other novel agents have the potential to greatly expand our armamentarium to treat thromboembolic disease, with more targeted approaches to specific procoagulant complexes, a predictable anticoagulant response that does not require monitoring, and use in both acute and long-term treatment settings.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Dabigatran; Drug Discovery; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Morpholines; Oligosaccharides; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism

Rivaroxaban is a small molecule, direct Factor Xa inhibitor and may be a potentially attractive alternative to vitamin K antagonists. Rivaroxaban is being investigated for the prevention and treatment of venous and arterial thrombosis. A broad search of Medline, clinicaltrials.gov and the annual proceedings of the American Society of Hematology and the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis was conducted. This review addresses the findings of this systematic search, including the need for new oral anticoagulants, the development and pharmacology of rivaroxaban, and the results of completed as well as ongoing trials with rivaroxaban. At present, the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban for the prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism has been evaluated in Phase II and Phase III trials involving over 24,000 patients. Additionally, rivaroxaban is being evaluated for the treatment of pulmonary embolism, secondary prevention after acute coronary syndromes and the prevention of stroke and non-central nervous system embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. The drug may have its greatest impact in providing a much-needed and attractive alternative to warfarin. Further data (especially large Phase III trials) are required.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Animals; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Binding Sites; Clinical Trials as Topic; Comorbidity; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Postoperative Complications; Rats; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thrombosis; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor XIa; Humans; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Background Nonvitamin K oral anticoagulants require dose adjustment based on kidney function.The most common estimate of kidney function employed in clinical practice is estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR); however, product monographs recommend the use of the Cockcroft-Gault estimated creatinine clearance (eCrCl) for dose adjustment. Methods and Results The authors included patients enrolled in the ORBIT-AF II (Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation AF II) trial. Dosing was considered inappropriate when use of eGFR resulted in a lower (undertreatment) or higher (overtreatment) dose than that recommended by the eCrCl. The primary outcome of major adverse cardiovascular and neurological events was a composite of cardiovascular death, stroke or systemic embolism, new-onset heart failure, and myocardial infarction. Among 8727 in the overall cohort, agreement between eCrCl and eGFR was observed in 93.5% to 93.8% of patients. Among 2184 patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), the agreement between eCrCl and eGFR was 79.9% to 80.7%. Dosing misclassification was more frequent in the CKD population (41.9% of rivaroxaban users, 5.7% of dabigatran users, and 4.6% apixaban users). At 1 year, undertreated patients in the CKD group had significantly greater major adverse cardiovascular and neurological events (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.93 [95% CI, 1.08-7.92]) compared with the group with appropriate nonvitamin K oral anticoagulants dosing (

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Systolic blood pressure interarm difference (IAD) predicts cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in primary prevention populations. We examined the predictive value of IAD and the effects of treatment with the combination of rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily plus aspirin 100 mg once daily versus aspirin 100 mg once daily according to IAD in patients with chronic coronary artery disease or peripheral artery disease.. COMPASS trial patients with IAD <15 mmHg and IAD >15 mmHg were compared with respect to thirty-month incidence risk of: 1) composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, or cardiovascular death (MACE), 2) composite of acute limb-ischemia or vascular amputation (MALE), 3) composite of MACE or MALE, and 4) effects of treatment with the combination versus aspirin alone on these outcomes.. 24,539 patients had IAD<15 mmHg and 2,776 had IAD ≥15 mmHg. Relative to patients with IAD ≥15 mm Hg, those with IAD<15 mmHg had similar incidence rates for all measured outcomes including the composite of MACE or MALE (HR 1.12 [95% CI: 0.95 to 1.31], p = 0.19), with the exception of stroke (HR 1.38 [95% CI: 1.02 to 1.88], p = 0.04). Compared to aspirin alone, the combination consistently reduced the composite of MACE or MALE in both IAD <15 mmHg (HR 0.74 [95% CI: 0.65-0.85], p < 0.0001, ARR = -23.1) and IAD>15 mmHg (HR 0.65 [95% CI: 0.44-0.96], p = 0.03; ARR = -32.6, p interaction = 0.53) groups.. Unlike primary prevention populations, measuring IAD for risk stratification purposes does not appear to be useful in patients with established vascular disease.

Topics: Aspirin; Blood Pressure; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

COMMANDER-HF was a randomised trial comparing rivaroxaban 2.5 mg two times a day to placebo, in addition to antiplatelet therapy, in patients hospitalised for worsening heart failure with coronary artery disease and sinus rhythm. Patients with diabetes are at increased risk of cardiovascular events and therefore have more to gain.. In this post-hoc analysis, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with (n=2052) and without diabetes (n=2970). The primary outcome was the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI) or ischaemic stroke. HRs and 95% CIs with interaction analyses were used to describe event-rates and treatment effects. Patients with diabetes had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities (eg, hypertension, obesity) and increased incidence of cardiovascular events. Adjusted HRs for events in people with versus without diabetes were 1.34 (95% CI 1.19 to 1.50) for the primary outcome, 1.21 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.75) for stroke, 1.51 (95% CI 1.14 to 1.99) for MI, 1.17 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.31) for heart failure hospitalisation and 1.06 (95% CI 0.56 to 2.01) for major bleeding. Rivaroxaban had no significant effect on event-rates in patients with and without diabetes (all interaction p values >0.05). Low-dose rivaroxaban was associated with an overall reduction in ischaemic stroke (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.95), with no apparent subgroup interaction according to diabetes status (p-int=0.93).. In COMMANDER-HF a diagnosis of diabetes conferred higher rates of cardiovascular events that, with exception of ischaemic stroke, was not substantially reduced by rivaroxaban. Rivaroxaban was associated with reduced risk of ischaemic stroke for patients with and without diabetes.. NCT01877915; Post-results.

Topics: Brain Ischemia; Cohort Studies; Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Mellitus; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Myocardial Infarction; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

The spectrum of brain infarction in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) has not been well characterized. Our objective was to define the frequency and pattern of brain infarcts detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) among patients with recent ESUS participating in a clinical trial.. In the NAVIGATE ESUS trial (New Approach Rivaroxaban Inhibition of Factor Xa in a Global Trial Versus ASA to Prevent Embolism in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source), an MRI substudy was carried out at 87 sites in 15 countries. Participants underwent an MRI using a specified protocol near randomization. Images were interpreted centrally by those unaware of clinical characteristics.. Most patients with ESUS, including those without prior clinical stroke or transient ischemic attack, had multiple large and/or cortical brain infarcts detected by MRI, reflecting a substantial burden of clinical stroke and covert brain infarction. Infarcts most frequently involved multiple vascular territories. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02313909.

Topics: Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Aspirin; Brain Infarction; Cohort Studies; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Internationality; Intracranial Embolism; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Middle Aged; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Covert brain infarcts are associated with important neurological morbidity. Their incidence in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) is unknown.. To assess the incidence of covert brain infarcts and cerebral microbleeds using MRI in a prospective substudy of the NAVIGATE ESUS randomized trial and to evaluate the effects of antithrombotic therapies.. At 87 sites in 15 countries, substudy participants were randomly assigned to receive rivaroxaban 15 mg daily or aspirin 100 mg daily and underwent brain MRI near randomization and after study termination. The primary outcome was incident brain infarct (clinical ischemic stroke or covert brain infarct). Brain infarcts and microbleeds were ascertained centrally by readers unaware of treatment. Treatment effects were estimated using logistic regression.. Among the 718 substudy participants with interpretable, paired MRIs, the mean age was 67 years and 61% were men with a median of 52 days between the qualifying ischemic stroke and randomization and a median of seven days between randomization and baseline MRI. During the median (IQR) 11 (12) month interval between scans, clinical ischemic strokes occurred in 27 (4%) participants, while 60 (9%) of the remaining participants had an incident covert brain infarct detected by MRI. Assignment to rivaroxaban was not associated with reduction in the incidence of brain infarct (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.49, 1.2) or of covert brain infarct among those without clinical stroke (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.50, 1.4). New microbleeds were observed in 7% and did not differ among those assigned rivaroxaban vs. aspirin (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.52-1.7).

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Brain Infarction; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Double-Blind Method; Embolic Stroke; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Intracranial Embolism; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Function is an important outcome after stroke; traditional assessments may not capture functional deficits important to patients. We examined the validity of the Standard Assessment of Global Everyday Activities (SAGEA), a patient-reported outcome that assesses activities important to patients and for use in international clinical trials.. The NAVIGATE-ESUS trial evaluated rivaroxaban compared to aspirin in preventing recurrent stroke in 7213 participants. The Modified Rankin Scale (mRS), the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), and the SAGEA were collected at entry. Chi square tests were used to compare proportions and Spearman rank correlations were used to compare between measures. SAGEA was compared to the Modified Frailty Index (MFI) and the occurrence of infarct to examine criterion validity RESULTS: Participants were 67 years, 2/3 were male, and at baseline 30% had no disability and 58% had slight disability according to mRS scores. SAGEA was weakly correlated with the mRS (r=0.37), the NIHSS (r=0.29) and the MFI (r=0.30). Of the 2154 with an mRS score of 0, 61% reported difficulty on the SAGEA. The largest discrepancies between SAGEA and other measures were because of cognitive functional deficits detected by the SAGEA that were not identified on other assessments. A larger number of MRI identified infarcts (acute and covert) were associated with a higher SAGEA score (p=0.007).. The SAGEA is a simple, globally applicable measure of cognitive and functional abilities that identifies issues that other commonly used assessments of disability and function do not capture.

Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Aged; Aspirin; Female; Humans; Male; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

The success of antithrombotic therapies is assessed based on thrombotic and bleeding events. Simultaneously assessing both kinds of events might be challenging, and recurrent bleeding events are often ignored. We tried to confirm the effects of kidney function on outcome events in patients undergoing antithrombotic therapy.. As a post hoc subgroup analysis of the Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Events with Rivaroxaban in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease (AFIRE) trial, a randomized clinical trial with a median follow-up of 36 months, patients were divided into high and low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) groups with a cutoff value of 50 mL/min. The cumulative incidence of bleeding and crude incidence of recurrent bleeding per 100 patient-years were calculated. We used the Cox regression model with multiple failure time data for recurrent bleeding events.. Among 2092 patients, 1386 (66.3%) showed high eGFR. The cumulative bleeding events per 100 patients at 1 year were 5.4 and 6.2 in the high and low eGFR groups, respectively. The difference continued to increase over time. The hazard ratio for time to the first bleeding event in the high eGFR group was 0.875 (95% confidence interval 0.701-1.090, p = .234) and that for the first composite event was 0.723 (95% confidence interval 0.603-0.867, p < .000). The recurrent bleeding events per 100 person-years were 11.3 and 15.3 in the high and low eGFR groups, respectively, with a rate ratio of 0.738 (95% confidence interval 0.615-0.886, p = .001). During the observation period, the risk of bleeding changed with time. It peaked soon after the study enrollment in both groups. It decreased continuously in the high eGFR group but remained high in the low eGFR group.. We reaffirmed that kidney function affects bleeding events in patients on antithrombotic therapy, considering recurrent events. Patients should have detailed discussions with physicians regarding the possible bleeding events when continuing antithrombotic therapy, especially in patients with decreased kidney function.. UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000016612 . ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02642419 . Registered on 21 October 2015.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

The effect of interventions on functional impairment is an important outcome in stroke prevention trials and should be considered as an adjunct to counting discrete events. In the NAVIGATE-ESUS trial, 7213 patients with recent embolic strokes of undetermined source were randomized to rivaroxaban (15 mg once daily) or aspirin (100 mg daily). After 11 months there was no effect on the prevention of recurrent stroke.. To determine the effect of rivaroxaban compared to aspirin on functional and cognitive outcomes.. Function and cognition were measured at baseline, 1 year, and study end using the Standard Assessment of Global Everyday Activities (SAGEA), a 15-item scale assessing cognitive, instrumental, and basic activities of daily living as well as mobility, and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Changes in scores were calculated by subtracting either study end or 1-year scores from baseline, and differences in distributions were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. SAGEA and MoCA scores were also correlated with recurrent stroke.. Follow-up SAGEA scores were available in 6378 (88%) participants. There was no difference in change in function for those allocated to rivaroxaban compared to aspirin (Mann-Whitney U test, p = 0.8), with both distributions having a median (25p,75p) change of 0 (-2,1). Overall, more of those who experienced a recurrent stroke (n=247; mostly minor ischemic), reported functional difficulty at study end versus entry, compared with those who did not (51% versus 30%, chi-square test, p< 0.001), and this was consistent across global regions. There was no difference in the change in cognition by treatment group, nor were recurrent strokes associated with a change in cognition.. Rivaroxaban, compared to aspirin, was not associated with changes in functional or cognitive status in patients with recent ESUS. The SAGEA scale detected changes in functional status associated with recurrent strokes in an international stroke population.

Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Aspirin; Cognition; Double-Blind Method; Embolic Stroke; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Intracranial Embolism; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Patients with moderate-to-severe mitral stenosis (MS) have bee excluded from all major randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).. In this pilot RCT, 40 patients were randomized to rivaroxaban 20 mg daily or warfarin. No patients experienced symptomatic ischemic strokes and systemic embolic events (the primary composite study outcome) during a 12-month follow-up. No major bleeding was reported. During the follow-up, 18.2% of patients in both groups showed echocardiographic signs of increased thrombogenicity in the left atrial appendage. The rate of silent cerebral ischemia was 13.3% in the rivaroxaban group and 17.6% in the warfarin group at brain magnetic resonance imaging.. Our results suggest acceptable efficacy and safety for rivaroxaban in patients with AF and moderate-to-severe MS and are encouraging for larger RCTs in this so far neglected setting (NCT03926156).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Mitral Valve Stenosis; Pilot Projects; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) such as warfarin or phenprocoumon have been the mainstay of therapy for long-term oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) in patients with atrial fibrillation or with pulmonary embolism. Due to interferences with matrix Gla-protein, an important vitamin K-dependent local calcification inhibitor in cardiovascular structures, VKA antagonists stimulate cardiovascular calcification (CVC). In contrast, rivaroxaban, a nonvitamin K-dependent oral anticoagulant (NOAC), should be neutral in terms of CVC. We seek to investigate these potential differences in CVC development between VKA versus NOACs in a randomized controlled trial (RCT).. The influence of rivaroxaban compared to vitamin K antagonist treatment upon development of cardiovascular calcification in patients with atrial fibrillation and/or pulmonary embolism trial (NCT02066662) is a multicenter, prospective RCT with a two-arm, open-label study design. The primary endpoint is the progression of coronary and aortic valve calcification (quantified as calcification volume score) as assessed by cardiac computed tomography (CT) at 24 months in patients either treated by rivaroxaban or VKA. A total of 192 patients were randomized in a 1:1 fashion. The main inclusion criteria were the presence of atrial fibrillation and/or pulmonary embolism with the indication for OAT and pre-existent coronary calcification. The development of CVC will be assessed by follow-up CT at 12 and 24 months.. In total 192 patients (median age 70, 72% male) were enrolled over a period of 5 years and followed up for 2 years.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Male; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K

To describe outcomes of patients with chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) and/or peripheral artery disease (PAD) enrolled in the Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies (COMPASS) randomized trial who were treated with the combination of rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily and aspirin 100 mg once daily during long-term open-label extension (LTOLE).. Of the 27 395 patients enrolled in COMPASS, 12 964 (mean age at baseline 67.2 years) from 455 sites in 32 countries were enrolled in LTOLE and treated with the combination of rivaroxaban and aspirin for a median of 374 additional days (range 1-1191 days). During LTOLE, the incident events per 100 patient years were as follows: for the primary outcome [cardiovascular death, stroke, or myocardial infarction (MI)] 2.35 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.11-2.61], mortality 1.87 (1.65-2.10), stroke 0.62 (0.50-0.76), and MI 1.02 (0.86-1.19), with CIs that overlapped those seen during the randomized treatment phase with the combination of rivaroxaban and aspirin. The incidence rates for major and minor bleeding were 1.01 (0.86-1.19) and 2.49 (2.24-2.75), compared with 1.67 (1.48-1.87) and 5.11 (95% CI 4.77-5.47), respectively, during the randomized treatment phase with the combination.. In patients with chronic CAD and/or PAD, extended combination treatment for a median of 1 year and a maximum of 3 years was associated with incidence rates for efficacy and bleeding that were similar to or lower than those seen during the randomized treatment phase, without any new safety signals.

Topics: Aspirin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Infant; Myocardial Infarction; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Treatment persistence for anticoagulant therapy is important in preventing thromboembolism in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients. Understanding drug utilization pattern and treatment changes in oral anticoagulant (OAC) users may facilite better NVAF management. Thus, our study aimed to examine OAC treatment patterns preceding events leading to switch or discontinuation and medication adherence in Korean NVAF patients.. We conducted a drug utilization study on all Korean patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) newly prescribed OACs between July 2015 and November 2016 using the national claims data. We assessed treatment changes such as switching and discontinuation from index OAC and relevant events preceding the change and examined patient characteristics as predictors of changes that occurred among OAC users. Medication adherence was compared among OAC users by calculating the medication possession ratio (MPR).. A total of 48,389 NVAF patients were identified who initiated OACs within the study period. Most initiated nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) (22% apixaban, 24% dabigatran, 37% rivaroxaban), and 18% initiated warfarin. The frequency of switch to another OAC was 8.8% for apixaban, 16.1% for dabigatran, 6.6% for rivaroxaban, and 19.1% for warfarin. The frequency of discontinuation was lower for apixaban (22.9%), dabigatran (26.3%), and rivaroxaban (25.7%) than warfarin (31.6%). Compared to warfarin, NOAC users were less likely to switch treatment. Thromboembolic event was the most common clinical event preceding switch from warfarin to NOAC and from NOAC to warfarin. Discontinuation of OAC was often preceded by a bleeding event. Patients who initiated apixaban showed significantly higher mean MPR compared to those on dabigatran and warfarin.. In real-world practice in Korea, we have observed treatment change to be common in OAC users. Our results indicate better medication adherence with NOACs than with warfarin. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT03572972).. Anticoagulants are drugs that thin blood with the purpose of preventing thromboembolic disease (e.g., stroke), which is a disease occurring when a blood clot forms or blocks vessel. Maintaining treatment for anticoagulation is important to prevent stroke in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. To understand current drug usage pattern and treatment changes related to oral anticoagulants (OAC) we examined OAC treatment patterns and preceding events that led to drug switch or stop and medication maintenance by Korean AF patients.The study was conducted by utilizing the Korean national claims data from July 2015 to November 2016. All AF patients who newly started taking OAC were included in the analysis. In total, 48,389 patients were identified with most (83%) taking nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC), which are newer generation blood thinners, including apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban, and 18% taking warfarin, the conventional blood thinner. Compared to warfarin, NOAC users were less likely to switch to other treatment. NOAC users discontinued the treatment less frequently than warfarin users. Thromboembolic events commonly preceded switch between OACs. Patients who stopped taking OACs were often confronted with a bleeding event before stopping treatment. Apixaban takers showed higher treatment persistence compared to dabigatran or warfarin users. In this study, we determined that treatment change is common in OAC-using patients. The results suggest that NOAC users may better adhere to treatment than warfarin users.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Drug Utilization; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

 Rivaroxaban monotherapy was noninferior to combination therapy (rivaroxaban plus antiplatelet therapy) in efficacy but superior in safety in the Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Events with Rivaroxaban in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease (AFIRE) trial. Among 2,215 patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and stable coronary artery disease (CAD), 1,378 had baseline creatinine clearance (CrCl) ≥50 mL/min and received 10 (underdose) or 15 mg/d (standard-dose) rivaroxaban. We aimed to assess the effects of rivaroxaban underdose on clinical outcomes..  We assessed efficacy endpoint (a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, unstable angina requiring revascularization, and death from any cause) and major bleeding in the subgroup of patients with preserved renal function in the AFIRE trial..  Age ≥75 years, female sex, lower CrCl, heart failure, and percutaneous coronary intervention history were associated with the underdose prescription. The underdose group had a similar incidence of the efficacy endpoint (3.62 vs. 3.51% per patient-year;.  In patients with AF, stable CAD, and preserved renal function, rivaroxaban underdose was associated with similar rates of thrombotic events but a lower incidence of hemorrhagic events than the standard dose..  AFIRE UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/), number UMIN000016612, and ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02642419.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Coronary Artery Disease; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Testing of factor Xa inhibitors for the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with rheumatic heart disease-associated atrial fibrillation has been limited.. We enrolled patients with atrial fibrillation and echocardiographically documented rheumatic heart disease who had any of the following: a CHA. Of 4565 enrolled patients, 4531 were included in the final analysis. The mean age of the patients was 50.5 years, and 72.3% were women. Permanent discontinuation of trial medication was more common with rivaroxaban than with vitamin K antagonist therapy at all visits. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 560 patients in the rivaroxaban group and 446 in the vitamin K antagonist group had a primary-outcome event. Survival curves were nonproportional. The restricted mean survival time was 1599 days in the rivaroxaban group and 1675 days in the vitamin K antagonist group (difference, -76 days; 95% confidence interval [CI], -121 to -31; P<0.001). A higher incidence of death occurred in the rivaroxaban group than in the vitamin K antagonist group (restricted mean survival time, 1608 days vs. 1680 days; difference, -72 days; 95% CI, -117 to -28). No significant between-group difference in the rate of major bleeding was noted.. Among patients with rheumatic heart disease-associated atrial fibrillation, vitamin K antagonist therapy led to a lower rate of a composite of cardiovascular events or death than rivaroxaban therapy, without a higher rate of bleeding. (Funded by Bayer; INVICTUS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02832544.).

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Echocardiography; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Rheumatic Heart Disease; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Real-world evidence on factor Xa inhibitor (rivaroxaban) prescribing patterns, safety, and efficacy in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) is rare. Herein, we sought to examine the above outcomes in the largest academic center in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA).. This is a retrospective observational study designed to examine the prescribing pattern, safety and real-world effectiveness of the factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban in patients with NVAF and VTE. Data on rivaroxaban prescriptions were collected and analyzed. Bleeding outcomes were defined as per the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) definition.. A total of 2,316 patients taking rivaroxaban recruited through several departments of King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC). The mean age was 61 years (±17.8) with 55% above the age of 60 and 58% were females. Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (VTE) was the most prevalent reason for prescribing rivaroxaban, followed by NVAF. A total daily dosage of 15 mg was given to 23% of the patients. The incidence rate of recurrent thrombosis and recurrent stroke was 0.2%. Furthermore, rivaroxaban had a 0.04 percent incidence rate of myocardial infarction. Half of the patients with recurrent thrombosis and stroke were taking 15 mg per day. The incidence rate of major bleeding was 1.1%. More over half of the patients who experienced significant bleeding were taking rivaroxaban at a dosage of 20 mg per day. According to the HAS-BLED Score (>2 score), 48 percent of patients who experienced significant bleeding had a high risk of bleeding. Non-major bleeding occurred in 0.6% of cases. Similarly, 40% of patients with non-major bleeding were taking rivaroxaban at a dosage of 20 mg per day. According to the HAS-BLED Score, just 6.6% of these individuals had a high risk of bleeding. 93.4% of the patients, on the other hand, were at intermediate risk.. The prescription of rivaroxaban in this real-life cohort study differs from the prescribing label and the outcomes of a phase 3 randomised clinical trial. However, for individuals with VTE and NVAF, the 20 mg dose looked to be more efficacious than the pivotal trial outcomes. Furthermore, among patients with VTE and NVAF, rivaroxaban was linked to a decreased incidence of safety events such as recurrent thrombosis, recurrent stroke, MI, major bleeding, and non-major haemorrhage in a real-world environment.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombin III; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Saudi Arabia; Stroke; Thrombophlebitis; Venous Thromboembolism

Although apixaban and rivaroxaban are commonly used in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and valvular heart disease (VHD), there is limited evidence comparing the 2 drugs in these patients.. To emulate a target trial of effectiveness and safety of apixaban and rivaroxaban in patients with AF and VHD.. New-user, active comparator, cohort study design.. Commercial health insurance database from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2020.. New users of apixaban or rivaroxaban who had a diagnosis of AF and VHD before initiation of anticoagulant therapy.. The primary effectiveness outcome was a composite of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism. The primary safety outcome was a composite of gastrointestinal or intracranial bleeding. Cox proportional hazards regression with a robust variance estimator was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs.. When compared with rivaroxaban in a propensity score-matched cohort of 19 894 patients (9947 receiving each drug), apixaban was associated with a lower rate of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (HR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.40 to 0.80]) and bleeding (HR, 0.51 [CI, 0.41 to 0.62]). The absolute reduction in the probability of stroke or systemic embolism with apixaban compared with rivaroxaban was 0.0026 within 6 months and 0.011 within 1 year of treatment initiation. The absolute reduction in the probability of bleeding events with apixaban compared with rivaroxaban was 0.012 within 6 months and 0.019 within 1 year of treatment initiation.. Short follow-up time and inability to ascertain some types of VHD.. In this study of patients with AF and VHD, patients receiving apixaban had a lower risk for ischemic stroke or systemic embolism and for bleeding when compared with those receiving rivaroxaban.. National Institutes of Health.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Embolism; Heart Valve Diseases; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

In the Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies (COMPASS) trial, there was a significant reduction in the adjudicated primary outcome among patients with stable atherosclerotic vascular disease randomized to dual pathway inhibition (rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily plus aspirin 100 mg daily) vs aspirin monotherapy, but not with rivaroxaban 5 mg twice daily vs aspirin monotherapy. Whether the results are similar without adjudication is unknown.. To examine the impact of dual pathway inhibition (with rivaroxaban plus aspirin) or rivaroxaban monotherapy compared with aspirin monotherapy on investigator-reported CV events and to understand the extent of concordance between investigator-reported and centrally adjudicated clinical events.. This is a secondary analysis of the COMPASS trial, an international, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized clinical trial with a 3-by-2 partial factorial design that evaluated participants with stable atherosclerotic vascular disease receiving rivaroxaban plus aspirin, rivaroxaban monotherapy, or aspirin monotherapy. End points were collected by blinded site investigators and adjudicated by a blinded clinical end point committee. Data were analyzed from March 2013 through February 2017.. Participants received dual inhibition pathway (2.5 mg rivaroxaban twice daily plus 100 mg aspirin once daily), rivaroxaban monotherapy (5 mg twice daily), or aspirin monotherapy (100 mg once daily).. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of cardiovascular (CV) death, stroke, or myocardial infarction (MI). Adjudicated and investigator-reported end points were compared.. A total of 27 395 patients (mean [SD] age, 68.2 [7.9] years; 78.0% men) were assessed, including 9152 patients randomized to dual pathway inhibition, 9117 patients randomized to rivaroxaban monotherapy, and 9126 patients randomized to aspirin monotherapy. Adjudication reduced the number of events by 10% to 15% for most end points. Among investigator-reported end points, dual pathway inhibition significantly reduced the rate of the primary efficacy outcome compared with aspirin alone (411 patients [4.5%] vs 542 patients [5.9%]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.75 [95% CI, 0.66-0.85]; P < .001), with similar reduction in adjudicated end points, (379 patients [4.1%] vs 496 patients [5.4%]; HR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.66-0.86]; P < .001). Likewise, effects on ischemic end points were highly concordant (κ statistic = 0.94 [95% CI, 0.93-0.95] for the primary composite end point). Unlike with adjudicated outcomes, there was a significant reduction in the primary end point with rivaroxaban monotherapy vs aspirin monotherapy using investigator-reported events (477 patients [5.2%] vs 542 patients [5.9%]; HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.78-0.99]; P = .04) compared with adjudicated events (448 patients [4.9%] vs 496 patients [5.4%]; HR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.79-1.03]; P = .12).. This secondary analysis of the COMPASS trial found that whether assessed by blinded site investigators or adjudicators, dual pathway inhibition significantly reduced CV events among patients with stable atherosclerotic disease compared with aspirin plus placebo. These findings suggest that using investigator-reported events in blinded clinical trials may be a more efficient alternative to adjudication.. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01776424.

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Atherosclerosis; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are frequently prescribed for the management of atrial fibrillation and venous thrombosis. There is a lack of published data on the utilization of DOACs in individuals who have undergone recent cardiac surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of apixaban and rivaroxaban compared to warfarin in patients postcardiac surgery.. In this retrospective cohort study, patients were separated into a DOAC cohort or a warfarin cohort based on the agent they received after cardiac surgery. Patients could be included if they were ≥18 years of age and received or were discharged on either rivaroxaban, apixaban, or warfarin within 7 days after cardiac surgery. The primary outcome for the study was the rate of International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) major bleeding during hospitalization and for 30 days following discharge or until first follow-up appointment.. There were a total of 194 patients included in the analysis, 97 in the DOAC cohort and 97 in the warfarin cohort. Four patients (4.1%) in the DOAC group experienced ISTH major bleeding, while 2 patients (2.1%) in the warfarin cohort experienced ISTH major bleeding (p = 0.68). No patients in the DOAC cohort experienced a thrombotic event, whereas 2 patients (2.1%) in the warfarin cohort experienced a thrombotic complication (p = 0.5).. Apixaban and rivaroxaban demonstrated similar safety when compared to a matched cohort of warfarin patients. Larger prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Rivaroxaban is one of the most commonly used non-vitamin K antagonists for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Different individual exposures exist for Asian and non-Asian populations, and dose selection is different for Japanese and non-Japanese subjects. Few studies have investigated the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of rivaroxaban in Chinese patients and provided a solid reference for dose selection and individualised therapy.. This is a single-centre prospective study. Rivaroxaban-treated Chinese NVAF patients will be recruited according to predetermined inclusion criteria. Blood samples will be collected from both outpatients and inpatients with different sampling strategies at steady state. Rivaroxaban plasma concentration, factor Xa activity, prothrombin time and single-nucleotide polymorphisms of candidate genes will be evaluated. Follow-up will be conducted following 3 and 6 months after enrolment to collect information about the safety and efficacy outcomes. A nonlinear mixed-effects modelling strategy will be used to develop a population PK-PD model of rivaroxaban.. The study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Huashan Hospital, Fudan University (KY2020-016). The study findings will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals and shared with public health authorities.. ChiCTR2100046685.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; East Asian People; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Inpatients; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Background Patients with single-ventricle physiology who undergo the Fontan procedure are at risk for thrombotic events associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The UNIVERSE Study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a novel liquid rivaroxaban formulation, using a body weight-adjusted dosing regimen, versus acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) in children post-Fontan. Methods and Results The UNIVERSE Study was a randomized, multicenter, 2-part, open-label study of rivaroxaban, in children who had undergone a Fontan procedure, to evaluate its dosing regimen, safety, and efficacy. Part A was the single-arm part of the study that determined the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and safety of rivaroxaban in 12 participants before proceeding to part B, whereby 100 participants were randomized 2:1 to open-label rivaroxaban versus ASA. The study period was 12 months. A total of 112 participants were enrolled across 35 sites in 10 countries. In part B, for safety outcomes, major bleeding occurred in one participant on rivaroxaban (epistaxis that required transfusion). Clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding occurred in 6% of participants on rivaroxaban versus 9% on ASA. Trivial bleeding occurred in 33% of participants on rivaroxaban versus 35% on ASA. For efficacy outcomes, 1 participant on rivaroxaban in part B had a pulmonary embolism (2% overall event rate); and for ASA, 1 participant had ischemic stroke and 2 had venous thrombosis (9% overall event rate). Conclusions In this study, participants who received rivaroxaban for thromboprophylaxis had a similar safety profile and fewer thrombotic events, albeit not statistically significant, compared with those in the ASA group. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier: NCT02846532.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Child; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thrombosis; Venous Thromboembolism

The COMPASS trial demonstrated that the combination of rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily and aspirin 100 mg once daily compared with aspirin 100 mg once daily reduced major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with chronic coronary artery disease or peripheral artery disease by 24% during a mean follow-up of 23 months. We explored whether this effect varies by sex.. The effects were examined in women and men using log-rank tests and Kaplan-Meier curve. Hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained from stratified Cox proportional hazards models to explore subgroup effects including subgroup of women and men according to baseline modified REACH risk score. Of 27 395 patients randomized, 18 278 were allocated to receive rivaroxaban plus aspirin (n = 9152) or aspirin alone (n = 9126), and of these, 22.1% were women. Women compared with men had similar incidence rates for MACE and major bleeding but borderline lower rates for myocardial infarction (1.7% vs. 2.2%, P = 0.05). The effect of combination therapy compared with aspirin in women and men was consistent for MACE (women: 3.8% vs. 5.2%, HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.54-0.97; men: 4.2% vs. 5.5%, HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.66-0.89; P interaction 0.75) and major bleeding (women: 3.1% vs. 1.4%, HR 2.22, 95% CI 1.42-3.46; men: 3.2% vs. 2.0%, HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.29-1.97; P interaction 0.19). There was no significant interaction between randomized treatment and baseline modified REACH score above or below the median for MACE or major bleeding.. In patients with stable coronary artery disease or peripheral artery disease, the combination of rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) and aspirin compared with aspirin alone appears to produce consistent benefits in women and men, independent of baseline cardiovascular risk.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aspirin; Comorbidity; Coronary Artery Disease; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Health Status Disparities; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Sex Factors; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The safety and efficacy of periprocedural use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for atrial fibrillation (AF) remain unclear. We compared the incidence of asymptomatic cerebral micro-thromboembolism and hemopericardium following AF ablation among patients receiving edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin and between normal- and low-dose use of edoxaban and rivaroxaban.. This prospective randomized study included 170 consecutive AF patients. Patients taking DOACs upon admission to our hospital were randomly assigned to an edoxaban group or to a rivaroxaban group. Warfarin was continued in patients receiving warfarin at admission. All patients underwent AF ablation, and cerebral MRI was performed to evaluate asymptomatic cerebral micro-thromboembolism the day after the procedure.. Sixty-one patients were assigned to edoxaban and 63 to rivaroxaban. Warfarin was continued in 46 patients. Although asymptomatic cerebral micro-thromboembolism was detected in 25 patients (16.3%), there were no significant differences among the groups. Hemopericardium occurred in 2 patients (one each in the rivaroxaban and warfarin groups). The incidence of asymptomatic cerebral micro-thromboembolism was higher in the low-dose group (9 patients, 25.7%) than in the normal-dose group (8 patients, 10.0%) for patients prescribed either edoxaban or rivaroxaban (p < 0.05). The proportion of males (88.0%, 69.5%, p < 0.05), history of prior AF ablation (64.0%, 42.2%, p < 0.05), and hypertension (68.0%, 46.1%, p < 0.05) were significantly higher in patients with cerebral thromboembolism.. The incidence of asymptomatic cerebral micro-thromboembolism and hemopericardium in AF ablation was similar among patients using edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin. However, low doses of DOACs may increase the risk of asymptomatic stroke.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Patients with symptomatic lower extremity peripheral artery disease (LE-PAD) experience an increased risk of major vascular events. There is limited information on what clinical features of symptomatic LE-PAD prognosticate major vascular events and whether patients at high risk have a greater absolute benefit from low-dose rivaroxaban and aspirin.. To quantify the risk of major vascular events and investigate the response to treatment with low-dose rivaroxaban and aspirin among patients with symptomatic LE-PAD based on clinical presentation and comorbidities.. This is a subanalysis of a previously reported subgroup of patients with symptomatic LE-PAD who were enrolled in a large, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial (Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies [COMPASS]) in 602 centers in 33 countries from March 2013 to January 2020. Data analysis was completed from May 2016 to June 2020.. A combination of low-dose rivaroxaban and aspirin compared with aspirin alone.. Thirty-month incidence risk of myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular death (MACE), major adverse limb events (MALE) including major vascular amputation, and bleeding.. The COMPASS trial enrolled 4129 patients with symptomatic LE-PAD (mean [SD] age, 66.8 [8.8] years; 2932 men [71.0%]). The 30-month Kaplan-Meier incidence risk of MACE or MALE, including major amputation, was 22.6% in those with prior amputation (this outcome was observed in 54 patients), 17.6% (n = 15) in those with Fontaine III or IV symptoms, and 11.8% (n = 142) in those with previous peripheral artery revascularization, classifying these features as high-risk limb presentations. The 30-month incidence risk of MACE or MALE, including major amputation, was 14.1% (n = 118) in those with kidney dysfunction, 13.5% (n = 67) in those with heart failure, 13.4% (n = 199) in those with diabetes, and 12.8% (n = 222) in those with polyvascular disease, classifying these features as high-risk comorbidities. Among patients with either high-risk limb presentations or high-risk comorbidities, treatment with rivaroxaban and aspirin compared with aspirin alone was associated with an estimated 4.2% (95% CI, 1.9%-6.2%) absolute risk reduction for MACE or MALE, including major amputation, at 30 months. Although the estimated absolute risk increase of major bleeding was higher with rivaroxaban and aspirin in combination than aspirin alone (2.0% [95% CI, 0.5%-3.9%]) for patients with either high-risk limb presentation or high-risk comorbidity, the estimated absolute risk increase of fatal or critical organ bleeding was low in this high-risk group (0.4% [95% CI, 0.2%-1.8%]), such that the net clinical benefit was estimated to be 3.2% (95% CI, 0.6%-5.3%).. Patients with LE-PAD with high-risk limb presentations or high-risk comorbidities had a high incidence of major vascular events. For these patients, treatment with rivaroxaban and aspirin in combination compared with aspirin alone led to a large absolute reduction in vascular risk.

Topics: Aged; Amputation, Surgical; Aspirin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Comorbidity; Diabetes Mellitus; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prognosis; Renal Insufficiency; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke

The efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with bioprosthetic mitral valves and atrial fibrillation or flutter remain uncertain. DESIGN: RIVER was an academic-led, multicenter, open-label, randomized, non-inferiority trial with blinded outcome adjudication that enrolled 1005 patients from 49 sites in Brazil. Patients with a bioprosthetic mitral valve and atrial fibrillation or flutter were randomly assigned (1:1) to rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily (15 mg in those with creatinine clearance <50 mL/min) or dose-adjusted warfarin (target international normalized ratio 2.0-30.); the follow-up period was 12 months. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, transient ischemic attack, major bleeding, valve thrombosis, systemic embolism, or hospitalization for heart failure. Secondary outcomes included individual components of the primary composite outcome, bleeding events, and venous thromboembolism. SUMMARY: RIVER represents the largest trial specifically designed to assess the efficacy and safety of a direct oral anticoagulant in patients with bioprosthetic mitral valves and atrial fibrillation or flutter. The results of this trial can inform clinical practice and international guidelines.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Atrial Flutter; Bioprosthesis; Brazil; Cause of Death; Creatinine; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Mitral Valve; Rivaroxaban; Sample Size; Stroke; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Trial of Rivaroxaban in AntiPhospholipid Syndrome was a prospective randomized, open-label, noninferiority study conducted in 14 centers in Italy. Rivaroxaban was compared with warfarin for the prevention of thromboembolic events, major bleeding, and vascular death in high-risk, triple-positive patients with antiphospholipid syndrome.. The aim of this paper is to report the events during the 2-year follow-up after the study closure.. On January 28, 2018, the trial was prematurely stopped by adjudication and safety committee for an excess of events in the rivaroxaban group. Randomized patients were advised on trial results and those randomized to rivaroxaban were solicited to switch to warfarin. All 14 participating centers were asked and accepted to follow their patients for clinical events. This report describes the rate of events that occurred between January 28, 2018, and January 28, 2020.. Of 120 randomized patients, 115 were available for follow-up. Outcome events were two in six (33.3%) patients who remained on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and six in 109 (5.7%) patients on warfarin (hazard ratio [HR] 6.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-34.5, P = .018). The two patients on DOACs (one taking dabigatran and one taking rivaroxaban) suffered from thromboembolic events, whereas of the six patients with composite outcomes on warfarin, three had thromboembolic events (HR for thrombosis 13.3; 95% CI 2.2-79.9, P = .005).. These data further support the use of warfarin in high-risk patients with antiphospholipid syndrome.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Italy; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

To date, vitamin K antagonists are the only available oral anticoagulants in patients with mechanical heart valves. In this way, we developed a pilot trial with rivaroxaban..  The RIWA study was a proof-of-concept, open-label, randomized clinical trial and was designed to assess the incidence of thromboembolic and bleeding events of the rivaroxaban-based strategy (15 mg twice daily) in comparison to dose-adjusted warfarin. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio and were followed prospectively for 90 days..  A total of 72 patients were enrolled in the present study. Of these, 44 patients were randomized: 23 patients were allocated to the rivaroxaban group and 21 to the warfarin group. After 90 days of follow-up, the primary outcome occurred in one patient (4.3%) in the rivaroxaban group and three patients (14.3%) in the warfarin group (risk ratio [RR] 0.27; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02-2.85; P = 0.25). Minor bleeding (without discontinuation of medical therapy) occurred in six patients (26.1%) in the rivaroxaban group versus six patients (28.6%) in the warfarin group (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.23-3.32; P = 0.85). One patient in the warfarin group died from myocardial infarction. No cases of hemorrhagic stroke, valve thrombosis, peripheral embolic events, or new intracardiac thrombus were related in both groups.. In this pilot study, rivaroxaban 15 mg twice daily had thromboembolic and bleeding events similar to warfarin in patients with mechanical heart valves. These data confirm the authors' proof-of-concept and suggest that a larger trial with a similar design is not unreasonable. CLINICALTRIAL.. NCT03566303.

Topics: Adult; Brain Infarction; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Embolism; Female; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

ROCKET AF demonstrated the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism (SE) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We examined baseline characteristics and outcomes in patients enrolled in Latin America compared with the rest of the world (ROW).. ROCKET AF enrolled 14,264 patients from 45 countries. Of these, 1,878 (13.2%) were from 7 Latin American countries. The clinical characteristics and outcomes (adjusted by baseline characteristics) of these patients were compared with 12,293 patients from the ROW. Treatment outcomes of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin were also stratified by region.. The annual rate of stroke/SE was similar in those from Latin American and ROW (P= .63), but all-cause and vascular death were significantly higher than in ROW (HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.20-1.64; HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.14-1.68; P< .001). Rates of major or nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding tended to be lower in Latin America (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.80-1.0; P= .05). Rates of stroke and/or SE were similar with rivaroxaban and warfarin in patients from Latin America and ROW (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.54-1.29 vs HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.75-1.07; interaction P= .77).. Patients with AF in Latin America had similar rates of stroke and/or SE, higher rates of vascular death, and lower rates of bleeding compared with patients in the ROW. The effect of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in Latin America was similar to the ROW. Further studies analyzing patient- and country-specific determinants of these regional differences in Latin America are warranted.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Latin America; Male; Mortality; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

In the AFIRE trial, rivaroxaban monotherapy was noninferior to combination therapy with rivaroxaban and an antiplatelet agent for thromboembolic events or death, and superior for major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and stable coronary artery disease. Little is known about impacts of stroke and bleeding risks on the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban monotherapy.. In this subanalysis of the AFIRE trial, we assessed the risk of stroke and bleeding by the CHADS. Rivaroxaban monotherapy significantly reduced the primary efficacy and safety end points with no evidence of differential effects by stroke risk (CHADS. The advantages of rivaroxaban monotherapy compared with those of combination therapy with respect to all prespecified end points, including thromboembolism, bleeding, and mortality were similar across patients with AF and stable coronary artery disease, irrespective of their risk for stroke and bleeding.. UMIN Clinical Trials Registry number, UMIN000016612, and ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02642419.

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Risk Adjustment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Improving adherence to direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) is challenging, and simple text messaging reminders have not been effective.. SmartADHERE was a randomized trial that tested a personalized digital and human direct oral anticoagulant adherence intervention compared to usual care. Eligibility required age ≥ 18, newly-prescribed (≤90 days) rivaroxaban for atrial fibrillation (AF), 1 of 4 at-risk criteria for nonadherence, and a smartphone. The intervention consisted of combination of a medication management smartphone app, daily app-based reminders, adaptive text messaging, and phone-based counseling for severe nonadherence. The primary outcome was the proportion of days covered by rivaroxaban (PDC) at 6 months. There were 25 U.S. sites, all cardiology and electrophysiology outpatient practices, activated for a target sample size of 378, but the study was terminated by the sponsor prior to reaching target enrollment.. There were 139 participants (age 65±9.6 years, 30% female, median CHA. The use of a centralized digital and human adherence intervention was feasible across multiple sites. Overall adherence was much higher than expected despite prescreening for at-risk individuals. SmartADHERE illustrates the challenges of trials of behavioral and technology interventions, where enrollment itself may lead to selection bias or treatment effects. Pragmatic study designs, such as cluster randomization or stepped-wedge implementation, should be considered to improve enrollment and generalizability.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Electronics; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Smartphone; Stroke

To clarify the appropriate initial dosage of heparin during radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving uninterrupted nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) treatment.. A total of 187 consecutive AF patients who underwent their first RFCA in our center were included. In the warfarin group (WG), an initial heparin dose of 100 U/kg was administered (control group: n = 38). The patients who were on NOACs were randomly divided into 3 NOAC groups (NG: n = 149), NG110, NG120, and NG130, and were administered initial heparin doses of 110 U/kg, 120 U/kg, and 130 U/kg, respectively. During RFCA, the activated clotting time (ACT) was measured every 15 min, and the target ACT was maintained at 250-350 s by intermittent heparin infusion. The baseline ACT and ACTs at each 15-min interval, the average percentage of measurements at the target ACT, and the incidence of periprocedural bleeding and thromboembolic complications were recorded and analyzed.. There was no significant difference in sex, age, weight, or baseline ACT among the four groups. The 15 min-ACT, 30 min-ACT, and 45 min-ACT were significantly longer in the WG than in NG110 and NG120. However, no significant difference in 60 min-ACT or 75 min-ACT was detected. The average percentages of measurements at the target ACT in NG120 (82.2 ± 23.6%) and NG130 (84.8 ± 23.7%) were remarkably higher than those in the WG (63.4 ± 36.2%, p = 0.007, 0.003, respectively). These differences were independent of the type of NOAC. The proportion of ACTs in 300-350 s in NG130 was higher than in WG (32.4 ± 31.8 vs. 34.7 ± 30.6, p = 0.735). Severe periprocedural thromboembolic and bleeding complications were not observed.. For patients with AF receiving uninterrupted NOAC treatment who underwent RFCA, an initial heparin dosage of 120 U/kg or 130 U/kg can provide an adequate intraprocedural anticoagulant effect, and 130 U/kg allowed ACT to reach the target earlier.. Registration number: ChiCTR1800016491, First Registration Date: 04/06/2018 (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx ).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; China; Dabigatran; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Monitoring; Female; Heparin; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Prospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin; Whole Blood Coagulation Time

Rivaroxaban and Dabigatran were the first two non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for preventing stroke among non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation patients. This article aimed to evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of Rivaroxaban versus Dabigatran.. An emulated target trial analysis was conducted based on Medicare, in which we constructed three "randomized clinical trials" with well-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria, treatment regimens, and analysis procedures. We analyzed the individual trials, examined temporal variations, and generated unified results via pooled analysis.. With a two-year data collection window (2012-2013), 70,129 subjects were enrolled in the three emulated trials, with 36,269 and 34,089 in the Rivaroxaban and Dabigatran arms, respectively. Dabigatran (the reference group for hazard ratio - HR) was superior regarding time to any primary event (including ischemic stroke, other thromboembolic events, major bleeding, and death; HR 1.232, P-value 0.0025), major bleeding (HR 1.187, P-value <0.0001), and mortality (HR 1.488, P-value <0.0001). Differences regarding stroke and other thromboembolic events were not significant.. Dabigatran was found as superior for the Medicare patients with multiple chronic conditions. Temporal variations, which had been largely neglected in the literature, were observed. This study may provide new insight into treating AF with NOACs.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Male; Medicare; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; United States

In this secondary analysis of the VOYAGER trial, rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice/day plus aspirin 100 mg/day was assessed in older adults. Advanced age is associated with elevated bleeding risk and unfavourable net benefit for dual antiplatelet therapy in chronic coronary artery disease. The risk-benefit of low-dose rivaroxaban in patients ≥75 years with peripheral artery disease (PAD) after lower extremity revascularization (LER) has not been described.. The primary endpoint was a composite of acute limb ischaemia, major amputation, myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, or cardiovascular death. The principal safety outcome was thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) major bleeding analysed by the pre-specified age cut-off of 75 years. Of 6564 patients randomized, 1330 (20%) were >75 years. Absolute 3-year Kaplan-Meier cumulative incidence rates for primary efficacy (23.4% vs. 19.0%) and safety (3.5% vs. 1.5%) endpoints were higher in elderly vs. non-elderly patients. Efficacy of rivaroxaban (P-interaction 0.83) and safety (P-interaction 0.38) was consistent irrespective of age. The combination of intracranial and fatal bleeding was not increased in patients >75 years (2 rivaroxaban vs. 8 placebo). Overall, benefits (absolute risk reduction 3.8%, number needed to treat 26 for the primary endpoint) exceeded risks (absolute risk increase 0.81%, number needed to harm 123 for TIMI major bleeding).. Patients ≥75 years with PAD are at both heightened ischaemic and bleeding risk after LER. No excess harm with respect to major, intracranial or fatal bleeding was seen in older patients yet numerically greater absolute benefits were observed. This suggests that low-dose rivaroxaban combined with aspirin should be considered in PAD after LER regardless of age.

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Brain Ischemia; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Vascular calcification is common in diabetic patients. Warfarin has been associated with renovascular calcification and worsening renal function; rivaroxaban may provide renopreservation by decreasing vascular inflammation. We compared the impact of rivaroxaban and warfarin on renal outcomes in diabetic patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).. Using United States IBM MarketScan data from January 2011 to December 2017, we identified adults with both NVAF and diabetes, newly-initiated on rivaroxaban or warfarin with ≥12-month insurance coverage prior to anticoagulation initiation. Patients with Stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) or undergoing haemodialysis at baseline were excluded. Differences in baseline covariates between cohorts were adjusted using inverse probability-of-treatment weighting (IPTW) based on propensity scores (absolute standardized differences <0.1 achieved for all after adjustment). Outcomes included incidence rates of emergency department/hospital admissions for acute kidney injury (AKI) and the composite of the development of Stage 5 CKD or need for haemodialysis. Patients were followed until an event, index anticoagulant discontinuation/switch, insurance disenrollment, or end-of-data availability. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox regression. We assessed 10 017 rivaroxaban (22.6% received a reduced dose) and 11 665 warfarin users. In comparison to warfarin, rivaroxaban was associated with lower risks of AKI (HR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.74-0.92) and development of Stage 5 CKD or need for haemodialysis (HR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.70-0.96). Sensitivity and subgroup analyses had similar effects as the base-case analysis.. Rivaroxaban appears to be associated with lower risks of undesirable renal outcomes vs. warfarin in diabetic NVAF patients.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Diabetes Mellitus; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Propensity Score; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin; Young Adult

The COMPASS (Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies) randomized clinical trial was stopped early owing to the efficacy of low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin in preventing major cardiovascular events. The main reason for early trial termination was the effect of combination therapy on reducing ischemic strokes.. To analyze the association between low-dose rivaroxaban with or without aspirin and different ischemic stroke subtypes.. This is a secondary analysis of a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study that was performed in 33 countries from March 12, 2013, to May 10, 2016. Patients with stable atherosclerotic vascular disease were eligible, and a total of 27 395 participants were randomized and followed up to February 6, 2017. All first ischemic strokes and uncertain strokes that occurred by this date were adjudicated using TOAST (Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment) criteria. The analysis of ischemic stroke subtypes was evaluated using an intention-to-treat principle. Statistical analysis was performed from March 12, 2013, to February 6, 2017.. Participants received rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice a day) plus aspirin (100 mg once a day), rivaroxaban (5 mg twice a day), or aspirin (100 mg once a day).. Risk of ischemic stroke subtypes during follow-up.. A total of 291 patients (66 women; mean [SD] age, 69.4 [8.5] years; 43 [14.8%] had a previous nonlacunar stroke) experienced an ischemic stroke. During the study, 49 patients (16.8%) received a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation. Applying TOAST criteria, 59 strokes (20.3%) were cardioembolic, 54 strokes (18.6%) were secondary to greater than 50% stenosis of the ipsilateral internal carotid artery, 42 strokes (14.4%) had a negative evaluation that met criteria for embolic stroke of undetermined source, and 21 strokes (7.2%) were secondary to small vessel disease. There were significantly fewer cardioembolic strokes (hazard ratio [HR], 0.40 [95% CI, 0.20-0.78]; P = .005) and embolic strokes of undetermined source (HR, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.12-0.74]; P = .006) in the combination therapy group compared with the aspirin-only group. A trend for reduction in strokes secondary to small vessel disease (HR, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.12-1.14]; P = .07) was not statistically significant. No significant difference was observed between the 2 groups in strokes secondary to greater than 50% carotid artery stenosis (HR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.45-1.60]; P = .61). Rivaroxaban, 5 mg, twice daily showed a trend for reducing cardioembolic strokes compared with aspirin (HR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.31-1.03]; P = .06) but was not associated with reducing other stroke subtypes.. For patients with systemic atherosclerosis, low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin was associated with large, significant reductions in cardioembolic strokes and embolic strokes of undetermined source. However, these results of exploratory analysis need to be independently confirmed before influencing clinical practice.. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01776424.

Topics: Aspirin; Atherosclerosis; Atrial Fibrillation; Carotid Stenosis; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Diseases; Humans; Intracranial Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), although commonly used to reduce thromboembolic risk in atrial fibrillation, have been incriminated as probable cause of accelerated vascular calcification (VC) in patients on hemodialysis. Functional vitamin K deficiency may further contribute to their susceptibility for VC. We investigated the effect of vitamin K status on VC progression in 132 patients on hemodialysis with atrial fibrillation treated with VKAs or qualifying for anticoagulation.. Patients were randomized to VKAs with target INR 2-3, rivaroxaban 10 mg daily, or rivaroxaban 10 mg daily plus vitamin K2 2000. Baseline dp-ucMGP was severely elevated in all groups. Initiation or continuation of VKAs further increased dp-ucMGP, whereas levels decreased in the rivaroxaban group and to a larger extent in the rivaroxaban+vitamin K2 group, but remained nevertheless elevated. Changes in coronary artery, thoracic aorta, and cardiac valve calcium scores and pulse wave velocity were not significantly different among the treatment arms. All cause death, stroke, and cardiovascular event rates were similar between the groups. Bleeding outcomes were not significantly different, except for a lower number of life-threatening and major bleeding episodes in the rivaroxaban arms versus the VKA arm.. Withdrawal of VKAs and high-dose vitamin K2 improve vitamin K status in patients on hemodialysis, but have no significant favorable effect on VC progression. Severe bleeding complications may be lower with rivaroxaban than with VKAs.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antifibrinolytic Agents; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Male; Prospective Studies; Renal Dialysis; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vascular Calcification; Vitamin K; Vitamin K 2; Vitamin K Deficiency

Background and Purpose- Atrial cardiopathy and atherosclerotic plaque are two potential mechanisms underlying embolic strokes of undetermined source (ESUS). The relationship between these two mechanisms among ESUS patients remains unclear. A better understanding of their association may inform targeted secondary prevention strategies. Methods- We examined the association between atrial cardiopathy and atherosclerotic plaque in the NAVIGATE ESUS trial (New Approach Rivaroxaban Inhibition of Factor Xa in a Global Trial Versus ASA to Prevent Embolism in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source), which enrolled 7213 patients with recent ESUS during 2014 to 2017. For this analysis, we included patients with data on left atrial dimension, location of brain infarction, and cervical large artery plaque. The variables of primary interest were left atrial diameter and cervical plaque ipsilateral to brain infarction. Secondary markers of atrial cardiopathy were premature atrial contractions on Holter monitoring and newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation. For descriptive purposes, left atrial enlargement was defined as ≥4.7 cm. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between atrial cardiopathy markers and ipsilateral plaque after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, current smoking, and hyperlipidemia. Results- Among 3983 eligible patients, 235 (5.9%) had left atrial enlargement, 939 (23.6%) had ipsilateral plaque, and 94 (2.4%) had both. Shared risk factors for left atrial enlargement and ipsilateral plaque were male sex, white race, hypertension, tobacco use, and coronary artery disease. Despite shared risk factors, increasing left atrial dimension was not associated with ipsilateral plaque after adjustment for covariates (odds ratio per cm, 1.1 [95% CI, 1.0-1.2];

Topics: Aged; Biomarkers; Brain Infarction; Cardiomegaly; Female; Heart Atria; Humans; Intracranial Embolism; Male; Middle Aged; Plaque, Atherosclerotic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is one of the main treatments for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in patients on effective anticoagulation. The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOA) has increased, given their efficacy and safety profile compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKA). We compared procedural and clinical outcomes of MT in patients on DOA and VKA treatment before stroke onset. We analyzed 2 groups from the Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke prospective registry: patients on DOA and patients on VKA treated by MT without thrombolysis. Generalized linear mixed models including center as random effect were used to compare angiographic (rates of reperfusion at end of procedure, number of passes >2, procedural complications) and clinical (favorable and excellent outcome, 90-day all-cause mortality, and hemorrhagic complications) outcomes according to anticoagulation subgroups. Comparisons were adjusted for prespecified confounders (age, admission NIH Stroke Scale score) as well as for meaningful baseline between-group differences. Among 221 patients included, more DOA-treated patients (n = 115, 52%) achieved successful (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score [mTICI] 2b/3) or near complete (mTICI 2c/3) reperfusion at the procedure end than did VKA-treated patients, with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) for DOA vs VKA of 3.27 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.40-7.65) and 2.00 (95% CI, 1.08-3.73), respectively. DOA-treated patients had a lower 90-day mortality risk with an adjusted OR of 0.47 (95% CI, 0.24-0.89) and a better excellent outcome OR of 2.40 (1.10-5.27). There was no significant between-group difference in hemorrhagic or procedural complications. The study highlights the benefits of DOA compared to VKA. Regarding mortality, excellent outcomes, and recanalization rate, DOA appears to provide a favorable setting for MT treatment in AIS.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Registries; Reperfusion; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thrombectomy; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K

Background and Purpose- Emboli in embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) may originate from various potential embolic sources (PES), some of which may respond better to anticoagulation, whereas others to antiplatelets. We analyzed whether rivaroxaban is associated with reduction of recurrent stroke compared with aspirin in patients with ESUS across different PES and by number of PES. Methods- We assessed the presence/absence of each PES (atrial cardiopathy, atrial fibrillation, arterial atherosclerosis, left ventricular dysfunction, cardiac valvulopathy, patent foramen ovale, cancer) in NAVIGATE-ESUS (New Approach Rivaroxaban Inhibition of Factor Xa in a Global Trial Versus ASA to Prevent Embolism in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source) participants. Prevalence of each PES, as well as treatment effect and risk of event for each PES were determined. Results by number of PES were also determined. The outcomes were ischemic stroke, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and myocardial infarction. Results- In 7213 patients (38% women, mean age 67years) followed for a median of 11 months, the 3 most prevalent PES were atrial cardiopathy (37%), left ventricular disease (36%), and arterial atherosclerosis (29%). Forty-one percent of all patients had multiple PES, with 15% having ≥3 PES. None or a single PES was present in 23% and 36%, respectively. Recurrent ischemic stroke risk was similar for rivaroxaban- and aspirin-assigned patients for each PES, except for those with cardiac valvular disease which was marginally higher in rivaroxaban-assigned patients (hazard ratio, 1.8 [95% CI, 1.0-3.0]). All-cause mortality risks were similar across treatment groups for each PES while too few myocardial infarctions and cardiovascular deaths occurred for meaningful assessment. Increasing number of PES was not associated with increased stroke recurrence nor all-cause mortality, and outcomes did not vary between rivaroxaban- and aspirin-assigned patients by number of PES. Conclusions- A large proportion of patients with ESUS had multiple PES which could explain the neutral results of NAVIGATE-ESUS. Recurrence rates between rivaroxaban- and aspirin-assigned patients were similar across the spectrum of PES. Registration- URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02313909.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Intracranial Embolism; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prevalence; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Survival Rate

Rivaroxaban exposure and patient characteristics may affect the rivaroxaban benefit-risk balance. This study aimed to quantify associations between model-predicted rivaroxaban exposure and patient characteristics and efficacy and safety outcomes in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), using data from the phase 3 ROCKET AF trial (NCT00403767). In ROCKET AF, 14,264 patients with NVAF were randomized to rivaroxaban (20 mg once daily [OD], or 15 mg OD if creatinine clearance was 30-49 mL/min) or dose-adjusted warfarin (median follow-up: 707 days); rivaroxaban plasma concentration was measured in a subset of 161 patients. In this post hoc exposure-response analysis, a multivariate Cox model was used to correlate individual predicted rivaroxaban exposures and patient characteristics with time-to-event efficacy and safety outcomes in 7061 and 7111 patients, respectively. There was no significant association between model-predicted rivaroxaban trough plasma concentration (C

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Biomarkers, Pharmacological; Chemoprevention; Drug Monitoring; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Statistical; Prognosis; Prothrombin Time; Risk Adjustment; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Venous Thromboembolism

Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is a neglected disease affecting 33 million people, mainly in low and middle income countries. Yet very few large trials or registries have been conducted in this population. The INVICTUS program of research in RHD consists of a randomized-controlled trial (RCT) of 4500 patients comparing rivaroxaban with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in patients with RHD and atrial fibrillation (AF), a registry of 17,000 patients to document the contemporary clinical course of patients with RHD, including a focused sub-study on pregnant women with RHD within the registry. This paper describes the rationale, design, organization and baseline characteristics of the RCT and a summary of the design of the registry and its sub-study. Patients with RHD and AF are considered to be at high risk of embolic strokes, and oral anticoagulation with VKAs is recommended for stroke prevention. But the quality of anticoagulation with VKA is poor in developing countries. A drug which does not require monitoring, and which is safe and effective for preventing stroke in patients with valvular AF, would fulfill a major unmet need.. The INVestIgation of rheumatiC AF Treatment Using VKAs, rivaroxaban or aspirin Studies (INVICTUS-VKA) trial is an international, multicentre, randomized, open-label, parallel group trial, testing whether rivaroxaban 20 mg given once daily is non-inferior (or superior) to VKA in patients with RHD, AF, and an elevated risk of stroke (mitral stenosis with valve area ≤2 cm. INVICTUS is the largest program of clinical research focused on a neglected cardiovascular disease and will provide new information on the clinical course of patients with RHD, and approaches to anticoagulation in those with concomitant AF.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular; Rheumatic Heart Disease; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K

Risks, sites, and predictors of major bleeding during antithrombotic therapies have not been well defined for patients with recent embolic stroke of undetermined source.. Exploratory analysis of major bleeds defined by International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis criteria occurring among 7213 participants in international NAVIGATE (New Approach Rivaroxaban Inhibition of Factor Xa in a Global Trial) embolic stroke of undetermined source randomized trial comparing rivaroxaban 15 mg daily with aspirin 100 mg daily.. During a median follow-up of 11 months, 85 major bleeds occurred. The most frequent site was gastrointestinal (38%), followed by intracranial (29%). Assignment to rivaroxaban (hazard ratio [HR], 2.7 [95% CI, 1.7-4.3]), East Asia region (HR, 2.5 [95% CI, 1.6-3.9]), systolic blood pressure ≥160 mm Hg (HR, 2.2 [95% CI, 1.2-3.8]), and reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (HR, 1.2 per 10 mL/min per 1.73 m. Among embolic stroke of undetermined source patients participating in an international randomized trial, independent predictors of major bleeding were assignment to rivaroxaban, East Asia region, increased systolic blood pressure, and impaired renal function. East Asia as a region was strongly associated with risk of intracerebral hemorrhage. Estimated glomerular filtration rate should be a consideration for stratifying bleeding risk. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02313909.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Asia, Eastern; Asian People; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Embolism; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Optimal secondary prevention for patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) remains unknown. We aimed to assess whether high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) levels are associated with major vascular events and whether hs-cTnT may identify patients who benefit from anticoagulation following ESUS.. Data were obtained from the biomarker substudy of the NAVIGATE ESUS trial, a randomized controlled trial testing the efficacy of rivaroxaban versus aspirin for secondary stroke prevention in ESUS. Patients were dichotomized at the hs-cTnT upper reference limit (14 ng/L, Gen V, Roche Diagnostics). Cox proportional hazard models were computed to explore the association between hs-cTnT, the combined cardiovascular end point (recurrent stroke, myocardial infarction, systemic embolism, cardiovascular death), and recurrent ischemic stroke.. In patients with ESUS, hs-cTnT was associated with increased cardiovascular event rates. While fewer recurrent strokes occurred in patients receiving rivaroxaban, outcomes were not stratified by hs-cTn results. Our findings support using hs-cTnT for cardiovascular risk stratification but not for decision-making regarding anticoagulation therapy in patients with ESUS. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02313909.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aspirin; Biomarkers; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Internationality; Intracranial Embolism; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Troponin T

Non-stenotic intracranial and systemic atherosclerosis are associated with ischemic stroke. We report frequency and response to anticoagulant vs. antiplatelet prophylaxis of patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) who have non-stenotic intracranial atherosclerosis and/or systemic atherosclerosis.. Exploratory analysis of the international NAVIGATE ESUS randomized trial comparing rivaroxaban 15mg daily with aspirin 100mg daily in 7213 patients with recent ESUS. Among participants with results of intracranial arterial imaging with either computed tomographic angiography (CTA) or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), the frequency and predictors of non-stenotic intracranial and systemic atherosclerosis and responses to antithrombotic therapy were assessed.. East Asia region was the strongest factor associated with intracranial atherosclerosis. There were no statistically significant differences between rivaroxaban and aspirin prophylaxis for recurrent ischemic stroke in patients with non-stenotic intracranial atherosclerosis and/or systemic atherosclerosis.

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Intracranial Arteriosclerosis; Intracranial Embolism; Male; Middle Aged; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prevalence; Recurrence; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The effects of rivaroxaban in patients with atrial fibrillation and a bioprosthetic mitral valve remain uncertain.. In this randomized trial, we compared rivaroxaban (20 mg once daily) with dose-adjusted warfarin (target international normalized ratio, 2.0 to 3.0) in patients with atrial fibrillation and a bioprosthetic mitral valve. The primary outcome was a composite of death, major cardiovascular events (stroke, transient ischemic attack, systemic embolism, valve thrombosis, or hospitalization for heart failure), or major bleeding at 12 months.. A total of 1005 patients were enrolled at 49 sites in Brazil. A primary-outcome event occurred at a mean of 347.5 days in the rivaroxaban group and 340.1 days in the warfarin group (difference calculated as restricted mean survival time, 7.4 days; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.4 to 16.3; P<0.001 for noninferiority). Death from cardiovascular causes or thromboembolic events occurred in 17 patients (3.4%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 26 (5.1%) in the warfarin group (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.35 to 1.20). The incidence of stroke was 0.6% in the rivaroxaban group and 2.4% in the warfarin group (hazard ratio, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.88). Major bleeding occurred in 7 patients (1.4%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 13 (2.6%) in the warfarin group (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.21 to 1.35). The frequency of other serious adverse events was similar in the two groups.. In patients with atrial fibrillation and a bioprosthetic mitral valve, rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin with respect to the mean time until the primary outcome of death, major cardiovascular events, or major bleeding at 12 months. (Funded by PROADI-SUS and Bayer; RIVER ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02303795.).

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Bioprosthesis; Cardiovascular Diseases; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mitral Valve; Rivaroxaban; Single-Blind Method; Stroke; Warfarin

Although randomized trials provide a high level of evidence regarding the efficacy of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs), the results of such trials may differ from those observed in day-to-day clinical practice.. To compare the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (S/SE) and major bleeding (MB) between NOAC and warfarin in clinical practice.. Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who started warfarin/NOACs between January 2015 and November 2016 were retrospectively identified from Korea's nationwide health insurance claims database. Using inpatient diagnosis and imaging records, the Cox models with inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity scores were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for NOACs relative to warfarin.. Of the 48,389 patients, 10,548, 11,414, 17,779 and 8,648 were administered apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban and warfarin, respectively. Many patients had suffered prior strokes (36.7%, 37.7%, 31.4%, and 32.2% in apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin group, respectively), exhibited high CHA2DS2-VASc (4.8, 4.6, 4.6, and 4.1 in apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin group, respectively) and HAS-BLED (3.7, 3.6, 3.6, and 3.3 in apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin group, respectively) scores, had received antiplatelet therapy (75.4%, 75.7%, 76.8%, and 70.1% in apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin group, respectively), or were administered reduced doses of NOACs (49.8%, 52.9%, and 42.8% in apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban group, respectively). Apixaban, dabigatran and rivaroxaban showed a significantly lower S/SE risk [HR, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.62, 0.54-0.71; 0.60, 0.53-0.69; and 0.71, 0.56-0.88, respectively] than warfarin. Apixaban and dabigatran (HR, 95% CI: 0.58, 0.51-0.66 and 0.75, 0.60-0.95, respectively), but not rivaroxaban (HR, 95% CI: 0.84, 0.69-1.04), showed a significantly lower MB risk than warfarin.. Among Asian patients who were associated with higher bleeding risk, low adherence, and receiving reduced NOAC dose than that provided in randomised controlled trials, all NOACs were associated with a significantly lower S/SE risk and apixaban and dabigatran with a significantly lower MB risk than warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Aim To evaluate safety of using rivaroxaban in patients with stage 4 chronic kidney disease (CKD) or transient, stable decline of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) to 15-29 ml /min / 1.73 m2 in the presence of atrial fibrillation (AF).Material and methods This multicenter prospective, randomized study included patients admitted to cardiology departments from 2017 through 2019. Of 10 224 admitted patients 109 (3 %) patients with AF and stage 4 CKD or a stable decline of GFR to 15-29 ml /min / 1.73 m2 were randomized at 2:1 ratio to the rivaroxaban 15 mg /day (n=73) treatment group or to the warfarin treatment group (n=36). The primary endpoint was development of BARC and ISTH major, minor, and clinically relevant minor bleeding. Mean follow-up duration was 18 months.Results Patients receiving warfarin had a significantly higher incidence of BARC (n=26 (72.2 %) vs. n=31 (42.4 %), р<0.01) and ISTH (n=22 (61.1 %) vs. n=27 (36.9 %), p<0.01) minor bleeding and all ISTH clinically relevant (minor clinically relevant and major bleedings) n=10 (27.7 %) vs. n=8 (10.9 %), р=0.03]. The number of repeated hospitalizations was 65 (43% of patients) in the rivaroxaban treatment group and 27 (48% of patients) in the warfarin treatment group (р=0.57), including 24 (36.9 %) and 11 (40.7 %) emergency admissions in the rivaroxaban and warfarin treatment groups, respectively (р=0.96). Significant improvement of changes in creatinine clearance and GFR (by CKD-EPI and Cockroft-Gault) was observed in the rivaroxaban treatment group.Conclusion The study provided evidence for a more beneficial safety profile of rivaroxaban compared to warfarin in patients with AF and advanced CKD.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Background and Purpose- The sources of emboli in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) are multiple and may not respond uniformly to anticoagulation. In this exploratory subgroup analysis of patients with carotid atherosclerosis in the NAVIGATE (New Approach Rivaroxaban Inhibition of Factor Xa in a Global Trial Versus ASA to Prevent Embolism)-ESUS trial, we assessed whether the treatment effect in this subgroup is consistent with the overall trial population and investigated the association of carotid atherosclerosis with recurrent ischemic stroke. Methods- Carotid atherosclerosis was analyzed either as the presence of mild (ie, 20%-49%) atherosclerotic stenosis or, separately, as the presence of carotid plaque. Primary efficacy outcome was ischemic stroke recurrence. Safety outcomes were major bleeding and symptomatic intracerebral bleeding. Results- Carotid plaque was present in 40% of participants and mild carotid stenosis in 11%. There was no significant difference in ischemic stroke recurrence between rivaroxaban- and aspirin-treated patients among 490 patients with carotid stenosis (5.0 versus 5.9/100 patient-years, respectively, hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.39-1.87; P for interaction of treatment effect with patients without carotid stenosis 0.78) and among 2905 patients with carotid plaques (5.9 versus 4.9/100 patient-years, respectively, HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.86-1.68; P for interaction of treatment effect with patients without carotid stenosis 0.2). Among patients with carotid plaque, major bleeding was more frequent in rivaroxaban-treated patients compared with aspirin-treated (2.0 versus 0.5/100 patient-years, HR, 3.75; 95% CI, 1.63-8.65). Patients with carotid stenosis had similar rate of ischemic stroke recurrence compared with those without (5.4 versus 4.9/100 patient-years, respectively, HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.73-1.69), but there was a strong trend of higher rate of ischemic stroke recurrence in patients with carotid plaque compared with those without (5.4 versus 4.3/100 patient-years, respectively, HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.99-1.54). Conclusions- In ESUS patients with carotid atherosclerosis, we found no difference in efficacy between rivaroxaban and aspirin for prevention of recurrent stroke, but aspirin was safer, consistent with the overall trial results. Carotid plaque was much more often present ipsilateral to the qualifying ischemic stroke than contralateral, supporting an important etiological role of nonstenotic car

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Aspirin; Carotid Artery Diseases; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Intracranial Embolism; Middle Aged; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Disease Management; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Guideline Adherence; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Stroke is often a devastating event among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection (HFrEF). In COMMANDER HF, rivaroxaban 2.5 mg b.i.d. did not reduce the composite of first occurrence of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction compared with placebo in patients with HFrEF, coronary artery disease (CAD), and sinus rhythm. We now examine the incidence, timing, type, severity, and predictors of stroke or a transient ischaemic attack (TIA), and seek to establish the net clinical benefit of treatment with low-dose rivaroxaban.. In this double-blind, randomized trial, 5022 patients who had HFrEF(≤40%), elevated natriuretic peptides, CAD, and who were in sinus rhythm were treated with rivaroxaban 2.5 mg b.i.d. or placebo in addition to antiplatelet therapy, after an episode of worsening HF. The primary neurological outcome for this post hoc analysis was time to first event of any stroke or TIA. Over a median follow-up of 20.5 (25th-75th percentiles 20.0-20.9) months, 150 all-cause stroke (127) or TIA (23) events occurred (ischaemic stroke in 82% and haemorrhagic stroke in 11% of stroke events). Overall, 47.5% of first-time strokes were either disabling (16.5%) or fatal (31%). Prior stroke, low body mass index, geographic region, and the CHA2DS2-VASc score were predictors of stroke/TIA. Rivaroxaban significantly reduced the primary neurological endpoint of all-cause stroke or TIA compared with placebo by 32% (1.29 events vs. 1.90 events per 100 patient-years), adjusted for the time from index HF event to randomization and stratified by geographic region (adjusted hazard ratio 0.68, 95% confidence interval 0.49-0.94), with a number needed to treat of 164 patients per year to prevent one stroke/TIA event. The principal safety endpoint of fatal bleeding or bleeding into a critical space, occurred at a similar rate on rivaroxaban and placebo (0.44 events vs. 0.55 events per 100 patient-years).. Patients with HFrEF and CAD are at risk for stroke or TIA in the period following an episode of worsening heart failure in the absence of atrial fibrillation. Most strokes are of ischaemic origin and nearly half are either disabling or fatal. Rivaroxaban at a dose of 2.5 mg b.i.d. reduced rates of stroke or TIA compared with placebo in this population.. COMMANDER HF (A Study to Assess the Effectiveness and Safety of Rivaroxaban in Reducing the Risk of Death, Myocardial Infarction, or Stroke in Participants with Heart Failure and Coronary Artery Disease Following an Episode of Decompensated Heart Failure); ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01877915.

Topics: Aged; Brain Ischemia; Case-Control Studies; Coronary Artery Disease; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Placebos; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Stroke Volume

Adding rivaroxaban to aspirin in patients with stable atherosclerotic disease reduces the recurrence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) but increases the risk of major bleeding. The aim of this study was to estimate the individual lifetime treatment benefit and harm of adding low-dose rivaroxaban to aspirin in patients with stable cardiovascular disease.. Patients with established CVD from the COMPASS trial (n = 27 390) and SMART prospective cohort study (n = 8139) were used. Using the pre-existing lifetime SMART-REACH model for recurrent CVD, and a newly developed Fine and Gray competing risk-adjusted lifetime model for major bleeding, individual treatment effects from adding low-dose rivaroxaban to aspirin in patients with stable CVD were estimated, expressed in terms of (i) life-years free of stroke or myocardial infarction (MI) gained; and (ii) life-years free from major bleeding lost. Calibration of the SMART-REACH model for prediction of recurrent CVD events in the COMPASS study was good. The major bleeding risk model as derived in the COMPASS trial showed good external calibration in the SMART cohort. Predicted individual gain in life expectancy free of stroke or MI from added low-dose rivaroxaban had a median of 16 months (range 1-48 months), while predicted individualized lifetime lost in terms of major bleeding had a median of 2 months (range 0-20 months).. There is a wide distribution in lifetime gain and harm from adding low-dose rivaroxaban to aspirin in individual patients with stable CVD. Using these lifetime models, benefits and bleeding risk can be weighed for each individual patient, which could facilitate treatment decisions in clinical practice.

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Prospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Patients treated with antithrombotic drugs are at risk of bleeding. Bleeding may be the first manifestation of underlying cancer.. We examined new cancers diagnosed in relation to gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding among patients enrolled in the COMPASS trial (Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies) and determined the hazard of new cancer diagnosis after bleeding at these sites.. Of 27 395 patients enrolled (mean age, 68 years; women, 21%), 2678 (9.8%) experienced any (major or minor) bleeding, 713 (2.6%) experienced major bleeding, and 1084 (4.0%) were diagnosed with cancer during a mean follow-up of 23 months. Among 2678 who experienced bleeding, 257 (9.9%) were subsequently diagnosed with cancer. Gastrointestinal bleeding was associated with a 20-fold higher hazard of new gastrointestinal cancer diagnosis (7.4% versus 0.5%; hazard ratio [HR], 20.6 [95% CI, 15.2-27.8]) and 1.7-fold higher hazard of new nongastrointestinal cancer diagnosis (3.8% versus 3.1%; HR, 1.70 [95% CI, 1.20-2.40]). Genitourinary bleeding was associated with a 32-fold higher hazard of new genitourinary cancer diagnosis (15.8% versus 0.8%; HR, 32.5 [95% CI, 24.7-42.9]), and urinary bleeding was associated with a 98-fold higher hazard of new urinary cancer diagnosis (14.2% versus 0.2%; HR, 98.5; 95% CI, 68.0-142.7). Nongastrointestinal, nongenitourinary bleeding was associated with a 3-fold higher hazard of nongastrointestinal, nongenitourinary cancers (4.4% versus 1.9%; HR, 3.02 [95% CI, 2.32-3.91]).. In patients with atherosclerosis treated with antithrombotic drugs, any gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding was associated with higher rates of new cancer diagnosis. Any gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding should prompt investigation for cancers at these sites.. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01776424.

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Atherosclerosis; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Neoplasms; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Topics: Aged; Aorta, Thoracic; Aspirin; Atherosclerosis; Double-Blind Method; Echocardiography, Transesophageal; Female; Humans; Intracranial Embolism; Male; Middle Aged; Prevalence; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

The potential role of new oral anticoagulants in antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) remains uncertain.. To determine whether rivaroxaban is noninferior to dose-adjusted vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for thrombotic APS.. 3-year, open-label, randomized noninferiority trial. (EU Clinical Trials Register: EUDRA [European Union Drug Regulatory Authorities] code 2010-019764-36).. 6 university hospitals in Spain.. 190 adults (aged 18 to 75 years) with thrombotic APS.. Rivaroxaban (20 mg/d or 15 mg/d, according to renal function) versus dose-adjusted VKAs (target international normalized ratio, 2.0 to 3.0, or 3.1 to 4.0 in patients with a history of recurrent thrombosis).. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of patients with new thrombotic events; the primary safety outcome was major bleeding. The prespecified noninferiority margin for risk ratio (RR) was 1.40. Secondary outcomes included time to thrombosis, type of thrombosis, changes in biomarker levels, cardiovascular death, and nonmajor bleeding.. After 3 years of follow-up, recurrent thrombosis occurred in 11 patients (11.6%) in the rivaroxaban group and 6 (6.3%) in the VKA group (RR in the rivaroxaban group, 1.83 [95% CI, 0.71 to 4.76]). Stroke occurred more commonly in patients receiving rivaroxaban (9 events) than in those receiving VKAs (0 events) (corrected RR, 19.00 [CI, 1.12 to 321.9]). Major bleeding occurred in 6 patients (6.3%) in the rivaroxaban group and 7 (7.4%) in the VKA group (RR, 0.86 [CI, 0.30 to 2.46]). Post hoc analysis suggested an increased risk for recurrent thrombosis in rivaroxaban-treated patients with previous arterial thrombosis, livedo racemosa, or APS-related cardiac valvular disease.. Anticoagulation intensity was not measured in the rivaroxaban group.. Rivaroxaban did not show noninferiority to dose-adjusted VKAs for thrombotic APS and, in fact, showed a non-statistically significant near doubling of the risk for recurrent thrombosis.. Bayer Hispania.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thrombosis; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Data regarding efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban in prevention of stroke in elderly polymorbid patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation are presented. In this aspect results of randomized clinical trial in direct comparison of rivaroxaban and warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation ROCKET-AF are discussed. Results of rivaroxaban use in elderly patients in real medical practice are also considered.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome

Covert vascular disease of the brain manifests as infarcts, white matter hyperintensities, and microbleeds on MRI. Their cumulative effect is often a decline in cognition, motor impairment, and psychiatric disorders. Preventive therapies for covert brain ischemia have not been established but represent a huge unmet clinical need.. The MRI substudy examines the effects of the antithrombotic regimens in COMPASS on incident covert brain infarcts (the primary outcome), white matter hyperintensities, and cognitive and functional status in a sample of consenting COMPASS participants without contraindications to MRI.. COMPASS is a randomized superiority trial testing rivaroxaban 2.5 mg bid plus acetylsalicylic acid 100 mg and rivaroxaban 5 mg bid against acetylsalicylic acid 100 mg per day for the combined endpoint of MI, stroke, and cardiovascular death in individuals with stable coronary artery disease or peripheral artery disease. T1-weighted, T2-weighted, T2*-weighted, and FLAIR images were obtained close to randomization and near the termination of assigned antithrombotic therapy; biomarker and genetic samples at randomization and one month, and cognitive and functional assessment at randomization, after two years and at the end of study.. Between March 2013 and May 2016, 1905 participants were recruited from 86 centers in 16 countries. Of these participants, 1760 underwent baseline MRI scans that were deemed technically adequate for interpretation. The mean age at entry of participants with interpretable MRI was 71 years and 23.5% were women. Coronary artery disease was present in 90.4% and 28.1% had peripheral artery disease. Brain infarcts were present in 34.8%, 29.3% had cerebral microbleeds, and 93.0% had white matter hyperintensities. The median Montreal Cognitive Assessment score was 26 (interquartile range 23-28).. The COMPASS MRI substudy will examine the effect of the antithrombotic interventions on MRI-determined covert brain infarcts and cognition. Demonstration of a therapeutic effect of the antithrombotic regimens on brain infarcts would have implications for prevention of cognitive decline and provide insight into the pathogenesis of vascular cognitive decline.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Brain; Brain Infarction; Brain Ischemia; Cognition; Cognition Disorders; Female; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Angiography; Male; Middle Aged; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

The management of anticoagulation therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and cancer is challenging due to increased thrombotic and bleeding risks. We sought to determine the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban in patients with AF and a history of cancer.. ROCKET AF randomized 14 264 patients with AF to rivaroxaban or warfarin with a median follow-up of 1.9 years. Cox regression models were used to assess the association between cancer history and clinical outcomes, and the relative treatment effect of rivaroxaban vs. warfarin in these patients. A total of 640 patients enrolled in ROCKET AF had a history of cancer, with the most common types being prostate (28.6%), colorectal (16.1%), and breast (14.7%) cancer. Patients with a history of cancer were older, more frequently male, more likely to have prior vitamin K antagonist (VKA) use and had higher rates of overall bleeding [hazard ratio (HR) 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16-1.47; P < 0.0001] and non-cardiovascular death (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.04-2.07; P = 0.031) compared with those with no cancer history. There were no significant associations between cancer history and stroke, venous thromboembolism, or myocardial infarction. The relative efficacy of rivaroxaban vs. warfarin for prevention of stroke/systemic embolism was similar in those with and without a history of cancer (interaction P-value = 0.21).. In ROCKET AF, a history of cancer was associated with a higher risk of bleeding and non-cardiovascular death, but not ischaemic events. The relative efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin were not significantly different in patients with and without a history of cancer. The results of this study are exploratory and should be taken in context of the study population, which may not be generalizable to those with advanced malignancy. Further investigation is needed to understand optimal anticoagulation strategies in patients with AF and cancer.Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00403767.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Australia; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Europe; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Neoplasms; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

Data on the comparison between uninterrupted and interrupted by one dose strategies for direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use during the periprocedural period of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation are scarce. The purpose of this study is to investigate the feasibility of uninterrupted DOAC strategy by evaluating the incidence of silent stroke (SS) and perioperative trends in coagulation markers compared with the interrupted strategy.. We randomly divided 200 consecutive patients receiving DOACs, who underwent AF ablation into uninterrupted group (UG = 100) and interrupted by one dose group (IG = 100). The rate of SS confirmed by post-operative magnetic resonance imaging and periprocedural trends in coagulation markers was investigated. A significant difference in SS incidence was found between the UG and IG (UG 4%, IG 17%, P < 0.005), although there were no differences in the rate of complications including bleeding and symptomatic thrombo-embolic events between the two groups. Intraoperative cardioversion [odds ratio (OR) 7.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.76-30.0; P < 0.01] and the length of procedure time (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05; P < 0.05) independently predicted the occurrence of SS in the IG. A significant increase in prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (PF1 + 2) values was observed in the IG compared with the UG on the operative and first post-operative days.. Silent stroke incidence in the IG was significantly higher than that in the UG; this seems to be supported by the difference in PF1 + 2 values between the UG and IG. Intraoperative cardioversion and procedure time predicted the occurrence of SS in the IG.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Asymptomatic Diseases; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Incidence; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Middle Aged; Peptide Fragments; Perioperative Care; Postoperative Complications; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Prospective Studies; Prothrombin; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles

Although a recent expert consensus statement has recommended periprocedural uninterrupted (UI) non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) as a Class I indication, there have been no clear randomized trials. We investigated the safety and efficacy of UI, procedure day single-dose skipped (SDS), and 24-hour skipped (24S) NOACs in patients undergoing AF ablation.. In this prospective, open-label, randomized multicentre trial, 326 patients (75% male, 58 ± 11 years old) scheduled for AF catheter ablation were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to UI, SDS, and 24S at three tertiary hospitals. Bridging with low molecular weight heparin was carried out in the patients with persistent AF who were assigned to the 24S group. Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban were assigned in order after randomization. The primary endpoint was the incidence of bleeding events within 1 month after ablation. The secondary endpoints included thrombo-embolic and other procedure-related complications. The intra-procedural heparin requirement was higher in the 24S group than others (P < 0.001), and the mean activated clotting time was comparable among the groups (P = 0.139). The incidence of major bleeding up to 1 month after ablation and a post-procedural reduction in the haemoglobin levels did not significantly differ among the treatment groups and different NOACs (P > 0.05). There were no fatal events or thrombo-embolic complications in all the three groups.. In patients undergoing AF ablation, UI NOACs and SDS or double dose skipped NOACs had a comparable efficacy and safety, regardless of the type of NOAC.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Humans; Incidence; Intraoperative Care; Male; Middle Aged; Preoperative Care; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Whole Blood Coagulation Time

Some experimental studies have shown that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have anti-inflammatory effects. However, the interval changes in inflammatory markers in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) who receive DOACs remain unknown. Between July 2013 and April 2014, a total of 187 AF patients randomly assigned to receive rivaroxaban (n = 91) or dabigatran (n = 96) were assessed for eligibility. The levels of the following inflammatory markers were serially evaluated: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, pentraxin-3, interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-18, tumor necrosis factor-α, monocyte chemotactic protein-1, growth and differentiation factor-15, and soluble thrombomodulin (sTM). The aim in this study was to evaluate the anti-inflammatory effects of rivaroxaban and dabigatran in patients with AF, in addition to the impact of markers on bleeding events. Finally, 117 patients (rivaroxaban: n = 55, dabigatran: n = 62) were included in the analysis at 12 months. Although the interval changes in sTM levels tended to be greater in the dabigatran group [0.3 (0-0.7) vs. 0.5 (0-1.0) FU/ml, p = 0.061], there were no significant differences in the interval changes in any inflammatory marker between 2 groups. There were no significant differences in bleeding events between 2 groups. The interval changes in sTM levels were significantly greater in patients with bleeding compared with those without [0.8 (0.5-1.3) vs. 0.4 (- 0.1-0.8) FU/ml, p = 0.017]. There were no significant differences in the interval changes in any inflammatory marker between rivaroxaban and dabigatran treatments in patients with AF. The increased levels of sTM after DOACs treatment might be related to bleeding events.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Prospective Studies; Regression Analysis; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke

Strokes were significantly reduced by the combination of rivaroxaban plus aspirin in comparison with aspirin in the COMPASS trial (Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies). We present detailed analyses of stroke by type, predictors, and antithrombotic effects in key subgroups.. Participants had stable coronary artery or peripheral artery disease and were randomly assigned to receive aspirin 100 mg once daily (n=9126), rivaroxaban 5 mg twice daily (n=9117), or rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily plus aspirin (n=9152). Patients who required anticoagulation or had a stroke within 1 month, previous lacunar stroke, or intracerebral hemorrhage were excluded.. During a mean follow-up of 23 months, fewer patients had strokes in the rivaroxaban plus aspirin group than in the aspirin group (83 [0.9% per year] versus 142 [1.6% per year]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44-0.76; P<0.0001). Ischemic/uncertain strokes were reduced by nearly half (68 [0.7% per year] versus 132 [1.4% per year]; HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.38-0.68; P<0.0001) by the combination in comparison with aspirin. No significant difference was noted in the occurrence of stroke in the rivaroxaban alone group in comparison with aspirin: annualized rate of 0.7% (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.65-1.05). The occurrence of fatal and disabling stroke (modified Rankin Scale, 3-6) was decreased by the combination (32 [0.3% per year] versus 55 [0.6% per year]; HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.37-0.89; P=0.01). Independent predictors of stroke were prior stroke, hypertension, systolic blood pressure at baseline, age, diabetes mellitus, and Asian ethnicity. Prior stroke was the strongest predictor of incident stroke (HR, 3.63; 95% CI, 2.65-4.97; P<0.0001) and was associated with a 3.4% per year rate of stroke recurrence on aspirin. The effect of the combination in comparison with aspirin was consistent across subgroups with high stroke risk, including those with prior stroke.. Low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin is an important new antithrombotic option for primary and secondary stroke prevention in patients with clinical atherosclerosis.. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01776424.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aspirin; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Although acetylsalicylic acid is of proven benefit for secondary prevention in patients with cardiovascular disease, the risk of recurrent ischemic events remains high. Intensification of antithrombotic therapy with more potent antiplatelet drugs, dual antiplatelet therapy, or vitamin K antagonists further reduces the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared with acetylsalicylic acid alone but increases the risk of bleeding without reducing mortality. In patients with prior coronary artery disease or peripheral arterial disease the COMPASS (Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies) trial revealed that compared with acetylsalicylic acid alone, dual pathway inhibition with low-dose rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice-daily), an oral factor Xa inhibitor, plus acetylsalicylic acid reduced major adverse cardiovascular event by 24%, major adverse limb events by 47%, and mortality by 18%. Major bleeding was increased by 70%, but there was no increase in fatal or intracranial bleeding. This article (1) reviews the results of the COMPASS trial, (2) explains why dual pathway inhibition is superior to antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy alone, (3) compares the results with rivaroxaban plus aspirin with those with other antithrombotic regimens, and (4) provides insight into how best to apply the COMPASS results into practice.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiovascular Diseases; Chronic Disease; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Recurrence; Research Design; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke

The NAVIGATE ESUS randomized clinical trial found that 15 mg of rivaroxaban per day does not reduce stroke compared with aspirin in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS); however, it substantially reduces stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).. To analyze whether rivaroxaban is associated with a reduction of recurrent stroke among patients with ESUS who have an increased risk of AF.. Participants were stratified by predictors of AF, including left atrial diameter, frequency of premature atrial contractions, and HAVOC score, a validated scheme using clinical features. Treatment interactions with these predictors were assessed. Participants were enrolled between December 2014 and September 2017, and analysis began March 2018.. Rivaroxaban treatment vs aspirin.. Risk of ischemic stroke.. Among 7112 patients with a mean (SD) age of 67 (9.8) years, the mean (SD) HAVOC score was 2.6 (1.8), the mean (SD) left atrial diameter was 3.8 (1.4) cm (n = 4022), and the median (interquartile range) daily frequency of premature atrial contractions was 48 (13-222). Detection of AF during follow-up increased for each tertile of HAVOC score: 2.3% (score, 0-2), 3.0% (score, 3), and 5.8% (score, >3); however, neither tertiles of the HAVOC score nor premature atrial contractions frequency impacted the association of rivaroxaban with recurrent ischemic stroke (P for interaction = .67 and .96, respectively). Atrial fibrillation annual incidence increased for each tertile of left atrial diameter (2.0%, 3.6%, and 5.2%) and for each tertile of premature atrial contractions frequency (1.3%, 2.9%, and 7.0%). Among the predefined subgroup of patients with a left atrial diameter of more than 4.6 cm (9% of overall population), the risk of ischemic stroke was lower among the rivaroxaban group (1.7% per year) compared with the aspirin group (6.5% per year) (hazard ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.07-0.94; P for interaction = .02).. The HAVOC score, left atrial diameter, and premature atrial contraction frequency predicted subsequent clinical AF. Rivaroxaban was associated with a reduced risk of recurrent stroke among patients with ESUS and moderate or severe left atrial enlargement; however, this needs to be independently confirmed before influencing clinical practice.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Intracranial Embolism; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Recurrence; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Whether anticoagulation benefits patients with heart failure (HF) in sinus rhythm is uncertain. The COMMANDER HF randomized clinical trial evaluated the effects of adding low-dose rivaroxaban to antiplatelet therapy in patients with recent worsening of chronic HF with reduced ejection fraction, coronary artery disease (CAD), and sinus rhythm. Although the primary end point of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke did not differ between rivaroxaban and placebo, there were numerical advantages favoring rivaroxaban for myocardial infarction and stroke.. To examine whether low-dose rivaroxaban was associated with reduced thromboembolic events in patients enrolled in the COMMANDER HF trial.. Post hoc analysis of the COMMANDER HF multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with CAD and worsening HF. The trial randomized 5022 patients postdischarge from a hospital or outpatient clinic after treatment for worsening HF between September 2013 and October 2017. Patients were required to be receiving standard care for HF and CAD and were excluded for a medical condition requiring anticoagulation or a bleeding history. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio. Analysis was conducted from June 2018 and January 2019.. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 2.5 mg of rivaroxaban given orally twice daily or placebo in addition to their standard therapy.. For this post hoc analysis, a thromboembolic composite was defined as either (1) myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, sudden/unwitnessed death, symptomatic pulmonary embolism, or symptomatic deep venous thrombosis or (2) all of the previous components except sudden/unwitnessed deaths because not all of these are caused by thromboembolic events.. Of 5022 patients, 3872 (77.1%) were men, and the overall mean (SD) age was 66.4 (10.2) years. Over a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 19.6 (11.7-30.8) months, fewer patients assigned to rivaroxaban compared with placebo had a thromboembolic event including sudden/unwitnessed deaths: 328 (13.1%) vs 390 (15.5%) (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.72-0.96; P = .01). When sudden/unwitnessed deaths were excluded, the results analyzing thromboembolic events were similar: 153 (6.1%) vs 190 patients (7.6%) with an event (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.64-0.98; P = .04).. In this study, thromboembolic events occurred frequently in patients with HF, CAD, and sinus rhythm. Rivaroxaban may reduce the risk of thromboembolic events in this population, but these events are not the major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with recent worsening of HF for which rivaroxaban had no effect. While consistent with other studies, these results require confirmation in prospective randomized clinical trials.. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01877915.

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Chronic Disease; Coronary Artery Disease; Death, Sudden; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mortality; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Proportional Hazards Models; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Stroke Volume; Thienopyridines; Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) identifies patients with cryptogenic ischemic stroke presumed due to embolism from several unidentified sources. Among patients with recent ESUS, we sought to determine independent predictors of recurrent ischemic stroke during treatment with aspirin or rivaroxaban and to assess the relative effects of these treatments according to risk.. Exploratory analyses of 7213 participants in the NAVIGATE ESUS international trial who were randomized to aspirin 100 mg/day or rivaroxaban 15 mg/day and followed for a median of 11 months, during which time there were 309 first recurrent ischemic strokes (4.6% per year). Baseline features were correlated with recurrent stroke by multivariate analysis.. The 7 independent predictors of recurrent stroke were stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) prior to the qualifying stroke (hazard ratio [HR] 2.03 95% confidence internal [CI] 1.58-2.60), current tobacco user (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.24-2.12), age (HR 1.02 per year increase, 95%CI 1.01-1.03), diabetes (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.01-1.64), multiple acute infarcts on neuroimaging (HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.09-2.02), aspirin use prior to qualifying stroke (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.02-1.70), and time from qualifying stroke to randomization (HR .98, 95% CI .97-.99). The rate of recurrent stroke rate was 2.6% per year for participants without any of these risk factors, and increased by an average of 45% for each independent predictor (P < .001). There were no significant interactions between treatment effects and independent stroke predictors or stroke risk status.. In this large cohort of ESUS patients, several features including prior stroke or TIA, advanced age, current tobacco user, multiple acute infarcts on neuroimaging, and diabetes independently identified those with an increased risk of ischemic stroke recurrence. The relative effects of rivaroxaban and aspirin were similar across the spectrum of independent stroke predictors and recurrent stroke risk status.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Brain Ischemia; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Intracranial Embolism; Male; Middle Aged; Recurrence; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Compelling evidence showing a link between atrial fibrillation (AF) and cognitive decline and dementia is accumulating.. Blinded Randomized Trial of Anticoagulation to Prevent Ischemic Stroke and Neurocognitive Impairment in Atrial Fibrillation (BRAIN-AF) is a prospective, multicentric, double-blind, randomized-controlled trial, recruiting patients with nonvalvular AF and a low risk of stroke. Patients with a high risk of bleeding will be excluded from the study. Participants will be randomized to receive either rivaroxaban (15 mg daily) or standard of care (placebo in patients without vascular disease or acetylsalicylic acid 100 mg daily in patients with vascular disease).. The primary outcome is the composite of stroke, transient ischemic attack, and cognitive decline (defined by a decrease in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment score ≥ 3 at any follow-up visit after baseline). Approximately 3250 patients will be enrolled in approximately 130 clinical sites until 609 adjudicated primary outcome events have occurred.. BRAIN-AF determines whether oral anticoagulation therapy with rivaroxaban compared with standard of care reduces the risk of stroke, transient ischemic attack, or cognitive decline in patients with nonvalvular AF and a low risk of stroke.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Brain Ischemia; Cognitive Dysfunction; Double-Blind Method; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Mental Status and Dementia Tests; Middle Aged; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Coronary artery disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and is a consequence of acute thrombotic events involving activation of platelets and coagulation proteins. Factor Xa inhibitors and aspirin each reduce thrombotic events but have not yet been tested in combination or against each other in patients with stable coronary artery disease.. In this multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, outpatient trial, patients with stable coronary artery disease or peripheral artery disease were recruited at 602 hospitals, clinics, or community centres in 33 countries. This paper reports on patients with coronary artery disease. Eligible patients with coronary artery disease had to have had a myocardial infarction in the past 20 years, multi-vessel coronary artery disease, history of stable or unstable angina, previous multi-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention, or previous multi-vessel coronary artery bypass graft surgery. After a 30-day run in period, patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive rivaroxaban (2·5 mg orally twice a day) plus aspirin (100 mg once a day), rivaroxaban alone (5 mg orally twice a day), or aspirin alone (100 mg orally once a day). Randomisation was computer generated. Each treatment group was double dummy, and the patients, investigators, and central study staff were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome of the COMPASS trial was the occurrence of myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01776424, and is closed to new participants.. Between March 12, 2013, and May 10, 2016, 27 395 patients were enrolled to the COMPASS trial, of whom 24 824 patients had stable coronary artery disease from 558 centres. The combination of rivaroxaban plus aspirin reduced the primary outcome more than aspirin alone (347 [4%] of 8313 vs 460 [6%] of 8261; hazard ratio [HR] 0·74, 95% CI 0·65-0·86, p<0·0001). By comparison, treatment with rivaroxaban alone did not significantly improve the primary outcome when compared with treatment with aspirin alone (411 [5%] of 8250 vs 460 [6%] of 8261; HR 0·89, 95% CI 0·78-1·02, p=0·094). Combined rivaroxaban plus aspirin treatment resulted in more major bleeds than treatment with aspirin alone (263 [3%] of 8313 vs 158 [2%] of 8261; HR 1·66, 95% CI 1·37-2·03, p<0·0001), and similarly, more bleeds were seen in the rivaroxaban alone group than in the aspirin alone group (236 [3%] of 8250 vs 158 [2%] of 8261; HR 1·51, 95% CI 1·23-1·84, p<0·0001). The most common site of major bleeding was gastrointestinal, occurring in 130 [2%] patients who received combined rivaroxaban plus aspirin, in 84 [1%] patients who received rivaroxaban alone, and in 61 [1%] patients who received aspirin alone. Rivaroxaban plus aspirin reduced mortality when compared with aspirin alone (262 [3%] of 8313 vs 339 [4%] of 8261; HR 0·77, 95% CI 0·65-0·90, p=0·0012).. In patients with stable coronary artery disease, addition of rivaroxaban to aspirin lowered major vascular events, but increased major bleeding. There was no significant increase in intracranial bleeding or other critical organ bleeding. There was also a significant net benefit in favour of rivaroxaban plus aspirin and deaths were reduced by 23%. Thus, addition of rivaroxaban to aspirin has the potential to substantially reduce morbidity and mortality from coronary artery disease worldwide.. Bayer AG.

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Coronary Artery Disease; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Morbidity; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Patients with peripheral artery disease have an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Antiplatelet agents are widely used to reduce these complications.. This was a multicentre, double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial for which patients were recruited at 602 hospitals, clinics, or community practices from 33 countries across six continents. Eligible patients had a history of peripheral artery disease of the lower extremities (previous peripheral bypass surgery or angioplasty, limb or foot amputation, intermittent claudication with objective evidence of peripheral artery disease), of the carotid arteries (previous carotid artery revascularisation or asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis of at least 50%), or coronary artery disease with an ankle-brachial index of less than 0·90. After a 30-day run-in period, patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive oral rivaroxaban (2·5 mg twice a day) plus aspirin (100 mg once a day), rivaroxaban twice a day (5 mg with aspirin placebo once a day), or to aspirin once a day (100 mg and rivaroxaban placebo twice a day). Randomisation was computer generated. Each treatment group was double dummy, and the patient, investigators, and central study staff were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction or stroke; the primary peripheral artery disease outcome was major adverse limb events including major amputation. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01776424, and is closed to new participants.. Between March 12, 2013, and May 10, 2016, we enrolled 7470 patients with peripheral artery disease from 558 centres. The combination of rivaroxaban plus aspirin compared with aspirin alone reduced the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (126 [5%] of 2492 vs 174 [7%] of 2504; hazard ratio [HR] 0·72, 95% CI 0·57-0·90, p=0·0047), and major adverse limb events including major amputation (32 [1%] vs 60 [2%]; HR 0·54 95% CI 0·35-0·82, p=0·0037). Rivaroxaban 5 mg twice a day compared with aspirin alone did not significantly reduce the composite endpoint (149 [6%] of 2474 vs 174 [7%] of 2504; HR 0·86, 95% CI 0·69-1·08, p=0·19), but reduced major adverse limb events including major amputation (40 [2%] vs 60 [2%]; HR 0·67, 95% CI 0·45-1·00, p=0·05). The median duration of treatment was 21 months. The use of the rivaroxaban plus aspirin combination increased major bleeding compared with the aspirin alone group (77 [3%] of 2492 vs 48 [2%] of 2504; HR 1·61, 95% CI 1·12-2·31, p=0·0089), which was mainly gastrointestinal. Similarly, major bleeding occurred in 79 (3%) of 2474 patients with rivaroxaban 5 mg, and in 48 (2%) of 2504 in the aspirin alone group (HR 1·68, 95% CI 1·17-2·40; p=0·0043).. Low-dose rivaroxaban taken twice a day plus aspirin once a day reduced major adverse cardiovascular and limb events when compared with aspirin alone. Although major bleeding was increased, fatal or critical organ bleeding was not. This combination therapy represents an important advance in the management of patients with peripheral artery disease. Rivaroxaban alone did not significantly reduce major adverse cardiovascular events compared with asprin alone, but reduced major adverse limb events and increased major bleeding.. Bayer AG.

Topics: Aged; Amputation, Surgical; Aspirin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Carotid Artery Diseases; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Lower Extremity; Male; Middle Aged; Morbidity; Myocardial Infarction; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

To evaluate the effect of telemonitoring on adherence to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients.. A randomized, single-blind, crossover, controlled trial in 48 AF patients on once or twice daily (OD or BID) NOAC. The Medication Event Monitoring System tracked NOAC intake during three phases of 3 months each: daily telemonitoring, telemonitoring with immediate telephone feedback in case of intake errors, and an observation phase without daily transmissions. Unprotected days were defined as ≥ 3 or ≥ 1 consecutively missed doses for a BID or OD NOAC, respectively, or excess dose intake. Cost-effectiveness was calculated based on anticipated stroke reduction derived from patients' risk profile and measured intake. Persistence over the entire study was 98%. Telemonitoring-only already led to very high taking and regimen adherence (97.4% respectively 93.8%). Nevertheless, direct feedback further improved both to 99.0% and 96.8%, respectively (P < 0.001 respectively P = 0.002). Observation without daily monitoring resulted in a significant waning of taking adherence (94.3%; P = 0.049). Taking adherence was significantly higher for OD compared to BID NOAC, although unprotected days were similar. Feedback intervention had an incremental cost of €344 289 to prevent one stroke, but this could be as low as €15 488 in high-risk patients with low adherence and optimized technology.. Telemonitoring resulted in high NOAC adherence due to the notion of being watched, as evidenced by the rapid decline during the observation period. Feedback further optimized adherence. Telemonitoring with or without feedback may be a cost-effective approach in high-risk patients deemed poorly adherent.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Cross-Over Studies; Feedback; Female; Humans; Male; Medication Adherence; Monitoring, Ambulatory; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Single-Blind Method; Stroke

Atrial fibrillation (AF) increases risk of stroke 5-fold. Carotid artery disease (CD) also augments the risk of stroke, yet there are limited data about the interplay of these 2 diseases and clinical outcomes in patients with comorbid AF and CD.. Among patients with both AF and CD, use of rivaroxaban when compared with warfarin is associated with a lower risk of stroke.. This post hoc analysis from ROCKET AF aimed to determine absolute rates of stroke/systemic embolism (SE) and bleeding, and the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in patients with AF and CD (defined as history of carotid occlusive disease or carotid revascularization [endarterectomy and/or stenting]).. A total of 593 (4.2%) patients had CD at enrollment. Patients with and without CD had similar rates of stroke or SE (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.66-1.48, P = 0.96), and there was no difference in major or nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding (adjusted HR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.88-1.24, P = 0.62). The efficacy of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin for the prevention of stroke/SE was not statistically significant in patients with vs those without CD (interaction P = 0.25). The safety of rivaroxaban vs warfarin for major or nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding was similar in patients with and without CD (interaction P = 0.64).. Patients with CD in ROCKET AF had similar risk of stroke/SE compared with patients without CD. Additionally, there was no interaction between CD and the treatment effect of rivaroxaban or warfarin for stroke prevention or safety endpoints.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Carotid Artery Diseases; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Information about rivaroxaban plasma level (RivLev) may guide treatment decisions in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) taking rivaroxaban.. In a multicenter registry-based study (Novel Oral Anticoagulants in Stroke Patients collaboration; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02353585) of patients with stroke while taking rivaroxaban, we compared RivLev in patients with AIS and ICH. We determined how many AIS patients had RivLev ≤ 100ng/ml, indicating possible eligibility for thrombolysis, and how many ICH patients had RivLev ≥ 75ng/ml, making them possibly eligible for the use of specific reversal agents. We explored factors associated with RivLev (Spearman correlation, regression models) and studied the sensitivity and specificity of international normalized ratio (INR) thresholds to substitute RivLev using cross tables and receiver operating characteristic curves.. RivLev did not differ between patients with AIS and ICH. Half of the patients with AIS under rivaroxaban had a RivLev low enough to consider thrombolysis. In ICH patients, two-thirds had a RivLev high enough to meet the eligibility for the use of a specific reversal agent. INR thresholds perform poorly to inform treatment decisions in individual patients. Ann Neurol 2018;83:451-459.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Brain Ischemia; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Cohort Studies; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Registries; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

The optimal long-term antithrombotic regimen for patients after successful catheter-based atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is not well defined. Presently, practice variation exists, and the benefits of oral anticoagulation over antiplatelet therapy across the entire spectrum of stroke risk profile remain undefined in the postablation population. To date, there are no randomized trials to inform clinicians on this therapeutic question.. The objective was to assess whether rivaroxaban is superior to acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) in reducing the risk of clinically overt stroke, systemic embolism, or covert stroke among patients without apparent recurrent atrial arrhythmias for at least 1 year after their most recent AF ablation procedure.. A prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized trial with blinded assessment of outcomes is under way (NCT02168829). Atrial fibrillation patients with at least 1 stroke risk factor (as defined by the CHA. The OCEAN trial is a multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating 2 antithrombotic treatment strategies for patients with risk factors for stroke after apparently successful AF ablation. We hypothesize that rivaroxaban will reduce the occurrence of clinically overt stroke, systemic embolism, and covert stroke when compared with ASA alone.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Monitoring; Female; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to determine the net clinical benefit (NCB) of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation.. This was a retrospective analysis of 14,236 patients included in ROCKET AF who received at least one dose of study drug. We analyzed NCB using four different methods: (1) composite of death, stroke, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, and major bleeding; (2) method 1 with fatal or critical organ bleeding substituted for major bleeding; (3) difference between the rate of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism minus 1.5 times the difference between the rate of intracranial hemorrhage; and (4) weighted sum of differences between rates of death, ischemic stroke or systemic embolism, intracranial hemorrhage, and major bleeding.. Rivaroxaban was associated with a lower risk of the composite outcome of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or systemic embolism (rate difference per 10,000 patient-years [RD]=-86.8 [95% CI -143.6 to -30.0]) and fatal or critical organ bleeding (-41.3 [-68 to -14.7]). However, rivaroxaban was associated with a higher risk of major bleeding other than fatal or critical organ bleeding (55.9 [14.7 to 97.2]). Method 1 showed no difference between treatments (-35.5 [-108.4 to 37.3]). Methods 2-4 favored treatment with rivaroxaban (2: -96.8 [-157.0 to -36.8]; 3: -65.2 [-112.3 to -17.8]; 4: -54.8 [-96.0 to -10.2]).. Rivaroxaban was associated with favorable NCB compared with warfarin. The NCB was attributable to lower rates of ischemic events and fatal or critical organ bleeding.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Internationality; Male; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

The New Approach Rivaroxaban Inhibition of Factor Xa in a Global Trial vs. ASA to Prevent Embolism in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source (NAVIGATE-ESUS) trial is a randomized phase-III trial comparing rivaroxaban versus aspirin in patients with recent ESUS.. We aimed to describe the baseline characteristics of this large ESUS cohort to explore relationships among key subgroups.. We enrolled 7213 patients at 459 sites in 31 countries. Prespecified subgroups for primary safety and efficacy analyses included age, sex, race, global region, stroke or transient ischemic attack prior to qualifying event, time to randomization, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus.. Mean age was 66.9 ± 9.8 years; 24% were under 60 years. Older patients had more hypertension, coronary disease, and cancer. Strokes in older subjects were more frequently cortical and accompanied by radiographic evidence of prior infarction. Women comprised 38% of participants and were older than men. Patients from East Asia were oldest whereas those from Latin America were youngest. Patients in the Americas more frequently were on aspirin prior to the qualifying stroke. Acute cortical infarction was more common in the United States, Canada, and Western Europe, whereas prior radiographic infarctions were most common in East Asia. Approximately forty-five percent of subjects were enrolled within 30 days of the qualifying stroke, with earliest enrollments in Asia and Eastern Europe.. NAVIGATE-ESUS is the largest randomized trial comparing antithrombotic strategies for secondary stroke prevention in patients with ESUS. The study population encompasses a broad array of patients across multiple continents and these subgroups provide ample opportunities for future research.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aspirin; Comorbidity; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Intracranial Embolism; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Racial Groups; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Sex Factors; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

This study sought to assess whether there were significant interactions of procedural access strategies and lesion characteristics with bleeding and ischemic events among atrial fibrillation (AF) patients anticoagulated with rivaroxaban or warfarin following a percutaneous coronary intervention.. Among stented AF patients, the impact of procedural access strategies or lesion characteristics on antithrombotic safety and efficacy outcomes is unclear.. In the PIONEER AF-PCI (An Open-label, Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Study Exploring Two Treatment Strategies of Rivaroxaban and a Dose-Adjusted Oral Vitamin K Antagonist Treatment Strategy in Subjects With Atrial Fibrillation Who Undergo Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) trial, 2,124 patients were randomized to 3 groups and followed for 12 months: 1) rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily plus a P2Y. Compared with warfarin, both rivaroxaban regimens consistently reduced clinically significant bleeding across subgroups of radial versus femoral arterial access and by vascular closure device use. Treatment effect of rivaroxaban on major adverse cardiovascular events did not vary when stratified by ischemia-driven revascularization, urgency of revascularization, location of culprit artery, presence of bifurcation lesion, presence of thrombus, type, and length of stent or number of stents (interaction p > 0.05 for all subgroups).. Among stented AF patients requiring long-term oral anticoagulation, there was no effect modification by procedure or lesion characteristics of either clinically significant bleeding or major adverse cardiovascular events. Rivaroxaban-based therapy was superior to warfarin plus DAPT in bleeding outcomes regardless of the type of stent or arterial access during the index coronary revascularization. (A Study Exploring Two Strategies of Rivaroxaban [JNJ39039039; BAY-59-7939] and One of Oral Vitamin K Antagonist in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Who Undergo Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PIONEER AF-PCI]; NCT01830543).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stents; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Embolic strokes of undetermined source represent 20% of ischemic strokes and are associated with a high rate of recurrence. Anticoagulant treatment with rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, may result in a lower risk of recurrent stroke than aspirin.. We compared the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban (at a daily dose of 15 mg) with aspirin (at a daily dose of 100 mg) for the prevention of recurrent stroke in patients with recent ischemic stroke that was presumed to be from cerebral embolism but without arterial stenosis, lacune, or an identified cardioembolic source. The primary efficacy outcome was the first recurrence of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke or systemic embolism in a time-to-event analysis; the primary safety outcome was the rate of major bleeding.. A total of 7213 participants were enrolled at 459 sites; 3609 patients were randomly assigned to receive rivaroxaban and 3604 to receive aspirin. Patients had been followed for a median of 11 months when the trial was terminated early because of a lack of benefit with regard to stroke risk and because of bleeding associated with rivaroxaban. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 172 patients in the rivaroxaban group (annualized rate, 5.1%) and in 160 in the aspirin group (annualized rate, 4.8%) (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87 to 1.33; P=0.52). Recurrent ischemic stroke occurred in 158 patients in the rivaroxaban group (annualized rate, 4.7%) and in 156 in the aspirin group (annualized rate, 4.7%). Major bleeding occurred in 62 patients in the rivaroxaban group (annualized rate, 1.8%) and in 23 in the aspirin group (annualized rate, 0.7%) (hazard ratio, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.68 to 4.39; P<0.001).. Rivaroxaban was not superior to aspirin with regard to the prevention of recurrent stroke after an initial embolic stroke of undetermined source and was associated with a higher risk of bleeding. (Funded by Bayer and Janssen Research and Development; NAVIGATE ESUS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02313909 .).

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Brain Ischemia; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Embolism; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke

The article considers modern approaches to the secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with stable ischemic heart disease (IHD) and / or atherosclerosis of peripheral arteries (peripheral artery disease - PAD) with the oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban. The results of the first international prospective phase III study COMPASS for the evaluation of efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban including 27 395 patients with stable IHD or PAD, are discussed. The results of the study were presented at European Congress of Cardiology 2017. Rivaroxaban reduced of the risk of cardiovascular death, stroke and myocardial infarction by 24 %. The results of the study confirm the positive balance of risk / benefit and supplement the previously obtained data on the efficacy of rivaroxaban in patients with cardiovascular diseases.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Ischemia; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

We investigated the impact of polyvascular disease in patients enrolled in ROCKET AF.. Cox regression models were used to assess clinical outcomes and treatment effects of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and coronary, peripheral, or carotid artery disease, or any combination of the 3.. A total of 655 (4.6%) patients had polyvascular disease (≥2 disease locations), and 3,391 (23.8%) had single-arterial bed disease. Patients with polyvascular disease had similar rates of stroke/systemic embolism but higher rates of cardiovascular and bleeding events when compared with those without vascular disease. Use of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin was associated with higher rates of stroke in patients with polyvascular disease (hazard ratio [HR] 2.41, 95% CI 1.05-5.54); however, this was not seen in patients with single-bed (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.64-1.28) or no vascular disease (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.69-1.04; interaction P = .058). There was a significant interaction for major or nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding in patients with polyvascular (HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.91-1.65) and single-bed vascular disease (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.13-1.49) treated with rivaroxaban compared with warfarin when compared with those without vascular disease (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.87-1.04; interaction P = .0006). Additional antiplatelet therapy in this population did not improve stroke or cardiovascular outcomes.. The use of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin was associated with a higher risk of stroke and bleeding in patients with polyvascular disease enrolled in ROCKET AF. Further studies are needed to understand the optimal management of this high-risk population.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Vascular Diseases; Warfarin

Heart failure is associated with activation of thrombin-related pathways, which predicts a poor prognosis. We hypothesized that treatment with rivaroxaban, a factor Xa inhibitor, could reduce thrombin generation and improve outcomes for patients with worsening chronic heart failure and underlying coronary artery disease.. In this double-blind, randomized trial, 5022 patients who had chronic heart failure, a left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or less, coronary artery disease, and elevated plasma concentrations of natriuretic peptides and who did not have atrial fibrillation were randomly assigned to receive rivaroxaban at a dose of 2.5 mg twice daily or placebo in addition to standard care after treatment for an episode of worsening heart failure. The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or stroke. The principal safety outcome was fatal bleeding or bleeding into a critical space with a potential for causing permanent disability.. Over a median follow-up period of 21.1 months, the primary end point occurred in 626 (25.0%) of 2507 patients assigned to rivaroxaban and in 658 (26.2%) of 2515 patients assigned to placebo (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84 to 1.05; P=0.27). No significant difference in all-cause mortality was noted between the rivaroxaban group and the placebo group (21.8% and 22.1%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.10). The principal safety outcome occurred in 18 patients who took rivaroxaban and in 23 who took placebo (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.43 to 1.49; P=0.48).. Rivaroxaban at a dose of 2.5 mg twice daily was not associated with a significantly lower rate of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke than placebo among patients with worsening chronic heart failure, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, coronary artery disease, and no atrial fibrillation. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; COMMANDER HF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01877915 .).

Topics: Aged; Coronary Artery Disease; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Heart Failure; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Patient Readmission; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Stroke Volume; Treatment Failure

D-dimer has been used as both a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in the assessment of patients with venous thromboembolism, but its prognostic value in the setting of arterial acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and the ability of pharmacotherapy to reduce D-dimer in ACS is less well characterized. It was hypothesized that elevated baseline D-dimer would be associated with poor clinical outcomes in ACS, and that Factor Xa inhibition with Rivaroxaban would reduce D-dimer acutely and chronically. The ATLAS ACS TIMI-46 trial assessed the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban compared with placebo in ACS patients. A subset of subjects had a D-dimer measured at baseline (n = 1,834, 52.5%). A univariate and multivariable logistic regression assessed the relation between baseline D-dimer and a composite end point of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke through 6 months. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare change in D-dimer level between the treatment groups from baseline. Baseline D-dimer was associated with the composite efficacy outcome in a univariate logistic regression (odds ratio 1.15, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.29, p = 0.015) and a multivariable logistic regression (odds ratio 1.13, 95% confidence interval 1.00 to 1.28, p = 0.048). Rivaroxaban administration lowered D-dimer levels compared wth placebo after administration of the first dose of study drug (p = 0.026), at day 30 (p < 0.001) and day 180 (p < 0.001). In conclusion, elevated baseline D-dimer was associated with an increased risk of the composite outcome within 6 months of the ACS event and administration of the Factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban was associated with lower D-dimer levels compared with placebo after the first dose, at day 30 and day 180.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Biomarkers; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a contributor to embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS). Subgroup analyses from previous studies suggest that anticoagulation could reduce recurrent stroke compared with antiplatelet therapy. We hypothesised that anticoagulant treatment with rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, would reduce the risk of recurrent ischaemic stroke compared with aspirin among patients with PFO enrolled in the NAVIGATE ESUS trial.. NAVIGATE ESUS was a double-blinded, randomised, phase 3 trial done at 459 centres in 31 countries that assessed the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban versus aspirin for secondary stroke prevention in patients with ESUS. For this prespecified subgroup analysis, cohorts with and without PFO were defined on the basis of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE). The primary efficacy outcome was time to recurrent ischaemic stroke between treatment groups. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding, according to the criteria of the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. The primary analyses were based on the intention-to-treat population. Additionally, we did a systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis of studies in which patients with cryptogenic stroke and PFO were randomly assigned to receive anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy.. Between Dec 23, 2014, and Sept 20, 2017, 7213 participants were enrolled and assigned to receive rivaroxaban (n=3609) or aspirin (n=3604). Patients were followed up for a mean of 11 months because of early trial termination. PFO was reported as present in 534 (7·4%) patients on the basis of either TTE or TOE. Patients with PFO assigned to receive aspirin had a recurrent ischaemic stroke rate of 4·8 events per 100 person-years compared with 2·6 events per 100 person-years in those treated with rivaroxaban. Among patients with known PFO, there was insufficient evidence to support a difference in risk of recurrent ischaemic stroke between rivaroxaban and aspirin (hazard ratio [HR] 0·54; 95% CI 0·22-1·36), and the risk was similar for those without known PFO (1·06; 0·84-1·33; p. Among patients with ESUS who have PFO, anticoagulation might reduce the risk of recurrent stroke by about half, although substantial imprecision remains. Dedicated trials of anticoagulation versus antiplatelet therapy or PFO closure, or both, are warranted.. Bayer and Janssen.

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Cohort Studies; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Foramen Ovale, Patent; Humans; International Cooperation; Male; MEDLINE; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Statistics, Nonparametric; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Adult; Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Internal Medicine; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Discharge; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Respiratory Insufficiency; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism

Rivaroxaban is broadly used for the primary prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in the general population with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). However, there is little published evidence on the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban for AF in patients with active cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban in patients with active cancer and AF. The use of rivaroxaban in patients with cancer at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center is monitored in the setting of a Quality Assessment Initiative. Patients with active cancer and AF, treated with rivaroxaban from January 1, 2014, to March 31, 2016, are included in this analysis. Clinical end points were defined a priori and assessed through text searches of medical records. A total of 163 evaluable patients were identified. After adjusting for competing risks, the estimated 1-year cumulative incidence of ischemic stroke was 1.4% (95% CI 0% to 3.4%) and major bleeding was 1.2% (95% CI 0% to 2.9%). The risk of clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding leading to discontinuation of anticoagulation at 1 year was 14.0% (95% CI 4.2% to 22.7%). The cumulative incidence of mortality was 22.6% (95% CI 12.2% to 31.7%) at 1 year, reflecting an active cancer population. One patient died after developing an acute ischemic cerebrovascular insult. In conclusion, the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban treatment for nonvalvular AF in patients with active cancer is comparable to the results of the Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET-AF) study in the general population.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; New York; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome

Although implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) in patients receiving warfarin is well studied, limited data are available on the use of oral factor Xa inhibitors in this setting.. Using data from Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET AF) (n=14 264), we compared baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation randomized to rivaroxaban versus warfarin who did and did not undergo CIED implantation or revision. In this post-hoc, postrandomization, on-treatment analysis, only the first intervention per patient was analyzed. During a median follow-up of 2.2 years, 453 patients (242 rivaroxaban group; 211 warfarin group) underwent de novo CIED implantation (64.2%) or revision procedures (35.8%). Patients who received CIEDs were older, more likely to be male, and more likely to have past myocardial infarction, but had similar stroke risk compared to patients who did not receive CIEDs. Most patients who received a device had study drug interrupted for the procedure and did not receive bridging anticoagulation. During the 30-day postprocedural period, 11 patients (4.55%) in the rivaroxaban group experienced bleeding complications compared with 15 (7.13%) in the warfarin group. Thromboembolic complications occurred in 3 patients (1.26%) in the rivaroxaban group and 1 (0.48%) in the warfarin group. Event rates were too low for formal hypothesis testing.. Bleeding and thromboembolic events were low in both rivaroxaban- and warfarin-treated patients. Periprocedural use of oral factor Xa inhibitors in CIED implantation requires further study in prospective, randomized trials.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00403767.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Defibrillators, Implantable; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Thrombolytic Therapy; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Several non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) alternatives to warfarin are available for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to describe the factors associated with selection of NOACs versus warfarin in patients with new onset AF.. The ORBIT-AF II study is a national, US, prospective, observational, cohort study of anticoagulation treatment in patients with AF receiving NOACs or warfarin in the United States from 2013 to 2016. We measured factors associated with oral anticoagulant selection in 4,670 patients recently diagnosed with AF.. At baseline, 1,169 (25%) patients were started on warfarin and 3,501 (75%) on NOACs: of these latter, 259 (6%) were started on dabigatran, 1858 (40%) on rivaroxaban, and 1384 (30%) on apixaban. Those receiving NOACs were slightly younger patients (median age 71 vs 72, P<.0001); were less likely to have prior stroke (5.3% vs 8.6%; P<.0001) or prior bleeding (2.7% vs 4.4%; P=.005); had better kidney function (mean estimated glomerular filtration rate 91 mL/min vs 80 mL/min, P<.0001); and had fewer patients at high stroke risk (CHA. In contemporary clinical practice, up to three-fourths of patients with new-onset AF are now initially treated with a NOAC for stroke prevention. Those selected for NOAC treatment had lower stroke and bleeding risk profiles, were more likely treated by cardiologists, and had higher socioeconomic status.. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01701817.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Registries; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Anticoagulation, reducing the risk of thromboembolic events in patients undergoing cardioversion, is a cornerstone of peri-cardioversion management in patients with atrial fibrillation. We aimed to analyse published data on the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients undergoing cardioversion. We performed a systematic review of randomized prospective clinical trials (RCTs) comparing DOACs with warfarin and reporting data on post-cardioversion outcomes of interest. Outcomes of interest were stroke, systemic thromboembolic events and major bleeding. We reviewed a total of six RCTs including 3900 cardioversions performed using a DOAC for thromboembolic prophylaxis. These studies reported a low incidence overall of adverse outcomes associated with the use of DOACs (around 1% in all studies, except the ROCKET post-hoc study which included ablation procedures). The incidence rate of adverse events during DOAC treatment was found to be very similar to that observed with warfarin anticoagulation. In RCTs DOAC treatment in patients undergoing cardioversion appears to be effective and safe. However, because evidence in this clinical setting is still weak, observational reports could be useful in providing further data about peri-procedural outcomes.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Electric Countershock; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Calcium Channel Blockers; Diltiazem; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Verapamil; Warfarin

The safety of intravenous thrombolysis in patients taking rivaroxaban has not been well established. We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of all patients who received thrombolytic therapy in the Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared With Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET AF). A review of medical and adverse event records for patients receiving thrombolytic therapy while enrolled in ROCKET AF was performed to determine their baseline characteristics, indications for thrombolysis, and type of agent used. Safety end points were 30-day post-thrombolytic rates of stroke, bleeding, and mortality. A total of 28 patients in ROCKET AF received thrombolytic therapy, with 19 patients on rivaroxaban and 9 patients on warfarin. Ischemic stroke was the most common indication for thrombolysis (n = 10), and alteplase was the most commonly used fibrinolytic agent (n = 14). Of the 19 patients in the rivaroxaban group, there were 2 nonfatal bleeding events and 2 deaths, mostly occurring when thrombolytic therapy was administered within 48 hours of the last rivaroxaban dose. Of the 9 patients in the warfarin group, there was 1 nonfatal bleeding event and 3 deaths, most occurring when thrombolytic therapy was administered outside of 48 hours from the last warfarin dose. In conclusion, these observations suggest that careful assessment of the time since the last dose may be of clinical significance in patients on novel oral anticoagulants who require emergent thrombolysis.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Male; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Survival Rate; Thrombolytic Therapy; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States; Vitamin K; Warfarin

In atrial fibrillation (AF)-related acute ischemic stroke, the optimal oral anticoagulation strategy remains unclear.. To test whether rivaroxaban or warfarin sodium is safer and more effective for preventing early recurrent stroke in patients with AF-related acute ischemic stroke.. A randomized, multicenter, open-label, blinded end point evaluation, comparative phase 2 trial was conducted from April 28, 2014, to December 7, 2015, at 14 academic medical centers in South Korea among patients with mild AF-related stroke within the previous 5 days who were deemed suitable for early anticoagulation. Analysis was performed on a modified intent-to-treat basis.. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive rivaroxaban, 10 mg/d for 5 days followed by 15 or 20 mg/d, or warfarin with a target international normalized ratio of 2.0-3.0, for 4 weeks.. The primary end point was the composite of new ischemic lesion or new intracranial hemorrhage seen on results of magnetic resonance imaging at 4 weeks. Primary analysis was performed in patients who received at least 1 dose of study medications and completed follow-up magnetic resonance imaging. Key secondary end points were individual components of the primary end point and hospitalization length.. Of 195 patients randomized, 183 individuals (76 women and 107 men; mean [SD] age, 70.4 [10.4] years) completed magnetic resonance imaging follow-up and were included in the primary end point analysis. The rivaroxaban group (n = 95) and warfarin group (n = 88) showed no differences in the primary end point (47 [49.5%] vs 48 [54.5%]; relative risk, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.69-1.20; P = .49) or its individual components (new ischemic lesion: 28 [29.5%] vs 31 of 87 [35.6%]; relative risk, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.54-1.26; P = .38; new intracranial hemorrhage: 30 [31.6%] vs 25 of 87 [28.7%]; relative risk, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.70-1.71; P = .68). Each group had 1 clinical ischemic stroke, and all new intracranial hemorrhages were asymptomatic hemorrhagic transformations. Hospitalization length was reduced with rivaroxaban compared with warfarin (median, 4.0 days [interquartile range, 2.0-6.0 days] vs 6.0 days [interquartile range, 4.0-8.0]; P < .001).. In mild AF-related acute ischemic stroke, rivaroxaban and warfarin had comparable safety and efficacy.. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02042534.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Magnetic Resonance Angiography; Male; Middle Aged; Republic of Korea; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Optimal antithrombotic treatment after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is unknown and determined empirically. The direct factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban may potentially reduce TAVR-related thrombotic complications and premature valve failure.. GALILEO is an international, randomized, open-label, event-driven, phase III trial in more than 1,520 patients without an indication for oral anticoagulation who underwent a successful TAVR (ClinicalTrials.govNCT02556203). Patients are randomized (1:1 ratio), 1 to 7days after a successful TAVR, to either a rivaroxaban-based strategy or an antiplatelet-based strategy. In the experimental arm, subjects receive rivaroxaban (10mg once daily [OD]) plus acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, 75-100mg OD) for 90days followed by rivaroxaban alone. In the control arm, subjects receive clopidogrel (75mg OD) plus ASA (as above) for 90days followed by ASA alone. In case new-onset atrial fibrillation occurs after randomization, full oral anticoagulation will be implemented with maintenance of the original treatment assignment. The primary efficacy end point is the composite of all-cause death, stroke, myocardial infarction, symptomatic valve thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, deep venous thrombosis, and systemic embolism. The primary safety end point is the composite of life-threatening, disabling, and major bleeding, according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium definitions.. GALILEO will test the hypothesis that a rivaroxaban-based antithrombotic strategy reduces the risk of thromboembolic complications post-TAVR with an acceptable risk of bleeding compared with the currently recommended antiplatelet therapy-based strategy in subjects without need of chronic oral anticoagulation.

Topics: Aortic Valve Stenosis; Aspirin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cause of Death; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Valve Diseases; Humans; Mortality; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Care; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thrombosis; Ticlopidine; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement; Venous Thrombosis

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Japan; Male; Prothrombin Time; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

The review shows the prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), depending on the severity of the disease. Patients with non-valvular AF and CKD have a significantly increased risk of both bleeding and thromboembolic complications, and death from all causes. Evaluation of the results of randomized clinical trials (RCTs), meta-analyzes of RCTs demonstrated the advantages of the new oral anticoagulants (NOAC), such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, compared with warfarin in reducing the risk of bleeding in patients with AF and CKD in predialysis stage. According to experimental and clinical studies, warfarin can promote renal vascular calcification. With the deterioration of filtration renal function during treatment with anticoagulants in patients with AF on the results of ROCKET AF study found that rivaroxaban is more preferable than warfarin in reducing the risk of stroke and systemic embolism without increasing the risk of bleeding. The absence of RCT data complicates the choice of anticoagulant therapy in patients with CKD on hemodialysis, although the NOAC approved by the Office of Quality Control Food and Drug US drugs (FDA) for the use of patients in this category. According to the instruction drugs rivaroxaban and apixaban are allowed to use in patients with end-stage CKD with creatinine clearance not less than 15 ml/min.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

We compared patient-reported treatment satisfaction and the economic impact of anticoagulation therapy with rivaroxaban vs. vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation undergoing elective cardioversion procedures.. The current study is a post hoc analysis of the prospective, multicentre X-VeRT (EXplore the efficacy and safety of once-daily oral riVaroxaban for the prevention of caRdiovascular events in subjects with non-valvular aTrial fibrillation scheduled for cardioversion) trial. Patient-reported treatment satisfaction with anticoagulation therapy was assessed using the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication version II in seven countries (US, UK, Canada, Germany, France, Italy, and the Netherlands). An economic model was also developed to estimate the impact of postponed cardioversions for two countries (UK and Italy). This model estimated the total costs of cardioversion, taking into consideration the costs for drug therapy (including extended treatment duration due to cardioversion postponement), international normalized ratio monitoring of VKAs, the cardioversion procedure, and rescheduling the procedure. These costs were linked to the respective X-VeRT study data to estimate the total costs. Patients receiving rivaroxaban in the delayed cardioversion group had significantly higher scores for Convenience, Effectiveness, and Global satisfaction (81.74 vs. 65.78; 39.41 vs. 32.95; and 82.07 vs. 66.74, respectively; P < 0.0001). Based on the total patient population included in the treatment satisfaction substudy (n = 632) in the delayed cardioversion group in X-VeRT, the use of rivaroxaban was estimated to result in a saving of £421 and €360 per patient in UK and Italian settings, respectively.. The use of rivaroxaban in the setting of cardioversion resulted in greater patient satisfaction and cost savings, compared with that of VKA.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Budgets; Canada; Cost Savings; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Costs; Electric Countershock; Europe; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Economic; Patient Satisfaction; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Surveys and Questionnaires; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) often take multiple medications.. We examined characteristics and compared adjusted outcomes between rivaroxaban and warfarin according to number of concomitant baseline medications and the presence of combined cytochrome P450 3A4 and P-glycoprotein inhibitors in the Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared With Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET AF) study. At baseline, 5101 patients (36%) were on 0 to 4 medications, 7298 (51%) were on 5 to 9, and 1865 (13%) were on ≥ 10. Although polypharmacy was not associated with higher risk of stroke or non-central nervous system embolism (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.02 for ≥ 10 versus 0-4 medications; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-1.38), it was associated with higher risks of the combined end point of stroke, non-central nervous system embolism, vascular death, or myocardial infarction (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.41 for ≥ 10 versus 0-4 medications; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-1.68) and nonmajor clinically relevant or major bleeding (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.47 for ≥ 10 versus 0-4 medications; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-1.65). There was no significant difference in primary efficacy (adjusted interaction P=0.99) or safety outcomes (adjusted interaction P=0.87) between treatment groups by number of medications. Patients treated with 0 to 4 medications had lower rates of major bleeding with rivaroxaban (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.95; interaction P=0.0074). There was no evidence of differential outcomes in those treated with ≥ 1 combined cytochrome P450 3A4 and P-glycoprotein inhibitors.. In a population of patients with atrial fibrillation, two thirds were on ≥ 5 medications. Increasing medication use was associated with higher risk of bleeding but not stroke. Rivaroxaban was tolerated across complex patients on multiple medications.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00403767.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Polypharmacy; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

To compare the characteristics and outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and aortic stenosis (AS) with patients with AF with mitral regurgitation (MR) or aortic regurgitation (AR) and patients without significant valve disease (no SVD).. Using Rivaroxaban Once-Daily, Oral, Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared With Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET AF) data, we analysed efficacy and safety outcomes, adjusting hazard ratios (HRs) for potential confounders using Cox regression analysis.. Among 14 119 intention-to-treat ROCKET AF trial patients, a trial that excluded patients with mitral stenosis or artificial valve prosthesis, 214 had AS with or without other valve abnormalities, 1726 had MR or AR and 12 179 had no SVD. After adjusting for prognostic factors, the composite of stroke, systemic embolism or vascular death increased approximately twofold in patients with AS (AS 10.84, MR or AR 4.54 and no SVD 4.31 events per 100 patient-years, p=0.0001). All-cause death also significantly increased (AS 11.22, MR or AR 4.90 and no SVD 4.39 events per 100 patient-years, p=0.0003). Major bleeding occurred more frequently in AS (adjusted HR 1.61, confidence intervals (CI) 1.03 to 2.49, p<0.05) and MR or AR (HR 1.30, 1.07 to 1.57, p<0.01) than in no SVD, but there was no difference between AS and MR or AR (HR 1.24, 0.78 to 1.97). The relative efficacy of rivaroxaban versus warfarin was consistent among patients with and without valvular disease. Rivaroxaban was associated with higher rates of major bleeding than warfarin in patients with MR or AR (HR 1.63, 1.15 to 2.31).. We found that patients with AF and AS on oral anticoagulants may have distinctly different efficacy and safety outcomes than patients with MR or AR or no SVD.. NCT00403767; Post-results.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Aortic Valve Insufficiency; Aortic Valve Stenosis; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Mitral Valve Insufficiency; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation is associated with higher mortality. Identification of causes of death and contemporary risk factors for all-cause mortality may guide interventions.. In the Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET AF) study, patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation were randomized to rivaroxaban or dose-adjusted warfarin. Cox proportional hazards regression with backward elimination identified factors at randomization that were independently associated with all-cause mortality in the 14 171 participants in the intention-to-treat population. The median age was 73 years, and the mean CHADS2 score was 3.5. Over 1.9 years of median follow-up, 1214 (8.6%) patients died. Kaplan-Meier mortality rates were 4.2% at 1 year and 8.9% at 2 years. The majority of classified deaths (1081) were cardiovascular (72%), whereas only 6% were nonhemorrhagic stroke or systemic embolism. No significant difference in all-cause mortality was observed between the rivaroxaban and warfarin arms (P=0.15). Heart failure (hazard ratio 1.51, 95% CI 1.33-1.70, P<0.0001) and age ≥75 years (hazard ratio 1.69, 95% CI 1.51-1.90, P<0.0001) were associated with higher all-cause mortality. Multiple additional characteristics were independently associated with higher mortality, with decreasing creatinine clearance, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, male sex, peripheral vascular disease, and diabetes being among the most strongly associated (model C-index 0.677).. In a large population of patients anticoagulated for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, ≈7 in 10 deaths were cardiovascular, whereas <1 in 10 deaths were caused by nonhemorrhagic stroke or systemic embolism. Optimal prevention and treatment of heart failure, renal impairment, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and diabetes may improve survival.. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT00403767.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cause of Death; Comorbidity; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Intention to Treat Analysis; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Multivariate Analysis; Proportional Hazards Models; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Sex Factors; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

The high costs associated with treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF) are primarily due to hospital care, but there are limited data to understand the reasons for and predictors of hospitalization in patients with AF.. The ROCKET AF trial compared rivaroxaban with warfarin for stroke prophylaxis in AF. We described the frequency of and reasons for hospitalization during study follow-up and utilized Cox proportional hazards models to assess for baseline characteristics associated with all-cause hospitalization. Of 14 171 patients, 14% were hospitalized at least once. Of 2614 total hospitalizations, 41% were cardiovascular including 4% for AF; of the remaining, 12% were for bleeding. Compared with patients not hospitalized, hospitalized patients were older (74 vs. 72 years), and more frequently had diabetes (46 vs. 39%), prior MI (23 vs. 16%), and paroxysmal AF (19 vs. 17%), but less frequently had prior transient ischaemic attack/stroke (49 vs. 56%). After multivariable adjustment, lung disease [hazard ratio (HR) 1.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.29-1.66], diabetes [1.22, (1.11-1.34)], prior MI [1.27, (1.13-1.42)], and renal dysfunction [HR 1.07 per 5 unit GFR < 65 mL/min, (1.04-1.10)] were associated with increased hospitalization risk. Treatment assignment was not associated with differential rates of hospitalization.. Nearly 1 in 7 of the moderate-to-high-risk patients with AF enrolled in this trial was hospitalized within 2 years, and both AF and bleeding were rare causes of hospitalization. Further research is needed to determine whether care pathways directed at comorbid conditions among AF patients could reduce the need for and costs associated with hospitalization.

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Comorbidity; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Geography; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; International Cooperation; Male; Multivariate Analysis; Proportional Hazards Models; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Despite rapid clinical adoption of novel anticoagulants, it is unknown whether outcomes differ among patients with worsening renal function (WRF) taking these new drugs compared with warfarin. We aimed to determine whether the primary efficacy (stroke or systemic embolism) and safety (major bleeding and nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding) end points from the ROCKET AF trial (Rivaroxaban Once-Daily, Oral, Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared With Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation trial) differed among participants with WRF taking rivaroxaban and those taking warfarin.. After excluding patients without at least 1 follow-up creatinine measurement (n=1624), we included all remaining patients (n=12 612) randomly assigned to either rivaroxaban or dose-adjusted warfarin. On-treatment WRF (a decrease of >20% from screening creatinine clearance measurement at any time point during the study) was evaluated as a time-dependent covariate in Cox proportional hazards models.. Baseline characteristics were generally similar between patients with stable renal function (n=9292) and WRF (n=3320). Rates of stroke or systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, and bleeding were also similar, but WRF patients experienced a higher incidence of vascular death versus stable renal function (2.21 versus 1.41 events per 100 patient-years; P=0.026). WRF patients who were randomized to receive rivaroxaban had a reduction in stroke or systemic embolism compared with those taking warfarin (1.54 versus 3.25 events per 100 patient-years) that was not seen in patients with stable renal function who were randomized to receive rivaroxaban (P=0.050 for interaction). There was no difference in major or nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding among WRF patients randomized to warfarin versus rivaroxaban.. Among patients with on-treatment WRF, rivaroxaban was associated with lower rates of stroke and systemic embolism compared with warfarin, without an increase in the composite bleeding end point.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00403767.

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Creatinine; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thrombophilia; Warfarin

The efficacy, safety, and ease of use of rivaroxaban may reduce anticoagulation-treatment burden and improve nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patient satisfaction compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs).. Transitioning from a VKA to rivaroxaban improves treatment satisfaction in routine practice.. Xarelto for Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (XANTUS) is a prospective, noninterventional study in patients with NVAF prescribed rivaroxaban for prevention of stroke in routine practice. Patients receiving a VKA 4 weeks prior to the initial XANTUS study visit and switched to rivaroxaban were asked to complete the Anti-Clot Treatment Scale (ACTS). Changes from the initial visit to the first follow-up visit at ∼ 3 months (corresponding to a comparison of rivaroxaban vs prior VKA) for ACTS burden and benefit scores were calculated using and reported as least squared mean differences (LSMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).. The study included 1291 NVAF patients with prior VKA treatment. The mean baseline ACTS burden and benefit scores were 50.51 ± 8.42 and 10.30 ± 2.70, respectively. After ∼ 3 months of rivaroxaban treatment, LSMDs were 4.38 points (95% CI: 2.53-6.22, P < 0.0001) for the burden and 1.01 points (95% CI: 0.27-1.75, P = 0.0075) for the benefit score. Fifty-four percent and 48% of patients reported experiencing at least a minimally important clinical difference in burden and benefit scores, respectively.. Within this XANTUS cohort, switching from a VKA to rivaroxaban yielded statistically and clinically significant improvements in ACT burden and benefit scores.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Drug Substitution; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Least-Squares Analysis; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Satisfaction; Prospective Studies; Registries; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Surveys and Questionnaires; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K

The authors assessed the use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during the ROCKET AF (Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation).. The frequency, patterns, and outcomes when adding DAPT to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in the setting of PCI in patients with AF are largely unknown.. The study population included all patients in the treatment group of the ROCKET AF trial divided by the receipt of PCI during follow-up. Clinical characteristics, PCI frequency, and rates of DAPT were reported. Clinical outcomes were adjudicated independently as part of the trial.. Among 14,171 patients, 153 (1.1%) underwent PCI during a median 806 days of follow-up. Patients treated with rivaroxaban were significantly less likely to undergo PCI compared with warfarin-treated patients (61 vs. 92; p = 0.01). Study drug was continued during PCI in 81% of patients. Long-term DAPT (≥30 days) was used in 37% and single antiplatelet therapy in 34%. A small number switched from DAPT to monotherapy within 30 days of PCI (n = 19 [12.3%]) and 15% of patients received no antiplatelet therapy after PCI. Rates of stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding events were high in post-PCI patients (4.5/100 patient-years and 10.2/100 patient-years) in both treatment groups.. In patients with AF at moderate to high risk for stroke, PCI occurred in <1% per year. DAPT was used in a variable manner, with the majority of patients remaining on study drug after PCI. Rates of both thrombotic and bleeding events were high after PCI, highlighting the need for studies to determine the optimal antithrombotic therapy.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Coronary Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Double-Blind Method; Drug Substitution; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Embolism; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Monitoring; Echocardiography, Transesophageal; Electric Countershock; Female; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Middle Aged; Premedication; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Pocock et al. (2012, European Heart Journal 33, 176-182) proposed a win ratio approach to analyzing composite endpoints comprised of outcomes with different clinical priorities. In this article, we establish a statistical framework for this approach. We derive the null hypothesis and propose a closed-form variance estimator for the win ratio statistic in all pairwise matching situation. Our simulation study shows that the proposed variance estimator performs well regardless of the magnitude of treatment effect size and the type of the joint distribution of the outcomes.

Topics: Algorithms; Confidence Intervals; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Odds Ratio; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Reproducibility of Results; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Sensitivity and Specificity; Statistical Distributions; Stroke; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome

Anticoagulation prophylaxis for stroke is recommended for at-risk patients with either persistent or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). We compared outcomes in patients with persistent vs. paroxysmal AF receiving oral anticoagulation.. Patients randomized in the Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared With Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET-AF) trial (n = 14 264) were grouped by baseline AF category: paroxysmal or persistent. Multivariable adjustment was performed to compare thrombo-embolic events, bleeding, and death between groups, in high-risk subgroups, and across treatment assignment (rivaroxaban or warfarin). Of 14 062 patients, 11 548 (82%) had persistent AF and 2514 (18%) had paroxysmal AF. Patients with persistent AF were marginally older (73 vs. 72, P = 0.03), less likely female (39 vs. 45%, P < 0.0001), and more likely to have previously used vitamin K antagonists (64 vs. 56%, P < 0.0001) compared with patients with paroxysmal AF. In patients randomized to warfarin, time in therapeutic range was similar (58 vs. 57%, P = 0.94). Patients with persistent AF had higher adjusted rates of stroke or systemic embolism (2.18 vs. 1.73 events per 100-patient-years, P = 0.048) and all-cause mortality (4.78 vs. 3.52, P = 0.006). Rates of major bleeding were similar (3.55 vs. 3.31, P = 0.77). Rates of stroke or systemic embolism in both types of AF did not differ by treatment assignment (rivaroxaban vs. warfarin, Pinteraction = 0.6).. In patients with AF at moderate-to-high risk of stroke receiving anticoagulation, those with persistent AF have a higher risk of thrombo-embolic events and worse survival compared with paroxysmal AF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cause of Death; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Morpholines; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in the acute stage of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) are at high risk of recurrent stroke, but the optimal anticoagulation strategy remains unclear due to the concern of intracranial bleeding. Novel oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin might be more safe and efficacious in patients suitable for early anticoagulation.. This trial is to evaluate the feasibility of early anticoagulation with rivaroxaban in acute ischemic stroke or TIA patients with nonvalvular AF.. This is a randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint evaluation trial. Inclusion criteria are (1) nonvalvular AF, (2) presumed cardioembolic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) confirmed by MRI within five-days from onset, and (3) mild to moderate stroke severity. We will randomize 196 patients to either rivaroxaban (10 mg once daily for five-days followed by 15 mg or 20 mg once daily) or dose-adjusted warfarin (coadministration of aspirin 100 mg per day until achieving international normalized ratio of 1·7). The study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02042534).. The primary endpoint is the composite of recurrent ischemic lesion and intracranial bleeding on MRI at four-weeks. Secondary endpoints are recurrent ischemic lesions, intracranial bleeding, major bleeding, major vascular events, four-week modified Rankin Scale score, and duration of hospitalization after randomization.. The results of this proof-of-concept trial will guide go/no-go decision to a large phase 3 confirmatory trial.

Topics: Adult; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Research Design; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes

Thrombin is a critical element of crosstalk between pathways contributing to worsening of established heart failure (HF). The aim of this study is to explore the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban 2.5 mg bid compared with placebo (with standard care) after an exacerbation of HF in patients with reduced ejection fraction (HF-rEF) and documented coronary artery disease.. This is an international prospective, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, event-driven study of approximately 5000 patients for a targeted 984 events. Patients must have a recent symptomatic exacerbation of HF, increased plasma concentrations of natriuretic peptides (B-type natriuretic peptide ≥200 pg/mL or N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide ≥800 pg/mL), with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% and coronary artery disease. Patients requiring anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation or other conditions will be excluded. After an index event (overnight hospitalization, emergency department or observation unit admission, or unscheduled outpatient parenteral treatment for worsening HF), patients will be randomized 1:1 to rivaroxaban or placebo (with standard of care). The primary efficacy outcome event is a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction or stroke. The principal safety outcome events are the composite of fatal bleeding or bleeding into a critical space with potential permanent disability, bleeding events requiring hospitalization and major bleeding events according to International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis bleeding criteria.. COMMANDER HF is the first prospective study of a target-specific oral antithrombotic agent in HF. It will provide important information regarding rivaroxaban use following an HF event in an HF-rEF patient population with coronary artery disease.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Coronary Artery Disease; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Prospective Studies; Research Design; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Survival Rate

Monitoring of anti-coagulation with the direct factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban is considered unnecessary in a routine clinical setting. However, assessment of its anti-coagulant effect may be desirable in certain clinical situations. We assessed prothrombin time (PT) reagents and commercially available anti-Xa assays (Biophen) calibrated for rivaroxaban and heparin in comparison to liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) measurements of rivaroxaban concentration in samples from patients on treatment with rivaroxaban for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Citrate plasma samples were obtained from 30 randomly selected patients on uninterrupted treatment with rivaroxaban for a minimum of 1 month. The anti-Xa assays, direct Xa inhibitor (DiXa-I®), and Heparin LRT® were conducted for both wide and low calibrations for rivaroxaban. Measurements were compared to LC-MS/MS using correlation, linear regression, intra-class correlation, and Bland-Altman analysis. In 30 patients (9 female) of median age 71.5 years and BMI 26.5 kg/m(2), rivaroxaban concentrations between 2.4 and 625 ng/ml (median 82 ng/ml) were measured by LC-MS/MS. PT reagents were poorly correlated with rivaroxaban concentrations (r (2) = 0.52 and 0.09). Anti-Xa assays DiXa-I (r (2) = 0.95) and Heparin LRT (r (2) = 0.97) were correlated with rivaroxaban in all concentrations, but especially in low concentrations with low calibrations (r (2) = 0.97 and 0.98, respectively). The highest agreement occurred between Heparin LRT and low rivaroxaban concentrations with a mean difference of -5.3 ng/ml (limits of agreement, 12.9 to 2.4 ng/ml). Anti-Xa assays can indirectly determine the concentration of rivaroxaban for a wide range of concentrations in real-world patients. An interpretation of anti-Xa and PT measurements in treatment with rivaroxaban requires knowledge of the local reagents.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heparin; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Prothrombin Time; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes

The prevalence of both atrial fibrillation (AF) and diabetes mellitus (DM) are rising, and these conditions often occur together. Also, DM is an independent risk factor for stroke in patients with AF. We aimed to examine the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban vs warfarin in patients with nonvalvular AF and DM in a prespecified secondary analysis of the ROCKET AF trial.. We stratified the ROCKET AF population by DM status, assessed associations with risk of outcomes by DM status and randomized treatment using Cox proportional hazards models, and tested for interactions between randomized treatments. For efficacy, primary outcomes were stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) or non-central nervous system embolism. For safety, the primary outcome was major or nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding.. The 5,695 patients with DM (40%) in ROCKET AF were younger, were more obese, and had more persistent AF, but fewer had previous stroke (the CHADS2 score includes DM and stroke). The relative efficacy of rivaroxaban and warfarin for prevention of stroke and systemic embolism was similar in patients with (1.74 vs 2.14/100 patient-years, hazard ratio [HR] 0.82) and without (2.12 vs 2.32/100 patient-years, HR 0.92) DM (interaction P = .53). The safety of rivaroxaban vs warfarin regarding major bleeding (HRs 1.00 and 1.12 for patients with and without DM, respectively; interaction P = .43), major or nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding (HRs 0.98 and 1.09; interaction P = .17), and intracerebral hemorrhage (HRs 0.62 and 0.72; interaction P = .67) was independent of DM status. Adjusted exploratory analyses suggested 1.3-, 1.5-, and 1.9-fold higher 2-year rates of stroke, vascular mortality, and myocardial infarction in DM patients.. The relative efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban vs warfarin was similar in patients with and without DM, supporting use of rivaroxaban as an alternative to warfarin in diabetic patients with AF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Diabetes Mellitus; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K

Transient ischemic attack (TIA) or minor ischemic stroke represents the largest group of cerebrovascular disease, and those patients have a high risk of early recurrent stroke. Over decades, anticoagulation therapy has been used prudently in them for likely increasing the risk of intra-/extra-cranial hemorrhagic complications. However, recently rivaroxaban, a new oral anticoagulant, is proved to be as effective as traditional anticoagulants, while carrying significantly less risk of intracranial hemorrhage. Therefore, we assumed that patients may benefit from rivaroxaban if treated soon after TIA or minor stroke, and designed this adequately powered randomized study, TRACE.. The Treatment of Rivaroxaban versus Aspirin in Non-disabling Cerebrovascular Events (TRACE) study is a randomized, double-blind clinical trial with a target enrollment of 4400 patients. A 14-days regimen of rivaroxaban 10 mg daily or a 14-days regimen of aspirin 100 mg daily will be administrated to randomized participants with acute TIA or minor stroke, defined as National Institute of Health Stroke Scale scores ≤ 3. The primary efficacy end point is percentage of patients with any stroke (ischemic or hemorrhage) at 14 days. Study visits will be performed at the day of randomization, day 14 and day 90.. Even though the new oral anticoagulants seem to be both safe and effective, few clinical trials have been carried out to test their effect on non-disabling cerebrovascular events. Treatment with rivaroxaban may prevent more cerebrovascular events with an acceptable risk profile after TIA or minor stroke, compared with aspirin, thus helping to improve the outcome of the disease.. No. NCT01923818.

Topics: Adult; Aspirin; Clinical Protocols; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

This study was designed to compare effectiveness and safety of warfarin, direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran, Xa factor inhibitors rivaroxaban and apixaban used to prevent stroke in 280 elderly patients in patients with age-specific non-valvular atrial fibrillation. The treatment of patients aged 65-74 and 75-80 yearsfor 2 years with dab itragan (110 mg b.i.d), apixaban (5 mg b. i. d), and rivaroxaban (20 mg once daily) prevented stroke as effectively as warfarin therapy but less frequently caused severe intracranial hemorrhage. It is concluded that these new anticoagulants can be used as alternative medication for antithrombotic therapy of elderly patients with age-specific non-valvular atrialfibrillation.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Drug Monitoring; Female; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Atherogenesis is a complex inflammatory process stemming from the accumulation and oxidation of low density lipoproteins (LDL). IgM autoantibodies against phosphorylcholine (anti-PC) bind to the PC epitope on oxidized LDL (OxLDL), inhibiting the uptake of oxLDL by macrophages in atherosclerotic lesions. Anti-PC autoantibodies have been reported to be protective against atherothrombosis. We investigated the relationship of anti-PC concentrations with cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). We measured anti-PC levels within 7 days of an ACS in 3,356 patients enrolled in the ATLAS ACS-TIMI 46 trial, a randomized dose ranging study of rivaroxaban versus placebo. The primary endpoint was death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or severe recurrent ischemia (SRI) requiring revascularization during 6 months. The median baseline anti-PC concentration was 40.9 U/mL (25th, 75th percentiles: 25.4, 67.4). There was no significant association between anti-PC levels and the primary endpoint (Q1: 6.8 %, Q2: 4.2 %, Q3: 7.8 %, Q4: 5.4 %, p-trend = 0.87), all-cause mortality (Q1: 1.4 %, Q2: 0.7 %, Q3: 2.4 %, Q4: 0.9 %, p-trend = 0. 96), or any of the other individual endpoint components (MI: p-trend = 0.87, Stroke: p-trend = 0.43, SRI: p-trend = 0.66). Using the previously reported anti-PC cutpoint of 17 U/mL did not reveal a significant relationship between anti-PC concentrations and cardiovascular outcomes (<17 U/mL: 8.1 % vs. ≥17 U/mL: 5.8 %; p = 0.11). Similarly, evaluation of anti-PC as a continuous variable did not reveal a significant association (p = 0.30). In this study of patients early after ACS undergoing intensive secondary preventive therapy, IgM anti-PC titers did not exhibit a significant relationship with cardiovascular outcomes.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Antibodies, Antiphospholipid; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Immunoglobulin M; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Myocardial Infarction; Phosphorylcholine; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes

This study assessed the effects and safety of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in Chinese patients with atrial fibrillation. In this double-blind clinical trial, a total of 353 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation who were at risk of stroke or systemic embolism were enrolled to receive either rivaroxaban or warfarin. The primary effect endpoint occurred in five patients in the rivaroxaban group (2.29% per year) and in seven patients in the warfarin group (2.91% per year) (hazard ratio with warfarin, 0.76, 95% CI, 0.64-0.91; p = 0.03). Major and non-major clinically relevant bleeding occurred in 38 patients (14.3% per year) in the rivaroxaban group and in 36 patients (13.7% per year) in the warfarin group (hazard ratio rivaroxaban versus warfarin, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.93-1.14; p = 0.39). Adverse events were similar between these two arms (p > 0.05). In conclusion, oral administration of rivaroxaban reduced the risk of stroke or systemic embolism without significantly increasing the safety concern.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; China; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Primary Prevention; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Results from a trial of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in 1280 Japanese patients with atrial fibrillation (J-ROCKET AF) revealed that rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin with respect to the principal safety outcome. In this subanalysis, we investigated the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban and warfarin in relation to patients' CHADS2 scores.. The mean CHADS2 score was 3.25, and the most frequent scores were 3 and 4. No statistically significant interactions were observed between principal safety outcome event rates and CHADS2 scores with respect to treatment groups (P value for interaction = .700). Irrespective of stratification into moderate- and high-risk groups based on CHADS2 scores of 2 and 3 or more, respectively, no differences in principal safety outcome event rates were observed between rivaroxaban- and warfarin-treated patients (moderate-risk group: hazard ratio [HR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], .58-1.95; high-risk group: HR, 1.11; 95% CI, .86-1.45; P value for interaction = .488). The primary efficacy end point rate in the rivaroxaban-treated group was numerically lower than in the warfarin-treated group, regardless of risk group stratification (moderate-risk group: HR, .46; 95% CI, .09-2.37; high-risk group: HR, .49; 95% CI, .22-1.11; P value for interaction = .935).. This subanalysis indicated that the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin were similar, regardless of CHADS2 score.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Japan; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Morpholines; Prospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

We investigated the prevalence of prior myocardial infarction (MI) and incidence of ischaemic cardiovascular (CV) events among atrial fibrillation (AF) patients.. In ROCKET AF, 14 264 patients with nonvalvular AF were randomized to rivaroxaban or warfarin. The key efficacy outcome for these analyses was CV death, MI, and unstable angina (UA). This pre-specified analysis was performed on patients while on treatment. Rates are per 100 patient-years. Overall, 2468 (17%) patients had prior MI at enrollment. Compared with patients without prior MI, these patients were more likely to be male (75 vs. 57%), on aspirin at baseline (47 vs. 34%), have prior congestive heart failure (78 vs. 59%), diabetes (47 vs. 39%), hypertension (94 vs. 90%), higher mean CHADS2 score (3.64 vs. 3.43), and fewer prior strokes or transient ischaemic attacks (46 vs. 54%). CV death, MI, or UA rates tended to be lower in patients assigned rivaroxaban compared with warfarin [2.70 vs. 3.15; hazard ratio (HR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73-1.00; P = 0.0509]. CV death, MI, or UA rates were higher in those with prior MI compared with no prior MI (6.68 vs. 2.19; HR 3.04, 95% CI 2.59-3.56) with consistent results for CV death, MI, or UA for rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in prior MI compared with no prior MI (P interaction = 0.10).. Prior MI was common and associated with substantial risk for subsequent cardiac events. Patients with prior MI assigned rivaroxaban compared with warfarin had a non-significant 14% reduction of ischaemic cardiac events.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Clopidogrel; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Morpholines; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyridines; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Vascular disease is included in a risk scoring system to predict stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). This post hoc analysis of ROCKET AF aimed to determine the absolute rates of stroke and bleeding, and the relative effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban vs. warfarin in patients with and without peripheral artery disease (PAD). Peripheral artery disease was defined on the case-report form as the presences of intermittent claudication, amputation for arterial insufficiency, vascular reconstruction, bypass surgery, or percutaneous intervention to the extremities, or previously documented abdominal aortic aneurysm.. ROCKET AF was a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized-controlled trial comparing rivaroxaban and warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism. A total of 839 (5.9%) patients in ROCKET AF had PAD. Patients with and without PAD had similar rates of stroke or systemic embolism [HR: 1.04, 95% CI (0.72, 1.50), P = 0.84] and major or non-major clinically relevant (NMCR) bleeding [HR: 1.11, 95% CI (0.96, 1.28), P = 0.17], respectively. The efficacy of rivaroxaban when compared with warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism was similar in patients with PAD (HR: 1.19, 95% CI: 0.63-2.22) and without PAD (HR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.73-1.02; interaction P = 0.34). There was a significant interaction for major or NMCR bleeding in patients with PAD treated with rivaroxaban compared with warfarin (HR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.06-1.86) compared with those without PAD (HR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.95-1.11; interaction P = 0.037).. Patients with PAD in ROCKET AF did not have a statistically significant higher risk of stroke or systemic embolism than patients without PAD, and there were similar efficacy outcomes in patients treated with rivaroxaban and warfarin. In PAD patients, there was a higher risk of major bleeding or NMCR bleeding with rivaroxaban when compared with warfarin (interaction P = 0.037). Further investigation is warranted to validate this subgroup analysis and determine the optimal treatment in this high-risk cohort of AF patients with PAD.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Female; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

This study sought to report additional safety results from the ROCKET AF (Rivaroxaban Once-daily oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation).. The ROCKET AF trial demonstrated similar risks of stroke/systemic embolism and major/nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding (principal safety endpoint) with rivaroxaban and warfarin.. The risk of the principal safety and component bleeding endpoints with rivaroxaban versus warfarin were compared, and factors associated with major bleeding were examined in a multivariable model.. The principal safety endpoint was similar in the rivaroxaban and warfarin groups (14.9 vs. 14.5 events/100 patient-years; hazard ratio: 1.03; 95% confidence interval: 0.96 to 1.11). Major bleeding risk increased with age, but there were no differences between treatments in each age category (<65, 65 to 74, ≥75 years; pinteraction = 0.59). Compared with those without (n = 13,455), patients with a major bleed (n = 781) were more likely to be older, current/prior smokers, have prior gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, mild anemia, and a lower calculated creatinine clearance and less likely to be female or have a prior stroke/transient ischemic attack. Increasing age, baseline diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥90 mm Hg, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or GI bleeding, prior acetylsalicylic acid use, and anemia were independently associated with major bleeding risk; female sex and DBP <90 mm Hg were associated with a decreased risk.. Rivaroxaban and warfarin had similar risk for major/nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding. Age, sex, DBP, prior GI bleeding, prior acetylsalicylic acid use, and anemia were associated with the risk of major bleeding. (An Efficacy and Safety Study of Rivaroxaban With Warfarin for the Prevention of Stroke and Non-Central Nervous System Systemic Embolism in Patients With Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: NCT00403767).

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Pressure; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Patient Safety; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Time Factors; Vitamin K; Warfarin

During long-term anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation, temporary interruptions (TIs) of therapy are common, but the relationship between patient outcomes and TIs has not been well studied. We sought to determine reasons for TI, the characteristics of patients undergoing TI, and the relationship between anticoagulant and outcomes among patients with TI.. In the Rivaroxaban Once Daily, Oral, Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared With Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET AF), a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study of rivaroxaban and warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, baseline characteristics, management, and outcomes, including stroke, non-central nervous system systemic embolism, death, myocardial infarction, and bleeding, were reported in participants who experienced TI (3-30 days) for any reason. The at-risk period for outcomes associated with TI was from TI start to 30 days after resumption of study drug. In 14 236 participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, 4692 (33%) experienced TI. Participants with TI were similar to the overall ROCKET AF population in regard to baseline clinical characteristics. Only 6% (n=483) of TI incidences involved bridging therapy. Stroke/systemic embolism rates during the at-risk period were similar in rivaroxaban-treated and warfarin-treated participants (0.30% versus 0.41% per 30 days; hazard ratio [confidence interval]=0.74 [0.36-1.50]; P=0.40). Risk of major bleeding during the at-risk period was also similar in rivaroxaban-treated and warfarin-treated participants (0.99% versus 0.79% per 30 days; hazard ratio [confidence interval]=1.26 [0.80-2.00]; P=0.32).. TI of oral anticoagulation is common and is associated with substantial stroke risks and bleeding risks that were similar among patients treated with rivaroxaban or warfarin. Further investigation is needed to determine the optimal management strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation requiring TI of anticoagulation.. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00403767.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Intracranial Embolism; Male; Morpholines; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

There are no data regarding management and outcomes of major bleeding events in patients treated with oral factor Xa inhibitors.. Using data from ROCKET AF, we analysed the management and outcomes of major bleeding overall and according to the randomized treatment. During a median follow-up of 1.9 years, 779 (5.5%) patients experienced major bleeding at a rate of 3.52 events/100 patient-years with a similar event rate in each arm (n = 395 rivaroxaban vs. n = 384 warfarin). The median number of transfused packed red blood cells (PRBC) per episode was similar in both arms [2 (25th, 75th: 2, 4) units]. Overall, few transfusions of whole blood (n = 14), platelets (n = 10), or cryoprecipitate (n = 2) were used. Transfusion of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) was significantly less in the rivaroxaban arm (n = 45 vs. n = 81 units) after adjustment for covariates [odds ratio (OR) 0.43 (95% CI 0.29-0.66); P < 0.0001]. Prothrombin complex concentrates (PCC) were administered less in the rivaroxaban arm (n = 4 vs. n = 9). Outcomes after major bleeding, including stroke or non-central nervous system embolism (4.7% rivaroxaban vs. 5.4% warfarin; HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.42-1.88) and all-cause death (20.4% rivaroxaban vs. 26.1% warfarin; HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.46-1.04) were similar in patients treated with rivaroxaban and warfarin (interaction P = 0.51 and 0.11).. Among high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation who experienced major bleeding in ROCKET AF, the use of FFP and PCC was less among those allocated rivaroxaban compared with warfarin. However, use of PRBCs and outcomes after bleeding were similar among patients randomized to rivaroxaban or to warfarin.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antifibrinolytic Agents; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Transfusion; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Plasma; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is a life-threatening complication of anticoagulation.. We investigated the rate, outcomes, and predictors of ICH in 14 264 patients with atrial fibrillation from Rivaroxaban Once Daily, Oral, Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared With Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET AF). Cox proportional hazards modeling was used.. During 1.94 years (median) of follow-up, 172 patients (1.2%) experienced 175 ICH events at a rate of 0.67% per year. The significant, independent predictors of ICH were race (Asian: hazard ratio, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.39-2.94; black: hazard ratio, 3.25; 95% CI, 1.43-7.41), age (1.35; 1.13-1.63 per 10-year increase), reduced serum albumin (1.39; 1.12-1.73 per 0.5 g/dL decrease), reduced platelet count below 210×10(9)/L (1.08; 1.02-1.13 per 10×10(9)/L decrease), previous stroke or transient ischemic attack (1.42; 1.02-1.96), and increased diastolic blood pressure (1.17; 1.01-1.36 per 10 mm Hg increase). Predictors of a reduced risk of ICH were randomization to rivaroxaban (0.60; 0.44-0.82) and history of congestive heart failure (0.65; 0.47-0.89). The ability of the model to discriminate individuals with and without ICH was good (C-index, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.64-0.73).. Among patients with atrial fibrillation treated with anticoagulation, the risk of ICH was higher among Asians, blacks, the elderly, and in those with previous stroke or transient ischemic attack, increased diastolic blood pressure, and reduced platelet count or serum albumin at baseline. The risk of ICH was significantly lower in patients with heart failure and in those who were randomized to rivaroxaban instead of warfarin. The external validity of these findings requires testing in other atrial fibrillation populations.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; Black People; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Morpholines; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Time in therapeutic range (TTR) is a standard quality measure of the use of warfarin. We assessed the relative effects of rivaroxaban versus warfarin at the level of trial center TTR (cTTR) since such analysis preserves randomized comparisons.. TTR was calculated using the Rosendaal method, without exclusion of international normalized ratio (INR) values performed during warfarin initiation. Measurements during warfarin interruptions >7 days were excluded. INRs were performed via standardized finger-stick point-of-care devices at least every 4 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint (stroke or non-central nervous system embolism) was examined by quartiles of cTTR and by cTTR as a continuous function. Centers with the highest cTTRs by quartile had lower-risk patients as reflected by lower CHADS2 scores (P<0.0001) and a lower prevalence of prior stroke or transient ischemic attack (P<0.0001). Sites with higher cTTR were predominantly from North America and Western Europe. The treatment effect of rivaroxaban versus warfarin on the primary endpoint was consistent across a wide range of cTTRs (P value for interaction=0.71). The hazard of major and non-major clinically relevant bleeding increased with cTTR (P for interaction=0.001), however, the estimated reduction by rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in the hazard of intracranial hemorrhage was preserved across a wide range of threshold cTTR values.. The treatment effect of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism is consistent regardless of cTTR.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Double-Blind Method; Drug Monitoring; Embolism; Europe; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; North America; Point-of-Care Systems; Predictive Value of Tests; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

In Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibitor Compared With Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET AF) trial, rivaroxaban was noninferior to dose-adjusted warfarin in preventing stroke or systemic embolism among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation at moderate to high stroke risk. Because of differences in patient demographics, epidemiology, and stroke risk management in East Asia, outcomes and relative effects of rivaroxaban versus warfarin were assessed to determine consistency among East Asians versus other ROCKET AF participants.. Baseline demographics and interaction of treatment effects of rivaroxaban and warfarin among patients within East Asia and outside were assessed.. A total of 932 (6.5%) ROCKET AF participants resided in East Asia. At baseline, East Asians had lower weight, creatinine clearance, and prior vitamin K antagonist use; higher prevalence of prior stroke; and less congestive heart failure and prior myocardial infarction than other participants. Despite higher absolute event rates for efficacy and safety outcomes in East Asians, the relative efficacy of rivaroxaban (20 mg once daily; 15 mg once daily for creatinine clearance of 30-49 mL/min) versus warfarin with respect to the primary efficacy end point (stroke/systemic embolism) was consistent among East Asians and non-East Asians (interaction P=0.666). Relative event rates for the major or nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding in patients treated with rivaroxaban and warfarin were consistent among East Asians and non-East Asians (interaction P=0.867).. Observed relative efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban versus warfarin were similar among patients within and outside East Asia. Rivaroxaban, 20 mg once daily, is an alternative to warfarin for stroke prevention in East Asians with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Asia, Eastern; Asian People; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation is common in elderly patients, who face an elevated risk of stroke but difficulty sustaining warfarin treatment. The oral factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin in the Rivaroxaban Once Daily, Oral, Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared With Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET AF). This prespecified secondary analysis compares outcomes in older and younger patients.. There were 6229 patients (44%) aged ≥75 years with atrial fibrillation and ≥2 stroke risk factors randomized to warfarin (target international normalized ratio=2.0-3.0) or rivaroxaban (20 mg daily; 15 mg if creatinine clearance <50 mL/min), double blind. The primary end point was stroke and systemic embolism by intention to treat. Over 10 866 patient-years, older participants had more primary events (2.57% versus 2.05%/100 patient-years; P=0.0068) and major bleeding (4.63% versus 2.74%/100 patient-years; P<0.0001). Stroke/systemic embolism rates were consistent among older (2.29% rivaroxaban versus 2.85% warfarin per 100 patient-years; hazard ratio=0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-1.02) and younger patients (2.00% versus 2.10%/100 patient-years; hazard ratio=0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-1.19; interaction P=0.313), as were major bleeding rates (≥75 years: 4.86% rivaroxaban versus 4.40% warfarin per 100 patient-years; hazard ratio=1.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.34; <75 years: 2.69% versus 2.79%/100 patient-years; hazard ratio=0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-1.19; interaction P=0.336). Hemorrhagic stroke rates were similar in both age groups; there was no interaction between age and rivaroxaban response.. Elderly patients had higher stroke and major bleeding rates than younger patients, but the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban relative to warfarin did not differ with age, supporting rivaroxaban as an alternative for the elderly.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with a fivefold increase in the risk of stroke. The Phase III ROCKET AF (Rivaroxaban Once-Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation) trial showed that rivaroxaban, an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor, was noninferior to warfarin for the reduction of stroke or systemic embolism in patients with AF. Compared with warfarin, rivaroxaban significantly reduced rates of intracranial and fatal hemorrhages, although not rates of bleeding overall. XANTUS (Xarelto(®) for Prevention of Stroke in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation) is a prospective, international, observational, postauthorization, noninterventional study designed to collect safety and efficacy data on the use of rivaroxaban for stroke prevention in AF in routine clinical practice. The key goal is to determine whether the safety profile of rivaroxaban established in ROCKET AF is also observed in routine clinical practice. XANTUS is designed as a single-arm cohort study to minimize selection bias, and will enroll approximately 6,000 patients (mostly from Europe) with nonvalvular AF prescribed rivaroxaban, irrespective of their level of stroke risk. Overall duration of follow-up will be 1 year; the first patient was enrolled in June 2012. Similar studies (XANTUS-EL [Xarelto(®) for Prevention of Stroke in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation, Eastern Europe, Middle East, Africa and Latin America] and XANAP [Xarelto(®) for Prevention of Stroke in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation in Asia-Pacific]) are ongoing in Latin America and Asia-Pacific. Data from these studies will supplement those from ROCKET AF and provide practical information concerning the use of rivaroxaban for stroke prevention in AF.

Topics: Africa; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Protocols; Europe; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Latin America; Middle East; Morpholines; Prospective Studies; Research Design; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Sample Size; Stroke; Thiophenes; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

We investigated clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with significant valvular disease (SVD) in the Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET AF) trial.. ROCKET AF excluded patients with mitral stenosis or artificial valve prostheses. We used Cox regression to adjust comparisons for potential confounders. Among 14 171 patients, 2003 (14.1%) had SVD; they were older and had more comorbidities than patients without SVD. The rate of stroke or systemic embolism with rivaroxaban vs. warfarin was consistent among patients with SVD [2.01 vs. 2.43%; hazard ratio (HR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55-1.27] and without SVD (1.96 vs. 2.22%; HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.75-1.07; interaction P = 0.76). However, rates of major and non-major clinically relevant bleeding with rivaroxaban vs. warfarin were higher in patients with SVD (19.8% rivaroxaban vs. 16.8% warfarin; HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.05-1.49) vs. those without (14.2% rivaroxaban vs. 14.1% warfarin; HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.94-1.10; interaction P = 0.034), even when controlling for risk factors and potential confounders. In intracranial haemorrhage, there was no interaction between patients with and without SVD where the overall rate was lower among those randomized to rivaroxaban.. Many patients with 'non-valvular atrial fibrillation' have significant valve lesions. Their risk of stroke is similar to that of patients without SVD after controlling for stroke risk factors. Efficacy of rivaroxaban vs. warfarin was similar in patients with and without SVD; however, the observed risk of bleeding was higher with rivaroxaban in patients with SVD but was the same among those without SVD. Atrial fibrillation patients with and without SVD experience the same stroke-preventive benefit of oral anticoagulants.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Aortic Valve Insufficiency; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Mitral Valve Insufficiency; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

X-VeRT is the first prospective randomized trial of a novel oral anticoagulant in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing elective cardioversion.. We assigned 1504 patients to rivaroxaban (20 mg once daily, 15 mg if creatinine clearance was between 30 and 49 mL/min) or dose-adjusted vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in a 2:1 ratio. Investigators selected either an early (target period of 1-5 days after randomization) or delayed (3-8 weeks) cardioversion strategy. The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of stroke, transient ischaemic attack, peripheral embolism, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 5 (two strokes) of 978 patients (0.51%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 5 (two strokes) of 492 patients (1.02%) in the VKA group [risk ratio 0.50; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15-1.73]. In the rivaroxaban group, four patients experienced primary efficacy events following early cardioversion (0.71%) and one following delayed cardioversion (0.24%). In the VKA group, three patients had primary efficacy events following early cardioversion (1.08%) and two following delayed cardioversion (0.93%). Rivaroxaban was associated with a significantly shorter time to cardioversion compared with VKAs (P < 0.001). Major bleeding occurred in six patients (0.6%) in the rivaroxaban group and four patients (0.8%) in the VKA group (risk ratio 0.76; 95% CI 0.21-2.67).. Oral rivaroxaban appears to be an effective and safe alternative to VKAs and may allow prompt cardioversion.. Clinicaltrials.gov;. NCT01674647.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Electric Countershock; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K

This study sought to investigate the outcomes following cardioversion or catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) treated with warfarin or rivaroxaban.. There are limited data on outcomes following cardioversion or catheter ablation in AF patients treated with factor Xa inhibitors.. We compared the incidence of electrical cardioversion (ECV), pharmacologic cardioversion (PCV), or AF ablation and subsequent outcomes in patients in a post hoc analysis of the ROCKET AF (Efficacy and Safety Study of Rivaroxaban With Warfarin for the Prevention of Stroke and Non-Central Nervous System Systemic Embolism in Patients With Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation) trial.. Over a median follow-up of 2.1 years, 143 patients underwent ECV, 142 underwent PCV, and 79 underwent catheter ablation. The overall incidence of ECV, PCV, or AF ablation was 1.45 per 100 patient-years (n = 321; 1.44 [n = 161] in the warfarin arm, 1.46 [n = 160] in the rivaroxaban arm). The crude rates of stroke and death increased in the first 30 days after cardioversion or ablation. After adjustment for baseline differences, the long-term incidence of stroke or systemic embolism (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61 to 3.11), cardiovascular death (HR: 1.57; 95% CI: 0.69 to 3.55), and death from all causes (HR: 1.75; 95% CI: 0.90 to 3.42) were not different before and after cardioversion or AF ablation. Hospitalization increased after cardioversion or AF ablation (HR: 2.01; 95% CI: 1.51 to 2.68), but there was no evidence of a differential effect by randomized treatment (p value for interaction = 0.58). The incidence of stroke or systemic embolism (1.88% vs. 1.86%) and death (1.88% vs. 3.73%) were similar in the rivaroxaban-treated and warfarin-treated groups.. Despite an increase in hospitalization, there were no differences in long-term stroke rates or survival following cardioversion or AF ablation. Outcomes were similar in patients treated with rivaroxaban or warfarin. (An Efficacy and Safety Study of Rivaroxaban With Warfarin for the Prevention of Stroke and Non-Central Nervous System Systemic Embolism in Patients With Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation [ROCKET AF]; NCT00403767).

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Electric Countershock; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Multivariate Analysis; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy remains the most common method of stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. Time in therapeutic range (TTR) is a widely cited measure of the quality of VKA therapy. We sought to identify factors associated with TTR in a large, international clinical trial.. TTR (international normalized ratio [INR] 2.0 to 3.0) was determined using standard linear interpolation in patients randomized to warfarin in the ROCKET AF trial. Factors associated with TTR at the individual patient level (i-TTR) were determined via multivariable linear regression. Among 6983 patients taking warfarin, recruited from 45 countries grouped into 7 regions, the mean i-TTR was 55.2% (SD 21.3%) and the median i-TTR was 57.9% (interquartile range 43.0% to 70.6%). The mean time with INR <2 was 29.1% and the mean time with an INR >3 was 15.7%. While multiple clinical features were associated with i-TTR, dominant determinants were previous warfarin use (mean i-TTR of 61.1% for warfarin-experienced versus 47.4% in VKA-naïve patients) and geographic region where patients were managed (mean i-TTR varied from 64.1% to 35.9%). These effects persisted in multivariable analysis. Regions with the lowest i-TTRs had INR distributions shifted toward lower INR values and had longer inter-INR test intervals.. Independent of patient clinical features, the regional location of medical care is a dominant determinant of variation in i-TTR in global studies of warfarin. Regional differences in mean i-TTR are heavily influenced by subtherapeutic INR values and are associated with reduced frequency of INR testing.. URL: ClinicalTrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00403767.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Asia; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Double-Blind Method; Drug Monitoring; Europe; Female; Healthcare Disparities; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Linear Models; Male; Morpholines; Multivariate Analysis; North America; Predictive Value of Tests; Residence Characteristics; Rivaroxaban; South Africa; South America; Stroke; Thiophenes; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

To evaluate the previously reported excess of thromboembolic events during the 30 days after the end of study (EOS) visit when participants transitioned from blinded therapy to open-label vitamin K antagonist.. At the EOS visit, open-label vitamin K antagonist was recommended, and the international normalized ratio (INR) was not to be measured until 3 days later to preserve blinding. We analyzed transition strategies, clinical outcomes, and INR values. Event rates are per 100 patient-years. A total of 9248 (65%) participants were taking study drug at EOS, and, between days 3 and 30, an excess of stroke and systemic embolic events were observed in participants assigned to rivaroxaban (rivaroxaban 22 events, event rate 6.42; warfarin 6 events, event rate 1.73; hazard ratio, 3.72; 95% confidence interval, 1.51-9.16; P=0.0044). No INR values were reported for ≈5% of participants transitioned to warfarin. By 30 days after EOS, 83% of the warfarin group and 52% of the rivaroxaban group had ≥1 therapeutic INR value. Median time to first therapeutic INR was 3 days in the warfarin group and 13 days in the rivaroxaban group.. The excess of events at EOS was likely because of a period of inadequate anticoagulation in rivaroxaban participants switched to vitamin K antagonist therapy. If transition from rivaroxaban to vitamin K antagonist is needed, timely monitoring and careful dosing should be used to ensure consistent and adequate anticoagulation.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Clinical Protocols; Continuity of Patient Care; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Substitution; Embolism; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Proportional Hazards Models; Research Design; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

In ROCKET AF (Rivaroxaban Once-Daily, Oral, Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared With Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation), a large randomized, clinical trial, rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin in preventing stroke or systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation.. To determine the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin among vitamin K antagonist (VKA)-naive and VKA-experienced patients.. Prespecified subgroup analysis. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00403767).. Global.. 14,264 persons with atrial fibrillation.. Interaction of the relative treatment effect of rivaroxaban and warfarin on stroke or systemic embolism among VKA-naive and VKA-experienced patients.. Overall, 7897 (55.4%) patients were VKA-experienced and 6367 (44.6%) were VKA-naive. The effect of rivaroxaban versus warfarin on stroke or systemic embolism was consistent: Rates per 100 patient-years of follow-up were 2.32 versus 2.87 for VKA-naive patients (hazard ratio [HR], 0.81 [95% CI, 0.64 to 1.03]) and 1.98 versus 2.09 for VKA-experienced patients (HR, 0.94 [CI, 0.75 to 1.18]; interaction P = 0.36). During the first 7 days, rivaroxaban was associated with more bleeding than warfarin (HR in VKA-naive patients, 5.83 [CI, 3.25 to 10.44], and in VKA-experienced patients, 6.66 [CI, 3.83 to 11.58]; interaction P = 0.53). After 30 days, rivaroxaban was associated with less bleeding than warfarin in VKA-naive patients (HR, 0.84 [CI, 0.74 to 0.95]) and similar bleeding in VKA-experienced patients (HR, 1.06 [CI, 0.96 to 1.17]; interaction P = 0.003).. The trial was not designed to detect differences in these subgroups.. The efficacy of rivaroxaban in VKA-experienced and VKA-naive patients was similar to that of the overall trial. There were more bleeding events within 7 days of study drug initiation with rivaroxaban, but after 30 days, rivaroxaban was associated with less bleeding in VKA-naive patients and similar bleeding in VKA-experienced patients. This information may be useful to clinicians considering a transition to rivaroxaban for patients receiving VKA therapy.. Johnson & Johnson and Bayer HealthCare.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Warfarin and aspirin are used to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). There are inherent challenges with both treatments, including variable and inconsistent benefit and increased bleeding risks. The availability of new anticoagulants offers some alternatives.. A mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis to evaluate direct and indirect treatment data including aspirin, warfarin apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban for the prevention of primary or secondary stroke in patients with AF.. A comprehensive, systematic literature search was conducted to identify randomized trials comparing aspirin, warfarin, apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban in patients with AF requiring treatment for stroke prevention. Open-label and blinded designs were included if they evaluated any stroke or any bleeding event. Data on stroke and bleeding events were abstracted, verified, evaluated, scored, and entered into Aggregate Data Drug Information System version 1.16 to generate a mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis. Direct and indirect comparisons were evaluated, and we looked for inconsistency in closed loop structures. Data are reported as rate ratios with 95% credible intervals. In addition, we reviewed variance statistics and explored variance with node-splitting models.. Our literature search yielded 30 articles, 21 of which were included. All treatments except aspirin reduced the risk of any stroke compared with placebo. Warfarin (0.43 [0.33-0.57]), apixaban (0.37 [0.27-0.54]), dabigatran (0.34 [0.21-0.57]), rivaroxaban (0.36 [0.22-0.60]), and aspirin with clopidogrel (0.73 [0.53-0.99]) were more protective than aspirin alone. Warfarin and the new anticoagulants were similar in the reduction of stroke, vascular death, and mortality. There was no difference in major bleeding between any treatment group. There were more nonmajor bleeding events when comparing warfarin and apixaban (1.83 [1.05-4.03]); no other differences between warfarin and the other new anticoagulants were found.. This mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis found similarity between warfarin and the new anticoagulants with the exception of one comparison, in which warfarin was associated with more non-major bleeding than apixaban. Thus, the new anticoagulants are therapeutically comparable when warfarin is inappropriate.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Databases, Bibliographic; Double-Blind Method; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

We sought to define the factors associated with the occurrence of stroke and systemic embolism in a large, international atrial fibrillation (AF) trial.. In ROCKET AF (Rivaroxaban Once-daily, oral, direct factor Xa inhibition Compared with vitamin K antagonism for prevention of stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation), 14 264 patients with nonvalvular AF and creatinine clearance ≥30 mL/min were randomized to rivaroxaban or dose-adjusted warfarin. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to identify factors at randomization independently associated with the occurrence of stroke or non-central nervous system embolism based on intention-to-treat analysis. A risk score was developed in ROCKET AF and validated in ATRIA (AnTicoagulation and Risk factors In Atrial fibrillation), an independent AF patient cohort. Over a median follow-up of 1.94 years, 575 patients (4.0%) experienced primary end-point events. Reduced creatinine clearance was a strong, independent predictor of stroke and systemic embolism, second only to prior stroke or transient ischemic attack. Additional factors associated with stroke and systemic embolism included elevated diastolic blood pressure and heart rate, as well as vascular disease of the heart and limbs (C-index 0.635). A model that included creatinine clearance (R(2)CHADS(2)) improved net reclassification index by 6.2% compared with CHA(2)DS(2)VASc (C statistic=0.578) and by 8.2% compared with CHADS(2) (C statistic=0.575). The inclusion of creatinine clearance <60 mL/min and prior stroke or transient ischemic attack in a model with no other covariates led to a C statistic of 0.590.Validation of R(2)CHADS(2) in an external, separate population improved net reclassification index by 17.4% (95% confidence interval, 12.1%-22.5%) relative to CHADS(2).. In patients with nonvalvular AF at moderate to high risk of stroke, impaired renal function is a potent predictor of stroke and systemic embolism. Stroke risk stratification in patients with AF should include renal function.. URL: http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00403767.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Factor Xa; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Male; Morpholines; Predictive Value of Tests; Reproducibility of Results; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

In the Japanese Rivaroxaban Once-daily oral direct factor Xa inhibition Compared with vitamin K antagonism for prevention of stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (J-ROCKET AF) study, rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily was given to patients with creatinine clearance (CrCl) ≥ 50 ml/min (preserved renal function), and was reduced to 10mg once daily in patients with CrCl 30-49 ml/min (moderate renal impairment). The aim of this subanalysis was to assess the safety and efficacy of the adjusted dose of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in a cohort with moderate renal impairment.. Compared with patients with preserved renal function, those with moderate renal impairment (22.2% of all randomized patients) had higher rates of bleeding and stroke events irrespective of study treatment. Among those with moderate renal impairment, the principal safety endpoint occurred at 27.76%/year with rivaroxaban vs. 22.85%/year with warfarin (hazard ratio [HR], 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78-1.91) and the rate of the primary efficacy endpoint was 2.77%/year vs. 3.34%/year (HR, 0.82; 95% CI: 0.25-2.69), respectively. There were no significant interactions between renal function and study treatment in the principal safety and the primary efficacy endpoints (P=0.628, 0.279 for both interactions, respectively).. The safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban vs. warfarin were consistent in patients with moderate renal impairment and preserved renal function.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; Creatinine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Japan; Kidney; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Renal Insufficiency; Reproducibility of Results; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The overall analysis of the rivaroxaban versus warfarin in Japanese patients with atrial fibrillation (J-ROCKET AF) trial revealed that rivaroxaban was not inferior to warfarin with respect to the primary safety outcome. In addition, there was a strong trend for a reduction in the rate of stroke/systemic embolism with rivaroxaban compared with warfarin.. In this subanalysis of the J-ROCKET AF trial, we investigated the consistency of safety and efficacy profile of rivaroxaban versus warfarin among the subgroups of patients with previous stroke, transient ischemic attack, or non-central nervous system systemic embolism (secondary prevention group) and those without (primary prevention group).. Patients in the secondary prevention group were 63.6% of the overall population of J-ROCKET AF. In the secondary prevention group, the rate of the principal safety outcome (% per year) was 17.02 in rivaroxaban-treated patients and 18.26 in warfarin-treated patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-1.29), while the rate of the primary efficacy endpoint was 1.66 in rivaroxaban-treated patients and 3.25 in warfarin-treated patients (HR 0.51; 95% CI 0.23-1.14). There were no significant interactions in the principal safety and the primary efficacy endpoints of rivaroxaban compared to warfarin between the primary and secondary prevention groups (P=.090 and .776 for both interactions, respectively).. The safety and efficacy profile of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin was consistent among patients in the primary prevention group and those in the secondary prevention group.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The purpose of this study was to understand the possible risk of discontinuation in the context of clinical care.. Rivaroxaban is noninferior to warfarin for preventing stroke in atrial fibrillation patients. Concerns exist regarding possible increased risk of stroke and non-central nervous system (CNS) thromboembolic events early after discontinuation of rivaroxaban.. We undertook a post-hoc analysis of data from the ROCKET AF (Rivaroxaban Once-Daily, Oral, Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared With Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation, n = 14,624) for stroke or non-CNS embolism within 30 days after temporary interruptions of 3 days or more, early permanent study drug discontinuation, and end-of-study transition to open-label therapy.. Stroke and non-CNS embolism occurred at similar rates after temporary interruptions (rivaroxaban: n = 9, warfarin: n = 8, 6.20 vs. 5.05/100 patient-years, hazard ratio [HR]: 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49 to 3.31, p = 0.62) and after early permanent discontinuation (rivaroxaban: n = 42, warfarin: n = 36, 25.60 vs. 23.28/100 patient-years, HR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.71 to 1.72, p = 0.66). Patients transitioning to open-label therapy at the end of the study had more strokes with rivaroxaban (n = 22) versus warfarin (n = 6, 6.42 vs. 1.73/100 patient-years, HR: 3.72, 95% CI: 1.51 to 9.16, p = 0.0044) and took longer to reach a therapeutic international normalized ratio with rivaroxaban versus warfarin. All thrombotic events within 30 days of any study drug cessation (including stroke, non-CNS embolism, myocardial infarction, and vascular death) were similar between groups (HR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.83 to 1.26, p = 0.85).. In atrial fibrillation patients who temporarily or permanently discontinued anticoagulation, the risk of stroke or non-CNS embolism was similar with rivaroxaban or warfarin. An increased risk of stroke and non-CNS embolism was observed in rivaroxaban-treated patients compared with warfarin-treated patients after the end of the study, underscoring the importance of therapeutic anticoagulation coverage during such a transition.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Morpholines; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Time Factors; Warfarin; Withholding Treatment

In ROCKET AF, rivaroxaban was non-inferior to adjusted-dose warfarin in preventing stroke or systemic embolism among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to investigate whether the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin is consistent among the subgroups of patients with and without previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA).. In ROCKET AF, patients with AF who were at increased risk of stroke were randomly assigned (1:1) in a double-blind manner to rivaroxaban 20 mg daily or adjusted dose warfarin (international normalised ratio 2·0-3·0). Patients and investigators were masked to treatment allocation. Between Dec 18, 2006, and June 17, 2009, 14 264 patients from 1178 centres in 45 countries were randomly assigned. The primary endpoint was the composite of stroke or non-CNS systemic embolism. In this substudy we assessed the interaction of the treatment effects of rivaroxaban and warfarin among patients with and without previous stroke or TIA. Efficacy analyses were by intention to treat and safety analyses were done in the on-treatment population. ROCKET AF is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00403767.. 7468 (52%) patients had a previous stroke (n=4907) or TIA (n=2561) and 6796 (48%) had no previous stroke or TIA. The number of events per 100 person-years for the primary endpoint in patients treated with rivaroxaban compared with warfarin was consistent among patients with previous stroke or TIA (2·79% rivaroxaban vs 2·96% warfarin; hazard ratio [HR] 0·94, 95% CI 0·77-1·16) and those without (1·44%vs 1·88%; 0·77, 0·58-1·01; interaction p=0·23). The number of major and non-major clinically relevant bleeding events per 100 person-years in patients treated with rivaroxaban compared with warfarin was consistent among patients with previous stroke or TIA (13·31% rivaroxaban vs 13·87% warfarin; HR 0·96, 95% CI 0·87-1·07) and those without (16·69%vs 15·19%; 1·10, 0·99-1·21; interaction p=0·08).. There was no evidence that the relative efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin was different between patients who had a previous stroke or TIA and those who had no previous stroke or TIA. These results support the use of rivaroxaban as an alternative to warfarin for prevention of recurrent as well as initial stroke in patients with AF.. Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development and Bayer HealthCare.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Intention to Treat Analysis; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Morpholines; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The global ROCKET AF study evaluated once-daily rivaroxaban vs. warfarin for stroke and systemic embolism prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). A separate trial, J-ROCKET AF, compared the safety of a Japan-specific rivaroxaban dose with warfarin administered according to Japanese guidelines in Japanese patients with AF.. J-ROCKET AF was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, phase III trial. Patients (n=1,280) with non-valvular AF at increased risk for stroke were randomized to receive 15 mg once-daily rivaroxaban or warfarin dose-adjusted according to Japanese guidelines. The primary objective was to determine non-inferiority of rivaroxaban against warfarin for the principal safety outcome of major and non-major clinically relevant bleeding, in the on-treatment safety population. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of stroke and systemic embolism. Non-inferiority of rivaroxaban to warfarin was confirmed; the rate of the principal safety outcome was 18.04% per year in rivaroxaban-treated patients and 16.42% per year in warfarin-treated patients (hazard ratio [HR] 1.11; 95% confidence interval 0.87-1.42; P<0.001 [non-inferiority]). Intracranial hemorrhage rates were 0.8% with rivaroxaban and 1.6% with warfarin. There was a strong trend for a reduction in the rate of stroke/systemic embolism with rivaroxaban vs. warfarin (HR, 0.49; P=0.050).. J-ROCKET AF demonstrated the safety of a Japan-specific rivaroxaban dose and supports bridging the global ROCKET AF results into Japanese clinical practice.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Female; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Plasma proteins mediate thrombogenesis, inflammation, endocardial injury and structural remodelling in atrial fibrillation (AF). We hypothesised that anti-coagulation with rivaroxaban, a direct factor Xa inhibitor, would differentially modulate biologically-relevant plasma proteins, compared with warfarin, a multi-coagulation protein antagonist. We performed unbiased liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectroscopy and candidate multiplexed protein immunoassays among Japanese subjects with non-valvular chronic AF who were randomly assigned to treatment with 24 weeks of rivaroxaban (n=93) or warfarin (n=94). Nine metaproteins, including fibulin-1 (p=0.0033), vitronectin (p=0.0010), haemoglobin α (p=0.0012), apolipoproteins C-II (p=0.0017) and H (p=0.0023), complement C5 precursor (p=0.0026), coagulation factor XIIIA (p=0.0026) and XIIIB (p=0.0032) subunits, and 10 candidate proteins, including thrombomodulin (p=0.0004), intercellular adhesion molecule-3 (p=0.0064), interleukin-8 (p=0.0007) and matrix metalloproteinase-3 (p=0.0003), were differentially expressed among patients with and without known clinical risk factors for stroke and bleeding in AF. Compared with warfarin, rivaroxaban treatment was associated with a greater increase in thrombomodulin (Δ 0.1 vs. 0.3 pg/ml, p=0.0026) and a trend towards a reduction in matrix metalloproteinase-9 (Δ 2.2 vs. -4.9 pg/ml, p=0.0757) over 24 weeks. Only modest correlations were observed between protein levels and prothrombin time, factor Xa activity and prothrombinase-induced clotting time. Plasma proteomics can identify distinct functional patterns of protein expression that report on known stroke and bleeding risk phenotypes in an ethnically-homogeneous AF population. The greater upregulation of thrombomodulin among patients randomised to rivaroxaban represents a proof-of-principle that pharmacoproteomics can be employed to discern novel effects of factor Xa inhibition beyond standard pharmacodynamic measures.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Biomarkers; Blood Proteins; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Proteomics; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thrombosis; Warfarin

The use of warfarin reduces the rate of ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation but requires frequent monitoring and dose adjustment. Rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, may provide more consistent and predictable anticoagulation than warfarin.. In a double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 14,264 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who were at increased risk for stroke to receive either rivaroxaban (at a daily dose of 20 mg) or dose-adjusted warfarin. The per-protocol, as-treated primary analysis was designed to determine whether rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin for the primary end point of stroke or systemic embolism.. In the primary analysis, the primary end point occurred in 188 patients in the rivaroxaban group (1.7% per year) and in 241 in the warfarin group (2.2% per year) (hazard ratio in the rivaroxaban group, 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.96; P<0.001 for noninferiority). In the intention-to-treat analysis, the primary end point occurred in 269 patients in the rivaroxaban group (2.1% per year) and in 306 patients in the warfarin group (2.4% per year) (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.03; P<0.001 for noninferiority; P=0.12 for superiority). Major and nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding occurred in 1475 patients in the rivaroxaban group (14.9% per year) and in 1449 in the warfarin group (14.5% per year) (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.11; P=0.44), with significant reductions in intracranial hemorrhage (0.5% vs. 0.7%, P=0.02) and fatal bleeding (0.2% vs. 0.5%, P=0.003) in the rivaroxaban group.. In patients with atrial fibrillation, rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism. There was no significant between-group difference in the risk of major bleeding, although intracranial and fatal bleeding occurred less frequently in the rivaroxaban group. (Funded by Johnson & Johnson and Bayer; ROCKET AF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00403767.).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intention to Treat Analysis; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and renal insufficiency are at increased risk for ischaemic stroke and bleeding during anticoagulation. Rivaroxaban, an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor metabolized predominantly by the liver, preserves the benefit of warfarin for stroke prevention while causing fewer intracranial and fatal haemorrhages.. We randomized 14 264 patients with AF in a double-blind trial to rivaroxaban 20 mg/day [15 mg/day if creatinine clearance (CrCl) 30-49 mL/min] or dose-adjusted warfarin (target international normalized ratio 2.0-3.0). Compared with patients with CrCl >50 mL/min (mean age 73 years), the 2950 (20.7%) patients with CrCl 30-49 mL/min were older (79 years) and had higher event rates irrespective of study treatment. Among those with CrCl 30-49 mL/min, the primary endpoint of stroke or systemic embolism occurred in 2.32 per 100 patient-years with rivaroxaban 15 mg/day vs. 2.77 per 100 patient-years with warfarin [hazard ratio (HR) 0.84; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57-1.23] in the per-protocol population. Intention-to-treat analysis yielded similar results (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.63-1.17) to the per-protocol results. Rates of the principal safety endpoint (major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding: 17.82 vs. 18.28 per 100 patient-years; P = 0.76) and intracranial bleeding (0.71 vs. 0.88 per 100 patient-years; P = 0.54) were similar with rivaroxaban or warfarin. Fatal bleeding (0.28 vs. 0.74% per 100 patient-years; P = 0.047) occurred less often with rivaroxaban.. Patients with AF and moderate renal insufficiency have higher rates of stroke and bleeding than those with normal renal function. There was no evidence of heterogeneity in treatment effect across dosing groups. Dose adjustment in ROCKET-AF yielded results consistent with the overall trial in comparison with dose-adjusted warfarin.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Renal Insufficiency; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Rivaroxaban is an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor, which is at an advanced stage of clinical development for prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. Two phase II studies, ODIXa-DVT and EINSTEIN DVT, assessed the efficacy and safety of oral rivaroxaban (once daily or twice daily) for treatment of acute deep-vein thrombosis (DVT). Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses of rivaroxaban in patients in these two phase II studies were conducted to characterize the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban and the relationship between important patient covariates and model parameters. Exposure simulations in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) were also performed in order to predict the exposure of rivaroxaban, using modified demographic data reflecting the characteristics of a typical AF population.. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed using plasma samples from these patients. Various simulations were conducted to explore the pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban in patients with DVT and to predict exposure in those with AF. Correlations between plasma rivaroxaban concentrations and the prothrombin time, Factor Xa activity, HepTest® and activated partial thromboplastin time were also described.. The pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban in patients with DVT were found to be consistent and predictable across all doses studied. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) increased dose dependently. The same total daily doses given once daily achieved higher maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) values (∼20%) and lower trough (minimum) plasma concentration (C(trough)) values (∼60%) than when given twice daily; however, the 5th-95th percentile ranges for these parameters overlapped. Rivaroxaban clearance was moderately influenced by age and renal function, and the volume of distribution was influenced by age, body weight and sex; the effects were within the observed interindividual variability. Simulations in virtual patient populations with AF showed that a rivaroxaban dose of 15 mg once daily in patients with creatinine clearance of 30-49 mL/min would achieve AUC and C(max) values similar to those observed with 20 mg once daily in patients with normal renal function. The prothrombin time correlated almost linearly with plasma rivaroxaban concentrations (≤500 μg/L).. Population analyses of phase II clinical data indicated that the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of all rivaroxaban doses were predictable and were affected by expected demographic factors in patients with acute DVT.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Body Weight; Computer Simulation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Venous Thrombosis; Young Adult

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common significant cardiac arrhythmia, increases the risk of stroke, particularly in the elderly. Warfarin is effective in reducing stroke risk but is burdensome to patients and is difficult to control. Rivaroxaban is an oral direct factor Xa inhibitor in advanced development as an alternative to warfarin for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders.. ROCKET AF is a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, event-driven trial, which aims to establish the noninferiority of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in patients with nonvalvular AF who have a history of stroke or at least 2 additional independent risk factors for future stroke. Patients are randomly assigned to receive rivaroxaban, 20 mg once daily (od), or dose-adjusted warfarin titrated to a target international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.5 (range 2.0-3.0, inclusive) using point-of-care INR devices to receive true or sham INR values, depending on the study drug allocation. The primary efficacy end point is a composite of all-cause stroke and noncentral nervous system systemic embolism. The primary safety end point is the composite of major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events. Over 14,000 patients have been randomized at 1,100 sites across 45 countries, and will be followed until 405 primary outcome events are observed.. The ROCKET AF study will determine the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban as an alternative to warfarin for the prevention of thromboembolism in patients with AF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Medical Records; Morpholines; Research Design; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thiophenes; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Rivaroxaban is an oral direct factor Xa inhibitor that has been effective in prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery. However, its use after acute coronary syndromes has not been investigated. In this setting, we assessed the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban and aimed to select the most favourable dose and dosing regimen.. In this double-blind, dose-escalation, phase II study, undertaken at 297 sites in 27 countries, 3491 patients stabilised after an acute coronary syndrome were stratified on the basis of investigator decision to use aspirin only (stratum 1, n=761) or aspirin plus a thienopyridine (stratum 2, n=2730). Participants were randomised within each strata and dose tier with a block randomisation method at 1:1:1 to receive either placebo or rivaroxaban (at doses 5-20 mg) given once daily or the same total daily dose given twice daily. The primary safety endpoint was clinically significant bleeding (TIMI major, TIMI minor, or requiring medical attention); the primary efficacy endpoint was death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or severe recurrent ischaemia requiring revascularisation during 6 months. Safety analyses included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug; efficacy analyses were by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00402597.. Three patients in stratum 1 and 26 in stratum 2 never received the study drug. The risk of clinically significant bleeding with rivaroxaban versus placebo increased in a dose-dependent manner (hazard ratios [HRs] 2.21 [95% CI 1.25-3.91] for 5 mg, 3.35 [2.31-4.87] for 10 mg, 3.60 [2.32-5.58] for 15 mg, and 5.06 [3.45-7.42] for 20 mg doses; p<0.0001). Rates of the primary efficacy endpoint were 5.6% (126/2331) for rivaroxaban versus 7.0% (79/1160) for placebo (HR 0.79 [0.60-1.05], p=0.10). Rivaroxaban reduced the main secondary efficacy endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke compared with placebo (87/2331 [3.9%] vs 62/1160 [5.5%]; HR 0.69, [95% CI 0.50-0.96], p=0.0270). The most common adverse event in both groups was chest pain (248/2309 [10.7%] vs 118/1153 [10.2%]).. The use of an oral factor Xa inhibitor in patients stabilised after an acute coronary syndrome increases bleeding in a dose-dependent manner and might reduce major ischaemic outcomes. On the basis of these observations, a phase III study of low-dose rivaroxaban as adjunctive therapy in these patients is underway.. Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development and Bayer Healthcare AG.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Aspirin; Chest Pain; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Myocardial Infarction; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyridines; Recurrence; Risk Reduction Behavior; Rivaroxaban; Safety; Statistics, Nonparametric; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome

Patients with a mechanical heart valve need a lifelong anticoagulation due to the increased risk of valve thrombosis and thrombo-embolism. Currently, vitamin K antagonists (VKA) are the only approved class of oral anticoagulants, but relevant interactions and side effects lead to a large number of patients not achieving the optimal therapeutic target international normalized ration (INR). Therefore, steady measurements of the INR are imperative to ensure potent anticoagulation within a distinctive range. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) with newer agents could serve as a possible alternative to VKAs in this patient cohort. DOACs are approved for several indications, e.g., atrial fibrillation (AF). They only have a minor interaction potential, which is why monitoring is not needed. Thereby, DOACs improve the livability of patients in need of chronical anticoagulation compared with VKAs. In contrast to dual platelet inhibition using aspirin in combination with an ADP receptor antagonist and the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran, the oral factor Xa inhibitors apixaban and rivaroxaban show promising results according to current evidence. In small-scale studies, factor Xa inhibitors were able to prevent thrombosis and thrombo-embolic events in patients with mechanical heart valves. Finally, DOACs seem to represent a feasible treatment option in patients with mechanical heart valves, but further studies are needed to evaluate clinical safety. In addition to the ongoing PROACT Xa trial with apixaban in patients after aortic On-X valve implantation, studies in an all-comer collective with rivaroxaban could be promising.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Valves; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Pyridones; Ritonavir; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

This study attempts to identify predictors associated with bleeding and stroke and systemic embolism (SSE) in Singaporean Asians taking rivaroxaban and apixaban.. A total of 134 Singaporean patients on either rivaroxaban or apixaban for non-valvular atrial fibrillation were included for this study. Baseline characteristics were recorded at recruitment while bleeding and SSE events were recorded during a 1-year follow-up. Peak and trough drug plasma concentrations were collected based on the dosing interval and pharmacokinetics of the drugs and quantified using high performance liquid chromatography. Characteristics of patients with or without bleeds were compared using relevant statistical tests. Multivariable regression that included covariates with p < 0.1 from an initial univariable regression was performed to analyse predictors that resulted in higher risk of bleeding in patients.. Median creatinine clearance (CrCl) was significantly lower in patients on rivaroxaban who experienced bleeds as compared to patients who did not experience bleeds (61.5 vs 70.8 mL/min, p = 0.047), while concomitant simvastatin use was found to be independently associated with a sixfold increased risk of bleeding (adjusted OR = 6.14 (95% CI: 1.18-31.97), p = 0.031) for rivaroxaban after controlling for body mass index, CrCl and having experienced a previous SSE.. Our findings suggest that concomitant use of simvastatin with rivaroxaban may be associated with bleeding events in an Asian cohort. Further studies using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling are required to investigate the drug-drug interactions between these drugs.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Asian People; Atorvastatin; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Simvastatin; Singapore; Stroke

Compare costs associated with all-cause healthcare resource use (HCRU), stroke/systemic thromboembolism (STE) and major bleedings (MB) between patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) initiating apixaban or other oral anticoagulants (OACs).. We performed a retrospective cohort study using the French healthcare claims database, including NVAF patients between 2014/01/01 and 2016/12/31, followed until 2016/12/31. We used 4 sub-cohorts of OAC-naive patients, respectively initiating apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban or VKAs. We matched patients initiating apixaban with patients initiating each other OACs using 1:n propensity score matching. All-cause HCRU and event-related costs by OAC treatment were estimated and compared between matched patients using generalised-linear models with gamma-distribution and two-part models.. There were 175,766 patients in the apixaban-VKA, 181,809 in the apixaban-rivaroxaban, and 42,490 in the apixaban-dabigatran matched cohorts. Patients initiating apixaban had significantly lower HCRU costs than patients initiating VKA (€1,105 vs. €1,578, p < 0.0001), dabigatran (€993 vs. €1,140, p < 0.0001) and rivaroxaban (€1,013 vs. €1,088 p < 0.0001). They have had significantly lower costs related to stroke/STE and MB than patients initiating VKA (respectively, €183 vs. €449 and €147 vs. €413; p < 0.0001), rivaroxaban (respectively, €145 vs. €197 and €129 vs. €193; p < 0.0001), and lower costs related to stroke/STE than patients initiating dabigatran (€135 vs. €192, p < 0.02). Costs related to MB were not significantly different in patients initiating apixaban and those initiating dabigatran (€119 vs. €149, p = 0.07).. HCRU and most event-related costs were lower in patients initiating apixaban compared to other OACs. Apixaban may be cost-saving compared to VKAs, and significantly cheaper than other DOACs, although cost differences are limited.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; France; Hemorrhage; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Clinical trials provide conflicting evidence regarding oral factor Xa inhibitors for prevention of ischemic stroke in patients without a history of atrial fibrillation (AF).. We performed a critical appraisal of randomized clinical trials that tested oral factor Xa inhibitors in patients without AF that reported ischemic stroke.. Considering the 11 trials that reported > 10 ischemic strokes during follow-up (97,578 participants, 1195 ischemic strokes), 1 tested apixaban (57 strokes), 1 betrixaban (52 strokes), and 9 rivaroxaban (1086 strokes). In 7 trials with placebo comparisons, numerically fewer ischemic strokes occurred among those assigned factor Xa inhibitors in 7 of 8 randomized comparisons (range of hazard ratios [HRs], 0.89-0.51), including statistically significant reductions in 2 trials that compared rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily vs placebo on a background of aspirin in patients with cardiovascular disease, COMPASS (HR, 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-0.68) and COMMANDER-HF (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.43-0.95). Compared with aspirin in 4 trials, oral factor Xa inhibitors were associated with fewer ischemic strokes in 2, with statistically significant reduction in 1 (rivaroxaban 5 mg twice daily in COMPASS; HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.53-0.90). Major bleeding was increased by oral factor Xa inhibitors in all 7 placebo-controlled trials (HR range, 1.42-4.08), with statistically significant increases reported in 5 trials, and in all 4 aspirin-controlled trials (all statistically significant increases; HR range, 1.52-2.72).. Aggregate evidence on the basis of placebo comparisons from randomized trials supports the potential for oral factor Xa inhibitors to reduce ischemic stroke in patients without AF, but major bleeding is increased.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Tramadol, a weak opioid, inhibits the reuptake of serotonin, a key feature on vascular homeostasis. A suspected interaction exists between dabigatran and tramadol, which might trigger an excess on risk of bleeding however, there is a gap in knowledge on this topic.. To estimate the effects of tramadol, dabigatran and concomitant use on the risk of hospitalized major bleeds (Gastrointestinal bleeding and intra-extracranial bleeds).. Among a validated established cohort of new users of oral anticoagulants for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) aged 18 years or older, we identified all hospitalized bleed episodes (GIB and extra/intracranial bleeds) within 2008-2015. A nested case-control analysis was conducted using conditional logistic regression. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for dabigatran, tramadol, and concomitant use. Several sensitivity analyses were carried out.. aORs (95%CIs) for current use of only dabigatran, only tramadol and concomitant users were 1.73 (1.37-2.18) and 1.38 (1.13-1.67) and 2.04 (0.74-5.67) compared with non-users of both drugs (>365 days). aORs for current continuers and non-continuer users of dabigatran were 1.36 (1.00-1.86) and 2.19 (1.61-2.98), respectively. For the latter, non-continuer users with a short duration of dabigatran cumulated the highest risk (3.36 [1.88-5.99]). There also was an increased risk with concomitant use of tramadol and rivaroxaban (2.24 [1.19-4.21]), or antagonist of vitamin K (1.30 [1.00-1.69]).. There was a trend towards and increased risk of excess bleeds when using concomitantly with dabigatran. The effect decreases with a narrower definition of current use.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Spain; Stroke; Tramadol

Data on non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) patients are controversial. In patients without atrial fibrillation (AF), rivaroxaban showed enhanced ischemia and bleeding as compared to standard of care. ENVISAGE showed enhanced bleeding in AF patients as compared to vitamin K antagonist (VKA). Only apixaban was non-inferior but failed superiority regarding bleeding in AF patients after TAVR. One could hypothesize that this might be due to pharmacokinetics of NOACs. Therefore, we compared outcome in rivaroxaban/edoxaban (once-daily) and apixaban (twice-daily) treated patients. 568 patients with indication for permanent oral anticoagulation due to AF undergoing TAVR were analyzed via inverse probability of treatment weighting. Valve academic research consortium complications during 30-day follow-up were assessed. Bleeding complications were similar in once-daily and twice-daily NOACs (major: 22 (7.5%) vs. 14 (5.3%), p = 0.285; minor: 66 (22.4%) vs. 46 (17.4%), p = 0.133). Complications did not change when splitting the cohort in the different agents apixaban, rivaroxaban and edoxaban. These findings remained robust after multivariate analysis. In summary, twice-daily and once-daily NOACs did not differ regarding bleeding complications in a hypothesis generating real-world cohort of TAVR patients with AF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement; Treatment Outcome

In England, most prescribing of direct-acting oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation (AF) is in primary care. However, there remain gaps in our understanding of dosage and disparities in use. We aimed to describe trends in direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) prescribing, including dose reduction in people with renal impairment and other criteria, and adherence.. Using English primary care sentinel network data from 2014 to 2019, we assessed appropriate DOAC dose adjustment with creatinine clearance (CrCl). Our primary care sentinel cohort was a subset of 722 general practices, with 6.46 million currently registered patients at the time of this study.. Of 6 464 129 people in the cohort, 2.3% were aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of AF, and 30.8% of these were prescribed vitamin K antagonist and 69.1% DOACs. Appropriate DOAC prescribing following CrCl measures improved between 2014 and 2019; dabigatran from 21.3% (95% CI 15.1% to 28.8%) to 48.7% (95% CI 45.0% to 52.4%); rivaroxaban from 22.1% (95% CI 16.7% to 28.4%) to 49.9% (95% CI 48.5% to 53.3%); edoxaban from 10.0% (95% CI 0.3% to 44.5%) in 2016 to 57.6% (95% CI 54.5% to 60.7%) in 2019; apixaban from 30.8% (95% CI 9.1% to 61.4%) in 2015 to 60.5% (95% CI 57.8% to 63.2%) in 2019.Adherence was highest for factor Xa inhibitors, increasing from 50.1% (95% CI 47.7% to 52.4%) in 2014 to 57.8% (95% CI 57.4% to 58.2%) in 2019. Asian and black/mixed ethnicity was associated with non-adherence (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.56 to 2.09) as was male gender (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.22), higher socioeconomic status (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.52 to 1.68), being an ex-smoker (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.19) and hypertension (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.17).. The volume and quality of DOAC prescribing has increased yearly. Future interventions to augment quality of anticoagulant management should target disparities in adherence.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Primary Health Care; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Warfarin, a commonly prescribed anticoagulant, requires frequent lab monitoring. Lab monitoring puts patients at risk of COVID-19 exposure and diverts medical resources away from health care systems. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) do not require routine therapeutic monitoring and are indicated first line for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) stroke prevention and venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention/treatment.. The purpose of the study was to determine the proportion of patients who qualify for DOACs and assess for predictors of qualification.. This cross-sectional study investigated patients on warfarin managed by Michigan Medicine Anticoagulation Service. Direct oral anticoagulant eligibility criteria were established using apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban package inserts. Patient eligibility was determined through chart review. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who qualify for DOACs based on clinical factors. Predictors of DOAC qualification were assessed.. This study included 3205 patients and found 51.8% (. Approximately 52% of patients on warfarin were eligible for DOACs. This presents an opportunity to reduce patient exposure to health care settings and health care utilization in the setting of COVID-19. Increased costs of DOACs need to be assessed.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; COVID-19; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

 Although a growing number of very elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), multiple conditions, and polypharmacy receive direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), few studies specifically investigated both apixaban/rivaroxaban pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in such patients..  To investigate: (1) DOAC concentration-time profiles; (2) thrombin generation (TG); and (3) clinical outcomes 6 months after inclusion in very elderly AF in-patients receiving rivaroxaban or apixaban..  Adage-NCT02464488 was an academic prospective exploratory multicenter study, enrolling AF in-patients aged ≥80 years, receiving DOAC for at least 4 days. Each patient had one to five blood samples at different time points over 20 days. DOAC concentrations were determined using chromogenic assays. TG was investigated using ST-Genesia (STG-ThromboScreen, STG-DrugScreen)..  Our study provides original data in very elderly patients receiving DOAC in a real-life setting, showing great inter-individual variability in plasma concentrations and TG parameters. Further research is needed to understand the potential clinical impact of these findings.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Prospective Studies; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thrombin

Per-label dosing of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is important for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), especially those with poor renal function, advanced age, low body weight or concomitant P-glycoprotein inhibitors. The study described DOAC use and dosing patterns in patients with NVAF in the UK.. Using Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD Gold), patients' profiles were described at DOAC initiation (1 January 2016-31 March 2021) and followed for a mean [standard deviation (SD)] 2 (1) years. Patients were categorised as under-dosing: received a lower dose with no indication for a reduced dose; over-dosing: received a standard dose with an indication for a reduced dose; per-label dosing, according to Summary Product Characteristics (SmPC).. Forty thousand seven hundred forty-four adult patients with NVAF were identified (mean age: 75.3 (11.2) years; males: 55.4%); 22,827 (56.0%) initiated treatment with apixaban, 930 (2.3%) dabigatran, 5633 (13.8%) edoxaban and 11,354 (27.9%) rivaroxaban. Baseline Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 4 was 65.1%; CHA. Although most patients received per-label dosing, ~ one in five patients was incorrectly dosed with DOAC, which may lead to serious clinical consequences and increased healthcare burden.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Male; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Oral anticoagulants (OACs) mitigate stroke and systemic embolism (SE) risk in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) patients but can increase the risk of major bleeding (MB). This study analyzed the gains in event-free time for these outcomes among OAC treatment options represented in the ARISTOPHANES study.. This sub-analysis consisted of NVAF patients who initiated warfarin, apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban from 01JAN2013-30SEP2015, with data pooled from Medicare and 4 US commercial claims databases. Propensity score matching was conducted between non-vitamin K antagonist OAC (NOAC) and warfarin cohorts in each database and results were pooled. Laplace regression was used to evaluate the delay in time to stroke/SE and MB events between NOACs and warfarin and between NOACs after the first 12-months of follow-up.. The population included 466,991 patients (167,413 warfarin; 108,852 apixaban; 37,724 dabigatran; and 153,002 rivaroxaban). Event-free time gain (95% confidence interval) for apixaban versus warfarin was 101 days (78- 124) for stroke/SE and 116 (103- 130) days for MB. The gain in event-free time for dabigatran versus warfarin was 45 days (3- 87) for stroke/SE and 92 (68- 116) days for MB. The gain in event-free time for rivaroxaban versus warfarin was 63 days (42- 84) for stroke/SE but event-free time decreased by 18 (-31-6) days for MB.. Over 12 months after initiation, apixaban and dabigatran conferred progressive increases in event free time for stroke/SE and MB vs warfarin, whereas rivaroxaban conferred an increase in stroke/SE-free time but a loss in MB-free time vs warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Medicare; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States; Warfarin

In the USA, there is a steady rise of atrial fibrillation due to the aging population with increased morbidity. This study evaluated the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (S/SE) and major bleeding (MB) among elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and multimorbidity prescribed direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).. Using the CMS Medicare database, a retrospective observational study of adult patients with NVAF and multimorbidity who initiated apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2017 was conducted. High multimorbidity was classified as having ≥ 6 comorbidities. Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the hazard ratios of S/SE and MB among three 1:1 propensity score matched DOAC cohorts. All-cause healthcare costs were estimated using generalized linear models.. Overall 36% of the NVAF study population had high multimorbidity, forming three propensity score matched (PSM) cohorts: 12,511 apixaban-dabigatran, 60,287 apixaban-rivaroxaban, and 12,567 dabigatran-rivaroxaban patients. Apixaban was associated with a lower risk of stroke/SE and MB when compared with dabigatran and rivaroxaban. Dabigatran had a lower risk of stroke/SE and a similar risk of MB when compared with rivaroxaban. Compared to rivaroxaban, apixaban patients incurred lower all-cause healthcare costs, and dabigatran patients incurred similar all-cause healthcare costs. Compared to dabigatran, apixaban patients incurred similar all-cause healthcare costs.. Patients with NVAF and ≥ 6 comorbid conditions had significantly different risks for stroke/SE and MB when comparing DOACs to DOACs, and different healthcare expenses. This study's results may be useful for evaluating the risk-benefit ratio of DOAC use in patients with NVAF and multimorbidity.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Medicare; Multimorbidity; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States; Warfarin

In the pivotal randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for patients with atrial fibrillation, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) had similar or even superior efficacy and safety compared with warfarin. However, RCTs comparing different DOACs are nonexistent and previous observational studies have yielded conflicting results. In this nationwide cohort study, rates of any stroke or systemic embolism (stroke/SE) and major bleeding were compared among new users of apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban with atrial fibrillation from 2014 to 2019. Inverse probability weighting was used to yield balanced study groups, and outcomes were compared using Cox regression. Stroke/SE rates were similar in patients receiving apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban. Dabigatran was associated with twofold higher rates of myocardial infarction (MI) than rivaroxaban (1.4 events/100 person-years (py) vs 0.7 events/100-py, hazard ratio [HR] 2.21, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-4.90) and apixaban (1.4 events/100-py vs 0.7 events/100-py, HR 2.26, 95% CI, 0.90-5.67), although the second comparison included the possibility of a null effect. Rivaroxaban was associated with higher major bleeding rates compared with apixaban (2.9 events/100-py vs 1.8 events/100-py, HR 1.64, 95% CI, 1.13-2.37) and dabigatran (2.9 events/100-py vs 1.4 events/100-py, HR 2.18, 95% CI, 1.21-3.93). Specifically, rivaroxaban had higher rates of major gastrointestinal bleeding and other major bleeding than apixaban. In conclusion, although stroke/SE rates were similar for DOACs, rivaroxaban was associated with higher rates of major bleeding than other DOACs and lower rates of MI than dabigatran. These results may help guide oral anticoagulant selection, especially in patients at high risk of bleeding or MI.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Propensity Score; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Connolly SJ, Karthikeyan G, Ntsekhe M, et al.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Rheumatic Heart Disease; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were introduced based on randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing them to vitamin-K-antagonist (VKA) warfarin. In Germany, almost exclusively phenprocoumon is used as VKA. RCTs with phenprocoumon being absent we analysed the benefits and harms of DOACs and phenprocoumon for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in a real-world setting.. In a retrospective observational cohort study, claims data covering inpatient and outpatient care from 2015 to 2019 were analysed by Cox regression and propensity score matching (PSM).. Data from a group of small-sized to medium-sized health insurance companies in Germany.. We analysed datasets of 71 961 patients with AF and first prescription of phenprocoumon (n=20 179) or DOAC in standard dose (n=51 782). Patients with reduced dose of DOACs were excluded (n=21 724).. Outcomes were thromboembolic events, major bleeding and death during a 12-month follow-up period.. The regression analysis widely showed similarity between phenprocoumon and standard dose DOACs regarding effectiveness and safety. There were only three statistically significant differences: a lower bleeding risk with composite DOACs and apixaban (HR (95% CI) = 0.67 (0.59 to 0.76) and 0.54 (0.46 to 0.63), respectively) and a higher risk of death with rivaroxaban (1.21 (1.10 to 2.34)). The analysis after PSM was consistent with the first two results regarding composite DOACs and apixaban (number needed to treat, NNT 101 and 78) and showed a lower bleeding risk with rivaroxaban (NNT 156). Absolute differences were small.. The small superiority or non-inferiority of DOACs over warfarin seen in the RCTs might not translate into relevant advantages of DOACs over phenprocoumon. To confirm the hypothesis, an RCT with phenprocoumon is needed. Next to the safety and effectiveness assessments other factors might also play a substantial role in the decision on the right OAC for stroke prevention.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Phenprocoumon; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamins; Warfarin

It is unclear whether warfarin treatment with high time in therapeutic range (TTR) is as effective and safe as non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). It is crucial to compare warfarin with effective TTR and NOACs to predict long-term adverse events in patients with atrial fibrillation.. We aimed to compare the long-term follow-up results of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who use vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) with effective TTR and NOACs.. A total of 1140 patients were followed at 35 different centers for five years. During the follow-up period, the international normalized ratio (INR) values were studied at least 4 times a year, and the TTR values were calculated according to the Roosendaal method. The effective TTR level was accepted as >60% as recommended by the guidelines. There were 254 patients in the effective TTR group and 886 patients in the NOAC group. Ischemic cerebrovascular disease/transient ischemic attack (CVD/TIA), intracranial bleeding, and mortality were considered primary endpoints based on one-year and five-year follow-ups.. Ischemic CVD/TIA (3.9% vs. 6.2%; P = 0.17) and intracranial bleeding (0.4% vs. 0.5%; P = 0.69), the one-year mortality rate (7.1% vs. 8.1%; P = 0.59), the five-year mortality rate (24% vs. 26.3%; P = 0.46) were not different between the effective TTR and NOACs groups during the follow-up, respectively. The CHA2DS2-VASC score was similar between the warfarin with effective TTR group and the NOAC group (3 [2-4] vs. 3 [2-4]; P = 0.17, respectively). Additionally, survival free-time did not differ between the warfarin with effective TTR group and each NOAC in the Kaplan-Meier analysis (dabigatran; P = 0.59, rivaroxaban; P = 0.34, apixaban; P = 0.26, and edoxaban; P = 0.14).. There was no significant difference in primary outcomes between the effective TTR and NOAC groups in AF patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Previous observational studies have yielded conflicting results on whether medication adherence differs between patients receiving warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Importantly, no study has adequately accounted for warfarin dosing being continuously modified based on INR values while dosing of DOACs is fixed. We aimed to compare non-adherence between new users of apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban and warfarin in a population-based cohort.. New users of apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban and warfarin from 2014 to 2019 living in the Icelandic capital area were included. Non-adherence was defined as proportion of days covered below 80%. Inverse probability weighting was used to yield balanced study groups and non-adherence was compared using logistic regression. Factors associated with non-adherence were estimated using multivariable logistic regression.. Overall, 1266 patients received apixaban, 247 dabigatran, 1566 rivaroxaban and 768 warfarin. The proportion of patients with non-adherence ranged from 10.5% to 16.7%. Dabigatran was associated with significantly higher odds of non-adherence compared with apixaban (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.04, p<0.001), rivaroxaban (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.89, p=0.005) and warfarin (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.23 to 2.15, p<0.001). The odds of non-adherence were similar for apixaban, rivaroxaban and warfarin. Apart from the type of oral anticoagulants (OACs) used, female sex, hypertension, history of cerebrovascular accident and concomitant statin use were all independently associated with lower odds of non-adherence.. Dabigatran was associated with higher odds of non-adherence compared with other OACs. Non-adherence was similar between apixaban, rivaroxaban and warfarin users. Female sex and higher comorbidity were associated with better medication adherence.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Medication Adherence; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) used in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) are dose-reduced in elderly and patients with impaired renal function. Only reduced dose dabigatran is concluded as having similar stroke risk reduction and lower risk of major bleeding than warfarin in the pivotal studies. In clinical practice, reduced dose is prescribed more often than expected making this an important issue. The objective of this study was to compare effectiveness and safety between reduced dose DOACs and high TTR warfarin treatment (TTR ≥ 70%) in NVAF. A Swedish anticoagulation registry was used in identifying eligible patients from July 2011 to December 2017. The study cohort consisted of 40,564 patients with newly initiated DOAC (apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban) (11,083 patients) or warfarin treatment (29,481 patients) after exclusion of 374,135 patients due to not being warfarin or DOAC naïve, not being prescribed reduced dose, having previous mechanical heart valve (MHV), or being under 18 years old. The median durations of follow up were 365, 419, 432 and 473 days for apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban and warfarin, respectively. Warfarin TTR identified from Auricula was 70.0%. Endpoints (stroke and major bleeding) and baseline characteristics were collected from hospital administrative registers using ICD-10 codes. Cohorts were compared using weighted adjusted Cox regression after full optimal matching based on propensity scores. DOACs are associated with lower risk of major bleeding (HR with 95% CI) 0.85 (0.78-0.93), intracranial bleeding HR 0.64 (0.51-0.80), hemorrhagic stroke HR 0.68 (0.50-0.92), gastrointestinal bleeding HR 0.81 (0.69-0.96) and all-cause stroke HR 0.87 (0.76-0.99), than warfarin. Apixaban and dabigatran are associated with lower risk of major bleeding, HR 0.70 (0.63-0.78) and HR 0.80 (0.69-0.94), and rivaroxaban is associated with lower risk of ischemic stroke, HR 0.73 (0.59-0.96), with higher major bleeding risk, HR 1.31 (1.15-1.48), compared to warfarin. Apixaban is associated with higher all-cause mortality compared to warfarin, HR 1.12 (1.03-1.21). DOACs are associated with lower risk of major bleeding and all-cause stroke, than high quality warfarin treatment, with exception of rivaroxaban that carried higher risk of major bleeding and lower risk of stroke or systemic embolism. In this large observational registry-based NVAF cohort, DOACs are preferred treatment in patients with indication for DOAC dose reduction, even

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Heart failure (HF) is a critical complication in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and diabetes mellitus (DM). Recent preclinical studies suggested that non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) can potentially suppress the progression of cardiac fibrosis and ischemic cardiomyopathy. Whether different oral anticoagulants influence the risk of HF in older adults with AF and DM is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of HF in elderly patients with AF and DM who were administered NOACs or warfarin.. A nationwide retrospective cohort study was conducted based on claims data from the entire Taiwanese population. Target trial emulation design was applied to strengthen causal inference using observational data. Patients aged  ≥ 65 years with AF and DM on NOAC or warfarin treatment between 2012 and 2019 were included and followed up until 2020. The primary outcome was newly diagnosed HF. Propensity score-based fine stratification weightings were used to balance patient characteristics between NOAC and warfarin groups. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazard models.. The study included a total of 24,835 individuals (19,710 NOAC and 5,125 warfarin users). Patients taking NOACs had a significantly lower risk of HF than those taking warfarin (HR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.74-0.86, p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses for individual NOACs suggested that dabigatran (HR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.80-0.93, p < 0.001), rivaroxaban (HR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.74-0.86, p < 0.001), apixaban (HR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.68-0.90, p < 0.001), and edoxaban (HR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.60-0.86, p < 0.001) were associated with lower risks of HF than warfarin. The findings were consistent regardless of age and sex subgroups and were more prominent in those with high medication possession ratios. Several sensitivity analyses further supported the robustness of our findings.. This nationwide cohort study demonstrated that elderly patients with AF and DM taking NOACs had a lower risk of incident HF than those taking warfarin. Our findings suggested that NOACs may be the preferred oral anticoagulant treatment when considering the prevention of heart failure in this vulnerable population. Future research is warranted to elucidate causation and investigate the underlying mechanisms.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus; Heart Failure; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Four direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are used in Japan (edoxaban, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran); however, few studies have examined the long-term treatment persistence of these DOACs. Furthermore, the factors associated with persistence remain unclear. This single-center, retrospective cohort study enrolled participants who were newly prescribed the 4 DOACs between January 1, 2012, and April 30, 2020. We assessed the treatment persistence rate by calculating the cumulative incidence rate of prescription switch or discontinuation for 5 years from the initial prescription. The factors associated with persistence were examined using multivariate analysis. The edoxaban was used as a reference for comparison with the other DOACs. The persistence rate at 5 years was 52.9% for all DOACs, including 67.0%, 51.6%, 50.2%, and 37.0% for edoxaban, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that age >65 years (hazard ratio [HR], 0.62 [95%CI, 0.41-0.93]), chronic kidney disease (HR, 1.63 [95%CI, 1.11-2.39]), baseline hemoglobin (HR, 0.85 [95%CI, 0.78-0.93]), diabetes mellitus (HR, 0.51 [95%CI, 0.29-0.93]), and type of DOACs (rivaroxaban: HR, 1.81 [95%CI, 1.03-3.18]; apixaban: HR, 2.00 [95%CI, 1.15-3.48]; and dabigatran: HR, 2.84 [95%CI, 1.66-4.86]) were significantly associated with nonpersistence at 1 year. At 5 years, diabetes mellitus (HR, 0.60 [95%CI, 0.37-0.97]) and type of DOAC were significantly associated with nonpersistence (rivaroxaban: HR, 1.79 [95%CI, 1.09-2.94]; apixaban: HR, 2.04 [95%CI, 1.26-3.31]; and dabigatran: HR, 2.76 [1.73-4.42]). Long-term treatment persistence differed according to the type of DOAC, with edoxaban exhibiting the highest level of persistence. The factors associated with persistence may change over the treatment course, but larger studies are required to generalize our findings.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

In clinical studies, rivaroxaban treatment has been associated with increased incidence of syncope not related to bleeding, anemia, or stroke. The study objective was to evaluate the occurrence of dizziness and/or syncope not related to bleeding, anemia, or stroke in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).. A retrospective, observational, comparative study of adult patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation and treated with DOACs was conducted using digital retrieval of medical records. Primary outcomes were an emergency department (ED) visit or hospitalization due to syncope, fall, or dizziness. Cases related to bleeding, anemia, or stroke were excluded. Separate examination of a sample of records validated the data.. Of 6467 eligible patients, 256 (4%) were hospitalized or referred to the ED due to fall, syncope, or dizziness during a mean observation period of 20.1 months. After multivariate regression analysis, statistically independent risk factors were found to be age (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.04, P < 0.0001) and benzodiazepine use (HR = 1.33, P = 0.03). No statistically significant difference was found among the different DOAC types regarding the primary outcome (apixaban and rivaroxaban HR = 0.97, P = 0.85; dabigatran and rivaroxaban HR = 1.2, P = 0.386).. The study results failed to confirm the claimed association between the use of a DOAC and syncopal symptoms unrelated to bleeding, anemia, or stroke in this relatively large Israeli patient population. Age and benzodiazepine treatment were significant independent risk factors of these events.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Dizziness; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Syncope

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used and are an important cornerstone in antithrombotic therapy. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) such as bleedings have only partially been investigated during clinical trials. The primary goal was to analyse pharmacovigilance data based on spontaneous reports of gastrointestinal (GI) bleedings with DOACs reported to EudraVigilance. A second goal was to compare GI safety profiles between DOACs based on these signals. All DOAC related GI bleedings mentioned in individual case safety reports (ICSRs) from 2012 till 2017 in the European Economic Area were classified in four GI categories based on the reported site of occurrence of the haemorrhage. Age group and gender of the patient, seriousness and ADR outcome, and the reporter's qualification were assessed per category and per DOAC. Disproportionality analyses were performed to evaluate whether or not the reported ADRs were more prevalent with a given DOAC. ICSRs were bleeding-related in about half of the cases (n = 28,992/53,471). Of these bleedings,  >25% was GI-related. Most patients experiencing GI bleedings were between 65 and 85 years old, with no obvious differences between men and women. Stomach, ulcer-related duodenal, and rectal bleedings were the most reported GI bleedings with a fatal outcome in 5.8%, 7.5%, and 9.8% of the cases for rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran, respectively. The disproportionality data suggest that dabigatran is more frequently involved in GI bleeding events than the other DOACs. DOACs were significantly associated with GI bleedings. Although the data should be interpreted with caution, it seems that dabigatran was associated more often than other DOACs with GI bleedings based on the analysis of spontaneous pharmacovigilance reports.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

The healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs of oral anticoagulant-naïve patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and diabetes initiated on rivaroxaban or warfarin in the United States (US) has not been previously evaluated.. This retrospective study used data from the Optum's de-identified Clinformatics. After IPTW, 17,881 and 19,274 patients initiated on rivaroxaban and warfarin were included, respectively (mean age: 73 years; 40% female). During 12 months of follow-up, the rivaroxaban cohort had lower all-cause HRU PPY across all components, including lower rates of inpatient stays (RR: 0.84, 95% CI 0.81, 0.88), outpatient visits (RR: 0.67, 95% CI 0.66, 0.68), and 30 day hospital readmission (OR: 0.75, 95% CI 0.66, 0.83; all p < 0.001) compared to the warfarin cohort. Moreover, rivaroxaban was associated with medical cost savings PPY (mean cost difference: - $9306, 95% CI - $11,769, - $6607), which compensated for higher pharmacy costs relative to warfarin (mean cost difference: $5518, 95% CI $5193, $5839), resulting in significantly lower all-cause total healthcare costs for rivaroxaban versus warfarin (mean cost difference: - $3788, 95% CI - $6258, - $1035; all p < 0.001).. Among NVAF patients with diabetes in a real-world US setting, rivaroxaban was associated with lower healthcare costs compared to warfarin.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Diabetes Mellitus; Female; Humans; Male; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States; Warfarin

Safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in low weight patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is unclear due to few low body weight patients enrolled in clinical trials. To assess bleeding and thrombotic event rates for patients with AF that are prescribed apixaban and have a low versus normal body weight. We analyzed patients with AF prescribed apixaban from 2017 to 2020 with at least 12 months of follow-up. Patients were divided into low [< 60 kg (kg)] and normal (60-100 kg) weight cohorts. Bleeding and thrombotic event rates were compared. Poisson regression and Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate adjusted adverse event rates. A total of 545 patients met inclusion criteria. In the unadjusted analysis, there was an increase in non-major bleeding events requiring an Emergency Department visit more often in the low versus normal weight cohort (10.8 versus 7.4 per 100 patient-years, p = 0.15). Thrombotic event rates also occurred more often in the lower versus normal weight cohort (2.4 versus 0.9 per 100 patient-years, p = 0.09). However, adjusted analysis found no statistically significant difference in bleeding or thrombotic events between low and normal weight cohorts. The adjusted hazard ratio for bleeding was similar between the two weight cohorts. The use of apixaban in low body weight patients was not associated with higher rates of bleeding or thrombotic events, compared to those with normal body weight, after adjusting for potential confounding covariates. Larger studies may offer further insight into the overall safety and efficacy of DOAC therapy in these patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ideal Body Weight; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thinness; Warfarin

In this article, we have selected four topics that particularly caught our attention during the year 2022, and which are related to anticoagulation, its bleeding complications, and hemophilia. Thus, we discuss the issue of the treatment with rivaroxaban of atrial fibrillation associated with rheumatic valvulopathy, which has been studied in a randomized trial, the intensity of thromboprophylaxis in COVID outpatients and inpatients, and the bleeding risk of anticoagulation in patients with cerebral tumors. Finally, recent data on gene therapy in severe hemophilia A, an upcoming treatment, are discussed.. Dans cet article, nous avons sélectionné 4 sujets qui ont particulièrement retenu notre attention durant l’année 2022, en lien avec l’anticoagulation, ses complications hémorragiques et l’hémophilie. Ainsi, nous abordons le traitement par rivaroxaban de la fibrillation atriale associée à une valvulopathie rhumatismale qui a fait l’objet d’une étude randomisée, l’intensité de la thromboprophylaxie chez les patients hospitalisés ou traités en ambulatoire avec un Covid dont les données se sont bien étoffées, le risque associé à l’anticoagulation chez les patients avec une néoplasie cérébrale et, finalement, la thérapie génique dans l’hémophilie A sévère qui devrait apparaître sur le marché très prochainement.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiology; COVID-19; Hemophilia A; Hemostasis; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Venous Thromboembolism

In clinical trials, event adjudication is a process to review and confirm the accuracy of outcomes reported by site investigators. Despite efforts to automate the communication between a clinical-data-and-coordination center and an event adjudication committee, the review and confirmation of outcomes, as the core function of the process, still fully rely on human labor. To address this issue, we present an automated event adjudication system and its application in two randomized controlled trials.. Centrally executed by a clinical-data-and-coordination center, the automated event adjudication system automatedly assessed and classified outcomes in a clinical data management system. By checking clinically predefined criteria, the automated event adjudication system either confirmed or unconfirmed an outcome and automatedly updated its status in the database. It also served as a management tool to assist staff to oversee the process of event adjudication. The system has been applied in: (1) the Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies (COMPASS) trial and (2) the New Approach riVaroxaban Inhibition of Factor Xa in a Global trial versus Aspirin to prevenT Embolism in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source (NAVIGATE ESUS) trial. The automated event adjudication system first screened outcomes reported on a case report form and confirmed those with data matched to preset definitions. For selected primary efficacy, secondary, and safety outcomes, the unconfirmed cases were referred to a human event adjudication committee for a final decision. In the New Approach riVaroxaban Inhibition of Factor Xa in a Global trial versus Aspirin to prevenT Embolism in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source (NAVIGATE ESUS) trial, human adjudicators were given priority to review cases, while the automated event adjudication system took the lead in the Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies (COMPASS) trial.. Outcomes that were adjudicated in a hybrid model are discussed here. The COMPASS automated event adjudication system adjudicated 3283 primary efficacy outcomes and confirmed 1652 (50.3%): 132 (21.1%) strokes, 522 (53%) myocardial infarctions, and 998 (59.7%) causes of deaths. The NAVIGATE ESUS one adjudicated 737 cases of selected outcomes and confirmed 383 (52%): 219 (51.5%) strokes, 34 (42.5%) myocardial infarctions, 73 (54.9%) causes of deaths, and 57 (57.6%) major bleedings. After one deducts the time needed for migrating the system to a new study, the automated event adjudication system helped to reduce the time required for human review from approximately 1303 to 716.5 h for the Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies trial and from 387 to 196 h for the New Approach riVaroxaban Inhibition of Factor Xa in a Global trial versus Aspirin to prevenT Embolism in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source trial.. The automated event adjudication system in combination with human adjudicators provides a streamlined and efficient approach to event adjudication in clinical trials. To immediately apply automated event adjudication, one can first consider the automated event adjudication system and involve human assistance for cases unconfirmed by the former.

Topics: Aspirin; Double-Blind Method; Embolic Stroke; Embolism; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

This study aimed to estimate the cost effectiveness of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) compared with warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in Thailand where suboptimal anticoagulation control is common.. A hypothetical cohort of 65-year-old patients with NVAF and their disease progression was simulated in the Markov model. The following anticoagulant agents were used: warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. Warfarin with high, intermediate, and low time in therapeutic ranges (TTR) was used as the three different reference treatments. Baseline clinical events were obtained from a recently published real-world study in Thailand. A lifetime horizon was utilized in this model, and all analyses were performed from societal and healthcare perspectives. The results were reported as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in 2021 US dollars per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. The sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the influence of parameter uncertainty.. Apixaban was a cost-effective intervention compared with warfarin with low and intermediate TTR groups. In the low TTR group, the ICERs were $779 and $816 per QALY gained from the societal and healthcare perspectives, respectively, and in the intermediate TTR group, the ICERs were $2038 and $3159 per QALY gained from the societal and healthcare perspectives, respectively. Both ICERs were below the accepted willingness-to-pay threshold ($4806) in the context of Thailand's healthcare.. In a developing country where suboptimal anticoagulation control is common, apixaban was the cost-effective alternative to warfarin for patients with both low and intermediate TTR control.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Developing Countries; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

The benefit-risk profile of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared with warfarin, and between DOACs in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic liver disease is unclear.. We conducted a new-user, retrospective cohort study of patients with AF and chronic liver disease who were enrolled in a large, US-based administrative database between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2017. We assessed the effectiveness and safety of DOACs (as a class and individually) compared with warfarin, and between DOACs in patients with AF and chronic liver disease. The primary outcomes were hospitalization for ischemic stroke/systemic embolism and hospitalization for major bleeding. Inverse probability treatment weights were used to balance the treatment groups on measured confounders.. Overall, 10 209 participants were included, with 4421 (43.2%) on warfarin, 2721 (26.7%) apixaban, 2211 (21.7%) rivaroxaban, and 851 (8.3%) dabigatran. The incidence rates per 100 person-years for ischemic stroke/systemic embolism were 2.2, 1.4, 2.6, and 4.4 for DOACs as a class, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin, respectively. The incidence rates per 100 person-years for major bleeding were 7.9, 6.5, 9.1, and 15.0 for DOACs as a class, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin, respectively. After inverse probability treatment weights, the risk of hospitalization for ischemic stroke/systemic embolism was significantly lower between DOACs as a class (hazard ratio [HR], 0.64 [95% CI, 0.46-0.90]) or apixaban (HR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.19-0.82]) compared with warfarin, but not significantly different between rivaroxaban versus warfarin (HR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.47-1.21]) or rivaroxaban versus apixaban (HR, 1.73 [95% CI, 0.91-3.29]). Compared with warfarin, the risk of hospitalization for major bleeding was lower with DOACs as a class (HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.58-0.82]), apixaban (HR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.46-0.78]), and rivaroxaban (HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.62-1.0]). However, the risk of hospitalization for major bleeding was higher for rivaroxaban versus apixaban (HR, 1.59 [95% CI, 1.18-2.14]).. Among patients with AF and chronic liver disease, DOACs as a class were associated with lower risks of hospitalization for ischemic stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding versus warfarin. However, the incidence of clinical outcomes among patients with AF and chronic liver disease varied between individual DOACs and warfarin, and in head-to-head DOAC comparisons.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Liver Diseases; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been increasingly utilised over warfarin. However, little is known about the relative consumption trends and costs of each DOAC at the global level.. An ecological study using pharmaceutical sales data from IQVIA-MIDAS database was used to estimate consumption and cost of individual DOACs in 65 countries from 2008 to 2019. Consumption was estimated from the volume of DOACs sold, expressed as defined-daily-dose/1000-inhabitants/day (DDDTID). Compound and absolute annual growth rates were reported to quantify consumption changes over time. Costs were estimated as manufacturer price per day-of-therapy.. Global consumption of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban were 0.31, 1.05, 1.08 and 0.78 DDDTID, respectively, in Q2-2019, compared to 0.23, 0.54, 0.21 and 0.03 in Q2-2015, with highest consumption in Western Europe, Northern Europe and Oceania (18.2, 14.07, 13.14 DDDTID). In most countries (46/65, 70%), rivaroxaban contributed to most DOAC consumption (35%-100%), whereas dabigatran accounted for less than one-third. Edoxaban accounted for < 20% of the total in Northern America and Europe but contributed significant proportions in Japan (28.58%) and South Korea (31.37%). Longer median time-to-adoption from FDA approval for apixaban and edoxaban was observed. Costs of all DOACs were ~2-4 times higher in the USA, Puerto Rico and Thailand than in other countries.. Regional differences exist in consumption pattern and trends of individual DOACs over the past decade. Consumption of rivaroxaban and apixaban overtook dabigatran in most countries, whereas use of edoxaban remains limited except in East Asian countries. The USA pays higher prices for DOACs than other countries.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

To appraise all available antithrombotic treatments within or after 12 months following coronary revascularization and/or acute coronary syndrome in two network meta-analyses.. Forty-three (N = 189 261 patients) trials within 12 months and 19 (N = 139 086 patients) trials beyond 12 months were included for efficacy/safety endpoints appraisal. Within 12 months, ticagrelor 90 mg bis in die (b.i.d.) [hazard ratio (HR), 0.66; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.49-0.88], aspirin and ticagrelor 90 mg (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76-0.95), or aspirin, clopidogrel and rivaroxaban 2.5 mg b.i.d. (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.51-0.86) were the only treatments associated with lower cardiovascular mortality, compared with aspirin and clopidogrel, without or with greater bleeding risk for the first and the other treatment options, respectively. Beyond 12 months, no strategy lowered mortality; compared with aspirin; the greatest reductions of myocardial infarction (MI) were found with aspirin and clopidogrel (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.55-0.85) or P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy (HR, 0.76; 95% CI: 0.61-0.95), especially ticagrelor 90 mg (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.32-0.92), and of stroke with VKA (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.44-0.76) or aspirin and rivaroxaban 2.5 mg (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44-0.76). All treatments increased bleeding except P2Y12 monotherapy, compared with aspirin.. Within 12 months, ticagrelor 90 mg monotherapy was the only treatment associated with lower mortality, without bleeding risk trade-off compared with aspirin and clopidogrel. Beyond 12 months, P2Y12 monotherapy, especially ticagrelor 90 mg, was associated with lower MI without bleeding trade-off; aspirin and rivaroxaban 2.5 mg most effectively reduced stroke, with a more acceptable bleeding risk than VKA, compared with aspirin.Registration URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/; Unique identifiers: CRD42021243985 and CRD42021252398.

Topics: Aspirin; Cardiology; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Network Meta-Analysis; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Ticagrelor

Lifelong oral anticoagulation is recommended in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) to prevent stroke. Over the last decade, multiple new oral anticoagulants (OACs) have expanded the number of treatment options for these patients. While population-level effectiveness of OACs has been compared, it is unclear if there is variability in benefit and risk across patient subgroups.. We analyzed claims and medical data for 34,569 patients who initiated a nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC); apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban) or warfarin for nonvalvular AF between 08/01/2010 and 11/29/2017 from the OptumLabs Data Warehouse. A machine learning (ML) method was applied to match different OAC groups on several baseline variables including, age, sex, race, renal function, and CHA. The mean age, number of females and white race in the entire cohort of 34,569 patients were 71.2 (SD, 10.7) years, 14,916 (43.1%), and 25,051 (72.5%) respectively. During a mean follow-up of 8.3 (SD, 9.0) months, 2,110 (6.1%) of patients experienced the composite outcome, of whom 1,675 (4.8%) died. The causal ML method identified 5 subgroups with variables favoring apixaban over dabigatran; 2 subgroups favoring apixaban over rivaroxaban; 1 subgroup favoring dabigatran over rivaroxaban; and 1 subgroup favoring rivaroxaban over dabigatran in terms of risk reduction of the primary endpoint. No subgroup favored warfarin and most dabigatran vs warfarin users favored neither drug. The variables that most influenced favoring one subgroup over another included Age, history of ischemic stroke, thromboembolism, estimated glomerular filtration rate, Race, and myocardial infarction.. Among patients with AF treated with a NOAC or warfarin, a causal ML method identified patient subgroups with differences in outcomes associated with OAC use. The findings suggest that the effects of OACs are heterogeneous across subgroups of AF patients, which could help personalize the choice of OAC. Future prospective studies are needed to better understand the clinical impact of the subgroups with respect to OAC selection.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Oral anticoagulant therapy is the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation management to prevent stroke and systemic embolism. However, there is limited real-world information regarding stroke and systemic embolism prevention strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation. The aim of the ROTA study is to obtain the real-world data of anticoagulant treatment patterns in patients with atrial fibrillation.. The ROTA study is a prospective, multicenter, and observational study that included 2597 patients with atrial fibrillation. The study population was recruited from 41 cardiology outpatient clinics between January 2021 and May 2021.. The median age of the study population was 72 years (range: 22-98 years) and 57.4% were female. The median CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 4 (range: 0-9) and 1 (range: 0-6), respectively. Vitamin K antagonists and direct oral anticoagulants were used in 15.9% and 79.4% of patients, respectively. The mean time in therapeutic range was 52.9% for patients receiving vitamin K antagonists, and 76% of those patients had an inadequate time in therapeutic range with <70%. The most common prescribed direct oral anticoagulants were rivaroxaban (38.1%), apixaban (25.5%), and edoxaban (11.2%). The rate of overuse of vitamin K antagonists and direct oral anticoagulants was high (76.1%) in patients with low stroke risk, and more than one-fourth of patients on direct oral anticoagulant therapy were receiving a reduced dose of direct oral anticoagulants. Among patients who were on direct oral anticoagulant treatment, patients with apixaban treatment were older, had higher CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores, and had lower creatinine clearance than the patients receiving other direct oral anticoagulants.. The ROTA study provides important real-world information about anticoagulant treatment patterns in patients with atrial fibrillation.time in therapeutic range with <70%.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K; Young Adult

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with cognitive decline, with anticoagulated subjects potentially having a reduced risk compared with non-anticoagulated subjects. However, whether non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) may reduce the risk of dementia compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) is unclear yet. Therefore, the risk of dementia was compared between AF subjects on NOACs versus VKAs.. AF subjects initiating anticoagulation between 2013 and 2019 were identified in Belgian nationwide data. Inverse probability of treatment weighted Cox regression was used to investigate cognitive outcomes.. Among 237,012 AF subjects (310,850 person-years (PYs)), NOAC use was associated with a significantly lower risk of dementia (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.85-0.98)) compared with VKAs. A trend towards a lower risk of vascular dementia (aHR 0.89, 95% CI (0.76-1.04)) and significantly lower risk of other/unspecified dementia (aHR 0.91, 95% CI (0.84-0.99)) were observed with NOACs compared with VKAs, whereas the risk of Alzheimer's disease was similar (aHR 0.99, 95% CI (0.88-1.11)). Apixaban (aHR 0.91, 95% CI (0.83-0.99)) and edoxaban (aHR 0.79, 95% CI (0.63-0.99)) were associated with significantly lower risks of dementia compared with VKAs, while risks were not significantly different with dabigatran (aHR 1.02, 95% CI (0.93-1.12)) and rivaroxaban (aHR 0.97, 95% CI (0.90-1.05)). Comparable risks of dementia were observed between individual NOACs, except for significantly lower risks of dementia (aHR 0.93, 95% CI (0.87-0.98)) and other/unspecified dementia (aHR 0.90 (0.84-0.97)) with apixaban compared with rivaroxaban.. NOACs were associated with a significantly lower risk of dementia compared with VKAs, likely driven by apixaban and edoxaban use.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Belgium; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Dementia; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are favorable in stroke prevention for geriatric patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation versus warfarin. These anticoagulants do not require international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring and have lower food/drug interactions. In addition, NOACs have risk reduction in bleeding and all-cause mortality compared with warfarin.. At a geriatric primary care practice, two registered nurses manage 88 patients on warfarin for INR monitoring. Nurse practitioners (NPs) provide oversight for warfarin titration after abnormal results. The goal of this quality-improvement project was to decrease the time spent monitoring patients on warfarin.. Primary care providers and cardiologists of patients on warfarin were contacted to gain approval of transition to a NOAC. The NP reviewed patients' renal function and the indication for anticoagulation and then created a list of eligible patients for transition.. Patients eligible for transition to NOACs were contacted for their consent. The transition process included stopping warfarin, ordering apixaban, ordering INR level, educating about starting apixaban, and coordinating appropriate follow-up.. Of 88 patients on warfarin, 21 were eligible for conversion from warfarin to apixaban. Of these 21 patients, 66% ( n = 14) consented to the conversion. Of those who were not converted to apixaban, five declined due to cost and two were lost to follow-up.. There was a reduction in nurses' monthly monitoring of patients on warfarin by 22%. Transition to NOAC was not only beneficial for patient safety and efficacy but also reduced nursing clinical time for anticoagulation encounters.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pregnane X Receptor; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

The risks of thromboembolism and major bleeding in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients were assessed according to the "Evaluated Heartvalves, Rheumatic or Artificial" (EHRA) classification. Additionally, the safety and efficacy of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were compared in AF patients with EHRA type 2 valvular heart disease (VHD) versus those with no VHD.. AF patients enrolled in the "Jordan Atrial Fibrillation (JoFib)" study were followed up for thromboembolic events and major bleeding at 30, 180, and 365 days. Patients in the EHRA type 2 VHD and non-VHD groups were sub-grouped to compare different OACs.. 2020 AF patients were recruited. The thromboembolic risk was higher in EHRA type 2 VHD patients compared to non-VHD controls. Major bleeding also occurred at higher rates in EHRA type 2 patients. In addition, NOACs were more effective in preventing thromboembolic events than VKAs and non-anticoagulation in EHRA type 2 VHD patients. Furthermore, EHRA type 2 VHD patients taking rivaroxaban had significantly less thromboembolic risk than their non-anticoagulated counterparts. At the same time, apixaban and warfarin did not significantly lower the risk of thromboembolism compared to non-anticoagulation.. AF patients with EHRA type 2 VHD are at significant risk of thromboembolism and major bleeding. Furthermore, NOACs were more effective than VKAs in preventing thromboembolic events in this group of patients without conferring an added risk of major bleeding. Moreover, rivaroxaban appears to be particularly efficacious.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Heart Valve Diseases; Hemorrhage; Humans; Jordan; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism

This study aimed to investigate the association between direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) concentration upon acute ischemic stroke (IS) or intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and stroke outcomes.. Patients aged ≥20 years treated with DOACs, including dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban, and developed acute IS or ICH were enrolled to measure DOAC concentration at the time of hospital presentation by using ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Ischemic stroke patients was categorized into low (<50 ng/mL) and effective (≥50 ng/mL) groups. The primary outcome was poor functional outcomes at 3 months (modified Rankin Scale scores of 4-6).. A total of 138 patients were enrolled, including 105 IS (76.1%) and 33 ICH patients. In the IS cohort, the average DOAC concentration was 85.7 ± 88.6 ng/mL (low DOAC concentration: 42.9%). Low level group had numerically higher NIHSS (14 versus 9, p = 0.37), significantly poorer functional outcomes at 3 months (odds ratio [OR], 5.08 [1.32, 19.63]), and higher chance of stroke-in-evolution (OR, 6.83 [1.64, 28.41]). In the ICH cohort, the average DOAC concentration was 128.9 ± 111.9 ng/mL. Reversal therapy was administered in 60.6% of patients. Hematoma growth occurred in 35.7% patients. The DOAC concentration was similar across patients with or without reversal therapy, and with or without hematoma growth.. Among DOAC users who developed IS, low drug concentrations at hospital presentation predicted poor outcomes.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Hematoma; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Ischemic Stroke; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Twice-daily dosing of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) may reduce drug adherence compared with once-daily dosing of NOACs in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), thus worsening clinical outcomes. We evaluated adherence to apixaban and dabigatran requiring twice-daily dosing compared with edoxaban or rivaroxaban with a once-daily dosing regimen and the subsequent clinical outcomes in patients with AF.. Adherence to each NOAC and outcomes were compared between patients who were diagnosed with AF and initiated NOACs between 2016 and 2017 using Korean claims data. High adherence was defined as the proportion of days covered (PDC) of the index NOAC ≥80%. The clinical outcomes included stroke, acute myocardial infarction, death, and composite outcome.. A total of 33,515 patients were analyzed (mean follow-up, 1.7 ± 1.3 years). The proportion of patients with high adherence to NOACs was 95%, which did not significantly differ according to the dosing regimen. The mean PDC for NOACs was as high as ~96%, which was the highest for apixaban users, intermediate for edoxaban or rivaroxaban users, and lowest for dabigatran users, regardless of the dosing regimen. Adverse outcomes in low adherence patients for each NOAC were higher than that of high adherence patients, regardless of the dosing frequency.. Adherence between once- and twice-daily dosing NOACs in patients with AF was high and similar among both dosing regimens. Patients with low NOAC adherence had poorer clinical outcomes, regardless of the dosing frequency.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

The aim was to analyze the characteristics, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes of Colombian patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) under treatment with oral anticoagulants (OAs).. Retrospective cohort in patients with NVAF identified from a drug dispensing database, aged ≥18 years, with first prescription of an OA (index) between January/2013 and June/2018, and a follow-up until June/2019. Data from the clinical history, pharmacological variables, and outcomes were searched. International Classification of Diseases-10 codes were used to identify the patient sample and outcomes. Patients were followed until a general composite outcome of effectiveness (thrombotic events), bleeding/safety or persistence (switch/discontinuation of anticoagulant) events. Descriptive and multivariate analyzes (Cox regressions comparing warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants-DOACs) were carried out.. The patients with NVAF in this study were mainly older adults with multiple comorbidities. Compared to warfarin, DOACs were found to be equally effective, but safer and had a lower probability of discontinuation or switch.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Colombia; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Evidence and guidelines for Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) use when prescribing concurrent rifampin for tuberculosis treatment in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) are limited.. Using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database from January 2009 to December 2018, we performed a population-based retrospective cohort study to assess the net adverse clinical events (NACE), a composite of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding, of NOACs compared with warfarin among NVAF patients taking concurrent rifampin administration for tuberculosis treatment. After a propensity matching score (PSM) analysis, Cox proportional hazards regression was performed in matched cohorts to investigate the clinical outcomes.. Of the 735 consecutive patients selected, 465 (63.3%) received warfarin and 270 (36.7%) received NOACs. Among 254 pairs of patients after PSM, the crude incidence rate of NACE was 25.6 in NOAC group and 32.8 per 100 person-years in warfarin group. There was no significant difference between NOAC and warfarin use in NACE (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48-1.14; P = 0.172). Major bleeding was the main driver of NACE, and NOAC use was associated with a statistically significantly lower risk of major bleeding than that with warfarin use (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.40-1.00; P = 0.0499).. In our population-based study, there was no statically significant difference in the occurrence of NACE between NOAC and warfarin use. NOAC use may be associated with a lower risk of major bleeding than that with warfarin use.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Rifampin; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Tuberculosis; Warfarin

Dabigatran is the first of four direct-acting oral anticoagulants approved to prevent stroke in adult patients with atrial fibrillation using a fixed two-dose scheme compared with warfarin dosing adjusted to a prothrombin time range associated with optimal risk reduction in stroke and serious bleeding. The pivotal phase III trial found dabigatran, depending on dose, is superior to warfarin in stroke reduction and similar in bleeding risk while also showing dabigatran efficacy and safety correlate with steady-state plasma concentrations. Because the relationship between dabigatran dose and plasma concentration is highly variable, a previously developed population pharmacokinetic model of over 9,000 clinical trial patients was used as a basis for simulations comparing the performance of dosing via the drug label to other proposed doses and regimens. Assessment of dosing regimen performance was based on simulations of trough plasma levels within the therapeutic concentration range of 75-150 ng/mL over a renal function range of 15-250 mL/min creatinine clearance, representing extremes for real-world patients. An improved regimen that best achieves this therapeutic range was identified, requiring five different dosing schedules, corresponding to specified renal function ranges, compared with the two approved in the label. The discussion focuses on how this information could better inform patient outcomes and future dabigatran development.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Dabigatran; Humans; Kidney; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Whether there are differences in direct oral anticoagulants efficacy and safety in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) combined with hypertension is unclear. We therefore conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study to assess the differences in the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with AF combined with hypertension. This multicenter retrospective cohort study was based on data from 15 centers in China and included 2086 patients with AF. We divided the patients into dabigatran and rivaroxaban groups according to their direct oral anticoagulants. Propensity score matching was used to balance the covariates between the groups. Due to our limited sample size, the number of cases of some clinical events with low incidence was small. During a mean follow-up period of 10 months, a total of 268 (12.9%) bleeding events occurred, including 27 (1.3%) major bleeding events and 241 (11.6%) minor bleeding events, and 45 (2.2%) thromboembolic events. In patients with AF combined with hypertension, rivaroxaban was associated with a higher major bleeding incidence than dabigatran (odds ratio [OR], 2.89 [95% confidence interval [CI, 1.22-6.87]; P = .012). In contrast, the risk of thromboembolism and minor bleeding was similar for rivaroxaban (OR, 0.55 [95%CI, 0.29-1.01]; P = .069) and dabigatran (OR, 0.82 [95%CI, 0.63-1.08]; P = .150). Based on the results of this study, in patients with AF and hypertension treated with direct oral anticoagulants, the incidence of thromboembolism and minor bleeding was not statistically different between dabigatran and rivaroxaban, but compared with rivaroxaban, dabigatran was associated with a lower risk of major bleeding.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Hypertension; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

A real-world association between direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) concentration and clinical outcomes among Asian patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is reported herein. Patients with AF aged ≥ 20 years who used DOAC for ≥ 3 days were enrolled. Trough and peak DOAC concentrations were measured and compared with the expected range reported in clinical trials. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to investigate the association between concentration and outcomes. From January 2016 to July 2022, a total of 859 patients were enrolled. Among them, 22.5%, 24.7%, 36.4%, and 16.4% were on dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, respectively. Compared with clinical trials, the proportion of DOAC concentrations higher or lower than the expected range were 9.0% and 14.6% for trough, respectively, and 20.9% and 12.1% for peak, respectively. The average follow-up duration was 2.4 ± 1.6 years. The incidence of stroke and systemic thromboembolism (SSE) was 1.31 per 100-person years, and low trough concentration predicted SSE (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.78 (1.20, 6.46)). The incidence of major bleeding was 1.64 per 100-person years, and high trough was associated with major bleeding (HR = 2.63 (1.09, 6.39)). The association between peak concentration and SSE or major bleeding was nonsignificant. Off-label underdosing (odds ratio (OR) = 2.69 (1.70, 4.26)), once daily DOAC dosing (OR = 3.22 (2.07, 5.01)), and high creatinine clearance (OR = 1.02 (1.01, 1.03)) caused low trough concentration. Contrarily, congestive heart failure was significantly associated with high trough concentration (OR = 1.71 (1.01, 2.92)). In conclusion, trough DOAC concentration measurements should be considered among patients at risk of out-of-expected range DOAC concentrations.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Although widely used in clinical fields, real-world data on the role of warfarin and non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for the secondary prevention of thromboembolic complications in ischemic stroke patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) are scarce.. This retrospective cohort study compared the effectiveness and safety of secondary prevention of NOAC and warfarin in ischemic stroke patients with NVAF.. From the Korean National Health Insurance Service Database, we included 16,762 oral anticoagulants-naive acute ischemic stroke patients with NVAF between July 2016 and June 2019. The main outcomes included ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding, and all-cause of death.. In total, 1717 warfarin and 15,025 NOAC users were included in the analysis. After 1:8 propensity score matching, during the observation period, all types of NOACs had a significantly lower risk of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism than warfarin (edoxaban: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-0.93, rivaroxaban: aHR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.70-0.96, apixaban: aHR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.69-0.91, and dabigatran: aHR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69-0.97). Edoxaban (aHR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.96), apixaban (aHR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60-0.90), and dabigatran (aHR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.51-0.86) had lower risks of major bleeding and all-cause of death.. All NOACs were more effective than warfarin in the secondary prevention of thromboembolic complications in ischemic stroke patients with NVAF. Except for rivaroxaban, most NOACs demonstrated a lower risk of major bleeding and all-cause of death than warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are indicated for the prevention of stroke in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Although Food and Drug Administration labeling for DOACs uses estimated creatinine clearance according to the Cockcroft-Gault (C-G) equation, estimated glomerular filtration rate according to the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation is often reported. The objectives of this study were to evaluate DOAC dosing discordance and to determine whether discordance based on various estimates of kidney function is associated with bleeding or thromboembolism. The study was an institutional review board approved retrospective analysis of patients at UPMC Presbyterian Hospital from January 1, 2010, to December 12, 2016. Data were obtained through electronic medical records. Adults who received a medication charge for rivaroxaban or dabigatran, had a diagnosis code for atrial fibrillation, and had a serum creatinine within 3 days of DOAC initiation were included. Doses were considered discordant if the calculated dose based on CKD-EPI did not match the patient's dose during index admission, if dosed correctly using C-G. Association of discordance with dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and clinical outcomes was determined using odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Rivaroxaban discordance was present among 49 of the 644 (8%) patients who were dosed correctly with C-G. Dabigatran discordance was present among 17 of the 590 (3%) patients who were dosed correctly. Discordance with rivaroxaban was found to increase the risk of thromboembolism when using CKD-EPI (odds ratio, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.02-7.79, P = .045) versus C-G. Our findings emphasize the need to dose DOACs, specifically rivaroxaban, appropriately in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Kidney; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism

Pharmacokinetic interactions exist between apixaban or rivaroxaban, and CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein inhibitors such as amiodarone, verapamil and diltiazem. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of exposure to this drug-drug association (DDA) and to assess the bleeding risk associated in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).. We conducted a cohort study using a representative 1/97. Between 2014 and 2019, the AF population under apixaban or rivaroxaban represented 10,392 patients. During the study period, the annual average prevalence of DDA exposure in this population was 38.9%. Among the 10,392 patients, 223 (2.1%) were hospitalized for bleeding, of which 75 (33.6%) received the association and 148 (66.4%) received apixaban or rivaroxaban alone. There was no association between DDA exposure and risk of hospitalization for bleeding (aHR = 1.19, [95% CI: 0.90, 1.58]). Age (HR 1.03 [1.02, 1.05]) and male gender (HR 1.72 [1.28, 2.30]) were associated with an increased risk of hospitalization for bleeding.. Exposure to antiarrhythmic drugs was not associated with an increased risk of hospitalization for bleeding in patients with AF under rivaroxaban or apixaban.

Topics: Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Delivery of Health Care; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Prevalence; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used in renal transplant recipients (RTR), but relatively understudied in this population. We assess the safety of post-transplant anticoagulation with DOACs compared to warfarin.. We conducted a retrospective study of RTRs at the Mayo Clinic sites (2011-present) that were anticoagulated for greater than 3 months excluding the 1st month post-transplant. The main safety outcomes were bleeding and all-cause mortality. Concomitant antiplatelet and interacting drugs were noted. DOAC dose adjustment was assessed according to common US prescribing practices, guidelines, and/or FDA labeling.. The median follow-up was longer for RTRs on warfarin (1098 days [IQR 521, 1517]) than DOACs (449 days [IQR 338, 942]). Largely, there were no differences in baseline characteristics and comorbidities between RTRs on DOACs (n = 208; apixaban 91.3%, rivaroxaban 8.7%) versus warfarin (n = 320). There was no difference in post-transplant use of antiplatelets, immunosuppressants, most antifungals assessed, or amiodarone. There was no significant difference in incident major bleeding (8.4 vs. 5.3%, p = 0.89), GI bleeding (4.4% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.98), or intra-cranial hemorrhage (1.9% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.85) between warfarin and DOAC. There was no significant difference in mortality in the warfarin group compared to DOACs when adjusted for follow-up time (22.2% vs. 10.1%, p = 0.21). Rates of post-transplant venous thromboembolism, atrial fibrillation or stroke were similar between the two groups. 32% (n = 67) of patients on DOACs were dose reduced, where 51% of those reductions were warranted. 7% of patients that were not dose reduced should have been.. DOACs did not have inferior bleeding or mortality outcomes compared to warfarin in RTRs. There was greater use of warfarin compared to DOACs and a high rate of improper DOAC dose reduction.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney Transplantation; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Individual variability of rivaroxaban was observed in clinical application. This study aimed to identify genetic variants associated with the variability of pharmacodynamics and bleeding risk of rivaroxbaban in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).. From June 2017, and July 2019, this study enrolled 257 patients with NVAF receiving rivaroxaban. Pharmacodynamics was assessed by determining anti-Factor Xa (anti-FXa) level 3 h after rivaroxaban administration as peak concentration. Whole-exome sequencing was performed to detected single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). This study was registered (NCT03161496).. The bleeding events within 12 months were significantly related to the peak anti-FXa level (p = .027). SUSD3 rs76292544 was associated with 12-month bleeding events (odds ratio [OR]: 4.20, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.17-8.14, p = 6.43×10. Peak anti-FXa level was associated with risk of bleeding events in patients with NVAF receiving rivaroxaban. SUSD3 rs76292544 was suggestively associated with 12-month bleeding events and five SNPs (NCMAP rs4553122, PRF1 rs885821, PRKAG2 rs12703159, rs13224758 and POU2F3 rs2298579) were suggestively associated with peak anti-FXa level.

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Amiodarone, the most effective antiarrhythmic drug in atrial fibrillation, inhibits apixaban and rivaroxaban elimination, thus possibly increasing anticoagulant-related risk for bleeding.. For patients receiving apixaban or rivaroxaban, to compare risk for bleeding-related hospitalizations during treatment with amiodarone versus flecainide or sotalol, antiarrhythmic drugs that do not inhibit these anticoagulants' elimination.. Retrospective cohort study.. U.S. Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older.. Patients with atrial fibrillation began anticoagulant use between 1 January 2012 and 30 November 2018 and subsequently initiated treatment with study antiarrhythmic drugs.. Time to event for bleeding-related hospitalizations (primary outcome) and ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, and death with or without recent (past 30 days) evidence of bleeding (secondary outcomes), adjusted with propensity score overlap weighting.. There were 91 590 patients (mean age, 76.3 years; 52.5% female) initiating use of study anticoagulants and antiarrhythmic drugs, 54 977 with amiodarone and 36 613 with flecainide or sotalol. Risk for bleeding-related hospitalizations increased with amiodarone use (rate difference [RD], 17.5 events [95% CI, 12.0 to 23.0 events] per 1000 person-years; hazard ratio [HR], 1.44 [CI, 1.27 to 1.63]). Incidence of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism did not increase (RD, -2.1 events [CI, -4.7 to 0.4 events] per 1000 person-years; HR, 0.80 [CI, 0.62 to 1.03]). The risk for death with recent evidence of bleeding (RD, 9.1 events [CI, 5.8 to 12.3 events] per 1000 person-years; HR, 1.66 [CI, 1.35 to 2.03]) was greater than that for other deaths (RD, 5.6 events [CI, 0.5 to 10.6 events] per 1000 person-years; HR, 1.15 [CI, 1.00 to 1.31]) (HR comparison:. Possible residual confounding.. In this retrospective cohort study, patients aged 65 years or older with atrial fibrillation treated with amiodarone during apixaban or rivaroxaban use had greater risk for bleeding-related hospitalizations than those treated with flecainide or sotalol.. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

Topics: Aged; Amiodarone; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Female; Flecainide; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Male; Medicare; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Sotalol; Stroke; United States

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Levetiracetam; Male; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Venous Thromboembolism

Nonadherence to oral anticoagulants (OACs) is a challenge to stroke risk reduction in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Data on primary medication nonadherence (PMN) in NVAF are lacking.. Our aim was to assess the rates and predictors of PMN among NVAF patients who were newly prescribed an OAC.. This was a retrospective database analysis of linked healthcare claims and electronic health record data. Adult NVAF patients with a prescription order for an OAC (apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran, or warfarin) between January 2016 and June 2019 were identified (date of first prescription order = index date). Patients had a 1-year baseline and a 6-month post-index period to assess the rates of PMN, defined as having a prescription order but no paid claim for any OAC on or within 30 days after the index date. Sensitivity analyses explored 60-, 90- and 180-day PMN thresholds. Logistic regression models were used to examine the predictors of PMN.. Among 20,393 patients, the overall 30-day PMN rate was 28.4%; PMN rates decreased to 17% with a 180-day threshold. PMN was numerically lowest for warfarin among OACs and numerically lowest for apixaban among direct OACs. A CHA. More than one-quarter of patients experienced PMN within 30 days of their initial prescription order. This rate decreased over a longer period, suggesting a delay in fills. Understanding the factors associated with PMN is warranted to develop effective interventions for improving OAC treatment rates in NVAF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Medication Adherence; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States; Warfarin

The effectiveness and tolerability of a reduced dose (110 mg) of dabigatran versus the standard dose (150 mg) were evaluated in subgroups of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) at high bleeding risk.. Eligible patients were adults with AF and a creatinine clearance rate ≥30 mL/min who were initiated on treatment with dabigatran (index) between 2016 and 2018. High-bleeding-risk subgroups were identified: (1) age ≥80 years; (2) moderate renal impairment (creatinine clearance rate 30-<50 mL/min); and (3) recent bleeding or a HAS-BLED score of ≥3. Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard regression models with inverse probability of treatment weights were used to investigate associations between dabigatran dose and three outcomes: stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding requiring hospitalization, and all-cause mortality.. Among 7858 patients with AF and a high bleeding risk (age ≥80 years, 3472; moderate renal impairment, 1574; recent bleeding or HAS-BLED score ≥3, 2812), 32.3% received reduced-dose dabigatran. Compared with the standard dose, use of the reduced dose of dabigatran was not associated with an increased risk for stroke or systemic embolism but was associated with a lower risk for major bleeding (HR = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.44-0.95) and all-cause mortality (HR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.65-0.92) in patients aged ≥80 years. The use of reduced-dose dabigatran was associated with a lower risk for major bleeding (HR = 0.54; 95% CI, 0.30-0.95) and all-cause mortality among patients with moderate renal impairment (HR = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.40-0.71).. Lower risks for bleed and mortality associated with reduced- versus standard-dose dabigatran in patients with AF and a high bleeding risk suggest a better dosing strategy.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Creatinine; Dabigatran; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Diabetes represents a pro-thrombotic condition.. The primary objective was to evaluate the effects of Vitamin K Antagonist (VKA) compared to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in diabetic and nondiabetic patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, newly diagnosed. The secondary objective was to evaluate the effects on the risk of bleeding.. We enrolled 300 patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation. One hundred and sixteen patients were taking warfarin, 31 acenocumarol, 22 dabigatran, 80 rivaroxaban, 34 apixaban, and 17 edoxaban. We evaluated: anthropometric parameters, glycated hemoglobin (HbA. We did not record any differences among nondiabetic patients between VKA and DOACs. However, when we considered diabetic patients, we found a slight, but significant improvement of triglycerides and SD-LDL. As regards incidence of bleeding, minor bleeding was more frequent in VKA diabetic group compared to DOACs diabetic group; furthermore, the incidence of major bleeding was higher with VKA in nondiabetic and diabetic group, compared to patients with DOACs. Among DOACs, we recorded a higher incidence of bleeding (minor and major) with dabigatran compared to rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban in nondiabetic and diabetic patients.. DOACs seem to be metabolically favourable in diabetic patients. Regarding incidence of bleeding, DOACs with the exception of dabigatran, seem better than VKA in diabetic patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Diabetes Mellitus; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

To compare the risk of readmissions for major bleeding within one year between apixaban and rivaroxaban as a component of triple antithrombotic therapy.. This study was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study conducted at two academic medical centers in the Western New York and New York City region between July 1, 2011 and September 25, 2019. Adult patients were included if they were diagnosed with atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism and discharged on new triple antithrombotic therapy. The primary outcome compared the rates of 1-year readmission for major bleeding between apixaban and rivaroxaban groups. Secondary outcomes included rate of ischemic outcomes. Time to event analysis was determined with a Kaplan-Meier plot and Cox proportional hazard ratios (HR).. A total of 378 patients were included in the study, 212 in the apixaban group and 166 in the rivaroxaban group. Within 1 year, readmission for major bleeding events occurred in six (2.8%) patients in the apixaban group and four (2.4%) patients in the rivaroxaban group ( P  = 1.000). After adjustment, the major bleeding event rate was not statistically significantly different between apixaban and rivaroxaban [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.12-3.77; P  = 0.6624]. Higher albumin levels were identified to be protective against major bleeding related readmission events (aHR 0.18, 95% CI 0.05-0.63; P  = 0.0072). The ischemic outcome occurred in seven (3.3%) patients in the apixaban group and three (1.8%) in the rivaroxaban group ( P  = 0.7368).. Use of apixaban or rivaroxaban in a triple antithrombotic regimen was not associated with bleeding or ischemic outcomes.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are common and coexistent conditions.. To investigate the adverse events and mortality risk factors in patients with AF and HF treated with rivaroxaban in Spain.. Multicenter, prospective and observational study with a follow-up of 2 years, that included adults, with a diagnosis of nonvalvular AF and chronic HF, anticoagulated with rivaroxaban at least 4 months before being enrolled.. Among patients with HF and AF anticoagulated with rivaroxaban, incidences of thromboembolic or hemorrhagic complications were low. The most important factor for improving survival was compliance with HF drugs, what strengths the need for early treatment with HF disease-modifying therapy and anticoagulation.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) represent the cornerstone therapy for cardioembolic events prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). In practice, the choice of one DOAC over another is guided by the decision-making process of the physician, which considers specific patient and drug characteristics. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical features and long-term outcomes of a real-world population treated with DOACs, where the use of the 4 different DOACs is quite equal. We conducted a retrospective observational, single-center, multidisciplinary study enrolling consecutive NVAF patients treated with one of the 4 DOACs. From an initial number of 753 patients, we excluded 72 patients because of loss to follow-up, at the end we enrolled 681:174 (23%) treated with dabigatran, 175 (23%) with apixaban, 190 (25%) with rivaroxaban, and 214 (29%) with edoxaban. Patients treated with apixaban were significantly older, more women represented (p <0.001), and with a higher cardioembolic and bleeding risk (p <0.001). Dabigatran was preferred in patients with liver failure (p = 0.008), whereas Apixaban and Edoxaban were chosen in chronic kidney disease (p = 0.002). At 3-year follow-up, 20 patients (2.7%) experienced a systemic thromboembolic event without significant differences in the 4 DOACs. In the same period, an International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis classification major bleeding event occurred in 26 patients (3.6%), more statistically correlated to edoxaban (6.1%) (p = 0.038). Thromboembolic events or major bleeding were higher in the edoxaban group (10%) compared with the others (p = 0.014). In our single-center real-world experience, the choice of the DOAC for a patient with NVAF was tailored to specific clinical features and drug pharmacokinetics of the patient. As a result, a small number of adverse events were observed.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly recommended over warfarin in stroke prevention for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). However, there is an important evidence gap in choosing the most appropriate DOAC for Chinese patients in clinical practice.. A multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) was adopted to build a scoring framework. Attributes and criteria were identified and determined by a scoping literature review, two rounds of Delphi surveys, and a consensus meeting. Weights of each attribute and criterion in the framework were determined using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Evidence was collected based on the domestic or at least Asian data. Scoring methods for each criterion were developed depended on their characteristics and determined with an expert consensus meeting. Comprehensive scores of each DOAC were calculated based on the utility scores of each criterion and their corresponding weights.. A total of 5 attributes, including safety, efficacy, costs/cost-effectiveness, suitability, and accessibility, were determined, and 16 criteria were under the 5 attributes. The safety and efficacy were ranked as the top two important attributes with the weights of 38.8% and 35.9%, respectively, while the suitability received the lowest weight of 7.9%. The comprehensive score for edoxaban was the highest (72.3), followed by dabigatran (49.7), rivaroxaban (37.9), and apixaban (35.8).. This study provided a scoring framework developed for comprehensive evaluation of DOACs in China. The ranking of DOACs could help to support the decision-making in clinical practice. The framework could provide a reference for comprehensive evaluation of other drugs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Since the introduction of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) for atrial fibrillation (AF) therapy, inappropriate and/or underdosing of these drugs has been a major clinical challenge. We evaluated the characteristics of patients with AF treated with inappropriate and low-dose DOACs.. Patients with AF treated with inappropriate and low-dose DOACs from October 2021 to December 2021 were evaluated from the French National Prospective Registry (PAFF). We evaluated 1890 patients with AF receiving DOACs (apixaban 55%, dabigatran 7%, and rivaroxaban 38%). Inappropriate dosing was noted in 18% of the population. Patients with appropriate dosing had less comorbidities: younger age (75 ± 10 vs. 82 ± 8 years old, P < 0.0001), reduced chronic renal failure (26 vs. 61%, P < 0.0001), and lower CHA2DS2VASc and HASBLED scores (3 ± 2 vs. 4 ± 3, P < 0.0001; 2 ±1 vs. 2 ± 2, P < 0.0001), respectively. In multivariate analysis, older age (P < 0.0001) and a higher CHA2DS2VASc score (P = 0.0056) were independently associated with inappropriate DOAC dosing. Among 472 patients (27%) treated with low-dose rivaroxaban or apixaban, 46% were inappropriately underdosed. Patients inappropriately underdosed were younger (82.3 ± 8.4 vs. 85.9 ± 5.9 years, P < 0.0001) with less chronic renal disease (47 vs. 98%, P < 0.0001). However, these patients had higher rates of prior haemorrhagic events (18 vs. 10%, P = 0.01), clopidogrel use (11 vs. 3%, P = 0.0002), and apixaban prescription (74 vs. 50%, P < 0.0001).. Within this large registry, DOACs were associated with inappropriate dosing in 18% of cases. Independent predictors of inappropriate dosing were high CHA2DS2VASc scores and older age. Moreover, 46% of patients treated with low-dose DOACs were inappropriately underdosed and more frequently in patients treated with apixaban.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

We previously conducted a retrospective cohort study using chart review of oral anticoagulant-naïve Japanese patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) that assessed the risk of major bleeding and stroke/systemic embolism (SE) events of apixaban versus warfarin.. In this subgroup analysis, we compared the risk of major bleeding and stroke/SE events by stratifying patients into four subgroups matched 1:1 using propensity score matching (PSM) according to baseline creatinine clearance (CrCl; mL/min): ≥ 15 to < 30, ≥ 30 to < 50, ≥ 50 to < 80, and ≥ 80.. Of the 7074 patients in the apixaban group and 4998 in the warfarin group eligible for inclusion in the analysis, 4385 were included in each group after PSM. Incidence rates of major bleeding and stroke/SE events were generally lower with apixaban versus warfarin across the CrCl subgroups. When all patients with a CrCl change of < 0 mL/min per year during the study period (apixaban, n = 3871; warfarin, n = 2635) were stratified into four subgroups based on the magnitude of CrCl decline (median CrCl change [mL/min] per year: - 1.09, - 3.48, - 7.54, and - 36.92 for apixaban, and - 1.10, - 3.65, - 7.85, and - 40.40 for warfarin), the incidence rates of major bleeding and stroke/SE events generally increased with an increasing CrCl decline per year in both groups.. In Japanese patients with NVAF, the safety and effectiveness of apixaban and warfarin were consistent across different renal subgroups, including those with severe renal impairment. Our results highlight the importance of monitoring renal function variations over time in patients with NVAF.. NCT03765242.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; East Asian People; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

This study aimed to assess the appropriateness of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) utilization in a Saudi tertiary hospital.. Adult inpatients and outpatients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation, deep vein thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism were included in a retrospective cohort study. Patients received at least one month of apixaban, rivaroxaban, or dabigatran. The duration of the study at the Armed Forces Hospital Southern Region in Khamis Mushait, Saudi Arabia, was from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2021. The study assessed the appropriateness of DOACs dosing, initial and follow-up monitoring, the presence of clinically significant interactions, and treatment duration adherence.. 778 patients were included in the analysis (mean age 71.34 ± 15.98 years, equal male and female representation). Rivaroxaban was administered to 40.8% of the patients, while apixaban and dabigatran were administered to 31.02% and 28.18% of the patients, respectively. The most prevalent indication for DOACs was atrial fibrillation (72.84%), followed by deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (27.16%). The most prevalent category of medication errors was inappropriate maintenance dose (41.7%), followed by inappropriate initial dose (37.97%) and lack of laboratory parameter monitoring (36.42%). 31.5 percent of the study sample lacked baseline renal functions, while 24.5% of patients lacked baseline liver functions. 115 patients (14.8%) had potential clinically significant interactions. Regarding treatment duration, 232 patients (29.8%) were improperly prescribed DOACs based on their indications.. In a significant proportion of DOAC patients, the prescribed rational DOAC utilization parameters were not implemented. The results of the study provide specific improvement areas and objectives for Anticoagulation stewardship programs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Embolism; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Saudi Arabia; Stroke; Tertiary Care Centers; Venous Thrombosis

Background Dose reduction of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) medications is inconsistently applied to older adults with multiple morbidities, potentially due to perceived harms and unknown benefits of standard dosing. Methods and Results Using 2013 to 2017 US Medicare claims linked to Minimum Data Set records, we conducted a retrospective cohort study. We identified DOAC initiators (apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban) aged ≥65 years with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation residing in a nursing home. We estimated inverse-probability of treatment weights for DOAC dose using propensity scores. We examined safety (hospitalization for major bleeding) and effectiveness outcomes (all-cause mortality, thrombosis [myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism, venous thromboembolism]). We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs using cause-specific hazard-regression models. Of 21 878 DOAC initiators, 48% received reduced dosing. The mean age of residents was 82.0 years, 66% were female, and 31% had moderate/severe cognitive impairment. After estimating inverse-probability of treatment weights, standard dosing was associated with a higher rate of bleeding (HR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.03-1.37]; 9.4 versus 8.0 events per 100 person-years). Standard-dose therapy was associated with the highest rates of bleeding among those aged >80 years (9.1 versus 6.7 events per 100 person-years) and with a body mass index <30 kg/m

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Medicare; Morbidity; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States

A high risk of gastrointestinal bleeding has been reported with the use of some direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). This risk may be of particular concern in individuals with associated anaemia. The aim of this study is to investigate potential differences in the risks of gastrointestinal bleeding and stroke among the four available DOACs in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and moderate or severe anaemia.. All Danish patients diagnosed with incident AF who had a baseline haemoglobin measurement and subsequently initiated DOAC therapy between 2012 and 2021 were identified through administrative registries. Only patients with moderate or severe anaemia (N = 7269) were included and evaluated regarding the risk of hospitalization for gastrointestinal bleeding and stroke. Standardized absolute 1-year risks of stroke and gastrointestinal bleeding were calculated from multivariable Cox regression analyses. DOACs were compared pairwise RESULTS: Compared with apixaban, both dabigatran and rivaroxaban were associated with a significantly increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding with standardized 1-year risk ratios of 1.73 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.10-2.35) and 1.56 (95 % CI, 1.18-1.93), respectively, while no significant difference was seen in the comparison of apixaban with edoxaban 1.32 (95 % CI, 0.41-2.32). No significant differences in gastrointestinal bleeding were observed with pairwise comparisons of dabigatran, rivaroxaban and edoxaban. Finally, no significant difference in stroke risk among the four DOACs was observed.. In AF patients with moderate or severe anaemia, apixaban was associated with a significantly lower risk of gastrointestinal bleeding than dabigatran and rivaroxaban. No significant difference in stroke risk was observed across all four available DOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anemia; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

An increased risk of recurrent stroke is noted in patients with atrial fibrillation despite direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use. We investigated the efficacy and safety of treatment with each of 4 different DOACs or warfarin after DOAC failure.. We retrospectively analyzed patients with atrial fibrillation with ischemic stroke despite DOAC treatment between January 2002 and December 2016. The different outcomes of patients with DOAC failure were compared, including recurrent ischemic stroke, major cardiovascular events, intracranial hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage, mortality, and net composite outcomes according to switching to different DOACs or vitamin K antagonist after index ischemic stroke. We identified 3759 patients with DOAC failure. A total of 84 patients experienced recurrent ischemic stroke after switching to different oral anticoagulants, with a total follow-up time of 14 years. Using the vitamin K antagonist group as a reference, switching to any of the 4 DOACs was associated with a 69% to 77% reduced risk of major cardiovascular events (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.25 [95% CI, 0.16-0.39] for apixaban, 0.23 [95% CI, 0.14-0.37] for dabigatran, 0.23 [95% CI, 0.09-0.60] for edoxaban, and 0.31 [95% CI, 0.21-0.45] for rivaroxaban), and a 69% to 83% reduced risk of net composite outcomes (aHR, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.18-0.35] for apixaban, 0.17 [95% CI, 0.11-0.25] for dabigatran, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.17-0.56] for edoxaban, and 0.31 [95% CI, 0.23-0.41] for rivaroxaban).. In Asian patients with DOAC failure, continuing DOACs after index stroke was associated with fewer undesirable outcomes than switching to a vitamin K antagonist. Alternative pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic strategies warrant investigation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Subarachnoid Hemorrhage; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Vitamin K antagonists have been frequently prescribed as anticoagulants with the potential side effect of spontaneous hematomyelia with a poor prognosis. However, to our knowledge, there has been no report of spontaneous hematomyelia combined with the use of a non-vitamin K antagonist. A 63-year-old man presented with left leg weakness, impaired sensation, and urinary retention while taking rivaroxaban (non-vitamin K antagonist) for 4 months for atrial fibrillation. Anticoagulant agents were discontinued. Methylprednisolone pulse therapy was administered without surgical hematoma evacuation. Three months after the initial development of the hematomyelia, the symptoms improved to grade 5 for both lower extremities, and there was complete recovery in sensory and urinary functions. This might be the first description of a complete recovery of neurologic deficits without hematoma evacuation in spontaneous hematomyelia patients caused by non-vitamin K antagonist therapy.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hematoma; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Rivaroxaban; Spinal Cord Vascular Diseases; Stroke

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) patients suffer a high risk of major cardiovascular (CV) events, with athero-thrombo-embolism as the underlying pathophysiologic mechanism. Recently, two large randomized clinical trials evaluated the efficacy and safety of low-dose rivaroxaban twice daily plus aspirin in stable PAD outpatients and those immediately after peripheral revascularization. We sought to determine if the effects of low-dose rivaroxaban and aspirin compared to aspirin alone are consistent across this broad spectrum of PAD patients.. We conducted a random-effects meta-analysis of the COMPASS and VOYAGER randomized trials among 11 560 PAD patients (4996 from COMPASS and 6564 from VOYAGER) in the primary analysis and 9332 (2768 from COMPASS and 6564 from VOYAGER) with lower extremity (LE)-PAD in the secondary analysis. The hazard ratio (HR) for the composite of CV death, myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, acute limb ischaemia, or major vascular amputation was 0.79 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.65-0.95) comparing low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin to aspirin alone. While the risk of major bleeding was increased with low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin compared to aspirin alone [HR: 1.51 (95% CI: 1.22-1.87)], there was no significant increase in severe bleeding [HR: 1.18 (95% CI: 0.79-1.76)]. Similar effects were observed in the subset with symptomatic LE-PAD.. Among PAD patients, low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin is superior to aspirin alone in reducing CV and limb outcomes including acute limb ischaemia and major vascular amputation. This reduction is offset by a relative increase in major bleeding, but not by an excess of fatal or critical organ bleeding. The consistency of findings of these trials supports the use of combination low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin in PAD patients across a broad spectrum of disease.

Topics: Aspirin; Brain Ischemia; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemia; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)-inhibiting factor Xa (FXa-DOAC) are being increasingly used as prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism and for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. In contrast to vitamin K antagonists, DOACs do not require monitoring in general. However, it is sometimes of value in the acute setting, for instance when considering a reversal agent in uncontrolled bleeding in patients on DOAC.. We evaluated if a low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH)-calibrated anti-factor Xa assay could be used to estimate FXa-DOAC concentration in the concentration range <100 ng/mL by spiking known concentrations of FXa-DOAC and from those result calculate the FXa-DOAC concentration from the response of the LMWH assay. This procedure was then evaluated by comparing the result with a drug-calibrated chromogenic assay and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) on clinical plasma samples from patients treated with apixaban or rivaroxaban.. Although the measuring range was narrower for the LMWH-calibrated assay, concentrations recalculated from the LMWH assay was comparable with those measured by the drug-calibrated method when compared with LC-MS/MS.. We suggest that an LMWH-calibrated anti-factor Xa assay can be used after characterization of the response of FXa-DOACs to give guidance on the concentration of apixaban and rivaroxaban. Shorter turnaround time than LC-MS/MS and the greater availability than drug-calibrated chromogenic assays could make this a valuable option in the acute setting.

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation Tests; Chromatography, Liquid; Clinical Decision-Making; Disease Management; Disease Susceptibility; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Reproducibility of Results; Rivaroxaban; Sensitivity and Specificity; Stroke; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; Venous Thromboembolism

Clinical models such as the HAS-BLED (standing for Hypertension, Abnormal liver/renal function, Stroke history, Bleeding history or predisposition, Labile INR, Elderly, Drug/alcohol usage) were developed to predict risk of major bleeding on vitamin K antagonists/antiplatelet therapy. We aimed to develop a model that will improve the ability to predict major bleeding events in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) treated with new oral anticoagulants (NOACs).. Clalit Health Services is the largest of four integrated healthcare organisations in Israel, which insures 4.7 million patients (53% of the population). We identified in Clalit Health Services all patients with AF, new users of an NOAC (2013-2017), and followed them until first occurrence of a major bleeding event, death, switch to another oral anticoagulant, 30 days after discontinuation of NOAC or end of follow-up (31 December 2019). Importance of the candidate model variables was estimated by inclusion frequencies across forward selection algorithm applied to 50 bootstrap samples. Then, backward selection algorithm using the modified Bayesian Information Criterion for competing risks was applied to select predictors for the final model.. We present a novel and simple risk score for prediction of major bleeding in patients with non-valvular AF treated with NOACs. Validation in additional cohorts is warranted.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Bayes Theorem; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Renal Dialysis; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

It is unclear whether 90-day supply fills with rivaroxaban result in better adherence and persistence compared to 30-day supply fills. We assessed patients' adherence and persistence to rivaroxaban at 12- and 24-months in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients whose rivaroxaban prescriptions were filled every 30- vs. 90-days.. Using the IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental data sets, we identified adult NVAF patients with ≥12-months of continuous insurance coverage who filled a prescription in May 2018 and their immediate subsequent prescription for rivaroxaban for the same days' supply. We propensity score-matched 30- and 90-day rivaroxaban interval fill patients and compared the percentage with a proportion of days covered (PDC) ≥80%, mean PDC, and percentage persistent to rivaroxaban therapy over 12- and 24-months of follow-up.. Following propensity score matching, 2237 patients were included in the rivaroxaban 30- and 90-day supply fill cohorts. The proportion of patients with a PDC ≥80% was greater in the 90-day vs. 30-day cohort at both 12-months (odds ratio [OR] = 1.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.54-1.97) and 24-months (OR = 1.78, 95%CI = 1.58-2.00), as were mean PDC values (absolute difference in mean PDC = 9.4%, 95%CI = 8.2-10.7% at 12-months and 11.2%, 95%CI = 9.5-12.9% higher at 24-months, respectively). Persistence to rivaroxaban was not found to significantly differ between the 30- and 90-day supply cohorts at 12- or 24-months (assuming a 30-day permissible gap); however, greater persistence was observed with 90-day fills at both time points when a 14-day gap was utilized (HR = 1.22, 95%CI = 1.10-1.36 at 12-months and HR = 1.12, 95%CI = 1.02-1.22 at 24-months).. Dispensing 90-day supply fills with rivaroxaban appears to increase the proportion of patients achieving acceptable (PDC ≥80%) adherence as well as mean adherence compared to 30-day supply fills. Ninety-day rivaroxaban fills may also result in improved persistence vs. 30-day fills.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Medicare; Medication Adherence; Prescriptions; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States

In the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF), anticoagulant medications such as warfarin and rivaroxaban are commonly prescribed to reduce the risk of ischaemic strokes, and other thromboembolic events. Research has highlighted advantages and disadvantages of each of these medications, but there remains an absence of qualitative evidence regarding the lived experiences of AF patients. The present study helps address this gap and obtain a greater understanding of the patient experience and beliefs surrounding their anticoagulant medication.. Semi-structured qualitative interviews with a purposive sample of 20 participants (10 warfarin, 10 rivaroxaban). Interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed.. Data analysis led to the generation of three key themes: positive perceptions of medication, distrust of alternatives, and inconsistencies in support experiences.. Positive perceptions of one anticoagulant medication (ACM) and distrust of alternatives may influence patients' confidence in switching medications. This is potentially problematic where there is a lack of patient engagement in medication changes, as seen during the COVID pandemic. Gaps in patient understanding of anticoagulation, including lack of clarity around medications selection and misconceptions about treatment, were evident. By addressing these misconceptions, clinicians may be better positioned to support people with AF in self-management of their ACM.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; COVID-19; Dabigatran; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Trust; Warfarin

Studies have shown that patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who discontinue oral anticoagulants (OACs) are at higher risk of complications such as stroke.. This analysis compared the risk of non-persistence with OACs among patients with NVAF.. Adult patients with NVAF who initiated apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin were identified using 01JAN2013-30JUN2019 data from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and four US commercial claims databases. Non-persistence was defined as discontinuation (no evidence of index OAC use for ≥ 60 days from the last days' supply) or switch to another OAC. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to illustrate time to non-persistence along with cumulative incidences of non-persistence. Baseline and time-varying covariates were evaluated, and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate non-persistence risk.. In total, 363,823 patients receiving apixaban, 57,121 receiving dabigatran, 282,831 receiving rivaroxaban, and 317,337 receiving warfarin were included. Of these, 47-72% discontinued/switched OAC therapy within an average 9-month follow-up. Apixaban was associated with a lower risk of non-persistence than were dabigatran (hazard ratio [HR] 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61-0.62), rivaroxaban (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.75-0.76), and warfarin (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.74-0.75). Dabigatran was associated with a higher risk of non-persistence than were warfarin (HR 1.21; 95% CI 1.19-1.22) and rivaroxaban (HR 1.23; 95% CI 1.22-1.25), and rivaroxaban was associated with a lower risk of non-persistence than was warfarin (HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.97-0.98). Clinical events (stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding [MB]) during follow-up were predictors of non-persistence (stroke HR 1.57; 95% CI 1.53-1.61; MB HR 2.96; 95% CI 2.92-3.00).. In over one million patients with NVAF, our results suggest differences in anticoagulation treatment persistence across OAC agents, even after accounting for clinical events after OAC initiation. It is important for clinicians and patients to take these differences into consideration, especially as non-persistence to OAC therapy is associated with thromboembolic complications.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Medicare; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States; Warfarin

In clinical practice, warfarin therapy requires frequent dose adjustments. In pharmacy claims, the days supplied value may not reflect the true duration of warfarin dispensation. This may affect the measures of association comparing the safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus warfarin.. Using Quebec healthcare administrative databases, we formed a cohort of 55 230 patients newly treated with oral anticoagulants between 2010 and 2016. The duration of dispensations was defined using two approaches: the recorded days supplied value, and the longitudinal coverage approximation (data-driven) that may account for individual variation in drug usage patterns. Propensity scores adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of major bleeding with dabigatran or rivaroxaban versus warfarin.. Using the days supplied, the mean (and standard deviation) dispensation durations for dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin were 19 (15), 19 (14), and 13 (12) days, respectively. Using the data-driven approach, the durations were 20 (16), 19 (15), and 15 (16) days, respectively. The choice of the approach had no impact on the HR estimates.. In our settings, the data-driven approach closely approximated the recorded days supplied value for the standard dose therapies such as dabigatran and rivaroxaban. For warfarin, the data-driven approach captured more variability in the duration of dispensations compared to the days supplied value, which may better reflect the true drug-taking behavior of warfarin. Both approaches may provide valid estimates when comparing the safety of DOACs versus warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Delivery of Health Care; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) may be prescribed warfarin or a non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOAC). There is increasing evidence that NOACs are superior to warfarin in terms of renal function preservation. This study aimed to compare renal outcomes in Chinese patients with NVAF between patients receiving NOACs and patients receiving warfarin.. In total, 600 Chinese patients with NVAF receiving oral anticoagulant therapy were retrospectively identified from an administrative database. The renal outcomes (≥30% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], doubling of serum creatinine, and kidney failure) were compared among four propensity-weighted treatment cohorts (warfarin, n=200; rivaroxaban, n=200; dabigatran, n=100; and apixaban, n=100).. The mean follow-up period across all groups was 1000 ± 436 days. Compared with warfarin, the three NOACs (pooled for consideration as a single unit) had significantly lower risks of ≥30% decline in eGFR (hazard ratio [HR]=0.339; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.276-0.417) and doubling of serum creatinine (HR=0.550; 95% CI=0.387-0.782). Dabigatran and rivaroxaban users both had lower risks of ≥30% decline in eGFR (both P<0.001) and doubling of serum creatinine (both P<0.05). Apixaban was only significantly associated with a lower risk of ≥30% decline in eGFR (P<0.001).. Compared with warfarin, NOACs may be associated with a significantly lower risk of decline in renal function among Chinese patients with NVAF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Creatinine; Dabigatran; Humans; Kidney; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Anticoagulant therapy is suggested within 45 days after Watchman device implantation for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). A previous study demonstrated that non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were a feasible peri- and postprocedural alternative to warfarin. The present study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of using different anticoagulants (low-dose NOACs vs. warfarin) within 45 days after Watchman device implantation in a Chinese population.. Patients with successful Watchman device implantation from October 2014 to June 2020 were included. All patients received anticoagulants within 45 days after the procedure, and those patients were divided into three groups according to the type of postprocedural anticoagulants. Transesophageal echocardiography follow-up was performed 45 days post procedure to assess residual flow and the occurrence of device-related thrombus (DRT).. A total of 368 patients were enrolled in the study. The study population was divided into three groups: the warfarin group (n = 77), the dabigatran group (n = 165) and the rivaroxaban group (n = 126). Periprocedural major bleeding was higher in the warfarin group (2.6% vs. 0% vs. 0%, P = 0.043), while minor bleeding was comparable among the groups (3.9% vs. 1.2% vs. 0.8%, P = 0.230). No periprocedural transient ischemic attack/stroke occurred. At follow-up, the incidence of DRT was higher in the warfarin group than in the other groups (4.2% vs. 0.6% vs. 0.8%; P = 0.116), but the difference was not statistically significant. The rates of thromboembolic and bleeding events were similar in the three groups.. The safety and efficacy of low-dose dabigatran and rivaroxaban were comparable to those of warfarin within 45 days after Watchman device implantation in a Chinese population.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The aim of the study was to compare the real-world effectiveness and safety in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients treated with edoxaban versus other oral anticoagulants (OACs) (apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and vitamin K antagonists [VKA]) in Germany.. Using a representative database of 3.5 million statutory health-insured lives in Germany, a retrospective cohort study was conducted to examine ischemic stroke (IS) or systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding in AF patients initiating anticoagulant therapy from January 2014 through June 2017. Inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity score was applied for baseline covariate adjustment. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the adjusted risk (hazard ratio [HR]) of each outcome comparing edoxaban versus other OACs. Among 21,038 patients treated with OACs, 1236 edoxaban, 6053 apixaban, 1306 dabigatran, 7013 rivaroxaban, and 5430 VKA patients were included. The adjusted combined risks of IS or SE were lower (p < 0.05) for each edoxaban pairwise comparison with other OACs (HR: 0.83 vs. apixaban, 0.60 vs. dabigatran, 0.72 vs. rivaroxaban, 0.64 vs. VKA). Edoxaban favored lower risks of major bleeding compared with rivaroxaban (HR: 0.74) and VKA (HR: 0.47). No differences in the risk of major bleeding were found between edoxaban and apixaban (p = 0.33), and between edoxaban and dabigatran (p = 0.06).. Edoxaban was associated with better effectiveness compared with other OACs in AF patients from Germany. Edoxaban also demonstrated a favorable safety profile.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Vitamin K

With the high cost, the long-term persistence of new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) was lower than that of warfarin in Chinese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) for a long time. The prices of NOACs (apixaban, rivaroxaban and dabigatran) decreased significantly over the past year in mainland China. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of NOACs versus warfarin for preventing stroke in patients with NVAF from a Chinese healthcare system perspective.. A decision tree and Markov model were used to assess the treatment strategies of four NOACs versus warfarin over a lifetime horizon. For each treatment strategy, the total lifetime cost, quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were calculated. The impact of parameter uncertainties on base-case analysis results was evaluated using sensitivity analyses.. In the base-case analysis, compared with warfarin, apixaban had a decreased total lifetime cost of USD 389 and rivaroxaban of USD 1482, while low-dose dabigatran had an increased total lifetime cost of USD 925 and high-dose dabigatran of USD 6641, with QALY increasing by 0.53, 1.32, 0.92 and 1.83, respectively. The ICER of low-dose dabigatran versus warfarin was USD 1005 per QALY gain, while those of apixaban (-USD 734 per QALY gain) and rivaroxaban (-USD 1123 per QALY gain) were negative. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses indicated that the base-case results were robust by applying certain varying parameters to the model.. These four NOAC (apixaban, rivaroxaban, low-dose dabigatran and high-dose dabigatran) treatment strategies were cost-effective compared with warfarin and recommended as substitutes for warfarin treatment for preventing stroke in patients with NVAF in the healthcare system of China, which might be driven by large drug price reductions in the past year.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

The present observational study aimed to clarify the association between bridging therapy with heparin before starting rivaroxaban and clinical outcomes after ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).Methods and Results: Patients with NVAF who experienced acute ischemic stroke or TIA of the middle cerebral artery territory and started rivaroxaban within 30 days after onset were enrolled and were followed up for 90 days. Outcome measures were ischemic events, major bleeding, their composite, and death or disability 90 days after onset. Ischemic events were defined as ischemic stroke, TIA, and systemic embolism. Of 1,308 analyzed patients, 638 received bridging therapy with unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin with a median of 10,000 IU/day. Associations between bridging therapy and ischemic events or major bleeding were not statistically significant individually, but the association between bridging therapy and their composite was statistically significant (multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio, 1.80; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-3.29). The association between bridging therapy and death or disability 90 days after onset was not statistically significant.. The composite of ischemic events and major bleeding was more frequent in patients with NVAF who received bridging therapy with low-dose heparin than in those who started treatment directly with rivaroxaban after ischemic stroke or TIA.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Ischemic Stroke; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amyloidosis; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiomyopathies; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Bleeding safety in relation to use of systemic fluconazole and topical azoles among patients with atrial fibrillation treated with apixaban, rivaroxaban, or dabigatran is insufficiently explored, despite clinical relevance and several reports suggesting associations.. Using nationwide Danish registers, we identified patients with atrial fibrillation initiated on apixaban, rivaroxaban, or dabigatran from 2012-2018. We investigated associations between bleeding incidents and systemic fluconazole or topical azole treatment using a case-crossover design with 30-day exposure windows and reported odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).. We included 32,340 (36%), 32,409 (36%), and 24,940 (28%) patients initiated on apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran, respectively. Patients on apixaban were older (median age: 77 years; interquartile range [IQR] 70-84) compared with rivaroxaban users (median age: 75 years; IQR 68-82) and patients on dabigatran (median age: 73 years; IQR 66-80). Apixaban users had a significantly increased risk of bleeding following exposure to systemic fluconazole: odds ratio (OR) 3.5; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.4-10.6. No increased risk was found among rivaroxaban and dabigatran users: ORs of 0.9 (95% CI, 0.2-3.0) and 1.7 (95% CI, 0.5-5.6), respectively. As to bleeding risk pertaining to topical azole exposure among apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran users, no association was found, with corresponding ORs of 0.8 (95% CI, 0.5-1.3); 1.3 (95% CI, 0.9-2.1); and 1.2 (95% CI 0.8-1.8), respectively.. In patients with atrial fibrillation on either apixaban, rivaroxaban, or dabigatran, an association between an elevated bleeding risk and use of systemic fluconazole was found among patients on apixaban. We found no increased risk of bleeding following co-exposure to topical azoles.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Azoles; Cross-Over Studies; Dabigatran; Fluconazole; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Decision making for the "best" treatment is particularly challenging in situations in which individual patient response to drugs can largely differ from average treatment effects. By estimating individual treatment effects (ITEs), we aimed to demonstrate how strokes, major bleeding events, and a composite of both could be reduced by model-assisted recommendations for a particular direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC).. In German claims data for the calendar years 2014-2018, we selected 29 901 new users of the DOACs rivaroxaban and apixaban. Random forests considered binary events within 1 y to estimate ITEs under each DOAC according to the X-learner algorithm with 29 potential effect modifiers; treatment recommendations were based on these estimated ITEs. Model performance was evaluated by the c-for-benefit statistics, absolute risk reduction (ARR), and absolute risk difference (ARD) by trial emulation.. A significant proportion of patients would be recommended a different treatment option than they actually received. The stroke model significantly discriminated patients for higher benefit and thus indicated improved decisions by reduced outcomes (c-for-benefit: 0.56; 95% confidence interval [0.52; 0.60]). In the group with apixaban recommendation, the model also improved the composite endpoint (ARR: 1.69 % [0.39; 2.97]). In trial emulations, model-assisted recommendations significantly reduced the composite event rate (ARD: -0.78 % [-1.40; -0.03]).. If prescribers are undecided about the potential benefits of different treatment options, ITEs can support decision making, especially if evidence is inconclusive, risk-benefit profiles of therapeutic alternatives differ significantly, and the patients' complexity deviates from "typical" study populations. In the exemplary case for DOACs and potentially in other situations, the significant impact could also become practically relevant if recommendations were available in an automated way as part of decision making.HighlightsIt was possible to calculate individual treatment effects (ITEs) from routine claims data for rivaroxaban and apixaban, and the characteristics between the groups with recommendation for one or the other option differed significantly.ITEs resulted in recommendations that were significantly superior to usual (observed) treatment allocations in terms of absolute risk reduction, both separately for stroke and in the composite endpoint of stroke and major bleeding.When similar patients from routine data were selected (precision cohorts) for patients with a strong recommendation for one option or the other, those similar patients under the respective recommendation showed a significantly better prognosis compared with the alternative option.Many steps may still be needed on the way to clinical practice, but the principle of decision support developed from routine data may point the way toward future decision-making processes.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Machine Learning; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

There has been sustained growth in the prescribing of direct oral anticoagulants (OACs) in primary care in the UK. Given the different indications, properties and prices of OACs, variation between prescribers is expected; however, a high level of variation may be evidence of inappropriate or suboptimal prescribing. This study examined the variation in the relative use of OACs in primary care in Wales.. Data on total defined daily doses of all community-dispensed OACs in 2019 were linked at the GP practice level with disease registers, patient demographic data and GP and patient numbers. The relative use of each OAC, as a fraction of all OACs prescribed, was analysed using Dirichlet regression to quantify the association between prescribing patterns and practice and area-level characteristics.. Across 417 GP practices, the mean (range) in the relative prescribing of warfarin was 37% (6%-64%), apixaban was 32% (2%-65%), rivaroxaban 23% (0%-66%), dabigatran 3% (0%-23%) and edoxaban 6% (0%-59%). Statistical modelling provided strong evidence that prescribing patterns are associated with a GP practice's health board and also their nearest major hospital. Compared to the null model, a model including health board resulted in a 15% fall in Akaike information criterion, increasing to 20% with the addition of nearest major hospital and 27% including further covariates.. Systematic variation in OAC prescribing, by health board and based on nearest hospital, indicates that factors other than patient clinical characteristics and preferences may be influencing prescribing decisions.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Semantic Web; Stroke; Wales

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Indicators and Reagents; Prothrombin Time; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Direct oral anticoagulants are increasingly replacing vitamin K antagonists for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation, partly owing to the lack of a need for routine monitoring. Therapeutic drug monitoring may still be warranted under certain circumstances. It is generally assumed that serum and plasma can be interchangeably used for this purpose. The aim of this study was to investigate possible differences between the serum, citrate-plasma, and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-plasma concentrations of apixaban and rivaroxaban in a larger patient group and their relation to factor X measurements.. Plasma and serum samples were drawn during the same venipuncture from patients treated with apixaban or rivaroxaban. Drug levels were measured using ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography combined with tandem mass spectrometry. Three sample matrices were obtained from 8 healthy volunteers for measurement of factor X antigen and activity.. Mean concentrations of apixaban and rivaroxaban were 16.8% and 36.6% higher in serum than in citrate-plasma, respectively (both P < 0.001). The corresponding differences in serum versus EDTA-plasma were 4.5% for apixaban and 13.1% for rivaroxaban (both P < 0.001). Factor X antigen measurements in citrate-plasma, EDTA-plasma, serum with clot activator, and serum without additives yielded comparable results, and factor X activity was significantly higher in serum than in plasma.. Apixaban and rivaroxaban concentrations were significantly higher in serum than in plasma. The difference was more pronounced with rivaroxaban and was larger between serum and citrate-plasma than between serum and EDTA-plasma. Higher factor X activity in serum may explain the observed concentration differences. The choice of matrix is, thus, important when interpreting therapeutic drug monitoring results and in research involving analyses of direct oral anticoagulants. The authors recommend citrate-plasma as the preferred matrix.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Citrates; Dabigatran; Edetic Acid; Factor X; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who are on long-term direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) with low anti-Xa or anti-IIa levels may be at higher risk of recurrent stroke. However, no prospective post-marketing study has investigated these DOAC plasma levels at the time of embolic stroke. The aim of this study was to assess the anti-Xa (rivaroxaban, apixaban) and anti-IIa (dabigatran) plasma levels in DOAC-treated AF patients at the time of acute embolic stroke.. We prospectively identified 43 patients with AF on long-term DOAC who experienced embolic strokes. We compared the DOAC plasma levels of these patients with a control sample of 57 patients who tolerated long-term therapeutic dose DOAC therapy without any adverse event. DOAC levels were assessed with drug-specific anti-Xa chromogenic analysis (rivaroxaban, apixaban) and with Hemoclot Thrombin Inhibitor assay (dabigatran).. Dabigatran-treated patients with stroke had significantly lower anti-IIa levels when compared with the trough (40.7 ± 36.9 vs. 85.4 ± 57.2 ng/mL, p < 0.05) and peak samples of the controls (40.7 ± 36.9 vs. 138.8 ± 78.7 ng/mL, p < 0.001). Similarly, there were significantly lower anti-Xa levels in apixaban-treated patients with stroke compared to the trough control samples (72.4 ± 46.7 vs. 119.9 ± 81.7 ng/mL, p < 0.05), and in rivaroxaban- and apixaban-treated patients when compared to peak control samples (rivaroxaban: 42.7 ± 31.9 vs. 177.6 ± 38.6 ng/mL, p < 0.001; apixaban: 72.4 ± 46.7 vs. 210.9 ± 88.7 ng/mL, p < 0.001).. This observational study showed significantly lower anti-IIa and anti-Xa plasma levels in AF patients with embolic stroke compared to those who tolerated long-term therapeutic dose DOAC therapy.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolic Stroke; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Prospective Studies; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Heart-Assist Devices; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Current evidence suggests that rivaroxaban may be well tolerated and effective in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and obesity; however, there is limited evidence on the impact of polypharmacy in this population. This study evaluated real-world clinical outcomes with rivaroxaban versus warfarin in patients with NVAF and obesity according to the number of concurrent medications.. This retrospective cohort study identified patients with one or more pharmacy claim for rivaroxaban or warfarin from two large claims databases. Patients were required to have an atrial fibrillation diagnosis, body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m. A total of 95,875 patients were identified with one or more claim for either rivaroxaban or warfarin. After PSM, patient characteristics were balanced between cohorts (n = 21,547 in each cohort). The overall composite risk of stroke and systemic embolism was significantly lower in the rivaroxaban cohort compared with the warfarin cohort (hazard ratio [HR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-0.84; p < 0.001). The risks of ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, and systemic embolism separately were also significantly reduced with rivaroxaban. Major bleeding risk was similar between cohorts (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.81-1.06; p = 0.2842), and results were consistent across the three polypharmacy groups.. In this real-world study of NVAF patients with obesity, rivaroxaban was associated with lower risks of stroke and systemic embolism and similar risk of major bleeding versus warfarin across polypharmacy categories.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Obesity; Polypharmacy; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Delivery of Health Care; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

The article discusses the development of cognitive deficit in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and provides data on mechanisms of the development of cognitive disorders in AF. Under discussion are a possibility of reducing the risk of cognitive disorders with the anticoagulant therapy for prevention of stroke in AF and different properties of different anticoagulants, which may be important for patients. Thus, patients with cognitive disorders are more prone to missing the dose, which may entail serious, possibly fatal consequences. Therefore, the convenience of dosing may be essential. The drug rivaroxaban that has once-a-day dosing schedule and a calendar package, may help the patient better adhere to the doctor's recommendations. Therefore, rivaroxaban may help improving the compliance, which is the major condition for comprehensive, necessary protection of an elderly patient with AF, including the protection, with high safety, from stroke, from the risk of coronary complications, and from the impairment of kidney function.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cognitive Dysfunction; Humans; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Patients with atrial fibrillation have a relevant risk for ischemic stroke despite the recommended use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC). The risk correlates with the functional DOAC plasma levels in clinical trials, but the value of their measurement in community use remains undetermined.. We aim to investigate the clinical implications and the prognostic value of DOAC plasma level measurement during steady state.. In this observational clinical cohort study among patients with ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation, 397 individuals on oral anticoagulants for secondary stroke prevention were included between 2016 and 2020. The functional DOAC plasma levels were measured during steady state. Early stroke recurrence within 3 months was recorded as the main outcome parameter.. Monitoring of DOAC plasma levels could help to identify patients with increased risk for stroke recurrence and should be considered for certain subgroups, including patients with high GFR.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Male; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

We assessed switching patterns of oral anticoagulants (OACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in the period following widespread availability of the direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs).. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using NPS MedicineWise's MedicineInsight dataset, collected from Australian general practices. Patients with AF who newly commenced an OAC between 1 January 2013 and 30 September 2017 were included. The switching rate was calculated within 12 months post-initiation. Switching rates between OACs were compared, and predictors of switching were identified.. We included 15,020 patients who were recorded as having been commenced on warfarin or a DOAC. Overall, 5.7% of patients switched their OAC within 12 months. The switching rates from warfarin, apixaban, dabigatran and rivaroxaban were 9.4%, 2.6%, 8.9% and 4.0%, respectively. Compared to apixaban, commencement on warfarin, dabigatran or rivaroxaban was associated with a higher risk of switching to another OAC. Patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 mL/min were more likely to switch from DOACs to warfarin and less likely to switch from warfarin, compared to those with an eGFR >60 mL/min.. There was a low switching rate between OACs in Australian general practice patients with AF. A key determinant of switching appeared to be kidney disease.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Australia; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; General Practice; Humans; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

The current treatment paradigm for atrial fibrillation (AF) prioritizes rate control over rhythm control; however, rhythm control has shown benefits over other AF strategies. This study compares the outcomes of rivaroxaban with and without concomitant antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs), using propensity score matching to correct for statistical effects of baseline discrepancies. This multi-center retrospective study included 1,477 patients with non-permanent AF who took rivaroxaban for at least one month between 2011 and 2016 and had not received catheter ablation. Concomitant AAD use was compared against clinical outcome endpoints for effectiveness, safety, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Associations with concomitant AAD use were evaluated using multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses. Patients were divided into two matched groups: rivaroxaban alone (n = 739) and with concomitant AADs (n = 738). The cumulative incidences of safety (p = 0.308), effectiveness (p = 0.583), and MACE (p = 0.754) were similar between the two groups, and multivariate analysis showed no significant differences. The new thromboembolism and all-cause death rates were higher in rivaroxaban alone (2.7% vs 0.8%, p = 0.005; and 10% vs. 6.9%, p = 0.032, respectively). The heart failure readmission rate was higher in the concomitant-AAD group (8.4% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.003). The concomitant use of rivaroxaban with AADs appears to be well-tolerated, with lower rates of thromboembolism and all-cause death, but is associated with more occurrences of congestive heart failure.

Topics: Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Heart Failure; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome

 To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of apixaban versus rivaroxaban among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)..  Using the United Kingdom's Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to the Hospital Episode Statistics repository, and the Office for National Statistics database, we identified a cohort of patients with NVAF and T2DM newly treated with apixaban or rivaroxaban between 2013 and 2020. Propensity scores with standardized mortality ratio weighting were used to control for confounding. We used weighted Cox proportional hazards models to estimate separately the hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and major adverse limb events associated with the use of apixaban compared with rivaroxaban. We also evaluated whether the risk was modified by age, sex, duration of diabetes, microvascular and macrovascular complications of diabetes, nephropathy, CHA.  The cohort included 11,561 apixaban and 8,265 rivaroxaban users. Apixaban was associated with a similar risk of stroke (HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.79-1.23), and a 32% reduced risk of major bleeding (HR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.59-0.78), compared with rivaroxaban. The risk of major adverse limb events was similar between apixaban and rivaroxaban (HR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.54-1.04). Overall, the risk of ischemic stroke and major bleeding was consistent in stratified analyses..  Among patients with NVAF and T2DM, apixaban was associated with a similar risk of stroke and a lower risk of major bleeding compared with rivaroxaban.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Prospectively collected data comparing the safety and effectiveness of individual non-vitamin K antagonists (NOACs) are lacking. Our objective was to directly compare the effectiveness and safety of NOACs in patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF).. In GLORIA-AF, a large, prospective, global registry program, consecutive patients with newly diagnosed AF were followed for 3 years. The comparative analyses for (1) dabigatran vs rivaroxaban or apixaban and (2) rivaroxaban vs apixaban were performed on propensity score (PS)-matched patient sets. Proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for outcomes of interest.. The GLORIA-AF Phase III registry enrolled 21,300 patients between January 2014 and December 2016. Of these, 3839 were prescribed dabigatran, 4015 rivaroxaban and 4505 apixaban, with median ages of 71.0, 71.0, and 73.0 years, respectively. In the PS-matched set, the adjusted HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dabigatran vs rivaroxaban were, for stroke: 1.27 (0.79-2.03), major bleeding 0.59 (0.40-0.88), myocardial infarction 0.68 (0.40-1.16), and all-cause death 0.86 (0.67-1.10). For the comparison of dabigatran vs apixaban, in the PS-matched set, the adjusted HRs were, for stroke 1.16 (0.76-1.78), myocardial infarction 0.84 (0.48-1.46), major bleeding 0.98 (0.63-1.52) and all-cause death 1.01 (0.79-1.29). For the comparison of rivaroxaban vs apixaban, in the PS-matched set, the adjusted HRs were, for stroke 0.78 (0.52-1.19), myocardial infarction 0.96 (0.63-1.45), major bleeding 1.54 (1.14-2.08), and all-cause death 0.97 (0.80-1.19).. Patients treated with dabigatran had a 41% lower risk of major bleeding compared with rivaroxaban, but similar risks of stroke, MI, and death. Relative to apixaban, patients treated with dabigatran had similar risks of stroke, major bleeding, MI, and death. Rivaroxaban relative to apixaban had increased risk for major bleeding, but similar risks for stroke, MI, and death.. URL: https://www.. gov . Unique identifiers: NCT01468701, NCT01671007. Date of registration: September 2013.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Prospective Studies; Pyridones; Registries; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Rheumatic valve disease is present in 0.4 % of the word population, mainly in lowincome countries. Rheumatic mitral stenosis affects more women and between 40 to 75 % of patients may have atrial fibrillation (AF), more frequently in upper-middle income countries. This rhythm disturbance is due to increased atrial pressure, chronic inflammation, fibrosis, and left atrial enlargement. There is also an increase in the prevalence of AF with age in patients with mitral stenosis. The risk of stroke is 4 % per year. Success rates for cardioversion, Cox-Maze procedure, and catheter ablation are low. Therefore, anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonist is mandatory for Evaluated Heart valves, Rheumatic or Artificial (EHRA) classification type 1. However, this anticoagulation is used by less than 80 % of those eligible and less than 30 % have the international normalized ratio in the therapeutic range. The safety and efficacy of using rivaroxaban, a direct factor Xa inhibitor anticoagulant, were demonstrated in the RIVER trial with a sample of 1005 patients with AF and bioprosthetic mitral valve. The indication for valve replacement, that is, if severe mitral stenosis or severe mitral regurgitation, was not specified. A randomized, open-label study (DAVID-MS) is underway to compare the effectiveness and safety of dabigatran and warfarin therapy for stroke prevention in patients with AF and moderate or severe mitral stenosis. Thus, the applicability of the use of direct anticoagulants in patients with AF and mitral stenosis and also in those undergoing mitral bioprostheses surgery will be the subject of further studies. The findings may explain if specific atrial changes of mitral stenosis even after the valve replacement will influence thromboembolic events with direct anticoagulants.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Mitral Valve Stenosis; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Obesity, a chronic disease established as a global epidemic by the World Health Organization, is considered a risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, which has high morbidity and mortality. Although both obesity and AF are diseases associated with negative outcomes, studies have shown the presence of an obesity paradox, in which patients with a high body mass index (BMI) and AF have a better prognosis than patients with a normal BMI. Despite the fact that the mechanisms that lead to this paradox are still uncertain, adequate anticoagulation in obese patients seems to play an important role in reducing adverse events in this group. In this perspective article, the authors discuss the relationship between new oral anticoagulants (NOACs), namely, apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban (factor Xa inhibitors) and dabigatran (direct inhibitor of thrombin), and the obesity paradox, seeking to deepen the understanding of the mechanism that leads to this paradox.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Obesity; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thrombin

Rivaroxaban, a direct factor Xa inhibitor, is widely used for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). The aim of this study was to conduct a population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) analysis of rivaroxaban in Chinese patients with NVAF to assess ethnic differences and provide model-based precision dosing. A total of 256 rivaroxaban plasma concentrations and 244 prothrombin time (PT) measurements were obtained from 195 Chinese NVAF patients from a prospective clinical trial. The population PK-PD model was developed using nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NONMEM) software. The PK of rivaroxaban was adequately described using a one-compartment model with first-order adsorption and elimination. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was identified as a major covariate for apparent clearance. No single nucleotide polymorphism was identified as a significant covariate. PT exhibited a linear relationship with rivaroxaban concentration. Total bilirubin (TBIL) and eGFR were identified as significant covariates for baseline PT. According to the Monte Carlo simulation, 15 mg for Chinese patients with eGFR ≥50 mL/min and normal liver function yielded an exposure comparable to 20 mg for Caucasian patients. Patients with moderately impaired renal function may require a lower dose of rivaroxaban to avoid overexposure. Moreover, there was an approximate 26% increase in PT levels in patients with TBIL of 34 μmol/L and eGFR of 30 mL/min, which could increase the risk of major bleeding. The established population PK-PD model could inform individualized dosing for Chinese NVAF patients who are administered rivaroxaban.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Bilirubin; China; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Morpholines; Nucleotides; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemia; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemia; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

The optimal timing of initiating oral anticoagulants after reperfusion therapy for ischemic stroke is unknown. Factors related to early initiation of rivaroxaban and differences in clinical outcomes of stroke patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who underwent reperfusion therapy was investigated.. From data of 1,333 NVAF patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) in a prospective multicenter study, patients who started rivaroxaban after intravenous thrombolysis and/or mechanical thrombectomy were included. The clinical outcomes included the composite of ischemic events (recurrent ischemic stroke, TIA, or systemic embolism) and major bleeding at 3 months.. Among the 424 patients, the median time from index stroke to starting rivaroxaban was 3.2 days. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, infarct size (odds ratio [OR], 0.99; 95%CI, 0.99-1.00) was inversely and successful reperfusion (OR, 2.13; 95%CI, 1.24-3.72) was positively associated with initiation of rivaroxaban within 72 hours. 205 patients were assigned to the early group (< 72 hours) and 219 patients (≥ 72 hours) to the late group. Multivariable Cox regression models showed comparable hazard ratios between the two groups at 3 months for ischemic events (hazard ratio [HR], 0.18; 95%CI, 0.03-1.32) and major bleeding (HR, 1.80; 95%CI, 0.24-13.54).. Infarct size and results of reperfusion therapy were associated with the timing of starting rivaroxaban. There were no significant differences in the rates of ischemic events and major bleeding between patients after reperfusion therapy who started rivaroxaban < 72 hours and ≥ 72 hours after the index stroke.. Unique identifier: NCT02129920; URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Infarction; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Ischemic Stroke; Prospective Studies; Reperfusion; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Evidence is needed on the impact of anticoagulation therapy on kidney function in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The objective of this analysis, which is part of the CALLIPER study, was to investigate the risk of worsening kidney function with rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily compared with warfarin in patients with AF and moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) in routine clinical practice in the United States.. CALLIPER was an observational, retrospective, new-user cohort study. Adult patients with AF in the US IBM Watson MarketScan databases who newly initiated anticoagulation with rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily or warfarin between January 2013 and December 2017 were included. Comparative analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards regression after adjustment for potential confounding by the stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting approach and propensity score matching. One of the main study outcomes was worsening kidney function (composite of progression to CKD stage 5, kidney failure, or need for dialysis), besides traditional AF-related outcomes.. The cohort included 7368 patients: 5903 (80.1%) initiating warfarin and 1465 (19.9%) initiating rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily. Rivaroxaban 15 mg was associated with a significant 47% reduction in the risk of worsening kidney function versus warfarin (hazard ratio 0.53; 95% confidence interval 0.35-0.78). Similar results were observed in the subgroup of patients with type 2 diabetes.. Rivaroxaban 15 mg may be associated with a lower risk of worsening kidney function as compared with warfarin in the atrial fibrillation population with moderate-to-severe CKD.. NCT03359876.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Kidney; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

In atrial fibrillation (AF) patients on vitamin K antagonists, a progressive deterioration of renal function is common but there is limited evidence with long-term use of rivaroxaban. Herein, we investigated the change in renal function in AF patients after 2 years of rivaroxaban treatment.. The EMIR registry is an observational and multicentre study including AF patients treated with rivaroxaban for at least 6 months prior to inclusion. Changes in analytical parameters were recorded during 2 years of follow-up. Renal function was estimated using the Cockroft-Gault equation.. 1433 patients (638, 44.5% women, mean age of 74.2 ± 9.7 years) were included. Creatinine clearance (CrCl) was available at baseline and at 2 years in 1085 patients. At inclusion, 33.2% of patients had impaired renal function (CrCl <60 ml/min). At 2 years, we were not able to find changes in the proportion of patients with impaired renal function, which increased to 34.6% (p = 0.290). However, the baseline mean CrCl was 76.0 ± 30.5 ml/min and slightly improved at 2 years (77.0 ± 31.8 ml/min; p = 0.014). Overall, the proportion of patients with CrCl <60 ml/min at baseline that had CrCl ≥60 ml/min at 2 years was significantly higher compared to that of patients with CrCl ≥60 ml/min at baseline and CrCl <60 ml/min after (22.2% vs. 13.1%; p < 0.001) CONCLUSIONS: In AF patients on long-term rivaroxaban therapy, a decrease in renal function was not observed. We even observed a slight improvement in the patients with renal impairment. These results reinforce the idea that rivaroxaban may be a safe option even in patients with renal impairment.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Registries; Renal Insufficiency; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Although epistaxis is one of the most common side effects of oral anticoagulation, it is unclear whether epistaxis rates vary between different oral anticoagulants (OAC).. To compare rates of clinically relevant epistaxis between OAC.. Epistaxis event rates were compared between new users of apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin in a nationwide population-based cohort study over a 5-year study period, 2014-2019. Data was collected from the Icelandic Medicine Registry and the five major hospitals in Iceland. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to yield balanced baseline characteristics, and epistaxis rates were compared using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and Cox regression.. During the study period, 2098 patients received apixaban, 474 dabigatran, 3106 rivaroxaban, and 1403 warfarin. In total, 93 patients presented with clinically relevant epistaxis, including 11 (12%) major epistaxis events and one fatal epistaxis episode. Furthermore, seven patients (9%) with non-major epistaxis later presented with major bleeding during the follow-up period. Warfarin use was associated with higher rates of epistaxis compared to apixaban (2.2 events per 100-person years (events/100-py) vs. 0.6 events/100-py, hazard ratio [HR] 4.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.08-8.59, p < 0.001), rivaroxaban (2.2 events/100-py vs. 1.0 events/100-py, HR 2.26, 95% CI 1.28-4.01, p = 0.005), and dabigatran (2.2 events/100-py vs. no events, HR n/a, p < 0.001).. Warfarin treatment was associated with higher rates of clinically relevant epistaxis compared to direct oral anticoagulants.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Epistaxis; Humans; Propensity Score; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

The anticoagulant therapy with a priority of direct oral anticoagulants is an approach to the prevention of recurrent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) that has presently proved its efficacy and is stated in international clinical guidelines. An extensive evidence-based database demonstrates advantages of rivaroxaban over other drugs of this class in secondary prevention of stroke in AF. Furthermore, these advantages are combined with the optimal safety profile. The rivaroxaban treatment may provide the most favorable prognosis due to the prevention of recurrent stroke in AF, reducing the rate of kidney disease progression, and slowing vascular atherosclerosis. An important beneficial feature of rivaroxaban is once-a-day intake, which is important in the context of a high incidence of cognitive disorders in this patient category, and may improve their compliance and, thus, help achieving the expected profile of treatment efficacy. Thus, rivaroxaban can be regarded as a drug of choice for secondary prevention of stroke in AF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

The resolution of the Council of Experts devoted to the discussion of the effectiveness of the use of a combination of rivaroxaban 2.5 mg 2 times a day and acetylsalicylic acid 100 mg per day to prevent recurrent non-coronary ischemic stroke results of the COMPASS study is presented. The advantages of this combination and the safety of its use are considered. Recommendations for the implementation of the results of the study in clinical practice are given.. Приведена резолюция совета экспертов, посвященная обсуждению эффективности применения комбинации ривароксабана 2,5 мг 2 раза в сутки и ацетилсалициловой кислоты по 100 мг/сут для предупреждения повторного нелакунарного ишемического инсульта по результатам исследования COMPASS. Рассматриваются преимущества указанной комбинации и безопасность ее применения. Приведены рекомендации по внедрению результатов исследования в клиническую практику.

Topics: Aspirin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Berberine; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

There are a paucity of real-world data examining effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with prior bleeding.. This retrospective analysis included data from 5 insurance claims databases and included NVAF patients prescribed OACs with prior bleeding. One-to-one propensity score matching was conducted between NOACs and warfarin and between NOACs in each database. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE) and MB.. A total of 244,563 patients (mean age 77; 50% female) with prior bleeding included 55,094 (22.5%) treated with apixaban, 12,500 (5.1%) with dabigatran, 38,246 (15.6%) with rivaroxaban, and 138,723 (56.7%) with warfarin. Apixaban (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76 [95% CI: 0.70, 0.83]) and rivaroxaban (HR: 0.79 [95% CI: 0.71, 0.87]) had a lower risk of stroke/SE vs. warfarin. Apixaban (HR: 0.67 [95% CI: 0.64, 0.70]) and dabigatran (HR: 0.88 [95% CI: 0.81, 0.96]) had a lower risk of MB vs. warfarin. Apixaban patients had a lower risk of stroke/SE vs. dabigatran (HR: 0.70 [95% CI: 0.57, 0.86]) and rivaroxaban (HR: 0.85 [95% CI: 0.76, 0.96]) and a lower risk of MB than dabigatran (HR: 0.73 [95% CI: 0.67, 0.81]) and rivaroxaban (HR: 0.64 [95% CI: 0.61, 0.68]).. In this real-world analysis of a large sample of NVAF patients with prior bleeding, NOACs were associated with similar or lower risk of stroke/SE and MB vs. warfarin and variable risk of stroke/SE and MB against each other.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were developed as an alternative to warfarin to treat and prevent thromboembolism, including stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients. The COVID-19 pandemic could increase the risk of stroke and/or the risk of bleeding in patients due to nonadherence or sub/supra-optimal dosing.. To investigate DOAC prescription trends in England's community settings during the complete first wave of COVID-19 pandemic.. Descriptive and interrupted time series (ITS) analyses were conducted to examine the prescription patterns of DOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban) and warfarin for primary care patients in the English Prescribing Dataset from January 2019 to February 2021, with March 2020 as the cut-off point.. A 19% increase in mean DOAC's accompanied with 20% warfarin prescriptions decline was observed. ITS modelling showed an increase in DOAC prescription volume in March 2020 (+7 million items,

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; COVID-19; Dabigatran; England; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Interrupted Time Series Analysis; Pandemics; Prescriptions; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

The efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism have been demonstrated in Asian and non-Asian patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in multiple studies. However, limited published data exist on its use specifically in treatment-naïve patients from the Asia region. Patients in South Korea and Taiwan can now receive rivaroxaban as first-line therapy, allowing for data generation in this patient group.. XaMINA was a prospective, real-world, multicenter, single-arm, observational cohort study of patients with NVAF in South Korea and Taiwan naïve to anticoagulation and initiating rivaroxaban. The primary outcome was major bleeding; secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, symptomatic thromboembolic events, and treatment persistence.. In total, 1094 patients were included and the follow-up was 1 year. The baseline mean CHADS. XaMINA demonstrated low incidence rates of major bleeding events and thromboembolic events in patients with NVAF newly initiating rivaroxaban in South Korea and Taiwan, consistent with previous real-world studies reconfirming the results of the ROCKET AF study.. The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT03284762) on 15 September 2017.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome

The aim of the study was to evaluate the performance of the 2MACE in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) treated with rivaroxaban and to improve the accuracy of 2MACE.. This was a post-authorization and observational study of AF adults treated with rivaroxaban for ≥ 6 months. The primary endpoint was any of the major adverse cardiac events (MACE), namely, cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and myocardial revascularization. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the performance of 2MACE, and a new score, 2MACER to predict MACE.. A total of 1433 patients were included (74.2 ± 9.7 years, CHA₂DS₂-VASc 3.5 ± 1.5, 26.9% 2MACE ≥ 3). The annual event rates (follow-up 2.5 years) were 1.07% for MACE, 0.66% for thromboembolic events and 1.04% for major bleeding. Patients with 2MACE ≥ 3 (vs. < 3) had higher risk of stroke/systemic embolism/transient ischemic attack (odds ratio [OR] 5.270; 95% CI 2.216-12.532), major bleeding (OR 4.624; 95% CI 2.163-9.882), MACE (OR 3.202; 95% CI 1.548-6.626) and cardiovascular death (OR 3.395; 95% CI 1.396-8.259). 2MACE was recalculated giving 1 more point to patients with baseline a glomerular filtration rate < 50 mL/min/1.73 m² (2MACER); 2MACER vs. 2MACE: IDI 0.1%, p = 0.126; NRI 23.9%, p = 0.125; AUC: 0.651 (95% CI 0.547-0.755) vs. 0.638 (95% CI 0.534-0.742), respectively; p = 0.361.. In clinical practice, AF patients anticoagulated with rivaroxaban exhibit a low risk of events. 2MACE score acts as a modest predictor of a higher risk of adverse outcomes in this population. 2MACER did not significantly increase the ability of 2MACE to predict MACE.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Data directly comparing trends in the use of different oral anticoagulants (OACs) among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) from different countries are limited. We addressed this using a large-scale network cohort study in the United States (US), Belgium, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom (UK).. We used nine databases (claims or electronic health records) that had been converted into the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model with analysis performed using open-source analytical tools. We identified adults with AF and a first OAC prescription, either vitamin K antagonist (VKA) or direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC), from 2010 to 2017. We described time trends in use, continuation, and switching.. In 2010, 87.5%-99.8% of patients started on a VKA. By 2017, the majority started on a DOAC: 87.0% (US), 88.3% (Belgium), 93.1% (France), 88.4% (Germany), and 86.1%-86.7% (UK). In the UK, DOACs became the most common starting OAC in 2015, 2-3 years later than elsewhere. Apixaban was the most common starting OAC by 2017, 50.2%-57.8% (US), 31.4% (Belgium), 45.9% (France), 39.5% (Germany), and 49.8%-50.5% (UK), followed by rivaroxaban, 24.8%-32.5% (US), 25.7% (Belgium), 38.4% (France), 24.9% (Germany), and 30.2%-31.2% (UK). Long-term treatment was less common in the US than in Europe, especially the UK. A minority of patients switched from their index OAC in the short and long term.. From 2010 to 2017, VKA use had significantly declined and DOAC use had significantly increased in the US and Europe. Apixaban was the most prescribed OAC in 2017, followed by rivaroxaban.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; France; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States

Despite evolving evidence, the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with extremes of body weight remains controversial. This study aimed to measure the impact of DOACs compared to warfarin on safety and efficacy outcomes in extreme body weight patients. This multi-center, health system, retrospective study examined the outcomes of patients with all body weights and extreme body weights prescribed a DOAC (rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban) or warfarin for atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism over a 9-year period. The primary outcome was a composite of thromboembolism, symptomatic recurrent VTE, or severe bleeding; analyzed by pre-determined BMI cutoffs. A total of 19,697 patients were included in the study: 11,604 in the DOAC group and in the 8093 in the warfarin group. 295 patients were underweight and 9108 patients were pre-obese to obese class 3. After adjusting for potential confounders, warfarin patients had higher odds of experiencing the composite outcome compared to DOAC patients (OR 1.337, 95% CI 1.212-1.475). Additionally, obese patients were 24.6% more likely to experience the outcome compared to normal BMI patients. Adjusted modeling showed that warfarin patients experienced higher bleed rates compared to DOAC patients (OR 1.432, 95% CI 1.266-1.620). Obese patients were less likely to be diagnosed with a bleed (OR 0.749, 95% CI 0.658-0.854), and underweight patients were more likely to be diagnosed with a bleed (OR 1.522, 95% CI 1.095-2.115) compared to normal BMI patients. In conclusion, DOACs for atrial fibrillation or VTE in patients with extreme body weights appear safe and effective when compared to warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Obesity, Morbid; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thinness; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

To assess the change in the use of oral anticoagulants in New Zealand over 10 years since the introduction of dabigatran and rivaroxaban.. Data were collected from the National Pharmaceutical database from January 2011 to March 2021. Seven and a half million prescriptions for oral anticoagulants were analysed.. The total number of people taking oral anticoagulants increased from 46,000 in July 2011 to 105,000 by March 2021. The growth was predominantly from the increased use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Initially, dabigatran was the only funded DOAC in New Zealand; approximately 50,000 people were taking this medication by August 2018, when rivaroxaban was introduced. Subsequent growth has predominantly been from rivaroxaban, with 23,000 users by March 2021. Warfarin use has dropped by 50% over the last 10 years.. The introduction of the DOACs was expected to reduce the use of warfarin. However, the rapid rise in DOAC use was not predicted. The increase is most likely in patients with atrial fibrillation with the positive benefit of reducing the incidence of embolic stroke. However, having a high proportion of the elderly population (15% of people over 75-years) on anticoagulants has implications for the health sector, making hospital admissions and surgery more complex.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; New Zealand; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Guidance for dabigatran and rivaroxaban in overweight patients diagnosed with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is still lacking.. Compare the effectiveness and safety of dabigatran and rivaroxaban for the treatment of NVAF in the overweight population.. A total of 396 out of 1029 overweight patients with NVAF at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, from January 2017 and December 2018 were retrospectively enrolled using propensity score matching analysis. The clinical outcomes were analyzed by chi-square test and Kaplan-Meier analyses. The risk of bleeding and thrombosis was assessed using a Cox regression analysis and validated using a nomogram model.. Dabigatran therapy was shown to be equally effective. It may be superior in reducing bleeding risk in an overweight population with NVAF than rivaroxaban. Further prospective studies are encouraged for analysis.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Overweight; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

To observe the safety and efficacy of warfarin and rivaroxaban in anticoagulation therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).. A total of 96 patients with AF treated in our hospital from June 2019 to February 2021 were enrolled in this study. According to the different modes of drug administration, the patients were divided into the warfarin group and rivaroxaban group. Demographic and clinical data such as age, body weight, and previous drug use were collected. The blood routine, liver and kidney function, blood coagulation routine, and cardiac color ultrasound were accessed. The valvular atrial fibrillation and anticoagulant taboos were excluded, and the risk of embolism and bleeding was evaluated. Among them, 48 patients in the warfarin group were given warfarin once a day, and the international ratio (INR) was used to adjust the dose, and the INR was controlled between 2.0 and 3.0. In contrast, 48 patients in the rivaroxaban group received a fixed dose of rivaroxaban 20 mg or 15 mg once a day. After administration, regular telephone or outpatient follow-up was given once a month, to monitor patients' drug compliance and ask if there was bleeding, and to detect blood routine, urine routine, fecal routine+occult blood, and liver and kidney function. In addition, at the beginning of 3, 6, and 12 months of follow-up, each patient was given cardiac color Doppler ultrasound, peripheral vascular color ultrasound, and brain CT to determine whether there were mural thrombosis, stroke, and peripheral arterial thromboembolism. The INR attainment rate, coagulation index, thromboembolism, bleeding, and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.. There was no significant difference in serum Dmurd and NT-proBNP levels between the two groups before treatment and 3, 6, and 9 months after treatment. There was no significant difference in the number of venous embolism, pulmonary embolism, cerebral embolism, and total embolism between the two groups (. Compared with warfarin, rivaroxaban anticoagulant therapy has the same advantage in tolerance and prevention of thromboembolism in patients with AF, but rivaroxaban can effectively reduce the risk of bleeding in patients with AF.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Cutaneous small vessel vasculitis (CSVV) was identified as a safety signal among patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC). This study aimed to determine if CSVV risk differed among patients with atrial fibrillation (Afib) who newly initiated warfarin or a DOAC.. We identified enrollees aged ≥21 years diagnosed with Afib who newly initiated rivaroxaban, dabigatran, apixaban, and warfarin in the Sentinel Distributed Database from October 19, 2010 to February 29, 2020. We selected and followed patients who did not have evidence of the following in the 183 days prior to initiating treatment: CSVV diagnosis, dispensing of other study drugs, select autoimmune diseases or autoimmune medications, cancer diagnoses or chemotherapeutic treatment, kidney dialysis or transplant, alternative anticoagulation indications, or an institutional (nursing home, hospice, hospital) stay on the treatment initiation date (index date) until CSVV outcome or pre-specified censoring. We conducted 1:1 propensity score matching in six comparisons.. CSVV incidence rates for DOACs and warfarin ranged from 3.3 to 5.6 per 10 000-person years in our matched Afib population. The adjusted CSVV hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) was 0.94 (0.64, 1.39) for rivaroxaban versus warfarin; 1.17 (0.67, 2.06) for dabigatran vs. warfarin; 0.85 (0.62, 1.16) for apixaban vs. warfarin; 0.86 (0.49, 1.50) for rivaroxaban vs. dabigatran; 0.99 (0.68, 1.45) for rivaroxaban versus apixaban; and 1.70 (0.90, 3.21) for dabigatran versus apixaban.. We did not find significant evidence of differential CSVV risk in pair-wise comparisons of DOACs and warfarin.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vasculitis; Warfarin

Stroke is an independent risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Although the risk of VTE persists after hospital discharge, information on the utilization of anticoagulants among stroke patients after discharge remains limited.. To evaluate changes in post-discharge thromboprophylaxis among stroke patients between 2006 and 2019.. We conducted a retrospective repeated cross-sectional analysis using a commercial healthcare insurance database in the United States. We included patients aged ≥ 18 years with incident stroke diagnosis and assessed prophylactic use of anticoagulants in the 30 days following hospital discharge including low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin ≤40 mg/day, dalteparin ≤5000 IU/day), unfractionated heparin ≤5000 IU/ twice daily or 3 times a day, apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily, and rivaroxaban 10 mg/day. Patients with atrial fibrillation, VTE, mechanical heart valves, cancer, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, and users of therapeutic doses of anticoagulants were excluded. We used the Cochrane-Armitage test to assess changes in the use of anticoagulants across the study period.. There was a small increase in the overall use of post-discharge prophylactic anticoagulants among stroke patients between 2006 and 2019 from 0.5% to 1.9%. The use of heparin decreased from 0.5% in 2006 to 0.3% in 2019 (P-value for trend = 0.001). In contrast, the use of apixaban or rivaroxaban increased from 0.1% in 2013 to 1.6% in 2019 (P-value for trend < 0.001). Apixaban was more commonly used than rivaroxaban.. In this population-based study of stroke patients, we found that post-discharge anticoagulant use remains low through 2019. Prophylactic use of heparin or rivaroxaban was relatively low but the use of apixaban increased over the study period. Further research is needed to determine if these agents are safe and effective for VTE prevention in stroke patients.

Topics: Aftercare; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dalteparin; Enoxaparin; Heparin; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Patient Discharge; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States; Venous Thromboembolism

Rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, has been used to treating a series of thromboembolic disorders in clinical practice. Measurement of the anticoagulant effect of rivaroxaban is important to avoid serious bleeding events, thus ensuring the safety and efficacy of drug administration. Metabolomics could help to predict differences in the responses among patients by profiling metabolites in biosamples. In this study, plasma metabolomes before and 3 hours after rivaroxaban intake in 150 nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients and 100 age/gender-matched controls were analyzed by liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). When compared with controls, a total of thirteen plasma metabolites were differentially expressed in the NVAF patients. Pathway analysis revealed that purine and lipid metabolism were dysregulated. A panel of three metabolites (17a-ethynylestradiol, tryptophyl-glutamate and adenosine) showed good predictive ability to distinguish nonvalvular atrial fibrillation with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 1 for the discovery phase and 1 for validation. Under rivaroxaban treatment, a total of seven metabolites changed, the lipid and glycosylphosphatidylinositol biosynthesis pathways were altered and the panel consisting of avocadene, prenyl glucoside and phosphatidylethanolamine showed predictive ability with an AUC of 0.86 for the discovery dataset and 0.82 for the validation. The study showed that plasma metabolomic analyses hold the potential to differentiate nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and can help to monitor the effect of rivaroxaban anticoagulation.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Chromatography, Liquid; Humans; Metabolome; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; Warfarin

To provide an updated comparison of the risk and cost of stroke/systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding between direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC: apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran) and warfarin among non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients.. Of the 264,479 eligible patients, 38,740 apixaban-warfarin pairs, 76,677 rivaroxaban-warfarin pairs, and 20,955 dabigatran-warfarin pairs were matched. Apixaban (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 0.46; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.38-0.56) and rivaroxaban (HR = 0.71; 95% CI 0.63-0.80) were associated with a significantly lower risk of stroke/SE compared to warfarin. Apixaban (HR = 0.57; 95% CI 0.51-0.63) and dabigatran (HR = 0.80; 95% CI 0.70-0.90) were associated with a significantly lower risk of major bleeding; rivaroxaban (HR = 1.14; 95% CI 1.07-1.21) was associated with a significantly higher risk of major bleeding compared to warfarin. Compared to warfarin, apixaban and rivaroxaban had significantly lower stroke/SE-related medical costs; and apixaban and dabigatran had significantly lower major bleeding-related medical costs.. This real-world analysis showed DOACs to be associated with a lower risk of stroke/SE and major bleeding, and lower medical costs compared to warfarin. Among them, only apixaban appears to be associated with a significantly lower risk of all three outcomes collectively: stroke/SE, major bleeding, and lower related medical costs compared to warfarin.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Medicare; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States; Warfarin

Background We sought to examine outcomes of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus warfarin in atrial fibrillation with valve repair/replacement. Methods and Results Two atrial fibrillation cohorts from Medicare were identified from 2015 to 2019. They comprised patients who underwent surgical or transcatheter mitral valve repair (MV repair cohort) and surgical aortic or mitral bioprosthetic or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (bioprosthetic cohort). Each cohort was divided into warfarin and DOACs (apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran) groups. Study outcomes included mortality, stroke, and major bleeding. Inverse probability weighting was used for adjustment between the 2 groups in each cohort. The MV repair cohort included 1178 patients. After a median of 468 days, DOACs were associated with lower risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.67 [95% CI, 0.55-0.82],

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Medicare; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States; Warfarin

A 61-year-old man presented with transient dysarthria and left upper extremity numbness. Head MRI showed an acute infarct in the left temporal lobe and multiple old infarcts in the bilateral cortices. A transesophageal echocardiogram revealed a patent foramen ovale with a large shunt. No deep vein thrombosis was found. He suffered a recurrent cerebral infarction while taking antiplatelet therapy. An insertable cardiac monitor was implanted on the 41st day, and the antiplatelet treatment was changed to warfarin. The insertable cardiac monitor did not detect atrial fibrillation, even when the patient had a recurrent transient ischemic attack on the 57th day under warfarin therapy. The patient underwent percutaneous foramen ovale closure on the 63rd day. On postoperative days 18-25, an insertable cardiac monitor detected brief atrial fibrillation, and he took rivaroxaban for three months. Atrial fibrillation may occur secondary to percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure for cryptogenic stroke. The insertable cardiac monitor may help diagnose the pathogenesis of secondary atrial fibrillation and determine the optimal antithrombotic therapy.

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Fibrinolytic Agents; Foramen Ovale; Foramen Ovale, Patent; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of the presence of heart failure (HF) on the clinical profile and outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) anticoagulated with rivaroxaban.. Observational and non-interventional study that included AF adults recruited from 79 Spanish centers, anticoagulated with rivaroxaban ≥ 6 months before inclusion. Data were analyzed according to baseline HF status.. Out of 1,433 patients, 326 (22.7%) had HF at baseline. Compared to patients without HF, HF patients were older (75.3 ± 9.9 vs. 73.8 ± 9.6 years; p = 0.01), had more diabetes (36.5% vs. 24.3%; p < 0.01), coronary artery disease (28.2% vs. 12.9%; p < 0.01), renal insufficiency (31.7% vs. 22.6%; p = 0.01), higher CHA2DS2-VASc (4.5 ± 1.6 vs. 3.2 ± 1.4; p < 0.01) and HAS-BLED (1.8 ± 1.1 vs. 1.5 ± 1.0; p < 0.01). After a median follow-up of 2.5 years, among HF patients, annual rates of stroke/systemic embolism/transient ischemic attack, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (non-fatal myocardial infarction, revascularization and cardiovascular death), cardiovascular death, and major bleeding were 1.2%, 3.0%, 2.0%, and 1.4%, respectively. Compared to those patients without HF, HF patients had greater annual rates of MACE (3.0% vs. 0.5%; p < 0.01) and cardiovascular death (2.0% vs. 0.2%; p < 0.01), without significant differences regarding other outcomes, including thromboembolic or bleeding events. Previous HF was an independent predictor of MACE (odds ratio 3.4; 95% confidence interval 1.6-7.3; p = 0.002) but not for thromboembolic events or major bleeding.. Among AF patients anticoagulated with rivaroxaban, HF patients had a worse clinical profile and a higher MACE risk and cardiovascular mortality. HF was independently associated with the development of MACE, but not with thromboembolic events or major bleeding.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism

The safety of dabigatran is poorly studied in patients with liver cirrhosis and has rarely been compared to warfarin in terms of bleeding risks.. We undertook a retrospective cohort study across three tertiary centres in Auckland, New Zealand, between 2008 to 2020. Adults 18 years and over and those with a clinically confirmed diagnosis of cirrhosis were included. Data collected included demographic data and clinical characteristics, baseline medication and comorbidities. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of any bleeding event that resulted in hospital admission.. Overall, 100 patients were included in this study. A total of 52 patients took warfarin, and 48 took dabigatran. Baseline characteristics for both groups were generally similar. The incidence rate of bleeds for patients taking warfarin was 14.4 per 100 person-years (95% CI, 8.8-23.5) compared to 9.1 per 100 person-years (95% CI, 4.5-18.1) for patients taking dabigatran. The incidence rate ratio comparing dabigatran to warfarin was 0.63 (95% CI, 0.23-1.60), p=0.25.. Our study found that patients on dabigatran may have a lower bleeding risk than patients taking warfarin, but this was not statistically significant.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; New Zealand; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common disease in elderly patients and thromboembolic complication prophylaxis significantly improves the prognosis in these patients. The study assessed the frequency of individual non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) use among patients ≥75 years and attempted to identify factors predisposing to their prescription.. The data of patients with non-valvular AF hospitalized in the reference cardiology center between 2011 and 2019 were analyzed.. Out of 1443 analyzed patients, 329 (22.8%) received apixaban, 618 (42.8%) dabigatran, and 496 (34.4%) rivaroxaban. The entire population mean age was 82.3 ± 5 years, and 57.9% were females. Independent predictors of apixaban use were age, and bleeding history. Hospitalization for the implantation/reimplantation of a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) reduced the chance of apixaban use. Hypertension was a predictor of dabigatran prescription. The chance of using dabigatran decreased with age. Hypertension and bleeding history decreased the chance of rivaroxaban application.. In hospitalized AF patients ≥75 years, dabigatran was the most frequently used NOAC. Age, comorbidities and bleeding risk determined the selection of individual NOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism

We aimed to compare the ability to balance baseline covariates and explore the impact of residual confounding between conventional and machine learning approaches to derive propensity scores (PS). The Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database (January 2012-September 2019) was used. Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who initiated oral anticoagulants during July 2015-September 2018 were included. The outcome of interest was stroke/systemic embolism. To estimate PS, we used a logistic regression model (i.e., a conventional approach) and a generalized boosted model (GBM) which is a machine learning approach. Both PS matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting were performed. To evaluate balance achievement, standardized differences,

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Humans; Machine Learning; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

To compare real-world effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AFib) for prevention of stroke.. A comparative cohort study in UK general practice data from The Health Improvement Network database.. Before matching, 5655 patients ≥18 years with nonvalvular AFib who initiated at least one DOAC between 1 July 2014 and 31 December 2020 were included. DOACs of interest included apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban and dabigatran, with the primary comparison between apixaban and rivaroxaban. Initiators of DOACs were defined as new users with no record of prescription for any DOAC during 12 months before index date.. The primary outcome was stroke (ischaemic or haemorrhagic). Secondary outcomes included the occurrence of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), transient ischaemic attacks (TIA), major bleeding events and a composite angina/MI/stroke (AMS) endpoint.. Compared with rivaroxaban, patients initiating apixaban showed similar rates of stroke (HR: 0.93; 95% CI 0.64 to 1.34), all-cause mortality (HR: 1.03; 95% CI 0.87 to 1.22), MI (HR: 0.95; 95% CI 0.54 to 1.68), TIA (HR: 1.03; 95% CI 0.61 to 1.72) and AMS (HR: 0.96; 95% CI 0.72 to 1.27). Apixaban initiators showed lower rates of major bleeding events (HR: 0.60; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.75).. Among patients with nonvalvular AFib, apixaban was as effective as rivaroxaban in reducing rate of stroke and safer in terms of major bleeding episodes. This head-to-head comparison supports conclusions drawn from indirect comparisons of DOAC trials against warfarin and demonstrates the potential for real-world evidence to fill evidence gaps and reduce uncertainty in both health technology assessment decision-making and clinical guideline development.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Myocardial Infarction; Primary Health Care; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United Kingdom; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were developed as an alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and are commonly used for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Unlike VKAs, DOACs do not require Internal Normalized Ratio (INR) monitoring, but regular intake is as important for effective anticoagulation.. This study examined treatment persistence among patients receiving oral anticoagulants (OACs) for NVAF.. Within the French healthcare claims database (SNDS), we assessed and compared the rates of non-persistence (≥ 30-day treatment gap) among patients with NVAF initiating an OAC between January 2014 and December 2016. The time-to-event of non-persistence was computed and plotted using a cumulative incidence function accounting for the competing risk of mortality. After adjusting on confounding factors, the risk for non-persistence was compared between apixaban and each other OACs using a Cox proportional hazard model, or Fine and Gray models.. In a cohort of 321,501 OAC-naive patients with NVAF, the cumulative incidence of non-persistence at 12 months considering competing risk was 44.3%, 31.0%, 41.3% and 46.8% for VKAs, apixaban, rivaroxaban and dabigatran, respectively. Median therapy duration before non-persistence ranged between 70 and 121 days. Non-persistence was lower with apixaban compared with VKAs (HR=0.63, 95%CI=[0.62-0.64]), rivaroxaban (HR=0.71, 95%CI=[0.70-0.73]), and dabigatran (HR=0.60, 95%CI=[0.59-0.62]).. In this nationwide observational study, non-persistence rates of oral anticoagulant treatment were high in patients treated for NVAF. Apixaban-treated patients seem to experience lowest discontinuation rates 12 months after treatment initiation compared to patients treated with any other OAC.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Infant; Insurance Claim Review; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

This study aims to analyze the real-life data of patients who were prescribed rivaroxaban and apixaban and to emphasize the points that we think will make a difference compared to randomized controlled studies.. The patients who accepted to participate in the study in whom rivaroxaban (15-20 mg) and apixaban (2.5-5 mg) were started with the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation between 01 January 2018 and 31 December 2019 and whose records were fully accessed through the hospital automation system were included in the study.. One hundred and ninety-four (48.5%) of a total of 400 patients using rivaroxaban and apixaban were women. The mean age was 73.34 ± 10.45 years, and the age range was 41-98. There was no significant difference in terms of demographic characteristics, background information of the patients, and the medications. Drug-induced complications and mortality rates were also similar. The GFR change rates of the patients in both groups were similar even though the initial GFRs were significantly higher in rivaroxaban group. The mean age and ejection fractions of the patients using rivaroxaban 15 mg were found to be lower than those of patients using rivaroxaban 20 mg whereas the mean systolic blood pressure and HAS-BLED score were found to be higher. Ischemic stroke and mortality rates were higher in patients using 15 mg rivaroxaban than patients using 20 mg rivaroxaban. The rates of nonmajor bleeding in patients using rivaroxaban 15 mg were lower compared to those using 20 mg, and this difference was statistically significant.. Stroke rates were found to be higher and to have similar bleeding rates compared to major clinical studies in our real-life analysis. However, high ischemic cerebrovascular event and low nonmajor bleeding rates are remarkable in low dose use of rivaroxaban. It is clear that there is a need to consider existing dose reduction criteria in terms of correct prescribing.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

The advantages of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over warfarin are well established in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, however, studies that can guide the selection between different DOACs are limited. The aim was to compare the clinical outcomes of treatment with apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran in patients with AF.. We conducted a retrospective, nationwide, propensity score-matched-based observational study from Clalit Health Services. Data from 141 992 individuals with AF was used to emulate a target trial for head-to-head comparison of DOACs therapy. Three-matched cohorts of patients assigned to DOACs, from January-2014 through January-2020, were created. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed. Efficacy/safety outcomes were compared using KaplanMeier survival estimates and Cox proportional hazards models. The trial included 56 553 patients (apixaban, n = 35 101; rivaroxaban, n = 15 682; dabigatran, n = 5 770). Mortality and ischaemic stroke rates in patients treated with rivaroxaban were lower compared with apixaban (HR,0.88; 95% CI,0.78-0.99; P,0.037 and HR 0.92; 95% CI,0.86-0.99; P,0.024, respectively). No significant differences in the rates of myocardial infarction, systemic embolism, and overall bleeding were noticed between the different DOACs groups. Patients treated with rivaroxaban demonstrated lower rate of intracranial haemorrhage compared with apixaban (HR,0.86; 95% CI,0.74-1.0; P,0.044). The rate of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients treated with rivaroxaban was higher compared with apixaban (HR, 1.22; 95% CI,1.01-1.44; P, 0.016).. We demonstrated significant differences in outcomes between the three studied DOACs. The results emphasize the need for randomized controlled trials that will compare rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran in order to better guide the selection among them.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Low-dose direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use is quite prevalent in clinical practice, but evidence of its effectiveness and safety compared with high-dose DOAC in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remains limited. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of low-dose and high-dose DOACs in patients with AF with similar baseline characteristics.. We used a cohort of hospitalized patients with a primary or secondary diagnosis of AF after discharge to the community, whose data were stored in the Quebec administrative databases, from 2011 to 2017. Older adults with AF newly prescribed with rivaroxaban (15 or 20 mg) or apixaban (2.5 mg or 5 mg) were classified as under treatment (UT) and intent to treat (ITT). We used an inverse probability treatment weighting study of new users of rivaroxaban and apixaban to address confounding by indication. The primary effectiveness outcome was ischemic stroke/systemic embolism (SE), while the primary safety outcome was major bleeding (MB). We used Cox proportional models to estimate the marginal hazard ratios (HRs).. A total of 1,722 and 4,639 patients used low-dose and standard-dose rivaroxaban, respectively, while 3,833 and 6,773 patients used low-dose and standard-dose apixaban, respectively. No significant difference was observed in the incidence of comparative stroke/SE and MB between low-dose and standard-dose rivaroxaban, except for the risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), which was increased with the low dose in the UT analysis. For apixaban, no difference was found in the bleeding rates, but the risk of stroke/SE (HR: 1.95; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.38-2.76) and death (HR: 1.99; 95% CI: 1.46-2.70) were greater in the low-dose group than in the standard-dose group in the UT analysis. Similar results were observed for the ITT analysis.. No significant differences were observed in the effectiveness or safety outcome between low-dose and standard-dose rivaroxaban, except for AMI. However, low-dose apixaban was associated with a greater risk of stroke/SE and death without a reduction in the bleeding rates.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

In the absence of robust evidence to guide clinical decision-making, the optimal approach to prevent stroke and systemic embolism in haemodialysis (HD) patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remains moot. In this position paper, studies on oral anticoagulation (OAC) in HD patients with AF are highlighted, followed by an evidence-based conclusion, a critical analysis to identify sources of bias and practical opinion-based suggestions on how to manage anticoagulation in this specific population. It remains unclear whether AF is a true risk factor for embolic stroke in HD. The currently employed cut-off values for the CHA2DS2-VASc score do not adequately discriminate dialysis patients deriving a net benefit from those suffering a net harm from OAC. Anticoagulation initiation should probably be more restrictive than currently advocated by official guidelines. Recent evidence reveals that the superior benefit-risk profile of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) observed in the general population and in moderate chronic kidney disease can be extended to the HD population. VKA may be especially harmful in dialysis patients and should therefore be avoided, in particular in patients with a high bleeding risk and labile international normalized ratio. Dose-finding studies of DOACs suggest that rivaroxaban 10 mg daily and apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily are appropriate choices in dialysis patients. Combined treatment with oral anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents should be reserved for strong indications and limited in time. Left atrial appendage occlusion is a potential attractive solution to reduce the risk of stroke without increasing bleeding propensity, but it has not been properly studied in dialysis patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Renal Dialysis; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K

The risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) can be mitigated by proton pump inhibitor (PPI) co-therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) treated with anticoagulants. We aimed to evaluate the effect of PPIs on the risk of GIB in Asian patients with AF, treated with oral anticoagulants (OACs), and with a prior history of upper GIB.. Using a nationwide claims database, OAC-naïve patients with AF and a history of upper GIB before initiating OAC treatment between January 2010 and April 2018 were included. Patients were categorized into 10 groups according to the index OAC (warfarin, rivaroxaban, dabigatran, apixaban, and edoxaban) and whether or not they received PPI co-therapy, and were followed up for incidence of major GIB.. Among a total of 42,048 patients, 40% were prescribed PPIs as co-therapy with OACs. Over a median 0.6 years (interquartile ranges 0.2-1.7 years) of follow-up, rivaroxaban use without PPIs showed the highest crude incidence of major GIB (2.62 per 100 person-years), followed by the use of warfarin without a PPI (2.20 per 100 person-years). Compared to the patients without PPI use, PPI co-therapy was associated with a significantly lower risk of major GIB, by 40% and 36%, in the rivaroxaban and warfarin groups, respectively. In dabigatran, apixaban, and edoxaban users, PPI co-therapy did not show a significant reduction in the risk of major GIB.. Among patients with AF receiving anticoagulant treatment and with a prior history of upper GIB, PPI co-therapy was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of major GIB in patients treated with rivaroxaban and warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Upper Gastrointestinal Tract; Warfarin

To assess the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding associated with the use of oral anticoagulants in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in a real-world population.. We identified all anticoagulant-naive initiators of warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban for the indication AF in Norway between January 2013 and December 2017. Multivariate competing risk regression was used to calculate subhazard ratios (SHRs) describing associations between non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) compared with warfarin for risk of stroke/SE and major bleeding.. Among 30 401 patients ≥75 years identified (median age 82 years, 53% women, mean CHA. In this nationwide cohort study of patients ≥75 years initiating oral anticoagulation for AF, standard and reduced dose NOACs were associated with similar risks of stroke/SE as warfarin and lower or similar risks of bleeding. The NOACs seem to be a safe option also in elderly patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Embolism; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Using Scandinavian population-based registries, we assessed risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE) and bleeding with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin in anticoagulation-naïve patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).. This historical cohort study included 219 545 AF patients [median age 74 years; 43% women; mean CHA2DS2-VASc (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, stroke or transient ischaemic attack, vascular disease, age 65-74 years, sex category) score 3.3] initiating apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden (1 January 2013 to 31 December 2016). The primary endpoints were stroke/SE and major bleeding. The median follow-up times were 9.7 (3.9-21.5) months for stroke/SE and 9.6 (3.8-21.3) months for bleeding. Apixaban and warfarin initiators were older and had higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores compared with dabigatran and rivaroxaban initiators. After 1:1 propensity score matching, three cohorts were created: apixaban-warfarin (n = 111 162), dabigatran-warfarin (n = 56 856), and rivaroxaban-warfarin (n = 61 198). Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using a Cox regression. For stroke/SE, adjusted HRs against warfarin were 0.96 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.87-1.06] for apixaban, 0.89 (95% CI: 0.80-1.00) for dabigatran, and 1.03 (95% CI: 0.92-1.14) for rivaroxaban. For major bleeding, the HRs against warfarin were 0.73 (95% CI: 0.67-0.78) for apixaban, 0.89 (95% CI: 0.82-0.97) for dabigatran, and 1.15 (95% CI: 1.07-1.25) for rivaroxaban. The results in the dabigatran cohort did not hold in all dose-defined subgroups.. In this large Scandinavian study among AF patients initiating oral anticoagulation, those initiating dabigatran, apixaban, and rivaroxaban had similar rates of stroke/SE to patients initiating warfarin. Rates of major bleeding were lower with apixaban and dabigatran and higher with rivaroxaban, each compared with warfarin.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Embolism; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) has dose reduction criteria including age, weight, serum creatinine, and creatinine clearance. There is a paucity of data for rates of inappropriate inpatient DOAC dosing in Australia. The objective was to determine the rates of inappropriate inpatient DOAC dosing in AF and identifying its associated underlying factors. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study from December 2013 to November 2019 across six South Australian public hospitals utilising a centralised electronic health record. Multivariate analysis was used to identify factors associated with underdosing of patients prescribed apixaban. Of 1882 inpatients, 544 (28.9 %) were inappropriately dosed. Underdosing was the most common form of inappropriate dosing with rates of 22.9 % (n = 295), 7.1 % (n = 7), and 25.1 % (n = 124) for apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban, respectively. Independent factors predictive of apixaban underdosing included higher age (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.63 [95 % Confidence Interval (CI): 1.47-1.81]), higher serum creatinine (aOR 1.13 [95 % CI: 1.08-1.19]), higher total number of drugs on discharge (aOR 1.08 [95 % CI: 1.04-1.11]), and being already prescribed a DOAC on admission (aOR 1.63 [95 % CI: 1.12-2.38]). Nearly one quarter of all apixaban prescribing was inappropriately underdosed. Older patients with multimorbidity, frailty and polypharmacy present a challenge for clinicians in balancing risks of thromboembolism and bleeding. It is likely prescribers are more conservative in their apixaban dosing in this population. Clinicians should consider alternative drug regimens to avoid DOAC use at inappropriate doses at unknown safety and efficacy.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Australia; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dabigatran; Humans; Inpatients; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Background Bleeding and thromboembolism prevention is important in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation receiving anticoagulants, including direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin. Asians have higher risks of bleeding complications when taking anticoagulants. However, evidence that considers laboratory parameters is lacking. Objective We aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness between direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin in Asian patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Setting Retrospective design using hospital-based data. Method This propensity score-matched cohort study included data extracted from the electronic medical records of the En Chu Kong Hospital Research Database. Main outcome measure Outcome measures were major bleeding and thromboembolism. Cox proportional hazard models were applied for evaluating hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Results Among 1075 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, 687 and 388 were administered direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin, respectively. After propensity score matching, 264 patient pairs were selected. Compared with warfarin use, direct oral anticoagulant use was associated with similar risks for major bleeding and thromboembolism; however, the latter was associated with increased gastrointestinal bleeding risks (adjusted hazard ratio 3.59; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-11.39). Notably, an approximately 10 fold increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding was observed in 0-6 month direct oral anticoagulant users (adjusted hazard ratio 10.13, 95% confidence interval 1.27-80.89). Conclusion Direct oral anticoagulant use was not associated with major bleeding and thromboembolism occurrence in Asian patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. However, direct oral anticoagulant use was associated with increased gastrointestinal bleeding risks, especially when used within 0-6 months of direct oral anticoagulant use.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

To analyse the appropriateness of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) dosing and determinants for under-and overdosing as well as acceptance and implementation rates of pharmacists' interventions.. Cross-sectional study in a tertiary hospital in hospitalized patients with atrial fibrillation on DOACs in 2019 (n = 1688). Primary outcome was the proportion of patients with inappropriate DOAC prescribing with identification of determinants for under-and overdosing. Secondary outcomes included acceptance and implementation rates of pharmacists' recommendations and determination of reasons for nonacceptance/nonimplementation.. Inappropriate prescribing was observed in 16.9% of patients (n = 286) with underdosing (9.7%) being more prevalent than overdosing (6.9%). For all DOACs considered together, body weight<60 kg (odds ratio [OR] 0.46 [0.27-0.77]), edoxaban use (OR 0.42 [0.24-0.74]), undergoing surgery (OR 0.57 [0.37-0.87]) and being DOAC naïve (OR 0.45 [0.29-0.71]) were associated with significantly lower odds of underdosing. Bleeding history (OR 1.86 [1.24-2.80]) and narcotic use (OR 1.67 [1.13-2.46]) were associated with significantly higher odds for underdosing. Determinants with a significantly higher odds of overdosing were renal impairment (OR 11.29 [6.23-20.45]) and body weight<60 kg (OR 2.34 [1.42-3.85]), whereas dabigatran use (OR 0.24 [0.08-0.71]) and apixaban (OR 0.18 [0.10-0.32]) were associated with a significantly lower odds of overdosing compared to rivaroxaban. Physicians accepted the pharmacists' advice in 179 cases (79.2%) consisting of 92 (51.4%) recommendations for underdosing, 82 (45.8%) for overdosing and 5 (2.8%) for contraindications.. Inappropriate DOAC prescribing remains common, although there is a slight improvement compared to our study of 2016. Clinical services led by pharmacists help physicians to reduce the number of inadequate prescriptions for high-risk medications such as DOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Body Weight; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dabigatran; Humans; Pharmacists; Physicians; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Early bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with increased risk of death and myocardial infarction; however, the association between bleeding and subsequent major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) remains unclear in patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease. We thus aimed to investigate this association.. The AFIRE trial (Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Events With Rivaroxaban in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease) was a multicenter, open-label trial conducted in Japan. This post hoc analysis included 2215 patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease treated with rivaroxaban or rivaroxaban plus an antiplatelet agent. MACCE was defined as a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, unstable angina requiring revascularization, or death from any cause. The association of bleeding with subsequent MACCE risk was investigated using time-adjusted Cox multivariate analysis after adjusting for baseline characteristics and time from bleeding. Bleeding events were classified according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria.. Among the 2215 patients, 386 (17.4%) had bleeding during follow-up, of whom 63 (16.3%) also experienced MACCE; MACCE incidence was higher in patients with bleeding than in those without (8.38% versus 4.20% per patient-year; hazard ratio, 2.01 [95% CI, 1.49-2.70];. In patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease, major bleeding was strongly associated with subsequent MACCE. Thus, it is important to prevent major bleeding to avoid cardiovascular events and death. Registration: URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr; Unique identifier: UMIN000016612. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02642419. Graphic Abstract: A graphic abstract is available for this article.

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Coronary Artery Disease; Hemorrhage; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

The article is devoted to an urgent medical and social problem - secondary prevention of atherothrombotic stroke and contains current evidence on the use of combined antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy. In the COMPASS study, the dual-pathway thrombosis inhibition scheme using rivaroxaban in combination with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) compared with ASA monotherapy demonstrated in patients with established atherosclerotic diseases of the circulatory system, a decrease in the total risk of stroke, death from cardiovascular causes and myocardial infarction by 24%; reduced risk of recurrent stroke by 67%. The incidence of repeated ischemic stroke (IS) in the combination therapy group was 1.1% per year, in the ASA group - 3.4% per year. The total incidence of adverse outcomes included in the combined indicator «net clinical benefit» in the rivaroxaban group in combination with ASA was 20% lower than in the ASA group and confirms the advantages of combination therapy in the prevention of recurrent noncardioembolic IS.. Статья посвящена актуальной медико-социальной проблеме — вторичной профилактике атеротромботического инсульта — и содержит современные данные о применении комбинированной антиагрегантной и антикоагулянтной терапии. В исследовании COMPASS схема двойного пути ингибирования тромбоза с помощью ривароксабана в сочетании с ацетилсалициловой кислотой (АСК) по сравнению с монотерапией АСК у пациентов с подтвержденным атеросклеротическим генезом болезней системы кровообращения продемонстрировала снижение суммарного риска инсульта, смерти от сердечно-сосудистых причин и инфаркта миокарда на 24%; снижение риска развития повторного инсульта на 67%. Частота развития повторного ишемического инсульта (ИИ) в группе комбинированной терапии была 1,1% в год, в группе АСК — 3,4% в год. Суммарная частота неблагоприятных исходов, включенных в комбинированный показатель «чистая клиническая выгода», в группе ривароксабана в сочетании с АСК была на 20% ниже, чем в группе АСК, и подтверждает преимущества комбинированной терапии в профилактике повторного некардиоэмболического ИИ.

Topics: Aspirin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are currently recommended as first-line or (after vitamin K antagonists) second-line therapy for preventing stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. In patients aged 80 years and over, however, the fear of DOAC-associated bleeding and the complexity of DOAC dosing regimes may prompt physicians to prescribe inappropriate dose levels.. The objective of this study was to determine compliance with French and European guidelines of doses of three DOACs (apixaban, dabigatran and rivaroxaban) prescribed to patients aged over 80 years in an indication of non-valvular atrial fibrillation, and to identify factors associated with poor compliance.. We performed a retrospective single-centre study of patients aged over 80 years routinely treated with a DOAC (apixaban, dabigatran or rivaroxaban) for non-valvular atrial fibrillation at Valenciennes General Hospital (Valenciennes, France) between 1 January, 2016 and 31 December, 2017. We determined compliance with French and European guidelines of DOAC doses as a function of each patient's clinical and laboratory parameters, and thus classified the regime as being appropriately dosed, overdosed or underdosed.. A total of 703 patients (371 taking apixaban, 92 taking dabigatran and 240 taking rivaroxaban) were included in the study. We found that 274 patients (39%) had been prescribed an inappropriate DOAC regime, with underdosing in 241 cases (34%) and overdosing in 33 cases (5%). Underdosing mainly concerned the two most widely prescribed DOACs, i.e. apixaban (39% of all apixaban prescriptions were underdosed) and rivaroxaban (40%). Concomitant treatment with an antidepressant was associated with underdosing of rivaroxaban or apixaban (p = 0.0339). In contrast, initial management in a neurology department was associated with appropriate dosing (p = 0.000146) for both these DOACs.. Among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation aged 80 years and over, about 40% of DOAC prescriptions feature inappropriate dose levels. It might be possible to reduce inappropriate dosing by raising awareness among hospital-based and private-practice prescribers, providing prescription support tools for DOACs, and performing medication reconciliations and reviews at hospital and in private practice.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

To compare clinical outcomes of rivaroxaban and warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and concurrent obesity and diabetes.. Patients aged ≥18 years were identified from a healthcare claims database with the following criteria: newly initiating rivaroxaban or warfarin, ≥1 medical claim with a diagnosis of AF, obesity determined by validated machine learning algorithm, and ≥1 claim with a diagnosis of diabetes or for antidiabetic medication. Treatment cohorts were matched using propensity scores and were compared for stroke/systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding using Cox proportional hazards models.. A total of 9999 matched pairs of NVAF patients with obesity and diabetes who initiated treatment with rivaroxaban or warfarin were included. The composite risk of stroke/SE was significantly lower in the rivaroxaban cohort compared with the warfarin cohort (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.74-0.90). Risks of ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes were also significantly reduced with rivaroxaban versus warfarin, but not SE. Major bleeding risk was similar between treatment cohorts (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.78-1.09).. In NVAF patients with comorbidities of obesity and diabetes, rivaroxaban was associated with lower risks of stroke/SE and similar risk of major bleeding versus warfarin.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Diabetes Mellitus; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Obesity; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Major atrial fibrillation (AF) guidelines recommend non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) over warfarin, except in rare clinical circumstances based on 4 randomized controlled trials comparing each NOAC with warfarin. We aimed to investigate the current NOAC prescription behaviors in alignment with the recent clinical evidence available.. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of NOAC-using patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who were aged ≥65 years on the index date (July 1, 2018) based on nationwide claims data. The types of NOACs being taken were analyzed using chi-squared tests, and factors influencing NOAC selection were identified using multinomial logistic regression analysis.. A total of 6,061 patients were included. Among the 4 NOACs, rivaroxaban was the most used NOAC. Patients aged ≥75 years (odds ratio [OR] = 1.270, confidence interval [CI] = 1.089-1.450) and women (OR = 1.148, CI = 1.011-1.284) were more likely to use apixaban relative to rivaroxaban. Patients with prior stroke/transient ischemic attack/thromboembolism had higher odds of using dabigatran (OR = 1.508, CI = 1.312-1.704) and apixaban (OR = 1.186, CI = 1.026-1.346). Patients with renal disease had higher odds of using apixaban (OR = 1.466, 95% CI = 1.238-1.693). These findings are consistent with the efficacy and safety profiles reported in pivotal trials and observational studies comparing individual NOACs.. Among the 4 NOACs, rivaroxaban was the most commonly used NOAC. Apixaban was preferred for patients aged ≥75 years, females, and patients with renal disease.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cross-Sectional Studies; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Republic of Korea; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

The populations included in the randomized controlled clinical trials and observational studies were different. The effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) varied among studies. This study aimed to estimate the real-world outcomes of rivaroxaban in patients with AF accurately. A discrete event simulation (DES) was used to predict the counterfactual results of the ROCKET AF study. The hypothetical cohorts of patients were generated using Monte Carlo simulation according to the baseline covariate distributions that matched the marginal distribution of covariates reported in the ROCKET AF and three observational studies. The DES model structure was constructed based on a priori knowledge about disease progression and possible outcomes of patients with AF. The DES model accurately replicated the overall results of the ROCKET AF study. Both predicted stroke/systematic embolism (SE) and major bleeding rates were lower in the three observational studies than in the simulated ROCKET AF study. The risk difference of stroke/SE and major bleeding was not significant among the predicted outcomes of the three observational studies. Although some differences existed in the absolute rates of stroke/SE and major bleeding between observed and simulated studies, the results confirmed that rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin for the prevention of stroke/systematic embolism with no significance in the risk of major bleeding in large AF populations, which was similar to the results of ROCKET AF.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Computer Simulation; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Monte Carlo Method; Observational Studies as Topic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Background In event-driven clinical trials, study termination is based on accrual of a target number of primary efficacy events. For noninferiority trials in which superiority is conditionally examined, the ideal cohort in which to track event accrual is unclear. We used data from the ROCKET AF (Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared With Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation) trial to determine the effect of primary efficacy-event tracking in the per-protocol cohort during the on-treatment period versus the intention-to-treat (ITT) cohort during the ITT period. Methods and Results ROCKET AF was terminated after accruing 429 primary efficacy events (stroke or systemic embolism) in the per-protocol cohort during the on-treatment period for noninferiority. We identified the date on which 429 events occurred in the ITT cohort during the ITT period. We performed noninferiority and superiority analyses based on hypothetical study termination on this date. ROCKET AF would have terminated 226 days earlier if events were tracked during the ITT period. Similar to the main trial findings, rivaroxaban would have met noninferiority versus warfarin for the primary efficacy end point (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.96;

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Intention to Treat Analysis; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Coronary Artery Disease; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Rivaroxaban is a direct inhibitor of activated Factor X (FXa), an anti-inflammatory protein exerting a protective effect on the cardiac valve and vascular endothelium. We compare the effect of Warfarin and Rivaroxaban on inflammation biomarkers and their contribution to heart valve calcification progression and renal preservation in a population of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3b - 4.. This was an observational, multicenter, prospective study enrolling 347 consecutive CKD stage 3b - 4 patients newly diagnosed with AF: 247 were treated with Rivaroxaban and 100 with Warfarin. Every 12 months, we measured creatinine levels and cardiac valve calcification via standard trans-thoracic echocardiogram, while plasma levels of inflammatory mediators were quantified by ELISA at baseline and after 24 months.. Over a follow-up of 24 months, long-term treatment with Rivaroxaban was associated with a significative reduction of cytokines. Patients treated with Rivaroxaban experienced a more frequent stabilization/regression of valve calcifications comparing with patients treated with Warfarin. Rivaroxaban use was related with an improvement in kidney function in 87.4% of patients, while in those treated with Warfarin was reported a worsening of renal clearance in 98% of cases. Patients taking Rivaroxaban experienced lower adverse events (3.2% vs 49%, p-value <0.001).. Our findings suggest that Rivaroxaban compared to Warfarin is associated with lower levels of serum markers of inflammation. The inhibition of FXa may exert an anti-inflammatory effect contributing to reduce the risk of cardiac valve calcification progression and worsening of renal function.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Calcinosis; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Valves; Humans; Inflammation; Kidney; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The prescription appropriateness of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs [dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban]) is carefully regulated, taking into account the criteria established in phase III trials and listed in the summary of the product characteristics of the four DOACs. In clinical practice, prescriptions are not always in compliance with established indications. In particular, the use of doses lower than those recommended in drug data sheets is relatively frequent. Literature data show that the inappropriate prescription of DOAC doses causes drug underexposure and an up to three-fold increase in the risk of stroke/transient ischemic attack, systemic thromboembolism, and hospitalizations. Possible causes of the deviation between the dose that should be prescribed and that actually employed may include erroneous prescriptions, an overstated bleeding risk perception, and the presence of frail patients, who were not included in pivotal trials. For these reasons, we summarize DOAC indications and contraindications and suggest the appropriate use of DOACs in common clinical scenarios, in accordance with what international guidelines and national and international health regulatory agencies recommend.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Prescriptions; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

The comparative effectiveness of rivaroxaban and apixaban, the most frequently prescribed oral anticoagulants for ischemic stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation, is uncertain.. To compare major ischemic and hemorrhagic outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with rivaroxaban or apixaban.. Retrospective cohort study using computerized enrollment and claims files for US Medicare beneficiaries 65 years or older. Between January 1, 2013, and November 30, 2018, a total of 581 451 patients with atrial fibrillation began rivaroxaban or apixaban treatment and were followed up for 4 years, through November 30, 2018.. Rivaroxaban (n = 227 572) and apixaban (n = 353 879), either standard or reduced dose.. The primary outcome was a composite of major ischemic (stroke/systemic embolism) and hemorrhagic (intracerebral hemorrhage/other intracranial bleeding/fatal extracranial bleeding) events. Secondary outcomes were nonfatal extracranial bleeding and total mortality (fatal ischemic/hemorrhagic event or other death during follow-up). Rates, hazard ratios (HRs), and rate differences (RDs) were adjusted for baseline differences in comorbidity with inverse probability of treatment weighting.. Study patients (mean age, 77.0 years; 291 966 [50.2%] women; 134 393 [23.1%] receiving reduced dose) had 474 605 person-years of follow-up (median [IQR] of 174 [62-397] days). The adjusted primary outcome rate for rivaroxaban was 16.1 per 1000 person-years vs 13.4 per 1000 person-years for apixaban (RD, 2.7 [95% CI, 1.9-3.5]; HR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.12-1.24]). The rivaroxaban group had increased risk for both major ischemic events (8.6 vs 7.6 per 1000 person-years; RD, 1.1 [95% CI, 0.5-1.7]; HR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.04-1.20]) and hemorrhagic events (7.5 vs 5.9 per 1000 person-years; RD, 1.6 [95% CI, 1.1-2.1]; HR, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.16-1.36]), including fatal extracranial bleeding (1.4 vs 1.0 per 1000 person-years; RD, 0.4 [95% CI, 0.2-0.7]; HR, 1.41 [95% CI, 1.18-1.70]). Patients receiving rivaroxaban had increased risk of nonfatal extracranial bleeding (39.7 vs 18.5 per 1000 person-years; RD, 21.1 [95% CI, 20.0-22.3]; HR, 2.07 [95% CI, 1.99-2.15]), fatal ischemic/hemorrhagic events (4.5 vs 3.3 per 1000 person-years; RD, 1.2 [95% CI, 0.8-1.6]; HR, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.21-1.48]), and total mortality (44.2 vs 41.0 per 1000 person-years; RD, 3.1 [95% CI, 1.8-4.5]; HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.02-1.09]). The risk of the primary outcome was increased for rivaroxaban in both those receiving the reduced dose (27.4 vs 21.0 per 1000 person-years; RD, 6.4 [95% CI, 4.1-8.7]; HR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.16-1.40]) and the standard dose (13.2 vs 11.4 per 1000 person-years; RD, 1.8 [95% CI, 1.0-2.6]; HR, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.06-1.21]) groups.. Among Medicare beneficiaries 65 years or older with atrial fibrillation, treatment with rivaroxaban compared with apixaban was associated with a significantly increased risk of major ischemic or hemorrhagic events.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Primidone; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Acenocoumarol is a vitamin-K antagonist (VKA) primarily used in certain countries (e.g. India, Netherlands, Spain). The half-life of acenocoumarol is similar to that of non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOAC), unlike warfarin, and this could affect comparative effectiveness and safety (CES). However, data on CES for NOAC come almost exclusively from studies using warfarin as the comparator. We aimed to assess outcomes of NOAC and acenocoumarol in people with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in real-world clinical practice.. This is a population-based retrospective cohort study. All new users of oral anticoagulants from November 2011 to December 2015 with NVAF were included (n = 41,560). Data were obtained by linking several health electronic records of the Valencia region, Spain. Incidence rates were estimated. We used the inverse probability of treatment weighted Cox analysis to control for indication bias when assessing the risk of effectiveness and safety outcomes for each NOAC compared with acenocoumarol. Several sensitivity analyses were performed.. We did not find differences in the risk of mortality, ischaemic stroke or any gastrointestinal bleeding. However, we did find a decreased risk of intracranial haemorrhage for dabigatran (HR: 0.34, 95% CI 0.20-0.56) and rivaroxaban (HR: 0.55, 95% CI 0.35-0.85) as compared to acenocoumarol. In subanalyses, apixaban showed a higher risk of ischaemic stroke in high-risk persons (≥75 years and CHA2DS2-VASC score ≥ 2).. No differences in clinical outcomes were found between NOAC and acenocoumarol overall, although dabigatran and rivaroxaban showed a lower risk of intracranial haemorrhage. Findings on the potential inferiority of specific NOAC in high-risk subgroups should be studied further.

Topics: Acenocoumarol; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Humans; India; Netherlands; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Spain; Stroke

Patient frailty amongst patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is associated with adverse health outcomes and increased risk of mortality. Additional evidence is needed to evaluate effective and safe NVAF treatment in this patient population.. This subgroup analysis of the ARISTOPHANES study compared the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (S/SE) and major bleeding (MB) amongst frail NVAF patients prescribed nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) or warfarin.. This comparative retrospective observational study of frail, older NVAF patients who initiated apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban or warfarin from 01JAN2013-30SEP2015 was conducted using Medicare and 3 US commercial claims databases. To compare each drug, 6 propensity score-matched (PSM) cohorts were created. Patient cohorts were pooled from 4 databases after PSM. Cox models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) of S/SE and MB.. Amongst NVAF patients, 34% (N = 150 487) met frailty criteria. Apixaban and rivaroxaban were associated with a lower risk of S/SE vs warfarin (apixaban: HR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.55-0.69; rivaroxaban: HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.72-0.87). For MB, apixaban (HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.57-0.66) and dabigatran (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.70-0.89) were associated with a lower risk and rivaroxaban (HR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.08-1.21) was associated with a higher risk vs warfarin.. Amongst this cohort of frail NVAF patients, NOACs were associated with varying rates of stroke/SE and MB compared with warfarin. Due to the lack of real-world data regarding OAC treatment in frail patients, these results may inform clinical practice in the treatment of this patient population.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cause of Death; Dabigatran; Frail Elderly; Hemorrhage; Humans; Propensity Score; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States; Vitamin K; Warfarin

The introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has broadened the treatment arsenal for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, but observational studies on the benefit-risk balance of DOACs compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) are needed. The aim of this study was to characterize the risk of major bleeding in DOAC users using longitudinal data collected from electronic health care databases from 4 different EU-countries analysed with a common study protocol.. A cohort study was conducted among new users (≥18 years) of DOACs or VKAs with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation using data from the UK, Spain, Germany and Denmark. The incidence of major bleeding events (overall and by bleeding site) was compared between current use of DOACs and VKAs. Cox regression analysis was used to calculate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) and adjust for confounders.. Overall, 251 719 patients were included across the 4 study cohorts (mean age ~75 years, % females between 41.3 and 54.3%), with overall hazard ratios of major bleeding risk for DOACs vs VKAs ranging between 0.84 (95% CI: 0.79-0.90) in Denmark and 1.13 (95% CI 1.02-1.25) in the UK. When stratifying according to the bleeding site, risk of gastrointestinal bleeding was increased by 48-67% in dabigatran users and 30-50% for rivaroxaban users compared to VKA users in all data sources except Denmark. Compared to VKAs, apixaban was not associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in all data sources and seemed to be associated with the lowest risk of major bleeding events compared to dabigatran and rivaroxaban.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Female; Germany; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Rivaroxaban; Spain; Stroke; Vitamin K

Atrial fibrillation (AF)-related stroke accounts for 20% of ischemic strokes. Rivaroxaban use in AF patients for preventing stroke and systemic embolism was approved in 2013 in Korea. This study was to investigate the safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban use in Korean patients with non-valvular AF in a real-world setting.. This was an analysis of the Korean patients in Xarelto for Prevention of Stroke in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation in Asia-Pacific (XANAP), which was a prospective, observational cohort study including patients with non-valvular AF starting rivaroxaban treatment to prevent stroke or non-central nervous system systemic embolism (non-CNS SE), conducted in 10 Asian countries.. A total of 844 patients were enrolled in the Korean portion of the XANAP study. In XANAP Korea, the mean age was 70.1 years and 62.6% were males. The mean CHADS2 score was 2.5 and the mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.8. 47% of the patients had experienced prior stroke or non-CNS SE or transient ischemic attack. 73.6% of the patients had CHADS2 score ≥ 2. Incidence proportions of 0.8% of the patients (1.1 per 100 patient-years) developed adjudicated treatment-emergent major bleeding. Death was observed in 1.2% of the patients. The incidence of non-major bleeding as well as thromboembolic event were 8.4% (11.6 per 100 patient-years) and 1.5% (2.0 per 100 patient-years), respectively.. This study reaffirmed the consistent safety profile of rivaroxaban. We found consistent results with overall XANAP population for rivaroxaban in terms of safety in non-valvular AF patients for the prevention of stroke and non-CNS SE.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Asia; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Prospective Studies; Republic of Korea; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

This study aimed to assess and compare postoperative bleeding occurrence after dental extraction in medically compromised elderly patients under anticoagulant therapy.. This retrospective study included medically compromised elderly patients aged ≥ 65 years who were taking apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, rivaroxaban, or warfarin and had undergone single or multiple dental extractions. The primary outcome measure was postoperative bleeding occurrence, which was defined as oozing or marked hemorrhage from 24 h to 7 days after dental extraction. Postoperative bleeding occurrence was calculated for each anticoagulant and compared using Fisher's exact test, followed by multiple comparisons.. Two hundred thirty-two patients met the inclusion criteria. The highest postoperative bleeding occurrence was recorded for rivaroxaban (12/37: 32.4%), followed by apixaban (8/44: 18.2%), warfarin (17/98: 17.3%), and edoxaban (2/35: 5.7%). Patients taking dabigatran did not present postoperative bleeding (0/18: 0%). Fisher's exact test, followed by multiple comparison tests, revealed a significant among-anticoagulant difference (p = 0.0095). Postoperative bleeding was significantly higher in patients taking rivaroxaban than in those taking edoxaban or dabigatran (p = 0.03088).. Within the limitations of this retrospective study design, these findings suggest that different anticoagulants may affect postoperative bleeding occurrence after dental extraction among medically compromised elderly patients.. Clinicians should carefully consider postoperative bleeding after dental extraction in patients taking anticoagulant therapy, especially rivaroxaban.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Tooth Extraction

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a frequent comorbidity in malignant patients. Anticancer therapies complicate anticoagulant strategy. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of long-term use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in breast cancer women.. In a prospective cohort study we enrolled 48 consecutive radically treated breast cancer women with AF (median age 63 [interquartile range 56-69] years, CHA. This study suggests that DOACs are an effective and safe therapeutic option in breast cancer patients with AF during adjuvant hormonal therapy.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Breast Neoplasms; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

D-dimer is a marker of fibrin degradation that reflects intravascular coagulation. Therefore, plasma concentrations of D-dimer might predict thromboembolic risk and rivaroxaban treatment effect. The aims of this study were to investigate the association between D-dimer levels and the risk of stroke and other thrombotic, bleeding and fatal events, and whether D-dimer concentrations could predict rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily (vs. placebo) effect in patients enrolled in the COMMANDER-HF trial who were in sinus rhythm, had heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and coronary artery disease.. In COMMANDER-HF, rivaroxaban reduced the risk of stroke but the benefit may be confined to patients with D-dimer concentrations above 515 ng/mL. Prospective trials are warranted to confirm these findings.

Topics: Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products; Heart Failure; Humans; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Stroke Volume; Ventricular Function, Left

To investigate the risk of dementia in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients treated with different oral anticoagulants (OACs).. This observational, population-based cohort study enrolled 53 236 dementia-free individuals with non-valvular AF who were aged ≥50 years and newly prescribed OACs from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2016 from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. Propensity score matching was used to compare the rates of dementia between users of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban) and warfarin and to compare each individual NOAC with warfarin. Propensity score weighting analyses were also performed. In the study population (41.3% women; mean age: 70.7 years), 2194 had a diagnosis of incident dementia during a mean follow-up of 20.2 months. Relative to propensity-matched warfarin users, NOAC users tended to be at lower risk of dementia [hazard ratio (HR) 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-0.90]. When comparing individual NOACs with warfarin, all the three NOACs were associated with lower dementia risk. In pairwise comparisons among NOACs, rivaroxaban was associated with decreased dementia risk, compared with dabigatran (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.74-0.92). Supplemental propensity-weighted analyses showed consistent protective associations of NOACs with dementia relative to warfarin. The associations were consistent irrespectively of age, sex, stroke, and vascular disease and more prominent in standard dose users of NOAC.. In this propensity-matched and -weighted analysis using a real-world population-based cohort, use of NOACs was associated with lower dementia risk than use of warfarin among non-valvular AF patients initiating OAC treatment.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Dementia; Female; Humans; Male; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

New oral anticoagulants (NOACs) is the preferred treatment in secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolic events (VTE). The aim of this study was to investigate possible risk factors associated with major bleeding in VTE-patients treated with NOACs. In this retrospective register-based study we screened the Swedish anticoagulation register Auricula (during 2012.01.01-2017.12.31) to find patients and used other national registers for outcomes. Primary endpoint was major bleeding defined as bleeding leading to hospital care. Multivariate Cox-regression analysis was used to reveal risk factors. 18 219 patients with NOAC due to VTE were included. 85.6% had their first VTE, mean age was 69.4 years and median follow-up time was 183 days. The most common NOAC was rivaroxaban (54.8%), followed by apixaban (42.0%), dabigatran (3.2%) and edoxaban (0.1%). The rate of major bleeding was 6.62 (95% CI 6.19-7.06) per 100 treatment years in all patients and 11.27 (CI 9.96-12.57) in patients above 80 years of age. Statistically independent risk factors associated with major bleeding were age (normalized HR 1.38, CI 1.27-1.50), earlier major bleeding (HR 1.58, Cl 1.09-2.30), COPD (HR 1.28, CI 1.04-1.60) and previous stroke (HR 1.28, Cl 1.03-1.58) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) (HR 1.33, Cl 1.01-1.76). Prior warfarin treatment was protective (HR 0.67, CI 0.58-0.78). This real world cohort shows a high bleeding rate especially among the elderly and in patients with previous major bleeding, COPD and previous stroke or TIA. This should be considered when deciding on treatment duration and NOAC dose in these patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with increased risk of stroke and thromboembolism. Patients with AF have a higher incidence of renal impairment, which may influence the risks of systemic thromboembolism or bleeding. We determined how different oral anticoagulants affect plasma clot properties and whether progressive renal dysfunction affects plasma clot properties in patients on warfarin.. We studied 257 patients with AF receiving oral anticoagulants. Furthermore, we recruited 192 separate patients with AF on warfarin and divided them in 4 groups based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Platelet poor plasma was prepared and clot formation and fibrinolysis was monitored kinetically up to 1 h.. Rate of clot formation was significantly slower with dabigatran and rivaroxaban. Time between 50% clotting and 50% lysis was prolonged in patients receiving warfarin compared to NOACs. Time to 50% lysis from maximum absorbance was significantly shorter in patients receiving rivaroxaban. Time between 50% clotting and 50% lysis became significantly prolonged with worsening eGFR. Time to 50% lysis from maximum absorbance was prolonged as renal function worsened.. Compared to warfarin, NOACs differently modulate coagulation and fibrinolysis under ex vivo conditions. Worsening renal function in AF patients on warfarin prolongs fibrinolysis, potentially increasing the risk of thrombosis.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thrombosis; Warfarin

Recently, guidelines recommended the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for the management of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is the most common post-surgical complication of cardiac surgery, but the efficacy and safety of DOAC for POAF have rarely been investigated. We conducted a prospective observational study to investigate the efficacy and safety of DOAC administered immediately after POAF.. In all, 135 patients that experienced POAF after cardiac surgery were treated with a DOAC. Primary endpoints were either bleeding or thromboembolic events. Secondary endpoints included changes in hemoglobin (Hb), prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), serum creatinine (sCr), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and pleural/pericardial effusion.. Patients were treated with apixaban (n = 31), edoxaban (n = 87), and rivaroxaban (n = 17). Major bleeding (p = 0.011) and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding (p = 0.047) were significantly more frequent in the rivaroxaban group. Stroke was observed in one rivaroxaban group patient and none in the other two groups.. DOAC as anticoagulation therapy for the early intervention of POAF following cardiac surgery is associated with a low incidence of major bleeding; a favorable safety profile and excellent efficacy were demonstrated for DOAC. Furthermore, our results indicate that the safety and efficacy of apixaban and edoxaban are better than rivaroxaban.

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

We investigated factors that influenced oral anticoagulant (OAC) initiation and choice in Australian general practice patients newly diagnosed with AF.. Using an Australian nationally representative general practice dataset, MedicineInsight, we identified patients newly diagnosed with AF between January 2009 and April 2019. Logistic regression analyses were used to examine factors associated with OAC initiation and choice.. A total of 63 212 patients with AF (53.7% males, mean age 72.4 years) were identified. Nearly two-thirds of these patients (40 854 [64.6%]) were initiated on an OAC, at a median time of 6 days after the documented diagnosis date. The proportion of patients who were initiated an OAC increased from 44.8% in 2009 to 72.2% in 2019 (P < .001). High risk of stroke (CHA. The proportion of newly diagnosed patients with AF initiated on OAC increased markedly following the introduction of the DOACs. Of those initiated, 9 in 10 were receiving a DOAC at the end of the study period. There is potential underuse in women and individuals with dementia.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Australia; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; General Practice; Geography; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Sex Factors; Stroke; Warfarin

In non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), rivaroxaban was not inferior to warfarin in preventing stroke and systemic embolism. However, a comparative evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban and warfarin therapies for NVAF patients at different renal function levels has not yet been reported, and this study aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in Chinese NVAF patients with CKD.. A Markov model was constructed to estimate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and lifetime costs associated with the use of rivaroxaban relative to warfarin in patients with NVAF at different estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) levels as follows: 30 to <50, 50 to <80 and ≥80 mL/min. Input parameters were sourced from the clinical literature. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess model uncertainty.. The incrementalQALYs with rivaroxaban was slightly increased by approximately 0.3 QALY as compared with that with warfarin in all the subgroups, resulting in an ICER of $9,736/QALY (eGFR, 30 to <50 mL/min), $9,758/QALY (50 to <80 mL/min) and $9,969/QALY (≥80 mL/min). The probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggested a chance of >80% that the ICER would be lower than the willingness-to-pay threshold of three times the GDP of China in 2019 in all the subgroups. Results were consistent even under the assumption of anticoagulant discontinuation after major bleeding events. The model was most sensitive to event-free-related utility and survival rates.. The existing evidence supports the cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban therapy as an alternative anticoagulant to warfarin for patients with NVAF at different renal function levels.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; China; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Health Expenditures; Hemorrhage; Humans; Models, Econometric; Polyketides; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Limited information is available on anticoagulant-related nephropathy (ARN). We therefore reviewed the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database to investigate kidney injury (KI) in patients administered warfarin or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and sought to clarify the risk factors for ARN. KI risk in warfarin users was associated with male sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-2.13; P < .01) and age ≥80 years (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.07-1.72; P = .01). KI risk in DOAC users was associated with body weight ≥80 kg (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.01-2.53; P = .04) and use of dabigatran (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.09-2.37; P < .01). Our findings suggest that risk factors for ARN differ between warfarin and DOACs and that these risk factors may be associated with bleeding risk. Therefore, the risk of ARN may be decreased by better managing bleeding risk in patients taking anticoagulants.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Humans; Japan; Male; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

To evaluate comparative effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin-K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus warfarin in Medicare beneficiaries with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and comorbid diabetes mellitus (DM).. A retrospective cohort study using 2014-2016 5% national Medicare data was undertaken. NVAF patients with DM aged ≥65 years having at least one prescription for NOACs or warfarin between July 2014 and December 2015 were included in the study. Propensity score matching was used to balance demographic and baseline clinical characteristics of patients in two treatment groups. Cardiovascular outcomes including stroke/systemic embolism (SE) and myocardial infarction (MI) were evaluated to measure effectiveness. Assessment of safety outcomes included intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), major gastrointestinal bleeding (MGB), bleeding from other sites (OB) and all-cause mortality. Stratified Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios for the outcomes in the matched cohort.. The matched sample consisted of 4582 patients (2291 pairs). Compared to warfarin, NOACs had a significantly lower risk of stroke/SE (hazard ratio (HR): 0.373, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.247-0.564,. Oral anticoagulation therapy with NOACs was found to be more effective than warfarin therapy among older adults with NVAF and comorbid DM.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Diabetes Mellitus; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Medicare; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

In patients with atrial fibrillation, incomplete adherence to anticoagulants increases risk of stroke. Non-warfarin oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are expensive; we evaluated whether higher copayments are associated with lower NOAC adherence.. Using a national claims database of commercially-insured patients, we performed a cohort study of patients with atrial fibrillation who newly initiated a NOAC from 2012 to 2018. Patients were stratified into low (<$35), medium ($35-$59), or high (≥$60) copayments and propensity-score weighted based on demographics, insurance characteristics, comorbidities, prior health care utilization, calendar year, and the NOAC received. Follow-up was 1 year, with censoring for switching to a different anticoagulant, undergoing an ablation procedure, disenrolling from the insurance plan, or death. The primary outcome was adherence, measured by proportion of days covered (PDC). Secondary outcomes included NOAC discontinuation (no refill for 30 days after the end of NOAC supply) and switching anticoagulants. We compared PDC using a Kruskal-Wallis test and rates of discontinuation and switching using Cox proportional hazards models.. After weighting patients across the 3 copayment groups, the effective sample size was 17,558 patients, with balance across 50 clinical and demographic covariates (standardized differences <0.1). Mean age was 62 years, 29% of patients were female, and apixaban (43%), and rivaroxaban (38%) were the most common NOACs. Higher copayments were associated with lower adherence (P < .001), with a PDC of 0.82 (Interquartile range [IQR] 0.36-0.98) among those with high copayments, 0.85 (IQR 0.41-0.98) among those with medium copayments, and 0.88 (IQR 0.41-0.99) among those with low copayments. Compared to patients with low copayments, patients with high copayments had higher rates of discontinuation (hazard ratio [HR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.19; P < .001).. Among atrial fibrillation patients newly initiating NOACs, higher copayments in commercial insurance were associated with lower adherence and higher rates of discontinuation in the first year. Policies to lower or limit cost-sharing of important medications may lead to improved adherence and better outcomes among patients receiving NOACs.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Databases, Factual; Deductibles and Coinsurance; Drug Costs; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Medicare Part C; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Sample Size; Stroke; Thiazoles; United States; Warfarin

There is inadequate information on the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding in patients who are under rivaroxaban and warfarin therapy in Iran. Determining the risk of GI bleeding in patients receiving these two drugs can help to select a more appropriate anti-coagulation prophylaxis in high-risk patients.. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of GI bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and concomitant bleeding risk factors receiving either warfarin or rivaroxaban.. In this observational study, 200 patients with AF and bleeding risk factors who referred to Imam Hossein Hospital (Tehran, Iran) were included. The patients were under treatment with either warfarin or rivaroxaban. The incidence of GI bleeding was compared between the two groups monthly for one year.. GI bleedings were observed in 61% and 34% of patients treated with warfarin and rivaroxaban, respectively (P = 0.001).Melena was the most common type of GI bleeding in both groups. History of hypertension, history of stroke, consumption of anti-platelet drugs, NSAID consumption, and history of alcohol consumption were associated with more frequent GI bleeding only in warfarin group.. The incidence of GI bleeding was lower in AF patients who received rivaroxaban compared to those treated with warfarin. Also, GI bleeding risk does not change according to the consumption of other anti-coagulant drugs and underlying history of hypertension or stroke in patients received rivaroxaban. Therefore, rivaroxaban is suggested as the choice of prophylaxisin patients with AF and concomitant coagulopathy.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Iran; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are hydrophilic drugs with plasma levels inversely proportional to lean body mass. Sarcopenic patients with low muscle mass may be at risk for supra-therapeutic DOAC levels and bleeding complications. We therefore sought to examine the influence of lean body mass on DOAC levels in older adults with atrial fibrillation (AF).. A prospective cohort study was conducted with patients 65 years of age or more receiving rivaroxaban or apixaban for AF. Appendicular lean mass (ALM) was measured using a bioimpedance device and a dual X-ray absorptiometry scanner. DOAC levels were measured using a standardized anti-Xa assay 4 hours after (peak) and 1 hour before (trough) ingestion.. The cohort consisted of 62 patients (47% female, 77.0 ± 6.1 years). The prescribed DOACs were apixaban 2.5 mg (21%), apixaban 5 mg (53%), and rivaroxaban 20 mg (26%). Overall, 16% had supra-therapeutic DOAC levels at trough and 25% at peak. In the multivariable logistic regression model, lower ALM was independently associated with supra-therapeutic DOAC levels at trough (odds ratio per ↓ 1-kg 1.23, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.49) and peak (odds ratio per ↓ 1-kg 1.18, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.37). Addition of ALM to a model consisting of age, total body weight, and renal function resulted in improved discrimination for supra-therapeutic DOAC levels.. Our proof-of-concept study has identified an association between ALM and DOAC levels in older adults with AF. Further research is needed to determine the impact of ALM on bleeding complications and the potential role of ALM-guided dosing for sarcopenic patients.

Topics: Absorptiometry, Photon; Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation Tests; Body Mass Index; Drug Dosage Calculations; Drug Monitoring; Electric Impedance; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney Function Tests; Male; Proof of Concept Study; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Sarcopenia; Stroke; Thinness

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of new anticoagulants and warfarin in the prevention of stroke in Chinese patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).. The Markov model was constructed to compare patients' quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) using drug cost, the cost of the examination after taking a drug, and the incremental cost of other treatments. Both dabigatran (110 and 150 mg, twice a day) and rivaroxaban (20 mg, once a day) were compared with warfarin (3-6 mg, once a day). Willingness to pay, three times the 2018 China GDP per capita (9481.88 $), was the cost-effect threshold in our study.. The total cost were was 5317.31$, 29673.33$, 23615.49$, and 34324.91$ for warfarin, rivaroxaban, dabigatran 110 mg bid, and dabigatran 150 mg bid, respectively. The QALYs for each of the four interventions were 11.07 years, 15.46 years, 12.4 years, and 15 years, respectively. The cost-effectiveness analysis of the three new oral anticoagulants and warfarin showed that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was 5548.07$/QALY when rivaroxaban was compared with warfarin. Rivaroxaban was the most cost-effective choice and warfarin was the least.. In Chinese patients with AF, although warfarin is cheaper, rivaroxaban has a better cost-effectiveness advantage from an economic point of view.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; China; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Humans; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

We compared the effectiveness and safety outcomes of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and warfarin in patients with AF and VHD, as these patients have been partially excluded from clinical trials.. This retrospective cohort study was conducted using the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. Patients with AF and VHD and above 20 years of age, who were prescribed oral anticoagulants such as warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban, were included. Propensity score matching was performed to balance intergroup differences. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare the effectiveness and safety of warfarin and NOACs.. We included 5833 NOAC-warfarin pairs, 3001 dabigatran-warfarin pairs and 2595 rivaroxaban-warfarin pairs. Warfarin and NOACs had similar risk of ischemic stroke (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-1.06;. NOACs had a comparable risk of ischemic stroke and bleeding in patients with AF and VHD, and reduced the risk of venous thromboembolism, intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality, compared to warfarin. Therefore, NOAC is an effective and safe alternative to warfarin in these patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Heart Valve Diseases; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation are an important atrial fibrillation subgroup in which direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have not been adequately studied in real-world settings. Since DOACs rely on renal elimination and renal dysfunction is prevalent in patients with heart failure, their use may increase bleeding risk, negating some of their advantage over warfarin.. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using linked Veterans Administration databases of patients with heart failure newly started on warfarin or DOACs for atrial fibrillation from October 2010 to August 2017 (23 635 warfarin, 25 823 DOAC). Outcomes included time to first bleeding, stroke, and death using Cox proportional hazards models with inverse probability of treatment weighting.. Total bleeding (hazard ratio, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.56-0.68]), major bleeding (hazard ratio, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.40-0.61]), and death (hazard ratio, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.71-0.78]) were lower with DOAC than warfarin, and with apixaban and dabigatran, but not rivaroxaban. Moderate/severe chronic kidney disease was common (48.7%); moderate chronic kidney disease was associated with increased bleeding with DOACs but not warfarin. However, death and bleeding remained lower with DOACs than warfarin across all renal function levels and clinical subgroups. A >20% transient/persistent decline in renal function occurred in 53% of DOAC-treated patients at some point during follow-up, would have required dose reduction in 10.5% of patients, and was associated with increased bleeding. Dose adjustments were made more often, and bleeding and death were lower in patients seen by pharmacists or anticoagulation clinics. There were significant between-site variations in DOAC dosing.. DOACs overall, apixaban, and dabigatran, but not rivaroxaban, were associated with less total bleeding and death than warfarin in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation at all levels of renal function. Renal function decline resulted in increased bleeding in patients with DOACs. DOAC dose adjustment was often indicated, associated with increased bleeding when not adjusted, emphasizing the need for closer monitoring in these patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Heart Failure; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

This study sought to compare patient characteristics, outcomes, and treatment effects among regions in the COMMANDER-HF trial.. Globalization of cardiovascular trials increases generalizability. However, regional differences may also introduce heterogeneity in results.. Incidence rates and interactions with treatment were recorded in pre-specified regions: Eastern Europe, Western Europe and South Africa, North America, Asia-Pacific, and Latin America.. In the COMMANDER-HF study, patients from Eastern Europe had a lower risk profile and fewer cardiovascular and bleeding events, possibly related to lower treatment adherence. Those differences might have influenced the effect of rivaroxaban therapy. (A Study to Assess the Effectiveness and Safety of Rivaroxaban in Reducing the Risk of Death, Myocardial Infarction or Stroke in Participants With Heart Failure and Coronary Artery Disease Following an Episode of Decompensated Heart Failure [COMMANDER HF]; NCT01877915).

Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Heart Failure; Humans; Latin America; Patient Selection; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Stroke Volume

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). We investigated the adherence of DOACs for years known to be associated with the effectiveness in Japanese NVAF patients, using a claim database.. We performed a retrospective evaluation of NVAF patients in a claims database in Japan, who initiated dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban between April 2011 and June 2016. Drug persistence was assessed by Kaplan-Meier method for the initially-prescribed DOAC and all DOACs including switched ones. Proportion of days covered (PDC) was also evaluated in patients with persistent prescription and compared among DOACs.. In the total of 671 patients, rivaroxaban (47%) was more prescribed than dabigatran (28%) and apixaban (25%). Drug persistence at 3 years was higher in rivaroxaban (69%) than dabigatran (57%) and apixaban (67%). Including switching to other DOACs, persistence of DOACs was 72% at 3 years without significant differences between index-DOACs. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, absence of hypertension, and prior history of cancer were significantly associated with the drug discontinuation of all DOACs. The mean PDC was ~ 95% and the frequency of high-adherent patients (PDC ≥0.80) was more than 90%, which similarly persisted at 3 years and showed no significant differences between index DOACs.. In a real-world Japanese claim data analysis, about 70% of patients under DOAC showed persistence with anticoagulation therapy at 3 years. High adherence to DOACs assessed by PDC (over 90%) persisted to 3 years regardless of the types of DOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Japan; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

To address literature gaps on treatment with real-world evidence, this study compared effectiveness, safety, and cost outcomes in NVAF patients with coronary or peripheral artery disease (CAD, PAD) prescribed apixaban versus other oral anticoagulants. NVAF patients aged ≥65 years co-diagnosed with CAD/PAD initiating warfarin, apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban were selected from the US Medicare population (January 1, 2013 to September 30, 2015). Propensity score matching was used to match apixaban versus warfarin, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban cohorts. Cox models were used to evaluate the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE), major bleeding (MB), all-cause mortality, and a composite of stroke/myocardial infarction/all-cause mortality. Generalized linear and two-part models were used to compare stroke/SE, MB, and all-cause costs between cohorts. A total of 33,269 warfarin-apixaban, 9,335 dabigatran-apixaban, and 33,633 rivaroxaban-apixaban pairs were identified after matching. Compared with apixaban, stroke/SE risk was higher in warfarin (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.93; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.61 to 2.31), dabigatran (HR: 1.69; 95% CI: 1.18 to 2.43), and rivaroxaban (HR: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.51) patients. MB risk was higher in warfarin (HR: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.52 to 1.83), dabigatran (HR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.13 to 1.68), and rivaroxaban (HR: 1.87; 95% CI: 1.71 to 2.05) patients vs apixaban. Stroke/SE- and MB-related medical costs per-patient per-month were higher in warfarin, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban patients versus apixaban. Total all-cause health care costs were higher in warfarin and rivaroxaban patients compared with apixaban patients. In conclusion, compared with apixaban, patients on dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin had a higher risk of stroke/SE, MB, and event-related costs.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cause of Death; Coronary Artery Disease; Dabigatran; Embolism; Female; Health Care Costs; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Mortality; Myocardial Infarction; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Propensity Score; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States; Warfarin

This study aimed to evaluate the safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) during daily clinical practice.. This was a prospective study conducted between January 01, 2016, and April 01, 2017, in patients aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of NVAF. We performed the study in 9 clinical centers from different regions of Turkey, and the mean follow-up period was 12+2 months. We investigated major and minor bleeding events of DOAC.. A total of 1807 patients with NVAF were enrolled. The mean age of the patients was 73.6±10.2 years, CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.6±1.4, and HAS-BLED score was 2±1.2. The most frequently prescribed DOAC was dabigatran 110 mg bid in 409 (22.6%) patients. The patients on apixaban 2.5 mg bid were older (p<0.001). Patients on rivaroxaban 15 mg od also had a higher prevalence of chronic renal failure, 46 (16.7%) patients. A total of 205 (11.4%) bleeding events were observed; among these, 34 (1.9%) patients had major bleeding and 171 (9.4%) patients had minor bleeding. The major and minor bleeding events were 2/273 (0.7%) and 30/273 (10.9%) in patients receiving dabigatran 150 mg bid, 13/409 (3%) and 44/409 (10.7%) in patients receiving dabigatran 110 mg bid, 4/385 (1%) and 42/385 (10.9%) in patients receiving rivaroxaban 20 mg od, 8/276 (2.9%) and 27/276 (9.7%) in patients receiving rivaroxaban 15 mg od, 3/308 (0.9%) and 14/308 (4.5%) in patients receiving apixaban 5 mg bid, 4/156 (2.5%) and 14/156 (9%) in patients receiving apixaban 2.5 mg bid, respectively. The total bleeding events were 17 (5.6%) in patients receiving apixaban 5 mg, less than those receiving other DOACs. On multivariate analyses, rivaroxaban 20 mg od (p=0.002), ATRIA and HAS-BLED scores, and peripheral artery disease were independent indicators of bleeding. The most frequent location of major bleeding was the gastrointestinal system (GIS) [17 (0.9%) patients], and the most frequent location of minor bleeding was the gingiva [45 (2.5%) patients].. This study showed that similar results as the previous real-life study; however, we had some different results, such as the GIS tract bleeding was more frequent in patients receiving dabigatran 110 mg bid. The major and intracranial bleeding events were similar for different DOACs; and among DOACs, only rivaroxaban 20 mg od was associated with a high risk of bleeding.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Following successful phase-III trials, direct oral anticoagulants such as rivaroxaban have largely replaced warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (SPAF). However, data from randomized trials should be confirmed in unselected cohorts.. Prospective registries can provide such data but often limit follow-up to short periods only. Extending our previously reported follow-up of 2.2 years in 1204 SPAF patients receiving rivaroxaban in the non-interventional DRESDEN NOAC REGISTRY, we now provide prospectively collected 5 years data (mean follow-up 5.5 ± 2.3 years) for this cohort.. Between 1 October 2011 and 31 December 2019, the combined endpoint of stroke/transient ischemic attack/systemic embolism occurred at a rate of 2.3/100 patient-years in the intention-to-treat analysis (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9-2.7) and at 1.6/100 patient-years in the on-treatment analysis (events within 3 days after last drug intake). On-treatment rates for major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding were 3.1 and 19.6/100 patient-years, respectively. Rivaroxaban treatment discontinuation occurred in a total of 574 patients during follow-up (11.0/100 patient-years in Kaplan-Meier analysis) and 426 patient died (all-cause mortality 6.3/100 pt. years; mean time from enrolment 3.6 ± 2.1 years), of which the causes of death were reported as arterial or venous embolism for 32 patients (21 occurring after treatment discontinuation and 11 during active treatment) and as bleeding for 24 patients.. Our data provide reassuring long-term outcome data for an elderly, co-morbid SPAF population, especially with regard to the low rate of fatal thromboembolic and bleeding complications.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Prospective Studies; Registries; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Current evidence indicates that the pharmacokinetic profile of rivaroxaban is not significantly impacted by body weight. However, real-world data are needed to better assess the potential clinical benefits and risks associated with rivaroxaban in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with obesity. Thus, our objectives were to assess the real-world effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus warfarin among NVAF patients with obesity in the US nationally representative commercially-insured population.. Health insurance claims data from the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus database (January 2010-September 2019) were used to identify NVAF patients with obesity (based on diagnosis codes) initiated on rivaroxaban or warfarin. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for imbalances between groups. Study outcomes of interest were evaluated up to 36 months post-treatment initiation and included the composite of stroke or systemic embolism (stroke/SE) and major bleeding. Outcomes were compared using Cox proportional hazards regression models with hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).. These results suggest that rivaroxaban is an effective and safe treatment option among NVAF patients with obesity in a commercially-insured US population.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Obesity; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

In a previous real-world study, rivaroxaban reduced the risk of stroke overall and severe stroke compared with warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). The aim of this study was to assess the reproducibility in a different database of our previously observed results (Alberts M, et al. Stroke. 2020;51:549-555) on the risk of severe stroke among NVAF patients in a different population treated with rivaroxaban or warfarin.. This retrospective cohort study included patients from the IBM® MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare databases (2011-2019) who initiated rivaroxaban or warfarin after a diagnosis of NVAF, had ≥6 months of continuous health plan enrollment, had a CHA. The mean observation period from index date to either stroke, or end of eligibility or end of data was 28 months. Data from 13,599 rivaroxaban and 39,861 warfarin patients were included. Stroke occurred in 272 rivaroxaban-treated patients (0.97/100 person-years [PY]) and 1,303 warfarin-treated patients (1.32/100 PY). Rivaroxaban patients had lower risk for stroke overall (hazard ratio [HR], 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.88) and for minor (NIHSS 1 to <5; HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74-0.93), moderate (NIHSS 5 to <16; HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78-0.99), and severe stroke (NIHSS 16 to 42; HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.22-0.91).. The results of this study in a larger population of NVAF patients align with previous real-world findings and the ROCKET-AF trial by showing improved stroke prevention with rivaroxaban versus warfarin across all stroke severities.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Databases, Factual; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants have become a standard therapy for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). However, little is known about their effectiveness/safety when prescribed by general practitioners to treat high-risk populations such as the elderly, those who are frail or have cognitive dysfunction.Methods and Results:In this multicenter, prospective study, a total of 5,717 NVAF patients (mean age 73.9 years) receiving rivaroxaban were registered by general practitioners, with a maximum 3-year follow up (mean 2.0±0.5 years). The primary endpoint was a composite of stroke and systemic embolism (SE). The annual incidence (per 100 person-years) of stroke/SE was 1.23% and for major bleeding, it was 0.63%. Multivariate analyses identified age ≥75 years (hazard ratio [HR]; 2.67, P<0.001) and history of ischemic stroke (HR; 1.89, P=0.005) as significant risk factors of stroke/SE, with history of major bleeding (HR; 14.9, P<0.001) and warfarin use (HR; 2.15, P=0.002) as risk factors for major bleeding events. Neither cognitive dysfunction, defined by the receipt of anti-dementia medications, nor frailty, evaluated by the classification of the Japanese Long-term Care Insurance system, correlated with stroke/SE or major bleeding events.. The low incidence of adverse events, including stroke/SE and bleeding, in patients prescribed rivaroxaban by general practitioners supports its use as a safe and efficacious treatment in the standard clinical care of high-risk patient populations.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; General Practitioners; Hemorrhage; Humans; Japan; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Adherence to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation in every day practice may be less than in clinical trials.. To assess adherence to DOACs in atrial fibrillation patients in every day practice and identify predictors for non-adherence.. Individual linked dispensing data of atrial fibrillation patients who used DOACs were obtained from the Foundation for Pharmaceutical Statistics covering the Netherlands between 2012 and 2016. One year adherence to DOAC was calculated for initial DOAC as proportion of days covered (PDC) ≥80% and the association between clinical variables and adherence was assessed using logistic regression. In addition, we measured non-persistence, that is, patients who completely stopped their initial DOAC within 1 year follow-up.. A total of 4797 apixaban-, 20 454 rivaroxaban- and 18 477 dabigatran users were included. The mean age was 69 years (n = 43 910), which was similar for the DOAC types. The overall proportion of patients with PDC ≥80% was 76%, which was highest for apixaban- (87%), followed by dabigatran- (80%) and rivaroxaban (69%) users. Multivariable analyses revealed that age ≤60 years, no concomitant drug use were predictors for non-adherence. Of atrial fibrillation patients who continued treatment, 97% had a PDC ≥80%, compared with only 56% for those who discontinued their DOAC treatment within 1 year.. Non-adherence to DOACs was associated with age ≤60 years and no concomitant drugs use. Non-adherence was higher in patients who later discontinued DOAC treatment. Results of our study support research into interventions to improve adherence.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Netherlands; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Aim        To evaluate the effectiveness of the decision-making module in selecting an oral anticoagulant for patients with atrial fibrillation.Material and methods        638 patients with atrial fibrillation aged 68.2±4.5 years were evaluated. The CHA2DS2-VASc, HAS-BLED, and 2MАСЕ scales, the creatinine clearance calculator, and the Morisky-Green questionnaire were used.Results   311 (48.75 %) patients had paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, 138 (21.6%) had persistent atrial fibrillation, 44 (22.7%) had long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation, and 145 (22.7 %) had permanent atrial fibrillation. Mean CHADS2‑VASc scale score was 4.82; НAS-BLED scale score was 2.9; 2MACE score was 2.28; and compliance score was 3.52. 172 (26.9 %) patients were treated with rivaroxaban; 166 (26 %), with apixaban; 84 (13.2 %), with dabigatran; 210 (32.9 %), with warfarin; and 6 (1 %), with acetylsalicylic acid.Conclusion            The developed decision-making module is based on scientific justification of personalized selection of the oral anticoagulant and updates the knowledge on major issues of prescription.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Middle Aged; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

There are now anticoagulant choices with proposed advantages of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) over warfarin being less routine monitoring and less drug interactions. Interacting medication can impact the efficacy and safety of anticoagulant therapy with management remaining clinically challenging. There have been limited studies comparing the potential for pharmacokinetic (PK) drug interactions between different anticoagulants. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare potential PK interactions in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) changing from warfarin to NOAC therapy. A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients with AF enrolled in a dedicated warfarin program but exiting this program to commence a NOAC. Patient data was collected, and concurrent medications were utilised to identify potential PK drug interactions with both warfarin and the chosen NOAC therapy. Patients were grouped according to the number of medications with potential PK interactions and comparisons made between groups. Of the 712 eligible patients who ceased warfarin to commence a NOAC, most commenced either apixaban (45.9%) or rivaroxaban (41.9%). When comparing warfarin to NOACs, there were significant differences in the proportion of patients taking no medication with potential PK drug interactions (46.9% vs 62.8%, p < 0.0001), and taking one (35.2% vs 28.5%, p = 0.0067) and two (14.5% vs 7.3%, p < 0.0001) potentially PK interacting medications. This study found when patients with AF were switched from warfarin to a NOAC, the potential for PK drug interactions significantly reduced but remained around 40%. Identifying and managing potential PK drug interactions with NOACs remains a priority to optimise clinical benefit of these anticoagulants.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is often accompanied by multiple comorbid conditions, which increase the associated risks and complexity of patient management. This study evaluated the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding (MB) among multimorbid patients with NVAF who were prescribed non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) or warfarin.. A retrospective study of patients with NVAF and high multimorbidity who initiated apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin from 1 January 2013 to 30 September 2015 was conducted using five insurance claims databases. Multimorbidity was defined as six or more comorbid conditions, and 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted between the NOAC-warfarin and NOAC-NOAC cohorts. Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the hazard ratios of stroke/SE and MB.. Of the NVAF population (n = 466,991), 33.4% (n = 155,959) had multimorbidity, including 36,921 apixaban, 10,248 dabigatran, 45,509 rivaroxaban, and 63,281 warfarin patients. Compared to warfarin, apixaban and rivaroxaban were associated with a lower risk of stroke/SE (hazard ratio [HR] 0.63, 95% CI 0.54-0.74; HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.64-0.77, respectively). Apixaban and dabigatran were associated with a lower risk of MB (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.56-0.67; HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.66-0.86, respectively) and rivaroxaban was associated with a higher risk of MB (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.12) compared to warfarin.. Among patients with NVAF and six or more comorbid conditions, NOACs were associated with varying risk of stroke/SE and MB compared to warfarin and to each other. Rather than a "one drug fits all" approach, our results may be useful for appropriate OAC treatment for multimorbid patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Multimorbidity; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Atorvastatin and direct oral factor Xa inhibitors (xabans) are frequently co-administrated in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, no studies investigating the possibility of the pharmacologic interaction between these agents have been conducted. The aim of this prospective observational study was to determine the impact of atorvastatin therapy on anti-Xa activity in xabans-treated patients with AF. We enrolled 115 AF patients on long-term rivaroxaban (52 patients) and long-term apixaban (63 patients) therapy. Long-term atorvastatin (40 mg once daily) was administrated to 28 rivaroxaban-treated patients and to 28 apixaban-treated patients. Trough and peak samples were tested for anti-Xa activity with drug-specific anti-Xa chromogenic analysis. For rivaroxaban, there were no significant differences in trough activity (45.5 ± 39.5 ng/ml vs. 46.2 ± 30.1 ng/ml; p = .34) and peak anti-Xa activity (179.2 ± 108.8 ng/ml vs. 208.1 ± 104.1 ng/ml; p = .94) between atorvastatin-treated patients and those without atorvastatin. Similarly, atorvastatin did not impact the trough activity (127.7 ± 71.1 ng/ml vs. 100.8 ± 61.1 ng/ml; p = .12) or peak anti-Xa activity (213.8 ± 103.6 ng/ml vs. 179.3 ± 72.9 ng/ml; p = .14) among apixaban-treated patients with AF. This observational study did not show a significant impact of atorvastatin on trough and peak anti-Xa activity in xabans-treated patients with AF.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atorvastatin; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Interactions; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thrombosis

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been proven to be effective and safe for prevention of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). However, suboptimal adherence, variable dosing and use in patient populations that otherwise would have been excluded from clinical trials may impact the efficacy and safety profile of DOACs in a routine care setting. We compared stroke, bleeding, and mortality rates on and off therapy for standard and low-dose DOACs (apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran) versus warfarin in a Canadian cohort. We also assessed persistence of DOACs compared to warfarin.. We conducted six 1-1 propensity-score matched retrospective cohort analyses using Quebec health administrative databases (2011-2017). NVAF patients (≥18 years) covered by the public medication insurance plan entered the cohort on the first OAC dispensation date. We excluded those with OAC use in the previous year or stroke or bleeding diagnoses in the previous two years. Follow-up ended at death, March 2017 or end of medication coverage by the public plan. Time-dependent Cox regression was applied.. We evaluated 10,893 patients initiated on apixaban (7206 standard, 3687 low-dose), 10,190 on rivaroxaban (7396 standard, 2794 low-dose), 5884 on dabigatran (2756 standard, 3128 low-dose), and propensity score-matched warfarin users. Across standard-dose DOACs, compared to warfarin, stroke risks were similar; bleeding risks were lower with apixaban (hazard ratio 0.63; 95% confidence interval 0.52-0.77) and dabigatran (0.47; 0.35-0.64) but not rivaroxaban (0.93; 0.79-1.10); death risks were lower with all DOACs. For low-dose DOACs, rivaroxaban demonstrated higher stroke (1.79; 1.21-2.64) and bleeding risks (1.37; 1.09-1.73); other agents had stroke risks similar to warfarin and bleeding risks lower than warfarin; only low-dose dabigatran had lower death risk (0.59; 0.52-0.68). Treatment discontinuation was lower with DOACs versus warfarin with the exception of low-dose rivaroxaban. The risks of stroke were 2-4 folds higher during time off any OAC versus time on warfarin. The risks of death were higher, while the risks of bleeding were generally lower during times off any OAC.. Standard-dose DOACs had similar stroke, better persistence and mortality profiles than warfarin. Only standard dose apixaban and dabigatran had better bleeding profiles than warfarin. Low-dose rivaroxaban had worse persistence, stroke and bleeding profiles than warfarin, while low-dose apixaban and dabigatran had similar stroke and better bleeding profiles. Real-world use of DOACs may explain some of the differences observed in Canadian routine care versus the phase III clinical trials.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Canada; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

There have been reports of clinically relevant uterine bleeding events among women of reproductive age exposed to rivaroxaban.. The aim of this study was to compare the risk of severe abnormal uterine bleeding (SAUB) resulting in transfusion or surgical intervention among women on rivaroxaban versus apixaban, dabigatran and warfarin.. We conducted a retrospective cohort study in the FDA's Sentinel System (10/2010-09/2015) among females aged 18+ years with venous thromboembolism (VTE), or atrial flutter/fibrillation (AF) who newly initiated a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC; rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran) or warfarin. We followed women from dispensing date until the earliest of transfusion or surgery following vaginal bleeding, disenrollment, exposure or study end date, or recorded death. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) using Cox proportional hazards regression via propensity score stratification. Four pairwise comparisons were conducted for each intervention.. Overall, there was an increased risk of surgical intervention with rivaroxaban when compared with dabigatran (HR 1.19; 95% CI 1.03-1.38), apixaban (1.23; 1.04-1.47), and warfarin (1.34; 1.22-1.47). No difference in risk for surgical intervention was observed for dabigatran-apixaban comparisons. Increased risk of transfusion was observed for rivaroxaban compared with dabigatran (1.49; 1.03-2.17) only. For patients with no gynecological history, rivaroxaban was associated with risk of surgical intervention compared with dabigatran (1.22; 1.05-1.42), apixaban (1.25; 1.04-1.49), and warfarin (1.36; 1.23-1.50).. Our study found increased SAUB risk with rivaroxaban use compared with other DOACs or warfarin. Increased risk with rivaroxaban was present among women without underlying gynecological conditions. Women on anticoagulant therapy should be aware of a risk of SAUB.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Uterine Hemorrhage; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban, are widely used for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation as well as for prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism. Although DOACs do not require routine laboratory monitoring of anticoagulant effect, there are special situations in which laboratory assessment may be warranted. Laboratory tests include quantitative assays, which measure plasma DOAC levels, and qualitative or semi-quantitative assays, which may be used to screen for the presence of clinically relevant DOAC levels. Indications for laboratory assessment include emergent indications (serious bleeding, urgent surgery, acute ischemic stroke with consideration of thrombolysis) and elective indications (extremes of bodyweight, renal hypo- or hyperfunction, liver disease, suspected drug-drug interactions, suspected gastrointestinal malabsorption). In general, quantitative assays that measure DOAC levels may be used for elective indications, whereas screening assays may be necessary for emergent indications if a quantitative assay with sufficiently rapid turnaround time is not available. Therapeutic ranges for DOACs have not been defined. In lieu of therapeutic ranges, data from pharmacokinetic studies may be used to determine whether a patient's plasma DOAC level falls within the expected range. If it does not, a change in therapy may be warranted. Depending on the clinical scenario, a change in therapy may involve adjustment of the DOAC dose, a change to a different DOAC, or a change to a different class of anticoagulant.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Dabigatran; Humans; Laboratories; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Recent data suggest direct oral anticoagulants are as safe and efficacious as warfarin among select patients with valvular heart disease and atrial fibrillation (AF). However, real-world treatment patterns of AF stroke prophylaxis in the setting of valvular AF are currently unknown. Accordingly, using the prospective, ambulatory National Cardiovascular Data Registry Practice Innovation and Clinical Excellence (PINNACLE) Registry, we sought to characterize overall use, temporal trends in use, and the extent of practice-level variation in the use of any direct oral anticoagulant and warfarin among patients with valvular AF from January 1, 2013, to March 31, 2019.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Male; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Registries; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Cardiac surgery patients frequently require anticoagulation. Warfarin remains the preferred agent, and a few trials have reported negative outcomes with the use of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in these patients. Therefore, limited literature exists that supports the dosing, safety, and efficacy of DOACs within the cardiac surgery population.. This single-center, retrospective analysis was conducted at a tertiary academic medical center. All data were extrapolated from electronic medical records of qualifying patients from August 2017 to August 2019. Adult patients were included if they received at least 1 of 4 DOACs (apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, or dabigatran) after undergoing one of the following cardiac surgeries: coronary artery bypass graft, bioprosthetic valve replacement, aortic surgery, or valve repair. The composite safety end point included major bleeding and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, as defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis. The composite efficacy outcome of thromboembolic events included deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, ischemic stroke, and intracardiac thrombus.. A total of 305 patient charts were identified for analysis; 229 patients met the inclusion criteria. The composite safety outcome occurred in 12 patients (5.2%) within 90 days after cardiac surgery. One patient (0.4%) experienced a thromboembolic event within 90 days after cardiac surgery. The most commonly prescribed DOAC was apixaban (79.0%). US Food and Drug Administration-approved dosing was used in 91.3% of patients, and DOACs were primarily used for the indication of stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter (88.2%).. These data provide insight into the prescribing practices, efficacy, and safety of DOACs in cardiac surgery patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

To assess persistence and adherence to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in five Western European healthcare settings.. We conducted a multi-country observational cohort study, including 559 445 AF patients initiating NOAC therapy from Stockholm (Sweden), Denmark, Scotland, Norway, and Germany between 2011 and 2018. Patients were followed from their first prescription until they switched to a vitamin K antagonist, emigrated, died, or the end of follow-up. We measured persistence and adherence over time and defined adequate adherence as medication possession rate ≥90% among persistent patients only.. Overall, persistence declined to 82% after 1 year and to 63% after 5 years. When including restarters of NOAC treatment, 85% of the patients were treated with NOACs after 5 years. The proportion of patients with adequate adherence remained above 80% throughout follow-up. Persistence and adherence were similar between countries and was higher in patients starting treatment in later years. Both first year persistence and adherence were lower with dabigatran (persistence: 77%, adherence: 65%) compared with apixaban (86% and 75%) and rivaroxaban (83% and 75%) and were statistically lower after adjusting for patient characteristics. Adherence and persistence with dabigatran remained lower throughout follow-up.. Persistence and adherence were high among NOAC users in five Western European healthcare settings and increased in later years. Dabigatran use was associated with slightly lower persistence and adherence compared with apixaban and rivaroxaban.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Background Rivaroxaban, apixaban and dabigatran are non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) that are widely used for treatment or prevention of venous thromboembolism and stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Objective To estimate and compare hemorrhagic events report of rivaroxaban, apixaban and dabigatran. Setting FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Methods The reporting odds ratio (ROR) was used to assess the signal of hemorrhagic events of different NOACs. Main outcome measure The overall hemorrhagic events and hemorrhagic events in different physiological systems. Results From January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2019, the total number of reports of hemorrhage related to rivaroxaban was 53,085, and the numbers of apixaban and dabigatran were 13,151 and 14,100 respectively. The overall ROR (95% CI) of hemorrhagic events reporting for rivaroxaban versus dabigatran and apixaban versus dabigatran were 1.58 (1.54-1.62) and 0.47 (0.46-0.48) respectively. The ROR (95% CI) for rivaroxaban versus dabigatran in gastrointestinal system, nervous system, renal and urinary system, skin and subcutaneous tissue, and eye system was 1.38 (1.34-1.42), 0.94 (0.90-0.98), 1.07 (1.01-1.13), 0.80 (0.70-0.90), and 1.38 (1.19-1.60) respectively. The RORs (95% CI) for apixaban versus dabigatran in gastrointestinal system, nervous system, renal and urinary system, skin and subcutaneous tissue, and eye system were 0.28 (0.27-0.29), 0.69 (0.66-0.73), 0.31 (0.29-0.34), 0.98 (0.86-1.12), and 1.18 (1.00-1.39), respectively. Conclusions Overall, we found a moderate signal of higher frequency of reporting hemorrhage in rivaroxban compared with dabigatran and decreased hemorrhagic event reporting in apixaban compared with dabigatran. While this potential signal has not been confirmed in clinical trials or observational studies, in clinical practice, attention should be paid to the risk of potential hemorrhage when the patients switch from apixaban to dabigatran or rivaroxban.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may increase the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and GI cancer compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKA).. We conducted a Danish nationwide cohort study comparing the bleeding risk associated with DOAC versus VKA in patients with AF and GI cancer. We calculated crude bleeding rates per 100 person-years (PYs) for GI and major bleeding. We then compared rates of bleeding at 1 year after initial oral anticoagulation filled prescription by treatment regimen using inverse probability of treatment weighting and Cox regression.. The unweighted study population included 1476 AF patients with GI cancer (41.6% women, median age 78 years) initiating a DOAC and 652 initiating a VKA. One-year risk of GI bleeding was 5.0% in the DOAC group and 4.7% in the VKA group with a corresponding weighted hazard ratio (HR) of 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63, 1.45). For patients with active cancer, weighted GI bleeding rates were slightly higher in both the VKA and DOAC group, and the weighted HR was 1.00 (95% CI: 0.53, 1.88). The HR was 1.12 (95% CI: 0.71, 1.76) for all bleedings. Hazard ratios for GI bleeding were 0.61 (95% CI: 0.25, 1.52) for patients with upper GI cancer, and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.58, 1.46) in patients with colorectal cancer.. Evidence from this nationwide cohort study suggests a comparable 1-year risk of bleeding associated with DOAC compared with VKA among patients with AF and GI cancer.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Confidence Intervals; Dabigatran; Denmark; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Rivaroxaban, a direct oral factor Xa inhibitor, mediates anti-inflammatory and cardiovascular-protective effects besides its well-established anticoagulant properties; however, these remain poorly characterized. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are important circulating messengers regulating a myriad of biological and pathological processes and may be highly relevant to the pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation as they reflect alterations in platelet and endothelial biology. However, the effects of rivaroxaban on circulating pro-inflammatory EVs remain unknown.. We hypothesized that rivaroxaban's anti-inflammatory properties are reflected upon differential molecular profiles of circulating EVs.. Differences in circulating EV profiles were assessed using a combination of single vesicle analysis by Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis and flow cytometry, and proteomics.. We demonstrate, for the first time, that rivaroxaban-treated non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients (n=8) exhibit attenuated inflammation compared with matched warfarin controls (n=15). Circulating EV profiles were fundamentally altered. Moreover, quantitative proteomic analysis of enriched plasma EVs from six pooled biological donors per treatment group revealed a profound decrease in highly pro-inflammatory protein expression and complement factors, together with increased expression of negative regulators of inflammatory pathways. Crucially, a reduction in circulating levels of soluble P-selectin was observed in rivaroxaban-treated patients (compared with warfarin controls), which negatively correlated with the patient's time on treatment.. Collectively, these data demonstrate that NVAF patients anticoagulated with rivaroxaban (compared with warfarin) exhibit both a reduced pro-inflammatory state and evidence of reduced endothelial activation. These findings are of translational relevance toward characterizing the anti-inflammatory and cardiovascular-protective mechanisms associated with rivaroxaban therapy.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Extracellular Vesicles; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Proteomics; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Low dose direct acting oral anticoagulants (LDDOACS) were approved for elderly atrial Fibrillation (AF) patients with limited information. A retrospective analysis collecting baseline characteristics and outcomes in AF patients ≥ 80 prescribed LDDOAC or warfarin (W), from a multidisciplinary practice between 1/1/11 (First LDDOAC available) and 5/31/17 was conducted. From 9660 AF patients, 514 ≥ 80 received a LDDOAC and 422 W. A multivariable comparison found LDDOAC patients were older (p <0.001), had lower creatinine clearance (CrCl) (p = 0.006), used more anti-platelet drugs (p <0.001), and more often had new onset AF verses those prescribed W (p <0.001). There were no clinically significant differences among those patients receiving Dabigatran 75 mgs BID (D), Rivaroxaban 15mgs (R) or Apixaban 2.5mgs BID (A). Forty-eight and 50% of the patients remained on their LDDOAC or W for the observation period (p = 0.55). Stroke/systemic embolism (SSE) and CNS bleeds were 1.16 vs 2.22%/yr., (p = 0.143) and 1.46 vs 0.93%/yr., (p = 0.24). Mortality and major bleeds were 6.26 vs 1.67%/yr., and 12.3vs 3.77%/yr. (p <0.001). SSE were 1.1%/yr for D, R, and A (p = 0.94). CNS bleeds were 2.2 for D, 1.7 for R and 0.8%/yr. for A: p = 0.53. Major bleeding was: 14.3 for D, 14.1 for R and 9.1%/yr. for A, p = 0.048 (with A < R, p = 0.01). Mortality was 5.5 for D, 4.2 for R and 9.5% for A, p = 0.031. In conclusion, half the patients remained on their assigned anti-coagulant. SSE and intracranial bleed rates were similar and low. Major bleeds and deaths were different between groups emphasizing the need for prospective randomized trials in this growing population with AF.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Multivariate Analysis; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and type 2 diabetes are at risk of kidney, limb, and ophthalmic complications. We evaluated the rate of these complications and death in patients with NVAF and type 2 diabetes prescribed rivaroxaban or warfarin.. We analyzed Optum de-Identified electronic health record (EHR) data from 11/2010-12/2019. We included adults with NVAF and T2D newly initiated on rivaroxaban or warfarin with ≥12 months of prior EHR activity. Patients with another indication for anticoagulation, valve disease, history of end-stage renal disease, major adverse limb events (MALE), diabetic retinopathy or pregnancy were excluded. We evaluated the incidence rate of developing a composite outcome of >40% decrease in estimated glomerular filtration incidence rate (eGFR) from baseline, eGFR < 15 mL/minute/1.73 m2, need for dialysis or kidney transplant, MALE, diabetic retinopathy or death. Overlap weighting was used to balance baseline characteristics between cohorts while preserving sample size. Hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using propensity score-overlap weighted Cox regression.. We included 24,912 rivaroxaban and 58,270 warfarin users. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) CHA2DS2VASc score was 4.3 ± 1.5 and modified HASBLED score was 1.5 ± 0.8. Thirty percent of rivaroxaban patients were started on 15 mg once daily, with the rest prescribed 20 mg once daily. Warfarin patients had a mean time in therapeutic range of 47 ± 28%. Patients were followed for a mean of 2.89 ± 1.95 years. Rivaroxaban was associated with a reduced hazard of the composite outcome (HR = 0.93, 95%CI = 0.91-0.95; absolute risk reduction = 1.97 events per 1000 patient-years; number needed-to-treat = 51) versus warfarin. Rivaroxaban was also associated with significant reductions in the relative hazard of > 40% decrease in eGFR from baseline (HR = 0.96), need for dialysis or renal transplant (HR = 0.81), and limb revascularization or major amputation (HR = 0.85). Death occurred at a lower incidence rate with rivaroxaban (HR = 0.92, 95%CI = 0.89-0.95).. Rivaroxaban was associated with reduced incidence rates of kidney and limb complications, and death in NVAF patients with type 2 diabetes compared to warfarin.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Electronic Health Records; Eye Diseases; Humans; Kidney; Kidney Diseases; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The decision to initiate anticoagulation in older adults with atrial fibrillation is complicated by the benefit of ischemic stroke prevention vs the risk of falls resulting in major bleeds. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of different treatments including direct oral anticoagulants on quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) in patients aged 75 years and older with atrial fibrillation in the context of falls.. A Markov decision process was constructed for older patients with atrial fibrillation taking no anti-thrombotic, aspirin, warfarin, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. Input probabilities for clinical events were estimated from the available literature. One-way and two-way sensitivity analyses were performed by measuring the impact of varying input probabilities of clinical events on QALY outcomes.. The base-case scenario estimated that older adults treated with no anti-thrombotic, aspirin, warfarin, rivaroxaban, and apixaban had QALYs of 8.03, 8.69, 10.38, 11.02, and 11.56, respectively. The sensitivity analysis estimated that an older adult would need to fall over 45 (rivaroxaban) and 458 (apixaban) times per year for the QALY of a direct oral anticoagulant to be lower than that of aspirin.. Older adults with atrial fibrillation benefit from stroke protection of anticoagulants, especially direct oral anticoagulants, even if they are at high risk of falls. Clinicians should not consider fall risk as a deciding factor for withholding anticoagulation in this population of patients.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Decision Support Techniques; Humans; Pyridones; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in clinical practice, and its prevalence increases with age. Nevertheless, data about the use of oral anticoagulants (OACs) among patients with ≥80 years remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and warfarin in octogenarians with non-valvular AF (NVAF).. Medical records of 387 patients who were ≥80 years and diagnosed with NVAF in our hospital between January 2017 and December 2019 were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with NVAF were divided into 2 groups (NOACs and warfarin), and the incidence of stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding were analyzed.. A total of 322 patients were included in the study. The median follow-up duration was 10.9 months for the NOACs group and 12.1 months for the warfarin group. The primary efficacy outcome was stroke/systemic embolism, and the primary safety outcome was major bleeding. A total of 220 patients were taking NOACs, and the most preferred NOACs were apixaban (53.6%), rivaroxaban (29.5%), dabigatran (13.2%), and edoxaban (3.6%) in this order. During a mean follow-up of 302.7 patient-years, the incidence of stroke or systemic embolic events was slightly higher among patients with warfarin but the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.862). The incidence rates of major bleeding events were similar between the treatment groups (p=0.824).. Our study revealed that the safety and efficacy outcomes are similar between the 2 treatment groups in octogenarians with NVAF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Senile patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are at a higher risk of thromboembolism and hemorrhage than younger patients. Three direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC), apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban, are registered in the Russian Federation and are extensively used for prevention of stroke in patients with AF. The DOAC treatment of older patients requires considering peculiarities of these patients, clinical situation and properties of individual drugs to achieve the balance of efficiency and safety and a comprehensive protection. According to studies of real clinical practice DOAC may have advantages over warfarin (reduced risk of fractures, diabetes mellitus, and dementia). Compliance with and constancy of the DOAC treatment are important for its efficiency, particularly in senile age. Results of clinical trials and real clinical practice studies have confirmed that rivaroxaban may provide a comprehensive protection for a senile patient with AF due to favorable indexes of efficiency and safety, beneficial effect on the risk of coronary events and impairment оf renal function, whereas once a day dosing of rivaroxaban improves the compliance with this treatment and its constancy.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyridones; Risk Management; Rivaroxaban; Russia; Stroke

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are recommended in preference to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) eligible for oral anticoagulation therapy; however, data and clinical experiences supporting the use of DOACs in patients with a body mass index ≥40 kg/m. We enrolled all consecutive patients with AF and extreme obesity undergoing treatment with DOACs followed up at Monaldi Hospital, Naples, Italy. To determine peak plasma and trough levels of DOACs, plasma samples were collected at 2nd, 4th, 6th, and 12th hours from the last dose intake in patients receiving apixaban and dabigatran and at the 2nd, 4th, 6th, and 24th hours in those receiving edoxaban and rivaroxaban. The DOACs' peak and trough plasma levels obtained from our study population were compared with those sourced from pharmacokinetic studies among patients without obesity, defined as a normal reference range in the literature. If at least 1 peak or trough plasma level was found ​​below or above the normal reference ranges, the patients were classified as having out-of-range DOAC plasma levels. Study population was then divided into in-range and out-of-range groups. Baseline characteristics, including DOAC treatment, were compared between the 2 groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to identify baseline variables associated with DOACs' plasma concentration out of the expected range.. A total of 58 patients (mean [SD] age, 70.93 [8.73] years; 40% female) with extreme obesity (mean [SD] body mass index. 44.43 [3.54] kg/m. Patients with extreme obesity and AF who were receiving DOAC therapy had DOAC plasma concentrations in the expected range. The inappropriate DOAC underdosing seems to be the only independent clinical factor associated with a plasma concentration of the drug out of the expected range.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Male; Obesity; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Esophagitis; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), such as rivaroxaban, reduce the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). However, it is still unclear whether the stroke reduction benefit outweighs the bleeding risk in elderly Japanese patients with NVAF. The Xarelto Post-Authorization Safety and Effectiveness Study in Japanese Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (XAPASS) was a real-world, prospective observational, post-marketing surveillance study on the safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban in Japanese clinical practice. This sub-analysis evaluated the clinical outcomes of elderly patients aged ≥ 75 years. At the 1-year follow-up, there were 4,685 (48.91%) and 4,893 (51.09%) patients aged ≥ 75 and < 75 years, respectively. Safety and effectiveness outcomes were compared between patients aged ≥ 75 years and those aged < 75 years, and among 3 elderly sub-populations (age ranges: 75-79, 80-84, and ≥ 85 years). Patients aged ≥ 75 years had higher rates of major bleeding [2.22 vs. 1.35 events per 100 patient-years, hazard ratio (HR) 1.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17-2.28] and composite of stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic)/non-central nervous system (non-CNS) systemic embolism (SE)/myocardial infarction (MI) (2.41 vs. 1.21 events per 100 patient-years, HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.40-2.77) compared to patients aged < 75 years. Intracranial hemorrhage rates were < 1 event per 100 patient-years in both groups (0.85 vs. 0.59 events per 100 patient-years, HR 1.43, 95% CI 0.85-2.40). Kaplan-Meier curves of major bleeding and stroke/non-CNS SE/MI showed that no significant differences of cumulative event rates were identified among the 3 elderly sub-populations. Stepwise Cox regression analyses revealed that creatinine clearance (CrCl) (<50 mL/min), hepatic impairment, and hypertension were specific predictors for major bleeding and no specific predictors were found for stroke/non-CNS SE/MI in patients aged ≥ 75 years. In conclusion, safety and effectiveness event rates were higher in patients aged ≥ 75 years compared with those aged < 75 years, yet, no distinct differences were observed among the 3 elderly sub-populations.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Prospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The real-life benefits and risks of the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in very elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are still debated.. Cohorts of new users of rivaroxaban 15 mg, dabigatran 110 mg, or vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for AF ≥85 years old in 2013 or 2014 were identified in the nationwide French claims database and followed-up for 1 year. Cohorts were compared after 1:1 matching using high-dimensional propensity score. Compared to VKA use and considering 1-year cumulative incidences, risk of stroke, and systemic embolism was not different with rivaroxaban use [hazard ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.93-1.40] and lower with dabigatran use (0.77, 95% CI: 0.60-0.99), risk of major bleeding was not different with rivaroxaban use (0.91, 95% CI: 0.74-1.11) and with dabigatran use (0.81, 95% CI: 0.64-1.03), risk of all-cause death was borderline to significance lower with rivaroxaban use (0.91, 95% CI: 0.83-1.00), and lower with dabigatran use (0.87, 95% CI: 0.78-0.97). The risk for a composite of all events above was not different with rivaroxaban use (0.96, 95% CI: 0.88-1.04) and lower with dabigatran use (0.87, 95% CI: 0.79-0.96) as compared with VKA use. The risk for the composite of all events was not different with rivaroxaban use as compared with dabigatran use (1.09, 95% CI: 0.97-1.23).. This study shows for the first time in more than 25 000 new real-life anticoagulant users for AF aged ≥85 years a neutral overall benefit-risk of rivaroxaban 15 mg vs. VKA and a favourable overall benefit-risk of dabigatran 110 mg vs. VKA on relevant clinical events.. European Medicines Agency EUPAS14567 (www.encepp.eu) and Clinicaltrials.gov id NCT02864758.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K

The goal of this study was to assess the differences between an ex ante and an ex post cost-effectiveness analysis of Dabigatran etexilate vs VKAs for the prevention of thromboembolic events in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients and to draw lessons on the design and use of real-world data for decision making.. The same model was used to calculate the cost-effectiveness ratio using two sets of parameters. One set included the efficacy and safety outcomes data from RE-LY, the pivotal trial comparing Dabigatran to warfarin; cost data came from an ex ante publication. Outcomes data for the second set came from real-world data studies. Cost data were a mix of real-world data and other sources. Two treatment strategies were compared: treatment initiation by either Dabigatran or VKAs, followed by either VKAs or Dabigatran. A crude comparison of results was performed; the impact of data differences was then assessed. Probabilistic sensitivity results of the two analyses were compared.. With real-world evidence, Dabigatran at both dosages was more effective for the prevention of ischemic strokes, intra-cranial haemorrhages, with less major extra-cranial haemorrhages and a similar risk of myocardial infarction. Using clinical trial data, Dabigatran150 mg (resp. Dabigatran110 mg) as a first-line treatment vs VKAs yielded an ICER of € 8077/QALY (resp. € 13,116/QALY). Real-world evidence scenarios were cost-saving and more effective for both dosages.. The reassessment of outcomes and cost data had an impact on results, improving the efficiency of Dabigatran. We identify methodological issues which should be discussed if post-launch RWE based cost-effectiveness data become a standard in HTA decision making.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; France; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

 Nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) require stricter medication adherence. We investigated the NOACs adherence in real-world practice..  We screened all patients in our cardiology department the day before their outpatient appointment, over a 5-month period. We enrolled 719 consecutive patients who were taking NOACs for atrial fibrillation. The patients were contacted by phone or text to bring the remnant pills with them without any information why. Adherence was measured by the percentage of prescribed doses taken (PDT) (number of doses taken/number of doses expected to be taken from the last prescription × 100 [%]) and the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS)-8..  Most patients who were taking NOACs had excellent adherence regardless of the dosing frequency. An MMAS ≥ 3 could be used as a simple screening tool for a poor NOAC adherence.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Surveys and Questionnaires; Thiazoles

Empirically, a significant proportion of patients using direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) take off-label reduced doses. We aimed to investigate the prevalence, indications, dosages, and bleeding complications of oral anticoagulants on admission to the emergency department.. In this retrospective analysis, patients presenting to our emergency department between January 1 and December 31, 2018, with therapeutic oral anticoagulation were included (ie, vitamin-K antagonists, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, and dabigatran). A detailed chart review was performed for each case concerning characteristics, indication, and bleeding complications.. A total of 19,662 consecutive cases in the emergency department were reported: 1721 (9%) had therapeutic oral anticoagulation. Vitamin-K antagonists (41%), rivaroxaban (36%), and apixaban (19%) were the most common. Stroke prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation (63.2%) and venous thromboembolism (24.1%) were the most common indications. In 27 cases (1.6%), no indication could be identified; further, 32% of patients were classified to have either off-label doses of DOACs or an international normalized ratio (INR) out of range (in vitamin-K antagonists), whereas 20% were classified as off-label underdosed and 12% as overdosed. No difference in the likelihood of bleeding on admission could be found between the respective drugs. Only concomitant use of aspirin was significantly associated with presence and higher severity of bleeding.. Vitamin-K antagonists are still the most widely used drug followed by rivaroxaban. A significant proportion of patients are being prescribed off label-doses. While no difference was found for the respective anticoagulants with respect to bleeding, concomitant aspirin use was a significant predictor for bleeding in our collective.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Emergency Service, Hospital; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Off-Label Use; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Vitamin K

Topics: Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Computed Tomography Angiography; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Topics: Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Computed Tomography Angiography; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Prognosis; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Stroke prevention in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) can be challenging, requiring a balance between thromboembolism prevention and serious bleeding. Comparisons of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and warfarin in older adults at different age strata (65-74, 75-89, and ≥ 90 years of age) in the daily practice have not been well described, particularly in Asians. We aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of NOACs compared with warfarin for stroke prevention in elderly patients with AF.. From 2012 to 2015, 64,169 patients ≥ 65 years of age with AF who received at least one NOAC (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban) or warfarin prescription were identified from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. The risks of ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), major bleeding, mortality, and composite adverse events were compared between NOACs and warfarin in all patients ≥ 65 years of age and, specifically, with different age strata (ie, 65-74, 75-89, ≥ 90 years).. Overall, NOACs were associated with a significantly lower risk of ischemic stroke (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.869; 95% CI, 0.812-0.931), ICH (aHR, 0.524; 95% CI, 0.456-0.601), major bleeding (aHR, 0.824; 95% CI, 0.776-0.875), mortality (aHR, 0.511; 95% CI, 0.491-0.532), and composite adverse events (aHR, 0.646; 95% CI, 0.625-0.667) than warfarin. There was heterogeneity in treatment effect for NOACs vs warfarin in different age strata, but the results still favored NOACs even among very older adults (≥ 90 years). The results were generally consistent with propensity matching analysis. The absolute risk difference and reductions in ICH and composite adverse events with NOAC use were even greater among older adults than warfarin.. Compared with warfarin, NOACs were associated with a significantly lower risk of adverse events, with heterogeneity in treatment effects among different age strata. Overall, the clear safety signal in favor of NOACs over warfarin was evident irrespective of age strata, being most marked in very older adults.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Taiwan; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been proven non-inferior or superior to warfarin in preventing stroke and systemic embolism, with a lower risk of major hemorrhage, in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). We sought to investigate whether effectiveness and safety differs among apixaban, rivaroxaban and dabigatran.. Patients with newly initiated DOAC treatment were identified from the Swedish anticoagulation quality registry, ranging from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2015. Patients were assigned to apixaban, dabigatran or rivaroxaban cohorts based on initiated DOAC and dose (standard or reduced). Baseline characteristics and endpoints were retrieved from validated Swedish quality registers and the National Patient Registry. Cohorts were matched using full optimal matching and directly compared.. A total of 25,843 NVAF patients were included. Patients treated with standard dose apixaban or dabigatran had lower risk of major bleeding than patients treated with rivaroxaban, HR 0.69 (95% CI 0.54-0.88) and HR 0.64 (95% CI 0.48-0.87). Regarding reduced dose, patients treated with apixaban had lower risk of major bleeding than those treated with dabigatran or rivaroxaban, HR 0.62 (95% CI 0.44-0.88) and HR 0.45 (95% CI 0.33-0.61). In reduced dose, patients treated with dabigatran had the lowest all-cause mortality. No differences in effectiveness were found.. In this large real-world NVAF cohort, direct comparisons show a favorable bleeding risk profile for dabigatran and apixaban in standard dose, and for apixaban in reduced dose. No differences in effectiveness were found. This study confirms previous indirect DOAC comparisons. Further studies are needed.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

A significant number of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) are ineligible for non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) due to previous major bleeding or because they are at high bleeding risk (HBR). In this setting the indication for percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAO) is a valuable alternative. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NOACs versus LAAO indication in NVAF patients at HBR (HAS-BLED ≥3).. All consecutive patients who underwent successful LAAO (n=193) and those treated with NOACs (n=189) (dabigatran, apixaban or rivaroxaban) were included. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was used to match LAAO and NOACs patients. At baseline, patients in the LAAO group had higher HAS-BLED (4.2% vs 3.3%, p<0.001) and lower CHADS-VASc (4.3% vs 4.7%, p=0.005) scores. After 1:1 PSM, 192 patients were enrolled in the final analysis (LAAO n=96; NOACs n=96). At two-year follow-up, no significant differences in thromboembolic (7.3% vs 6.3%, p=0.966) and ISTH major bleeding event rates (6.7% vs 4.8% p=0.503) were found between the two unmatched groups. All-cause death was significantly higher in the LAAO group (18.7% vs 10.6%; p=0.049). After PSM, all-cause death, thromboembolic and ISTH major bleeding event rates were similar between the groups. Significant independent predictors of all-cause death were dialysis (HR 5.65, 95% CI: 2.16-14.85, p<0.001) and age (HR 1.08, 95% CI: 1.05-1.13, p<0.001).. In NVAF patients at HBR, LAAO and NOACs performed similarly in terms of thromboembolic and major bleeding events up to two-year follow-up. Our findings warrant further investigation in randomised trials and therefore can be considered as hypothesis-generating.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiac Catheterization; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K

The study objective was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of dabigatran and other direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared with warfarin among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation using a prospective monitoring program. We implemented a cohort design with propensity score matching to compare initiators of DOACs and warfarin between 2010 and 2015 in two US healthcare databases. Proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for stroke and major bleeding. The final analyses included 29,448 dabigatran, 35,520 rivaroxaban, and 19,588 apixaban initiators, matched to warfarin initiators. The pooled HR for stroke was 0.75 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58-0.98) for dabigatran, 0.77 (95% CI 0.61-0.98) for rivaroxaban, and 0.69 (95% CI 0.50-0.96) for apixaban, consistent with findings from randomized trials. For major hemorrhage, the HRs were 0.72 (95% CI 0.65-0.80), 1.02 (95% CI 0.94-1.12), and 0.56 (95% CI 0.49-0.64), respectively, showing a decreased risk of major bleeding for both dabigatran and apixaban, as compared with trial evidence.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin; Young Adult

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin; Young Adult

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Humans; Prejudice; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K

In China, dabigatran and rivaroxaban are the only approved non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). The goal of this article was to assess the cost-effectiveness of dabigatran versus rivaroxaban for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in Chinese patients with AF from the perspective of the Chinese health care system.. A Markov model was constructed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of dabigatran versus rivaroxaban. Clinical events were modeled for a lifetime horizon, based on clinical efficacy data from indirect treatment comparisons. The weighted average of the most recent prices of these 2 drugs was used as the drug acquisition cost. Other costs, including follow-up costs and event costs, were collected by using a survey from a panel of local experts. Utility inputs (health state utilities, clinical event disutilities, and event history utility) were obtained from published literature. Sensitivity analyses that included scenario analyses and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis were conducted to examine the robustness of the economic model.. Over a lifetime, patients treated with dabigatran experienced fewer ischemic strokes (2.14 dabigatran vs 2.61 rivaroxaban) and fewer intracranial hemorrhage (0.48 vs 0.94) per 100 patient-years. In the base case analysis, dabigatran had an incremental cost of ¥28,128 but with higher life years (10.38 vs 10.14) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) (7.95 vs 7.70). The resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of ¥112,910 per QALY gained and net monetary benefit of ¥12,214 versus rivaroxaban showed that dabigatran was a cost-effective alternative to rivaroxaban. Extensive sensitivity analyses indicated that the results were robust over a wide range of inputs. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that dabigatran was cost-effective in 84.2% of the 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations compared with rivaroxaban.. Dabigatran reduced the occurrence of clinical events and increased QALYs compared with rivaroxaban. The use of dabigatran for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism is a cost-effective option compared with rivaroxaban among patients with AF in China.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; China; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Embolism; Female; Humans; Male; Markov Chains; Models, Economic; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to compare the risk of stroke or systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) using dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban in routine clinical practice.. Using nationwide registries in Norway from January 2013 to December 2017, we established a cohort of 52 476 new users of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) with AF. Users of individual NOACs were matched 1:1 on the propensity score to create three pairwise-matched cohorts: dabigatran vs. rivaroxaban (20 504 patients), dabigatran vs. apixaban (20 826 patients), and rivaroxaban vs. apixaban (27 398 patients). Hazard ratios (HRs) for the risk of stroke or SE and major bleeding were estimated. In the propensity-matched comparisons of the risk of stroke or SE, the HRs were 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76-1.02] for dabigatran vs. rivaroxaban, 0.88 (95% CI 0.75-1.02) for dabigatran vs. apixaban, and 1.00 (95% CI 0.89-1.14) for apixaban vs. rivaroxaban. For the risk of major bleeding, the HRs were 0.75 (95% CI 0.64-0.88) for dabigatran vs. rivaroxaban, 1.03 (95% CI 0.85-1.24) for dabigatran vs. apixaban, and 0.79 (95% CI 0.68-0.91) for apixaban vs. rivaroxaban.. In this nationwide study of patients with AF in Norway, we found no statistically significant differences in risk of stroke or SE in propensity-matched comparisons between dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. However, dabigatran and apixaban were both associated with significantly lower risk of major bleeding compared with rivaroxaban.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Databases, Factual; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Norway; Patient Safety; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Registries; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The present study aimed at describing (i) the characteristics of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients newly treated with oral anticoagulants (vitamin K antagonists [VKA] or new oral anticoagulants [NOAC]), and (ii) their persistence to treatment assigned, clinical outcomes (bleeding and thromboembolic events) and mortality.. This study was conducted using administrative databases of an Italian Local Health Unit. All adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with NVAF and naïve to VKA (warfarin) or NOAC (rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran) were included between January 1, 2014 and June 30, 2015. Propensity score matching was performed to check for confounding effects. Included patients were characterized for comorbidities, CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED score, antiplatelet drug use and followed up for at least 12 months to assess persistence to treatment and incidence of clinical outcomes.. A total of 970 NVAF patients newly treated with oral anticoagulants were included; 595 (61.3%) received VKA and 375 (38.7%) NOAC. VKA naïve patients had a lower low and intermediate score for HAS-BLED and CHA2DS2-VASc compared to NOAC patients. Overall, 80.6% of naïve NAO patients and 73.4% of naïve AVK patients were persistent to treatment. Incidence of bleeding events was slightly higher in VKA patients (3.13/100 persons year) compared to NOAC patients (2.73/100 persons years), as well as incidence of thromboembolic events (3.48/100 persons year and 2.18/100 persons year, respectively). After propensity score matching no differences were observed.. The majority of NVAF patients newly treated with oral anticoagulants received VKA-based therapy. Incidence of bleeding and thromboembolic events was slightly higher in VKA patients compared to NOAC patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Cause of Death; Comorbidity; Dabigatran; Databases, Factual; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Medication Adherence; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Propensity Score; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Data comparing dabigatran with rivaroxaban regarding the resolution of left atrial/left atrial appendage (LA/LAA) thrombus in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) are scarce. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of dabigatran vs rivaroxaban regarding the resolution of LA/LAA thrombus in patients with nonvalvular AF.. This retrospective study enrolled nonvalvular AF patients scheduled to undergo catheter ablation or cardioversion in Shanghai Ruijin Hospital between January 2014 and January 2019. Altogether, 34 patients with LA/LAA thrombus detected by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) were enrolled. Among them, 12 patients were treated with dabigatran 150 mg bid and the other 22 with rivaroxaban 20 mg qd. Follow-up TEE was performed within greater than or equal to 3 weeks to less than 6 months of the initial TEE to evaluate the resolution of the LA/LAA thrombus.. Baseline patient characteristics were similar in the two groups. Overall, 18 patients (81.8%) in the rivaroxaban group had complete thrombus resolution after 70.3 ± 22.1 treatment days, and 10 patients (83.3%) in the dabigatran group had complete thrombus resolution after 69.3 ± 47.9 treatment days. There was no significant difference between the groups (P = .6). TEE showed that the average length, width, and area of thrombus significantly decreased in both groups after treatment, although there was no significant difference in the amount of change in these parameters between the two groups after treatment (P = .6). Undissolved thrombus in two patients in the rivaroxaban group did dissolve after switching to dabigatran.. The results suggest that both dabigatran and rivaroxaban are potential options for treating LA/LAA thrombus in patients with nonvalvular AF. Dabigatran could be an alternative option for the resolution of LA/LAA thrombus resistant to rivaroxaban.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antithrombins; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

It is important to understand the risk of thromboembolism and bleeding in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) receiving direct oral anticoagulants; however, data on risk factors in Japanese patients are limited.. XAPASS (Xarelto Post-Authorization Safety and Effectiveness Study in Japanese Patients with Atrial Fibrillation) is a prospective observational study examining the safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban in Japanese real-world clinical practice. We investigated risk factors for stroke/noncentral nervous system systemic embolism (non-CNS SE)/myocardial infarction (MI) and major bleeding using 1-year follow-up data. Associations between baseline characteristics and outcomes were examined by Cox regression analysis.. During April 2012-June 2014, 11,308 patients newly started with rivaroxaban treatment were enrolled. Of 9578 patients with 1-year data fixed as of September 2017, 6220 patients who received appropriate dosages of rivaroxaban for their creatinine clearance were included in the present safety outcomes subanalysis, and 6198 were included in the effectiveness outcomes analysis. Stroke/non-CNS SE/MI was observed in 97 of 6198 patients (1.6%, 1.8 events/100 patient-years), and major bleeding occurred in 102 of 6220 patients (1.6%, 1.9 events/100 patient-years). Age greater than or equal to 75 years (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.27; [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.49, 3.47]), prior ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack (2.08; [1.38, 3.13]), and antiplatelet use (3.23; [1.83, 5.70]) were associated with stroke/non-CNS SE/MI. Creatinine clearance less than 50 mL/min (HR: 1.86; [95% CI: 1.26, 2.75]), diabetes (1.55; [1.02, 2.35]), and antiplatelet use (3.04; [1.70, 5.45]) were associated with major bleeding.. These results would help physicians to assess risks in Japanese patients with NVAF receiving rivaroxaban.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Decision-Making; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Selection; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Prospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate the fracture risk among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) treated with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) or warfarin.. We conducted a real-world nationwide retrospective cohort study using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. All adult patients in Taiwan newly diagnosed with AF between 2012 and 2016 who received NOACs or warfarin were enrolled and followed up until 2017. Patients treated with NOACs were sub-grouped according to the NOAC used (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban). Propensity score matching was performed for each head-to-head comparison. Cox regression analysis, with a shared frailty model, was used to calculate the adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for hip, vertebral, and humerus/forearm/wrist fractures. After matching, 19 414 patients were included (9707 in each NOAC and warfarin groups). The median follow-up time was 2.4 years. Compared with warfarin, NOACs were associated with a reduced fracture risk [aHR = 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.77-0.93; P < 0.001]. Sub-analyses revealed that each NOAC, namely dabigatran (aHR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.78-0.99; P = 0.027), rivaroxaban (aHR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.72-0.90; P < 0.001), and apixaban (aHR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.52-0.87; P = 0.003), had a reduced fracture risk. Analyses including all eligible patients, without propensity score matching, generated similar results.. Compared with warfarin, NOAC was associated with a reduced fracture risk among AF patients. Therefore, if oral anticoagulants are indicated, NOACs rather than warfarin should be considered to lower the risk of fractures. However, further studies are needed to investigate the underlying mechanisms and elucidate causality.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Taiwan

We evaluated adherence to dosing criteria for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) taking dabigatran or rivaroxaban and the impact of off-label dosing on thromboembolic and bleeding risk.. We used data for a retrospective cohort from a large U.S. health plan for Medicare beneficiaries age > =65 years with AF who initiated dabigatran or rivaroxaban during 2010-2016. Stroke and major bleeding were quantified in patients who were eligible for low dose but received standard dose, and in patients who were eligible for standard dose but received low dose.. We identified 8035 and 19,712 patients who initiated dabigatran or rivaroxaban, respectively. Overall, 1401 (17.4%) and 7820 (39.7%) patients who received dabigatran and rivaroxaban met criteria for low dose, respectively. Of those, 959 (68.5%) and 3904 (49.9%) received standard dose. In contrast, 1013 (15.3%) and 2551 (21.5%) of patients eligible for standard dose dabigatran and rivaroxaban received low dose. Mean follow-up for patients eligible for low and standard dose dabigatran and rivaroxaban were 13.9, 15.1, 10.1, and 12.3 months, respectively. In unadjusted analyses, patients eligible for low or standard dose dabigatran and rivaroxaban but receiving off-label dose, had no differences in the rates of ischemic stroke. Among patients who met criteria for standard dose direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC), use of low dose was associated with significantly higher risk of any major bleeding (Dabigatran: HR = 1.44; 95% CI 1.14-1.8, P = 0.002, Rivaroxaban HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.11-1.6, P = 0.002) and gastrointestinal bleeding (Dabigatran: HR = 1.48; 95% CI 1.08-2, P = 0.016). In patients who met criteria for low dose DOACs, there was lower risk of major bleeding (Dabigatran: HR = 0.59; 95% CI 0.43-0.8, P < 0.001), gastrointestinal (Rivaroxaban: HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.64-0.98, P = 0.03) and intracranial bleeding (Dabigatran: HR = 0.33; 95% CI 0.12-0.9, P = 0.001) with standard dosing. After propensity matching, use of off-label doses was not associated with stroke, major, gastrointestinal or intracranial bleeding for either dabigatran or rivaroxaban.. While a significant number of patients receive higher or lower dose of dabigatran and rivaroxaban than recommended, we found no evidence of significant impact on thromboembolic or hemorrhagic outcomes.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Databases, Factual; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Medicare; Off-Label Use; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States

Background Reducing major bleeding events is a challenge when managing anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation. This study evaluated the impact of modifiable and nonmodifiable bleeding risk factors in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving rivaroxaban and estimated the impact of risk factor modification on major bleeding events. Methods and Results Modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors associated with major bleeding events were identified from the XANTUS (Xarelto for Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) prospective registry data set (6784 rivaroxaban-treated patients). Parameters showing univariate association with bleeding were used to construct a multivariable model identifying independent risk factors. Modeling was used to estimate attributed weights to risk factors. Heavy alcohol use (hazard ratio [HR]=2.37; 95% CI 1.24-4.53); uncontrolled hypertension (HR after parameter-wise shrinkage=1.79; 95% CI 1.05-3.05); and concomitant treatment with antiplatelets, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or paracetamol (HR=1.80; 95% CI 1.24-2.61) were identified as modifiable, independent bleeding risk factors. Increasing age (HR=1.25 [per 5-year increment]; 95% CI 1.12-1.38); heart failure (HR=1.97; 95% CI 1.36-2.86); and vascular disease (HR=1.91; 95% CI 1.32-2.77) were identified as nonmodifiable bleeding risk factors. Overall, 128 (1.9%) patients experienced major bleeding events; of these, 11% had no identified bleeding risk factors, 50% had nonmodifiable bleeding risk factors only, and 39% had modifiable bleeding risk factors (with or without nonmodifiable risk factors). The presence of 1 modifiable bleeding risk factor doubled the risk of major bleeding. Conclusions Elimination of modifiable bleeding risk factors is a potentially effective strategy to reduce bleeding risk in atrial fibrillation patients receiving rivaroxaban. Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01606995.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alcohol Drinking; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Atrial Fibrillation; Europe; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Registries; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

With safety concerns about increasing bleeding, off-label underdosing of non-vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants (NOACs) is common in East Asian patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We tried to investigate the pattern of NOAC underdosing and associated clinical outcomes in patients with AF who are indicated for standard dosing. Using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database, we evaluated 16,568 patients with a new prescription of NOAC who are indicated for standard NOAC dosing and compared 4,536 patients with warfarin with respect to thromboembolic events (ischemic stroke or systemic embolization), all-cause mortality and major bleeding. Of the 16,568 patients indicated for standard NOAC dosing, 8,549 (51.9%) received off-label underdosing (50.6% rivaroxaban, 53.0% apixaban). During a median follow up of 15.0 months, as compared with warfarin, underdosing of rivaroxaban was associated with lower risks of major thromboembolic events (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41 to 0.69) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.57, 95% CI: 0.41 to 0.82), and a similar risk of major bleeding (HR 1.10, 95% CI: 0.82 to 1.46). However, underdosing of apixaban was associated with similar risks of major thromboembolic events (HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.70 to 1.16), all-cause mortality (HR 0.94, 95 CI: 0.71 to 1.24) and major bleeding (HR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.61 to 1.17). In conclusion, in this Korean population with AF who are indicated for standard NOAC dosing, off-label underdosing is common and its clinical benefit over warfarin was inconsistent according to types of NOAC. Notably, apixaban underdosing provides no benefit in effectiveness compared with warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Off-Label Use; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

There is limited evidence on the effectiveness and safety of direct-acting oral anticoagulants in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study compared the risks of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism (ISSE) and major bleeding in patients with NVAF and stage IV-V CKD treated with rivaroxaban or warfarin.. Patients with NVAF and stage IV-V CKD who initiated rivaroxaban or warfarin treatment between November 2011 and June 2018 were selected from the Optum® Deidentified Electronic Health Record Database. Propensity score matching was used to balance rivaroxaban and warfarin patients on 112 measured baseline covariates. ISSE and major bleeding events over 2 years following treatment initiation were ascertained with validated end point definitions. Outcomes were analyzed as time-to-event data using Kaplan-Meier survival estimators and Cox regression.. A total of 781 eligible rivaroxaban-treated patients were propensity score-matched to 1,536 warfarin-treated patients; baseline covariates were well balanced after matching (absolute standardized differences <0.1). The average patient age was 80 years; 60.5% were female; 81.3% and 18.7% had CKD stage IV and V, respectively. Hazard ratios for rivaroxaban compared to warfarin were 0.93 (95% CI 0.46-1.90, P = .85) for the risk of ISSE and 0.91 (95% CI 0.65-1.28, P = .60) for major bleeding.. No statistically significant difference in the risk of ISSE or major bleeding was found between rivaroxaban- and warfarin-treated patients. Although further study is needed, rivaroxaban appears to be a reasonable alternative to warfarin for ISSE prevention in the setting of NVAF and stage IV-V CKD.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Apixaban and rivaroxaban are the most commonly prescribed direct oral anticoagulants for adults with atrial fibrillation, but head-to-head data comparing their safety and effectiveness are lacking.. To compare the safety and effectiveness of apixaban versus rivaroxaban for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.. New-user, active-comparator, retrospective cohort study.. A U.S. nationwide commercial health care claims database from 28 December 2012 to 1 January 2019.. Adults newly prescribed apixaban (n = 59 172) or rivaroxaban (n = 40 706).. The primary effectiveness outcome was a composite of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism. The primary safety outcome was a composite of intracranial hemorrhage or gastrointestinal bleeding.. 39 351 patients newly prescribed apixaban were propensity score matched to 39 351 patients newly prescribed rivaroxaban. Mean age was 69 years, 40% of patients were women, and mean follow-up was 288 days for new apixaban users and 291 days for new rivaroxaban users. The incidence rate of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism was 6.6 per 1000 person-years for adults prescribed apixaban compared with 8.0 per 1000 person-years for those prescribed rivaroxaban (hazard ratio [HR], 0.82 [95% CI, 0.68 to 0.98]; rate difference, 1.4 fewer events per 1000 person-years [CI, 0.0 to 2.7]). Adults prescribed apixaban also had a lower rate of gastrointestinal bleeding or intracranial hemorrhage (12.9 per 1000 person-years) compared with those prescribed rivaroxaban (21.9 per 1000 person-years), corresponding to an HR of 0.58 (CI, 0.52 to 0.66) and a rate difference of 9.0 fewer events per 1000 person-years (CI, 6.9 to 11.1).. Unmeasured confounding, incomplete laboratory data.. In routine care, adults with atrial fibrillation prescribed apixaban had a lower rate of both ischemic stroke or systemic embolism and bleeding compared with those prescribed rivaroxaban.. Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Incidence; Male; Propensity Score; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Oral anticoagulants are prescribed for stroke prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation, which is the most common heart arrhythmia worldwide. The vitamin K antagonist (VKA) warfarin is a long-established anticoagulant. However, newer direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been recently introduced as an alternative. Given the prevalence of atrial fibrillation, anticoagulant choice has substantial clinical and financial implications for healthcare systems. In this study, we explore trends and geographic variation in anticoagulant prescribing in English primary care. Because national guidelines in England do not specify a first-line anticoagulant, we investigate the association between local policies and prescribing data.. Primary care prescribing data of anticoagulants for all NHS practices from 2014 to 2019 in England was obtained from the ePACT2 database. Public formularies were accessed online to obtain local anticoagulation prescribing policies for 89.5% of clinical commissioning groups (CCGs). These were categorized according to their recommendations: no local policies, warfarin as first-line, or identification of a preferred DOAC (but not a preferred anticoagulant). Local policies were cross-tabulated with pooled prescribing data to measure the strength of association with Cramér's V.. Nationally, prescribing of DOACs increased from 9% of all anticoagulants in 2014 to 74% in 2019, while that of warfarin declined accordingly. Still, there was significant local variation. Across geographical regions, DOACs ranged from 53 to 99% of all anticoagulants. Most CCGs (73%) did not specify a first-line choice, and 16% recommended warfarin first line. Only 11% designated a preferred DOAC. Policies with a preferred DOAC indeed correlated with increased prescribing of that DOAC (Cramér's V = 0.25, 0.27, 0.38 for rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban respectively). However, local policies showed a negligible relationship with the classes of anticoagulants prescribed-DOAC or VKA (Cramér's V = 0.01).. Nationally, the use of DOACs to treat atrial fibrillation has increased rapidly. Despite this, significant geographical variation in uptake remains. This study provides insights on how local policies relate to this variation. Our findings suggest that, in the absence of a nationally recommended first-line anticoagulant, local prescribing policies may aid in deciding between individual DOACs, but not in adjudicating between DOACs and vitamin K antagonists (i.e. warfarin) as general classes.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Drug Utilization; England; Female; Humans; Male; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Primary Health Care; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; State Medicine; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Body Mass Index; Comorbidity; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heart Disease Risk Factors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Obesity; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Prospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thinness; Thromboembolism; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The evolution of non-vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants (NOACs) has changed the horizon of stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (SPAF). All 4 NOACs have been tested against dose-adjusted warfarin in well-designed, pivotal, phase III, randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) and were approved by regulatory authorities for an SPAF indication. However, as traditional RCTs, these trials have important weaknesses, largely related to their complex structure and patient participation, which was limited by strict inclusion and extensive exclusion criteria. In the real world, however, clinicians are often faced with complex, multimorbid patients who are underrepresented in these RCTs. This article is based on a meeting report authored by 12 scientists studying atrial fibrillation (AF) in diverse ways who discussed the management of challenging AF cases that are underrepresented in pivotal NOAC trials.. An advisory board panel was convened to confer on management strategies for challenging AF cases. The article is derived from a summary of case presentations and the collaborative discussions at the meeting.. This expert consensus of cardiologists aimed to define management strategies for challenging cases with patients who underrepresented in pivotal trials using case examples from their routine practice. Although strong evidence is lacking, exploratory subgroup analysis of phase III pivotal trials partially informs the management of these patients. Clinical trials with higher external validity are needed to clarify areas of uncertainty. The lack of clear evidence about complex AF cases has pushed clinicians to manage patients based on clinical experience, including rare situations of off-label prescriptions.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiologists; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Consensus; Dabigatran; Disease Management; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Warfarin is standard anticoagulation therapy for patients with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD). However, warfarin requires regular monitoring and dosage adjustments and fails for many patients, causing thromboembolic and bleeding events. Factor Xa inhibitors have been shown to be noninferior to warfarin in preventing strokes and are associated with less intracranial hemorrhage in patients with atrial fibrillation. We evaluated treatment safety and effectiveness in CF-LVAD patients who switched from warfarin to a factor Xa inhibitor (apixaban or rivaroxaban) after warfarin failure.. This was a retrospective, single-center study of patients treated between 2008 and 2018. We assessed the occurrence of stroke, non-central nervous system (CNS) embolism, pump thrombosis, and major gastrointestinal bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage during therapy.. Factor Xa inhibitors may be viable treatment options for CF-LVAD patients for whom warfarin therapy has failed. Large prospective studies are necessary to confirm these results.

Topics: Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heart Failure; Heart-Assist Devices; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

To assess the safety (ie, risk of bleeding) and effectiveness (ie, risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE)) separately for four non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs; apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban and rivaroxaban) versus warfarin in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), including those at high risk of bleeding and treated with reduced doses of NOACs.. We conducted a retrospective analysis of electronic health records and claims data from 372 acute care hospitals in Japan for patients with NVAF newly initiated on NOACs or warfarin. Baseline characteristics were balanced using inverse probability of treatment weighting with stabilised weights (s-IPTW). Bleeding risk and stroke/SE risk were expressed as HRs with 95% CIs. Two sensitivity analyses were conducted.. In patients with NVAF primarily treated with reduced-dose NOACs, the risks of stroke/SE and major bleeding were significantly lower with NOACs versus warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Administrative Claims, Healthcare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Electronic Health Records; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Safety; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

It remains unknown whether the comparative effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin differs between atrial fibrillation patients with and without a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). Using 2012 to 2014 Medicare claims data, we identified patients newly diagnosed with AF in 2013 to 2014 who initiated apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin. We categorized patients based on a history of stroke or TIA. We constructed Cox proportional hazard models that included indicator variables for treatment groups, a history of stroke or TIA, and the interaction between them, and controlled for demographics and clinical characteristics. DOACs were generally more effective than warfarin in stroke prevention; however, there were important differences between subgroups defined by a history of ischemic stroke. In particular, the superiority of dabigatran compared with warfarin in ischemic stroke prevention was more pronounced in patients with a history of stroke or TIA (hazard ratio [HR] 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48 to 0.85) than in patients with no history of stroke or TIA (HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.75 to 1.16; p value for interaction = 0.034). There was no difference in the risk of stroke between apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban in patients with no history of stroke or TIA. However, in patients with a history of stroke or TIA, the risk of stroke was lower with dabigatran (HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.48 to 0.85) and rivaroxaban (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.56 to 0.87), compared with apixaban (p value for both interactions <0.05). In conclusion, the comparative effectiveness of DOACs differs substantially between patients with and without a history of stroke or TIA; specifically, apixaban is less effective in patients with a history of stroke or TIA.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Medicare; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemostasis; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thrombelastography

To investigate the decline of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs).. Multicentre prospective cohort study including 1667 patients with nonvalvular AF. The eGFR was assessed by the CKD-EPI formula at baseline and during follow-up. The primary endpoint of the study was the median annual decline of eGFR according to VKA (n = 743) or NOAC (n = 924) use. As secondary endpoints, we analysed the transition to eGFR <50 mL/min/1.73 m. Median age was 73.7 ± 9.1 years and 43.3% were women. VKA-treated patients showed an eGFR decline of -2.11 (interquartile range [IQR] -5.68/-0.62), which was -0.27 (IQR -9.00/4.54, P < 0.001 vs VKAs), -1.21 (IQR -9.98/4.02, P = 0.004 vs VKAs) and -1.32 (IQR -8.70/3.99, P = 0.003 vs VKAs) in patients on dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban, respectively. Transition to eGFR <50 mL/min/1.73 m. Patients prescribed NOACs showed a lower decline of renal function compared to those prescribed VKAs. This effect was partially lost in patients with diabetes.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Aim To evaluate frequency of administration of anticoagulant therapy (ACT) for atrial fibrillation and to study the effect of chronic antithrombotic therapy (ATT) on kidney function.Material and methods Due to a high medical and social significance of AF, much attention is presently paid to appropriate administration of ACT for AF in clinical practice. The study retrospectively analyzed 776 case reports of hospitalized patients with AF. The effect of chronic ATT on kidney function was studied in 70 patients who were rehospitalized, including 25 patients treated with warfarin, 25 patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC), and 20 patients treated with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA).Results In January 2014, at the prehospital stage, 74.3 % of patients did not receive ATT, 14.7 % of patients received antiplatelet therapy, and only 11 % received anticoagulants. In the hospital in January 2014, ACTs were administered to 74.3 % of patients (warfarin, 58.6 %; DOAC, 15.7 %), 20.6 % of patients received antiplatelet drugs, and 5.1 % of patients were discharged without ATT. In January 2019, the number of patients receiving ACT at the prehospital stage increased to 58.1 % (warfarin, 13.8 %; DOAC, 44.3 %); 12 % of patients received antiplatelet drugs; and 29.9 % of patients did not receive ATT. The number of patients treated with warfarin and DOAC in the hospital increased to 14.8 % and 70.6 % (rivaroxaban, 33.4 %; apixaban, 25.5 %, and dabigatran, 11.7 %), respectively. The number of patients taking antiplatelet drugs decreased to 3.7 %, and the number of patients without ATT decreased to 10.9 %. There were no statistically significant differences in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) between these three groups at baseline. Only in the warfarin treatment group, GFR was significantly decreased from baseline during the follow-up period. Comparison of GFR in three study groups at the finale stage of the study showed significant differences between mean GFRs in the warfarin treatment group and the DOAC treatment group and between the warfarin treatment group and the ASA treatment group.Conclusion Among the prescribed and taken anticoagulants, DOACs are presently in the first place. Among DOACs, the most frequently prescribed drug is rivaroxaban. GFR decreases with the DOAC treatment slower than with the warfarin treatment. Despite the slower decrease in GFR with the ASA treatment compared to warfarin, ASA is not indicated for prevention of stroke in AF due to its

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

The objective was to compare major bleeding risk of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs; per type and dose) with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), irrespective of indication, using real-world data.. A population-based prospective cohort study, using the French national health data system (SNIIRAM), identified 47 469 adults living within 5 well-defined geographical areas, who were new users of oral anticoagulants in the period 2013-2015: 20 205 VKA users, 19 579 rivaroxaban users, 4225 dabigatran users and 3460 apixaban users. From all emergency departments within these areas, clinical data for all adults referred for bleeding was collected and medically validated. The databases were linked for common key variables. The main outcome measure was major bleeding: intracranial haemorrhage, major gastrointestinal bleeding and other major bleeding events. Hazard ratios were derived from adjusted Cox proportional hazard models. We used propensity score weighting as a sensitivity analysis, with separate analyses according to indications (atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism).. Compared to VKAs, high and low-dose DOACs were associated with a reduced risk of intracranial haemorrhage (adjusted hazard ratio 0.55, 95% confidence interval 0.37-0.82 and 0.54, 0.26-1.12 respectively), and a reduced risk of other major bleeding events (0.41, 0.29-0.58 and 0.41, 0.22-0.79 respectively), irrespective of duration and indication. Neither DOAC dose evidenced any significant difference from VKAs in terms of risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding.. There is a clear benefit of using DOACs with regard to intracranial haemorrhage. The study provides new insight into major gastrointestinal and other major bleeding events.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K

It is unclear whether anticoagulant type is associated with the risk for osteoporotic fracture, a deleterious complication of anticoagulants among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).. To compare the risk for osteoporotic fracture between anticoagulants.. Population-based cohort study.. Territory-wide electronic health record database of the Hong Kong Hospital Authority.. Patients newly diagnosed with AF between 2010 and 2017 who received a new prescription for warfarin or a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) (apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban). Follow-up ended on 31 December 2018.. Osteoporotic hip and vertebral fractures in anticoagulant users were compared using propensity score-weighted cumulative incidence differences (CIDs).. There were 23 515 patients identified (3241 apixaban users, 6867 dabigatran users, 3866 rivaroxaban users, and 9541 warfarin users). Overall mean age was 74.4 years (SD, 10.8), ranging from 73.1 years (warfarin) to 77.9 years (apixaban). Over a median follow-up of 423 days, 401 fractures were identified (crude event number [weighted rate per 100 patient-years]: apixaban, 53 [0.82]; dabigatran, 95 [0.76]; rivaroxaban, 57 [0.67]; and warfarin, 196 [1.11]). After 24-month follow-up, DOAC use was associated with a lower risk for fracture than warfarin use (apixaban CID, -0.88% [95% CI, -1.66% to -0.21%]; dabigatran CID, -0.81% [CI, -1.34% to -0.23%]; and rivaroxaban CID, -1.13% [CI, -1.67% to -0.53%]). No differences were seen in all head-to-head comparisons between DOACs at 24 months (apixaban vs. dabigatran CID, -0.06% [CI, -0.69% to 0.49%]; rivaroxaban vs. dabigatran CID, -0.32% [CI, -0.84% to 0.18%]; and rivaroxaban vs. apixaban CID, -0.25% [CI, -0.86% to 0.40%]).. Residual confounding is possible.. Among patients with AF, DOAC use may result in a lower risk for osteoporotic fracture compared with warfarin use. Fracture risk does not seem to be altered by the choice of DOAC. These findings may help inform the benefit-risk assessment when choosing between anticoagulants.. The University of Hong Kong and University College London Strategic Partnership Fund.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hip Fractures; Hong Kong; Humans; Male; Osteoporotic Fractures; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Spinal Fractures; Stroke; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation with minimally interrupted direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may raise a concern about their remaining activity. We tested the residual activity of four different DOACs and its impact on intraprocedural heparinization in patients undergoing AF ablation.. We measured the anti-factor Χa activity for rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, and serum DOAC concentration for rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran, 24 hours after the last intake in patients undergoing AF ablation treated with standard or reduced doses of DOACs. The heparin requirement during the procedure was also measured.. We enrolled 34 patients with rivaroxaban, 35 with apixaban, 32 with edoxaban, and 31 with dabigatran, and among them, 30 were treated with reduced doses. The anti-factor Χa activity was the highest in the apixaban group among the patients with standard doses. The DOAC concentration was paradoxically lower in patients with standard doses than in those with reduced doses among the patients with rivaroxaban (34.3 ± 19.8 vs 56.6 ± 7.7 ng/mL; P = .01) and dabigatran (12.6 ± 10.6 vs 23.4 ± 14.7 ng/mL; P = .03). The total heparin requirement per body surface area had significant correlations with the anti-factor Χa activity (r = -.36) and DOAC concentration (r = -.32). Two different multiple linear regression models (adjusted R. Factors determining residual DOAC activity may include its type and dose regimen, and it may influence the heparin requirement during AF ablation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Recommended rivaroxaban doses for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (SPAF) are 20 and 15 mg/day in patients with normal and reduced renal function, respectively, but lower doses (15 and 10 mg) have been tested and approved in Japan. It is not known whether 15 and 10 mg rivaroxaban are appropriate in other Asian populations. This study compared the anti-Factor Xa (FXa) activity of 20 and 15 mg rivaroxaban in Thai patients with normal renal function and 15 and 10 mg rivaroxaban in patients with reduced renal function.Methods and Results:Sixty non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients receiving rivaroxaban (mean [±SD] age 69.3±9.1 years, mean creatinine clearance 59.2±22.7 mL/min) were enrolled. The anti-FXa activity of standard rivaroxaban and Japan-specific doses was measured at peak and trough concentrations. Median anti-FXa activity at peak concentrations was significantly higher for the standard than Japan-specific dose. Median anti-FXa activity measured at the trough was significantly higher for the standard dose only in those with impaired renal function. A higher proportion of patients receiving the Japan-specific rather than standard dose had anti-FXa activity at peak concentrations within the expected range (87.7% vs. 64.4%; P=0.001). One-third of those receiving the standard dose had anti-FXa activity higher than the expected range.. A significantly higher proportion of Thai patients receiving the Japan-specific dose of rivaroxaban had anti-FXa activity at peak concentrations within the expected range.

Topics: Aged; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Dosage Calculations; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thailand; Treatment Outcome

Black patients are under-represented in randomized trials evaluating oral anticoagulants in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). We sought to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in African Americans with NVAF.. We performed an analysis using Optum® De-Identified Electronic Health Record (EHR) data from 1/1/2012-9/30/2018. We included adult African American patients with a diagnosis of NVAF who were anticoagulant-naïve during the 12-months prior to initiation of rivaroxaban or warfarin. Patients receiving rivaroxaban were 1:1 propensity score matched to warfarin patients. Our primary effectiveness and safety outcomes were the 2-year incidence rates (%/year) of stroke or systemic embolism (SSE) and major bleeding using an intention-to-treat approach. Cohorts were compared using doubly-robust Cox regression and reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).. We matched 4102 rivaroxaban and 4102 warfarin users with a median (interquartile range) available follow-up of 2.0 (0.9, 2.0) years. Median CHA2DS2-VASc and HASBLED scores were 3 (2, 4) and 2 (1, 3). Rivaroxaban use was associated with a lower risk of SSE (1.99 versus 2.48, HR = 0.77, 95%CI = 0.60-0.99), ischemic stroke (1.84 versus 2.37, HR = 0.76, 95%CI = 0.59-0.98) and major bleeding (4.22 versus 4.98, HR = 0.84, 95%CI = 0.70-0.99). No differences in intracranial hemorrhage or gastrointestinal bleeding were observed. Neither sensitivity analyses utilizing an on-treatment methodology nor inverse probability-of-treatment weighting showed significant differences in SSE or major bleeding between rivaroxaban and warfarin users.. Rivaroxaban appeared at least as effective and safe as warfarin when used to manage African American patients with NVAF in routine practice.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Black or African American; Embolism; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Comparative effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation and high polypharmacy are unknown.. We used Medicare administrative data to evaluate patients with new atrial fibrillation diagnosis from 2015 to 2017, who initiated an oral anticoagulant within 90 days of diagnosis. Patients taking ≤3, 4 to 8, or ≥9 other prescription medications were categorized as having low, moderate, or high polypharmacy, respectively. Within polypharmacy categories, patients receiving apixaban 5 mg twice daily, rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily, or warfarin were matched using a 3-way propensity score matching. Study outcomes included ischemic stroke, bleeding, and all-cause mortality.. The study cohort included 6985 patients using apixaban, 3838 using rivaroxaban, and 6639 using warfarin. In the propensity-matched cohorts there was no difference in risk of ischemic stroke between the 3 drugs in patients with low and moderate polypharmacy. However, among patients with high polypharmacy, the risk of ischemic stroke was higher with apixaban compared with warfarin (adjusted hazard ratio 2.34 [95% CI, 1.01-5.42];. Our study suggests that among patients with significant polypharmacy (>8 drugs), there may be a higher stroke and mortality risk with apixaban compared with warfarin and rivaroxaban. However, differences were of borderline significance.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Polypharmacy; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticoagulants; Anticonvulsants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Valproic Acid; Venous Thrombosis

To compare the effectiveness and safety of a drug in daily practice with the outcomes of a target non-inferiority trial by rigorously mimickingin an observational study the trial's design features.. This cohort study was conducted using the British Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) to emulate the ROCKET AF (Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation) trial. Patients with atrial fibrillation who were newly prescribed (>=12 months of no use) either rivaroxaban or warfarinfrom October 2008 to December 2017 were included. Non-inferiority of rivaroxaban to warfarin in the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism was assessed in different analysis populations (intention-to-treat [ITT], per-protocol [PP], and as-treated populations) using a hazardratio (HR) of 1.46 as the non-inferiority margin. Major bleeding (safety outcome) was also assessed and compared to that of the target trial. All outcomes were analyzed using Cox-proportional hazard analyses.. We included 25,473 incident users of rivaroxaban (n=4,008) or warfarin(n=21,465). Similar to the trial, non-inferiority in the primary out come was demonstrated in all three analysis populations: HR=1.04 (95%CI 0.84 to 1.30) (ITT), HR=0.98 (95%CI 0.70 to 1.38) (PP), and HR=1.11 (95%CI 0.86 to 1.42) (as-treated). Risk of major bleeding was also similar to the target trial.. The results of this study provide supportive evidence to the effectiveness of rivaroxaban and adds knowledge on the usefulness of emulating a non-inferiority trial to assess drug effectiveness.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The effects of direct oral anticoagulants in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation should be assessed in actual conditions of use. France has near-universal healthcare coverage with a unified healthcare information system, allowing large population-based analyses. NAXOS (Evaluation of Apixaban in Stroke and Systemic Embolism Prevention in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation) aimed to compare the safety, effectiveness, and mortality of apixaban with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), rivaroxaban, and dabigatran, in oral anticoagulant-naive patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.. This was an observational study using French National Health System claims data and including all adults with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who initiated oral anticoagulant between 2014 and 2016. Outcomes of interest were major bleeding events leading to hospitalization (safety), stroke and systemic thromboembolic events (effectiveness), and all-cause mortality. Four approaches were used for comparative analyses: matching on propensity score (PS; 1:n); as a sensitivity analysis, matching on high-dimensional PS; adjustment on PS; and adjustment on known confounders. For each outcome, cumulative incidence rates accounting for competing risks of death were estimated.. Overall, 321 501 patients were analyzed, of whom 35.0%, 27.2%, 31.1%, and 6.6% initiated VKAs, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran, respectively. Apixaban was associated with a lower PS-matched risk of major bleeding compared with VKAs (hazard ratio [HR], 0.43 [95% CI, 0.40-0.46]) and rivaroxaban (HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.63-0.72]), but not dabigatran (HR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.81-1.08]). Apixaban was associated with a lower risk of stroke and systemic thromboembolic event compared with VKAs (HR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.56-0.65]), but not rivaroxaban (HR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.97-1.15]) or dabigatran (HR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.78-1.11]). All-cause mortality was lower with apixaban than with VKAs, but not lower than with rivaroxaban or dabigatran.. Apixaban was associated with superior safety, effectiveness, and lower mortality than VKAs; with superior safety than rivaroxaban and similar safety to dabigatran; and with similar effectiveness when compared with rivaroxaban or dabigatran. These observational data suggest potentially important differences in outcomes between direct oral anticoagulants, which should be explored in randomized trials.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Rivaroxaban is a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) approved for the treatment of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Data related to the risk factors associated with rivaroxaban-induced bleeding in patients with NVAF remain scarce in the community setting. We sought to investigate these bleeding risk factors in a racially diverse patient population.. We conducted a single-center, retrospective study based on a chart review of patients who received rivaroxaban from our outpatient pharmacy from January 2015 to April 2018 for NVAF. Any reported bleeding event (BE) was recorded as either major or minor bleeding event. Demographic and clinical data were collected and analyzed.. Of the 327 patients included in our analysis, 105 (32%) were female, and the mean age was 62 ± 12 years. Among the included patients, 176 (54%) patients were black, 71 (22%) were white, 51 (15.6%) were Hispanic, 13 (4%) were Asian, and 15 (4.6%) belonged to other races. 89 (27.2%) of the patients had co-prescription of aspirin. A total of 24 (7.3%) patients developed BE, out of which 9 (2.7%) patients had a major BE, and 15 (4.5%) patients had minor BE. Non-fatal gastrointestinal bleeding and epistaxis were the most common type of BE. On multivariable analysis, concurrent aspirin use (81 to 325 mg) (P = 0.03; odds ratio (OR) 2.60 [1.08-6.28]) and increasing age (P = 0.00; OR 1.06 [1.01-1.11]) were independent predictors of BE.. In community practice, aspirin co-prescription is common among NVAF patients prescribed rivaroxaban. Increasing age and concurrent aspirin use are independent predictors of BE.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Acute Disease; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Clopidogrel; Combined Modality Therapy; Cyclophosphamide; Dabigatran; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stents; Stroke; Vitamin K

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are widely used in the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). The efficacy of NOACs has been attributed in part to pleiotropic effects that are mediated through effects on thrombin, factor Xa, and their respective receptors. Direct pharmacological effects of NOACs and cardiac ion channels have not been addressed to date. We hypothesized that the favourable clinical outcome of NOAC use may be associated with previously unrecognized effects on atrial repolarizing potassium channels.. This study was designed to elucidate acute pharmacological effects of NOACs on cloned ion channels Kv11.1, Kv1.5, Kv4.3, Kir2.1, Kir2.2, and K2P2.1 contributing to IKr, IKur, Ito, IK1, and IK2P K+ currents. Human genes, KCNH2, KCNA5, KCND3, KCNJ2, KCNJ12, and KCNK2, were heterologously expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes, and currents were recorded using voltage-clamp electrophysiology. Apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban applied at 1 µM did not significantly affect peak current amplitudes of Kv11.1, Kv1.5, Kv4.3, Kir2.1, Kir2.2, or K2P2.1 K+ channels. Furthermore, biophysical characterization did not reveal significant effects of NOACs on current-voltage relationships of study channels.. Apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban did not exhibit direct functional interactions with human atrial K+ channels underlying IKr, IKur, Ito, IK1, and IK2P currents that could account for beneficial clinical outcome associated with the drugs. Indirect or chronic effects and potential underlying signalling mechanisms remain to be investigated.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Potassium Channels; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

The "on-therapy range" of direct oral anticoagulants is the 90% interval of drug concentration. Previously, we reported the on-therapy range of rivaroxaban in a single-center cohort. The present study aimed to confirm the range and intraindividual reproducibility in a multicenter cohort.Eligible patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation under rivaroxaban treatment for prevention of ischemic stroke were enrolled from nine institutes in Tokyo, Japan, between June 2016 and May 2017 (n = 324). The first and second (three months later) blood samples both taken within 1-5 hours after rivaroxaban intake were analyzed (n = 219). Plasma concentration of rivaroxaban (PC-Riv) and prothrombin time (PT) with five reagents were measured.The 90% interval of PC-Riv was 47.3-532.9 ng/mL. The 90% interval of PT measured with RecombiPlasTin 2G was 11.8-22.3 seconds, the widest range among the five reagents examined. PC-Riv reproducibility within a 90% interval was evaluated bidirectionally (first-to-second and second-to-first), and 92.4% of samples were reproducible. The change rate (CR) of PC-Riv between two samplings ranged widely, and high CR (≥54.3%, cutoff for predicting non-reproducibility) was predicted by concomitant drugs (non-dihydropyridine calcium antagonist and thiazide) and mitral regurgitation.We reported the on-therapy range of rivaroxaban in a multicenter cohort. This range was consistent with that of a single-center cohort and was highly reproducible within three months in daily clinical practice. However, caution is necessary regarding several factors that may affect the intraindividual variation of PC-Riv.

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Reproducibility of Results; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Following the publication of the COMPASS trial, the European Medicines Agency has approved a regimen of combination of rivaroxaban 2.5mg twice daily and a daily dose of 75-100mg acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) or symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD) at high risk of ischemic events. However, the applicability of such a therapeutic strategy in France is currently unknown.. To describe the proportion of patients eligible to COMPASS in France, their baseline clinical characteristics and the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events, using the REACH registry.. From the the REduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) registry database, a large international registry of patients with, or at risk, of atherothrombosis, we analyzed patients included in France with either established CAD and/or PAD and fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the COMPASS trial. The ischemic outcome was a composite of cardiovascular (CV) death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke, and serious bleeding were defined as haemorrhagic stroke or bleeding leading to hospitalization or transfusion.. Among more than 65000 patients enrolled in REACH, 2.012 patients were evaluable and enrolled in France. Among them, 1194 patients (59.3%) were eligible to COMPASS. The main reasons for exclusion of the COMPASS trial, were high bleeding risk (59.1%), anticoagulant use (43.4%), requirement for dual antiplatelet therapy within 1 year of an ACS or PCI (24.7%). In the "COMPASS eligible population", the rate of MACE (CV, MI and stroke) at 4 years follow-up was 13.4% [11.3-15.8], and serious bleeding was 2.5% at 4 years [1.6-3.4]. Patients with polyvascular disease (n=219) had the highest rate of MACE, compared with patients with CAD only and PAD only (19.1% [13.9-26.1] vs. 11.6% [9.1-14.8] vs 13.2% [9.2-18.8], P<0.0001, respectively).. The COMPASS therapeutic strategy in France appears to be applicable to more than half of CAD or PAD patients. This population appears at high residual risk of atherothrombotic events, and patients with polyvascular disease experienced the highest rate of events.

Topics: Aged; Analysis of Variance; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atherosclerosis; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Follow-Up Studies; France; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Patient Selection; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Registries; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Amputation, Surgical; Aspirin; Brain Ischemia; Chocolate; Cysts; Humans; Ischemia; Ischemic Stroke; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Myocardial Infarction; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

The results of randomised clinical trials (RCTs) on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) can mostly be applied to primary prevention in relatively young patients, since only a minority of patients included in these trials were receiving DOACs for secondary prevention. The real-life secondary prevention subgroup, comprising mostly elderly and high-risk patients, remains a point of interest where further exploration is needed. Our objective was to explore the effectiveness and safety of DOACs for secondary prevention in the real-life conditions.. In a six-year (2012-2018) period all consecutive patients with a history of transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or stroke, recorded NVAF and prescription of DOAC, were included in this single-centre registry. Choice of the DOAC and dose was based on the discretion of the attending clinician. Data regarding recurrent stroke/TIA or other embolic events, intracranial haemorrhage, other major bleeding, adherence and potential changes of therapy were collected and analysed.. During the study period, 566 patients were prescribed a DOAC for secondary stroke prevention, and follow-up data were available for 510 patients, with an average observational time of 2.6 years. The mean age of patients was 77.9 ± 8.7 years. The mean CHA. Our real-life data study suggests that secondary stroke prevention with DOACs is as effective and safe as primary prevention, both in standard and reduced doses, in a typical group of patients who are older than patients included in RCTs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Registries; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke

To provide the most current assessment of real-world healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who newly initiated rivaroxaban and apixaban using a large US database.. A retrospective weighted cohort design was used with healthcare insurance claims from the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart databases (January 2012-December 2018). The index date was defined as the first dispensing of rivaroxaban or apixaban. Adult NVAF patients with an index date on or after 1 January 2016, ≥ 12 months of continuous eligibility before the index date and ≥ 1 month after, and without prior use of oral anticoagulant were included. The observation period spanned from the index date to the earliest of the end of data availability, end of insurance coverage, or death. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics between cohorts. All-cause healthcare resource utilization (HRU), including hospitalization, emergency room, and outpatient visits, and healthcare costs, including medical and pharmacy costs, were evaluated from the payer's perspective during the observation period up to 18 and 24 months, separately.. In this large retrospective analysis, patients with NVAF initiated on rivaroxaban incurred significantly lower healthcare costs compared to those initiated on apixaban, which were primarily driven by significantly lower outpatient visits and costs during the 18- and 24-month follow-up periods.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Health Expenditures; Humans; Insurance Claim Review; Male; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States

To compare the hospital length of stay (LOS) between rivaroxaban and warfarin in hospitalized acute stroke patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in Japan.. This was a retrospective, observational study using a Japanese hospital claims database. Data of NVAF patients who were started on oral anticoagulant (OAC) treatment during hospitalization were extracted and LOS-OAC (period from the initiation of index OAC therapy to the end of hospitalization or censoring date) and medical costs were compared between rivaroxaban and warfarin treatments. To compare LOS-OAC, a time-to-event analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The analysis period was from April 2012 to December 2015.. This study included 773 rivaroxaban users and 1077 warfarin users. After the propensity score matching, 546 patients for each treatment constituted the matched cohorts. Although the rivaroxaban users had a similar LOS-OAC to warfarin users (median, 18 vs. 19 days,. It is not possible to say that the only confounder was stroke severity and therefore other possible known and unknown confounders could not be ruled out.. The rivaroxaban users had a 3-day shorter LOS-OAC after IPTW-adjustment. Using rivaroxaban was associated with 4-5 days shorter LOS-OAC than using warfarin in patients with mild or moderate stroke, though treatment selection did not have a large impact in patients with severe stroke.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Hospitalization; Hospitals; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Length of Stay; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Comparative gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) risk between rivaroxaban and low-dose aspirin is unknown in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This study investigated GIB risk with rivaroxaban vs aspirin among two separate AF cohorts in Hong Kong and the United Kingdom, using a common protocol approach.. This was a population-based cohort study using separate data from the Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System (CDARS) of the Hong Kong Hospital Authority (2010-2018) and The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database in the United Kingdom (2011-2017). Patients with AF newly prescribed aspirin or rivaroxaban were included. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compare GIB risks for rivaroxaban vs aspirin, accounting for confounders using propensity score fine stratification approach.. In CDARS, 29 213 patients were included; n = 1052 (rivaroxaban), n = 28 161 (aspirin). Crude GIB event rates per 100 patient-years in CDARS were 3.0 (aspirin) and 2.6 (rivaroxaban). No difference in GIB risk was observed between rivaroxaban and aspirin overall (HR = 1.04, 95%CI = 0.76-1.42), and in dose-stratified analyses (HR = 1.21, 95%CI = 0.84-1.74 [20 mg/day]; HR = 0.80, 95%CI = 0.44-1.45 [≤15 mg/day]). In THIN, 11 549 patients were included, n = 3496 (rivaroxaban) and n = 8053 (aspirin). Crude GIB event rates were 1.3 (aspirin) and 2.4 (rivaroxaban) per 100 patient-years. No difference in GIB risk was observed between rivaroxaban and aspirin overall (HR = 1.40, 95%CI = 1.00-1.98) and low-dose rivaroxaban (≤15 mg/day) (HR = 1.00, 95%CI = 0.56-1.30), but increased GIB risk was observed for rivaroxaban 20 mg/day vs aspirin (HR = 1.57, 95%CI = 1.08-2.29).. In patients with AF, GIB risk was comparable between aspirin and rivaroxaban ≤15 mg/day. GIB risk for rivaroxaban 20 mg/day vs aspirin remains uncertain and warrants further investigation.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Covert brain infarcts are associated with cognitive decline. It is not known whether therapies that prevent symptomatic stroke prevent covert infarcts. COMPASS compared rivaroxaban with and without aspirin with aspirin for the prevention of stroke, myocardial infarction, and vascular death in participants with stable vascular disease and was terminated early because of benefits of rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily plus aspirin over aspirin. We obtained serial magnetic resonance imagings and cognitive tests in a consenting subgroup of COMPASS patients to examine treatment effects on infarcts, cerebral microbleeds, and white matter hyperintensities.. Baseline and follow-up magnetic resonance imagings were completed in 1445 participants with a mean (SD) interval of 2.0 (0.7) years. Whole-brain T1, T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, T2* sequences were centrally interpreted by blinded, trained readers. Participants had serial measurements of cognition and function. The primary end point was the proportion of participants with incident covert infarcts. Secondary end points were the composite of clinical stroke and covert brain infarcts, cerebral microbleeds, and white matter hyperintensities.. At baseline, 493 (34.1%) participants had infarcts. Incident covert infarcts occurred in 55 (3.8%) participants. In the overall trial rivaroxaban plus aspirin reduced ischemic stroke by 49% (0.7% versus 1.4%; hazard ratio [95% CI], 0.51 [0.38-0.68]). In the magnetic resonance imaging substudy the effects of rivaroxaban+aspirin versus aspirin were: covert infarcts: 2.7% versus 3.5% (odds ratio [95% CI], 0.77 [0.37-1.60]); Covert infarcts or ischemic stroke: 2.9% versus 5.3% (odds ratio [95% CI], 0.53 [0.27-1.03]). Incident microbleeds occurred in 6.6% of participants and 65.7% of participants had an increase in white matter hyperintensities volume with no effect of treatment for either end point. There was no effect on cognitive tests.. Covert infarcts were not significantly reduced by treatment with rivaroxaban and aspirin but estimates for the combination of ischemic stroke and covert infarcts were consistent with the effect on ischemic stroke in the overall trial. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01776424.

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Brain; Brain Infarction; Cognitive Dysfunction; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Loss, Surgical; Dabigatran; Elective Surgical Procedures; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Medication Therapy Management; Perioperative Care; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Adjustment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are mostly prescribed to prevent cardioembolic stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). An increasing number of guidelines recommend DOAC in AF patients with preserved renal function for the prevention of thromboembolism, and an increased use of DOAC in daily practice has been recorded also in elderly patients. Ageing is associated with a reduction in glomerular filtration rate, and impaired renal function, regardless of the cause, increases the risk of bleeding. Multiple medication use (polypharmacy) for treating superimposed co-morbidities is common in both elderly and chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients and drug-drug interaction may cause accumulation of DOAC, thereby increasing the risk of bleeding. The safety profile of DOAC in patients with CKD has not been defined with any certainty, particularly in those with severely impaired renal function or end stage renal disease. This has been due to the heterogeneity of studies and the relative paucity of data. This document reports the position of three Italian scientific societies engaged in the management of patients with atrial fibrillation who are treated with DOAC and present with CKD.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antidotes; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Drug Interactions; Drug Monitoring; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Observational Studies as Topic; Polypharmacy; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles

Direct oral anticoagulants, such as apixaban and rivaroxaban, are important for the treatment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism and to reduce the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Because apixaban and rivaroxaban are predominantly eliminated by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A and P-glycoprotein (P-gp), concomitant use of combined P-gp and strong CYP3A4 inhibitors and inducers should be avoided. Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models for apixaban and rivaroxaban were developed to estimate the net effect of CYP3A induction, P-gp inhibition, and P-gp induction by rifampicin. The disposition of rivaroxaban is more complex compared with apixaban because both hepatic and renal P-gp is considered to contribute to rivaroxaban elimination. Furthermore, organic anion transporter-3, a renal uptake transporter, may also contribute the elimination of rivaroxaban from systemic circulation. The models were verified with observed clinical drug-drug interactions with CYP3A and P-gp inhibitors. With the developed models, the predicted area under the concentration time curve and maximum concentration ratios were 0.43 and 0.48, respectively, for apixaban, and 0.50-0.52 and 0.72-0.73, respectively, for rivaroxaban when coadministered with 600 mg multiple doses of rifampicin and that were very close to observed data. The impact of each of the elimination pathways was assessed for rivaroxaban, and inhibition of CYP3A led to a larger impact over intestinal and hepatic P-gp. Inhibition of renal organic anion transporter-3 or P-gp led to an overall modest interaction. The developed apixaban and rivaroxaban models can be further applied to the investigation of interactions with other P-gp and/or CYP3A4 inhibitors and inducers.

Topics: ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1; Atrial Fibrillation; Biological Transport; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inducers; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors; Drug Interactions; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rifampin; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Venous Thromboembolism

Although the direct oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban is recommended for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation based on Phase III clinical trials, there is still a need for additional safety data from everyday clinical practice. The ROSE study was initiated to collect further information on the safety and utilisation of rivaroxaban in a broader range of patient groups in routine clinical practice.. The ROSE study was conducted in hospitals in England and Wales. Consenting adults with non-valvular atrial fibrillation newly started on rivaroxaban were eligible and followed up for 12 weeks. Data was derived through secondary use of medical records. The primary outcome was major bleeding within gastrointestinal, urogenital and intracranial sites. A total of 4846 patients were enrolled in the study September 2013 to January 2016, 965 of which were treated with rivaroxaban for non-valvular atrial fibrillation. The median age in the rivaroxaban non-valvular atrial fibrillation cohort was 76 years, 53.6% were male. The median HAS-BLED score was 2 and the median CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4. The risk of major bleeding within each of the primary sites of gastrointestinal, urogenital and intracranial during the 12 week observation period was low (0.2%; n = 2). The risk of major bleeding in all sites was 1.0% (n = 10) at a rate of 5.5 events per 100 patient years.. In terms of the primary outcome risk of major bleeding within gastrointestinal, urogenital and intracranial sites during the 12 week observation period, the risk estimates in the non-valvular atrial fibrillation rivaroxaban user population were low (<1%), and consistent with risk estimated from clinical trial data and in routine clinical practice.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; England; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Care; Stroke; Wales

Prior use of direct oral anticoagulants has been associated with reduced stroke severity in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) on stroke severity in patients who were receiving dabigatran or rivaroxaban at the time of stroke onset.. We enrolled 107 patients with NVAF who developed acute ischemic stroke while on dabigatran or rivaroxaban and presented within 24 hours to nine hospitals between January 2014 and December 2018. The results of PT and aPTT assays were obtained within 24 hours of stroke onset in all patients. We analyzed PT and aPTT in relation to stroke severity and ischemic lesion volume using correlation and multivariable regression analyses.. Of the 107 patients included, 46 (43.0%) were on dabigatran and 61 (57.0%) were on rivaroxaban. In patients with prior dabigatran use, while aPTT was inversely correlated with admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (r = -0.369, p = 0.012) and ischemic lesion volume (r = -0.480, p = 0.005), there was no correlation between PT and either of these variables. Multivariable analysis confirmed the existence of a significant independent inverse relationship between aPTT and NIHSS score at admission (B, -0.201; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.370 to -0.032; p = 0.005) and between aPTT and ischemic lesion volume (B, -0.076; 95% CI, -0.130 to -0.023; p = 0.007). In patients with prior rivaroxaban use, neither PT nor aPTT was associated with admission NIHSS score or ischemic lesion volume in the correlation and multivariable analyses.. In patients with NVAF who were receiving dabigatran, prolonged aPTT was associated with reduced stroke severity.

Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Partial Thromboplastin Time; Prognosis; Prothrombin Time; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke

Aim To compare efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and reduced creatinine clearance.Material and methods Systematic search for literature and indirect comparison of DOACs were performed.Results The indirect comparison included five randomized clinical trials. The DOACs were comparable by the efficacy of preventing stroke and systemic embolism. The safety profiles had differences. Apixaban significantly decreased the relative risk of major bleeding compared to rivaroxaban by 27 % (relative risk (RR) 0.73; 95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.55-0.98). The apixaban advantage was even greater in the group of patients with a creatinine clearance <50 ml/min: RR was reduced by 48 % compared to rivaroxaban (RR=0.52; 95 % CI: 0.32-0.84), by 50 % compared to dabigatran 300 mg/day (RR=0.50; 95 % CI: 0.31-0.81), and by 48 % compared to dabigatran 220 mg/day (RR=0.52; 95 % CI: 0.32-0.85)Conclusion The indirect comparison of DOACs showed that their efficacy was comparable. With respect of safety, apixaban is the preferrable DOAC for patients with atrial fibrillation and creatinine clearance below 50 ml/min.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

To investigate the differences in the characteristics and clinical outcomes of recently diagnosed patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving different types of anticoagulants in a real-life setting.. We retrospectively analyzed the charts of 1000 consecutive patients with non-valvular AF diagnosed at our institution or referred it to from 2013 to 2018.. Over the observed period, the frequency of direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) therapy use significantly increased (P = 0.002). Patients receiving warfarin had more unfavorable thromboembolic and bleeding risk factors than patients receiving DOAC. Predetermined stroke and major bleeding risks were similarly distributed among the dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban groups. Patients receiving warfarin had shorter time-to-major bleeding (TTB), time to thrombosis (TTT), and overall survival (OS) than patients receiving DOACs. After adjustment for factors unbalanced at baseline, the warfarin group showed significantly shorter OS (hazard ratio 2.27, 95% confidence interval 1.44-3.57, P<0.001], while TTB and TTT did not significantly differ between the groups. Only 37% of patients on warfarin had optimal dosing control, and they did not differ significantly in TTB, TTT, and OS from patients on DOACs.. Warfarin and DOACs are administered to different target populations, possibly due to socio-economic reasons. Patients receiving warfarin rarely obtain optimal dosing control, and experience significantly shorter survival compared with patients receiving DOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Survival Rate; Warfarin; Young Adult

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with increased stroke and bleeding risk in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Little is known about the real-life use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in CKD stage G4. In a retrospective cohort study, we enrolled 182 consecutive AF patients with CKD stage G4 including 90 (49%) subjects on NOAC, ie, 61 on apixaban 2.5 mg bid and 29 on rivaroxaban 15 mg qd, and 92 (51%) subjects on warfarin. Thromboembolic and bleeding events were recorded during a mean follow-up of 26.3 months. There were no differences in demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables at baseline between the 2 treatment groups. During follow-up, arterial thromboembolic events occurred in 11 (12.22%) subjects on NOAC and 7 (7.61%) on warfarin, (hazard ratio [HR] 1.70; 95% CI, 0.65-4.42), with similar risk of ischemic stroke (9 [10%] vs. 7 [7.61%], P = 0.56, respectively). Major bleedings or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding occurred in 14 (15.56%) on NOAC and 13 (14.13%) on warfarin, (HR 1.12; 95% CI, 0.53-2.39), with similar risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (HR 0.70; 95% CI, 0.20-2.47). We observed no difference in all-cause mortality related to the type of anticoagulants, but it tended to be lower in the apixaban group compared with rivaroxaban group (14.7% vs. 31%, P = 0.07), without any differences in thromboembolic and bleeding events. The study suggests that AF patients with CKD stage G4 receiving reduced-dose NOAC or warfarin have similar risk of thromboembolism and bleeding in everyday practice of a tertiary anticoagulation center.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Poland; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were shown to have better outcomes than warfarin for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Given limited local real-world data, this study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of NOACs versus warfarin for NVAF in Singapore.. This single-centre retrospective cohort study included 439 patients ≥ 21 years old that were newly prescribed with oral anticoagulants (OACs) for NVAF in 2015. Follow-ups for patients upon OAC initiation lasted either for 2 years or until the occurrence of bleeding or thromboembolism event or death (whichever was earlier). Primary endpoints included major bleeding and stroke, while secondary endpoints included overall bleeding and thromboembolic events. Time-to-events was evaluated via Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Data on time in therapeutic range (TTR) and compliance were analysed.. NOACs were associated with similar stroke and major bleeding rates as warfarin for NVAF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Singapore; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin; Young Adult

In Japanese surveillance in an early phase after the approval of rivaroxaban, inappropriate underdose was frequently utilized. The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence and predictors of the inappropriate usage of rivaroxaban in a single-center, cardiovascular-specialized hospital. Consecutive 661 non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients treated with rivaroxaban between 2012 and 2017 were recruited. After excluding 30 patients without assessment of creatinine clearance (CCr), the proportion and predictors of inappropriate underdose were analyzed. Additionally, patient outcomes, including thromboembolism (ischemic stroke or systemic embolism) and major bleeding, were determined. In patients with CCr ≥ 50 mL/min (n = 532) and < 50 mL/min (n = 98), inappropriate underdose and overdose were used in 123 (23%) and 8 (8%), respectively. The predictors of inappropriate underdose (in patients with CCr ≥ 50 mL/min) were CCr [50-63 mL/min (the lowest tertile) compared to ≥ 64 mL/min], age ( ≥ 75 years), female gender, prescription of antiplatelet, and coexistence of heart failure. Although PT under rivaroxaban was lower in patients with inappropriate underdose than in those with an appropriate dose, no significant increase in the incidence of thromboembolism or major bleeding was observed within the mean follow-up of 683 days. Inappropriate underdose of rivaroxaban was frequently observed for NVAF patents even in a cardiovascular hospital, particularly in patients with CCr adjacent to the dose reduction criteria. The responses of PT and the incidence of adverse outcomes under an inappropriate dose of rivaroxaban should be further investigated.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Biomarkers; Creatinine; Drug Utilization; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Hemorrhage; Humans; Inappropriate Prescribing; Japan; Kidney; Kidney Diseases; Male; Middle Aged; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Prothrombin Time; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Topics: Aspirin; Carotid Artery Diseases; Embolism; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Brain infarction is a critical complication after lung resection using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Recent reports have described its association with thrombosis in the pulmonary vein (PV) stump. However, the optimal management of this complication remains controversial. We describe serial 3 cases of brain infarctions associated with thrombosis in the PV stumps, which were successfully treated with the oral Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban.. We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 3 patients. The first case was a 72-year-old man who underwent left upper lobectomy for treatment of lung adenocarcinoma. The second case was a 55-year-old man who underwent right lower segmentectomy for treatment of metastatic tumor from Barrett's esophageal carcinoma. The third case was a 73-year-old man who underwent left upper lobectomy for treatment of metastatic tumor from colon adenocarcinoma. In the first case, a large cerebellar infarction was developed and a decompressive craniotomy was performed on postoperative day 4. In the second and the third case, cerebral infarctions in the territories of right middle cerebral arteries occurred on postoperative day 2. In all cases, contrast-enhanced computed tomography demonstrated the thrombi in the stumps of the PVs. They were treated with oral administration of rivaroxaban without adverse effect, and the thrombi in the PVs disappeared within 1 month.. Blood flow stasis in the long PV stump after lung resection might contribute to thrombosis development. Oral Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban appeared to be safe and useful for the management of ischemic stroke associated with PV thrombosis after lung resection.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Brain Ischemia; Decompressive Craniectomy; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pneumonectomy; Pulmonary Veins; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thrombosis

Antiplatelet therapy (APT) use in combination with oral anticoagulation is common among patients with atrial fibrillation, but there is scarce information regarding its effect on outcomes in patients on non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC). We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of APT use in a 'real-world' cohort of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients initiating NOAC.. We conducted a retrospective multicentre study including 2361 consecutive NVAF patients initiating NOAC between January 2013 and December 2016. Patients with an acute ischaemic event within the last 12 months (acute coronary syndrome, stroke or revascularization) were excluded. Patients were followed up, and all clinical events were recorded at 3 months. The primary outcome of the study was major bleeding, and the secondary outcomes were stroke, nonfatal myocardial infarction, intracranial bleeding and death.. One hundred forty-five (6.1%) patients received concomitant APT, and aspirin was the more common (79%). At 3 months, 25 (1.1%) patients had major bleeding, 8 (0.3%) had nonfatal myocardial infarction, 7 (0.3%) had ischaemic stroke, and 40 (1.7%) died. After multivariate adjustment, concomitant APT was associated with higher risk for major bleeding (HR = 3.62, 95% CI 1.32-9.89; P = .012), but was not associated with a higher risk of other clinical outcomes.. Concomitant APT use is uncommon among these patients and does not seem to be associated with lower rates of ischaemic events or death. However, there are signals for an increased risk of bleeding, which reinforces current guideline recommendations.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombins; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Mortality; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Proportional Hazards Models; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles

To evaluate the appropriateness of the initial prescribed daily dose of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) according to label in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in the UK.. Population-based cross-sectional study.. UK primary care.. 30 467 patients with NVAF and a first prescription for apixaban, dabigatran or rivaroxaban between January 2011 and December 2016.. Percentage of patients prescribed a NOAC dose according to the European Union (EU) labels (appropriately dosed), and not according to the EU labels (inappropriately dosed-including both underdosed and overdosed patients); percentage of patients prescribed an initial NOAC dose according to renal function status.. A total of 15 252 (50.1%) patients started NOAC therapy on rivaroxaban, 10 834 (35.6%) on apixaban and 4381 (14.4%) on dabigatran. Among patients starting NOAC therapy on rivaroxaban, 17.3% were eligible to receive a reduced dose compared with 12.8% of patients starting on apixaban and 53.8% of patients starting on dabigatran. The majority of patients were prescribed an appropriate dose according to the EU labels: apixaban 74.9 %, dabigatran, 74.4%; rivaroxaban, 84.2%. Underdosing occurred in 21.6% (apixaban), 8.7% (dabigatran), 9.1% (rivaroxaban). Overdosing was more frequent for dabigatran (16.9%) than for rivaroxaban (6.6%) or apixaban (3.5%). There was a trend towards dose reduction with increasing renal impairment. Among patients with severe renal impairment, the majority received a reduced dose NOAC: apixaban, 91.1%, dabigatran, 80.0%, rivaroxaban, 83.0%.. Between 2011 and 2016, the majority of patients starting NOAC therapy in UK primary care were prescribed a daily dose in line with the approved EU drug label. Underdosing was more than twice as common among patients starting on apixaban than those starting on dabigatran or rivaroxaban. Research into the patient characteristics that may influence inappropriate underdosing of NOACs in UK primary care is warranted.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United Kingdom

Prior stroke is a risk factor for stroke and bleeding during anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Although rivaroxaban is widely prescribed to reduce their risk of stroke in patients with nonvalvular AF (NVAF), the real-world evidence on rivaroxaban treatment is limited. We aimed to examine the outcomes of rivaroxaban treatment in NVAF patients with prior ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) by using the data of the Xarelto Post-Authorization Safety and Effectiveness Study in Japanese -Patients with AF, a prospective, single-arm, observational study.. The clinical outcomes of 9,578 patients who completed the 1-year follow-up were evaluated. Safety and effectiveness outcomes were compared between patients with and without prior ischemic stroke/TIA.. Among the patients, 2,153 (22.5%) had prior ischemic stroke/TIA. They were significantly older and had lower body weight, lower creatinine clearance, higher CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and modified HAS-BLED scores as compared to those without prior ischemic stroke/TIA. Any bleeding (9.1 vs. 7.2 events per 100 patient-years), major bleeding (2.3 vs. 1.6 events per 100 patient-years), and stroke/non-central nervous system systemic embolism/myocardial infarction (3.4 vs. 1.3 events per 100 patient-years) were more frequent in patients with prior ischemic stroke/TIA. Stepwise regression analysis suggested that body weight of ≤50 kg and diabetes mellitus were predictive of major bleeding in patients with prior ischemic stroke/TIA.. Safety and effectiveness event rates were higher in patients with prior ischemic stroke/TIA than those without. This might be explained by differences in several risk profiles including age, body weight, renal function, and risk scores such as CHADS2 between the groups. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01582737.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Equivalence Trials as Topic; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thrombosis; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Topics: Blood Coagulation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Disease Progression; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Patient Readmission; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Disease; Anemia, Iron-Deficiency; Anticoagulants; Cardiotonic Agents; Case-Control Studies; Diuretics; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Aneurysm; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Iron; Myocardial Infarction; Pacemaker, Artificial; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Placebos; Portraits as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Stroke Volume; Thrombosis; Urea

Treatment with anticoagulants, including direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), should be considered for patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation (AF) deemed at risk of ischaemic stroke. There are limited real world data related to the characteristics of patients with non-valvular AF who were not taking anticoagulants at the time of first ischaemic stroke and their subsequent DOAC treatment for the secondary prevention of stroke. Furthermore, little is known about patient adherence and experiences of DOAC treatment, especially for patients with non-valvular AF receiving DOAC therapy for the secondary prevention of stroke.. This is a UK mixed methodology, non-interventional study, involving retrospective and prospective medical record reviews and a prospective patient survey, in progress in six UK National Health Service secondary/tertiary care centres. The study comprises two groups of patients. Group 1 will include 300 eligible consenting patients with a first ischaemic stroke associated with non-valvular AF untreated with anticoagulants in the 12 months prior to stroke. Group 2 will include a subgroup of 150 patients from Group 1 initiated on one of the DOACs targeting activated Factor X (n = 50 on apixaban, n = 50 on edoxaban and n = 50 on rivaroxaban). The primary endpoint of the study is the CHA. This mixed methodology study will provide new real world insights into the characteristics and management pathways and patient-reported experiences of this important group of patients. It is anticipated that the results of this study will provide the medical community and patients with important information to inform clinical decision-making and help facilitate meaningful improvements in the care of patients with non-valvular AF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Humans; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; United Kingdom

Less onerous, compared with warfarin, treatment with direct oral anticoagulants (DOA) can lead to better adherence to treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, in a certain number of patients with AF, who were recommended by DOA, cardioembolic stroke recurs, which is largely due to the patients' failure to comply with medical recommendations. The appointment of DOA as first-line drugs does not guarantee a high adherence of patients with non-valvular AF. For elderly and old patients with AF and numerous comorbidities, the proposal of a simpler pharmacotherapy regimen is especially important. In a number of large modern studies performed in clinical practice, high adherence to rivaroxaban therapy has been established, which may be a result of taking this DOA 1 time per day, its safety and effectiveness.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

In the last two decades a group of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) has been developed that directly block the activity of thrombin or activated factor X. No randomized controlled trials have been conducted to verify their efficacy and safety in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) and atrial fibrillation. Few studies compared NOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) with classic anticoagulants in this unique group, and the results of these analyses remain controversial and inconclusive. Simple extrapolation of recommendations from the general population may be erroneous and lead to an increased risk of complications. Several controlled randomized trials with oral direct anticoagulants in hemodialysis patients are currently underway.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Humans; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are a major advance for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). Use of the vitamin K antagonist (VKA), warfarin, has dropped 40% since 2010 in our institution. There is limited Irish hospital data on NOAC prescribing for stroke prevention.. Single centre, retrospective observational cohort study of consecutive AF patients at increased risk of stroke and/or awaiting electrical cardioversion. Data on prescribed NOACs from February 2010 till July 2015 was collected from the electronic inpatient record. Appropriateness of prescriptions was based on CHA2DS2-VASC score and accuracy on individual NOAC SPCs. Potential drug interactions and bleeding risk were also quantified.. A total of 348 patients AF and increased risk of stroke (CHA2DS2-VASC score > 1 for men and > 2 for women) were studied. Forty-eight percent were female with a mean age 71 ± 18.6 years, 52% of whom were > 75. Mean CHA2DS2-Vasc and HAS-BLED scores were 4.1 ± 1.8 and 1.4 ± 0.8, respectively. Rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban were prescribed to 154 (54.2%), 106 (34.3%) and 41 (13.2%) patients, respectively. 20.4% had inaccurate prescriptions; 92.9% (n = 65) underdosed and 7.1% (n = 5) on inappropriately higher doses. Neither choice of NOAC, age, history of anaemia, previous bleeding or co-prescribed antiplatelets influenced the accuracy of prescription (p = NS), but decreased renal function appeared to do so (p = 0.05).. Our study highlights significant inaccuracies in NOAC prescribing. Patients commenced on NOACs should be assessed and followed up in a multidisciplinary AF clinic to ensure safe and effective prescribing and stroke prevention.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Inappropriate Prescribing; Male; Medical Audit; Middle Aged; Prescriptions; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

The management of stroke risk in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation has changed over the past few years. This change has occurred due to the introduction of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) such as apixaban, rivaroxaban and dabigatran for the management of non-valvular atrial fibrillation. These agents have shown comparable stroke risk reduction to warfarin in large international multicentre trials [1-3]. This has changed the clinical practice of many treating physicians since their introduction from 2011 to 2013. The purpose of this review was to highlight the now mainstream use of NOAC administration in preference to warfarin, by comparing the trends in the number of prescriptions filled since all three forms of oral anti-coagulant became available in 2013. These agents are being increasingly prescribed due to their ease of use compared to warfarin, which not only requires ongoing monitoring due to narrow therapeutic range but also has many drug and food interactions. Since November 2015, NOACs have become the mainstream choice for anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation likely given their ease of use compared to warfarin. The use of each anticoagulant remains divergent with the use of warfarin continuing to decrease.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thrombolytic Therapy; Treatment Outcome; Victoria; Warfarin

Topics: Aspirin; Atherosclerosis; Chronic Disease; Clinical Trials as Topic; Death; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thrombosis; Vascular Diseases

The EXPAND Study examined the real-world efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism (SE) in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). In this sub-analysis, we compared the differences in efficacy and safety between patients with and those without history of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). This multicenter, prospective, non-interventional, observational, cohort study was conducted at 684 medical centers in Japan. A total of 7141 NVAF patients aged ≥ 20 years [mean age 71.6 ± 9.4 (SD) years] who were being or planned to be treated with rivaroxaban (10 mg/day, 43.5%; 15 mg/day, 56.5%) were followed for a mean period of 897.1 ± 206.8 days with a high follow-up rate (99.7%). The primary prevention group comprised patients without history of ischemic stroke or TIA (n = 5546, 77.7%), and the secondary prevention group comprised those with history of ischemic stroke or TIA (n = 1595, 22.3%). In the primary and secondary prevention groups, the incidence rate of stroke or SE (primary efficacy endpoint) was 0.7 and 2.2%/year, respectively (P < 0.001), and the incidence rate of major bleeding (primary safety endpoint) was 1.2 and 1.5%/year, respectively (P = 0.132). For major bleeding events, the incidence rate of intracranial bleeding was 0.4 and 0.8%/year (P = 0.002) in the primary and secondary prevention groups, respectively. This sub-analysis of the EXPAND Study showed that the Japan-specific dosages of rivaroxaban were effective and safe in Japanese NVAF patients with and those without ischemic stroke or TIA in routine clinical practice.

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Primary Prevention; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

To compare the effectiveness and safety of standard-dose rivaroxaban (20 mg o.d.) and warfarin in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with a non-sex-related CHA2DS2-VASc score of 1.. Analysis of United States Truven MarketScan claims from November 2011 to December 2016 for anticoagulant-naïve NVAF patients with a single non-sex-related stroke risk factor assigned 1-point in the CHA2DS2-VASc score and ≥12-months of continuous medical/prescription insurance coverage prior to the qualifying oral anticoagulant dispensing. Standard-dose rivaroxaban users were 1:1 propensity score-matched to warfarin users. Patients were followed until outcome occurrence, insurance disenrollment, or end of data availability. Primary outcomes included stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding and were compared using Cox regression and reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In all, 3319 rivaroxaban users were 1:1 propensity score-matched to 3319 warfarin users. Median (interquartile range) duration of follow-up was 1.6 (0.7, 2) years and the most common qualifying stroke risk factor was hypertension (n = 4532, 68.3%). Rivaroxaban was associated with a significant reduction in the 1-year stroke or systemic embolism vs. warfarin (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.17-0.98), with no significant difference in overall major bleeding (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.44-1.26) or major bleeding subtypes (HR ranging from 0.33 to 0.78, P > 0.05 for all). Similar results were seen after extending follow-up to 2 years.. Rivaroxaban may lower the rate of stroke or systemic embolism vs. warfarin in NVAF patients with a non-sex-related CHA2DS2-VASc score of 1 without impacting major bleeding.

Topics: Administrative Claims, Healthcare; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Databases, Factual; Decision Support Techniques; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Predictive Value of Tests; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

Based on Phase III data, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants are recommended for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. To determine whether trial outcomes translate into similar event rates in unselected patients, this analysis compared outcomes from the real-world XANTUS study with those from the Phase III ROCKET AF study.. Individual patient data from 4020 XANTUS patients were re-weighted to match the proportion of selected baseline characteristics in 7061 rivaroxaban-treated patients from ROCKET AF, using the matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) method. For the primary analysis, CHADS2 scores and gender were selected as relevant variables. Adjusted annualized incidence rates for XANTUS were calculated and compared with incidence rates from ROCKET AF-the ratio of these rates ('MAIC ratio') was used as a relative effect estimate. Rates of major bleeding [3.10%/year vs. 3.60%/year; MAIC ratio 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-1.12] and stroke/non-central nervous system systemic embolism (1.54%/year vs. 1.70%/year; MAIC ratio 0.91; 95% CI 0.62-1.32) were similar between XANTUS and ROCKET AF. The rate of all-cause death was higher in XANTUS (3.22%/year vs. 1.87%/year; MAIC ratio 1.72; 95% CI 1.31-2.27), but the rates of vascular death were similar (1.83%/year vs. 1.53%/year; MAIC ratio 1.19; 95% CI 0.84-1.70). Sensitivity analyses weighted by different baseline characteristics supported these results.. The low rates of major bleeding and stroke in XANTUS were consistent with results from ROCKET AF. All-cause death, but not vascular death, was higher in XANTUS, as expected in an unselected real-world population.

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Cause of Death; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Sex Factors; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis recommends avoiding direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in morbidly obese patients with a body mass index (BMI) >40 kg/m. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DOACs in morbidly obese patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter.. A retrospective, single-center cohort study was conducted of patients older than 18 years, with BMI >40 kg/m. A total of 64 patients in each group were included in the study analysis. The incidence rate of ischemic stroke or TIA was 1.75%/year in the DOAC group compared with 2.07%/year in the warfarin group (rate ratio = 0.84; 95% CI = 0.23 to 3.14; P = 0.80). The incidence rate of major bleeding was 2.18%/year in the DOAC group, compared with 4.97%/year in the warfarin group (rate ratio = 0.44; 95% CI = 0.15 to 1.25; P = 0.11). Conclusion and Relevance: Apixaban and rivaroxaban may be considered as alternatives to warfarin for atrial fibrillation or flutter in morbidly obese patients. Dabigatran use in morbidly obese patients needs caution until further studies are conducted.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity, Morbid; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin; Young Adult

Several comparative real-world effectiveness studies on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been conducted, but an overview of the available evidence remains to be developed, which could provide a better understanding of the value of DOACs relative to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs).. A systematic literature review was conducted on the available real-world evidence (RWE) of three DOACs (rivaroxaban, dabigatran, and apixaban) compared with VKAs (e.g. warfarin), in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).This systematic literature review included RWE published up to December 2016. Studies with > 50 patients reporting on incident and prevalent NVAF cases were included. The following databases were searched: Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Outcomes of interest included thromboembolic events, all-cause mortality, bleeding events, and nonpersistence. Of the 562 RWE DOACs articles retrieved, 49 presented results for rivaroxaban versus VKAs, 79 for dabigatran versus VKAs, and 18 for apixaban versus VKAs. Substantial heterogeneity was found across patient population, outcome definition, and follow-up period. Major bleeding, ischemic stroke, and intracranial hemorrhage were the most frequent outcomes analyzed.. Overall, the RWE studies were aligned with the Phase 3 trials. However, conflicting results were reported for several outcomes of interest.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

This is one of the first head-to-head real-world evidence studies comparing stroke-related and bleed-related healthcare and resource utilization (HCRU) and costs among non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients initiating oral anticoagulants.. Adult NVAF patients newly diagnosed and treated with dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin between 10/01/2010 and 12/31/2014 were identified using MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases. Per-patient-per-month stroke and bleed-related HCRU and costs were reported.. Dabigatran patients were matched 1:1 to 26,592 rivaroxaban and 33,024 warfarin patients (mean age=68 years). Compared to rivaroxaban, dabigatran patients had lower bleed-related inpatient and outpatient HCRU (0.004 vs. 0.005; 0.099 vs. 0.145) and significantly lower adjusted bleed-related costs ($116 vs. $172), all p <0.05. Compared to warfarin, dabigatran patients had significantly lower stroke-related outpatient visits (0.034 vs. 0.048, p<0.001) and higher bleed-related outpatient visits (0.101 vs. 0.091, p=0.045). Multivariate adjusted bleed-related costs were significantly lower for dabigatran patients than warfarin patients ($94 vs. $138, p<0.001).. The results suggest that dabigatran patients had lower bleed-related HCRU and costs than rivaroxaban patients, and lower outpatient stroke-related HCRU, higher bleed-related outpatient HCRU, and lower bleed-related costs than warfarin patients. It provides valuable stroke-related and bleed-related HCRU and costs information among commercially insured and Medicare patients.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Health Care Costs; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Medicare; Middle Aged; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States; Warfarin

Heart failure (HF) is a common co-morbidity in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients and a potent risk factor for stroke, bleeding, and a decreased time-in-therapeutic range with warfarin. We assessed the real-world effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban and warfarin in NVAF patients with co-morbid HF.. Effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban vs. warfarin are sustained in NVAF patients with co-morbid HF treated in routine practice. The general consistency between this real-world study and those from phase III randomized trial data of rivaroxaban should provide additional reassurance to clinicians regarding the use of rivaroxaban in NVAF patients with HF.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Comorbidity; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Incidence; Male; Medicare; Propensity Score; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

Oral anti-Xa inhibitors have demonstrated noninferiority to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation and recurrent venous thromboembolism. They are associated with a decrease in major bleeding. In contrast with VKA, no coagulation monitoring is required. However, in clinical practice, determination of drug concentration is sometimes necessary.. The objective of this study was to evaluate a low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) calibrated anti-Xa assay for the quantification of rivaroxaban and apixaban plasma concentration in emergency.. The anti-Xa plasma concentration of rivaroxaban and apixaban were measured in emergency in 210 patients using STA anti-Xa liquid assay. For each plasma concentration <150 ng/mL of rivaroxaban or apixaban, an anti-Xa assay calibrated with LMWH was performed.

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Blood Coagulation Tests; Calibration; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Male; Predictive Value of Tests; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Sensitivity and Specificity; Stroke; Venous Thromboembolism

In Europe, the approved rivaroxaban dose for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is 20 mg once daily (o.d.), with 15 mg o.d. recommended in patients with creatinine clearance (CrCl) 15-49 mL/min. Non-recommended doses are prescribed in real-world practice. This analysis of the XANTUS study assessed outcomes associated with non-recommended dosing and patient characteristics that may have impacted dose choice.. Baseline characteristics and 1 year outcomes were compared in 4464/6784 patients with known CrCl, receiving recommended or non-recommended rivaroxaban doses; 3608 (80.8%) patients received recommended doses (mean CHADS2 score 1.9) and 856 (19.2%) non-recommended doses (mean CHADS2 score 2.5). Incidence rate (events/100 patient-years) for the composite of treatment-emergent adjudicated major bleeding, stroke/systemic embolism, and death was 7.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.7-9.8] and 4.8 (95% CI 4.1-5.7) with non-recommended and recommended doses, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) 1.55, 95% CI 1.2-2.1; P = 0.004]. Incidence rates for the components of the composite were 3.7 and 2.6, 1.4 and 0.9, and 3.5 and 1.9, respectively. Adjustment for baseline characteristics showed similar rates of the composite outcome (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.77-1.45; P = 0.719). Multivariable analysis identified age, anaemia, congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus, CrCl, lower body weight, AF type, and vascular disease as predictors of non-recommended dosing.. Non-recommended rivaroxaban dosing was associated with less favourable outcomes, possibly due to baseline characteristics, in addition to renal function, that may also affect physicians' dosing decisions.. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01606995.

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Canada; Clinical Decision-Making; Drug Dosage Calculations; Embolism; Europe; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Israel; Male; Middle Aged; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in routine clinical practice.. This retrospective cohort study used linked administrative data. The study population (n = 14 577) included patients with a diagnosis of AF (confirmed in hospital) who initiated DOAC treatment in Scotland between August 2011 and December 2015. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios of thromboembolic events, mortality and bleeding events.. No differences between the DOACs were observed with regard to the risk of stroke, systemic embolism or cardiovascular death. In contrast, the risk of myocardial infarction was higher among patients prescribed apixaban in comparison to those on rivaroxaban (HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.02-2.71), and all-cause mortality was higher among rivaroxaban patients in contrast to both apixaban (1.22 [1.01-1.47]) and dabigatran (1.55 [1.16-2.05]) patients; rivaroxaban patients also had a higher risk of pulmonary embolism than apixaban patients (5.27 [1.79-15.53]). The risk of other major bleeds was higher among rivaroxaban patients compared to apixaban (1.50 [1.10-2.03]) and dabigatran (1.58 [1.01-2.48]) patients; the risks of gastrointestinal bleeds and overall bleeding were higher among rivaroxaban patients than among apixaban patients (1.48 [1.01-2.16] and 1.52 [1.21-1.92], respectively).. All DOACs were similarly effective in preventing strokes and systemic embolisms, while patients being treated with rivaroxaban exhibited the highest bleeding risks. Observed differences in the risks of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction and pulmonary embolism warrant further research.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Scotland; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Continuous usage of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) among nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients is essential to maintain stroke prevention. We examined switching and discontinuation rates for the three most frequently initiated DOACs in NVAF patients in the USA.. Patients who initiated apixaban, rivaroxaban, or dabigatran (index event/date) were identified from the Pharmetrics Plus claims database (Jan 1, 2013-Sep 30, 2016, includes patients with commercial and Medicare coverage) and grouped into cohorts by index DOAC. Patients were required to have a diagnosis of NVAF and continuous health plan enrollment for 12 months prior to the index date (baseline period) and at least 3 months during the follow-up period. Drug switching rates to any other DOAC or warfarin and index DOAC discontinuation rate were evaluated separately with descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and multivariable Cox regression analysis.. Of the NVAF study population (n = 41,864), 37% initiated apixaban (n = 15,352; mean age 62 years), 51% initiated rivaroxaban (n = 21,250; mean age 61 years), and 13% initiated dabigatran (n = 5262; mean age 61 years). During the follow-up period, the unadjusted drug switching rates of patients treated with apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran were 3.6%, 6.3%, and 11.1%, respectively (p < 0.001 across the three cohorts); while the index DOAC discontinuation rates were 52.8%, 60.3%, and 62.9%, respectively (p < 0.001). After we controlled for differences in patient characteristics, patients treated with rivaroxaban (HR 1.8; 95% CI 1.6-2.0; p < 0.001) and dabigatran (HR 3.4; 95% CI 3.0-3.8, p < 0.001) had a significantly greater likelihood for drug switching than patients treated with apixaban. Also, both rivaroxaban (HR 1.1; 95% CI 1.1-1.2, p < 0.001) and dabigatran (HR 1.3; 95% CI 1.2-1.3, p < 0.001) treated patients were more likely to discontinue treatment.. In the real-world setting, patients with NVAF newly treated with apixaban were less likely to switch or discontinue treatment compared to patients treated with rivaroxaban or dabigatran.. Pfizer and Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Adherence and Compliance; United States; Warfarin

We used the US Department of Defense Military Health System database to compare the safety and effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) initiating dabigatran vs. rivaroxaban or apixaban.. Two cohorts of adults with NVAF, newly initiated on standard-dose DOAC, were identified based on clinical approval dates: July 2011-June 2016 for dabigatran (150 mg b.i.d.) or rivaroxaban (20 mg QD) and January 2013-June 2016 for dabigatran (150 mg b.i.d.) or apixaban (5 mg b.i.d.). Propensity score matching (1:1) identified two well-balanced cohorts (dabigatran vs. rivaroxaban n = 12 763 per treatment group; dabigatran vs. apixaban n = 4802 per treatment group). In both cohorts, baseline characteristics and follow-up duration were similar between treatment groups. Patients newly initiating dabigatran had significantly lower risk of major bleeding vs. rivaroxaban [2.08% vs. 2.53%; hazard ratio (HR) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70-0.97; P = 0.018], while stroke risk was similar (0.60% vs. 0.78%; HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.57-1.04; P = 0.084). The dabigatran vs. apixaban cohort analysis found no differences in risk of major bleeding (1.60% vs. 1.21%; HR 1.37, 95% CI 0.97-1.94; P = 0.070) or stroke (0.44% vs. 0.35%; HR 1.26, 95% CI 0.66-2.39; P = 0.489).. Among NVAF patients newly initiated on standard-dose DOAC therapy in this study, dabigatran was associated with significantly lower major bleeding risk vs. rivaroxaban, and no significant difference in stroke risk. For dabigatran vs. apixaban, the reduced sample size limited the ability to draw definitive conclusions.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Dabigatran; Databases, Factual; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Military Medicine; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States; United States Department of Defense; Young Adult

Previous reports have suggested that direct oral anticoagulants exert a prothrombolytic effect against intracardiac thrombi. We hypothesized that these anticoagulants may also help recanalize occluded intracranial arteries via prothrombolytic effects. In this study, we evaluated the effects of rivaroxaban, a direct oral anticoagulant, on fibrin emboli within the cerebrocortical microvessels in a mouse model of embolic stroke. Fibrin emboli prepared ex vivo were injected into the common carotid artery of male C57BL/6 mice, and embolization in the microvessels on the brain surface was observed through a cranial window. Oral administration of rivaroxaban was initiated a week before injection of the emboli. The number and sizes of the emboli were measured at two time points: immediately after and 3 h after the embolus injection in the rivaroxaban-treated mice (n =6) and untreated mice (n =7). The rates of recanalization and change in the embolus size were analyzed between the two groups. Complete recanalization was observed only in the rivaroxaban group (three mice in the rivaroxaban group compared with none in the control group). A significantly higher rate of reduction of the embolus size was observed in the rivaroxaban group than in the control group (P=0.0216). No significant differences between the two groups were observed in the serum levels of the following coagulation markers: thrombin-antithrombin III complexes, D-dimers, or plasmin-α2-plasmin inhibitor complex. Our findings indicate that rivaroxaban may promote reduction in the size of stagnated fibrin emboli in cerebrocortical microvessels in cases of embolic stroke.

Topics: Administration, Oral; alpha-2-Antiplasmin; Animals; Anticoagulants; Antithrombin III; Biomarkers; Blood Coagulation; Carotid Arteries; Cerebral Cortex; Cerebrovascular Circulation; Disease Models, Animal; Embolism; Fibrin; Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products; Fibrinolysin; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Microvessels; Peptide Hydrolases; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) receiving vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) with time in therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) range (TTR) <70%, despite good adherence, are by guidelines recommended to switch to non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs). The aim was to assess if patients are switched from VKA to NOAC when TTR is <70% in a real-world setting.. Non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients receiving VKA (1 January 2010 to 31 December 2012) were identified in nationwide registries. Time in therapeutic range was calculated by the Rosendaal method by a minimum of three INR values. Time in therapeutic range of patients continuing VKA (non-switchers) were compared with patients switched from VKA to dabigatran or rivaroxaban (switchers), the only NOACs available at that time. Factors associated with switching were analysed in a multivariable logistic regression model. 7276 patients with NVAF receiving VKA were included; of these, 6437 (88.5%) patients continued VKA [57.9% male, median age 76.7 years (Q1-Q3 68.9-83.5)] and 839 (11.5%) switched to NOAC [54.0% male, median age 76.5 years (Q1-Q3 68.4-83.6)]. No significant differences in CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were seen between the groups. The mean TTR for non-switchers was 64.0 [standard deviation (SD) 27.8] and 52.9 (SD 28.1) for switchers. Among non-switchers, 51% had a TTR <70% vs. 69% among switchers. 85% of patients with TTR <70%, were not switched contrary to recommendations. Time in therapeutic range <70% was associated with the switch [odds ratio 2.28, 95% confidence interval (1.92-2.72)].. A TTR below 70% was associated with switching from VKA to NOAC, yet by guidelines, most patients were still not switched.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Drug Monitoring; Drug Substitution; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Guideline Adherence; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Logistic Models; Male; Multivariate Analysis; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Time Factors; Warfarin

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Italy; Male; Propensity Score; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

To analyze the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients attended in clinical practice.. Observational and prospective study of AF patients that started treatment with DOACs.. This was the first prospective study that analyzed the use of all DOACs in AF patients in Spain, showing a good profile in terms of safety and effectiveness in accordance with pivotal studies.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Spain; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

To compare persistence and outcomes of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus warfarin in Chinese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF).. Given the unpredictable warfarin response and the costliness of NOACs, more research is needed to clarify which drug enjoys better persistence and outcomes, helping to provide personalised care for patients.. A prospective cohort study.. Chinese patients taking NOACs or warfarin from March 2016-April 2018 were followed up by telephone or outpatient visit at 3, 6 months and half a year thereafter. Anticoagulant persistence and outcomes including stroke and bleeding were collected. We used Cox regression to analyse data. This study was reported according to the STROBE guideline.. A total of 344 patients were enrolled; 146 patients received NOACs including dabigatran and rivaroxaban, and 198 patients received warfarin. Persistence with anticoagulants was low and dropped sharply at the third month. Patients on NOACs had worse persistence at 3, 6 and 12 months than those on warfarin. There was no difference in the incidence of ischaemic stroke and bleeding between groups, although ischaemic stroke and major bleeding occurred less frequently in the NOACs group. Paroxysmal AF, no heart failure and no stroke were predictors of NOACs non-persistence. Prior catheter ablation and no diabetes were associated with poor persistence of warfarin. The main reason for anticoagulant cessation was patient preference.. Chinese patients taking NOACs had lower persistence, similar rate of ischaemic stroke and bleeding compared with those on warfarin. Further inventions are needed to improve persistence in Chinese patients on NOACs.. Anticoagulation should highlight both persistence and outcomes emphasising personalised care of different drugs. Further interventions to improve persistence should be developed based on causes and risk factors and carried out in the third month of therapy.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Patient Preference; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Embolism; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Research Design; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Health Services Misuse; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Septal Occluder Device; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Although the efficacy and safety of the factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) were shown in global and Japanese phase III clinical trials, safety and effectiveness data from unselected patients in everyday clinical practice are limited. The objective of the XAPASS (Xarelto Post-Authorization Safety & Effectiveness Study in Japanese Patients with Atrial Fibrillation) is to investigate the safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban in Japanese real-world clinical practice.. The XAPASS is a prospective, single-arm, real-world observational study mandated by the Japanese authority as post-marketing surveillance. In total, 11,308 patients with NVAF who began treatment with rivaroxaban were enrolled from April 2012 to June 2014, and 9578 patients were analyzed to examine the one-year outcomes.. Real-world outcomes of the XAPASS showed incidence rates of major bleeding and thromboembolic events, suggesting that rivaroxaban is safe and effective in Japanese daily clinical practice (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01582737).

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome

The efficacy of early anticoagulation in acute stroke with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) remains unclear. We performed a study to evaluate the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke (IS) and major bleeding in acute IS patients with NVAF who started rivaroxaban. This observational study evaluated patients with NVAF and acute IS/transient ischemic attack (TIA) in the middle cerebral arterial territory who started rivaroxaban within 30 days after the index IS/TIA. The primary endpoints were recurrent IS and major bleeding within 90 days after the index IS/TIA. The relationship between the endpoints and the time to start rivaroxaban was evaluated by correlation analysis using cerebral infarct volume, determined by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images within 48 hours of onset of the index IS/TIA. Of 1309 patients analyzed, recurrent IS occurred in 30 (2.3%) and major bleeding in 11 (0.8%) patients. Among patients with known infarct size (N = 1207), those with small (<4.0 cm3), medium (≥4.0 and <22.5 cm3), and large (≥22.5 cm3) infarcts started rivaroxaban a median of 2.9, 2.9, and 5.8 days, respectively, after the index IS/TIA. Recurrent IS was significantly less frequent when starting rivaroxaban ≤14 days versus ≥15 days after IS (2.0% versus 6.8%, P = 0.0034). Incidences of recurrent IS and major bleeding in whom rivaroxaban was started <3 days (N = 584) after IS were also low: 1.5% and 0.7%, respectively. Initiation of rivaroxaban administration in acute IS or TIA was associated with a low recurrence of IS (2.3%), and a low incidence of major bleeding events (0.8%) for 90 days after the index stroke. For the prevention of recurrent attacks in acute IS patients with NVAF, it is feasible to start the administration of rivaroxaban within 14 days of onset. Rivaroxaban started within 3 days of onset may be a feasible treatment option for patients with a small or medium-sized infarction.

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Aspirin; Foramen Ovale, Patent; Humans; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

This 37-year-old man presented with left sided facial warmth and numbness associated with new sudden-onset right hemiparesis. The patient first developed sudden numbness of his left lip and warmth in left ear which travelled to the rest of left face. His past medical history was significant for hypertension, Hodgkin lymphoma treated with radiation therapy at the age of 10, and sleeve gastrectomy for obesity 1 year ago complicated by bilateral ischaemic cerebral infarctions with residual left hemiparesis. No acute infarcts were found on MRI. Transesophageal echocardiography revealed a complex atheroma near the sinotubular junction in ascending aorta.

Topics: Adult; Anticholesteremic Agents; Aortic Valve; Aspirin; Echocardiography, Transesophageal; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Valve Diseases; Humans; Male; Paresis; Rivaroxaban; Rosuvastatin Calcium; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Whether intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (r-TPA) therapy can be administered in acute ischemic stroke patients treated with novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), including rivaroxaban, remains controversial.. A 76-year-old woman with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, who had been receiving 15 mg rivaroxaban once daily, was brought to the emergency department with right-side hemiparesis and aphasia. The onset of neurological deficits occurred 8 hours after the last dose of rivaroxaban administration.. The patient was diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke.. Intravenous infusion of 0.6 mg/kg of r-TPA (total dose: 29 mg) was performed 9 hours and 40 minutes after the last rivaroxaban administration. During r-TPA infusion, improvement in the patient's neurological deficit was observed.. The clinical picture evidently improved from with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 21 to 16 on completion of r-TPA treatment.. Although current guidelines do not recommend administering thrombolytics in patients using NOACs with a doubtful anticoagulation status and administered within the last 24 or, even more strictly, 48 hours, this and other case studies suggest that r-TPA treatment could be considered in selected acute ischemic stroke patients receiving rivaroxaban or other Xa inhibitors, taking the patient's clinical condition and the prospective clinical benefits of r-TPA into account.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Brain Ischemia; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thrombolytic Therapy; Tissue Plasminogen Activator; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antineoplastic Agents; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Dasatinib; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Humans; Imatinib Mesylate; Interferons; Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive; Network Meta-Analysis; Pyrimidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Background Liver cirrhotic patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation have been excluded from randomized clinical studies regarding oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention. Whether non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants ( NOAC s) are superior to warfarin for these patients remains unclear. Methods and Results This nationwide retrospective cohort study, with data collected from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, enrolled 2428 liver cirrhotic patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation taking apixaban (n=171), dabigatran (n=535), rivaroxaban (n=732), or warfarin (n=990) from June 1, 2012, to December 31, 2016. We used propensity score-based stabilized weights to balance covariates across study groups. Patients were followed until the occurrence of an event or the end date of study. The NOAC group (n=1438) showed risk of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism and intracranial hemorrhage comparable to that of the warfarin group (n=990) after adjustment. The NOAC group showed significantly lower risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (hazard ratio: 0.51 [95% CI, 0.32-0.79]; P=0.0030) and all major bleeding (hazard ratio: 0.51 [95% CI, 0.32-0.74]; P=0.0003) compared with warfarin group. Overall, 90% (n=1290) of patients were taking a low-dose NOAC (apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily, rivaroxaban 10-15 mg daily, or dabigatran 110 mg twice daily). The subgroup analysis indicated that both dabigatran and rivaroxaban showed lower risk of all major bleeding than warfarin. The advantage of lower gastrointestinal and all major bleeding with NOACs over warfarin is contributed by those subgroups with either nonalcoholic or nonadvanced liver cirrhosis. Conclusions NOACs have a risk of thromboembolism comparable to that of warfarin and a lower risk of major bleeding among liver cirrhotic Asian patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Consequently, thromboprophylaxis with low-dose NOAC s may be considered for such patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Safety; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Taiwan; Thromboembolism; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are known to have a high risk of stroke and bleeding. We investigated the effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in octogenarian patients with non-valvular AF compared with warfarin.. A total of 687 octogenarian patients with AF who were administered NOACs (n = 403) or warfarin (n = 284) for stroke prevention between 2012 and 2016 were included. Thromboembolic (TE) events (stroke or systemic embolism), major bleeding events, and all-cause death were analyzed.. The NOACs group (age 83.4±3.2 years, women 52.4%, CHA2DS2-VASc score 5.0±1.8) comprised 141 dabigatran, 158 rivaroxaban, and 104 apixaban users. Most patients from the NOACs group had been prescribed a reduced dose of medication (85.6%). During 14±18 months of follow-up periods, there were 19 TE events and 18 major bleeding events. Patients with NOAC showed a lower risk of TE (1.84 vs. 2.71 per 100 person-years, hazard ration [HR] 0.134, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.038-0.479, P = 0.002), major bleeding (1.48 vs. 2.72 per 100 person-years, HR 0.110, 95% CI 0.024-0.493, P = 0.001), and all-cause death (2.57 vs. 3.50 per 100 person-years, HR 0.298, 95% CI 0.108-0.824, P = 0.020).. In octogenarian Asian patients with AF, NOACs might be associated with lower risks of thromboembolic events, major bleeding, and all-cause death than warfarin. Although most patients had received reduced doses, on-label use of NOACs was effective and safe.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Background and Purpose- In patients with ischemic stroke on therapy with vitamin K antagonists, stroke severity and clinical course are affected by the quality of anticoagulation at the time of stroke onset, but clinical data for patients using direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are limited. Methods- Data from our registry including all patients admitted with acute cerebral ischemia while taking oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation between November 2014 and October 2017 were investigated. The activity of vitamin K antagonists was assessed using the international normalized ratio on admission and categorized according to a threshold of 1.7. DOAC plasma levels were measured using the calibrated Xa-activity (apixaban, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban) or the Hemoclot-assay (dabigatran) and categorized into low (<50 ng/mL), intermediate (50-100 ng/mL), or high (>100 ng/mL). Primary objective was the association between anticoagulant activity and clinical and imaging characteristics. Results- Four hundred sixty patients were included (49% on vitamin K antagonists and 51% on DOAC). Patients on vitamin K antagonists with low international normalized ratio values had higher scores on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and a higher risk of large vessel occlusion on admission. For patients on DOAC, plasma levels were available in 75.6% and found to be low in 49 (27.7%), intermediate in 41 (23.2%), and high in 87 patients (49.2%). Low plasma levels were associated with higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores on admission (low: 8 [interquartile range, 3-15] versus intermediate: 4 [1-11] versus high: 3 [0-8]; P<0.001) and higher risk of persisting neurological deficits or cerebral infarction on imaging (85.7% versus 75.6% versus 54.0%; P<0.001). Low DOAC plasma levels were an independent predictor of large vessel occlusion (odds ratio, 3.84 [95% CI, 1.80-8.20]; P=0.001). Conclusions- The activity of anticoagulation measured by specific DOAC plasma levels on admission is associated with stroke severity and presence of large vessel occlusion.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Registries; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Warfarin

Differences in adherence may represent drug properties (e.g. dosing interval) or patient experiences while on treatment. Adherence to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is important to maintain effectiveness over the course of treatment.. This was a retrospective cohort study using 2009-2015 Truven Health MarketScan Databases. New initiators of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban with NVAF were identified. Twelve months of continuous enrollment before treatment was required to assess demographics and medical history. Proportion of days cover (PDC) was used to measure adherence at 3, 6, 9 and 12-month. Gaps in therapy and treatment switches were also evaluated. Logistic regression was used to compare high adherence (PDC ≥0.80).. A total of 14,864 dabigatran, 16,005 rivaroxaban, and 8078 apixaban users were identified. Apixaban users had the highest adherence overall, with mean PDC at 3, 6, 9, and 12-months of 0.83, 0.76, 0.72, and 0.69, while dabigatran had the lowest adherence of 0.78, 0.67, 0.61, and 0.57. Adherence to DOACs increased with increased stroke risk scores. Adherence was also higher when first days supplied was > 30 days compared to 30 days and when filled via mail order pharmacies. Switching was highest among dabigatran users. Apixaban users were the most likely to have high adherence versus dabigatran (OR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.60-1.88) and versus rivaroxaban (OR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.14-1.34) at 12-months.. Apixaban users had the highest overall adherence despite twice-daily dosing versus once-daily dosing for rivaroxaban. These findings can be useful for formulary decision-making and when assessing treatment options.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Databases, Factual; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Substitution; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The crushed-tablet rivaroxaban concentration has been previously reported to be lower than the non-crushed concentration. However, the rivaroxaban concentration of fine granules has not yet been investigated. The anticoagulation intensity of rivaroxaban with fine granules, tablets, and crushed tablets was compared in acute stroke patients to assess the efficacy of each form.. Hospitalized patients over 75 years old with acute stroke who started taking rivaroxaban from April 2012 to September 2017 were included. Blood samples were drawn just before and 4 hours after taking rivaroxaban on a median of 5 days after treatment initiation for concentration measurements (C0h, C4h) based on an anti-factor Xa chromogenic assay. Of 114 patients (49 female, 83±5 years old), 97 had ischemic strokes, 9 had transient ischemic attacks, and 8 had intracerebral hemorrhages. Rivaroxaban was administered a median of 7 days after onset. Of these, 38 patients were given the 15 mg dose, and 76 were given the 10 mg dose. In the 15 mg dose group, C0h was significantly higher in the fine granule group than in the crushed tablet group, with no significant difference compared to the tablet group [C0h: 27.6±6.8 vs 4.0±4.1 (P = 0.01) vs. 33.3±25.2 ng/ml, (P = 0.51), respectively], as was C4h [223.0±66.6 vs 103.0±79.5 (P = 0.02) vs. 229.5±121.6 ng/ml (P = 0.88)]. In the 10 mg dose group, C0h was significantly higher in the fine granule group than in the crushed tablet group and comparable to that in the tablet group [23.2±7.9 vs 7.5±6.2 (P<0.01) vs 19.0±15.8 ng/ml, (P = 0.35)], as was C4h [150.7±85.4 vs 85.1±46.8 (P<0.01) vs 189.8±92.7 ng/ml (P = 0.18)].. The rivaroxaban concentration with fine granules was consistent with that in the tablet group and higher than that in the crushed tablet group.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Tablets; Treatment Outcome

 This study assessed changes in anticoagulation therapy over time in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF)..  Analyses were performed on a claims-based dataset of 4 million health-insured individuals. The study population consisted of patients newly initiating a non-vitamin-K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) or vitamin K antagonist (VKA) for AF between 2013 and 2016. The study outcomes consisted of the proportion of patients who had (1) discontinued OAC treatment, (2) switched from VKA to NOAC, (3) switched from NOAC to VKA or (4) switched from one NOAC to another. Predictors of discontinuation or switching of OAC treatment were determined by Cox proportional hazards regression models with time-independent and time-dependent covariates..  The study population comprised 51,606 AF patients initiating VKA (.  Overall discontinuation rates of VKA and NOACs are comparable over the first year of therapy, while switching from VKA to NOAC was more common than from NOAC to VKA. The majority of treatment changes were associated with clinical events.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Drug Substitution; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Germany; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K; Withholding Treatment

Atrial fibrillation (AF) prevalence increases with age; > 80% of US adults with AF are aged ≥ 65 years. Compare the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE), major bleeding (MB), net clinical outcome (NCO), and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) among elderly non-valvular AF (NVAF) Medicare patients prescribed direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) VS warfarin. NVAF patients aged ≥ 65 years who initiated DOACs (apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban) or warfarin were selected from 01JAN2013-31DEC2015 in CMS Medicare data. Propensity score matching was used to balance DOAC and warfarin cohorts. Cox proportional hazards models estimated the risk of stroke/SE, MB, NCO, and MACE. 37,525 apixaban-warfarin, 18,131 dabigatran-warfarin, and 55,359 rivaroxaban-warfarin pairs were included. Compared to warfarin, apixaban (HR: 0.69; 95% CI 0.59-0.81) and rivaroxaban (HR: 0.82; 95% CI 0.73-0.91) had lower risk of stroke/SE, and dabigatran (HR: 0.88; 95% CI 0.72-1.07) had similar risk of stroke/SE. Apixaban (MB: HR: 0.61; 95% CI 0.57-0.67; NCO: HR: 0.64; 95% CI 0.60-0.69) and dabigatran (MB: HR: 0.79; 95% CI 0.71-0.89; NCO: HR: 0.84; 95% CI 0.76-0.93) had lower risk of MB and NCO, and rivaroxaban had higher risk of MB (HR: 1.08; 95% CI 1.02-1.14) and similar risk of NCO (HR: 1.04; 95% CI 0.99-1.09). Compared to warfarin, apixaban had a lower risk for stroke/SE, MB, and NCO; dabigatran had a lower risk of MB and NCO; and rivaroxaban had a lower risk of stroke/SE but higher risk of MB. All DOACs had lower risk of MACE compared to warfarin.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiovascular Diseases; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Medicare; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

Vitamin K antagonists (eg, warfarin) have been the standard of care for stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation. The direct oral anticoagulants dabigatran (direct thrombin inhibitor) and rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban (direct factor Xa inhibitors) are as efficacious as and in some instances superior to vitamin K antagonists in the prevention of stroke, systemic embolism, and major bleeding compared with warfarin for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Benefits of direct oral anticoagulants include a rapid onset of therapeutic effect, fixed dose-response relationships without the need for routine monitoring, a short half-life, and infrequent need for periprocedural bridging with a parenteral agent. However, direct oral anticoagulants differ in subsets of patients. Critical care and advanced practice nurses must understand these differences, prescribing considerations, drug aherence interventions, drug-drug interactions, and periprocedural management. This article presents an update and review of direct oral antigcoagulants based on the latest national guidelines.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Critical Care Nursing; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Antiplatelet agents and vitamin K antagonists (VKA) are usually used in the treatment of cervical (carotid or vertebral) artery dissections (CADs); however, data about the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in these conditions are very limited. DOACs have proven to be effective in stroke reduction in non-valvular atrial fibrillation and, when possible, they are preferred to warfarin because of their better safety profile. We describe four cases of CADs and, firstly in literature, cervico-cerebral (CCADs) in young patients (average age of 42 years) treated with rivaroxaban 20 mg daily. Three of these four dissections had affected the vertebral artery (condition with an unfavorable prognosis and more often complicated by subarachnoid hemorrhages), and the other one was a carotid dissection at the extra-intracranial passage. All patients were followed clinically and with serial neurosonological examinations at 1, 3, and 6 months and with magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) at 6 months. All patients presented a good outcome with vascular recanalization without stroke recurrence or bleedings, even in patients with intracranial vertebral artery involvement. DOACs could be an alternative in young patients with CADs and their use could be considered in intracranial artery dissections too.

Topics: Adult; Carotid Artery, Internal, Dissection; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vertebral Artery Dissection

There are limited data regarding clinical outcomes and healthcare resource utilization of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who are morbidly obese (body mass index >40 kg/m. Using data from 2 US healthcare claims databases, we identified patients initiating rivaroxaban or warfarin who had ≥1 medical claim with an AF diagnosis, a diagnostic code for morbid obesity (ICD-9: 278.01, V85.4%; ICD-10: E66.01%, E66.2%, Z68.4%), and a minimum continuous enrollment of 12 months before and 3 months after treatment initiation. Patients were excluded if they had mitral stenosis, a mechanical heart valve procedure, an organ/tissue transplant, or an oral anticoagulant prescription prior to the index date. Rivaroxaban and warfarin patients were 1:1 propensity score matched. Conditional logistic regression was used to compare ischemic stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding risk. Generalized linear models were used to compare healthcare resource utilization and costs.. A total of 3563 matched pairs of morbidly obese AF patients treated with rivaroxaban or warfarin were identified. The majority (81.4%) of patients in the rivaroxaban cohort were receiving the 20 mg dose. The rivaroxaban and warfarin cohorts were well balanced after propensity score matching. The risks of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding were similar for rivaroxaban and warfarin users (stroke/systemic embolism: 1.5% vs 1.7%; odds ratio [OR]: 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60, 1.28; P = .5028; major bleeding: 2.2% vs 2.7%; OR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.59, 1.08; P = .1447). Total healthcare costs including medication costs per patient per year (PPPY) were significantly lower with rivaroxaban versus warfarin ($48,552 vs $52,418; P = .0025), which was primarily driven by lower hospitalization rate (50.2% vs 54.1%; P = .0008), shorter length of stay (7.5 vs 9.1 days; P = .0010), and less outpatient service utilization (86 vs 115 visits PPPY; P < .0001).. Morbidly obese AF patients treated with rivaroxaban had comparable risk of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding as those treated with warfarin, but lower healthcare resource utilization and costs.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Costs; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Morbidity; Obesity, Morbid; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Survival Rate; United States; Warfarin

Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation with stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease or undergoing hemodialysis were excluded from phase III randomized trials of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). We sought to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease or undergoing hemodialysis in routine practice.. Using MarketScan data from January 2012 to December 2017, we identified patients on oral anticoagulant (OAC) with naïve nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease or undergoing hemodialysis and with ≥12 months of insurance coverage before OAC initiation. Differences in baseline covariates between the rivaroxaban and warfarin cohorts were adjusted using inverse probability-of-treatment weights based on propensity scores calculated using generalized boosted models and 10,000 regression trees (absolute standardized differences <0.1 achieved for all covariates after adjustment). Patients were followed until a stroke/systemic embolism or major bleeding event, OAC discontinuation/switch, insurance disenrollment, or end of data availability. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing the OAC cohorts were calculated using Cox regression.. We identified 1896 rivaroxaban (38.7% received a dose <20 mg/d) and 4848 warfarin users. Eighty-eight percent of included patients had stage 5 chronic kidney disease or were undergoing hemodialysis. Rivaroxaban did not significantly reduce stroke or systemic embolism (HR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.27-1.10) or ischemic stroke (HR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.30-1.50) alone, but it was associated with a significant 32% (95% CI = 1-53%) reduction in major bleeding risk compared with warfarin.. Among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease or undergoing hemodialysis, rivaroxaban appears associated with significantly less major bleeding compared to warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Databases, Factual; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States; Warfarin; Young Adult

The aim of this study was to compare effectiveness and safety of low-strength and high-strength direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) with warfarin in the Australian Veteran population.. Sequential cohort study using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and propensity score matching. Initiators of high-strength (apixaban 5 mg, dabigatran 150 mg, rivaroxaban 20 mg) and low-strength DOACS (apixaban 2.5 mg, dabigatran 110 mg, rivaroxaban 15 mg) were compared with warfarin initiators.. Australian Government Department of Veterans' Affairs claims database.. 4836 patients who initiated oral anticoagulants (45.8%, 26.0% and 28.2% on low-strength, high-strength DOACs and warfarin, respectively) between August 2013 and March 2015. Mean age was 85, 75 and 83 years for low-strength, high-strength DOACs and warfarin initiators, respectively.. One-year risk of hospitalisation for ischaemic stroke, any bleeding event or haemorrhagic stroke. Secondary outcomes were 1-year risk of hospitalisation for myocardial infarction and death.. Using the IPTW method, no difference in risk of ischaemic stroke or bleeding was found with low-strength DOACs compared with warfarin. As a class, no increased risk of myocardial infarction was found for low-strength DOACs, however, risk was elevated for apixaban (HR 2.25, 95% CI 1.23 to 4.13). For high-strength DOACs, no difference was found for ischaemic stroke compared with warfarin, however, there was a significant reduction in risk of bleeding events (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.89) and death (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.58). Propensity score matching showed no difference in risk of ischaemic stroke or bleeding.. We found that in the practice setting both DOAC formulations were similar to warfarin with regard to effectiveness and had no increased risk of bleeding.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Australia; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Dabigatran; Databases, Factual; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Propensity Score; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Veterans; Warfarin

The timing of anti-coagulation therapy initiation after acute cardioembolic stroke remains controversial. We investigated the effects of post-stroke administration of a factor Xa inhibitor in mice, focusing on tissue repair and functional restoration outcomes. We initiated administration of rivaroxaban, a Xa inhibitor, immediately after permanent distal middle cerebral artery occlusion (pMCAO) in CB-17 mice harboring few leptomeningeal anastomoses at baseline. Rivaroxaban initiated immediately after pMCAO hindered the recovery of blood flow in ischemic areas by inhibiting leptomeningeal anastomosis development, and led to impaired restoration of neurologic functions with less extensive peri-infarct astrogliosis. Within infarct areas, angiogenesis and fibrotic responses were attenuated in rivaroxaban-fed mice. Furthermore, inflammatory responses, including the accumulation of neutrophils and monocytes/macrophages, local secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and breakdown of the blood-brain barrier, were enhanced in infarct areas in mice treated immediately with rivaroxaban following pMCAO. The detrimental effects were not found when rivaroxaban was initiated after transient MCAO or on day 7 after pMCAO. Collectively, early post-stroke initiation of a factor Xa inhibitor may suppress leptomeningeal anastomosis development and blood flow recovery in ischemic areas, thereby resulting in attenuated tissue repair and functional restoration unless occluded large arteries are successfully recanalized.

Topics: Animals; Blood-Brain Barrier; Brain Ischemia; Disease Models, Animal; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Infarction, Middle Cerebral Artery; Male; Mice; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Time Factors

Whether four direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are superior to warfarin in Asian patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) remains unclear.. This nationwide retrospective cohort study was based on data from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database from June 1, 2012, to December 31, 2017, covering patients with NVAF taking edoxaban (n = 4,577), apixaban (n = 9,952), rivaroxaban (n = 33,022), dabigatran (n = 22,371), and warfarin (n = 19,761). Propensity score weighting was used to balance covariates across study groups. Patients were followed up until occurrence of study outcomes or end date of study.. In the largest real-world practice study among Asian patients with NVAF, four DOACs were associated with a comparable or lower risk of thromboembolism, and a lower risk of bleeding than warfarin. There was consistency even among high-risk subgroups and whether standard-or low-dose regimens were compared.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Databases, Factual; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Taiwan; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Older adult patients are underrepresented in clinical trials comparing non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and warfarin. This subgroup analysis of the ARISTOPHANES study used multiple data sources to compare the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding (MB) among very old patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) prescribed NOACs or warfarin.. Retrospective observational study.. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and three US commercial claims databases.. A total of 88 582 very old (aged ≥80 y) NVAF patients newly initiating apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin from January 1, 2013, to September 30, 2015.. In each database, six 1:1 propensity score matched (PSM) cohorts were created for each drug comparison. Patient cohorts were pooled from all four databases after PSM. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) of stroke/SE and MB.. The patients in the six matched cohorts had a mean follow-up time of 7 to 9 months. Compared with warfarin, apixaban (HR = .58; 95% confidence interval [CI] = .49-.69), dabigatran (HR = .77; 95% CI = .60-.99), and rivaroxaban (HR = .74; 95% CI = .65-.85) were associated with lower risks of stroke/SE. For MB, apixaban (HR = .60; 95% CI = .54-.67) was associated with a lower risk; dabigatran (HR = .92; 95% CI = .78-1.07) was associated with a similar risk, and rivaroxaban (HR = 1.16; 95% CI = 1.07-1.24) was associated with a higher risk compared with warfarin. Apixaban was associated with a lower risk of stroke/SE and MB compared with dabigatran (stroke/SE: HR = .65; 95% CI = .47-.89; MB: HR = .60; 95% CI = .49-.73) and rivaroxaban (stroke/SE: HR = .72; 95% CI = .59-.86; MB: HR = .50; 95% CI = .45-.55). Dabigatran was associated with a lower risk of MB (HR = .77; 95% CI = .67-.90) compared with rivaroxaban.. Among very old NVAF patients, NOACs were associated with lower rates of stroke/SE and varying rates of MB compared with warfarin. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:1662-1671, 2019.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Medicare; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Japan; Male; Prognosis; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Survival Rate

Clinical trials have demonstrated that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are at least non-inferior to warfarin in reducing the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE) among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), but the comparative risk of major bleeding varies between DOACs and warfarin. Using US Department of Defense (DOD) data, this study compared the risk of stroke/SE and major bleeding for DOACs relative to warfarin.. Adult patients with ≥1 pharmacy claim for apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin from 01 Jan 2013-30 Sep 2015 were selected. Patients were required to have ≥1 medical claim for atrial fibrillation during the 12-month baseline period. Patients with a warfarin or DOAC claim during the 12-month baseline period were excluded. Each DOAC cohort was matched to the warfarin cohort using propensity score matching (PSM). Cox proportional hazards models were conducted to evaluate the risk of stroke/SE and major bleeding of each DOAC vs warfarin.. Of 41,001 identified patients, there were 3691 dabigatran-warfarin, 8226 rivaroxaban-warfarin, and 7607 apixaban-warfarin matched patient pairs. Apixaban was the only DOAC found to be associated with a significantly lower risk of stroke/SE (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.39, 0.77; p < 0.001) and major bleeding (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.53, 0.80; p < 0.001) compared to warfarin. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban initiation were associated with similar risk of stroke/SE (dabigatran: HR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.43, 1.07; p = 0.096; rivaroxaban: HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.64, 1.09; p = 0.187) and major bleeding (dabigatran: HR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.79, 1.40; p = 0.730; rivaroxaban: HR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.91, 1.27; p = 0.423) compared to warfarin.. Among NVAF patients in the US DOD population, apixaban was associated with significantly lower risk of stroke/SE and major bleeding compared to warfarin. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban were associated with similar risk of stroke/SE and major bleeding compared to warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; United States; United States Department of Defense; Warfarin; Young Adult

An 82-year-old female was admitted with chest pain and non-specific T wave changes on her ECG. After 72 hours of conservative management she deteriorated with non-specific symptoms including nausea and a single episode of vomiting. Abdominal and Chest X-rays were unremarkable, blood tests showed worsening Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) on Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD); and raised C-Reactive Protein (CRP) with no obvious symptoms or focus of infection. She rapidly deteriorated going into asystole cardiac arrest and attempts at resuscitation failed. Post-mortem examination suggested the most likely cause of death was acute spontaneous Haemopericardium due to Rivaroxaban therapy which she was on for non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (AF). We believe that this might be the first reported mortality with Rivaroxaban-associated spontaneous haemopericardium in the UK.

Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Electrocardiography; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fatal Outcome; Female; Humans; Pericardial Effusion; Radiography, Thoracic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a powerful cardiovascular risk factor, its presence is accompanied by an increased risk of hospitalization for exacerbation of chronic heart failure (CHF), adverse outcomes in myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular mortality. Among the adverse events, an increased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) should be noted. This article contains discussion of current approaches to the treatment of AF in patients with different stages of CKD, data on benefits of certain direct oral anticoagulants, as well as comparative characteristics of therapy with direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of direct oral anticoagulants, which determine the features of therapy in CKD, are also considered.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Background and Purpose- In the daily practice, low-dose nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants are commonly used among Asian patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of the present study was to compare the risks of ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and net clinical benefit of Asian patients with AF treated with off-label low-dose and on-label dosing rivaroxaban. Methods- A total of 2214 patients with AF aged ≥20 years treated with rivaroxaban at a tertiary medical center in Taiwan were studied. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: (1) on-label dose (n=1630): ROCKET-AF or J-ROCKET dosage criteria; and (2) off-label low-dose (10 mg/d for patients with an estimated glomerulus filtration rate >50 mL/min, n=584). The risks of ischemic stroke and intracranial hemorrhage were compared between 2 groups. Results- Compared with the on-label dose group, off-label low-dose rivaroxaban was associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke with an adjusted hazard ratio of 2.75; 95% CI =1.62-4.69; P<0.001). The risk intracranial hemorrhage did not differ significantly between the on-label and off-label low-dosing groups (adjusted hazard ratio =0.62; 95% CI =0.32-1.20; P=0.213). Compared with off-label low-dose group, on-label dosing rivaroxaban was associated with a positive net clinical benefit in different weighted models. The results were consistent among the propensity-matched cohort. Conclusions- Off-label low-dosing rivaroxaban should be avoided for Asian patients with AF giving the higher risk of ischemic stroke without risk reduction in intracranial hemorrhage compared with on-label dosing.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Rivaroxaban is a non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant and has been approved for prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Current labeling recommends 20 mg once a day (q.d.) as a standard dose and a reduced dose of 15 mg q.d. in patients with renal impairment.. The aim of this study was to analyze the adherence to current labeling concerning initial rivaroxaban dosing and to determine whether potential lack of such adherence is medically justified.. Patients with AF initiated on rivaroxaban between January 1, 2016 and January 31, 2017, were identified in the Heart Center Leipzig database. Health records were screened to identify prescribed rivaroxaban dose, presence or absence of renal impairment, patient characteristics, further dosing-relevant diagnoses and co-medication with antiplatelet drugs and non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs).. We identified a total of 378 consecutive patients. In 282 cases (74.6%), rivaroxaban was prescribed in a standard dose and in 96 (25.4%) in a reduced dose. Out of 96 patients receiving a reduced dose, 50 (52.1%) did not meet labeling criteria for dose reduction. In uni- and multivariate regression analysis, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (odds ratio [OR] 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.12-0.95, P = .04) was the only independent predictor of rivaroxaban underdosage.. In clinical practice, rivaroxaban dosing is frequently incoherent with labeling. In this study, rivaroxaban was often administered underdosed. Potentially inappropriate dose reduction was significantly associated with eGFR, the same factor that is used as criterion for dose adjustment.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Labeling; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Despite considerable progress in the field of heart failure about drugs and device therapy, the mortality rate of patients with heart failure remains high. Studies have shown that thromboembolism and stroke are associated with high mortality in patients with heart failure. Although warfarin therapy reduces the rate of ischemic stroke in patients with heart failure, the overall benefit from warfarin in this population seems to be offset by the increased bleeding risk. Thus, whether patients with chronic heart failure might benefit from anticoagulation, especially in patients with sinus rhythm, is still controversial. Rivaroxaban, a new oral anticoagulant, is a selective direct factor Xa inhibitor that is used to reduce thrombin generation, which may bring hope to anticoagulation in patients with heart failure. However, the COMPASS trial and recently published COMMANDER HF trial presented different results. By carefully analyzing 2 clinical trials, we think several factors might explain this different outcome.

Topics: Chronic Disease; Clinical Decision-Making; Evidence-Based Medicine; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Patient Selection; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Anticoagulants; Coronary Artery Disease; Heart Failure; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Rivaroxaban is a direct oral anticoagulant administered to reduce the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). The Xarelto Post-Authorization Safety and Effectiveness Study in Japanese Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (XAPASS) was a prospective, observational, post-marketing surveillance study that examined the safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban in routine clinical practice. This sub-analysis of the XAPASS investigated the outcomes of patients with worsening renal function (WRF).. The XAPASS included 11,308 patients with NVAF who began treatment with rivaroxaban. Of 9578 patients who completed 1-year follow-up, the 7509 patients, for whom the change in creatinine clearance could be assessed, were included in the present analysis. Patients with WRF were those with a decrease in creatinine clearance of ≥20% from enrollment to any time point; patients with stable renal function (SRF) were those without such a decrease. Outcomes in patients with WRF versus SRF were compared at 1 year.. No association between WRF and occurrence of any bleeding, major bleeding, and stroke/systemic embolism/myocardial infarction was observed in patients with AF on rivaroxaban treatment during 1-year follow-up in real-world clinical practice. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01582737.

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Renal Insufficiency; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are being increasingly used in the secondary prevention of thromboembolic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Patients taking NOACs are difficult to manage perioperatively, and several unexpected complications have been reported in these patients.. We report a case of a rivaroxaban-induced retroperitoneal haematoma in a 72-year-old man who underwent an L5/S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) for grade 1 spondylolytic spondylolisthesis. The patient suffered from atrial fibrillation and was taking rivaroxaban, a factor Xa inhibitor, for thromboembolic risk reduction. In accordance with perioperative Novel Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) guidelines, rivaroxaban was stopped 2 days preoperatively and restarted on the third postoperative day. The patient presented on the ninth postoperative day, complaining of severe left iliac fossa pain, nausea, and vomiting, accompanied by swelling and bruising around the surgical site. A computed tomography (CT) scan showed a large expanding retroperitoneal haematoma. The patient was taken back to theatre for an evacuation of the haematoma and subsequently recovered without any further complications.. This is the first case of a rivaroxaban-induced retroperitoneal haematoma reported in the literature, secondary to elective spinal surgery. This report adds to the body of evidence on the risk of postoperative bleeding in patients taking NOACs. If patients on NOACs present with abdominal symptoms following anterior approach to the lumbar spine, treating clinicians should have a high index of suspicion for retroperitoneal haematoma.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hematoma; Humans; Lumbar Vertebrae; Male; Postoperative Complications; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Retroperitoneal Space; Rivaroxaban; Spondylolisthesis; Stroke; Thromboembolism

After non-vitamin K antagonist (VKA) oral anticoagulation agents (NOAC) have been approved for thrombo-embolic prophylaxis in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), utilization of oral anticoagulants (OAC) in NVAF has changed. Contemporary shifting from a VKA to a NOAC (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban) has not been quantified, and could help assess whether these drugs are used according to recommendations.. Using Danish nationwide registries, we identified all VKA-experienced NVAF patients initiating a NOAC from 22 August 2011 to 31 December 2015 (shifters) and all VKA-experienced NVAF patients who were not switched to NOACs (non-shifters). Baseline characteristics and temporal utilization trends were examined. We included 62 065 patients with NVAF; of these, 19 386 (29.6%) shifted from a VKA to a NOAC (9973 (54.2%) shifted to dabigatran, 4775 (26.0%) to rivaroxaban, and 3638 (19.8%) to apixaban). Shifting was associated with lower age [odds ratio (OR) 0.95, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.94-0.96 per 5 year increments], female gender (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.28-1.38), and certain co-morbidities: more often stroke, bleeding, heart failure, and alcohol abuse, and less often hypertension, ischaemic heart disease, and diabetes. Shifting was common and initially dominated by shifting from VKA to dabigatran, but at the end of 2015, most shifters were shifted to rivaroxaban (45%) or apixaban (45%) whereas shifting to dabigatran decreased (to 10%).. In a contemporary setting among VKA-experienced NVAF patients; VKA is still prevalent although about 30% by December 2015 had shifted to a NOAC.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Denmark; Drug Substitution; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Registries; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K

Although randomized trials demonstrate the noninferiority of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in the context of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF), little is known about how these drugs compare in practice.. To assess the relative effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in a large health system and to evaluate this association by time in therapeutic range (TTR).. We conducted a retrospective cohort study with propensity matching in the Cleveland Clinic Health System. The study included patients initiated on warfarin or rivaroxaban for thromboembolic prevention in nonvalvular AF between January 2012 and July 2016. The main outcomes were thromboembolic events and major bleeds. Analyses were stratified by warfarin patients' TTR.. The cohort consisted of 472 propensity-matched pairs. The mean age was 73.6 years (SD = 11.7), and the mean CHADS. Under real-world conditions, warfarin and rivaroxaban were associated with similar safety and effectiveness, even among those with suboptimal therapeutic control. Individualized decision making, taking into account the nontherapeutic tradeoffs associated with these medications (eg, monitoring, half-life, cost) is warranted.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Non-vitamin K antagonist direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are fixed-dose regimens indicated for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients. Dose adjustment is necessary among patients with renal insufficiency to optimize efficacy and safety.. To assess DOAC dosing appropriateness and its effect on clinical outcomes in NVAF patients.. Adult NVAF patients with ≥1 DOAC pharmacy claim (January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2014), continuous enrollment for ≥12 months post-index DOAC claim, and documented creatinine clearance within 3 months preindex date in the Optum/Humedica SmartFile database were eligible. DOAC dosage was classified as inappropriate or appropriate by level of renal function, age, and body weight per US prescription information. Cox proportional models were used to assess the risks of bleeding and stroke associated with inappropriate DOAC dosage.. Of the 388 eligible patients, 69 (17.8%) were inappropriately dosed, and rivaroxaban had the highest inappropriate dosing rate. Most inappropriately dosed patients were underdosed. Inappropriately dosed patients were more likely to be older, female, and have a body weight of ≤60 kg; they also had higher mean CHA. Inappropriate dosing occurred among patients with normal and insufficient renal function. The consideration of clinical factors beyond renal function is necessary to reduce bleeding risk associated with DOAC therapy.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Renal Insufficiency; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Young Adult

Comparative data of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) are lacking in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).. We compared effectiveness and safety of standard and reduced dose NOAC in AF patients.. Using Danish nationwide registries, we included all oral anticoagulant-naïve AF patients who initiated NOAC treatment (2012-2016). Outcome-specific and mortality-specific multiple Cox regressions were combined to compute average treatment effects as 1-year standardized differences in stroke and bleeding risks (g-formula).. Amongst 31 522 AF patients, the distribution of NOAC/dose was as follows: dabigatran standard dose (22.4%), dabigatran-reduced dose (14.0%), rivaroxaban standard dose (21.8%), rivaroxaban reduced dose (6.7%), apixaban standard dose (22.9%), and apixaban reduced dose (12.2%). The 1-year standardized absolute risks of stroke/thromboembolism were 1.73-1.98% and 2.51-2.78% with standard and reduced NOAC dose, respectively, without statistically significant differences between NOACs for given dose level. Comparing standard doses, the 1-year standardized absolute risk (95% CI) for major bleeding was for rivaroxaban 2.78% (2.42-3.17%); corresponding absolute risk differences (95% CI) were for dabigatran -0.93% (-1.45% to -0.38%) and apixaban, -0.54% (-0.99% to -0.05%). The results for major bleeding were similar for reduced NOAC dose. The 1-year standardized absolute risk (95% CI) for intracranial bleeding was for standard dose dabigatran 0.19% (0.22-0.50%); corresponding absolute risk differences (95% CI) were for rivaroxaban 0.23% (0.06-0.41%) and apixaban, 0.18% (0.01-0.34%).. Standard and reduced dose NOACs, respectively, showed no significant risk difference for associated stroke/thromboembolism. Rivaroxaban was associated with higher bleeding risk compared with dabigatran and apixaban and dabigatran was associated with lower intracranial bleeding risk compared with rivaroxaban and apixaban.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Denmark; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Registries; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Dabigatran and rivaroxaban have been approved by the US FDA to reduce the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients. Newly published real-world evidence based on the US population found that elderly Medicare patients with NVAF treated with rivaroxaban experienced statistically significant increases in intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and major extracranial bleeding, and statistically nonsignificant decreases in thromboembolic stroke and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) compared with dabigatran. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of dabigatran vs. rivaroxaban for the treatment of US Medicare NVAF patients.. A previously published Markov model was adapted to compare dabigatran and rivaroxaban. The model considered thromboembolic stroke, bleeding events, and AMI based on the published real-world event risks. Model outputs included clinical event rates, costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).. Dabigatran patients experienced fewer ICH and major extracranial bleeding events than rivaroxaban patients, but more stroke and AMI events. Dabigatran was found to yield lower costs and higher QALYs than rivaroxaban, with incremental costs of -$3534 and incremental QALYs of 0.004. Results remained consistent in sensitivity analyses, with a positive net monetary benefit (willingness-to-pay thresholds of $50,000 and $100,000 per QALY) for dabigatran over rivaroxaban for all model inputs tested.. In this study using US Medicare real-world data, dabigatran was found to dominate rivaroxaban. The analyses were limited by the short follow-up period of the real-world data and results may not be generalizable to other patient populations.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Humans; Medicare; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States

Once-daily dosing of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) may increase patient adherence to treatment but may also be associated with a higher risk of bleeding. In this study, we investigated the adherence to once- or twice-daily dosing of NOACs and the risk of bleeding in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients. This multicenter cross-sectional study, conducted between 1 September 2015 and 28 February 2016, included 2214 patients receiving NOACs for at least 3 months, due to NVAF. Patients receiving once-daily or twice-daily NOAC doses were 1:1 propensity score matched for baseline demographic characteristics and the presence of other diseases. The medication adherence was assessed by the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale. Risk factors were investigated in relation to minor and major bleeding. The mean age of patients was 71 ± 10 years, and 53% of the patients were women. The medication adherence was lower in patients receiving twice-daily NOAC doses compared to once-daily-dose group (47% versus 53%, p = 0.001), and there was no difference between the groups in terms of minor (15% versus 16%, p = 0.292) and major bleeding (3% versus 3%, p = 0.796). Independent risk factors for bleeding were non-adherence to medication (OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.23-2.14, p = 0.001), presence of 3 or more other diseases (OR: 10.3, 95% CI: 5.3-20.3, p < 0.001), and HAS-BLED (Hypertension, Abnormal renal and liver function, Stroke, Bleeding, Labile INR, Elderly, Drugs or alcohol) score (OR: 4.84, 95% CI: 4.04-5.8, p < 0.001). In summary, the once-daily dose of NOACs was associated with increased patient adherence to medication, while it was not associated with bleeding complications.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Patient Safety; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Turkey

The Shikoku Rivaroxaban Registry Trial (SRRT) is a retrospective survey of the use of rivaroxaban for stroke prevention in elderly patients in Shikoku, Japan.. The SRRT enrolled 1339 patients from 8 hospitals. Patients were divided into two groups according to their age, the extreme elderly group (453 patients aged ≧80 years) and the control group (886 patients aged <80 years).. These results suggest that rivaroxaban is effective and safe in extreme elderly patients with atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Incidence; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been proposed as a more convenient alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), which are commonly associated with poor treatment persistence in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (nv-AF).. Using data from the French national health care databases (Régime Général, 50 million beneficiaries), a cohort study was conducted to compare the 1-year non-persistence rates in nv-AF patients initiating dabigatran (N=11,141) or rivaroxaban (N=11,126) versus VKA (N=11,998). Treatment discontinuation was defined as a switch between oral anticoagulant (OAC) classes or a 60-day gap with no medication coverage, with the additional criterion of no reimbursement for international normalized ratio monitoring during this gap for VKA patients. Considering death as a competing risk, differences between 1-year discontinuation rates were used to compare each DOAC versus VKA. The 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated via bootstrapping. Baseline patient characteristics were adjusted using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Subgroup analyses considered DOAC dose at initiation, age, risk of stroke, and bleeding.. Adjusted 1-year discontinuation rates were higher for dabigatran than for VKA new users (36.8% vs 30.2%; difference: 6.6% [95% CI, 5.5-7.6]) and for rivaroxaban versus VKA new users (33.4% vs 30.4%; 3.0% [1.9-4.1]). Similar differences were found in all subgroup analyses, except in dabigatran and rivaroxaban patients <75 years (dabigatran vs VKA: 0.3% [-1.4 to 1.8]; rivaroxaban vs VKA: -2.6% [-4.3 to -0.9]) and dabigatran 150 mg new users (-1.1% [-3.1 to 0.7]). Consistent results were obtained when considering both switches between OAC classes and death as competing risks of treatment discontinuation.. Results from this nationwide cohort study showed high non-persistence levels with all OACs and suggest that persistence with both dabigatran and rivaroxaban therapy is not better than persistence with VKA therapy. Hospitalizations for bleeding among non-persistent patients were unlikely to explain these high non-persistence rates.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Databases, Factual; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; France; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K

We investigated recurrent stroke volume with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients treated with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) about clinical backgrounds and number of recurrent stroke.. We administered 4 NOACs, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban in 101 postcardioembolic strokes with NVAF. In a retrospective study, we measured recurrent stroke volume with magnetic resonance imaging volumetric software and compared them between 10 vitamin K anticoagulant (VKA: warfarin) cases and 13 NOAC cases under anticoagulant therapy.. Of 101 cases, 31 were started with a VKA and switched to NOACs after 10 recurrent strokes. Other 70 cases were directly started with NOACs and 13 cases with NOACs as first anticoagulants had recurrent stroke. The frequency of recurrent stroke during anticoagulant therapy is not different between the VKA group and the 3 NOACs group. Recurrent stroke volume is significantly larger in the VKA group (26.4 cm. Secondary prevention with NOACs after stroke might be more beneficial than a VKA by reducing recurrent infarct volume.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Japan; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Recurrence; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Topics: Age Factors; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Incidence; Male; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

To describe the early uptake of edoxaban; the fourth direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) to enter the market.. Using the Danish nationwide health registries, we identified new users of edoxaban (n = 609) from June 6 (day of marketing) through June 2017. For comparison, we also identified new users of dabigatran (n = 2211), rivaroxaban (n = 19 227), and apixaban (n = 14 736). Users were described regarding indication of use, previous anticoagulant experience, comorbidity, and co-medication.. The rate of edoxaban initiation increased to 2.0 per 100 000 person months in June 2017, compared with 6.3, 37.5, and 27.0 for dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. Atrial fibrillation was the most common registered indication for edoxaban (67%) as well as the other DOACs (41-55%). Overall, users of edoxaban were comparable to users of other DOACs (median age 75 vs 72-76 years and 57% vs 53-59% males), except for a generally lower concomitant use of other drugs. Noticeably, 95% of edoxaban users had previously received anticoagulant treatment compared with 31% to 43% for new users of other DOACs, with 77% switching directly from another anticoagulant treatment to edoxaban (45% directly from VKA and 32% directly from DOACs).. While the use of edoxaban is still limited compared with other DOACs, it is increasing. The majority of edoxaban users switch to edoxaban from other anticoagulant treatments. Continued monitoring of the utilization of DOACs, including effectiveness and safety, is considered essential to the safe and rational use of these drugs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Denmark; Drug Utilization; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Registries; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles

Information on utilization of oral anticoagulants (OACs) in nursing homes is scarce. This study aimed to (i) describe OAC use in German nursing home residents, (ii) examine factors influencing whether treatment is initiated with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and (iii) assess which conditions predict switching to NOAC instead of continuing VKA.. Using claims data (2010-2014), we studied a cohort of new nursing home residents aged ≥65 years receiving OAC. Further, OAC use in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) was examined over the years.. Overall, 16 804 patients (median age: 85 years, 75% female, 44% with renal disease) were included. The majority received phenprocoumon as first OAC (58.0%), followed by rivaroxaban (28.1%). Over the study period, NOAC use increased substantially. Initiating NOAC instead of VKA was predicted by a previous stroke (adjusted odds ratio: 1.76; 95% confidence interval: 1.49-2.08). In contrast, renal disease predicted VKA initiation (0.66; 0.59-0.75) as did the presence of a prosthetic heart valve. Switching from VKA to NOAC was predicted by a stroke (2.55; 2.00-3.24), bleeding events and a recent hospitalization. During 2010-2014, the proportion of AF patients with a CHADS2 score ≥2 receiving OAC increased from 27% to 46%.. NOACs are increasingly used in German nursing homes, both for initial anticoagulation but also in VKA pre-treated patients. Switching from VKA to NOAC was substantially influenced by aspects such as intended higher effectiveness and safety but probably also practicability due to less blood monitoring.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Drug Monitoring; Female; Germany; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Male; Nursing Homes; Phenprocoumon; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K

Electrical cardioversion (ECV) is a procedure in which a direct current electric shock is used to quickly and effectively restore the normal sinus rhythm. Appropriate anticoagulation reduces the risk of embolic events during and after ECV. The aim of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban compared with vitamin K oral antagonists (VKAs) in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing elective ECV in the Netherlands.. A static transmission model over a 1-year time horizon was developed to compare rivaroxaban with VKAs in terms of clinical outcomes, health effects (quality-adjusted life years; QALYs), and costs. Cost-effectiveness was assessed from a societal and health care payer perspective at a willingness-to-pay level of €20,000 per QALY gained. The use of rivaroxaban as an anticoagulant in patients with atrial fibrillation scheduled for ECV would lead to a health gain of 0.23 QALYs per patient and would cost €1.83 per patient from the societal perspective, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €7.92 per QALY gained. The probability of rivaroxaban being cost-saving compared with VKAs was 49.6% from this perspective. From the health care payer perspective, the incremental cost would be €509 per patient with a health gain of 0.23 QALYs per patient, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €2198 per QALY gained.. The use of rivaroxaban in elective ECV is a cost-effective alternative to the use of VKAs. Rivaroxaban has a 50% probability of being cost-saving compared with VKAs and would increase a patient's quality of life when non-health care costs such as productivity loss and informal care costs are taken into account.

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Electric Countershock; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Netherlands; Quality of Life; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

To describe the prevalence and associated factors of inappropriate doses of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in a national registry of patients of real clinical practice.. Five hundred and thirty outpatients with atrial fibrillation treated with DOAC were included in a prospective, national, multicentre study. The appropriateness of the doses of DOAC was defined according to the recommendations of the European Heart Rhythm Association. Mean age was 73 ± 9 years, with a 46% of women. Two hundred and sixty-seven patients were prescribed dabigatran, 190 rivaroxaban, and 73 apixaban. A total of 172 patients (32%) did not receive the appropriate dose: 93 patients received a lower dose (18%) and 79 patients a higher dose (15%). In the comparisons among the subgroups of inappropriately low, appropriate, and inappropriately high dose, we observed significant trends to older age (69 ± 8 years vs. 73 ± 10 years vs. 77 ± 6 years), more frequent female sex (37% vs. 46% vs. 59%), antiplatelet drugs (5% vs. 8% vs. 25%), rivaroxaban (14% vs. 38% vs. 53%), and apixaban use (5% vs. 15% vs. 19%), higher CHAD2DS2-VASc (3.00 ± 1.38 vs. 3.58 ± 1.67 vs. 4.59 ± 1.44) and HAS-BLED scores (1.83 ± 0.87 vs. 1.92 ± 1.07 vs. 2.47 ± 1.13), lower body mass index (30 ± 6 kg/m2 vs. 29 ± 4 kg/m2 vs. 28 ± 4 kg/m2) and glomerular filtration rate (74 ± 27 mL/min vs. 70 ± 22 mL/min vs. 63 ± 16 mL/min), and lower frequency of dabigatran use (81% vs. 47% vs. 28%) (all comparisons P ≤ 0.01).. In this real-life study, 32% of patients received an inappropriate dose of DOAC. Several clinical factors can identify patients at risk of this situation.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Comorbidity; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Guideline Adherence; Humans; Inappropriate Prescribing; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism

To evaluate inpatient oral anticoagulant (OAC) treatment, discharge location, and post-discharge OAC treatment for patients hospitalized with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).. Retrospective study using claims data linked to hospital electronic health records (EHR). Patients (n = 2,484) were hospitalized with a primary (38%) or secondary (62%) diagnosis of AF without evidence of mitral valvular heart disease or valve replacement between January 2009 and September 2013. Inpatient OAC treatment was identified from EHR data.. Inpatient and post-discharge OAC treatment [direct OAC (DOAC; apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran), warfarin, no OAC] and discharge location (long-term care, home health-care, home self-care).. Mean age was 72.6 years, 61.2% were male, and 89.5% had a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2. Overall, 6.4% received a DOAC, 38.0% warfarin, and 55.6% no OAC during hospitalization. Compared to other treatment groups, patients receiving DOAC were younger and more likely to be male. The majority (72.2%) were discharged to home health-care, 13.2% home self-care, and 6.0% long-term care. Among patients who were treated with warfarin during hospitalization, 40.3% filled a warfarin prescription within 30 days post-discharge, whereas among patients who were treated with a DOAC, 52.4% filled a DOAC prescription within 30 days post-discharge. Some NVAF patients not treated with an OAC during hospitalization filled a prescription for warfarin (18.0%) or DOAC (1.9%) within 30 days post-discharge. Results were similar among patients with CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2.. Most patients hospitalized for NVAF were discharged to home support, and the majority did not have OAC treatment during hospitalization or the 30 days post-discharge. Additional investigation should be conducted on trends beyond 30 days post-hospitalization, and the reasons for not receiving anticoagulation therapy in patients at moderate-to-severe risk of stroke or systemic embolism. Helping to avoid preventable strokes is an important goal for public health.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Inpatients; Male; Middle Aged; Outpatients; Patient Discharge; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Since non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were released for clinical use, many studies have investigated its effectiveness in stroke prevention. In this study, to determine whether or not there is a difference in outcome in secondary stroke prevention between warfarin and NOACs, patients with embolic stroke with newly prescribed anticoagulants were prospectively analyzed.. Patients with acute ischemic stroke, who newly started anticoagulant therapy, were consecutively asked to participate in this study. Enrolled patients (76.3 ± 11.0 years old) were classified into warfarin (n = 48), dabigatran (n = 73), rivaroxaban (n = 49), and apixaban (n = 65). The outcome in 1 year was prospectively investigated at outpatient clinic or telephone interview. Recurrence of stroke and death was considered as the critical incidence.. The prevalence of risk factors was not different among all medicines. Patients with dabigatran showed significantly younger onset age (P < .001: 72.2 years old) and milder neurologic deficits than patients on other medicines (P < .001). Cumulative incident rates were 7.1%, 15.3%, 19.0%, and 29.7% for dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin, respectively. Dabigatran showed relatively better outcome compared with warfarin (P = .069) and rivaroxaban (P = .055). All patients on NOACs presented lower cumulative stroke recurrence compared with warfarin.. Even in the situation of secondary stroke prevention, noninferiority of NOACs to warfarin might be demonstrated.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Brain Ischemia; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Incidence; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recurrence; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The prevalence of diabetes is growing, and diabetes is an independent risk factor for both atrial fibrillation (AF) and stroke. However, the relative effectiveness and safety of different oral anticoagulants for diabetic patients with non-valvular AF remain unclear. We aimed to compare thromboembolic events, bleeding and mortality in diabetic AF patients treated with rivaroxaban, dabigatran and warfarin.. In diabetic AF patients, dabigatran and rivaroxaban showed a superior or non-inferior effectiveness and safety profile compared with warfarin. Dabigatran was associated with a significantly lower risk of mortality than rivaroxaban.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Dabigatran; Databases, Factual; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Safety; Proportional Hazards Models; Risk; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Taiwan; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Topics: Acute Kidney Injury; Aged; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Comorbidity; Female; Humans; Kidney Function Tests; Male; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk Adjustment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

Whereas intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is allowed for acute ischaemic stroke in patients on vitamin K antagonists with international normalized ratio ≤1.7, there are no similar recommendations for patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), notably due to the lack of coagulation tests to assess the therapeutic effects. Although the literature is scarce, consisting of small case series and retrospective studies, considering the frequency of this situation the French Vascular Neurology Society and the French Study Group on Haemostasis and Thrombosis have worked on a joint position paper to provide a practical position regarding the emergency management of ischaemic stroke in patients on DOACs.. Based on a review of the literature, the authors wrote a first text that was submitted to a broad panel of members from the two societies. The text was then amended by the authors to address experts' comments and to reach a consensus.. In patients with normal renal function and who stopped the DOAC for at least 48 h, the management should not differ from that in patients without oral anticoagulant. In patients who are still on DOACs, mechanical thrombectomy is encouraged preferentially when applicable in first line. Otherwise, when specific tests are available, values <50 ng/ml indicate that IVT is allowed. In the absence of specific tests, standard tests (thrombin time, prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time) can be used for dabigatran and rivaroxaban, although interpretation of these tests may be less reliable. In some patients on dabigatran, idarucizumab may be used before IVT.. In this expert opinion paper, it is suggested that IVT can be performed in patients selected according to the time elapsed since the drug was last taken, renal function, type of hospital where the patient is admitted and plasma concentration of DOAC.

Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation Tests; Brain Ischemia; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thrombolytic Therapy

Randomized clinical trials comparing direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) to warfarin in cancer patients have not been performed. We evaluated the effectiveness and associated risk of DOACs vs warfarin, as well as comparisons of DOACs, in a large population of cancer patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Using the MarketScan databases, we identified 16 096 AF patients (mean age, 74 years) initiating oral anticoagulant and being actively treated for cancer between 2010 and 2014. Anticoagulant users were matched by age, sex, enrollment date, and drug initiation date. Study end points were identified with diagnostic codes and included ischemic stroke, severe bleeding, other bleeding, and venous thromboembolism (VTE). Cox regression was used to estimate associations of anticoagulants with study end points. Compared with warfarin, rates of bleeding (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]) were similar in rivaroxaban (1.09 [0.79, 1.39]) and dabigatran (0.96 [0.72, 1.27]) users, whereas apixaban users experienced lower rates (0.37 [0.17, 0.79]). Rates of ischemic stroke did not differ among anticoagulant users. Compared with warfarin, rate of VTE (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]) was lower among rivaroxaban (0.51 [0.41, 0.63]), dabigatran (0.28 [0.21, 0.38]), and apixaban (0.14 [0.07, 0.32]) users. In head-to-head comparisons among DOACs, dabigatran users had lower rates of VTE than rivaroxaban users; apixaban users had lower rates of VTE and severe bleeding than rivaroxaban users. In this population of patients with AF and cancer, DOAC users experienced lower or similar rates of bleeding and stroke compared with warfarin users, and a lower rate of incident VTE.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Databases, Factual; Hemorrhage; Humans; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin; Young Adult

Topics: Brain; Brain Ischemia; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Oral anticoagulants are prescribed in non-valvular atrial fibrillation for stroke prevention; however, little is known about the current management of anticoagulation in France, particularly given the availability of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in recent years.. To describe the characteristics of patients prescribed oral anticoagulants, and assess treatment persistence in French primary care.. We conducted a cohort study of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, who were newly prescribed oral anticoagulants between 1 January 2014 and 31 January 2016, using French primary care data (IMS Longitudinal Patient Database). Adjusting for baseline characteristics, risk of non-persistence (switch or discontinuation) was compared using Cox regression.. Of 4111 patients, 1710 were newly prescribed vitamin K antagonists, 1257 rivaroxaban, 744 apixaban and 400 dabigatran. The median age was 76 years, and 57.5% were male. History of hypertension was the most common co-morbidity (68.1%). Compared with vitamin K antagonists, non-persistence was higher with rivaroxaban (hazard ratio: 1.28; 95% confidence interval: 1.13-1.45) and dabigatran (hazard ratio: 1.42; 95% confidence interval: 1.20-1.69) and similar with apixaban (hazard ratio: 1.12; 95% confidence interval: 0.96-1.32).. Non-persistence (treatment discontinuation or switch) with vitamin K antagonists was lower than with rivaroxaban and dabigatran in French primary care; however, non-persistence with the newest drug, apixaban, was similar to vitamin K antagonists. Larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to support these findings. This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02488421).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Comorbidity; Dabigatran; Databases, Factual; Drug Prescriptions; Drug Substitution; Female; France; Humans; Male; Primary Health Care; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Clinical practice guidelines recommend regular kidney function monitoring in atrial fibrillation patients on nonvitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOAC); however, information regarding compliance with these recommendations in daily life conditions is scarce. We sought to determine the compliance with kidney function monitoring recommendations in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients starting NOAC and its implication on the appropriateness of NOAC dosage.. This study involves the retrospective analysis of a multicentre registry including consecutive NVAF patients who started NOAC (n = 692). Drug dosage changes and serum creatinine determinations were recorded during 1-year follow-up. European Heart Rhythm Association criteria were used to define the appropriateness of kidney function monitoring as well as adequate NOAC dosage.. During the follow-up (334 ± 89 days), the compliance with kidney function monitoring recommendations was 61% (n = 425). After multivariate adjustment, age (OR × year: 0.92 (CI 95%: 0.89-0.95) P < .001), creatinine clearance (OR × mL/min: 1.02 (CI 95%: 1.01-1.03) P < .001) and adequate NOAC dosage at baseline (OR: 1.54 (CI 95%: 1.06-2.23), P = .024) were independent predictors of appropriate kidney function monitoring. Compliance with kidney function monitoring recommendations was independently associated with change to appropriate NOAC dose after 1 year (OR: 2.80 (CI 95%: 1.01-7.80), P = .049).. Noncompliance with kidney function monitoring recommendations is common in NVAF patients starting NOAC, especially in elderly patients with kidney dysfunction. Compliance with kidney function monitoring recommendations was associated with adequate NOAC dosage at 1-year follow-up. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the implication of kidney function monitoring on prognosis.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Creatinine; Dabigatran; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Guideline Adherence; Humans; Kidney Function Tests; Male; Multivariate Analysis; Odds Ratio; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Registries; Renal Insufficiency; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Prevention of thromboembolic complications is a priority in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) is more common and some patients have indications for a reduced dose.. We sought to evaluate the frequency of NOACs being prescribed to AF patients and to compare the groups of AF patients receiving standard and reduced doses.. The study included 1327 patients diagnosed with AF and hospitalised at an institution of the highest referral level in cardiology in the years 2015-2016. Final analysis encompassed 713 patients with nonvalvular AF, who were prescribed NOACs upon discharge.. In the group of patients receiving NOACs, standard doses were used in 383 (53.7%) patients, while 330 (46.3%) patients received reduced doses. Among patients treated with reduced doses, dabigatran was prescribed to 186 (56.4%) patients, rivaroxaban to 124 (37.5%) patients, and apixaban to 20 (6.1%) patients. Absence of indications for dose reduction was identified in 54 out of 330 (16.4%) patients receiving reduced-dose NOACs, including six out of 20 patients receiving reduced-dose apixaban (30%), 21 out of 186 patients receiving reduced-dose dabigatran (11.3%), and 24 out of 124 pa-tients receiving reduced-dose rivaroxaban (19.3%). Among patients treated with reduced dose of dabigatran (n = 186), one indication for dose reduction was observed in 75 patients, and at least two indications were observed in 90 patients. One indication was observed in 71 patients, and at least two indications were observed in 30 patients treated with a reduced dose of rivaroxaban (n = 124).. Standard doses of NOACs were prescribed to most hospitalised AF patients. Apixaban was prescribed more frequently in the reduced-dose regimen, while the frequencies of standard and reduced doses prescribed were similar for dabigatran and rivaroxaban. Absence of indications for dose reduction as defined in relevant guidelines and Summaries of Product Characteristics was identified in 15.5% of patients receiving reduced doses of NOACs. More than one indication for dose reduction was identified in most patients receiving reduced-dose dabigatran, while one indication was identified in most patients receiving reduced-dose rivaroxaban.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of different rivaroxaban dosage regimens in preventing ischemic stroke and systemic thromboembolism among Asians. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on data from nationwide insurance claims in Taiwan. Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation under warfarin or rivaroxaban therapy were included. Propensity score matching was used to balance the covariates, and Cox-proportional hazard models were applied to compare the effectiveness and safety of each treatment group. Rivaroxaban was associated with a significantly lower risk of venous thromboembolism (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.29-0.92, P = 0.02) and intracranial hemorrhage (HR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.32-0.72, P < 0.001) than warfarin. Rivaroxaban 20 mg and 15 mg were associated with a significantly lower risk of ischemic stroke (20 mg, HR: 0.48; CI: 0.29-0.80, P = 0.005; 15 mg, HR: 0.69; CI: 0.53-0.90, P = 0.005), but rivaroxaban 10 mg was not. In the subgroup analysis of patients older than 65 years, the results were generally the same, except that rivaroxaban had a significantly lower risk of ischemic stroke than warfarin.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Taiwan; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

INTRODUCTION Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia with a significant risk of morbidity and mortality. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants are the first‑line drugs in stroke prevention in patients with AF. Oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy may differ between medical centers. OBJECTIVES We compared the clinical characteristics of AF patients treated with OAC in a district and an academic hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS We analyzed 3528 patients from the multicenter retrospective CRAFT study: 2666 patients from the academic hospital and 862 patients from the district hospital. Their baseline clinical characteristics were compared. RESULTS Patients treated in the district hospital were older (mean [SD] age, 73.9 [10.3] years vs 66.0 [13.4] years; P <0.001) and more likely female (49.1% vs 37.4%; P <0.001). Patients treated in the academic hospital more frequently had paroxysmal AF, while those in the district hospital, permanent AF. The latter group was also more likely to have comorbidities and a higher frequency of previous bleeding episodes or anemia. The groups did not differ regarding kidney function. In both groups, patients were significantly more likely to be on rivaroxaban than on dabigatran. The group treated in the district hospital were at higher risk of thromboembolic events than the other gruop (mean [SD] CHA2DS2VASc score, 4.6 [1.7] vs 3.05 [2.0]; P <0.001), as well as of hemorrhagic events (mean [SD] HASBLED score, 0.6 [0.7] vs 0.4 [0.6]; P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS Patients with AF treated with OACs in the district and academic hospitals have different clinical characteristics. Patients treated in the district hospital were older, had more comorbidities, more frequently had permanent AF, and were at higher risk of thromboembolic and bleeding events than patients treated in the academic hospital.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Heart Valve Diseases; Hospitals, District; Hospitals, University; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism

Stroke is a recognized clinical course of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. This interesting case showed notable difference on the electrocardiogram of a patient 4 months prior to suffering a stroke and 10 days after suffering a stroke. The pre-stroke electrocardiogram showed atrial fibrillation with a narrow QRS complex, while the post-stroke electrocardiogram showed marked left ventricular hypertrophy. Left ventricular hypertrophy was diagnosed using the Sokolow-Lyon indices. The development of left ventricular hypertrophy a few days after suffering a stroke has not previously been reported.. An 83-year-old white British woman with a background history of permanent atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and previous stroke attended the emergency department with a 2-day history of exertional dyspnea, and chest tightness. On examination, she had bibasal crepitations with a systolic murmur loudest at the apex. In-patient investigations include an electrocardiogram, blood tests, chest X-ray, contrast echocardiogram, coronary angiogram, and cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. An electrocardiogram showed atrial fibrillation, with inferolateral T wave inversion, and left ventricular hypertrophy. A chest X-ray showed features consistent with pulmonary edema. A contrast echocardiogram showed marked hypertrophy of the mid to apical left ventricle, appearance consistent with apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Coronary angiography showed eccentric shelf-type plaque with non-flow-limiting stenosis in the left coronary artery main stem. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging reported findings highly suggestive of apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Our patient was treated and discharged on rivaroxaban, bisoprolol, and atorvastatin with a follow-up in the cardiomyopathy outpatient clinic.. Electrocardiogram diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy led to the diagnosis of apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in this patient. Left ventricular hypertrophy was only evident a few days after our patient suffered a stroke. The underlying mechanisms responsible for this remain unclear. Furthermore, differential diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy should be considered in people with electrocardiogram criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging is an important diagnostic tool in identifying causes of left ventricular hypertrophy. Family screening should be recommended in patients with new diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Antihypertensive Agents; Bisoprolol; Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic; Chest Pain; Coronary Angiography; Diagnosis, Differential; Dyspnea; Electrocardiography; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Real-world data are a well-recognized component within the drug lifecycle, and such data are generated from a range of sources and study designs, including claims databases, electronic health records, non-interventional studies (NIS) and registries. While this information can be of vital clinical importance, there may be challenges in understanding the relevance of the differing study designs, endpoints and populations. Here, we summarize the value of real-world evidence and considerations pertinent to their use in clinical research. Owing to the variety of analyses being conducted using real-world data, it is important for researchers and clinicians to have a clear understanding of the nature and origin of those data, and to ensure they are valid, reliable and robust in terms of extrapolating meaningful findings. There are crucial questions to address when evaluating real-world studies, and we introduce a checklist to meet these objectives. In addition to advice for appraising data quality and study designs, several updates will be covered from real-world studies of rivaroxaban for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF): the nationwide Danish cohort study, U.S. Department of Defense Military Health System database, retrospective claim database study REAFFIRM and a pooled analysis from the global NIS XArelto on preveNtion of sTroke and non-central nervoUS system systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (XANTUS). Real-world studies consistently show that rivaroxaban is an effective treatment option with acceptable safety when used for stroke prevention in a large number of patients with AF across the globe.

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Evidence-Based Medicine; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

With improved life expectancy and the aging population, the global burden of atrial fibrillation (AF) continues to increase, and with AF comes an estimated fivefold increased risk of ischaemic stroke. Prophylactic anticoagulant therapy is more effective in reducing the risk of ischaemic stroke in AF patients than acetylsalicylic acid or dual-antiplatelet therapy combining ASA with clopidogrel. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants are the standard of care for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular AF. The optimal anticoagulant strategy to prevent thromboembolism in AF patients who are undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and stenting, those who have undergone successful transcatheter aortic valve replacement and those with embolic stroke of undetermined source are areas of ongoing research. This article provides an update on three randomized controlled trials of rivaroxaban, a direct, oral factor Xa inhibitor, that are complete or are ongoing, in these unmet areas of stroke prevention: oPen-label, randomized, controlled, multicentre study explorIng twO treatmeNt stratEgiEs of Rivaroxaban and a dose-adjusted oral vitamin K antagonist treatment strategy in patients with Atrial Fibrillation who undergo Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PIONEER AF-PCI) trial; the New Approach riVaroxaban Inhibition of factor Xa in a Global trial vs Aspirin to prevenT Embolism in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source (NAVIGATE ESUS) trial and the Global study comparing a rivAroxaban-based antithrombotic strategy to an antipLatelet-based strategy after transcatheter aortIc vaLve rEplacement to Optimize clinical outcomes (GALILEO) trial. The data from these studies are anticipated to help address continuing challenges for a range of patients at risk of stroke.

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement; Treatment Outcome

In recent years, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become an alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) as well as for prevention and treatment of deep venous thrombosis. Pivotal trials have demonstrated non-inferiority and potential superiority compared to warfarin, which increases the options of anticoagulant treatment. In our setting, the Anticoagulant Treatment Units (ATUs) and Primary Care Centres (PCCs) play an important role in the education, follow-up, adherence control and management in special situations of anticoagulated patients. These considerations have motivated us to elaborate the present consensus document that aims to establish clear recommendations that incorporate the findings of scientific research into clinical practice to improve the quality of care in the field of anticoagulation.. A group of experts from the Catalan Thrombosis Group (TROMBOC@T) reviewed all published literature from 2009 to 2016, in order to provide recommendations based on clinical evidence.. As a result of the project, a set of practical recommendations have been established that will facilitate treatment, education, follow-up and management in special situations of anticoagulated patients with ACODs.. Progressive increase in the use of DOACs calls for measures to establish and homogenise clinical management guidelines for patients anticoagulated with DOACs in ATUs and PCCs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Frailty predicts poorer outcomes and decreased anticoagulation use in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. We sought to assess the effectiveness and safety of apixaban, dabigatran and rivaroxaban versus warfarin in frail nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients.. Using US MarketScan claims data from November 2011 to December 2016, we identified frail oral anticoagulant-naïve nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients with ≥12 months of continuous insurance coverage before oral anticoagulant initiation. Frailty status was determined using the Johns Hopkins Claims-based Frailty Indicator score (≥0.20 indicating frailty). Users of apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban were separately 1:1 matched to warfarin users via propensity-scores, with residual absolute standardized differences <0.1 being achieved for all covariates after matching. Patients were followed for up to 2 years or until an event, insurance disenrollment or end of follow-up. Rates of stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding were compared using Cox regression and reported as hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In total, 2700, 2784, and 5270 patients were included in the apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban 1:1 matched analyses to warfarin. At 2 years, neither apixaban nor dabigatran were associated with differences in the hazard of stroke or systemic embolism (HR=0.78; 95% CI=0.46-1.35 and HR=0.94; 0.60-1.45) or major bleeding (HR=0.72; 95% CI=0.49-1.06 and HR=0.87; 95% CI=0.63-1.19) versus warfarin. Rivaroxaban was associated with reduced stroke or systemic embolism at 2 years (HR=0.68; 95% CI=0.49-0.95) without significantly altering major bleeding risk (HR=1.07; 95% CI=0.81-1.32).. Our study found rivaroxaban but not apixaban or dabigatran to be associated with reduced SSE versus warfarin in frail nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients. No direct-acting oral anticoagulants demonstrated a significant difference in major bleeding versus warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Frail Elderly; Humans; Incidence; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

To identify differences in clinical characteristics and severity of cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) including cerebral microbleeds (CMBs), between patients suffering ischemic stroke (IS) or intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) while taking novel (non-vitamin K antagonists) oral anticoagulants (NOACs).. Multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study performed at 38 centers between 2012 and 2015. We compared demographics, comorbidity, and functional status (before and after stroke) between NOAC-IS and NOAC-ICH patients. Extent of white matter lesions (WML), and location and counts of CMBs were analyzed in a subgroup of patients for whom MRI including hemorrhage-sensitive sequences was available.. A total of 351 patients were included (290 NOAC-IS, 61 NOAC-ICH). Functional status was worse in NOAC-ICH patients before and after stroke. No significant differences were found for demographic variables and cardiovascular comorbidity. In the subgroup with available MRI (n = 116), the proportion of patients with at least one CMB was higher in NOAC-ICH than in NOAC-IS (15/19 [79%] vs 36/97 [37%], P < .001), as was the absolute number of CMBs (median 5 [IQR 1-24] vs 0 [0-1], P < .001). WML were more extensive in NOAC-ICH than in NOAC-IS patients. Adjusted for WML, logistic regression analysis showed higher odds of NOAC-ICH in patients with CMB than without (OR 5.60 [1.64-19.14], P = .006).. Patients with NOAC-ICH have similar clinical characteristics but a higher prevalent burden of CSVD compared to NOAC-IS. The role of neuroimaging in selection of patients for anticoagulation with NOAC requires further investigation in longitudinal studies.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Cerebral Small Vessel Diseases; Comorbidity; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thrombolytic Therapy

The objective of the study was to examine how the comparative effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin differ across subgroups of patients with atrial fibrillation defined by stroke risk (CHA2DS2-VASc score ≤3, 4 to 5, ≥6). Using Medicare claims data, we identified patients newly diagnosed with atrial fibrillation in 2013 to 2014 who initiated warfarin (n=12,354), apixaban (n=2,358), dabigatran (n=1,415), or rivaroxaban (n=5,139), and categorized them according to their CHA2DS2-VASc score (≤3, 4 to 5, ≥6). Primary outcomes included the combined risk of ischemic stroke, other thromboembolic event and death, and the risk of bleeding. We constructed Cox proportional hazard models that included terms for treatment, CHA2DS2-VASc subgroup, and the interaction between them, and controlled for demographics and a comprehensive list of clinical characteristics. We found that DOACs were generally more effective than warfarin, but this effect was most pronounced in the lowest risk subgroup. Specifically, the hazard ratio for the primary effectiveness outcome with apixaban compared with warfarin was 0.46 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32 to 0.65) for CHA2DS2-VASc ≤3, 0.71 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.86) for 4 to 5, and 0.86 (95% CI 0.74 to 1.01) for ≥6 (p value for interaction = 0.005). The comparative safety profile of DOACs versus warfarin did not change with CHA2DS2-VASc score. In conclusion, DOACs are more effective than warfarin, but this effect is more pronounced in patients with lower risk of stroke. Further research is needed to validate these findings in other patient cohorts and uncover their underlying mechanisms.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

Discontinuation of oral anticoagulants may expose non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients to an increased risk of stroke. This study describes the real-world discontinuation rates and compared the risk of drug discontinuation among NVAF patients initiating apixaban, warfarin, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban. This retrospective cohort study evaluated newly-anticoagulated NVAF patients in the MarketScan® data population from 01/01/2012 through 12/31/2014. Discontinuation was defined as a lack of subsequent prescription of the index drug within 30 days after the last supply day of the last prescription. A Cox model was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of discontinuation, adjusted for age, sex, and comorbidities. Among 45,361 eligible NVAF patients, 15,461 (34.1%) initiated warfarin; 7,438 (16.4%) apixaban; 4,661 (10.3%) dabigatran; and 17,801 (39.2%) initiated rivaroxaban treatment. Compared to warfarin, patients who initiated dabigatran (adjusted HR [aHR]: 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.80-0.87, P<0.001), rivaroxaban (aHR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.68-0.73, P<0.001), or apixaban (aHR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.55-0.60, P<0.001) were 16%, 30%, and 43% less likely to discontinue treatment, respectively. When compared to apixaban, patients who initiated dabigatran (aHR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.38-1.54, P<0.001) or rivaroxaban (aHR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.17-1.28, P<0.001) were more likely to discontinue treatment. Among newly-anticoagulated NVAF patients in the real-world setting, initiation on rivaroxaban, dabigatran, or apixaban was associated with a significantly lower risk of discontinuation compared to warfarin. When compared to apixaban, patients who initiated treatment with warfarin, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban were more likely to discontinue treatment.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States; Warfarin; Withholding Treatment; Young Adult

Warfarin and new oral anticoagulants are effective in reducing stroke in atrial fibrillation; however, the benefits and risks rates in clinical trials show heterogeneity for each anticoagulant, and is unknown the cost influence on a model considering most of the treatment consequences. We designed a benefit-risk and cost assessment of oral anticoagulants.. We followed the roadmap proposed by IMI-PROTECT and the considerations of emerged good practice to perform Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). The roadmap defines the following steps: (1) planning, (2) evidence gathering and data preparation, (3) analyses, (4) explorations, and (5) conclusions. We defined two reference points (0-100) to allocate numerical values for scores and weights, and used an analogue numeric scale to assess physicians' preferences. As benefits of the anticoagulant therapy, we included reductions in stroke and all-cause mortality; intracranial haemorrhage, gastrointestinal haemorrhage, minor bleeding and myocardial infarction were considered risks. We also made an estimation of the annual drug cost per person.. The scores were: Apixaban 33, Dabigatrán 25, warfarin 18 and Rivaroxaban 14 this score reveals the most preferred up to the less preferred option, considering the benefit-risk ratio and drug costs altogether. The relative model weights were: 51.1% for risks, 40.4% for benefits and 8.5% for cost. The sensitivity analysis confirms the model robustness.. From this analysis, apixaban should be considered as the preferred anticoagulant option -due to a better benefit-risk balance and a minor cost influence- followed by dabigatran, warfarin and rivaroxaban.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Decision Support Techniques; Drug Costs; Hemorrhage; Humans; Models, Statistical; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Several studies have compared the cost effectiveness of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and warfarin using results from clinical trials evaluating NOACs. However, the time in therapeutic range (TTR) of warfarin groups ranged across clinical trials, and all were below the therapeutic goal of 70%. We compared the cost effectiveness of edoxaban 60 mg, apixaban 5 mg, dabigatran 150 mg, dabigatran 110 mg, rivaroxaban 20 mg, and well-managed warfarin with a TTR of 70% in preventing stroke among patients with atrial fibrillation at high risk of bleeding.. For the six treatments, we used a Markov state-transition model to quantify lifetime costs in $US and effectiveness in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). We simulated relative risk ratios of clinical events with each NOAC versus warfarin with a TTR of 70% using published regression models that predict how the incidence of thrombotic or hemorrhagic events changes for each unit change in TTR. We re-ran our analysis for two other estimates of TTR: 65 and 75%.. Treatment with edoxaban 60 mg cost $US127,520/QALY gained compared with warfarin with a TTR of 70% and cost $US41,860/QALY gained compared with warfarin with a TTR of 65%. However, warfarin with a TTR of 75% was more effective and less expensive than all NOACs. For three levels of TTR, apixaban 5 mg, dabigatran 150 mg, dabigatran 110 mg, and rivaroxaban 20 mg were dominated strategies.. The comparative cost effectiveness of edoxaban and warfarin is highly sensitive to TTR. At the $US100,000/QALY willingness-to-pay threshold, our results suggest that warfarin is the most cost-effective treatment for patients who can achieve a TTR of 70%.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Markov Chains; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Risk Adjustment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Therapeutic Equivalency; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Managing endovascular thrombectomy (ET) in diabetic ischemic stroke (IS) with novel anticoagulants is challenging due to putative risk of intracerebral hemorrhage. The study evaluates increased hemorrhagic transformation (HT) risk in Rivaroxaban-treated diabetic rats post ET. Diabetes was induced in male Sprague-Dawley rats by intraperitoneal injection of 60 mg/kg streptozotocin. After 4-weeks, rats were pretreated orally with 30 mg/kg Rivaroxaban/saline; prothrombin time was monitored. IS and ET was induced after 1 h, by thread-induced transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (tMCAO) that mimicked mechanical ET for proximal MCA occlusion at 60 min. After 24 h reperfusion, infarct volumes, HT, blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability, tight junction at peri-ischemic lesion and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) activity was measured. Diabetic rats seemed to exhibit increased infarct volume and HT at 24 h after ET than normal rats. Infarct volumes and functional outcomes did not differ between Rivaroxaban and diabetic control groups. A significant increase in HT volumes and BBB permeability under Rivaroxaban treatment was not detected. Compared to diabetic control group, neither the occludin expression was remarkably lower in the Rivaroxaban group nor the MMP-9 activity was higher. Together, Rivaroxaban does not increase HT after ET in diabetic rats with proximal MCA occlusion, since Rivaroxaban has fewer effects on post-ischemic BBB permeability.

Topics: Animals; Blood-Brain Barrier; Brain Ischemia; Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Matrix Metalloproteinase 9; Occludin; Permeability; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thrombectomy

In the clinical practice a physician quite often is at a loss due to "freedom of choice" granted by availability of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC). If a patient with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) has indications for therapy with anticoagulants which DOAC should be preferred? What are benefits for a patient with ischemic heart disease and AF when definite NOAC is chosen and what are risks inherent of this choice? Answers to such questions are given in this paper.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Myocardial Ischemia; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Diabetes Mellitus; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are at least non-inferior to warfarin in efficacy and safety among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Limited evidence is available regarding outcomes for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients with coronary/peripheral artery disease.. Non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients aged ≥65 years diagnosed with coronary/peripheral artery disease in the US Medicare population, newly initiating DOACs (apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran) or warfarin were selected from January 1, 2013 to September 30, 2015. Propensity score matching was used to compare DOACs vs warfarin. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the risk of stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding, and composite of stroke/myocardial infarction/all-cause mortality.. There were 15,527 apixaban-warfarin, 6,962 dabigatran-warfarin, and 25,903 rivaroxaban-warfarin-matched pairs, with a mean follow-up of 5-6 months. Compared with warfarin, apixaban was associated with lower rates of stroke/systemic embolism (hazard ratio [HR] 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37-0.62), major bleeding (HR 0.66; 95% CI, 0.58-0.75), and stroke/myocardial infarction/all-cause mortality (HR 0.63; 95% CI, 0.58-0.69); dabigatran and rivaroxaban were associated with lower rates of stroke/myocardial infarction/all-cause mortality (HR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70-0.90 and HR 0.87; 95% CI, 0.81-0.92, respectively). Rivaroxaban was associated with a lower rate of stroke/systemic embolism (HR 0.72; 95% CI, 0.60-0.89) and a higher rate of major bleeding (HR 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05-1.23) vs warfarin.. All DOACs were associated with lower stroke/myocardial infarction/all-cause mortality rates compared with warfarin; differences were observed in rates of stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding. Findings from this observational analysis provide important insights about oral anticoagulation therapy among non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients with coronary/peripheral artery disease and may help physicians in the decision-making process when treating this high-risk group of patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Coronary Artery Disease; Dabigatran; Embolism; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Medicare; Myocardial Infarction; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants, which include the factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban, have some advantages over vitamin K antagonists in regard to stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, no antidotes to reverse the effect of oral anticoagulants are commercially available, which can complicate treating patients in whom reversal is urgent. We faced this challenge in a kidney transplant candidate, a 65-year-old man with end-stage renal disease who had been taking rivaroxaban for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. When a deceased-donor kidney became available, we needed to rapidly reduce the patient's bleeding risk, while minimizing the cold ischemic time of the donor kidney. Therefore, we decided to take an experimental approach and perform therapeutic plasma exchange. The patient's plasma anti-factor Xa level decreased from 0.4 IU/mL immediately before treatment to 0.21 IU/mL afterward, indicating that rivaroxaban had been actively removed from circulation. Waste fluid showed significant anti-Xa activity, indicating that the risk of rebound anticoagulation had been mitigated. The patient subsequently underwent successful kidney transplantation. To our knowledge, this is the first report of therapeutic plasma exchange to reverse the effects of rivaroxaban in a patient undergoing urgent surgery. This treatment may also be suitable for patients who have life-threatening, large-volume bleeding, especially in the presence of substantial kidney or liver dysfunction.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Plasma Exchange; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Rivaroxaban; Spain; Stroke

To analyze clinical profile and management of patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation treated with rivaroxaban in clinical practice according to age and to ascertain rates of thromboembolic and bleeding events during rivaroxaban therapy.. Retrospective study of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients that started rivaroxaban therapy between May 2013 and February 2017 in the cardiology department of two hospitals from Huesca, Spain.. A total of 137 patients (mean age 78.2 ± 8.9 years; CHA. In this cohort of elderly and highly comorbid patients treated with rivaroxaban, rates of thromboembolic and bleeding events were low.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Spain; Stroke; Thromboembolism

To analyze the evolution of clinical profile of patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation treated with rivaroxaban.. Retrospective study in which patients treated with rivaroxaban were divided into two groups according to the data in which the initial prescription was performed (November 2012-December 2013 and January 2014-January 2017).. Although, the initial prescription of rivaroxaban was mainly performed in very elderly patients and/or with a higher bleeding risk, this has been extended to the overall nonvalvular atrial fibrillation population.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Patient Selection; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate the clinical profile and effectiveness/safety of patients taking rivaroxaban in clinical practice.. Retrospective study that included patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation treated with rivaroxaban for the prevention of stroke between January 2012 and December 2016 in a tertiary hospital in Spain.. Data regarding effectiveness and safety in our cohort were consistent with previous studies, showing that rivaroxaban can be effective and safely used in our setting.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Spain; Stroke; Tertiary Care Centers; Thromboembolism

To analyze the clinical profile and outcomes of patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation treated with rivaroxaban in a regional hospital.. Retrospective study of patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation that started treatment with rivaroxaban between July 2013 and May 2017 in a regional hospital.. In our practice of regional hospital, rates of discontinuation, thromboembolic and bleeding outcomes are low.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Spain; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome

To assess the clinical profile and thromboembolic and bleeding events in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) who were attended in a hematology unit.. Retrospective study of AF patients that started treatment with rivaroxaban between February 2012 and June 2016 in a hematology unit from a tertiary hospital in Spain.. Rivaroxaban was effective and safe among AF patients treated in a hematology unit, with very low discontinuation rates.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Hospital Units; Humans; Male; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Spain; Stroke; Tertiary Care Centers; Thromboembolism

To analyze the clinical profile and rates of stroke, major bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) treated with rivaroxaban in clinical practice.. Retrospective study of AF patients anticoagulated with rivaroxaban in a Healthcare Area of Valencia, Spain. Patients started treatment with rivaroxaban from July 2012 to December 2015.. A total of 230 patients (mean age 76.9 ± 9.9 years; CHA. In this cohort of AF patients anticoagulated with rivaroxaban, despite patients being older and having a high thromboembolic risk, rates of stroke, major bleeding and intracranial bleeding were low.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Spain; Stroke

To evaluate medication persistence and outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation after 2 years of treatment with rivaroxaban in routine practice.. Retrospective study of atrial fibrillation patients in whom rivaroxaban was prescribed during the first quarter of 2014 in the healthcare area of Costa del Sol (Málaga).. A total of 111 patients (mean age 74.9 ± 10.9 years; 52.3% men; CHA. In routine practice, medication persistence with rivaroxaban was high. Rates of major cardiac events were low.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Rivaroxaban; Spain; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Algorithms to define current exposure to warfarin using administrative data may be imprecise. Study objectives were to characterize dispensation patterns, to measure gaps between expected and observed refill dates for warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).. Retrospective cohort study using administrative health care databases of the Régie de l'assurance-maladie du Québec. We identified every dispensation of warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban for patients with AF initiating oral anticoagulants between 2010 and 2015. For each dispensation, we extracted date and duration. Refill gaps were calculated as difference between expected and observed dates of successive dispensation. Refill gaps were summarized using descriptive statistics. To account for repeated observations nested within patients and to assess the components of variance of refill gaps, we used unconditional multilevel linear models.. We identified 61 516 new users. Majority were prescribed warfarin (60.3%), followed by rivaroxaban (16.4%), dabigatran (14.5%), apixaban (8.8%). Most frequent recorded duration of dispensation was 7 days, suggesting use of pharmacist-prepared weekly pillboxes. The average refill gap from multilevel model was higher for warfarin (9.28 days, 95%CI:8.97-9.59) compared with DOACs (apixaban 3.08 days, 95%CI: 2.96-3.20, dabigatran 3.70, 95%CI: 3.56-3.84, rivaroxaban 3.15, 95%CI: 3.03-3.27). The variance of refill gaps was greater among warfarin users than among DOAC users.. Greater refill gaps for warfarin may reflect inadequate capture of the period covered by the number of dispensed pills recorded in administrative data. A time-dependent definition of exposure using dispensation data would lead to greater misclassification of warfarin than DOACs use.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Administrative Claims, Healthcare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Databases, Factual; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Quebec; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

The comparative effectiveness and safety of individual direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in clinical practice is largely unknown. The study objectives were to compare effectiveness and safety of DOACs in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).. Based on nationwide registers we established a population-based historical cohort study of 12,638 new users of standard dose DOACs (apixaban 5 mg twice daily, dabigatran 150 mg twice daily and rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily) with NVAF in Denmark, July 2013 to March 2016. Patients were matched on propensity scores in a 1:1 ratio comparing apixaban vs. dabigatran (for a total of 6470 patients), apixaban vs. rivaroxaban (7352 patients), and rivaroxaban vs. dabigatran (5440 patients). Hazard ratios (HRs) for stroke or systemic embolism (effectiveness outcome) and major bleeding (safety outcome) were estimated.. In propensity-matched comparisons of the risk of stroke or systemic embolism, the HRs were 1.27 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-1.96) for apixaban vs. dabigatran, 1.25 (95% CI, 0.87-1.79) for apixaban vs. rivaroxaban, and 1.17 (95% CI, 0.69-1.96) for rivaroxaban vs. dabigatran. For the risk of major bleeding, the HRs were 0.94 (95% CI, 0.62-1.41) for apixaban vs. dabigatran, 0.88 (95% CI, 0.64-1.22) for apixaban vs. rivaroxaban, and 1.35 (95% CI, 0.91-2.00) for rivaroxaban vs. dabigatran.. Among patients with NVAF in routine clinical practice, there were no statistically significant differences in risk of stroke or systemic embolism or major bleeding in propensity-matched comparisons between apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban used in standard doses. While analyses indicate that more than moderate differences can be excluded, smaller differences cannot be ruled out.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Registries; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

The efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has been established in clinical trials. However, well-conducted, prospective, real-world observational studies of the safety and effectiveness of DOACs are needed.. This study sought to assess the real-world safety profile of rivaroxaban through a pooled analysis of patients with AF enrolled in the XANTUS (Xarelto for Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) program worldwide.. A pre-planned pooled analysis of the XANTUS, XANAP (Xarelto for Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation in Asia), and XANTUS-EL (Xarelto for Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation in Latin America and EMEA Region) registries was performed. Patients with AF newly starting rivaroxaban for stroke prevention were followed for 1 year. Primary outcomes were treatment-emergent major bleeding, adverse events (AEs)/serious AEs, and all-cause death. Secondary outcomes included treatment-emergent thromboembolic events and nonmajor bleeding. Major outcomes were centrally adjudicated.. Overall, 11,121 patients were included (mean age 70.5 ± 10.5 years; female 42.9%). Comorbidities included heart failure (21.2%), hypertension (76.2%), and diabetes (22.3%). Event rates were: events/100 patient-years: major bleeding 1.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5 to 2.0; lowest: Latin America 0.7; highest: Western Europe, Canada, and Israel 2.3); all-cause death 1.9 (95% CI: 1.6 to 2.2; lowest: Eastern Europe 1.5; highest: Latin America, Middle East, and Africa 2.7); and stroke or systemic embolism 1.0 (95% CI: 0.8 to 1.2; lowest: Latin America 0; highest: East Asia 1.8). One-year treatment persistence was 77.4% (lowest: East Asia 66.4%; highest: Eastern Europe 84.4%).. This large, prospective, real-world analysis in 11,121 patients from 47 countries showed low bleeding and stroke rates in rivaroxaban-treated patients with AF, with low treatment discontinuation in different regions of the world. Results were broadly consistent across regions. (Xarelto for Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation [XANTUS]; NCT01606995; Xarelto for Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation in Latin America and EMEA Region [XANTUS-EL]; NCT01800006; and Xarelto for Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation in Asia [XANAP]; NCT01750788).

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Thrombocytopenia was one of the exclusion criteria in randomized trials in which non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were tested. The safety of NOACs in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and thrombocytopenia remains unclear.. We studied 62 patients with AF aged from 53 to 85 (mean 70.5) years with platelet count from 50 to 100 × 109/L who were treated with rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily (33.9%), dabigatran 110 mg twice daily (bid) (54.8%), or apixaban 2.5 mg bid (11.3%). Age- and sex-matched AF patients with normal platelet count and similar CHA2DS2-VASc scores who were treated with the recommended doses of NOACs served as a reference group.. Patients were followed for a mean of 55 months (range, 23-64 months). In the thrombocytopenia group bleeding risk was higher (mean HAS-BLED score 2.0, vs. 1.0, P < 0.0001). During follow-up in thrombocytopenic and normocytopenic patients, we observed similar rates of major bleeding (1.8%/year vs. 2.7%/year, P = 0.49), clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB) (1.5%/year vs. 1.1%/year, P = 0.74), ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attacks (1.8%/year vs. 1.5%/year, P = 0.8), and death (1.06%/year vs. 1.11%/year, P = 0.96). The risk of bleeding and stroke was unaffected by the type of the NOAC used in both groups. Major bleedings and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding in thrombocytopenic patients on NOACs were predicted only by age (hazard ratio 1.1, 95% confidence interval 1.0-1.3, P = 0.04).. Our findings indicate that in AF patients with mild thrombocytopenia, anticoagulation with NOAC at reduced doses seems to be safe and effective.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Case-Control Studies; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thrombocytopenia; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Brain Ischemia; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Intracranial Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke

Factor Xa inhibitors reduce stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Pulmonary veins (PVs) and the sinoatrial node (SAN) are crucial for genesis of atrial fibrillation. However, the electrophysiological effects of factor Xa inhibitors (edoxaban and rivaroxaban) on PVs and the SAN remain unclear. Conventional microelectrodes were used to record the action potential in isolated rabbit PVs and SAN preparations before and after administration of edoxaban (0.1, 0.3, and 1 μM) or rivaroxaban (0.01, 0.03, 0.1, and 0.3 μM). A whole-cell patch-clamp was used to record the late sodium current (I

Topics: Action Potentials; Animals; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Guanidines; Male; Microelectrodes; Models, Animal; Myocytes, Cardiac; Oligopeptides; Patch-Clamp Techniques; Pulmonary Veins; Pyridines; Rabbits; Ranolazine; Receptor, PAR-1; Rivaroxaban; Sinoatrial Node; Sodium-Calcium Exchanger; Stroke; Thiazoles

Novel oral anticoagulation (NOAC) has been introduced in recent years, but data on use in atrial fibrillation (AF) in primary care setting is scarce. In Germany, General Practitioners are free to choose type of oral anticoagulation (OAC) in AF. Our aim was to explore changes in prescription-rates of OAC in German primary care before and after introduction of NOAC on the market.. Data of a representative morbidity registration project in primary care in Germany (CONTENT) were analysed. Patients with AF in 2011 or 2014 were included (before and after broad market authorization of NOAC, respectively). We defined three independent groups: patients from 2011 without follow-up (group A), patients from 2014 but without previous record in 2011 (group B) and patients with AF and records in 2011 and 2014 (group C).. 2642 patients were included. Group A (n = 804) and B (n = 755) were comparable regarding patient characteristics. 87.3% of group A and 84.8% of group B had CHA. In summary, our study showed a significant increase of OAC over time, which is fostered by the use of NOAC but with a stable rate of VKA and a sharp decrease of ASA. Patients on VKA are rarely switched to NOAC, but new patients with AF are more likely to receive NOAC.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dabigatran; Female; Germany; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Phenprocoumon; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Primary Health Care; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Young Adult

Nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been proposed as an alternative to vitamin K antagonists in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients but the comparative benefits between NOACs and optimally anticoagulated patients is unknown. We estimated the absolute benefit in clinical outcomes rates of real-world effect of NOACs in optimally anticoagulated AF patients with acenocoumarol. We included 1,361 patients stable on acenocoumarol with time in therapeutic range of 100% and 6.5 years of follow-up. Estimation of clinical events avoided was calculated applying hazard ratio, absolute and relative risk reduction from the real-world meta-analysis. Compared with an optimally anticoagulated population, dabigatran 110 mg had the highest estimated stroke reduction (0.97%/year vs 1.47%/year; p = 0.002), and the benefit was higher than in RE-LY trial. For major bleeding, apixaban showed the highest estimated reduction (1.81%/year vs 2.83%/year; p <0.001). For mortality, the largest estimated reduction was with apixaban (2.68%/year). For gastrointestinal bleeding, only apixaban had a significant reduction compared with acenocoumarol (0.69%/year vs 1.10%/year; p = 0.004), and the reduction was significantly higher than in ARISTOTLE trial. All NOACs showed significantly lower rates for intracranial hemorrhage and had a positive Net Clinical Benefit compared with acenocoumarol. Apixaban showed the highest extended estimated Net Clinical Benefit 2.64 (95%CI 2.34 to 2.96). In conclusion, in optimally acenocoumarol anticoagulated AF patients, estimated reductions in all clinical outcomes with various NOACs are evident, with the best effectiveness and safety profile with apixaban. Indeed, the estimated effect with "real world" NOACs would probably be higher than that seen in phase-III clinical trials.

Topics: Acenocoumarol; Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Spain; Stroke

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Israel; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Rivaroxaban has previously been shown to be as efficacious and safe as warfarin for the prevention of stroke in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Therefore, treatment satisfaction becomes an important consideration. Here we examine treatment satisfaction in Japanese NVAF patients who were switched from warfarin to rivaroxaban.. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) data were collected as part of a prospective, multi-center, post-marketing surveillance (PMS) of a direct oral-anticoagulant, rivaroxaban, in Japan. The Anti-Clot Treatment Scale (ACTS) and the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication version II (TSQM-II) were collected at baseline, month 3, and month 6. Change in scores from baseline to month 3 and month 6 were assessed. Exploratory analyses included change in scores by patient characteristics. Safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban were also assessed.. ACTS Burdens scores significantly improved at month 3 (54.6 ± 6.3) and month 6 (54.5 ± 6.5) compared to baseline (51.0 ± 7.6) (p < .001). ACTS Benefits score remained stable over time (baseline = 10.1 ± 2.8, month 3 = 10.2 ± 3.1, month 6 = 10.1 ± 3.1). Mean TSQM-II sub-scale scores significantly improved at month 3 and month 6 compared to baseline for all four domains (all p < .001).. Findings suggest treatment satisfaction may improve in Japanese NVAF patients after a switch from warfarin to rivaroxaban. Higher treatment satisfaction may translate into improved treatment adherence, which is critical for the long-term prevention of stroke.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Patient Satisfaction; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Little is known about the utilization of rivaroxaban in real life treatment settings in France.. Objectives of this study were to describe the conditions of use and treatment persistence in patients with atrial fibrillation and treated with rivaroxaban for stroke prevention (SP-AF).. A cohort study was performed using a representative sample of the French nationwide database. All adults who initiated rivaroxaban for SP-AF between 01/08/2012 and 31/12/2014 were included and followed for one year. Inappropriate use of rivaroxaban's was defined as use inconsistent with the summary of product characteristics.. In this study, 1278 patients were included, 687 (53.8%) were men and the mean age was 73.4years; 123 patients (9.6%) had a stroke and 78 (6.1%) a major bleeding event in the three years before rivaroxaban initiation. At treatment initiation 236 (18.5%) had chronic congestive heart failure, 991 (77.5%) hypertension, 247 (19.3%) diabetes and 9 (0.7%) HIV, hepatitis B or C infection. No anticoagulant had been administered in the six previous months for 777 patients (60.8%); 160 patients (12.5%) had an inappropriate use of rivaroxaban in SP-AF. At 6 and 12 months after the first delivery with rivaroxaban, 62.8%, and 51.7% (68.5% and 60.5% in sensitivity analyses) of the patients were still treated with rivaroxaban. The proportion of patients with a continuous medication availability above 80% was 96.1%.. The characteristics of patients in this study are similar to patients treated with this drug in other observational studies. Adherence and persistence with rivaroxaban can be considered good.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Databases, Factual; Drug Utilization; Female; France; Humans; Insurance Claim Review; Male; Middle Aged; Pharmacoepidemiology; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Young Adult

Topics: Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thrombosis

To investigate risk factors for stroke in patients initiating oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation in Norway and their association with receiving DOACs versus warfarin.. From nationwide registries, we identified naïve users initiating treatment with warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban for atrial fibrillation from 2010 to 2015 in Norway. We studied temporal changes in the CHA. The uptake of DOACs was rapid and spurred an increase in new users of oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation from 2010 to 2015 in Norway. The mean CHA

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Decision-Making; Dabigatran; Databases, Factual; Female; Humans; Male; Norway; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Registries; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Sex Factors; Stroke

Inappropriate doses of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are often prescribed. This study evaluated the prevalence, outcomes, and predictors of the prescription of inappropriately low doses of 4 types of DOACs in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).. We retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data from a single-center registry with 2272 patients prescribed DOACs for AF (apixaban: 1014; edoxaban: 267; rivaroxaban: 498; dabigatran: 493). Patients were monitored for 2years and classified into appropriate-dose (n = 1,753; including appropriate low doses), inappropriate-low-dose (n = 490) and inappropriate-high-dose groups (n = 29). Major bleeding (MB) and thromboembolic events (TEEs) were evaluated.. In a single-center registry, 23% of patients with AF treated with a DOAC received an inappropriate dose. Several clinical factors, such as age and the creatinine clearance value, can identify patients at risk of under-treatment with DOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Chi-Square Distribution; Dabigatran; Databases, Factual; Drug Dosage Calculations; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Inappropriate Prescribing; Incidence; Japan; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Odds Ratio; Prevalence; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have considerably changed clinical practice and are increasingly being used as an alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for 3 main reasons: 1) an improved benefit-risk ratio (in particular lower rates of intracranial bleeding), 2) a more predictable effect without the need for routine monitoring, and 3) fewer food and drug interactions compared with VKAs. Currently, there are four NOACs available: the factor Xa inhibitors apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban, and the thrombin inhibitor dabigatran. This consensus paper reviews the properties and usage of NOACs in a number of high-risk patient populations, such as patients with chronic kidney disease, patients ≥80 years of age and others and provides guidance for the use of NOACs in patients at risk of bleeding.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Intracranial Embolism; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Intracranial Embolism; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Intracranial Embolism; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Intracranial Embolism; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Topics: Aspirin; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Topics: Aspirin; Foramen Ovale, Patent; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke

Background and Purpose- The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of improved antithrombotic treatment in atrial fibrillation after the introduction of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants on the incidence of stroke and bleeding in a real-life total population, including both primary and secondary care. Methods- All resident and alive patients with a recorded diagnosis for atrial fibrillation during the preceding 5 years in the Stockholm County Healthcare database (Vårdanalysdatabasen) were followed for clinical outcomes during 2012 (n=41 008) and 2017 (n=49 510). Results- Pharmacy claims for oral anticoagulants increased from 51.6% to 73.8% (78.7% among those with CHA

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Is this paper discuss problems of selection of anticoagulant therapy in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation, use of unreasonably low doses of anticoagulants, their risks and adherence to therapy is discussed in the paper.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Background The aims of the present study were to investigate the relationships between prior direct oral anticoagulant ( DOAC ) therapy and infarct volume and the site of arterial occlusion in patients with acute ischemic stroke and non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Methods and Results From March 2011 through November 2016, consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke in the middle cerebral artery territory and non-valvular atrial fibrillation were recruited. The infarct volume was assessed semi-automatically using initial diffusion-weighted imaging, and the arterial occlusion site was evaluated on magnetic resonance angiography. The effect of prior DOAC treatment on the site of arterial occlusion was assessed by multivariate ordinal logistic regression analysis. A total of 330 patients (149 women; median age 79 [quartiles 71-86] years; median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 11 [4-21]) were enrolled. Of these, 239 were on no anticoagulant, 40 were undertreated with a vitamin K antagonist ( VKA ), 22 were sufficiently treated with VKA ( PT - INR ≥1.6), and 29 were on a DOAC before the acute ischemic stroke. The infarct volume on admission differed among the groups (median 14.5 [2.0-59.8] cm

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cerebral Angiography; Dabigatran; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Female; Humans; Infarction, Middle Cerebral Artery; International Normalized Ratio; Logistic Models; Magnetic Resonance Angiography; Male; Multivariate Analysis; Prothrombin Time; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Background There is concern that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRI s) substantially increase bleeding risk in patients taking anticoagulants. Methods and Results We studied 737 patients taking SSRI s in the ROCKET AF (Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared With Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Embolism and Stroke Trial in Atrial Fibrillation) trial of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin for the prevention of stroke/systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. These patients were propensity score matched 1:1 to 737 patients not taking SSRI s. The primary outcome measure was major and nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding events, the principal safety outcome in ROCKET AF . Over a mean 1.6 years of follow-up, the rate of major/ nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding was 18.57 events/100 patient-years for SSRI users versus 16.84 events/100 patient-years for matched comparators, adjusted hazard ratio ( aHR ) of 1.16 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95-1.43). The aHR s were similar in patients taking rivaroxaban ( aHR 1.11 [95% CI, 0.82-1.51]) and those taking warfarin ( aHR 1.21 [95% CI, 0.91-1.60]). For the rarer outcome of major bleeding, the aHR for SSRI users versus those not taking SSRI s was 1.13 (95% CI, 0.62-2.06) for rivaroxaban; for warfarin, the aHR was higher, at 1.58 (95% CI , 0.96-2.60) but not statistically significantly elevated. Conclusions We found no significant increase in bleeding risk when SSRI s were combined with anticoagulant therapy, although there was a suggestion of increased bleeding risk with SSRI s added to warfarin. While physicians should be vigilant regarding bleeding risk, our results provide reassurance that SSRI s can be safely added to anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation . Clinical Trial Registration URL : https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT 00403767.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Anxiety Disorders; Atrial Fibrillation; Depressive Disorder; Embolism; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Proportional Hazards Models; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Stroke; Warfarin

Background Patients with impaired liver function ( ILF ) were excluded from clinical trials that investigated non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants ( NOAC s) for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NOAC s in atrial fibrillation patients with ILF . Methods and Results A cohort study based on electronic medical records was conducted from 2009 to 2016 at a multicenter healthcare provider in Taiwan and included 6451 anticoagulated atrial fibrillation patients (aged 76.7±7.0 years, 52.5% male). Patients were classified into 2 subgroups: patients with normal liver function (n=5818) and patients with ILF (n=633, 9.8%). Cox regression analysis was performed to investigate the risks of thromboembolism, bleeding, and death associated with use of NOAC s and warfarin in patients with normal liver function and ILF , respectively. In patients with normal liver function, compared with warfarin therapy (n=2928), NOAC therapy (n=4048) was associated with significantly lower risks of stroke or systemic embolism (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-0.88; P<0.001) and death (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.60-0.80; P<0.001) with no difference in major bleeding or gastrointestinal bleeding. In patients with ILF , compared with warfarin therapy (n=394), NOAC therapy (n=342) was associated with significantly lower risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.49-0.83; P<0.001), but no difference in stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, or gastrointestinal bleeding. Conclusions In atrial fibrillation patients with ILF , NOAC therapy and warfarin therapy were associated with similar risks of stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, and gastrointestinal bleeding.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Hepatic Insufficiency; Humans; Male; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Limited real-world data are available regarding the comparative safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). The objective of this retrospective claims observational cohort study was to compare the risk of bleeding among non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients prescribed apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban. NVAF patients aged ≥18 years with a 1-year baseline period were included if they were new initiators of NOACs or switched from warfarin to a NOAC. Cox proportional hazards modelling was used to estimate the adjusted hazard ratios of any bleeding, clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding, and major inpatient bleeding within 6 months of treatment initiation for rivaroxaban and dabigatran compared to apixaban. Among 60,227 eligible patients, 8,785 were prescribed apixaban, 20,963 dabigatran, and 30,529 rivaroxaban. Compared to dabigatran or rivaroxaban patients, apixaban patients were more likely to have greater proportions of baseline comorbidities and higher CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores. After adjusting for baseline clinical and demographic characteristics, patients prescribed rivaroxaban were more likely to experience any bleeding (HR: 1.35, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.26-1.45), CRNM bleeding (HR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.27-1.49), and major inpatient bleeding (HR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.17-1.74), compared to patients prescribed apixaban. Dabigatran patients had similar bleeding risks as apixaban patients. In conclusion, NVAF patients treated with rivaroxaban appeared to have an increased risk of any bleeding, CRNM bleeding, and major inpatient bleeding, compared to apixaban patients. There was no significant difference in any bleeding, CRNM bleeding, or inpatient major bleeding risks between patients treated with dabigatran and apixaban.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Inpatients; Male; Middle Aged; Outpatients; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Thromboembolic and bleeding risk are elevated in older patients with atrial fibrillation and prior stroke. We compared dabigatran with rivaroxaban for secondary prevention in a national population after skilled nursing facility (SNF) discharge.. Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged ≥ 65 years with atrial fibrillation hospitalized for ischemic stroke (November 2011-October 2013) and subsequently admitted to an SNF were studied. Dabigatran (n = 332) and rivaroxaban users (n = 378) were compared in a retrospective, active comparator, new-user cohort. The index medication claim occurred within 120 days after hospital discharge and exposure continued until a 14-day treatment gap ('as treated'). The primary net clinical benefit outcome was the time to recurrent stroke, transient ischemic attack, intracranial hemorrhage, extracranial bleed, myocardial infarction, venous thromboembolism, or death. All-cause mortality was evaluated separately as a secondary outcome. Multivariable adjusted Cox models stratified by dosage estimated hazard ratios (aHR).. Among those receiving low dosages, the crude composite event rate was 40.4/100 person-years among dabigatran users and 33.7/100 person-years among rivaroxaban users. The composite outcome [aHR 1.48; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87-2.51] and all-cause mortality (aHR 1.67; 95% CI 0.84-3.31) rates were higher among low-dose dabigatran users. For those receiving standard doses, the crude composite event rates were 19.5/100 person-years for dabigatran users and 37.1/100 person-years for rivaroxaban users. Although no difference in mortality was observed, the composite outcome rate was lower among standard-dose dabigatran users (aHR 0.65; 95% CI 0.36-1.15).. In older adults treated with direct-acting oral anticoagulants after ischemic stroke, outcome rates varied considerably by drug and dosage.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Medicare; Myocardial Infarction; Proportional Hazards Models; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Skilled Nursing Facilities; Stroke; Thromboembolism; United States

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Dabigatran use has been linked to gastrointestinal complaints, but it is unknown if this leads to more use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI). Furthermore, it is unknown whether gastrointestinal complaints occur more frequently in dabigatran users compared with other direct oral anticoagulant (DOACs) users. We investigated the association between DOAC use (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban) and subsequent PPI initiation as a proxy for gastrointestinal complaints.. In this population-based observational study with an active-comparator new user study design, anonymised dispensing data from Community Pharmacies in the Netherlands from 2012 to 2016 were used. Patients initiating DOAC for the treatment of atrial fibrillation without any PPI use before or at time of DOAC initiation were included. The outcome measure, subsequent PPI initiation, was determined in 28553 DOAC users.. The patients initiating dabigatran (10 942), apixaban (4897), or rivaroxaban (12714) were comparable for age (mean 69 years), sex (62% men), socioeconomic class, and concomitant medication use. The risk of PPI initiation in apixaban versus rivaroxaban users was similar (adjusted hazard ratio 1.06; 95% confidence interval 0.96-1.31) The adjusted hazard ratio of initiating PPI for dabigatran users was 1.21 (95% confidence interval 1.14-1.29) compared with rivaroxaban/apixaban users. The cumulative incidence of PPI initiation at 6 months of follow-up for patients using dabigatran was 13.0%, and 10.0% for those using rivaroxaban/apixaban, yielding a number needing treatment of 33.. Proton pump inhibitor initiation occurred frequently in incident DOAC users but more often in patients treated with dabigatran than in those treated with rivaroxaban or apixaban.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Drug Prescriptions; Female; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Netherlands; Proportional Hazards Models; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

 The stroke severity or functional outcomes could differ because the efficacy of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) could be different according to the dose. We investigated whether there was any difference in the stroke outcomes in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) by their prior medication status, including standard-dosed versus under-dosed NOACs..  We enrolled 858 patients with acute ischaemic stroke with chronic NVAF admitted at six hospitals in Korea. We categorized their prior medication status as follows: (1) no anti-thrombotics (.  Among the 858 patients, the patients on standard-dosed NOACs had the lowest initial National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, followed by those on warfarin with a therapeutic intensity and those on only anti-platelet (.  Use of warfarin with a therapeutic intensity or standard-dosed NOACs was associated with a relatively mild stroke in the patients with NVAF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Disease Progression; Drug Dosage Calculations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Korea; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

New oral anticoagulants (NOAC) have been introduced in Swedish health care as first line treatment of atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. NOAC have also been studied in combination with platelet antiaggregation in both patients with coronary and peripheral arterial disease, and reduced doses will presumably emerge as routine treatment also in these conditions.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Cardiovascular Diseases; Coronary Artery Disease; Dabigatran; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Ischemia; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Sweden; Thiazoles

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Background and Purpose- This ARISTOPHANES study (Anticoagulants for Reduction in Stroke: Observational Pooled Analysis on Health Outcomes and Experience of Patients) used multiple data sources to compare stroke/systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding (MB) among a large number of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients on non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) or warfarin. Methods- A retrospective observational study of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients initiating apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin from January 1, 2013, to September 30, 2015, was conducted pooling Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicare data and 4 US commercial claims databases. After 1:1 NOAC-warfarin and NOAC-NOAC propensity score matching in each database, the resulting patient records were pooled. Cox models were used to evaluate the risk of stroke/SE and MB across matched cohorts. Results- A total of 285 292 patients were included in the 6 matched cohorts: 57 929 apixaban-warfarin, 26 838 dabigatran-warfarin, 83 007 rivaroxaban-warfarin, 27 096 apixaban-dabigatran, 62 619 apixaban-rivaroxaban, and 27 538 dabigatran-rivaroxaban patient pairs. Apixaban (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61; 95% CI, 0.54-0.69), dabigatran (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.68-0.94), and rivaroxaban (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.69-0.82) were associated with lower rates of stroke/SE compared with warfarin. Apixaban (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.54-0.62) and dabigatran (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.66-0.81) had lower rates of MB, and rivaroxaban (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02-1.13) had a higher rate of MB compared with warfarin. Differences exist in rates of stroke/SE and MB across NOACs. Conclusions- In this largest observational study to date on NOACs and warfarin, the NOACs had lower rates of stroke/SE and variable comparative rates of MB versus warfarin. The findings from this study may help inform the discussion on benefit and risk in the shared decision-making process for stroke prevention between healthcare providers and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ . Unique identifier: NCT03087487.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Background and Purpose- The increased use of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) to control atrial fibrillation is largely driven by the assumption that they are equally effective as warfarin at preventing ischemic stroke while putting patients at lower risk of hemorrhages. To test this hypothesis, a retrospective study of the relative incidence of strokes among patients taking NOACs versus those taking warfarin is performed. Methods- Relative stroke incidence in the 2 groups of patients was compared using odds ratios and Fisher exact tests for significance using a data set of 71 365 on NOACs and 59 546 patients on warfarin. In addition, the 7033 patients with a record of both warfarin and NOAC use were analyzed as a separate cohort. Results- There is a significantly higher (odds ratio=1.29, <0.001) frequency of ischemic strokes among patients prescribed NOACs compared with those on warfarin. The relative frequency of ischemic strokes was also higher for every individual NOAC compared with warfarin (these higher frequencies are statistically significant for dabigatran and apixaban, though not for edoxaban and rivaroxaban). There is a lower incidence of intracranial hemorrhages and nontraumatic hemorrhages in general among patients taking NOACs, consistent with the published literature. Comparisons of the demographic and clinical profiles of the patients taking NOACs to those on warfarin do not show significantly higher background stroke risk in NOAC patients; in fact, patients on NOACs tend to be at lower background risk overall for ischemic strokes. Conclusions- Because NOAC use is associated with higher ischemic stroke risk together with a lower risk of hemorrhages than warfarin use, it can be concluded that patients on warfarin are more strongly anticoagulated. The observed effect could be a secondary consequence of dosage control or alternatively a result of different anticoagulant effects among the different medications.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Incidence; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Background and Purpose- Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are safer, at least equally efficacious, and cost-effective compared to warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) but they remain underused, particularly in demented patients. We estimated the cost-effectiveness of DOACs compared with warfarin in patients with AF and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Methods- We constructed a microsimulation model to estimate the lifetime costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and cost-effectiveness of anticoagulation therapy (adjusted-dose warfarin and various DOACs) in 70-year-old patients with AF and AD from a US societal perspective. We stratified patient cohorts based on stage of AD and care setting. Model parameters were estimated from secondary sources. Health benefits were measured in the number of acute health events, life-years, and QALYs gained. We classified alternatives as cost-effective using a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000 per QALY gained. Results- For patients with AF and AD, compared with warfarin, DOACs increase costs but also increase QALYs by reducing the risk of stroke. For mild-AD patients living in the community, edoxaban increased lifetime costs by $6603 and increased QALYs by 0.076 compared to warfarin, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $86 882/QALY gained. Even though DOACs increased QALYs compared with warfarin for all patient groups (ranging from 0.019 to 0.085 additional QALYs), no DOAC treatment alternative had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio <$150 000/QALY gained for patients with moderate to severe AD. For patients living in a long-term care facility with mild AD, the DOAC with the lowest incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (rivaroxaban) costs $150 169 per QALY gained; for patients with more severe AD, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were higher. Conclusions- For patients with AF and mild AD living in the community, edoxaban is cost-effective compared with warfarin. Even though patients with moderate and severe AD living in the community and patients with any stage of AD living in a long-term care setting may obtain positive clinical benefits from anticoagulation treatment, DOACs are not cost-effective compared with warfarin for these populations. Compared to aspirin, no oral anticoagulation (warfarin or any DOAC) is cost effective in patients with AF and AD.

Topics: Aged; Alzheimer Disease; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Disease Progression; Health Care Costs; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Topics: Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Comparative effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and multiple chronic conditions (MCC) are unknown.. To determine whether there are differences in efficacy and safety of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin regarding stroke prevention and bleeding rates, respectively, in elderly patients with AF with MCC.. This retrospective comparative effectiveness analysis included data from the population-based Medicare beneficiaries database, evaluating patients with new AF diagnosed from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2013, who initiated an oral anticoagulant within 90 days of diagnosis. Patients with CHA2DS2-VASc scores of 1 to 3, 4 to 5, and 6 or higher; HAS-BLED scores of 0 to 1, 2, and 3 or higher; and Gagne comorbidity scores of 0 to 2, 3 to 4, and 5 or higher were categorized as having low, moderate, or high morbidity, respectively. Within morbidity categories, patients receiving dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin were matched using a 3-way propensity matching, and the relative hazards of stroke, major hemorrhage (MH), and death were evaluated. Data analysis included follow-up from the date of initial anticoagulant use through December 31, 2013.. Rivaroxaban (20 mg once daily), dabigatran (150 mg twice daily), or warfarin therapy.. Ischemic stroke, MH, and death.. The study cohort included 21 979 patients using dabigatran (mean [SD] age, 75.8 [6.4] years; 51.1% female), 23 177 using rivaroxaban (mean [SD] age, 75.8 [6.4] years; 49.9% female), and 101 715 using warfarin (mean [SD] age, 78.5 [7.2] years; 57.3% female). In the propensity-matched cohorts, there were no differences in stroke rates between the 3 oral anticoagulant groups. Dabigatran users had lower hazard of MH compared with warfarin users among patients with low MCC (hazard ratio [HR], 0.62; 95% CI, 0.47-0.83; P < .001; for MCC defined as low CHA2DS2-VASc score), and similar risk in patients with moderate to high MCC. While there was no difference in MH between rivaroxaban and warfarin users, rivaroxaban users had significantly higher MH risk compared with dabigatran users in the medium and high comorbidity groups (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.04-1.48; P = .02 and HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.05-1.56; P = .01, respectively). Dabigatran and rivaroxaban users had lower rates of death compared with warfarin users (HR ranged from 0.52-0.84), across comorbidity levels.. Oral anticoagulants are similarly effective in stroke prevention among patients with AF with MCC. However, dabigatran and rivaroxaban use may be associated with lower rates of mortality in patients with MCC.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Chronic Disease; Comorbidity; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Male; Proportional Hazards Models; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

Adding rivaroxaban to standard therapy in patients with heart failure and no atrial fibrillation did not show any beneficial effect on death risk.

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Appropriate dosing of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) requires consideration of renal function. Discordance between commonly used estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and creatinine clearance (CrCl) might affect the dosing appropriateness in stroke patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to explore the effect of renal function estimates on the dosing patterns in a real-world setting.. Using a hospital-based stroke registry, we identified consecutive patients between 2014 and 2017 who were hospitalized for acute stroke, had AF, and started DOACs within 90 days after stroke. We compared the difference between eGFR and CrCl in assessing appropriateness of dosage. Effectiveness and safety outcomes were verified by chart review, and event rates were presented as per 100 person-years.. Of the156 patients with mean age 74±11 years, 72 (46%) were prescribed dabigatran and 84 (54%) rivaroxaban. Substituting eGFR for CrCl would have 55% (37/67) of patients with CrCl less than 50 mL/min and 89% (8/9) of patients with CrCl less than 30 mL/min not correctly classified, and potentially lead to overdosing. The misclassification would cause underdosing in 6% (5/89) of patients with CrCl ≥50 mL/min and 1% (1/147) of patients with CrCl ≥30 mL/min. In reality, the substitution resulted in reduction of overdosing from 10% to 4% for dabigatran and from 2% to 1% for rivaroxaban; underdosing increased from 17% to 26% for rivaroxaban. After median follow-up of 17 months, 33 patients developed outcomes including 21 major bleedings. The event rate was 6.9% per year (95% CI, 4.1%-11.4%) for effectiveness, and 9.6% per year (95% CI, 6.3%-14.8%) for safety.. Although substituting eGFR for CrCl carries potential risks of DOAC overdosing in patients with AF, the effect might be offset by clinicians' predilection for lower dosage in this stroke cohort.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Middle Aged; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

To compare the level of adherence of public health nurses to BP measurement guidelines based on their knowledge if the guidelines and skills in BP measurement before and after Blood Pressure Measurement Training Program (BPMTP).. An experimental pre- and post-test design using two-staged cluster randomization was conducted. 118 PHNs (mean age ± 38.45 years, mean years of experience ± 13.45 years; 84.1% women) from six districts in Manila were equally assigned to either the BPMTP group or control group. Structured instruments were used.. This study showed that Blood Pressure Measurement Training Package is feasible in improving adherence of nurses based on their increased knowledge of the BP measurement guidelines and skills in BP measurement. A larger-scale study is warranted to show that BPMTP can potentially improve clinical management of hypertension in public health clinics globally.. The fixed dose of 15 mg rivaroxaban might carry a risk of under exposure, which would lead to an increase of thromboembolic complications in patients with high BMI. Therefore, rivaroxaban dose increase was suggested for obese patients. Use of DOACs appears to have considerable safety in obese patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alzheimer Disease; Angiotensin II; Animals; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Body Mass Index; Catheter Ablation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Dogs; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Genotype; Hemorrhage; Humans; Hypertension; Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular; Incidence; Male; Matrix Metalloproteinase 2; Matrix Metalloproteinase 3; Middle Aged; Norepinephrine; Obesity; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Sympathectomy

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Stents; Stroke; Warfarin

We aimed to assess the uptake of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) among patients with atrial fibrillation between 2010 and 2015 in Switzerland.. We performed a prospective observational cohort study. At the baseline examination and during yearly follow-ups, we used questionnaires to obtain information about clinical characteristics and antithrombotic treatment. Stroke risk was assessed using the CHA2DS2-VASc score.. 1545 patients were enrolled across seven centres in Switzerland. Mean age was 68 ± 12 years and 29.5% were female. The percentage of anticoagulated patients with an indication for oral anticoagulation (CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2 in women and ≥1 in men) was 75% in 2010 and 80% in 2015 (p = 0.2). There was a gradual increase in the use of NOACs from 0% in 2010 to 29.8% in 2015 (p <0.0001). Out of 888 patients, who initially received a vitamin K antagonist (VKA), 86 (9.7%) were switched to an NOAC during follow-up. Use of aspirin as a monotherapy decreased from 23% in 2010 to 11% in 2015 (p <0.0001).. After regulatory approval, the use of NOACs in Switzerland steadily increased to about 30% in 2015, whereas switches from VKAs to NOACs were infrequent. In parallel, the prescription of aspirin as monotherapy was more than halved, suggesting significant guideline-concordant improvements in oral anticoagulation use among patients with atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Prospective Studies; Registries; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Switzerland

Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become available for the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Conflicting results have been published on the risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with the use of DOACs in comparison with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). The objective of the present study was to evaluate the risk of AMI in patients with AF who are exposed to either VKAs, DOACs or low-dose (< 325 mg) aspirin.. We conducted a population-based cohort study using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (2008-2014). The study population (n = 30 146) consisted of all patients ≥18 years with a diagnosis of AF who were new users of VKAs, DOACs (rivaroxaban and dabigatran) or aspirin. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of AMI for users of DOACs or aspirin vs. VKA. Adjustments were made for age, gender, lifestyle, risk factors, comorbidity and other drugs.. The risk of AMI was doubled when we compared current use of DOACs with current use of VKAs [adjusted HR 2.11; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08, 4.12] and for current users of aspirin vs. current VKA users (adjusted HR 1.91; 95% CI 1.45, 2.51).. There is a twofold increase in the risk of AMI for users of DOACs, in comparison with VKAs, in AF therapy. In addition, the results suggested that in patients with AF, the incidence of AMI is higher during aspirin monotherapy than during the use of VKAs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K

Sex-specific comparative effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation is not known. Via this retrospective cohort study, we assessed the sex-specific, comparative effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants (rivaroxaban and dabigatran), compared to each other and to warfarin among patients with atrial fibrillation.. The reduced risk of ischemic stroke in patients taking rivaroxaban, compared with dabigatran and warfarin, seems to be limited to men, whereas the higher risk of bleeding seems to be limited to women.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Chi-Square Distribution; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Medicare Part D; Multivariate Analysis; Patient Admission; Propensity Score; Proportional Hazards Models; Protective Factors; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Sex Factors; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

Long-term anticoagulant therapy with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) is essential to prevent thromboembolic complications, especially ischemic stroke. This study examines medium-term persistence in AF patients using a non-vitamin-K antagonist oral anticoagulant drug (NOAC).. We assessed national Pharmaceutical Benefit Scheme records December 2013 through September 2016 for initial prescription of a NOAC in a 10% random sample of concessional patients. Key outcome measures were: (a) proportions filling first repeat prescription, (b) proportions persisting with NOAC over 12 and 30 months and (c) proportions switching to another NOAC or warfarin.. A total of 8656 patients with AF initiated a NOAC (3352 apixaban, 1340 dabigatran, 3964 rivaroxaban). Mean age was 77 years, 53% male; 91% collected the first repeat prescription for any NOAC, 70% and 57% collected any NOAC or subsequent warfarin prescription over 12 months and 30 months respectively; 8.9% had switched to warfarin. The proportions switching from apixaban, dabigatran and rivaroxaban to a different NOAC were 14%, 31% and 17% respectively. In a regression model adjusting for age, gender and comorbidity, apixaban-initiated patients over 30 months were 28% more likely to persist with any anticoagulant therapy compared with dabigatran-initiated patients (hazard ratio [95% CI] 1.28 [1.16-1.42]) and 15% more likely to persist compared with rivaroxaban-initiated (1.15 [1.06-1.24]). Rivaroxaban-initiated patients were 12% more likely to persist compared with dabigatran-initiated patients (1.12 [1.02-1.24]).. Long-term persistence with anticoagulation in patients with AF remains a concern, even with NOACs. Patients initiated to apixaban appear to experience better medium-term persistence compared with rivaroxaban or dabigatran.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Australia; Comorbidity; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

We aimed to examine the comparative effectiveness and safety between dabigatran and rivaroxaban in atrial fibrillation patients.. We conducted a population-based, retrospective, new-user cohort study based on the National Health Insurance claims database in Taiwan. Adult atrial fibrillation patients who initiated dabigatran (N=10 625) or rivaroxaban (N=4609) between June 1, 2012 and May 31, 2014 were identified as the overall population. A propensity score was derived using logistic regression to model the probability of receipt of rivaroxaban as a function of potential confounders. Altogether, 4600 dabigatran users were matched with 4600 rivaroxaban users to create a propensity score-matched population. The marginal proportional hazards model was applied among the propensity score-matched population as the primary analysis, and the proportional hazards model with adjustment of the quintiles of the propensity score among the overall population was used as the secondary analysis. Rivaroxaban users had a higher risk of all-cause death than dabigatran users (hazard ratio 1.44, 95%CI 1.17-1.78 in the primary analysis and hazard ratio 1.47, 95%CI 1.23-1.75 in the secondary analysis). Rivaroxaban users also possessed a higher risk of gastrointestinal hemorrhage needing transfusion than dabigatran users in the primary analysis (hazard ratio 1.41, 95%CI 1.02-1.95), but the difference diminished in the secondary analysis (hazard ratio 1.20, 95%CI 0.92-1.56). The risks of ischemic stroke, acute myocardial infarction, arterial embolism/thrombosis, and intracranial hemorrhage were similar between the 2 groups.. Rivaroxaban therapy was associated with a statistically significant increase in all-cause death compared with dabigatran therapy in atrial fibrillation patients.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Transfusion; Cause of Death; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Dabigatran; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Logistic Models; Male; Mortality; Myocardial Infarction; Propensity Score; Proportional Hazards Models; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Medicare; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States; Warfarin

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Medicare; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States; Warfarin

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Medicare; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States; Warfarin

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Medicare; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States; Warfarin

The use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasing rapidly. We compared characteristics of AF patients initiated on NOACs versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs).. Using Danish nationwide registry data, we identified AF patients initiating either a VKA or a NOAC from 22 August 2011 until 30 September 2016. We compared patient characteristics including age, gender, comorbidities, concomitant pharmacotherapy and CHA. The study population comprised 51 981 AF patients of whom 19 989 (38.5%) were initiated on a VKA, 13 242 (25.5%) on dabigatran, 8475 (16.3%) on rivaroxaban and 10 275 (19.8%) on apixaban. Those patients initiated on apixaban had higher mean ± SD CHA. Atrial fibrillation patients who were initiated on apixaban had higher stroke risk scores than patients initiated on VKAs. Interestingly, opposite results were found for dabigatran.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Data evaluating the impact of the periprocedural administration of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) on complications in the setting of pulmonary vein (PV) isolation using cryoballoon (CB) is limited. In the present study, our aim was to analyze procedural characteristics and incidence of complications in those patients who underwent CB ablation for atrial fibrillation and the impact of NOACs on adverse events compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Consecutive patients with drug resistant atrial fibrillation who underwent PV isolation by CB as index procedure were retrospectively included in our analysis. In group I, 290 of 454 patients (63.9%) received VKAs (warfarin: n = 222 and acenocoumarol: n = 68), and in group II, 164 of 454 patients (36.1%) were treated with NOACs (rivaroxaban: n = 71; dabigatran: n = 60; and apixaban: n = 33). Age was significantly higher in the group II (62.8 ± 9.7 vs 58.6 ± 11.3; p <0.001). During the study period, 454 consecutive patients (male 71%, age 60.1 ± 10.9 years) were enrolled. Major complications occurred in 9 patients (2.0%): peripheral vascular complications were observed in 6 patients (1.3% per procedure), persistent phrenic nerve palsy occurred in 2 (0.4%), and transient ischemic attacks in 1 (0.2%). In both groups, the incidence of major complications was similar (group I [VKAs]: 7 patients [2.4%] vs group II [NOACs]: 2 patients [1.2%]; p = 0.5). In conclusion, CB ablation is a safe procedure for PV isolation and is associated with low complication rates. The incidence of adverse events in PV isolation using the second-generation CB with the periprocedural administration of NOACs is not significantly different than VKA treatment.

Topics: Ablation Techniques; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Belgium; Cryosurgery; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Intraoperative Period; Italy; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Prognosis; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Survival Rate; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Vitamin K

Renal dysfunction is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease and is an independent predictor of stroke and systemic embolism. Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with renal dysfunction may face a particularly high risk of thromboembolism and bleeding. The current retrospective cohort study was designed to assess the impact of renal function on ischemic stroke and major bleeding rates in NVAF patients in the real-world setting (outside a clinical trial).. Medical claims and Electronic Health Records were retrieved retrospectively from Optum's Integrated Claims-Clinical de-identified dataset from May 2011 to August 2014. Patients with NVAF treated with warfarin (2468) or rivaroxaban (1290) were selected. Each treatment cohort was stratified by baseline estimated creatinine clearance (eCrCl) levels. Confounding adjustments were made using inverse probability of treatment weights (IPTWs). Incidence rates and hazard ratios of ischemic stroke and major bleeding events were calculated for both cohorts.. Overall, patients treated with rivaroxaban had an ischemic stroke incidence rate of 1.9 per 100 person-years (PY) while patients treated with warfarin had a rate of 4.2 per 100 PY (HR = 0.41 [0.21-0.80], p = .009). Rivaroxaban patients with an eCrCl below 50 mL/min (N = 229) had an ischemic stroke rate of 0.8 per 100 PY, while the rate for the warfarin cohort (N = 647) was 6.0 per 100 PY (HR = 0.09 [0.01-0.72], p = .02). For the other renal function levels (i.e. eCrCl 50-80 and ≥80 mL/min) HRs indicated no statistically significant differences in ischemic stroke risks. Bleeding events did not differ significantly between cohorts stratified by renal function.. Ischemic stroke rates were significantly lower in the overall NVAF population for rivaroxaban vs. warfarin users, including patients with eCrCl below 50 mL/min. For all renal function groups, major bleeding risks were not statistically different between treatment groups.

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney; Kidney Function Tests; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Dose reduction of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) is indicated in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) with renal impairment. Failure to reduce the dose in patients with severe kidney disease may increase bleeding risk, whereas dose reductions without a firm indication may decrease the effectiveness of stroke prevention.. The goal of this study was to investigate NOAC dosing patterns and associated outcomes, i.e., stroke (ischemic stroke and systemic embolism) and major bleeding in patients treated in routine clinical practice.. Using a large U.S. administrative database, 14,865 patients with AF were identified who initiated apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban between October 1, 2010, and September 30, 2015. We examined use of a standard dose in patients with a renal indication for dose reduction (potential overdosing) and use of a reduced dose when the renal indication is not present (potential underdosing). Cox proportional hazards regression was performed in propensity score-matched cohorts to investigate the outcomes.. Among the 1,473 patients with a renal indication for dose reduction, 43.0% were potentially overdosed, which was associated with a higher risk of major bleeding (hazard ratio: 2.19; 95% confidence interval: 1.07 to 4.46) but no statistically significant difference in stroke (3 NOACs pooled). Among the 13,392 patients with no renal indication for dose reduction, 13.3% were potentially underdosed. This underdosing was associated with a higher risk of stroke (hazard ratio: 4.87; 95% confidence interval: 1.30 to 18.26) but no statistically significant difference in major bleeding in apixaban-treated patients. There were no statistically significant relationships in dabigatran- or rivaroxaban-treated patients without a renal indication.. In routine clinical practice, prescribed NOAC doses are often inconsistent with drug labeling. These prescribing patterns may be associated with worse safety with no benefit in effectiveness in patients with severe kidney disease and worse effectiveness with no benefit in safety in apixaban-treated patients with normal or mildly impaired renal function.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States; Vitamin K; Young Adult